2140 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
19 February 2011
Editor © Muhammad Haque
The East End action in concert with the democratic wave that is spreading across north and north east Africa, Asia
In fact the East End of London has been the setting of pro-democracy action for decades.So how is it that this isn’t mentioned by the BBC? Or by the ITV or by Rupert Murdoch's SKY news network? In fact, how is it that the printed symbol [and now ‘aggressively ferociously liberally’ on the Internet] the Guardian does not recognise this?
The answer is that all of these institutions and agencies have got a lot to lose if democratic actions in the inner cities as represented by the democratic activities in the East End of London are recognised.
These agencies will lose in the sense that their roles will be exposed in the process of the truth being told about other agencies and about the stage and its local and regional operations as against the democratic demands and desires ofd ordinary people.
Take the sad case of the Guardian, London, ‘front-controlled’ [this word is devised here and now by AADHIKAR Media] partly by Alan Rusbridger's and ‘wife’ Lindsey Mackie and by Polly Toynbee and assorted other subsidiary fronters on the other hand. Despite overwhelming evidence that the Guardian has been for DECADES suppressing the truth about the fact and the extent of the squalor and the denials and the hardships being caused in Britain by those with controlling powers and influence on what happens to the public resources and to public rights, entitlements, despite undeniable evidence that democracy is being routinely suppressed in all parts of Britain, despite overwhelmingly objectively verifiable evidence that successive regimes. ententes, alliances and Collusions fronting the forces in control of the powers in the UK have been violating all major obligations that are required by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and various related international charters, the GUARDIAN suppresses the main facts and denies the truth.
And yet the Guardian continues to be cited as “the liberal” British media outlet.
How is THAT possible?
How is THAT done?
For an answer, take a look at this week’s GUARDIAN’s role in suppressing the truth of the lies that the CONDEM Cameron mounted on the UK’s most deprived people from a platform based in, yes, in THE BRICK LANE area itself.
[To be continued]
2606th Edition.
1105 Hrs GMT London Sunday 05 October 2014
AADHIKAR Media Foundation.Editor©Muhammad Haque London E1 UK. AADHIKARMEDIA Foundation supporting KHOODEELAAR! Defending the community in the East End of London, including KHEYDAIEELAAR! ‘Keep Banglatown’ IN. In association with 62+non-profit initiatives active 53rd year: The KAY JORDAN FOUNDATION, All Volunteers News, Brick Lane Community
Saturday, 19 February 2011
How is Ed Miliband being used by antidemocratic elements to continue the suppress democratic voices in the inner cities in Britain in February 2011
Exclusive historical diagnosis and updater report on the role played by Ken Livingstone in the 1980s in London in creating an antidemocratic servile ‘press’ that was entirely dependent on funding from the then Greater London Council [GLC].. and which servility destroyed the universal democratic fervour that would have been present in the pages of the small scale news titles and periodicals small groups of [initially passionate campaigners] without exception came from the Asian and African origins and backgrounds...
The neutralising of those campaigners was an act of gross outrage against democracy.....
A quarter of a century on, Ken Livingstone is still at it. In fact on 6 February 2010, Livingstone was featuring in a propaganda slot on a 21st century version of the ‘ethnicity linked’ and ‘GLC-funded’ ‘media’ as he made an intervention against democracy in Tower Hamlets. Livingstone was being shown [Saturday 06 February 2010] as calling for the scrapping of councillors in the democratic context when he called for the introduction and installation of an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets. A few years earlier, Livingstone had called for the scrapping of the democratic remits and say of elected London borough councils. When he was in post in London in the name of the people of London, Livingstone behaved as if he had nothing but contempt for London local councils. This came to the fore whenever Livingstone found any significant resistance to planning permission he was intent on giving to Big Business interests seeking to rob and or contaminate and or destroy London’s environment....
UPDATER DIAGNOSTICS Part 1
1905 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
By © Muhammad Haque
The particular 'event' staged in the past week in the UK Houses of parliament buildings featuring Ed Miliband and the ‘Speaker’ of the House of Commons as toadies being feted by some bizarre ‘ethnicity linked’ outfit in London appears to have been linked with a man who was one of the main recipients of the 'ethnicity linked' 'grants' that the former Greater London Council [GLC] in the early 1980s.
The GLC, as led by Ken Livingstone, was getting almost always favourable coverage in the ‘ethnicty-linked’ ‘newspapers’ published by the ‘ethnic entrepreneurs’. It was that coverage that played THE DECISIVE role in creating the myth that Ken Livingstone was THE FRIEND of the ‘ethnic’ communities. The words and the terms ‘ethnic’ and ‘ethnic minorities’ in the context of London in the years 1981-1986 denoted without substantial variation the communities of people in inner London boroughs who came from Asia and or Africa and in the context of Hackney, Brent, Lambeth, Islington and Southwark from various islands in the Caribbean where the British colonialists had ruled for centuries. The nearest and the only other ‘community’ whose collective image was being literally pressed into serving the propaganda purpose of Ken Livingstone was broadly speaking the one with backgrounds in Ireland and in ‘Northern’ Ireland. [To be continued]
The neutralising of those campaigners was an act of gross outrage against democracy.....
A quarter of a century on, Ken Livingstone is still at it. In fact on 6 February 2010, Livingstone was featuring in a propaganda slot on a 21st century version of the ‘ethnicity linked’ and ‘GLC-funded’ ‘media’ as he made an intervention against democracy in Tower Hamlets. Livingstone was being shown [Saturday 06 February 2010] as calling for the scrapping of councillors in the democratic context when he called for the introduction and installation of an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets. A few years earlier, Livingstone had called for the scrapping of the democratic remits and say of elected London borough councils. When he was in post in London in the name of the people of London, Livingstone behaved as if he had nothing but contempt for London local councils. This came to the fore whenever Livingstone found any significant resistance to planning permission he was intent on giving to Big Business interests seeking to rob and or contaminate and or destroy London’s environment....
UPDATER DIAGNOSTICS Part 1
1905 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
By © Muhammad Haque
The particular 'event' staged in the past week in the UK Houses of parliament buildings featuring Ed Miliband and the ‘Speaker’ of the House of Commons as toadies being feted by some bizarre ‘ethnicity linked’ outfit in London appears to have been linked with a man who was one of the main recipients of the 'ethnicity linked' 'grants' that the former Greater London Council [GLC] in the early 1980s.
The GLC, as led by Ken Livingstone, was getting almost always favourable coverage in the ‘ethnicty-linked’ ‘newspapers’ published by the ‘ethnic entrepreneurs’. It was that coverage that played THE DECISIVE role in creating the myth that Ken Livingstone was THE FRIEND of the ‘ethnic’ communities. The words and the terms ‘ethnic’ and ‘ethnic minorities’ in the context of London in the years 1981-1986 denoted without substantial variation the communities of people in inner London boroughs who came from Asia and or Africa and in the context of Hackney, Brent, Lambeth, Islington and Southwark from various islands in the Caribbean where the British colonialists had ruled for centuries. The nearest and the only other ‘community’ whose collective image was being literally pressed into serving the propaganda purpose of Ken Livingstone was broadly speaking the one with backgrounds in Ireland and in ‘Northern’ Ireland. [To be continued]
Who is framing Ed Miliband AND John Bercow into playing a role about ‘local Tower Hamlets politics’ that is being plotted by secretive agencies?
Who is framing Ed Miliband AND John Bercow into playing a role about ‘local Tower Hamlets politics’ that is being plotted by some strange and unaccountable secret elements?
Who is 'framing' UK House of Commons 'Speaker' John Bercow in the increasingly odd ‘ethnicty-linked’ 'awards' 'events' and such like, being staged somewhere inside or near the ‘Palace of Westminster’?
1045 [1040] [1000] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
19 February 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
It is only a matter of time before the London DAILY MAIL brings to readers another scintillating item featuring Sally Bercow, the highly-publicity-linked ‘spouse’ of the UK’s almost as ‘newsworthy’ Speaker John Bercow.
One of the most important things john Bercow has in his real CV is the fact that he played a very central propaganda role as part of the Federation of Conservative Students [FCS]. The FCS may not feature as an important thing in John Bercow's official bio data these days but he has never distanced himself from the racist ideology of the FCS that was so central in the assaults on the human rights of the people that the FCS had targeted in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
This week it was John Bercow himself who again featured in what appears to have become an ethnicty-linked lobbying route ‘into the UK Parliament’. This diversionary indulgence in antidemocratic peddling has been seen in the utterances that the Official Opposition MPs’ leader Ed Miliband made at an event , apparently organised by another ’ethnicity-linked’ ‘media’ ‘group’.
AADHIKAR Media will shortly be updating our examination of the ethnicty-linked media groups in the context of their activities in and around London over the past decades.
Back to the past week and the role that Ed Miliband appears to have been ill-advised into playing when he made an appearance at the event.
In the appearance, Ed Miliband apparently made utterances that suggest that he supported the view that there should be more people in public life in effect representing the ethnicty-linked composition of the UK Society at present.
The accounts seen so far by AADHIKAR Media so far do not show any evidence that Miliband was referring to Tower Hamlets, as such. Although it has also been confirmed that there were several individuals who could be linked to aspects of ‘public life’ connected to the inner city East London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
The staged event had no democratic linkage to the ordinary lives of the people in Tower Hamlets. Yet strangely, another ‘statement’ was made in the name of Tower Hamlets Council and apparently claiming yet again a huge success and achievement ‘for the people of Tower Hamlets’ ‘by Tower Hamlets Council’. As has become apparent in the past year or so, there was neither a democracy representative nor a legitimate source present to challenge that one-sided propaganda for the Tower Hamlets Council.
As if that were not bad enough for those struggling to hold to democratic audit and local accountability the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council.. the Official Opposition MPs’ leader Ed Miliband has been juxtaposed in images as if he is now endorsing the conduct and the composition and the propaganda being promoted for the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council. We shall be examining and updating on that clique further in view fo the ‘Budget’ formalities scheduled for the middle fo the coming week.
Back to Ed Miliband's appearance, whoever orchestrated or lobby-ed into being.
Ed Miliband is being careless if he thinks that making appearances at these events and issuing statements of the sort he has reportedly made at the event concerned as staged this week in the Palace of Westminster or in its vicinity, is a democratically accountable and legitimate use of the privileges and links that area available to him by the facts of his being an MP as well as the leader of the Official Opposition Party in the present Parliament.
The carelessness is multifaceted.
Firstly because those getting him to appear on these stages are not doing any favours to the democratic and the economic, social and ethical needs,m rights, preferences and concerns let alone demands of the anonymous collections of ordinary people in whose ethnicty-linked and packaged names they are doing their business. This raises the question: Does Ed Miliband know the difference between the invited crowds of alleged ethnicty-linked ‘representatives’ AND the communities of ordinary people out in the communities? There is no evidence to show that Ed Miliband knows this when it matters in the context of the suppression of democratic legitimacy by the Bliared Party bureaucracy of which he is now ‘the leader’ in the context of Tower Hamlets and as being churned out via certain ethnicty-linked but highly dubious and inauthentic outlets as still licensed by the official ‘regulatory’ agencies in place “to regulate the conduct of the media” in the UK. That regulation is absent as far as the contens, the thrust and the disservice to democracy in the inner cities generally and in this context in Tower Hamlets is concerned.
[To be continued]
Who is 'framing' UK House of Commons 'Speaker' John Bercow in the increasingly odd ‘ethnicty-linked’ 'awards' 'events' and such like, being staged somewhere inside or near the ‘Palace of Westminster’?
1045 [1040] [1000] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
19 February 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
It is only a matter of time before the London DAILY MAIL brings to readers another scintillating item featuring Sally Bercow, the highly-publicity-linked ‘spouse’ of the UK’s almost as ‘newsworthy’ Speaker John Bercow.
One of the most important things john Bercow has in his real CV is the fact that he played a very central propaganda role as part of the Federation of Conservative Students [FCS]. The FCS may not feature as an important thing in John Bercow's official bio data these days but he has never distanced himself from the racist ideology of the FCS that was so central in the assaults on the human rights of the people that the FCS had targeted in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
This week it was John Bercow himself who again featured in what appears to have become an ethnicty-linked lobbying route ‘into the UK Parliament’. This diversionary indulgence in antidemocratic peddling has been seen in the utterances that the Official Opposition MPs’ leader Ed Miliband made at an event , apparently organised by another ’ethnicity-linked’ ‘media’ ‘group’.
AADHIKAR Media will shortly be updating our examination of the ethnicty-linked media groups in the context of their activities in and around London over the past decades.
Back to the past week and the role that Ed Miliband appears to have been ill-advised into playing when he made an appearance at the event.
In the appearance, Ed Miliband apparently made utterances that suggest that he supported the view that there should be more people in public life in effect representing the ethnicty-linked composition of the UK Society at present.
The accounts seen so far by AADHIKAR Media so far do not show any evidence that Miliband was referring to Tower Hamlets, as such. Although it has also been confirmed that there were several individuals who could be linked to aspects of ‘public life’ connected to the inner city East London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
The staged event had no democratic linkage to the ordinary lives of the people in Tower Hamlets. Yet strangely, another ‘statement’ was made in the name of Tower Hamlets Council and apparently claiming yet again a huge success and achievement ‘for the people of Tower Hamlets’ ‘by Tower Hamlets Council’. As has become apparent in the past year or so, there was neither a democracy representative nor a legitimate source present to challenge that one-sided propaganda for the Tower Hamlets Council.
As if that were not bad enough for those struggling to hold to democratic audit and local accountability the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council.. the Official Opposition MPs’ leader Ed Miliband has been juxtaposed in images as if he is now endorsing the conduct and the composition and the propaganda being promoted for the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council. We shall be examining and updating on that clique further in view fo the ‘Budget’ formalities scheduled for the middle fo the coming week.
Back to Ed Miliband's appearance, whoever orchestrated or lobby-ed into being.
Ed Miliband is being careless if he thinks that making appearances at these events and issuing statements of the sort he has reportedly made at the event concerned as staged this week in the Palace of Westminster or in its vicinity, is a democratically accountable and legitimate use of the privileges and links that area available to him by the facts of his being an MP as well as the leader of the Official Opposition Party in the present Parliament.
The carelessness is multifaceted.
Firstly because those getting him to appear on these stages are not doing any favours to the democratic and the economic, social and ethical needs,m rights, preferences and concerns let alone demands of the anonymous collections of ordinary people in whose ethnicty-linked and packaged names they are doing their business. This raises the question: Does Ed Miliband know the difference between the invited crowds of alleged ethnicty-linked ‘representatives’ AND the communities of ordinary people out in the communities? There is no evidence to show that Ed Miliband knows this when it matters in the context of the suppression of democratic legitimacy by the Bliared Party bureaucracy of which he is now ‘the leader’ in the context of Tower Hamlets and as being churned out via certain ethnicty-linked but highly dubious and inauthentic outlets as still licensed by the official ‘regulatory’ agencies in place “to regulate the conduct of the media” in the UK. That regulation is absent as far as the contens, the thrust and the disservice to democracy in the inner cities generally and in this context in Tower Hamlets is concerned.
[To be continued]
THE BRICK LANE DRAMA REHEARSALS 19 February 2011 Transcript-1
THE BRICK LANE DRAMA
REHEARSALS
19 February 2011
Transcript-1
Question: Why doesn’t the Council do anything to stop the rot in the local community?
Answer: The Council doesn't have to do anything.
Question: Why?
Answer: Because the Council, that is the candidates for Council ward elections, when the election comes, these candidates get their votes delivered to them on a plate. By the ‘leaders’; of these ‘community organisations’
Question: Who delivers the votes?
Answer: These ‘community organisations’.
Question: How do they do that?
Answer: That is when they activate the Village Button.
Question: You mean that is when they PRESS the Village Button?
Answer: The same thing!
Question: Yes. But “press the village buttons” sounds cuter!
Answer: Yes it does. Let’s use it then. Here goes: “That is when the community organisations press the village button to get their co-villagers living in the area to cast the votes in the boxes for the candidates chosen!”
Ends transcript 1
Scene 1
Act 1
London Saturday 19 February 2011
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
AADHIKAR Media Foundation
AVNews
Kay Jordan Foundation
KHOODEELAAR!
Updates
http://twitter.com/khoodeelaar
REHEARSALS
19 February 2011
Transcript-1
Question: Why doesn’t the Council do anything to stop the rot in the local community?
Answer: The Council doesn't have to do anything.
Question: Why?
Answer: Because the Council, that is the candidates for Council ward elections, when the election comes, these candidates get their votes delivered to them on a plate. By the ‘leaders’; of these ‘community organisations’
Question: Who delivers the votes?
Answer: These ‘community organisations’.
Question: How do they do that?
Answer: That is when they activate the Village Button.
Question: You mean that is when they PRESS the Village Button?
Answer: The same thing!
Question: Yes. But “press the village buttons” sounds cuter!
Answer: Yes it does. Let’s use it then. Here goes: “That is when the community organisations press the village button to get their co-villagers living in the area to cast the votes in the boxes for the candidates chosen!”
Ends transcript 1
Scene 1
Act 1
London Saturday 19 February 2011
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
AADHIKAR Media Foundation
AVNews
Kay Jordan Foundation
KHOODEELAAR!
Updates
http://twitter.com/khoodeelaar