Tuesday, 30 October 2012

The Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Part E © Muhammad Haque /CBRUK /Khoodeelaar! / LCAN 2006/2012




UPDATER Context:

The Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006

Part E

© Muhammad Haque /CBRUK /Khoodeelaar! / LCAN 2006/2012

Written and published on the internet at 0950 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 24 January 2006
________________________________________________________________________
These contents are original and forum Part of the Khoodeelaar! MANIFESTO 2006 which is currently being published in separate parts. The complete Khoodeelaar! MANIFESTO 2006 will be published in print form and in a single volume later on in 2006. These materials may be quoted fore educational purposes only. No commercial or unethical or anti-democratic or unlawful use of any of these materials is allowed.
_______________________________________________________________________
a. The morass that exists on the London borough of Tower Hamlets council is manifold. It is a morass of democracy. There is no manifest democratic activity on the council. The morass is also cultural and historic.
b. And the two are intertwined. The lack of political accountability is the direct result of the absence from the agenda of political selection of candidates [for election to the London borough of Tower Hamlets council] of any criteria based on voluntary compliance with the requirements of democracy and of constitutionality that is compatible with the requirements of democracy.
c. The culture that dominates the behaviour of those who control the access to the powers available to the LBTH council is a corrupt culture. It is a corrupt culture. It has been a corrupt culture. It is bound to remain a corrupt culture. That is why there is the absolute need and demand for the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006.
d. This manifesto is unlike any other that has ever been published anywhere in the UK. it has been prompted by the immediate and dire absence of democratic representation on the tower hamlets council that would and should protect the brick lane London e1 area from the Crossrail hole [attacks plan and programme and] bill and it is the product of the evidence of the reaction to the Khoodeelaar!! campaign of all the elements and forces and agencies and beneficiaries of the corrupt status quo that has created the Crossrail threat to the local community in the London borough of Tower Hamlets.
e. This Khoodeelaar! manifesto 2006 will provide the frame of democratic reference for the community to ethically and constitutionally probe the entirety of the operation and use of the London borough of Tower Hamlets council and serve as the definitive democratic guide for exposing corruption and wrongdoing of holders of ‘elected’ posts and of those others whom the holders of ‘elected’ posts use to carry out their anti-democratic, corrupt agenda against the mandate, the wishes, the needs and the demands of the local community in the London borough of Tower Hamlets.
f. here is no bigger instance of abuse of democracy at the present time [24 January 2006] than the Crossrail threat that has been brought into this area by the undemocratic behaviour of the allegedly democratic holders of the particularly Crossrail-promoting ‘elected’ and the powerful positions in the London borough of Tower Hamlets council in the past relevant years.
g. The historic reasons include the access to the application of the finance – and the financial powers – that the users and abusers of the ‘powers’ of the London borough of Tower Hamlets council have. that access has been used to either perpetuate institutional and personal discrimination in violating human rights and in maintaining a discriminatory and corrupt regime by first denying human and equal rights and then posing as the ‘saviour’ of the victims of the violations. This is most noticeable in the antics of the very corrupt and the very contradictory and the very unethical players that the ‘mainstream’ British media has afforded spots to between 9 January 2006 and 23 January 2006. The Khoodeelaar! the brick lane London E1 area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill
1. THAT Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 Area Campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the analysis of the crisis and the betrayal and the denial of local democratic accountability. This will be a service that the local community deserve need and want from their local council.
2. Towards the publication of such analysis Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 Area Campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will take into account the facts of the behaviour of those who are [or have been or were] in control of the LBTH Council at the time that the anti-democratic decision/s were made or instigated or incited.
3. That the meanings of the two words ‘instigated’ and ‘incited’ will be determined by reference to contemporary use and treated in the context of the current and the temporal uses of the two words in ordinary life.
4. That Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 Area Campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the political account of the representations made by and on behalf of the pro-accountability, pro-democratic activists, organisations and persons to the occupant in the highest-paid post in the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council who is officially also the chief adviser to the controlling group on the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council on compliance with the law and the ‘constitution’.
5. That Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 Area Campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will use all statutes, precedents and dicta as well as all applicable decisions and opinions that have been expressed by any relevant judicial body or forum or court in the UK or internationally to focus attention on the utter duty of holders of elected posts and on the others ‘carrying out their decisions’ within or in the name of or on behalf of or on the implied authority of the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council to tell the truth on what they say and do and on what they do not say and do not do when they invoke or use or claim authority on their ‘elected’ and ‘democratic’ rights to exercise and use the powers available to the ‘London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council’.

Friday, 26 October 2012

Criminals carried on their cruel attacks under cover of "professional" "care homer" for the vulnerable-1


'Culture of cruelty': 11 care home workers sentenced for shocking abuse of vulnerable residents exposed by Panorama probe

  • 11 care workers admitted 38 charges of either neglect or ill-treatment of people with severe learning difficulties between them
  • Six members of staff jailed for total of seven years and four months and five received suspended sentences at Bristol Crown Court today
  • Wayne Rodgers, 32, was jailed for two years for abusing vulnerable patients
  • Footage showed residents being slapped, soaked in water, trapped under chairs, taunted, sworn at and having their hair pulled and eyes poked
  • Jason Gardiner, 43, apologised, saying it was a 'tough place to work'

Six members of staff who abused vulnerable patients at a residential care home with a 'culture of cruelty' were today jailed for a total of seven years and four months.
Winterbourne View private hospital in Bristol was closed after five weeks of undercover filming captured shocking treatment of disabled people.
Patients were slapped, soaked in water, forcibly pinned down, trapped under chairs, taunted and had their eyes poked and hair pulled by staff members.
Scroll down for video
Abusers: Top left to right Kelvin Fore, Michael Ezenagu, Neil Ferguson, Sookalingun Appoo and Wayne Rogers. Bottom left to right Alison Dove, Charlotte Cotterell, Danny Brake, Graham Doyle, Holly Draper and Jason Gardiner
Abusers: Top left to right Kelvin Fore, Michael Ezenagu, Neil Ferguson, Sookalingun Appoo and Wayne Rogers. Bottom left to right Alison Dove, Charlotte Cotterell, Danny Brake, Graham Doyle, Holly Draper and Jason Gardiner
The staff admitted 38 charges of either neglect or ill-treatment of people with severe learning difficulties between them.
Five members of staff received suspended sentences - walking away from court free after admitting sickening crimes.
Wayne Rogers, 32, who was jailed for two years, was condemned by a judge at Bristol Crown Court for dishing out abuse to disabled patients.
 
Rogers was among the 11 staff - nine support workers and two nurses - caught in a BBC Panorama sting by a reporter with a hidden camera posing as a carer.
On one shocking occasion footage showed three support workers forcibly holding down a resident while a nurse forced paracetamol into her mouth.
Michael Ezenagu leaves Bristol Crown Court where he was sentenced to six-month jail term which was suspended for two years
Jason Gardiner leaves Bristol Crown Court where he was sentenced to a four-month jail term which was suspended for two years
Michael Ezenagu, left, leaves Bristol Crown Court today where he was sentenced to six-month suspended jail term and Jason Gardiner, right, who was given a four-month suspended sentence for their part in the abuse
A woman cries as family members and friends of the victims gather to read a statement outside Bristol Crown Court
A woman cries as family members and friends of the victims gather to read a statement outside Bristol Crown Court
Bev Dawkins, centre, of Mencap, reads a statement on behalf of the families who suffered abuse
Bev Dawkins, centre, of Mencap, reads a statement on behalf of the families who suffered abuse
Judge Neil Ford QC, the Recorder of Bristol, described Winterbourne View an 'institution in which systematic abuse' of vulnerable people took place.
He said: 'The hospital was run with a view to profit and with a scandalous lack of regard to the interests of its residents and staff.
'A culture of ill-treatment developed and, as is often the case, cruelty bred cruelty.
'This culture corrupted and debased, to varying degrees, the defendants.'
Guilty: 11 care workers, sketched during an earlier appearance, were sentenced today after they were caught on camera abusing patients
Guilty: 11 care workers, sketched during an earlier appearance, were sentenced today after they were caught on camera abusing patients
Convicted: Six members of staff were jailed. The other five were given suspended sentences by a judge at Bristol Crown Court
Convicted: Six members of staff were jailed. The other five were given suspended sentences by a judge at Bristol Crown Court
The judge condemned the abuse the care workers (pictured) meted out to disabled patients at the Winterbourne View private hospital, at Hambrook, South Gloucestershire
The judge condemned the abuse the care workers (pictured) meted out to disabled patients at the Winterbourne View private hospital, at Hambrook, South Gloucestershire
Whistleblower Terry Bryan, a former nurse at the home, went to the BBC with his concerns after his complaints to owner Castlebeck and care watchdogs were ignored.
Journalist Joseph Carey recorded shocking footage during a five-week investigation in February and March last year and the programme was shown the following June.
A serious case review published in August criticised Darlington-based Castlebeck Ltd, which owned the hospital, for putting profits before humanity.
The 26-bed hospital opened in 2006 and by 2010 had a turnover of £3.7 million. The average weekly fee for a patient was £3,500.
Prosecutor Kerry Barker said care watchdogs failed to act on repeated warnings of 'inhumane, cruel and hate-fuelled treatment' of patients.
'The so-called restraint techniques were used to inflict pain, humiliate patients and bully them into compliance with the demands of their carers,' Mr Barker said.
'It is the Crown’s case that generally the offences were motivated by hostility towards the victims based on their disabilities.
'The offenders were operating in groups; the offences involved an abuse of power; an abuse of trust; the victims were particularly vulnerable and on occasion the ill-treatment of a patient was sustained, with the consequences of serious psychological effects.'
Mr Barker told the court that the five residents, Simone Blake, Simon Tovey, Louise Bissett, Louisa Deville and Lorraine Guildford, suffered greatly at the hands of the defendants.
Among the hours of graphic footage played to the court during the sentencing hearing was support worker Wayne Rogers telling Miss Blake: 'Do you want me to get a cheese grater and grate your face off?
'Do you want me to turn you into a giant pepperoni?'
He also slapped Mr Tovey across the cheek and told him: 'Do you want a scrap? Do you want a fight? Go on and I will bite your bloody face off.'
This poor woman was dragged across the floor in this undercover footage obtained by a whistleblower
This poor woman was dragged across the floor in this undercover footage obtained by a whistleblower
Staff played games with the patients, shown here placing one person under furniture with the other sat in the seat above
Staff played games with the patients, shown here placing one person under furniture with the other sat in the seat above
Colleague Alison Dove said Miss Blake 'loved pain' and then told her: 'Simone, come here and I’ll punch your face.'
Dove also threatened Miss Bissett when she broke a window in the lounge with a chair.
She snarled at her: 'Listen, in future I’m going to let you sit on the f****** floor, cos you don’t deserve a chair.'
On another occasion, Dove, Graham Doyle and Holly Draper restrained Miss Blake as Sookalingum Appoo forced paracetamol into her mouth.
Later during the same shocking incident Doyle put on a mock-German accent and, mimicking a Nazi guard, slapped her over the head with his gloves shouting: 'Nein, nein, nein, nein.'
Barristers representing the 11 defendants apologised on behalf of their clients but blamed the culture of Castlebeck - calling it a 'disease', a 'cancer' and a 'fog' that had engulfed Winterbourne View.
Judge Ford praised Mr Casey for the 'unpleasant task' of collecting evidence of the ill-treatment of the residents, which was later broadcast on Panorama.

FAMILIES OF VICTIMS CALL ON GOVERNMENT TO STOP ABUSE RECURRING

The families of the victims call upon the Government to stop a similar scandal happening again
The families of the victims call upon the Government to stop a similar scandal happening again
In a statement read outside Bristol Crown Court by Bev Dawkins, of Mencap, the families of the victims called on the Government to make changes to ensure the catalogue of abuse could never again.
'The righteous public outrage over the treatment of our children has highlighted the necessity of these vulnerable adults receiving the same care and protection due to them in law as any other member of the public,' they said.
'We sincerely hope that the Government will seize this unique opportunity with both hands to actually enforce existing policy and enshrine some of those changes in law.
'In the 21st century places like Winterbourne View should not exist, they should be closed and more local services developed.'
James Welch, legal director for Liberty, which is representing some of the families involved in the scandal, said: 'Now that those who were directly responsible have been sentenced it is time to look at wider institutional failings that led to the horrific abuse of patients at Winterbourne View.
'Not only does the management of the hospital bear responsibility for what happened but there is evidence that attempts by whistleblowers to alert the authorities were ignored.'
Lawyer Alison Millar, from Leigh day & Co, who is also representing victims, said: 'This sends a clear message to abusers that the responsible authorities will take heed of their actions and they will be brought to justice.'
Care and Support minister Norman Lamb pledged to publish the Government's report into the scandal 'very soon'.
'His footage has provoked widespread and understandable feelings of revulsion,' the judge said.
'It has also led to the closure of an institution in which systematic abuse of vulnerable people would otherwise have continued.'
Judge Ford said he sentenced the defendants on the basis of their guilty pleas and not for the totality of the abuse at Winterbourne View.
'These offences constituted a gross breach of trust and power,' he said.
'Your victims were particularly vulnerable and have been significantly affected by your acts of abuse in the context of a regime of continuing abuse and on occasions you offended as part of a group.'
Judge Ford said one particularly nasty incident involved Doyle and Rogers restraining Miss Blake while taunting her with sweets.
'The image of you both enjoying sweets while that young woman was being treated in the manner I have described is truly disturbing in its callous disregard for her comfort and well- being,' he said.
Addressing Rogers, a senior support worker, the judge said: 'Your overall conduct amounted to physical and mental ill-treatment, often of a particularly cruel nature, to extremely vulnerable people who were in your care.
'In the face of behaviour that was not particularly challenging, your first resort was to use wholly inappropriate methods of restraint, often coupled with taunting and assault.'
Judge Ford told Dove, a support worker: 'I have read the pre-sentence report in which you say you were originally shocked by the ill-treatment of residents at the hospital but that you became desensitised to it over time.
'You suggested it was born of boredom during long shifts and that you had viewed patients as playthings.'
Winterbourne View residential hospital in Bristol where the vile offences took place
Winterbourne View residential hospital in Bristol where the vile offences took place
Addressing Doyle, who had started at Winterbourne View as a kitchen pot washer before becoming a support worker, the judge said: 'In a letter to me you have described your conduct as disgusting, vile and inexcusable.
'You are considered genuinely remorseful and haunted by guilt. But your treatment of Simone Blake was often cruel, callous and degrading. It was always wholly unjustified.'
The owners of Winterbourne View said huge changes had taken place within the company since the abuse was exposed by Panorama.
Castlebeck Ltd said there had been 'extensive changes in board and management' and new measures introduced to ensure there could not be a repeat.
Jason Gardiner, 43, one of five support workers at the scandal-hit home who escaped immediate jail sentences, apologised today for his behaviour.
Gardiner, who was a prison officer in Bristol for 11 years before working in the care sector, said as he left court: 'At the time it was misguided, I was trying to do the right thing and I ended up doing wrong and I would apologise for that.
'I've apologised all the way through and I've taken full responsibility for everything I have done. It was a very difficult place to work, a tough place to work.
'Understaffed, high pressure, 12 hour days, no breaks, but there are no excuses for what anybody did.
'All I can do is apologise to everybody for what happened and I really never meant any harm to anybody and that is heartfelt.'
The court heard that Gardiner was planning to marry his partner of 12 years but that relationship had ended as a result of his involvement in the care home abuse and he was now sleeping on his mother's sofa.

A TOTAL OF 38 CHARGES OF EITHER NEGLECT OR ILL-TREATMENT

The former staff admitted 38 charges of either neglect or ill-treatment of people with severe learning difficulties. They are:
Wayne Rogers, 32, of Purton Close, Bristol, pleaded guilty to nine charges of ill-treating Ms Deville, Mr Tovey and Miss Blake. He denied a charge of ill-treating Miss Bisset, which was accepted by the prosecution and he did not face trial. He was jailed for two years.
Alison Dove, 25, of Chipperfield Drive, Bristol, pleaded guilty to seven charges of ill-treating Miss Guilford, Miss Bisset and Miss Blake. She pleaded not guilty to ill-treating Mr Tovey, which was accepted by the prosecution and she did not face trial. She was jailed for 20 months.
Graham Doyle, 26, of Brackendene, Bradley Stoke, Bristol, pleaded guilty to seven charges of ill-treating Miss Blake. He denied charges of wilfully neglecting Miss Guilford and ill-treating Mr Tovey. The prosecution accepted the pleas and he did not face trial. He was also jailed for 20 months.
Jason Gardiner, 43, of Mellent Avenue, Bristol, admitted two charges of ill-treating Ms Deville and Mr Tovey. His four-month jail term was suspended for two years. Gardiner was ordered to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work.
Michael Ezenagu, 29, of Malabar Court, India Way, Shepherds Bush, west London, pleaded guilty to two counts of ill-treating Miss Blake. He denied two further of ill-treating the same patient and a third similar charge against Mr Tovey. The prosecution accepted the pleas and he did not face trial. His six-month jail term was suspended for two years. Ezenagu was ordered to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work.
Danny Brake, 27, of Beechen Drive, Fishponds, Bristol, also pleaded guilty to two charges of ill-treating Miss Blake and Mr Tovey. His four-month jail term was suspended for two years. Brake was ordered to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work.
Charlotte Cotterell, 22, of Melrose Avenue, Yate, Bristol, pleaded guilty to one charge of ill-treating Miss Blake. She denied a second charge against the same victim, which was accepted by the prosecution and she did not face trial. Her four-month jail term was suspended for two years. Cotterell was ordered to carry out 150 hours of unpaid work and complete 12 months supervision.
Holly Draper, 24, The Old Orchard, Mangotsfield, Bristol, pleaded guilty to two charges of ill-treating Miss Blake. She was jailed for 12 months.
Neil Ferguson, 28, of Emersons Green, Bristol, pleaded guilty to one count of ill-treating Miss Blake. He denied a second charge of ill-treating the same patient, which the prosecution accepted and he did not face trial. His six-month jail term was suspended for two years. Ferguson was ordered to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work.
Sookalingum Appoo, 59, of Dial Lane, Bristol, admitted three charges of wilfully neglecting Miss Blake. He was jailed for six months.
Kelvin Fore, 33, of Ellesmere Walk, Middlesbrough, pleaded guilty to one charge of wilfully neglecting Miss Blake but denied a second allegation against the same person, which was accepted by the prosecution and he did not face trial. He was also jailed for six months.
VIDEO: Care home worker Jason Gardiner apologises and family issue statement
 

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

There is hype on now in many media outlets suggesting that "house prices bonanza" is to greet many property owners along the "Crossrail line".


1236 [1228] Hrs Wednesday 24 October 2012:

There is hype on now in many media outlets suggesting that "house prices bonanza" is to greet many property owners along the "Crossrail line".

This hype is a most misleading one. 

Typically attached to the hype that anti-social agenda-pushing pluggers of Big Biz-prompted projects tend to indulge in, this line fails to report the truth about the housing shortage and homeless crisis that mars thousands of lives and ruins the local and the wider UK economy in the long, the short and the medium terms.

You can only have a "bonanza" if you can afford to own the property in the first place.
How many people in the hyped-up areas own their own houses and properties?

That depends on income and earnings. How many people in your area are unable to find jobs despite trying very hard?

Or is the hyper for Big Biz still claiming that the Economy is doing really fine, when even Mervin King, of the Bank of England, has felt in necessary to say the prospects of the UK economy are really dim, so dim that he foresees generations to come to live in the shadow of the poor Economy!

Muhammad Haque
Organiser
Khoodeelaar! No to Big Biz Agenda Crossrail

The Bank of England's Mervyn King sheds crocodile tears for the children!


The Bank of England's Mervyn King sheds crocodile tears for the children!

By © Muhammad Haque
2340 GMT London tuesday 23 October 2012.

What an absolute outrage! Mervyn King, who has intellectually tottered for years as he has kept his job as the nominal boss of the bankrupt  central bank the Bank of England is now being given a plug by Paul Dacre's DAILY MAIL as if King knows what he is on about at all!
Throughout the past years, King has delivered banalities and scripted words of optimism to suit the prevailing opportunists' political weather. He has not been the teller of the truth about the bankrupt Bank of England role or indeed about the rest of what passes for the UK Economy. Fakery has been King's hallmark. He has even faked bank notes. In their millions. So when he is paraded as a citizen concerned about the future of the children, he really exceeds his own record in failing to grasp reality. All those fake bank notes must have totally altered Mervyn's entire personality and outlook on the world as it really is. He must now believe in  make-believe in everything. So he expects that he will be believed as a true guardian of the future generations. 
Pass the sick back, Richard In grams! [To be continued] 

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 for a decent Tower Hamlets, served by a Council that is staffed ONLY by decent people, not by liars making a deprived borough even more deprived.


The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 for a decent Tower Hamlets, served by a Council that is staffed ONLY by decent people, not by liars making a deprived borough even more deprived.

The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 for a decent Tower Hamlets, served by a Council that is staffed ONLY by decent people, not by liars making a deprived borough even more deprived.
UPDATER PREAMBLE       and a second review of the Channel 4 propaganda series “UNDERCOVER FRAUD” [Oops! "Boss"] featuring Kevan/Colin/faker/Collins in July 2010
By © Muhammad Haque
0320 [0255] [0250] [0225] [0210] [0120] Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 16 October 2012
Who is KEEPING the housing crisis festering in Tower Hamlets?      It is the corrupt bureaucracy in the Council itself, the evidence shows this conclusively!
Why did Channel 4 TV allow [the then Tower Hamlets Council "town clerk"] Kevan Collins to peddle outrageous lies for the corrupt bureaucracy?
How a significant number of people are being made homeless by Tower Hamlets Council’s very own “homeless persons” unit, whatever the “operation” is now called!
Why did Channel 4 TV allow Kevan Collins in July 2010 to peddle outrageous lies for the corrupt bureaucracy operating via one of the UK’s “most deprived”, “inner cities” “East End” borough of Tower Hamlets Council?
I have asked this question before.
In fact I published a number of comments on the Channel 4 Series UNDERCOVER BOSS  featuring Kevan Collins shortly after it was broadcast.       Has there been any other comment to the same effect?     May be.       But none comes to mind that caused any  real attention to be paid to the scandal that a [as Collins was at the time] “employed” “town clerk” in a widely admitted deprived borough could stage such a complete fakery at the expense of the people whom the corrupt bureaucracy had failed to serve so miserably.
The corruption in Tower Hamlets Council’s “housing option” [!!!!!!] operation is rampant.     So why is there no outrage about it?
Why, for instance, isn’t there any call from the “combined front” of Peter Golds, the Archant “local” papers [typified by the former "East London Advertiser"] and the assortment of “Fleet Street ‘insiders’ in Tower Hamlets” [who are strangely dedicated to "scouring for gossip about the peripheral issues of faith and politics, rather than those of corruption, bribery and so on] for something to be done by, say, Eric Pickles about the corruption?
Why isn’t [wasn't] there an outcry deploring the fact that Kevan Collins actually fronted a project of blatant lying and called himself “Colin” on camera when also at the same time standing next to the “real” Colin [Cormack] who must have known that Kevan Collins was engaged at the time in peddling a fraudulent PR line for the Council’s relevant corrupt bureaucracy and promoting the image of the Council’s “homeless” “service” ["headed by Cormack"] as a “caring, efficient and responsible” one to the “hapless who found themselves homeless”!!!
The truth is that Tower Hamlets Council’s corrupt bureaucracy has been CAUSING homelessness in the borough on purpose. And where it has not been doing so, it has been allowing a significant crisis in housing provisions to fester forever.
The segment of the Channel 4 PR programme “UNDERCOVER BOSS” that showed the faking Kevan/Colin doing an incredibly unrealistic “matey” “chat” with a young “staff”  at the “homeless” “service” cannot be related to by a single one of the real people who have been made homeless by Tower Hamlets Council’s corrupt bureaucracy.
Here is the summary of one person’s testimony [Colin Cormack caused that person to be homeless for years].
This is evidence  involving the role played by Colin Cormack from  May 1996
The scene is a “kitchen” of a flat not far from the Fieldgate Street, London E1.
For legal reasons, the full postal address is not being given here, just for now, but will be published in the very near future.
The scene is a very small kitchen dominated by “work tools” and little else
There are only two persons sitting at opposite sides of a small table in that kitchen
One is Colin Cormack and the other is the “homeless person” “staying” at that flat [that did not belong to him, "obviously"!] for just under a year or so mostly in order to look after their “work tools”
The person telling Colin Cormack that the flat was too small to house the person’s work tools. The phrase “work tools” will be elaborated on in the later pieces.
Colin Cormack is visiting the address as part of his “work” that he had been ORDERED to do by the then Chief Executive of Tower Hamlets Council.
That – for newcomers to the antics of Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy which never misses the slightest of opportunities top overdo the glory and the tokenism – was also the first woman town clerk [Ooops! "chief Executive"] employed in Tower Hamlets Council.
The reason why Colin Cormack had been ORDERED by Sylvie Pierce [for it was she! the "Chief executive"] was so that the Council could avoid a protracted legal battle with the person who had prepared the legal action claims.
Cormack had been introduced to the homeless person by the head of the Chief Executive’s Office communicating to the homeless person ON BEHALF of Sylvie Pierce in May 1996.
Sylvie Pierce had already spoken to and had  communicated with and exchanged communications with the homeless person several times before.
So this meeting was taking place in the flat near the Fieldgate Street against the background of a number that had already taken place between the two, Colin Cormack and the homeless person.           How did Colin Cormack look?
Not as he did when posing next to the faker Colin on the Channel 4 UNDERCOVER FRAUD [Oops! Boss!]
It looks, on reflection, that Sylvie Pierce, may, just get something that she must have resigned to thinking she would never get: a reprieve!
In “legacy”.
And it looks even MORE LIKELY that I may bring about the things that will give Sylvie pierce that reprove
It may even be the case that Sylvie Pierce will be the most unprepared person to receive such a boost from me  !!!!!!!!
[THE SCENE with Colin Cormack in 1996 oozing "solidarity, understanding and support" for the "homeless orson", in that flat near the Fieldgate street, is to be continued]

The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 for a decent Tower Hamlets, served by a Council that is staffed ONLY by decent people, not by liars making a deprived borough even more deprived.


The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 for a decent Tower Hamlets, served by a Council that is staffed ONLY by decent people, not by liars making a deprived borough even more deprived.

The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 for  a decent Tower Hamlets, served by a Council that is staffed by decent people, not by liars making a deprived borough even more deprived.   
UPDATER PREAMBLE       
 By © Muhammad Haque    
0300 [0255] [0250] [0225] [0210] [0120] Hrs GMT     
London Tuesday 16 October 2012              
Who is KEEPING the housing crisis festering in Tower Hamlets?      It is the corrupt bureaucracy in the Council itself, the evidence shows this conclusively!     
Why did Channel 4 TV allow [the then Tower Hamlets Council "town clerk"] Kevan Collins to peddle outrageous lies for the corrupt bureaucracy?     
How a significant number of people are being made homeless by Tower Hamlets Council’s very own “homeless persons” unit, whatever the “operation” is now called!           
Why did Channel 4 TV allow Kevan Collins in July 2010 to peddle outrageous lies for the corrupt bureaucracy operating via one of the UK’s “most deprived”, “inner cities” “East End” borough of Tower Hamlets Council?               
I have asked this question before.       
In fact I published a number of comments on the Channel 4 Series UNDERCOVER BOSS  featuring Kevan Collins shortly after it was broadcast.       Has there been any other comment to the same effect?     May be.       But none comes to mind that caused any  real attention to be paid to the scandal that a [as Collins was at the time] “employed” “town clerk” in a widely admitted deprived borough could stage such a complete fakery at the expense of the people whom the corrupt bureaucracy had failed to serve so miserably.     
The corruption in Tower Hamlets Council’s “housing option” [!!!!!!] operation is rampant.     So why is there no outrage about it?       
Why, for instance, isn’t there any call from the “combined front” of Peter Golds, the Archant “local” papers [typified by the former "East London Advertiser"] and the assortment of “Fleet Street ‘insiders’ in Tower Hamlets” [who are strangely dedicated to "scouring for gossip about the peripheral issues of faith and politics, rather than those of corruption, bribery and so on] for something to be done by, say, Eric Pickles about the corruption?       
Why isn’t [wasn't] there an outcry deploring the fact that Kevan Collins actually fronted a project of blatant lying and called himself “Colin” on camera when also at the same time standing next to the “real” Colin [Cormack] who must have known that Kevan Collins was engaged at the time in peddling a fraudulent PR line for the Council’s relevant corrupt bureaucracy and promoting the image of the Council’s “homeless” “service” ["headed by Cormack"] as a “caring, efficient and responsible” one to the “hapless who found themselves homeless”!!!      
The truth is that Tower Hamlets Council’s corrupt bureaucracy has been CAUSING homelessness in the borough on purpose. And where it has not been doing so, it has been allowing a significant crisis in housing provisions to fester forever.     The segment of the Channel 4 PR programme “UNDERCOVER BOSS” that showed the faking Kevan/Colin doing an incredibly unrealistic “matey” “chat” with a young “staff”  at the “homeless” “service” cannot be related to by a single one of the real people who have been made homeless by Tower Hamlets Council’s corrupt bureaucracy.     Here is the summary of one person’s testimony [Colin Cormack caused that person to be homeless for years].       
This is evidence  involving the role played by Colin Cormack from  May 1996       
The scene is a “kitchen” of a flat not far from the Fieldgate Street, London E1.     
For legal reasons, the full postal address is not being given here, just for now, but will be published in the very near future.       
The scene is a very small kitchen dominated by “work tools” and little else  There are only two person sitting at opposite sides of a small table in that kitchen       
One is Colin Cormack and the other is the “homeless person” “staying” at that flat [that did not belong to him, "obviously"!] for just under a year or so mostly in order to look after their “work tools”       
The person telling Colin Cormack that the flat was too small to house the person’s work tools. The phrase “work tools” will be elaborated on in the later pieces.     
Colin Cormack is visiting the address as part of his “work” that he had been ORDERED to do by the then Chief Executive of Tower Hamlets Council.      
That – for newcomers to the antics of Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy which never misses the slightest of opportunities top overdo the glory and the tokenism – was also the first woman town clerk [Ooops! "chief Executive"] employed in Tower Hamlets Council.       
he reason why Colin Cormack had been ORDERED by Sylvie Pierce [for it was she! the "Chief executive"] was so that the Council could avoid a protracted legal battle with the person who had prepared the legal action claims.       
Cormack had been introduced to the homeless person by the head of the Chief Executive’s Office communicating to the homeless person ON BEHALF of Sylvie Pierce in May 1996.     Sylvie Pierce had already spoken to and had  communicated with and exchanged communications with the homeless person several times before.       So this meeting was taking place in the flat near the Fieldgate Street against the background of a number that had already taken place between the two, Colin Cormack and the homeless person.           How did Colin Cormack look?       
Not as he did when posing next to the faker Colin on the Channel 4 UNDERCOVER FRAUD [Oops! Boss!]     
 It looks, on reflection, that Sylvie Pierce, may, just get something that she must have resigned to thinking she would never get: a reprieve! In “legacy”. 
And it looks even MORE LIKELY that I may bring about the things that will give Sylvie pierce that reprove     it may even be the case that Sylvie Pierce will be the most unprepared person to receive such a boost from me  !!!!!!!!
[THE SCENE with Colin Cormack in 1996 oozing "solidarity, understanding and support" for the "homeless orson", in that flat near the Fieldgate street, is to be continued]p

Monday, 15 October 2012

The TUC's "RESISTANCE" to the Conmen's cuts is already looking like abject surrender!



1740 [1730] Hrs GMT London Monday 15 October 2012

By © Muhammad Haque

Last night's "stunt" at the central London Anglican Church venue, St Paul's Cathedral, was obviously done to maintain the tradition of "moderation" by the faithful "rebels".
Done by emulating the recent Moscow "original" stunt-makers calling themselves the PUSSY Rioters, the London version was far less hysterically handled by the local ["City of London'] Police than had been the case when Moscow Police came across the fragrant females! They reacted with much-recorded revulsion and detained the women who later faced prolonged prosecution
The St Paul's PUSSY RIOTERs did not get arrested. But the point has been made, that the CONDEM CUTS are uncivilised, "barbaric", unchristian,  etc etc.

These women are obviously sympathetic to the overly bureaucratised English TUC, the Trades Union Congress, which has now sponsored yet another very loyal and very demure "rebellion" against the cuts!
The TUC's day of resistance is already looking set to be another political joke, with no real challenge to the Conmen Cameron and Osborne on the horizon.
For generations, starting in fact in the 1920s, the "British"  TUC has played second fiddle to the power-wielders in the country and the power-holders in the UK.
The 20th October demo will be a political damp squib like hundreds of previous show-demos by the TUC have been.
The real DEMO will have to come from the millions of ordinary people whose lives have been violated by the hundreds of creepy attacks that the CONDEM Collusion has mounted in the past two and a half yard.
Will the ordinary people do what is required by their own human needs and Social demands? Or will the millions choose, instead, to be dragged downwards and into the more of ever deeper denials, deprivation and depletions in their possessions?

[To be continued]










Members of the Occupy London movement, which camped outside the cathedral for four months last winter, interrupted last night's (October 14) evensong by chaining themselves to the base of the pulpit.
2011OccupyLondonPA280212.jpg
While the choir sang, four women dressed in white shouted their own sermon to mark the anniversary of the start of the Occupy camp outside St Paul's, accusing the cathedral authorities of colluding with banks and failing to help the poor, The Guardian reports.



Activist Alison Playford shouted: "Your collusion with the City Of London Corporation led to our violent eviction on your doorstep. You testified against us which acted to uphold injustice and inequality that is growing by the day. St Paul's Cathedral, you must stand up and be counted at this great trial of history."



The women later cut their chains and have since declared the action a success. In a statement issued today (October 15), one of the activists, Siobhan Grimes, an Anglican who works for an environmental charity, said: "I chained myself to the pulpit in St Paul's Cathedral in protest about women's economic inequality. As a Christian, I know that my faith teaches through the example of Christ's radical action to protect the poorest and most vulnerable members of society.”



During the group's occupation of St Paul's Cathedral a year ago, a raft of musicians including Billy Bragg, Kate Nash and Enter Shikari turned out to support the movement.

Sunday, 14 October 2012

Tower Hamlets Council clique lied to tenants and residents via "East End Lies" and faked the "dream" future on housing with the RSLs


0845 [0840] [0800] [0730] [0700] [0640] Hrs GMT 
London 
Sunday 14 October 2012. 
EVIDENTIALLY EXCLUSIVELY 
UPDATING THE PREAMBLE 
to the 
KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 
By © Muhammad Haque

The fact that the "East End Lies" is published almost every week and its 'news and features' spaces are filled with
plugs and PR for "the current administration" means that all "sides" that have ever been in power and control of the Council since this little pravda was introduced have abused their position and taken part in pretending that they were "doing things four the community" when the truth ids that they were inducing in propaganda for their own images and for their own cliques, factions that happened to be "in power" at that particular time.
They have, in effect over the years, abolished the 
And the fact that the "East End Lies" is "in-house", that is, it is produced by employees of Tower Hamlets Council means that there is no likelihood that the "manufacturers" of the lies will want to stop lying. It follows that they will carry on telling the lies. For any questioning of the blind [='unquestioning'] PR for the given "current administration" will result in some sort of disciplinary step being taken by the same administration against the "truth teller/s" or against the raiser/s of the ethical questions.
It is thus not just after the model of the USSR-era Pravdas controlled from their Moscow HQs but also of the "Eastern bloc" type culture of fierce propaganda for the sitting regime so noisily associated with the regime of Nicolae Caucescue in Romania.
It is true that the apparatuses that the Romanian regime [which "ended" with the calamitous fall in 1989] had far outweighed in scale and detail those available to the little local regime based at the overly expensively "hired/leased" Mulberry Place in London E14 2BG [at the community's expense and in the name of the community that is treated with increasing obstructiveness and hostility].
But the detrimental purpose to undermine the local community and to sabotage democratic debate and to obstruct the creation of any atmosphere for good service to the local community has been operated to a traceably corrupting extent via the "East End Lies" just as effectively as any Romanian equivalent with a greater scale would have done in Romania before 1989.

I here refer again to the lies that were perpetrated against the rights and the futures of the local Council housing tenants when the stock transfer of Council housing was mounted.
On the surface, the claim was that local tenants were able to exercise their utmost freedom to "choose".
But the truth is that people were given false information, with the aim being to mislead most tenants into "believing" that IF THEY REMAINED WITH THE COUNCIL then their housing needs would suffer and that the ONLY way to make sure that they 
[a] got good housing service  in the immediate future and 
[b] even better hosing service after that was to OPT FOR YES to the transfer of the housing stock.
That that was a lie was confirmed again on Thursday during a radio programme that I presented. A caller [whom I know] made the assertion that the Tower Hamlets Council's housing stock transfer to the identifiable registered social [!!!] landlords was contaminated by corruption  at all levels of the operation, before, during and after.
The caller, Carole, is a known campaigner AGAINST the transfer of the Council housing stock away from Council control and into the holds of the RSLs.
Carole said some of the things that I have known to be true as well.
Like the fact that quite a few people who sit on the so-called Boards of these RSLs are also involved with the Council where they occupy decision-making positions.
That is a conflicting position.
And it is made worse by the failure or rather the refusal on the parts of these individuals to publish the facts of WHAT they do on the Boards and what they SEE as being the behaviour of the "post transfer" RSLs.
The truth of the ROLE of Tower Hamlets Council in ENCOURAGING the CORRUPTING state of affairs to continue is beyond  denial.
How?
Answer: Over four years ago, I started to ask the "DEMOCRATIC SERVICES" [Tower Hamlets Council]  to tell me about Tower Hamlets Council's "representatives" on the RSLs. I did ask to be given the evidence of these "representatives' conduct" on OTHER external outfits and agencies too.

But I particularly focussed on the Council's "representatives" sitting on the RSLs. I asked: what did they do? 
Did they report back to the "democratic Council" on what went on in those organisations and what they, these "representatives" saw there?
Initially, I had asked the then Chief Executive to tell me about these.
The then Chief Executive's office suggested that I asked the Council's Democratic Services about my questions.
I asked who in the Democratic Services would tell me what I had been asking to know.
I was told that a man named John S Williams would be the one to tell me all I wanted to know.
I took that in good faith and asked away.
I even sent - over the four years or so since starting to ask these questions - about a hundred separate, constantly updating communications including emails and telephone messages.
But ANSWER there came NONE from John S Williams.
To begin with, it was not John S Williams that I found myself speaking to, most of the times. Or sending emails to, most of the times.
It was a member of the staff, whom I shall not name here, in my voluntary compliance with the standards of ethics that I apply to my public statements and commentaries.
That member of staff turned out to be a partner in the business of misleading, fabrication and fakery too.
So after four years of efforts, I could not get any evidence from Tower Hamlets Council showing WHAT if anything, the same Council's REPRESENTATIVES on the external "bodies": especially the "registered Social landlords" now controlling the majority of the transferred Council Housing stock DID as they SAT there in the name of the "elected Tower Hamlets Council".

[To be continued]
___________________________________________________________________________

Is Tower Hamlets Council really that dysfunctional when it comes to standards, ethics and legality?

0700 [0640] Hrs GMT London Sunday 14 October 2012. By ©Muhammad Haque.

It must be if the evidence reaching the Khoodeelaar! campaign is anything to go by at all.

Take the latest series of claims promoted via East End Lies [Oops! "East End News"}. Apart from the ever-smiling faces gracing [!] the pages of the very seriously wasteful and misleading little 'pravda', the "title" [!!!!!] scarcely contains any facts that resonate with the lies of most people who constitute the electorate, the community, the neighbourhoods that are still allowed to be in this East End Borough.

This has been the case with the "East End Lies".
When the title was first hyped up and promoted under the "political" administration of the then SDP now Lib Dems there were a lot of promises made about what it would seek to do.

Portray the community as it really is and tell the truth. Almost!

For it is not a given policy on the part of ANY bureaucracy, whatever the bent [INDEED!]  or the orientation, to say things like "we shall tell the truth".

But there is a significance in the fact that the "East End Lies" as it was when I publicly gave it the true title in September 2000 during a session of a meeting held in the Town Hall Chamber, has degenerated even further in the 12 years that have passed.

I shall diagnose and share the key symptoms of the dysfuntionality and the dishonesty peddled by the "East End Lies" that I come across,  in the later parts of this PREAMBLE to the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012.


[To be continued]