2210 Hrs GMT
London
Friday
28 january 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
One of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign’s diagnostic and evidential pillars has been our still active assertion that the “railway” bureaucracy in Britain is corrupt to the core. Today’s “news’ featured on the Times front-page merely touches the surface. KHOODEELAAR! has said since January 20904 that Crossrail has been a front for the corrupt cabal that actually holds most of the powerful positions in the UK’s railway bureaucracy.
The front-page of the TOWER HAMLETS RECORDER dated 27 October 2004 was devoted to the first KHOODEELAAR! demonstration held in the Greatorex Street against the complicity of the Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘leadership’ with Crossrail hole attacks on the community . The main montage features Kay Jordan holding a campaign banner that Kay herself had helped design to show the effects on the Brick Lane London E1 area of the then planned Dirt Hole......[To be continued]
2606th Edition.
1105 Hrs GMT London Sunday 05 October 2014
AADHIKAR Media Foundation.Editor©Muhammad Haque London E1 UK. AADHIKARMEDIA Foundation supporting KHOODEELAAR! Defending the community in the East End of London, including KHEYDAIEELAAR! ‘Keep Banglatown’ IN. In association with 62+non-profit initiatives active 53rd year: The KAY JORDAN FOUNDATION, All Volunteers News, Brick Lane Community
Friday, 28 January 2011
DAILY MAIL and Times begin to echo the KHOODEELAAR! campaign's investigative work that had exposed the dishonesty of City of London interests...
DAILY MAIL and Times begin to echo the KHOODEELAAR! campaign's investigative work that had exposed the dishonesty of City of London interests...
2145 [2000] [1955]
[1920] [1800]
Hrs GMT
London
Friday
28 January 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
Organiser, KHOODEELAAR! No “to Crossrail hole...” Campaign.
With the CONDEM assault on Society in the UK looking very exposed as it unravels, the East End of London can note yet another vindication of the accurate diagnosis which the Khoodeelaar! campaign had been making of the behaviour and the related, conduct-linked personalities of a number of key players long before they were thought to be heading for the spotlight that they are in now.
The UK CONDEM finance minister George Osborne’s admission to Channel 4 News, just broadcast, that “more investment” was needed to get the UK economy anywhere near the level where the German economy was performing at present again illustrates the utter lack of sense in the CONDEM ‘economic recovery policy’! Why? Because Osborne only uttered his string of slogans after Channel 4 News Economics editor Faisal Islam pointed out the “relatively better performance” by the German economy. Moments previously, Faislal Islam had referred to the US economy too doing better than the UK one under the CONDEM regime. Osborne looked blank. In fact he looked blank throughout the “interview” that he went through with Faisal Islam. Apart from anything else, he would look a complete fool if he made any move to physically get off from the encounter with Faisal islam and the Channel 4 News camera crew.
Osborne was challenged on his blaming the snow of the last quarters economic performance.
The Khoodeelaar! campaign against Big Business agenda Crossrail hole assault had warned seven years ago this month that the scam was being driven by people who were using the transport slogan to actually loot and rob the UK public.
For seven years, KHOODEELAAR! campaign has diagnosed reach and every key evidence and has published the findings. Not a single one of the mainstream parties has backed us in that time. Yet on all key counts, the Khoodeelaar! diagnosis has been proven correct and our conclusions vindicated.
As it is again vindicated today [Friday 28 January 2011].
This is on the Times newspaper front page today. As it is also online on the Daily Mail web portal.
Today’s ‘mainstream media’ coverage also reinforces the Khoodeelaar! campaign analysis maintained for the past seven years of the behaviour of the ‘railway bureaucracy’. We found evidence pretty early on as we set of to stop that the ones who were fronting the propaganda label ‘Crossrail’ were lying. Their lying meant that they could not be trusted on anything they they said. Neither on the unspecified, vaguely uttered benefits that they were saying the East End would receive from “Crossrail” nor on the reasoning for the Crossrail hole route that constituted the central threat to this part of London. A key aspect of their lying was unearthed by Kay Jordan who deployed her engineering, design and architectural prowess in her determination to find the truth beyond the lies that we were being told. Kay came across the ‘little known’ matter of the Heron Tower. We were in the first part of 2004 when Kay began exploring. By the time the full extent and the implications of the role played by ‘the Heron Tower’ in the Crossrail hole plan against the Brick Lane London E1 area, our campaign had already established the main parameters and set out the defining details of the democratic case against Crossrail. It was still a long while before the SUNDAY TIMES insignificantly caught up on the Heron Tower link. But they did it to aid and abet Boris Johnson. Their angle was the link that one of the Guinness trial jailbirds [by now ‘ex’ jail bird] had with Ken Livingstone. The SUNDAY TIMES didn’t publish anything about our campaign. Yet it was our campaign that had made the Heron Tower at all a ‘public interest issue’! Khoodeelaar! was again vindicated because we had argued for more than four years already that the “City of London” “interests” had untenable links with the still actively-in-office [‘incumbent’ doesn’t say as much, does it as ‘still actively in office’] [in the name of the people of London] Ken Livingstone.
[To be continued]
2145 [2000] [1955]
[1920] [1800]
Hrs GMT
London
Friday
28 January 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
Organiser, KHOODEELAAR! No “to Crossrail hole...” Campaign.
With the CONDEM assault on Society in the UK looking very exposed as it unravels, the East End of London can note yet another vindication of the accurate diagnosis which the Khoodeelaar! campaign had been making of the behaviour and the related, conduct-linked personalities of a number of key players long before they were thought to be heading for the spotlight that they are in now.
The UK CONDEM finance minister George Osborne’s admission to Channel 4 News, just broadcast, that “more investment” was needed to get the UK economy anywhere near the level where the German economy was performing at present again illustrates the utter lack of sense in the CONDEM ‘economic recovery policy’! Why? Because Osborne only uttered his string of slogans after Channel 4 News Economics editor Faisal Islam pointed out the “relatively better performance” by the German economy. Moments previously, Faislal Islam had referred to the US economy too doing better than the UK one under the CONDEM regime. Osborne looked blank. In fact he looked blank throughout the “interview” that he went through with Faisal Islam. Apart from anything else, he would look a complete fool if he made any move to physically get off from the encounter with Faisal islam and the Channel 4 News camera crew.
Osborne was challenged on his blaming the snow of the last quarters economic performance.
The Khoodeelaar! campaign against Big Business agenda Crossrail hole assault had warned seven years ago this month that the scam was being driven by people who were using the transport slogan to actually loot and rob the UK public.
For seven years, KHOODEELAAR! campaign has diagnosed reach and every key evidence and has published the findings. Not a single one of the mainstream parties has backed us in that time. Yet on all key counts, the Khoodeelaar! diagnosis has been proven correct and our conclusions vindicated.
As it is again vindicated today [Friday 28 January 2011].
This is on the Times newspaper front page today. As it is also online on the Daily Mail web portal.
Today’s ‘mainstream media’ coverage also reinforces the Khoodeelaar! campaign analysis maintained for the past seven years of the behaviour of the ‘railway bureaucracy’. We found evidence pretty early on as we set of to stop that the ones who were fronting the propaganda label ‘Crossrail’ were lying. Their lying meant that they could not be trusted on anything they they said. Neither on the unspecified, vaguely uttered benefits that they were saying the East End would receive from “Crossrail” nor on the reasoning for the Crossrail hole route that constituted the central threat to this part of London. A key aspect of their lying was unearthed by Kay Jordan who deployed her engineering, design and architectural prowess in her determination to find the truth beyond the lies that we were being told. Kay came across the ‘little known’ matter of the Heron Tower. We were in the first part of 2004 when Kay began exploring. By the time the full extent and the implications of the role played by ‘the Heron Tower’ in the Crossrail hole plan against the Brick Lane London E1 area, our campaign had already established the main parameters and set out the defining details of the democratic case against Crossrail. It was still a long while before the SUNDAY TIMES insignificantly caught up on the Heron Tower link. But they did it to aid and abet Boris Johnson. Their angle was the link that one of the Guinness trial jailbirds [by now ‘ex’ jail bird] had with Ken Livingstone. The SUNDAY TIMES didn’t publish anything about our campaign. Yet it was our campaign that had made the Heron Tower at all a ‘public interest issue’! Khoodeelaar! was again vindicated because we had argued for more than four years already that the “City of London” “interests” had untenable links with the still actively-in-office [‘incumbent’ doesn’t say as much, does it as ‘still actively in office’] [in the name of the people of London] Ken Livingstone.
[To be continued]
Nowhere is the poverty-creation programme going on as rampantly as it is in the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
1228 [1225] [1200] Hrs GMT
London
Friday
28 January 2011.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
How far is the “City of London” from the inner city. ‘deprived’ East End of London? Not far at all;. In fact the “City of London” is almost upon the East End, so far and far reaching has been its agenda of take-over and occupation! This has not however changed the centuries long tactics or agenda of exploitation and looting that have taken place in the iniquitous relationship.
The ideology of caprice, greed, avarice and immorality and acquisition is as rampant in the behaviour of the “City of London” today as it always has been.
And in her daily struggle to keep the greedy ones away from the ordinary people typically inhabiting the Brick Lane London E1 area, Kay Jordan in the past 30 years has had to deal with some of the most immoral “city of London” profiteers. We shall UPDATE on that battle, starting with one particular assailant [Oops! “City of London” “entrepreneur”!].
As a contextual introduction to that OVERDUE UPDATE, we shall take a detailed look at the role of the lower courts in the English judicial system in CREATING poverty, hardship, dispossession in the inner city areas.
Nowhere is the poverty-creation programme going on as rampantly as it is in the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
[To be continued]
London
Friday
28 January 2011.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
How far is the “City of London” from the inner city. ‘deprived’ East End of London? Not far at all;. In fact the “City of London” is almost upon the East End, so far and far reaching has been its agenda of take-over and occupation! This has not however changed the centuries long tactics or agenda of exploitation and looting that have taken place in the iniquitous relationship.
The ideology of caprice, greed, avarice and immorality and acquisition is as rampant in the behaviour of the “City of London” today as it always has been.
And in her daily struggle to keep the greedy ones away from the ordinary people typically inhabiting the Brick Lane London E1 area, Kay Jordan in the past 30 years has had to deal with some of the most immoral “city of London” profiteers. We shall UPDATE on that battle, starting with one particular assailant [Oops! “City of London” “entrepreneur”!].
As a contextual introduction to that OVERDUE UPDATE, we shall take a detailed look at the role of the lower courts in the English judicial system in CREATING poverty, hardship, dispossession in the inner city areas.
Nowhere is the poverty-creation programme going on as rampantly as it is in the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
[To be continued]