Big Business agenda "Crossrail jobs" lies resumed via Tower Hamlets Council [4]B

Big Business agenda "Crossrail jobs" lies resumed via Tower Hamlets Council [4] b

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Economics and Environmental and Democratic Accountability Commentary:

Abysmal state of dysfunction, ignorance and the betrayal of the local Community by the Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling clique which has reverted to openly peddling the lies for Big Business via the word “Crossrail” as it had done seven years ago

[1]

2100 Hrs GMT London Saturday 20 Aril 2013

October 2007 to 20 April 2013.

How many years is that?

SIX years.

Of course!

But it could easily be SIXTY years.

Sixty years?

Isn’t that stretching the imagery a bit too far?

Not at all, if the imagery is being devised about the Big Business Agenda AS fronted via “Crossrail”.

Why?

How?

Answer

Because it was as part of the untruths peddled via Ken Livingstone’s “Undone Mayor” years [that too is a KHOODEELAAR! devised phrase to depict the role that Ken Livingstone was manoeuvred by Big Business int playing in the correct contest of his role whilst still in that Onion - a word that KHOODEELAAR! had coined for that building YEARS before Boris Johnson was even heard of in that context at all] that they had released a wanton lie and untruth and had claimed that “CROSSRAIL was worth the public costs because it would being so many £Billions INTO the Economy in the NEXT SIXTY years” [or a temporal stretch and economic "period" near to 60 years!].

Now any rational person would see that that was stupid beyond condemnation.

How can the “GDP” be predicted for even the next ONE year, let alone for the next SIXTY years? Especially after the evidence has at last been admitted of large scale lying and fakery by the entirety of the country’s Financial “institutions” and by the “Banks” including the “financial regulators”, themselves and by the UK Department called the Treasury, and the MPs themselves......!

All of those “hitherto” [to the brainwashed] hallowed “Authority-Entities” have been exposed by the overwhelming weights of their own corruption, dishonesty, fraudulence and crimes!

So the SIXTY years ....of that we have used as an image is to illustrate the incredible emptiness in the Tower Hamlets Council Chamber, as witnessed on Wednesday 17 April 2013.

There was no debate.

No audit

No holding to account of anybody on behalf of the people of Tower Hamlets

Only crass, contaminated exchanges aimed by each bunch at the other, across the so-called “opposed” “benches” of “Councillors”!

There was no political discourse, least of all any ethics or morality on behalf of the affected, the outraged. the really actually unglamorously dispossessed people and families across the Borough who were being targeted by the CONDEM assault on Society

No atmosphere in the “Council Chamber” of the “London Borough of Tower Hamlets” therefore to even theoretically expect an uptodate in-depth exposition by any side on the dire, deeply worrying, unjustified, undemocratic, treacherous and cruel and uncaring and indifferent and contemptuous state of the failures by “the elected Tower Hamlets Council” to speak up, to challenge the assault by the CONDEM Collusion.

If, in that situation and in that environment, a bid is made for a Chunk of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets by an agency operating as a front for any of the Big Biz outfits and conglomerates that are notionally required to get the [“planning”] “approval of the local Council” then the likelihood is that the bid would succeed.

If it is “rejected” at first or at a later “repeat application” that event must NEVER be treated as a genuine rejection by the Council at all.

Such rejections constitute the TACTICAL parades, the haggling for the “bribe” to the “Council” by the DEGENERATORS, misleadingly referred to by the “mainstreams” in Britain as “developers”.

In the years SINCE October 2007, a very long list of DEGENERATOR plans has been approved by the Tower Hamlets Council.

So much so that the Council bureaucracy is now referring to Crossrail without any hesitation, qualification, let alone and reservation at all!

Exactly what WE SAID ten years ago, in December 2003 when the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign was conceived of in this form by myself and Kay Jordan as we walked to the Bishopsgate Bus terminal one evening when Kay was going to catch a bus home to the Kentish Town area.

Four years after the KHOODEELAAR! campaign had been active, in October 2007, I wrote a diagnostic pice for publication in the then “East London Advertiser”.

The “East London IDIOTISER” failed to honour its “then” promise and so the piece was not published.

What, however, remains valid is the accuracy of the analysis [that I had written in October 2007] that must be applied to the role being played by the Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling clique of paid post-holders today, in April 2013.

That role is to LET the BIG BUSINESS agenda INTO the East End and let Bg Biz take over the East End land and dispossess the people, the community out of here.

EXACTLY as they had ATTEMPTED to do via the front Of their agenda disguised as “Crossrail” and its “benefits”.

So grossly ignorant is the Tower hamlets Council’s controlling bureaucracy now that it has uttered abysmally idiotic plug words “for Crossrail” within DAYS of the huge piece of admission PUBLISHED by the UK’s LARGEST CIRCULATED "popular" daily the SUN of Crossrail’s JOBS for local people lies!!!!

[To be continued]

Against this diagnostic and evidential UPDATER, I publish BELOW the temporally edited version of my piece that the then “East London ADVERTISER” had REQUESTED but failed to publish in October 2007.

KHOODEELAAR! defends the community in the East End of London against the Crossrail hole attacks.

This defence also entails campaigning against the deliberate misrepresentation by the institutions like Tower Hamlets council that are supposed to speak for and to protect the community in the area.

I say that because during the last four years of our campaign we have repeatedly experienced such misrepresentation-and we expect it to continue.

We have found that the Council has been controlled in such a way, and by such unrepresentative elements, that it has been made into a puppet and a conduit for hugely damaging attacks on the entire East End.

It is in this context that we must examine what I believe are streams of diversionary and divisive activities that have been used by the Council's "controlling clique".

Take the recent ignorant exclusion of some elected councillors from having any say at all on council policy-making simply because they were not Bangladeshi: that was diabolically hostile and treacherous behaviour which ADDED to racial disharmony, not reduced it.

That act merely proves the Khoodeelaar! point that Tower Hamlets Council is being mis-led by a clique that has no understanding of its duties.

And this is exactly what we have found in relation to the role of the clique in surrendering the rights, interests and safety of the local community to the commands of 'Big Business' who pretend to be the 'bringer of benefits' to the East End.

The Council clique has said Crossrail will bring benefits to regenerate the area. In fact, we have found they will deprive the area and degenerate it even further.

They have said that they will negotiate with Crossrail promoters to minimise the impact of the disruptions that Crossrail will cause to the area.

Actually, we have found that they are-and have been-colluding with Crossrail to cause the main disruptions, dislocations and devastations to the area.

The proposed new station at Whitechapel and the knock-on effect that creates would not have happened without council complicity.

They have said that they are working with the community.

However, we believe they have been actively seeking to wreck the community and to disenfranchise it even further.

Now it appears that they are no longer even pretending to defend the area against attacks, which include the destruction of streets for the building of huge ventilation shafts.

In response to my question posed at the full council meeting on September 11, in which I asked why they had failed to answer 800 questions posed by us since January 2004, they made that plain.

In the last paragraph of their 'answer' they don't hide the fact that they have surrendered the council to the dictates of Crossrail by saying:

"Ultimately, the council must respect Crossrail's overarching duty to have regard to...the health and safety of Crossrail passengers and workers which will dictate the location of such shafts."

That one paragraph gave the game away! No mention in there of the say or the right or the welfare of the local people in Tower Hamlets.

"Overarching" indeed!

This could only come from collusion relationship, not from a dignified, democratic representational relationship.

It has been almost four years since we started to say the [Tower Hamlets] Council was acting for Big Business, CrossRail and against the Community in the East End.

At long last the [Tower Hamlets] Council clique have admitted it. [That was a reference to the Clique’s “response” to the then latest formal representation by me in September 2007 of the KHOODEELAAR! Demands for the “ELECTED COUNCIL” to do its job and stop acting as a stooge to Big Business

[DIAGNOSTIC updates, reports and analyses are to be continued in defending the Community in the East End of London against the ploys and the Agenda of Big Biz]      

Big Business agenda "Crossrail jobs" lies resumed via Tower Hamlets Council [4]

Big Business agenda "Crossrail jobs" lies resumed via Tower Hamlets Council [4]

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Economics and Environmental and Democratic Accountability Commentary:

Abysmal state of dysfunction, ignorance and the betrayal of the local Community by the Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling clique which has reverted to openly peddling the lies for Big Business via the word “Crossrail” as it had done seven years ago [1]

2100 Hrs GMT London Saturday 20 Aril 2013

October 2007 to 20 April 2013.

How many years is that?

SIX years.

Of course!

But it could easily be SIXTY years.

Sixty years?

Isn’t that stretching the imagery a bit too far?

Not at all, if the imagery is being devised about the Big Business Agenda AS fronted via “Crossrail”.

Why?

How?

Answer

Because it was as part of the untruths peddled via Ken Livingstone’s “Undone Mayor” [that too is a KHOODEELAAR! devised phrase to depict Ken Livingstone in the correct contest of his role whilst still in that Onion - a word that KHOODEELAAR! had coined for that building YEARS before Boris Johnson was even heard of in that context at all] hat they had released a wanton lie and untruth and had claimed that “CROSSRAIL was worth the public costs because it would being so many £Billions INTO the Economy in the NEXT SIXTY years” [or a temporal stretch and economic "period" near to 60 years!].

Now any rational person would see that that was stupid beyond condemnation.

How can the “GDP” be predicted for even the next ONE year, let alone for the next SIXTY years? Especially after the evidence has at last been admitted of large scale lying and fakery by the entirety of the country’s Financial “institutions” and by the “Banks” including the “financial regulators”, themselves and by the UK Department called the Treasury, and the MPs themselves......!

All of those “hitherto” [to the brainwashed] hallowed “Authority-Entities” have been exposed by the overwhelming weights of their own corruption, dishonesty, fraudulence and crimes!

So the SIXTY years ....of that we have used as an image is to illustrate the incredible emptiness in the Tower Hamlets Council Chamber, as witnessed on Wednesday 17 April 2013.

There was no debate.

No audit

No holding to account of anybody on behalf of the people of Tower Hamlets

Only crass, contaminated exchanges aimed by each bunch at the other, across the so-called “opposed” “benches” of “Councillors”!

There was no political discourse, least of all any ethics or morality on behalf of the affected, the outraged. the really actually unglamorously dispossessed people and families across the Borough who were being targeted by the CONDEM assault on Society

No atmosphere in the “Council Chamber” of the “London Borough of Tower Hamlets” therefore to even theoretically expect an uptodate in-depth exposition by any side on the dire, deeply worrying, unjustified, undemocratic, treacherous and cruel and uncaring and indifferent and contemptuous state of the failures by “the elected Tower Hamlets Council” to speak up, to challenge the assault by the CONDEM Collusion.

If, in that situation and in that environment, a bid is made for a Chunk of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets by an agency operating as a front for any of the Big Biz outfits and conglomerates that are notionally required to get the [“planning”] “approval of the local Council” then the likelihood is that the bid would succeed.

If it is “rejected” at first or at a later “repeat application” that event must NEVER be treated as a genuine rejection by the Council at all.

Such rejections constitute the TACTICAL parades, the haggling for the “bribe” to the “Council” by the DEGENERATORS, misleadingly referred to by the “mainstreams” in Britain as “developers”.

In the years SINCE October 2007, a very long list of DEGENERATOR plans has been approved by the Tower Hamlets Council.

So much so that the Council bureaucracy is now referring to Crossrail without any hesitation, qualification, let alone and reservation at all!

Exactly what WE SAID ten years ago, in December 2003 when the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign was conceived of in this form by myself and Kay Jordan as we walked to the Bishopsgate Bus terminal one evening when Kay was going to catch a bus home to the Kentish Town area.

Four years after the KHOODEELAAR! campaign had been active, in October 2007, I wrote a diagnostic pice for publication in the then “East London Advertiser”.

The “East London IDIOTISER” failed to honour its “then” promise and so the piece was not published.

What, however, remains valid is the accuracy of the analysis [that I had written in October 2007] that must be applied to the role being played by the Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling clique of paid post-holders today, in April 2013.

That role is to LET the BIG BUSINESS agenda INTO the East End and let Bg Biz take over the East End land and dispossess the people, the community out of here.

EXACTLY as they had ATTEMPTED to do via the front Of their agenda disguised as “Crossrail” and its “benefits”.

So grossly ignorant is the Tower hamlets Council’s controlling bureaucracy now that it has uttered abysmally idiotic plug words “for Crossrail” within DAYS of the huge piece of admission PUBLISHED by the UK’s LARGEST CIRCULATED "popular" daily the SUN of Crossrail’s JOBS for local people lies!!!!

[To be continued]

Against this diagnostic and evidential UPDATER, I publish BELOW the temporally edited version of my piece that the then “East London ADVERTISER” had REQUESTED but failed to publish in October 2007.

KHOODEELAAR! defends the community in the East End of London against the Crossrail hole attacks.

This defence also entails campaigning against the deliberate misrepresentation by the institutions like Tower Hamlets council that are supposed to speak for and to protect the community in the area.

I say that because during the last four years of our campaign we have repeatedly experienced such misrepresentation-and we expect it to continue.

We have found that the Council has been controlled in such a way, and by such unrepresentative elements, that it has been made into a puppet and a conduit for hugely damaging attacks on the entire East End.

It is in this context that we must examine what I believe are streams of diversionary and divisive activities that have been used by the Council's "controlling clique".

Take the recent ignorant exclusion of some elected councillors from having any say at all on council policy-making simply because they were not Bangladeshi: that was diabolically hostile and treacherous behaviour which ADDED to racial disharmony, not reduced it.

That act merely proves the Khoodeelaar! point that Tower Hamlets Council is being mis-led by a clique that has no understanding of its duties.

And this is exactly what we have found in relation to the role of the clique in surrendering the rights, interests and safety of the local community to the commands of 'Big Business' who pretend to be the 'bringer of benefits' to the East End.

The Council clique has said Crossrail will bring benefits to regenerate the area. In fact, we have found they will deprive the area and degenerate it even further.

They have said that they will negotiate with Crossrail promoters to minimise the impact of the disruptions that Crossrail will cause to the area.

Actually, we have found that they are-and have been-colluding with Crossrail to cause the main disruptions, dislocations and devastations to the area.

The proposed new station at Whitechapel and the knock-on effect that creates would not have happened without council complicity.

They have said that they are working with the community.

However, we believe they have been actively seeking to wreck the community and to disenfranchise it even further.

Now it appears that they are no longer even pretending to defend the area against attacks, which include the destruction of streets for the building of huge ventilation shafts.

In response to my question posed at the full council meeting on September 11, in which I asked why they had failed to answer 800 questions posed by us since January 2004, they made that plain.

In the last paragraph of their 'answer' they don't hide the fact that they have surrendered the council to the dictates of Crossrail by saying:

"Ultimately, the council must respect Crossrail's overarching duty to have regard to...the health and safety of Crossrail passengers and workers which will dictate the location of such shafts."

That one paragraph gave the game away! No mention in there of the say or the right or the welfare of the local people in Tower Hamlets.

"Overarching" indeed!

This could only come from collusion relationship, not from a dignified, democratic representational relationship.

It has been almost four years since we started to say the [Tower Hamlets] Council was acting for Big Business, CrossRail and against the Community in the East End.

At long last the [Tower Hamlets] Council clique have admitted it. [That was a reference to the Clique’s “response” to the then latest formal representation by me in September 2007 of the KHOODEELAAR! Demands for the “ELECTED COUNCIL” to do its job and stop acting as a stooge to Big Business

[DIAGNOSTIC updates, reports and analyses are to be continued in defending the Community in the East End of London against the ploys and the Agenda of Big Biz]     

UK Tory MP David Davis raises alarm over police spying on public's email, phone calls

UK Tory MP David Davis raises alarm over police spying on public's email, phone calls

TORY DAILY TELEGRAPH reporting

UK Tory MP David Davis raises alarm over police spying on public's email, phone calls

HOME»NEWS»

POLITICS Police forces spying on our phone calls and emails 250,000 times a year Police forces are routinely snooping on people's email and phone call details hundreds of thousands times a year, a major survey has found.

By Christopher Hope,

Senior Political Correspondent6:00AM BST 20 Apr 201336 Comments A survey using Freedom Of Information laws found that 25 police forces made 506,720 requests for people’s “communications data” over the past three years. There were big disparities between force areas, with people in Merseyside are six times more likely to be spied on than those in neighbouring Lancashire.

A breakdown shows that the number of requests for phone or email records - but not the content of calls or emails - increased from 158,677 in 2009/10 to 178,985 in 2011/12.

Including estimates for the forces which failed to reply to the FOI survey, the figures suggest that as many as 250,000 requests are being made every year. Campaigners Big Brother Watch, which carried the survey, said the evidence suggested the police and other agencies do not need more “snooping powers”.

A newly drafted Communications Bill is due to be published in the summer, which is likely to propose more powers to spy on people.

Emma Carr, deputy director of Big Brother Watch, urged ministers to order a “comprehensive investigation of how current powers are operating” before bringing in new ones later this year. She said: “The research makes clear that between police forces there are significant inconsistencies in the way that communications data is being used. “It emphasises how it impossible to form a measured view of how the current system is operating given the huge discrepancies in the way forces are recording how they use communications data.” Merseyside made 36 requests for every 1,000 residents living in the county – compared with the Metropolitan Police, which put in 21 requests, Lancashire (6 requests) and Hampshire (0.8 requests).

David Davis MP, the former Tory shadow home secretary who quit the front bench in protest over the Labour government’s treatment of civil liberties, said:

“It is frankly not good enough that the government is considering introducing a snoopers' charter without even being able to tell us what they have used communications data for in the past – and indeed not even be able to tell us how many times they have done so.

“The Government should come clean with parliament and tell us exactly how the powers they currently have been used in the past, and tell us for example, whether they have been using it across the country for traffic offences.” A Home Office spokesman said: "This legislation is vital to help catch paedophiles, terrorists and other serious criminals. Communications data includes time, duration and dialling numbers of a phone call, or an email address. It does not include the content of any phone call or email.

“The cross-party Joint Committee which scrutinised the Bill reported that it was impressed with the thoroughness with which each and every application for communications data is considered. “The police and other requesting authorities are subject to rigorous independent inspections by the Interception of Communications Commissioner (IoCC). The IoCC also publishes annual statistics on communications data requests and releases.”

[To be continued]

London: East End, 'most deprived' "Council" colludes as City of London grabs the Borough land...

London: East End, 'most deprived' "Council" colludes as City of London grabs the Borough land...

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

The "LOBBY" by about five or six persons that were photographed outside Tower Hamlets Council building on Wednesday was not really registered as a political event at all.

Why?

Here is my Report [3]

1025 [1015] [0955] [0925] [0855] Hrs GMT London Saturday 20 April 2013

INSIDE the "Council Chamber" ["full Council" meeting, a ritualistic absurdity that is staged in the Tower Hamlets Council which is no longer a Council with the democratic powers but is lumbered with a diversion from democratic accountability via the installation of a post called "Executive Mayor"], there were noisy utterances by individuals who are called "councillors".

But they did not make any campaigning noises at all.

Most of their noises, as far as I could see from where I was sitting, were performances of scripted items!

Those scripts were NOT devoted to accountability about the ordinary people out in the Community in the London borough of Tower Hamlets.

The scripts were about "the Council Administration" and their supposed opponents, which are made up of the [more numerous] Labour Party councillors and the smaller Conservative ones.

When the "leader" of the supposed Opposition [on the Labour Group, notionally speaking for The Opposition] Joshua Peck, spoke, he spoke about HIS personally-related issues.

Not about the Community.

Least of all about the Council's duties to the Community!

Not that I could hear or discern any manifest prominence given in his spiel to the reality of the Council's behaviour in delivering its duties to the Community out across the area called in context here the "London Borough of Tower Hamlets" [=LBTH]!

And the listed "petitions and the questions" from the supposed members of the Public, on this occasion [Wednesday 17 April 2013] at that sitting of the LBTH Council, were as far beyond my comprehension as they ever could be. Of course there were words that I could recognise.

Of course there phrases that I had heard before and some of those I could even understand.

But I could not hear any campaigning in anything that was presented in those presentations!

So Eileen Short will have to show me what I had missed in the two sets of presentations under

"Petitions" and "Questions".

I heard nothing about campaigning.

Nor did any of the "councillors" from any of the "sides" make any noise whilst I was there [until just before 10 PM when I left] that amounted to what I know to be a campaigning noise.

Far less did any of those make any Campaigning statement!

NOTHING that the "rival" title to the LBTH Council’s very own PR “pravda” the "East End Lies" has since [that meeting] published, about or after that "LBTH Council Meeting” shows that there was any campaign in that Tower Hamlets Council Chamber during that meeting.

Below is the latest piece on the web site of the eastlondonadvsier.co.uk that shows that IF ANYTHING, the most interesting and reportable events are happening OUTSIDE of that LBTH Council Meeting.

Such as the alleged abuse of the Council's resources and its Constitutional law position and remits by the CURRENT LBTH COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION

[To be continued]

____________________________________________________

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/investigation_launched_into_tower_hamlets_mayor_s_advisors_illegal_election_planning_1_2120044

Investigation launched into Tower Hamlets Mayor’s advisors’ ‘illegal election planning’

Robin de Peyer

Friday, April 19, 2013

2:56 PM

An investigation has been launched into the role of Tower Hamlets Mayor Lutfur Rahman’s team of taxpayer funded advisors, amid claims they are illegally planning his re-election campaign.

Mr Rahman recently used council reserves to almost double the budget for his office and advisors, to £750,000 for the current financial year. But leaked minutes of a meeting held last year have triggered allegations the Mayor’s team has been illegally using council facilities and staff for electoral and partisan political purposes – in contravention of the Localism Act.

The minutes reportedly showed council officers and advisors involved in preparing campaign literature for electoral wards and discussing setting up a bank account for election funding.

Opposition councillors from Labour and the Conservatives voted together this week to “appoint an independent investigator into this […] in order to identify all misuse of public funds by using council facilities and officers for political campaign activity.”

But Mr Rahman’s cabinet member for resources Cllr Alibor Choudhury defended the £300,000 increase in the budget for advisors and the Mayor’s office.

“Let me stress that our advisors play an important part in the delivery of council services and the Mayor’s priorities”, he said.

He has previously insisted the advisors represent “great value”.

A council spokesperson confirmed the investigation, but offered no further comment.

Mr Rahman will take on London Assembly Member John Biggs in what is expected to be a closely fought contest next year.

Can Lutfur Rahman stop Tower Hamlets Council sinking beyond repair? The SPECTATOR magazine web site 'debates' [2]

Can Lutfur Rahman stop Tower Hamlets Council sinking beyond repair? The SPECTATOR 'debates' [2]

SPECTATOR magazine web site, London UK

The 2nd COMMENT posted online by MUHAMMAD HAQUE this morning Tuesday 09 April 2013 sharing the CONCERNS about the dysfunctional bureaucracy [or clique of people in publicly paid posts and behaving irresponsibly, with callous disregard to the duties they owe to the people in the Community] that has been disregarding the Tower Hamlets Council.

the key thrust of this Second Comment is a wake up call to all those, including and in context typified by Lutfur Rahman as the “executive mayor”, who are in place following "elections", to take note and act before Tower hamlets Council is destroyed totally.

that destruction will be brought about by key decision-making Council-employees behaving wrongfully and illegally and doing so with the democratically elected post-holders failing or neglecting to hold these employees to account without any more delay.

In my initial comment on this piece

"Right to reply: Mayor Lutfur Rahman responds to Nick Cohen" 

I had said that Tower Hamlets Council was not being held to democratic accountability.

I had said that because that was true then and that remains true today, Tuesday 09 April 2013, a day that I am going to have to dedicate to finding out more evidence of why "my local Council" is failing the local community so abysmally.

There is no better place to start than by looking at the evidence of my own direct communications.

If we say that I have had to create in the past 30 months several thousand separate and originally researched and verified items of communications examining the behaviour of the various decision-makers in Tower Hamlets Council perhaps that will give a fairly representative idea of the detail of the evidence.

Based on that, I can share the findings here say that most of Tower Hamlets Council’s decision-making goes on without any democratic audit, accountability or oversight.

And that it is costing people affected by the adverse decisions dearly. And there is no known viable recourse for people who badly need redress but cannot find any.

Lutfur knows what I am talking about here.

As do at least five of his very closely active colleagues in “the cabinet” that he fronts. Over the past 30 months, I have had to communicate with him more times than I had ever imagined should have been necessary.

Why then was it necessary?

As I have already stated in a number of broadcast programmes on radio and on satellite TV, this has been done by a number of key decision-making employees in the Council who behave as if they do not have to abide by any laws or any constitutionality, let alone with any ethics or any sense of fairness.

Some of that was also hinted at and in a particular case extensively detailed by the MP Robert [Bob] Neil who spoke in a House of Commons debate he had been involved in calling for on 23 January 2013 about local Councils which debate featured Tower Hamlets as, in the context of that speech, one of the failing Councils in England and Wales.

On the evidence of my communications and clear concerns about the wrongful, illegal and unconstitutional behaviour of Tower Hamlets Council’s key decision-making employees, there is a serious dysfunction in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.

And someone has got to democratically accountably and transparently and conclusively admit it and immediately start dealing with it in real terms.

As opposed to in making excuses, being in denial or worse in even suggesting that the evidence does not exist or that the Council’s critics are somehow making things up!

Otherwise the very existence of Tower Hamlets Council as “we have known it” will be exposed to serious and real threat!

That will in turn mean that the vast majority of people in one of England’s most deprived Boroughs will get even worse “service” than they have ben doing recently.

Which brings me to the little matter of the “mayor election” as scheduled for 2014.

Do those who claim to be set on replacing Lutfur Raman from his perch as the “elected executive mayor of Tower Hamlets Borough” have a programme?

I have not seen any that contains a programme for a really democratic accountability by the Council to the Community in Tower Hamlets Borough. This is what I call ground for raw discontent about the Council as a whole. This means the discontent is set to come in the direction of Lutfur Rahman faster and more forcefully than he appears to have realised so far.

Margaret Thatcher: What forces had created this image of Political Violence on Society?

Margaret Thatcher: What forces had created this image of Political Violence on Society?

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Margaret Thatcher -

What forces had created this image of Political Violence on Society? [1]

0302 [0245] [0220] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 09 April 2013

 This front page [image above this Commentary] is of the British Communist Party Daily Morning Star’s front-page dated Tuesday 09 April 2013.

It is tame, misleading and the contents that go with it are even more misleading. In the following Commentary, I shall be examining the bankruptcy of the "British Left" in the context of the tool that the Neo Cons had invented in Maggie [Margaret Hilda Roberts] Thatcher. 

There is NO evidence that she had either the intellect or the depth of understanding or the dedication to “her work” [what WAS her work when compared to the destruction of the values and the assaults on Society that she was engaged in?] which are being attributed to her. 

She was being used as a strategically invented political tool, as one of the most effective Trojan horses, to coin a phrase, the real enemies of Society found in her and rammed it through under the guise of her APPEARANCES as a ‘woman...’ and all those ‘features’.... that the and the worst use from Society’s standpoint was being deliberately done by depicting her gender and the ‘fact’ of her being “a woman”. Of course she was a biological woman with all that that entailed. 

But politically, why was she being repeatedly cited as “a woman”?

 What message was being intended to be conveyed by that reference, that ‘identification’?

 If being “a woman” was supposed to show, amongst other qualifiers to that portrayal in that temporal and social, Economic and Political context, the non-violent, ethical, moral, compassionate, just view towards Society then she failed totally. 

She personified and coney the worst image of a woman in power: the image of a woman who was bent on attacking Society. How was that a good thing for Society? Or for humanity? 

Or for the world? 

Wasn’t she also the one who berated the other image, that of Nelson Mandela, still incarcerated in the Apartheid prison on that Island off the coasts of mainland South Africa and called him a terrorist without hesitation, remorse or regret? 

She did more damage to women than has yet been admitted. Isn’t it time to remember her interview in January 1978 on ITV that is still full of venom and hatred as based on ethnicity, race and racist intolerance? How are those being ‘tackled’ if they are being tacked at all? 

And is Ed Milibrand any ‘good’ at all at confronting the Thatcherite resurgence that the Neo Cons Collusion is embarked on now, as at 09 April 2013, with the aim of finishing off Society? Who had scripted that phrase that Margaret Thatcher mouthed to the effect that “there is [was] no such thing as Society”? 

As the footage has already been played, the Political Margaret Thatcher was an invention. 

Thought up by men some of whom are still around and are openly admitting to having played parts in the programme that manufactured her. 

To the point of coaching her to put across the “strategic” diction! 

As a ploy to fool the gullible public already prepared to receive the messages of poison and discord that she had been scripted to pledge to discourage [all those phrases about “St Francis of Assisi” etc that she had been tutored to mouth at the inception of her formal embarkation of Office] which would show that she was uttering an utter untruth on that pledge. 

[To be continued]

MUHAMMAD HAQUE UPDATING LUTFUR RAHMAN on the crisis of racism in Tower Hamlets Council

MUHAMMAD HAQUE UPDATING LUTFUR RAHMAN on the crisis of racism in Tower Hamlets Council

Dear Lutfur Rahman,

I was wondering if this time you were going to put your name to a response to anything published in "Fleet Street".

I shall come back after I observe what happens to THIS short comment from me.

I am surprised that you make references to yourself as not being involved in anything "extreme".

Why am I surprised?

Because as you KNOW from the evidence that I have made available to the Council over the years that an agenda of racism is very much active in Tower Hamlets and that agenda is being carried out via the existing Council.

I shall give name, date and chapter and verse on the rest if anyone would like to deny this assertion that I am making.

I have published, on radio and on a number of occasions on TV programmes, my finding that Tower Hamlets Council has been failing to serve the local community as a whole and I have said this is due to the fact that the Council is not being held to democratic accountability.

What do I mean by this?

I said only a fortnight ago: that the elected Councillors- and that elected element includes you as well] - were free to hold the Council bureaucracy to account but were choosing [not to] or failing to do so.

Muhammad Haque diagnosing the morally compromised Ed Miliband who is letting Society down by capitulating to the Neo Cons Agenda against Society in Britain

Muhammad Haque diagnosing the morally compromised Ed Miliband

THIS image has been taken from the SPECTATOR magazine’s web site this evening [Sunday 07 April 2013].

It is a grinning Liam Byrne, the morality-free, thought-free, compassion-free, ethics-free “shadow” to Iain Duncan Smith in the UK House of Commons. In that role, Byrne has proven the worst suspicions about him: he is unfit for the purpose.

Byrne is the one who had left that notorious, callous “note” apparently boasting “there is no money left” as they exited the offices of “power” following the 2010 general election . Byrne has proven since then that there is not on ly ‘no money lefty’ but that there is no brains left either.

The question is:

what on earth is this git doing faking it as the person speaking about Society as a “counter to the Neo Cons’ Assault that he has been complicit in every-time he has uttered anything on the situation?

Muhammad Haque diagnosing the morally compromised Ed Miliband who is letting Society down by capitulating to the Neo Cons Agenda against Society in Britain

The SPECTATOR magazine website Sunday 07 April 2013

Published on the SPECTATOR magazine’s ‘coffee house’ web site this evening [07 April 2013]

What Society needs is a comprehensive review of all the ills that successive sets of bureaucrats operating the corrupting and the unfair agenda of Big Business have heaped on Society to the point where the very idea of Society is now in danger.

Has Ed Miliband got that perspective?

Or is he too morally compromised to dare to confront the Neo Cons at their own game?

If the utterances strategically unleashed via the Neo Cons Media operations during the weekend is any guide, Miliband will fail to tell the truth on  Society.

But I am quite prepared for him to try to prove my findings on him wrong!

THE above COMMENT is accessible at

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/04/liam-byrne-tries-to-answer-labours-welfare-question/

EXPOSING the Neo Cons' lies, envy and falsehood against the Poor, against Society: We also exposed BBC politics man John Pienaar as an ill-informed, ignorant git

EXPOSING the Neo Cons' lies, envy and falsehood against the Poor, against Society: We also exposed BBC politics man John Pienaar as an ill-informed, ignorant git

The main COMMENT below the image, is from the GUARDIAN web site. That Comment, by Ethicaliser, takes to task the self-serving opportunist Harriet Harman for her own stupidity, crassness and lack of compassion.

BBC enters the fray and is exposed as being ill-briefed on key facts: John Pie Naar!

OUR Image, an AADHIKAR Diagnostic Montage on the BBC today, shows John Pienaar and some of his 'guests' on the programme that he had misleadingly announced on twitter would have George Osborne as a guest. Osborne was NOT a guest.

Osborne was interviewed on a pre-recorded items

But the BBC Radio 5Live's John Pienaar was not the only ignorant one today. Earlier, Eddie Mair, who got stratospheric PLUGS over his encounter with the 'nasty piece of work' Boris JohnsonJohnson last week, was all oozing with accommodation when he was presented with the guest Harriet Harman.

Harman is a long documented self-seeking careerist who has abused the weakness of the Bliared Party structure to enhance herself over decades.

Eddie Mair on BBC TV this morning failed miserably to pin the heartless, cruel, opportunist Harman to the facts.

Here, then, is a short expose of the shallow foundation on which Harman pitched her own careerist liens via the BBC.

We shall publish other diagnostic items here in this series on what has been said and done during this POLITICAL WEEKEND.

We start with the Guardian web site which has given Harman a splash on that plug for the Cruel Harriet Harman via the BBC

The following COMMENT by “Ethicaliser” was posted on the Guardian website [at 1835 GMT today Sunday 07 April 2013] has been retrieved at appx 1950 GMT London Sunday 07 April 2013.

We publish it after making a few, very minor spelling and grammatical corrections

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/apr/07/working-families-exasperated-benefits-harman?commentpage=1

If your [shown as being published by “the OBSERVER” on the guatdian.co.uk web site] report is an accurate account of Harriet Harman’s utterance then of course she is even more unfit for purpose than she had showed in the secure career that she has mysteriously enjoyed in the name of the “Labour Party”.


Harriet Harman is not a social scientist.

Nor is she known for making ethics or morality the key purpose of her career.


She is wrong to say what she has said because it is untrue.

Worse, she is inciting resentment as she is basing her ‘arguments’ on envy.


Envy [of] the haves against the have-nots.


This is too far from reasoned debate based on hard evidence.


If the pollsters asked a reactionary question, most people wold give a reactionary answer.

It is all hype.


If Harman is “representing” Ed Miliband in this then of course the analysis must be that it is a bankrupt Party.


The truth is the actual sums paid to Big Banks.


Bring those figures out.


Analyse those.


Divide the sums by the numbers of the recipients. Compare those with the incomes or the earnings of individual workers on the factory floor.


Bring out the statists on actual jobs that manual workers, others in the lower floors do and show their wages.
Constituency by Parliamentary Constituency.
Local Authority by Local Authority.


Industry by Industry.


Show the figures on what is paid to what sort of claimant in benefits.
Show what means testing is.


Show what Housing g benefits are.


Show the crime statistic and describe all the capital offences.


Correlate the crimes and the offences with the actual social backgrounds of the offenders the perpetrators.


Show how many “benefit claimants” there are


Show how many benefit claimants there are.


Show how many benefit are illegally denied.


Show many are legally owed but are held back from claimants.
Show the figures on evictions.


How many illegal eviction have taken place every year for the past decade and more.


And the figures must continue until the full facts are exhaustively shown.


Otherwise, the campaign is very seriously flawed as it is based on rumour, gossip and envy by the rich of the poor!


Now that UK Foreign Secretary William Hague has joined the assault on Society, let us bring in the External activities in the Budget as well.
Show the figures for the UK expenditure in the involvement with war on Iraq, the occupation of Afghanistan.


And the full Expenditures on everything.....