Racist criminals' attacks in Brick Lane August-Sept 2012 - UPDATER 05 Oct 2014

Racist criminals' attacks in Brick Lane August-Sept 2012 - UPDATER 05 Oct 2014
1111 Hrs GMT London Sunday 05 October 2014

The racist criminals’ attacks in Brick Lane London E1 6RU in August-September 2012.

DETAILS of the evidential data in the MONTAGED REPORT 1111 GMT London Sunday 05 October 2014.

The racist (male) thug who fronted the gang and did the crimes on the ground floor (left), his co-racist (who stood at a window near the “Union Jack” shown) in the building on the Code St. chanted racist abuse aiming it at the target of the racist attacks going on at the time.

That racist, a female as pointed by the black arrow) (right) had not been known until then.. She ‘joined in’ and boosted the racist thug doing the attacks on the ground (located at general spot pointed in the white arrow, left)



Tory PM Cameron's Minister Newmark gives cause for Asian sex groom criminals a cause to "rejoice"!

Tory PM Cameron's Minister Newmark gives cause for Asian sex groom criminals a cause to "rejoice"!
0630 Hrs GMT London Monday 29 september 2014


This is a 2005 picture of the sex-groomer minister Brooks Newmark with his wife Lucy


REELING OFF Rotherham


and the Cameron Minister who was in effect a groomer too!

How a Cameron Minister WOULD groom a young blonde!


Whether that person was real or not, would not matter to Brooks Newmark!
The attempt now to underplay THAT by pleading "entrapment" by an undercover reporter would not remove the impact..


The man was out of order in what he was voluntarily sending and asking for on the belief at the time he was communicating with a real young blonde female...!


Most of the psychological tactics and the ‘plausible’ stuff he sent can be found, in different words and on different dates etc, in the details of the perpetration by so many of the Rotherham, Rochdale groomers!


It must not matter what so-called Political Party the Sunday Mirror supposedly backs.


Look at the thousands of items the Tory backing titles do against Labour!
And against other anti-Tory groups, activists across the land.


[To be continued]



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2772489/I-complete-fool-admits-Tory-minister-Brooks-Newmark-forced-quit-sending-explicit-photos-Paisley-pyjamas.html  The 'blonde PR girl' who brought down a minister: Tory sent explicit pictures of himself in his...

The image of the glamorous blonde '20 something Tory' was used on a fake Twitter account, set up by an undercover reporter to entice the married...

DAILYMAIL.CO.UK

Cliff Richard "about" Brick Lane! This linkage is purely evidential, analytical, legal

Cliff Richard "about" Brick Lane! This linkage is purely evidential, analytical, legal
0548 Hrs GMT London Monday 29 September 2014


Editor © Muhammad Haque

KHOODEELAAR! Action UPDATES 24.7 on

twitter.com/khoodeelaar

contextually bringing up to date the Community’s Defence against the Assault and Takeover and Displacement Agenda of Big Biz City of London who are operating their Agenda with the collusion of the corrupt controlling clique in the London Borough of Tower Ha mlets Council



This is a MailOnline (the London Daily Mail’s web portal) item about CLIFF RICHARD feeling so insulted after his home in Sunningdale, Berkshire had been raided by the Police and shown by the BBC that Richard is now selling that estate


How would Richard be seen by the gang of criminally motivated criminals and wrongdoers if they had perpetrated their crimes and wrongs on a plot to attack his home, work space and more sited in Brick Lane in August 2012 if he were there in August 2012?
What WOULD Cliff Richard say if he witnessed what the racist criminals and wrongdoers actually did do in Brick Lane in August 2012 and September 2012

[To be continued]


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2772929/I-m-selling-3million-home-police-violated-child-abuse-raid-says-Sir-Cliff.html


EXPOSING Nasty Neo Cons on the political platforms Sunday 28 Sept 2014

EXPOSING Nasty Neo Cons on the political platforms Sunday 28 Sept 2014
By © Muhammad Haque


1805 [1735] [1724] Hrs GMT London Sunday 28 September 2014.


REELING OFF the Nasty pro-war pro-racist anti democracy pro-Poverty-creation political army of Neo Connivers...


Pro-war right winger and Boris-groupie & political fanatic Nadine Dorries looked on SKY NEWS Murnaghan as if she would physically stop Livingstone from speaking. She did this repeatedly throughout this morning’s edition of the Murnaghan programme where she appeared with Livingstone to “review” the Sunday papers.


Dorries behaved as aggressively as her “idol” the original liar Boris Johnson who came across as the Nasty piece of work in April 2012 in the run up to the “mayor of London” poll when he (Boris Johnson) exaggerated Livingstone's tax lies into a general lying trait.


On a pure point of principle, I took up the right to reply that Livingstone was being denied. I published extensively and was, so far as I know, the only commentator to do so on all the London Media web sites that I could access and post n at the time.


Boris is the worse offender when it comes to lying on an industrial scale.


Dorries LOVES that political opportunist, Big Biz Agenda operator careerist liar and is dying for Boris to push Cameron out... ..so she can get in..... Very Nasty prospects indeed...


[The diagnostic, evidential dissection of and OPPOSITION to the Neo Conniving liars to be continued]

EXPOSING Nasty Neo Cons on the political platforms Sunday 28 Sept 2014

EXPOSING Nasty Neo Cons on the political platforms Sunday 28 Sept 2014
By © Muhammad Haque


1805 [1735] [1724] Hrs GMT London Sunday 28 September 2014.


REELING OFF the Nasty pro-war pro-racist anti democracy pro-Poverty-creation political army of Neo Connivers...


Pro-war right winger and Boris-groupie & political fanatic Nadine Dorries looked on SKY NEWS Murnaghan as if she would physically stop Livingstone from speaking. She did this repeatedly throughout this morning’s edition of the Murnaghan programme where she appeared with Livingstone to “review” the Sunday papers.


Dorries behaved as aggressively as her “idol” the original liar Boris Johnson who came across as the Nasty piece of work in April 2012 in the run up to the “mayor of London” poll when he (Boris Johnson) exaggerated Livingstone's tax lies into a general lying trait.


On a pure point of principle, I took up the right to reply that Livingstone was being denied. I published extensively and was, so far as I know, the only commentator to do so on all the London Media web sites that I could access and post n at the time.


Boris is the worse offender when it comes to lying on an industrial scale.


Dorries LOVES that political opportunist, Big Biz Agenda operator careerist liar and is dying for Boris to push Cameron out... ..so she can get in..... Very Nasty prospects indeed...


[The diagnostic, evidential dissection of and OPPOSITION to the Neo Conniving liars to be continued]

Demanding justice for RUBEL AHMED and other tweets on Monday 08 September 2014

Demanding justice for RUBEL AHMED and other tweets on Monday 08 September 2014
1738 GMT London Monday 08 September 2014.

 Editor © Muhammad Haque.

 KHOODEELAAR! Original diagnostic tweets so far today covering Theresa May's negligent Immigration Detention Centre (where 26 year old Bangladeshi Rubel Ahmed was neglected to his death), the corrupt (Sub-Trotskyite) "British Left" outlets' shielding of the corrupt clique in Tower Hamlets;

Rotherham Council's chief executive's belated resignation and Tower Hamlets Council's Neo Conservative councillor Peter Golds’ continuing distance from the ordinary issues and demands, needs and concerns of the people of and in Tower Hamlets. 

The tweets are to be read in the order of the latest one appearing first...

 KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  37m Unless it is part of t' NeoCon Big Biz Joint Enterprise! Is that why he has been as silent on Poverty, Housing & general lack of standards? Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  39m T’ takeover of huge parts of Tower Hamlets by Big Biz hasn’t featured in any of Peter Gold's highest profiled coverage via Fleet St. Why? Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  42m views, needs and opinions. So far, Peter Golds has not shown he belongs with the people in and of Tower Hamlets. He runs back to TaxPayers! Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  43m The only way forward in Tower Hamlets is by shedding the racist gear and moving into the community where people have real diversity of... Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  45m We also share with Peter Golds a secret: his racist pal & sewer linked to “Fleet Street” will not, cannot salvage him in Tower Hamlets. Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

 Birmingham  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  47m But so far, Peter Golds has behaved with demonstrable ignorance & prejudice and t’ more he does so t’ less credible he gets! That’s a Shame! Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  50m But that has not stopped us from seeing the other stuff he has been saying as well. So we are not blinkered. We are not prejudiced either. Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  51m

We have of course condemned him for that racist idiocy on the Channel Servile when he made a racist remark over the word “Banglatown” Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  53m

Over t’ past four years, we have consistently asked him t explain WHY he staged t’ U-Turn on t’ undemocratic Mayor system. He’s been Silent! Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  55m that he has to come out of his safe, comfy zone of being installed in t’ certain safety of being an out and out “Ultra Intolerant Neo Con”! Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  58m T’ KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has an emphatic ethical record of giving Peter Golds due credit on things that deserve credit. We also point out... Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  1h He says "tax payers" more often than he says "electors", "voters", "people". Tax Payers only cover so much, Peter Golds. Reach out to voters Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  1h Peter Golds risks being confirmed the most boring Tory to haunt t’ Tower Hamlets Council corrupt clique to date. Get original, Peter. Fast! Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

 Birmingham  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  1h Tower Hamlets Tory Cllrs. group leader Peter Golds has got to get his act together. Playing repeatedly very old & inappropriate blames bore! Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  2h Theresa May must answer the Questions on why Rubel Ahmed was neglected by Morton Hall Detention Centre LINCS. staff https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2014/09/518065.html … Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

 Birmingham  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  2h 1624GMT UPDATE on Rubel Ahmed who was deliberately neglected by Theresa May's Detention Centre staff who left him to die of heart illness Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

 Westminster, London  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  3h Quoting the Guardian: "after it emerged councillors, police and social services turned a blind eye to the abuse of at least 1,400 children." Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

 Westminster, London  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  4h 1441GMT Tower Hamlets has 3 buildings out of 13 in all of London that have caused London Fire Crews to attend calls on Lifts! That bad! Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

 Westminster, London  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  4h 1426GMT.Tower Hamlets Council BOASTS of being an anti-social Council, as Delafield House features in the list of shame calls to 999 Crews Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

 Westminster, London  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  4h Really? Is that all they can do? Hundreds more must go! "Rotherham Council Chief Martin Kimber Resigns Following Child Sex Abuse Scandal" Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

 Birmingham  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  5h Tower Hamlets Council is operated by cabals of irresponsible, anti-social personnel making decisions to neglect t’ demographics daily. Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  6h That lying operative is one of the evidential bases for our Question: Is it a bearded liar or is he a liar with a beard? Reply
Replied to 0 times Retweet
Retweeted 0 times Favorite
Favorited 0 times More

  KHOODEELAAR! @khoodeelaar  ·  6h That operative wore on the outside the gear that made him look a "devout Muslim" but was -and is- an out and out lying criminal fabricator.


Contexting RACISTS' attacks in BRICK LANE August-Sept 2012

Contexting RACISTS' attacks in  BRICK LANE August-Sept 2012
1924 [1846] [1817] GMT

LONDON SATURDAY 06 SEPTEMBER 2014

PUTTING in the context of Brick Lane (and the racist attacks there in August and September 2012 ) THE DAILY MAIL'S REPORT (MailOnline London Saturday 06 September 2014) of "anti-English" "racist attacks" in Scotland....

RACISTS carried out a series of attacks in BRICK LANE two years ago (which continued) today 06 September 2012.

The impact of the racists’ attacks carried out with the collusion of Tower Hamlets Council is still being assessed within Tower Hamlets Council.

The preliminary estimates of the costs of the racist criminals and wrongdoers’ attacks have exceeded £100 Million.

The racist criminal fronting the attacks and wrongdoing has already been exposed as a calculated liar who created an aggravated liability for Tower Hamlets Council by adding a defamatory statement aimed at the target of the racist wrongdoing and attacks on 2012.

Tower Hamlets Council has “apologised unreservedly” and even made an offer of £££.

But BOTH have been rejected by the Claimant.

While the same racist criminal lying of the same racist liar has been has included as part of the key evidence in a Complaint against a “solicitor” (based at an address in Brick Lane at the time of the racist attacks in August 2012 and September 2012).

The Legal Ombudsman in their specific ruling have found in favour of the Complainant and have ruled that the Solicitor trading as a sole-trader should apologise to the Complainant.

[To be continued]


Contexting RACISTS' attacks in BRICK LANE August-Sept 2012

Contexting RACISTS' attacks in  BRICK LANE August-Sept 2012
1924 [1846] [1817] GMT

LONDON SATURDAY 06 SEPTEMBER 2014

PUTTING in the context of Brick Lane (and the racist attacks there in August and September 2012 ) THE DAILY MAIL'S REPORT (MailOnline London Saturday 06 September 2014) of "anti-English" "racist attacks" in Scotland....

RACISTS carried out a series of attacks in BRICK LANE two years ago (which continued) today 06 September 2012.

The impact of the racists’ attacks carried out with the collusion of Tower Hamlets Council is still being assessed within Tower Hamlets Council.

The preliminary estimates of the costs of the racist criminals and wrongdoers’ attacks have exceeded £100 Million.

The racist criminal fronting the attacks and wrongdoing has already been exposed as a calculated liar who created an aggravated liability for Tower Hamlets Council by adding a defamatory statement aimed at the target of the racist wrongdoing and attacks on 2012.

Tower Hamlets Council has “apologised unreservedly” and even made an offer of £££.

But BOTH have been rejected by the Claimant.

While the same racist criminal lying of the same racist liar has been has included as part of the key evidence in a Complaint against a “solicitor” (based at an address in Brick Lane at the time of the racist attacks in August 2012 and September 2012).

The Legal Ombudsman in their specific ruling have found in favour of the Complainant and have ruled that the Solicitor trading as a sole-trader should apologise to the Complainant.

[To be continued]


Defend the Community in the East End of London by stopping telling lies

Defend the Community in the East End of London by stopping telling lies
2020 Hrs GMT

London Friday 05 September 2014

The best way to Defend the Community in the East End of London is to stop telling lies which lies the local Tower Hamlets Council has been telling on an “industrials scale” as the phrase now goes.

And to start telling the truth. And to stop colluding with the City of London, Big Biz and Big Finance crooks. Big Finance IS Big crooks!

[To be continued]



KHOODEELAAR! first diagnosis of the High Court ruling on Tower Hamlets Council this week - 1

KHOODEELAAR! first diagnosis of the High Court ruling on Tower Hamlets Council this week - 1
Editor © Muhammad Haque

24.7 twitter.com/khoodeelaar

UPDATERS by KHOODEELAAR! ACTION DEFENDING the Community in the East End of London agains the Agenda of Big Biz takeover being carried out via the cabal in control of Tower Hamlets Council’s “Bureaucracy” as is typified in the daily loss of Tower Hamlets land and say to Big Biz takeover merchants and City of London Agenda couriers and occupiers.



1920 [1900] [1825] GMT Friday 05 September 2014.

KHOODEELAAR! Action Diagnosing the “jurisprudence” about Tower Hamlets Council and the implications of it for the behaviour of the said Council in relation to the rights of the people in the geographical Community covered by Tower Hamlets.

Contextually evidentially citing and strictly as a reference an item we have retrieved just now from the website called eastlondonadvertier.co.uk stating that it is reporting on the ruling by a High Court judge in London earlier this week.

The eastlondonadvertier.co.uk web site does not give a date when the said judge had given the ruling in the High Court.

However, we cite the piece strictly as a contextual reference and to ALSO diagnostically make the point that - regardless of the details of the judge’s “reasoning” - the key, the crux of that ruling (if it is later found to have been given without prejudice, bias and with no racism in the thinking underlying the judgement) VINDICATES those of us who have maintained, consistently, concisely (as well as ind detail at ties) that the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council is bad news; that the clique is in denial; that the clique is dishonest; that the clique is corrupt; that the clique is illegally engaged in breaking the duties and the obligations the “Council” owes to the people in the Community in the “London Borough of Tower Hamlets” which - LBTH - is the area, the geographic, the demography called Tower Hamlets area than and as clearly different from any controlling clique or cabal called “Tower Hamlets”.

Finally at this stage we say:
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!
That the succession of overpaid licensed law traders in the name of Tower Hamlets people has been paid on false pretence and that most of these licensed law traders have been exposed as being ignorant, incompetent and dishonest.

These “licensed law traders” are as they have been unfit for purpose.. UP TO NO GOOD!

These licensed law traders are easily evidentially, demonstrably called licensed liars.

[To be continued]





http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/tower_hamlets_bid_to_stop_town_hall_audit_rejected_by_high_court_judge_1_3759302

Tower Hamlets bid to stop Town Hall audit rejected by High Court judge

LBTH Mayor Lutfur Rahman (left)

and Communities Secretary Eric Pickles Mike Brooke

Friday, September 5, 2014

3:51 PM

A top High Court judge has this week rejected attempts by Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman to halt a major inspection of his council’s public spending which had been ordered by Communities Secretary Eric Pickles.

The Town Hall applied for a judicial review in July to stop an audit by Pricewaterhouse-Coopers into its finances—which was ordered by the Secretary of State more than three months earlier over allegations of fraud and financial mismanagement.

But Judge Kenneth Parker has thrown out Mayor Rahman’s application on several grounds including legality.

“The first ground is hopeless,” his statement says. “The defendant (Mr Pickles) was plainly entitled to exercise his common law power to ask an expert body (Pricewaterhouse-Coopers) to assist him by providing advice on any aspect of public affairs that was of potential concern to him.”

Mr Justice Parker adds:



“Where concerns have been raised that a local authority is poorly governed, poorly managed financially and may even have engaged in fraud, it stands to reason that there must be concerns as to whether such an authority has exercised its functions as economically, efficiently and effectively as could properly have been expected. The contrary is simply not arguable.”



There were also serious issues of delay, the judge pointed out. The audit was ordered on April 4, but the council applied for a judicial review as late as July.

The application “plainly has to be brought within days—not months,” the judge pointed out.

Legislation which makes the local authority pick up the tabs for a Government-ordered audit came into effect on April 3, a day before Mr Pickles sent in the auditors. The judge said:

“The council allowed the inspector to carry out an investigation for a substantial period, no doubt at considerable public expense, before launching its belated challenge and asking months later for the decision to be quashed. “There is no good reason for extending the time in which this claim (by the council) should have been brought.”

The council’s next move is for an oral hearing in which its QC Jonathan Swift will challenge the audit. The hearing would decide if a full judicial review should go ahead.

A Town Hall spokesman confirmed this-afternoon: “We will now be proceeding to apply for an oral hearing, which will be lodged today. “ The audit—thought to be costing £1 million so far—follows allegations about misuse of public funds in a BBC Panorama programme just before May’s local elections.

Attempts to halt the audit follows another High Court rejection of a council move to throw out a petition claiming fraud at the polls. Tory group Opposition leader Peter Golds called the latest High Court rejection “an extraordinary indictment of the management of the council”.



Cllr Golds added: “Twice in four days Rahman has been severely criticised by different High Court judges.”

Tories claim the audit investigation was “another example of Rahman treating the taxpayer as a personal ‘piggy bank’ for his own ego.”



Human rights matter! Especially when the anti-human rights Daily Mail BACKS human rights

Human rights matter! Especially when the anti-human rights Daily Mail BACKS human rights
1248 Hrs GMT London Monday 01 September 2014. When the London Daily Mail (MailOnline as its web operations portal is called) uses the two words "human rights" in the approbate way without pejoration then the Neo Conniving belligerent Big Biz Corporate Warmongers who defy all notions of human rights must pause and listen.

EU Contraventions of Human Rights of 5 year old cancer child

EU Contraventions of Human Rights of 5 year old cancer child
By © Muhammad Haque

0700 [0628] GMT. London Monday 01 September 2014.

We use the clip from the SKY NEWS PRESS PREVIEW aired on 31 August 2014 as a piece of evidence. The wider context will be explained in the UPDATES that we shall post following this initial publication via youtube.

We call it three European States' Contravention of Human Rights of the Dangerously ill 5 year old, parents, the siblings

AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Campaign diagnostic item focussing on the brazen violations of the European Conventions on Human Rights

[To be UPDATED]



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I59dez-OWQQ&feature=youtu.be



UPDATER Video Commentary on George Galloway, after the attack on him in Notting Hill

UPDATER Video Commentary  on George Galloway, after the attack on him in Notting Hill
1518 Hrs GMT London Sunday 31 August 2014.

AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Action Original video exclusively recorded, Edited and posted online in the past 18 minutes.

AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Action File containing the full SKYNEWS Piece about the Mail on Sunday (see below) piece by-lined to George Galloway describing his feelings and reactions to the attack on him on Friday 29 August 2014.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLi-MKDb7LQ&feature=youtu.be



'I crashed to the ground thinking... this man is going to kick me to death':

George Galloway reveals his terror after attack in Notting Hill - and how he led police to suspect George Galloway was left with broken rib when he was assaulted in street He also suffered a badly bruised face following violent attack in Notting Hill Below, the Respect MP reveals how he feared for his life during incident

By GEORGE GALLOWAY

FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY

PUBLISHED: 22:11, 30 August 2014 | UPDATED: 22:11, 30 August 2014

30 shares

I was walking down the street in Notting Hill in broad daylight and getting into my car when two Moroccan guys approached me.

One of them said he was leaving Britain the next day and would love a photo with me for his cafe back home. I stood in the road shaking hands with him as his friend took a picture. Out of the corner of my eye I saw a man powering towards me like a bat out of hell.

[Caption to picture on the MailOnline website] George Galloway was left with a broken rib and bruising when he was assaulted by a man in street

He laid into me and was effing and blinding about the Holocaust. He looked like the type who works out and moved very fast.

He punched me so many times I kept thinking, ‘When is this going to stop?’

But it didn’t.

I went into what boxers call ‘peekaboo style’ like American heavyweight Floyd Patterson when he fought Muhammad Ali, covering my face and eyes.

More... Respect MP George Galloway hit repeatedly around head by attacker who 'called him Hitler' as firebrand politician posed for pictures on street in Notting Hill

Facebook threats against Galloway just hours before vicious street attack as man is charged with religiously aggravated assault on Respect MP

He got frustrated his punches weren’t getting through and kicked me back towards the kerb.

I lost my footing and staggered backwards, crashing into a grille on a Moroccan delicatessen I had eaten at a few hours earlier. I was on the ground thinking ‘this man is going to kick me to death’.







The Respect Party tweeted this comment with the above picture of Mr Galloway following the assault He was so enraged he got on top of me and eventually landed a haymaker right on my jaw. I felt a terrible crack and sickening thud. It went on for about three minutes – a long time when punches are raining down on you. Luckily, the two Moroccan guys pulled him off. My attacker calmly walked across the road and I drove up the road behind him. I was in a bad way but I was determined he wouldn’t get away with it. I called 999 and described him to police. He knew I was behind him. I slowed down and the police told me to stop following him. I pulled the car over and saw him go down a side street. While I was talking to the police, he reappeared and walked over to a bus stop.





[ Mr Galloway was attacked in Golborne Road (pictured) in Notting Hill, West London]

At this point a police van hurtled round the corner with four police officers in it.

Three were women.

It was like Cagney and Lacey. I shouted, ‘He is getting on the No 23 bus’ and the police drove into the middle of the road to stop it.

The policewomen bravely piled on to the bus, and brought a man out with handcuffs on. 'I have no idea why it happened, though I suspect my attacker was a thug from an extreme Right-wing group' I have no idea why it happened, though I suspect my attacker was a thug from an extreme Right-wing group. Regardless of his motives, I have no regrets about speaking out on issues like Israel and the Middle East.

We live in a democracy, and as someone who has been elected as an MP on six occasions, I have a right to voice my opinions.

And like other politicians who have suffered similar threats and attacks, I am entitled to receive a degree of protection from the State so I can continue to do so.

Even though I have just turned 60 years old, I am slightly ashamed to admit that I didn’t land a single blow. But I am not ready to stop fighting for what I believe in yet.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2738682/I-crashed-ground-thinking-man-going-kick-death-George-Galloway-reveals-terror-attack-Notting-Hill-led-police-suspect.html#ixzz3Bv8PBd80



Mail on Sunday: George Galloway, after the attack on him in Notting Hill

Mail on Sunday: George Galloway, after the attack on him in Notting Hill
'I crashed to the ground thinking... this man is going to kick me to death': George Galloway reveals his terror after attack in Notting Hill - and how he led police to suspect George Galloway was left with broken rib when he was assaulted in street He also suffered a badly bruised face following violent attack in Notting Hill Below, the Respect MP reveals how he feared for his life during incident By GEORGE GALLOLWAY FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY PUBLISHED: 22:11, 30 August 2014 | UPDATED: 22:11, 30 August 2014 30 shares I was walking down the street in Notting Hill in broad daylight and getting into my car when two Moroccan guys approached me. One of them said he was leaving Britain the next day and would love a photo with me for his cafe back home. I stood in the road shaking hands with him as his friend took a picture. Out of the corner of my eye I saw a man powering towards me like a bat out of hell. +3 Politician: George Galloway was left with a broken rib and bruising when he was assaulted by a man in street He laid into me and was effing and blinding about the Holocaust. He looked like the type who works out and moved very fast. He punched me so many times I kept thinking, ‘When is this going to stop?’ But it didn’t. I went into what boxers call ‘peekaboo style’ like American heavyweight Floyd Patterson when he fought Muhammad Ali, covering my face and eyes. More... Respect MP George Galloway hit repeatedly around head by attacker who 'called him Hitler' as firebrand politician posed for pictures on street in Notting Hill Facebook threats against Galloway just hours before vicious street attack as man is charged with religiously aggravated assault on Respect MP He got frustrated his punches weren’t getting through and kicked me back towards the kerb. I lost my footing and staggered backwards, crashing into a grille on a Moroccan delicatessen I had eaten at a few hours earlier. I was on the ground thinking ‘this man is going to kick me to death’. +3 Battered: Mr Galloway, pictured after the assault, said the man moved toward him like 'a bat out of hell' Tweet: The Respect Party tweeted this comment with the above picture of Mr Galloway following the assault He was so enraged he got on top of me and eventually landed a haymaker right on my jaw. I felt a terrible crack and sickening thud. It went on for about three minutes – a long time when punches are raining down on you. Luckily, the two Moroccan guys pulled him off. My attacker calmly walked across the road and I drove up the road behind him. I was in a bad way but I was determined he wouldn’t get away with it. I called 999 and described him to police. He knew I was behind him. I slowed down and the police told me to stop following him. I pulled the car over and saw him go down a side street. While I was talking to the police, he reappeared and walked over to a bus stop. +3 Scene of the crime: Mr Galloway was attacked in Golborne Road (pictured) in Notting Hill, West London At this point a police van hurtled round the corner with four police officers in it. Three were women. It was like Cagney and Lacey. I shouted, ‘He is getting on the No 23 bus’ and the police drove into the middle of the road to stop it. The policewomen bravely piled on to the bus, and brought a man out with handcuffs on. 'I have no idea why it happened, though I suspect my attacker was a thug from an extreme Right-wing group' I have no idea why it happened, though I suspect my attacker was a thug from an extreme Right-wing group. Regardless of his motives, I have no regrets about speaking out on issues like Israel and the Middle East. We live in a democracy, and as someone who has been elected as an MP on six occasions, I have a right to voice my opinions. And like other politicians who have suffered similar threats and attacks, I am entitled to receive a degree of protection from the State so I can continue to do so. Even though I have just turned 60 years old, I am slightly ashamed to admit that I didn’t land a single blow. But I am not ready to stop fighting for what I believe in yet. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2738682/I-crashed-ground-thinking-man-going-kick-death-George-Galloway-reveals-terror-attack-Notting-Hill-led-police-suspect.html#ixzz3Bv8PBd80 Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

UPDATER next about George Galloway, who has been treated after assault

UPDATER next about George Galloway, who has been treated after assault
UPDATER next about George Galloway, who has been treated after assault

A year ago, we held FUTURE of the Community Action Seminar

A year ago, we held FUTURE of the Community Action Seminar
Race Equality in Tower Hamlets 
রেইস ইকুয়ালিটি ইন টাওয়ার হ্যামলেটস

Key decisions made at the end of the Action Seminar on Saturday 6 July 2013:

 

1. That the takeover of the western areas of the LBTH by Big Developers and associated incursions and invasions were taking place with the participation of the Tower Hamlets Council which was LEAVING the community out of the contacts, communications, negotiations that have been taking place and are taking place between the LBTH COuncil and those parties and their agents and agencies. THIS was having a manifest and demonstrable adverse effects on the Community from the standpoint of the anti-discrimination legislation that has been in the UK statute Books for decades. One of the most directly adversely affected groups in the population has been and is the Bangladeshi community in the area. Others with similar ethnic, racial, cultural and related faith orientations and interests and affiliations have also been adversely affected. This process of planned displacements has been taking place with no evidence that Tower Hamlets Council is active over this as the electorally representative body that should be supporting the people, the electorate and the key community housing the electorate, over the huge range of planned attacks that have been going on in the programme that could only have been conceived by the combined inputs from Big Business, City of London and those  parts of “Business” that remain still dedicated to a pro-racist, racist and apartheid programme for Britain. The beneficiaries of the LBTH Council’s abdication of its democratic and representative duties and of the Council’s abandonment of its option for interventions to defend the community have been the property speculators, land-grabbers and Big Business that have been making strategic sorties for decades to take over the area. The Crossrail hole plot and the ploy to get rid of the word “Banglatown” are two of the most recent examples of that Agenda being active against the parts of Tower Hamlets covered in these analyses and URGENT ACTION CALLS.

2. That the elected councillors for the Spitalfields and Banglatown Ward and those for the adjoining Wards of Weavers and Whitechapel were not engaged as elected representatives of the Community on the key decisions being made in this context.

3. That Tower Hamlets Council has no programme to protect the Community in the areas covered and that it must have a programme as based on the evidence and most importantly as based on the long-standing views of those who have been defending the community on every key economic, planning, environmental, social, demographic, democracy crisis and critical point stretching back decades.

5. That the Executive Mayor be given the opportunity to urgently meet with the Race Equality in Tower Hamlets organisation and to take steps for the LBTH Council to 

[a] address the LBTH Council’s duties and role in the context of the Race Relations, the Human Rights and the Equalities Acts in this context and

[b] help start the very urgent process of reversing the takeover of the Community that has been ongoing and to create the series of activities that can at once defend the community and create the necessary gains in social, economic, demographic and electoral terms for the whole of the Community in the parts of the LBTH.

From: Muhammad Haque The Secretary email: threclegal@yahoo.co.uk ________________________ FAO Lutfur Rahman The Executive Mayor LBTH Sent by email on Monday 08 July 2013 to mayor@towerhamlets.gov.uk Key decisions made at the end of the Action Seminar on Saturday 6 July 2013: 1. That the takeover of the western areas of the LBTH by Big Developers and associated incursions and invasions were taking place with the participation of the Tower Hamlets Council which was LEAVING the community out of the contacts, communications, negotiations that have been taking place and are taking place between the LBTH COuncil and those parties and their agents and agencies. THIS was having a manifest and demonstrable adverse effects on the Community from the standpoint of the anti-discrimination legislation that has been in the UK statute Books for decades. One of the most directly adversely affected groups in the population has been and is the Bangladeshi community in the area. Others with similar ethnic, racial, cultural and related faith orientations and interests and affiliations have also been adversely affected. This process of planned displacements has been taking place with no evidence that Tower Hamlets Council is active over this as the electorally representative body that should be supporting the people, the electorate and the key community housing the electorate, over the huge range of planned attacks that have been going on in the programme that could only have been conceived by the combined inputs from Big Business, City of London and those  parts of “Business” that remain still dedicated to a pro-racist, racist and apartheid programme for Britain. The beneficiaries of the LBTH Council’s abdication of its democratic and representative duties and of the Council’s abandonment of its option for interventions to defend the community have been the property speculators, land-grabbers and Big Business that have been making strategic sorties for decades to take over the area. The Crossrail hole plot and the ploy to get rid of the word “Banglatown” are two of the most recent examples of that Agenda being active against the parts of Tower Hamlets covered in these analyses and URGENT ACTION CALLS. 2. That the elected councillors for the Spitalfields and Banglatown Ward and those for the adjoining Wards of Weavers and Whitechapel were not engaged as elected representatives of the Community on the key decisions being made in this context. 3. That Tower Hamlets Council has no programme to protect the Community in the areas covered and that it must have a programme as based on the evidence and most importantly as based on the long-standing views of those who have been defending the community on every key economic, planning, environmental, social, demographic, democracy crisis and critical point stretching back decades. 5. That the Executive Mayor be given the opportunity to urgently meet with the Race Equality in Tower Hamlets organisation and to take steps for the LBTH Council to  [a] address the LBTH Council’s duties and role in the context of the Race Relations, the Human Rights and the Equalities Acts in this context and [b] help start the very urgent process of reversing the takeover of the Community that has been ongoing and to create the series of activities that can at once defend the community and create the necessary gains in social, economic, demographic and electoral terms for the whole of the Community in the parts of the LBTH.

A year ago, we held FUTURE of the Community Action Seminar

A year ago, we held FUTURE of the Community Action Seminar
Race Equality in Tower Hamlets 
রেইস ইকুয়ালিটি ইন টাওয়ার হ্যামলেটস

Key decisions made at the end of the Action Seminar on Saturday 6 July 2013:

 

1. That the takeover of the western areas of the LBTH by Big Developers and associated incursions and invasions were taking place with the participation of the Tower Hamlets Council which was LEAVING the community out of the contacts, communications, negotiations that have been taking place and are taking place between the LBTH COuncil and those parties and their agents and agencies. THIS was having a manifest and demonstrable adverse effects on the Community from the standpoint of the anti-discrimination legislation that has been in the UK statute Books for decades. One of the most directly adversely affected groups in the population has been and is the Bangladeshi community in the area. Others with similar ethnic, racial, cultural and related faith orientations and interests and affiliations have also been adversely affected. This process of planned displacements has been taking place with no evidence that Tower Hamlets Council is active over this as the electorally representative body that should be supporting the people, the electorate and the key community housing the electorate, over the huge range of planned attacks that have been going on in the programme that could only have been conceived by the combined inputs from Big Business, City of London and those  parts of “Business” that remain still dedicated to a pro-racist, racist and apartheid programme for Britain. The beneficiaries of the LBTH Council’s abdication of its democratic and representative duties and of the Council’s abandonment of its option for interventions to defend the community have been the property speculators, land-grabbers and Big Business that have been making strategic sorties for decades to take over the area. The Crossrail hole plot and the ploy to get rid of the word “Banglatown” are two of the most recent examples of that Agenda being active against the parts of Tower Hamlets covered in these analyses and URGENT ACTION CALLS.

2. That the elected councillors for the Spitalfields and Banglatown Ward and those for the adjoining Wards of Weavers and Whitechapel were not engaged as elected representatives of the Community on the key decisions being made in this context.

3. That Tower Hamlets Council has no programme to protect the Community in the areas covered and that it must have a programme as based on the evidence and most importantly as based on the long-standing views of those who have been defending the community on every key economic, planning, environmental, social, demographic, democracy crisis and critical point stretching back decades.

5. That the Executive Mayor be given the opportunity to urgently meet with the Race Equality in Tower Hamlets organisation and to take steps for the LBTH Council to 

[a] address the LBTH Council’s duties and role in the context of the Race Relations, the Human Rights and the Equalities Acts in this context and

[b] help start the very urgent process of reversing the takeover of the Community that has been ongoing and to create the series of activities that can at once defend the community and create the necessary gains in social, economic, demographic and electoral terms for the whole of the Community in the parts of the LBTH.

From: Muhammad Haque The Secretary email: threclegal@yahoo.co.uk ________________________ FAO Lutfur Rahman The Executive Mayor LBTH Sent by email on Monday 08 July 2013 to mayor@towerhamlets.gov.uk Key decisions made at the end of the Action Seminar on Saturday 6 July 2013: 1. That the takeover of the western areas of the LBTH by Big Developers and associated incursions and invasions were taking place with the participation of the Tower Hamlets Council which was LEAVING the community out of the contacts, communications, negotiations that have been taking place and are taking place between the LBTH COuncil and those parties and their agents and agencies. THIS was having a manifest and demonstrable adverse effects on the Community from the standpoint of the anti-discrimination legislation that has been in the UK statute Books for decades. One of the most directly adversely affected groups in the population has been and is the Bangladeshi community in the area. Others with similar ethnic, racial, cultural and related faith orientations and interests and affiliations have also been adversely affected. This process of planned displacements has been taking place with no evidence that Tower Hamlets Council is active over this as the electorally representative body that should be supporting the people, the electorate and the key community housing the electorate, over the huge range of planned attacks that have been going on in the programme that could only have been conceived by the combined inputs from Big Business, City of London and those  parts of “Business” that remain still dedicated to a pro-racist, racist and apartheid programme for Britain. The beneficiaries of the LBTH Council’s abdication of its democratic and representative duties and of the Council’s abandonment of its option for interventions to defend the community have been the property speculators, land-grabbers and Big Business that have been making strategic sorties for decades to take over the area. The Crossrail hole plot and the ploy to get rid of the word “Banglatown” are two of the most recent examples of that Agenda being active against the parts of Tower Hamlets covered in these analyses and URGENT ACTION CALLS. 2. That the elected councillors for the Spitalfields and Banglatown Ward and those for the adjoining Wards of Weavers and Whitechapel were not engaged as elected representatives of the Community on the key decisions being made in this context. 3. That Tower Hamlets Council has no programme to protect the Community in the areas covered and that it must have a programme as based on the evidence and most importantly as based on the long-standing views of those who have been defending the community on every key economic, planning, environmental, social, demographic, democracy crisis and critical point stretching back decades. 5. That the Executive Mayor be given the opportunity to urgently meet with the Race Equality in Tower Hamlets organisation and to take steps for the LBTH Council to  [a] address the LBTH Council’s duties and role in the context of the Race Relations, the Human Rights and the Equalities Acts in this context and [b] help start the very urgent process of reversing the takeover of the Community that has been ongoing and to create the series of activities that can at once defend the community and create the necessary gains in social, economic, demographic and electoral terms for the whole of the Community in the parts of the LBTH.

A year ago, we held FUTURE of the Community Action Seminar

A year ago, we held FUTURE of the Community Action Seminar
Race Equality in Tower Hamlets 
রেইস ইকুয়ালিটি ইন টাওয়ার হ্যামলেটস

Key decisions made at the end of the Action Seminar on Saturday 6 July 2013:

 

1. That the takeover of the western areas of the LBTH by Big Developers and associated incursions and invasions were taking place with the participation of the Tower Hamlets Council which was LEAVING the community out of the contacts, communications, negotiations that have been taking place and are taking place between the LBTH COuncil and those parties and their agents and agencies. THIS was having a manifest and demonstrable adverse effects on the Community from the standpoint of the anti-discrimination legislation that has been in the UK statute Books for decades. One of the most directly adversely affected groups in the population has been and is the Bangladeshi community in the area. Others with similar ethnic, racial, cultural and related faith orientations and interests and affiliations have also been adversely affected. This process of planned displacements has been taking place with no evidence that Tower Hamlets Council is active over this as the electorally representative body that should be supporting the people, the electorate and the key community housing the electorate, over the huge range of planned attacks that have been going on in the programme that could only have been conceived by the combined inputs from Big Business, City of London and those  parts of “Business” that remain still dedicated to a pro-racist, racist and apartheid programme for Britain. The beneficiaries of the LBTH Council’s abdication of its democratic and representative duties and of the Council’s abandonment of its option for interventions to defend the community have been the property speculators, land-grabbers and Big Business that have been making strategic sorties for decades to take over the area. The Crossrail hole plot and the ploy to get rid of the word “Banglatown” are two of the most recent examples of that Agenda being active against the parts of Tower Hamlets covered in these analyses and URGENT ACTION CALLS.

2. That the elected councillors for the Spitalfields and Banglatown Ward and those for the adjoining Wards of Weavers and Whitechapel were not engaged as elected representatives of the Community on the key decisions being made in this context.

3. That Tower Hamlets Council has no programme to protect the Community in the areas covered and that it must have a programme as based on the evidence and most importantly as based on the long-standing views of those who have been defending the community on every key economic, planning, environmental, social, demographic, democracy crisis and critical point stretching back decades.

5. That the Executive Mayor be given the opportunity to urgently meet with the Race Equality in Tower Hamlets organisation and to take steps for the LBTH Council to 

[a] address the LBTH Council’s duties and role in the context of the Race Relations, the Human Rights and the Equalities Acts in this context and

[b] help start the very urgent process of reversing the takeover of the Community that has been ongoing and to create the series of activities that can at once defend the community and create the necessary gains in social, economic, demographic and electoral terms for the whole of the Community in the parts of the LBTH.

From: Muhammad Haque The Secretary email: threclegal@yahoo.co.uk ________________________ FAO Lutfur Rahman The Executive Mayor LBTH Sent by email on Monday 08 July 2013 to mayor@towerhamlets.gov.uk Key decisions made at the end of the Action Seminar on Saturday 6 July 2013: 1. That the takeover of the western areas of the LBTH by Big Developers and associated incursions and invasions were taking place with the participation of the Tower Hamlets Council which was LEAVING the community out of the contacts, communications, negotiations that have been taking place and are taking place between the LBTH COuncil and those parties and their agents and agencies. THIS was having a manifest and demonstrable adverse effects on the Community from the standpoint of the anti-discrimination legislation that has been in the UK statute Books for decades. One of the most directly adversely affected groups in the population has been and is the Bangladeshi community in the area. Others with similar ethnic, racial, cultural and related faith orientations and interests and affiliations have also been adversely affected. This process of planned displacements has been taking place with no evidence that Tower Hamlets Council is active over this as the electorally representative body that should be supporting the people, the electorate and the key community housing the electorate, over the huge range of planned attacks that have been going on in the programme that could only have been conceived by the combined inputs from Big Business, City of London and those  parts of “Business” that remain still dedicated to a pro-racist, racist and apartheid programme for Britain. The beneficiaries of the LBTH Council’s abdication of its democratic and representative duties and of the Council’s abandonment of its option for interventions to defend the community have been the property speculators, land-grabbers and Big Business that have been making strategic sorties for decades to take over the area. The Crossrail hole plot and the ploy to get rid of the word “Banglatown” are two of the most recent examples of that Agenda being active against the parts of Tower Hamlets covered in these analyses and URGENT ACTION CALLS. 2. That the elected councillors for the Spitalfields and Banglatown Ward and those for the adjoining Wards of Weavers and Whitechapel were not engaged as elected representatives of the Community on the key decisions being made in this context. 3. That Tower Hamlets Council has no programme to protect the Community in the areas covered and that it must have a programme as based on the evidence and most importantly as based on the long-standing views of those who have been defending the community on every key economic, planning, environmental, social, demographic, democracy crisis and critical point stretching back decades. 5. That the Executive Mayor be given the opportunity to urgently meet with the Race Equality in Tower Hamlets organisation and to take steps for the LBTH Council to  [a] address the LBTH Council’s duties and role in the context of the Race Relations, the Human Rights and the Equalities Acts in this context and [b] help start the very urgent process of reversing the takeover of the Community that has been ongoing and to create the series of activities that can at once defend the community and create the necessary gains in social, economic, demographic and electoral terms for the whole of the Community in the parts of the LBTH.

ALDGATE EAST TUBE two passengers in violent fight

ALDGATE EAST TUBE two passengers in violent fight

Shocking moment elderly man was knocked unconscious on Tube train after being kicked and punched in the face

  • Two men brawl as District line train pulls into Aldgate East station
  • Man in his 60s punches a younger man twice in head and in groin
  • Younger man then retaliates by punching him six times in the head
  • Other passengers on Monday can be heard urging the pair to stop

By MARK DUELL

 

This is the moment a horrifying fight broke out between two London Underground train passengers, leaving an elderly man apparently unconscious.

Footage posted online shows two men - one much older than the other - brawling on Monday night as a train on the District Line pulls into Aldgate East station in East London.

The video sees a man in his late 60s, wearing a red T-shirt, green hat and black coat, fighting with a younger man sitting next to him in a blue jacket, punching him twice in the head and in the groin.

Scroll down for video

 
Attack: An elderly man appeared to have been left unconscious after a fight on the London Underground

Attack: An elderly man appeared to have been left unconscious after a fight on the London Underground

 

 
 
British Transport Police are investigating
The brawl happened on Monday night on a District line train
 

Shocking: Police are investigating after footage posted online showed two men - one much older than the other - brawling on Monday night as a District line train pulled into Aldgate East in East London

 

 
The video shows a man in his 60s, wearing a red T-shirt, green hat and black coat
The incident happened at around 9.20pm and was filmed on a mobile phone
 

Attack: The video shows a man in his 60s, wearing a red T-shirt, green hat and black coat, fighting with a younger man sitting next to him, punching him twice in the head and twice in the groin

 

 

During the incident, which happened at around 9.20pm and was filmed on a mobile phone, the younger man retaliates by punching him six times in the head, before kicking him in the face.

Other passengers can be heard urging the pair to stop, saying ‘Oi, listen man, leave it out', ‘Woah hang on’ and 'calm down', reported the London Evening Standard.

 

 

It happened just minutes after the latest Tube strike began at 9pm on Monday, but is not believed to be related to the 48-hour walkout by members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union.

A 68-year-old man from Newham was arrested on suspicion of common assault, resisting arrest and a public order offence. One man needed treatment after the incident, British Transport Police said.

Detective Constable Lawrence Murphy, who is leading the investigation, said: ‘A physical altercation occurred between two men which resulted in a fight which left a man requiring hospital treatment.

 
Two men brawl in London underground tube carriage
 
 
 
 
 
Knocked out: During the incident, which happened at around 9.20pm and was filmed on a mobile phone, the younger man retaliates by punching him six times in the head, before kicking him in the face

Knocked out: During the incident, which happened at around 9.20pm and was filmed on a mobile phone, the younger man retaliates by punching him six times in the head, before kicking him in the face

 

 
Location: It happened as a District line train pulled into Aldgate East station (file picture) in East London

Location: It happened as a District line train pulled into Aldgate East station (file picture) in East London

 

 

 

‘I urgently want to speak to the man [in blue] pictured, as I believe he will be able to greatly assist the investigation. If you recognise him, or were on board the train, please get in touch.’

'Violence on the Tube is rare, but when it does happen, because of the confined spaces, it can be all the more shocking'

Detective Constable Lawrence Murphy

 

He added: ‘Violence on the Tube is rare, but when it does happen, because of the confined spaces, it can be all the more shocking.

‘Passengers can be reassured that BTP takes all violent offences extremely seriously and will do everything in its power to trace offenders and bring them to justice.’

Anyone with information is asked to call 0800 405040 or text 61016, quoting B4 of 29/04/2014. Details can also be passed anonymously to Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2616600/Tube-strike-Fight-breaks-London-Underground-District-train-ten-punches-thrown.html#ixzz30MpyXKdI 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

KHOODEELAAR! UPDATING diagnosis of the dysfunctional clique in TH Council

KHOODEELAAR! UPDATING diagnosis of the dysfunctional clique in TH Council
0515 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 29 April 2014. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign can confirm that it has NEVER ever applied for a grant nor been offered a grant by Tower Hamlets Council. And that it is the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign that has campaigned for more than ten years now against corruption in Tower Hamlets Council. More on that later! For now, we note this:

DAILY MAIL updates item at 1024 GMT London Monday 28 April 2014 and claims "Mayor Lutfur Rahman accused of doubling fund to Bengali-run charities”

[The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign exclusive, long running and original ethical democratic and Constitutional diagnosis of the Daily Mail and of the Tower Hamlets Council will be continued]

Downing Street probe into controversial London council 'over suspected links to Islamic extremists'

  • Tower Hamlets council already being investigated over suspected fraud
  • Mayor Lutfur Rahman accused of doubling fund to Bengali-run charities
  • New report accuses Mr Rahman of having links to Islamist groups
  • Report also links Alibor Choudhury, minister for finance, to extremists
  • Council buildings allegedly used as a meeting place by hate groups
  • Large amounts of funding also given to controversial East London mosque

By CHRIS PLEASANCE

 

An embattled London council is being probed over its links to Muslim extremists, a report reveals.

Tower Hamlets council is already under investigation for alleged fraud after mayor Lutfur Rahman doubled recommended funding to Bengali-run charities in an apparent attempt to buy favour.

But now a leaked government report suggests  the mayor and his finance minister, Alibor Choudhury, have links to Islamic extremist groups, including one seeking to set up a Sharia state in Europe.

 
Lutfur Rahman, the mayor of Tower Hamlets, is being investigated over allegations of fraud and has now been linked to extremist groups
Alibor Choudhur is also linked to hate groups in the government report
 

Lutfur Rahman, the mayor of Tower Hamlets, is being investigated over allegations of fraud and has now been linked to extremist groups, as has Alibor Choudhury, his finance minister

 

 

 

A document handed to The Sunday Telegraph says that three community centres owned by the council, or by their housing authority, were used for meetings of radical groups including al-Muhajiroun, the banned Islamist terrorist organisation founded by Omar Bakri Mohammed and Anjem Choudary

A third was used by political hate group Hizb ut-Tahrir and 'may still be' in use, according to the report which was prepared for David Cameron in 2013.

Another cause for concern is the council's £2million of funding given partially to the East London Mosque, which previously held a telephone Q&A with al-Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki.

 

 

They have links to the Islamic Forum of Europe which is seeking to set up a Sharia state within Europe. The council's new finance minister, Alibor Choudhury, has close connections to the organisation as do other senior council officers.

Earlier this week police and investigators were called to the council to assess whether Mr Rahman had deliberately doubled funding to Bengali-run charities in the hope of buying favour.

 

 

Mr Rahman was also accused by Panorama of increasing public funding to Bangladeshi and Somali groups from £1.5 million to £3.6 million in the face of officer recommendations.

The mayor has denied all the claims, which he claims are motivated by racism and Islamophobia.

 
Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has sent inspectors into the council to work alongside police

Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has sent inspectors into the council to work alongside police

 

Speaking to Mail Online, a DCLG spokesman said: 'It is a matter of public record that Ministers have long been concerned about a worrying pattern of divisive community politics and alleged mismanagement of public money by the mayoral administration in Tower Hamlets.

'Separately, Ministers are also minded to use their new powers under the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014 to take action against councils continuing inappropriate spending of taxpayers’ money, and Brandon Lewis has written to Tower Hamlets about this.'

The spokesman added that, as the report was leaked, the department would not be commenting on allegations of extremism.

A spokesman for Tower Hamlets council said: 'Tower Hamlets has a strong record in partnership working with many different agencies in tackling and preventing extremism from Office of Security and Counter Terrorism (OSCT) funded projects to our Prevent programmes, receiving Home Office sign off to working with Stonewall on faith and sexuality.  

'Our approach to diversity, equality and social cohesion has been recognised by our peers and is reflected in the ‘Excellent’ rating received from the Local Government Association.'

An earlier version of this article referred to the Osmani Trust as a Muslim-only youth group. We have been asked to make clear that the Osmani Trust is not faith based.  

 

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Racists again attack the image of the whole Bangladeshi community

Racists again attack the image of the whole Bangladeshi community
This image has been retrieved from a website run by a far right racist British Nationalist group. The reason we use it here is to illustrate the serious threats against the whole UK Bangladeshi community that are being “justified by claiming” that Tower Hamlets Council has been corrupt and has been denying the white community its fair share of the grants . [To be continued]

2350 Hrs  GMT London Monday 21 April 2014. 

DEFENDING the Community in the East End of London. The Morass that is the corrupt controlling clique in Tower Hamlets is undermining the widest extents and details and ranges of the ordinary people in the East End of London, in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. That is being undermined by the silence of the corrupted cabals that have been funded by successive opportunists  in order to acquire short term gains and advantage. Silence of the "Bengali" "community" "leaders" in the weeks of British Media reports about Tower Hamlets Council and the Borough: How long will the latest lies "work”?

It is a silence that is intriguing.

To put it most mildly.

Yet it is and has been inevitable.

Why?

For a start, there is NO Bengali Community in Tower Hamlets.

What there has been - and is - is a Bangladeshi one.

And the Bangladeshis are without a doubt Seelotee speakers.

So it is a Seelotee Bangladeshi community.

In the UK.

As in the inner London areas of Tower Hamlets, Newham.

Those whose mother tongue may not be Seelotee to begin with get to use  Seelotee 

in due course.

Seelotee (Sylhetti) is also the main language of the UK-wide Bangladeshis.

But these are only two of the key facts that the racists operating their craft

perpetrate.

To the racists, using platforms linked with Fleet Street, the idea of an independent Bangladeshi State remains anathema.

Contrary to the myths that the racists “sympathised” with Bangladesh in 1971.

Just why do racists in Britain persist in referring to Bangladeshis as Bengalis is directly linked with the racist empire line.

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! Campaigning against Corruption in Government..

KHOODEELAAR! Campaigning against Corruption in Government..
1340 [1325] [1322] [1312] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 09 April 2014.

HOW KHOODEELAAR! took part, has been taking part and is continuing to be part of the Campaign DEMANDING an end to corruption. How we have been covering as a Campaign the reach of the demand for Maria Miller to quit!

Now that she has just quit as Cabinet Minister, the demand for an end to corruption in Government must continue.

Here is some of our analysis overnight, as well as some telling evidence of the reach of the demand against corruption by the State in Britain

Campaigning for an end to corruption in Government - centrally, regionally and locally: Our Exclusive diagnostic and coverage so far of the Maria Miller Scandal. Continuing from the time BEFORE this afternoon's news that Miller had at last "quit as a Cabinet Minister". Here is what had been being building up as a way of centrally mainstream Media d Rightwing Media joining Leftwing Media against Dave's handling of the Miller scandal:

Image

Campaigning for an end to corruption in Government - centrally, regionally and locally:

Our Exclusive diagnostic and coverage so far of the Maria Miller Scandal.
Continuing from the time BEFORE this afternoon's news that Miller had at last "quit as a Cabinet Minister".
Here is what had been being building up as a way of centrally mainstream Media d Rightwing Media joining Leftwing Media against Dave's handling of the Miller scandal:

In the SKY NEWS PRESS PREVEW on Tuesday 8 April 2014:

AADHIKAROnline the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community:
AADHIKAROnline transcript of theSKY NEWS PRESS REVIEW clip containing the SUN’s Political Editor Tim Newton-Dunn (Eton schooled) elaborating on why the SUN
has reported today (Wednesday 9 April 2014) the reporting by the COMMUNIST Morning Star on the Maria Miller scandal.
Excerpts:

Tom Newton-Dunn: The MORNING STAR, the one and only. And this is what the Government have done. With their handling of this story. They’ve managed to unite the SUN, the Daily Telegraph and the Mail .. Right-of-Centre Press with the MORNING STAR, the bastion of
 “Communism” 
SOUND of laughter by female voice/s
Tom Newton-Dunn (continuing): in this country. They’ve (Morning Star, being displayed by SKY NEWS) also got a very good exclusive.. tomorrow.. The Government (David Cameron., No 10 Downing Street) (has aborted) 61 different attempts to set up a “Maria Miller Must GO” petition on the Government website..There’s a little man - or woman- sitting at No 10 (Downing Street) pressing DELETE frantically all day long....”
[To be continued]



Dave has failed again to show that he even knows standards or ethics when they hit him ...

Dave has failed again to show that he even knows standards or ethics when they hit him ...

2335 [2305] [2258] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 08 April 2014

ANOTHER EXCLUSIVE © Muhammad Haque Ethical COMMENTARY! on the dire depth of depravity that the “Government” now pursuing the Big Biz Agenda of ramming Society down the gutters with multiple attacks on basic values and human rights for the majority (and shielding Bankers, looters and Cabinet Minsters) is trying to stifle the most basic of values.
This is illustrated by the Rightwing SUN happily doing one plug for the clearly leftwing Communist Party daily the Morning Star Star which has a scoop on the dirty tricks being done by Dave’s Downing Street cabal to stifle free speech over Maria Miler...

Maria Miller CONTINUES to fail to show respect to basic decent values.

 

So toxic has she become in this context that Smarmy "Dave" Cameron  has now been lambasted (quite literally in the last few minutes) by a fellow Eton-boy, the Sun's Tom Newton-Dunn.

As if to make things worse for Smarmy "Dave", the SUN is favourably REPORTING the EXCLUSIVE done by the "Communist Morning Star" on the dirty deeds that Dave's Downing Street cabal has been made to engage in- to SHUT DOWN public criticism (61 such have been deleted, according to Tom Newton-Dunn reporting the Morning Star's own exclusive) on Maria Miller's behaviour and the dire desperate damage-limitation misdeeds that Downing Street has been exposed as having been engaged in...

 

[To be continued]

 

Wednesday's MORNING STAR [09 April 2014]

has been praised by the SUN and by its Political Editor Tom Newton-Dunn on SKY PRESS PREVIEW!

 

Image




I told the West to Deal with POVERTY in Africa and Asia

I told the West to Deal with POVERTY in Africa and Asia
I told the West to Deal with POVERTY in Africa and Asia. Did they listen?

By © Muhammad Haque

1030 [0505] Hrs GMT London Monday 07 April 2014.


Almost a quarter century ago, I TOLD John Major to pay attention. As I did the UNO. But would they listen?


Now, they keep screaming as they continue to show disregard for human rights.


I also broadcast a dedicated TV Message, on the "mainstream" Channel 4 
SLOT, the definitive peak-time Politics SLOT and said to anyone who was watching, that the MOST IMPORTANT POLITICAL DYNAMITE that was threatening Western European countries was the POVERTY in Africa and Asian.

Especially in the countries which could not feed their people. Many of them, I WARNED, would make such a phenomenal dash for the West that would overwhelm the Western countries.


DEAL with the poverty in those countries NOW, I said.


Instead, they went on causing MORE POVERTY, killing people, destroying infrastructures, contaminating the arable lands...


And now, they scream of Sangatte ii.


They have not seen nothing yet, the morons in Government and in the Media!
[To be continued]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2598296/Sangatte-Mark-II-Grim-echo-2002-hundreds-migrants-pack-squalid-Calais-camp.html



KHOODEELAAR! Campaign finds Mr Ken Livingstone vision in a tunnel made by the City!

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign finds Mr Ken Livingstone vision in a tunnel made by the City!


2340 Hrs GMT London Saturday 05 April 2014: "Ken Livingstone, as the then Mayor of London (when he took Ronson’s cash) was taking a stand FOR CROSSRAIL Hole plot knowing full well the link between Crossrail hole plot and the specific agenda of the likes of Ronson to expose the Brick Lane London E1 area to the kind of danger that the plot did expose the area to. ...”

UPDATED 2325 [1450] Hrs 4538 Hrs GMT

London

Saturday 

05 April 2014

Image

KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN defending the Community in the East End of London against the role for Big Biz that Ken Livingstone  misguidedly keeps playing....or keeps being 'hired' or 'employed' to play..... what a far cry from the image of "Red" Ken that role is...

 

Ken Livingstone in this still image (shown above) and created by AADHIKAROnline from his appearance on SKY NEWS earlier this year (2014), had been exposed by the SUNDAY TIMES for receiving donation from Gerald Ronson who was still planning the HERON TOWER [above] (in Bishopsgate near the Liverpool Street Station in the City of London) in the AADHIKAROnline picture (Friday 04 April 2014]. So Livingstone had himself been neutralised by his cash receipt from a City of London fraudster (one of the Guinness Three had been jailed following his conviction  for fraud). This is why KHOODEELAAR! cited that link as an argument against the Crossrail hole. That hole was targeted in Hanbury Street and Princelet Street in Brick Lane by changing the route or the alignment of the Crossrail tunnel so that it would avoid the site of Ronson’s HERON TOWER (above). Now, Tower Hamlets Council has employed (whether paid or on what pay has not been disclosed yet) to act as a PR face. That was one of the wrong decisions by whoever made that decision. 

That shows that the controlling bureaucracy in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council continues to fail to recognise the local Tower Hamlets people...

What this also means is that Ken Livingstone, as the then Mayor of London (when he took Ronson’s cash) was taking a stand FOR CROSSRAIL Hole plot knowing full well the link between Crossrail hole plot and the specific agenda of the likes of Ronson to expose the Brick Lane London E1 area to the kind of danger that the plot did expose the area to. 

Additionally, Ken Livingstone lost moral credibility by staying silent about his City of London-linked donor’s agenda to benefit by having a plan that was indifferent as to whether its effects would be destroying the homes, shops and the entire  Community in Brick Lane!!!!

[To be continued]

 

Original photographs, reports and montage by

AADHIKAROnline/fotografixOriginal

By © Muhammad Haque

Friday 04 and Saturday 05 April 2014







The BBC Panorama programme failed to deliver . Too timid, lacked rigour. No tempo!

The BBC Panorama programme failed to deliver . Too timid, lacked rigour. No tempo!

0712 [0602] GMT London Tuesday 01 April 2014

Image

BHANGEELAAR! the Campaign against an elected executive mayor system in Tower Hamlets. The Contextual review of the BBC’s overhyped, oversold Panorama programme as transmitted on Monday 31 March 2014 -1

 

Oversold over-hyped Panorama failed to deliver the scrutiny or investigation into Tower Hamlets-1

 

Someone did a modest re-design on the Panorama logo

That displays the extent of over=selling of the episode of the programme

 

By © Muhammad Haque

0602 [0505] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 01 April 2014

 

That [quoted below] is what the BBC-issued TVGuide published by the likes of STV had boasted before the actual transmission of the episode of the Panorama programme on BBC One at 1930 GMT on Monday 31 March 2014.

 

http://tvguide.stv.tv/show-details/?tvgListingID=400862917&tvgEpisodeID=30911309&tvgShowID=3633754&tvgTitle=The%20Mayor%20and%20Our%20Money%20-%20Panorama 

 

“The Mayor and Our Money – Panorama

 

Up and down the country, directly-elected mayors control billions of pounds of public funds. But can this lead to too much power being concentrated into the hands of one politician? John Ware investigates the directly-elected mayor of Tower Hamlets in London – where opponents claim he’s used public funds both to promote himself and to create a local power base that, come election time this May, will help return him to office. Panorama reveals evidence suggesting that, under the mayoral system in Tower Hamlets, accountability and transparency have been put into reverse, with the mayor refusing to answer opposition questions about spending decisions involving millions of pounds of public money – and also how he has injected faith into politics.”

 

Something must have changed between the writing of that hype and the actual final editing and airing of the Panorama episode.

 

For the transmitted episode did not examine the “directly-elected mayors”.

 

It gave no table, no stats, no evidence at all to compare or contrast the “directly-elecetd mayors” and the alternative system.

 

There was no investigation into the state of “democracy” inside the Tower Hamlets Council.

 

There was nothing at all about who had brought about the directly-elecetd mayor system in Tower Hamlets. 

 

And why.

 

There was nothing at all about what any of the Opposition councillors had said about the system at all. Neither the Tower Hamlets Council’s Opposition Conservative group nor the Opposition Labour Party group leader was featured.

 

No mentionable clip from the Council Meetings at all, except few seconds showing the Council’s Speaker Lesley Pavitt more than once and the Labour group deputy leader Rachel Saunders stating a very short question.

 

There was no sign of what Tower Hamlets residents generally thought of the Tower Hamlets Council. No reference to the Community in the East End. No investigation into the relationship between Tower Hamlets council and the residents. 

 

It looked like a very very strange package.

 

Whatever the BBC had hoped to show must have got seriously derailed at some point just before transmission.

 

Or that the BBC never had done any of the investigations missing from their transmitted version.

 

Which makes this episode of the Panorama as being disproportionately over-hyped and unjustifiably promoted as an investigation that it wasn’t!

 

It did not reveal evidence that demonstrated that “under the mayoral system in Tower Hamlets, accountability and transparency have been put into reverse”.

 

Perhaps the programme had found evidence to substantiate that claim but in the traumatised version that evidence was most emphatically not visible!

 

Finally, this Panorama as transmitted, did not test the veracity of a single one of the claims made by Lutfur Rahman as included in the broadcast clips of the “interview”!

 

This AADHIKRnline fotografixlriinal montage contains images from Saturday 6 February 2010 when the then Campaigners (for some time!!!) agains an elected Mayor system in Tower Hamlets demonstrated in the Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane. The BHANGEELAAR! Campaign, part of the Movement Defending the Community in the East End of London, is represented by Muhammad Haque. [ Saturday 6 February 2010] Also seen is the lone Lid Dem Councillor on Tower Hamlets Coun cil, Stephanie Eaton, also speaking with a loud hailer backing the NO-to-an-elected-execuive-mayor call. Stephanie Eaton has become a supporter of the Mayor system as well as of the “incumbent” Lutfur Rahman as seen on many occasions in the past four years.

 

THIS BHANGEELAAR! diagnosis of the Council will be continued.

 

The BBC Panorama programme failed to deliver . Too timid, lacked rigour. No tempo!

The BBC Panorama programme failed to deliver . Too timid, lacked rigour. No tempo!

0712 [0602] GMT London Tuesday 01 April 2014

Image

BHANGEELAAR! the Campaign against an elected executive mayor system in Tower Hamlets. The Contextual review of the BBC’s overhyped, oversold Panorama programme as transmitted on Monday 31 March 2014 -1

 

Oversold over-hyped Panorama failed to deliver the scrutiny or investigation into Tower Hamlets-1

 

Someone did a modest re-design on the Panorama logo

That displays the extent of over=selling of the episode of the programme

 

By © Muhammad Haque

0602 [0505] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 01 April 2014

 

That [quoted below] is what the BBC-issued TVGuide published by the likes of STV had boasted before the actual transmission of the episode of the Panorama programme on BBC One at 1930 GMT on Monday 31 March 2014.

 

http://tvguide.stv.tv/show-details/?tvgListingID=400862917&tvgEpisodeID=30911309&tvgShowID=3633754&tvgTitle=The%20Mayor%20and%20Our%20Money%20-%20Panorama 

 

“The Mayor and Our Money – Panorama

 

Up and down the country, directly-elected mayors control billions of pounds of public funds. But can this lead to too much power being concentrated into the hands of one politician? John Ware investigates the directly-elected mayor of Tower Hamlets in London – where opponents claim he’s used public funds both to promote himself and to create a local power base that, come election time this May, will help return him to office. Panorama reveals evidence suggesting that, under the mayoral system in Tower Hamlets, accountability and transparency have been put into reverse, with the mayor refusing to answer opposition questions about spending decisions involving millions of pounds of public money – and also how he has injected faith into politics.”

 

Something must have changed between the writing of that hype and the actual final editing and airing of the Panorama episode.

 

For the transmitted episode did not examine the “directly-elected mayors”.

 

It gave no table, no stats, no evidence at all to compare or contrast the “directly-elecetd mayors” and the alternative system.

 

There was no investigation into the state of “democracy” inside the Tower Hamlets Council.

 

There was nothing at all about who had brought about the directly-elecetd mayor system in Tower Hamlets. 

 

And why.

 

There was nothing at all about what any of the Opposition councillors had said about the system at all. Neither the Tower Hamlets Council’s Opposition Conservative group nor the Opposition Labour Party group leader was featured.

 

No mentionable clip from the Council Meetings at all, except few seconds showing the Council’s Speaker Lesley Pavitt more than once and the Labour group deputy leader Rachel Saunders stating a very short question.

 

There was no sign of what Tower Hamlets residents generally thought of the Tower Hamlets Council. No reference to the Community in the East End. No investigation into the relationship between Tower Hamlets council and the residents. 

 

It looked like a very very strange package.

 

Whatever the BBC had hoped to show must have got seriously derailed at some point just before transmission.

 

Or that the BBC never had done any of the investigations missing from their transmitted version.

 

Which makes this episode of the Panorama as being disproportionately over-hyped and unjustifiably promoted as an investigation that it wasn’t!

 

It did not reveal evidence that demonstrated that “under the mayoral system in Tower Hamlets, accountability and transparency have been put into reverse”.

 

Perhaps the programme had found evidence to substantiate that claim but in the traumatised version that evidence was most emphatically not visible!

 

Finally, this Panorama as transmitted, did not test the veracity of a single one of the claims made by Lutfur Rahman as included in the broadcast clips of the “interview”!

 

This AADHIKRnline fotografixlriinal montage contains images from Saturday 6 February 2010 when the then Campaigners (for some time!!!) agains an elected Mayor system in Tower Hamlets demonstrated in the Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane. The BHANGEELAAR! Campaign, part of the Movement Defending the Community in the East End of London, is represented by Muhammad Haque. [ Saturday 6 February 2010] Also seen is the lone Lid Dem Councillor on Tower Hamlets Coun cil, Stephanie Eaton, also speaking with a loud hailer backing the NO-to-an-elected-execuive-mayor call. Stephanie Eaton has become a supporter of the Mayor system as well as of the “incumbent” Lutfur Rahman as seen on many occasions in the past four years.

 

THIS BHANGEELAAR! diagnosis of the Council will be continued.

 

Oversold over-hyped Panorama failed to deliver the scrutiny or investigation into Tower Hamlets-1

Oversold over-hyped Panorama failed to deliver the scrutiny or investigation into Tower Hamlets-1
Someone did a modest re-design on the Panorama logo
That displays the extent of over=selling of the episode of the programme


By © Muhammad Haque
0505 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 01 April 2014

That [quoted below] is what the BBC TVGuide had boasted before the actual transmission of the episode of the Panorama programme on BBC One at 1930 GMT on Monday 31 March 2014.


http://tvguide.stv.tv/show-details/?tvgListingID=400862917&tvgEpisodeID=30911309&tvgShowID=3633754&tvgTitle=The%20Mayor%20and%20Our%20Money%20-%20Panorama

“The Mayor and Our Money - Panorama

Up and down the country, directly-elected mayors control billions of pounds of public funds. But can this lead to too much power being concentrated into the hands of one politician? John Ware investigates the directly-elected mayor of Tower Hamlets in London - where opponents claim he's used public funds both to promote himself and to create a local power base that, come election time this May, will help return him to office. Panorama reveals evidence suggesting that, under the mayoral system in Tower Hamlets, accountability and transparency have been put into reverse, with the mayor refusing to answer opposition questions about spending decisions involving millions of pounds of public money - and also how he has injected faith into politics.”

Something must have changed between the writing of that hype and the actual final editing and airing of the Panorama episode.

For the transmitted episode did not examine the “directly-elected mayors”.

It gave no table, no stats, no evidence at all to compare or contrast the “directly-elecetd mayors” and the alternative system.

There was no investigation into the state of “democracy” inside the Tower Hamlets Council.

There was nothing at all about who had brought about the directly-elecetd mayor system in Tower Hamlets.

And why.

There was nothing at all about what any of the Opposition councillors had said about the system at all. Neither the Tower Hamlets Council’s Opposition Conservative group nor the Opposition Labour Party group leader was featured.

No mentionable clip from the Council Meetings at all, except few seconds showing the Council’s Speaker Lesley Pavitt more than once and the Labour group deputy leader Rachel Saunders stating a very short question.

There was no sign of what Tower Hamlets residents generally thought of the Tower Hamlets Council. No reference to the Community in the East End. No investigation into the relationship between Tower Hamlets council and the residents.

It looked like a very very strange package.

Whatever the BBC had hoped to show must have got seriously derailed at some point just before transmission.

Or that the BBC never had done any of the investigations missing from their transmitted version.

Which makes this episode of the Panorama as being disproportionately over-hyped and unjustifiably promoted as an investigation that it wasn’t!

It did not reveal evidence that demonstrated that “under the mayoral system in Tower Hamlets, accountability and transparency have been put into reverse”.

Perhaps the programme had found evidence to substantiate that claim but in the traumatised version that evidence was most emphatically not visible!

Finally, this Panorama as transmitted, did not test the veracity of a single one of the claims made by Lutfur Rahman as included in the broadcast clips of the “interview”!

Tower Hamlets Council in the grip of a clique, as KHOODEELAAR! has been telling for 10 years +

Tower Hamlets Council in the grip of  a clique,  as KHOODEELAAR! has been telling for  10 years +
1832 Hrs AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community in the East End of London TOLD YOU SO!

For four years! That rampant lack of democratic accountability in every part of Tower Hamlets Council was bound to warrant ridicule, condemnation and worse.

By @ Muhammad Haque

1755 Hrs GMT

London Monday 31 March 2014.

The sight of Eric Pickles being paraded as a saviour of standards for the people of Tower Hamlets should be enough to rush for the sick bag.

But things are getting even nastier. For those who have wilfully colluded with the corrupt controlling clique in Tower Hamlets for years are now braying for ethics, morality and standards. Ugh!

The Movement Defending the Community in the East End of London will be watching the elements who seek to use the BBC Panorama programme as a vicarious vehicle to vent their own cravings as well as their own shortcomings.

We have said for years that an “elected executive mayor” “system” itself was, is and will continue to be deeply and dangerously undemocratic.

So why have the “pro-accountability” elements disclosed and peddled by the BBC change their stance of "NO to elected mayor in Tower Hamlets”, seek ‘election to become mayor” themselves and tell lies and rush to join the corrupting antidemocratic careerists’ route in 2010 when the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign stuck to the principles and said NO?


[To be continued]

High death rate in Tower Hamlets, a report on heat-wave finds!

High death rate in Tower Hamlets, a report on heat-wave finds!

Image

 

HIGH HEALTH RISKS to older people in Tower Hamlets. BBC publishes a report naming Tower Hamlets as one of the Capital's two most unsafe boroughs for older people's health - AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Action COMMENTARY DEFENDING The Community in the East End of London.
By © Muhammad Haque
2142 Hrs GMT London Monday 24 March 2014

AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Campaign
Action COMMENTARY DEFENDING The Community in the East End of London. By © Muhammad Haque on the BBC Monday 24 March 2014

The BBC London NEWS report this evening (Monday 24 March 2014) featured here about high health risks in Tower Hamlets (and Hackney) is unlikely to be found in the local Council’s propaganda “newspaper” the Tower Hamlets ‘Pravda’. I called it the East End Lies more than a decade ago, in 2000 in fact.
The East End Lies is lying unconvincingly in its current front page which it abuses to make a plasticky ingratiation to the image of Angela Lansbury, the grand daughter of George Lansbury (who went on to become the Leader of the Labour Party and) one of the Poplar Councillors of 90 years or so ago who defied the Tories and went to jail to uphold the rights of their community.
[To be continued]

An Oppenheimer continues to be appalled by the Neo Cons’ Looting while Tebbit returns to disgust

An Oppenheimer continues to be appalled by the Neo Cons’ Looting while Tebbit returns to disgust
By © Muhammad Haque
0010 Hrs GMT London Friday 21 March 2014


Image [below from the London INDEPENDENT web site] of East London MP Margaret Hodge (Oppenheimer) (born in Cairo in 1944) who has been chairing the House of Commons Pubic Accounts Committee.
Hodge appears to be doing penance for her career as a Right-wing Labour Party careerist. Hodge is a shareholder ion the family Business that was worth £6BN a year in 2011 (Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Hodge) . So it must be an experience for her when she has been forced to take into account how the Rich have been fleecing the British public and making them poorer by the hour

[To be continued]
2328 [2322] Hrs GMT London Thursday 20 March 2014.

Tebbit scorns food bank demand.

The anti-social, neo conniving Reactionary Poverty-Creating political ogre returns to the 'news' with the hateful display of disrespect for basic civilising values...Tebbit has called for a ministerial inquiry into what he actually thinks are sham claims of hunger.. The truth is that if any inquiry is to be held on the issue, it should by investigating the lies that Tebbit has told in his disgraceful career that has been built on the assertion that the looting rich deserve to loot Society.

..[To be continued]

 

2322 Hrs GMT London Thursday 20 March 2014. Tebbit scorns food bank demand. The anti-social, neo conniving Reactionary Poverty-Creating political ogre  returns to the 'news' with the hateful display of disrespect for basic civilising values...Tebbit has called for a ministerial inquiry into what he actually thinks are sham claims of hunger.. The truth is that if any inquiry is to be held on the issue, it should by investigating the lies that Tebbit has told in his disgraceful career that has been built on the assertion that the looting rich deserve to loot Society...[To be continued]

 

THE GUARDIAN web site:

 

Lord Tebbit scorns food bank demand

Former Conservative cabinet minister claims people spend money on junk food then rely on charities for the basics
Tebbit said ministers should study junk food sales in areas where food bank demand has risen.
Tebbit said ministers should study junk food sales in areas where food bank demand has risen. Photograph: Chris Jackson/PA

The former Conservative cabinet minister Lord Tebbit has suggested that people who visit food banks are at the same time spending their money on junk food.

Speaking in the House of Lords, Tebbit said there was a "near infinite demand" for valuable goods given away free and asked ministers to "initiate research into junk food sales in areas where people are [relying] for basic food on the food banks".

He made the comments moments after a Tory environment minister, Lord de Mauley, drew gasps from the chamber by saying food banks are not a scandal but a sign of Britain's charity and ministers should not seek to "interfere" in their use.

During the debate on food banks, several Labour, Liberal Democrat and crossbench independent peers condemned the rise in their usage. Statistics from the Trussell Trust, which oversees more than 400 UK food banks , show 614,000 adults and children received help from its food banks in the first nine months of 2013-14, compared with 350,000 for all of 2012-13.

Asked whether he agreed that the need for food banks was a scandal, De Mauley, a hereditary peer and former banker who went to Eton, said: "Britain has a great tradition of charitable giving, and it would be a bad day on which we started to interfere with that."

Pressed on whether he really meant that, the minister said: "I think I have just answered that, my Lords. Britain has a great tradition of charitable giving, and it would be a great mistake to interfere with that." He did, however, decline to commission the research into junk food requested by Tebbit, saying that there has been a decrease in the number of households reporting that they felt unable to afford food compared with 2007.

Earlier, Tebbit called for David Cameron to be replaced as Tory leader by the next election. In a speech to the Bow Group, he said: "It's not about whether we go left or right but whether we will be a top-down, narrowly focused party run by an elite, or a bottom-up party run by like-minded, anti-statist minded people.

"I hope that change can be brought about and that before the general election we can feel like Conservatives again and feel like the prime minister is a son of Thatcher and not a son of Tony Blair."

Tebbit, who is famous for suggesting in 1981 that the unemployed should get on their bikes to find work, also warned the bedroom tax could lose the party the next election.

"I think we introduced that rather without thinking it through very well, and I think that's costing us," he said.

• This article was amended to correct the date of Lord Tebbit's "on your bike" speech

An Oppenheimer continues to be appalled by the Neo Cons’ Looting while Tebbit returns to disgust

An Oppenheimer continues to be appalled by the Neo Cons’ Looting while Tebbit returns to disgust
By © Muhammad Haque
0010 Hrs GMT London Friday 21 March 2014


Image [below from the London INDEPENDENT web site] of East London MP Margaret Hodge (Oppenheimer) (born in Cairo in 1944) who has been chairing the House of Commons Pubic Accounts Committee.
Hodge appears to be doing penance for her career as a Right-wing Labour Party careerist. Hodge is a shareholder ion the family Business that was worth £6BN a year in 2011 (Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Hodge) . So it must be an experience for her when she has been forced to take into account how the Rich have been fleecing the British public and making them poorer by the hour

[To be continued]
2328 [2322] Hrs GMT London Thursday 20 March 2014.

Tebbit scorns food bank demand.

The anti-social, neo conniving Reactionary Poverty-Creating political ogre returns to the 'news' with the hateful display of disrespect for basic civilising values...Tebbit has called for a ministerial inquiry into what he actually thinks are sham claims of hunger.. The truth is that if any inquiry is to be held on the issue, it should by investigating the lies that Tebbit has told in his disgraceful career that has been built on the assertion that the looting rich deserve to loot Society.

..[To be continued]

 

2322 Hrs GMT London Thursday 20 March 2014. Tebbit scorns food bank demand. The anti-social, neo conniving Reactionary Poverty-Creating political ogre  returns to the 'news' with the hateful display of disrespect for basic civilising values...Tebbit has called for a ministerial inquiry into what he actually thinks are sham claims of hunger.. The truth is that if any inquiry is to be held on the issue, it should by investigating the lies that Tebbit has told in his disgraceful career that has been built on the assertion that the looting rich deserve to loot Society...[To be continued]

 

THE GUARDIAN web site:

 

Lord Tebbit scorns food bank demand

Former Conservative cabinet minister claims people spend money on junk food then rely on charities for the basics
Tebbit said ministers should study junk food sales in areas where food bank demand has risen.
Tebbit said ministers should study junk food sales in areas where food bank demand has risen. Photograph: Chris Jackson/PA

The former Conservative cabinet minister Lord Tebbit has suggested that people who visit food banks are at the same time spending their money on junk food.

Speaking in the House of Lords, Tebbit said there was a "near infinite demand" for valuable goods given away free and asked ministers to "initiate research into junk food sales in areas where people are [relying] for basic food on the food banks".

He made the comments moments after a Tory environment minister, Lord de Mauley, drew gasps from the chamber by saying food banks are not a scandal but a sign of Britain's charity and ministers should not seek to "interfere" in their use.

During the debate on food banks, several Labour, Liberal Democrat and crossbench independent peers condemned the rise in their usage. Statistics from the Trussell Trust, which oversees more than 400 UK food banks , show 614,000 adults and children received help from its food banks in the first nine months of 2013-14, compared with 350,000 for all of 2012-13.

Asked whether he agreed that the need for food banks was a scandal, De Mauley, a hereditary peer and former banker who went to Eton, said: "Britain has a great tradition of charitable giving, and it would be a bad day on which we started to interfere with that."

Pressed on whether he really meant that, the minister said: "I think I have just answered that, my Lords. Britain has a great tradition of charitable giving, and it would be a great mistake to interfere with that." He did, however, decline to commission the research into junk food requested by Tebbit, saying that there has been a decrease in the number of households reporting that they felt unable to afford food compared with 2007.

Earlier, Tebbit called for David Cameron to be replaced as Tory leader by the next election. In a speech to the Bow Group, he said: "It's not about whether we go left or right but whether we will be a top-down, narrowly focused party run by an elite, or a bottom-up party run by like-minded, anti-statist minded people.

"I hope that change can be brought about and that before the general election we can feel like Conservatives again and feel like the prime minister is a son of Thatcher and not a son of Tony Blair."

Tebbit, who is famous for suggesting in 1981 that the unemployed should get on their bikes to find work, also warned the bedroom tax could lose the party the next election.

"I think we introduced that rather without thinking it through very well, and I think that's costing us," he said.

• This article was amended to correct the date of Lord Tebbit's "on your bike" speech

How BSKY814 has been painting a very false image of Tower Hamlets.

How BSKY814 has been painting a very false image of Tower Hamlets.
THIS Statement by the "HousinG Options Service" is misleading

 

0648 [0642] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 19 March 2014

How BSKY814 has been painting a very false image of Tower Hamlets.

It has been hiding the massive homelessness, lack of housing, rising unemployment, low income, high anti-social behaviour and raging discrimination, unfairness in Tower Hamlets while Big Biz and the City of London interests are being allowed a blanket facility by the Council bureaucracy to take over most of the land and the spaces in Tower Hamlets...

 

[To be continued]

 

AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR Campaign Contextually Originally Diagnosing the evidence as seen in the role of BSKYB814, dated Tuesday 18 March 2014

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVuILoAA894&feature=youtu.be

 

AADHIKAROnline the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign diagnosing the latest evidence of the fabrication by BSKYB Ch 814 Tuesday 18 March 2014 for Tower Hamlets Council about housing in the Borough.

By © Muhammad Haque

0642 [0620] [0515] Hrs GMT

London Wednesday 19 March 2014.

 

Housing in Tower Hamlets remains the biggest social problem linked to the persistence of poverty and deprivation-creation  that has been going on via the locally sited State bureaucracies.

The numerically most significant agency is of course the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council.

Through its de facto Poverty- Creation Project, mis-called “the Benefits Service”, Tower Hamlets Council operates the Neo Conservative agenda of maintaining denial, keeping up deprivation and perpetuating the scams that keep poverty at a high level in the Borough.

Closely linked with Tower Hamlets Council’s Poverty-creation project are the Tower Hamlets Council’s  Housing Denial project miscalled “Housing Options” “service”  that is based in the Roman Road (London E2)  and is run by a cabal that is negligent, prejudiced, incompetent,  reactionary, pro-racist and comprehensively dysfunctional and unfit for purpose and its equally dysfunctional homelessness-creation project.

By all accounts, half of the “ordinary” population of Tower Hamlets are in poor housing or in no housing and in low income and in no income.

Because of the unreliability and lack of transparency  by the dysfunctional cabal “Housing Options” Tower Hamlets Council has been allowed, as a bureaucracy to get away with its massive disservice to the Community on housing, poverty and and anti-social behaviour, all of which are linked.

And one very relevant source operating at the expense of the “local Community” in c doing propaganda for the Council’s bureaucracy  in that way has been the BSKYB Channel 814 which on Tuesday 18 March 2014 carried a typically misleading and untruthful image of the Council in its bulletin described below:

 

The Ch 814 "news" "presenter" insulted the viewers again by uttering an absolutely

false statement.

That statement gave credit to "Tower Hamlets Council".

Yet the money had come from the UK Central Government and that fact should have

been the main statement.

There were dozens of other untruths in that clip as shown as "news" by Channel 814 in

its "bulletin" allegedly due on air at 2200 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 18 March 2014 but which didn’t come on  air until several minutes later than claimed

 [To be continued]

Khoodeelaar! Campaign Defending the East End of London SAYING NO2HS2

Khoodeelaar! Campaign Defending the East End of London SAYING NO2HS2
By © Muhammad Haque

Organiser the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign

PUBLISHED by AADHIKAROnline

0428 [0414] [0356] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 18 march 2014. HS2 isn't quite in the East End of London.

Yet the Khoodeelaar! Campaign Defending the East End of London Against Big Biz Agenda IS actively engaged in opposing HS2.

Why?

For a start, the values that Big Biz represents, typifies, symbolises are hostile to and in violation of the rights, the needs and the say of the affected local communities. That is only a start.

There are many details that I shall be UPDATING here and on related posts in due course.

For now, a piece of third party publication and comment is being cited here as part of the evidential base of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign.

AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Campaign noting the Shire Counties Tories' admission that Big Biz scam HS2.

In due course I shall also examine e in detail the obscene and uneconomic fixation by the Guardian to Big Biz scams.

In the same vein, I shall also look at Kevin Maguire's (formerly of the Guardian and now of the Daily Mirror) out of context invocation of the anti-progress views of those who oppose Big Business...

As Maguire showed in his ritualistic 'taunting' performed at the expense of the London Daily Mail's Andrew Pierce in this clip that I have attached to this COMMENTARY from SKY NEWS (hosted by Anna Botting, Monday 17 March 2014).

I am OPPOSED to most of Pierce's "politics" but I also recognise that even Pierce can see that Shire County Neo Cons are opposed to HS2, albeit for their own "reasons"! Whatever their motive, they are SAYING NO2HS2.

I recognise that "opposition', regardless of their location in " opportunistic motives". [To be continued]



DWP Department for Want & Poverty-creation descends from meltdown to nudity with pants half down

DWP Department for Want & Poverty-creation descends from meltdown to nudity with pants half down
1512 Hrs GMT London Saturday 15 March 2014

After the Guardian reported Margaret Hodge MP as saying that the UK Department for Want and Poverty Creation was on the verge of meltdown, (The DAILY MAIL reports) a "job centre" protest by one victim of the DWP as nakedly proving the analysis true!


Woman strips to her underwear in the middle of a Jobcentre as part of bizarre protest over benefits (but is it just the latest Neknominate dare to end up online?)

• Woman heads into jobcentre and strips off, protesting about job seekers

• She is shortly thrown out by a security guard and told to 'grow up'

• When outside she can be seen drinking and 'nominating' someone else

By LUKE GARRATT

PUBLISHED:

11:38, 15 March 2014

UPDATED: 14:18, 15  Marc



She begins by walking into the Jobcentre in Stockton, Teesside and begins stripping off for the camera

A video has emerged showing the moment a woman stripped to her underwear in a Jobcentre in an apparent Neknominate challenge, which she attempted to pass off as an act of protest.

The young woman walked into a branch of the Jobcentre in Teesside in Stockton wearing a long coat.

In the film she can be seen removing her coat to reveal that she is wearing only a black bra, pants, stockings, suspenders and trainers.

She is also wearing a pair of gold hooped earrings.

The film footage, posted on Facebook, shows her disrobing and claiming she is protesting against sanctions to her jobseeker's allowance.

She is very quickly thrown out of the job centre by a security officer, who can be heard telling her to 'grow up' as she is thrown out, just before her coat is thrown out as well.

She can then be seen outside drinking from a can and nominating someone else to do the challenge.

Right after, she is told to move away from the job centre or face being arrested.

It is believed she carried out the clothes-off protest as part of the new drinking game that has swept the internet.

NekNomination involves friends nominating each other to do challenges and finishing it by downing a drink, usually something alcoholic, before posting their exploits on the internet.

Recent cases locally have included a teenager who sparked a sea rescue launch after posting that he was planning to jump from Saltburn Pier as part of the game and a woman who rode a horse into a Tesco store in Bishop Auckland.

+5 

(Left) The young woman begins to strep off in the Stockton branch of the Jobcentre in Teeside, she then begins to yell about political matters, claiming she is protesting about job seekers allowance (right)

The most disturbing case was when a boy of just 10 downed a sickening mixture of Nando's sauce, cream, mayonnaise and vodka as part of the deadly Neknominate online drinking game craze sweeping the world, it emerged today.

The primary school-age youngster from Calderdale, West Yorkshire, was reportedly filmed by friends guzzling the nauseating cocktail after he was dared to take part.

More...







• Young people risk being bullied online if they 'chicken out' of NekNomination drinking dares, health minister warns

• Boy, 10, downed Nando's sauce, cream, mayo and vodka as Neknominate craze hits the playground... and councils tell Twitter and Facebook to warn users of dangers

• Schools are putting up signs and holding special assemblies to warn pupils about dangers of NekNominate



This prompted council chiefs to Twitter and Facebook they should publish prominent warnings of the dangers of the social media trend, which claimed three lives in the UK.

Headmasters across the country have also been reading out warnings in assembly and displaying them on noticeboards in an effort to discourage children from taking part.

Woman's Jobcentre strip 'protest' actually Neknomination stunt

 +5 

After being thrown out she downs a can of drink, and then makes a gesture to the camera and 'nominates' someone else

Read more:



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ article-2581551/Woman-strips-underwear-middle-Jobcentre-bizarre-protest- benefits-just-latest-Neknominate-dare-end-online.html#ixzz2w2mQfvmI



















Tower Hamlets Council continuing to fail to represent the needs of the Borough

Tower Hamlets Council continuing to fail to represent the needs of the Borough
Tower Hamlets Council continuing to fail to represent the needs of the Borough of Tower Hamlets as the Council is again exposed as behaving in a way that adds to the disrepute it has already brought on the East End Community

[To be continued]

1335 [0300] Hrs GMT Saturday 08 March 2014

 

The report on the Daily Express web site, which the Khoodeelaar! Campaign accessed in the early hours of today Saturday 08 March 2014, has more than 30 comments on it at this time.

 

Most of those are clearly about "Muslims".

 

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has been describing Tower Hamlets Council as in the grip of a controlling corrupt clique.

 

We hold that clique responsible for the latest exhibition which most people would find unacceptable. 

 

To put it very mildly.

 

Reading the Daily Express online report and the comments posted so far, we can go further and assert:

 

Unless those whose behaviour has been depicted in this Daily Express report

seriously change their approach and their attitude then they WILL be held responsible for causing a serious worsening in the atmosphere in the Community among people based on “faith, ethnicity” and so on.

 

Several participants feature in the Daily Express report. 

 

Those individuals should recognise that they are councillors 

because they were elected to serve the Community.

 

What is coming across is that there is inflammation, incitement and 

hostility among councillors.

 

This is the opposite of what an elected Council should be.

 

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign is aware of more than one published claim - so far published by PRIVATE EYE magazine (dated 7 March 2014, issue 1361)  at page 14 in the ROTTEN BOROUGHS Column where it covers quite a few aspects of the same Council Meeting which the Daily Express is reporting on.

 

One of the points Private Eye makes is that the BBC’s Panorama programme is due to report on Tower Hamlets.

 

The indications so far are that it will add to and accentuate the picture of Tower Hamlets Council is polarising fast along ‘faith’ ethnicity, racial...” lines.

 

That cannot be doing the Community any good at all.

 

So we are demanding that Tower Hamlets Council  stop abusing their positions in the ways already seen and that they should start addressing the many pressing needs of the Community which they have been failing to address or serve.

 

If hey continue to fail to pay heed to this then quite disproportionate escalation in hostilities will take place and Tower Hamlets Borough will be turned into the focus for all the wrong reasons.  

 

That will let the Community down even more badly than has happened so far.

 

_________

 

The Daily Express online

 

'We're not CURRY PEOPLE!' Amazing VIDEO of politicians erupting in Asian-White race row

THESE extraordinary videos show a town hall meeting descending into bitterness and chaos after an Asian councillor likened white colleagues to Oswald Mosley’s Blackshirts, while another claimed his community had been branded “curry people”.

Published: Fri, March 7, 2014
[googlemaps https://maps.google.com/_/+1/fastbutton?usegapi=1&size=medium&hl=en-GB&origin=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.express.co.uk&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.express.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fuk%2F463677%2FWe-re-not-CURRY-PEOPLE-Amazing-VIDEO-of-politicians-erupting-in-Asian-White-race-row&gsrc=3p&jsh=m%3B%2F_%2Fscs%2Fapps-static%2F_%2Fjs%2Fk%3Doz.gapi.en_GB.3rf8gRJcqR4.O%2Fm%3D__features__%2Fam%3DAQ%2Frt%3Dj%2Fd%3D1%2Ft%3Dzcms%2Frs%3DAItRSTOGsoa8HrEE1Jz7qoqy1SvBS4UPqw#_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C_resizeMe%2C_renderstart%2Concircled%2Cdrefresh%2Cerefresh%2Conload&id=I0_1394248243201&parent=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.express.co.uk&pfname=&rpctoken=85817179&w=100&h=240]

FURY Cllr Anwar Khan accused his white Labour colleagues of halting the ambitions of BengalisFURY: Cllr Anwar Khan accused his white Labour colleagues of halting the ambitions of Bengalis [TOWER HAMLETS]

A Labour Bangladeshi councillor even claimed his own party was ruled by a “white elite” and he is alleged to have called one white colleague a “racist piece of s**”.

The footage was captured by Tower Hamlets Council’s own cameras in east London, which were installed in the debating after a general edict to local government bosses from Communities Secretary Eric Pickles last year.

Mr Pickles had wanted taxpayers to see how their elected representatives, who are paid between £10,000 and £65,000 a year, behaved during town hall debates.

His department had specifically highlighted previous antics of Tower Hamlets, which is ridden with race politics. 

The film was taken at the meeting of the full council to discuss a £1.2billion budget last week.

The notorious borough, which is one of Britain’s most deprived, is run by a directly elected mayor, Lutfur Rahman.

He is an independent who was expelled from Labour during an acrimonious election campaign in 2010.

(WATCH EDITED VERSION OF ROW)

 

Since then he has created a cabinet comprised entirely of councillors from a Bangladeshi background after failing to attract white members to defect from Labour.

The split has caused a poisonous atmosphere between the political groups.

During the meeting on Wednesday last week, Labour councillor Anwar Khan is invited to address the chamber by Speaker Lesley Pavitt.

As he makes some remarks about the budget, he cites the name of party colleague, Ann Jackson.

He refers to an email she sent before the Olympics criticising the Mayor’s attempt to make the borough’s famous Brick Lane a “Curry Capital” for 2012 tourists.

In that email, she had implored the mayor to be more adventurous and make the borough known for more than just good curry.

 

sirajul islam, alibor choudhury, danny de vitoFARCE: Labour's group leader in Tower Hamlets, Sirajul Islam, was mocked as Danny de Vito lookalike [TOWER HAMLETS]

However, Cllr Khan in the video footage he says: "Despite the current chair of the Labour group Councillor Jackson dismissing the people of Tower Hamlets as nothing more than curry people in her email in 2010.

“In her email in 2010 when she dismisses the people of Tower Hamlets as nothing more than curry.” 

Outraged, Cllr Jackson, who was wearing a black cardigan because she was in private mourning for her ex-husband, rises to her feet.

She dismisses his version of events as “laughable” and explains the “proper context” of her words.

But this was not enough for Councillor Alibor Choudhury who sits in the mayor’s cabinet and is in charge of the £1.2billion budget.

 

Oswald Mosely had the black shirts in the Thirties. John Biggs has the black cardigans

Cllr Alibor Choudhury

It is after his words that the meeting erupts.

Unaware that Cllr Jackson is in mourning, he says: "Cllr Jackson back then did say those derogatory things, and let me say one thing to you.”

He then points to her and to her boss John Biggs, a London Assembly member, and says: “Oswald Mosely had the black shirts in the Thirties. 

“John Biggs has the black cardigans."

The speaker, Cllr Pavitt is visibly furious and says: "Cllr Choudhury, that was more than offensive.”

She then tries to have him evicted, only to be told that all she can do is issue a warning.

In the background, other councillors start chanting “Out, out, out.”

A few minutes later, Cllr Anwar Khan, who today quit the local party, is again the centre of attention. He mocks the appearance of Labour’s group leader, Cllr Sirajul Islam, labelling him “Danny de Vito”.

Seconds later and off-camera, another Labour councillor sitting next to him, Joshua Peck, switches off Cllr Khan’s microphone. At that point, Cllr Khan sees red and with increasing volume, yells: “Councillor, why did you turn it off? 

 

alibor choudhury, tower hamlets council, oswald mosley blackshirts,Independent councillor Alibor Choudhury 'joked' Labour were like Oswald Mosley's Blackshirts [TOWER HAMLETS]

lesley pavitt, labour, tower hamlets speakerVeteran Labour councillor was visibly shocked by the behaviour and accusations [TOWER HAMLETS]

“Why are you being so disruptive and turning it off? Why are you turning it off?"He continues: "Madam speaker, why did he just turn my microphone off when you gave me permission to speak?"

This prompts more uproar in the chamber as the Speaker appeals for calm.

Cllr Peck then says: "Madam speaker, it was perhaps inadvisable for me to switch the microphone off because you were standing when Cllr Khan was speaking.

“But the comment he made, heard by a number of councillors around me that I was a 'racist piece of s***' is unacceptable from one councillor to another."

Explaining himself, Cllr Khan then says: “I think it is unacceptable that a member, my fellow ward colleague for four years, comes rushing without full context to turn my microphone off. 

“It goes to the heart of the point I've been raising over the last four weeks, that the Labour administration - the white elite - do not want talented Bengalis to speak."

This prompts more shouting, jeering and cheering and another independent councillor, Rania Khan says: "He feels that the Labour Party hinders Bengalis from speaking out; which I second and I agree with."

Until Cllr Anwar Khan’s resignation today, the Tower Hamlets Labour group comprised 13 Bangladeshi councillors, one Somali and 13 white members.

Thirty of the 52 elected representatives in Tower Hamlets are Bangladeshi.

Cllr Anwar Khan today denied calling Cllr Peck a “racist piece of s***”.

Today, Cllr Choudhury said he had been "mortified to learn" Ann Jackson was in mourning and that his remarks had been "ill-advised".

(WATCH THE LONGER VERSIONS OF THE EXCHANGES BELOW.)

 

Tower Hamlets Council in dysfunction

Tower Hamlets Council in dysfunction
1350 [1340] [1336] Hrs GMT London Thursday 06 March 2014.

By © Muhammad Haque

Serious dysfunction exposed in Tower Hamlets Council.
The reported remarks by Alibor Choudhury must be seen in the context of the whole of the L B Tower Hamlets Council as being on a plane that is far removed from the ordinary population in the “deprived” inner city, East End of London Borough of Tower Hamlets
Shocking" is not the word

It is a festering crisis that looks set to get worse, because there is no visible genuinely democratic movement on the part of the paid Opposition councillors ion the ramshackle, wasteful Council.

The controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council is above the law, because the paid Opposition is lazy, opportunistic and lacks basic rigour and commitment.
This is why Alibor Choudhury was able to think that his "Black Shirt, Black Cardigan" remark was justified.
Paid Opposition councillors have in the past used derogatory words against their supposed rivals who sit as Lutfur Rahman’s supporters.
As the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has been pointing out, there is no really democratic Tower Hamlets Council.
What exists is a sham and the paid Opposition councillors (with the lone exception of the Tory Peter Golds) are as much to blame as the “executive mayor” side.
Their “highest” point is reached when they abuse each other.
There is no real debate about the day to day corruption and lying that go on under covers of “Council services”.

To be continued.

The following online piece has been retrieved from the Archant-owned online news and commercial web site

Mourning councillor compared to Oswald Mosely’s Blackshirts Cllr Alibor Choudhury was gagged at the meeting Adam Barnett Friday, February 28, 2014 6:32 PM A senior east London councillor was gagged after comparing a grieving opposition politician to Oswald Mosely’s fascist Blackshirts. Oswald Mosely, leader of the British Union of Fascists, in 1936 Cllr Alibor Choudhury was banned from speaking at the council meeting following his public outburst against Cllr Ann Jackson, and Labour have called for him to make a public apology. Cllr Choudhury, cabinet member for resources, speaking about the opposition councillor who recently lost her husband, is reported to have said: “Oswald Mosely had his Blackshirts, John Biggs has his ‘Black Cardigans’!” The “astonished” Bow West councillor was wearing black in mourning for her ex-husband, whose funeral was this week and who is father of her children. The council voted to pass a motion that Cllr Choudhury “be not further heard”, meaning his right to speak at the meeting was removed. Cllr Ann Jackson, when she was Tower Hamlets mayor in 2007 Labour said it would be raising a formal complaint against Cllr Choudhury over his conduct. Cllr Jackson, who served as mayor in 2007, said: “I was astonished. I made an effort to attend a crucial budget council meeting a day after a family funeral, only to be subject to this kind of baseless and abhorrent abuse.” She added: “What really concerns me is Cllr Choudhury’s willingness to say anything to smear an opponent no matter how false or how hurtful it might be.” Last week Cllr Choudhury, who is an independent councillor for Shadwell, reported Labour mayoral candidate John Biggs to the Equality and Human Rights Commission for remarks Cllr Choudhury called racist. Cllr Sirajul Islam, leader of the Labour group, said: “Comparing a grieving councillor to a racist Blackshirt is deeply offensive and totally beyond the pale. “If Alibor Choudhury has any integrity what so ever he will publicly apologise for his comments and the distress they have caused.” Cllr Choudhury was unavailable for comment at time of press. Oswald Mosely was leader of the British Union of Fascists, whose members - nicknamed Blackshirts for their uniforms - marched through the East End in the 1930s attacking Jewish people.


Bow, E3 resident, blonde, "University lecturer" is jailed as a gangsters' moll! Not a word by ELA!

Bow, E3 resident, blonde, "University lecturer" is jailed as a gangsters' moll! Not a word by ELA!

2024 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 04 March 2014. Why has the “local” East London Advertiser been suppressing a serious item of news involving a Tower Hamlets resident who has just been jailed for three years in an English Crown Court? This incident of the East London Idiotiser hiding the news items is a tip of the iceberg of criminality that the Idiotiser has been perpetrating for years. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign  has long argued that the East London Idiotiser is a lying outlet that has been aiding and abetting crimes and criminals. The only time that it “concedes” the facts of crimes and criminals is when that suits the Idiotiser's racist agenda. This time, the convicted and jailed criminal is a young blonde “University lecturer”, too much for the racists to accept.....Because that would break the racist stereotype....BELOW:  PRESS ASSOCIATION copy as reported by the London INDEPENDENT.  A Tower Hamlets resident from Hewlett Road near the Roman Road in Bow London E3, has been convicted of a series of offences. The Court called the blonde a gangsters' moll. Rachel Kenehan

 

Jail for London Metropolitan lecturer who turned 'gangster's moll' and helped her boyfriend after he 'executed' a rival

 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 

Monday 03 March 2014

  
  
  
  
  
  
171

A university lecturer turned "gangster's moll" has been jailed for three-and-a-half years for assisting her boyfriend and two others in their bid to escape after they "executed" a rival to their drugs gang.

Ads by Google

Rachel Kenehan, who taught sociology and psychology at the London Metropolitan University, suffered a "spectacular fall from grace" after she became "infatuated" with Pierre Lewis who she met while carrying out charitable mentoring work for young offenders.

Kenehan, of Hewlett Road, London, E3, was found guilty at Winchester Crown Court of assisting offenders, conspiracy to supply class A drugs and perverting the course of public justice.

Lewis, who turns 21 on Sunday, of Castlenau, Barnes, London, SW13, Jemmikai Orlebar-Forbes, 20, of Cloudesdale Road, London, SW17, and Isaac Boateng, 22, of Mill Farm Crescent, Hounslow, TW4, were found guilty of the murder of 23-year-old drug dealer Jahmel Jones, from Brixton, who was killed in Southampton, Hampshire.

They already pleaded guilty to conspiracy to supply drugs.

Lewis was jailed for a minimum of 29 years, Orlebar-Forbes for 31 years and Boateng for 30 years.

Sentencing Kenehan, Mr Justice Keith told the 35-year-old, who he described as being infatuated by Lewis: "If one was looking for stereotypes, you would be the gangster's moll.

"But that would be too facile a description of you. You are a woman of many talents, hugely gifted with intellect, ambition and drive, with qualities of generosity and kindness which have so impressed the many people who spoke so highly of you in the course of the trial.

"The fact is that had you not met Lewis, you would not be where you are now. Whether you will be able to pursue your career in the future is now highly questionable.

"That is the real punishment for you, and although you must, of course, go to prison, you would, I think, have been punished twice over if I did not significantly reduce the sentences I would otherwise have passed to reflect your spectacular fall from grace, and the indignity of being at the receiving end of the system which you studied and taught with such conspicuous success."

He added: "All of this, of course, will have a profound effect on your career, but I conclude by expressing the hope that you can one day return to the field of criminology in which you have so much to contribute, with the advantage of the new perspective you will have having seen the system in operation from the inside."

The judge added: "I want to say something to the family of Jahmel Jones. Whatever else can be said of him, he did not deserve to die. I was greatly moved by the victim impact statement from his mother, and I want his family to know that I have taken into account the terrible effect that his death has had on their lives. I wish to express to them my own condolences for their loss."

Following the conviction, Sarah Dineley, District Crown Prosecutor for the CPS in Wessex, said: "It is difficult to understand in this case how Rachel Kenehan, a university lecturer who was completing her PhD in criminology threw away her promising career and future to be involved in the criminal activities of her young boyfriend Pierre Lewis and his two co-defendants.

"These criminal activities led to the brutal death of Jahmel Jones, who had also chosen to lead a criminal lifestyle.

"She met Pierre Lewis through her charitable mentoring work with young male offenders with the aim of reducing their re-offending on release from prison.

"However, she failed to observe the boundaries that were set out by the charity between mentors and offenders and became infatuated with him.

"Her actions in this criminal enterprise showed the extent of that infatuation and what lengths she was prepared to go to for her boyfriend."

Describing the murder, Ms Dineley continued: "Jahmel Jones had selected the St Mary's area of Southampton to sell crack cocaine and heroin.

"He was quite established in Southampton and would regularly deal from flats belonging to drug users.

"Forbes, Lewis and Boateng had also chosen the St Mary's area in which to ply their drugs and they became rivals of Jones.

"They would travel back and forth from London to Southampton bringing with them crack and heroin.

"They would stay free of charge in flats belonging to addicts in return for drugs.

"They believed Jones had robbed them of drugs and as a result sought retribution - the retribution was execution by shooting.

"Once the killing was done, they fled back to London with the assistance of Kenehan who picked them up from Basingstoke and they all returned to her home where they stayed for three days.

"Whilst there is no evidence that she knew that they had planned to kill Jahmel Jones, the jury at Winchester Crown Court heard how she assisted them and went to great efforts to destroy the evidence.

"The evidence also showed how she also assisted the defendants in their supply of drugs by paying in excess of £4,000 for hire cars for the numerous trips that the defendants made to Southampton."

She added: "Our thoughts are with the family of Jahmel Jones at this time."

PA

 

Other news sources, carrying almost identical facts, as revealed in a Google.com search result retrieved at 2018 GMT Tuesday 04 March 2014 include the following:

 

 

 
 
 



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10574982/Criminologist-helped-escape-after-murder.html

Bow, E3 resident, blonde, "University lecturer" is jailed as a gangsters' moll! Not a word by ELA!

Bow, E3 resident, blonde, "University lecturer" is jailed as a gangsters' moll! Not a word by ELA!

2024 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 04 March 2014. Why has the “local” East London Advertiser been suppressing a serious item of news involving a Tower Hamlets resident who has just been jailed for three years in an English Crown Court? This incident of the East London Idiotiser hiding the news items is a tip of the iceberg of criminality that the Idiotiser has been perpetrating for years. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign  has long argued that the East London Idiotiser is a lying outlet that has been aiding and abetting crimes and criminals. The only time that it “concedes” the facts of crimes and criminals is when that suits the Idiotiser's racist agenda. This time, the convicted and jailed criminal is a young blonde “University lecturer”, too much for the racists to accept.....Because that would break the racist stereotype....BELOW:  PRESS ASSOCIATION copy as reported by the London INDEPENDENT.  A Tower Hamlets resident from Hewlett Road near the Roman Road in Bow London E3, has been convicted of a series of offences. The Court called the blonde a gangsters' moll. Rachel Kenehan

 

Jail for London Metropolitan lecturer who turned 'gangster's moll' and helped her boyfriend after he 'executed' a rival

 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 

Monday 03 March 2014

  
  
  
  
  
  
171

A university lecturer turned "gangster's moll" has been jailed for three-and-a-half years for assisting her boyfriend and two others in their bid to escape after they "executed" a rival to their drugs gang.

Ads by Google

Rachel Kenehan, who taught sociology and psychology at the London Metropolitan University, suffered a "spectacular fall from grace" after she became "infatuated" with Pierre Lewis who she met while carrying out charitable mentoring work for young offenders.

Kenehan, of Hewlett Road, London, E3, was found guilty at Winchester Crown Court of assisting offenders, conspiracy to supply class A drugs and perverting the course of public justice.

Lewis, who turns 21 on Sunday, of Castlenau, Barnes, London, SW13, Jemmikai Orlebar-Forbes, 20, of Cloudesdale Road, London, SW17, and Isaac Boateng, 22, of Mill Farm Crescent, Hounslow, TW4, were found guilty of the murder of 23-year-old drug dealer Jahmel Jones, from Brixton, who was killed in Southampton, Hampshire.

They already pleaded guilty to conspiracy to supply drugs.

Lewis was jailed for a minimum of 29 years, Orlebar-Forbes for 31 years and Boateng for 30 years.

Sentencing Kenehan, Mr Justice Keith told the 35-year-old, who he described as being infatuated by Lewis: "If one was looking for stereotypes, you would be the gangster's moll.

"But that would be too facile a description of you. You are a woman of many talents, hugely gifted with intellect, ambition and drive, with qualities of generosity and kindness which have so impressed the many people who spoke so highly of you in the course of the trial.

"The fact is that had you not met Lewis, you would not be where you are now. Whether you will be able to pursue your career in the future is now highly questionable.

"That is the real punishment for you, and although you must, of course, go to prison, you would, I think, have been punished twice over if I did not significantly reduce the sentences I would otherwise have passed to reflect your spectacular fall from grace, and the indignity of being at the receiving end of the system which you studied and taught with such conspicuous success."

He added: "All of this, of course, will have a profound effect on your career, but I conclude by expressing the hope that you can one day return to the field of criminology in which you have so much to contribute, with the advantage of the new perspective you will have having seen the system in operation from the inside."

The judge added: "I want to say something to the family of Jahmel Jones. Whatever else can be said of him, he did not deserve to die. I was greatly moved by the victim impact statement from his mother, and I want his family to know that I have taken into account the terrible effect that his death has had on their lives. I wish to express to them my own condolences for their loss."

Following the conviction, Sarah Dineley, District Crown Prosecutor for the CPS in Wessex, said: "It is difficult to understand in this case how Rachel Kenehan, a university lecturer who was completing her PhD in criminology threw away her promising career and future to be involved in the criminal activities of her young boyfriend Pierre Lewis and his two co-defendants.

"These criminal activities led to the brutal death of Jahmel Jones, who had also chosen to lead a criminal lifestyle.

"She met Pierre Lewis through her charitable mentoring work with young male offenders with the aim of reducing their re-offending on release from prison.

"However, she failed to observe the boundaries that were set out by the charity between mentors and offenders and became infatuated with him.

"Her actions in this criminal enterprise showed the extent of that infatuation and what lengths she was prepared to go to for her boyfriend."

Describing the murder, Ms Dineley continued: "Jahmel Jones had selected the St Mary's area of Southampton to sell crack cocaine and heroin.

"He was quite established in Southampton and would regularly deal from flats belonging to drug users.

"Forbes, Lewis and Boateng had also chosen the St Mary's area in which to ply their drugs and they became rivals of Jones.

"They would travel back and forth from London to Southampton bringing with them crack and heroin.

"They would stay free of charge in flats belonging to addicts in return for drugs.

"They believed Jones had robbed them of drugs and as a result sought retribution - the retribution was execution by shooting.

"Once the killing was done, they fled back to London with the assistance of Kenehan who picked them up from Basingstoke and they all returned to her home where they stayed for three days.

"Whilst there is no evidence that she knew that they had planned to kill Jahmel Jones, the jury at Winchester Crown Court heard how she assisted them and went to great efforts to destroy the evidence.

"The evidence also showed how she also assisted the defendants in their supply of drugs by paying in excess of £4,000 for hire cars for the numerous trips that the defendants made to Southampton."

She added: "Our thoughts are with the family of Jahmel Jones at this time."

PA

 

Other news sources, carrying almost identical facts, as revealed in a Google.com search result retrieved at 2018 GMT Tuesday 04 March 2014 include the following:

 

 

 
 
 



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10574982/Criminologist-helped-escape-after-murder.html

KHOODEELAAR! Diagnosing the Channel 814, the Daily Express and LBTH Council clique -1

KHOODEELAAR! Diagnosing the Channel 814, the Daily Express and LBTH Council clique -1
0040 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 19 February 2014

By © Muhammad Haque

 

KHOODEELAAR! first Commentary on the DAILY EXPRESS version of a 'news report' about the ethnicity-linked 'satellite' BSKB TV Channel 814 (also known as "Channel S") that has led with the claim that Tower Hamlets Council's Executive Mayor Lutfur Rahman had given the convicted and now jailed fraudster Ferdhaus Jail a glowing reference "just before" the latter (Mahee Jolil Ferdhaus/Mohammed Jolil Ferdhaus…)  was sent to jail by London's Southwark Crown Court on Monday 17 February 2014.

 

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign is critical o the particular bias and omissions as shown by the DAILY EXPRESS.

 

These commentaries will be continued.

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign posted a comment on the London DAILY EXPRESS website at 2151 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 18 February 2014

That Comment was numbered 4th on the “comments” at that time on the DAILY EXPRESS Website piece.

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign is DEFENDING the Community in the East End of London and also carrying the ethical banner for fairness and impartiality in the way we comment on issues.

Quoting [with two typos corrected in the UPDATE]

The headline to your online piece reads “Anger as London mayor gives GLOWING court reference for convicted insurance FRAUDSTER”.

Clearly you have been too excited to realise that an insertion of “a” should have been put before the “London” to distinguish the “mayor” from the “London mayor”.

The main “news” is about the fraud by an individual whose published “home” address is Warley in Essex. And his published reported place of fraud has been in the London Borough of Waltham Forest and elsewhere and not, as far as is definitely known at the time of writing on 18 February 2014, in Tower Hamlets.

So why give so much prominence to Tower Hamlets?

Especially as you say at the end that there is no suggestion that Lutfur

was involved in the reported fraud by Ferdhaus?

As the news story that follows your headline is really not about Lutfur Rahman, the reasonable and fair-minded question is: why lead with that?

As Ted Jeory, whose by-line appears with the story, ought to know, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has been OPPOSED to there being an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets. On that principle, we stand firm.

In contrast with our position, the “star” name that Mr Jeory promotes about Tower Hamlets is that of Peter Golds. And what has Peter Golds been doing?

First he claimed that he was opposed to the mayor system and then he became a supporter of the system.

There is absolutely nothing that justifies someone changing their “principle” like that!

Now, he has become THE expert in demanding all manner of investigation into the many allegations he has made about the Council.

The Council is controlled by a corrupt clique and it will NOT do anything that exposes its corruption.

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has said this for ages.

Since before anyone in the ordinary population in Tower Hamlets had ever heard of either Lutfur Rahman or indeed of Peter Golds.

So why haven’t you, the Daily Express and Mr Ted Jeory done any reporting on that?

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/460480/Tower-Hamlets-mayor-Lutfur-Rahman-court-praise-for-Channel-S-fraudster-Mohammed-Ferdhaus

The DAILY EXPRESS online piece has used a number of images, including the one below. This one shows Channel 814 giving another platform to Lutfur Rahman. The slot was fronted by Ferdhaus Jolil in November 2013 according to the DAILY EXPRESS online piece retrieved at 2130 GMT
 
Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman court praise for Channel S fraudster Mohammed Ferdhaus | UK |...
www.express.co.uk

 

 

THE DAILY EXPRESS ONLINE REPORT QUOTED BELOW:

 

 

Anger as London mayor gives GLOWING court reference for convicted insurance FRAUDSTER

ONE of Britain’s most controversial mayors provided a glowing court reference yesterday to a convicted insurance fraudster who was then sentenced to three years in jail for money laundering.

Published: Tue, February 18, 2014
 
 
 

TV Mayor Lutfur Rahman right being interviewed on Channel S by Mohammed Ferdhaus leftTV: Mayor Lutfur Rahman, right, being interviewed on Channel S by Mohammed Ferdhaus, left [YOUTUBE]

Lutfur Rahman, the directly elected mayor of Tower Hamlets Council in east London, praised Mohammed Ferdhaus’s “instrumental role” in promoting Britain’s Bangladeshi community just minutes before he was sent to prison for the second time in six years.

Mr Rahman’s letter of praise made reference to Ferdhaus’s work with Channel S, an influential satellite TV station for British Bangladeshis and which has been warned by Ofcom for broadcasting biased coverage of the mayor’s policies. Ferdhaus is the channel’s founder and was until recently a regular presenter.

He interviewed Mr Rahman, an independent who was expelled from Labour in 2010, on the channel as recently as last November. Despite a previous jail sentence for insurance fraud, Ferdhaus has been named as one of the most powerful Bangladeshis in Britain.

However, a judge at Southwark Crown Court yesterday said another custodial sentence was the only possible outcome for his latest crime, laundering the money from a £1.9million crash for cash insurance scam.

 

lutfur rahman, mohammed ferdhaus, channel s, tower hamlets, tower hamlets council, mahee, mahee jalil, mahee insurance, mahee kidnap, lutfur rahman, peter golds, channel s ofcomCONTROVERSIAL: Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman was expelled from the Labour party in 2010 [TOWER HAMLETS]

Ferdhaus, 40, who is also known as Mahee Jalil, grinned as his sentence was read out and waved at supporters in the public gallery, saying "thank you" and "see you  soon". He helped flush funds generated by a team of fraudsters led by his brother, Mohammed Samsul Haque, 26.

Haque, together with five other men, had already been sentenced to a total of more than 12 years in prison. More than 120 bogus insurance claims for luxury motors including Mercedes, Jaguars and BMWs were engineered by Haque through his company, Motor Alliance.

Cars were trashed at crash for cash drinking parties at Haque's garage in Tottenham, north London, the court heard. The gang rammed the vehicles into each other blocking out the noise with blaring music, before finishing the job with baseball bats.

Between November 2005 and October 2008, a series of London-based accident management firms were used as a front to hide their activities. They also persuaded other drivers to provide their licence details to back up the insurance claims in return for small amounts of cash.

 

 

lutfur rahman, mohammed ferdhaus, channel s, tower hamlets, tower hamlets council, mahee, mahee jalil, mahee insurance, mahee kidnap, lutfur rahman, peter golds, channel s ofcomCONVICT: Mohammed Ferdhaus was alos jailed for insurance fraud in 2008 [CENTRAL]

Money laundering is a serious offence. You were close to the source of the fraud and you dishonestly handled £500,000

Judge Anthony Pitts

The firm raked in around £1.17million in profits from the scam, which was unearthed after police raided Motor Alliance and found 64 files relating to insurance claims in the boot of a silver Mercedes.

Ferdhaus had a “background” role in the firm and was involved in the scam between July 19, 2006 and October 31, 2008. The media mogul tried to pin the blame on his innocent middle brother, Abdul, and maintained his innocence on the day he was due to stand trial in July last year. 

He was jailed for 18 months in 2008 for conspiracy to defraud in respect of an almost identical earlier insurance scam between 2002 and 2003. The businessman was on bail awaiting trial at the time he became embroiled in the later fraud. 

Ferdhaus had suffered post traumatic stress disorder after being kidnapped at gunpoint outside his TV station offices in Walthamstow, east London and issued with a £250,000 ransom demand. When he refused to pay his assailants they tortured him, hanging him upside down and pouring boiling water on his head, before threatening to rape his daughter.

He continues to endure psychological difficulties as a result of the ordeal in May 2011, shortly after he returned from a pilgrimage to Mecca, the court heard. But sentencing, Judge Anthony Pitts said: “The proceeds of the fraud Motor Alliance received was something a little over £1m. 

“Payments from the proceeds of the fraud were put into your account or accounts controlled by you.

“The proceeds of the fraud received by you was £500,000. It wasn't proceeds which you suspected might be proceeds of fraud but of course which you knew were the proceeds of fraud. You are a highly intelligent man, there is no doubt about that and I have read a lot of good things about you. 

“Of course you have suffered post traumatic stress disorder and anxiety and depression. But money laundering is a serious offence. You were close to the source of the fraud and you dishonestly handled £500,000.

 

“This offending by you is so serious that even given the lapse in time, largely for which you are responsible, an immediate custodial sentence of some length must be passed.” 

Shaven headed and wearing a black jacket, grey sweater and jeans Ferdhaus bit his nails and held his head in his hands as he sat in the glass-enclosed dock during the hearing. 

But he appeared cheerful as the sentence was passed, thanking the judge and giving a thumbs up to supporters in the packed public gallery. He grinned and waved, telling them “thank you” and “see you soon” as he was led down to the cells. 

Ferdhaus was also banned from being a director for 10 years. 

Mark Milliken-Smith QC, defending Ferdhaus, said of his kidnapping: “The fact that he suffered post traumatic stress disorder is hardly surprising given the physical and mental ordeal he was subjected to.

“What happened to him in May 2011 was a very, very significant and life changing experience. This is a changed man.” 

Ferdhaus received a glowing references, including the one from Mr Rahman, who described him as playing an “instrumental role” in promoting the Bangladeshi community through Channel S.

He has a “real desire to help others” and is a keen philanthropist in particular supporting those affected by natural disasters, the court heard. 

 

Related articles

“He has a selflessness which one doesn't naturally associate with an individual concerned with personal greed,” Mr Milliken-Smith added. 

Ferdhaus, from Brentwood, Essex, admitted possessing criminal property. Samsul Haque, of Maida Vale, west London, was given five years in October 2011 after he admitted conspiracy to defraud between November 13, 2005 and October 16, 2008.

His lieutenant Rosul Yusuf, 33, was jailed for four years, while Shalim Miah, 29, received two years behind bars and Halimur Rashid, 28, was jailed for 15 months.

Nazruislam Muhammad Rahman, 32, and Noveed Akhtar, 40, both of whom were named in bogus claims made by Haque's gang were given 12 month sentences suspended for 12 months.

Paul Ellis, 37, who pleaded guilty to providing six driving licences to Haque was given a six-month sentence suspended for 12 months.

Ellis and Rahman were ordered to carry out 100 and 140 hours of unpaid work respectively.

Today, Councillor Peter Golds, the leader of the Tory opposition in Tower Hamlets called for a council investigation into the town hall’s links with Channel S.

The council and the mayor declined to comment.

There is no suggestion that Lutfur Rahman had any involvement in the insuranceor money laundering scam.

___________________________________________________________________________

CONTEXTUAL BACKGROUND STORIES about Tower Hamlets Council retrieved

at appx 0020 GMT London Wednesday 19 february 2014

THE London EVENING STANDARD web site:

Revealed: Tower Hamlets mayor’s close links to TV station rapped for bias towards him

 
 
 
 
Support: Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman received favourable coverage from Channel S (Picture: Nigel Howard)
 
  
83
  
16
  
  

Published: 06 March 2013

 

The full extent of links between Tower Hamlets council and a controversial Bangladeshi TV channel can be revealed today.

An investigation by the Evening Standard has found Channel S provided such favourable political coverage to mayor Lutfur Rahman that regulator Ofcom ruled some of its programmes illegal.

Shows on the satellite station, based in Walthamstow, did not “inform and educate” but were broadcast to promote Mr Rahman “in a positive light”.

The problems occurred under previous owner Mohammed Ferdhaus, who was jailed for fraud in 2008. Ofcom is powerless to act as Channel S, which is watched by tens of thousands, is now under new management.

The mayor employs Channel S journalist Mohammed Jubair as a personal adviser on a publicly funded salary. Tower Hamlets — which has the highest child poverty rate in Britain, with four in 10 children living in poverty — spent £12,000 sponsoring a Channel S awards ceremony last May.

Mr Jubair appears to have played a role in the payment, according to documents released under freedom of information laws.

Ministers are so concerned about Ofcom’s inability to tackle the issue that they are preparing to introduce legislation. Local government minister Brandon Lewis said: “Such actions are not just a misuse of public funds, they are harmful to local democracy and an independent, free media.

“We are looking at putting [measures] on a statutory basis to address this abuse of taxpayers’ money.”

Mr Rahman, an ally of Ken Livingstone, was elected as an independent in 2010. He has been supported by coverage from Channel S, which broadcasts to the borough’s 80,000-strong Bangladeshi population. Ofcom has found that its coverage of Tower Hamlets breached broadcasting rules five times since 2008.

The latest censure, last month, said an advert featuring Mr Rahman misled the public. After the previous “serious breaches”, the regulator said it wanted a “significant fine”, but the station was beyond reach as its holding company had entered liquidation and re-formed under new owners.

In May last year, the council paid £12,000 to sponsor Channel S’s awards ceremony. An invoice approving the payment contains a note from Tower Hamlets director of communications Takki Sulaiman. “Please proceed with Jubair,” it reads.

Mr Jubair earns £175 a day for a three-day week. Peter Golds, leader of the local Conservative group, said: “There is a conflict of interest. Mr Jubair cannot be on the council payroll while reporting on the council.”

Mr Ferdhaus still presents shows on the channel. At Croydon crown court in 2008, he was jailed for 18 months over “crash-for-cash” bogus accidents. Tower Hamlets said: “Ofcom censured the advertisers not the council. We are considering our position in respect of future advertising.” It said Mr Jubair “supports the Mayor in fulfilling the commitments he has made to local people”.

Of the sponsorship of Channel S, the council added: “We sponsor a range of events across the community to promote council services.”

Channel S said: “Channel S Television Ltd in its present form has only been trading since the end of June 2012. Everything that you mention was prior to June 2012 and I cannot comment on it as it was under different management at that time.”

The KHOODEELAAR! Action stays ahead of the "local authorities" in the East End of London.

The KHOODEELAAR! Action stays ahead of the "local authorities" in the East End of London.
0520 [0510] Hrs GMT London Monday 17 February 2014.


By © Muhammad Haque.


The KHOODEELAAR! Action stays ahead of the "local authorities" in the East End of London.


Local “flood warden” (volunteer) Sue Burrows TOLD visiting "flood tourist" MP Phillip Hammond that help was NOT coming to Wraysbury despite the community being promised such help. As the UK Defence Minister, Hammond had been expected to know what his Government should have been, be doing. Yet on camera, live on SKY NEWS.


Hammond was caught unaware of what was needed. He ASKED Sue Burrows what SHE thought his Government should do. And she told him. Exactly as she should have done.


And things began to change almost within minutes of that encounter shown on satellite TV news channel SKY NEWS live.


But that was not an usual encounter. It happened more by coincidence than as part of the normal campaigning to defend local communities.


KHOODEELAAR! has been creating the same impact by by taking the campaign through far less dramatic routes.


In fact, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community in the East End of London has been campaigning for over ten years now as much against the ATTACKERS coming from outside the are AS IT HAS BEEN HAVING to campaign against some of the entrenched “local authority” elements in the East End of London itself and their colluders who would have destroyed the East End of London out of recognition by now without our campaign. [To be continued]


The KHOODEELAAR! Action stays ahead of the "local authorities" in the East End of London.

The KHOODEELAAR! Action stays ahead of the "local authorities" in the East End of London.
0520 [0510] Hrs GMT London Monday 17 February 2014.


By © Muhammad Haque.


The KHOODEELAAR! Action stays ahead of the "local authorities" in the East End of London.


Local “flood warden” (volunteer) Sue Burrows TOLD visiting "flood tourist" MP Phillip Hammond that help was NOT coming to Wraysbury despite the community being promised such help. As the UK Defence Minister, Hammond had been expected to know what his Government should have been, be doing. Yet on camera, live on SKY NEWS.


Hammond was caught unaware of what was needed. He ASKED Sue Burrows what SHE thought his Government should do. And she told him. Exactly as she should have done.


And things began to change almost within minutes of that encounter shown on satellite TV news channel SKY NEWS live.


But that was not an usual encounter. It happened more by coincidence than as part of the normal campaigning to defend local communities.


KHOODEELAAR! has been creating the same impact by by taking the campaign through far less dramatic routes.


In fact, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community in the East End of London has been campaigning for over ten years now as much against the ATTACKERS coming from outside the are AS IT HAS BEEN HAVING to campaign against some of the entrenched “local authority” elements in the East End of London itself and their colluders who would have destroyed the East End of London out of recognition by now without our campaign. [To be continued]


Tower Hamlets Council housing allocation CORRUPTION alleged by ex-Cllr Tory

Tower Hamlets Council housing allocation CORRUPTION alleged by ex-Cllr Tory
This image of the front page of this blog dated in March 2012, is being re-published now, as at 0458 Hrs GMT London Friday 14 February 2014 here to, amongst other campaigning things consistent with our activities, provide evidential context and to reiterate the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign’s Defence of the Community in the East End of London> Our DEFENCE is based on the UNIVERSALITY of values and universality of the principle of equality and entitlement. Which means that we are committed to defending the rights of people to universal provisions regardless of the peoples’ ethnicity, faith or no faith; regardless of their gender or age or orientation [and the list goes on]

[0432] [0400] [0340] Hrs GMT London Friday 14 February 2014

 

Bangladeshi Tory Ex-Councillor [RESPECT] accuses Lutfur Rahman of corruption in housing allocation..

 Image

One of George Galloway’s RESPECT Party’s “first Tower Hamlets Councillors” [May 2006] who staged a series of defections [that eventually became a pattern whereby all the RESPECT councillors except two, defected to other Parties] until declaring himself as a Conservative before losing his Council seat to Labour, has accused Tower Hamlets Council “executive mayor” Lutfur Rahman of corruption in housing allocation. 

 

Ahmed Hussain, who is not a councillor at present, made the claim when speaking about Tower Hamlets Council on an ethnicity-linked satellite TV Channel BSKYB 844 on Wednesday 12 February 2014. 

 

The Channel 844  TV programme is called “Straight Dialogue” and is fronted by Shoaib Choudhury. On the same edition, Labour Party councillor on Tower Hamlets, Khales Uddin Ahmed also accused Lutfur Rahman of making misleading and untruthful claims about housing in Tower Hamlets. 

Khales Uddin said that housing waiting list in Tower Hamlets now stood at 26,000 which had INCREASED in the three years since Lutfur Rahman “took over”.

 

 

This is the crux of what Ahmed Hussain said speaking in Bangla (Bengali)

 

"“Of course we know that he (Lutfur Rahman) hasn’t (been able to)

allocate the housing to anyone other than to his (personally) own people.”

 

 

Tower Hamlets Council has not issued any comment on those claims.

However, one of Lutfur Rahman’s “cabinet” colleagues, Shahed Ali (who too had been elected as a Labour councillor in 2010 before joining Lutfur’s “cabinet” later in the year following the “first elected Mayor cabinet” being formed) did send a text message to the

programme praising Lutfur Rahman’s achievement.

But that did not refer to Ahmed Hussain’s or Khales Uddin Ahmed’s allegations against Lutfur over housing.

 

Shahed Ali praised Lutfur Rahman for “keeping” the “Education Maintenance Award”.

 

Shahed Ali is also still embroiled in a series of complaints he has filed against the London Labour Party executives claiming racism and other discrimination. That  followed the Labour Party’s expulsion of himself and others from the Labour Party on the ground that he and those others supported Lutfur who was a political opponent of the Labour Party.

 

[To be continued]





Tower Hamlets Council housing allocation CORRUPTION alleged by ex-Cllr Tory

Tower Hamlets Council housing allocation CORRUPTION alleged by ex-Cllr Tory

[0432] [0400] [0340] Hrs GMT London Friday 14 February 2014

 

Bangladeshi Tory Ex-Councillor [RESPECT] accuses Lutfur Rahman of corruption in housing allocation..

 Image

One of George Galloway’s RESPECT Party’s “first Tower Hamlets Councillors” [May 2006] who staged a series of defections [that eventually became a pattern whereby all the RESPECT councillors except two, defected to other Parties] until declaring himself as a Conservative before losing his Council seat to Labour, has accused Tower Hamlets Council “executive mayor” Lutfur Rahman of corruption in housing allocation. 

 

Ahmed Hussain, who is not a councillor at present, made the claim when speaking about Tower Hamlets Council on an ethnicity-linked satellite TV Channel BSKYB 844 on Wednesday 12 February 2014. 

 

The Channel 844  TV programme is called “Straight Dialogue” and is fronted by Shoaib Choudhury. On the same edition, Labour Party councillor on Tower Hamlets, Khales Uddin Ahmed also accused Lutfur Rahman of making misleading and untruthful claims about housing in Tower Hamlets. 

Khales Uddin said that housing waiting list in Tower Hamlets now stood at 26,000 which had INCREASED in the three years since Lutfur Rahman “took over”.

 

 

This is the crux of what Ahmed Hussain said speaking in Bangla (Bengali)

 

"“Of course we know that he (Lutfur Rahman) hasn’t (been able to)

allocate the housing to anyone other than to his (personally) own people.”

 

 

Tower Hamlets Council has not issued any comment on those claims.

However, one of Lutfur Rahman’s “cabinet” colleagues, Shahed Ali (who too had been elected as a Labour councillor in 2010 before joining Lutfur’s “cabinet” later in the year following the “first elected Mayor cabinet” being formed) did send a text message to the

programme praising Lutfur Rahman’s achievement.

But that did not refer to Ahmed Hussain’s or Khales Uddin Ahmed’s allegations against Lutfur over housing.

 

Shahed Ali praised Lutfur Rahman for “keeping” the “Education Maintenance Award”.

 

Shahed Ali is also still embroiled in a series of complaints he has filed against the London Labour Party executives claiming racism and other discrimination. That  followed the Labour Party’s expulsion of himself and others from the Labour Party on the ground that he and those others supported Lutfur who was a political opponent of the Labour Party.

 

[To be continued]

0450

Diagnosing the creation of POVERTY via Housing robbery -

Diagnosing the creation  of POVERTY via Housing robbery -

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Economics and Social Commentary: Diagnosing the creation  of POVERTY via Housing robbery - and denial. London Empty Properties scandal-

2145 [2132] Hrs GMT London Saturday 01 February 2014.

The Guardian report is a mere tip of the iceberg.

Image

But the Sunday Times linked (she has been “Political Editor” of the “Sunday Times” , owned by Murdoch) self-seeking Isabel Oakshott (who is a Rightwing ideological propagandist, as confirmed by her being given a slot by the Right-winger Andrew Neil on his BBC platforms) made a petty point and dismissed the Guardian report, questioning the scandal. She quipped in an immoral way, “where’s the scandal”?

With that remark, the “Political Editor” of the Sunday Times showed just how 

total her emptiness was.

Which is exactly why she is Political Editor of the Sunday Times as owned and controlled by Rupert Murdoch!

 

[To be continued]

 

The AADHIKAROnline transcript of the SKY NEWS PRESS REVIEW on 31 January 2014 featuring Oakshott and Purvis. 

Excerpt and Diagnostics.

 

“Why bother to live in them when you can make so much money just owning them.” was how Stuart Purvis “Journalism professor” and former TV New Executive summed up the mentality of those whose empty properties  SCANDAL worth £Millions was reported on Saturday’s front page of the Guardian [01 February 2014]

£350mIllion worth of vacant properties on thats stretch of Bishops Avenue.

The owner of the Express and the Star Richard Desmond loves there. Lives round the corner from Bishops Avenue.

 

The AADHIKAROnline/fotografixOriginal montage of the SKY NEWS PRESS REVIEW featuring the Guardian Report on London's Bishops Avenue £Millionaires Empty properties, as broadcast on Friday 31 January 2014.

UPDATER diagnosing the dysfunction and the morass in the controlling clique of LB T Hamlets Council

UPDATER diagnosing the dysfunction and the morass in the controlling clique of LB T Hamlets Council
2328 GMT London Wednesday 29 January 2014

What is Eric Pickles going to make of this report by the DAILY MAIL about Tower Hamlets?

KHOODEELAAR! isn’t waiting for a Pickled byte.
We are running another exclusive UPDATER diagnosing the dysfunction and the morass in the corrupt controlling clique in the Tower Hamlets “Bureaucracy”

In the NEXT PARTS of this diagnostic commentary, KHOODEELAAR! will cite original chapter and verse of the evidence of the totally corrupt state of the Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling clique.

The quoted article below was retrevd from the MAIL ONLINE website at 2328 GMT 29 January 2013
The main images montaged by AADHIKAROnline and fotografixOriginal for the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign

Image

'999, we have a dog poo': Council jobsworth threatens 'non-compliant' woman with arrest over dog mess... that was nothing to do with her pet

  • Tower Hamlets Enforcement Officer accused Amber Langtry, 35, of leaving her dog's remains in Victoria Park, East London
  • Miss Langtry denied the allegation but offered to pick it up if the park attendant could take her to it
  • Accusing her of 'non-compliance', he called in police 'back-up' to the scene

By WILLIAM TURVILL

PUBLISHED: 13:10, 29 January 2014 | UPDATED: 17:30, 29 January 2014

 

1,155 shares

 

579

View
comments

A council worker called for police 'back-up' after he found a dog poo in a park.

The Tower Hamlets Enforcement Officer accused Amber Langtry, 35, of not clearing up after her German Shepherd in Victoria Park, East London, as she was walking her friend.

Miss Langtry denied the allegation, trying to explain that her dog had not been in the area where the attendant found the faeces, but still offered to pick it up to end the confrontation.

Scroll down for video

 

article-2548013-1B0BDC1A00000578-929_634x323.jpg

icon_camera_90x68.png+9

Amber Langtry was shocked when this council worker accused her of leaving her dog's poo in Victoria Park

 

 

 

article-2548013-1B0BD6BF00000578-332_634x299.jpg

icon_camera_90x68.png+9

He threatened to arrest Miss Langtry and called for police 'back-up' as she challenged him to show her the poo

article-2548013-1B0DFB3C00000578-902_634x528.jpg

icon_camera_90x68.png+9

Miss Langtry here is pictured with her German Shepherd, Olive

 

Jobsworth threatens woman with arrest over dog mess

 

 

video-undefined-1B0C0A0800000578-537_636x358.jpg

 

 

 

The council worker issued her with a ticket, which could result in a court hearing and a £1,000 fine, and called officers to the park on New Year's Day accusing her of 'non-compliance'.

Miss Langtry told the Evening Standard that she and her friend, who recorded the incident, had cleaned up their dogs’ mess earlier in the walk. 

She also said the park attendant refused to show them the poo she was being challenged over.

 

More...

 

In the ten-minute video the officer is heard accusing the woman of ‘non-compliance’ and calling officers to the scene.

He described Miss Langtry’s friend, who was recording him with her iPhone, as ‘aggressive’.

At one point, she is heard on the video saying: 'He can't even show us the poo - it's ridiculous!'

 

article-2548013-1B0BD84B00000578-979_634x330.jpg

icon_camera_90x68.png+9

The council worker issued her with a ticket, which could result in a court hearing and a £1,000 fine

 

article-2548013-1B0BD75000000578-469_634x316.jpg

icon_camera_90x68.png+9

Miss Langtry was told by Tower Hamlets council, in a five-page letter, that it will not be continuing prosecution

 

 

Miss Langtry told the paper: ‘I remember thinking, “This is ridiculous. Why does he need police back-up for a five-foot-four woman looking for a dog poo?”’

‘When the police got here they were as bemused as I was, and they didn't have a problem with me or my dog.'

After half an hour, Miss Langtry was shown the poo, which she maintains was not left by her dog. 

She told Mail Online: 'As I am a reasonable person, and would never leave a dog faeces behind, I picked it up in a poo bag and popped it in a nearby bin.' 

She was told by Tower Hamlets council, in a five-page letter, that it will not be continuing prosecution, but that the officer has the power to deal with an offence ‘of failing to remove dog faces [sic]’.

 

article-2548013-1B0BDFEF00000578-54_634x333.jpg

icon_camera_90x68.png+9

The Enforcement Officer accused Miss Langtry's friend, who recorded the incident, of being 'aggressive'

 

article-2548013-1B0BE6EB00000578-815_634x344.jpg

icon_camera_90x68.png+9

Waiting: After around nine minutes of recording, the park attendant speaks to police officers who are on their way to Victoria Park, East London, on New Year's Day

 

 

Miss Langtry said that while the video is 'funny' to watch now, it was 'scary, intimidating and confusing at the time'.

The Metropolitan Police told the paper that no ‘allegation of crime’ was made to officers. 

A council spokesperson said: 'The council has a long standing policy of tackling the issue of dog fouling. The council can confirm an incident took place on Wednesday, 1 January, where a Tower Hamlets Enforcement Officer (THEO) asked a dog owner to clean up after their dog.

'When the dog owner refused to give their name as the THEO requested, the THEO then called for appropriate back up after explaining the situation fully to the dog owner. 

'We take dog fouling seriously in this borough as it is a concern for residents which is why the council took this course of action.'

 

article-2548013-1B0BD85C00000578-765_634x352.jpg

icon_camera_90x68.png+9

Miss Langtry is pictured here with her German Shepherd, Olive, in Victoria Park

 

article-2548013-1B0BDFD400000578-19_634x355.jpg

icon_camera_90x68.png+9

In the video, the officer is heard accusing the woman of 'non-compliance' and calling police to the scene

 

 

 

 

Share or comment on this article

  • 1.1k
    shares

by Taboola

Sponsored Content

FROM THE WEB

 

Bitcoin-image.jpg

Bitcoin is hot, It's everywhere and you ca…

eToro

 

5b03d29f72a1d9508eea921fd68a8dcd.jpg

This crazy loophole allows to shop at 80% d…

Megabargains.com

 

1672e28cb4176bdb2a1e01fc9ff45b5a.jpg

How to Live On a Low Income

Money Advice Service

 

0ffe87a2302fda27812b4c4c436fdd64.jpg

The Shocking Underground World of …

QuiBids

 

 

 

 

MOST WATCHED NEWS VIDEOS

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next

Ads by Google

Brain Training Games

Train memory and attention with scientific brain games.

Happy Holistic Healing

Healing Foundation Courses Meditation, Treatments 13yrs exp.

Tibetan Herbal Healthcare

Anti-stress incense from Tibetan Medical Center of H.H. Dalai Lama

Stress Management

Highly Successful Programmes To Minimise Employee Stress. Call Now!

MOST READ NEWS

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next

btn_add-your-comment.png

icon_comments_74.png Comments (579)

Share what you think



  • Newest


  • Oldest


  • Best rated


  • Worst rated

 View all

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

 

 

The Bee, Atlanta, 3 hours ago

Wouldn't a more apt title be 'Poo Patrol"?

Reply

New

 

 

9

 

361

Click to rate

 

 

 

Cy Anide, York, 3 hours ago

Another gem for Littlejohn,you couldn't make it up.This country has become a laughing stock with all the PC crap,god help us all

Reply

New

 

 

28

 

742

Click to rate

 

 

 

Myself, Heathfield, 3 hours ago

Why is the nincompoop, (appropriate ending to that word) called an "Officer"? Looks to me like a Jobsworth with no brain on a mission. G Bartholomew East Sussex

Reply

New

 

 

24

 

717

Click to rate

 

 

 

Smallgreenbouncyone, here, 3 hours ago

Is it a job requirement to be an absoloute plank?

Reply

New

 

 

20

 

735

Click to rate

 

 

 

richard246, UK, United Kingdom, 3 hours ago

It seems the council have decided to extend their money making schemes beyond bus lane enforcement and parking tickets, to dog walkers. If this catches on we'll have dog foul enforcement cameras installed in our local parks, issuing £70 fines automatically to any pet owner suspected of not cleaning up after their pets!!!!

Reply

New

 

 

16

 

463

Click to rate

 

 

 

palerider77, southampton, 3 hours ago

ANOTHER JOBS WORTH BY THE LOOKS OF IT. THERE IS REAL CRIME GOING ON OUT THERE ,SOME ONE SHOULD REMIND HIM OF THAT.

Reply

New

 

 

19

 

477

Click to rate

 

 

 

Bernard, Isle of Dogs London, United Kingdom, 3 hours ago

I have the misfortune of living in the rotten borough of Tower Hamlets. This is nothing, the shenanigans that go on in the town hall would make a banana republic look respectable.

Reply

New

 

 

9

 

570

Click to rate

 

 

 

ojmayhall, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 3 hours ago

buffoon

Reply

New

 

 

13

 

437

Click to rate

 

 

 

Pete, Carlise, United Kingdom, 3 hours ago

Dog worth

Reply

New

 

 

12

 

360

Click to rate

 

 

 

paulc, gloster, 3 hours ago

refuse to pay the fine, insist on a jury trial and get your defence team to ask them to provide the specimen of evidence along with DNA testing that proves it came from her dog.

 

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2548013/999-dog-poo-Council-jobsworth-threatens-non-compliant-woman-arrest-dog-mess-pet.html#ixzz2rpduYkYO 

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[To be continued]

Benefits, English, Tower Hamlets Council, racists Mail on Sunday and Dave Cameron U-KREEP

Benefits, English, Tower Hamlets Council, racists Mail on Sunday and Dave Cameron U-KREEP
By © Muhammad Haque The Organiser the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and Editor, AADHIKAR Media Foundation. London. BENEFITS LIES by C4's COMPLICIT STREET racists has a new, revamped 'fan', Dave Cameron and the lies bandwagon has now expanded into Tower Hamlets and other parts. 0615 [0604] [0555] [0545] [0528] [0522] Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2014


Image

 

 

 

 

By © Muhammad Haque

The Organiser the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and Editor, AADHIKAR Media Foundation. London.

BENEFITS LIES by C4's COMPLICIT STREET racists has a new, revamped 'fan', Dave Cameron and that bandwagon of lies has now expanded into Tower Hamlets and other parts.

 

0604 [0555] [0545] [0528] [0522] Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2014

 

C4's COMPLICIT STREET of racist myth-making and lying against Society has now reached Birmingham - via the so-called chief inspector of the English Constabulary (the man is in highly paid post to audit and inspect the English Police forces.

 

He has turned out to be another promoter of racist myths against those communities that are at the top of the least served by the Police forces.

 

 And by David Cameron repeating again the lie that "the Benefits" are being "looted, robbed, pocketed…." by hordes of non-English  speaking claimants!!!

 

The Mail on Sunday, at the Neo Cons PR war vanguard for racist agenda, has typically mentioned Tower Hamlets and suggested and implied that “Tower Hamlets Council” (until recently) was making it easy for the hordes of non-English speaking claimants to loot and plunder the Benefits budget...

 

DIAGNOSING the latest racist scam mouthed by the racist BENEFIT SCROUNGER Dave" Cameron and perpetrated by the Mail on Sunday [19 January 2014].

 

First off:

 

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has AUTHORED, CREATED, PUBLISHED 

well over 100 Million words in defence of the Community in the East

End of London in the past ten year.... 

 

ALL of the over 20 Million

words in the English language...

 

 

The DETAILED Examination of the Mail on Sunday's latest racist reference to "Tower Hamlets" “Benefits" follows this.

 

 

Today’s MailOnline (publishing a piece from the Mail on Sunday dated 19 January 2014) claims the following:

 

 

“Town halls such as Tower Hamlets in East London publish guides on how to claim benefits in foreign  languages which would be paid for separately to the DWP figures.”

 

 

But this is a multi-layered lie.

 

The layers of lies include the following facts:

 

1.  Tower Hamlets Council operates one of the most racist and corrupt “Benefit” bureaucracies to be found anywhere in all of the UK;

 

Because Tower Hamlets Council does not audit its so-called Benefits Service or hold to account the personnel engaged in making the racist and the corrupt decisions under covers of the same “Benefit Service”, there is no accessible information on the numbers of lawful “benefit claimants” being denied benefits by the racists engaged by Tower Hamlets Council.

 

For that reason,  there is no accessible evidence that Tower Hamlets Council is only denying lawfully claimed benefits because of any linguistic association with any of the claimants. 

 

Racist discrimination over “benefits” is operated  by the decision-makers in Tower Hamlets Council regardless of the linguistic identities, differences or skills or the related communicational competence of the person/s being racistly discriminated against by the makers of the racistly discriminatory decisions within Tower Hamlets Council.

 

2. The Tower Hamlets Council as the ‘local Council’ was the subject of an orchestrated organisational  and internally operated racist attack and vilification a few years ago by its own “political leadership” at the time. That “political leadership” claimed that the Council had been spending too much money in “translations” and the provisions for translations were in the main scrapped by the Council. That “political leadership” was in lace in the name of “the Labour Party”! (see more, under item 4 below,  about how backward and racistly discriminatory the “Labour Party”banner-carriers can be ion Tower Hamlets Council) 

 

3. The majority of the “elected” Tower Hamlets Councillors as well as those listed currently as “the Cabinet” are in fact speakers of Seelotee (which is still wrongly spelt as “Sylheti” in the English language references) as their first language and those ones  ALSO speak English as a second or a third language, in the main. In a number of cases, Bangla (which is still wrongly spelt as “Bengali” in the English language references) would be their second or third language. 

 

4. To demonstrate just how detached from the truth the Mail on Sunday’s latest (and) racist reference to Tower Hamlets is, the Council’s Speaker (Labour Councillor Lesley Pavitt) “STOPPED” a local elector who had begun to address the Council Meeting in September 2013 in Seelotee.  The fact that the vast majority of the Councillors present at that Council Meting could perfectly understand the elector speaking in Seelotee and were NOT objecting to the choice of language he had begun to speak in and yet he was stopped from proceeding on the claimed ground that he was speaking in a language that was not English shows that it is not the difference in language but it is the difference in recognition. Communication of the meaning was not a problem at that meeting but the assertion of a monolingual dominance exclusively given to English was what was being done. None of the evidence under reference in that speech by the Seelotee-speaker elector needed to be expressed in English or indeed in any specific language, as long as the facts were communicated and perceived accurately.

 

5. That “incident” was then distorted further by the “local” “East London Advertiser” and by the Richard Desmond-owned tabloid, the very racist Daily Express.

 

[To be continued]

 

 

The Mail on Sunday’s (MoS) latest perpetration of a racist propaganda by abusing “SPEAK IN ENGLISH - OR LOSE BENEFITS” line of racist lies can be accessed online via the web link below as technologically tested by AADHIKAROnline at 0530 Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2014.

 

In that piece, the racist MoS piece refers to Tower Hamlets (Council) (calling it a ‘Town Hall’) Council’s (scrapped, “admits” the racist Mail on Sunday) “translation service for “benefit claimants” speaking or using languages (not English).

That reference is GROSSLY false, misleading and it gives the wrong image to the racists in place iNSIDE Tower Hamlets Council making illegal and racistly motivated, prejudicial and distressingly harassing against claimants who do NOT need nor use any of these languages but use the English language.

 

[To be continued]

 

This AADHIKAROnline ForografixOriginal Evidential 

MONTAGE was created at 0500 Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2013

Benefits, English, Tower Hamlets Council, racists Mail on Sunday and Dave Cameron U-KREEP

Benefits, English, Tower Hamlets Council, racists Mail on Sunday and Dave Cameron U-KREEP
By © Muhammad Haque The Organiser the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and Editor, AADHIKAR Media Foundation. London. BENEFITS LIES by C4's COMPLICIT STREET racists has a new, revamped 'fan', Dave Cameron and the lies bandwagon has now expanded into Tower Hamlets and other parts. 0615 [0604] [0555] [0545] [0528] [0522] Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2014


Image

 

 

 

 

By © Muhammad Haque

The Organiser the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and Editor, AADHIKAR Media Foundation. London.

BENEFITS LIES by C4's COMPLICIT STREET racists has a new, revamped 'fan', Dave Cameron and that bandwagon of lies has now expanded into Tower Hamlets and other parts.

 

0604 [0555] [0545] [0528] [0522] Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2014

 

C4's COMPLICIT STREET of racist myth-making and lying against Society has now reached Birmingham - via the so-called chief inspector of the English Constabulary (the man is in highly paid post to audit and inspect the English Police forces.

 

He has turned out to be another promoter of racist myths against those communities that are at the top of the least served by the Police forces.

 

 And by David Cameron repeating again the lie that "the Benefits" are being "looted, robbed, pocketed…." by hordes of non-English  speaking claimants!!!

 

The Mail on Sunday, at the Neo Cons PR war vanguard for racist agenda, has typically mentioned Tower Hamlets and suggested and implied that “Tower Hamlets Council” (until recently) was making it easy for the hordes of non-English speaking claimants to loot and plunder the Benefits budget...

 

DIAGNOSING the latest racist scam mouthed by the racist BENEFIT SCROUNGER Dave" Cameron and perpetrated by the Mail on Sunday [19 January 2014].

 

First off:

 

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has AUTHORED, CREATED, PUBLISHED 

well over 100 Million words in defence of the Community in the East

End of London in the past ten year.... 

 

ALL of the over 20 Million

words in the English language...

 

 

The DETAILED Examination of the Mail on Sunday's latest racist reference to "Tower Hamlets" “Benefits" follows this.

 

 

Today’s MailOnline (publishing a piece from the Mail on Sunday dated 19 January 2014) claims the following:

 

 

“Town halls such as Tower Hamlets in East London publish guides on how to claim benefits in foreign  languages which would be paid for separately to the DWP figures.”

 

 

But this is a multi-layered lie.

 

The layers of lies include the following facts:

 

1.  Tower Hamlets Council operates one of the most racist and corrupt “Benefit” bureaucracies to be found anywhere in all of the UK;

 

Because Tower Hamlets Council does not audit its so-called Benefits Service or hold to account the personnel engaged in making the racist and the corrupt decisions under covers of the same “Benefit Service”, there is no accessible information on the numbers of lawful “benefit claimants” being denied benefits by the racists engaged by Tower Hamlets Council.

 

For that reason,  there is no accessible evidence that Tower Hamlets Council is only denying lawfully claimed benefits because of any linguistic association with any of the claimants. 

 

Racist discrimination over “benefits” is operated  by the decision-makers in Tower Hamlets Council regardless of the linguistic identities, differences or skills or the related communicational competence of the person/s being racistly discriminated against by the makers of the racistly discriminatory decisions within Tower Hamlets Council.

 

2. The Tower Hamlets Council as the ‘local Council’ was the subject of an orchestrated organisational  and internally operated racist attack and vilification a few years ago by its own “political leadership” at the time. That “political leadership” claimed that the Council had been spending too much money in “translations” and the provisions for translations were in the main scrapped by the Council. That “political leadership” was in lace in the name of “the Labour Party”! (see more, under item 4 below,  about how backward and racistly discriminatory the “Labour Party”banner-carriers can be ion Tower Hamlets Council) 

 

3. The majority of the “elected” Tower Hamlets Councillors as well as those listed currently as “the Cabinet” are in fact speakers of Seelotee (which is still wrongly spelt as “Sylheti” in the English language references) as their first language and those ones  ALSO speak English as a second or a third language, in the main. In a number of cases, Bangla (which is still wrongly spelt as “Bengali” in the English language references) would be their second or third language. 

 

4. To demonstrate just how detached from the truth the Mail on Sunday’s latest (and) racist reference to Tower Hamlets is, the Council’s Speaker (Labour Councillor Lesley Pavitt) “STOPPED” a local elector who had begun to address the Council Meeting in September 2013 in Seelotee.  The fact that the vast majority of the Councillors present at that Council Meting could perfectly understand the elector speaking in Seelotee and were NOT objecting to the choice of language he had begun to speak in and yet he was stopped from proceeding on the claimed ground that he was speaking in a language that was not English shows that it is not the difference in language but it is the difference in recognition. Communication of the meaning was not a problem at that meeting but the assertion of a monolingual dominance exclusively given to English was what was being done. None of the evidence under reference in that speech by the Seelotee-speaker elector needed to be expressed in English or indeed in any specific language, as long as the facts were communicated and perceived accurately.

 

5. That “incident” was then distorted further by the “local” “East London Advertiser” and by the Richard Desmond-owned tabloid, the very racist Daily Express.

 

[To be continued]

 

 

The Mail on Sunday’s (MoS) latest perpetration of a racist propaganda by abusing “SPEAK IN ENGLISH - OR LOSE BENEFITS” line of racist lies can be accessed online via the web link below as technologically tested by AADHIKAROnline at 0530 Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2014.

 

In that piece, the racist MoS piece refers to Tower Hamlets (Council) (calling it a ‘Town Hall’) Council’s (scrapped, “admits” the racist Mail on Sunday) “translation service for “benefit claimants” speaking or using languages (not English).

That reference is GROSSLY false, misleading and it gives the wrong image to the racists in place iNSIDE Tower Hamlets Council making illegal and racistly motivated, prejudicial and distressingly harassing against claimants who do NOT need nor use any of these languages but use the English language.

 

[To be continued]

 

This AADHIKAROnline ForografixOriginal Evidential 

MONTAGE was created at 0500 Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2013

Benefits, English, Tower Hamlets Council, racists Mail on Sunday and Dave Cameron U-KREEP

Benefits, English, Tower Hamlets Council, racists Mail on Sunday and Dave Cameron U-KREEP
By © Muhammad Haque The Organiser the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and Editor, AADHIKAR Media Foundation. London. BENEFITS LIES by C4's COMPLICIT STREET racists has a new, revamped 'fan', Dave Cameron and the lies bandwagon has now expanded into Tower Hamlets and other parts. 0615 [0604] [0555] [0545] [0528] [0522] Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2014


Image

 

 

 

 

By © Muhammad Haque

The Organiser the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and Editor, AADHIKAR Media Foundation. London.

BENEFITS LIES by C4's COMPLICIT STREET racists has a new, revamped 'fan', Dave Cameron and that bandwagon of lies has now expanded into Tower Hamlets and other parts.

 

0604 [0555] [0545] [0528] [0522] Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2014

 

C4's COMPLICIT STREET of racist myth-making and lying against Society has now reached Birmingham - via the so-called chief inspector of the English Constabulary (the man is in highly paid post to audit and inspect the English Police forces.

 

He has turned out to be another promoter of racist myths against those communities that are at the top of the least served by the Police forces.

 

 And by David Cameron repeating again the lie that "the Benefits" are being "looted, robbed, pocketed…." by hordes of non-English  speaking claimants!!!

 

The Mail on Sunday, at the Neo Cons PR war vanguard for racist agenda, has typically mentioned Tower Hamlets and suggested and implied that “Tower Hamlets Council” (until recently) was making it easy for the hordes of non-English speaking claimants to loot and plunder the Benefits budget...

 

DIAGNOSING the latest racist scam mouthed by the racist BENEFIT SCROUNGER Dave" Cameron and perpetrated by the Mail on Sunday [19 January 2014].

 

First off:

 

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has AUTHORED, CREATED, PUBLISHED 

well over 100 Million words in defence of the Community in the East

End of London in the past ten year.... 

 

ALL of the over 20 Million

words in the English language...

 

 

The DETAILED Examination of the Mail on Sunday's latest racist reference to "Tower Hamlets" “Benefits" follows this.

 

 

Today’s MailOnline (publishing a piece from the Mail on Sunday dated 19 January 2014) claims the following:

 

 

“Town halls such as Tower Hamlets in East London publish guides on how to claim benefits in foreign  languages which would be paid for separately to the DWP figures.”

 

 

But this is a multi-layered lie.

 

The layers of lies include the following facts:

 

1.  Tower Hamlets Council operates one of the most racist and corrupt “Benefit” bureaucracies to be found anywhere in all of the UK;

 

Because Tower Hamlets Council does not audit its so-called Benefits Service or hold to account the personnel engaged in making the racist and the corrupt decisions under covers of the same “Benefit Service”, there is no accessible information on the numbers of lawful “benefit claimants” being denied benefits by the racists engaged by Tower Hamlets Council.

 

For that reason,  there is no accessible evidence that Tower Hamlets Council is only denying lawfully claimed benefits because of any linguistic association with any of the claimants. 

 

Racist discrimination over “benefits” is operated  by the decision-makers in Tower Hamlets Council regardless of the linguistic identities, differences or skills or the related communicational competence of the person/s being racistly discriminated against by the makers of the racistly discriminatory decisions within Tower Hamlets Council.

 

2. The Tower Hamlets Council as the ‘local Council’ was the subject of an orchestrated organisational  and internally operated racist attack and vilification a few years ago by its own “political leadership” at the time. That “political leadership” claimed that the Council had been spending too much money in “translations” and the provisions for translations were in the main scrapped by the Council. That “political leadership” was in lace in the name of “the Labour Party”! (see more, under item 4 below,  about how backward and racistly discriminatory the “Labour Party”banner-carriers can be ion Tower Hamlets Council) 

 

3. The majority of the “elected” Tower Hamlets Councillors as well as those listed currently as “the Cabinet” are in fact speakers of Seelotee (which is still wrongly spelt as “Sylheti” in the English language references) as their first language and those ones  ALSO speak English as a second or a third language, in the main. In a number of cases, Bangla (which is still wrongly spelt as “Bengali” in the English language references) would be their second or third language. 

 

4. To demonstrate just how detached from the truth the Mail on Sunday’s latest (and) racist reference to Tower Hamlets is, the Council’s Speaker (Labour Councillor Lesley Pavitt) “STOPPED” a local elector who had begun to address the Council Meeting in September 2013 in Seelotee.  The fact that the vast majority of the Councillors present at that Council Meting could perfectly understand the elector speaking in Seelotee and were NOT objecting to the choice of language he had begun to speak in and yet he was stopped from proceeding on the claimed ground that he was speaking in a language that was not English shows that it is not the difference in language but it is the difference in recognition. Communication of the meaning was not a problem at that meeting but the assertion of a monolingual dominance exclusively given to English was what was being done. None of the evidence under reference in that speech by the Seelotee-speaker elector needed to be expressed in English or indeed in any specific language, as long as the facts were communicated and perceived accurately.

 

5. That “incident” was then distorted further by the “local” “East London Advertiser” and by the Richard Desmond-owned tabloid, the very racist Daily Express.

 

[To be continued]

 

 

The Mail on Sunday’s (MoS) latest perpetration of a racist propaganda by abusing “SPEAK IN ENGLISH - OR LOSE BENEFITS” line of racist lies can be accessed online via the web link below as technologically tested by AADHIKAROnline at 0530 Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2014.

 

In that piece, the racist MoS piece refers to Tower Hamlets (Council) (calling it a ‘Town Hall’) Council’s (scrapped, “admits” the racist Mail on Sunday) “translation service for “benefit claimants” speaking or using languages (not English).

That reference is GROSSLY false, misleading and it gives the wrong image to the racists in place iNSIDE Tower Hamlets Council making illegal and racistly motivated, prejudicial and distressingly harassing against claimants who do NOT need nor use any of these languages but use the English language.

 

[To be continued]

 

This AADHIKAROnline ForografixOriginal Evidential 

MONTAGE was created at 0500 Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 January 2013

Human trafficking of Bangladeshis by Bangladeshis into UK, claims "Bangladeshi”! to Daily Mail

Human trafficking of Bangladeshis by Bangladeshis into UK, claims "Bangladeshi”! to Daily Mail
By © Muhammad Haque

0248 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 07 January 2014



The following is the full text as published on the Daily mail web site. We have retained their error the spelling of Dhaka as “Dhakar” (which is a frequent error that occurs in British references to the Bangladeshi capital Dhaka that is often confused with the Senegalese town in West Africa - versions of the idiotic error occurred even before the spelling of Dacca was “Bengalicised” into “Dhaka”)


DAILY MAIL/MailOnline (London UK)

The secret SLAVES in our curry houses:

Lured to our shores with promises of riches - then double-crossed by bosses who trap them in a twilight of poverty and fear

By RICHARD PENDLEBURY PUBLISHED: 01:45, 6 January 2014 |

UPDATED:

12:23, 6 January 2014 455 shares77View comments To millions of migrants, Britain is a land of plenty - but, once here, many are brutally maltreated by their own countrymen.

On Saturday, we told how gangmasters savagely exploited Eastern Europeans. Today, we reveal the shocking treatment of some workers in curry restaurants...

Hard labour:

Workers like Rafique and Abdul are exploited by restaurants (picture posed by models) Early evening in Banglatown, East London, and the 50 or so curry houses which line Brick Lane are beginning to fill.

The narrow street throbs with vitality and colour, but we are sitting in a basement storeroom a few feet below the action, among enormous sacks of rice and spices and barrels of cooking oil. In the middle of the room a man has begun to weep into his hands.

‘What kind of life is this?’ he asks. ‘I move around from house to house because I am afraid of the authorities. When someone knocks on the front door, I hide in the wardrobe or under the bed, if I can’t escape out through the back. I am always looking over my shoulder. ‘If I am sick, I only go to the chemist, because the doctor would ask for my identity and address. Often, I only get food from the charity of others. ‘In the three years since I came to London, I have never seen Buckingham Palace or Big Ben. Only around Brick Lane. ‘It feels like I don’t exist.’ Officially he doesn’t. Abdul is one of the ‘invisible’ or ‘unseen’ workers of Banglatown, trapped in a perpetual twilight world of grinding poverty, illegality, isolation and above all, perhaps, shame.

One Bengali businessman described it to me as ‘modern-day slavery.’ This is not a story of illegal immigration or, in many cases, of premeditated law-breaking. Abdul was not the client of a conventional human trafficker; he didn’t arrive in the UK secreted in the back of a lorry or carrying a false passport.

He came quite openly and with the correct permissions. But like a number of other ‘invisible workers’ I have spoken to, Abdul claims that promises made to him back home in Bangladesh turned out to be false. The wild riches and long-term security for which his family literally bet their farm were a lie. Now, he is constantly on the run and unable to return home without compounding the disaster his British adventure has already visited upon the family he left behind.

More... Britain's new slaves:

To millions of migrants, our streets seem paved with gold. But what awaits many is savage exploitation by gangmasters from their own lands





Basic principle of Enoch Powell's Rivers of Blood speech was right, says Nigel Farage Bribes to border guards, no toilets and baking hot:

Journey from hell on board the first coaches from Romania to UK



For a number like him, tragically, the only way out has been suicide. The background to this story is Britain’s almost insatiable appetite for south Asian food. Around 90 per cent of ‘Indian’ restaurants in the UK - of which the most famous concentration is in Brick Lane - are, in fact, owned by Bangladeshis. Once part of the Indian state of Bengal, Bangladesh remains one of the world’s poorest countries.

Hundreds of thousands leave every year as economic migrants.

The UK is a popular destination for those who can arrange and afford the journey.

Hopes of a better life:

Many Bangladeshi migrants who come to the UK come from the Sylhet area of the country, where this farmer is from

(posed by model)

One of the peculiarities of the estimated 300,000-plus strong British-Bangladeshi population is that as many as 95 per cent were born or have roots in the region of Sylhet, a former British Raj hill station.

Money sent home by workers abroad - largely in the UK - was estimated to benefit Sylhet by £3.02 billion in 2007.

Glass office blocks and large villas in a style quite out of keeping with the Bengali tradition are usually signs of their owner’s success abroad.

The promise of such riches is what drew another worker - 34-year-old Rafique - to Brick Lane.

We meet only after he has been convinced by a mutual contact that I want to hear his story rather than turn him in to the authorities.

'My family had to sell their farm to send me here' Rafique is the oldest of seven children of a rice farmer from Jahidpur, a village 70 miles from Sylhet.

‘People in Bangladesh think people in London live a very rich life, so my father thought I should come to this country,’ Rafique explains. He graduated back home in ‘social services’, a qualification that allowed him to become a teacher or civil servant. But in Bangladesh ‘there are few jobs, poor pay and much competition’, he explains.

‘Instead, I helped my father in the fields and we ate most of what we grew. I had never travelled further than Sylhet city.’ In late 2003, one of his father’s friends visited from England, where he had been living for several years.

‘My father asked him: “Please take my boy to England.” ’ The friend, who owned several restaurants in England, agreed on condition that Rafique’s family paid him £11,000 to arrange it. That was an enormous sum in Bangladesh, where the average weekly wage was less than £5. Yet Rafique’s father was determined his son should have the chance of a better future and took out a loan from a wealthy neighbour. The lender charged interest on the loan. After one year, the family was supposed to pay back around £13,000. This wouldn’t be a problem, the family was told.

'Unseen' workers: Many migrants such as Abdul and Rafique work in establishments, similar to those pictured, on Brick Lane in east London Rafique says: ‘My father’s friend said that I would get £350 a week wages.

My father thought that I could pay back the loan within the year.

After that, there would be enough income for my family to be very comfortable.’

The fee was paid and the official paperwork to secure Rafique a work permit was submitted in the UK by the restaurateur. In February 2004, Rafique received notification of his permit’s approval. He travelled to the British embassy in Dhakar, where he was granted a one-year visa to work as a waiter in the family friend’s restaurant in England.

Rafique says: ‘My father’s friend had said that at the end of my first year he would get me a visa extension for free.’ He was met at Heathrow by his new boss and taken to a restaurant in Bishops Stortford, Hertforshire. Rafique found himself sharing four rooms with eight other employees. He had never worked in a restaurant before, and the only English words he knew were ‘yes’ and ‘no’. But his language and lifestyle difficulties were as nothing compared with the shock he received at the end of his first 60-hour week’s work.

‘The owner gave me my wages in a brown envelope. I opened it and inside was just two £20 notes and a £10 note,’ he recalls. ‘He told me that my work wasn’t very good and once I had learned more, my pay would increase.’ At the end of the second week, Rafique received only £30 cash. The owner also kept the waiters’ tips.

‘He said to me: ‘I told your father I would get you a visa extension, and so I have to save the money for that out of your wages.’ 'I was paid just £30 for one week's work' Rafique wrote to his father - there was no telephone in his village - and a month later received a worried reply. ‘My father said: “You must tell him to pay you the full amount. We need the money to pay back the loan.” ’

‘But in the first year, all I managed to send back was £700,’ says Rafique. ‘Even that left me with very little to buy basic things like toothpaste.’ This was way short of the remittance his family needed.

They had to sell off the family farm, and even then could not repay the debt. ‘It was terrible,’ recalls Rafique. ‘I told the restaurant owner what was happening and he said: “Tell your father not to worry. You will get the visa extension and then good money will come.”’

But when Rafique’s visa expired, his boss told him he had to go home to Syhlet. ‘He said the Home Office had turned down my visa extension. He took my passport and told me that I was finished at his restaurant because if the police came and found me without a visa, I would be arrested and it would be big trouble for him. ‘I thought then he was telling the truth, but now I think he lied. He simply wanted to sell my work permit place to another family.’ And that is how Rafique became an ‘invisible worker’. One Banglatown businessman I spoke to suggested there are perhaps 10,000 of them struggling to survive in London alone. Since being sacked, Rafique has lived a peripatetic life, working at restaurants all over the south of England. His ‘invisible’ status means he is paid a pittance - sometimes working just for food - and is always on the move.

‘The longest time I had work was five weeks, at a restaurant in Newmarket. I got £100 a week there, which was good for me. The worst paid job was at a restaurant in Essex, where I got only £10 for a week.’ More often he is without work. Mostly, his only food of the day is a takeaway meal of fried chicken and chips and a can of soft drink.

Alternatively, he will go to an Asian area such as Whitechapel where a Bengali family offer such people a bed and a bowl of rice for £10. Also, during Ramadan, the Islamic month of daylight fasting, mosques provide free evening meals. Like Abdul - the labourer who left his family in Bangladesh while he worked in Britain - Rafique has the fraught mentality of a fugitive. ‘When I see a police car or hear an ambulance siren, my heart jumps. I think it is for me.’

He says he was racially abused by a man on a bus but did not make a fuss in case the police were called and he was arrested. ‘I spend my days walking up and down here asking for work. I watch TV in takeaway shops until I am thrown out. I have met many other men like me. Sometimes we are sleeping three or four to a small room.

‘I am 34 and not married. Life is passing. I am a fugitive. I cannot claim benefits or seek help because I should not be here. I am alone in the world.’ Now Rafique, too, is weeping.

Why does he not return to Bangladesh?

Trapped: The families of migrants have often paid large amounts of money to send them away, selling their homes and land to finance the journey ‘People ask me that.

But I cannot go home because I am ashamed. My family paid so much money and now they have lost everything.

They have even had to sell the family home to pay back the lender.’ He has not spoken with them for three years.

‘Sometimes I think my father did wrong to send me here, but then I remember that he is not literate.

He just had a big dream.’ But the dream has turned into a nightmare.

Rafique says he has developed dangerously high blood pressure and when he went to a doctor for treatment, he was told: “The problem is your life and I cannot give you a tablet for that.” ’

Abdul feels under greater pressure even than Rafique. He, too, is the son of a rice farmer from a village near Sylhet, where he worked as a day labourer. But Abdul is 52 and has a wife and three children in Bangladesh to support.

His family borrowed £10,000 at an interest rate of 3 per cent a month for an agent to get him a UK tourist visa. In three years, he has managed to send home only £1,000. Like Rafique, his family have sold off land and buildings to meet the deficit, but it still stands at £5,000.

Since then, he has lived around Banglatown, mostly in council flats sublet by their tenants with several like him to a room. ‘When I came here, I was told it would be like heaven,’ Abdul says.

‘Now I live like a ghost, my family have no land left to sell and their creditors pressure for the money we paid.’ Some benevolent employers are beginning to campaign on behalf of people such as Abdul and Rafique. Azmal Hussain, who owns four restaurants on Brick Lane, is outspoken in his opposition to the widespread abuse of such men. ‘Something must be done,’ he says. ‘They are illegal but they are also human. Many work only to be able to eat. Who could imagine that slavery is taking place in the 21st century on our very doorsteps?’ He says the issue is a ‘taboo subject. I’ve been told not to talk about these things because of the problems it will cause to everyone.’

Above all, he questions the way Britain’s work permit system is so lax. ‘I could get four work permits a year for each of my restaurants.

They can be sold for £10,000 each (the going rate) on the black market - that’s £160,000 a year for me. The system is ripe for corruption.’

His solution? ‘Legalise those who are here rather than hand out new licences.’ In any case, he points out, there is no shortage of chefs and the unemployment rate in his community (among the highest of any immigrant group already) is high.

A Home Office spokesman, though, rejects his suggestion of an amnesty, saying: ‘It would reward those who break the immigration rules and would only encourage further illegal working in the future.’ There have been some changes, however. Last year the UK Border Agency, which had become discredited, was replaced by a new body called Home Office Immigration Enforcement.

A cap of 20,700 so-called ‘Tier 2’ work visas (which cover skilled workers) per year was also implemented in late 2010, though there is no limit per restaurant. The Government’s new immigration bill - now at its Report Stage - is aimed, claims Home Secretary Theresa May, at making the UK a ‘hostile environment’ for illegal migrant labour. The maximum penalty for those using illegal labour will be doubled to £20,000, and ministers propose to simplify right-to-work checks, to make it easier for employers to establish an employee is bona fide. In answer to a number of questions about the specific issue of the problem of ‘invisible workers’, a Home Office spokesman told me: ‘The Government is building an immigration system which is more selective. ‘The restaurant sector, like other businesses, should look to source the skills they need from the British workforce first, and move away from an unsustainable reliance on immigration. ‘The upcoming Immigration Bill will also take even tougher action against businesses which use illegal labour, and will double the fines levied against rogue employers.’ For Abdul and Rafique, though, and others like them who will never be able to pay off their debts and save their families from ruin, this is little comfort: they remain trapped.



Additional reporting by Shekhar Bhatia







Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2534379/The-secret-SLAVES-curry-houses-Lured-shores-promises-riches-double-crossed-bosses-trap-twilight-poverty-fear.html#ixzz2pfxDqFNi





DAILY MAIL report alleging Bangladeshis treating other Bangladeshis as slaves in Brick Lane -1

DAILY MAIL report alleging Bangladeshis treating other Bangladeshis as slaves in Brick Lane -1
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Campaign Commentary - the London Daily Mail running a two-page spread (Monday 06 January 2014) alleging that Bangladeshis are treating other Bangladeshis as slaves in Brick Lane “curry houses..”. -1

0125 Hrs GMT

London

Tuesday 07 January 2014

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Depending the Community in the East End of London.

[To be continued]





Marking a year of the Dysfunctional Tower Hamlets Council - Old Flo - 1

Marking a year of the Dysfunctional Tower Hamlets Council - Old Flo - 1
2320 Hrs GMT London Saturday 04 January 2014.


The DYSFUNCTIONAL Tower Hamlets Council.

UPDATE a year on from that interview presented by Charlene White on ITV London who spoke to Tower Hamlets Councillor Rania Khan about the then "row" over the sale or no sale or the claim or no claim on the sculpture “Draped Seated Woman” or “Old Flo”.
I am interested to notice that in her statement justifying the ‘stance’ of Tower Hamlets Council over “ownership” to the “Old Flo”, Rania Khan made three points.
I summarise those here:

THAT
1. Tower Hamlets Borough has “the highest child poverty rate”

2. Tower Hamlets Council has “23,000 people waiting on the housing waiting list”

And the 3rd point came across when the presenter asked her a question about the hypothetical sum of money not likely to be going straight to “the disadvantaged” in Tower hamlets. Rania Khan reassured Ms White as follows:

“...you’ll be surprised how quickly (we can?) turn things round in Tower Hamlets”
THAT is INDEED a surprise to me!


[To be continued]



KHOODEELAAR! Defending the Demand for a Democratic London Assembly - scrap the Mayor altogether

KHOODEELAAR! Defending the Demand  for a Democratic London Assembly - scrap the Mayor altogether
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Democracy Action and Campaign Commentary: Diagnosing the morass that is “London Mayoral” Politics in London- the “latest” instalment as retailed by the London Evening (EXTREMELY LOW) Standard

1538 GMT London Saturday 04 January 2014

BOTH “main” British Parties’ BUREAUCRACIES are lying about London.

And THE PUBLISHED and publicly accessible records as at present of the Apparatchik role played by Sadiq Khan in the run-up to the 2012 “London Mayor election” will show that he came across as mechanical, mostly ignorant about the Big London picture and he failed to make any intellectual, analytical let alone ethical impact at all...

I here cite the full texts of the bit on Wikipedia, retrieved just a minute ago, to convey exactly WHY I am calling Sadiq Khan an “apparatchik”; it is derived from the Russian of the USSR culture.

[Quote the Wikipedia entry]
“Apparatchik /ˌɑːpəˈrɑːtʃɪk/ (plural apparatchiki or apparatchiks; Russian: аппара́тчик [əpɐˈrat͡ɕɪk]) is a Russian colloquial term for a full-time, professional functionary of the Communist Party or government, i.e. an agent of the governmental or party "apparat" (apparatus) that held any position of bureaucratic or political responsibility, with the exception of the higher ranks of management called "Nomenklatura”.
[Unquote the Wikipedia entry]

I am ALSO saying that Sadiq Khan let the side down [as far as he could do otherwise] when he took part in the limited but demonstrable broadcast “commentaries” in the immediate hours after the votes had been cast.

I am charging Sadiq Khan with opportunism and I am saying that he FOLLOWED the line that was DISTANCING the Labour Party Bureaucracy from Ken Livingstone at that time.

I AM contrasting Khan’s “deliberate diffidence” and intellectually ambivalent and hesitant performance with the superb adherence to principle and coherent delivery, on the night, that the Islington MP Emily Thornberry showed in her many appearances on TV that crucial night after the voting.
It was crucial because the VOTING was NOT the end for democratic accountability.
Emily Thornberry DID hold her ground and DID show enough loyalty to Ken Livingstone when it was so important for the viewers to distinguish between the two candidates.
I am surprised that Khan has been given the “London” brief and yet he remains as much
in the dark now as he was almost two years ago.
What I am saying about Khan here does NOT mean that I am at all impressed by a single one of the others that have been displayed as being on the “Labour List for London”.

Perhaps one of the reasons why the vaunted (so far, at any rate) “Labour List for London” contains so many dumb ones is a function of the corruption that has dominated the Labour Party’s controlling Bureaucracy for decades.

It is by SHEER ACCIDENT that the likes of Emily Thornberry have managed to get any spots in the Labour Party Machine.

But independent, principled political programme is NOT encouraged by the Labour Party Machine.

So that is one reason why Ken Livingstone was ALWAYS a stranger.

I say all this “for” Livingstone in the full knowledge that I am and have been the most extensive, longest standing critic of so many wrong things that Livingstone did both at the GLC and as the Bliar-backed occupier of the post at the Onion in the name of London.

I say “Bliar-backed” to refer to the post being created by the antidemocratic cabal that Bliar fronted in Government.

That post was wrong for London as it has been and remans wrong for every single London borough wherever it has been foisted in miniature since.

Here I am advocating an ethical standard in these commentaries.

Especially as the London Evening Standard has no standards at all in ITS coverage!

[To be continued]

Sadiq Khan is quoted as saying:

Boris Johnson is a 'blithering, Bullingdon, Bollinger drinking buffoon', says Tooting MP....


http://www.standard.co.uk/news/mayor/boris-johnson-is-a-blithering-bullingdon-bollinger-drinking-buffoon-says-tooting-mp-sadiq-khan-8979777.html

 

 

Into the 10th year with KHOODEELAAR! Saying NO to Big Biz City of London interests and their Agenda

Into the 10th year with KHOODEELAAR! Saying NO to Big Biz City of London interests and their Agenda

 

2342 [2338] GMT London Friday 03 January 2014: Exposing he racist idiocy of the British Community Party which collided against the Community as it suppressed news of the core KHOODEELAAR! Action against the Big Biz Agenda City of London interests who were intent on using the Crossrail hole plot in order to destroy the Community in he Brick Lane London E1 area in the East End .... The KHOODEELAAR! Defence of the Community enters 10th year with the need for the defence ten times greater than they were when we began in January 2003....Kay Jordan and Muhammad Haque worked out the key action place in december 2003 as they walked near Bishospgate on Kay Jordan’s way home by bus to Kentish Town.....

 ImageImageImage

 

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Democracy Action and Campaign Commentary: Diagnosing the CPGB Morning Star and the Ed Minibrand emptiness in the face of the Neo Cons Big Six Energy Conglomerates fleecing Britain 

 

2332 [2310] [2235] GMT London Friday 03 January 2014.

 

The CPGB “Morning SCAR” (Friday 03 January 2014)  is idiotically peddling the Ed Minibrand Bureaucratic line that "public ownership" amounts to transparency, AND in the interpretation of it the ACCOUNTABILITY that is real, realised and consistent and not a token, show or a one-off.

It DOES NOT DO so.

But it CAN do so.

That CAN depend on the presence ( as in the active existence) of political programme and will to deliver an accountable publicly owned and controlled "service".

[To be continued]

 

QUOTING the CPGB MORNING STAR website (and PRINT) :

 

Big Six Energy Companies Accused Of £4 Billion Rip-Off

 

  2014   Friday 3RD  JAN

posted by Ryan Fletcher in Britain

 

Toothless regulator Ofgem 'can't investigate' claims energy giants skimmed £50 from every household in pricing scam

Labour squared up to toothless energy watchdog Ofgem yesterday after it said it was not capable of investigating the party's claims that energy companies are ripping off the nation by inflating every household bill by £50 a year.

The so-called big six - British Gas, SSE, Eon, EDF, npower and Scottish Power - paid £4 billion more for power than the market rate by buying energy produced in their own power stations, according to shadow energy secretary Caroline Flint.

Labour said this had cost each household £150 over the last three years.

Shockingly a senior partner for Ofgem Ian Marlee admitted there was no way Labour's analysis could be investigated because "there is not enough transparency to be able to actually look at that."

However the regulator announced it was introducing a number of reforms to energy tariffs to help create a simpler and clearer market and help rebuild consumer trust - though it will not give the Ofgem greater powers of investigation.

Labour shadow energy minister Tom Greatrex MP said: "It is just not good enough for Ofgem to say it doesn't know whether consumers are being overcharged - it's the regulator's job to know.

"There is now clear evidence which suggests that all the big energy companies have been buying electricity at above the market price.

Campaigning Labour MP Kelvin Hopkins renewed his call for the energy industry to be renationalised in the wake of the news.

He said: "It's very obvious that the energy sector has been a cartel for a long time.

"Today's news makes the case all the stronger for public ownership.

"As for Ofgem being unable to investigate - it's the same answer.

"The only way to create complete transparency is bring it into public ownership and make it accountable to Parliament."

Labour's analysis compared the price paid for electricity by the energy giants, the weighted average cost of fuel, with the average market price a year ahead provided to them by small supplier First Utility.

Energy UK, which represents the big six suppliers, denied the accusations and said the figures also covered "losses, the energy element of reconciliation-by-difference costs and balancing and shaping costs incurred by the supply."

The industry representative also said wholesale prices fluctuated depending on the supplier and time of purchase and that "different business practices mean that each energy company will be paying a different amount for its wholesale energy."

 

UnQUOTING the CPGB MORNING STAR website (and PRINT) 

 

AADHIKAROnline/Fotografixoroginal Contextual detail London Friday 03 January 2014:

Image

Image Image

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business Campaign image of Kay Jordan (backdrop Brick Lane) from the BBC “The Politics Show” 26 March 2006; the AADHIKAR Launching masthead 19 December 1980 and the

KHOODEELAAR! Action logo on top of the image of the City of London “Heron Tower” pictured by © Muhammad Haque.

On the entirety of the core action by the campaign that we had started under the banner of KHOODEELAAR! in January 2003 AGAINST THE CITY OF LONDON BIG BIZ AGENDA ASSAULT to take over the East End of London by destroying Brick Lane under the pretext of the Crossrail hole, the CPGB “Morning Scar” remained essentially quiet. 

On the lone occasion when it did report, it did so with the extreme reluctance.

Why did it do that?

I shall UPDATE in due course

But I can say this now:

The CPGB is a statist, non-democratic operation and it will NEVER understand the

idea of Community or Society.

It was ALSO in an alliance of its own with Ken Livingstone (HE WAS compromised by his links with Gerald Ronson (one of the “Guinness Three” who had been convicted of fraud in a rare action in the City of London)  the HERON TOWER’s owner, who had donated £10,000 to one of Livinsgtone's earlier Mayor Campaigns)  (in post as the Undone Mayor).

 

At that time, the Heron Tower was in the planning stages and would NOT have been built if it didn't get the Crossrail alignment DIVERTED away from its proposed site and into Brick Lane.....which is why we had TO MOBILISE against them.....It was Kay Jordan, the Community Architect working with the KHOODEELAAR! Action (defending the Community) who had done the crucial research and uncovered the Heron Tower Link to the Crossrail alignment...being shifted.....

The CPGB is also a very racist outfit and it cannot understand that non-Europeans

can LEAD anything!

Which is why its ‘lament’ (in the “Morning Star” of Friday 03 January 2014) that the

‘C’ word has been left out of the tributes to Nelson Mandela is a multilayered idiocy and insult.

The “C” word was a serious abuse of the vast majority of the Black (African, Asian and others) people who suffered under racism.

As I have said many times before, “apartheid” is not anywhere near accurate to describe racism.

[To be continued]

Into the 10th year with KHOODEELAAR! Saying NO to Big Biz City of London interests and their Agenda

Into the 10th year with KHOODEELAAR! Saying NO to Big Biz City of London interests and their Agenda

 

2342 [2338] GMT London Friday 03 January 2014: Exposing he racist idiocy of the British Community Party which collided against the Community as it suppressed news of the core KHOODEELAAR! Action against the Big Biz Agenda City of London interests who were intent on using the Crossrail hole plot in order to destroy the Community in he Brick Lane London E1 area in the East End .... The KHOODEELAAR! Defence of the Community enters 10th year with the need for the defence ten times greater than they were when we began in January 2003....Kay Jordan and Muhammad Haque worked out the key action place in december 2003 as they walked near Bishospgate on Kay Jordan’s way home by bus to Kentish Town.....

 ImageImageImage

 

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Democracy Action and Campaign Commentary: Diagnosing the CPGB Morning Star and the Ed Minibrand emptiness in the face of the Neo Cons Big Six Energy Conglomerates fleecing Britain 

 

2332 [2310] [2235] GMT London Friday 03 January 2014.

 

The CPGB “Morning SCAR” (Friday 03 January 2014)  is idiotically peddling the Ed Minibrand Bureaucratic line that "public ownership" amounts to transparency, AND in the interpretation of it the ACCOUNTABILITY that is real, realised and consistent and not a token, show or a one-off.

It DOES NOT DO so.

But it CAN do so.

That CAN depend on the presence ( as in the active existence) of political programme and will to deliver an accountable publicly owned and controlled "service".

[To be continued]

 

QUOTING the CPGB MORNING STAR website (and PRINT) :

 

Big Six Energy Companies Accused Of £4 Billion Rip-Off

 

  2014   Friday 3RD  JAN

posted by Ryan Fletcher in Britain

 

Toothless regulator Ofgem 'can't investigate' claims energy giants skimmed £50 from every household in pricing scam

Labour squared up to toothless energy watchdog Ofgem yesterday after it said it was not capable of investigating the party's claims that energy companies are ripping off the nation by inflating every household bill by £50 a year.

The so-called big six - British Gas, SSE, Eon, EDF, npower and Scottish Power - paid £4 billion more for power than the market rate by buying energy produced in their own power stations, according to shadow energy secretary Caroline Flint.

Labour said this had cost each household £150 over the last three years.

Shockingly a senior partner for Ofgem Ian Marlee admitted there was no way Labour's analysis could be investigated because "there is not enough transparency to be able to actually look at that."

However the regulator announced it was introducing a number of reforms to energy tariffs to help create a simpler and clearer market and help rebuild consumer trust - though it will not give the Ofgem greater powers of investigation.

Labour shadow energy minister Tom Greatrex MP said: "It is just not good enough for Ofgem to say it doesn't know whether consumers are being overcharged - it's the regulator's job to know.

"There is now clear evidence which suggests that all the big energy companies have been buying electricity at above the market price.

Campaigning Labour MP Kelvin Hopkins renewed his call for the energy industry to be renationalised in the wake of the news.

He said: "It's very obvious that the energy sector has been a cartel for a long time.

"Today's news makes the case all the stronger for public ownership.

"As for Ofgem being unable to investigate - it's the same answer.

"The only way to create complete transparency is bring it into public ownership and make it accountable to Parliament."

Labour's analysis compared the price paid for electricity by the energy giants, the weighted average cost of fuel, with the average market price a year ahead provided to them by small supplier First Utility.

Energy UK, which represents the big six suppliers, denied the accusations and said the figures also covered "losses, the energy element of reconciliation-by-difference costs and balancing and shaping costs incurred by the supply."

The industry representative also said wholesale prices fluctuated depending on the supplier and time of purchase and that "different business practices mean that each energy company will be paying a different amount for its wholesale energy."

 

UnQUOTING the CPGB MORNING STAR website (and PRINT) 

 

AADHIKAROnline/Fotografixoroginal Contextual detail London Friday 03 January 2014:

Image

Image Image

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business Campaign image of Kay Jordan (backdrop Brick Lane) from the BBC “The Politics Show” 26 March 2006; the AADHIKAR Launching masthead 19 December 1980 and the

KHOODEELAAR! Action logo on top of the image of the City of London “Heron Tower” pictured by © Muhammad Haque.

On the entirety of the core action by the campaign that we had started under the banner of KHOODEELAAR! in January 2003 AGAINST THE CITY OF LONDON BIG BIZ AGENDA ASSAULT to take over the East End of London by destroying Brick Lane under the pretext of the Crossrail hole, the CPGB “Morning Scar” remained essentially quiet. 

On the lone occasion when it did report, it did so with the extreme reluctance.

Why did it do that?

I shall UPDATE in due course

But I can say this now:

The CPGB is a statist, non-democratic operation and it will NEVER understand the

idea of Community or Society.

It was ALSO in an alliance of its own with Ken Livingstone (HE WAS compromised by his links with Gerald Ronson (one of the “Guinness Three” who had been convicted of fraud in a rare action in the City of London)  the HERON TOWER’s owner, who had donated £10,000 to one of Livinsgtone's earlier Mayor Campaigns)  (in post as the Undone Mayor).

 

At that time, the Heron Tower was in the planning stages and would NOT have been built if it didn't get the Crossrail alignment DIVERTED away from its proposed site and into Brick Lane.....which is why we had TO MOBILISE against them.....It was Kay Jordan, the Community Architect working with the KHOODEELAAR! Action (defending the Community) who had done the crucial research and uncovered the Heron Tower Link to the Crossrail alignment...being shifted.....

The CPGB is also a very racist outfit and it cannot understand that non-Europeans

can LEAD anything!

Which is why its ‘lament’ (in the “Morning Star” of Friday 03 January 2014) that the

‘C’ word has been left out of the tributes to Nelson Mandela is a multilayered idiocy and insult.

The “C” word was a serious abuse of the vast majority of the Black (African, Asian and others) people who suffered under racism.

As I have said many times before, “apartheid” is not anywhere near accurate to describe racism.

[To be continued]

Tower Homeless Borough: 10,000 more to be made homeless in coming months

Tower Homeless Borough: 10,000 more to be made homeless in coming months
London Borough of Tower Hopeless
Over 10,000 people including children, of course, are ‘budgeted’ in Tower Hamlets to be made homeless in the coming months!

By © Muhammad Haque
0250 Hrs GMT London Friday 20 December 2013
Tower Homeless London borough:

This is a scene from Tower Hamlets in 2013.

The man slumped on the desk is an identifiable ‘homeless’.
The woman sitting is an identifiable ‘helper’.

For legal reasons (because the woman is a piece of evidence) her identity is being withheld here, until the legal reason
no longer applies.

The picture is a proof that in Tower Hamlets there is an active policy of MAINTAINING homelessness.

That is, to create homelessness as in causing it and in
doing things that keep people homeless.

Tower Hamlets Council is the biggest causer
of homelessness in the
Borough.

[To be continued]



Tower Homeless Borough: 10,000 more to be made homeless in coming months

Tower Homeless Borough: 10,000 more to be made homeless in coming months
London Borough of Tower Hopeless
Over 10,000 people including children, of course, are ‘budgeted’ in Tower Hamlets to be made homeless in the coming months!

By © Muhammad Haque
0250 Hrs GMT London Friday 20 December 2013
Tower Homeless London borough:

This is a scene from Tower Hamlets in 2013.

The man slumped on the desk is an identifiable ‘homeless’.
The woman sitting is an identifiable ‘helper’.

For legal reasons (because the woman is a piece of evidence) her identity is being withheld here, until the legal reason
no longer applies.

The picture is a proof that in Tower Hamlets there is an active policy of MAINTAINING homelessness.

That is, to create homelessness as in causing it and in
doing things that keep people homeless.

Tower Hamlets Council is the biggest causer
of homelessness in the
Borough.

[To be continued]



Into 34th year with AADHIKAR the Rights Media Defending the Community...

Into 34th year with AADHIKAR the Rights Media Defending the Community...

On taking the AADHIKAR Media into the 34th year since its foundation in New Road London E1 1HE UK on Monday 19 December 1980, thirty three full years ago....

ImageImageImage

PAYING for the multiplicity of tasks entailed in the Defence of the Community: the term “paying” includes literally paying from my own pocket to confront and to challenge the (word deleted) that are continuing to let down, misrepresent, violate and exploit and abuse the overall Community and its rights..... Just why it is that I have to be doing the paying while so many are getting PAID £Millions in the name of “serving” the same community that I maintain they are DISSERVING, will be revealed in the course of this UPDATER Commentary.
As will be the facts about my “sources” of the money that I have been forced to spend in defending the most vital rights and interests of the whole community mainly in the East London borough of Tower Hamlets (LBTH)


I start by focussing on the CURRENT dysfunctional state of the local Tower Hamlets Council, about which the AADHIKAR Media has been specially unique and about which our findings as published and chronicled by the AADHIKAR Reports in the last 33 years have been without exception vindicated

 

This UPDATER Commentary REFLECTING

on the battle against publicly funded corruption 

and antisocial practices, decisions and linked entrenchment via the unaccountable, unethical, unelected Bureaucracy operated via democratically dyfunctioning local Tower Hamlets Council (LBTH)  including the collusion of the superficially “elected” “regional’ London Assembly (whose distorted, obverse ‘face’ is imaged via “Boris Johnson”) as well as by the corrupting collusion of those claiming links with the so-called elected Parliamentary Constituency at the “Palace of  Westminster”

Part 1

0745 Hrs GMT London Monday 16 December 2013

 

 

AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Action Report

London Monday 16 December 2013.

Pasted Graphic.tiff

Muhammad Haque (pictured)  campaigning

against imposing an elected mayor system on

Tower Hamlets, pictured speaking

in Hanbury Street on Saturday

06 February 2010. The loudhailer

Muhammad Haque used in that

action had been borrowed from

a local person based in Shadwell.

To get that loudhailer, at short notice,

Muhammad Haque paid for a mini cab 

and then also for the batteries that

were needed to get the loudhailer to work.

The demonstration that I (Muhammad Haque)

addressed on that occasion was (it was later found out)

filmed by Channel 4 TV (amongst others).

But the key points  that I (Muhammad Haque) made

on that day or later, were not reported by

Channel 4 who also failed to show me (Muhammad Haque)

speaking. 

Now, I do NOT need C4 or any other 'Mainstream' or "surrogate' Media se to ‘show me in their footage’. I point this out because years later, the same Channel 4 TV station, did a so-called ‘Dispatches’ investigation (June 2013 in fact] about how the incumbent (name left out of here)  as the ‘elected executive mayor’ was, as they claimed, abusing his "executive mayor" "powers and position" and  how he was wasting the public money. They broadcast a string of allegations.  

They (C4 Dispatches” June 103) reinforced one particular accusation that had been made by the Labour Party’s now confirmed candidate to seek election as “the executive mayor” to the effect that the incumbent (“executive mayor” of Tower Hamlets)   was indulging in a series of vanity programmes and activities.

As have some other quarters ever since - those quarters too have made the same allegation.

Now, my point on 6 February 2010 was that a rigorously accountable democratic local Council is the first stage for local I people’s having the basic democratic say on things that affect their lives., that matter to them and their communities.

So if you undermine that democracy platform you do a great disservice to the whole community.

Yet I was the only speaker at that whole event who addressed

all the key aspects of the then attempt (first stage via the “Referendum" which was given unwarranted 'attention' by the recruitment of Ken Livingstone, George Galloway and Keith Vaz, amongst others, by the real forces of antidemocratic interests who drove the “YES” project at that stage and launched it formally on that ate - hence our demonstration against that launch ) at dismantling democracy at the Tower Hamlets Council and I was the one who set out the key evidential, historic, social contexts and parameters and priorities for the future for a cohesive Society and Community in the East End of London.

Not only has C4 been exposed as being untenably stupid to leave out what I was saying then. It has also been exposed as being untenably uncaring and ignorant about the subject.

Why was it stupid?

Because, as the record will show: I was the one who made the most relevant points about why there should not be an “executive mayor” system in place in LBTH Council.

I also remain the only opponent to the mayor system in Tower Hamlets.

All the others who “listened to me” and were also shouting slogans “against” an elected mayor system, have turned!

They are all now “believers” in the Mayor system.

Some of them have even tried to be candidates for being elected to that post!

Those who were “OPPOSED” to the Mayor system, have ALL CONVERTED to being supporters of the system.

Not only that, even as I was speaking on 6 February 2010 on the assumption that I was addressing “like minded” opponents of the mayor system, some of those present and even posing for Channel 4 TBV crew, were in  contact (by their cell phones and by personally knocking o  their doors) cat with their potential, supporters (as voters) for when they (these WANNABEs) would need their votes when returning to the voters as  Mayor candidates!

It remains the case that the entire ‘change’ to the

Tower Hamlets Council (LBTH)  from the old system of

the Council making key decisions in a Cabinet made up

of elected local Councillors, to one where an “executive mayor” , a sole individual, 

has all the powers in or about the Council’s “decision-making”, has made things

very much less democratic and has turned an already very poorly

accountable local Council into a very seriously lethally dysfunctional, antidemocratic one. 

The impact of the badness of the LBTH Council are demonstrably many times worse. 

Every day.

 

[To be continued]

33 years on, AADHIKAR Rights Media marching on defending the Community in the UK

33 years on, AADHIKAR Rights Media marching on defending the Community in the UK
33 years on, AADHIKAR Rights Media marching on defending the Community in the UK

Two of the most racist British tabloids BACK the PR for "Islamist" "hate-preacher" event in Brick

Two of the most racist British tabloids BACK  the PR for "Islamist" "hate-preacher" event in Brick
Editor © Muhammad Haque

2035 Hrs GMT London Saturday 14 December 2013

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against Big Biz Agenda has been defending the Community in the Brick Lane London E1 area for 10 years.

Did the Daily Mail or the Daily Express support the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign once in the ten years?

So what is the significance of this ‘coverage’ by the Express and the Daily Mail?

[To be continued]







KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! You couldn't trust a Bliaring backer of Big Biz nor a Con Dem One!

KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! You couldn't trust a Bliaring backer of Big Biz nor a Con Dem One!
No to HS2! No to lies by the UK 'uncivil servants'
No to Con Dem Minister Francis Maude's backing for lies for HS2

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Diagnosis of the lies and the lying at the very ’top’ of the UK Uncivil service and at the very core of the ConDem regime: UPDATE on Francis Maude, HS2, Robin Butler, Alistair Darling etc
Image

0630 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 10 December 2013
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!

Just as we have been vindicated over the oversold economic benefits of “Crossrail” so we are witnessing the continuing unravelling of the latest lies being peddled via UK Government by the real forces of corporate theft and looting: the BiG Biz behind the PR for HS2.

How bad is the HS2 project PR?

Very bad.

Even the DAILY MAIL is admitting that Francis Maud and the PRESENT neo Cons “Transport Secretary” are among the fakers engaged in trying to hide the truth about how bad HS2 is!

I can EXCLUSIVELY reveal that Francis Maude is doubly embarrassed in this context because he told me, exclusively, in April 2006 that you could not trust anything the :”Transport Secretary” said!

Of course the holder of that post then was as L:about Party one, Alistair Darling and Maude was answering my questions about Crossrail hole...

But to make things worse for Maude et al, even Darling (the very same one, Alistar) is now OPPOSED to HS2!

He has seen the sense of the KHOODEELAAR! Diagnostics which we had given him in 2005-2007!

So bad that two factions of the liars, the ‘civil service’ brigade and their ‘critics in the Con Dem Government’ fronted at present by Francis Maude, have ‘joined forces’ in a desperate bid to hide the truth that HS2 is not a good project to fund with public £Billions.

I have bad news for the Neo Cons! As I observe that the HS2 lying gravy train that the Neo Cons are promoting for the Big Biz contractors is bound to keep hitting the buffers. It is a lying scam that will rob the UK public of £Billions and will add to indescribable destruction of the environment and will bring no real economic benefit o the people.
What the Neo Coins should do instead is to address the £Billions worth of repair, refurbishing and essential and cost-effective maintenance work that the EXISTING transport infrastructure across the country has ben crying out for!

The Neo Cons should quit the lying and drop HS2 before they cause any more losses on the bogus ‘studies; that only keep funding even more bogus Neo Cons PR firms that are in business to promote lies.

Francis Maude, the Neo Cons “minister for the Civil Service” has been reported in another embarrassing role; his part in seeking to hush up the truth about the latest Big Biz Contractors plot called HS2.
Maude has been caught in flagrant denial of the truth.
What that means is that Maude is either lying in this bid or he lied when he protested, through a “spokesperson” last week, that his then semi-spat with Robin Butler, one of Britain’s retired but most unaccountable “heads” of the overpaid and over-peddled “Civil Service”.
Robin and I go back some way!
I still call him a backer of liars in the British uncivil service. Why do I maintain that position?
Answer: Because he (Robin Butler) failed to answer my questions which I had put to him more than 20 years ago while he was still in post and I had uncovered a series of cracks in the facade of lies dressed up as “civil service etiquette” that the various Departments, including the then DHSS (the pervious name of the lying DWP of today) were hiding under Butler’s over-stated, oversold watch.

This is not good, especially when Maude was only last week being reported as

Can you trust Tory Francis Maude?
Not fully, that is what I say.
I say this on the evidence of his statements to me almost eight years ago.
He said that the (then) Transport Secretary Alistair Darling could not be trusted!
In fact, Maude said to me that he wouldn't ANYTHING Alistair Darling said!
So impatient was Maude to say that he didn’t trust Alistair Darling that he could not wait before I could complete my question to him about Darling.

In the following part of my quizzing him, Francis Maude makes his impatience and distrust clear:

“4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says. “

The full transcript by AADHIKAROnline for the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign:

7 years 7 months and 16 days ago, Francis Maude told me that his colleagues
(Tory MPs in the House of Commons) would be speaking in particular against the Crossrail hole that at that stage was still set to be driven through the Brick Lane London E1 Area.

I spoke to him briefly as he left a Tory Party Political trip to the very street, Brick Lane at 1210 GMT (appx).

The full transcript is republished below.

However, Francis Maude never kept that ‘promise’ that his colleagues would speak in that specific term in the House of Commons, “soon”.

Our campaign went ahead and is still ongoing in defending the Community in the East End of London.


AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006

Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006

1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen. We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: My colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon. ”
[The AADHIKARonline/KHOODEELAAR! transcript 24 April 2006 concluded]

The DAILY MAIL online reporting Tuesday 10 December 2013:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2521058/Ministers-bid-block-report-says-HS2-danger-failing-Transport-Secretary-calling-PM-veto-release-claim-seriously-damage-project.html


AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer
between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and
Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane
London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006

KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! You couldn't trust a Bliaring backer of Big Biz nor a Con Dem One!

KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! You couldn't trust a Bliaring backer of Big Biz nor a Con Dem One!
No to HS2! No to lies by the UK 'uncivil servants'
No to Con Dem Minister Francis Maude's backing for lies for HS1

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Diagnosis of the lies and the lying at the very ’top’ of the UK Uncivil service and at the very core of the ConDem regime: UPDATE on Francis Maude, HS2, Robin Butler, Alistair Darling etc
Image

0630 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 10 December 2013
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!

Just as we have been vindicated over the oversold economic benefits of “Crossrail” so we are witnessing the continuing unravelling of the latest lies being peddled via UK Government by the real forces of corporate theft and looting: the BiG Biz behind the PR for HS2.

How bad is the HS2 project PR?

Very bad.

Even the DAILY MAIL is admitting that Francis Maud and the PRESENT neo Cons “Transport Secretary” are among the fakers engaged in trying to hide the truth about how bad HS2 is!

I can EXCLUSIVELY reveal that Francis Maude is doubly embarrassed in this context because he told me, exclusively, in April 2006 that you could not trust anything the :”Transport Secretary” said!

Of course the holder of that post then was as L:about Party one, Alistair Darling and Maude was answering my questions about Crossrail hole...

But to make things worse for Maude et al, even Darling (the very same one, Alistar) is now OPPOSED to HS2!

He has seen the sense of the KHOODEELAAR! Diagnostics which we had given him in 2005-2007!

So bad that two factions of the liars, the ‘civil service’ brigade and their ‘critics in the Con Dem Government’ fronted at present by Francis Maude, have ‘joined forces’ in a desperate bid to hide the truth that HS2 is not a good project to fund with public £Billions.

I have bad news for the Neo Cons! As I observe that the HS2 lying gravy train that the Neo Cons are promoting for the Big Biz contractors is bound to keep hitting the buffers. It is a lying scam that will rob the UK public of £Billions and will add to indescribable destruction of the environment and will bring no real economic benefit o the people.
What the Neo Coins should do instead is to address the £Billions worth of repair, refurbishing and essential and cost-effective maintenance work that the EXISTING transport infrastructure across the country has ben crying out for!

The Neo Cons should quit the lying and drop HS2 before they cause any more losses on the bogus ‘studies; that only keep funding even more bogus Neo Cons PR firms that are in business to promote lies.

Francis Maude, the Neo Cons “minister for the Civil Service” has been reported in another embarrassing role; his part in seeking to hush up the truth about the latest Big Biz Contractors plot called HS2.
Maude has been caught in flagrant denial of the truth.
What that means is that Maude is either lying in this bid or he lied when he protested, through a “spokesperson” last week, that his then semi-spat with Robin Butler, one of Britain’s retired but most unaccountable “heads” of the overpaid and over-peddled “Civil Service”.
Robin and I go back some way!
I still call him a backer of liars in the British uncivil service. Why do I maintain that position?
Answer: Because he (Robin Butler) failed to answer my questions which I had put to him more than 20 years ago while he was still in post and I had uncovered a series of cracks in the facade of lies dressed up as “civil service etiquette” that the various Departments, including the then DHSS (the pervious name of the lying DWP of today) were hiding under Butler’s over-stated, oversold watch.

This is not good, especially when Maude was only last week being reported as

Can you trust Tory Francis Maude?
Not fully, that is what I say.
I say this on the evidence of his statements to me almost eight years ago.
He said that the (then) Transport Secretary Alistair Darling could not be trusted!
In fact, Maude said to me that he wouldn't ANYTHING Alistair Darling said!
So impatient was Maude to say that he didn’t trust Alistair Darling that he could not wait before I could complete my question to him about Darling.

In the following part of my quizzing him, Francis Maude makes his impatience and distrust clear:

“4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says. “

The full transcript by AADHIKAROnline for the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign:

7 years 7 months and 16 days ago, Francis Maude told me that his colleagues
(Tory MPs in the House of Commons) would be speaking in particular against the Crossrail hole that at that stage was still set to be driven through the Brick Lane London E1 Area.

I spoke to him briefly as he left a Tory Party Political trip to the very street, Brick Lane at 1210 GMT (appx).

The full transcript is republished below.

However, Francis Maude never kept that ‘promise’ that his colleagues would speak in that specific term in the House of Commons, “soon”.

Our campaign went ahead and is still ongoing in defending the Community in the East End of London.


AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006

Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006

1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen. We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: My colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon. ”
[The AADHIKARonline/KHOODEELAAR! transcript 24 April 2006 concluded]

The DAILY MAIL online reporting Tuesday 10 December 2013:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2521058/Ministers-bid-block-report-says-HS2-danger-failing-Transport-Secretary-calling-PM-veto-release-claim-seriously-damage-project.html


AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer
between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and
Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane
London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006

The © Muhammad Haque Lines on the Wrinkled poster - Lines One

The © Muhammad Haque Lines on the Wrinkled poster - Lines One
Lines on a wrinkled poster of the 1994 South African Elections
“rescued from the gutter”
by Martin Hall....
By © Muhammad Haque [1]
1204 Hrs GMT London Saturday 07 December 2013
1150 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 07 December 2013

Prompted by Salford University's Vice Chancellor Professor Martin Hall's statement on BBC News Channel this morning that he has one of his most treasured items - a wrinkled poster from the 1994 South African election...

“What would you do, Martin?
Supposing it was no less than Graca
herself who asked you to part
with that treasured wrinkled poster and give it away?
Would you really just give it away?
Just because Graca Machel asked
you to?
Not that lightly, you won’t.
Not if I have any inkling, any idea
of what you must have gone through
over the years to keep it with you
in your knowledge!

Am I right, Martin?
You were far too modest
when you said briefly
that it was one of your
proudest possessions.


It could be your only
such possession.

Am I right, Martin?
You have done your looking
and you have done your digging
and have done your reflecting!

All those hours, no, days, no, weeks
months and years of pain,
the dirt, the real, filthy, unhealthy
dirt
that you have embraced,
no madly rolled in, got soaked in
and submerged in,
all those years of travail have
not been as crazy as they may
have looked.
They have been divine
in search of that little tiny
the infinitesimal
bit of authenticity


Isn’t it Martin?


It is that small.
Tiny.
But it can, no mostly has,
taken a life time or more
to find!


And it looks
just like
that wrinkled
tatty
old
1994
South African
Election poster
picked up
straight
from a mundane
real
gutter!

And it has been next to your heart
ever since!

Am I right, Martin?

1204 Hrs GMT London Saturday

07 December 2013
[To be continued]



40 years of Campaign rejecting and exposing the  racist SUNDAY TIMES attack of 2 Dec 1973

40 years of Campaign rejecting and exposing the  racist SUNDAY TIMES  attack of 2 Dec 1973

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Anniversaries of the Struggles for the Defence of the Community in the East End of London - UPDATE and 40th anniversary of the Campaign rejecting and exposing the  racist SUNDAY TIMES Colour Supplement attack of 02 December 1973 -1 and 2

1934 [1832] [1745] Hrs GMT London Sunday 01 December 2013

 

Image

Is it any wonder then that Tony Bliar almost got away with selling that lie (see my previous post, quoted in full below) as a “national achievement”?

Bliar was, almost by accident, stopped when he attempted to raise the Toynbee Hall into a status that it never deserved.

An unnamed ‘civil servant’ stopped Bliar (around  2000) and noted as follows about the Toynbee Hall (28 Commercial Street London E1):

‘Toynbee Hall is not the most active or stimulating organisation. As a training provider it is very poor . . . we do not support a further* honour.’

That short note as quoted is a stunning revelation. This, in my knowledge, is the fist ever such statement coming out of the State at all about the Toynbee Hall.

The note is published in the DAILY MAIL piece today (Sunday 01 December 2013) in connection with the promotion of the forthcoming West End Musical featuring Stephen Ward and the linked promotion for Geoffrey Robertson’s ‘investigation’ into the fall guy Stephen Ward who was made the scapegoat so that Tory War Minister John Profumo and the rest of the Conservative and other “British Establishment” figures were spared over the so-called Christine Keeler/John Profumo scandal.

It is a telling measure of the relevant role that Toynbee Hall has been put to play for the British Establishment that following Profumo's resignation, he was installed at the Toynbee Hall, notionally geographically situated “in the deprived East End” but in fact engaged in the promotion of the same Agenda that is subscribed to and preferred by the likes of William Whitewall, David Cameron, Tony Bliar et al, all of whom have played their parts in mentioning the Toynbee Hall in dispatches...

The Toynbee Hall is engaged in the continuation of the agenda that would keep the State happy and keep out the Community. 

It is also operated on the East India Company’s model where they have an ethnic surrogate appendage to make the Empire look “local enough”.

Parallel to the Commercial Street is of course Brick Lane which has been identified as the location of the Bangladeshis in the UK.

In fact the name Brick Lane was only mentioned in any significant way on Sunday 02 December 1973 in the article the “World Beyond the Curtains” by-lined to Lesley Garner and published in the London Sunday Times Colour Supplement.

A year ago, I wrote the following diagnostic update about that  Sunday Times Colour Supplement attack on the Seelotee-Bangladeshis in the UK in December 1973 and its implications:

http://kheydaieelaar.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/0820-0812-0700-hrs-gmt-london-thursday-05-december-2012-the-muhammad-haque-daily-ethical-commentary-and-contextual-updater-on-the-racist-sunday-times-attack-on-the-brick-lane-london-e1-are/

 

[To be continued]

 

___

If there is one paragraph of three sentences anywhere online that sums up an utter lie at the expense of the East End of London then it is the following which I have retrieved in the last 2 minutes from the internet Wikipedia entry on the Toynbee Hall

(1734 GMT London Sunday 01 December 2013):

 

“Toynbee Hall is a community-focused charity based in the East End of London. 

The charity pioneers ways to reduce poverty and disadvantage. It gives one of the country’s most deprived area a voice by providing access to free advice, support services and helps to tackle social injustice.”

 

[To be continued]

 





The Battle to Defend the idea of Brick Lane as the front lane (note my word there: “Lane”, not “line” in the FRONT LANE) in the defence of the community has been ongoing since that Sunday 2 December 1973.

And unrecognised by everyone else, the “British Establishment” has not relented on ITS attacks on the Community, symbolised by the two words “Brick Lane”.

Here is my summarised anniversary list of some key milestones (which means there have been others but those are accurately conveyed ion the implications of the ones listed below) of that racist war on the Bangladeshi Community:-

1. Sunday Times attack on 02 December 1973;

2. Channel 4 TV drama “Garlands” co-created by identifiable anti-Bangladeshis;

3. The BBC TV series “King of the Ghetto”, screened in May 1986; CARMABUK was established to campaign against that;

4. The London DAILY STAR, edited by Brian Hitchen (1987-1994) ran a series of attacks (1988) that was parallel to the Sunday Times piece in relation to many of the racistly falsified, racist assertions and hateful innuendoes - CARMABUK demonstrated in Fleet Street London EC4 in 1988 against the DAILY STAR attacks;

5. The Granta Commissioned CONTINUATION of what the other three had carried and disguised as a “novel” (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) called “Brick Lane” and claiming that it was written by the “English” “daughter of a Bengali”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5. The much-hyped, anti-Bangladeshis-linked production of a “movie” allegedly based on the above and “introducing the revolutionary revelation” that “Bengali” (notice the idea of Bangladeshis is alien to all of them) “men and women” too had propensities to adultery.......


[To be continued]

Linked pieces, all written and Edited by © Muhammad Haque:

http://carmabuk.blogspot.co.uk/2005/09/why-has-no-study-been-done-on-that.html

http://asianmediaaudit.blogspot.co.uk/2005_12_01_archive.html




Tower Hamlets Council isn't working - UPDATE 28 November 2013

Tower Hamlets Council isn't working - UPDATE 28 November 2013

Tower Hamlets Council isn't working - UPDATE 28 November 2013

 Image

AADHIKARonline KHOODEELAAR! Action Defending the Community in the East End of London The © Muhammad Haque Commentary on Tower Hamlets Council

2140 Hrs GMT London Thursday 28 November 2013

Editor © Muhammad Haque. This AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! (series) Investigative Report on Tower Hamlets Council is based on the purpose of a local Council.

What is that purpose and if that purpose is being served by those who get elected to the Council on regular bases. At the end of last night's "full Council" meeting at the Mulberry Place, I spoke briefly to two councillors who attended the Meeting. Neither had spoken, as far as I noticed as I spoke to them. Both said the same thing- that the time and resources of the Council had been mainly wasted by the three hours of the Meeting. One belonged to "Executive Mayor" Lutfur's "Independent" councillors group and the other was an Opposition Labour Councillor.

A third, who DID speak, quite a bit, was seen racing towards Cllr Kabir Ahmed (Lutfur supporter) who too had spoken a bit at the meeting.

That third, Cllr Abdal Ullah from the Opposition Labour Group, was the subject of a mild rebuke by another of Lutfur's supporters, Rania Khan. Rania Khan held up what she said was a picture of the same Abdal Ullah being pally with Lutfur Rahman not all that long ago, whom he was now condemning on the Council floor.

The bottom line is that the Council is being wasted by the overly obsessive exchanges that are mainly about showing dislike of the other side than on focussing on the actual bread and butter services that the Council exists to provide to ordinary people who were coming under severe added attacks by the central Government.

Was the local state, typified by Tower Hamlets Council, aiding and abetting those central state attacks on peoples' lives and on Society? This Question and other related Questions warrant being considered by the local Council. It is after all, “the elected democratic forum for the local people in the East End Borough of Tower Hamlets”!

No? Quite so!

Because none of the evidence of the interest/s of the councillors who took to the floor last night could support any claim that Tower Hamlets Council was seriously bothered about giving top priority to its democratic duties to the local voters, let alone to the local Community! Scoring points appeared to be the main intent.

Those points were as below par to onlookers (Oops! “Public Gallery”) as they were to a good number of the “performers” themselves (see above). But audit of the Council as the organisation which exists on public costs to provide services to local people was NOT coming across in the spiels, counter spiels. The shallowness of the apparent acrimony (note my phrase: “apparent acrimony”) on the Council floor was confirmed by Abdal Ullah's performance just outside the entrance to the Mulberry Place. More on that performance, shortly.

[To be continued]

Why isn't Mark Serwotka, over-hyped "Leftwing" Trade Unionist active against racist DWP attacks?

Why isn't Mark Serwotka, over-hyped "Leftwing" Trade Unionist active against racist DWP attacks?

By © Muhammad Haque

1755 [1705] Hrs London Sunday 24 November 2013.

CONTINUING the Exclusive REPORT on the

racist attacks that the UK Government (then Tory)

allowed to take place on Asian claimants 

visiting the Benefits Agency (DSS) at 

60 Commercial Road London E1.

 

Image

 

I am publishing this series of exclusive reports in immediate response to the comments attributed by the UK “news outlets” to Stephen Timms MP and the PCS Union’s Mark Serwotka  this past week. I am doing this to tell them that they are being totally dishonest to only talk about “Job Centre Plus staff” being assaulted. What I am saying is that the Benefits Department or the DWP has been ASSAULTING claimants fro years and that the assaults have been quite physical, material as well as of other varieties including obviously emotional...I am FOCUSSING on the racist motivation, plan, intention and the perpetration of these attacks...

 

 

THIS IS a very shortened version of a lot of things that happened in and around the DWP’s building known as 60 Commercial Road London E1. The things that happened there were not exceptional and nobody has ever said anything about these events nor has any Political party or Party Political group made anything of it. Yet the things are far more worrying than anything that any known member of the English Defence League (EDL)  has ever been caught doing to anyone on the streets of the East End of London.  The CBRUK Investigation, which are still going, began almost as soon as the Campaign was established in July 1989, looking at and monitoring personal as well as institutional racist violations and attacks by the local Council, the central Government units, operations, Departments and Agencies and other state forces. CBRUK  is publishing these short reports less than 2 months after the EDL was “marching” on Tower Hamlets. Almost 300 “antifascists (that word is overdue for serious re-examination and update) ” were reportedly arrested by the London Metropolitan Police on that day, Saturday 7 September 2013. 

 

The events I am diagnostically contextually reporting below took place literally yards from where the Met Police arrested almost 300 antifascists, in the same Commercial Road! And over a  thousand “anti-EDL” "protesters" rallied at the nearby Altab Ali Park ...... 

 

But nobody, neither 'approved' speaker nor 'authorised’ organiser of the “anti-EDL, antifascists” “demo and rally”  spoke a single word on that day (or before or after) about far else AGAINST racism that takes place, took place and has been and is taking place every single day in Tower Hamlets and elsewhere in the East End. 

 

Nor the fact that most of the “normal day to day racism” is taking place quite clearly by perpetrators who are neither members of the EDL nor supporters of them.....

 

SPACE ONE

 

When the Asian man arrived at the 60 Commercial Road London E1 address, he had very little time to wait. He had not had any food for days. So was in a rush to know what his entitlement was. He would have needed at most one minute or two to get the info and then he would be back on the street, looking for a way to find some food.

His benefits had been stopped.

Like it had been many times before that.

He was focussed on only one thing: to tell the Benefits Agency that he had got their letter and that he was there to report to the counter saying that and then being ready to hear whatever they had to tell him.

So he joined a not long queue.

Only two or three people ahead of him.

Seeing that one was a woman in her 50s and the other one a very young female, he thought nothing.

He decided to concentrate on what he would do after he finishes at the counter.

It is a dire, dire time he was having and he could not afford to get side-tracked from his aim to get hold of some food.

He would not count the number of days he had been without food.

He has had little chance t have a cup of tea either.

So he wasn’t very string.

Just about staying in one piece.

He had no idea when the Benefits Agency would let him any money again.

But he had to do the process, as he was there today to do.

His last appointment with the GP had been a disaster.

He was pushed and shoved by the GP’s wife who doubled as his Receptionist as well.

So he was being very focussed, very keen to avoid being attacked by someone else.

[REPORT To be continued]

Why isn't Mark Serwotka, over-hyped "Leftwing" Trade Unionist active against racist DWP attacks?

Why isn't Mark Serwotka, over-hyped "Leftwing" Trade Unionist active against racist DWP attacks?

By © Muhammad Haque

1755 [1705] Hrs London Sunday 24 November 2013.

CONTINUING the Exclusive REPORT on the

racist attacks that the UK Government (then Tory)

allowed to take place on Asian claimants 

visiting the Benefits Agency (DSS) at 

60 Commercial Road London E1.

 

Image

 

I am publishing this series of exclusive reports in immediate response to the comments attributed by the UK “news outlets” to Stephen Timms MP and the PCS Union’s Mark Serwotka  this past week. I am doing this to tell them that they are being totally dishonest to only talk about “Job Centre Plus staff” being assaulted. What I am saying is that the Benefits Department or the DWP has been ASSAULTING claimants fro years and that the assaults have been quite physical, material as well as of other varieties including obviously emotional...I am FOCUSSING on the racist motivation, plan, intention and the perpetration of these attacks...

 

 

THIS IS a very shortened version of a lot of things that happened in and around the DWP’s building known as 60 Commercial Road London E1. The things that happened there were not exceptional and nobody has ever said anything about these events nor has any Political party or Party Political group made anything of it. Yet the things are far more worrying than anything that any known member of the English Defence League (EDL)  has ever been caught doing to anyone on the streets of the East End of London.  The CBRUK Investigation, which are still going, began almost as soon as the Campaign was established in July 1989, looking at and monitoring personal as well as institutional racist violations and attacks by the local Council, the central Government units, operations, Departments and Agencies and other state forces. CBRUK  is publishing these short reports less than 2 months after the EDL was “marching” on Tower Hamlets. Almost 300 “antifascists (that word is overdue for serious re-examination and update) ” were reportedly arrested by the London Metropolitan Police on that day, Saturday 7 September 2013. 

 

The events I am diagnostically contextually reporting below took place literally yards from where the Met Police arrested almost 300 antifascists, in the same Commercial Road! And over a  thousand “anti-EDL” "protesters" rallied at the nearby Altab Ali Park ...... 

 

But nobody, neither 'approved' speaker nor 'authorised’ organiser of the “anti-EDL, antifascists” “demo and rally”  spoke a single word on that day (or before or after) about far else AGAINST racism that takes place, took place and has been and is taking place every single day in Tower Hamlets and elsewhere in the East End. 

 

Nor the fact that most of the “normal day to day racism” is taking place quite clearly by perpetrators who are neither members of the EDL nor supporters of them.....

 

SPACE ONE

 

When the Asian man arrived at the 60 Commercial Road London E1 address, he had very little time to wait. He had not had any food for days. So was in a rush to know what his entitlement was. He would have needed at most one minute or two to get the info and then he would be back on the street, looking for a way to find some food.

His benefits had been stopped.

Like it had been many times before that.

He was focussed on only one thing: to tell the Benefits Agency that he had got their letter and that he was there to report to the counter saying that and then being ready to hear whatever they had to tell him.

So he joined a not long queue.

Only two or three people ahead of him.

Seeing that one was a woman in her 50s and the other one a very young female, he thought nothing.

He decided to concentrate on what he would do after he finishes at the counter.

It is a dire, dire time he was having and he could not afford to get side-tracked from his aim to get hold of some food.

He would not count the number of days he had been without food.

He has had little chance t have a cup of tea either.

So he wasn’t very string.

Just about staying in one piece.

He had no idea when the Benefits Agency would let him any money again.

But he had to do the process, as he was there today to do.

His last appointment with the GP had been a disaster.

He was pushed and shoved by the GP’s wife who doubled as his Receptionist as well.

So he was being very focussed, very keen to avoid being attacked by someone else.

[REPORT To be continued]

Why isn't Mark Serwotka, over-hyped "Leftwing" Trade Unionist active against racist DWP attacks?

Why isn't Mark Serwotka, over-hyped "Leftwing" Trade Unionist active against racist DWP attacks?

By © Muhammad Haque

1755 [1705] Hrs London Sunday 24 November 2013.

CONTINUING the Exclusive REPORT on the

racist attacks that the UK Government (then Tory)

allowed to take place on Asian claimants 

visiting the Benefits Agency (DSS) at 

60 Commercial Road London E1.

 

Image

 

I am publishing this series of exclusive reports in immediate response to the comments attributed by the UK “news outlets” to Stephen Timms MP and the PCS Union’s Mark Serwotka  this past week. I am doing this to tell them that they are being totally dishonest to only talk about “Job Centre Plus staff” being assaulted. What I am saying is that the Benefits Department or the DWP has been ASSAULTING claimants fro years and that the assaults have been quite physical, material as well as of other varieties including obviously emotional...I am FOCUSSING on the racist motivation, plan, intention and the perpetration of these attacks...

 

 

THIS IS a very shortened version of a lot of things that happened in and around the DWP’s building known as 60 Commercial Road London E1. The things that happened there were not exceptional and nobody has ever said anything about these events nor has any Political party or Party Political group made anything of it. Yet the things are far more worrying than anything that any known member of the English Defence League (EDL)  has ever been caught doing to anyone on the streets of the East End of London.  The CBRUK Investigation, which are still going, began almost as soon as the Campaign was established in July 1989, looking at and monitoring personal as well as institutional racist violations and attacks by the local Council, the central Government units, operations, Departments and Agencies and other state forces. CBRUK  is publishing these short reports less than 2 months after the EDL was “marching” on Tower Hamlets. Almost 300 “antifascists (that word is overdue for serious re-examination and update) ” were reportedly arrested by the London Metropolitan Police on that day, Saturday 7 September 2013. 

 

The events I am diagnostically contextually reporting below took place literally yards from where the Met Police arrested almost 300 antifascists, in the same Commercial Road! And over a  thousand “anti-EDL” "protesters" rallied at the nearby Altab Ali Park ...... 

 

But nobody, neither 'approved' speaker nor 'authorised’ organiser of the “anti-EDL, antifascists” “demo and rally”  spoke a single word on that day (or before or after) about far else AGAINST racism that takes place, took place and has been and is taking place every single day in Tower Hamlets and elsewhere in the East End. 

 

Nor the fact that most of the “normal day to day racism” is taking place quite clearly by perpetrators who are neither members of the EDL nor supporters of them.....

 

SPACE ONE

 

When the Asian man arrived at the 60 Commercial Road London E1 address, he had very little time to wait. He had not had any food for days. So was in a rush to know what his entitlement was. He would have needed at most one minute or two to get the info and then he would be back on the street, looking for a way to find some food.

His benefits had been stopped.

Like it had been many times before that.

He was focussed on only one thing: to tell the Benefits Agency that he had got their letter and that he was there to report to the counter saying that and then being ready to hear whatever they had to tell him.

So he joined a not long queue.

Only two or three people ahead of him.

Seeing that one was a woman in her 50s and the other one a very young female, he thought nothing.

He decided to concentrate on what he would do after he finishes at the counter.

It is a dire, dire time he was having and he could not afford to get side-tracked from his aim to get hold of some food.

He would not count the number of days he had been without food.

He has had little chance t have a cup of tea either.

So he wasn’t very string.

Just about staying in one piece.

He had no idea when the Benefits Agency would let him any money again.

But he had to do the process, as he was there today to do.

His last appointment with the GP had been a disaster.

He was pushed and shoved by the GP’s wife who doubled as his Receptionist as well.

So he was being very focussed, very keen to avoid being attacked by someone else.

[REPORT To be continued]

Neo Con Law Officer Dominic Grieve "QC" is criminally ignorant of the law -6

Neo Con Law Officer Dominic Grieve "QC" is criminally ignorant of the law -6
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Constitutional Law Diagnosis- Dominic the lawless Attorney General who is caught and exposed a racist bigot fuelled by his own ignorance and lack of learning - 4

1625 [1550] [1524] Hrs GMT London Saturday 23 November 2013

In a 2005 Criminal Law Analysis (monograph) headlined "Appraising Strict Liability", it was said that a tendency to accuse a person of an offence simply because they belong to a group, a race or ethnic community was a dangerously irresponsible things and that it went against the universal human rights of the person so damned.

Dominic the Ignorant Grieve cannot have read that or related criminal law literature....

In APPRAISING STRICT LIABILITY an Oxford University Press monograph (edited by Andrew Simester) contributors examined in some detail the danger of accusing (and convicting) people who have done no wrong.

This is what Dominic Grieve has just done: he has condemned “the Pakistani community” of corruption...

And he has not produced any evidence whatever. The contributors to “APPRAISING STRICT LIABILITY” conducted, what the publishers says “the first full-length consideration of the problem of liability in the criminal law: that is, the problem of criminal offences that allow a defendant to be convicted without proof of fault. Because of its potential to convict blameless persons, strict liability is a highly controversial phenomenon in the criminal law.”

At page 65 of the 13th Edition of the leading English Criminal Law Textbook “Smith and Hogan’s Criminal Law” (OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 2011) the CURRENT EDITOR David Ormerod (linked with the Queen Mary College, sited in Tower Hamlets, of all places) says as follows:

“(“state of affairs”) offences of this type are treated with great caution. They are commonly associated with tyrannical regimes, in which offences of a “status” are enacted, for example, offences of being a member of a particular political organisation or being a member of particular race or religion..”

That is precisely what Dominic Grieve has done in his spiel to the DAILY TELEGRAPH accusing the “Pakistani community of corruption”. DOMINIC GRIEVE should stop uttering racist idiocies and start reading up on what is crime and what is corruption...

[To be continued]



Racist Neo Con "law chief" Dominic Grieve is exposed as a Grievously ignorant racist inciter -1

Racist Neo Con "law chief" Dominic Grieve is exposed as a Grievously ignorant racist inciter -1
Racist Neo Con "law chief" Dominic Grieve is exposed as a Grievously ignorant inciter to racist hatred -1
In doing so, Grieve joins the ‘EDL Bandwagon’. This can only be as part of his electoral corruption plot.

Grieve is grievously ignorant on the law.
He has been peddling the irresponsible and intentional lie that “the Pakistanis in Britain are the corrupt community”.
The same will soon be said against the Bangladeshis!
Indeed, it has been said already now for almost four years.
Voter fraud is what the Grievously Ignorant one is on about on the surface of what he has spieled
So let’s take that for a start as the real cause for the concern.
Is Grievously Ignorant saying that ordinary Pakistanis in Britain are corrupt and that they are corrupting the British vote system?
If he is saying that then he must produce the evidence.
Otherwise, he should apologise unreservedly and he must do so immediately.
In areas with significant Bangladeshi voters, the allegation of voters fraud has been made now for many years.
The first place is Tower Hamlets.
So why haven’t the “authorities” taken acton against such alleged widespread voter fraud?
Why has the London Metropolitan Police refused to prosecute on voter fraud in Tower Hamlets?
As the present Attorney General, shouldn’t the Grievously Ignorant Idiot Dominic be required to explain this blatant lack of evidence?
The same should be put to him about his claim about the “Pakistani community”.

It is noticeable that the Grievously divisive Ignorant Dominic indulges in giving the “Indian community” a clean certificate!
He does that just as corruptly intentionally as his Raj racist predecessors had done in the 19th Century in the Sub-Continent as they continued on their corrupt occupation.
The Ignorant Grieve has evidently never heard of the Indian National Army (the INA), let alone of the Netaji Bose!
He could not have heard of the 1857 Revolt against the British Empire lying to divide and to create the internecine warfare amongst the “Sepoys”.
Just as the anti-Imperialists fighting the British Empire across the Subcontinent saw through Dominic's racist Empire and Raj predecessors then so will the people of Bangladeshi, Indian and Pakistani descents in the UK see through Grievous’ latest Neo Con racist and divisive tactics.

[To be continued]


Racist Neo Con "law chief" Dominic Grieve is exposed as a Grievously ignorant racist inciter -1

Racist Neo Con "law chief" Dominic Grieve is exposed as a Grievously ignorant racist inciter -1
Racist Neo Con "law chief" Dominic Grieve is exposed as a Grievously ignorant racist inciter -1
Grieve is grievously ignorant on the law.
He has been peddling the irresponsible and intentional lie that “the Pakistanis in Britain are the corrupt community”.
The same will soon be said against the Bangladeshis!
Indeed, it has been said already now for almost four years.
Voter fraud is what Grievously Ignorant so on about on the surface.
So let’s take that for a start as the real cause for the concern.
Is Grievously ignorant t saying that ordinary Pakistanis in Britain are corrupt and that they are corrupting the British vote system?
If he is saying that then he must produce the evidence.
Otherwise, he should apologise unreservedly and he must do so immediately.
In areas with significant Bangladeshi voters, the allegation of voters fraud has been made now for many years.
The first place is Tower Hamlets.
So why haven’t the “authorities” taken acton against such alleged widespread voter fraud?
Why has the London Metropolitan Authority refused to prosecute on voter fraud?
As the present Attorney General, shouldn’t the Grievously Ignorant Idiot Dominic be required to explain this blatant lack of evidence?
The same should be put to him about his claim about the “Pakistani community”. It is noticeable that the Grievously divisive Ignorant Dominic indulges in giving the “Indian community” a clean certificate!
He does that just as corruptly intentionally as his Raj racist predecessors had done in the 19th Century in the Sub-Continent as they continued on their corrupt occupation.
The Ignorant Grieve has evidently never heard of the Indian National Army, let alone of the Netaji Bose!
He could not have heard of the 1857 Revolt against the British Empire lying to divide and to create the internecine warfare amongst the “Sepoys”.
Just as the anti-Imperialists across the Subcontinent saw through Dominic's racist Empire and Raj predecessors then so will the people of Bangladeshi, Indian and Pakistani descents in the UK see through Grievous’ latest Neo Con racist and divisive tactics.

[To be continued]


The © Muhammad Haque Newspaper Pictures - CONTEXTUAL EVIDENTIAL MONTAGES -1

The © Muhammad Haque Newspaper Pictures - CONTEXTUAL EVIDENTIAL MONTAGES -1

 

KHOODEELAAR! diagnostics and the Muhammad Haque Newspaper Pictures – 1


This montage is made of two pictures of Newspapers that I took - on 22 November 2013 and 31 August 2012.

The camera I used for both pictures is the camera that Kay Jordan researched and bought in May 2010 as part of the resourcing of the then 1 year old All Volunteers News project that she and I had set up in 2009 at 160 Brick Lane London E1 6RU.

I have abbreviated a lot of information into the caption which is the quiz as well as a report as shown in the montage below.

I will post more contextual evidential campaigning updates on the pictures and on the ALL Volunteers News here..

[To be continued]


Image

By © Muhammad Haque  THE DIAGNOSTIC REPORT was originally published jointly with the resources of CBRUK / KHOODEELAAR 2006 | 15.01.2006 10:01 |

Analysis | Social Struggles | London | World

 

THIS Version has been edited at 1818 Hrs GMT London Friday 22 November 2013 and a Legal Note attached to it at the end about our original legal email address

lawmedia@hotmail.com

 

On Tuesday of this coming week, 17 January 2006, a UK House of Commons committee is due to start formally looking at the Crossrail hole Bill in view of the petitions that have been submitted mainly by objectors to the Bill.

There is no room in that process for the truth of the real political machinations and betrayals during the past three years by the ‘elected’ politicians for the area affected in London KHOODEELAAR the BRICK LANE LONDON E1 COMMUNITY campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill is now set to draw public attention to the unnecessary attack via the Crossrail hole scheme on a widely-noted most deprived part of the East End.

The publication programme is coinciding with the scheduled start of the formal ‘scrutiny’ of the House of Commons Crossrail Bill by the formally appointed ‘select committee’ beginning next week.

The MPs committee is only going to look at the formally submitted petitions those petitions are in accordance with the overly bureaucratic and jargonised procedure of the House of Commons.

There is no room in that process for the truth of the real political machinations and betrayals that have caused the problem of the Crossrail hole to be resisted by the local community in the East End.

For the past 24 months, that defence of the community has been carried out by the KHOODEELAAR BRICK LANE LONDON E1 community campaign against the Crossrail hole plan, scheme, project and Bill. The facts and the evidence of that campaign are essential for a proper and genuine and factual understanding of what the Crossrail hole Bill is about and why it must be scrapped. Campaign schedule as at 0930 Hrs London Sunday 15 January 2006 1.

 

 

Publication of the KHOODEELAAR BRICK LANE LONDON E1 COMMUNITY documentary evidence of the role of the former Bethnal Green ands Bow MP Oona King – analysing her promotion of the Crossrail scheme and based on the speech she made in which she stated that the local community would come round to accepting the Crossrail assault on the community if only the Crossrail promoters explained the alleged advantages more!

2.Publication of the latest evidence of the collusion with Crossrail hole scheme promoters by the controlling elements on Tower Hamlets Council which INVITED the Crossrail destruction attacks to the East End under the multiple duplicity of ‘regeneration’.

3. Publication of the KHOODEELAAR demands to the formal Tower Hamlets council for the Council to oppose the Crossrail hole attacks on both the Brick Lane London e1 area as well as on other parts of the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets. The KHOODEELAAR demands date back to January 2004.

4. Publication of the KHOODEELAAR demands to Gordon Brown [February 2004] and to Tony Blair [March 2004] and to Alistair Darling [May 2004]

5. Publication of the KHOODEELAAR investigation into the overdosing on poverty and deprivation by the controlling corrupt cliques on the Tower Hamlets council who have WANTED to maintain poverty to remain a factor in the East End as part of the ‘central UK GIOVT. Funding programme as affecting the Borough. The glaring lies that the same cliques have been perpetrating over the past week alleging that they even know what the needs of the community are let alone have any willingness to recognise the community far less show true and democratic respect to the people who actually own the Council but who have been disenfranchised by the corrupt clique that has been in de facto control of the Tower Hamlets Council’s agenda.

6. Publication of the evidence of how Crossrail hole plan would destroy the future of the youths and prematurely blight all community efforts and stability in the East End.

© CBRUK / KHOODEELAAR 2006 THIS e-mail address is currently not active due to legal proceedings that are currently underway (as at 1824 GMT Friday 22 November 2013]

e-mail:

lawmedia@hotmail.com

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/london/2006/01/331512.html?c=on#comments

 

 

I know the moon doesn't rise in the sky here... 33 years on, contexting the AADHIKAR Launching Poem

I know the moon doesn't rise in the sky here... 33 years on, contexting the AADHIKAR Launching Poem
By © Muhammad Haque
0112 Hrs GMT London Friday 22 November 2013

I know the moon doesn't rise in the sky here... 33 years on, contexting the AADHIKAR Launching Poem, as three slaves are freed in Lambeth, south London after 30 years in captivity


0055 Hrs GMT London Friday

22 November 2013

SLAVERY in London 2013!



Warned against in December 1980!

By © Muhammad Haque

"I know the moon doesn't rise

in the sky

here...."



This (above) is how I hand wrote (see more below)

as I also conceived the Poem that became

the main masthead statement on the weekly AADHIKAR (means Rights in several

Asian languages;

the transliteration AADHIKAR is entirely mine - so as to create the most accurate sound) that we launched on Monday 19 December 1980 from New Road

London E1 1HE. I had my siblings all doing their bits and we stayed up on our feet for almost a whole week without sleep or rest!

The main typing on a still pre-IT age typewriter was done by Azizul. (Ayzul)

The main power of support behind the whole things was Mother.

She could see we were collapsing under the unprecedented strain of

working for a week on our feet and she encouraged: if you can bear it, go forward!

The rest of the poem went on to say a topical thematic

statement about the then raging racist band called

the British Movement.

And then it told about the UK Bangladeshis’

fighting for an independent Bangladesh in 1971

with the ideals and dreams...

I have done a montage with the words from the AADHIKAR MASTHEAD POEM being joined on the EVENING STANDARD latest edition of Thursday 21 NOvember 2013. I took the picture at 2132 GMT in the City of London.

What I am saying there is that I had said "I know the moon doesn't rose in the sky here.." 3 years before the three slaves freed in a Lambeth, London house went into slavery...

For 30 years, they could feel that the moon didn';t rise in their skies as they stayed in captivity....

Why don’t “leaders....” “councillors, social workers, law and order service personnel” read poems like mine and think?

POETRY is, at its most original, a prophetic prognosis on Society.

That is how I see it, that is how I conceive it!

[To be continued]

I know the moon doesn't rise in the sky here... 33 years on, contexting the AADHIKAR Launching Poem

I know the moon doesn't rise in the sky here... 33 years on, contexting the AADHIKAR Launching Poem
By © Muhammad Haque
0112 Hrs GMT London Friday 22 November 2013

I know the moon doesn't rise in the sky here... 33 years on, contexting the AADHIKAR Launching Poem, as three slaves are freed in Lambeth, south London after 30 years in captivity


0055 Hrs GMT London Friday

22 November 2013

SLAVERY in London 2013!



Warned against in December 1980!

By © Muhammad Haque

"I know the moon doesn't rise

in the sky

here...."



This (above) is how I hand wrote (see more below)

as I also conceived the Poem that became

the main masthead statement on the weekly AADHIKAR (means Rights in several

Asian languages;

the transliteration AADHIKAR is entirely mine - so as to create the most accurate sound) that we launched on Monday 19 December 1980 from New Road

London E1 1HE. I had my siblings all doing their bits and we stayed up on our feet for almost a whole week without sleep or rest!

The main typing on a still pre-IT age typewriter was done by Azizul. (Ayzul)

The main power of support behind the whole things was Mother.

She could see we were collapsing under the unprecedented strain of

working for a week on our feet and she encouraged: if you can bear it, go forward!

The rest of the poem went on to say a topical thematic

statement about the then raging racist band called

the British Movement.

And then it told about the UK Bangladeshis’

fighting for an independent Bangladesh in 1971

with the ideals and dreams...

I have done a montage with the words from the AADHIKAR MASTHEAD POEM being joined on the EVENING STANDARD latest edition of Thursday 21 NOvember 2013. I took the picture at 2132 GMT in the City of London.

What I am saying there is that I had said "I know the moon doesn't rose in the sky here.." 3 years before the three slaves freed in a Lambeth, London house went into slavery...

For 30 years, they could feel that the moon didn';t rise in their skies as they stayed in captivity....

Why don’t “leaders....” “councillors, social workers, law and order service personnel” read poems like mine and think?

POETRY is, at its most original, a prophetic prognosis on Society.

That is how I see it, that is how I conceive it!

[To be continued]

Kate Hamilton-Baillie: Fight for justice in the East End of London - East End News 1981

Kate Hamilton-Baillie: Fight for justice in the East End of London - East End News 1981
PICTURED Campaigning journalist and writer Kate Hamilton-Baillie (Courtesy of Kate’s family)

Fight for justice in the East End of London - East End News 1981
Kate Hamilton-Baillie, a very special journalist, took up position against the very useless “East London Advertiser” when at the start of the 1980s, a group of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) decided to publish the East End News to fill the void represented by the East London Advertiser. It wasn’t too long before Kate and I became the only members of the East End News Editorial Collective to disagree with the very different direction from the stated aims that the controlling clique took! We also became the best of pals! Which meant that she being a sort of car-owners, we travelled to places with her doing the driving.
On that memorable morning, a Monday, when I quit smoking, she was driving and casually offered me a cigarette!
We were on assignment, possibly to cover either a Police story or a fire or an accident. One of those types.
I said no!
Kate nearly crashed!
When I told her I had given up smoking at the weekend, she was absolutely hysterical. She was laughing. She was giggling.
Why was she incredulous?
Because she knew how badly addicted to cigarette smoking I had been.
It was I who always appeared to have enough cigarettes to hand out to whoever was in the group!
Then I said I really had quit.
Kate quipped:
“you can never do that!
How can you quit smoking!”
I replied:
THAT has made up my mind, Kate. Thank you for the challenge.
Thirty two years on, I have not smoked a single time!
Except the involuntary inhalation that goes on in the still smokey, stuffy London environment.
The East End News controlling clique wanted to suck up to the just up and coming GLC (which was months away yet to have that May 1981 election which was soon followed by Ken Livingstone's very own coup against Andrew Macintosh) Bureaucracy!
So badly had they wanted it that they even begged me to do a writeup for the overly-beaming Paul Boateng, the 1981 intake’s “first black” Member on the GLC!
Boateng had been flaunted by the ignorant classes as the “next ethnic symbol”
That was years BEFORE they foisted on the Nation the very misleading “ Labour Party Black Sections”.
When I quizzed Boateng at County Hall in May 1981, doing my “first assignment” at the “newsy-radically taken-over GLC”, he was instantly transparent - as a time-server and political faker!
Soon after the Ken Livingstone Coup, it was obvious that the East End News Collective’s controlling cliquesters also wanted the GLC’s dosh!
Kate and I totally disagreed.

Would the racist gang allow Charles to continue calling for Volunteering in the East End?

Would the racist gang allow Charles to continue calling for Volunteering in the East End?
1338 Hrs GMT London Sunday 17 November 2013

Would the racist gang allow Charles to continue calling for Volunteering in the East End?

MORE On that Question, later


Charles backs Volunteering.
This article below, attributed to Charles, has been retrieved from the website of the Mail on Sunday.
Why the brutal gang murder of this boy inspired me to make Britain a nation of volunteers:
In the week of his 65th birthday, Prince Charles makes an impassioned plea to curb street violence

Why the brutal gang murder of this boy inspired me to make Britain a nation of volunteers: In the week of his 65th birthday, Prince Charles makes an impassioned plea to curb street violence

  • Death of Jimmy Mizen, 16, inspired the Prince to encourage volunteering
  • Believes providing structured activities through organisations such as Scouts, Guides and cadets can help young people through rite of passage
  • Many organisations hampered by lack of adult volunteers, he says
  • Supporting #iwill campaign through youth initiative called Step Up 2 Serve

By HRH THE PRINCE OF WALES

PUBLISHED: 22:00, 16 November 2013 | UPDATED: 22:00, 16 November 2013

 

Tragic: Jimmy Mizen, 16, was murdered by Jake Fahri, 19, in May 2008 whilst at the Three Cook's Bakery in Lee, South East London

Tragic: Jimmy Mizen, 16, was murdered by Jake Fahri, 19, in May 2008 whilst at the Three Cook's Bakery in Lee, South East London

 

After listening to families whose children have been murdered through street violence, I found it impossible to ignore their pleas for help in finding solutions to a problem which has blighted too many lives.

I often reflect on the bravery and courage shown by Barry and Margaret Mizen, whose teenage son Jimmy was murdered in 2008. The Mizens are convinced – as I have been for the past 40 years – that part of the solution  is in providing more structured activities for young people.

In my opinion, tragedies such as the murder of Barry and Margaret’s son are the extreme result of too many young people no longer guided through a rite of passage; young people who would benefit from the guidance and help of organisations such as the Guides, Scouts, cadets and other youth organisations. However, these are all groups which are hampered in their growth by a lack of adult volunteers.

Speaking with Barry and Margaret and members of Families United – a group for those parents whose children have been torn away from them and killed in such appallingly brutal ways as a result of gang violence – made me even more determined to start a long-term leadership campaign.

This would provide many more opportunities for all young people to acquire a sense of constructive purpose, motivation and service, and also build on a collaborative initiative with youth organisations, called Youth United, that  I started four years ago.

This kind of initiative can help to provide a constructive team-based substitute for destructive gang violence, so that no more families like the Mizens should have to suffer such untold  misery in the future.

This week at Buckingham Palace, I am joining the leaders of Britain, including the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition, plus 50 young people, to launch a pledge campaign called  #iwill through a collaborative youth initiative called Step Up 2 Serve.

I believe that such a long-term campaign, which is supported by all sectors of society and involving faith and political leaders, education, business, trade unions and the voluntary sector, has a unifying vision.

That vision is that all of us, from all walks of life, will ‘step up’ and pledge, at #iwill, to help young people take every opportunity to be of service to others.

At present, just 29 per cent volunteer regularly, although more may do so informally. The campaign proposes that we should support and inspire 50 per cent of all those aged between ten and 20 to take part in practical action in the service of others by 2020.

I am so glad that the main political parties and youth organisations and businesses are saying  ‘I will’.

I know that young people have an immense contribution to  make to our society, but I have long believed we are failing to do enough to unlock their talent and unleash their energies to help tackle all sorts of challenges.

Young people are the solution to so much and yet, too frequently, they are seen as the problem.

 
A family torn apart: Prince Charles, meets with Barry and Margaret Mizen during a visit to the Cafe of Good Hope following the death of their son

A family torn apart: Prince Charles, meets with Barry and Margaret Mizen during a visit to the Cafe of Good Hope following the death of their son

 

In the nearly 40 years that I have been supporting youngsters, many of them have told  me they also want the chance to put something back and assist their communities.

If you think that all over our country there are thousands of lonely old people who need company, younger children who need alternatives to hanging about on street corners, crucial environmental work that needs doing, and local causes that need espousing, it is not difficult to see how any small voluntary contribution can help.

As I travel the length and breadth of our land, I am  fortunate enough to see marvellous examples of youth-led social action. I am incredibly proud of all the young people I meet who are already engaged in such action because through this experience they can then go on to motivate others.

'I hope we can build on the spirit shown by so many during last year's Olympics'

Prince Charles

In Ayrshire last month, I presented members of the first Police Cadet Unit in Scotland with their certificates, and was enormously encouraged to hear of the large numbers who wanted to join through their schools.

These examples – and countless others – give me hope that we  can achieve our goal of Step Up  2 Serve.

While much is done by young people through their own efforts or through great youth organisations and inspirational teachers, we need them to start volunteering at a younger age, and embed the habit of community involvement in those vital years when they move from primary school to secondary school.

To do this effectively, we must enlist thousands more adults to  support and motivate younger people in their social action, and to encourage those who have already been involved to engage and lead others.

Young people need to be recognised and celebrated for their progress – as the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award does so successfully – and we must develop many more opportunities which stretch and challenge those in their service to others.

 

 

I remember a speech I made in the House of Lords in the early 1970s. I spoke about the need for young people to be of service to others, to face challenging situations, and to learn and reflect on that experience. 

I myself was a volunteer coastguard – as well as spending time in the cadet unit when I was at school – and I remember what a difference that made to me at that age.

Some 25 years ago, I set up the Prince’s Trust Team programme as a pilot community service scheme, and that confirmed to me that volunteering to help others brings immense benefits to young people, as well as to  the whole community.

 
Prime Minister David Cameron
Liberal Democrat Leader Nick Clegg
 

Support: Prince Charles is joining David Cameron and Nick Clegg, pictured, in supporting the #iwill campaign, part of the Step Up 2 Serve initiative

 

The young people learnt social skills, built up their confidence and self-esteem and realised – perhaps for the first time – the contribution they could make  to those who needed assistance, and the satisfaction they could feel from service to others.

In total, 160,000 young people have completed this one programme run by my Trust, and thousands more each year clear derelict sites, create community gardens, help disabled children or produce films which warn  of the dangers of gun and knife crime.

Helping hand: The Duchess of Cambridge has helped increase the ranks of much-needed Scout volunteers during her time as an occasional volunteer for the organisation

Helping hand: The Duchess of Cambridge has helped increase the ranks of much-needed Scout volunteers during her time as an occasional volunteer for the organisation

 

My Trust will double the number of young people volunteering as our pledge to the Step Up 2 Serve campaign.

The motivation, commitment and sense of purpose the volunteers develop is truly inspiring and makes me enormously proud of what young people can achieve. I am equally encouraged to hear that the National Citizens Service, established now as a ‘rite of passage’ programme for 16-year-olds, is  having the same effect for many young people, and so we now need to develop the journey  earlier on in their lives.

The CBI recently reported that employers need young  people who are optimistic, determined and emotionally intelligent – and research shows that youngsters who take on challenging volunteer activities have all those character traits and virtues.

I believe the business world has a vital role to play too, not only by making it clear that it values this in future recruits, but also by actively supporting  employees as adult volunteers. And so I hope that many companies will pledge at #iwill to support Step Up 2 Serve.

I need hardly say that I am particularly delighted that my daughter-in-law, the Duchess of Cambridge, has helped to swell the ranks of much-needed Scout volunteers during her time as an occasional volunteer for the organisation, since enrolling many more adults as leaders is the greatest need for so many of our youth groups.

And in this sense I would hope that we might also build on  the wonderful volunteering spirit and the contribution made by so many to the success of last year’s London Olympics.

I wanted to convene and launch this campaign as I reached my 65th birthday in order to  support all those who are engaging young people to say ‘I will’, and to underline the vital  contribution youngsters can make with their service to the community.

On Thursday, the campaign will announce and encourage pledges from organisations and individuals all over Britain.

I can only hope that Mail on Sunday readers will be moved to consider what their personal contribution to the Step Up  2 Serve campaign could be and perhaps pledge their support  at #iwill.

stepuptoserve.org.uk



 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2508483/Why-brutal-gang-murder-boy-inspired-make-Britain-nation-volunteers-In-week-65th-birthday-Prince-Charles-makes-impassioned-plea-curb-street-violence.html#ixzz2kuQQpCvN 

 

 @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Starvation in Britain. BBC is starving Britain of the truth!

Starvation in Britain. BBC is starving Britain of the truth!
We caught a split second on the BBC Breakfast programme this morning where Keith Vaz, made famous by the DAILY MAIL and others as “sleaze Vaz” during his “brillianT’ (NOT!) career when Bliar was at No 10 Downing Street, was heard to justify his craving for appearing on the BBC by making, in the context, a most incredible assertion. He said that “our” Police were the best Police service in the world”.
That would have been acceptable for a few minutes if it wasn’t for the fact that the ever-flexible Vaz was actually on the early morning BBC slot about a thing called Plebgate - or Plebs-Gate as it ought accurately to be called if at all called anything about PLEBS - the various allegations and counter allegations that were still flying furiously among the various Police, Neo Cons Ministers and others.

The flexible Vaz, whom Arif Ali (of the now disbanded but still “profiting”’‘Hansib’ 'Publishing' !!!!!!!!!! based for a long time in the Finsbury Park area of North London when he justified his routine and allocated generous sums from Ken Livingstone's vanity-programmes put in place to maintain strategically installed claimants to ethnicity linked Media promotions supporting Livingstone's own career via the unaccountably operated purses at the GLC which Livingstone controlled) praised as one “of our greatest political achievers”, to talk about the serious “reputatitional damage” that the Police faced over the Plebs-Gate shenanigans! Now if EVER there was flexibility in positioning a 'political' career in three or four places at once then Keith Vaz definitely has displayed it!
More, LATER , on Keith Vaz and his role in 2009-2010 in lumbering the Borough of Tower Hamlets with an “Executive Mayor” system...
We shall also look at his co-participants in the obscene stunts they thought they pulled about getting rid of Corruption in Tower Hamlets Council! They are Ken Livingstone and George Galloway






1110 [1048] Hrs GMT London Sunday 03 November 2013

BBC is starving Britain

The BBC is starving Britain of the truth!

[To be continued]

 

1022 GMT
London
Sunday
03 November 2013
AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR!
© Muhammad Haque Reporting on
BBC failure to tell the truth about hunger, starvation in the UK Sunday 03 November 2013. This item featured in this clip is only shown by the BBC because it referred to an X-Factor actress! Not about real starvation and hunger. Because

in the slot with Pete Waterman, a Rightwing individual that appears on the BBC from time to time allegedly to review the papers, there was no reference toe starvation at all.

And there wouldn't 't have been, if Pete Waterman had anything to rio with it.
If he were to talk about starvation, at all,
then he would more likely

blame the victims of starvation and hunger, of poverty and hardship than he would

those who caused them....
Come to think of it, there must be quite a few people across Britain who have been starving so that they won't be hounded by the BBC bailiffs demanding the licence fee!
[To be continued]

24.7 KHOODEELAAR! Action Commentary and updates on twitter.com/khoodeelaar

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAdcawaWmZA&feature=youtu.be

 

Image

No to HS2:, Camden campaigners find their 'local' resident Ed Minibrand is shortsighted

No to HS2:, Camden campaigners find their 'local' resident Ed Minibrand is shortsighted
0115 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 29 October 2013
KHOODEELAAR! Contextual Campaign UPDATE and Commentary

The first picture shows Chilterns area MP Cheryl Gillan who is one of the Conservative MPs opposed to HS2


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheryl_Gillan


 

Muhammad Haque

0048 GMT 29 October 2013

 

No to HS2 -3

 

Ed Miliband is back to being Mr Miniature again!

 

As the Camden New Journal shows the evidence of Mr Minibrand's ignorance, self-serving and disconnection.

 

Here is their NEWS REPORT:

 

Labour leader Miliband tours home turf but is reluctant to protect Camden from HS2 building

 

Ed Miliband and Chuka Umunna meet Camden Town butcher Miguel Martin

 

 

Published: 17 October, 2013

by RICHARD OSLEY

 

LABOUR leader Ed Miliband toured the area set to be worst affected by the London to Birmingham HS2 rail link on Thursday – his home turf of Camden.

 

But while he shelled out promises to freeze business rates and energy bills, he could not promise to halt the years of demolition and disruption that the £50billion high-speed link will cause around Euston and in Camden Town.

 

Instead, he insisted Labour still backed HS2, a project his party’s members in Camden say they oppose.

 

As it stands, the HS2 plan will see residents and businesses in the south of the borough turfed out, while Camden Town is turned into a construction site as the new link is hooked up to the existing HS1 line to Kent over the ageing London Overground bridges.

 

Mr Miliband, who was visiting Camden Town with shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna, said: “I would say you have to make the decision on HS2, first of all, on what is in the national interest and the interests of London, and then you have to look at what can be done about local concerns.

 

"You have to get the national decision right first, and then look at Camden.”

 

His support for the scheme is unlikely to go down well with Labour members locally who will tell voters they are doing their best to fight HS2 ahead of next May’s elections, but seem unable to convince their own party’s leader.

 

Mr Miliband added: “There are two issues on HS2 – there’s the overall issue, and we’ve said we are in favour of HS2, although ensuring that it is value for money.

 

"That’s the important thing, there can’t be any blank cheques.

 

“The second thing is the local concerns, and that’s got to go through the proper planning processes – and I do understand the local concerns in Camden as a local resident. I do, but that’s the process it has got to go through.”

 

On their tour of Camden, Mr Miliband and Mr Umunna visited Martin’s Butchers in Camden High Street, which warned they might have to move out of Camden Town if business rates did not stop rising.

 

Later, in a newsagent, Mr Miliband was warned by a builder struggling to find work that people “felt like crying”, and that people lined up for work on a construction site each morning like a scene from On The Waterfront, each hoping to be picked.

 

Mr Miliband, who lives in Dartmouth Park and is a former student of Haverstock School, said rising business rates should not be blamed on Camden Council.

 

He insisted: 

 

“A lot of this comes from central government. The council is trying to help as hard as it can, but the responsibility lies with the government.”

 

 

And the Camden New Journal Editorial comment:

 

http://www.camdennewjournal.com/new-journal-comment-hs2-whose-‘national-interest’-are-we-talking-about-rent-control-worthy-risk

 

The look says it all!

IMAGE BELOW from Camden New Journal.

Words by © Muhammad Haque, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser.

 

A very sterile, a very blank and a very unfriendly stare on Ed Minibrand's face as he is confronted by local trade Miguel Martin in Camden..

.Image

Has John Biggs got what it takes to serve the people of Tower Hamlets? WHAT exactly is he about?

Has John Biggs got what it takes to serve the people of Tower Hamlets? WHAT exactly is he about?

CONTEXTING the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2014

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical and the KHOODEELAAR! Contextual Commentary about the future of the Community in Tower Hamlets -

John Biggs has got to come out and tell us what he stands for in truth. Does he know there is a serious problem of corruption in the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council and that it has been thus for years?

Does he believe that Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘town hall pravda’ “East End Lies” is being kept in production significantly in part because of the rampant inadequacies and the persistent  idiocies of the East London Idiotiser (aka ‘Docklands and East London Advertiser’)? -
UPDATER 1

1730 Hrs GMT

London

Wednesday

23 October 2013

 

So John Biggs will merely 'review' the Tower Hamlets Council PRAVDA, will he?

 

John Biggs has got to come out with a clear commitment to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth 'if elected'.

 

He should do so even if he is NOT elected.

 

The point surely is that John Biggs has stayed silent for too long on too many issues that affect the people in Tower Hamlets.

 

Why is he so reticent?

 

The real test is whether he has the full confidence himself as the candidate. If he has then let us see and hear the evidence of that confidence.

 

John Biggs needs to stop playing it safe.

 

His safe playing isn’t hitting any targets. Not where I am sitting!

 

Be unambiguous, John.

Be unequivocal.

Be ethical, moral, democratic and  accountable.

 

Merely letting slip minor utterances is not enough democratically, ethically, and most emphatically it isn’t enough electorally.

 

Make a splash, tell the whole programme.

 

What will you offer the people?

 

Will you keep the lying Council bureaucracy intact?

Or will you get them out of the community's way?

 

In my finding: the controlling clique of bureaucrats in Tower Hamlets Council is corrupt. 

 

Will John Biggs stop the corruption?

 

I cannot believe that he has even the notion that there is any corruption in Tower Hamlets Council at all.

 

He keeps making bland, 3 letter 4 word utterances.

Ever so rationed.

Ever so totally unheard!

 

A £Billion miles away from a splash!

 

Will you show respect to the people who daily do the work for nothing for the community’s good?

 

What is your big plan Mr Biggs?

 

Or haven’t you got a big plan?

 

And a Billion other questions in that same order!

 

[To be continued]

Today's [weekly] front-page of the "Docklands and East London Advertiser'

Image




http://khoodeelaar.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/contexting-the-khoodeelaar-manifesto-for-tower-hamlets-2014-the-muhammad-haque-daily-ethical-commentary-contextual-commentary-about-the-future-of-the-community-in-tower-hamlets-john-bigg/


KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2014 CONTINUING the CONTEXT of the UPDATE

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2014  CONTINUING the CONTEXT of the UPDATE

0625 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 23 October 2013 

The CONTEXT of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2014 UPDATE includes:

The Rupert Murdoch-paid, Thatcher-peddling Rhodesia-bent

self-admitted liar [in his own 'autobiography']  Matthew Parris who could see in the name "Brick Lane" only aliens, only people from 'not Rhodesia' (of ‘his culture, his heritage, his empire...’) and thus easy targets to be removed, displaced from their homes, from their Community and disenfranchised....

Parris spewed out his racist contempt for the people of “Brick Lane” in July 2005, literally weeks after the voters of Bethnal Green and Bow kicked out Oona King who had been a part of those who were engaged in hoodwinking, in misleading and in defaming the people they had targeted for a programme of displacement so that the Big Biz forces could expand and occupy the Brick Lane London E1 Area....

Parris was also voicing the racists’ hatred of those who mistook George Galloway (who was let in by the fact that the voters had decided to kick out Oona King) for a natural 

member of the “Brick Lane London E1 Area” and so he (the racist Parris) let rip by messing together Galloway and the Community and “concluding” that because the voters had let in Galloway so they must be punished!

Parris knew exactly the worst punishment tool: It was the Crossrail hole!

Parris said that Bliar (for it was Bliar still in post at No. 10 Downing Street) should drive Crossrail through Brick Lane and smash everything that it found in the  way!

There was no restraint.

No sign of rationality.

No reasonable deference to even the idea of democracy there.

And there was no opposition from the elected councillors.

Not even a any known retort from George Galloway himself.

Not then in July 2005.

Not once ever since.

Not now, October 2013, EIGHT years and almost three months after the

poisonous Parris spewed out his racist provocation and incitement against Brick Lane London E1 Area and published it.

Except KHOODEELAAR!

KHOODEELAAR! spotted Parris’ poison and we put that in the spotlight and we extensively analysed it then and we have been doing it ever since.

Now that Brick Lane is EIGHT years and three months  from those days , we have a lot of other material contextual UPDATES to make.

Which will be continued to be done in the coming parts.

[To be continued]

 Image

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2014 CONTINUING the CONTEXT of the UPDATE

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2014  CONTINUING the CONTEXT of the UPDATE

0625 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 23 October 2013 

The CONTEXT of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2014 UPDATE includes:

The Rupert Murdoch-paid, Thatcher-peddling Rhodesia-bent

self-admitted liar [in his own 'autobiography']  Matthew Parris who could see in the name "Brick Lane" only aliens, only people from 'not Rhodesia' (of ‘his culture, his heritage, his empire...’) and thus easy targets to be removed, displaced from their homes, from their Community and disenfranchised....

Parris spewed out his racist contempt for the people of “Brick Lane” in July 2005, literally weeks after the voters of Bethnal Green and Bow kicked out Oona King who had been a part of those who were engaged in hoodwinking, in misleading and in defaming the people they had targeted for a programme of displacement so that the Big Biz forces could expand and occupy the Brick Lane London E1 Area....

Parris was also voicing the racists’ hatred of those who mistook George Galloway (who was let in by the fact that the voters had decided to kick out Oona King) for a natural 

member of the “Brick Lane London E1 Area” and so he (the racist Parris) let rip by messing together Galloway and the Community and “concluding” that because the voters had let in Galloway so they must be punished!

Parris knew exactly the worst punishment tool: It was the Crossrail hole!

Parris said that Bliar (for it was Bliar still in post at No. 10 Downing Street) should drive Crossrail through Brick Lane and smash everything that it found in the  way!

There was no restraint.

No sign of rationality.

No reasonable deference to even the idea of democracy there.

And there was no opposition from the elected councillors.

Not even a any known retort from George Galloway himself.

Not then in July 2005.

Not once ever since.

Not now, October 2013, EIGHT years and almost three months after the

poisonous Parris spewed out his racist provocation and incitement against Brick Lane London E1 Area and published it.

Except KHOODEELAAR!

KHOODEELAAR! spotted Parris’ poison and we put that in the spotlight and we extensively analysed it then and we have been doing it ever since.

Now that Brick Lane is EIGHT years and three months  from those days , we have a lot of other material contextual UPDATES to make.

Which will be continued to be done in the coming parts.

[To be continued]

 Image

Time to criminalise, prosecute and ban crooks that control big charity funds, rob the poorer

Time to criminalise, prosecute and ban crooks that control big charity funds, rob the poorer

Image

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNblflFvreo&feature=youtu.be

 

KHOODEELAAR Focus on Big fat corrupt UK charity bosses 

 

1748 [1705] [1635] [1555] [1530] [1330] Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 October 2013

IMAGE of a fat charity funds-grabber Ronnie Saez (pictured [in the fotografix montage] by DAILY RECORD Glasgow; left)

got a very fat cheque while Easterhouse continued to fester

in deprivation.

Crooks who gain control of charities and then are allowed

to rob them must be treated as bankers.

In fact they should be treated as criminals, prosecuted and sent to jail to serve time just as robbers who rob banks and take ordinary peoples savings are condemned to do.

These criminals then should be barred for life from seeking let alone holding any position that has any control or influence on other peoples' money, income, entitlements.

And they should also be investigated for any past links with any of their local Councils or with any elected local Councillor/s.

The bankrupt wasteland that is local elected Councils across the UK should  be seriously reviewed for the role it is put to in allowing crooks to ply their criminal trades under covers of the "elected local Councils".

What connections do the crooks from these unaudited "respectable" outfits have among themselves while the public are looted, robbed and kept in perpetual deprivation?

 

[To be continued]

 

24.7 Action Reports, Commentary and Manifesto 2014 programmes by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community in the East End of London

is accessible on

 

twitter.com/khoodeelaar

Time to criminalise, prosecute and ban crooks that control big charity funds, rob the poorer

Time to criminalise, prosecute and ban crooks that control big charity funds, rob the poorer

Image

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNblflFvreo&feature=youtu.be

 

KHOODEELAAR Focus on Big fat corrupt UK charity bosses 

 

1748 [1705] [1635] [1555] [1530] [1330] Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 October 2013

IMAGE of a fat charity funds-grabber Ronnie Saez (pictured [in the fotografix montage] by DAILY RECORD Glasgow; left)

got a very fat cheque while Easterhouse continued to fester

in deprivation.

Crooks who gain control of charities and then are allowed

to rob them must be treated as bankers.

In fact they should be treated as criminals, prosecuted and sent to jail to serve time just as robbers who rob banks and take ordinary peoples savings are condemned to do.

These criminals then should be barred for life from seeking let alone holding any position that has any control or influence on other peoples' money, income, entitlements.

And they should also be investigated for any past links with any of their local Councils or with any elected local Councillor/s.

The bankrupt wasteland that is local elected Councils across the UK should  be seriously reviewed for the role it is put to in allowing crooks to ply their criminal trades under covers of the "elected local Councils".

What connections do the crooks from these unaudited "respectable" outfits have among themselves while the public are looted, robbed and kept in perpetual deprivation?

 

[To be continued]

 

24.7 Action Reports, Commentary and Manifesto 2014 programmes by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community in the East End of London

is accessible on

 

twitter.com/khoodeelaar

Time to criminalise, prosecute and ban crooks that control big charity funds, rob the poorer

Time to criminalise, prosecute and ban crooks that control big charity funds, rob the poorer

Image

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNblflFvreo&feature=youtu.be

 

KHOODEELAAR Focus on Big fat corrupt UK charity bosses 

 

1748 [1705] [1635] [1555] [1530] [1330] Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 October 2013

IMAGE of a fat charity funds-grabber Ronnie Saez (pictured [in the fotografix montage] by DAILY RECORD Glasgow; left)

got a very fat cheque while Easterhouse continued to fester

in deprivation.

Crooks who gain control of charities and then are allowed

to rob them must be treated as bankers.

In fact they should be treated as criminals, prosecuted and sent to jail to serve time just as robbers who rob banks and take ordinary peoples savings are condemned to do.

These criminals then should be barred for life from seeking let alone holding any position that has any control or influence on other peoples' money, income, entitlements.

And they should also be investigated for any past links with any of their local Councils or with any elected local Councillor/s.

The bankrupt wasteland that is local elected Councils across the UK should  be seriously reviewed for the role it is put to in allowing crooks to ply their criminal trades under covers of the "elected local Councils".

What connections do the crooks from these unaudited "respectable" outfits have among themselves while the public are looted, robbed and kept in perpetual deprivation?

 

[To be continued]

 

24.7 Action Reports, Commentary and Manifesto 2014 programmes by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community in the East End of London

is accessible on

 

twitter.com/khoodeelaar

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2014 for Tower Hamlets - COMING UP! First the Intro

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2014 for Tower Hamlets - COMING UP! First the Intro

By © Muhammad Haque
The Organiser of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and Author of
the KHOODEELAAR! Manifestos 2006 - 2014
1442 HRS GMT
LONDON
SUNDAY
20 OCTOBER 2013


UPDATER Commentary on
THE KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for the East End of London


Anyone interested in the future of the East End of London should read the following quoted from our Manifesto published on 4 January 2006.

From January 2006 to 20 October 2013 SEVEN years EIGHT months and 16 days.

 

Image
That is almost TWO terms of the “elected” Tower Hamlets Council.
With over 50 councillors, that is almost 400 “councillor years”!
What, then, have they done in that time?
What have they said in that time?
What did they hear from the Community but did not admit in that time?
What rights, what obligations, what entitlements have they denied in that time?
What havoc, what losses, what harm have they allowed to be inflicted on how many lives in Tower Hamlets in that time?
What crimes of denial, deprivation and wilful illegality and plot to undermine the legal duties as perpetrated by employees in the Council have the “elected Councillors” allowed to take place in those two Terms, from January 2006 to 20 October 2013?

THIS SERIES OF UPDATES on the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2014 will examine the LATEST evidence and seek the answers to these and related outstanding questions so that the people in Tower Hamlets get a competent, honestly working locally elected Council that they need, have needed but have been denied.

[To be continued]

Editorial note: The email address law media@hotmail.com 
which has been one of the key email addresses created and used by KHOODEELAAR! as part of the Movement Defending the Community in the East End of London is currently the subject of technical investigation and legal assessments and is not to be addressed as the destination email address for sending any messages. Not until further notice.

The email address that can be used is for the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign is the following. 
KHOODEELAAR! only recommends the following email address to be used STRICTLY for legal and Constitutional law queries. Messages must not exceed 30 words. This is due to administrative and management reasons. Messages exceeding 30 words will be treated as spam and junk and shall not be attended to.. 

khoodeelaar@yahoo.com


The following is the text of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto as published on 04 January 2006.

[That was one of several parts and editions of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2006]




WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 04, 2006
Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill

© The Author / CBRUK / KHOODEELAAR 2006
Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill 
London 1100 Hrs Wednesday 4 January 2006

Why a manifesto ?

The current Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling group is made up of councillors who got elected without a traceable manifesto in 2002. 

Since that election, there has been no evidence of any audit by the people in Tower Hamlets of the behaviour of those councillors or of that Council. The audit cannot take place or if one is attempted it cannot be an effective one without a frame of reference to make sense of the actual behaviour of the councillors.

By all independent accounts, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council has abolished local peoples’ democratic say. 

On the Crossrail hole Bill and the collusion with the promotion of that Bill by controlling group councillors. Over the past five years. With not a jot or an iota of their secret contacts with he City of London and the Crossrail hole promoters being made known to the local electors. To the local community in Tower Hamlets.

Who are the controlling group on Tower Hamlets Council loyal to?

Answer: To Crossrail hole Bill promoters. 
To Big Business interests that represent their colluders in the City of London,

Tower Hamlets Council is one of the most notorious users of ‘inner cities deprivation funding’ from the UK central Government and via the UK central Government. 

Tower Hamlets Council is not delivering democratic representation to the people in Tower Hamlets. The controlling group on Tower Hamlets Council has effectively abolished all pretences to local democracy.

This is evident in the dishonest and the corrupt way that the controlling group of councillors on Tower Hamlets Council has colluded with the actual interests that are (and have been for the past four years) pushing for the uneconomic Crossrail plan to be given UK parliamentary approval in the Crossrail hole Bill.

That Crossrail hole Bill is currently scheduled to be tokenistically ‘scrutinised’ by a group of MPs before Tony Blair pushes it through the two Houses of UK Parliament making it the ‘Crossrail Act’ and thus giving the Big Business and City of London interests the ‘powers’ to carry out their planned assault on the Brick Lane London E1 Area. 




The Crossrail hole Bill scheme plotters and planners will wreak havoc on the East End community by destroying peoples’ lives, their families and their livelihoods. 

The Crossrail hole will destroy homes and the spaces and the environment in the Brick Lane London E1 Area .

It will also have long term and immediate destructive effects on the wider parts of the East End.

The price the East End of London will pay will not be recoverable.

And yet that price need not have to be paid.

The fact that the Crossrail hole plan is at all included in the Crossrail hole Bill is to do with the undemocratic, the unrepresentative and the untenable role played by the VERY small but the ‘controlling group’ of councillors on Tower Hamlets Council.

They have behaved dishonestly throughout and have done so despite it being pointed out to them by the local community that their behaviour would constitute grounds for several legal claims against them and against the particularly identifiable senior employees in the present Tower Hamlets Council.

That state of affairs has existed because there has been no political action within the Council or within any of the officially recognised political groups 'listed' on the current Tower Hamlets Council to either monitor the conduct of Tower Hamlet council or to hold the anti-community controlling group of councillors or their colluding employees on the Council to proper political account.


Key points from the KHOODEELAAR! MANIFESTO 2006 Part B published in London UK at 1000 Hrs GMT on Wednesday 4 January 2006

1. KHOODEELAAR the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will provide maximum possible support for the widest possible public attention to be drawn to the conduct of the controlling group that makes the decisions ‘in the name of and as the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council’ in relation to ALL uses of the ‘resources, human and material and the revenues, the reserves, the stocks, the powers, facilities, influence’ of the LBTH Council over land, properties, the environment, the Council duties, Council links with any party or parties whose objects, aims and plans and or tactics or strategies are or may be in conflict with the interest of the community in Tower Hamlets

2. KHOODEELAAR the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will monitor the behaviour of the 'key' employees in the LBTH Council in relation to the above and will put in place a system whereby any violating behaviour by any employee of the LBTH Council is first drawn to attention of the employees themselves for rectification failing which the implications of the behaviour will be drawn to the public attention of the local community in Tower Hamlets.

3. Any ‘key’ or ‘senior’ employee in the LBTH Council (or any of their counterparts acting as a one off contractor or as an agent or ‘representative’ of any duration and acting in the name of the corporate legal entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council ) who is authoritatively and reliably known and or is found to have been engaged in any identifiable or actual conduct or behaviour (whether actively or passively) to conceal from the local community the facts of the LBTH Council’s collusion with any agency or agencies in the promotion of the CrossRail hole plan affecting the Brick Lane London E1 Area community or similarly affecting any other part of the Borough will be named and their role will be featured in the community audit of Tower Hamlets Council that will be held from time to time.

4. KHOODEELAAR the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish - or cause to be published - the key findings of the independent investigation under the auspices of the London Community Audit Network (un-funded and totally party politically and financially independent organisation for the defence of the democratic rights of the people across London) into the collusion by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council in the period 2001 - 2005 (so far) with Crossrail hole plan promoters so far. 

5. The publication will take place to give the local community the facts of what the Tower Hamlets Council is being used for and by who and with what negative, devastating consequences to the community and against the welfare, safety and future of the people in the community.

6. KHOODEELAAR the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will ask each councillor to make an immediate and public and fully factual and comprehensive statement on their own understanding and preferences on the Crossrail hole Bill attack on the Brick lane London E1 Area especially in view of the fact that those councillors who were each given a personally addressed copy of all the relevant Questions and analyses by the CBRUK - KHOODEELAAR ! campaign between March 2004 and May 2004 have failed to make any comment to the community about what they (these councillors) think about the Crossrail hole attack plan on the community. Many of the same councillors are already known to be included as candidates for the scheduled May 2006 election to the Tower Hamlets Council.

[Part C of the manifesto to appear in the next week]

Explanatory notes on the KHOODEELAAR! MANIFESTO 2006 AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL hole Bill -

A Manifesto is a programme of action that the party publishing it will implement in office following an ordinary election. Here, the KHOODEELAAR campaign is not NECESSARILY fielding candidates for election to the Tower Hamlets Council at the scheduled May 2006 local council election. This manifesto is an advance guidance for observance by those who will seek election to the Tower Hamlets Council and the terms of this manifesto will form the full set of references against which the conduct of the elected councillors will be audited by the community generally and by the KHOODEELAAR! campaign in particular.

The Tower Hamlets borough-wide implications of the KHOODEELAAR MANIFESTO 2006, will be felt by and or be relevant to all ordinary members of the population in the East London borough in relation to their consideration and understanding of the behaviour of the ‘elected Tower Hamlets councillors’ [in the individual capacities of those councillors on issues that are raised with them for representation on behalf of the electors - whether or not the electors actually cast their votes or if they voted for the councillor concerned) over any matter that may become the subject of any contention, dispute or debate or controversy related to the use and or the abuse of the ‘constitutional powers of the elected holder of office on a local council’ or over any matter related to or arising from the undemocratic, improper, sleazy or corrupt behaviour of a given councillor or of more than one councillor.

KHOODEELAAR Manifesto 2006 against the CrossRail hole Bill also will be citable, de facto, as a frame of democratic references for the establishment of a democratic right [or more than one right] in the context of the legally definable and the statutory duties [and the remits] of the elected councillor/s and those of the decision-making components or units, agents, agencies and ‘employees’ of the ‘elected Council’ in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.

The facts of the publication in December 2005 and in January 2006 of the KHOODEELAAR Manifesto 2006 against the CrossRail hole Bill will be relevant evidence in any formal court or legal proceedings that members of the local community - individually or as group/s- may take or may find themselves involved in, in support of the existence from the dates of the publication of the democratic demands and guidance for the candidates seeking election to the Tower Hamlets Council at the scheduled May 2006 local council election.

KHOODEELAAR the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will - between now and the last moment of any ordinary ‘election campaign’ in connection with the scheduled May 2006 local council election in Tower Hamlets - draw attention of the community to all verifiable cases of abuses and false claims by either any existing councillor/s or by anyone definitely planning to be a candidate to become a councillor after the May 2006 scheduled council election.

Constitutional law queries
Any original constitutional law or legal queries on the KHOODEELAAR Manifesto 2006 against the CrossRail hole Bill may be addressed via e-mail [total texts in the initial message may not exceed 200 words] to

Gangsters and criminals mostly control “elected” Councils’ 'housing'

Gangsters and criminals mostly control “elected” Councils’ 'housing'

fotografix montage for AADHIKAROnline the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign 

including the DAILY MAIL pictures of Eric Champ and the Renfrewshire Council building at the centre of the battle for housing and democratic and social rights




The © Muhammad Haque Daily World Exclusive Ethical Commentary on the Housing crisis that is rampant across and in the UK with the professional gangsters and criminals capturing control of the locally “elected” Councils’ housing mis-operations and those of the  so-called registered social landlords who were given a golden opportunity to comprehensively rob, loot and plunder the Council housing stock, “thanks” to the stupidities of John Prescott as the then “Secretary of State”  and the criminal agenda-pushers for Big Business that operated within the Bliaring  UK regime – UPDATE [1]

1620

[1610] 

[1550] [1530] 

Hrs GMT

London

Saturday

19 October 2013. 

Whoever had thought that the idea of social housing – as represented “in” “Council housing” – was ever compatible with or was ever safe in the hands of Council cliques controlling the provision got that totally wrong.

Corrupt Council employees involved in housing decision-making, budgeting and “strategic plans” devised internally and then rubber-stamped by mostly docile and or collusive councillors across the UK have proven to be corrupt, criminal and contemptuous of the core service that housing SHOULD be but isn’t.

This has been allowed to be so by the rampant antidemocratic and non-democratic behaviour of “elected” Councils and “elected Councillors” across the UK.

There have been many adverse and serious consequences.

Having studied housing over decades, I can say that there is a very fundamental link between the UK local Councils’ decreasing link with democratic remit and the simultaneous collusion by the time serving self-serving “political  groupings with the naked, greedy elements that have been making personal gains and profits while they have been undermining the social and the objectively defined economic benefits for people and communities that social hosing brings.

Housing has been used as an anti-hosing profiteering field where criminal gangsters – ‘property developers’ – have been allowed to move in by the collusion  successive “planning” stooges in the Councils.

Those stooges have been allowed to serve the criminal assaults by the property gangsters because the Councils’  ‘planning’ has been exposed as nothing but a rubber stamping tool that is now routinely being used to destroy what remains of social housing and social housing spaces.

Neither the Neo Cons nor the Lib Dumbs nor the Bliar-ed Bureaucracy in what used to be the Labour Party can be expected to oppose the trend.

Despite the totally ridiculous and infantile noises being made from time to time by the

very securely paid and pension-protected  ‘trade union’ ‘leaders’ – who  operate their own brands of self-serving agendas – and despite the very pathetic half-awareness spiels and spits that some of the residual “left” “Labour” MPs mouth and pen by suggesting that they are all for “action against the Class Enemy”, there is no sign anywhere across the vast terrains now subject to property gangsters’ robbery programmes that housing will be available to Society on a Social basis…

Just as Frank Field, wearing a “Labour” badge but operating a Neo Cons pro-racist agenda on “welfare” did to undermine the universal concepts of rights and as Liam Byrne has done in the past three years to give legitimacy to the illegitimate agenda and activities of the Neo Cons and their Lob Dumbs and ‘Labour’-labelled colluders across the board on ‘welfare’.

In Tower Hamlets in London’s ‘East End’, universally admitted as having a population that is one of the most deprived in all of England (and the UK), housing provision has been the target of property gangsters posing as controlling members on a number of key ‘registered social landlord’ outfits. Internally, Tower Hamlets Council has allowed a gang of its own posing as “housing” “service” staff, to operate to sabotage housing rights and to decrease the housing provisions on a social scale and basis. 

The absence of democratic audit is so rampant  and its adverse impact on housing and on Society locally so extensive and pervasive that it warrants full and detailed treatment. I shall UPDATE that perpetration in the later parts of this Commentary, to be posted in the course of the next 24 hours (I am writing this at 1505 Hrs GMT Saturday 19 October 2013).

AS a contextual introduction to the rampant housing crisis creation and operation by Tower Hamlets Council;s very own in-house gang of ‘housing decision-makers’:

The BBC’s Kirt Birling fronted a short piece for BBC London TV this past week about 

the housing crisis in London that included a relatively big chunk of references to Tower Hamlets Borough and the Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘role’ in housing.

In that very ignorant piece fronted by Kirt Birling failed to address the matter of stock, the matter of dereliction and the matter of deliberate criminality that the Tower Hamlets Council Housing “bureaucracy” has been involved in perpetrating for a very long time. 

IT IS AGAINST such a background that I now link to a piece, taken from the DAILY MAIL’s London web site, featuring the stand taken by a lone tenant on a Council housing building in the Scottish Council of Renfrewshire.

There are quite a few online comments posted on that piece that in fact echo the experiences of so many hundreds of thousands of people across the UK: that the local Council housing “operations” (the ceased to be “housing services” a long while ago)  are marred by corruption and that local Councils are abysmally failing to deliver basic accountability let alone fully fledged democratic service to the local communities.

It is most clear that neither local Councillors, nor local MPs nor anyone else who claims to have been elected by the local peoples’ votes on the promise to deliver any democratic service to the local population, is anywhere to be found actually defending the rights of the embattled tenants and those of the thinking, principled, ethically active morally assertive citizens like the one featured in this particular news item by the DAILY MAIL web site below.

No wonder the person has to take the stand that this one has taken, thus exposing the sham democracy that his local Renfrewshire Council is!

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2467100/Defiant-council-flat-resident-living-high-rise-tower-block-refusing-budge-local-authority-battle-bring-bulldozers.html

 

fotografix montage for AADHIKAROnline the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign 

including the DAILY MAIL pictures of Eric Champ and the Renfrewshire Council building at the centre of the battle for housing and democratic and social rights

 

Image

KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN DEFENDING THE COMMUNITY IN THE EAST END OF London.

KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN DEFENDING THE COMMUNITY IN THE EAST END OF London.

Tower Hamlets slammed after chief lands £115,000 payout

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical CommentaryKHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN DEFENDING THE COMMUNITY IN THE EAST END OF London.
Diagnosing the evidence of how the local people in Tower Hamlets are being betrayed by a dysfunctional bureaucracy that appears increasingly quite blasé’ about its contemptuous indulgence in serving itself at the existence of the people of the most deprived inner city English Borough of Tower Hamlets - the ‘development and renewal’ of Aman Dalvi’s income -[5]

0805 Hrs GMT London Saturday 19 October 2013.

The most solidly accepted definition of ‘news’ remains this: when a dog bites a man it is not news; when a man bites a dog it IS news!

Tower Hamlets slammed after chief lands £115,000 payout

Aman Dalvi, who remains a corporate director at Tower Hamlets CouncilAman Dalvi, who remains a corporate director at Tower Hamlets Council

by Robin de PeyerFriday, October 18, 2013 
9:45 AM

  

 

 

A town hall chief received a £115,000 payout, causing a government minister to accuse Tower Hamlets Council of “outrageous waste.”

 

 

The council, which is facing budget cuts totalling £100million over three years, has been criticised by local government minister Brandon Lewis after it made the six figure payment last year.

The sum was paid to former interim chief executive Aman Dalvi after he took the local authority to an employment tribunal last year.

He subsequently took another top council job, earning an extra £119,000 as a corporate director for development and renewal.

The total amount he received from the council in the financial year 2012/13 – published in a public council document – topped £256,000 once pension contributions were added.

Mr Lewis described the payments as “an outrageous waste of taxpayers’ money.”

The average household income in the borough is less than £30,000, according to a council-backed report.

Council documents say the money was paid to Mr Dalvi for his role as interim chief executive, but it has since been confirmed it was made as part of an out of court legal settlement.

The chief executive position has since been scrapped as the town hall tries to trim its £1.2billion annual budget.

A spokesman said: “The council has complied with its statutory requirements in the preparation and publication of the annual accounts. We will not be commenting further.”

Mr Dalvi could not be reached for a comment.

 

 

 GOOGLE:

 

    1. images.jpg

    2. Tower Hamlets slammed after chief lands £115000 payout
      East London Advertiser-18 Oct 2013
      The sum was paid to former interim chief executive Aman Dalvi after he took the local authority to an employment tribunal last year.


 

 

Currently trending

A single London Council shows the sheer stupidity of its 'leaders', directors, overpaid 'officers'!

A single London Council shows the sheer stupidity of its 'leaders', directors, overpaid 'officers'!
GUARDIAN web site: Thousands of UK's poor in court over non-payment of council tax Courts across country fill up with people on lowest incomes as introduction of new council tax charges in April begins to bite

A single London Council shows the sheer stupidity of its 'leaders', directors, overpaid 'officers'!

A single London Council shows the sheer stupidity of its 'leaders', directors, overpaid 'officers'!
GUARDIAN web site: Thousands of UK's poor in court over non-payment of council tax Courts across country fill up with people on lowest incomes as introduction of new council tax charges in April begins to bite

UPDATE on the East London Advertiser removing story about Council employee's soccer player salary..

UPDATE on the East London Advertiser removing story about Council employee's soccer player salary..

0055 Hrs GMT

London

Friday

18 October 2013.

 

DIRE DOINGS on in and about Tower Hamlets Council Bureaucracy!

 

AADHIKAROnline Media Diagnostics discovered at shortly after 0012 GMT today Friday 18 October 2013 that the online item about Aman Dalvi by-lined to Robin de Peyer had disappeared from the eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk

website where it had appeared 24 hours or so earlier.

 

This (below) is what appears when the web page carrying the item is clicked on

 

"Sorry - we haven't been able to serve the page you asked for

You may have followed a broken link, an outdated search result, or there may be an error on our site. If you typed in a URL, please make sure you have typed it in correctly."

 

The question is:

what prompted ARCHANT to remove the item?

 

The piece is the front-page lead on the print edition of the “Dockhands and East London Advertiser” that has been selling across East London all day Thursday [17 October 2013].

 

The contents of the ADVERTISER web piece is not really ‘new’, in that Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy has been notorious for the sort of strange self-serving that it reinforces.

 

Aman Dalvi himself received £100,000.00 from the Council and Isabella Freeman, being the Council’s ‘head of legal’ for several years, was herself suing her own Department in effect when she had started an industrial tribunal action against the Council.

 

It is just a rare event that she chose to ‘move on’ before the proceedings actually took place.

 

[To be continued]

 

AADHIKAROnline montage of the East London Advertiser and Aman Dalvi's images

 Image

UPDATE on the East London Advertiser removing story about Council employee's soccer player salary..

UPDATE on the East London Advertiser removing story about Council employee's soccer player salary..

0055 Hrs GMT

London

Friday

18 October 2013.

 

DIRE DOINGS on in and about Tower Hamlets Council Bureaucracy!

 

AADHIKAROnline Media Diagnostics discovered at shortly after 0012 GMT today Friday 18 October 2013 that the online item about Aman Dalvi by-lined to Robin de Peyer had disappeared from the eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk

website where it had appeared 24 hours or so earlier.

 

This (below) is what appears when the web page carrying the item is clicked on

 

"Sorry - we haven't been able to serve the page you asked for

You may have followed a broken link, an outdated search result, or there may be an error on our site. If you typed in a URL, please make sure you have typed it in correctly."

 

The question is:

what prompted ARCHANT to remove the item?

 

The piece is the front-page lead on the print edition of the “Dockhands and East London Advertiser” that has been selling across East London all day Thursday [17 October 2013].

 

The contents of the ADVERTISER web piece is not really ‘new’, in that Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy has been notorious for the sort of strange self-serving that it reinforces.

 

Aman Dalvi himself received £100,000.00 from the Council and Isabella Freeman, being the Council’s ‘head of legal’ for several years, was herself suing her own Department in effect when she had started an industrial tribunal action against the Council.

 

It is just a rare event that she chose to ‘move on’ before the proceedings actually took place.

 

[To be continued]

 

AADHIKAROnline montage of the East London Advertiser and Aman Dalvi's images

 Image

How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End...

How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End...
KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against City of London Big Biz Agenda fronted via Crossrail hole attacks: A contextual updater Commentary at 1815 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 15 October 2013

How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End...
And how one has been prevented so far on a large scale but how it is POSSIBLE that racists are carrying out attacks and violations away from the glare of public awareness.......

Simmering racist hatred could take the form of a hurricane of racist storm in London's East End - a contextual commentary after Cyclone Phailin in India.

 

1800 [1750] [1740] [1720] GMT London Tuesday 15 October 2013 

By © Muhammad Haque

Image 

This is what would have happened if Murdoch-employed ex-Neo Cons ‘MP’ Matthew Parris’ racist incitement against the Brick Lane London E1 area in July 2005 had been allowed to be implemented against Brick Lane.

 

HURRICANE Phailin to Racist Hatred:

Assaults, Emergencies and Displacements

From Orissa to Seelot to Brick Lane and the East End of London:

 

 

 

Noting a recent agency image of some people escaping the impact of the

Cyclone Phailin, as pictured in Orissa that has now been renamed as the eastern Indian region of Odissa/Odisha.

There is a long link between the people of Orissa and those of Seelot

that linguistically straddles the Aakhomia (Assamese)  language to the north and the north east and the Bangla language to the south and the south east.

Oorr-ee-ah is the Selotee language word for the people from Orissa.

They were itinerant trades people very much like the Kaboolees (Tagore wrote about them in his Kabooleewahla short story).

The terms and the manner of trade differed but both groups travelled through Seelot only to trade with the Seelotees.

There were many groups of such traders who would ply their stuff mainly to 

households.

And by definition, the Oorreeahs’ trading decisions were made by Seelotee women.

Household, domestic stuff. 

And loads of fancy goods!

And what was without exception a very noisy, haggling session!

The sight (in this image) of stranded Ooreeah people is not so far from many that could be found in the East End of London.

What would happen if a community was under attack by a racist gang?

This is the nearest to a cyclone that can be imagined in the context of the

simmering intolerance that is maintained in Britain by pro-racist elements in the Neo Cons Parties (those include the racists in the Labour Party bureaucracy too).

This could have been so as recently as September this year.

So how was such an attack  prevented?

It was not once.

Such an attach could take place any time.

But for the fact that some of the community members have remained ever vigilant against the attacks .

This has then had the impact on those who crave the votes, most of those coming from the voters targeted by racists in the context of Tower Hamlets.

And those in turn have had some correlational links with the Police who have no alternative but to be seen to be active against threatened assaults by racists on the population.

But what if the numbers of the racists were smaller than those witnessed on Saturday 7 September 2013?

Would the Police take action?

 

[To be continued]

 

How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End...

How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End...
KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against City of London Big Biz Agenda fronted via Crossrail hole attacks: A contextual updater Commentary at 1815 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 15 October 2013

How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End...
And how one has been prevented so far on a large scale but how it is POSSIBLE that racists are carrying out attacks and violations away from the glare of public awareness.......

Simmering racist hatred could take the form of a hurricane of racist storm in London's East End - a contextual commentary after Cyclone Phailin in India.

 

1800 [1750] [1740] [1720] GMT London Tuesday 15 October 2013 

By © Muhammad Haque

Image 

This is what would have happened if Murdoch-employed ex-Neo Cons ‘MP’ Matthew Parris’ racist incitement against the Brick Lane London E1 area in July 2005 had been allowed to be implemented against Brick Lane.

 

HURRICANE Phailin to Racist Hatred:

Assaults, Emergencies and Displacements

From Orissa to Seelot to Brick Lane and the East End of London:

 

 

 

Noting a recent agency image of some people escaping the impact of the

Cyclone Phailin, as pictured in Orissa that has now been renamed as the eastern Indian region of Odissa/Odisha.

There is a long link between the people of Orissa and those of Seelot

that linguistically straddles the Aakhomia (Assamese)  language to the north and the north east and the Bangla language to the south and the south east.

Oorr-ee-ah is the Selotee language word for the people from Orissa.

They were itinerant trades people very much like the Kaboolees (Tagore wrote about them in his Kabooleewahla short story).

The terms and the manner of trade differed but both groups travelled through Seelot only to trade with the Seelotees.

There were many groups of such traders who would ply their stuff mainly to 

households.

And by definition, the Oorreeahs’ trading decisions were made by Seelotee women.

Household, domestic stuff. 

And loads of fancy goods!

And what was without exception a very noisy, haggling session!

The sight (in this image) of stranded Ooreeah people is not so far from many that could be found in the East End of London.

What would happen if a community was under attack by a racist gang?

This is the nearest to a cyclone that can be imagined in the context of the

simmering intolerance that is maintained in Britain by pro-racist elements in the Neo Cons Parties (those include the racists in the Labour Party bureaucracy too).

This could have been so as recently as September this year.

So how was such an attack  prevented?

It was not once.

Such an attach could take place any time.

But for the fact that some of the community members have remained ever vigilant against the attacks .

This has then had the impact on those who crave the votes, most of those coming from the voters targeted by racists in the context of Tower Hamlets.

And those in turn have had some correlational links with the Police who have no alternative but to be seen to be active against threatened assaults by racists on the population.

But what if the numbers of the racists were smaller than those witnessed on Saturday 7 September 2013?

Would the Police take action?

 

[To be continued]

 

How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End...

How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End...
KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against City of London Big Biz Agenda fronted via Crossrail hole attacks: A contextual updater Commentary at 1815 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 15 October 2013

How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End...
And how one has been prevented so far on a large scale but how it is POSSIBLE that racists are carrying out attacks and violations away from the glare of public awareness.......

Simmering racist hatred could take the form of a hurricane of racist storm in London's East End - a contextual commentary after Cyclone Phailin in India.

 

1800 [1750] [1740] [1720] GMT London Tuesday 15 October 2013 

By © Muhammad Haque

Image 

This is what would have happened if Murdoch-employed ex-Neo Cons ‘MP’ Matthew Parris’ racist incitement against the Brick Lane London E1 area in July 2005 had been allowed to be implemented against Brick Lane.

 

HURRICANE Phailin to Racist Hatred:

Assaults, Emergencies and Displacements

From Orissa to Seelot to Brick Lane and the East End of London:

 

 

 

Noting a recent agency image of some people escaping the impact of the

Cyclone Phailin, as pictured in Orissa that has now been renamed as the eastern Indian region of Odissa/Odisha.

There is a long link between the people of Orissa and those of Seelot

that linguistically straddles the Aakhomia (Assamese)  language to the north and the north east and the Bangla language to the south and the south east.

Oorr-ee-ah is the Selotee language word for the people from Orissa.

They were itinerant trades people very much like the Kaboolees (Tagore wrote about them in his Kabooleewahla short story).

The terms and the manner of trade differed but both groups travelled through Seelot only to trade with the Seelotees.

There were many groups of such traders who would ply their stuff mainly to 

households.

And by definition, the Oorreeahs’ trading decisions were made by Seelotee women.

Household, domestic stuff. 

And loads of fancy goods!

And what was without exception a very noisy, haggling session!

The sight (in this image) of stranded Ooreeah people is not so far from many that could be found in the East End of London.

What would happen if a community was under attack by a racist gang?

This is the nearest to a cyclone that can be imagined in the context of the

simmering intolerance that is maintained in Britain by pro-racist elements in the Neo Cons Parties (those include the racists in the Labour Party bureaucracy too).

This could have been so as recently as September this year.

So how was such an attack  prevented?

It was not once.

Such an attach could take place any time.

But for the fact that some of the community members have remained ever vigilant against the attacks .

This has then had the impact on those who crave the votes, most of those coming from the voters targeted by racists in the context of Tower Hamlets.

And those in turn have had some correlational links with the Police who have no alternative but to be seen to be active against threatened assaults by racists on the population.

But what if the numbers of the racists were smaller than those witnessed on Saturday 7 September 2013?

Would the Police take action?

 

[To be continued]

 

The BENTH BULLETIN - 30 years and five months ago, the Educational Voice of the Community

The BENTH BULLETIN - 30 years and five months ago, the Educational Voice of the Community

The © Muhammad Haque Daily History of Action for Educational Rights Commentary - the BENTH BULLETIN published 30 years and five months ago [1]

                                                                                  Image

2115 Hrs GMT

London

Sunday

13 October 2013

 

When there was no satellite TV of any kind

When the Bangladeshis in Tower Hamlets had to travel across town 

to even deliver a piece of paper to a “Bengali” newspaper

When there was no mentionable Bangladeshi councillor even on Tower Hamlets council

let alone “Leader” of the Council

When to even think of a having a “Bangladesh-born” candidate for

election to Parliament would itself make shocking news!

When there was no concept of there being a Bangladesh-born “Baroness”

in the House of Peers

When there was no one known anywhere in the UK institutions

with any affinity with the Bangladeshis

speaking for the community let alone voicing a universal

demand for the whole Society to be moved forward along with the

Bangladeshis being given a fair share in the Society....

it was about that time that a little magazine appeared 

and put a stop to all that blank...

That magazine was the organ of the 

Bangladeshis’ Educational Needs in Tower Hamlets. 

In short, it was the B.E.N.T.H. Bulletin=BENTH Bulletin.

devised, designed, written pasted up and published by 

Muhammad Haque

The first issue launched in May 1983.

All of that done from an unfurnished, undecorated, 

mostly unheated flat in New Road London E1 1HE.

 

[To be continued]

1394296_527013877383016_1498646619_n.jpg

Against corruption under cover of 'social housing' in the East End of London -UPDATER Report

Against corruption under cover of 'social housing' in the East End of London -UPDATER Report
1912 Hrs GMT London Thusrday 10 October 2013

This is a relatively recent Image of David Orr who is cited in a multi-million£ claim against wrongdoers involved in attacking the Community in the East End of London
Orr is cited in relation to a part of the claim that refers to his role in the violations of the rights of a family in the East End of London which violations are at the centre of the multi£million claim.
Tower Hamlets Council is also cited.

David Orr, who has been featured on the British “media” as a champion [!!!!!!!!] of social housing is accused of being the opposite and his involvement in the promotions of the Tower Hamlets Community Housing [THCH], condemned by many residents with the demonstrable the knowledge of Tower Hamlets Council’s key decision-makers and Council-appointed “THCH board members” , has been described as a contributory factor in the sabotage of the residents’ say and welfare after Tower Hamlets Council was misled a decade or so earlier into handing over so much Council housing stock to rogue individuals who took up controlling positions and were allowed to be installed in the grabbing outfits a number of which posed as “Registered Social Landlords”
[To be continued]

 

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign defending the Community in the East End of London  against corrupt & antisocial 'registered social landlords' [RSLs] continues  

 

 

1835 Hrs GMT

London

Thursday

10 October 2013

 

Firstly NOTING the revelation [Oops! NOT] that the stupid East London Idiotiser is still stupid!

It does not require a revelation.

Those who have been at the receiving end of the stupidities of the IDIOTISER know that the outlet is stupid almost every single time.

The IDIOTS who allegedly edit this idiotic outfit have sat on their ignorance

for a good number of weeks since the decision was made to public 

CONDEMN the Tower Hamlets Community Housing [THCH]

 

INSIDE HOUSING has had the following on its web site since 25th  September 2013 and the East London Idiotiser has not run the story!

 

It is THREE WEEKS  and a day since then and the IDIOTISER is conceding the “relevance” of the news item for people in Tower Hamlets only today!

 

Little does the IDIOTISER realise that it crass stupidity and its matching racist backwardness have been allowed to deny access to such important news items that the people in the East End of London borough - ‘recognised’ as one of the most deprived - deserve.

 

We have more news and disclosures about the corruption in Housing that has been going on in Tower Hamlets for years and even decades.

 

The IDIOTISER has not touched a single one of those corrupt activities or their severe lethal effects on the community in Tower Hamlets

 

[To be continued]

______________________________________

 

http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/regulation/housing-association-is-downgraded-by-regulator/6528730.article

 

 

• Home Regulation

Housing association downgraded by regulator

25 September 2013 | By Pete Apps

 

 

A housing association has been criticised for a ‘weak financial profile’ and ‘inappropriately delegating’ responsibility for key risks, in a judgement published today.

It received a ‘G2’ rating for governance, meaning it needs to improve aspects of its governance arrangements, and a ‘V2’ rating for viability, meaning it needs to manage its material exposures to continue compliance.

‘The regulator has concluded that the board has inappropriately delegated to committees ownership and responsibility for key risks, and is concerned that this could lead to failings in risk management or internal control,’ the judgement said.

‘The regulator is not assured that THCH’s large board, combined with long terms of office and infrequent review of performance and skills, position it appropriately to manage risks arising from the challenging external environment and its plans for increased development.’

It said the total of 16 board members, eight of whom are elected tenants, is more than suggested by the landlord’s code of governance.

THCH has committed to reviewing its governance arrangements later this year.

Downgrading its viability, the judgement noted that with two exceptions, THCH forecasts a net deficit every year until 2027, with interest cover below 100 per cent for several of them.

‘This is due to high levels of investment in stock and high service and management costs relative to income, which contribute to low social housing operating margins,’ the judgement said.

‘This weak financial profile makes the impact of other risks such as cost increases and underperformance against business plan assumptions more significant.’

The housing association has confirmed it has introduced more rigorous development cash flow forecasting, with senior management team oversight on a fortnightly basis.

Inside Housing was unable to reach THCH for comment before the judgement was published today.

 

_________

 

Here [below] is the text of the East London Idiotiser piece published 3 weeks and a day after the above [Inside Housing] report was put online on 25 September 2013 about the same THCH failures and downgrading by a reluctant HCA!

 

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/tower_hamlets_community_housing_board_criticised_by_watchdog_1_2872433

 

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/tower_hamlets_community_housing_board_criticised_by_watchdog_1_2872433

Watching Crossrail contractors’ crass manoeuvres in Whitechapel, Vallance Road...

Watching Crossrail contractors’ crass manoeuvres in Whitechapel, Vallance Road...
KHOODEELAAR! Action UPDATE

Watching Crossrail contractors’ crass manoeuvres in Whitechapel, Vallance Road...

Watching Crossrail contractors’ crass manoeuvres in Whitechapel, Vallance Road...
KHOODEELAAR! Action UPDATE

Brick Lane in focus: 40 years on from the racist Sunday Times Colour Supplement attack of 02 Decemb

Brick Lane in focus: 40 years on from the racist Sunday Times Colour Supplement attack of 02 Decemb
Brick Lane in focus: 40 years on from the racist Sunday Times Colour Supplement attack of 02 December 1973 - UPDATER DIAGNOSTICS on The Sunday Times Colour Magazine Attack on the Seelotee-speaking (overwhelming majority) UK Bangladeshis on Sunday 02 December 1973 [1]


The © Muhammad Haque Ethical Evidential Diagnosis and Commentary
on the ethics-free morality free parts of the "British Media" which remains perniciously racist, Empire loyalist and anti-social and which looks set to remain so despite the British Privy Council's over-plugged involvement in producing an ethical framework for the malignant components of the British Press to become ethical and accountable:40th anniversary of the Campaign against the racist attack by the Sunday Times Colour Supplement UPDATER DIAGNOSTICS on The Sunday Times Colour Magazine Attack on the Seelotee-speaking (overwhelming majority) UK Bangladeshis on Sunday 02 December 1973 [1]

 

Image

0645
[0638]
[0518] 
[0502] 
Hrs GMT 
London 
Tuesday 
08 October 2013

Noting the latest news of an impasse on newspaper regulation in the wake of the Leveson report.

Will contextually examine the impasse and look again at the behaviour of the morons that have kept the piece online,” headlined Man addresses Tower Hamlets Council meeting in Bengali”.

The Idiotiser is treating the language actually spoken by the Bangladeshis in Tower Hamlets as being unacceptable!

The East London Idiotiser and the racist Daily Express have run their racist items after the 18 September 2013 Tower Hamlets Council meeting where a KHOODEELAAR! Campaign-organised contribution included a local resident speaking to the Council in Seelotee.

Part of the racists’ continuing distortion of the UK Bangladeshis’ characteristics is that the racists keep referring to the Seelotee language as Bengali.

This despite the fact that for more than 40 years now, especially since racist focussed on the Seelotee-speaking community with the agenda of racistly maligning the community, we, the Movement in defence of the Community have pointed out the extensive ground,s evidence, diagnosis of why the Seelotee language is a language in its own right and how the State of Bangladesh is and always has been a federation of languages.

That in the UK and in the rest of the ‘West’, Seelotee is the most widely spoken of the languages by people migrating from Seelot in the State of Bangladesh.

The two languages are spoken in the UK but the most numerous one is the Seelotee which is spoken in Tower Hamlets by the second largest number of people in that Borough.

The racist British Media fetish with the wrong designation of languages in the Asian Subcontinent (including the key regions of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan) is a fetish that is linked with the original Empire Agenda.

This racist fetish was exhibited in a grotesque perpetration against the Bangladeshis in Tower Hamlets on Sunday 02 December 1973, forty years ago when the then SUNDAY TIMES Colour Magazine carried a poisonously anti-Bangladeshi item “THE WORLD BEYOND THE CURTAINS”.

In that perpetration the main attack was on the Seelotee-speaking Bangladeshis.

Seelotee-speakers were vilified on 02 december 1973 for being from Seelot (Sylhet) and were accused of not supporting the cause of Bangladesh during 1971!

The lying was callous: it accused ALL SEELOTEES in Tower Hamlets of NOT coming forward with support for Bangladesh in 1971!

Forty years later, the campaign is still having to be maintained in defending the community against current, newer versions of the same lies by parts of the Fleet Street.

The question is: what difference to this will the British Privy Council “deliberations” make?

Will they make the likes of the East London Idiotiser recognise Communities and show due respect to their universal attributes?

It is my view that they won’t.

Unless we carry on campaigning for the truth!

[To be continued]

Brick Lane in focus: 40 years on from the racist Sunday Times Colour Supplement attack of 02 Decemb

Brick Lane in focus: 40 years on from the racist Sunday Times Colour Supplement attack of 02 Decemb
Brick Lane in focus: 40 years on from the racist Sunday Times Colour Supplement attack of 02 December 1973 - UPDATER DIAGNOSTICS on The Sunday Times Colour Magazine Attack on the Seelotee-speaking (overwhelming majority) UK Bangladeshis on Sunday 02 December 1973 [1]


The © Muhammad Haque Ethical Evidential Diagnosis and Commentary
on the ethics-free morality free parts of the "British Media" which remains perniciously racist, Empire loyalist and anti-social and which looks set to remain so despite the British Privy Council's over-plugged involvement in producing an ethical framework for the malignant components of the British Press to become ethical and accountable:40th anniversary of the Campaign against the racist attack by the Sunday Times Colour Supplement UPDATER DIAGNOSTICS on The Sunday Times Colour Magazine Attack on the Seelotee-speaking (overwhelming majority) UK Bangladeshis on Sunday 02 December 1973 [1]

 

Image

0645
[0638]
[0518] 
[0502] 
Hrs GMT 
London 
Tuesday 
08 October 2013

Noting the latest news of an impasse on newspaper regulation in the wake of the Leveson report.

Will contextually examine the impasse and look again at the behaviour of the morons that have kept the piece online,” headlined Man addresses Tower Hamlets Council meeting in Bengali”.

The Idiotiser is treating the language actually spoken by the Bangladeshis in Tower Hamlets as being unacceptable!

The East London Idiotiser and the racist Daily Express have run their racist items after the 18 September 2013 Tower Hamlets Council meeting where a KHOODEELAAR! Campaign-organised contribution included a local resident speaking to the Council in Seelotee.

Part of the racists’ continuing distortion of the UK Bangladeshis’ characteristics is that the racists keep referring to the Seelotee language as Bengali.

This despite the fact that for more than 40 years now, especially since racist focussed on the Seelotee-speaking community with the agenda of racistly maligning the community, we, the Movement in defence of the Community have pointed out the extensive ground,s evidence, diagnosis of why the Seelotee language is a language in its own right and how the State of Bangladesh is and always has been a federation of languages.

That in the UK and in the rest of the ‘West’, Seelotee is the most widely spoken of the languages by people migrating from Seelot in the State of Bangladesh.

The two languages are spoken in the UK but the most numerous one is the Seelotee which is spoken in Tower Hamlets by the second largest number of people in that Borough.

The racist British Media fetish with the wrong designation of languages in the Asian Subcontinent (including the key regions of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan) is a fetish that is linked with the original Empire Agenda.

This racist fetish was exhibited in a grotesque perpetration against the Bangladeshis in Tower Hamlets on Sunday 02 December 1973, forty years ago when the then SUNDAY TIMES Colour Magazine carried a poisonously anti-Bangladeshi item “THE WORLD BEYOND THE CURTAINS”.

In that perpetration the main attack was on the Seelotee-speaking Bangladeshis.

Seelotee-speakers were vilified on 02 december 1973 for being from Seelot (Sylhet) and were accused of not supporting the cause of Bangladesh during 1971!

The lying was callous: it accused ALL SEELOTEES in Tower Hamlets of NOT coming forward with support for Bangladesh in 1971!

Forty years later, the campaign is still having to be maintained in defending the community against current, newer versions of the same lies by parts of the Fleet Street.

The question is: what difference to this will the British Privy Council “deliberations” make?

Will they make the likes of the East London Idiotiser recognise Communities and show due respect to their universal attributes?

It is my view that they won’t.

Unless we carry on campaigning for the truth!

[To be continued]

Racist UK Indymedia site again bares its colours and shields a racist propaganda in T Hamlets

Racist UK Indymedia site again bares its colours and shields a racist propaganda in T Hamlets
IRONIC! And absolutely crucial illustrations of the lines of battles that are being drawn up now between Society and the Neo Cons who are absolutely racist as well (as the London EVENING STANDARD has found itself to having to report over one of their Indian-descended reporters sent on assignment to interview the Dulwich school-admitted racist and admirer of Adolph Hitler Nigel Farage over at Manchester amid reports that Farage was deeply down the Neo Cons’ opportunistic immoral, grubby and contaminating unmentionable parts in his pursuit for power, ‘legitimacy’ and political office in the UK).

The DAILY MAIL is running this image (of a heading from its original offensive piece) on the MailOnline website accompanying a ‘reply’ by Ed Miliband to one of the Neo Cons pro-racist, pro-Conservative, pro-Big Business London Daily Mail’s latest hatchet jobs, this time attacking Ralf Miliband, Ed Miliband’s father, in their first hasty retaliation at Ed Miliband’s almost beginning to echo the peoples’ voices when he spoke last week against Energy Price hikes and was immediately inundated with massive shows of support from across Society, a scene the Neo Cons did not like at all!!!!

We shall examine that in some detail in die course



 

0810 [0735] GMT

London

Tuesday

01 October 2013

 

UK INDYMEDIA, the Internet site that claims to be a platform for campaigning sometimes even claiming to be “against racism” (!!!!), has behaved again in a racist and a pro-racist way and has hid a piece (posted by CBRUKUPDATE on the INDYMEDIA site on Monday 30 September 2013).  That CBRUKUPDATE post exclusively and emphatically exposes the pro-racist and most probably the racist contents and agenda of a propaganda ‘report’ published with the stamp of the Tower Hamlets Council on that same date.

 

As we have pointed out many times in the past ten years or so especially during the particularly intensive campaigning by the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London, the UKIndymedia operation is heavily suspect. It is infested by all manner of spies and their likes.

Again, we put this very kindly mildly and generously..

There is a toxic piece of idiocy shown underneath the CBRUKUPDATE that Indymedia has hidden. It abuses the CBRUKUPDATE and calls it a troll!

Evidently, the abuser is a troll.

CBRUKUPDATE is raising a vey serious issue about the absence of REFERENCE to let alone the most important and overdue examination of racism in Tower Hamlets generally and in Tower Hamlets Council in this context from the published report and it is doing so with demonstrated contextual evidence and diagnosis.

We shall continue to defend the Community with dignity, decorum, decency, evidence and rationality.

Here is that post that UK Indymedia ‘hid’ a few hours following the post on Monday 30 September 2013.

 

 

Three weeks since the EDL 'threat', Tower Hamlets Council 'grins' victory again!

CBRUKUPDATE | 30.09.2013 19:48 | Anti-racism | Indymedia | Social Struggles | London | World

As some of the Indymedia UK visitors may recall, there was a supposed mass mobilisation against the supposedly racist EDL on Saturday 7 September 2013 in Tower Hamlets. The licensed anti-fascist cabal UAF was even allowed to serve as the MC at the celebratory platform they foisted at the Altab Ali Park.

 

As some of the Indymedia UK visitors may recall, there was a supposed mass mobilisation against the supposedly racist EDL on Saturday 7 September 2013 in Tower Hamlets. The licensed anti-fascist cabal UAF was even allowed to serve as the MC at the celebratory platform they foisted at the Altab Ali Park. 

 

And on Wednesday 18 September 2013, Eleven days later, the Tower Hamlets Council’s “full” Meeting (as different from the “Cabinet” and “committee” meetings) heard a lot of bragging about that Council and its “allies” including the UAF having foiled the EDL “march” on 7 September 2013 

 

If that is the case then all unsuspecting anti-racists would be entitled to expect that Tower Hamlets Council would wait a bit longer before celebrating yet another victory! 

 

One that surely must be very questionable, unjustified and false. 

 

Also very dangerous for the oft-flaunted “community cohesion in Tower Hamlets” 

 

That wishful and contrived victory is being celebrated via the web site of the East London Advertiser and the Guardian Media operations this evening. 

 

The pretext is the publication of a thing they are describing as the Report of their “Fairness Commission.” 

 

And in it, there is not one lone, isolated, single mention of racism in Tower Hamlets! 

 

That is very interesting indeed. 

 

Logically, it in effect agrees with the EDL’s “discourse”, that there is, really, “no racism in Tower Hamlets”. 

 

Something else is the problem, the EDL’s line contends as is by now very widely known. 

 

So Tower Hamlets Council is giving credibility to the EDL’s own de facto claims! 

 

Here we are putting the picture very mildly.

KHOODEELAAR! Defending Universal Values of Moral Responsibility & engagement in defending Community

KHOODEELAAR! Defending Universal Values of Moral Responsibility & engagement in defending Community
AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Action

Iain Dale is NOT the only nasty courier of a racist political agenda

Iain Dale is NOT the only nasty courier of a racist political agenda
KENYA!
Here we come with a timely contextual reminder of the 1968 British Labour Party’s RACIST Policy against “Kenya Asians...”
READ about Kenya then in the main body of the COMMENT below retrieved from the web site workersliberty.org

The Nasty Party Propagandist behind the Dirty Damian McBride SMEAR BOOK, the rabidly rightwing Iain Dale is NOT the only nasty courier of a racist political agenda exposed during the ritualised Party jamborees season in Britain

. The so-called British Communist Party's OTT-self-congratulating and all "Labour traditions-drum-beating" “daily” Morning Star is exposed as backing a racist gang in a French suburb where the Mayor led a gang of 60 and smashed the temporary homes of 'immigrants’, in Vitry..

                                                                                        Image

 

 

When the Communist Party of Great Britain’s “daily” organ the “Morning Star" Backed Racist Gangsters led by a racist “Communist” Mayor in the small French city of Vitry.

Retrieved at 0405 GMT on Wednesday 25 September 2013 from the website workersliberty.org.

WEB PAGE retrieved 

http://www.workersliberty.org/node/10748

 

Submitted on 18 June, 2008 - 19:04

Ballad of the CPF "Communist" Heroes of Vitry

Parables for Socialists 16

On 15 January, 1981, the Morning Star, the daily paper of the Communist Party of Great Britain, once called the "Daily Worker", had a fine front page article denouncing a proposed Tory anti-immigration law. Straight to target: the" Nationality Bill", it told its readers, is a racist Bill. That is why immigrant groups are vigorously opposing it, and why the broad labour movement must fight it too.

But now turn to page 2 of the same issue of the Star. There, you will find a report on the policy of the French Communist Party on immigration to France, and an attempt to explain away a recent shameful incident at Vitry, a suburb of Paris. What happened at Vitry?

There, just before Christmas, the CP mayor of Vitry, Paul Mercieca, led a gang of 60 men, reportedly CP members and supporters, in a 'direct action' to stop 300 immigrants from Mali being rehoused in Vitry.

The gang turned off water, gas and electricity, and used a bulldozer to smash up the hostel.

Then on the weekend of 10-11 January, a big anti-immigration (which, in the real world of tensions and scapegoating, means anti-immigrant) demonstration was organised in Vitry to support the mayor's action and the Party's immigration policy. Over 10,000 people attended.

One of them was Georges Marchais, the General Secretary of the Communist Party of France (CPF), and the Party's candidate for President of France in the upcoming April election. Machais made it clear that Mercieca's gang acted in line with Party policy.

According to the Guardian, the Vitry policy is being generalised. The 'Communist' town council at Rennes in Brittany has cancelled a building permit for an Islamic centre. "...other Communist councils have said that they will resist attempts to settle more immigrants" (Guardian, 16.1. 81).

What does the Morning Star (and the CPGB) have to say about the scandalous antics of its French comrades? It excuses them, covers for them, and thereby supports them!

The article, by one Harry Samson, 'reporting from Paris', denounces the comments in the press as a 'smear' on the French CP. His version of what happened more or less admits the facts — but presents the actions of the mayor of Vitry and his gang as acceptable and reasonable.

He describes attempts to move immigrant workers into 'Communist'-controlled municipalities as "a dumping operation". He implies that the Vitry mayor's vigilante operation was a valid means of defending the interests of the workers in Vitry, a proper communist response to an action by the middle-class, conservative-controlled St. Naur municipality, which was trying to "get rid of the immigrants and at the same time whip up feeling against a Communist (sic) municipality".

Vitry, you see, "already has two 600-bed immigrant hostels, a 17 per cent immigrant population (twice the national average), and a 3,500 long waiting list. The town council wants decent conditions for all the town's inhabitants — French and immigrant...". That, it seems, justified direct action against the immigrants.

But Henry Samson doesn't want you to run away with the idea that the 'Communist' mayor of Vitry has the reflexes of a fascist thug, or that the first thing he did was to send for the bulldozer and the other thugs. Not at all. First he talked to the Mali workers. He cut up rough only when he couldn't persuade these bewildered newcomers in a strange and obviously hostile country to leave the hostel peacefully and go back to St. Naur: that is, to abandon the accommodation they had been allotted and put themselves on the streets.

They wouldn't listen to reason; they were too unsophisticated to understand that the mayor was a 'Communist' and not an ordinary racist gangster.

It was only then, says Samson, that "some local inhabitants took it upon themselves to destroy symbolically the gates leading to the premises and to turn off the water, gas and electricity". So it was only 'symbolic'. Or perhaps the writer — or his subconscious — is trying to say that they should be grateful that the 60 thugs didn't Klu-Klux it properly and kill a few of the black intruders?

Samson's account implies that contrary to the reports in the serious bourgeois press the mayor and the CP had nothing to do with it. It was only "some local inhabitants".

So what was the mayor doing while it was happening? What is the CPF doing calling an anti immigrant demonstration in Vitry (or anywhere)? Samson shows that he is a calculating liar when he explains why "some local inhabitants" made the hostel uninhabitable. They did it he says to "prevent [the premises] from being occupied, so as not to play into the hands of the St. Naur council".

Better to "play into the hands of" the racists, fascists and chauvinists. Better to abandon the only policy that undercuts attempts to divide the working class by blaming immigrants for the social problems capitalism creates — united working class action and opposition to all scapegoating. Better to trample the ideas of communism, socialism and even decent liberalism in the mud churned up by the bulldozer and in the noxious waste matter of people like Henry Samson who now takes on the job of rationalising what the CPF is doing.

THIS DlSPLAY of rancid chauvinism lines up the CPF with the French racists. It must encourage them and make their poison more palatable to sections of the French working class who would be ashamed to find themselves consciously adopting racist attitudes.

ln 1968, the British Labour Government's racist decision to stop British passport-holding Kenyan Asians entering Britain was followed first by Enoch Powell's speech predicting and threatening "rivers of blood" unless immigration was stopped, and then by an enormous shift of 'mainstream' British politics towards that open racism which has unashamedly been expressed in all immigration legislation and immigration-control practice since. Racist definitions, concerns and obsessions were moved from the crank right wing fringe of politics to centre stage.

Nothing less than this can be the result of what the CPF is doing now.

How many of the 10,000 demonstrators who turned out to march behind Georges Marchais
in support of the Communist heroes of Vitry can be assumed to be free from the taint of racism?

And finally, all this must be seen in the context of the eruption of anti-semitism in France which has taken the form of terrorist attacks on Jews. In Paris right now a heavily armed CRS man carrying a sub-machine gun stands guard outside each synagogue.

THE CPF CALLS for a halt to all immigration. The Morning Star justifies this too. Sarnson explains that many of the four million south European and north African immigrants live in "overpopulated badly-adapted unhygienic hostels and are subjected to racism, police harassment and insecurity". Many of them had known unemployment in their own countries and are experiencing it again in France.

The CPF opposes racial discrimination, says Samson, and in a recent document "condemns all threats to the dignity of these men and women living far from home and reaffirms its solidarity with them as it has always done in the past". And so?

He goes on: "It is for this reason that in the present economic crisis and to avoid adding to the two million French and immigrant workers already unemployed that the CPF is calling for a halt to immigration in the mutual interests of all workers in France irrespective of their origin"!

Apart from the reference to the working class, you could travel far rightwards across the ranks of the Tory Party — as far as the repatriationists in fact — and get more or less exactly the same sort of reasoning to justify this policy in Britain. It is the declared policy of the Tory Party!

And that is the ground on to which their justification of the CPF now takes the Morning Star and the CPGB. The Morning Star and the CP of course have long refused to oppose all immigration controls. Refusing to accept that all immigration controls are intrinsically racist, they only oppose the 1971 Act and its later refinements. But this is a new departure.

For if the Tory policy is correct for France when pursued by the CPF, then in principle it must be correct for Britain too. How can the front page of the Morning Star carry conviction when page 2 champions stringent and inevitably racist immigration laws for France and justifies and excuses racist violence and gangsterism?

On this basis, the weaseling of the right wing and soft-left Labour politicians is good working class policy to defend the workers black and white already here. At any rate, those who smear themselves publicly with the racist filth of Marchais' party won't carry much conviction with themselves or anyone else when they try to fight these policies.

What "Party" has the ethics, the morality, the sense to respect the East End ?

What "Party" has the ethics, the morality, the sense to respect the East End ?

1450 Hrs GMT

London
Monday
23 September 2013

MY DAILY ETHICAL COMMENTARY - this part - is in the COMMENT I have posted on the state of the Labour Party as “reported” by Damian McBride!

On Gordon's gangsters at No 10 Downing Street!
And other equally enlightening revelations!

I have just posted the first comment on the piece on the London EVENING STANDARD web site a few minutes ago. Here is the piece after I checked a few typos that keep appearing when doing online posting:

Muhammad HaqueL

ess than a minute ago

I notice in your report that there is no mention at all about either the "British Constitution" nor indeed of any Constitution, far less of the "Labour Party" rules or "ethics" if there was any recognition of the last one inside the "No 10 Downing Street operations" that the "excellent" Mr McBride was part of!
Any student of English law will know that the Prime Minster’s Office is run according to the law! And that the kind of revelations we have been offered via Mr Paul Dacre’s organs (Oops! Media Group titles) and attributable to Mr McBride would have had to be deferred for decades before being so grotesquely tantalisingly available!
So whatever has happened to the basic tenets of Government by Constitution and by law? By any code of ethics and morality?
All this before we can even examine the contents and the other detailed filth that Mr McBride has decided to put on the rhetorical breakfast tables of the imagined Nation!
The equally worrying other thing is that Mr McBride did not only do dirt in Downing Street he is still doing dirt long after getting out of Downing Street and in doing so he is also confirming that the Labour Party “when in Government” is not operated either for the benefit of those who believe in any values - including those distorted vah-loos as uttered by McBride’s ‘master’ Gordon Brown - or for the advancement of the universal values of making peoples’ lives better, safer and securer!
The question of bringing about justice by that Government doesn't arise at all!
As Damian McBride has been saying on payment by Mr Paul Dacre’s enterprise, the Gordon Brown camp had wanted to knife Cherie but before they could execute their plot on her, she knifed them instead!
So how can the little people being urged to trust the candidates for the same Party have any trust in them?
Mr McBride depicts the many characters and their motivations so convincingly as if he is recounting his life as a mean member of a nasty gang of foul perpetrators!
How far could that be from the thoughts and the commitments of those who had founded the Party of that name?


Len McCluskey spoke 'against' evil today. has he heard of the evils being done in Tower Hamlets?

Len McCluskey spoke 'against' evil today. has he heard of the evils being done in Tower Hamlets?

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: First lines 

in response to Len McCluskey’s utterances today at the

Labour Party Conference “debate” staged by the London

DAILY MIRROR:

Lines of Questions for the attention n of

Comrade Len McCluskey

about the evils of 

Hatred, Hunger, Starvation and Harassment

in the inner city London Borough of Tower Hamlets

Lines [2]

 Image

 

 

 

1718 Hrs GMT

London

Sunday

22 September 2013

 

Comrade Len McCluskey has made a few appearances

in images if not actually seen physically strolling about

in the streets of the East End.

Comrade Len appears to have become the 

(no, the latest)

 substitute for Comrade Ken!

Bizarrely, Comrade Len’s appearances in 

the imaged  surrounds that are suggested to be

 ‘in or about’ Tower

hamlets don’t actually appear to have been in

manifest response to any democratic preference 

for them as objectively attributable to the ordinary 

people in the Borough.

More acutely, none of these appearances appear

to be in solidarity with those who could be

justified in demanding true solidarity from

Comrade Len who is often depicted as a

a source of (albeit highly fabricated, configured)

“clout” that could conceivably be cited or hopefully

deployed to stop the daily doses of the evil 

hatred, hunger, starvation and harassment

that are foisted on so many who continue to

be missed by the radar of those who are

supposedly the leaders of state outfits in

the Borough.

Is it possible that Comrade Len might be

or he already may have been in communication

with some of those?

If so, might the communication have included

any hint - lets be measured here! - that in the

borough that is still described as one of the

most deprived in the UK (if not as “the most deprived”), 

the “locally elected” Tower Hamlets Council is 

not only failing to show that it wants poverty 

and deprivation to end but that it is a number 

of the very same Council’s

“Service” operations  that are engaged

 as active aiders and abetters of  Hatred, Hunger, 

Starvation and Harassment?

Is Comrade Len aware of that?

Is Comrade Len aware of ANY of that 

going on in Tower Hamlets?

 



[To be continued]

UPDATED 24.7

twitter.com/khoodeelaar

 

KHOODEELAAR! Defending the East End, Defending the Truth, Defending the Community against racists

KHOODEELAAR! Defending the East End, Defending the Truth, Defending the Community against racists
KHOODEELAAR! Action with emphatic extensive exclusive original evidence in defence of the truth of the Defence of the Community in the East End of London

1550 [1532 ]Hrs GMT London

Saturday
21 September 2013.



This © Muhammad Haque picture (seen here) of the then "East London Advertiser" staff reporter Michael Parker was taken at the Mulberry Place London E14 2BG in September 2007, SIX years and a week ago this week.

Ironic?

This picture was taken when Michael Parker was himself taking the pictures of another KHOODEELAAR! demonstration that was then in progress outside the Mulberry Place.
And the people in that Khoodeelaar! demonstration? Yes!

`the majority of the people in that KHOODEELAAR! Campaign demonstration were from the Streets that are also featured in the PETITION that was IN EFFECT presented by Muhammad Haque speaking in English throughout the event, to the Tower Hamlets Council on Wednesday 18 September 2013
SIX years earlier, the Council’s Meeting heard the same KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser Muhammad Haque - about the impact of the then plotted Crossrail hole plan work on the residents in the streets involved.

Over 16 months previously, Parker was seen taking pictures like he is seen here, when the Crossrail group of MPs 'toured' the East End areas affected by the Crossrail plan (that was Tuesday 23 May 2006).

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign held demonstrations in the Whitechapel Road, in the Brady Street (opposite the Swanlea School where the MPs held a short talk as well). The PICTURES that Michael Parker took on 23 May 2006 never appeared in then then “East London Advertiser”.
Except one, a picture of Muhammad Haque speaking outside the Whitechapel underground station, alerting the East End Community to the multifarious environmental. dislocation and economic threats posed to them by the Crossrail hole Agenda.

That picture with a short item was in the East London Advertiser print edition of the last Thursday in May 2006.

The heading had said, "Voice of Protest" next to the picture of Muhammad Haque with the loud-hailer

UPDATED on the UK Indymedia web site at appx 1400 GMT on Saturday 21 September 2013

 

CBRUK starts mobilisation against latest racist smear and lies by Tories

 

And by the racist DAILY EXPESS Group and the racist ARCHANT Group-owned ‘East London Advertiser’ web sites.

 

CBRUK | 19.09.2013 19:29

As Richard Desmond allows new racist lies to be published on his DAILY EXPRESS web site against the Community in Tower Hamlets, a new mobilisation has begun to confront the vile racism

 

East London voters and Bangladeshis are being asked to support the call for action against the DAILY EXPRESS, the Sunday Express, the East London Advertiser and against the Tory Councillor Peter Golds over their latest attack on the Bangladeshi community. 

Daily action details of the campaign will be published on campaign sites on the Internet. 

As Richard Desmond allows new racist lies to be published on his DAILY EXPRESS web site against equal human rights in Tower Hamlets, a new anti-racist mobilisation has begun to confront the latest vile racism invented and retailed via the Desmond EXPRESS Group by a racist cell that has been operating via that Group for the past four years or so. 

 

 

 

Man addresses Tower Hamlets Council meeting in Bengali 

Robin de Peter 

Thursday, September 19, 2013
10:30 AM 

Like 

Recommend 

 

 

 

Tweet 

 

 

 

 

This page has been shared 2 times. View these Tweets. 

 

+1   Recommend this on Google 

 

 

A Tower Hamlets council meeting was plunged into confusion when a member of the public started addressing the chamber in Bengali. 

 

 

The man, who was presenting a petition to Wednesday evening’s meeting on preserving green spaces on a housing estate in Whitechapel, launched into a speech to councillors and the public in Bengali. 

When the chamber’s speaker, Cllr Lesley Pavitt, stopped the petitioner, he said he was unable to speak English. 

Town hall officers told him the council would have provided an interpreter had they been notified of the problem. 

But as no notice was given, another member of the audience in the public gallery was given permission to ask the question on his behalf.

CBRUK

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

CBRUK UPDATE on Tower Hamlets Council in exposing the racist lies by the EXPRESS

20.09.2013 08:39

 

Subject: 

 

CBRUK UPDATE on Tower Hamlets Council in exposing the racist lies by the EXPRESS 

 

The racist Daily /Sunday Express web piece and the ignorant East London Advertiser web pieces about Tower Hamlets Council Meeting of Wednesday 18 September 2013: 

 

Reason for this UPDATE: ; This CBRUK UPDATE is to make known the truth about the extensive communications that had been ongoing for four and half months precisely about the PRESENTATION of the Petition to a Meeting of the Tower Hamlets Council and to show that the racist EXPRESS group and its racist sources have got their ‘facts’ utterly wrong. Again. 

 

UPDATE 1: 

 

The CBRUK Campaign has received confirmation from the Head of the Tower Hamlets council's Democratic services at 0810 GMT today that the Public Petition that was presented in part in Seelotee (Sylhetti) language had been the subject of preparations and communications with the Petition Organisers for months, dating back to 30 April 2013 when the actual petition had been formally submitted to the Council. 

 

By “the Council” here is meant both the Council’s “Democratic Services” and the “Executive Mayor”. 

 

The fact of that submission can be verified independently and extensively by independent means and sourcing. 

 

The Council’s “Democratic Services” spokesperson agreed this morning that the media outlets that had published the items/a had got the facts wrong. 

 

OTHER aspects of the Communications will be further investigated and checked this afternoon and UPDATE or UPDATEs posted here and on associated CBRUK campaign sites during the day and at the weekend. 

 

2. Contents of one Communications sent to the Tower Hamlets Community Housing (THCH) - the subject of the Petition as presented to Tower Hamlets Council on Wednesday 18 September 2013 - in May 2013, more than FOPUR months before the date of the Council Meting where the Petition about the THCH was actually presented due to internal Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy 

 

 

 

To 

 

[THCH employee named] 

 

 

Thank you for your reply dated 13 May 2013. 

Since your item concerns the representation of the residents, I have now received their first reply to your commutation [dated 13 May 2013] and would be grateful for your immediate attention and response on each of the points they make. 

 

1. The residents totally dispute your claim at number 2 of your reply. 

There is no evidence, the residents maintain, to substantiate that claim. 

 

There has been no meeting, the residents further claim,  where residents have asked for let alone agreed the work you refer to. 

 

2. The allegations may not have been detailed  in my [Cllr named] Member Enquiry addressed to you [Mr name identified]  but you should have been aware of the many Communications sent to your organisation by the residents and on their behalf. One of the communications is acknowledged by your relevant colleague  in your organisation's letter dated 30 April 2013 to Mr [name and address]  

The OTHER is your detailed conversations and text messages exchanged between yourself and Cllr [named] earlier this month. This information has been confirmed more than once by Cllr [named] to the residents via one of the residents in [street named] with whom Cllr [named] has been known to be in contact. 

Item 5 in your reply is also not addressing the residents’ Constitutional law point. 

They did not specify (street named)in the context of the reference to the Tower Hamlets Council’s transfer of the Council’s housing stock to THCH. What the residents said and are maintaining and will insist on doing in the foreseeable future in this context is this: the series of promises that Tower Hamlets Council at the time of the “ballots” had made included the undertakings that ALL REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS would honour and uphold and deliver the same social and communal and civic provision and amenities that residents were enjoying under the Council. The residents are asking for THOSE PLEDGES to be honoured in (street named) as well.  

Item 6 in your reply is a contradiction of the known facts concerned. If THCH “have not overridden what residents want” then  why are the residents making this very serious representation claiming that THCH has [‘have’]  done so?  Why was there a letter from THCH .. dated 30 April 2013? 

(resident named) has repeatedly asserted that one of the employees of THCH had misled residents in relation to two specific facts. 

You have the details of those allegations. 

And yet you are stating that the “decision was made by our Area Residents Board which is only made up of residents”. 

The residents do not agree that they - the residents - made any such request or that the stated “Area Residents Board” made any decision that truthfully reflected the residents preference, let alone any express demand for what you say is going to be done very soon. 

CBRUKUPDATE

Further evidence: it was Tower Hamlets Council that refused to hear English

21.09.2013 14:19

The REPRESENTATION of the rights, the say of the residents concerned in the Street/estate in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets was at the centre of the SERIES of Questions and Petitions put to the local LBTH, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council. 

 

The lead organiser of these representations has been the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign. 

 

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser was APPROACHED by the residents themselves in February 2013 with a list of requests for help with the residents' attempts to get across their say to the Tower Hamlets Community Housing (THCH). 

 

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organised a series of Constitutional law and democratic activities to get the residents needs established and recognised. 

 

But that first set of actions was abandoned because the residents were sent a misleading message by someone who claimed to be close to the Council’s “leadership”. 

 

When this was discovered as a diversion that it in fact was, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign spent another two months in rearranging and restarting the processes. 

 

One of those processes concerned the behaviour of the Crossrail contractors in the area. 

 

It was Crossrail that had been the reason for the residents approaching the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in the first place. 

 

Because the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign had been active since 2006 in helping the same Streets deal with the then planned attack on their environment, health by the Crossrail plans. 

 

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign demonstrated against the Crossrail plans in May 2006 in Whitechapel when a group of Crossrail Committee MPs visited the area. 

 

One of the reports published about that KHOODEELAAR! demonstration was in the then EAST LONDON ADVERTISER print edition. 

 

That title wasn’t known at that time to have any internet site of its own. 

 

(This may be checked and verified) 

 

The UPDATED reports on the Crossrail digging and noise disruption carried out for three years and how those affected the residents in the streets concerned were then posted by KHOODEELAAR! online and on youtube. 

 

The remaining issues about Crossrail affecting the residents in the particular area are under campaign review at present and will be published separately. 

 

Back to the Petition to the Council - about the residents’ demand for recognition of their right to have their say on all aspects of THCH’s involvement in their streets -  on 18 September 2013. 

 

As the contents of the communications of the past nearly five months between the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and the Council’s “Democratic Services” (that deals with the Council’s Meetings and related matters) make clear, there never was any intention by the organisers of the representation to allow the appearance of a diversionary pretext that the racists could then use at all. 

 

The racists (at the Archant-owned ‘East London Advertiser” web site and at the DAILY EXPRESS Group, so far) have miscalculated with their rush to depict a small part of the presentation of that item (at 5.2 on the Agenda at the Tower Hamlets Council meeting on 18 September 2013) as another ‘takeover by the Bengalis’. 

 

Some of the racists involved in the propaganda being dissected here in these UPDATES know that they have got all of that utterly wrong. 

 

Far from the item being anything of the sort that the racists have untruthfully portrayed it to be, it was about the democratic values that CBRUK and KHOODEELAAR! Campaigns have been advocating for a very long time in Tower Hamlets and elsewhere in the UK. 

 

The racists’ decision to abuse the information and to do a racist propaganda will come back to hit them with a series of rigorous exposé’s. 

 

Those racists should not doubt this at all 

 

Certain racists operating via the Richard Desmond DAILY EXPRESS Group and their clandestine allies on the peripheries of the ‘mainstream’ INTERNET war on universality and human rights are not only very well known to the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and to the MOVEMENT DEFENDING THE COMMUNITY in the East End of London, these racists will themselves be personally treated to provisions of the existing laws and legal processes in due course. 

 

 

Here is the letter from Tower Hamlets Council’s Head of Democratic Services to the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser dated 7 August 2013, that is more than FIVE weeks before the 18 September 2013 Council Meeting. 

 

 

7 August 2013 

 

 

Dear Mr Haque, 

  

Further to previous e-mail correspondence, I received on 30th April 2013 a petition from yourself and other residents regarding THCH [certain words deleted]. 

  

The petition could not be presented to the Council meeting on 26th June because all of the available slots for petitions at that meeting were already filled.  It was therefore held over for the next meeting. 

  

The next Council meeting will take place on 18th September 2013 and I write to ask whether the petitioners still wish the petition to be included on the agenda for that meeting?  

  

If so, I should be grateful if you could let me have the name and contact details for the lead petitioner. 

  

Please note that it will not be possible for you to present the petition personally at the meeting because you asked a question at the June meeting and the Council's Constitution states:' "An individual or group may submit either a petition or a question to the Council at any given meeting, not both.  In addition, an individual or group may not submit a petition to a meeting of the Council if that individual or group has previously submitted a question or a petition to either of the previous two Council meetings." (Council Procedure Rule 19.9) 

  

Many thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. 

  

John S. Williams 

Service Head, Democratic Services 

London Borough of Tower Hamlets 

Town Hall, Mulberry Place 

5 Clove Crescent 

London, E14 2BG 

Tel:  020 7364 4204 

Fax:  020 7364 3232 

e-mail: maillink.gif JohnS.Williams@towerhamlets.gov.uk 

www.towerhamlets.gov.uk 

 

Miliband is FORCED to stage a stunt on ‘scrapping' the Neo Cons’ 'Bedroom tax'. A stunt!

Miliband is FORCED to stage a stunt on ‘scrapping' the Neo Cons’ 'Bedroom tax'. A stunt!
2018 Hrs GMT London Friday 20 September 2013

By © Muhammad Haque

This is an image of one of the perpetrators of the Nasty assault on Society. This is an image of David Fraudster Freud

He is and has always been an opportunist, neo Conman
But He was given a platform under the ignorant regime (!) of Gordon Brown.
Funny that on the day (Today Friday 20 September 2013) when new revelations show how viciously immoral, unprincipled, antidemocratic, corrupting the Bliar regime and its feuds with Brown was, there is no sign or sound of any of the crooks who served both or either of those two “PM”s” as ministers and paddlers. The fact that Eddie Minibrand is now forced to make an utterances against the Bedroom Tax is NO proof that Miliband either understands the attack nor that he has any commitment against the Noe Cons Agenda. Which is what I have said in my latest diagnostic on the CPGB below.

[To be continued]2010 [1955] Hrs GMT London Friday 20 September 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Economics and Democracy Commentary: Image

 

 

How the infantile idiotic  triumphalist CPGB Morning Star celebration hides the shallowness that mars the TUC and exposes Ed Miliband to being eventually condemned to insignificance as he fails to show genuine, intelligent commitment of the need and the obligation to work thoroughly against the whole of the Neo Cons Agenda against Society…

 

The CPGB (Communist Party of Great Britain) is once again being very infantile in this stupidly ignorant triumphalist front page on the weekend edition of its “Morning Star” parading Ed Miliband as decisively committed..

The CPGB parade piece for Ed Miliband heavily relies on the TUC’s bureaucracy that is now fronted by the incredibly tokenistic, half-informed, complacent ‘celeb’ feted by the CPGB at every excuse, Frances O’Grady whose utterances have been as shallow as have been the TUC bureaucracy’ publicly known role in even understanding the true purpose, extent and penetration of the Neo Cons Agenda against Society let alone in confronting it.

But the CPGB prefers its “political campaigning” to be cosy!

And Frances O’Grady lets the CPGB have plenty of cosy feel!

She is after all “untouchable” as an “image”!

Which is why tokenism is so corrupting and corroding against fairness, against justice and against universality…

[To be continued]

The emptiness of the BBC looking at the 'rest of the world' is most acutely seen on slots as this!

The emptiness of the BBC looking at the 'rest of the world'  is most acutely seen on slots as this!
BLANK PAPERS on the BBC

By © Muhammad Haque 1345 GMT London Tuesday 17 September 2013

The ghastly Neo Conservative PR man and so-called financial expert David Buik (seen to the right) typifies the emptiness of the BBC which continues to fail to bring out the truth about what is actually happening in the world.
Like their most recently exposed abuse of the public’s licence fee, the BBC “leaders” are lost in a wasteland when it comes to telling the truth about the world.
Like this 5 minute slot 0445 GMT Tuesday 17 September 2013] allegedly reviewing the Business Papers, the BBC network has other token slots that are fronted by some of the UK’s emptiest vessels mouthing prescribed idiocies under the covers of covering the coverage of the Papers..

[To be continued]





When the Professor in Brick Lane saw a fox in the Kittens' Court yard.....

When the Professor in Brick Lane saw a fox in the Kittens' Court yard.....
And of journeys in Kentish Town with Kay Jordan hoping to meet a fox or two...

                                                                                  Image

This fox could be one of the foxes that the Community Architect Kay Jordan, a Kentish Town resident for years, showed me on many early morning drives which she and I took several years ago specially to see foxes across London!

Those were the hours when the likelihood of spotting foxes was higher than at other times.

Most of the foxes that we saw looked very weary and were extremely measured in their movements

 

 

 

The Professor in Brick Lane apparently scared a fox that had lost its way....

 

On the EVENING STANDARD web site:

 

Muhammad Haque

 

Less than a minute ago

 

This is yet another unjustified attempt at stirring up intolerance and fear about foxes. 

An almost identical fox as the one your pictures show, lost its way one evening a few years ago in Brick Lane London E1. 

Just to give an idea of the “danger” it posed, a cat scared the fox so much that the fox ran into a building, ran up the stairs and rushed into a room and hid under furniture. 

Nobody using that room could see the fox. 

The only clue, three or four days later, was a window curtain that looked damaged. 

What was the damage? 

The curtain got torn as the nervous fox tried to climb up it in order to escape but couldn't do so as the window was closed, firmly shut. 

A search took place and the poor petrified little fox was found curled up into absolute scared state in a corner. 

Then it was another day’s wait until it was night time when the fox could be encouraged to run out of the room and down the stairs and into the court yard. Hopefully on his way out back to where he had lost his way to begin with. 

Once in that yard, the fox was faced with the same cat, the Professor, again. 

It took some creative work to get the fox out of the buildings! 

All of that was done by me and the Professor watching my movements around the fox! 

So, please, have some proportion and balance. 

ANY being can be a danger to others, including children. It all depends on the circumstances. 

Just because it is a fox does NOT mean it is harmful by that fact alone. 

I am glad too that the child in your report was unharmed. 

The fox depicted in your report must have been terribly scared and confused and hungry and it must have been misled or rushed by some one or something into the premises to begin with! 

A fox has as much need as any human to be left alone unthreatened”

 

The scary, anti-fox 'news' item on the web site of the London EVENING STANDARD 

 

 

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/fox-found-licking-face-of-sleeping-sixyearold-in-fourth-floor-bedroom-of-clapham-house-8819725.html

 

____

 

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/8555635/Resident-prompts-anger-after-ordering-urban-foxes-to-be-shot.html

 

The picture (shown with this item)  of a fox on the web site of the London DAILY TELEGRAPH (By Victoria Ward 7:00AM BST 04 Jun 2011) carrying an item about residents in KENTISH TOWN, Camden ['north' London] protesting against a person calling for 'urban foxes' to be harmed!

This fox could be one of the foxes that the Community Architect Kay Jordan, a Kentish Town resident for years, showed me on many early morning drives which she and I took several years ago specially to see foxes across London!

Those were the hours when the likelihood of spotting foxes was higher than at other times.

Most of the foxes that we saw looked very weary and were extremely measured in their movements.

 

[To be continued]

When the BBC on HS2 folly in effect vindicated KHOODEELAAR! diagnosis of 10 years

When the BBC on HS2 folly in effect vindicated KHOODEELAAR! diagnosis of 10 years

Editor  © Muhammad Haque

This post on youtube e

by AADHIKAROnline

is at 0030 Hrs GMT

from London

Monday 16 September 2013.

 

Image

 

AADHIKAROnline

publishing with the 

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the

Community in the East End of London

CONTEXTUALLY updating the Campaign

diagnosis of the Big Biz Agenda plotters as typified by the HS2 scam and as we have been witnessing in the similar hypes that they used to peddle the lies and the lying lines to the effect that the Big Biz branded Crossrail would bring infinite benefits to the communities affected by the contractors’s scam that they would implement via the OTT-hyped brand.

 

For the past ten years, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has been vindicated on each and very single item of analysis about the lies that Big Biz Agenda promoters have perpetrated.

 

They have perpetrated those directly and also via the local Tower Hamlets Council.

 

And via the locally installed Parties’ cards-carrying varieties of  paid post-holders.

 

Because of the deliberate and campaign-strategic decision made by  the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign at the relevant time, we saw that from 06 May 2005 to 10 May 2010 the local Parliamentary Constituency of Bethnal Green and Bow was NOT among the backers of the Big Biz Agenda  Crossrail scam.

 

These reports will be continued

and 24.7 Action Updates o the Khoodeelaar! campaign are

posted  on

twiutter.com/khoodeelaar

 

Part 1:

 

“No to HS2 MP Candidates”

are likely to stand at the

General Election in 2015

to stop the HS2. Osborne

himself may face defeat

as may a number of 

sitting Tory MPs...

Contrast the amount

of resources having to 

be devoted to the campaign

to stop HS2 with the

KHOODEELAAR!

Campaign against the

Crossrail hole through

the Brick Lane London

E1 area... The Crossrail

digging operation is

taking place now 

[Monday 16 September 2013]

 near the

Whitechapel Underground

Train station.

KHOODEELAAR! is monitoring

the Old Montague Street and 

Vallance Road

and Durward Street 

Crossrail digging

activities  to

the east of Brick Lane 

.. as well as watching the

Crossrail digging taking

place near the Bishopsgate 

area and to the west of the 

Liverpool Street railway station 

in the west. 

The KHOODEELAAR!

Campaign has been asking

Crossrail to confirm what

they are actually going to do

in the Brick Lane 

London E1 Area. The Crossrail

company has so far not replied.

We shall wait for another

appropriate period before

announcing another

Community Mobilisation to

stop any clandestine

 Crossrail hole attacks

that may be being secretly 

plotted under cover

of Crossrail’s silence

to our queries last

made a few weeks ago.

We shall if necessary

pay them a demonstration

visit now that Crossrail

company’s HQ is actually

situated in Tower Hamlets

Borough!

[To be continued]

Saturday 07 Sept 2013 Police stopped a D3 Bus at corner New Rd, Commercial Rd & Cannon St Rd

Saturday 07 Sept 2013 Police stopped a D3 Bus at corner New Rd, Commercial Rd & Cannon St Rd
Saturday 07 Sept 2013 Police stopped a D3 Bus at corner New Rd, Commercial Rd & Cannon St Rd

ImageBy © Muhammad Haque
The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community in the East End of London.
AADHIKAROnline reporting from the corner ofNew Road, Commercial Road andCannon Street RoadLondon E1 UK when London MetropolitanPolice stop aD3 bus from continuing to Crossharbour at appx 1255 GMTon Saturday07 September2013
This short video was filmed by AADHIAROnline
with the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign hours before
any confirmation was available
of any actual arrests being made by the London Metropolitan Police
either of the racist "English Defence League" or of its opponents who had gathered at the Altab Ali Park on the Whitechapel road London E1 UK.
THESE EXCLUSIVE REPORTS are to be continued in video, online and in print.

THIS item posted at 2250 GMT London Sunday 08 September 2013

Additional updater commentary by © Muhammad Haque

2216 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
08 September 2013
The IDIOCY of the Channel 4 News "editors" is in the fact that when this webpage link is clicked on, the number that appears at the time of writing is 300, double that mentioned in their web page headline itself

[see below]

http://www.channel4.com/news/edl-march-london-arrests

EDL Tower Hamlets march: 160 arrested
www.channel4.com
EDL leader "Tommy Robinson" and 150 anti-fascist protesters were among those arrested after an English Defence League march to the Tower Hamlets area of east London.

2004 GMT Sunday 08 September 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:
UPDATING on my ethical disgust that there isn't a truthful daily newspaper title either in Fleet Street or in Wall Street or indeed in any Moscow Street today! Extrapolate this analysis across the rest of the G20 Capitals of today and then go even to the BBC's staple title of hype in the 1960s, 1970s, the Al Ahram of Cairo! Like the morally barren dailies of Fleet Street, Wall Street, the ever imitating, servile Arabic language versions are also lying. The world is deeply in the Dark Age and there is no sign of light at either end of the tunnel! [1]

Altab Ali Park. KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has to CORRECT the callous, offensive, ignorant BBC!

Altab Ali Park. KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has to CORRECT the callous, offensive, ignorant BBC!

1000

[0925]

[0908] Hrs GMT

London

Sunday

08 September 2013

By © Muhammad Haque

The BBC has now “discovered” "their" [meaning their recognition of the facts, of the objective truth of the real campaign against racism and the implications of the BBC's callous indifference to those...] name of ALTAB ALI and has put in the three words “Altab Ali park”,  ONLY hours after we had pointed out the BBC’s omission of the name Altab Ali from their previous piece/s online!

 

[To be continued]

 Image

 EVIDENTIALLY citing the BBC online report texts:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24002252

 

EDL leader Tommy Robinson held on east London march

 

A tweet on the EDL website stated: "Tommy's been arrested for incitement"

Continue reading the main story

Related Stories

EDL loses march route court case

English Defence League (EDL) leader Tommy Robinson has been arrested as about 500 supporters of the far-right group held a march in east London.

About 3,000 officers were deployed as the group walked from Queen Elizabeth Street, over Tower Bridge, to Aldgate.

Police said 14 people, mainly from the EDL, were arrested for public order offences during the march.

By 19:40 BST, police said about 150 counter-protesters had been arrested for diverting from their agreed route.

On Friday, the EDL lost a court battle after police cut short the route of its planned march through the Tower Hamlets area, which has one of the biggest Muslim populations in the country.

Hundreds of anti-fascist demonstrators gathered at a park in Aldgate East to protest against the shortened EDL march.

"There have been 14 arrests as part of the policing operation for the demonstrations," a police statement said.

It added: "In addition we have made approximately 150 arrests for breaching section 12 and section 14 of the Public Order Act 1986. All these approximately 150 people were protesting against the EDL presence."

'United community'

A tweet on the EDL website stated: "Tommy's been arrested for incitement."

 

About 3,000 police officers were deployed

The anti-EDL gathering took place at the Altab Ali Park in Aldgate East, and was also attended by the mayor of Tower Hamlets, Lutfur Rahman, and John Biggs, a Labour London Assembly member.

Mr Rahman said he was "very fed up" with the EDL's demonstrations in the area, adding: "We are a united community and we are a diverse community. Young people are not coming out today because they are frightened."

BBC London home affairs correspondent Guy Smith said Met officers formed a "security envelope" around the EDL with a strategy to "keep both sides apart".

It took the police to the High Court after the Met shortened the route of Saturday's march over concerns of "serious public disorder".

Mr Robinson said he would hold sponsored walks in east London to raise money to pay for the court costs.

Is the Unite trade union consistent against abuse by secret decision-making? Say in Tower Hamlets?

Is the Unite trade union consistent against abuse by secret decision-making? Say in Tower Hamlets?
UNITE the British trade union is keeping up the pressure against “blacklisting” [that has dogged the “news” about London’s Crossrail “railway” project for over as year now] as this image from the Edinburgh Reporter shows.



Is Unite, the British trade union reportedly the donor of the highest sum of trade union contribution to the UK labour Party, consistent against abuse by secret decision-making? Say in Tower Hamlets?
This question arises in the context of some reports that Frank Morris, one of the more widely known targets of Crossrail contractors blacklisting, has “won” his case against the victimisers.
As I have written extensively about the Unite General secretary Len McCluskey since “discovering” him in january 2013, it is beginning to be the case that some “Fleet Street”-linked ”"professional journalists" [!!!!!!!!!!!!] and over-hyped self-servers in the vicinity of journalism” are waking up to the fact that Mr McCluskey has been on a mission in Tower Hamlets.
My exclusively take is that he is now playing an INFLUENTIAL role [note my word, INFLUENTIAL] in “helping” to shape the voting behaviour in this Borough in the next year or two.

For this reason, Mr McCluskey is correctly going to feature in a lot of reports about Tower Hamlets in the coming months and more. UNLESS something truly shocking or unusual happens to later all of that.





0530 GMT London Saturday 31 August 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Crossrail “concedes” the demand against blacklisting. A contextual UPDATER on the demand for Crossrail to make all their stations step-free accessible for people with disabilities and other physical needs

[4]

 

0510 [0440] Hrs GMT

London

Saturday

31 August 2013

 Image

I reported on Thursday on Crossrail’s Programme Director Andy Mitchell giving an undertaking to address the demand for step-free access at all Crossrail stations. Mitchell was speaking at Canary Wharf as he received the signed demand for the step free access at stations. KHOODEELAAR! signed the demands in Bangladeshi and in English.

 

As I filmed Mitchell speak, I noticed that he was coming across as causal, down to earth, not at all showing off, if I read his physical gestures and body language right.

 

Now why am I saying this?

 

Because Crossrail company has been, in its heavy duty, power-photo opportunities, as shown with Tony Bliar, Ken Livingstone and Gordon Brown and Ruth Kelly, very physically oppressive-looking.

 

And in the years since the trade unionists began to demand an and to blacklisting by Crossrail contractors, the Crossrail company has been reluctant to show humility.

 

So I noticed a contrast in the way that Andy Mitchell cam,e across at the end of our rally on Thursday. And I sincerely hope that he keeps that outlook up and does not relapse into the offensive Crossrail posture. Physically and in policy terms.

 

 

UPDATER Contextual  on Crossrail blacklisting of workers:

Frank Morris has been reinstated, according to reports.

 

To understand the degenerating impact of the corrupting practice of "blacklisting", here is a link to the PANORAMA report on the BBC about some key cases, shown earlier this year

UPDATER Contextual  on Crossrail blacklisting of workers:

Frank Morris has been reinstated, according to reports.

 

To understand the degenerating impact of the corrupting practice of "blacklisting", here is a link to the PANORAMA report on the BBC about some key cases, shown earlier this year

 

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22817084

 

Brick Lane: Tower Hamlets Council must stop causing rifts, ugly rivalries in community, traders

Brick Lane: Tower Hamlets Council must stop causing rifts, ugly rivalries in community, traders

1205 [1142] [1132] Hrs GMT

London

Sunday

18 August 2013

 

By © Muhammad Haque

The Organiser

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community in the East End of London.

 

Unite the Community for a positive future!

 

This is the call that the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign is giving out this weekend.

The call is being reiterated in the light of the mess that Tower Hamlets Council has created by closing Brick Lane to traffic. 

 

The ‘local Tower Hamlets’ Council says that the closure is experimental. But one of the immediate consequences has been ugly exchanges of abuse between supporters of the closure and those who argue against it. 

 

This ugly situation has been created by Tower Hamlets Council’s failure to follow rational, logical and responsible course of action: 

 

                             Consult the Community first and fully!

 

If the Council now does listen to the reasonable view that it should conduct full and thorough consultations with all the people that constitute the Brick Lane London E1 area then a better programme of action can begin to be taken to safeguard the businesses and to make things hopefully better for all concerned.

 

1. Those who live in the area.

 

2.  Those who have businesses, including curry restaurants, in Brick Lane and in nearby streets that depend on moving traffic for the important customer and trade access.

 

3. And those who visit Brick Lane for a variety of reasons,

Including the people who need free and unobstructed access to the places of faith and worship, as represented by the Brick Lane Jamme’ Mosque

 

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! continuing the Action for the Future of the Community in Brick Lane London E1 Area

KHOODEELAAR! continuing the Action for the Future of the Community in Brick Lane London E1 Area
AADHIKAROnline:

Fact checker on this item [see the captioned image] featuring Muquim Ahmed [Cafe Naz] accusing Azmal Mert Hussain [Preem and Prithi] of starting touting in Brick Lane.

0855 [0840] Hrs GMT London Saturday 17 August 2013

Editor © Muhammad Haque

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in association with the Brick Lane Community Business Forum

Azmal Mert Hussain [left] is the owner of the “Preem” and “Prithi” restaurants in Brick Lane.

Muquim Ahmed [right] is the owner of Cafe Naz in Brick Lane. These two are known as “millionaire businessmen”.

Azmal Mert Hussain appeared on BSKYB Channel 844 last week in an edition of the programme “Straight Dialogue” and admitted that the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser Muhammad Haque had been trying for years to get the curry restaurant owners and other traders in Brick Lane to work with the local residents community to create a dignified environment for trading without giving rise to accusations of anti-social behaviour.

This accusation has been one of the strongest features of the negative image that the Brick Lane curry restaurant has acquired in the past decade and is damaging the future of the street.

[To be continued]



Qs after Ajmol Alom: What are elected post-holders doing to stop this again?

Qs after Ajmol Alom: What are elected post-holders doing to stop this again?

Image

 

Image

1625 [1555]  Hrs GMT

London

Friday 

16 August 2013

 

AADHIKAROnline, CBRUK, KHOODEELAAR! and associated Initiatives constituting the Movement for the Defence of the Community in the East End of London posting a consolidated ACTION UPDATE and Commentary on the Internet.

 

This youtube post [accessible via the webpage link cited below]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7nLhExk-x0&feature=youtu.be

is dated today Friday 16 August 2013 and it contains the Question as to what role the elected post-holders are playing to address and comprehensively tackle the 'Bangladeshi-on-Bangladeshi'violence that has just been witnessed in the tragic loss of the school boy Ajmol Alom's life in Poplar in the inner city, 'one of the most deprived' boroughs, Tower Hamlets.

 

Also featured is a short plea, from a young  member of the community who grew up in Whitechapel about the purity of the Legacy of the struggle for universal dignity and human tolerance and against racism. The key point of concern to Sufi Miah, is linked to the appearance of a canine statue in the Altab Ali Park.

 

The final piece in  this AADHIKAROnline report by © Muhammad Haque is about the latest set of views from local residents and businesses worried and concerned  at the lack of consultation by Tower Hamlets Council with the affected community over the Council's plan to shut traffic through Brick Lane [albeit on an allegedly experimental basis].

 

These KHOODEELAAR! Campaign action reports continue to be updated online on twitter.com/khoodeelaar   and on associated AADHIKAR, KHOODEELAAR!, CBRUK and allied action, campaign and social justice, rights and advocacy sites and blogs

 

[To be continued]

 

Bangladeshi young male charged in court with murdering Bangladeshi young man in Tower Hamlets!

Bangladeshi young male charged in court with murdering Bangladeshi young man in Tower Hamlets!
Bangladeshi young male charged in court with murdering Bangladeshi young man in Tower Hamlets!


Picture shown here of Ajmol Alom, the the Langdon Park secondary [Poplar] school boy murdered on Monday in Poplar!

The news report below was retrieved by AADHIKARonline at 1340 Hrs GMT London on Thursday 15 August 2013 from the web site of the East London Advertiser

Robin de Peyer

Thursday, August 15, 2013


1:55 PM

A 19-year-old man appeared in court today charged with murdering star pupil Ajmol Alom after police arrested a third suspect.

Aminur Khan, of Robin Hood Gardens in Poplar is accused of stabbing 16-year-old Langdon Park School pupil Ajmol to death on Monday night.

Ajmol, who was described by his headteacher Chris Dunne as “a delightful young man”, suffered a fatal wound to the thigh during the incident in Spey Street, Poplar. Khan is also charged with the attempted murder of Ajmol’s friend Azime Rob, also 16, who was stabbed through the cheek.

Both were taken to hospital, where Ajmol died. A post-mortem examination showed the stab wound to Ajmol’s leg had been fatal.

Khan, who wore a grey T-shirt in the dock at Thames Magistrates’ Court in Bow, spoke only to confirm his name, age and address during the two-minute hearing. District Judge Gareth Branston remanded Khan in custody and told him he will next appear at the Old Bailey on Monday.

A 21-year-old man from the Poplar area was arrested this morning and is being held at an east London police station.

A further 19-year-old was arrested on Tuesday on suspicion of murder and remains in custody at an east London police station.

Another KHOODEELAAR! Action Report, an AADHIKAR world

Another KHOODEELAAR! Action Report, an AADHIKAR world
Muhammad Haque, in this AADHIKAR Media Picture during the KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN HOUR, talking about the SUNDAY TIMES COLOUR MAGAZINE attack on the Sylhetti speaking UK Bangladeshis in December 1973 [To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! Defending the Community the 10th Action Year

KHOODEELAAR! Defending the Community the 10th Action Year

The © Muhammad Haque Daily KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Report Defending the Community in the East End of London.

0905 [0825] Hrs GMT

London Sunday 11 August 2013.

Kay Jordan, seen above made the inaugural speech on Friday 22 October 2004  as the first KHOODEELAAR! street action got underway in the Campaign to defend the Community against Big Biz Agenda plot Crossrail hole. To the right of Kay Jordan is Turon Miah, a KHOODEELAAR! Campaign supporter, who ran a co-operative music and accessory shop in the Hanbury Street. His shop served as a de facto Campaign Contact address for most KHOODEELAAR! Supporters between the start of the particular action and until he closed the business in 2010. The KHOODEELAAR! demonstration was held in the Greatorex Street opposite the ‘address’ where two ‘local Councillors’ for the Ward covering the Brick Lane London E1 Area, had their ‘surgery’ at the time.  The two councillors, still ‘Labour’ on 22 October 2004, were Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ [whose name was still Abbas Uddin then] and Lutfur Rahman. Both were perceived by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign to be backing the Crossrail hole Big Biz Agenda. That is why the demonstration was held there. As Abbas Uddin was the leader of the controlling Labour Group of Councillors, the address in Greatorex Street as strategically selected to focus attention on his role on the Council vis a vis the long term future of the Community in the Brick lane London E1 Area.  We have, just had, last week, the end of the Ramadan Month of 2013. Friday 22 October 2004 was also in the month of Ramadaan. And the KHOODEELAAR! Action demonstration was marked on that day with the marking of the day's fasting by the observing participant. It was decided to hold another action in the street, the next week. Which took place outside the Truman Brewery Complex in Brick lane itself. Kay Jordan and Muhammad Haque spoke for the longest time. And it was also the occasion when Kay actually encountered a little ethnic specimens of the Metropolitan Police! The specimen was so remarkable that Kay Jordan would burst out into uncontrollable laugher because she thought it so hilarious that the Metropolitan Police had decided to send one of their [what then must have been freshly recruited] 'ethnicity-linked' [Community Support] 'officers'! That was not the only 'ethnicity-linked' attempt by the forces guarding the interests of Big Business operating in the Area which was, and is, a key target for the takeover by the City of London interests. A crazed member of the 'ethnicity-linked' gang serving the Agenda via the Truman Brewery Complex made repeated attempts at provoking the demonstrators into an altercation beyond the bounds of reasonability.
As has been the case throughout, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has remained ethical, Constitutional, ration al and dignified. So it did on 27 October 2004 during the Action Demonstration held outside the Truman Brewery Complex in Brick Lane against the then latest sham “consultation” being ‘completed’ by “Crossrail-flaunting” Big Biz operatives in one of the spaces in the Truman Brewery Complex!

[To be continued]

Defending the Community in the context of the universal duty t defend the whole of humanity - 1

Defending the Community in the context of the universal duty t defend the whole of humanity - 1
On this day, Eid al Fitr, in London on Thursday 08 August 2013, a most emphatic statement about the Muslim's duty to the rest of humanity, as spoken by Qazi Nazrul Islam in his "Eid Mubarak" in this interpretation by Muhammad Haque, done today

Islam in the context of the duty Muslims owe to all of humanity:  To uphold the rights of all humanity is one of a true Muslim’s foremost duties:

The © Muhammad Haque Translation of Qazi Nazrul Islam:

Eid Mubarak 

London

Thursday

08 August 2013

Image

 

The © Muhammad Haque Eid al Fitr Day

Rebel Poetry:

Translating parts of  Eid Mubarak by the 

Rebel Poet

Qazi Nazrul Islam

 

1130 Hrs GMT 

London

Thursday

08 August 2013

 

Today Islam’s shout across the world

No one is higher to anyone else

All humanity are equal

No one is a king 

No one a subject 

to anyone

 

What Ameer, 

Nawab, 

Monarch 

are you in Brothel?

You are a disgrace of all time!

You cause doubt in Islam!

 

Islam says:

we are all for everyone

we shall share the gains

the sorrows in equal 

measure

No right 

to horde

[what we have]

 

[To be continued]

 

Future of the Community NEEDS elected Councillors to act in solidarity with Community Campaigns -1a

Future of the Community NEEDS elected Councillors to act in solidarity with Community Campaigns -1a
UPDATER NOTE about the overdue democratic and accountability service that is owed to the local Community by the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, ‘the local, East End of London’ and “one of the Country's most deprived Boroughs” Council

1328 [1310] Hrs GMT London Thursday 08 August 2013

THIS image [the first one on this page] of Len McCluskey is from a SKYNEWS interview as broadcast in January 2013 which had been the referential base for Muhammad Haque’s analytically introducing McCluskey to visitors of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign sites and blogs. The context was McCluskey’s then stated condemnation of the Ed Minibrand-ed tendencies in the UK Labour Party’s controlling bureaucracy
Since then, the Unite Trade Union leader has become a fixture on some other 'blogs' and PR operations, that had NOT been anticipated in the original Muhammad Haque diagnostics as published.
Because of this preponderance of images of Len McCluskey in the latter way in and around “Tower Hamlets”, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community in the East End of London is now planning to make a determined effort to ascertain what Mr McCluskey actually stands for in the context of the promotional role that “he” has been - on the face of it as depicted in his publicised images - recruited to play for the "benefit" of Tower Hamlets Council

Does Mr McCluskey appreciate the fact that local people are entitled to ask him what on earth made him launch himself in the way that he has done?

Especially by “receiving” for his Union a financial grant from the most deprived Borough’s Council and also getting into a PR bed with one of the Big Bad Banks!?

[To be continued]

Image

Former Tower Hamlets Councillor Louise Alexander [picture retrieved from the BBC web site at 0215 Hrs GMT London Sunday 04 August 2013.]

The then Councillor Alexander [Weavers Ward, Tower Hamlets] was the only sitting Councillor at the time, who actually put a fully detailed Motion on the table in the Council against the Crossrail hole.

WE SHALL comment further on that move and its democratic implications for the community.

 

Motion from Councillor Louise Alexander regarding Crossrail

  • Meeting of Council, Wednesday, 1st March, 2006 7.30 p.m. (Item 10.2)

     

    Councillor Alexander left the Council within the year following that Motion.

     

    [To be continued]

     

    The Council's web site contains the following record:

    This Council categorically rejects:

     

    ·       Any Crossrail intervention shaft in the Brick Lane London E1 area, as contained in the present Crossrail Bill in the House of Commons;

     

    ·       Crossrail plans for an additional tunnel surfacing in Allen Gardens;

     

    ·       The use of a conveyor belt to take spoil to dump in Mile EndPark; and

     

    ·       The unsubstantiated, uneconomic and wasteful provision of a Crossrail station at Whitechapel which will necessitate digging an evacuation shaft in the Brick Lane London E1 area

    This Council resolves to:

    ·       Use the strongest possible terms when this Council presents the arguments and the evidence in support of any previously-submitted formally-timed petition to the Crossrail Select Committee in the House of Commons.

    ·       Lobby within political parties and for the active attention of the Government to represent the interests of the residents of this Borough.  This Council undertakes to take action in court and constitutionally to maintain, establish, reinstate and protect the community's right not to suffer the damage to environment, health and business which will be brought about by having an intervention shaft in this area”.

    Decision:

    Councillor Alexander’s motion following debate was subject to an amendment from Councillor Keith

     

    DECISION

     

     The Council confirms

     

    The Council will exercise it powers of general wellbeing to the benefit of all communities in the borough.

     

    The Council categorically rejects

     

    The tunnelling strategy proposed by Crossrail that produces the need for the major intervention in Hanbury Street area, a conveyor belt to take spoil to Mile End Park and the use of Mile End Park for spoil handling.

     

    The Council notes:

     

    The work that the Labour run Council has commissioned on tunnelling strategy , safety, construction practice, and railway engineering to protect the interests of the people of the borough.

     

    The work the Labour run Council has done to lobby Ministers , petition the House of Commons and campaign to protect the interests  of the people of the borough.

     

    The meetings that have been held with local community groups to work together on petitioning against Crossrail’s proposals.

     

     

    The Council resolves to

     

    1-  Use the strongest possible terms when this Council presents the arguments and the evidence in support of any previously-submitted formally-time petition to the Crossrail Select Committee in the House of Commons; and

     

    2 – Work in partnership with local community groups to maximise the impact of our petitioning strategy by combing where possible – the position of the Council with the work done by local campaigning community organisations.

     

    (Action by Emma Peters- Corporate Director of Development & Renewal)

    Minutes:

    Moved by Councillor Louise Alexander and Seconded by Councillor Akikur Rahman.

     

    “This Council confirms that:

     

    It is this Council’s duty to protect the community’s rights not to suffer damage to the environment, health and business.

     

    This Council categorically rejects:

     

    ·       Any Crossrail intervention shaft in the Brick Lane London E1 area, as contained in the present Crossrail Bill in the House of Commons;

     

    ·       Crossrail plans for an additional tunnel surfacing in Allen Gardens;

     

    ·       The use of a conveyor belt to take spoil to dump in Mile EndPark; and

     

    ·       The unsubstantiated, uneconomic and wasteful provision of a Crossrail station at Whitechapel which will necessitate digging an evacuation shaft in the Brick Lane London E1 area

    This Council resolves to:

    ·       Use the strongest possible terms when this Council presents the arguments and the evidence in support of any previously-submitted formally-timed petition to the Crossrail Select Committee in the House of Commons.

     

    Lobby within political parties and for the active attention of the Government to represent the interests of the residents of this Borough.  This Council undertakes to take action in court and constitutionally to maintain, establish, reinstate and protect the community's right not to suffer the damage to environment, health and business which will be brought about by having an intervention shaft in this area”.

     

    Moved by Councillor Michael Keith and Seconded by Councillor Abdus Shukur that the motion be amended as follows

     

    “The Council confirms

     

    The Council will exercise its powers of general wellbeing to the benefit of all communities in the borough.

     

    The Council categorically rejects

    • (delete the four paragraphs that follow and insert)

     

    • The tunneling strategy proposed by Crossrail that produces the need for the major intervention in the Hanbury Street area, a conveyor belt to take spoil to Mile EndPark and the use of MileEnd Park for spoil handling.

     

    Add

    The Council notes:

    • The work that the Labour run Council has commissioned on tunneling strategy, safety, construction practice, and railway engineering to protect the interests of the people of the borough.

     

    • The work the Labour run Council has done to lobby ministers, petition the House of Commons and campaign to protect the interests of the people of the borough.

     

    • The meetings that have been held with local community groups to work together on petitioning against Crossrail’s current proposals.

     

    The Council resolves to:

    • Use the strongest possible terms: STET this paragraph

     

    • Delete second paragraph

     

    • Work in partnership with local community groups to maximize the impact of our petitioning strategy by combining – where possible – the position of the Council with the work done by local campaigning community organisations”.

     

    After discussion Moved by Councillor Michael Keith, Seconded by Councillor Abdus Shukur and

     

    RESOLVED:

     

    That in accordance with Rule 14.1. 10 the question be now put.

     

    The amendment was then put to the meeting and AGREED.

     

    The amended motion was then put to the meeting and it was:

     

    RESOLVED:

     

    That this Council confirms that the Council will exercise it powers of general wellbeing to the benefit of all communities in the borough.

     

    The Council categorically rejects the tunnelling strategy proposed by Crossrail that produces the need for the major intervention in the Hanbury Street area, a conveyor belt to take spoil to Mile End Park and the use of Mile End Park for spoil handling.

     

    The Council notes:

    ·       the work that the Labour run Council has commissioned on tunnelling strategy, safety, construction practice, and railway engineering to protect the interests of the people of the borough;

     

    ·       the work the Labour run Council has done to lobby ministers, petition the House of Commons and campaign to protect the interests  of the people of the borough; and

     

    ·       the meetings that have been held with local community groups to work together on petitioning against Crossrail’s proposals.

     

     

    The Council resolves to

     

    1.       Use the strongest possible terms when this Council presents the arguments and the evidence in support of any previously-submitted formally-timed petition to the Crossrail Select Committee in the House of Commons; and

     

    2.               Work in partnership with local community groups to maximise the impact of our petitioning strategy by combining where possible the position of the Council with the work done by local campaigning community organisations.

     

     

    Motion to Extend the Meeting

     

    During the debate on the Crossrail motion, at 10.26pm, Moved by Councillor Michael Keith, Seconded by Councillor Abdus Shukur and

     

    RESOLVED That in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 14.1.13 (motion to extend the meeting under Rule 9) the meeting be extended by 30 minutes.

Callous Council employees add to disabled pensioner's distress!

Callous Council employees add to disabled pensioner's distress!
Editor © Muhammad Haque

2358 [2345] Hrs GMT London Saturday 03 August 2013.

The running joke in Society today is that all the violations of civil and civic rights that occur against the poor, the disabled, the vulnerable are to be blamed on the Neo Cons Collusion in the UK.

It is a joke.
Why?
Because the huge portion of the blame for the violations lie with local Councils across London who are stuffed full of too many lying, dishonest, callous and uncaring employees.

In key posts and positions.
There is no visible accountability process to which these violators, these law-breakers, these attackers are subjected by the so-called democratically elected Councils in the Boroughs concerned

From time to time, cases do come to light mainly via what remains of a “local Press” in the Borough concerned but in the main as a result of action by the residual campaigners in the areas concerned, that show just how impunity from audit and accountability is allowing these post-holding perpetrators to threaten peoples’ rights and sometimes withhold services that put peoples’ safety at risk

Here is a Commentary about what lambeth Council has done against the 65 old woman who is disabled and is not an offender. yet she has been treated worse than an offender by Lambeth Council.


IMAGE here is of Brenda-Dawn Linney, the 65 year old disabled woman who has been put through an additional nightmare by the morons “deciding her rights” at Lambeth Borough Council in South London.

Corruption at its most hurtful!
That is what dominates the Council tax section and its decision-making callous individuals paid in the name of the people of Lambeth, in the what counts for the “minds” of the south London borough Council’s relevant financial decision-making employees.

Lambeth, however is not alone in this:
callous, negligent, uncaring individuals are employed by other councils too.


CONTEXTUALLY: The London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council has far too many like those in Lambeth who put the 65 year old disabled pensioner Brenda-Dawn Linney through an extra nightmare of two weeks following a completely minor and an innocent error she had ,made in paying too much money for her Council tax.
The Council employees then came down very heavily on her depriving her of food or sustenance for two endless, nightmare, traumatic weeks!

UPDATES on the outrageous impunity allowed by Tower Hamlets Council’s “elected” duty-holders to the corrupt and the ill-educated, prejudiced, ignorant, uncaring employees will be posted here in due course.

Here, first, a piece from the web site of the London weekly the SOUTH LONDON PRESS, detailing some of the experiences of Ms Linney at the bands of the callous decision-makers in the Lambeth Council.

Council tax error left me penniless

Tuesday, 30 July 2013

 

By Ben Morgan

A DISABLED woman was left “destitute for a fortnight” after making a mistake paying her council tax bill online.

Brenda-Dawn Linney, 65, was left penniless for more than two weeks after erroneously overpaying and says council call centre staff “fobbed her off”.

Ms Linney, from Brixton, suffers from a series of medical conditions, including Parkinson’s disease – which causes her left arm to tremble – making it difficult to write or use a keyboard.

On July 10, she logged on to her online bank account to transfer a nominal charge of £8.25 to cover her council tax for the year.

However, due to the effects of her illness, she accidentally entered a sum of £800.25.

Despite immediately trying to stop the payment, the money left her account and she has not had enough money to buy food for the last two weeks.

Ms Linney, of Loughborough Road, said: “The receipt came out and it said £800.25. I rang my bank immediately and they were helpful but there was nothing they could do.

“Then I rang Lambeth council and was told I had to come down on the following Monday with paperwork, which I did.”

However, despite numerous phone calls and visits to Olive Morris House in Brixton Hill, she says she kept getting nowhere.

“What was scaring me was that I had to pay other bills by direct debit but I couldn’t pay them. I was worried about slipping deeper into debt and getting bank charges.

“Fortunately, I had dried pasta in the cupboard and some other supplies, which I had to ration.”

As time went on, she claims her situation became more desperate and on Wednesday her main meal consisted of dried mashed potato, powdered egg and fried onions.

“I covered it in tomato sauce to make it nicer to eat,” Ms Linney said.

“I was made destitute for the last fortnight. It’s given me a lot of stress and worry. I juggle things to live within my means. I’m very frugal.”

Yesterday, Lambeth council confirmed that Mrs Linney would be fully reimbursed and apologised for the error.

It said it was “looking into” the causes of the delay.

Cllr Paul McGlone, cabinet member for finance, said: “We contacted Ms Linney yesterday to personally apologise for the distress caused by our delays in refunding her overpayment.

“A full repayment has been made to Ms Linney.”

 

Email: ben.morgan@slp.co.uk

 



[The AADHIKAROnline will continue to publish these evidential commentaries: NEXT on the Heygate Estate scandal in nearby Southwark Council]

KHOODEELAAR! defending Brick Lane Area Community to local Tower Hamlets Council -

KHOODEELAAR! defending Brick Lane Area Community to local Tower Hamlets Council -
This © Muhammad Haque Picture is of Tarik Ahmad, a local resident in the Brick Lane London E1 Area for many years. This picture is part of the KHOODEELAAR! Action programme in defending the Action History of the Community in this area. Tarik Ahmad has stated his own views about the needs to recognise the correct history of the struggle for the community in the Brick lane Area. He spoke shortly after KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser Muhammad haque spoke on BSKYB 844 on Wednesday 05 September 2012 about the latest concentrated racially and strategically motivated attack on the resources of the Community's struggle and history.
The Brick Lane Blitzkrieg was briefly discussed with programme presenter SHOAIB Choudhury hosting the STRAIGHT DIALOGUE edition on Wednesday 05 September 2012.
The contextual further reports on that attack and the due updates on the remainder of the references and factors as published on that BSKYB Channel 844 programme will be updated in due course here and on related AADHIKARonline and KHOODEELAAR! Campaign web sites, blogs and social media platforms.

 

Being published by AADHIKAROnline in association with the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign at 1205 Hrs GMT London Saturday 03 August 2013.

Tower Hamlets Council’s Cabinet Meeting Wednesday 31 July 2013

“Public Question at Cabinet
Question from Mr Haque

There are concerns from residents and businesses at the Council’s proposals to close Brick Lane to traffic. Can the Council confirm what is planned and why?
Answer to the question from Stephen Halsey (Head of Paid Service and Corporate Director, Communities, Localities and Culture)
The only plans for traffic in Brick Lane are some sort short experimental road closures involving the part-time creation of a traffic-free environment in the street on 4 saturday afternoons/evenings in August. These are being discussed with the Police in the light of responses received to preliminary consultation.
Various suggestions have been put forward over many years for a variety of pedestrianisation proposals and we are acutely aware of the sensitivity of this issue.
The impact of these tests will allow us to assess the benefit and disadvantages of developing the concept as part of future plans for the improvement of the area which would need to involve extensive public consultation.”

 

HERE, below, is the exact quotation of the document that Mr Stephen Halsey, Tower Hamlets Council’s “chief executive”, also known as the “Head of Paid Service” held up as he spoke at some length in answer to the Question put to the Cabinet of the LBTH Council by Mr Muhammad Haque, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser at the Meeting of the Cabinet on Wednesday 31 July 2013.

That Meeting of the Cabinet was Chaired by the Council’s Executive Mayor Lutfur Rahman.

Although the Council had known that Mr Muhammad Haque had been in extensive communications over the previous 24 hours on the matter and they [“the Council”] accordingly prepared the document and arranged for Mr Halsey’s to state the Council’s “answer”, they had not made the document available ahead of Mr Muhammad haque’s actual presentation of the Question to the Cabinet.

Mr Haque made the presentation without notes and he only saw a copy of Mr Halsey’s answer as he [Mr Hasley] was already speaking.

The text of “the Question” as shown in the document below, was a version as edited from Mr Muhammad Haque’s several communications by email.

The details of Mr Muhammad Haque’s actual Question as he put it to the Tower Hamlets Council’s Cabinet Meeting on 31 July 213, has already been published in a numbered summary in the previous youtube post by AADHIKAROnline publishing with the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign defending the Community in the East End of London.

“Public Question at Cabinet
Question from Mr Haque
There are concerns from residents and businesses at the Council’s proposals to close Brick Lane to traffic. Can the Council confirm what is planned and why?

Answer to the question from Stephen Halsey (Head of Paid Service and Corporate Director, Communities, Localities and Culture)

The only plans for traffic in Brick Lane are some sort short experimental road closures involving the part-time creation of a traffic-free environment in the street on 4 saturday afternoons/evenings in August. These are being discussed with the Police in the light of responses received to preliminary consultation.

Various suggestions have been put forward over many years for a variety of pedestrianisation proposals and we are acutely aware of the sensitivity of this issue.

The impact of these tests will allow us to assess the benefit and disadvantages of developing the concept as part of future plans for the improvement of the area which would need to involve extensive public consultation.”

Tower Hamlets Council goes OTT to give 3rd highest building in the country planning permission!

Tower Hamlets Council goes OTT to give 3rd highest building in the country planning permission!
টাওয়ার হ্যামলেটস কাউন্সিল

এবলা

ই এলাকার সমাজর উপরে

খোলা হামলা চালার

This image [above, left] which has the Gherkin at the centre, has been used in another misleading piece by the "East London Advertiser". The figures seen on the foreground in the picture are supposed to be in Devonshire Square, which is closer to Bishopsgate, Bevis Marks and Liverpool Street than it is to "Aldgate". But the use of the word "Aldgate" by the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER web site is a part of the calculation to falsely show that the East End is already a part of the "City of London" culture and its "celebrations".




Tower Hamlets Council is openly attacking the local community's very physical existence now. Thus also exposing as a wanton lie the line which had been contrived and uttered by the strategic planners [25-30 years or so ago] behind the recruitment of “ethnicity-linked” ‘candidates as councillors” that having "councillors from your own community" [whatever is THAT now?] would help the community's future! the entire batch of Tower Hamlets Councillors that has got in there by claiming "community commitment" has become recruited to the project for the destruction if the community, making way for Big Business, big buildings and big takeover of the East End....
[To be continued]



The following item has been retrieved by AADHIKARonline from the website www.wharf.co.uk at 0415 GMT Sunday 2013

Solely for use by AADHIKAROnline visitors as a reference item
We have included the comments as well, which are displayed by the www.wharf.co.uk editors i n a way that shows open brazen attack on the ordinary East End people and their rights
AADHIKAR Media and KHOODEELAAR! are publishing these here as parts of the evidence of just how Tower Hamlets “ our local Council” is now part of the war on the community on behalf of Big building developers and big business and the City of London Agenda-pushers as against the local people in the East End [To be continued]

Fears for community cohesion as City Pride scheme approved

citypride4802.jpg

A controversial application to build a 75-storey skyscraper on the site of the former City Pride pub has been given the green light - despite being rejected by Tower Hamlets councillors last month.

The scheme, by developers Chalegrove Properties Limited, will see private housing focussed on the north of the island, with the social housing shunted to a separate scheme.

This notion of separating out social housing directly contradicts the council's own policies.

At the City Pride site, 752 homes will be private while just 70 will be allocated for shared ownership.

Councillors turned down the plans in June voicing citing a failure to represent "a mixed and balanced community".

The developer's separate affordable housing development, Island Point, will offer 173 homes in a six-storey tower on the south of the Isle of Dogs.

At Thursday's strategic development committee meeting, chairman Cllr Helal Abbas used his casting vote to push through the City Pride plans while Island Point was passed by four votes to two.

citypride1480.jpeg

The developer said it was "delighted" to be granted the opportunity to regenerate the sites and create an "iconic landmark" for the Isle of Dogs.

But concern about the separation of social housing remains, with Conservative councillor Peter Golds, representing Blackwall and Cubitt Town, branding the approval a "terrible decision".

He said: "It's sending out the wrong message. It does nothing for community cohesion. The [City Pride] site is going to be ghastly serviced apartments.

"It's not people who will live there, it's people who are passing through. It should be mixed. Every survey there is shows you build a stable community with a mixed development. Tower Hamlets has regressed 40 years."

A council spokesman said the approval of the application did not commit the body to give the nod to similar developments.

He said: "In relation to City Pride, it is not considered that the development would detrimentally affect the balance of the community in the locality as there are a number of mixed tenure schemes including the adjacent development at the Landmark.

"It was considered that the Island Point site afforded a better opportunity to provide good quality family housing with access to private gardens and better open space for children's play."

The plans will now be referred to the Mayor of London for approval.

To see The Wharf's view on the decision, click here

Share: Comments (5)

Permalink | 
  •  
  • facebook.gif

5 Comments

steve arnold said:

Excellent. Great decision. Why on earth does London have this nonsensical policy to dump people on benefits in the middle of affluent areas in the fantasy that the wealth will somehow rub off on the poor? It beggars belief.

The precise reason that canary wharf does not have a sense of community (as councillor Peter Golds alludes to) is because of the ridiculous idea to mix these residential developments. It is why middle class families do not see canary wharf as a realistic place to live. The simple fact is they do not want to be rubbing shoulders with unemployed people on benefits.

I live in the canary central development which in itself is full of pleasant hard working people. However, TH council forced the developers to build social housing right next door in a bizarre effort to mix the community. What we now have is some people working incredibly hard to buy a 2 bed flat for £400k, whilst next door someone on benefits gets it for free. We also have a terrible problem with dog mess from dog owners within the social housing site next door and rowdy anti-social teenagers.

The idea of social inclusion is bonkers!! The two parts of the development NEVER interact. Furthermore, any young middle class families are forced to leave the isle of dogs when their kids reach schooling age because the schools are full of children from parents on benefits.

It really is a tragic state of affairs and unless it is changed, CW will never become a stable, safe and pleasant residential area. Sticking the social housing developments right next to the private developments offers no benefit to either cohort.

Mike Anonymous said:

Completely agree with Steve Arnold. Why on Earth these people are able to be on benefits and given houses or flats to live in within exclusive areas is hard to fathom. People work all their lives to afford these properties and if people choose not to work then the choice should be made for them by making the houses available to them in areas outside of London.

Concerned Resident said:

Both of you appear to be of the misinformed opinion that everyone in Social Housing is on benefits. Little do you realise that any number of the future owners of these properties could let them out to private renters who... then claim Housing Benefit.

You appear to live in a black and white world where you can either afford a £400k flat, or alternatively, you are on benefits.

Where are young people supposed to live, the old, the hard working low paid?

Your arguments are ill thought through, terribly prejudiced and although I am not saying there is not some merit in the discussion, your base assumptions and ignorance is quite disgraceful.

Local Resident said:

Mike and Steve - your comments are hilariously outrageous and unbelievably ignorant. I would challenge you as to whether you genuinely believe what you're writing, but shamefully I've heard other similar narrow minded comments from others living in the so-called more "exclusive" areas of the Isle of Dogs. I also doubt you could qualify them with anything even remotely sound, besides annecdotes of yobs outside your house.

You do realise that the Isle of Dogs and the wider area surrounding it already had residents before all the glossy towers started popping up. Presumably you are suggesting those that have lived here all their lives are fair game when it comes to developers pricing them and their children out of the area - both in terms buying and rental.

Granted we live in a largely capitalist market, but we are also supposed to be a civilised and developed country where decisions on development need not solely be focused on money, greed and ignorance - which seems to be the principles you value your existence by, which is fine, because to be honest, you're probably in the minority.

christopher littley said:

i agree w the first comment, why do the councillors think that people on benifits and low incomes can afford to live in that area anyway? its crazy to think people will get their benifits on a monday morning and then stroll into cabot circus to buy their groceries?

KHOODEELAAR! continues to set high standard in the ethical defence of Society! Now can Clarence?

KHOODEELAAR! continues to set high standard in the ethical defence of  Society! Now can Clarence?
0702 Hrs GMT London Saturday 27 July 2013

Can a former BBC Journalist do what the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign does: defend the Community against Big Biz Agenda and its many outlets and agencies local, ‘National’ and international? Can Clarence Mitchell be a setter of the ethical standard which Martin Bell another former BBC journalist had a splendid go at while doing his stint at the Palace of Westminster? And many other questions of this order in context.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

On hearing the news that former BBC journalist Clarence Mitchell is a candidate for MP from Brighton Pavilion [1]

 

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: 

 

On hearing the news that former BBC journalist Clarence Mitchell is a candidate for MP from Brighton Pavilion [1]

 

This question added at 0652 Hrs GMT London Saturday 27 July 2013

 

Will this rare BBC journalist who has in his portfolio of ordinary reporting one very special moment which so resonated with a large number of peoples’ lives, prove to David Cameron that he, Clarence Mitchell, will not accept racist prejudice or allow racism to be any part of his political life?

 

 

 

0332 Hrs GMT

London

Saturday

27 July 2013

 

I have just posted this on the Evening Standard website.

 

There is a slight error in the version on the Standard have corrupted that in the version below

 

Another note as well: 

 

I think Clarence Mitchell was part of a small BBC News team that did care for some of the moral issues in the news. I know this for a fact. More on that in due course.

 

Here [below] is my first Comment on the STANDARD [which happened to also to be fist Comment on that story to appear on the web site of the London EVENING STANDARD] about Clarence Mitchell's having just been selected to stand as a candidate for Parliament from Brighton Pavilion. 

 

My Comment is NOT at all an endorsement of the Tories but in fact a warning to Clarence Mitchell against their agenda that they will push through his candidature and or [possible] election.....

 

 

 

Clarence Mitchell has been a good journalist. 

Can he reconcile the best instinct of a good journalist with the Neo Cons Agenda or the corruption that is the dominant culture at the Palace of Westminster?

I have had empirical evidence on another former BBC journalist, Martin Bell.

Unlike in relation to Mitchell, I have reported on some events along side Bell.

Both however belong in a rare group of British journalists, with propriety and decency being the stronger features of their work.

So while Martin Bell has proven his pledges, can Clarence Mitchell match Bell’s work as a leading exponent of ethical politics at Westminster?

 

0314 GMT Saturday 27 July 2013Image

Defence of the East End of London is done much better with the founding values of the Labour Party

Defence of the East End of London is done much better with the founding values of the Labour Party

 

AADHIKAROnline Action Montage with

the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending

the Community in the East End of London

0600 Hrs GMT London Thursday 25 July 2013

Editor © Muhammad Haque

UPDATES 24.7     twitter.com/khoodeelaar

 

We are denoting Len McCluskey as the relatively bigger sized figure to show proportion and we are thus showing Ed Minibrand [our word for him] as the relative miniature figure to keep the proportion as reported by pollsters yougov and by the associated PR outlets operating the Big Biz Agenda for the elimination of democracy and any remaining signs of ethics morality or FairPlay in Society in the UK.

 

We also tell the Minibrand to stop being so futile in his utterances and tell him to get going with some overdue conviction commitments that Society desperately needs and the still significantly wide base of Labour supporters are crying out for!

 

We warn the Minibrand against succumbing to any tendency, induced by the reactive Bliaring influence or otherwise, to minimise the values on which the Labour Party was founded and on which it must be again rebuilt and reconsolidated.

 

[To be continued]

 

Image

On the day that the
Evening Standard failed

On the day that the
Evening Standard failed
0435 [0325] [0308] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 23 July 2013 By © Muhammad Haque KHOODEELAAR! Campaign UPDATES twitter.com/khoodeelaar Image CONTEXTUAL KHOODEELAAR! Action report on the Future of the Community in the East End of London. On the day that the Evening Standard failed to keep up with the news of Kate Middleton's baby nor could The London EVENING Standard engage most Lon donors who passed through Bishopsgate in the City of London. Piles of the STANDARD were left uncollected. Just as piles of the Standard's PR pieces over the years for Big Business have turned out to have been lies. The STANDARD has let Londoners down. It has let the Community in the East End of London down too. By failing to tell the truth about the real motives of BiG Biz City of interest Agenda, the EveninG Standard has contributed to the lying 'news' that has caused serious misconceptions and have contributed to the decline and the weakness of economic, democratic and accountable defence of the community that should have been provided by the elected local Tower Hamlets Council. This void is being filled by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign calling for for urgent action. Social support structures are vital to protect the community in the East End of London, its shops, its businesses, its homes and its health. The City of London Big Business Takeover Agenda is invading the Area and the local Tower Hamlets Council is playing stooged part in the invasion. KHOODEELAAR! Action for the future of the Communities LATEST  KHOODEELAAR! Video Report UPDATING on the Future of the Community in the East End of London facing the Big Biz Agenda takeover of the East End by the City of London interests by using the stooged role being played by the three “planning” outlets of the “locally elected” Tower Hamlets Council. This KHOODEELAAR! Video Report focuses on the bankruptcy and the obsolescence and the irrelevance of the London EVENING STANDARD to the lives of ordinary people in and of London, as evident by the fact that the EVENING STANDARD got all key timings on its “coverage” of Kate’s baby yesterday wrong. How did it get all of that wrong? For a start, by still showing the PLACARD that KATE was IN LABOUR, two hours after the bay had already been born! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TL-J8cnrnKA&feature=youtu.be The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign reporting of the truth to be continued

HERON TOWER site was a major "City of London" site that Crossrail dishonestly aided...

HERON TOWER site was a major "City of London" site that Crossrail dishonestly  aided...
0252 [0230] Hrs GMT London Monday 22 July 2013. KHOODEELAAR! ACTION UPDATE: By © Muhammad Haque.
The Heron Tower, as Kay Jordan referred to it in one of her addresses to the MPs during 2006-2007 Session in the House of Commons.
These texts are being reproduced here to focus on the part played by the HERON TOWER in the Crossrail route alignment to ‘the north’ that affected Brick Lane and the northern side of the Whitechapel Road... [To be continued]


http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmcross/uc235-v/uc23502.htm


[Although the web page says “UNCORRECTED Evidence”, there is no need to worry about the accuracy of Kay Jordan’s evidence as contained in that page. What she says there is what also appears in the “finalised” version of the HANSARD report as published]
18697. MS JORDAN: I just want to take you through the fact that when Mott MacDonald in 2002 set the route alignment - which in fact it is quite true that there have been many different lookings at vent shaft positions, station positions and vertical and horizontal alignments - the route itself has remained route A, with the exception, which in fact Mr Elvin made reference to earlier on, that it slightly tweaked itself north and it moved going through Princelet Street, to going through Hanbury Street, so it slightly lifted itself. But that route alignment has been there since 2002 and no other southerly route has ever been considered at all by Crossrail. And the people who considered it were whoever the body was before Crossrail.
18698. In fact, in doing that the three route alignments they looked at were A, B and C. Can we go to drawing number four, please? The red one is the northerly one called A, which everything has been around since 2002 - all the assessments have been around A. Route B goes to Whitechapel and route C ignores Whitechapel and goes south. All three lines go up to Bow Common and, at this stage, three was no consideration of a leg down to Canary Wharf. I will not go down route C but I will just look at A and B.
18699. A and B were two valid route alignments that were looked at in that 2001 report, which was then passed on to MacDonald's and MacDonald's reviewed, and because of the results of the 2001 report they said: "B and C, we are not going down; we will stick with route A". In fact, route B was considered to be possible. It had the same speed as route A, it did not have this funny twist at the end at Liverpool Street Station, so there is no problem. One of its problems was the fact that there was a major development coming up called the Heron Tower.
18700. If you could go to plan 5. This shows alignment A and alignment B. Alignment A is the one that predates the one that Mr Elvin was talking about and it goes down Princelet Street, not Hanbury Street, but you can see the Hanbury Street shaft marked at the end. The southern route is route B, and you can see the box at the end which is the station box. It has been swung round.
18701. This is a composite drawing. We have transposed the line B on to the drawing of line A, which was the one which was the chosen route. Line B, which is shown there, was dismissed because it was concerned about the Heron Tower, which is the building on the lower left-hand side of the drawing, which you can maybe see just outside Liverpool Street, which was going to be a 50-storey development. The other reason that it was concerned about it and they dismissed it was because it did go under - this line is the one that does go under Cutlers Gardens, that they are all going on about - this one does go under Cutlers Gardens, but at that time they felt that the whole of Cutlers Gardens was, in fact, piled. Now they are admitting that the southern half of Cutlers Gardens is not piled because it is a listed building and it was before piles were invented.
18702. So you can see the southerly alignment is possible from Liverpool Street to Whitechapel almost going down Whitechapel Road, as the Committee said, and it does not have three swings and a roundabout on it; it is almost in a straight line. It is a viable route, but it has never, ever been considered because that development by Liverpool Street Station, which in fact did not have planning permission - that 50-storey tower block - until July 2002, whereas this report was February 2002. It was decided that it would avoid all this and we would take route A. We have taken route A ever since.
18703. What I am trying to say to the Committee - I know it is terrible - is that there is a perfectly viable southerly alignment, that in fact the people before Crossrail came up with. It is not severely obstructed with buildings. If you can get the Jubilee Line between Big Ben and Portcullis House, you can certainly get these lines through and along Whitechapel to a Whitechapel Station position that would be far better for everybody concerned, including the station.
18704. These lines have never been looked at. There has never been any analysis done by Crossrail at all of any southern alignment, and that is what we are saying to you; we agree with you, we were exceedingly pleased when you asked them to consider this. We think that what they have done in coming up with a diagram, with no report behind it whatsoever, is an absolute snub, not just to you but to us as well. We feel that this analysis should be done properly; it should be looked at because it could be a lot better for them, but they are not prepared to do it. The only way that we can get them to do it is to ask you to ask them to do it. I have drawn on here, you can see, halfway along the line, off Whitechapel Road, there is a building, which is called Black Lion House, I think. It is a government building - even better - you might pay them some money for it (?). There could be site access from it. I am sure there are lots of options along here, but what we are saying is the southerly alignments have never been looked at, ever, and we think that they should be looked at before you decide that what they are proposing is good for us. That is what we are really asking you to do. In fact, if I just show you my next drawings ----


[TO BE CONTINUED]

KHOODEELAAR! Defence of the Community continues with a timely action history lesson on Isle of Dogs

KHOODEELAAR! Defence of the Community continues with a timely action history lesson on Isle of Dogs
This "East London Advertiser" web site image [published online at 1100 GMT today Sunday 21 July 2013] is of Kenny Frederick, according to that web site. Ms Frederick is retiring as Head Teacher of the George Green's Secondary school on the Isle of Dogs, situated on the Manchester Road area in the far south east of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets
She became head teacher in 1996, says the web site. And she admits, on her retirement, that as she arrived at the school, she found the school atmosphere very racially segregated.
She does not say anything else about racism.
For instance, the near-death attack suffered by a Bangladeshi pupil in that school in 1994. Two years before Ms Frederick arrived to take up he post of Head Teacher, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser [that name, KHOODEELAAR! was a few years off from being devised then] as the CBRUK Organiser, had been contacted by people on the Isle of Digs with urgent pleas for help
Why?
Because a pupil at the George Green’s school had almost died after he was sat upon and attacked in an incident the like of which were common occurrences at the school at the time.
Almost within 24 hours of that information reaching Muhammad Haque, the first of a series of Community Action events began to take place on estates in the Manchester Road and at nearby locations across the Isle of Dogs. Those activities culminated in other, democratic and peace-creating steps including the matter being raised with the then Prime Minister John Major
Muhammad Haque led a delegation of Parents guardians and Community members from the Isle of Dogs to No. 10 Downing Street in 1994 demanding that urgent steps were taken to ensure that pupils and their parents and families felts safe about the School and about the environment nearby.
[These EXCLUSIVE UPDATER REPORTS on Defending the Community in the Isle of Digs are to be continued]

 

1705 [1644] Hrs GMT London Sunday 21 July 2013: DEFENDING the Community in the East End of London. By Creating a non-racist environment in the East End of London. Another crucial UPDATER Commentary by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser on the work that he had been involved in for mobilising the community, parents of pupils at the George Green’s secondary school on the Isle of Dogs in particular, to make the George Green's school a safe, non-racist school for all the pupils... that mobilisation had followed a near-fatal racist attack on a Bangladeshi pupil inside the George Green’s school boundaries in 1994 .

That mobilisation was sponsored by CBRUK, the Committee for Bangladeshis’ Rights in the UK. CBRUK itself had been founded in July 1989 to defend victims and targets of racist attacks following the fatal attacks on Esmoth/Ismoth Ali and Watir Ali on the Flower and Dean Walk off Brick Lane, in the London E1 Area at the beginning of July 1989.

THE FOLLOWING Comment by © Muhammad Haque is in response to the piece about the outgoing head teacher of the George Green's school, Kenny Frederick on the East London Advertiser web site 

[quoted below the Muhammad Haque Comment]

The Muhammad Haque Comment:

Two years before Ms Frederick took over as head teacher at George Green’s, I had to get involved with the community in the school’s immediate vicinity. 

I had heard that a Bangladeshi pupil nearly died following a physical attack on the school site. That was in 1994.

Parents I spoke to were very worried about the safety of their children. Many wound’t allow the children to go to school. 

To put it very mildly, the “school” at the time was in denial. 

As was a particular politician who was in place at the time. 

I found that the only thing to do was to mobilise the parents and others and we held a series of meetings, collected signatures and the first democratic community movement against racism on the Isle of Dogs began. We took the petition to No 10 Downing Street as we did to the relevant MPs and the campaign was ongoing when Kenny Fredrick arrived.

I note her portrayal of racism as you report it. However, and on the relevant facts on the Isle of Dogs in the context of the situation across the whole Borough of Tower Hamlets that I am aware of I am not sure that her statements on the challenge posed by racism is a complete one.

My most recent observations on the ground suggest that a lot needs to be done to create a genuine atmosphere of non and anti-racist Social reality both on the Isle of Dogs as indeed it does in the rest of the East End Borough of Tower Hamlets.

I would say that Tower Hamlets Council remains a part of the problem as it has been failing to thoroughly address racism in its day to day practices. 

For this reason, I support the initiative to hold a formal investigation into racism in Tower Hamlets Council that has been started by the “Is Tower Hamlets Council fit for the People?” Initiative, ITHP for short.

The investigation is already on and the Executive Mayor of Tower Hamlets Council Lutfur Rahman has been asked to answer the Questions that the Investigation has raised over the conduct of Tower Hamlets Council.

ITHP is conducting the investigation in accordance with existing UK laws and the findings will be published in four parts. The preliminary findings will be published in a few weeks.

1705 [1644] GMT London Sunday 21 July 2013

 

Big Read: Isle of Dogs has moved away from racism, says retiring George Green’s head Kenny Frederick

Kenny FrederickKenny Frederick

Robin de PeyerSunday, July 21, 2013 
12:00 PM

  

 

 

The retiring head teacher of an Isle of Dogs school says the area it serves has moved away from the “overt racism” she encountered when she arrived there 17 years ago.

 

 

As Kenny Frederick waved goodbye to George Green’s School for the last time on Friday, she reflected on the increased acceptance of diversity among pupils and parents on the Island.

But things were very different when she took over in 1996. She says racism was commonplace, with children from different ethnic backgrounds not even speaking to each other in class.

“I came to the Island and I didn’t really quite know what I’d taken on because it has its own character,” she said.

“It’s very inward looking. There was terrible overt racism between the white population and the Bengalis. It was really quite shocking.”

Upon arrival, she made the decision to confront the racism she encountered - starting in the classroom.

She explained: “Kids hadn’t gelled together. One of the first things I discovered was there had been a fight in a year 11 class between a white boy and a Bengali girl, and they didn’t know each other’s names - but they’d been in the same class for five years.

“When you walked around the school the white kids would sit with the white kids and the Bengali kids would sit on their own; it was very strange. So the first thing was to try to bring people together, which is easier said than done.

“But it’s a different place to when I took over.”

During her time at George Green’s she has helped establish the school’s reputation as a pioneering institution.

In one project, she oversaw visits to Belfast for some of the schools “toughest gang leaders and racists” to give them an insight into the divisions there. Despite her nerves, the scheme paid off - with some of those pupils going on to deliver assemblies condemning Islamophobia in the wake of 2007’s London bombings.

And in 2008, the school was among the first in the UK to start teaching the International Baccalaureate. And it is such “calculated risks” as those which Mrs Frederick says have given her the biggest satisfaction.

The qualification allows pupils to study a wider range of subjects for longer.

“It was a very tough process, and it’s the best thing we’ve ever done,” she said. “It’s really raised the game.”

The work the school has done around inclusion and ensuring everyone is welcomed there – regardless of any special needs they may have – is also a source of pride.

“I’ve always felt that whatever your needs you should be educated – if you can – in a mainstream school.

“The nicest thing is when you sit at a graduation evening and there’s some kids up there graduating and you look at them, and say ‘gosh, here’s this youngster who’s gone through so much and they’re actually graduating with GCSEs’ – whereas two years ago I might have thought they might not make it.”

Now at the age of 60, Mrs Frederick is stepping aside from her role, during which she has established a reputation as a leading voice of the teaching profession.

She taught geography at schools in Haringey and Hackney before being given the headship at George Green’s and she will work as a consultant passing on her wisdom to other schools and head teachers during her retirement.

But she admits she will miss the faces of colleagues and pupils at George Green’s.

“You have to leave sometime and I think I‘ve chosen the right time to leave, while I’m still healthy. I wouldn’t want to become an embarrassment!

“I’ve made the right decision but I shall still be very sad saying goodbye to people because I’m very emotionally attached – which is why I stayed 17 years. I’ll miss people - pupils and staff.”

Throughout her 17 years as a head, Mrs Frederick has remained determinedly outspoken, at times being highly critical of government policies – most recently those backed by Conservative education secretary Michael Gove.

And she insists teachers should be willing to go on record with their views.

“I think it’s a duty,” she said. “Education’s too important to have people trying to win a vote to use as a political football.

“I can’t stand by and listen to the nonsense that comes out of the politicians or media – whoever it is – that all teachers are useless when I actually see what they do every day.

“Political interference really winds me up. But sometimes heads are scared. If you’re a new head you think ‘oh, I’ll get into trouble’. But I’ve never got into trouble; nobody’s ever said boo to me. I always explain what I’m doing and why I’m doing it.”

Her replacement, Jill Baker, who is coming from the Jo Richardson School in Dagenham, will therefore have her blessing to voice her own views.

But Mrs Frederick, who came to the East End from Kilkenny in Ireland as a child, insists she will not be interfering too much as her replacement settles in from September.

“I’m happy to be handing over to her,” she said. “It’d be difficult if it was someone who I didn’t trust, but you have to let go.”

 

Image

 http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/big_read_isle_of_dogs_has_moved_away_from_racism_says_retiring_george_green_s_head_kenny_frederick_1_2287335

 

Defending Brick Lane’s Foundations, trailing some momentous events in July 2001 with Kay Jordan

Defending Brick Lane’s Foundations, trailing some momentous events in July 2001 with  Kay Jordan
CLICK ON THIS IMAGE to access the related webpage or video post either cited by KHOODEELAAR! or Created by KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the East End of London

0715 [0650] Hrs GMT Sunday 21 July 2013 London UK .
This Original KHOODEELAAR! Action Report by © Muhammad Haque is part of the Series Defending the Brick Lane Foundations, devised and created by Muhammad Haque in association with Kay Jordan between July 2001 and 23 December 2010.

Today is just within the anniversary of the momentous ten days to 31 July [2001] when Muhammad Haque actually had the first ever meeting about the Future of the Community in the East End of London.
That meeting took place in the small room next to Kay Jordan’s work base at 7-15 Greatorex Street London E1 5NF.
The meeting lasted for several hours and was interrupted a few times by an assistant who needed to either confer with Kay or get her to sign essential correspondence and documents.
The meeting took place during the working hours.
It was that meeting that led to the next nine years of intense activities including the community in the East End of London.
THIS the first VIDEO REPORT in the Series [click on the image of a picture of the Princelet Street taken by Muhammad haque in June 2013] is part of the Action Archive and Future of the Brick Lane Foundation Documentary Reports.
The debt owed to the humanity of Kay Jordan, the intellectual, social and political grasp of the person cannot be expressed in words. The whole community owes Kay Jordan a greater debt for all her work, her dedication and the utterly immeasurable scarifies of personal rest or the neglect of her own human needs than has been expressed by anyone elsewhere except by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign.
The Kay Jordan Foundation will be publishing the key literature on Kay Jordan’s work for the people and the community in the East End of London and much further afield.
In this the first KHOODEELAAR! Campaign video about these streets, Osman Gani, who had worked with Kay Jordan in the late 1980s when he was working in the housing field, refers to parts of the events that he was involved with along with Kay in defending the Community, its socially sensitive and representative architecture and its Say as against the greedy, callous anti-social [as they always are and will be] developer leeches that had been spreading their tentacles over the Brick Lane London E1 area even then.
Those were the founding days that witnessed what I am calling the natural embrace of Kay Jordan the truly caring Community Architect that then embarked on shaping, refining and shielding, protecting, fighting for and defending her Community.
As Malcolm Riley, a comparatively recent worker who joined Kay as a colleague in the area and came to know Kay through work, recalled only last week, he recalls Kay Jordan as being at the centre of interest and involvement with the people. Anyone who would walk the streets in the Brick Lane area with Kay would know, people would just want to say hello to Kay, talk to Kay. [The Kay Jordan Conversations and Reports are to be continued]

HS2 run out of legitimacy so they team up with OTT-faking ES to exploit ethnicity raising resentmen

HS2 run out of legitimacy so they team up with OTT-faking ES to exploit ethnicity raising resentmen
0905 GMT London Friday 19 July 2013
Look at the HS2 lying.
And the completely dishonest
Evening Standard aiding and abetting
with its very own tailor made PR line
that would roll off its “asset” Boris
Johnson’s tongues next time
they stage another photo opp
like this one.
What psycho Game are they playing with the OTT-faking London Evening Standard?

What is the explanation for this cruelly false photo opp that shows three Asian, all with Muslim names and only one white?

Why not a mixed group of youngsters with diverse ethnic, racial backgrounds?

Is that the message they want to send out? Why are so many Asian youngsters available for these iffy “jobs”? What is happening to the white youngsters of their age groups and to African youngsters? When the Evening Standard talks about creating jobs ladder for London there will have to be a B-Link somewhere be it a Bank, a barclays or a Boris. Whatever the detail, the EVENING STANDARD is not creating ladders for London.

It is engaging in fakery and in deception about everything.

It is only a matter time before its fanatic David Cohen pops up behind one of these “Asian youths being helped”! Stop the hype and the lying ES and HS2 and Power Networks!

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! Leads the way again in voicing the truth about East End Lies and much more...

KHOODEELAAR! Leads the way again in voicing the truth about East End Lies and much more...
Image here of Eric with the overblown Pickles [his ego, for a start] as published by the UK PRESS Gazette, now known only as press gazette.co.uk.

Muhammad Haque is a historian of the UK Press Gazette, having been an avid original writer and contributor to its column where he helped launch the campaign in the 1970s and 1980s against racism in the British Media

 

0610 Hrs GMT London Friday 19 July 2013: The Most Original Journalism for the East End of London is being brought here by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign - The Campaign in the mainstream Media and in the UK Parliament over Tower Hamlets Council: The Muhammad Haque Commentary straight from the front line in the Community in the East End of London,m exposing the East End Lies and also putting Eric and his over-blown Pickles in the context where the Community must have the say on what our local Council owes to us and how we hold this Council to account and why the East End Lies must stop lying to us and begin to tell us the truth about our whole community....

The © Muhammad Haque Evidential Commentary on the dire state of the East End Lies, also known as the "town hall Pravda"

The Commentary below has been posted online on the PRESS GAZETTE web site.


http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/government-plans-curb-them-nuj-comes-out-defence-council-newspapers


London Friday 19 July 2013.

Helen Watson, from Tower Hamlets NUJ Branch which is involved in the “East End Life” writes:
“Most of us came here because it represented a better offer than the publications we were working on. Our wages and conditions were much improved, it allowed us to provide a better standard of living for our families and helped us achieve a decent work/life balance.”
Has it occurred to Ms Watson that the people who ordinarily live or try to live in Tower Hamlets may be also entitled to a “work/life balance”?
In relation to the Council which is obliged to deliver services that directly affect work, life and the balance that is deserved?
Where in the current edition of the “East End Life” would she say is an accurate reflection of the Life of the people of the borough of Tower Hamlets?
I would suggest that the title is a false one. It should be called “East End Lies” which is what I have been calling it on the records for the past at least 14 years.
I know most current councillors, the majority of whom have been in the Borough for years before getting into the Council.
But I do not see them being reflected on the East End Lies as people. I see some of them who are featured only because they are in “the Cabinet”.
They come across as caricatures, not as real life people with real links connections or concerns about the community which has been experiencing one of the most depressing economic and social, communal times, as even the Guardian has had to admit [against its own record of mysteriously “approving” of the L B Tower Hamlets Council controlling bureaucracy] only this week when comparing the glaring disparity that exists between Canary Wharf, HSBC and the ordinary Tower Hamlets.
It is not Eric Pickles who is leading the call for a truthful “in-house” title. 
It is ordinary people like me who are and have been doing so.
I even know when the first issue of the East End Life was published and who edited it and where that person is now. A can confirm that from that issue on, all the promises made then have been broken and the ordinary people depicted with nothing short of contempt by whoever has been setting the toxic, dishonest editorial tone of the “East End Lies”.
Deny, divert and dissemble are three words that combine to make up the attitude of the East End Lies: Distort!
Sure, Eric Pickles will gain a few points as a Conservative Politician. But the real losses, damages and misinformation have been caused to the ordinary people in the Borough for as long as the editorial contents of the East End Lies” have been geared to please the controlling “political faction, group or entity”.
As the organiser of the first openly political and democratic mobilisation on Sunday 7 May 1978 following the racist murder of Altab Ali on Thursday 4 May 1978, I spoke of the moral legacy that our peaceful but ethically determined and restraining Campaign for a tolerant Society has had.
I spoke on 4 May 2013 at the Altab Ali Park. There were a number of others who had later become involved in that year and helped mobilise many people in the peaceful Actions of all races against racism.
Did the “East End Life” report that anniversary event?
Not really.
It carried an offensive, misleading, tokenistic piece of anonymity that had neither any mention of those who had taken part in that socially and in the universal context a significant even a pioneering consciousness-raising, universal movement in May 1978 nor ddi it have any in-depth ethical lessons or social far less international humanitarian or political lessons recounted.
Yet our movement in may 1978 had all those elements and they
transformed the environment not only in the East End but seriously impacted for the good on the rest of what happened, and has been happening, in British politics, as a whole.
As at least one of the speakers said exactly that at the rally this year at the Altab Ali park on 4 May 2013.
But the “East End Life” was busy faking up its own set of lies to insert in place of the real life on the streets of Tower Hamlets.
Not only that, the Council has been caught as being callous on the memorial on the victims of racist violence.
Altab Ali again in context:
I have published, twice now in the past two years, criticism that the “mural” inscription on the side of the Altab Ali Park, written in Bangla, gives the wrong year as being that of Altab Ali’s murder and martyrdom!
In the English language text, the year is correct, 1978. But the Bangla language version has the year 1977 as the year when Altab Ali was murdered and martyred.
But even that is not a consistent text!
Tower Hamlets Council, which commissioned that work, has ignored the error and the fact that it has been pointed out, more than once.
I last spoke about it on a satellite TV programme on 29 May 2013.
Whatever Ms Helen Watson and her “NUJ” branch colleagues may say in support of their work and wages in Tower Hamlets Borough Council, one thing is clear, they cannot say that the “East End Lies” is telling the basic truth about the life of the community outside the Council!
All self-respecting NUJ members must pay a little attention to the constituency in whose name they take part in the editorial decision-making and in the publication of something like the “East End Life”.
How can Ms Watson’s branch be so careless and inattentive to what we the ordinary people out in the Borough of Tower Hamlets have been saying for years, many years before anyone had ever heard of Eric or had any idea of his own Pickles?
As the NUJ has been my only trade union, I would not refer to it carelessly. 
But I believe that one of the aims that the NUJ has aways claimed to encourage its members to support is to tell the truth about ordinary Society!
That aim is being weekly trampled on by the editorial practices of the East End Lies. 
And there cannot be any basis for claiming that it is a right practice.
Finally, I am and have been very active in this community for a very long time. 
In 1981, I was involved in an effort to create an alternative to the “East London Advertiser”.
That was called EAST END NEWS.
So, I cannot be and must not be in any associated with any agenda that the East London Advertiser or their owners ARCHANT would have for liaising with Eric Pickles or anyone of that ilk.
What I am saying here is a fraction of what I have always said and I have done so both on the EVENING STANDARD website, on the Guardian and also on broadcast programmes where I have evidentially dealt with the dishonesty that dominates the “editorial” line which is based on pretending that in Tower Hamlets there is no life in the ordinary community except in the diversionary, the dubious, the distorted, the twisted fabricated contents of the fantasy title they call “East End Life”!
On most of the photos they publish, the supposed human characters are seen mostly beaming!
Whatever for, especially in a borough where most of the ordinary people are undergoing experiences that do not constitute grounds for putting on cheesy, cheeky or cheery appearances!

Written and posted this online at 0455 Hrs GMT London Friday 19 July 2013


Eric Pickles picture [below] as used by the PRESS GAZETTE where the Muhammad Haque commentary [above] appears about the dire role of the town hall pravda the "East End Lies".
Image
Muhammad Haque dismisses
Eric and his Pickles when it
comes to claiming what the ordinary
people of Tower Hamlets have to
say about the Council’s “town hall” “pravda”
the “East End Life” which Haque 
has been calling “East End Lies”
for longer than Eric or his Pickles
have been heard of
far less have had any recognition 
about real Life of the people
in the the East End of London at all.



Muhammad Haque's trade union, the National Union of Journalists had an attempt in the early 1980s in Bethnal Green to establish an alternative to the East London Advertiser.

That is one of the historic foundations Muhammad Haque uses above to dispel any even suggestion that criticism of the diabolically “edited” "East End Lies" is linked with the East London Advertiser or with the Conservative Party.

Muhammad Haque's Political Party is the Labour Party, the only Political Party he has ever been prepared to join and remain a paying member of!

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/government-plans-curb-them-nuj-comes-out-defence-council-newspapers

KHOODEELAAR! started the Big Debate over Tower Hamlets Council: Now the topic is leading 3 sites

KHOODEELAAR! started the Big Debate over Tower Hamlets Council: Now the topic is leading 3 sites

0428 Hrs GMT London Thursday 18 July 2013. The Big Debate that is now on the Newham recorder, East London Advertiser, London24.com web sites as a consequence of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign’s Question to Tower Hamlets full Council on 26 June 2013 :

Image

 

 

“Question from Mr Muhammad Haque, Organiser, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in Defence of the Community in the East End of London”. “ What is Tower Hamlets Council’s Constitutionally installed and transparently DEMOCRATICALLY active audit procedure for overseeing the conduct of those bodies especially the ones that have been allowed to take over the control of formerly Council-owned and Council controlled Housing stock in the context of the clear and the express undertaking given by LBTH Council to the Community and parts of the Community in the Borough on the relevant estates affected by the implications of the stock transfer procedures that were put into operation?”

The Big Debate that is now on the Newham recorder, East London Advertiser, London24.com web sites  as a consequence of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign’s Question to Tower Hamlets full Council on 26 June 2013 :   “Question from Mr Muhammad Haque, Organiser, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in Defence of the Community in the East End of London”.         “ What is Tower Hamlets Council’s Constitutionally installed and transparently DEMOCRATICALLY active audit procedure for overseeing the conduct of those bodies especially the ones that have been allowed to take over the control of formerly Council-owned and Council controlled Housing stock in the context of the clear and the express undertaking given by LBTH Council to the Community and parts of the Community in the Borough on the relevant estates affected by the implications of the stock transfer procedures that were put into operation?”

 

ANOTHER UPDATED RESPONSE to “the Big Debate”

 

 

 

ABOUT the conduct of local Councils, here Tower Hamlets in London’s “East End”.

The “Debate” is the latest consequence of my Question about Housing that I was presenting to Tower Hamlets Council on 26 June 2013 when John Wright decided to FILM the Council’s proceedings, confirming to me within minutes that it had been the SUBJECT of my Question that had prompted him to start the filming, to begin with.

 

This one [the Comment below] posted on the website london24.com which states that my Comment is “awaiting moderation” as at 0400 Hrs GMT today Thursday 18 july 2013

 

I ADDRESS the publisher, London24.com as the “You/you”:

 

You say that “Mayor Lutfur Rahman’s Tower Hamlets has been criticised in Parliament by Eric Pickles who threatens to use legislation to force him to let anyone film meetings, after an OAP in the public gallery was stopped from filming on his mobile phone.”Perhaps you should have done a bit of factual research before writing the above. 

 

Had you done so, you would have come across enough direct statements by John Wright a community activist who has campaigned for housing rights fro years. “an OAP” doesn’t quite come across as a live, lively and concerned campaigner, does it?John Wright had been sitting two rows behind in “the public gallery” where I was standing as I addressed the Tower Hamlets Council Meeting concerned [Wednesday 26 June 2013] . I was presenting a Public Question item on the Council’s Agenda of Business that evening.

This is what my Question, as printed on the Council’s Agenda reads:

 

QUESTIONS

 

Nine questions have been submitted as set out below:-

 

6.1 Question from Mr Muhammad Haque, Organiser, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in Defence of the Community in the East End of London.

 

What is Tower Hamlets Council’s Constitutionally installed and transparently DEMOCRATICALLY active audit procedure for overseeing the conduct of those bodies especially the ones that have been allowed to take over the control of formerly Council-owned and Council controlled Housing stock in the context of the clear and the express undertaking given by LBTH Council to the Community and parts of the Community in the Borough on the relevant estates affected by the implications of the stock transfer procedures that were put into operation?

 

You can view that part of the Tower Hamlets Council’s Agenda of Business for 26 June 2013 at the following web page:

This is the AADHIKAROnline transcript of my interview with John Wright literally within minutes of Tower Hamlets Council Speaker Lesley Pavitt suspending the Meeting because of the filming:John Wright: 

 

[Speaking to Muhammad Haque who was filming this interview with John Wright] I only started filming because of your subject

Muhammad Haque: Right.

John Wright: Because I had a fight for eight years. .. the way that Tower Hamlets [Council] transferred housing stock and never protected those estates that they handed over.[Adds emphasis] To good or bad hands![Then adds] Some of the Registered Social Landlords are good. And some of them are rubbish. And Tower Hamlets [Council] have not protected us [the tenants of the Council Hosing properties that the Council transferred to those “landlords” a decade or so previously]And do you know the most terrible things [points to others standing nearby as they watch and support the exchanges. They are not in vision, not visible on this film but they had been at the Public Gallery as well, including Meg, whose voice can be heard in parts of this interview]: you [the voters, the people of the Tower Hamlets Borough, in this context] have a right to put a Freedom of Information Request to your Government, you have a right to put a Freedom of Information request to your Council, but you haven’t got a right to put a Freedom of Information request to your [“social”] landlord [who has been handed the Council housing stock by Tower Hamlets Council for over ten years now, as at the date of this interview Wednesday 26 June 2013.]

A "Big Debate" on the Future of the Community in the East End of London, sparked by KHOODEELAAR!

A "Big Debate" on the Future of the Community in the East End of London, sparked by KHOODEELAAR!
IMAGE here is of TOMORROW's ACTION News front page today
The MORNING STAR front page Thursday 18 July 2013 confirming Dave's latest plot and sleaze against Society

1945 [1920] [1915] Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
17 July 2013

Editor © Muhammad Haque

 

1928 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 17 July 2013   KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Action UPDATER Commentary in defence of the Community in the East End of London, emphasising the utmost need to have a really honest, decent, accountable and democratic  Tower Hamlets Council that must be required to really stick up for the local Community in the East End of London ...... just as  indications are spotted of Big Biz and Neo Cons and Looting Banks' agenda being hatched at No 10 Downing Street as part of yet another plot against Society...

Image

TOMORROW's Campaign news front page today at 1920 GMT Wednesday 17 July 2013

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Public Question to Tower Hamlets Council on 26 June 2013 has had another consequence. It was that Question on Housing presented by Muhammad Haque that prompted John Wright to start filming. The “Newham Recorder” has begun today Wednesday 17 July 2013 a “Big Debate” about the Council’s Meetings being recorded. In a first response to that “Big Debate”, Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque has posted a detailed diagnostic on the democracy deficit in Tower Hamlets Council.

Related video reports by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign as published by AADHIKARonline


Featuring East End Housing rights campaigner and activist John Wright



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow1RoOZDUcQ

Featuring East End Campaigner and historian Tom Ridge



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLVex-PGSro

And another contextual KHOODEELAAR! Campaign post online



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFOIE0G-w2I

Featuring John Biggs interviewed on the Future of the Community in the East End of London


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evEe4XpdS6g





[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending Democracy for the Community in Tower Hamlets. UPDATER Commentary

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending Democracy for the Community in Tower Hamlets. UPDATER Commentary
1720 [1632] [1615] GMT London Wednesday 17 June 2013.

One paragraph has been rewritten since the posting on the Newham Recorder web site:

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending Democracy for the Community in Tower Hamlets. UPDATER Commentary by © Muhammad Haque on the poor state of democracy on offer to the East End by our "elected" Council. This Commentary contains crucial evidence of just how many weaknesses CURRENTLY undermine the Community’s receiving a genuinely manifestly democratic, accountable, transparent service from Tower Hamlets Council. The Commentary has been posted online as the first response to the ARCHANT-owned ‘local newspaper title’ the Newham Recorder carrying a piece about the public recording and filming the Council Meetings in the adjoining “East End” boroughs of Newham and Tower Hamlets. The evidence referred to by Muhammad Haque also relates to the fact that Tower Hamlets Council has been being used as a tool by Big Business which has been taking over vast parts of the Borough by destroying it and by displacing the communities that have lived in their home estates, neighbourhoods and streets for generations and generations. The focus is placed again at Muhammad Haque’s Public Question to Tower Hamlets Council on 26 June 2013 bout he unaccountability by the Housing associations in the borough which had been handed massive amounts of the Council’s Housing stock a decade earlier...

As Lutfur Rahman appears to be concerned to protect the implied privacy of those members of the public who may not wish to be filmed, perhaps your readers who are unfamiliar with the architecture of the Tower Hamlets "Council chamber" may like to know that the members of the public are not likely to be in the focus of the camera. 

Image

The Tower Hamlets Council Chamber “public gallery" is really not a gallery in the conventionally understood sense. 

The Council Chamber is obstructive with a big pillar blocking a lot of the scenes!

As the building, “Mulberry Place” could not have been designed by an architect with democratic thoughts, the “Council Chamber” reflects a disregard to democracy that must have dominated the minds of those behind the obstructive visual space within.

The other related thing about filming or recording “Council Meetings” is the concept of democracy in action.

What do those who work at the publicity scripts think democracy to be?

Do they think democracy is a parade?

Democracy is not a parade.

Democracy is the crux of the behaviour of the entrusted towards their electors, their real line managers.

The outrage that the public feel whenever elected post-holders misbehave or behave unsatisfactorily is to be found in the fact that the vote is a precious commodity. 

That it is a symbol of trust which is then to be monitored throughout the duration of the mandated period.

Filming is a part of that democratic monitoring by the voters.

Be that filming done by a single one, John Wright, or by more than one.

Back to the Tower Hamlets Council Chamber and its architecture.

It is rows of seats that face the "Council in session” from one side. 

So anyone who may film or photograph the “Council” can do so by carefully focussing only on Councillors or on Lutfur himself if he speaks. 

He rarely speaks in the Council Meetings. 

When he does, his is a prepared item that is over very soon.The issue is not whether Lutfur can get involved in an extra curricular reference that includes the insertion of a byte of praise for something Ed Miliband has done - which cannot be a contextual reference about the filming of the proceedings of Tower Hamlets Council - but whether the public who do care for a democratic local Tower Hamlets Council feel that they are getting democracy delivered by the Council when it sits. 

I have already extensively published on my own evidential part [as John Wright later confirmed to me] in John Wright’s decision to start the filming on 26 June 2013. 

It is vital that elected Councillors and the “elected executive mayor” are seen to be delivering a democratically accountable service to the people of Tower Hamlets as verifiable by and acceptable to the people ourselves.

I don’t believe that Tower Hamlets Council has been behaving anywhere near the standard of democratic delivery that it should do. Whether filming or recording will make such a substantial change in the contents of what councillors do deliver on the “floor of the Council” is not automatically guaranteed. 

It cannot be said with absolute certainty that the present batches of councillors from all the five “groupings” will be transformed overnight directly liked with the Meetings being allowed to be filmed. 

The option to be able to film is in fact linked with the outlook towards the Council. When such an option is in place, most people will not even bother to record the proceedings. Some will. But most are unlikely to do so. People want to feel that Tower Hamlets Council is not a dodgy assembly and that it is with the people of the Borough.As John Wright asked on 26 June 2013: “are you all corrupt”?If Tower Hamlets Council has nothing to hide it should not be prolonging the litany of excuses that deny the people in the borough the option that is now beyond any legitimate questioning.

As I do not write these comments from any party political or careerist standpoint, I may suggest that Lutfur Rahman is being unduly bothered about what Jim Fitzpatrick may or may not have to say. 

Let Jim Fitzpatrick have his piece. 

He only made what to me appears to be, in substance, a monosyllabic intervention in the House of commons on 8 July 2013. 

As for Eric Pickles, Tower Hamlets as “the Council” should take care not to come across as looking for further excuses. 

Eric Pickles, politically, career-wise, has had a not-so-high image. 

The less scope given to him to come across as being on a higher level of accountability than Tower Hamlets is preferable from the standpoint of democratic legitimacy that the local Tower Hamlets council should enjoy. It is not a good tactic for anyone who objectively cares for the reputation of Tower Hamlets Council and the Community in this borough to give any opportunity to either Eric Pickles or to any other party outside to come across as being on a higher moral or democratic plane than our elected Borough Council.

In any case, a local Borough Council has Constitutionally speaking many reasons to think about its remits when comparing itself with the UK central Governments or with the UK Prime Minister!

One obvious reason why No 10 Downing Street should not be open to filming is that it is in actual fact the place where they do discuss some very sensitive matters that will be compromised if done openly or on openly accessible records.

Tower Hamlets Council can make that comparison between itself and No 10 Downing Street if it is included as part of the UK national Operations of Governance by No 10 Downing Street.

So fas as I know, the briefings that the local Borough Council may be party to will have implications for local Policing, crime, disorder and similar issues.Nobody in the community is asking those to be open to filmingPeople have more sense than to ask for that kind of openness.

There has to be balance and there has to be fair comparisons.

Alibor Choudhury, who is reported frequently by the East London Advertiser as the “Cabinet member for resources”, has now made, during Tower Hamlets Council Meetings more than one reference to Eric Pickles’ “biscuit” expenses. 

In what way is it so important to people in Tower Hamlets to try to show Eric Pickles as being irresponsible? How is that the same as Tower Hamlets Council delivering on democratic items that are owed to the people in Tower Hamlets by the Council elected by voters in Tower Hamlets for a decent, accountable Tower Hamlets Council?

Eric Pickles’ biscuit expenses reference has been made as an apparent stick with which to [in a manner of speaking] hurt Tower Hamlets Conservative councillors leader Peter Golds

Every time it has been tried, Golds has survived the “intended injury”.

The much more appropriate approach, theoretically speaking, would be to aim the weapon at some real failing by the Tower Hamlets Tories over their duties to represent their voters.

They may be in the Tory party but they do not have any duty for Eric Pickles’ abuses of Pickles’ own position or power in the CONDEM Collusion.

The SUBJECT that I was asking Tower Hamlets Council the Public Question about when John Wright felt prompted to start the filming on 26 June 2013 was the absence of audit and accountability by the housing associations to which Tower Hamlets council had transferred so much of the Public Council housing stock. 

What has Tower Hamlets Borough Council to say about this stark absence of accountability? What does it say to John Wright’s question, which I have published on video, that housing associations are beyond the scope of the Freedom of Information Act requests? 

What does LBTH Council say to John Wright who has asserted that many of the Council housing estates that were transferred to the housing associations by Tower Hamlets Council have not been protected? 

On 30 April 2013, I helped tenants, residents and families on a housing estate [that is controlled by one of the housing associations that has benefited from the housing stock transfer] deliver a petition to the “executive mayor” and to the Tower Hamlets Council. 

That petition had been organised to obtain rights of say by the tenants and residents and families on what that housing association does on the estate. 

To date, neither “the executive mayor’s” office nor the Council’s “Democratic Services” has responded to the tenants over that petition. 

How is that delivering democracy to the people in Tower Hamlets?

So filming and recording will not cover most of the Council’s and the “executive mayor’s” conduct. 

What it will do is to provide a glimpse of what they do in the formal settings. 

As for the recording of the “Executive Mayor’s Cabinet Meetings”, there is no need for making any excuses against recording.

Why do I say this?

Because as I witnessed on 3 July 2013, the “Cabinet” could and did exclude the “press and the public” from a significant part of its “proceedings”.

Not only that, my own Question, which I presented to that Cabinet that day, has, since, been the subject of substantial correspondence between me and the “Democratic Services”.

So deficient in democratic consistency, transparency and logic has the relevant part of the LBTH Council’s “Democratic Services” been on this occasion that I have had to send a complaint against their stance to, yes, Eric Pickles!

Now, if that is the way that “Tower Hamlets Council is showing Eric Pickles in a poor light” then of course it is they who will be found wanting and neither the public nor Eric Pickles, in context!

And the fault will lie with Tower Hamlets Council and whoever keeps making these really unacceptable, undemocratic, unaccountable decisions in the name of the Council!

 

1234 GMT Wednesday 17 June 2013

 


http://www.newhamrecorder.co.uk/news/big_debate_should_the_public_be_able_to_film_council_meetings_1_2282844

DEFENDING the East End of London against Big Biz takeover.....

DEFENDING the East End of London against Big Biz takeover.....

DEFENDING the East End of London against Big Biz takeover aided and abetted by local Council's stooged "planning" "structures" and made worse by irrational, ignorant, irresponsible "local newspaper journalism" - UPDATER Tuesday 16 July 2013 

Image

© MUHAMMAD HAQUE Comment online in response to the following item on the East London Advertiser web site:

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/new_report_says_londoners_are_migrating_east_to_stratford_bow_and_stepney_green_1_2281180

Your [www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk] online piece, dated today 16 July 2013, is a shorter copy word for word of the promoters’ own piece on the web published on 26 June 2013.

I cite their web page here:

http://www.cebr.com/reports/ea...

One of the astonishing things that they had said and which you repeat is this:
“Other factors enhancing the desirability of E20 include the close proximity of the Westfield Stratford retail centre, as well as growing employment prospects in the wider Stratford area and the prospect of 15,000 jobs at the new International Quarter, adjacent to East Village, which is set to begin construction in 2013-14.”

Both they and you are promoting irrationality in the context of the dire dearth of jobs and income security for local people in “Stepney Green” and in “E20”.
Anyone actually walking down the Stratford High Street can see that it is a people-free zone, in the sense that ordinary people avoid the place because there is nothing going on there.

So when you say that “construction” is set to begin in 2013-14 at the “New International Quarter” are you saying that people are MOVING in there ahead of that because the “construction” really is nothing like ordinary construction but more like a gold mine being opened up in the formerly derelict site that is now OTT-plugged as “east Village” and “E20”?

If so, where did they get the money to afford this?

And overall, where are the “east London” people going to? or [being] driven to?

Any student of basic economics will know that demand is a function of capacity. Here that capacity is either ready cash or its de facto equivalent.
Whichever it is, the “new movers and shakers” of your gold-mining imagery cannot be among Iain Duncan Smith’s targets for this week’s caps: 

the hundreds of thousands in London who face drastic further reduction in their lives’ standards and their access to income that they purely need.

They may very well include some of the fancy foreign billionaires that are also in today’s [Tuesday 16 July 2013] news.

You are betraying your basic duty to tell the ordinary people in the East London boroughs of Tower Hamlets, Newham and Hackney that they are being pushed out by this sort of “migration”.

You should also apologise for having used [that term and concept of migration], as the title the “East London Advertiser” over the past 70 years to denote something negative.

Here, for a rare occasion, you sue that term positively.

Although once again, you get the context totally wrong.

I had invited your newsroom to attend a Future of the Community in the East End of London which I had organised and conducted on Saturday 6 July 2013.
You have not reported this hereby showing where your affiliation lies.

I have sent the Tower Hamlets Council the key demands that arose from the Seminar. Lutfur Rahman is yet to reply to the demand.

The key finding at the Acton Seminar was that ordinary East enders are being economically displaced and deported from their homes and their communities and from their home estates and neighbourhoods.

This is starkly happening along the west of Tower Hamlets extending to Hackney.

Huge demographic engineering and social, economic, cultural and communal displacement are afoot.

And your glowing plug for the ones with the cash proves that they and you do not care about the huge impact and massive negative implications for individuals lives, families and for the whole of the East End of London.

I notice that neither the original promoters [CEBR] on which you your piece is based nor you use the expression “East End of London”, preferring instead to use the materialistic “East” of London, devoid of all associations with communities, home, culture, history, tradition!

You ape the “Cebr Fundamentals Index of key London postcodes” approach and thereby help to demolish what the East End of London represents to people who belong here within their neighbourhood estates and the wider East End Communities!

It is quite possible that some of those East Enders may wake up to what you have been engaged in peddling for quite a while now.

On the very date 26 June 2013, when CEBR published their piece I refer to above, I was addressing, in a very short formal Pubic Question, the Tower Hamlets Council about the serious absence of accountability to the community by the “social landlords” who had been handed huge Council hosing stock by Tower Hamlets Council 10 years earlier. 

As I was on my feet, John Wright, a housing and community rights activist from Shadwell began to fi,m the Council proceedings, telling me minutes later that he had been prompted to start the filming by my SUBJECT.

John added, as you can see in the youtube post I published, accessible via the youtube link below, that Tower Hamlets Council had failed to protect the estates that they had handed over to the “social landlords”, in other words the housing associations.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

He said that he had already spent 8 years fighting for the Council to uphold the promises that the Council had made at the time of the transfer of the housing stock!

A week earlier, I filmed local historian and campaigner Tom Ridge telling me that the East End of London was already surrounded by the takeover operations. He highlighted the zone along the West of the Borough and including Aldgate, Aldgate east, Commercial Street, leman Street and the Games complexes in Stratford on the East and canary Wharf in the South of Tower Hamlets.

You can view my report with Tom Ridge’s observations in the vie on youtube cited below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

Time for you to let these facts get included in your reporting.

2132 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 16 July 2013

Social blood-suckers now in grip of State power in UK are bleeding Society of vitaL supplies

Social blood-suckers now in grip of State power in UK are bleeding Society of vitaL supplies
SEEN HERE is Diagnostic photo-montage created in London this afternoon [Tuesday 16 July 2013] by AADHIKARonline campaigning with the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the East End of London against Big Biz Agenda attacks that are forever disguised as "projects" “regenerating the local area” which projects and scams are in factd degenerating the area in every conceivable way.

The “locally elected local Tower Hamlets Council” is, has been exposed as being a part and parcel of the operation of the Big Biz takeover of the East End of London Agenda, via the three “planning outfits” that are supposedly democratically active as the representatives of the people and the Community i the East End of London but which “planning outfits” in the LBTH Council are in fact and in effect rubber stamping devices that are hardly if ever even commented on by the “elected councillors” let alone being held to account for the role they are and have been playing for the agenda of selling out the Borough and its land quite literally to the Big Greedy Big Business bidders

The East End of London is being taken over at a faster speed by Big Business because of the increasingly supine and servile role by the so-called elected local Tower Hamlets Council

Editor © Muhammad Haque
[To be continued]
For CONTEXTUAL Campaign resources reference, we publish below a factual piece of CURRENT reporting dated 15 July 2013

From the Morning Star website, London [published by the British Communist Party]

Benefit-basher IDS caught out yet again

 
Monday 15 July 2013
by Rory McKinnon
 
 
 

Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith was caught lying yet again today after he claimed that homeless figures had "hardly moved" under the Con-Dem coalition.

The millionaire minister tossed out the claim in a huff over harsh criticisms on the launch of his new household benefit cap.

The £500 per family per week limit, which is lowered to £350 for a single person, has been criticised for its "one-size-hits-all" approach.

More than half of the households affected include four or more children, according to the government's own research.

The resulting cut will see those families pushed £10.88 a week below the poverty line set by Mr Duncan Smith's own department.

Meanwhile housing campaigners say the inclusion of housing benefit in the cap will sting households for rents that they have no control over.

A leaked letter from Communities Secretary Eric Pickles's office warned the cap would leave 20,000 households homeless, on top of another 20,000 made homeless by the bedroom tax.

But Mr Duncan Smith brazenly told a BBC news anchor today that he did not "believe" the Con-Dems' policies had forced people out of their homes.

"The great talk about thousands being made homeless has not come true - the homeless figures hardly moved at all," he claimed.

But figures from Mr Duncan Smith's own department show a 10 per cent rise in statutory homelessness in the last year alone.

More than 55,300 households were in temporary accommodation care of their local authority at the end of March.

The homeless figure in England has risen by around 27 per cent since the Con-Dems came to power in 2010, according to reports by the House of Commons Library, although campaigners say the real number is far higher as many claimants are turned away.

Mr Duncan Smith has a history of misinformation. In April he bragged that "8,000 people who would have been affected by the (benefit) cap" had since got jobs.

But the UK Statistics Authority said that claim was "unsupported by official evidence."

The arch-Tory bristled at the rebuke - but when questioned again today still could not stump up the figures.

"The reality is, I believe that to be right," he fumed.

Meanwhile Child Poverty Action Group's Tim Nicholls told the Morning Star the real problem with housing benefit was taxpayer cash "going to the landlord, not the claimant."

Years of politicians' pandering to property speculators meant that in most cases it would be state help for a family's rent that activates the cap.

"We need politicians to start taking the tough decisions to bring down sky-high rents instead of punishing the victims of the housing crisis," he said.

 

KHOODEELAAR! DEFENDING Brick Lane Community. Are the "ethnicity"-linked BSKYB Channels?

KHOODEELAAR! DEFENDING Brick Lane Community. Are the "ethnicity"-linked BSKYB Channels?

KHOODEELAAR! is defending the Brick Lane London E1 Area as it is continuing to fight defending the Community in the East End of London. Are the ethnicity-linked OFCOM-licensed “satellite TV” outlets delivering on their claim that they are serving the original and the specially produced and suited output that are good for and demonstrably beneficial to the community as they have been claiming to OFCOm and to advertisers and to each other?

KHOODEELAAR! is defending the Brick Lane London E1 Area as it is continuing to  fight  defending the Community in the East End of London. Are the ethnicity-linked OFCOM-licensed “satellite TV” outlets delivering on their claim that they are serving the original and the specially produced and suited output that are good for  and demonstrably beneficial  to the community as they have been claiming to OFCOm and to advertisers and to each other?

 

By © Muhammad Haque
1845 [183 [1830]
Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
14 July 2013
WHO IS SPEAKING FOR THE COMMUNITY?
KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN.
Who else?
What are the “ethnicity-linked” outlets, licensed by the OFCOM, actually delivering by way of hard facts and documentary service to the communities in whose name they seek and keep the OFCOM licenses?

 

On “Straight Dialogue”
aired on Channel 844 
on Wednesday 05 Sept
2012, presenter & host
Shoaib Choudhury [seen, LEFT 
in the ACTION MONTAGE below, in
a still from the programme]
promised viewers that
from the following 
week, 12 Sept 2012,
the Khoodeelaar!
Campaign Organiser
Muhammad Haque
would report from Brick Lane
on the
state of the Community 
and its future
[To be continued]

Image

Kay Jordan pictured speaking with a loud hailer [above, right in the Action Montage] 
on Friday 22 October 2004 as she was invited by Muhammad Haque to deliver the
launching speech commencing the KHOODEELAAR! demonstration held
against the role of two of the local councillors from
the Brick Lane area [“Spitalfields and Banglatown”].
Who were the two “local” Councillors?
Lutfur Rahman and his close friend and colleague
Abbas Uddin “Helal”. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign
mounted that demonstration after BOTH councillors had
failed to sit down with the Campaign Defending the 
Community in the Brick Lane London E1 Area against 
the Crossrail hole plot. Then still actively circulated
local titles the Tower Hamlets Recorder and the East 
London Advertiser gave ADVANCE coverage to that 
very first public demonstration by KHOODEELAAR!
[The CONTEXTUAL ACTION REPLAY is to be 
continued]

The East End of London is a target for further poverty, hardship and displacement ...

The East End of London is a target for further poverty, hardship and displacement ...

By © Muhammad Haque

1130 Hrs GMT London Sunday 14 July 2013

 Image

 

AADHIKAROnline/KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Action Montage [above] of images about how the UK Neo Cons via CONDEM are fast approaching the point where they will be able to demand, quite "plausibly" that ordinary people eat grass and survive on that!

Ed Minibrand is of course millions of miles away from even realising that his “leadership” has been part of the Neo Cons strategy, which is being operated on two levels, one the overt Neo Cons Agenda and the other the covert “reforming” agenda that the Minibrand has been brandishing all over the place as he goes on the rampage against the Founding values of the Labour Party every single time the Tories want him to show just how “tough” he can be with the unintentionally poor, the unintentionally jobless, the unintentionally homeless and hopeless....

 

[To be continued]

Disastrous state of housing in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets ....

Disastrous state of housing in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets ....


The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary on the dearth of Campaigning Journalism in England: UPDATING on the dire state of idiocy and ignorance in the “Fleet Street” and “Westminster” “mainstream” “Meeja” and their surrogates stooges and peripherals about the disastrous state of housing in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets as caused by the “Bliaring-John Prescotting” transfer of Council housing stock to “social [NOT!] landlords” - [N’th UPDATE]

 

Image

2030 [2014] [1950]
Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
13 July 2013


CONTINUING to update on how STUPIDITY dominates those belonging to the "mainstream" "Meeja" in Britain who "think" they are telling it as it is about Tower Hamlets.

For the n'th time, I can confirm that they are lying.
John Wright of Shadwell, Tower Hamlets, TOLD ME on film that he was PROMPTED to start filming on 26 June 2013 in the "Tower Hamlets Council Chamber" by my SUBJECT. Housing associations unaccountability to the people living in or trying to live in Council housing stock that Tower Hamlets Council had transferred to "social landlords", that is ;' housing associations.

I was on my feet, in the middle of completing my PUBLIC QUESTION to Tower Hamlets Council when john Wright began his filming.

When the Chair of the Council, 'Speaker" Lesley Pavitt asked John Wright to stop the filming and then suspended the Meeting for a good 10 minutes or longer, John Wright went out side to, amongst other things, have a cigarette.

And he spoke to me as well. On film.

I have published that video and reported on what happened many times since.

But the "Meeja" keeps repeating the lie that John Wright began the filming because of what Eric Pickles said!

He may have known of and been supportive of some of Eric Pickles' statement concerned.
But on that occasion, John Wright began the filming because of what I was saying in presenting my Public Question to the “full” session of the Tower Hamlets Council.

As I was on my feet, John Wright was sat only two rows behind in the public gallery. So he could see and hear me address the Council’s duties to make the “social landlords”, the housing associations accountable for heir conduct.

Here, once again, is the published text of my Question to Tower Hamlets Council [Wednesday 26 June 2013]:

[QUESTIONS
Nine questions have been submitted as set out below:-
6.1 Question from Mr Muhammad Haque, Organiser, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in Defence of the Community in the East End of London]

What is Tower Hamlets Council’s Constitutionally installed and transparently DEMOCRATICALLY active audit procedure for overseeing the conduct of those bodies especially the ones that have been allowed to take over the control of formerly Council-owned and Council controlled Housing stock in the context of the clear and the express undertaking given by LBTH Council to the Community and parts of the Community in the Borough on the relevant estates affected by the implications of the stock transfer procedures that were put into operation?


Accessible on this web page:
http://modgov.towerhamlets.gov.uk/documents/s45739/Report%20Public%20Questions%2026.06.13.pdf

And what I was saying to the Council had a special appeal to John Wright himself, having spent a good eight years struggling to get the truth out if the Council about the disastrous transfer of the Tower Hamlets Council housing stock.

[This is all on the video report and the KHOODEELAAR! blog reports and AADHIKAROnline reports and transcript that I have since published online]

Here is the UNTRUTHFUL, ignorant and misleading post on the website of one of the Westminster-centric "mainstream" "Meeja" outlets


http://www.politics.co.uk/news/2013/07/10/are-you-hiding-something-threats-from-westminster-after-71-y

They are as misleading and ignorant as the "others" who they have been citing have been.

By the "others" I of course mean those immoral and prejudiced and ignorant elements in and or on the periphery of the “Mainstream Meeja" in and near Fleet Street that claim that they have been reporting the ruth of what happened at Tower Hamlets Council on Wednesday 26 June 2013 when in fact they have been lying and been doing so to give, as they appear to think they are doing, an evidential basis for further Neo Cons assault on Society.
To those lying elements, “Tower Hamlets Council” is “wrong” not because it is exposed in their coverage as doing wring but because of its association with a [or more than one] particular ethnicity or ethnic, nationality or cultural background/s etc.

To me, and to John Wright, and to the majority of the people in Tower Hamlets, the Council is wring because whatever the faces ethnically, on the Council sats, the Council is a malfunctioning bureaucracy that is failing to protect the Community against rogue landlord outfits.

In fact, John Wright stressed the fact that after the Tower Hamlets Council Housing stock had been transferred, Tower Hamlets Council has failed to “protect the estates” [that is to protect the rights of the people, tenants, residents and families on the housing estates] that Tower Hamlets Council had handed over to the [in Muhammad Haque’s words] rogue landlord outfits mis-called “social landlords”!

Here, once again, is the online post of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign video report published by AADHIKAROnline containing John Wright’s ORIGINAL interview with me on 26 June 2013:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow1RoOZDUcQ

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! told Tower Hamlets Council so! As did John wright! Now D Mirror's Jason Beattie joins

KHOODEELAAR! told Tower Hamlets Council so! As did John wright! Now D Mirror's Jason Beattie joins
This AADHIKAROnline photo montage features [clockwise] the then [Sept 2007] reporter on the then “East London Advertiser” Mike Parker;
the BBC Paper reviews panellists Mina al Oirabi and the Daily Mirror’s Political Editor Jason Beattie [BBC News Channel 10 July 2013], KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser Muhammad Haque [pictured by KHOODEELAAR!] [Broadcasting the KHOODEELAAR! Champaign Hour] and John Wright. The two AADHIKAR and KHOODEELAAR! posters are part of the Campaign Publishing images archives that are added for SOURCE RECOGNITION.
Muhammad Haque had made dozens of calls - on a series of broadcast programmes - asking Tower Hamlets Council’s Executive Mayor Lutfur Rahman and or his “housing spokesperson” Cllr. Rabina Khan to answer the hundreds of long outstanding and very urgent Questions the people in Tower Hamlets had about the Council’s failures covering all aspects of Housing in the East London Borough.
Lutfur Rahman and Rabina Khan did not reply to the dozens of emails, telephone messages to the Tower Hamlets Council’s “press Office staff” and “Executive Support Officers” about the same subject, conveyed to them by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser between 2011 and 26 June 2013.
It was on Wednesday 26 June when the PUBLIC QUESTION about HOUSING ACCOUNTABILITY to the full Council was put by Muhammad Haque.
John Wright, himself an activist for housing rights and concerned about the negative impact that transfer of Council Housing stock had had on the people in the Borough, was prompted to start filming when Muhammad Haque was in the middle of presenting his Question to the formal Council.
This is how John Wright explained his filming when he spoke to Muhammad Haque moments after the Council Meeting was suspended by Council Speaker Lesley Pavitt.

[To be continued]

CROSSRAIL Big Biz PR-peddling VINCE Cable was unplugged by our CAMPAIGN in 2009

CROSSRAIL Big Biz PR-peddling VINCE Cable was unplugged by our CAMPAIGN in 2009
CROSSRAIL Big Biz PR-peddling VINCE Cable was unplugged by our CAMPAIGN in 2009. Now we again do another exclusive contextual ethical update diagnosing why Vince Cable the Neo Cons Sell-Off Man was always ready to sell Society out to the Big Biz bidders! The Lib Dumbs really must get rid of the tag “Lib” anywhere about them. They are Sub-Cons from now on and this tag is given to them by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign at 0048 GMT London Thursday 11 July 2013

Vince Cable's been caught without his political cables again! He is unplugged and is a stooge!

Vince Cable's been caught without his political cables again! He is unplugged and is a stooge!
Image of the “British Communist Party” daily outlet the MORNING STAR [published from an address in London E3 in the Borough of Tower Hamlets] reporting on the Vince Cable role as the CONDEM Collusion minister [Oops! "Secretary of State"!] doing the bidding of Big Business and the City of London interests and serving the Neo Cons overall Assault programme against Society


The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: UPDATING on the vicious Neo Cons Agenda that Vince Cable is now poised to take even further than any Neo Con-labelled operative or stooge in UK Collusion regime had ventured to do before [1]


0030 [0015] Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
11 July 2013

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in Defence of the Community in the East End of London

KHOODEELAAR! Told the Daily Mail and Paul Dacre so: that they were wrong to paint Vince Cable as "Saint Vince" at all!

Image


UPDATING on another world exclusive exposing the Neo Con s Agenda if the CONDEM Collusion, months before the Collusion came into cobbled toter existence:

Vince Cable was EXPOSED as being UNPLUGGED from reality when in October 2009 we had filmed him at a Lib Dems stunt staged in the Oxford House, off Bethnal Green Road [opposite the TESCO store] in Tower Hamlets.

KHOODEELAAR! also had reported on other Vince Cable dubiousness.

The incident at the Oxford House, libDems stunt was the utterance by Vince Cable of this Question referring to the Crossrail route: “Does it come/go through here”? The “here” being/ meaning the London Borough of Tower Hamlets!

Given that the Bethnal Green Road was in Tower Hamlets and even more importantly, given that there were HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of “results” on the internet search engine sites stating the word “KHOODEELAAR!” at the very time that Vince Cable was appearing at that Oxford House Lib Dems “do”, the fact that Vince Cable didn't;t even know if the Crossrail route [as plotted] went through “here” where he was sat as he uttered the stupid question, completed for us, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against the Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London, the overdue answer to an unwarranted myth and a puzzle that had been created by the DAILY MAIL group creating the stupider suggestion that Vince Cable was the most “sincere and honest” of all the Front Bench Politician in the UK!

We had never seen any evidence that Vince Cable was anything like the image that the corrupting agenda worked via the Daily Mail group was seeking to construct of him.

We DID see enough evidence to conclude that Vince Cable - far from being “Saint Vince” as the DAILY MAIL group corruptly peddled him in the key period leading up to the disastrous antidemocratic poll staged in the UK in May 2010 - to conclude that Vince Cable was an opportunist whose careerist agenda was just as vicious as that of the others in the Parliamentary Political front row and that he was milking maximum benefit from the accidental notoriety that he had obtained by a craftily configured, rehearsed and delivered - but very small - intervention in the UK House of Commons.

Now that he is poised to sell off the Post Office, it is time for Paul dacre et al over at the DAILY MAIL GROUP to provide evidence how this latest act of destruction of Society amounts to anything saintly.

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! ahead of the BBC and a host of other "mainstream Meeja" on Tower Hamlets ....

KHOODEELAAR! ahead of the BBC and a host of other "mainstream Meeja" on Tower Hamlets ....

UPDATER ETHICAL COMMENTARY: State of Undemocray in Britain and the utter untruthfulness of “The Meeja” including the lying behaviour of the BBC bureaucracy behind the Sunday Politics programme - the London segment about Tower Hamlets  Contextually the N'th postImage 

 

1534

1508 

[1450] Hrs GMT

London

Wednesday

10 July 2013

 

“Look what you said”

“I actually started filming because of your subject”

 

John Wright to Muhammad Haque on 26 June 2013 about Muhammad Haque’s Question to the Council that PROMPTED John Wright to start the filming at all:

 

[See more on the video for the entire statement about the housing mess in Tower Hamlets that John Wright made to me on Wednesday 26 June 2013]

 

And my SUBJECT that had PROMPTED John Wright to start the filming is, was and remains: the abysmal, the awful housing in Tower Hamlets and the abysmal failure of Tower Hamlets Council to get a grip on the anti-social, unaccountable, illegal and criminal behaviour by so many of the so-called Social Landlord outlets to whom the Council had handed over vast amounts of the Council Housing stock.

 

That is my subject.

That was my subject in my Question to Tower Hamlets Council on Wednesday 26 June 2013.

That Question can be found on the Tower Hamlets Council web site at this address
http://modgov.towerhamlets.gov.uk/documents/s45739/Report%20Public%20Questions%2026.06.13.pdf

and here, BELOW, is the full text of my QUESTION as contained in the Tower Hamlets Council’s Agenda for 26 June 2013

QUESTIONS Nine questions have been submitted as set out below:-

6.1 Question from Mr Muhammad Haque, Organiser, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in Defence of the Community in the East End of London

What is Tower Hamlets Council’s Constitutionally installed and transparently DEMOCRATICALLY active audit procedure for overseeing the conduct of those bodies especially the ones that have been allowed to take over the control of formerly Council-owned and Council controlled Housing stock in the context of the clear and the express undertaking given by LBTH Council to the Community and parts of the Community in the Borough on the relevant estates affected by the implications of the stock transfer procedures that were put into operation?

 

UPDATING:

 

KHOODEELAAR! SCOOPS and exposes the following as lying about the filming of the Tower Hamlets Council Meeting on 26 June 2013:

 

1. The BBC Sunday Politics Programme [the London segment, fronted by Tim Donovan and reported on “Tower Hamlets” by A Cryer] 

2. The Dockland and East London Advertiser

3. The Private Eye magazine - The Rotten Boroughs column, the first item [dated Friday 12 July 2013] and

4. The website politics.co.uk which repeats the untruth that John Wright had been “prompted by Eric Pickles’ statement to start the filming in the Tower Hamlets Council Chamber”.

 

NOT to mention dozens of others...

All of the above outlets have either deliberately lied or have negligently left out the truth about why Tower Hamlets resident John Wright, widely reported to be 71 years old and a disabled person, had BEGUN to film the Tower Hamlets Council Meeting on Wednesday 26 June 2013.

 

As the KHOODEELAAR! Youtube post shows, John Wright VOLUNTEERS on camera to me that he had ONLY begun to film because of the subject on which I was SPEAKING when he had begun filming...

 

So it was MY SPEECH and the SUBJECT of it that had sparked him to start the filming.

 

Wasn’t that significant?

 

Yet all the above outlets say that it was what Eric Pickles had said that got John Wright to start the filing.

 

But John Wright did not say that when he made the statement to me on record as I was recording the statement which he was making it to me within literally minuets of the Council Meting being suspended!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ow1RoOZDUcQ&feature=youtu.be

 

Image of John Wright [shown on this post] from my original video report on him which I had filmed on Wednesday 26 June 2013

 

[The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary on the abysmal, dysfunctional state of Tower Hamlets Borough Council is to be continued]

ACTION SEMINAR ACTION CALL

ACTION SEMINAR ACTION CALL
THIS IMAGE is from the KHOODEELAAR! DEMO against Crossrail hole plot, held in February 2008.


Kay Jordan is seen in the image just immediately below the little girl being held on to by a larger person .

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Banner had been made by Kay Jordan who had devised the creation and then supervised it being actually done by a number of individuals working in the Socially responsible and caring SSBA that Kay Jordan built up by 30 years of dedication as the architect for the Community in the East End of London



The ACTION SEMINAR respectfully mentioned the work of Kay Jordan through the SSB A fir the defence of the Community against BiG Biz Agenda attacks

1532GMTLondonMonday08July2013.
Tower Hamlets Executive Mayor Lutfur Rahman is being asked to take action to defend the Community from Big Business Agenda attacks.
The call is in the 5-Point Action Programme, sent to mayorattowerhamletsdotgovdotuk address this afternoon by the Organisers of the Action Seminar held in the Brick Lane London E1 Area on Saturday 65 July 2013. T
he Seminar was conducted by Muhammad Haque the Khoodeelaar! Campaign Organiser against the Crossrail hole plot on Brick Lane

[ACTION UPDATES will be continued]

DATELINE Brick Lane London E1 in the East End of London UK 1320 Hrs GMT Sunday 07 July 2013

DATELINE Brick Lane London E1 in the East End of London UK 1320 Hrs GMT Sunday 07 July 2013
Images for the FUTURE OF The Community in the BRICK LANE London E1 Area. UPDATED on 06 July 2013 by © Muhammad Haque
Main picture of Kay Jordan by © Muhammad Haque taken at a KHOODEELAAR! Action Event in the Greatorex Street and the inset, photographed by © Muhammad Haque showing two of the founding members of the Spitalfields Housing Cooperative [since re-designated ‘Spitalfields Housing Association’] and the Spitalfields Small Business Association.
For over 30 years Kay Jordan stewarded the Spitalfields Small Business Association and in doing so made unparalleled contraction to the defence, stability and cohesion of the many small traders, businesses, families, individuals and their extended families both in the UK and beyond
[The Action Archives Continue to be Reported, UPDATED by © Muhammad haque]


DATELINE BRICK LANE: Original Commentary on the British Media on Sunday 07 July 2013
খেদাইলার
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Socio-Linguistic and Ethical Commentary: The Future of the Community in the Brick Lane London E1 Area - Introducing the context for the follow up reports on the Action Seminar that I had organised and conducted on Saturday 06 July 2013 [1]

1320 [1225] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
07 July 2013

This খেদাইলার!  [above] is a Seelotee Language word - transliterated into English by using phonetics: Kheydaieelaar! - that I UPDATED in 2012 in the context of the then proposal by the "Boundary Commission" about "England and Wales" to drop the word "Banglatown" from the official name of the Tower Hamlets Council Ward "Spitalfields and Banglatown".

They, the Community’s  Biggest, the most resourced and the most politically and economically powerful Enemies in Britain including and acting as extensions of the Agenda of Big Business, the Big Conglomerates, the Big Power-Wielders, are displacing, driving the Community out, pushing the Community out of our home, our neighbourhood, our Society, our land..

As can be seen from y description at the top of this Commentary, I am addressing the battle for the existence of the Community that is facing the threats from the very same sources and their likes which were threatening the same Community previously when they had plotted to dig the Community out of the area via the “Crossrail hole”.

More than 13 years ago, the UK Labour Party controlling Bureaucracy and Clique, then  very much Bliared and Right-wing, was allowing the BiG biz, Conglomerates and the Military industrial Complex [MIC] interests to add new pressures behind the already ongoing City of London Interests’ push for the takeover of the East End of London.

The idea of the Brick Lane London E1 Area as a politically galvanisable entity in the context of what passes for “democratic mobilisation” had already been tested and given expressions to.

In fact that was 40 years ago in 1973 when the pre-Murdoch [EVEN the pre-Murdoch!!!!] Sunday Times “Colour Supplement” [Magazine] carried an upfront naked assault on the Community as located in Brick Lane!

I had no option in December 1973 but to mobilise immediate Opposition to the contents of that Sunday Times Colour Magazine attack on the Brick Lane Community but also to its immediate and long term impacts and implications.

And the 1973 SUNDAY TIMES Colour Magazine ASSAULT on the Community in Brick Lane London E1 had an even more concentrated focus against  the people it had decided constituted the central part of the population here: the Seelotees!

Sylhet!

The Sunday Time Colour Magazine Attack on the Brick Lane London E1 Bangladeshi was given extra toxicity by targeting the people who had come to the UK, to London from Sylhet.
So why had the Sunday Times Colour Magazine carried that piece?

Who had given the Sunday Times Colour Magazine ANY excuse to  even mount that naked attack?

What was the “response” [NONE at all!!!!] from the “Bangladeshi political activists employed in Britain at the time” to the Sunday Times Colour Magazine attack on the SEELOTEE-speaking Bangladeshis in 1973?

[To be continued]





[To be continued]

DATELINE BRICK LANE: Original Commentary on the British Media on Sunday 07 July 2013

DATELINE BRICK LANE: Original Commentary on the British Media on Sunday 07 July 2013
DATELINE BRICK LANE: Original Commentary on the British Media on Sunday 07 July 2013
খেদাইলার
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Socio-Linguistic and Ethical Commentary: The Future of the Community in the Brick Lane London E1 Area - Introducing the context for the follow up reports on the Action Seminar that I had organised and conducted on Saturday 06 July 2013 [1]

1225 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
07 July 2013

This খেদাইলার!  [above] is a Seelotee Language word - transliterated into English by using phonetics: Kheydaieelaar! - that I UPDATED in 2012 in the context of the then proposal by the "Boundary Commission" about "England and Wales" to drop the word "Banglatown" from the official name of the Tower Hamlets Council Ward "Spitalfields and Banglatown".

They, the Community’s  Biggest, the most resourced and the most politically and economically powerful Enemies in Britain including and acting as extensions of the Agenda of Big Business, the Big Conglomerates, the Big Power-Wielders, are displacing, driving the Community out, pushing the Community out of our home, our neighbourhood, our Society, our land..

As can be seen from y description at the top of this Commentary, I am addressing the battle for the existence of the Community that is facing the threats from the very same sources and their likes which were threatening the same Community previously when they had plotted to dig the Community out of the area via the “Crossrail hole”.

More than 13 years ago, the UK Labour Party controlling Bureaucracy and Clique, then  very much Bliared and Right-wing, was allowing the BiG biz, Conglomerates and the Military industrial Complex [MIC] interests to add new pressures behind the already ongoing City of London Interests’ push for the takeover of the East End of London.

The idea of the Brick Lane London E1 Area as a politically galvanisable entity in the context of what passes for “democratic mobilisation” had already been tested and given expressions to.

In fact that was 40 years ago in 1973 when the pre-Murdoch [EVEN the pre-Murdoch!!!!] Sunday Times “Colour Supplement” [Magazine] carried an upfront naked assault on the Community as located in Brick Lane!

I had no option in December 1973 but to mobilise immediate Opposition to the contents of that Sunday Times Colour Magazine attack on the Brick Lane Community but also to its immediate and long term impacts and implications.

And the 1973 SUNDAY TIMES Colour Magazine ASSAULT on the Community in Brick Lane London E1 had an even more concentrated focus against  the people it had decided constituted the central part of the population here: the Seelotees!

Sylhet!

The Sunday Time Colour Magazine Attack on the Brick Lane London E1 Bangladeshi was given extra toxicity by targeting the people who had come to the UK, to London from Sylhet.
So why had the Sunday Times Colour Magazine carried that piece?

Who had given the Sunday Times Colour Magazine ANY excuse to  even mount that naked attack?

What was the “response” [NONE at all!!!!] from the “Bangladeshi political activists employed in Britain at the time” to the Sunday Times Colour Magazine attack on the SEELOTEE-speaking Bangladeshis in 1973?

[To be continued]



VINDICATION again for Kay Jordan who told the truth about Crossrail and the Agenda behind the hole

VINDICATION again for Kay Jordan who told the truth about Crossrail and the Agenda behind the hole
By © Muhammad Haque: REPORTING from the Action Seminar- One man detailed the nightmare 3 years of noise hell he and his family suffered because of Crossrail digging in the East End near Whitechapel.


2310 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
06 July 2013

REPORTING STRAIGHT from the Acton Seminar on the Future of the Community in the Brick Lane London E1 Area in the East End of London.
Jointly Organised by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and THREC [now renamed Race Equality in Tower Hamlets] and supported by associated campaigners groups invaliding the Brick Lane Community Business Forum, CBRUK, the Kay Jordan Foundation and others.

In the proceedings, one fact came out as a crystal clear vindication of the Community Campaigners carrying the KHOODEELAAR! banner in defending the Community against the City of London interests and their linked Big Business Agenda pushers bent in  taking over the East End of London.

Of particular note was the role played by Kay Jordan who was at pains to paint the true picture of the devastation that the Crossrail Big Biz Agenda plot would cause to the community in the East End of London.

Kay Jordan, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaigner in defence of the East End of London against the Agenda of the Big Business City of London Interests last spoke at the Vallance Gardens in August 2008.  

On that occasion, certain employees of the local Tower Hamlets Council as well as a number of the Crossrail project employees were also present, as were certain intermediary personnel speaking for the Big Biz agenda. 
Kay Jordan and the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser Muhammad Haque exposed the bankruptcy of the pedlars of the Crossrail hole plot line in their diagnostic rejection of the fakery that the employees put there. 
Kay Jordan and Muhammad Haque accurate warned that 
At one point, Princelet Street [off Brick Lane] resident and Khoodeelaar! campaign supporter Askir Miah joined in and condemned the line being then taken by certain individuals who had been ignorant of the severe impact the planned Crossrail hole would have on the community.
That meeting took place in a small room in the corner of Wodeham Gardens and Vallance Road on Friday 6 August 2008.
Today, Saturday 6 July 2013, FOUR years and eleven months to THE DAY since then, Kay Jordan's stand against the Crossrail hole was vindicated at another local meeting, held in another room, slightly bigger, again in the Brick Lane London E1 Area.
There, one of the speakers was Mr Yeabor Miah who too had been present at the 6 August 2008 meeting at the corner of Wodeham gardens and vallance Road. He had heard what Kay Jordan and Muhammad Haque said about Crossrail hole plan bringing noise, pollution and contamination.
Mr Yeabor Miah said today that he and his wife had to endure three long years of noise pollution, vibration and other environmental attacks on their home and on their street, Trahorn Close, because of the digging that was being done by Crossrail behind their home.
[To be continued]

Vallance gardens Crossrail NOISE was relived today with action recognition paid to Kay Jordan -

Vallance gardens Crossrail NOISE was relived today with action recognition paid to Kay Jordan -
Vallance Gardens Crossrail NOISE was relived today with action recognition paid to Kay Jordan. This was at the ACTION SEMINAR held today, Saturday 6 July 2013.

[To be continued]

Vallance gardens Crossrail NOISE was relived today with action recognition paid to Kay Jordan -

Vallance gardens Crossrail NOISE was relived today with action recognition paid to Kay Jordan -
Vallance Gardens Crossrail NOISE was relived today with action recognition paid to Kay Jordan. This was at the ACTION SEMINAR held today, Saturday 6 July 2013.

[To be continued]

Future of Brick Lane Area is under serious threat: warns a founder of Spitalfields Housing Coop

Future of Brick Lane Area is under serious threat: warns a founder of Spitalfields Housing Coop
By © Muhammad Haque Action SEMINAR on the Future of the Community in Brick Lane London E1 Area 01 July 2013. The SEMINAR Supporters: “Osman Gani has been a frequent contributor to a number of Bangla language outlets over the years, mainly as part of his involvement with various initiatives in the late 1970s and during the 1980s that were taken by the many active people concerned for and actively engaged with one another in creating the structures for the protection of the community as a whole...”




The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

UPDATING on the run up to FUTURE OF THE COMMUNITY, the Action Seminar in Defence of the Brick Lane London E1 Area in the East End of London: How the ethnicity-linked Media, some of whose “trade operators” “celebrated” 20 years of their trading grouping called “London Bangla Press Club” at a venue on the Mile End Road London E1, in the Borough of Tower Hamlets which is the subject of one of the most severe brazen take-over programmes taking place with the active collusion of the “local” Tower Hamlets Borough Council as the “planning” Authority. The other side of the toxic coin of dysfunction affecting the ordinary people in the East End is the numerically very present “ethnicity-linked” “Media” whose sole preoccupation seems to be to supplicate to the status quo of pro-Empire, pro-racist, State and sub-state Agencies while being in contemptuous and brazen denial of the very Community in whose name they, these “ethnicity-linked” “Media” claim their relevance when approaching the many sources of patronage, funding and “official validation and affiliation [4]

2224 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
01 July 2013
Image

The Future of the Community Action SEMINAR on Saturday 6 July 2013 is being supported by a number of local campaigners in the East End of London.

One of them is Mohammed Osman Gani who spoke to me outside the water Lily Centre where the London Bangla Press Club was holding its Fund-raising Function celebrating 20 years of its existence.

Osman Gani has been a frequent contributor to a number of Bangla language outlets over the years, mainly as part of his involvement with various s initiatives in the late 1970s and during the 1980s that were taken by the many active people concerned for and actively engaged with one another in creating the structures for the protection of the community as a whole. 

He has never really belonged to any media outlet as a full time “member of staff” or as part of the "proprietors" or "businesspersons" who happened to start the out;let at any given time but has been well connected with many of the outlets which appear to be mushrooming at an inexplicable rate from addresses in the East End of London.

So he is well placed to comment on what those outlets are doing now as we approach the First Action Seminar of Saturday 6 July 2013 in the East End to defend the Community in the Brick Lane London E1 Area:

Here is a sample of what he told me in his response to the questions that I had put to him in the Mile End Road yesterday:


“.... taking over part of Tower Hamlets, particularly Banglatown, Brick Lane Area...


“ In a way, the Community is under real threats and there is no-one [who is defending the Community which is feeling] defenceless.

And our Media, particularly the ethnic Media and the mainstream Media are failing.

They are pandering to the developers.

And the developers are ruthless.

Twenty years ago, the got rid of [the] Spitalfields Market and the whole Market has been taken over ..

It is a matter of time... Brick Lane, Bangla Town will be non existent.”

[To be continued]

Seminar supporter Osman Gani [pictured by © Muhammad Haque on 30 June 2013] tells Muhammad Haque how the very future of the Brick Lane London E1 area is threatened with extinction in 10 years...

UK Bangladeshis aren't recognised by a "Club" that has been doing brisk business for its Members...

UK Bangladeshis aren't recognised by a "Club" that has been doing brisk business for its Members...

Future of the Community in the East End of London is not even mentioned. But then the UK Bangladeshis aren't recognised by a "Club" that has been doing brisk business for its Members based entirely on the struggle of the Community - 1

 Image

When the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign issued the first comprehensive legal action Notice against a Bangladesh “weekly” called Notun Din and a few others in 2006, it did so after thoroughly examining the evidence of the ABSENCE OF ALL reports of the Campaign in all the “Bengali weeklies”.

 

The Defence of the Community has NEVER been reported by the “Bengali Press”.

When they have done so they have done it in order to show their servility to the racists, like those who fronted the Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy in January 2006.

 

From the SUNDAY TIMES’ magazine assault on the Seelottee-speaking people, - the overwhelming majority of Bangladeshis in the UK who pioneered the “OVERSEAS Bangladeshi contributions to the idea and then the state of Bangladesh”, the so-called “Bengali Press in London” has NOT existed.

 

More evidence  came of this last night at an event that was “celebrated” as being the completion of 20 years of a  Club, called  the “London Bangla Press Club”

 

_____

 

 

This © Muhammad Haque picture [above, taken on] [Sunday 30 June 2013] shows Lutfur Rahman looking positive as he hears a statement by an official of the "London Bangla Press Club" hoping that the Club would have its very own Building in the [near] future.

 

The event, held in the Mile End Road, near Whitechapel, was to mark the reported 20 years of the existence of the Club.

 

Presentations, including a short speech by Lutfur Rahman, gave the impression that it was a Club rather than an association of journalists, as journalism is normally understood.

 

In the only serious "historic" comment that was made by one of the stated founders of the Club, a reference to Altab Ali was inserted as a passing, casual event skipping all of the 19 years that followed and glueing the history to 1997 and the many "achievements".

 

The UK Bangladeshi community was not shown in any way as a Community other than as an attachment to certain individuals and their careers!

 

In fact the CLUB claimed the major credit for the fact that certain persons were now installed in the British Parliament and that Lutfur Rahman was “the executive mayor iN Tower Hamlets”.

 

Two of those, including Lutfur Rahman, actually acknowledged the Club’s Members’ role in getting them to be where they were now!

 

[To be continued]

 ______

 

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: How the "London Bangla Press Club" is sinking the role of the UK Bangladeshis and abolishing all traces of the Community;s struggle for creating the space and the opportunities in which the CLUB now flourishes! -[1]

 

1300 Hrs GMT

London

Monday

01 July 2013

 

Tower Hamlets Council neglects Campaigners demand to DROP the Evictions & NO to CUTS -3

Tower Hamlets Council neglects Campaigners demand to DROP the Evictions &  NO to  CUTS -3
This is Eileen Short pictured by © Muhammad Haque on Wednesday 26 June 2013

KHOODEELAAR! Action Reports and Commentary in Defence of the Community in the East End of London

By © Muhammad Haque

1710
1644 Hrs GMT

London

Friday

28 June 2013

 

 

On Wednesday, 26 June 2013, three persons stood together as one of them, Eileen Short, presented the petition against Evictions.

One other, Audrey Aymer, spoke after Eileen Short. But she could not go on. She broke down with emotion.

The stress of being forced to live on ever decreasing amounts of income and the sheer brutality of the treatment she has been experiencing from Tower Hamlets Council’s own employees, must have got to her!

Audrey Aylmer was visibly overcome with emotion, as she joined Eileen Short and tried to add her voice to the presentation of the Petition to the “full” Council

She had to be comforted by Eileen Short and her co-campaigner Rouf Ahmad “Shibli’.

Audrey Aylmer had spoken to me earlier and I will be CONTINUING THESE REPORTS based on her statements and ON those made by her colleagues Eileen Short and Rouf Ahmed Shibli, later.

I start with Eileen Short’s actual words [below]

 

EILEEN SHORT had told me before the Council Meeting:

 

Image

[AADHIKAROnline transcript Friday 28 June 2013 of the exclusive KHOODEELAAR! Campaign report]

“The Government is slashing benefits which means that thousands of people have been reduced to desperate  poverty and others who live in fear of losing their homes. So we’ve come to the [Tower Hamlets] Council to ask them to stand with us,m the people that they represent and help to resist what the Government are doing. That means that they {Tower Hamlets Council] agree not to evict people falling in arrears due to benefit cuts. they [Tower Hamlets Council] need to tell other landlords [e.g. the so-called Registered Social landlords or ‘the RSLs”] that’s what they expect them to do and they [Tower Hamlets Council] need to do something with other Councils across London and nationally  to put effective pressure back on the [UK Central Government, also known as the CON-Dem Collusion against Society] [and say that what the Government is doing is to benefits is not [on] [and it is] destroying [peoples’ lives i Tower Hamlets][ and so  it has got to be stopped].”

 

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! Question causes Shadwell Activist to ask LBTH Council:: ARE YOU CORRUPT?

KHOODEELAAR! Question causes Shadwell Activist to ask LBTH Council:: ARE YOU CORRUPT?
This © Muhammad Haque picture of Shadwell, London E1 activist John Wright was taken outside the “Town Hall” of the east London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council on Wednesday 26 June 2013. John had just been told by new Chair of the Council Lesley Pavitt to stop filming the Council;s proceedings. John Wright retorted by asking the Council: What have got to hide? Are YOU CORRUPT?
The KHOODEELAAR! Investigation into the Council;s democracy deficit was at the centre of John Wright’s interests in filing the Proceedings, he told Muhammad Haque.
John Wright said
“it was the subject” of Muhammad Haque’s Question to the Council that had got him to start filming.
John Wright said that he had spent EIGHT years trying to get truthful answers from Tower Hamlets Council about the behaviour of several Registered Social landlord outfits. The formal texts of Muhammad haque’s Question to the Council read as follows:

“Question from Mr Muhammad Haque, Organiser, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in Defence of the Community in the East End of London What is Tower Hamlets Council’s Constitutionally installed and transparently DEMOCRATICALLY active audit procedure for overseeing the conduct of those bodies especially the ones that have been allowed to take over the control of formerly Council-owned and Council controlled Housing stock in the context of the clear and the express undertaking given by LBTH Council to the Community and parts of the Community in the Borough on the relevant estates affected by the implications of the stock transfer procedures that were put into operation?”

[This investigation continues]

 

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Democracy Action campaign: Diagnosing the lying by the Tower Hamlets ~Council's "town hall pravda" the East End Lies and its so-called "independent" commercial rival the "East London Idiotiser" - the Big Lying for the Big fat Social landlords which have been embraced by the Council's CORRUPT bureaucracy over the "landlords" abuse of their control of former Council Housing stocks - [1]

 

And an exclusive report on WHY “the Shadwell Film-maker” John Wright had begun filming the Council proceedings in the first place last night...

 

1535 Hrs GMT

London

Thursday

27 June 2013

 

The East London Idiotiser remains very narrow-minded and prejudiced and utterly misleading.

 

Why?

 

Because as the following piece I have retrieved from their web site shows they have a blind spot when  it coms to holding the Tower Hamlets Council to account on universal truthful bases.

 

The fact that a local Tower Hamlets resident, reported by the IDIOTISER as John Wright in their piece below, was involved in a row with the Council's Speaker Lesley pavitt over his filing of the proceedings is not at all complete without the REASON behind the man's decision to start filming in the first place!

 

The superficiality and the sub-racist bias on the part of the Idiotiser are parts of the obstruction to democracy in the Tower Hamlets.

 

Why?

 

Because as the 'film-maker' told me not long afterwards, he had ONLY STARTED filming the Council's proceedings because of... my subject.

 

And what subject was he referring to as my “subject”?

 

Answer:

 

Well, the first Question [from the Members of the Public] that was underway when the filming was spotted, was my question about the dysfunction in the behaviour of the 

Council in the context of the abysmal disservice by the Registered Social landlords that had been given huge stock of Tower Hamlets Council housing!

 

I was only about to put the rest of my SUPPLEMENTARY QUESTION when the “filming” became the ficus of Speaker Lesley Pavitt.

 

She “suspended the meeting for a few minutes”.

 

But “John Wright” told me minutes later that he had  only begun the filming because  of my subject. the  behaviour of the RSLs. The so-called Registered Social landlords. He told me that  had spent 8 years trying to get answers from the Council in precisely what I was doing in my Question.

 

But the IDIOTISER would not know that at all!

 

For the past decade since the housing stock was transferred by Tower Hamlets Council, the East London Idiotiser has failed to report on the behaviour of the “social landlord” outfits at all.

 

Why?

 

Because the IDIOTISER remains a very backward “local news” operation and is hundreds of years behind the times or the themes.

 

If it had a “reporter” sitting right behind where I was speaking, that reporter would have shut his eyes, his ears and his mind to all that I had to say!

 

And thereby they would shut their eyes, their ears and their minds to what the people in the ordinary community were experiencing at the  hands of not only the “social landlords”: but also at the democracy-deficit Tower Hamlets Dysfunctional Council.

 

This latest behaviour shows that the East London IDIOTISER is as bad as the East End Lies, the so-called ‘town hall pravda’ that Eric Pickles has been blasting away at t suit the Neo Cons Big Business interests that ARCHANT ‘local titles’ back.

 

In Tower Hamlets there is therefore no short cut to asserting the peoples’ democratic and representational rights: Do NOT rely on or  trust the Tory-leaning East London Idiotiser or the in-house vanity paper [as John Biggs as been recently calling the agenda] of the East End Lies that is published by the Controlling Clique in Tower Hamlets Council.

 

The “staff” that make the decisions on either are real life strangers to the truth that ordinary people in Tower Hamlets, one of the most deprived Boroughs in England, experience daily, every hour, every single time they are in contact with “their local” Council!

 

Community Action campaigns  are the platforms to tell and to carry the truth against lying of both kinds.

 

 

___________________________________________________________________

 

Quoting the full contents of the online piece on the website "www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk"

 

Tower Hamlets council halts its meeting when OAP is spotted filming it

 

Mike Brooke

Thursday, June 27, 2013 

9:36 AM

 

    

A row with security guards erupted when a disabled pensioner caught filming Tower Hamlets council’s open meeting on his pocket camera at the Town Hall last night was ordered to stop.

 

Email Print

Police were being called when John Wright, 71, refused to stop recording.

 

He was told by the council Speaker to switch off—or be thrown out.

 

The 71-year-old Alzheimer’s Ambassador for Tower Hamlets refused to budge or turn off his device, protesting that the council was being undemocratic preventing him recording proceedings for his disabled neighbours at Shadwell who were unable to get to the Town Hall.

 

John, who had organised a Big Lunch street party on Shadwell’s Glamis Estate earlier this month to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Queen’s coronation, argued that Parliament and the London Assembly were videoed, while Communities Secretary Eric Pickles was pressing local authorities to follow.

 

The Council Speaker adjourned the meeting for 20 minutes because of the protest.

 

He told the press during the break: “Until police move me, I’m staying put. I’m filming because the people ought to know what’s going on—if you’re housebound like me, you can’t get to council meetings.”

 

A council enforcement officer asked him to leave, but the protesting pensioner realising he was not a policeman continued his protest.

 

The officer asked on his radio for police back-up.

 

The meeting resumed when the Speaker asked John to stop filming.

 

He had already put away his pocket camera, he told her, to laughter in the public gallery. No police turned up.

 

Regulations brought in last year on filming and access to local authorities do not apply to full council meetings, only executive meetings and committees, according a Town Hall statement issued to the press minutes later.

The Speaker confirmed she was keen to move towards filming proceedings, the statement added, but “in a planned manner with proper protocols.”

KHOODEELAAR! Question causes Shadwell Activist to ask LBTH Council:: ARE YOU CORRUPT?

KHOODEELAAR! Question causes Shadwell Activist to ask LBTH Council:: ARE YOU CORRUPT?

 

 

 

 

 

ImageEast London Campaigner MYRA GARRETT in this © Muhammad Haque picture 26 June 2013 was backing the Campaign to stop EVICTIONS in Tower Hamlets.

KHOODEELAAR! has already reported in May 2013 that Myra Garrett has very good opinion of a fellow Campaigner, Kay Jordan....

 

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Democracy Action campaign: Diagnosing the lying by the Tower Hamlets ~Council's "town hall pravda" the East End Lies and its so-called "independent" commercial rival the "East London Idiotiser" - the Big Lying for the Big fat Social landlords which have been embraced by the Council's CORRUPT bureaucracy over the "landlords" abuse of their control of former Council Housing stocks - [1]

 

And an exclusive report on WHY “the Shadwell Film-maker” John Wright had begun filming the Council proceedings in the first place last night...

 

1535 Hrs GMT

London

Thursday

27 June 2013

 

The East London Idiotiser remains very narrow-minded and prejudiced and utterly misleading.

 

Why?

 

Because as the following piece I have retrieved from their web site shows they have a blind spot when  it coms to holding the Tower Hamlets Council to account on universal truthful bases.

 

The fact that a local Tower Hamlets resident, reported by the IDIOTISER as John Wright in their piece below, was involved in a row with the Council's Speaker Lesley pavitt over his filing of the proceedings is not at all complete without the REASON behind the man's decision to start filming in the first place!

 

The superficiality and the sub-racist bias on the part of the Idiotiser are parts of the obstruction to democracy in the Tower Hamlets.

 

Why?

 

Because as the 'film-maker' told me not long afterwards, he had ONLY STARTED filming the Council's proceedings because of... my subject.

 

And what subject was he referring to as my “subject”?

 

Answer:

 

Well, the first Question [from the Members of the Public] that was underway when the filming was spotted, was my question about the dysfunction in the behaviour of the 

Council in the context of the abysmal disservice by the Registered Social landlords that had been given huge stock of Tower Hamlets Council housing!

 

I was only about to put the rest of my SUPPLEMENTARY QUESTION when the “filming” became the ficus of Speaker Lesley Pavitt.

 

She “suspended the meeting for a few minutes”.

 

But “John Wright” told me minutes later that he had  only begun the filming because  of my subject. the  behaviour of the RSLs. The so-called Registered Social landlords. He told me that  had spent 8 years trying to get answers from the Council in precisely what I was doing in my Question.

 

But the IDIOTISER would not know that at all!

 

For the past decade since the housing stock was transferred by Tower Hamlets Council, the East London Idiotiser has failed to report on the behaviour of the “social landlord” outfits at all.

 

Why?

 

Because the IDIOTISER remains a very backward “local news” operation and is hundreds of years behind the times or the themes.

 

If it had a “reporter” sitting right behind where I was speaking, that reporter would have shut his eyes, his ears and his mind to all that I had to say!

 

And thereby they would shut their eyes, their ears and their minds to what the people in the ordinary community were experiencing at the  hands of not only the “social landlords”: but also at the democracy-deficit Tower Hamlets Dysfunctional Council.

 

This latest behaviour shows that the East London IDIOTISER is as bad as the East End Lies, the so-called ‘town hall pravda’ that Eric Pickles has been blasting away at t suit the Neo Cons Big Business interests that ARCHANT ‘local titles’ back.

 

In Tower Hamlets there is therefore no short cut to asserting the peoples’ democratic and representational rights: Do NOT rely on or  trust the Tory-leaning East London Idiotiser or the in-house vanity paper [as John Biggs as been recently calling the agenda] of the East End Lies that is published by the Controlling Clique in Tower Hamlets Council.

 

The “staff” that make the decisions on either are real life strangers to the truth that ordinary people in Tower Hamlets, one of the most deprived Boroughs in England, experience daily, every hour, every single time they are in contact with “their local” Council!

 

Community Action campaigns  are the platforms to tell and to carry the truth against lying of both kinds.

 

 

___________________________________________________________________

 

Quoting the full contents of the online piece on the website "www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk"

 

Tower Hamlets council halts its meeting when OAP is spotted filming it

 

Mike Brooke

Thursday, June 27, 2013 

9:36 AM

 

    

A row with security guards erupted when a disabled pensioner caught filming Tower Hamlets council’s open meeting on his pocket camera at the Town Hall last night was ordered to stop.

 

Email Print

Police were being called when John Wright, 71, refused to stop recording.

 

He was told by the council Speaker to switch off—or be thrown out.

 

The 71-year-old Alzheimer’s Ambassador for Tower Hamlets refused to budge or turn off his device, protesting that the council was being undemocratic preventing him recording proceedings for his disabled neighbours at Shadwell who were unable to get to the Town Hall.

 

John, who had organised a Big Lunch street party on Shadwell’s Glamis Estate earlier this month to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Queen’s coronation, argued that Parliament and the London Assembly were videoed, while Communities Secretary Eric Pickles was pressing local authorities to follow.

 

The Council Speaker adjourned the meeting for 20 minutes because of the protest.

 

He told the press during the break: “Until police move me, I’m staying put. I’m filming because the people ought to know what’s going on—if you’re housebound like me, you can’t get to council meetings.”

 

A council enforcement officer asked him to leave, but the protesting pensioner realising he was not a policeman continued his protest.

 

The officer asked on his radio for police back-up.

 

The meeting resumed when the Speaker asked John to stop filming.

 

He had already put away his pocket camera, he told her, to laughter in the public gallery. No police turned up.

 

Regulations brought in last year on filming and access to local authorities do not apply to full council meetings, only executive meetings and committees, according a Town Hall statement issued to the press minutes later.

The Speaker confirmed she was keen to move towards filming proceedings, the statement added, but “in a planned manner with proper protocols.”

KHOODEELAAR! Question causes Shadwell Activist to ask LBTH Council:: ARE YOU CORRUPT?

KHOODEELAAR! Question causes Shadwell Activist to ask LBTH Council:: ARE YOU CORRUPT?

 

 

 

 

 

ImageEast London Campaigner MYRA GARRETT in this © Muhammad Haque picture 26 June 2013 was backing the Campaign to stop EVICTIONS in Tower Hamlets.

KHOODEELAAR! has already reported in May 2013 that Myra Garrett has very good opinion of a fellow Campaigner, Kay Jordan....

 

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Democracy Action campaign: Diagnosing the lying by the Tower Hamlets ~Council's "town hall pravda" the East End Lies and its so-called "independent" commercial rival the "East London Idiotiser" - the Big Lying for the Big fat Social landlords which have been embraced by the Council's CORRUPT bureaucracy over the "landlords" abuse of their control of former Council Housing stocks - [1]

 

And an exclusive report on WHY “the Shadwell Film-maker” John Wright had begun filming the Council proceedings in the first place last night...

 

1535 Hrs GMT

London

Thursday

27 June 2013

 

The East London Idiotiser remains very narrow-minded and prejudiced and utterly misleading.

 

Why?

 

Because as the following piece I have retrieved from their web site shows they have a blind spot when  it coms to holding the Tower Hamlets Council to account on universal truthful bases.

 

The fact that a local Tower Hamlets resident, reported by the IDIOTISER as John Wright in their piece below, was involved in a row with the Council's Speaker Lesley pavitt over his filing of the proceedings is not at all complete without the REASON behind the man's decision to start filming in the first place!

 

The superficiality and the sub-racist bias on the part of the Idiotiser are parts of the obstruction to democracy in the Tower Hamlets.

 

Why?

 

Because as the 'film-maker' told me not long afterwards, he had ONLY STARTED filming the Council's proceedings because of... my subject.

 

And what subject was he referring to as my “subject”?

 

Answer:

 

Well, the first Question [from the Members of the Public] that was underway when the filming was spotted, was my question about the dysfunction in the behaviour of the 

Council in the context of the abysmal disservice by the Registered Social landlords that had been given huge stock of Tower Hamlets Council housing!

 

I was only about to put the rest of my SUPPLEMENTARY QUESTION when the “filming” became the ficus of Speaker Lesley Pavitt.

 

She “suspended the meeting for a few minutes”.

 

But “John Wright” told me minutes later that he had  only begun the filming because  of my subject. the  behaviour of the RSLs. The so-called Registered Social landlords. He told me that  had spent 8 years trying to get answers from the Council in precisely what I was doing in my Question.

 

But the IDIOTISER would not know that at all!

 

For the past decade since the housing stock was transferred by Tower Hamlets Council, the East London Idiotiser has failed to report on the behaviour of the “social landlord” outfits at all.

 

Why?

 

Because the IDIOTISER remains a very backward “local news” operation and is hundreds of years behind the times or the themes.

 

If it had a “reporter” sitting right behind where I was speaking, that reporter would have shut his eyes, his ears and his mind to all that I had to say!

 

And thereby they would shut their eyes, their ears and their minds to what the people in the ordinary community were experiencing at the  hands of not only the “social landlords”: but also at the democracy-deficit Tower Hamlets Dysfunctional Council.

 

This latest behaviour shows that the East London IDIOTISER is as bad as the East End Lies, the so-called ‘town hall pravda’ that Eric Pickles has been blasting away at t suit the Neo Cons Big Business interests that ARCHANT ‘local titles’ back.

 

In Tower Hamlets there is therefore no short cut to asserting the peoples’ democratic and representational rights: Do NOT rely on or  trust the Tory-leaning East London Idiotiser or the in-house vanity paper [as John Biggs as been recently calling the agenda] of the East End Lies that is published by the Controlling Clique in Tower Hamlets Council.

 

The “staff” that make the decisions on either are real life strangers to the truth that ordinary people in Tower Hamlets, one of the most deprived Boroughs in England, experience daily, every hour, every single time they are in contact with “their local” Council!

 

Community Action campaigns  are the platforms to tell and to carry the truth against lying of both kinds.

 

 

___________________________________________________________________

 

Quoting the full contents of the online piece on the website "www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk"

 

Tower Hamlets council halts its meeting when OAP is spotted filming it

 

Mike Brooke

Thursday, June 27, 2013 

9:36 AM

 

    

A row with security guards erupted when a disabled pensioner caught filming Tower Hamlets council’s open meeting on his pocket camera at the Town Hall last night was ordered to stop.

 

Email Print

Police were being called when John Wright, 71, refused to stop recording.

 

He was told by the council Speaker to switch off—or be thrown out.

 

The 71-year-old Alzheimer’s Ambassador for Tower Hamlets refused to budge or turn off his device, protesting that the council was being undemocratic preventing him recording proceedings for his disabled neighbours at Shadwell who were unable to get to the Town Hall.

 

John, who had organised a Big Lunch street party on Shadwell’s Glamis Estate earlier this month to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Queen’s coronation, argued that Parliament and the London Assembly were videoed, while Communities Secretary Eric Pickles was pressing local authorities to follow.

 

The Council Speaker adjourned the meeting for 20 minutes because of the protest.

 

He told the press during the break: “Until police move me, I’m staying put. I’m filming because the people ought to know what’s going on—if you’re housebound like me, you can’t get to council meetings.”

 

A council enforcement officer asked him to leave, but the protesting pensioner realising he was not a policeman continued his protest.

 

The officer asked on his radio for police back-up.

 

The meeting resumed when the Speaker asked John to stop filming.

 

He had already put away his pocket camera, he told her, to laughter in the public gallery. No police turned up.

 

Regulations brought in last year on filming and access to local authorities do not apply to full council meetings, only executive meetings and committees, according a Town Hall statement issued to the press minutes later.

The Speaker confirmed she was keen to move towards filming proceedings, the statement added, but “in a planned manner with proper protocols.”

TOM RIDGE Says No to the Big Biz Agenda being imposed on the East End of London

TOM RIDGE Says No to the Big Biz Agenda being imposed on the East End of London

Tom Ridge [facing camera] pictured at “Mulberry Place” by Muhammad Haque
in the evening of Wednesday 19 June 2013.
[INSET: right] Muhammad Haque is seen leading the KHOODEELAAR! rally at the

same place on Wednesday 01 March 2006 against Tower Hamlets Council’s role in inviting the Crossrail hole scam attacks on the East End of London. The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has again been vindicated by the behaviour of Tower Hamlets Council as seen on Wednesday 19 June 2013. It IS still playing a diabolical role in sucking up to Big Biz Agenda courier Crossrail as the Council also colludes with the planned AGENDA for the destruction of the East End Architecture, Environment and History.
And puts at serious and certain risk the very existence of the local Community. [To be continued]
AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Defending the Community in the

East End of London
0920 Hrs GMT London Thursday 20 June 2013 



SAY NO Tower Hamlets Council playing any role as a stooge for Neo Cons, CONDEM, Big Biz. Say it NOW

SAY NO Tower Hamlets Council playing any role as a stooge for Neo Cons, CONDEM, Big Biz. Say it NOW
SAY NO Tower Hamlets Council playing any role as a stooge for Neo Cons, CONDEM, Big Biz. Say it NOW

Bedroom tax? Con-Dem Cruelty, Lying and Denial? NOT enough demos are happening! Why?

Bedroom tax? Con-Dem Cruelty, Lying and Denial? NOT enough demos are happening! Why?
Image from the BIRMINGHAM MAIL shows a demo but my question is: why aren’t more people demonstrating in the British areas where the poverty-imposiutoon programmes INCLUDING the “bedroom tax” has been being fiercely carried via the “local” mostly Labour, Councils?
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Diagnosing the moral, ethical, intellectual, Legal and Constitutional bankruptcy of the MPs, the “left” and the Trade union bureaucracies now “featuring” in some news about the “bedroom tax” ]
1040 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
19 June 2013

I must first make the evidential point: 
WHERE had all the "leaders of the bedroom tax-related campaigns" been all those years BEFORE this toxic phrase came into existence?
FOR years, No!  for DECADES, the UK's "benefit system" had BEEN a corrupt system, an unjust system and a totally oppressive, stress-causing one.
Neither the "trade unions" nor "the socialists" [!] had made ANY retrievable case for any justice for the thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of people who had been pushed deliberately into various states of poverty  by the "benefit system".
Nor had  "the MPs".
Nor are the MPs even now.
Just take a look at the indescribably stupid, ignorant, supplicatory, role of the MPs "select committee" allegedly about today's DWP!
It is dim
It is ignorant
It is timid
It is servile
It is obsolete.

What have I been calling the DWP?
What do I call the DWP today?
SAMPLES:
Department for Want and Poverty-creation!
Now, updating it:
Department for Want and Poverty-Imposition!
Department for Woes and Poverty-perpetration!
And so on along the same factual, evidential lines.

[To be continued

Campaign UPDATE SEMINAR in defence of the East End against Big Biz takeover via LBTH Council

Campaign UPDATE SEMINAR in defence of the East End against Big Biz takeover via LBTH Council
Kay Jordan seen talking to the BBC Politics Show in March 2006
The Organiser of KHOODEELAAR! the Campaign against the Crossrail hole and in Defence of the Community in the East End of London has told the London-based satellite TV station ChanneliEurope [BSKYB Channel 844, filmed in the Hanbury Street in the Brick Lane London E1 area this evening] that the Community in the East End faces extinction……

This post online at
0405 [0325] [0305] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 19 June 2013

Campaign Seminar on Saturday 06 July 2013
Future of the Community in the Brick Lane London E1 area
REPORT researched and produced jointly by:
AADHIKAROnline, KHOODEELAAR! KHEYDAIEELAAR! and THREC

By © Muhammad Haque
0315 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
19 July 2013
The BBC1 “Politics Show” had interviewed Muhammad Haque and Kay Jordan in March 2006 in the context of the then still “uncertain” future of the East End that had been targeted b y Big Business using the Crossrail project to dig the local community out f the area.
KHOODEELAAR! Campaign had created such pressure on the political “establishment” locally and nationally that the BBC conceded that the issue of Crossrail needed to be “debated”.
In the picture below, Kay Jordan is seen talking to the reporter who had done the interviews Zia Trench [with her back to camera].
Zia Trench and Muhammad Haque exchanged a great deal of correspondence before and after those interviews and the reason was that the BBC programme, actually aired on 26 March 2006 failed to air MOST of the evidence against the Big Business Agenda of taking over the East End of London.
I shall be reporting on THOSE correspondence an d UPDATE their implications in light of the BIG BIZ ATTACK on the Community in the East End of London NOW!
The CAMPAIGN SEMINAR: the Future of the Community in the Brick Lane London E1 Area is being held just weeks after the G8 Summit.
We shall examine the G8 Big Biz agenda in action just across the road in the “City of London” which has been daily occupying newer and newer bits, parts, estates and neighbourhoods in the East End of London.
In our UPDATER Diagnostics, we shall look at Kay Jordan’s role as an annual attender of a weird event in the City of London where Kay has been the only person to puncture the balloon of bogus words, phrases and [incredibly] ‘promises’ issued routinely by the performers of lies for Big Business Agenda ….
[To be continued]
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/p480x480/1016590_471524719598599_283348444_n.jpg” width=”184″ height=”141″ />

Interview with Muhammad Haque and Osman Gani
Campaign Seminar on the Future of the Community in the Brick Lane London E1 Area scheduled to be held on Saturday 06 July 2013

This post online at
0325 [0305] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 19 June 2013

Campaign Seminar on Saturday 06 July 2013
Future of the Community in the Brick Lane London E1 area
REPORT researched and produced jointly by:
AADHIKAROnline, KHOODEELAAR! KHEYDAIEELAAR! and THREC
Editor © Muhammad Haque
2200 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 18 June 2013
In an Exclusive interview Muhammad Haque, the Organiser of KHOODEELAAR! the Campaign against the Crossrail hole and in Defence of the Community in the East End of London has told the London-based satellite TV station ChanneliEurope [BSKYB Channel 844, filmed in the Hanbury Street in the Brick Lane London E1 area this evening] that the Community in the East End faces extinction because the area is beg taken over by Big Business resulting directly from the planning collusion by the local Tower Hamlets Council. He announced that a series of Campaign Seminar is being launched in two weeks [Saturday 06 July 2013] to mobilise the defence of the community by reversing the role that Tower Hamlets Council has been playing. He said that attention will also be focussed on the relevant strategic role of the London Assembly, the Lon don mayor and of the UK central government and the Parliament t at Westminster.
Excerpts:
“We are organising the defence of the local community by addressing the role of the local Council as a planning, strategic planning authority that is responsible for allowing people to build high rise buildings in the area and make the local, existing small businesses and the local community unable to economically survive in this area.
[The Community] In the East End of London specially in the Brick Lane London E1 Area is threatened with extinction and take-over by the Big Business.
We are having a seminar in the afternoon on Saturday 6 July 2013….
I am going to pass over to Mr Osman Gani who is the Chair of the Tower Hamlets Race Equality Council [THREC] and (one of the) founders of (two of the most important social organisations that in fact have played key parts in the defence of the local community which we now have to again evened with the new initiates), the Spitalfields Small Business Association and the Spitalfields Housing Association.”
Osman Gani: Mr Muhammad Haque has spoken the absolute truth.
[Here are the key facts in the context of the Campaign Seminar on Saturday 6 July 2913 called “Future of the Community in the Brick Lane Lon don E1 Area...”]
Towards 1979-80, we established the Spitalfields Small Business Association [SSBA] and the Spitalfields Housing Co-Operative [now known as the Spitalfields Housing Association] in order that small Businesses could exist and in order that [the Bangladeshi community, then experiencing the most severe denial in access to decent o any housing rights] could get the housing needs met with access to decent housing. We had stabs firmed the social organisations of the whole community with those two initiatives.
But decades later the achievements are being very seriously reversed, the whole community is being destroyed.
This is happening because of the policies of the local Tower Hamlets Council.
[To be continued]

By © Muhammad Haque
0315 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
19 July 2013

The BBC1 “Politics Show” had interviewed Muhammad Haque and Kay Jordan in March 2006 in the context of the then still “uncertain” future of the East End that had been targeted b y Big Business using the Crossrail project to dig the local community out f the area.
KHOODEELAAR! Campaign had created such pressure on the political “establishment” locally and nationally that the BBC conceded that the issue of Crossrail needed to be “debated”.
east-end-of-london-community-architect-and-defvender-kay-jordan-on-bbc1-sunday-26-march-2006.jpg
Zia Trench and Muhammad Haque exchanged a great deal of correspondence before and after those interviews and the reason was that the BBC programme, actually aired on 26 March 2006 failed to air MOST of the evidence against the Big Business Agenda of taking over the East End of London.
I shall be reporting on THOSE correspondence an d UPDATE their implications in light of the BIG BIZ ATTACK on the Community in the East End of London NOW!
The CAMPAIGN SEMINAR: the Future of the Community in the Brick Lane London E1 Area is being held just weeks after the G8 Summit.
We shall examine the G8 Big Biz agenda in action just across the road in the “City of London” which has been daily occupying newer and newer bits, parts, estates and neighbourhoods in the East End of London.
In our UPDATER Diagnostics, we shall look at Kay Jordan’s role as an annual attender of a weird event in the City of London where Kay has been the only person to puncture the balloon of bogus words, phrases and [incredibly] ‘promises’ issued routinely by the performers of lies for Big Business Agenda ….
[To be continued]

Animals are teachers in so many ways that humans simply are too behind to even understand-1

Animals are teachers in so many ways that humans simply are too behind to even understand-1
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Into 8th year since Kay Jordan Called me to come to the Three Kittens!

THIS IMAGE has been taken from the website of the London DAILY EXPRESS Newspaper Group. I have created a miniature montage with added image from the BBC and some graphics

The cat and the owls in the image have e not been referred to in the item below

0932 Hrs GMT London Sunday 16 June 2013

Come! Quick! There are three kittens!"
Kay said!
And the face of the entire Movement was thereby changed for ever!
It was THIS WEEK SEVEN years ago that Kay Jordan called me on a mobile phone and sent me racing across the East End of London.
The Kittens have been at the centre of the Movement that has been carrying some of the Century’s most important “local” actions in defending the Community in the East End of London.
The Kittens have also been key indicators of the state of uncivilisation that still dominates so many people who appear to be ‘almost civilised’.
THIS Series will UPDATE on The KITTENS that Kay Jordan took me to! [To be continued]


When will the Guardian bring a really overdue EXCLUSIVE, on the Dishonours System?

When will the Guardian bring a really overdue EXCLUSIVE, on the Dishonours System?
Stop insulting the people of the Brick Lane London E1 area community

When will the Guardian bring a really overdue EXCLUSIVE, on the Dishonours System?

Brick Lane area Park, Allen Gardens under siege from louts as Council caught in vanity expenditure

Brick Lane area Park, Allen Gardens under siege from louts as Council caught in vanity expenditure
Brick Lane area: Local Park, Allen Gardens under siege from louts as “local” Tower Hamlets Council is once again caught in allegations made by a UK Govt-backing MP accusing Tower Hamlets of indulging in abuse of public money in vanity expenditures


By © Muhammad Haque


Retrieved by AADHIKAROnline at 0430 GMT on Friday 07 June 2013 from the following web site

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/spitalfields_residents_barricaded_in_homes_as_boozy_revellers_descend_on_parks_for_weekend_parties_1_2221996

Spitalfields residents ‘barricaded in homes’ as boozy revellers descend on parks for weekend parties

 Canisters from legal highs in Allen Gardens after crowds took the park Robin de Peyer Tuesday, June 4, 2013 
11:55 AM

Thousands of rowdy revellers using legal highs and downing booze in parks are leaving residents under siege in their homes.





Litter strewn across Allen Gardens, Spitalfields

Just weeks after authorities announced a “dispersal zone” to tackle anti-social behaviour, people are too scared to venture outside their front doors as youths party in green spaces, leaving a trail of urine and smashed bottles.

Speaking after thousands of revellers descended on Allen Gardens in Spitalfields this weekend, a resident of nearby Woodseer Street, who did not wish to be named, said: “People were drinking, taking drugs, and using the street as a toilet.

“I felt scared to go out, and I’m 6ft 4in. I knew it would lead to confrontation, so I chose to stay barricaded in my home.”

Others reported glass bottles being lobbed into gardens, and drumming until 2am. One woman was sitting in her greenhouse when a “missile” shattered the roof above her head, showering her with glass.

 Broken glass in Allen Gardens after the weekend's antics Residents said police presence had decreased in recent weeks, despite the new “dispersal zone” introduced by the Met and Tower Hamlets Council in a bid to tackle anti-social behaviour last month.
The park is in the middle of the targeted area – but was described by locals as a “lawless zone”. Empty gas canisters from legal highs and shards of broken glass were strewn across the field on Monday morning. An actress, who lives in Buxton Street said people go to Allen Gardens after clubs in nearby Brick Lane stop serving.
“Everyone’s raving all night and swallowing massive amounts of drugs, and they come here instead of going home,” she said. “I am so stressed and scared. I’m not against the culture, but you have got to have some respect.” A Tower Hamlets Police spokesman said they are “fully aware” of the disorder in the area, and said additional officers were being deployed on Thursday, Friday and Saturday evenings. A council spokeswoman added:
“Tower Hamlets Enforcement Officers have been tasked to patrol this area to address street drinking and anti-social behaviour, and we would expect to see results from this during June.”     

KHOODEELAAR! Documenting Tower Hamlets Council; to make the Council accountable and democratic [3]

KHOODEELAAR! Documenting Tower Hamlets Council; to make the Council accountable and democratic [3]
The [3rd of the] First-time KHOODEELAAR! Campaign pictures
of the “Council in session” on Wednesday
22 May 2013 when the Committee Clerk
[Ooops! “Service Head, Democratic Services”]
John S. Williams invited ‘the Press and others’
to take pictures of Cllr. Lesley Pavitt who was
being formally put in the Chair to act as
Speaker of the Council for the next year.”
Lesley Pavitt was praised to the rafters by
Conservative group leader Peter Golds who
spoke with knowledge befitting someone far older
than had been ‘innocently’ assumed of him hitherto,
as he included the late Laurie Pavitt MP [Lesley’s father]
for what sounded like a very personally,
empirically related praise: “like father, like
daughter!”, Peter Golds declared!
Words and images by © Muhammad Haque
London Wednesday 22 May 2013
Published by AADHIKAROnline and KHOODEELAAR!
0540 Hrs GMT
London ‘Bank Holiday’ Monday
27 May 2013
[More KHOODEELAAR! Pictures of Tower Hamlets Council to follow]

KHOODEELAAR! posting a Speaker's moment! Will the Community have a Say too?

KHOODEELAAR! posting a Speaker's moment! Will the Community have a Say too?
Lesley Pavitt receives a salute marking her assumption of Office as Tower Hamlets Council's new speaker.
The title is the replacement for the Ceremonial Mayor which was reviewed following the appearance of a Constitutional alteration allowing g for the post of Executive Elected Mayor" to be created.
This © Muhammad Haque picture of Councillor Lesley Pavitt was taken on Wednesday 22 May 2013.

[To be continued]

Those with eyes can see the grief of the bereaved... Those with eyes of cruel hearts can't..[1]

Those with eyes can see the grief of the bereaved... Those with eyes of cruel hearts can't..[1]
The © Muhammad Haque Political Poetry
1840 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
26 May 2013
The Picture -1
Those with eyes
take a look
at this picture
below!
You cannot see?
You will see
if you think!
Think
and you will see.
Here is a snapshot
taken only a few hours ago
this very day
Sunday
26 May 2013.
Those with eyes
can see the deluge.
And you can see
Yes you can.
Now
look at that face
you will see streams
of tears
gushing out
of the eyes
of the bereaved
streams of tears
gushing out of the
eyes of the bereaved!
Now
say
a word
if you dare
that will stem that
flood
that has already formed
all around
the bereaved
distraught
they are floating helplessly
wounded in the heart beyond words
how could a human being
do such a thing?
How could a human being
cause such grief to another
human?
How could they do
such a thing?
[The lines of grief continue]

Shard Image in shreds! Absurd, immoral, corrupt, against Society - Big Biz Agenda PR exposed again

Shard Image in shreds! Absurd, immoral, corrupt, against Society - Big Biz Agenda PR exposed again
An IMAGE of the LONDON SHARD, taken from the website of the London DAILY MAIL Media Group

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in Defence of the Community in the East End of London within the framework of the overall Movement for universal values for justice and true equality.
In this context the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign is engaged in the advancement of the argument that the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council has become a stooge to Big Business expansion programme taking over most of the East End of London where ordinary people and communities are being pushed out of their own homes, their places of work and from their communities. This is happening with the overt and the covert cooperation with the fore s of Big Business by the controlling bureaucracy in the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council.
Our unique investigative and evidential reporting is updated 24.7 on the main Khoodeelaar! Campaign twitter account at twitter.com/khoodeelaar

PUBLISHING by
AADHIKAROnline
AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION
Established in London E1 1HE UK
on Monday 19 December 1980.
Editor© Muhammad Haque

1535 [1455] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
26 May 2013.
AADHIKAROnline retrieved the following item from the website of the London DAILY MAIL at 1440 GMT on Sunday 26 May 2013.

The DAILY MAIL GROUP retains all Authoring rights to the item which AADHIKAROnline is publishing for purposes of reference and study, especially in the context of our diagnostic assertion that Big Biz Agenda has been controlling the propaganda in favour of destroying the London environment and the London skyline and that only rarely, like this time, is there an admission of this truth by the likes of the DAILY MAIL Group which in effect and IDEOLOGICALLY, culturally and politically and socially backs Big Business notwithstanding its pretences to the contrary...



[To be continued]


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2330926/Almost-year--The-Shard-turns-tallest-white-elephant-world.html#ixzz2UPTb6jQX


Almost empty after a year...

The Shard turns into the tallest white elephant in the world

• Just six of its 72 floors in use after owners struggle to find buyers and tenants for luxury flats

• Only occupants are 32nd floor restaurant and a viewing gallery on the upper five floors

• The Shard is south of the Thames, across the river from the lucrative  Square Mile

By ALEX HAWKES

PUBLISHED: 22:02, 25 May 2013 | UPDATED: 10:54, 26 May 2013 •

Reaching more than a thousand feet into the air, The Shard was hailed as one of the wonders of the age when it was completed.

Yet Britain’s tallest building is almost entirely empty, as its owners struggle to find buyers and tenants for its offices and luxury flats.

As our picture shows, London’s  72-storey skyscraper is largely dark in the early evening, while the surrounding buildings are bright with office lights.

Almost a year after it opened at a cost of £500 million, the building’s only occupants are a restaurant on the 32nd floor and a viewing gallery on the upper five floors, which offers visitors stunning views of the capital for £25. Not a single office in the 26 floors devoted to business use has been rented.

High rents and economic stagnation have been blamed for the slow take-up – but other experts believe the problem is more fundamental: location, location, location.  

The Shard is to the south of the Thames, across the river from the financial institutions of the Square Mile who would be its target tenants.  Under used: The building's only occupants are a restaurant on the 32nd floor and a viewing gallery on the upper five floors, which offers visitors views of the capital for £25

 A Room With a View: Britain's tallest building offers views across the capital, but experts believe it is struggling to find tenants because of its location south of the Thames

In contrast, in two other skyscrapers – nicknamed Cheesegrater and the Walkie Talkie – more than half the floor space has already been let, even though they are still under construction.

But these both lie in the heart of the City.

Julian Hind, an office leasing agent at estate agency Farebrother, said: ‘It’s been marketed as an iconic central London tower, priced like the City.

'For people to locate south of the river the developers are asking quite big rents.’

[Photo caption -photo not reproduced in this publication]  Contrasting popularity: London's newest skyscrapers nicknamed the Cheesegrater, left, and the Walkie Talkie, right

A 205-room five-star hotel will open in The Shard in the summer, but it will still leave empty almost 600,000 sq ft of office space on the first 28 floors.

Ten luxury flats with price tags of up to £50 million also remain unoccupied, although the building’s Qatari owners say they will not be put on sale formally until the hotel underneath them opens.

National Trust chairman Sir Simon Jenkins, who has been forthright in his criticism of the ‘egomaniacal architecture’ of The Shard, said the building was unsuitable for businesses because the offices were ‘the wrong shape’.

The former editor of The Times said:
'They are not a very attractive proposition. Office blocks across London are empty. 'It’s entirely speculative, you hope one day it will be filled.’

He added that few super rich inhabitants would ever end up actually living in the apartments in The Shard.

‘They are just bank accounts in the sky,’ he said. ‘Nobody wants to live in these places, they are buying them as investments.’

However, letting agent Julian Hind believes that The Shard will be ‘in a better position’ to attract businesses once surrounding development work is also finished.

Talks are currently under way that, if successful, will see at most a quarter of the space in the Shard being taken up.

But although the empty floors may be embarrassing, the building’s owners have deep pockets and are believed to be comfortable about waiting until the City economy picks up. The building, at London Bridge station, was financed by the oil-rich gulf state of Qatar, which has wide interests in Britain, with stakes in Sainsbury’s, Harrods, the Canary Wharf development and Barclays Bank, among others.

Say No to Tower Hamlets Council evicting people over 'Bedroom tax'

Say No to Tower Hamlets Council evicting people over 'Bedroom tax'
Say No to Tower Hamlets Council evicting people over 'Bedroom tax'


By©Muhammad Haque.
0515 GMT London
Thursday 23 May 2013.
My pictures show the Socialist Party
members and Eileen Short
[inset, right] leaving the brief
lobby outside Tower Hamlets
Council ‘HQ’ Mulberry Place
near Blackwall Tunnel,
London E14 on Wednesday
22 May 2013. The Council was
having its AGM at that meeting,
so the planned petition demanding
the Council’s BAN on evictions
over Bedroom Tax, was postponed....
Eileen Short said that [about] fifty
people’ had turned up...to back the
demand on Tower Hamlets Council.
[To be continued]

"British BNP backs Sharia law ! For Muslim sex gangs!

"British BNP backs Sharia law ! For Muslim sex gangs!
Are the 'Pakistani' 'Muslims' the 'biggest source of recruitment for the British BNP'?

Retrieved simply as a piece of current, topical reference, by AADHIKARONLINE at 2310 GMT Friday 17 May 2013 from the web site of the “Morning Star”, the “Communist Party of Great Britain” (CPGB) organ. AADHIKAROn;lien is republishing the piece [below] without stating any position as to how much of the analysis and diagnostic we [AADHIKARONLINE] agree with or not. OUR POSITION on the issue covered will be published in the relevant editions of the © Muhammad Haque daily Ethical Commentary.

Fighting child abuse in the community Friday 17 May 2013

by Ann Czernik

The Oxford child sex exploitation case has once again focused the nation's attention on so-called Asian sex gangs - prompting fears of racist reprisals.

Last week Hope Not Hate and the Islamic Society launched an interfaith campaign in Bradford to manage a co-ordinated response - the Community Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation (Caase).

Within frightened communities there is anger over a systemic failure to address child sex exploitation, which left vulnerable young people at the mercy of violent sex gangs across Britain.

Hope Not Hate CEO Nick Lowles says: "It's been increasingly clear that the main activity of the far right has been around grooming and the paedophile issue.

"We have to tackle this head on. We have to occupy that space. If we leave a vacuum, the far right will move into it and racialise the issue."

The Islamic Society's Julie Siddiqui agrees:

"The danger for the Pakistani community in Oxford or Bradford, in Leicester or Birmingham or wherever, is that if they don't get a grip and understand what is happening they will be rightly accused of something that is happening on their doorstep.

"If we don't speak out or acknowledge that there's a problem, that just fuels the far right."

Over the past 12 months hundreds of men of Pakistani heritage have been arrested all over Britain in relation to child sex exploitation.

"We need a mature debate about this," Siddiqui insists. "We're not saying that Pakistani men are a problem - we're saying let's see what the research is.

"If patterns are emerging in the cases we can't afford not to talk about it."

The first agency to address child sex exploitation, then called child prostitution, in Britain was also set up in Bradford, back in 1996 - Barnardo's Turnaround project.

For decades vulnerable children have been trafficked from care homes and sold at sex parties or made to work in brothels.

There is nothing new about the sexual abuse of children except the assignation of ethnicity to the perpetrators.

Not everyone is happy with the Caase project. Just West Yorkshire, an influential racial justice organisation, has criticised it for failing to deconstruct links between men of Pakistani heritage and this particular model of exploitation.

Director Ratna Lachman says: "The decision to launch the initiative in Bradford is highly suspect, because it panders to prejudices and stereotypes about Asian men being predisposed to child sexual exploitation."

Operation Yewtree and the plethora of cases within religious, educational and care institutions clearly highlights that sexual abuse does not observe racial, religious, cultural or colour boundaries, she points out.

"To tackle child sex exploitation it is critical that we view it as a safeguarding issue, keeping all young people safe, rather than viewing it exclusively through a racialised lens."

There is no consensus as to how best to address the complex relationships between poverty, corruption, misogyny, vulnerability, crime, drugs and gang culture, all factors which produce child sex exploitation.

And according to Alyas Karmani of the Strategy to Reach, Empower and Educate Teenagers (Street) - an agency which has done work dealing with the perpetrators of sexual violence and exploitation and which provides expert advice to Caase - the debate is becoming less informed and more hysterical.

"I feel that grooming is the new terrorism, the new stick to beat a particular community with," he says.

"You don't get communities on board by alienating them, demonising them or enforcing stereotypes."

Karmani is one of the leading practitioners in addressing child sex abuse. "There is denial that there is a problem, and apologists who say 'yes, we take responsibility'," he argues.

"It's about bringing some common sense into this area of work. It's also about prevention. The more we are learning about grooming and how it occurs in different communities and different gangs, the more we learn about how to prevent it taking place."

The Oxford case has forced Hope Not Hate and the Islamic Society into taking a stance which would have been unthinkable a year ago.

Child sex exploitation is not an election issue, Lowles says, but "in places like Rochdale and Rotherham it whips up racism.

"It whips up Islamophobia. It whips up the image of the Islamic community defending and protecting paedophiles and the police and councils too scared to do anything about it.

"No-one is doing anything about this issue. We can't be scared to take it on - and take the race out of it."

Caase, conceived in London, made in Bradford, could be said to have fallen foul of the city's own brand of passionate, intelligent and informed activism - which has claimed many an experienced parliamentarian.

When George Galloway made his online comments about rape, he was swiftly called to account by the women in his constituency.

Ed Miliband was sent packing by the polite but firm Muslim Women's Council - and the Labour Party is history in certain parts of the city following the "Bradford earthquake," one of the most radical shake-ups of local politics in Britain.

The response to Caase in the city has been mixed, Siddiqui admits. The event very nearly didn't happen.

But 90 men have been arrested in Bradford over the past six months for offences related to child sex exploitation.

"We decided to hold the launch in West Yorkshire because it is where some cases have been - and more are coming up that we've been told about.

"This is the reality. People talk about shining a spotlight by holding an event - believe me, the spotlight on Bradford isn't from our event but from the cases."

She's been warned that the cases to come up are going to be very, very difficult. "I'm not sure on what I've seen and heard that people in Bradford are ready to deal with it," she says.

Bradford remembers the riots of just over a decade ago with bitter clarity. Caase co-ordinators are worried. "The impact will be very, very damaging unless people come together not just on rhetoric but properly," to protect their community, Siddiqui argues.

Communities need to prepare and she still feels people haven't understood how dangerous the situation is.

"It's very difficult. It's not easy and I'm certainly not saying I've got all the answers."

The arrests, investigations and inquiries are slipping out of the control of police, local authorities and agencies as people put pressure on them to explain the systemic failures which have allowed child sexual exploitation to continue for decades.

Victims, families and communities have been blamed for the failure to detect and apprehend the criminals who perpetrated these crimes.

Caase organisers at the launch grappled with the question - why here, why now, in Bradford?

The best answer came from a man sitting quietly in the audience. Sabbir Hussain is currently organisation, development and performance manager with Manningham Housing Association.

"How do you motivate people to do something when they see something wrong?" he asked.

"In the UK celebrities are under investigation for sexual abuse. You have a pope who is elected and his main focus is on sexual abuse.

"You need every facet of communities, the consciousness of every person. So now is the right time. If we can't do something about child sex exploitation now, we will never do anything about it."

Sex exploitation, Hussain continued, is "a monster with a thousand faces. It has a different face for the Asian community. It has a different face for the white community, a different face for the religious community.

"We have to recognise the face it has for our own communities and tackle it that way.

"These men are criminals. It's not to do with their traditions, it's not to do with their heritage - most people who were involved are totally irreligious, never went to mosque."

Rather than targeting one community over this shocking crime, Bradford and other cities across Britain need to understand its causes and tackle it head on.

OUR POSITION on the issue covered will be published in the relevant editions of the © Muhammad Haque daily Ethical Commentary.

Brick Lane incident between a banker and a policeman: cop on trial at Southwark court

Brick Lane incident between a banker and a policeman: cop on trial at Southwark court
THIS PICTURE of the Policeman , PC Cooke, has been taken from the web site of the London DAILY TELEGRAPH

2330 GMT London Wednesday 15 May 2013

Brick Lane London E1 Incident between a banker and a Policeman is on trial at SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT

From the web site of the London DAILY TELEGRAPH


Banker claims he was framed after telling Pc:
‘I pay your wages’.

A banker who told a police officer “I pay your wages” was falsely accused of assault by another officer in a “shameful” attempt to frame him, a court heard.  Police officer Jason Cook at Southwark Crown Court. Photo: CENTRAL By Agencies 11:55PM BST 15 May 2013 Pc Jason Cooke, 42, claimed that Anthony Jordine had pushed him into a shop window, causing it to break during the incident in Brick Lane, east London, jurors heard. But Simon Connolly, prosecuting, said it was Pc Cooke who had dived at Mr Jordine, 29, performing a “flying rugby tackle” on him. Moments later, Mr Jordine, a bank team leader, was forced to the ground and repeatedly kicked in the face, Southwark Crown Court heard. Describing the incident on February 26 last year, Mr Connolly said: “Mr Jordine was an innocent member of the public minding his own business, out with his brother and his friend. The defendant, rather shamefully, decided to fit him up. “He pretended Mr Jordine assaulted him in the street, pushing him against a shop window and causing the window to break. The Crown’s case is that isn’t true. Mr Jordine says he never assaulted the officer. Actually, when he was detained by the officer, it was he that was assaulted.”

Mr Jordine, who was in a “jolly” mood, was walking in the street when he was first spoken to by another officer, Pc Alan Porter, the court heard.
“He hadn’t done anything wrong. He was sort of jaywalking, I suppose, but it’s not a road where many cars are moving,’ said Mr Connolly. Mr Jordine told Pc Porter:
“There’s no need to be cheeky, officer, I pay your wages.”
Pc Porter responded by asking him what he did for work, before saying: “I pay your wages,” jurors heard.

He then radioed Pc Cooke and another officer, Pc Bob Golding asking for assistance.
Pc Cooke and Pc Golding chased Mr Jordine, said Mr Connolly. “He is then taken hold of. He will say he was assaulted.”

Mr Jordine was arrested on suspicion of assaulting an officer and criminal damage, jurors heard.

In his statement, Pc Cooke claimed Mr Jordine told him “---- you” and ran off, adding: “I lunged for him and caught hold of his wrist. The subject twisted out of my grip and pushed me off balance, causing me to fall and slam into a door window.”

Mr Connolly said: “Mr Jordine was interviewed and once the CCTV was seen, the view was taken, sensibly you may think, that there wasn’t an allegation properly made against him.

“As a result of seeing that Mr Jordine didn’t, on the face of it, assault the officer, the investigation was diverted to the police officer himself.”

Pc Cooke told the investigation that the incident happened in a “split second” with what he feared was an “unknown threat”. He described the push as a “misunderstanding of words”, saying that “wasn’t what he really meant”.

Pc Cooke, from Colchester, Essex, denies an act tending, and intended to, pervert the course of justice.

The trial continues.



Tower Hamlets Councillors are doing NOTHING to stop Govt attacks...[2].

Tower Hamlets Councillors are doing NOTHING to stop Govt attacks...[2].
1250 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 14 May 2013 HOW exactly is Tower Hamlets Council performing in the context of the CURRENT UK Central [COALITION of Conservative and Lib Dem=CONDEM] Govt cuts that affect already impoverished families, individuals and communities in the “deprived” Borough of Tower Hamlets?
And are THOSE “activists” [this word will be exclusively exposed in the current context, in later pieces and in other items of the Muhammad Haque Ethical Commentary] , who are not either involved publicly with the behaviour of the decision-makers in the LB Tower Hamlets Council who, like the Tories claim to be in fact "opposed" to the Tower Hamlets Council's current "Administration" really ACTIVELY OPPOSING the CUTS, the AGENDA behind the CUTS and are the same “activists” taking the side of the targets of the attacks??


[To be continued]

[BELOW From the previous post on this topic]

Tower Hamlets Councillors are doing NOTHING to stop the onslaught from the Government.

Hugo Pierre, speaking for the TUSC campaign, told KHOODEELAAR! Organiser Muhammad Haque at the end of the latest meeting held in Bethnal Green on Thursday night [09 May 2013]:

“And we need councillors, we need representatives who are going to say NO, we are NOT having cuts.”

What a campaigning councillor would have said, according to Hugo Pierre would be this :

“We’ll fight these cuts and we will fight the Government for the money that our Borough needs. The poorest Borough in the country. And we will fight the Government for this.”

[To be continued]

Tower Hamlets COUNCIL is failing the Community, meeting in Bethnal Green hears

Tower Hamlets COUNCIL is failing the Community, meeting in Bethnal Green hears
1645 Hrs GMT London Friday 10 May 2013 By © Muhammad Hague Tower Hamlets borough in the "East End of London" is still at the top of the poverty indices about Society in the UK.

And the locally "elected" Tower Hamlets Council is failing the local community.

According to the speakers at the TUSC meeting held at the Oxford House in Benthnal Green last night.

As had happened at an earlier meeting organized by the same group at the same venue, last night’s meeting heard calls for people who were dissatisfied with the behavior of their present councilors to come forward and stand as candidates for election to the Council.

[To be continued]

Toxic Big Biz 'Blacklisting' attack on trade unionists. No to Vince Cable complicity, Crass role!

Toxic Big Biz 'Blacklisting' attack on trade unionists. No to Vince  Cable complicity, Crass role!


Toxic Big Biz 'Blacklisting' attack on trade unionists. No to Vince Cable complicity, Crass role!

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: The Big Biz profiteers and looters’ latest lies for driving the East End people out of their homes, out of their communities, under the multiple lure of “property prices” along the “Crossrail route” [N’th edition]

1415 [1250] Hrs GMT London Saturday 04 May 2013 CRASS role for Big Biz agenda s fronted via the catchword "Crossrail" is exposed in the latest plug for the crooked Rich as carried by the Daily Neo Cons Telegraph web site viewed today [Saturday 04 May 2013].

The people, according to this NEO CONSERVATIVE DAILY TELEGRAPH-carried plug, one of dozens pouring out in the past few days, who will profit most are the ones who have been picking dosh from whatever r corrupt practices and they will be descending on areas like Whitechapel [where CRASS role players are overdoing the hype for a "crossrail" station and even a sub-hub] and SPECULATE and BUY the ordinary local people out of their home, out of their community... KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!

And the corrupt plug, carried on the "EAST END LIES" [the PROPAGANDA outlet peddling the agenda of the controlling clique in the Tower Hamlets Council] and their assortment of scriptwriters who exercise the key relevant control on what is uttered in the name of the “Borough of Tower Hamlets Council” has been ignoring the truth. What is the truth about “Crossrail” carrying the Big Biz agenda over the East End of London? The truth is just as acute as the truth about the 2012 Games hosting. It was NOT for the local people.

The “property prices” “bonanza” that the Neo Cons Daily Telegraphs is peddling will benefit those who have the money and will drive out of the area the people whose homes, whose community has been the East End.

But Tower Hamlets, the “local” Council has not heard of this at all!

It has sucked into the lies of Big Business and has been retailing those lies now for weeks.

Tower Hamlets ‘the local’ Council has allowed the Big Biz lies to be distributed prominently as a “benefit” via its ‘propaganda organ the perniciously-crafted pravda called ‘East End Lies’ for the people who are being actually robbed, being further deprived by the Big Biz agenda operated via the Crossrail hype!

[To be continued]

Kay Jordan is cited on May Day 2013: East End activist Myra Garrett remembers the ABSENT Kay!

Kay Jordan is cited on May Day 2013: East End activist Myra Garrett remembers the ABSENT Kay!
The © Muhammad Haque East End of London Daily:

Myra Garrett talks about Kay Jordan: May Day Matters Indeed!

1620 Hrs GMT London Friday 03 May 2013

I saw Myra Garrett by chance as I waited for a bus on Wednesday.

Quite unprompted, she said:

"We all miss Kay"

Myra there is of course talking about the ABSENT Kay!

Then she added: "Something happened...”

Kay is Kay Jordan and Myra has known Kay as one of the most principled women ever to be seen working for the community in the East End of London.

We spoke briefly, Myra and I, but the feelings have been revived, again.

As they will continue to be forever!

Something happened!

Kay Jordan!

Community Architect.

Community matters.

Kay Matters.

May Day matters. Wednesday 01 May 2013 May Day.

What a day to hear Myra Garrett say what she said of Kay!

[To be continued]



SAVAR Casualties number rises, as EU "acts" on Bangladesh State failures [1]

SAVAR Casualties number rises, as EU "acts" on Bangladesh State failures [1]
Retrieved by AADHIKAROnline at
1740 GMT
London
Wednesday
01 May 2013

from the REUTERS web site


(Reuters) -
The European Union is considering trade action against Bangladesh, which has preferential access to EU markets for its garments, to pressure Dhaka to improve safety standards after a building collapse killed more than 400 factory workers.
Duty-free access offered by Western countries and low wages have helped turn Bangladesh's garment exports into a $19 billion a year industry, with 60 percent of clothes going to Europe.

Any action by the EU on Bangladesh's duty-free and quota-free access would require the agreement of all member states and could take more than a year to implement.
"The European Union calls upon the Bangladeshi authorities to act immediately to ensure that factories across the country comply with international labour standards...," the 27-nation bloc said in a statement issued by EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Trade Commissioner Karel de Gucht.
The death toll from the collapse last week of the illegally built Rana Plaza in Dhaka's commercial suburb of Savar rose to 411 on Wednesday and about 40 unidentified victims were buried. One woman at the cemetery collapsed into tears when she recognised the body of her sister by her dress.
Several thousand workers rallied in the capital to mark Labour Day, and some called for capital punishment for those responsible for the tragedy.
"The owner of the building ... should be hanged to death and compensation should be given to the injured and those who died," said labour leader Moshrefa Mishu. "A healthy and safe atmosphere should be made in the factories."
"SHOT ACROSS THE BOWS"
With local anger growing over the country's worst industrial accident, a delegation from the International Labour Organisation met Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in Dhaka to offer support and press for action to prevent any more such incidents.
The EU had already urged Bangladesh to adhere to ILO standards in January after two earlier factory fires.
A European Union official said the latest EU statement, issued late on Tuesday, was "a shot across the bows". "We want to turn up the diplomatic heat on them and get them to sit down and discuss this with us.
About 3.6 million people work in Bangladesh's garment industry, making it the world's second-largest apparel exporter, behind China. The industry employs mostly women, some of whom earn as little as $38 a month.
The prime minister warned factory owners they would have to take care of their workers. "You will have to ensure workers' fair wages, allowances and other rights … you must look after their workplace safety if you want to do business," she told a discussion forum.
There were about 3,000 people inside the complex, which was built on a swamp, when it collapsed. About 2,500 people have been rescued, but many remain unaccounted for.
"Why are they taking so much time to pull out bodies?" asked a grief-stricken father who, like many others, has been waiting on the streets near the collapsed factory, hoping for information about his son.
Police said DNA samples of the bodies buried on Wednesday had been preserved, so tests could be done if relatives came forward later.
The building's owner Mohammed Sohel Rana and his father, Abdul Khalek, are among eight people arrested so far, and police are seeking a fifth factory boss, Spanish citizen David Mayor, although it was unclear whether he was in Bangladesh at the time of the accident.
EU IS BIGGEST MARKET
The factory collapse was the third deadly incident in six months to raise questions about worker safety and labour conditions in the poor South Asian country, which relies on garments for 80 percent of its exports. Clothes made in five factories inside the Rana Plaza building were produced for retailers in Europe and Canada.
In the year to June 2012, Bangladesh's garment exports to the EU rose to $11.37 billion from $10.52 billion a year earlier, according to Bangladesh's commerce ministry. Germany is the main EU market at $3.4 billion, followed by the UK at $2.13 billion, Spain at $1.71 billion and France at $1.27 billion.
Bangladesh's next biggest garment export market is the United States, which accounts for 23 percent, or $4.53 billion.
"The EU is presently considering appropriate action, including through the Generalised System of Preferences - through which Bangladesh currently receives duty-free and quota-free access to the EU market," Ashton and de Gucht said.
"The sheer scale of this disaster and the alleged criminality around the building's construction is finally becoming clear to the world."
The Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI), an umbrella organisation that brings NGOs, unions and brands together to try to improve working conditions, said retailers, major brands and the suppliers who own the factories would have to contribute towards factory inspections.
"Bangladeshi companies who supply to our retailers need to be pricing in operating a decent factory, a safe factory and paying proper wages," ETI director Peter McAllister told Reuters.
"And then the retail world needs to recognise that the real cost of having sustainable businesses are going to be higher." he said, adding that he thought retailers would accept slightly higher prices if all outlets agreed to the changes.
Following a private emergency meeting of Canadian retailers, the Retail Council of Canada said on Tuesday it would develop a new set of guidelines. That meeting brought together retailers including Loblaw, Sears Canada Inc and Wal-Mart Canada, to discuss how to deal with the tragedy.
Representatives of some 45 companies, including Gap Inc, H&M, J.C. Penney, Nike Inc, Wal-Mart, Britain's Primark, Marks & Spencer and Tesco, and Li & Fung, met officials from the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association in Dhaka this week to discuss worker and plant safety.
Primark and Loblaw have promised to compensate the families of garment workers killed while making their clothes.
(Reporting by Susan Taylor, Neha Alawadhi, Serajul Quadir and Ruma Paul; Writing by Paul Tait and Michael Perry; Editing by Mark Bendeich, Ian Geoghegan and Philippa Fletcher)

TRAHORN CLOSE RESIDENTS SAY NO to ANTI-SOCIAL LANDLORD THCH plot

TRAHORN CLOSE RESIDENTS SAY NO to ANTI-SOCIAL LANDLORD THCH plot
2055 [1535] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 30 April 2013

By © Muhammad Haque.

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign today, Tuesday 30 April 2013 delivered a double petition addressed to Tower Hamlets Council's "Executive Mayor" [Lutfur Rahman] [seen in the inset in this AADHIKAR! Online Visual Montage created today by © Muhammad Haque] and to the Council's Democratic Services for inclusion as an Agenda Item for presentation as a Petition to the next full Council meeting. The twin pet on is signed by residents, rants and families in the Trahorn Close, off the Castlemain Street near valance Road London E1.

The petition demands that Tower Hamlets Community housing [THCH] be stopped from going head with creating an antisocial problem for the residents tenants and families.

Resident have already spoken to Cllr Gulam Robbani, one of the local councillors and have sent him advance copy of the pet on. The same has been sent to other local councillors including Fozol Miah Abbas Uddin Helal.

The Campaign continues.

[To be continued]

UPDATES

http://twitter.com/khoodeelaar



THE KEY TEXTS OF THE  PETITION to Executive Mayor, LBTH Council and to the LBTH Council:

By residents tenants and families in the Trahorn Close London E1

We the undersigned residents/tenants and members of the families living in the street addresses listed below again reiterate our support to the representation of our collective demand that the LB Tower Hamlets Council, as the elected Local Democratic representative body responsible for the community, carry out its undertaking given to all the Council housing tenants and residents  at the time of the Housing stock transfers to THCH that the Council would continue to do its duty and to uphold the rights and meet the needs of the residents, tenants and their families.

We are supporting this latest demand in light of the fact that despite years of our representation to the THCH to abide by our preference for their actions to create an environments conducive to peaceful, crime-free and decent living, they are unreasonably seeking to impose on our area a most unwanted additional problem.

We have clearly asked THCH to stop the plan for an alteration to the green spaces that will then be turned into a most likely, even a veritable draw for anti-social activities thus creating additional stress, anxiety, lack of peace and quiet and most likely to all degrees of antisocial and violent disorder thus causing serious detriment to the quality of  our lives but THCH appear determined to ignore us, adamantly insisting that they must add to problems for this neighbourhood. We are asking all our local Ward Councillors, the Executive Mayor and all the LBTH Council Members to ensure that our Preferences are heeded and that THCH are not allowed to foist and impose the additional new problems on us. 



Crazy CONDEM Cuts assaults rolled out against Society in Britain today

Crazy CONDEM Cuts assaults rolled out against Society in Britain today
0750 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 30 April 2013

Ed Miliband IS caught up as offering an “Economic Minibrand” on the day before the latest phase of the Crazy CONDEM Cuts assaults are rolled out against Society in Britain today

[To be continued]

TEST post from a Bangladeshi web site in Bangla language: an Editorial about a BBC item on Media

TEST post from a Bangladeshi web site in Bangla language: an Editorial about a BBC item on Media


http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2013-04-29/news/348476
নিজের দায় অন্যের ওপর চাপানোর অপপ্রয়াস সংবাদমাধ্যমের ওপর ক্ষোভ |
তারিখ: ২৯-০৪-২০১৩
মন্তব্যপ্রিন্ট
সাভারের ধসে যাওয়া রানা প্লাজার ধ্বংসস্তূপ থেকে প্রায় পৌনে চার শ মানুষের লাশ উদ্ধার, ধ্বংসস্তূপের ভেতরে আরও অজানাসংখ্যক মানুষের লাশে পরিণত হওয়ার আশঙ্কা, সহস্রাধিক মানুষের আহত হওয়া, আহত ব্যক্তিদের একটি বড় অংশের চিরতরে পঙ্গু হয়ে যাওয়ার আশঙ্কা—সব মিলিয়ে বাংলাদেশে যে মানবিক বিপর্যয় সৃষ্টি হয়েছে, তার সংবাদ পরিবেশনে বাড়াবাড়ি করা হচ্ছে, এমন ইঙ্গিতপূর্ণ অভিযোগ তুলে ক্ষোভ প্রকাশ করা নিষ্ঠুরতার প্রকাশ।
এই নিষ্ঠুরতার প্রকাশ ঘটিয়েছেন বাংলাদেশের তৈরি পোশাক প্রস্তুত ও রপ্তানিকারক সমিতির (বিজিএমইএ) সভাপতি মো. আতিকুল ইসলাম।
গত শনিবার রাজধানীর বিয়াম মিলনায়তনে বিবিসির [BBC Special Dialogue] বিশেষ সংলাপে তিনি বলেছেন, সাভারের ভবনধসের প্রতিবেদন প্রকাশ করে সংবাদমাধ্যম দেশের ভাবমূর্তি ক্ষুণ্ন করছে।
তৈরি পোশাকশিল্পের মালিকদের এই নেতা দেশের ভাবমূর্তি নিয়ে এতটাই উদ্বিগ্ন হয়ে পড়েছেন যে তাঁর কথাবার্তা শুনে মনে হচ্ছে, তিনি সংবাদমাধ্যমকে শেখাতে চান কীভাবে সংবাদ পরিবেশন করতে হয়। ‘কেন আমরা বারবার এসব দেখাচ্ছি’—এই প্রশ্নও তিনি তুলেছেন।
তাঁর আপত্তির কারণ, ‘এতে দেশের ভাবমূর্তি ক্ষুণ্ন হবে।...বিদেশিরা ২৪ ঘণ্টা টিভি চ্যানেলের সামনে বসে আছে।’
কিন্তু এভাবে উদ্বেগ, দুশ্চিন্তা কিংবা সংবাদমাধ্যমের ওপর ক্ষোভ প্রকাশ করার চেয়ে নিজেদের দায়িত্বশীলতা বাড়ানোর প্রতি মনোযোগী হওয়া বেশি জরুরি। বাংলাদেশের সংবাদমাধ্যম তার দায়িত্ব নিজের সামর্থ্য অনুযায়ী পালন করেই যাবে। আর ইউরোপ-আমেরিকার যেসব নাগরিক বাংলাদেশের তৈরি পোশাক ব্যবহার করেন, তাঁরা এ দেশের সংবাদমাধ্যমের ওপর নির্ভরশীল নন।
আন্তর্জাতিক সংবাদমাধ্যমে সাভারের ভবনধসের সচিত্র খবর, মন্তব্য, বিশ্লেষণী নিবন্ধ-প্রবন্ধ এমনকি সম্পাদকীয় বক্তব্যও প্রকাশিত হচ্ছে। শিল্প খাতের কোনো দুর্ঘটনায় এত বিপুলসংখ্যক মানুষের হতাহত হওয়ার ঘটনা এর আগে ঘটেনি। এই দুর্ঘটনার মধ্য দিয়ে আরও স্পষ্ট হয়ে উঠেছে, বাংলাদেশের তৈরি পোশাকশিল্পে শ্রমিকদের নিরাপত্তার বিষয়টি কত অবহেলিত—এসব কথা ইউরোপ-আমেরিকার প্রথম সারির দৈনিক সংবাদপত্রগুলোতে লেখা হচ্ছে। তাই এ দেশের সংবাদমাধ্যমের দোষ ধরার চেষ্টা করে পোশাকমালিকেরা সুফল পাবেন না, বরং শ্রমিকদের নিরাপত্তার ব্যাপারে অবহেলা, দায়িত্বজ্ঞানহীনতা এবং সব রকম আইনের ঊর্ধ্বে থাকার মানসিকতা ত্যাগ করলে পরিস্থিতির কিছু উন্নতি ঘটতে পারে।
গত নভেম্বরে তাজরীন ফ্যাশনসে অগ্নিকাণ্ডে ১১২ শ্রমিকের প্রাণহানির ঘটনাসহ তার আগের অনেক দুর্ঘটনায় অজস্র শ্রমিকের প্রাণহানি ঘটেছে, কিন্তু এ পর্যন্ত কোনো পোশাক কারখানার মালিকের শাস্তি হয়নি।
ওই ঘটনায় মালিকদের পক্ষ থেকে যেসব প্রতিশ্রুতি দেওয়া হয়েছিল, সেগুলো পূরণ করা হয়নি। এ ছাড়া বিজিএমইএ হাতিরঝিল ভরাট করে অবৈধভাবে বহুতল ভবন নির্মাণ করেছে, আদালতের আদেশে অবৈধ ঘোষিত হওয়ার পরও যেটি তাদের ঔদ্ধত্যের প্রতীক হিসেবে দাঁড়িয়ে আছে। রানা প্লাজার মালিকসহ ওই ভবনের তিনটি পোশাক কারখানার মালিকেরা যে শেষ পর্যন্ত গ্রেপ্তার হয়েছেন, তাতে যে সংবাদমাধ্যমে প্রকাশিত জনমতের প্রবল চাপেরও ভূমিকা রয়েছে—এটা অনস্বীকার্য। কেউ আইনের ঊর্ধ্বে নয়, অপরাধ করে কেউই যেন পার পেয়ে যেতে না পারে—এ লক্ষ্যেই সংবাদমাধ্যম সংবাদ পরিবেশন করে।


Bangladesh: Police injure relatives protesting against Bulding collapse deaths

Bangladesh: Police injure relatives protesting against Bulding collapse deaths
KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN in London UK solidarising with the bereaved families and others and with the injured in Savar, Bangladesh.

Bangladesh:

Police injure relatives protesting against Building collapse deaths

Report [below] from the web site of the London daily the MORNING STAR

Police attack massive rally against unsafe factories

Friday 26 April 2013

by Our Foreign Desk

Police fired rubber bullets and tear gas today at thousands of garment workers who were protesting against the death of over 300 workers in the collapse of a Dhaka factory building.

"The situation is very volatile. Hundreds of thousands of workers have joined the protests.

"We fired rubber bullets and tear gas to disperse them," said an officer in the police control room.

Hundreds of thousands of workers had walked out of their factories in solidarity with their dead colleagues.

Some workers' leaders attacked Western firms, who they accused of turning "a blind eye" while using Bangladeshis as "money-making machines."

At one demonstration angry workers demanded the arrest and even the execution of factory bosses and building owners, smashing dozens of vehicles, but most other protests were peaceful.

As the protests grew rescue crews bored deeper into the wreckage of the Rana Plaza, hoping for miracle rescues that would prevent the death toll from rising much higher.

Some of those trapped under fallen concrete in the building were still alive, rescue workers said, but they were so badly hurt and weakened that they needed to be extricated within a few hours.

Rescue co-ordinators said that the death toll had reached 304, and that 2,200 people have been rescued.

Hundreds of rescuers, some crawling through the maze of rubble, spent a third day working amid the cries of the trapped and the wails of workers' relatives.

Police cordoned off the building site, pushing back thousands of bystanders and relatives, after rescue workers said that the crowds were hampering their work. Clashes erupted between relatives of those still trapped and police officers, who used batons to disperse the crowds.

Police said that 50 people had been injured in the clashes.

The rescue workers said they were proceeding very cautiously inside the crumbling building, using their hands, hammers and shovels, to avoid further collapses.

A military official said that search-and-rescue operations would continue until at least Saturday.



Crossrail noise drove family out of their own home - into a 'shelter' in another part! [1][b]

Crossrail noise drove family out of their own home - into a 'shelter' in another part! [1][b]
Crossrail noise annoys families: One sufferer speaks out on Vallance Road

By © Muhammad Haque

Organiser, "KHOODEELAAR! NO to the Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail hole assault on the East End of London" CAMPAIGN

1955 Hrs GMT London Thursday 25 April 2013

This is Mr Yeabor Miah a resident in the "Bethnal Green South" Ward in the London borough of Tower Hamlets.

He has been a KHOODEELAAR! Campaign participant since 2007 when he was one of the residents who travelled to the Tower Hamlets Town Hall "Mulberry Place" [near the very remotely located Blackwall Tunnel] and observed from the "Public Gallery" the presentation of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign petition by Organiser Muhammad Haque before the formal sitting of the Tower Hamlets Council in September 2007.

Nearly SIX years later, Mr Yeabor Miah and his fellow residents from the same area in Bethnal Green South ward are asking the question:

Why didn't Tower Hamlets Council listen to the Khoodeelaar! petition of September 2007?

Why are we being caused the noise, the nuisance and the disruption by Crossrail six years later?

Why is the Council standing idle while the so-called "Social landlord" THCH which is one of those to whom Tower Hamlets Council transferred the Council Housing stock Mr Miah lives in the Trahorne Close, near the Vallance Road.

Trahorne Close is on the inside of the estate reached from the Castlemain Street which is off the Street that is a side road parallel to the Whitechapel Road, much shorter but cove rug the length of the Crossrail local digging and noise-creating activities.

He is pictured here by © Muhammad Haque on Monday 22 April 2013, speaking a few yards from the Vallance Road. Here he is speaking in Seelotee and saying that the noise made by Crossrail has been unbearable for him and his family.

And that the noise has been affecting nearby streets and residents there. He says that for three years already [and another five years of Crossrail work to go yet] he and his wife have had to move away from the eastern side of their home and take shelter in Western side in order to avoid the penetrating noise.

He is saying that that noise came from the eastern side of their flat in the Trahorne Close. This picture is taken from a site where Crossrail is CURRENTLY doing the noisy work next to the Vallance Road.

Mr Yeabor Miah is critical of Tower Hamlets Council and he is even more critical of those who have been colluding with the Tower Hamlets Community Housing [THCH].

Mr Miah has been complaining for more than a year now about the behaviour of THCH which he accuses of ignoring the local residents and of imposing on the residents a plan that is unhelpful to the residents.

Something the residents have not been consulted on nor given their considered consent on as far as the THCH’s imposition is concerned.

Mr Yeabor Miah was ignored by the THCH staff concerned when he tried to raise the issue with them of what the residents want.

[To be continued]



CROSSRAIL noise pollution nighmare for families in the Vallance Road area - REPORTS, NEXT

CROSSRAIL noise pollution nighmare for families in the Vallance Road area - REPORTS, NEXT
Big Business agenda "Crossrail jobs" lies resumed via Tower Hamlets Council [4] b The © Muhammad Haque Daily Economics and Environmental and Democratic Accountability Commentary:
Abysmal state of dysfunction, ignorance and the betrayal of the local Community by the Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling clique which has reverted to openly peddling the lies for Big Business via the word “Crossrail” as it had done seven years ago
[2]

Crossrail causes noise mayhem to families in the Vallance Road area behind the Whitechapel Station


2100 Hrs GMT London Saturday 20 Aril 2013

October 2007 to 20 April 2013.

How many years is that?
SIX years.
Of course!
But it could easily be SIXTY years.
Sixty years?
Isn’t that stretching the imagery a bit too far?
Not at all, if the imagery is being devised about the Big Business Agenda AS fronted via “Crossrail”.
Why?
How?
Answer

Because it was as part of the untruths peddled via Ken Livingstone’s “Undone Mayor” years [that too is a KHOODEELAAR! devised phrase to depict the role that Ken Livingstone was manoeuvred by Big Business into playing in the correct contest of his role whilst still in that Onion - a word that KHOODEELAAR! had coined for that building YEARS before Boris Johnson was even heard of in that context at all] that they had released a wanton lie and untruth and had claimed that “CROSSRAIL was worth the public costs because it would being so many £Billions INTO the Economy in the NEXT SIXTY years” [or a temporal stretch and economic "period" near to 60 years!].

Now any rational person would see that that was stupid beyond condemnation.
How can the “GDP” be predicted for even the next ONE year, let alone for the next SIXTY years? Especially after the evidence has at last been admitted of large scale lying and fakery by the entirety of the country’s Financial “institutions” and by the “Banks” including the “financial regulators”, themselves and by the UK Department called the Treasury, and the MPs themselves......!

All of those “hitherto” [to the brainwashed] hallowed “Authority-Entities” have been exposed by the overwhelming weights of their own corruption, dishonesty, fraudulence and crimes!

So the SIXTY years ....of that we have used as an image is to illustrate the incredible emptiness in the Tower Hamlets Council Chamber, as witnessed on Wednesday 17 April 2013.

There was no debate.
No audit
No holding to account of anybody on behalf of the people of Tower Hamlets
Only crass, contaminated exchanges aimed by each bunch at the other, across the so-called “opposed” “benches” of “Councillors”!

There was no political discourse, least of all any ethics or morality on behalf of the affected, the outraged. the really actually unglamorously dispossessed people and families across the Borough who were being targeted by the CONDEM assault on Society

No atmosphere in the “Council Chamber” of the “London Borough of Tower Hamlets” therefore to even theoretically expect an up-to-date in-depth exposition by any side on the dire, deeply worrying, unjustified, undemocratic, treacherous and cruel and uncaring and indifferent and contemptuous state of the failures by “the elected Tower Hamlets Council” to speak up, to challenge the assault by the CONDEM Collusion.

If, in that situation and in that environment, a bid is made for a Chunk of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets by an agency operating as a front for any of the Big Biz outfits and conglomerates that are notionally required to get the [“planning”] “approval of the local Council” then the likelihood is that the bid would succeed.

If it is “rejected” at first or at a later “repeat application” that event must NEVER be treated as a genuine rejection by the Council at all.

Such rejections constitute the TACTICAL parades, the haggling for the “bribe” to the “Council” by the DEGENERATORS, misleadingly referred to by the “mainstreams” in Britain as “developers”.

In the years SINCE October 2007, a very long list of DEGENERATOR plans has been approved by the Tower Hamlets Council.

So much so that the Council bureaucracy is now referring to Crossrail without any hesitation, qualification, let alone and reservation at all!

Exactly what WE SAID ten years ago, in December 2003 when the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign was conceived of in this form by myself and Kay Jordan as we walked to the Bishopsgate Bus terminal one evening when Kay was going to catch a bus home to the Kentish Town area.

Four years after the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign had been active, in October 2007, I wrote a diagnostic piece for publication in the then “East London Advertiser”.

The “East London IDIOTISER” failed to honour its “then” promise and so the piece was not published.
What, however, remains valid is the accuracy of the analysis [that I had written in October 2007] that must be applied to the role being played by the Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling clique of paid post-holders today, in April 2013.

That role is to LET the BIG BUSINESS agenda INTO the East End and let Big Biz take over the East End land and dispossess the people, the community out of here.

EXACTLY as they had ATTEMPTED to do via the front Of their agenda disguised as “Crossrail” and its “benefits”.

So grossly ignorant is the Tower hamlets Council’s controlling bureaucracy now that it has uttered abysmally idiotic plug words “for Crossrail” within DAYS of the huge piece of admission PUBLISHED by the UK’s LARGEST CIRCULATED "popular" daily the SUN of Crossrail’s JOBS for local people lies!!!!


[To be continued]


against this diagnostic and evidential UPDATER, I publish BELOW the temporally edited version of my piece that the then “East London ADVERTISER” had REQUESTED but failed to publish in October 2007.





KHOODEELAAR! defends the community in the East End of London against the Crossrail hole attacks.

This defence also entails campaigning against the deliberate misrepresentation by the institutions like Tower Hamlets council that are supposed to speak for and to protect the community in the area.
I say that because during the last four years of our campaign we have repeatedly experienced such misrepresentation-and we expect it to continue.
We have found that the Council has been controlled in such a way, and by such unrepresentative elements, that it has been made into a puppet and a conduit for hugely damaging attacks on the entire East End.
It is in this context that we must examine what I believe are streams of diversionary and divisive activities that have been used by the Council's "controlling clique".
Take the recent ignorant exclusion of some elected councillors from having any say at all on council policy-making simply because they were not Bangladeshi: that was diabolically hostile and treacherous behaviour which ADDED to racial disharmony, not reduced it.
That act merely proves the Khoodeelaar! point that Tower Hamlets Council is being mis-led by a clique that has no understanding of its duties.
And this is exactly what we have found in relation to the role of the clique in surrendering the rights, interests and safety of the local community to the commands of 'Big Business' who pretend to be the 'bringer of benefits' to the East End.
The Council clique has said Crossrail will bring benefits to regenerate the area. In fact, we have found they will deprive the area and degenerate it even further.
They have said that they will negotiate with Crossrail promoters to minimise the impact of the disruptions that Crossrail will cause to the area.
Actually, we have found that they are-and have been-colluding with Crossrail to cause the main disruptions, dislocations and devastations to the area.
The proposed new station at Whitechapel and the knock-on effect that creates would not have happened without council complicity.
They have said that they are working with the community.

However, we believe they have been actively seeking to wreck the community and to disenfranchise it even further.
Now it appears that they are no longer even pretending to defend the area against attacks, which include the destruction of streets for the building of huge ventilation shafts.
In response to my question posed at the full council meeting on September 11, in which I asked why they had failed to answer 800 questions posed by us since January 2004, they made that plain.
In the last paragraph of their 'answer' they don't hide the fact that they have surrendered the council to the dictates of Crossrail by saying:

"Ultimately, the council must respect Crossrail's overarching duty to have regard to...the health and safety of Crossrail passengers and workers which will dictate the location of such shafts."

That one paragraph gave the game away! No mention in there of the say or the right or the welfare of the local people in Tower Hamlets.
"Overarching" indeed!
This could only come from collusion relationship, not from a dignified, democratic representational relationship.
It has been almost four years since we started to say the [Tower Hamlets] Council was acting for Big Business, CrossRail and against the Community in the East End.
At long last the [Tower Hamlets] Council clique have admitted it. [That was a reference to the Clique’s “response” to the then latest formal representation by me in September 2007 of the KHOODEELAAR! Demands for the “ELECTED COUNCIL” to do its job and stop acting as a stooge to Big Business


[DIAGNOSTIC updates, reports and analyses are to be continued in defending the Community in the East End of London against the ploys and the Agenda of Big Biz]


UK Tory MP David Davis raises alarm over police spying on public's email, phone calls

UK Tory MP David Davis raises alarm over police spying on public's email, phone calls
TORY DAILY TELEGRAPH reporting

UK Tory MP David Davis raises alarm over police spying on public's email, phone calls

HOME»NEWS»



POLITICS Police forces spying on our phone calls and emails 250,000 times a year Police forces are routinely snooping on people's email and phone call details hundreds of thousands times a year, a major survey has found.





By Christopher Hope,

Senior Political Correspondent6:00AM BST 20 Apr 201336 Comments A survey using Freedom Of Information laws found that 25 police forces made 506,720 requests for people’s “communications data” over the past three years. There were big disparities between force areas, with people in Merseyside are six times more likely to be spied on than those in neighbouring Lancashire.

A breakdown shows that the number of requests for phone or email records - but not the content of calls or emails - increased from 158,677 in 2009/10 to 178,985 in 2011/12.

Including estimates for the forces which failed to reply to the FOI survey, the figures suggest that as many as 250,000 requests are being made every year. Campaigners Big Brother Watch, which carried the survey, said the evidence suggested the police and other agencies do not need more “snooping powers”.

A newly drafted Communications Bill is due to be published in the summer, which is likely to propose more powers to spy on people.

Emma Carr, deputy director of Big Brother Watch, urged ministers to order a “comprehensive investigation of how current powers are operating” before bringing in new ones later this year. She said: “The research makes clear that between police forces there are significant inconsistencies in the way that communications data is being used. “It emphasises how it impossible to form a measured view of how the current system is operating given the huge discrepancies in the way forces are recording how they use communications data.” Merseyside made 36 requests for every 1,000 residents living in the county – compared with the Metropolitan Police, which put in 21 requests, Lancashire (6 requests) and Hampshire (0.8 requests).

David Davis MP, the former Tory shadow home secretary who quit the front bench in protest over the Labour government’s treatment of civil liberties, said:

“It is frankly not good enough that the government is considering introducing a snoopers' charter without even being able to tell us what they have used communications data for in the past – and indeed not even be able to tell us how many times they have done so.

“The Government should come clean with parliament and tell us exactly how the powers they currently have been used in the past, and tell us for example, whether they have been using it across the country for traffic offences.” A Home Office spokesman said: "This legislation is vital to help catch paedophiles, terrorists and other serious criminals. Communications data includes time, duration and dialling numbers of a phone call, or an email address. It does not include the content of any phone call or email.

“The cross-party Joint Committee which scrutinised the Bill reported that it was impressed with the thoroughness with which each and every application for communications data is considered. “The police and other requesting authorities are subject to rigorous independent inspections by the Interception of Communications Commissioner (IoCC). The IoCC also publishes annual statistics on communications data requests and releases.”


[To be continued]

London: East End, 'most deprived' "Council" colludes as City of London grabs the Borough land...

London: East End, 'most deprived' "Council" colludes as City of London grabs the Borough land...
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

The "LOBBY" by about five or six persons that were photographed outside Tower Hamlets Council building on Wednesday was not really registered as a political event at all.

Why?

Here is my Report [3]

1025 [1015] [0955] [0925] [0855] Hrs GMT London Saturday 20 April 2013

INSIDE the "Council Chamber" ["full Council" meeting, a ritualistic absurdity that is staged in the Tower Hamlets Council which is no longer a Council with the democratic powers but is lumbered with a diversion from democratic accountability via the installation of a post called "Executive Mayor"], there were noisy utterances by individuals who are called "councillors".

But they did not make any campaigning noises at all.

Most of their noises, as far as I could see from where I was sitting, were performances of scripted items!

Those scripts were NOT devoted to accountability about the ordinary people out in the Community in the London borough of Tower Hamlets.

The scripts were about "the Council Administration" and their supposed opponents, which are made up of the [more numerous] Labour Party councillors and the smaller Conservative ones.

When the "leader" of the supposed Opposition [on the Labour Group, notionally speaking for The Opposition] Joshua Peck, spoke, he spoke about HIS personally-related issues.

Not about the Community.

Least of all about the Council's duties to the Community!

Not that I could hear or discern any manifest prominence given in his spiel to the reality of the Council's behaviour in delivering its duties to the Community out across the area called in context here the "London Borough of Tower Hamlets" [=LBTH]!

And the listed "petitions and the questions" from the supposed members of the Public, on this occasion [Wednesday 17 April 2013] at that sitting of the LBTH Council, were as far beyond my comprehension as they ever could be. Of course there were words that I could recognise.
Of course there phrases that I had heard before and some of those I could even understand.

But I could not hear any campaigning in anything that was presented in those presentations!
So Eileen Short will have to show me what I had missed in the two sets of presentations under

"Petitions" and "Questions".

I heard nothing about campaigning.

Nor did any of the "councillors" from any of the "sides" make any noise whilst I was there [until just before 10 PM when I left] that amounted to what I know to be a campaigning noise.

Far less did any of those make any Campaigning statement!

NOTHING that the "rival" title to the LBTH Council’s very own PR “pravda” the "East End Lies" has since [that meeting] published, about or after that "LBTH Council Meeting” shows that there was any campaign in that Tower Hamlets Council Chamber during that meeting.

Below is the latest piece on the web site of the eastlondonadvsier.co.uk that shows that IF ANYTHING, the most interesting and reportable events are happening OUTSIDE of that LBTH Council Meeting.

Such as the alleged abuse of the Council's resources and its Constitutional law position and remits by the CURRENT LBTH COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION

[To be continued]

____________________________________________________

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/investigation_launched_into_tower_hamlets_mayor_s_advisors_illegal_election_planning_1_2120044

Investigation launched into Tower Hamlets Mayor’s advisors’ ‘illegal election planning’

Robin de Peyer

Friday, April 19, 2013

2:56 PM

An investigation has been launched into the role of Tower Hamlets Mayor Lutfur Rahman’s team of taxpayer funded advisors, amid claims they are illegally planning his re-election campaign.

Mr Rahman recently used council reserves to almost double the budget for his office and advisors, to £750,000 for the current financial year. But leaked minutes of a meeting held last year have triggered allegations the Mayor’s team has been illegally using council facilities and staff for electoral and partisan political purposes – in contravention of the Localism Act.

The minutes reportedly showed council officers and advisors involved in preparing campaign literature for electoral wards and discussing setting up a bank account for election funding.

Opposition councillors from Labour and the Conservatives voted together this week to “appoint an independent investigator into this […] in order to identify all misuse of public funds by using council facilities and officers for political campaign activity.”

But Mr Rahman’s cabinet member for resources Cllr Alibor Choudhury defended the £300,000 increase in the budget for advisors and the Mayor’s office.

“Let me stress that our advisors play an important part in the delivery of council services and the Mayor’s priorities”, he said.

He has previously insisted the advisors represent “great value”.

A council spokesperson confirmed the investigation, but offered no further comment.

Mr Rahman will take on London Assembly Member John Biggs in what is expected to be a closely fought contest next year.



Campaign UPDATE defending the Community in the East End of London

Campaign UPDATE defending the Community in the East End of London


KHOODEELAAR!
Campaign UPDATE defending the Community in the East End of London
Thursday 18 April 2013

Updated 24.7 twitter.com/khoodeelaar

[To be continued]

No Evictions in Tower Hamlets! A small gathering outside Tower Hamlets Council suggests!

No Evictions in Tower Hamlets! A small gathering outside Tower Hamlets Council suggests!


KHOODEELAAR!
Campaign UPDATE defending the Community in the East End of London
Thursday 18 April 2013

Updated 24.7 twitter.com/khoodeelaar

[To be continued]

WHO is letting the City of London take over the East End?

WHO is letting the City of London take over the East End?
AADHIKAROnline/ KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Commentary Saying NO to the City of London Big Agenda Takeover of the East End of London

0525 [0435] Hrs GMT london Tuesday 16 April 2013

Kay Jordan [below:
on right in this Muhammad Haque picture taken in the Hanbury Street London E1 at a KHOODEELAAR! No to "Big Biz City of Lon don Agenda Crossrail hole" Campaign action,] attended an event in the City of London every September for many years when the forces of occupation staged an elaborate pretence that they were "exploring ways to help" "the fringes of the City", suggesting that the inhabitants of the "fringes" were in need of contacts with the City of London…
That it was a sham and a con became instantly obvious to Kay. She knew from the off that the City was worse than the Vulture; that it was looking for ways and excuses to take over the land and displace the people, the inhabitants and the community on 'the fringes'.

Kay knew what the City of London plotters were unto because she saw their drawings, she heard their chatter on the dastardly designs.

In this Khoodeelaar! montage of the Muhammad Haque images [latest ones taken on Monday 15 April 2013] is the "big picture" of one of the City's ugliest manifestations of what Kay had caught them at plotting.

Hugely expensive high rise apartments for totally alike, unknown arrivals from the outers spaces. The bold advertising Bill Boards put hip by "onecommercialstreet.com" gives the game away.

"Where City Meets Fringe".
Just read that address again:
Onecommerciualstreet.com.
It is not linked with the UK. it is not a UK website address. It is a dot.com web site address, appealing to Big Business internationally.

Question is: who are these people who have already snapped up 50 percent of the apartments?
Where did they find the dosh to do that?
And more “locally” WHO gave them the permission to build this high rise contraption? Tower Hamlets Council? Look at the KHOODEELAAR! placard of 2007 next to Kay Jordan in the montaged picture. We exposed them then that their role was letting in occupation forces that were bent on displacing the local community.


[To be continued]


Has Tower Hamlets Council been abused again as a tool of the City of London ?

Has Tower Hamlets Council been abused again as a tool of the City of London ?
Kay Jordan [below: on right in this Muhammad Haque picture taken in the Hanbury Street London E1 at a KHOODEELAAR! No to "Big Biz City of Lon don Agenda Crossrail hole" Campaign action,] attended an event in the City of London every September for many years when the forces of occupation staged an elaborate pretence that they were "exploring ways to help" "the fringes of the City", suggesting that the inhabitants of the "fringes" were in need of contacts with the City of London… That it was a sham and a con became instantly obvious to Kay. She knew from the off that the City was worse than the Vulture; that it was looking for ways and excuses to take over the land and displace the people, the inhabitants and the community on 'the fringes'. Kay knew what the City of London plotters were unto because she saw their drawings, she heard their chatter on the dastardly designs. In this Khoodeelaar! montage of the Muhammad Haque images [latest ones taken on Monday 15 April 2013] is the "big picture" of one of the City's ugliest manifestations of what Kay had caught them at plotting. Hugely expensive high rise apartments for totally alike, unknown arrivals from the outers spaces. The bold advertising Bill Boards put hip by "onecommercialstreet.com" gives the game away. "Where City Meets Fringe". Just read that address again. Onecommerciualstreet.com. It is not linked with the UK. it is not a UK website address. It is a dot.com web site address, appealing to Big Business internationally. Question is: who are these people who have already snapped up 50 percent of the apartments? Where did they find the dosh to do that? And more “locally” WHO gave them the permission to build this high rise contraption? Tower Hamlets Council? Look at the KHOODEELAAR! placard of 2007 next to Kay Jordan in the montaged picture. We exposed them then that their role was letting in occupation forces that were bent on displacing the local community. [To be continued]

Big Business advances Agenda by the “locally elected” Tower Hamlets Council

Big Business advances Agenda by the “locally elected” Tower Hamlets Council
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Economics, Environment and Electoral and Ethical Commentary

Dysfunctional Democracy-defeating, Democracy-Deficit Stooging for Big Business Agenda by the “locally elected” Tower Hamlets Council [102]
1220 Hrs
GMT
London
Monday
15 April 2013

Tower Hamlets Council has failed to correct this ignorant insert of the wrong year in a Bangla language "description" of the "history'" of the racist murder of Altab Ali.
As AADHIKAR Online had pointed out almost 2 years ago, the basic exception as based on basic level of competence was that the Council would have corrected the ignorant "mistake".
But, then, as events in Brick Lane are showing now every day, Tower Hamlets Council is NOT bothered about the community.
Not if the community does not "appear like an electoral store of assured votes.."
Early this morning [Monday 15 April 2013] at the junction of the Hanbury Street and Brick Lane, very much opposite the Truman Brewery building, a man spoke to the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organiser about the state of Tower Hamlets Council today.
A damning comment it was not.
For to call it "a damning comment" would very seriously understate the strength of disapproval of Tower Hamlets Council that came across in the statement.
And that statement really is not that of one individual only.
Workers in the Brick Lane Curry restaurants have been expressing serious concern at Tower Hamlets Council's incompetence, negligence and plain lack of care towards the economic, social life in and around the Brick Lane, London E1 area.
The very area whose comprehensive defence the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been making for the past ten years.
In this UPDATED MONTAGE of the pictures of Kay Jordan and other Khoodeelaar!
Campaign supporters taken during the focussed activities against the Crossrail hole assault, we placed even more intense focus on the abysmal failure of the "Tower Hamlets Council" and we pinpointed its "role" in inviting the Crossrail Hole Assault on the East End of London.
Similar Assaults to the Crossrail hole Assault are being INVITED by Tower Hamlets Councils current controlling clique, NOW, on Monday 15 April 2013, TEN years after the actual programme and actions for the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign were first extensively diagnosed.
And the evidence of Tower Hamlets Council’s failure and negligence of Brick Lane London E1 area and the de facto collusion with the Big Business agenda-spawned interests-as seen in the rising heights of buildings in the adjacent streets, is everywhere.
Tall buildings are growing out of the ground in every corner and street, literally stones throws from Brick Lane.
And the "lack of planning" is the order of the day, as far as Tower Hamlets Council has been concerned.

[To be continued]


No to the cruelty to the poor & the envy by the rich against the poor...

No to the cruelty to the poor & the envy by the rich against the poor...
0110 Hrs GMT London Sunday 14 April 2013.

The TORY London Daily Telegraph web site admits that Thatcher remains very unpopular in Liverpool!

But the Telegraph tells a big lie now.

Thatcher is widely unpopular with all the genuine people across the country.

Across the world.

The truth is that the Telegraph is hiding the facts and colluding with the propagandists who are even now confecting new tales to make Thatcher come across as a "Methodist".

Does the Telegraph know how many ordinary believers in the "Methodist" ethos Margaret Hilda Roberts Thatcher had hurt, violated, destituted... and how many others she had ignored, shown contemptuous insults towards?

[To be continued]

Communities SAY NO to Thatcherites' Attack on Society today- Yorkshire No to 'Bedroom tax'

Communities SAY NO to Thatcherites' Attack on Society today- Yorkshire No to 'Bedroom tax'
COMMUNITIES in Britain SAYING NO to Thatcherites' ATTACK on Society today.

Retrieved from the web site of the Communist Party of Great Britain daily the MORNING STAR at 0500 GMT London Saturday 13 April 2013


Residents condemn bedroom tax as an attack on the poor



Friday 12 April 2013

by Peter Lazenby

A packed public meeting on Thursday night heard how the coalition government's vicious bedroom tax is causing fear and anger among council tenants in West Yorkshire.

The meeting in Halifax was organised by local campaigners against the tax and by Calderdale Save Our Services.

Speakers included left-Labour former MP Alice Mahon.

The meeting heard how the Tories had learned from the failure of the poll tax not to take on working people all at once but to divide them and drive in wedges of division, picking off one group at a time.

The bedroom tax hits only people receiving housing benefit, dividing them from other working-class people.

Out of 55,000 council tenants in neighbouring Leeds 8,000 will be hit by the bedroom tax.

Lawyer Ryan Bradshaw said:

"The bedroom tax is just one of the many cuts that are going to be affecting the poorest in society."

Mr Bradshaw pointed out that people will also be hit by legal aid cuts, the new universal credit and harsher sanctions.

And he noted that housing benefit will now be paid to tenants instead of landlords, and monthly instead of fortnightly.

"Imagine how that will impact on someone with mental health problems." When the new payments system was introduced in a trial rent arrears went up by 700 per cent, he said.

"It is targeting people who need help most."

Young campaigner Jonathon Maguire said:

"I got brought up being told 'your home is your castle - this is your domain.' I heard the term 'a council house is for life.' I despise them for doing this. What the government is doing is despicable."

But he said people should recognise the power they have collectively.

"We can make a difference," he said.

"People need to unite against this. We have to say to those people who feel isolated and have no support: 'We are here for you'."



http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/news/content/view/full/131635



The AADHIKAR Online reports on the continuing campaign to defend d communities across the UK to be continued]

Paxman fails to quiz Blair's Campbell on HIS role in lying to the people, in dividing the Country

Paxman fails to quiz Blair's Campbell on HIS role in lying to the people, in dividing the Country
AADHIKARONline

DIAGNOSING the “mainstream” manipulation of the Message over Margaret Thatcher

In THIS part, NEWSNIGHT, hosted by Jeremy Paxman and featuring Alastair Campbell, Tony Bliar’s ‘spin doctor’ who turned out to be many times worse than Thatcher’s own “attack dog”, Bernard Ingham. More on Ingham in later parts.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary

2330 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 10 April 2013

Kay Jordan, here in my picture of her in 2007 in the Greatorex Street London E1 when she had just got back from another encounter with the Crossrail-hole-plot-backers at Westminster, told me once of a “Labour-supporters’ meeting” she had been to in Camden. It was addressed by Alistair Campbell.

Kay said that Campbell had spoken with such disrespect to the people at the meeting that she concluded that there could not be much hope of getting a just or fair representation for the country by the likes of them.

Campbell of course was still at the height of his “Bliar-linked” “powers”.

Kay said that many of the people at the meeting were lifelong supports of the Labour Party yet they were made to feel small by Campbell.

He showed nothing but contempt to every concern that they had on how Bliar was behaving....

So, to hear the same Campbell “criticise” Thatcher, as seen in the past 90 minutes on the BBC’s NEWSNIGHT programme was another shocker!

Those who had not to endure Campbell when he was peddling the lies of Bliar would not know just how awful Campbell was to so many people.

And this is not to begin to recall just how full of contempt for democracy and Society Bliar himself was.



[To be continued]





Prove it! Campaigners deliver petition calling for Iain Duncan Smith to live on £53 a week

Prove it! Campaigners deliver petition calling for Iain Duncan Smith to live on £53 a week
PICTURED in this image is DOMINIC AVERSANO who organised the petition against the lying boast by Iain Duncan Smith.


Retrieved by AADHIKAROnline from the INDEPENDENT, London, website
0230 GMT Wednesday 10 April 2013
Prove it!

Campaigners deliver petition calling for Iain Duncan Smith to live on £53 a week to his Whitehall office

Petition with almost half a million signatures demands the Work and Pensions Secretary backs up his claim

KEVIN RAWLINSON 

MONDAY 08 APRIL 2013





The Work and Pensions Secretary has today accused some welfare applicants of getting their claim in early to avoid stringent new conditions, as a petition with more than 460,000 names calling on him to back up his claim that he could live on £53 a week was handed in to his office.

Iain Duncan Smith, who lives in a 16th-century Tudor mansion, made the claim last week as he announced reforms to the benefits system. The petition, the fastest-growing in the history of the Change.org website, was dismissed as a “complete stunt” by Mr Duncan Smith, who said he had experienced life “on the breadline”.

The petition was set up when David Bennett, a market trader, said the sum was all he had to live on after his housing benefit was cut. Mr Duncan Smith responded by claiming he could manage on that amount.

It asks demands that Mr Duncan Smith prove his claim by doing so for a year. But the Work and Pensions Secretary told his local newspaper last week: “This is a complete stunt which distracts attention from the welfare reforms which are much more important and which I have been working hard to get done. I have been unemployed twice in my life so I have already done this. I know what it is like to live on the breadline.”

Shop Assistant Dominic Aversano handed over the petition, who started the petition. The 28-year-old from Twickenham, south west London, said: "I don't think Mr Duncan Smith has a choice about whether to listen to the petition because so many people have signed it.

"I think it has changed the debate around welfare cuts. I was very surprised because I didn't think we would have such a large response. I am delighted."

Security staff, seeing the group approaching, locked the doors to the building and - initially at least - refused to accept the petition.

Mr Aversano said: “That is in keeping with pretty much everything that Iain Duncan Smith has done, he has been ignoring all the people who signed the petition. And so, to ignore us when we come to the door is not really a surprise to me, it proves the point even more."

John Coventry of campaigning website Change.org, which hosted the petition, said: “Funnily enough, the last time we were locked out like of a building was the Chinese embassy when we were handing in hundreds of thousands of signatures to free human rights activist Liu Xiaobo about three or four months ago.”

It took various attempts and numerous calls and emails to Department staff to eventually persuade them to allow the petition through the doors.

Mr Coventry  said it was the largest his organisation had ever hosted.

He said: "This has really taken the debate out of politicians' hands and put it back in the hands of the people. Social media has the power to do that now."

Mr Duncan Smith went on the offensive today, claiming people have been rushing to get disability benefits before the coalition toughens up the system.

He said a surge in applications before the personal independence payment (PIP) started coming into force today demonstrated why reform was needed.

He told the Daily Mail: “Seventy per cent of people on it have lifetime awards which means no one sees you ever again. It doesn't matter if you get better or your condition worsens - it's quite ridiculous.

“We've seen a rise in the run-up to PIP. And you know why? They know PIP has a health check. They want to get in early, get ahead of it. It's a case of 'get your claim in early'.”

He added that rigorous new health checks for claimants were “common sense”.

Both Downing Street, on behalf of David Cameron, and George Osborne have sidestepped questions on their ability to cope on such an income. But Greg Clark, the Treasury minister, admitted that any politician would find it difficult to live on £53 a week.



The INDEPENDENT web site has the news item, accessible via the URL cited below

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/prove-it-campaigners-deliver-petition-calling-for-iain-duncan-smith-to-live-on-53-a-week-to-his-whitehall-office-8563671.html

Can Lutfur Rahman stop Tower Hamlets Council sinking beyond repair? The SPECTATOR 'debates' [2]

Can Lutfur Rahman stop Tower Hamlets Council sinking beyond repair? The SPECTATOR 'debates' [2]
SPECTATOR magazine web site, London UK

The 2nd COMMENT posted online by MUHAMMAD HAQUE this morning Tuesday 09 April 2013 sharing the CONCERNS about the dysfunctional bureaucracy [or clique of people in publicly paid posts and behaving irresponsibly, with callous disregard to the duties they owe to the people in the Community] that has been disregarding the Tower Hamlets Council.

the key thrust of this Second Comment is a wake up call to all those, including and in context typified by Lutfur Rahman as the “executive mayor”, who are in place following "elections", to take note and act before Tower hamlets Council is destroyed totally.

that destruction will be brought about by key decision-making Council-employees behaving wrongfully and illegally and doing so with the democratically elected post-holders failing or neglecting to hold these employees to account without any more delay.

In my initial comment on this piece

"Right to reply: Mayor Lutfur Rahman responds to Nick Cohen" 

I had said that Tower Hamlets Council was not being held to democratic accountability.

I had said that because that was true then and that remains true today, Tuesday 09 April 2013, a day that I am going to have to dedicate to finding out more evidence of why "my local Council" is failing the local community so abysmally.

There is no better place to start than by looking at the evidence of my own direct communications.

If we say that I have had to create in the past 30 months several thousand separate and originally researched and verified items of communications examining the behaviour of the various decision-makers in Tower Hamlets Council perhaps that will give a fairly representative idea of the detail of the evidence.

Based on that, I can share the findings here say that most of Tower Hamlets Council’s decision-making goes on without any democratic audit, accountability or oversight.

And that it is costing people affected by the adverse decisions dearly. And there is no known viable recourse for people who badly need redress but cannot find any.

Lutfur knows what I am talking about here.

As do at least five of his very closely active colleagues in “the cabinet” that he fronts. Over the past 30 months, I have had to communicate with him more times than I had ever imagined should have been necessary.

Why then was it necessary?

As I have already stated in a number of broadcast programmes on radio and on satellite TV, this has been done by a number of key decision-making employees in the Council who behave as if they do not have to abide by any laws or any constitutionality, let alone with any ethics or any sense of fairness.

Some of that was also hinted at and in a particular case extensively detailed by the MP Robert [Bob] Neil who spoke in a House of Commons debate he had been involved in calling for on 23 January 2013 about local Councils which debate featured Tower Hamlets as, in the context of that speech, one of the failing Councils in England and Wales.

On the evidence of my communications and clear concerns about the wrongful, illegal and unconstitutional behaviour of Tower Hamlets Council’s key decision-making employees, there is a serious dysfunction in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.

And someone has got to democratically accountably and transparently and conclusively admit it and immediately start dealing with it in real terms.

As opposed to in making excuses, being in denial or worse in even suggesting that the evidence does not exist or that the Council’s critics are somehow making things up!

Otherwise the very existence of Tower Hamlets Council as “we have known it” will be exposed to serious and real threat!

That will in turn mean that the vast majority of people in one of England’s most deprived Boroughs will get even worse “service” than they have ben doing recently.

Which brings me to the little matter of the “mayor election” as scheduled for 2014.

Do those who claim to be set on replacing Lutfur Raman from his perch as the “elected executive mayor of Tower Hamlets Borough” have a programme?

I have not seen any that contains a programme for a really democratic accountability by the Council to the Community in Tower Hamlets Borough. This is what I call ground for raw discontent about the Council as a whole. This means the discontent is set to come in the direction of Lutfur Rahman faster and more forcefully than he appears to have realised so far.

Can Lutfur Rahman stop Tower Hamlets Council sinking beyond repair? The SPECTATOR 'debates' [2]

Can Lutfur Rahman stop Tower Hamlets Council sinking beyond repair? The SPECTATOR 'debates' [2]
SPECTATOR magazine web site, London UK

The 2nd COMMENT posted online by MUHAMMAD HAQUE this morning Tuesday 09 April 2013 sharing the CONCERNS about the dysfunctional bureaucracy [or clique of people in publicly paid posts and behaving irresponsibly, with callous disregard to the duties they owe to the people in the Community] that has been disregarding the Tower Hamlets Council.

the key thrust of this Second Comment is a wake up call to all those, including and in context typified by Lutfur Rahman as the “executive mayor”, who are in place following "elections", to take note and act before Tower hamlets Council is destroyed totally.

that destruction will be brought about by key decision-making Council-employees behaving wrongfully and illegally and doing so with the democratically elected post-holders failing or neglecting to hold these employees to account without any more delay.

In my initial comment on this piece

"Right to reply: Mayor Lutfur Rahman responds to Nick Cohen" 

I had said that Tower Hamlets Council was not being held to democratic accountability.

I had said that because that was true then and that remains true today, Tuesday 09 April 2013, a day that I am going to have to dedicate to finding out more evidence of why "my local Council" is failing the local community so abysmally.

There is no better place to start than by looking at the evidence of my own direct communications.

If we say that I have had to create in the past 30 months several thousand separate and originally researched and verified items of communications examining the behaviour of the various decision-makers in Tower Hamlets Council perhaps that will give a fairly representative idea of the detail of the evidence.

Based on that, I can share the findings here say that most of Tower Hamlets Council’s decision-making goes on without any democratic audit, accountability or oversight.

And that it is costing people affected by the adverse decisions dearly. And there is no known viable recourse for people who badly need redress but cannot find any.

Lutfur knows what I am talking about here.

As do at least five of his very closely active colleagues in “the cabinet” that he fronts. Over the past 30 months, I have had to communicate with him more times than I had ever imagined should have been necessary.

Why then was it necessary?

As I have already stated in a number of broadcast programmes on radio and on satellite TV, this has been done by a number of key decision-making employees in the Council who behave as if they do not have to abide by any laws or any constitutionality, let alone with any ethics or any sense of fairness.

Some of that was also hinted at and in a particular case extensively detailed by the MP Robert [Bob] Neil who spoke in a House of Commons debate he had been involved in calling for on 23 January 2013 about local Councils which debate featured Tower Hamlets as, in the context of that speech, one of the failing Councils in England and Wales.

On the evidence of my communications and clear concerns about the wrongful, illegal and unconstitutional behaviour of Tower Hamlets Council’s key decision-making employees, there is a serious dysfunction in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.

And someone has got to democratically accountably and transparently and conclusively admit it and immediately start dealing with it in real terms.

As opposed to in making excuses, being in denial or worse in even suggesting that the evidence does not exist or that the Council’s critics are somehow making things up!

Otherwise the very existence of Tower Hamlets Council as “we have known it” will be exposed to serious and real threat!

That will in turn mean that the vast majority of people in one of England’s most deprived Boroughs will get even worse “service” than they have ben doing recently.

Which brings me to the little matter of the “mayor election” as scheduled for 2014.

Do those who claim to be set on replacing Lutfur Raman from his perch as the “elected executive mayor of Tower Hamlets Borough” have a programme?

I have not seen any that contains a programme for a really democratic accountability by the Council to the Community in Tower Hamlets Borough. This is what I call ground for raw discontent about the Council as a whole. This means the discontent is set to come in the direction of Lutfur Rahman faster and more forcefully than he appears to have realised so far.

Margaret Thatcher: What forces had created this image of Political Violence on Society?

Margaret Thatcher: What forces had created this image of Political Violence on Society?
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Margaret Thatcher -
What forces had created this image of Political Violence on Society? [1]

0302 [0245] [0220] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 09 April 2013 This front page [image above this Commentary] is of the British Communist Party Daily Morning Star’s front-page dated Tuesday 09 April 2013.
It is tame, misleading and the contents that go with it are even more misleading. In the following Commentary, I shall be examining the bankruptcy of the "British Left" in the context of the tool that the Neo Cons had invented in Maggie [Margaret Hilda Roberts] Thatcher. There is NO evidence that she had either the intellect or the depth of understanding or the dedication to “her work” [what WAS her work when compared to the destruction of the values and the assaults on Society that she was engaged in?] which are being attributed to her. She was being used as a strategically invented political tool, as one of the most effective Trojan horses, to coin a phrase, the real enemies of Society found in her and rammed it through under the guise of her APPEARANCES as a ‘woman...’ and all those ‘features’.... that the and the worst use from Society’s standpoint was being deliberately done by depicting her gender and the ‘fact’ of her being “a woman”. Of course she was a biological woman with all that that entailed. But politically, why was she being repeatedly cited as “a woman”? What message was being intended to be conveyed by that reference, that ‘identification’? If being “a woman” was supposed to show, amongst other qualifiers to that portrayal in that temporal and social, Economic and Political context, the non-violent, ethical, moral, compassionate, just view towards Society then she failed totally. She personified and coney the worst image of a woman in power: the image of a woman who was bent on attacking Society. How was that a good thing for Society? Or for humanity? Or for the world? Wasn’t she also the one who berated the other image, that of Nelson Mandela, still incarcerated in the Apartheid prison on that Island off the coasts of mainland South Africa and called him a terrorist without hesitation, remorse or regret? She did more damage to women than has yet been admitted. Isn’t it time to remember her interview in January 1978 on ITV that is still full of venom and hatred as based on ethnicity, race and racist intolerance? How are those being ‘tackled’ if they are being tacked at all? And is Ed Milibrand any ‘good’ at all at confronting the Thatcherite resurgence that the Neo Cons Collusion is embarked on now, as at 09 April 2013, with the aim of finishing off Society? Who had scripted that phrase that Margaret Thatcher mouthed to the effect that “there is [was] no such thing as Society”? As the footage has already been played, the Political Margaret Thatcher was an invention. Thought up by men some of whom are still around and are openly admitting to having played parts in the programme that manufactured her. To the point of coaching her to put across the “strategic” diction! As a ploy to fool the gullible public already prepared to receive the messages of poison and discord that she had been scripted to pledge to discourage [all those phrases about “St Francis of Assisi” etc that she had been tutored to mouth at the inception of her formal embarkation of Office] which would show that she was uttering an utter untruth on that pledge. [To be continued]

BBC Unleashes its very own bash-the-poor weapon: The BBC papers preview

BBC Unleashes its very own bash-the-poor weapon: The BBC papers preview
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

BBC Unleashes its very own bash-the-poor weapon: The BBC papers preview [1]

0425 Hrs GMT


London


Monday


08 April 2013


BBC unleashes ITS very own NEO Conservative PR back up to Fleet Street’s over-charged dirty war against Society, against International treaties, against Constitutionality.

As if the DAILY MAIL, the DailY Telegraph and the rest of the Neo Cons Media bashing Society, disown any need for justice, and dismissing morality daily were not enough, the BBC recruited the services of a dubious [as in of doubtful reliability in context on the subject and on Society] “commentator” called “Michael Caplan QC”...



[To be continued]



MUHAMMAD HAQUE UPDATING LUTFUR RAHMAN on the crisis of racism in Tower Hamlets Council

MUHAMMAD HAQUE UPDATING LUTFUR RAHMAN on the crisis of racism in Tower Hamlets Council


Dear Lutfur Rahman,

I was wondering if this time you were going to put your name to a response to anything published in "Fleet Street".

I shall come back after I observe what happens to THIS short comment from me.

I am surprised that you make references to yourself as not being involved in anything "extreme".

Why am I surprised?

Because as you KNOW from the evidence that I have made available to the Council over the years that an agenda of racism is very much active in Tower Hamlets and that agenda is being carried out via the existing Council.

I shall give name, date and chapter and verse on the rest if anyone would like to deny this assertion that I am making.

I have published, on radio and on a number of occasions on TV programmes, my finding that Tower Hamlets Council has been failing to serve the local community as a whole and I have said this is due to the fact that the Council is not being held to democratic accountability.

What do I mean by this?

I said only a fortnight ago: that the elected Councillors- and that elected element includes you as well] - were free to hold the Council bureaucracy to account but were choosing [not to] or failing to do so.



Muhammad Haque diagnosing the morally compromised Ed Miliband

Muhammad Haque diagnosing the morally compromised Ed Miliband
THIS image has been taken from the SPECTATOR magazine’s web site this evening [Sunday 07 April 2013].
It is a grinning Liam Byrne, the morality-free, thought-free, compassion-free, ethics-free “shadow” to Iain Duncan Smith in the UK House of Commons. In that role, Byrne has proven the worst suspicions about him: he is unfit for the purpose.

Byrne is the one who had left that notorious, callous “note” apparently boasting “there is no money left” as they exited the offices of “power” following the 2010 general election . Byrne has proven since then that there is not on ly ‘no money lefty’ but that there is no brains left either.
The question is:
what on earth is this git doing faking it as the person speaking about Society as a “counter to the Neo Cons’ Assault that he has been complicit in every-time he has uttered anything on the situation?



Muhammad Haque diagnosing the morally compromised Ed Miliband who is letting Society down by capitulating to the Neo Cons Agenda against Society in Britain.

Published on the SPECTATOR magazine’s ‘coffee house’ web site this evening [07 April 2013]


What Society needs is a comprehensive review of all the ills that successive sets of bureaucrats operating the corrupting and the unfair agenda of Big Business have heaped on Society to the point where the very idea of Society is now in danger.

Has Ed Miliband got that perspective?

Or is he too morally compromised to dare to confront the Neo Cons at their own game?

If the utterances strategically unleashed via the Neo Cons Media operations during the weekend is any guide, Miliband will fail to tell the truth on  Society.

But I am quite prepared for him to try to prove my findings on him wrong!


THE above COMMENT is accessible at

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/04/liam-byrne-tries-to-answer-labours-welfare-question/


BBC enters the fray and is exposed as being ill-briefed on key facts: John Pie Naar!

BBC enters the fray and is exposed as being ill-briefed on key facts: John Pie Naar!
OUR Image, an AADHIKAR Diagnostic Montage on the BBC today, shows John Pienaar and some of his 'guests' on the programme that he had misleadingly announced on twitter would have George Osborne as a guest. Osborne was NOT a guest.

Osborne was interviewed on a pre-recorded items

But the BBC Radio 5Live's John Pienaar was not the only ignorant one today. Earlier, Eddie Mair, who got stratospheric PLUGS over his encounter with the 'nasty piece of work' Boris JohnsonJohnson last week, was all oozing with accommodation when he was presented with the guest Harriet Harman.

Harman is a long documented self-seeking careerist who has abused the weakness of the Bliared Party structure to enhance herself over decades.

Eddie Mair on BBC TV this morning failed miserably to pin the heartless, cruel, opportunist Harman to the facts.

Here, then, is a short expose of the shallow foundation on which Harman pitched her own careerist liens via the BBC.

We shall publish other diagnostic items here in this series on what has been said and done during this POLITICAL WEEKEND.


We start with the Guardian web site which has given Harman a splash on that plug for the Cruel Harriet Harman via the BBC
The following COMMENT by “Ethicaliser” was posted on the Guardian website [at 1835 GMT today Sunday 07 April 2013] has been retrieved at appx 1950 GMT London Sunday 07 April 2013.

We publish it after making a few, very minor spelling and grammatical corrections

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/apr/07/working-families-exasperated-benefits-harman?commentpage=1



If your [shown as being published by “the OBSERVER” on the guatdian.co.uk web site] report is an accurate account of Harriet Harman’s utterance then of course she is even more unfit for purpose than she had showed in the secure career that she has mysteriously enjoyed in the name of the “Labour Party”.


Harriet Harman is not a social scientist.

Nor is she known for making ethics or morality the key purpose of her career.


She is wrong to say what she has said because it is untrue.

Worse, she is inciting resentment as she is basing her ‘arguments’ on envy.


Envy [of] the haves against the have-nots.


This is too far from reasoned debate based on hard evidence.


If the pollsters asked a reactionary question, most people wold give a reactionary answer.

It is all hype.


If Harman is “representing” Ed Miliband in this then of course the analysis must be that it is a bankrupt Party.


The truth is the actual sums paid to Big Banks.


Bring those figures out.


Analyse those.


Divide the sums by the numbers of the recipients. Compare those with the incomes or the earnings of individual workers on the factory floor.


Bring out the statists on actual jobs that manual workers, others in the lower floors do and show their wages.
Constituency by Parliamentary Constituency.
Local Authority by Local Authority.


Industry by Industry.


Show the figures on what is paid to what sort of claimant in benefits.
Show what means testing is.


Show what Housing g benefits are.


Show the crime statistic and describe all the capital offences.


Correlate the crimes and the offences with the actual social backgrounds of the offenders the perpetrators.


Show how many “benefit claimants” there are


Show how many benefit claimants there are.


Show how many benefit are illegally denied.


Show many are legally owed but are held back from claimants.
Show the figures on evictions.


How many illegal eviction have taken place every year for the past decade and more.


And the figures must continue until the full facts are exhaustively shown.


Otherwise, the campaign is very seriously flawed as it is based on rumour, gossip and envy by the rich of the poor!


Now that UK Foreign Secretary William Hague has joined the assault on Society, let us bring in the External activities in the Budget as well.
Show the figures for the UK expenditure in the involvement with war on Iraq, the occupation of Afghanistan.


And the full Expenditures on everything.....

Miliband is colluding with and capitulating to the Neo Cons in their assault on Society

Miliband is colluding with and capitulating to the Neo Cons  in their assault on Society
© Muhammad Haque Daily ethical Commentary
0700 GMT London Sunday 07 April 2013



"…Miliband is colluding with and capitulating to the Neo Cons in their assault on Society.

On fairness. On basic decency….

Everything that the founding members of the Labour Party fought for. Everything that keeps Society 'standing' at all…."

[To be continued @khoodeelaar]

"Civil servants" "fight back" is not credible action

"Civil servants" "fight back" is not credible action
"Civil servants" "fight back" is not credible action


Osborne NASTY! Osborne is most accurately called Nasty! The Hebrew-Yiddish 'golem' isn't the word!

Osborne NASTY! Osborne is most accurately called Nasty! The Hebrew-Yiddish 'golem' isn't the word!


"Nasty" is the word for Osborne.

As it is for Iain Duncan Smith

and David Cameron!

How, like Boris Johnson as described by Eddie Mair, they all are!

0130 [0115] GMT London Saturday 06 April 2013

A word about the CPGB 'Morning Star' headline writer who has compared Gorge Osborne to a 'vengeful golem’:

As far as I can determine, the word golem [pronounced 'goolem'] is not about a real person. It is a thing made of other things, mostly inanimate.

Short etymology:

European “Hebrew” and then “accepted” in the Yiddish vocabulary. So the two words 'vengeful' and 'golem', as used by the 'Morning Star' ‘today’, don't really depict Osborne.

A much better and expressive one, word, that is, is:

Nasty!

[To be continued]



No to HS2. No to Camden Council capitulation to Big Biz Neo Cons occupiers, profiteers...

No to HS2. No to Camden Council capitulation to Big Biz Neo Cons occupiers, profiteers...



KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Commentary: NO to “Camden Council Clique’s Complicity with HS2!”
By © Muhammad Haque.
2035 [2020] [1855] [1820] Hrs GMT London Friday 05 April 2013.
Camden Needs a No to HS2 Campaign. Now!
CAMDEN Council confirm what KHOODEELAAR! has said all along:

they are another bunch of liars! Today, they have lied all four ways. They are against HS2. They are for HS2. They are for legal action. They are for a compromise with the Big Liars.

They have let the local people down.
The local people too have been hijacked by all manner of careerists, time-servers and even, like a “Ms” Sommers who made appearances before the TV news cameras, “patriots”.
No wonder that Big Biz thieves keep on robbing and looting the resources that belong to Society.
HS2-peddling PR operatives have been promising everything to all their target areas which they want to take over, destroy and appropriate.
This is a classic ploy that greedy, selfish and corrupt profiteers and violators of Society do. This is what they have done for hundreds of years.
This is what has been featured in the “UK nation-wide news bulletins during the day today, Friday 05 April 203 when another clutch of the Big Bank Robbers, costing ‘the public’ in excess of £40 Billion, has been exposed and also at the same time exonerated’.
While their colluders, complicit in their Capitalist Class warrior, neo-Conservative warfare against Society, have maintained their onslaught against the Victims of the Big Biz Agenda-pushing thieves: G Osborne has failed to apologise for his LATEST outrageous, despicable behaviour against the “little people”! [the ‘notion’ of the ‘little people’, shown in the context of HS2 capitulation by Camden, the London Borough Councillors and their colluders at the expense of the local community’ - as broadcast in bits on the ‘BBC London News’ bulletin 1730 GMT today, Friday 05 April 2013]
The problem for the people in the Camden Borough Council areas targeted by HS2 Agenda is that they have got got a single campaign with the resolve to “Say NO to HS2”.
They should do.
Even now, it isn’t too late.
[To be continued]

A 'most deprived' Borough, Tower Hamlets, spends £Millions in sacking staff!

A 'most deprived' Borough, Tower Hamlets, spends £Millions in sacking staff!
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

Financial dysfunction and democracy deficit in Tower Hamlets, in context [Commentary Edition: N’th]

0705 Hrs GMT London Friday 05 April 2013

Tower Hamlets Council, allegedly 'representing' a borough that is rated one of the 'most deprived' in England, paid £2Million in REDUNDANCY payments. So says a report in the London EVENING STANDARD [Thursday 04 April 2013]

Overall, London Councils paid £200 Million, says the same item in the EVENING STANDARD.

I have not noticed a single squeak from a single Councillor, in Tower Hamlets or elsewhere, who has shown that they even knew that this was going on!

Talking about discrediting elected democracy!

[To be continued]



Who are the Council staff Tower Hamlets sacked at a cost of £2 Million?

Who are the Council staff Tower Hamlets sacked at a cost of £2 Million?
0140 Hrs GMT

London Friday 05 April 2013

TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL, IN EFFECT, SACKED - compulsory redundancy - a number of staff at a cost, of £2Million AT LEAST.

Thursday's EVENING STANDARD reported [Page 2 of their 'print' Edition/s]

Editor © Muhammad Haque

0130 Hrs GMT

London

Friday 05 April 2013



KHOODEELAAR! the Campaign against Big Biz Agenda scam Crossrail hole assault is also the Campaign that has been defending the Community in Tower Hamlets.

KHOODEELAAR! today Friday 05 April 2013, is asking -as it has been asking for a decade -for the local Tower Hamlets Council to be accountable to the local community. The “news item” which we are diagnosing HERE, is from the website of the “Docklands and East London Advertiser” and it is, on the face of it, an item that has been linked with the activities of the Conservatives on Tower Hamlets Council [the 2nd numerically major group of Councillors on the “Opposition” benches] and their ally, the Rightwing pressure group called “The Taxpayers Alliance”.

That makes the item a Right-wing one. Their Agenda is a Rightwing Agenda.

But does THAT mean that the item is without OBJECTIVE credibility?

It most certainly does not do so.

This is why the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign is making the point that Tower Hamlets Council has got to be run in a way that does not make people ask: what do they think they are doing? Who gave them the licence to behave this way?

How dare they waste money on fancy biscuits, even fancier snacks and luxury 'branded' bottled water and tea when they are cutting g essential Services?

And a MILLION others!

Yes, TWO MILLION, in fact!

Who are the staff that Tower Hamlets Council sacked at a cost of £2Million?

Who are the staff that Tower Hamlets Council sacked at a cost of £2Million?
TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL, IN EFFECT, SACKED - compulsory redundancy - a number of staff at a cost, of £2Million AT LEAST.

Thursday's EVENING STANDARD reported [Page 2 of their 'print' Edition/s]

Editor © Muhammad Haque

0130 Hrs GMT

London

Friday 05 April 2013



KHOODEELAAR! the Campaign against Big Biz Agenda scam Crossrail hole assault is also the Campaign that has been defending the Community in Tower Hamlets.

KHOODEELAAR! today Friday 05 April 2013, is asking -as it has been asking for a decade -for the local Tower Hamlets Council to be accountable to the local community. The “news item” which we are diagnosing HERE, is from the website of the “Docklands and East London Advertiser” and it is, on the face of it, an item that has been linked with the activities of the Conservatives on Tower Hamlets Council [the 2nd numerically major group of Councillors on the “Opposition” benches] and their ally, the Rightwing pressure group called “The Taxpayers Alliance”.

That makes the item a Right-wing one. Their Agenda is a Rightwing Agenda.

But does THAT mean that the item is without OBJECTIVE credibility?

It most certainly does not do so.

This is why the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign is making the point that Tower Hamlets Council has got to be run in a way that does not make people ask: what do they think they are doing? Who gave them the licence to behave this way?

How dare they waste money on fancy biscuits, even fancier snacks and luxury 'branded' bottled water and tea when they are cutting g essential Services?

And a MILLION others!

Yes, TWO MILLION, in fact!



[To be continued]



Tip of the CONDEM iceberg of assaults on Society: Contemptible Minister Iain Duncan Smith

Tip of the CONDEM iceberg of assaults on Society: Contemptible Minister Iain Duncan Smith
The © Muhammad Haque Lines in Context on the Cruel, Contemptible Minister Iain Duncan Smith [1]

1625 Hrs GMT London Thursday 04 April 2013

Even funnier, Iain, is this word Class
It so easily fits & rhymes with Crass!
Then there is your favourite phrase
about yourself: the Quiet Man
we now ask you to “Be Quiet, Man!”


[To be continued]

Found on the web: a rhyming grunt at IDS' stunt!

Found on the web: a rhyming grunt at IDS' stunt!
"Funnily enough Iain, most of the people that have signed that petition tend to use a rhyming phrase* to describe you"

[* ‘word’]
,br>

Neo Cons Daily Mail agenda continues to dominate Guardian 'Editor' -1

Neo Cons Daily Mail agenda continues to dominate Guardian 'Editor' -1
AADHIKAROnline News and Commentary Graphic designed by Muhammad Haque with images including three from the Guardian in CONTEXT:

1510 [1415] Hrs GMT

London

Thursday

04 April 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: The Guardian's servility to Paul dacred Daily Mail [1]

Zoe Williams is in a significant minority among the Alan Rusbridger-fronted "Guardian". No surprise then that her "Comment is Free" piece about the Paul Dacred Daily Mail's poisonous lies about "Vile" "Welfare" causing the Mick Philpotts to do what they did [or will do!] has attracted desperate "Editorial" attention, with the online CORRECTION appearing under her piece about the EXACT details on how Paul Dacre has NOT been responsible for any failings on the part of the PCC!

Equally unsurprisingly, the Zoe Williams "Comment is Free" piece [as I write this at 1414 GMT 04 April 2013] appears to have been "disconnected" from further viewer Comments!

[To be continued]

Even the Neo-Cons-peddling London EVENING STANDARD is forced to mock IDS £53-a-week con!

Even the Neo-Cons-peddling London EVENING STANDARD is forced to mock IDS £53-a-week con!
AADHIKAROnline-Khoodeelaar! Campaign NO to IDS' latest lie against the INVOLUNTARY POOR

0405 [0400] [0325] GMT London Thursday 04 April 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

Continuing to diagnose the dire malaise that is the Neo Cons of Britain as exposed by the deeply sick-making depth of stupidity and blatant nastiness of the utterance of the man who faked his entire career by capitalising on a false image that he was the “Quiet Man”!

That he never was anything remotely like Quiet has been exposed by his nasty cruel calculated contempt for the people whom he has been pushing into involuntary destitution in the name of“reform” [11]



Even the Neo-Cons-peddling London EVENING STANDARD is forced to mock IDS £53-a-week con!
[see texts of their short, mocking piece, reproduced below]

[To be continued]

THE LONDON EVENING STANDARD Londoner's Diary Column Wednesday 03 April 2013:

Who will save Iain Duncan Smith from a tight budget?

As the numbers signing a petition to have Iain Duncan Smith live on £53 a week rivals Tory party membership numbers, will no one ride to his rescue?

Edwina Currie, former Health Minister, said she could live on £53 a week.

“Asked her to talk to Channel 5 News about it,” tweets producer Nick Frost. “She wanted 500 quid.”

And what about Michael Portillo, who had some experience of a tight budget after living as a single parent on £80 a week for a BBC documentary a decade ago when IDS was party leader? “I’m keeping out of this," he wrote to the Londoner.



0325 GMT London Thursday 04 April 2013

Even the Neo-Cons-peddling London EVENING STANDARD is forced to mock IDS £53-a-week con! [see texts of their short, mocking piece, reproduced below

[To be continued]



Who will save Iain Duncan Smith from a tight budget?

As the numbers signing a petition to have Iain Duncan Smith live on £53 a week rivals Tory party membership numbers, will no one ride to his rescue?

Edwina Currie, former Health Minister, said she could live on £53 a week. “Asked her to talk to Channel 5 News about it,” tweets producer Nick Frost. “She wanted 500 quid.”

And what about Michael Portillo, who had some experience of a tight budget after living as a single parent on £80 a week for a BBC documentary a decade ago when IDS was party leader? “I’m keeping out of this," he wrote to the Londoner.

Wednesday's campaigning frontpage of the Morning Star: Tories attack the weakest AGAIN!

Wednesday's campaigning frontpage of the Morning Star: Tories attack the weakest AGAIN!
EDWINA CURRIE joins the gravy train, just as the Country was getting to grip with Iain Duncan Smith.

As could be expected, Edwina Currie asked to be paid £500 of BBC licence fee payers' money to agree to tell how she could live on £53.00 a week!

[To be continued]

Only Neo Con Liars in their sick-making cynical fantasies could live as IDS lyingly claims...

Only Neo Con Liars in their sick-making cynical fantasies could live as IDS lyingly claims...
1925 [1915] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 02 April 2013

The Guardian website news item on IDS stunt attracts nearly 700 Comments in less than three hours of the item going online.

While the challenge by
https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/iain-duncan-smith-iain-duncan-smith-to-live-on-53-a-week
to the untruthful stunt claim by the faker Duncan Smith about HIS £53.00 a week has already exceed a quarter of a million supporters to the petition.

This one will and must continue.

[To be continued]



Women unsafe in India! Rape, other sexual violence against women a main cause...

Women unsafe in India!  Rape, other sexual violence against women a main cause...
Women unsafe in India!

Rape, other violence against women cause foreign women to avoid the world’s “biggest democracy”!



Foreign women avoid India owing to sexual crimes: Survey Posted by:

Shubham Ghosh

Updated:

Tuesday, April 2, 2013, 0:17 [IST]

Foreign women are avoiding trips to India as the country is increasingly making the headlines for offence against women, particularly rape, in news media across the world.

A Delhi-based business association has informed this.

The number of foreign tourists visiting India has fallen by 25 per cent since December, the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India has found in a recent survey which covered 1,200 tour operators around the country.

The fact will frustrate government plans to improve the number of tourists by 12 per cent every year. Women tourists are even more afraid to visit India.

The number of women travellers has diminished by 35 per cent as women from Britain, Canada and the US have been found cancelling scheduled trips, local business operators told the group. According to many, the tourists were asking through emails whether travelling in India was safe. A brutal gang-rape in New Delhi had shaken the world and although the media and political authorities have pursued the issue of crime against women since that incident, the crime rate against women hasn't decreased.

Recently, a Korean and Swiss women were raped in the state of Madhya Pradesh, causing further embarrassment to the country. More recently, a British woman said she had jumped from her hotel window to avoid an indecent conduct from a hotel official. D S Rawat, secretary general of the association said India was trying to improve its battered image in front of the world but the latest trend in foreigners' visit shows that the effort is still a distance away from reaching a satisfactory conclusion. Tourism has taken a serious beating in cities across the country. OneIndia News



Read more at:

http://news.oneindia.in/2013/04/02/foreign-women-avoid-india-crime-survey-1184241.html



Anne Begg, on the evidence, has been totally unfit for purpose on the DWP Committee

Anne Begg, on the evidence, has been totally unfit for purpose on the DWP Committee
1830 Hrs GMT London [‘Bank Holiday’] Monday 01 April 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Welfare Deformed, lied about as Society is denied by the Neo Cons being aided and abetted by some of the most gullible “Labour” types! [4]

Anne Begg, “MP” seen in this image of her flatteringly promoted by the DAILY MAIL Group, on the evidence, has been totally unfit for purpose on the DWP Committee. As Chair of the vital Select Committee, Begg has failed to even make the Daily Mail!

She should have hit the headlines most days but she hasn’t done so.

Why?

Because she matters little as a news topic because she says little of substance. Except on this occasion when she is being hailed by the Neo-Conservatives at the DAILY MAIL who, like Cameron, would prefer to abolish Society altogether if they could, scrapping the last remnants of compassion, care and sympathy, thus driving Society out of existence and resurrecting rampant jungle market exploitation, selfishness greed and injustice...

In this piece [CLICK on her image her to access the DAILY MAIL plug for “Labour MP” Anne Begg!], the DAILY MAIL paints Begg as a Labour MP who BACKS WELFARE REFORM! That is the slogan: “welfare reform”! It could not be more untruthful as an indication of the real agenda behind it.

[To be continued]

Bedroom tax: Diagnosing the multiple fraud by the "Social landlords" [1]

Bedroom tax: Diagnosing the multiple fraud by the "Social landlords" [1]
1720 Hrs GMT London [‘Bank Holiday’] Monday 01 April 2013.

DIAGNOSING David Orr, the false “Champion” for the rights of the victims of the Neo Conservatives’ bedroom tax assault today:

[3]

THIS AADHIKAR Media CONTEXTUAL NEWS images Montage today [‘Bank Holiday’] Monday 01 Aril 2013 contains the latest sources and references around the promotion of "David Orr", the "chief executive" who was featured in the front page splash of the London Guardian-controlled OBSERVER's front page yesterday [Sunday 31 March 2013].

David Orr is seen on the BBC NEWS CHANNEL at lunchtime today being “interviewed” by the semi-informed Joanna Gosling [married to a Neo Conservative Cuts-crusader spin doctor backing the CONDEM Collusion’s onslaught on Society] whose own limitations were made even worse by the caption that the BBC ran underneath David Orr’s name erroneously describing him as the “chief executive” of the “National Housing Association” when the the fact is that his outfit is called “Federation” and has been so called for years.

Neither Orr nor Gosling said anything that added to the sum of the knowledge on the commencement today of the Neo Conservatives’ assault via peoples’ bedrooms.

In fact Orr confessed to having been in close contact with successive UK central Governments for years and years!

That shows that he must have SHARED a lot of information on peoples’ social, financial and sociological conditions with Government bureaucrats who must have been encouraged by Orr’s role.

AS Orr said, he HOPES that the Neo Conservatives [our words, his affiliation!] “universal credit” welfare reform would succeed.

He reckoned that that would be a good thing!

Orr “drew the line”, however, in again faking his “pitch” as if he was fooling the people whose lives had already been made miserable by the attacks on them over the years carried out by the member outfits involved with the “National Housing Federation”.

Orr feigned that the “Bedroom tax” was not the sort of welfare reform that would work!

Unlike OTHER PARTS of the attacks under that offensively false banner!

Orr is not noted for having opposed the transfer of Council housing stock away from local Councils and over to the “social landlords”, the majority of who make up the main membership of Orr’s outfit.

In fact for years and years and years, David Orr has been a central part of the oppressive “housing associations” bureaucracy that has been blocking any move to democratise and make accountable the behaviour of this bloc that plays such crucially antidemocratic and illegal part in exacerbating the housing crisis of those who are nominally housed but are obstructed from exercising the majority of the facilities, benefits and amenities that the ”social landlords” and their colluding counterpart bureaucrats in place as employees of the transferring Councils had promised as parts of the luring PR during the stock transfer “ballot”.

That ballot was a sham.

As bad and as misleading as the front page PR for David Orr on yesterday’s OBSERVER as if Orr gave a toss about the people on whom the Neo Conservatives are inflicting blows after blows by attacking basic universally understood human rights in housing.

[To be continued]





The truth about David Orr, the OBSERVER's frontage-bedroom tax "housing chief" -1

The truth about David Orr, the OBSERVER's frontage-bedroom tax "housing chief" -1
COMING HERE


The truth about David Orr, the OBSERVER's frontage-bedroom tax "housing chief" -1

Too much for a single day. We have G shapps to deal with. Now it is Keith Vaz hitting the headlines

Too much for a single day. We have G shapps to deal with. Now it is Keith Vaz hitting the headlines
Keith Vaz and Grant Shapps both on a single dreadful day! Things cannot get any worse! Surely!

WARNING: This is NO April Fool Day: This is the day that Git Shapps Arrived on your bedrooms!

WARNING: This is NO April Fool Day: This is the day that Git Shapps Arrived on your bedrooms!
Worse than April Fool: It is Git Shapps in your Bedrooms!

[To be Continued]

ONLY WAY to stop the CONDEM attacks on the Community is by DEMOCRATISING the local Council ....

ONLY WAY to stop the CONDEM attacks on the Community is by DEMOCRATISING the local Council ....
GUARDIAN web site COMMENT from Tower Hamlets BHANGEELAAR! CAMPAIGN

POSTED on the Guardian, London UK web site

31 March 2013 6:36pm [1736 GMT]

BHANGEELAAR! The campaign against an executive elected mayor system in Tower Hamlets

The reason for our campaigning against an executive elected mayor system in Tower Hamlets has been, from the very moment when we opposed those who were fervently collecting signatures for a “YES to a Mayor” system in 2009-2010, the URGENT NEED for an accountable, democratic local Council in this borough.

Why?


Because it is, as you admit in this piece, one of the most deprived boroughs in the country!


So the question is: how would it be democratic and accountable if we had a system without one and the same person being the political as well as the executive chief of a Council that has access to a budget in excess of £1Billion?


The answer is very clear and, to use a phrase that is in vogue, “affordable”.
As you have pointed out, “the poor” are the targets of the latest anti-NHS legislation that the Lib Dem-backed Collusion of Neo Conservatives is imposing tomorrow. Just at the same time that it is doing the POVERTY-CREATING bits of the legislation it deliberately wrongly calls “welfare reform”.


The role of a democratic Tower Hamlets Council is ABSENT.


In fact Tower Hamlets Council is allowing employees in all the key departments to behave as if they were parts of the AGENDA of poverty-creation, poverty-aggravation and health deterioration being fomented and foisted upon Society and in this borough by the CONDEM Collusion.


And there is no evidence of any recognition of this wrongdoing by Council employees in anything that has EVER been said by “elected Councillors” in the Tower Hamlets Council Chamber in the past two years.


The double deficit of democracy and deprivation continues to multiply in Tower Hamlets via the daily default and denial by the democracy-diminished Council of the ADDITIONAL deprivations being caused by Tower Hamlets Council’s own employees’ prejudice, wrongful mentality and worse being perpetrated under covers of THE COUNCL and in the name of and at the expense of the people in one of the country’s most deprived boroughs!


Unlike the NHS which has always been reliant on tiers of “career professionals”, the local Council has in theory a direct link with basic democracy. 


The ongoing battle for the local ordinary voters and the Community in Tower Hamlets is to reinstate a form of tangible democratic accountability in the the daily conduct and constitution of the Tower Hamlets Council so that those aspects of illness, stress and denial that are traceable to wrongful Council decisions can be addressed and reversed and stopped.

BHANGEELAAR! The campaign against an executive elected mayor system in Tower Hamlets


1835 Hrs London Sunday 31 March 2013



Tories' attack on Met Police hides Ed Miliband's Poverty on Poverty!

Tories' attack on Met Police hides Ed Miliband's Poverty on Poverty!
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

Ed Miliband’s Poverty is unacceptably acute!
[1]

0830 Hrs GMT

London

Sunday

31 March 2o13.

Tories "attack" Met Police "Plebgate" leak as disgusting... Churches condemn the latest cuts by CONDEM against the living standards of the already poor and deprived!

These are just two of Sunday’s “mainstream” “British news” headlines.

But these two suffice as pointers to the deepening crisis in Society that the CONDEM Collusion is aggravating.

The Tories” attack on the Police is on Rupert Murdoch’s SUNDAY TIMES front page today whilst the BBC has been running the “Four Churches” attack on the latest CONDEM cuts against the poor that come into effect tomorrow, Monday 01 April 2013.

I say “the deepening crisis in Society that the CONDEM Collusion is aggravating” because I find enough evidence of the SUPPORT to the CONDEM AGENDA of attacks on Society, that is on the Poor and the already disenfranchised in what Ed Miliband is doing in the UK House of Commons.

First Ed Miliband’s poverty on State-created Poverty in the UK.

Even without getting into the details of Liam Byrne’s contemptible collusion, the fact that he is still the supposedly official critic of the Poverty Creation Minister Iain Duncan Smith is itself ample proof that Ed Miliband doesn’t get it about poverty at all.

If Ed Miliband expects that his gradual bid to shift his image away from the time he had associated with [and served the Agenda fronted by] Gordon Brown is “succeeding in conveying the message that he, Ed Miliband, is not like Gordon Brown when it come to the real “values” then Ed Miliband is seriously mistaken. He is NOT coming across as different from Gordon Brown. In fact Ed Miliband is coming across as a muffled, uncertain amateur who is unsure as to what he should say let alone do as “the theoretical future Prime Minster” of the UK.

Ed Miliband’s failure is most acute on race and ethnicity. As it is on the CONDEM attacks on Society.

I don’t trust the “polls”, whoever does them.

But they DO confirm certain general trends in prevailing perceptions and the poll rating poverty that Ed Miliband has been enduring is akin to his poverty of perception of poverty in Society being caused by the CONDEM assaults.

Miliband’s poverty is in the fact that he is too poor on perceptions!

He doesn’t even understand that POVERTY is CREATED! And that Bliaring years saw as much POVERTY being created under the Bliaring “administration” in the UK as did the “Gordon Brown years”.

And there is no evidence that Miliband has the remotest idea of how POVERTY-creating Government Departments have successfully created the perception among the public that it is the victims of the created poverty who are to blame and who will pay even more horribly than they have been forced to do by Govt assaults so far.

Ed Miliband has been rehearsing CONDEM rhetoric, showing the utter bankruptcy and poverty of his position on the assaults on Society!

[To be continued]

2046 GMT London Sat 30 MaRCH 2013: IDS, the robber of bedrooms has 4 spare bedrooms!

2046 GMT London Sat 30 MaRCH 2013: IDS, the robber of bedrooms has 4 spare bedrooms!
AADHIKAROnline RETRIEVED the following news item [exposing UK’s front man in the CON CRUSADE against Society, Iain Duncan Smith and his rent-free life style at the £Million-pounds pad in an English Country location] from the web site of the London DAILY MIRROR at 2128 GMT 30 march 2013:
AADHIKAROnline has left in the REPRODUCED piece the DAILY MIRROR’s very own spelling errors as well.

Just for authenticity!

Bedroom tax: Iain Duncan Smith lives rent free in £2million country home with at least FOUR spare bedrooms 30 Mar 2013 20:46 The Old Etonian - the man behind the hated tex - is a tenant of the landed gentry Fremantle family Iain Duncan Smith PA The man behind the controversial bedroom tax lives rent-free in a £2million aristocratic country house… with at least FOUR spare bedrooms.


Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, is a tenant of the landed gentry Fremantle family. But unlike the 660,000 families in social housing who are being forced to pay an average of £14 a week extra for a spare bedroom, Mr Duncan Smith can live happily knowing he has to pay no rent or mortgage. The 16th-century Tudor house on a sprawling estate in Buckinghamshire originally had five bedrooms but has had wings added down the centuries. With a swimming pool, tennis courts and set in acres of countryside, it’s a far-cry from the social housing his bedroom tax victims live in.


It’s also a world away from the MP for Chingford and Woodford Green’s London constituency – and is sure to further enrage the thousands of protesters who marched around Britain against his hated tax yesterday. But Old Etonian IDS lives free on the estate like a Lord. The former Tory leader – who lost the top job after a no confidence vote by his party in 2003 – married into the Fremantle family in 1982 and was given use of the mansion by his father-in-law, the 5th Baron Cottesloe, in 2001. Mr Duncan Smith and his wife Betsy Cottesloe moved there and brought up their four children in the peaceful, privileged, countryside setting.


One local said: “It is in a beautiful area. I don’t know how many bedrooms it has but I’d say there are more than five now after all the extensions that have gone up over the years. “It must be worth millions.” Home fit for zero: IDS lives in home he married into Steve Shepard Baron Cottesloe, Commander John Tapling Fremantle, is head of one of Britain’s most aristocratic families. He lived in there until 2001, before he and his wife took another home.


The Baron kept ownership until 2005 when it was signed over to Mrs Duncan Smith’s brother Thomas, her cousin Richard Brooks and Paul Knocker, a millionaire friend of the Baron.


According to the land registry, a company run by the three men took ownership in 2005. The Fremantle family have been at the centre of life in the area for hundreds of years. John, the 5th baron, is a wealthy farmer. He is a former Royal Navy Commander and has been both High Sheriff and Lord-Lietuentant of Buckinghamshire. The estate was first bought in 1798 by Thomas Fremantle, the first Baron Cottesloe. It has been occupied by family members ever since, including the second Baron Cottesloe, a businesman who became a prominent Tory politician.They built their fortune through farming, property and landowning. One local said: “The Fremantle family is a fixture here. Some people still call Baron Cottesloe ‘The Commander’. “They are very nice, friendly people and you see them around regularly.” Under the plans introduced this week, anyone in housing association homes or council housing with a spare bedroom will lose 14 per cent of housing benefit, or 25 per cent if they have two spare rooms – despite the lack of one-bedroom council homes.


Following a Sunday People campaign, the government has performed a U-turn on families with severely disabled children and foster carers. However, the bedroom tax will see 660,000 working-age social tenants losing an average £14 a week, with some missing out on £25.


Two-thirds of the total affected are disabled. Housing association tenants face losing £16 a week. It is estimated 95,000 people will not be able to afford the changes. But the millionaire Duncan Smiths won’t have to take in a lodger or downsize like hundreds of thousands of others are being forced to. They can enjoy a life of luxury while struggling social housing tenants are staring at poverty or homelessness. Housing professionals and Labour MPs have lined up to slam the policy. And since the Sunday People launched our campaign in January, we have been flooded with cases of angry people who face a stark choice between giving up homes or finding extra cash. Even Mr Duncan Smith’s own party members have expressed their worries about the way it will affect people in their constituencies. Although a discretionary fund has been set aside to help the most vulnerable, experts fear it will not be nearly enough to stop many facing poverty. Mr Duncan Smith’s Parliamentary Private Secretary, Andrew Selous, has written to Bedfordshire council ­protesting about the way two constituents would be hit. The disabled couple live in a specially adapted home and are unable to downsize. Mr Selous wrote that just giving short-term discretionary payments to help them meet the higher rent payments would not be enough. He added:


“The situation could be exactly the same at the end of the payment period. “Surely people who have disabilities whose houses have been adapted specifically to help them live in them should be in a separate category.”


Almost 26,000 angry protesters turned out all over the country yesterday to march against the hated tax.


In London crowds gathered in Trafalgar Square before heading to No10 in Whitehall. Among them was Mandy Francis, 56, who had heart bypass surgery just six weeks ago. She will struggle to get by with less than £50 per week.


She said: “People talk about scroungers getting rich on benefits but I haven’t met any.”


In Manchester, 57-year-old Beverley Mills headed up the march with her Sunday People campaign poster. She said: “I have fibromyalgia and umpteen things wrong with me. I need the extra bedroom for when a carer stays over. I’m going to lose about £20 a week and I’ll have to go without.” Demonstrators in Liverpool declared an “uprising”. Among protesters was wheelchair-bound mum Jan Syme, 54, who fears having to leave her ­specially adapted house when her grown-up daughters leave home.


She said: “My fear is that I will have no money left to live on.” In Carlisle, Cumbria, organiser Lee Sherrif said: “The turnout shows the strength of feeling about the unfair tax. David Cameron must think again.”


Faked "justice" over QATADA Court ruling. This is a brainwashing saga...

Faked "justice" over QATADA Court ruling. This is a brainwashing saga...
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

UPDATING on the fantasy of “English judicial justice and promoted by the Communist Party of Great Britain” which appears to be a fanatic member of the PR ands brainwashing war that has been on via the IMAGE they called Qatada.. [1]

2008 [1950] Hrs GMT London Saturday 30 March 2013

The VERY BRITISH "Communist Party" [!!!!] organ the "Morning Star" is a stunning example of the fact that there is NOTHING LEFT in "British Politics".

The CPGB “Daily” relies on the wooliest "lefty" of them all, Jeremy Corbyn to provide intellectual rigour against the Right!

Says it all!

And the CPGB title also celebrates almost every single day of its publishing week INSTANCES of what it peddles to be those of the "great British" judiciary dishing out “justice”!

It will take the CPGB a million years before it sees that there is nothing independent, FAR LESS JUST about the "British judiciary" and that the deliberately staged parade over Qatada "defeating" Theresa May is, has been a sick, poisonous joke.

The real agenda is brainwashing the masses about the IMAGE of Qatada.

Nobody in the ordinary strategically targeted “ethnicity and faith-linked parts” of the population in the UK has the slightest interest in Qatada yet it is they - the ordinary targets as I have contextually and evidentially described, defined and diagnosed them here - who are the targets of the brainwashing that is being done via the daily flaunting of this ridiculous image and circus. The Courts system as well as the "law trade" in the UK are as corrupt as can be.

But will the CPGB ever even know this?

Oops!

They have their very own "law heroine", Liz Davies, "barrister" who is hauled in whenever they want to show off their own dedicated affinity with the “Established” norms of “English” justice and jurisprudence...!

Anyone disagreeing with this short diagnosis is invited to name to me the "English Court" that EVER ruled against racism, without there being a campaign for that sam court to so do [and] ever so TOKENISTICALLY! [To be continued]





Retrieved at 1632 GMT London Saturday 30 March 2013 from the website of the CPGB “daily” the MORNING STAR dated “Friday 29 March 2013”

by Paddy McGuffin Home Affairs Reporter 

Nearly two and a half million of England's poorest families face paying on average an extra £138 a year in council tax thanks to the government's draconian benefit cuts, a leading charity said today.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation said the abolition of council tax benefit coming into force on Monday will leave 150,000 families paying an average £300 a year more.

And 1.9 million claimants currently paying no council tax will face an average £140 a week more.

It's unclear how economical it will be for councils to chase up thousands of low-income families for that £12 a month.

The old benefit is being replaced with a local-authority-run council tax support, with a 10 per cent funding cut.

Pensioners are protected by the cuts, leaving working-age claimants to bear the brunt, according to the foundation.

Its head of poverty Chris Goulden said: "Making up the shortfall will be beyond most, with working hours under pressure and benefits falling behind inflation.

"This tax hike will push people into poverty or cause more hardship for already very poor households, taking money from families who had little to start with."

The New Policy Institute (NPI) which conducted the research for the foundation, said that around 300,000 claimants living just above the breadline were at risk of falling into hardship.

It found 232 local authorities have devised schemes that will demand council tax from everyone regardless of income while 58 will retain current levels of support for families.

NPI researcher Sabrina Bushe said: "From Monday over two million households that were previously deemed too poor to pay council tax will find hefty bills landing on their doormats.

"Hitting only the poorest and most vulnerable, this tax increase - which won't raise much more money than it costs - is both unjust and unwise."

A Department for Communities and Local Government spokeswoman blamed the last Labour government for overseeing a doubling of the benefit.

She added: "The localisation of council tax benefit will give councils stronger incentives to cut fraud, promote local enterprise and get people back into work."



FALSE OPTIMISM over QATADA Court ruling. This is a brainwashing saga...

FALSE OPTIMISM over QATADA Court ruling. This is a brainwashing saga...
Retrieved at 1632 GMT London Saturday 30 March 2013 from the website of the CPGB “daily” the MORNING STAR dated “Friday 29 March 2013”

by Paddy McGuffin Home Affairs Reporter 

Nearly two and a half million of England's poorest families face paying on average an extra £138 a year in council tax thanks to the government's draconian benefit cuts, a leading charity said today.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation said the abolition of council tax benefit coming into force on Monday will leave 150,000 families paying an average £300 a year more.

And 1.9 million claimants currently paying no council tax will face an average £140 a week more.

It's unclear how economical it will be for councils to chase up thousands of low-income families for that £12 a month.

The old benefit is being replaced with a local-authority-run council tax support, with a 10 per cent funding cut.

Pensioners are protected by the cuts, leaving working-age claimants to bear the brunt, according to the foundation.

Its head of poverty Chris Goulden said: "Making up the shortfall will be beyond most, with working hours under pressure and benefits falling behind inflation.

"This tax hike will push people into poverty or cause more hardship for already very poor households, taking money from families who had little to start with."

The New Policy Institute (NPI) which conducted the research for the foundation, said that around 300,000 claimants living just above the breadline were at risk of falling into hardship.

It found 232 local authorities have devised schemes that will demand council tax from everyone regardless of income while 58 will retain current levels of support for families.

NPI researcher Sabrina Bushe said: "From Monday over two million households that were previously deemed too poor to pay council tax will find hefty bills landing on their doormats.

"Hitting only the poorest and most vulnerable, this tax increase - which won't raise much more money than it costs - is both unjust and unwise."

A Department for Communities and Local Government spokeswoman blamed the last Labour government for overseeing a doubling of the benefit.

She added: "The localisation of council tax benefit will give councils stronger incentives to cut fraud, promote local enterprise and get people back into work."



Labour Councillor in Suffolk, found drunk and with a toddler, tried to gag the Press...

Labour Councillor in Suffolk, found drunk and with a toddler, tried to gag the Press...
High Court judge criticises Councillor for being drunk while in charge of a toddler. He also criticises her for her low standard of behaviour whilst a councillor.

REPORT from the web site of the DAILY MAIL London 0040 GMT Saturday 30 March 2013

Labour councillor fined for being drunk with her toddler tried to gag Press for a year

• Theresa Gandy, 35, admitted being drunk in charge of a two-year-old

• But she then applied to the court to restrict reporting of the case

• Magistrates disagreed so she sought judicial review and an injunction

• Local papers successfully fought her lawyers in the high court

By CLAIRE ELLICOTT

PUBLISHED: 00:40, 30 March 2013 | UPDATED: 00:40, 30 March 2013

• 


Comments (161)

[NOT republished here by AADHIKAROnline, London] • 




[PICTURE NOT PUBLISHED HERE BY AADHIKARONLINE London UK] Named and shamed:

Labour councillor Theresa Gandy, 35, lost a legal fight to stay anonymous after she was found drunk in charge of a child

An Oxford-educated Labour politician has lost her year- long battle to gag the Press from reporting that she was arrested for being drunk in charge of her toddler.

Tess Gandy, 35, who had previously been cautioned for a similar offence, was hauled in front  of magistrates last May to answer for her crime.

But the former banking lawyer tried to prevent newspapers from identifying her and covering the case by applying for reporting restrictions.

After magistrates refused to grant the application, she ordered her lawyers to seek an injunction and apply for a judicial review to prevent details of the case ever emerging.

But the newspapers challenged the injunction in the High Court and judges have now ruled against  her, arguing that there was an ‘undeniable legitimate interest’ in reporting the case. Gandy, who has been a councillor in Lowestoft, Suffolk, since 2011, has now resigned as she felt the ‘publicity’ meant she could not continue in her role.

Anti-censorship campaigners last night branded her actions a ‘classic attempt’ to abuse the right to privacy and prevent the public knowing the truth about her behaviour.

The district councillor fought to keep her identity secret for almost a year following her arrest in Asda in Lowestoft last April.

The store’s manager called the police after becoming concerned by Gandy’s behaviour while in charge of her two-and-a-half-year-old daughter.

Her blood alcohol level was found to be four times the legal limit for driving a car.

Gandy, who was cautioned for a similar offence in August 2011, was arrested. She was later fined £100 and ordered  to pay £85 costs and a victim surcharge of £15.



Deep regret: Gandy said she felt she had let people down, and that she had used alcohol as a crutch to help her deal with post-natal depression and high levels of anxiety

During the hearing, Gandy’s solicitor, Mary-Anne Mir, asked magistrates to apply reporting restrictions to the case.

Gandy said she was seeking help for mental health issues and alcohol dependency and applied for an order under Section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933.

The act is used to prevent the publication of information that might lead to the identification of any children – not adults – who are involved in criminal proceedings.

No evidence was provided about how the child might be affected by its mother’s identification, other than that it ought to be protected ‘from the serious impact of a press release on this matter’.

  More...

• Drunk business account manager facing the sack for destroying decorations at work Christmas party • Father-of-three drove his children to nursery after drinking THREE LITRES of wine • Sex, booze and pilfering, it's a BBC farewell party: Staff gather for drink-fuelled goodbye to Television Centre

The magistrates refused to grant the order, but Gandy’s lawyers served an injunction on the Lowestoft Journal and its sister title the Eastern Daily Press, preventing any publication of the case.

They served an interim injunction because Gandy’s solicitors were seeking a judicial review over the decision by magistrates not to apply reporting restrictions.

They argued the child would be identifiable if the newspapers named Gandy, said she was a councillor without naming her, or said what she was charged with.

But the newspapers argued that it was in the public interest and in the interests of open justice to publish the details of her offence.







Drunk in charge: The manager of the Asda in Lowestoft became concerned about Gandy's condition while she was in the shop and called police who found she was four times over the drink-drive limit





Judges Mr Justice Kenneth Parker and Lord Justice Pitchford agreed and dismissed Gandy’s judicial review in their High Court judgment. Mr Justice Parker said:

‘The criminal conviction itself, although it attracted a relatively low penalty, was far from trivial. ‘To be drunk in charge of a small child of two-and-a-half years of age raises very considerable concerns regarding the general welfare of the child, especially when a caution had been administered not long before for the same offence.’

He said the caution – and the risk of public exposure – had failed to deter Gandy from committing the offence a second time, which ‘strongly suggested there might be more serious underlying problems’.

He added that Gandy was ‘an elected councillor, and her conduct in public had twice fallen well below the standard that could reasonably be expected of an elected official by her constituents and by the public generally, who had an undeniable legitimate interest in learning, through media publication, of how [she] had behaved’.

He said that Gandy’s mental health problems and alcohol dependence were also details ‘which arguably the public were entitled to learn through a press report of proceedings’. Padraig Reidy, spokesman for the Index on Censorship campaign group, said: ‘It’s  a classic attempt to abuse  the right to privacy to cover up misdemeanours.

‘This case is a matter of public interest and involves an elected official.’

Gandy said she had turned to drink to cope with post-natal depression and anxiety.

She said she had offered to resign at the time but claimed the Labour Party and Waveney District Council advised her she did not need to as it was a personal matter.

She added: ‘I sought legal advice to obtain an injunction to stop any printing of the story purely to protect the privacy of my family and not for any personal reasons.’

Getting the Guardian to tell the truth and support the Community in Tower Hamlets!

Getting the Guardian to tell the truth and support the Community in Tower Hamlets!
2138 Hrs GMT London Friday 29 March 2013


PUBLISHED on the Guardian website at 2028 GMT Friday 29 March 2013:

BHANGEELAAR! the Campaign against an Elected Executive Mayor system in Tower Hamlets

2028 Hrs GMT London Friday 29 March 2013

Does the Guardian really care about crime in areas like Tower Hamlets? If so, when did it last report on the criminal activities and the remedies against those?

And what is the message being given by Hugh Muir going OTT on the Guardian website about IT BEING “Endlessly scratchy in Tower Hamlets, east London where there is total war between Labour and the independent mayor Lutfur Rahman”?

If the evidence of the statements - or, on the facts and emphatically the LACK OF THEM - by the “wannabes” now doing their utmost to bag the votes of Labour Party members for next week’s internal Party poll for the selection of the “Tower Hamlets Labour Party candidate” for election as Executive Mayor in 2014 is any guide, then there is not only NO WAR “between Labour and the independent mayor Lutfur Rahman” but also there is no real campaign going on in any mentionable way inside the “Tower Hamlets Labour Party” about holding the CURRENT Tower Hamlets Borough COUNCIL administrations to genuinely democratic and ethical account in the context of the serious and long lasting assaults on the quality of life and the Standard of civic liberty that are underway as part of the consensus between the Ed Miliband Front Bench and the ConDem Collusion

.By all objective criteria and measures, the majority of the formerly understood “Council Services” are being either not delivered or being ill-delivered or mis-delivered or even denied by the various clutches of controlling cliques that collectively make up the Tower Hamlets Council’s bureaucracy.

Neither the elected and mostly officially Opposition councillors nor the others who are backing Lutfur Rahman is there the necessary level of democratic assertion of demands on the cliques to deliver the services that are still within the financial resources of the Council to elver to a good standard but are not being so delivered.

The ONLY really noticeable waves appear to be being made, very strangely and ironically, by the Conservatives who are absolutely adamant in their support to the CONDEM Agenda of assault on Society!

Even more strangely and tellingly, it was the Conservatives’ leader Peter Golds who had made the key points that lead up to Bob Neill, MP’s House of Commons speech in January 2013 cataloguing a very long list of questionable and unconstitutional activities in the present Tower Hamlets Council.There is nothing in anything the “Labour” Party Councillors on Tower Hamlets Council have said or done that could remotely be compared with that event on the records.

BHANGEELAAR! the Campaign against an Elected Executive Mayor system in Tower Hamlets2028 Hrs GMT London Friday 29 March 2013



[THESE ORIGINAL EXCLUSIVE andCOMPELLINGLY CENTRAL CAMPAIGN COMMENTARIES in defence of the community in the East End of London will be continued]

Kay Jordan Among the First Defenders of the Community against Big Biz, City of London..

Kay Jordan Among the First Defenders of the Community against Big Biz, City of London..
2215 [2145] Hrs GMT

London

Thursday 28 March 2013

Kay Jordan is the Community Architect whose work spanning more than 30 years in defence of the East End of London against the Big Biz City of London Agenda has been the central feature in the series of radio and TV programmes created and broadcast by Muhammad Haque since September 2012. Kay Jordan is among the First Defenders of the Community being recognised by the multi-media Education, learning and information programme announced by Muhammad Haque in a short speech to the Tower Hamlets Council on 23 January 2013.

[To be continued]



285 Commercial Road London E1 - the address of a load of housing problems in the East End

285 Commercial Road London E1 - the address of a load of housing problems in the East End
285 Commercial Road London E1 - the address of a load of housing problems in the East End

Grim facade of Tower Hamlets Council's even grimmer agenda: deny housing rights to people

Grim facade of Tower Hamlets Council's even grimmer agenda: deny housing rights to people
© Muhammad Haque Picture of the "Albert Jacob House", Roman Road, London E2, “housing” the operational HQ of Tower Hamlets Council’s small army of employees engaged in frustrating peoples’ housing rights
.


2328 [2310] [2300] [2250] Hrs GMT

London Wednesday 27 March 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

behind the grim facade of the 'Albert Jacob House' in the Roman Road London E2 [1]

This grim look on the outside of this building in the Roman Road London E2 in [the grimly-chronicled] 'one of the most deprived boroughs in England, Tower Hamlets, ' in the East End of London, hints accurately at an even grimmer agenda being carried out inside by a small army of publicly paid, Council employees whose purpose is to frustrate the duties for which the Council Constitutionally and legally exists.

It is a purpose that is not admitted to officially, of course. But it is a purpose that has been being pursued just the same.

The Albert Jacob House is the destination of dozens of people from all across the Borough that is still called Tower Hamlets.

The visitors arrive with a variety of needs, all to do with housing.

They are viewed with unconcealed indifference by the "managers" who control the behaviour of a "tram" that contains personnel of a variety of backgrounds.

Despite this factor, the agenda is adamantly to say NO to the hopefuls for housing.



[To be continued]

News from Warley in Essex: SKY Channel 814 'founder' facing fraud trial in July

News from Warley in Essex: SKY Channel 814 'founder' facing fraud trial in July
News from Warley in Essex: SKY Channel 814 'founder' facing fraud trial in July

STUPIDITY of "ethnicity-linked" "TV channels" misrepresenting UK Bangladeshis in the UK!

STUPIDITY of "ethnicity-linked" "TV channels" misrepresenting UK Bangladeshis in the UK!
STUPIDITY of "ethnicity-linked" "TV channels" misrepresenting UK Bangladeshis in the UK!
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

The STUPIDITY of "ethnicity-linked" "TV channels" misrepresenting UK Bangladeshis in the UK! [2]

But is it “stupidity” or TOXICITY?

Is it by default or is it by design?

Is the UK Bangladeshi community being misrepresented by the ignorant “satellite” “TV” “Channels” carried by BSKYB, owned by Murdoch Media Empire and operated by personnel on individual “Channels” whose first affinity is fixed on the agenda of certain Political parties in Bangladesh.

FORTY-TWO years after the state of “Bangladesh” was helped into being by the key role played by the “UK Bangladeshis”, the community is being invaded by the operatives serving the agenda of the Political Parties in Bangladesh and suppressing the community’s day to day and basic democratic and social and economic needs and priorities in the UK Itself.



[To be continued]



Barren words via Murdoch's BSKYB to deepen the attacks of denial, deprivation in Tower Hamlets

Barren words via Murdoch's BSKYB to deepen the attacks of denial, deprivation in Tower Hamlets
A First review of the ignorance that is "ethnicity-linked" "TV channel" peddling the "ethnicity" as the future of Politics in Tower Hamlets!

Here
Next.

DEBUNKING Myths at the expense of the East End [1000]

DEBUNKING Myths at the expense of the East End [1000]
1725 Hrs GMT London Saturday 16 March 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: The Myths about Toynbee Hall and John Profumo: How Britain’s “mainstream meeja” is full of lies.

About nothing closer to home than the “East End”
The “East End of London” that is. MYTHS after myths have been manufactured and maintained by ignorant, confused, prejudiced and biased persons whose “writings” and “views” have become included in the “records”.

So widespread, so pervasive are the myths and the lies and the exaggerations that there is this urgent need to put regular updater diatribe on line and elsewhere to put a halt to the streams of lies.
.
The one I am addressing in this Commentary today Saturday 16 march 2013 from a table in Whitechapel Road London E1 is located literally a few hundred yards from the Toynbee Hall. I am writing this one about the Toynbee Hall and John Profumo. Both are of the Right Persuasions.
Whatever the Party affiliations of the OTHERS who constitute the core of the bureaucracy that controls the agenda of the Toynbee Hall, the FACT is that the TOYNBEE HALL is a Social imperialist outfit. It is, has NEVER been a genuine, far less spontaneous, part of the anti-imperialistic movements.
The “launch pad” that Poverty-Causer Dave Cameron used in February 2011 to mount his anti-Society disenfranchising agenda was the Toynbee Hall.

But you will not get that impression if you read the London EVENING STANDARD web piece dated 13 March 2013, when they did a “social contextual backgrounder” on “high profile convicts”!

[My phrase, this, NOT the EVENING STANDARD’s]

I quote their PR piece for John Profumo and the Toynbee Hall

The ES claims are false about BOTH Profumo and Toynbee Hall.

[To be continued]



John Profumo, CBE

Best known for his involvement in the1963 scandal involving a prostitute, which may have helped topple the Conservative government of Harold Macmillan. After his resignation he volunteered as a lavatory cleaner at Toynbee Hall, an East End-based charity fighting against poverty, where he rose to become chief fundraiser. He was awarded a CBE for his involvement and it restored his reputation enough for him to receive an invitation to Margaret Thatcher’s 70th birthday dinner and not lose his membership of Boodle’s Club.

East End Lies, lies to the people in Tower Hamlets

East End Lies, lies to the people in Tower Hamlets
1150 Hrs GMT

London

Saturday

16 March 2013

Lutfur Rahman’s position in Tower Hamlets Council is being seriously undermined by the Council employees. So why are they doing so? How are they doing so?

We here start that examination.

We cover the role of the “East End Lies” and we do this topically>

The topicality is the fact that at the latest “budget-setting” formality of the Council, there has been a significant bit of “disagreement” across the “Parties” in the Council Chamber over the role of the “East End Lies”. Officially known as “East End Life”, the title has been recently dubbed “the town hall pravda” for Tower Hamlets Council’s “executive mayor”. In a later piece we shall trace the origins of this toxicity against ethics and accountability in "locally elected democratic Council”.

We shall show why Lutfur Rahman has been able to keep the title under COuncil funding for as long as he has done

Lutfur Rahman has shown that he prefers to cultivate privately the sources that he believes will keep him in post and most crucially may back him the next time he plans to seek the electoral stamp.



We shall examine all of Lutfur Rahman’s strategies and the £millions of the Tower Hamlets Council’s - the Tower Hamlets Peoples’ - money that he has been spending in strategic allocations, grants and supports in the belief that he will get re-elected in return.

IN RETURN is THE phrase.

He has been proven to have been wrong about the ROLE of the East End Lies.

Issue after issue of the East End Lies gets produced by leaving out the truth of what is happening in the community across the borough. And in smaller neighbourhoods and estates.

What the East End Lies does is highlight facile, plasticky stuff while concealing the truth about the cuts, the effect of the cuts. Cuts that have been going on for decades in Tower Hamlets.



The facile focus of the “East End Lies” is rampant on the front-page of the issue dated 11-17 March 2013.



Here is what it claims: “News from Tower Hamlets Council and your community [.]

“Free school meals to fuel the future [.]

Mayor’s budget to fund healthy lunches for all reception and year 1 children [.]

Then there is the picture under the bold boast: “Breathing Life Into The Baths”. The Baths is the Poplar Baths.

This has been a topic of exceedingly disproportionate claims by the Council’s bureaucracy.

The Poplar Baths have been falsely linked by the Council’s PR script-designers to the untrue suggestion that the controversial and partial reinstatement of the former Poplar baths has been addressing the serious housing and social needs in the Borough. It is absolutely true that the Poplar Baths project has addressed some needs. But it is utterly untrue that it has addressed the main needs in the area for housing and other services.



[To be continued]

Is the EVENING STANDARD telling the truth about Tower Hamlets Council's wastes, its "mayor"?

Is the EVENING STANDARD telling the truth about Tower Hamlets Council's wastes, its "mayor"?


1045 Hrs GMT London Saturday 16 March 2013



This AADHIKAROnline electronic image is of the piece published in the print Edition of the London EVENING STANDARD about Tower Hamlets Council’s “executive mayor” Lutfur Rahman’s links with BSKYB Channel 814, described by the EVENING STANDARD as “a controversial Bangladeshi TV channel”
There is another item on the website of the EVENING STANDARD which has been commented on, on 102 times, according to the website at the time of our retrieving the piece this morning.
That second item is about Lutfur’s taxi expenses.
Almost all the contents of the ‘comments’ are hostile to Lutfur Rahman and they also bring in very serious racist claims aimed at the entire UK Bangladeshi community and add the commenters' ire against Muslims, Asians and others
It is clear that to most of those who have posted comments, Lutfur Rahman variously is a “crook”, a “liar”, a “fraudster:” and worse!
Is there anything worse than being called a “crook, a liar or a fraudster”?
There IS.
And it is to discredit the legitimacy that usually is a core result of a “democratic endorsement”.

There is an even WORSE thing that Lutfur can be diagnosed about:
competence

Is he a “competent leader of the locally elected Council”?

These factors and questions have been at the centre of the AADHIKAR Media Foundation’s investigative work that has been conducted in Tower Hamlets since Monday 19 December 1980
We have shown that the “meeja” has failed to tell the truth overall about the corrupt and the racist Council that Tower Hamlets Council has been

BY “racist” we mean to use the same sense of racism as is conveyed by today’s DAILY MAIL [front page Saturday 16 March 2013]
In 1980, Lutfur Rahman was a child. He may have been in his teens but he was a child politically.
So in the years that have followed and he has moved from being a teenager/child to being a juvenile, youth and to currently occupying this post, has he shown that he is up to the task of being “the executive mayor”?

We are about to address this question that many have touched on but have not addressed by applying the diagnosis to the facts of Lutfur Rahman’s occupation of the post.
Before we do so, a word of contextual reference:

We [AADHIKAR Media] have been chronicling the disastrous conduct of and by the many employees in Tower Hamlets Council over the years.
We have continued to publish the evidence about the corrupt cabals that occupy the highly paid posts in Tower Hamlets Council where the employees have been showing two fingers to the local community.
We shall publish the latest findings here and on associated sites today and over the weekend and beyond

NEXT on this site [not below but in the next post here] will be the scandal of Tower Hamlets Council preparing to in effect deport entire neighbourhoods [as measured in the size of, the numbers of people affected] out of the Boro as part of the Council’s collusion with the CONDEM assault on Society.


[To be continued]




“No-to-Cuts” candidates for election in Tower Hamlets!

“No-to-Cuts” candidates for election in Tower Hamlets!
“No-to-Cuts” candidates wanted to stand for election in Tower Hamlets!

The “TUSC-against-cuts”
campaign group is asking activists opposed to cuts in Tower Hamlets to stand for election in Tower Hamlets.
The call was reiterated last night at a public meeting held at the Oxford House, off the Bethnal Green Road London E2.

Serious criticism of the Tower Hamlets Council was voiced at the meeting

[To be continued]


CRASS CAMERON attacks on poor continue unabated at PMQs

CRASS CAMERON attacks on poor continue unabated at PMQs
CRASS CAMERON attacks on poor continue unabated at PMQs

High Court case: foster carer aunt defeats Tower Hamlets Council and is lauded as 'unsung heroine'

High Court case: foster carer aunt defeats Tower Hamlets Council  and is lauded as 'unsung heroine'
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: High Court ruling against Tower Hamlets Council’s illegal policy on foster carers’ pay rates VINDICATES the KHOODEELAAR! Diagnosis of the dysfunctional Council [21]

0715 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 13 March 2013.

THE AADHIKARONLINE electronic image here is of the front page of the print edition of the weekly “The Dockhands & East London Advertiser”, dated today Wednesday 13 March 2013. It is about the “unsung heroine”, a carer aunt who has defeated Tower Hamlets Council over foster carer’s wage rates. Responding to the Local Government Lawyer’s queries, an unnamed Tower Hamlets Council spokeswoman said that the Council had a policy of not commenting on specific cases. My first Commentary on this case, is as follows:

The unnamed Tower Hamlets Council "spokeswoman" is faking it and most possibly is also uttering a deliberate untruth if your published quotation of her is accurate: "We don't comment on specific cases”.

That takes us straight to the “East End Lies”, the so-called “pravda” that Tower Hamlets Council publishes as part of the propaganda for the current administration generally and to perpetrate an environment of fakery about the Council’s duties and the community’s deprivation. Issue after issue of the “East End Lies” is stuffed full of the Council boasting about its "achievements" on “specific cases”. Let the “spokeswoman” declare her name and I will detail the “specific boasts” as retailed via the “East End Lies”.

There is an atmosphere of unconstitutionality about the highly paid employees in Tower Hamlets Council who make some of the most undemocratic, illegal decisions that in turn adversely affect significant numbers of people, typified by the “unsung heroine” that the High Court Judge has praised in the case.

[See below the retrieved report from the “Local Government Lawyer” website]

http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=13529%3Adifferent-treatment-of-family-and-unrelated-foster-carers-qunlawfulq-says-judge&catid=54&Itemid=22

They are getting away with these because of the absence of real democratic accountability and the absence of a demanding Opposition on the Council. [To be continued]



Different treatment of family and unrelated foster carers "unlawful": High Court

   Tuesday, 12 March 2013 19:40

A local authority’s policy of differential treatment of family foster carers and unrelated foster carers was unlawful, a High Court judge has ruled.

The claimant in the case of X, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2013] EWHC 480 (Admin) was the aunt of three damaged and difficult children aged 15, 14 and 7, all of whom had special needs.

The mother had alcohol and drug problems, while the father had schizophrenia and was in a mental hospital.

In 2007 the children were removed from the parental home and were placed with foster carers. However, three separate placements each broke down as the carers could not cope.

The children lived separately for a while as no foster carer could be found to manage all three of them together. Eventually Tower Hamlets approached their aunt and asked her if she would consider caring for them.

She agreed, even though this meant she would have to give up her job as an art restorer. The aunt moved, at the council’s request, to a bigger house in a semi rural area out of London and became dependent on state benefits.

In February 2011 the aunt was formally approved as the foster carer for the children. The most recent looked after child review made it clear that she provided an excellent standard of care and commitment to the children that would be difficult to replicate elsewhere.

“Despite their continuing and very significant problems, the children are now happy and settled in a way which would otherwise have been impossible,” Mr Justice Males said. “Indeed, the difficulty of providing any alternative and the extent of the burden undertaken by the claimant can be demonstrated further from the fact that although the local authority was willing to pay for respite care, for some two years it was impossible to find anybody willing to care for the children while the claimant had a break from them. This only became possible in about October 2012.”

The aunt received an allowance from Tower Hamlets, the local authority responsible for the children. However, the council’s policy is to pay less, save in exceptional circumstances, to family foster carers than it pays to unrelated foster carers. The claimant therefore received less money than she would have if she hand not been the children’s aunt.

She argued that this was unlawful, both as a matter of domestic law applying ordinary principles of public law and because it constituted unlawful discrimination contrary to Article 14 (unlawful discrimination) when read with Article 8 (right to respect for family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The aunt also claimed that Tower Hamlets’ failure to pay her an enhancement to the weekly allowance, in circumstances where she appeared to qualify for such an enhancement in accordance with the authority’s policy on ‘exceptional circumstances’, demonstrated that the council had fettered its discretion in the application of that policy.

The barrister for Tower Hamlets argued, amongst other things, that the statutory scheme left it to local authorities to determine the terms, including payment terms, on which they will provide fostering services for looked after children.

He also pointed out that the statutory guidance permitted local authorities to pay different rates to different types of foster carer.

Mr Justice Males, who described the aunt as “one of the unsung heroines of our society”, found in the claimant’s favour.

He concluded that the local authority’s policy on fees (and if necessary allowances) were not in accordance with the statutory guidance to the extent that they provided for different treatment of family and unrelated foster carers.

Nor could the departure from the guidance be characterised as so minor that there was substantial compliance. The judge later added: “In circumstances where there is no evidence that….[other] possibilities….have been considered, the local authority has not discharged the burden upon it of showing sufficiently cogent reasons for departing from the principle of equal treatment of family and unrelated foster carers in the payment of fees (and to the extent relevant, allowances) required by the statutory guidance.” The judge said that if he were satisfied that all reasonable possibilities had been considered and rejected for good reason, so that the local authority's ability to perform its statutory duties would indeed have been seriously affected by a declaration of illegality, he would necessarily have concluded that there were sufficiently cogent reasons for departing from the guidance. “Indeed that conclusion would suggest that the guidance itself was fundamentally flawed,” he said. “But that is not the position on the evidence before me. It follows that the local authority's policies are unlawful. “I reach this conclusion with some regret, as I do not doubt the good faith of the local authority or the real and serious efforts which it makes to ensure, in very difficult circumstances and with limited resources, the best possible outcome for all the children who are or may in future be in its care.” The judge declared that Tower Hamlet’s fostering policies were unlawful to the extent that they discriminated on the grounds of pre-existing relationship with the child between family and unrelated foster carers in the payment of (a) the fostering fee (currently £171 per week) provided for in the council’s March and November 2011 policies and (b) the "reward/fee" element of the payments made to carers of children with disabilities provided for in its April 2012 policy. Mr Justice Males said that he had had reached this conclusion as a matter of domestic public law and therefore did not need determine whether the same result would be reached under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The local authority was told to reconsider its policies. Rebecca Chapman of Ridley & Hall, the claimant’s solicitors, said: “I was shocked to read the council’s new policies particularly because in early 2011 the government issued guidance called Family and Friends Care: Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities which made it clear that councils should make sure family and friends carers are fully supported to care for the children placed with them and that they should not be treated unfavourably because they knew the child before they came to live with them. "The family and friends guidance was issued at around the same time as a number of other guidance which made the same point. Although the guidance was pointed out to the local authority they decided to continue with their discriminatory policy.” The aunt, who was not named for legal reasons, said: “I am absolutely delighted with the result. I am pleased that this judgment has recognised that family and friends carers should be treated fairly and should be paid the same amount as a professional foster carer when they are doing the same job.” A spokeswoman for Tower Hamlets said: “We don't comment on specific cases.”   

Big Biz Jobs lies resurfaced via Crossrail, London Hospital links

Big Biz Jobs lies resurfaced via Crossrail, London Hospital links
GPS warn people against dangerous hospitals

From the Times web site, London:

Patients need to be kept away from dangerous hospitals, GPs are warning.

In an extraordinary attack on standards of care, the leaders of Britain’s family doctors have called for a “paradigm shift” in the way the NHS is run to avoid a repeat of the Mid Staffordshire scandal.

Only the most serious cases should be treated in hospital, they say, transferring tens of thousands of vulnerable.....

Serial faker "Dr" Kevan Collins did great disservice to the integrity in Council "governance”

Serial faker "Dr" Kevan Collins did great disservice to the  integrity in Council "governance”
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary 2000 Hrs GMT [Whitechapel] London E1 UK Tuesday 12 March 2013: The emptiness in the Tower Hamlets Council threatening to explode in the faces of the complacent and the corrupt “deal-makers” who contrive to “control” the powers that belong to the electors of Tower Hamlets who are denied at every turn: Diagnosing the dysfunction that is the corrupt bureaucracy in Tower Hamlets Council [20]

The idea that the “East End Lies”, dubbed belated “the pravda” of the local Council bureaucracy, will be missed if it ceased publication is as untrue and as ridiculous as the claim by the neo Conservatives leaning Archant-controlled “Docklands and East London Advertiser” that they, the Neo-Cons, will provide “Eastenders” with a proper news and information service which the “East End Lies” fails to provide and has never been intended to or designed to provide

It is the Neo-Cons and the pro-racist elements that have done the running thus far in the superficial campaign to have the “East End Lies” scrapped.

And therein lies the near certainty, in my reading of things in Tower Hamlets and beyond, that in one shape or another the “East End Lies” will continue to fester, denying the dire state of social cleansing that has been underway for years in Tower Hamlets under the covers of the overly “multi-ethnic” and the almost equally overly “Muslim”-dominated “Tower Hamlets Council-careerists-dom.”

This is my phrase, just devised, here in Tower Hamlets where I am using the borrowed access to a computer located at en even more unstable premise!

The “Tower Hamlets Council careerists-dom” is an embarrassing “movement”.

It is heading downwards, to the sinking hole of humiliation.

Today or tomorrow. Not far beyond the day after that.

That humiliation will take place en bloc.

No two way about that.

The precise timing is, e..r, only a matter of time!

And all signs are that the mass humiliation will take place at the expense of the most lowly paid and the most ill provided for parts of the population in the East End borough.

The blame, the blaming finger will be pointing at the most disenfranchised and the most deprived and the most denied. The most letdown and the most betrayed by the bureaucracy that controls the Tower Hamlets Council and one that has controlled the Council for years.



[To be continued]

EVENING STANDARD / East London ADVERTISER online focus again on Lutfur Rahman's expenses link

EVENING STANDARD / East London ADVERTISER online focus again on Lutfur Rahman's expenses  link
RETRIEVED by AADHIKARONline from the web site “eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk” at 1950 GMT London Monday 11 March 2013



Revealed:

Taxpayers’ £20,000 bill for Tower Hamlets’ Mayor’s ‘propaganda’ adverts

Robin de Peyer

Monday, March 11, 2013


3:01 PM

Mayor of Tower Hamlets Lutfur Rahman has been accused of “siphoning off cash to pay for propaganda” after the taxpayer footed a £20,000 bill for political advertisements promoting him.

Broadcasting watchdog Ofcom ruled in January that adverts shown the previous year breached its code and amounted to a party political broadcast for the mayor.

An investigation has now revealed the £20,000 cost to the taxpayer for the adverts, which were broadcast on five Bengali television channels in January 2012.

Public spending pressure group the Taxpayers’ Alliance has now called on Mayor Rahman to repay the money himself.

Campaign manager Robert Oxley said:

“Using taxpayers’ money to fund the mayor’s political campaigning is a disgusting abuse of taxpayers’ resources.

“It speaks volumes that an administration meant to be finding ways to save residents’ money is instead siphoning off cash to pay for their own propaganda.”

Labour opposition councillors called for an investigation following Ofcom’s ruling, which came after a complaint from Conservative group leader Cllr Peter Golds. Outgoing Labour group leader Cllr Joshua Peck said:

“Spending £20,000 of the public’s money on self-serving publicity is scandalous.

“When the mayor is cutting frontline services and social workers in the borough, spending £20,000 on adverts which could instead have been used to protect residents is utterly outrageous.”

Mayor Rahman has been widely criticised since Ofcom published its ruling, with local government minister Brandon Lewis accusing his administration of a “worrying pattern of divisive community politics and mismanagement of council staff and resources”.

The adverts featured photographs of Mayor Rahman in the cab of a digger and inspecting a flat, and outlined his aims for improving the borough’s housing situation.

Despite repeated requests, the council failed to provide a comment.



How BAD is Tower Hamlets Council's "Social Cleansing" bureaucracy?

How BAD is Tower Hamlets Council's "Social Cleansing" bureaucracy?



AADHIKAROnline is continuing here, later this evening [Monday 11 March 2013], our examination of the corrupt conduct by Tower Hamlets Council employees who are doing even worse than has been exposed in the behaviour of Southwark Council's Housing benefits section.


Justice for Bangladesh: demo in a chilly Whitechapel London Monday 11 March

Justice for Bangladesh: demo in a chilly Whitechapel London Monday 11 March
“Justice for Bangladesh!” demo in a chilly Whitechapel London Monday 11 March 2013

This AADHIKARMedia © Muhammad Haque picture on the Whitechapel Road London E1 around 1520 GMT today Monday 11 March 2013, was a surprise event! Out of the chilled “blue” sky over the snowy horizon came the noisy display of passion for a series of men currently facing trials in “Kangaroo courts” in Bangladesh, as the demonstrators described them. The demonstrators received an unsurprising “treat” when some crazed, possibly racist, onlookers from inside a building opposite the “East London Mosque” threw [possibly] dirty water on them as they walked briskly past....



Back at the Altab Ali Park whence the “local march” had begun after the midday prayers, the protesters delivered a series of calls amid chants by supporters calling for a variety of punishments for the current regime chief Hasina Wazed [Sheikh hasina], the daughter of Sheikh Mujibur Rahamn who long ago ditched her married surname. Hasina’s own “crime” seems to have been her role in the setting up of the “International war Crimes Tribunals” in Bangladesh after she got into “power” three and half years ago.

Those currently undergoing trials include Ghulam Azam, described today as a Soldier for [the Bangla] Language Rights - “Bhasa Shainik” - for their alleged parts in the alleged brutalities in 1971 committed against the innocent members of the public in the then “East Pakistan” now the State of Bangladesh, which was undergoing a “liberation war:” against the occupying Pakistani Army in the tumultuous year.

The “war crimes” trials have become the focal issue around which the three Parties’ political survival now revolves.

Ghulam Azam’s own Party, the allegedly Fundamentalist Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami [a description originally conceived of in India and later circulated throughout the USA and the Western European soft left forums] is now the subject of noisy demands in Bangladesh for proscription, or banning.

It is now clear that the Hasina-fronted outfits, the so-called 14-Party “Coalition” is set on a collusion course against the 18-Party Alliance including the Jamaat-e-Islami backed by the Bangladeshi Nationalist Party [or, as I would abbreviate it, BDBNP].

Some longstanding observers of the “Subcontinent” believe that some sort of military-linked regime will take hold of Bangladesh unless Hasina stops her campaign.

But these observers miss one key factor out: what is the spur behind the CURRENT tumult and the deadly displays of aggro among or between the two sides in Bangladesh? Seasoned students of the subcontinents believe that OTHER forces, other than Bangladesh-based Parties, are in fact remotely controlling events in Bangladesh.

NEXT

The case for the trial of the real war criminals of Bangladesh in 1971: What are the criteria of the crimes?

Tower Hamlets Council's very own Housing benefits lies and nightmares [1]

Tower Hamlets Council's very own Housing benefits lies and nightmares [1]
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

EXCLUSIVELY revealing ten serious dysfunction in the corrupt bureaucracy in Tower Hamlets Council. UPDATE on the Housing Benefits Scandal [2]

1830 [ 1750] [1325] Hrs GMT London Sunday 10 March 2013

This image [of the SOUTH LONDON PRESS front page of Friday 8 March 2013] illustrates the case of Southwark man John Charen being put through hell by “Affinity Sutton” [a “housing” operator] who crassly contrived to evict him for a housing benefit error that Southwark's STUPID COUNCIL committed.

TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL has been allowing even more stupid behaviour by ITS Benefits Section personnel concerned than has been uncovered about the neighbouring [across the river Thames] Borough of Southwark whose treatment of John Charen, a terminally ill man subjected to more than a year’s torment by being threatened with eviction .
How is that happening?

It has been happening because there is no real accountability as far as the standard of compliance with the law BY THE DECISION-MAKERS go

Who are the decision-makers?

These are people who “decide” who gets the rent-rebates, the Council tax rebates.

IN Tower Hamlets Council, there is no line of constitutional law audit of the conduct of these decision-makers.

So errors that could have been prevented from happening have become institutionalised and are now defended by the “Benefits Service” as if they are lawful acts.

Families and individual households are exposed to being abused by the lawless prejudices of the decision-makers who have got away with forcing at least a number of their targets from their homes.

The numbers of illegal evictions of people and families from their homes due to “rent arrears” are not published by the Council nor are they volunteered by any of the known agencies of the UK central Government that funds local Councils, like Tower Hamlets with their particular social and demographic compositions.

The principle underlying this analysis is as follows

That Council employees must abide by the law and that their compliance with the law must be seen to be being done.

Is this compliance transparent in the case of Tower Hamlets Council?

What is the test which enables a conclusion, a finding of whether Tower Hamlets Council is compliant with the law?

Again, the full statistics are never published by Tower Hamlets Council. Nor are they published by the UK Central Government Department for Want and Poverty-creation [=“DWP”] with which the “Benefits Section” of the Council operates in close complicity.

The COMPLICITY is evident in the fact that the stated “lawful and legal method”, the “objective, neutral and the fair” “means-testing” that is supposedly to be followed in reaching decisions about eligibility to Housing benefits/Council tax benefits IS FLOUTED BY TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL’s “Benefits entitlement decision-makers”.

This is done openly.

Blatantly.

Given the extreme stress that “low income” or “no-income” brings with it to the person/s and the families experiencing hardship, the very fact that the person whose application is under consideration by the “benefits decision-makers” makes it very hard for the affected person/s even to think of mounting a challenge when a [the] decision is made to deny them the “benefits” let alone feeling the necessary confidence and resourcefulness to carry out any sustained process of challenge.







From 1325 GMT Edition, Sunday 10 March 2013

The nightmare that John Charen went through is bad enough.

But what about Tower Hamlets Council's Housing Benefits section?

What would happen if Tower Hamlets Council’s “Housing Benefits” managers not only made a similar “error” but defied all evidence of their mistake and continued to stand by the “error” that they should not have committed?

And how much would the family or the “community” targeted by Tower Hamlets Council’s DELIBERATE ERROR-making “housing benefits managers” lose out, suffer as the consequence of the DELIBERATE ERROR?

The KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN has been investigating the behaviour of Tower Hamlets Council’s Housing benefit section for the past ten years, shall we say, starting almost at the same time when the Campaign against the Crossrail hole AGenda began in December 2003.

We shall show how successive holders of the post of “leader of the Council” have known about the serious evidence of wrongdoing and law-breaking by the “Benefits Section” and yet NOTHING has been done.

Such has been the damage that a law suit is about to start seeking £100 million in damages!

Those damages have been caused by wrongdoers who have CLAIMED TO HAVE RELIED on Tower Hamlets Council’s employees for doing the harm.....and causing the very serious losses and the nightmares...

[To be continued]






1910 Hrs GMT

London

Saturday

09 March 2013

THIS FRONT PAGE of the “SOUTH LONDON PRESS” is dated yesterday, Friday 08 March 2013.

It is a typical “South London Press” news story and splash.
Brilliant local paper journalism.

Unimaginable in Tower Hamlets

Here, in Tower Hamlets, the “local paper’ is NOT local at all.

It is sick-makingly remote from the local population.

Even worse, it is, as last Wednesday’s “coverage” of the latest visit by the “Queen” of the former “London Hospital” [Ooops! “the Royal London”] has exhibited, very parochial, even rampantly racist!
[To be continued]

Does Tower Hamlets Council give people nightmares by causing wrong rent arrears?
In our NEXT report, we examine the LATEST state of CRISIS that afflicts Tower Hamlets Council’s role in HOUSING in the borough.
We show that the Tower Hamlets Council’s very own BENEFITS SECTION that controls the housing benefits [rent rebate and the Council tax benefit = council tax rebate] has been telling lies and been causing homelessness.

We assert that the lying by the Council’s Housing benefits section has been made known to all the “lead” members “concerned with housing and resources’ in the “cabinet” of the “executive mayor”, at least since the first week of September 2011.

ANOTHER HOUSING SCANDAL involving a big Biz construction outfit that has been exposed as looting the public cash
Carried by the SOUTH LONDON PRESS


Questions as £50m repair deal torn up Tuesday, 05 March 2013



By Ben Morgan A COUNCIL contractor has had its £50million repairs deal terminated after a project was beset by delays and problems.

Southwark council has agreed to “mutually conclude” its five-year deal with Breyer Group PLC who were were responsible for carrying out £5.1million worth of repair and maintenance work at Draper House, in Elephant & Castle.

The total value of the contract was £50million spread over five years for work to take place in the Rockingham Estate in Borough, Vauban Estate in Bermondsey and Brandon Estate in Walworth.

In November, a female tenant at Draper House was taken to hospital after a gas leak in her flat, which led to major works being suspended.

Draper House is a 24-storey block of flats containing 140 homes and was build in 1965. Residents had been promised major works would be carried out for a number of years. These works included cleaning and repairs, new asphalt roofs, fire safety upgrades and absestos removal.

The project was beset by delays and leaseholders in the block regularly complained to the council over the cost of major works.

A council report also noted that, due to the problems with getting the work started, there was a “was a lack of trust and confidence in the council” felt by residents.

On Monday evening, the council’s housing scrutiny committee met to look at what had gone on.

Opposition Liberal Democrats have called on the Labour-run council to disclose the cost of terminating the deal to taxpayers in the borough.

Lib Dem Cllr Catherine Bowman said: “Residents have gone through absolute hell in the past few months and many have been left with boarded-up windows and walls while the council works out what it’s doing next.

“After all the problems with this project it’s absurd for the council to try to hide details of how the contract was ended and how much it has cost us.

“This is taxpayers’ money and it is clearly in the public interest that the council comes clean on Draper House.”

However, the council says it is unable to release that information.

Southwark council has said it would ask residents of Draper House whether they want a back-up contractor to complete the work, or put the contract out to tender once more.

Cllr Ian Wingfield, cabinet member for housing, said: “Southwark council and Breyer Group PLC have mutually agreed to conclude their five-year partnering agreement.

“This agreement means that Breyer will no longer be responsible for the completion of works at Draper House.

“Our priority is to resume work at Draper House as swiftly as possible. We know that is what residents want and we will be speaking to them about our plans to get this important work under way again.”

The Breyer Group PLC has confirmed that “an amount” of money was still owed to the company for major work carried out on other blocks in the borough. A spokesman added: “This is a mutually agreed conclusion to the contract.”









Racist resurgence in Britain given legitimacy by the Milibranding of the Bliared Bureaucracy: [1b]

Racist resurgence in Britain given legitimacy by the Milibranding of the Bliared Bureaucracy: [1b]
0002 Hrs GMT London Thursday 07 March 2013

[2310 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 06 March 2013]

The © Muhammad Haque DAILY Ethical Commentary: TESSA Jowell capitulates to rampant racist call by Rupert Murdoch SUN’s David Wooding that “Labour should apologise’ for its [even] superficial past ‘anti-racist’ stance!

As the face and the teeth of the Milibrand Racist Agenda, TESSA Jowell did the pro-racist performances just as Ed Milibrand would have wanted and Bliar would have cheered

Racist resurgence in Britain given legitimacy by the Milibranding of the Bliared Bureaucracy:
[1]




The day that Ed Milibrand hit the SKY Business programme Jeff Randall Live over Mildibrand's branding of the Bliared Party Bureaucracy as the resurgent pro-racist Party of British Parliamentary Careerism, Rupert Murdoch’s SKY NEWS hosted Tessa Jowell [Oops! “Dame” Tessa Jowell] appearing on the Anna Botting news slot with the SUN’s David Wooding! Between the three of them, they did as “perfect” a job of making resurgent racism sound “decent”!

This was the SKY NEW PRESS PREVIEW between 2230 GMT and 2300 Hrs GMT today 06 March 2013.

[To be continued]



OFCOM again exposed as failing to regulate ethnicity linked BSKYB Channels, SKY 814 typical example

OFCOM again exposed as failing to regulate ethnicity linked BSKYB Channels, SKY 814 typical example
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Diagnosing OFCOM and finding all its teeth absent [if OFCOM ever had any teeth!] [1]

The AADHIKAROnline image here is based on a screen grab from BSKYB 814 in February 2013. It shows Mohammed Jubair, described as the “Chief Reporter” of the “Channel”other.
But Jubair’s role as a 3 day a week £175 a day “media adviser” to Tower Hamlets Council Executive Mayor Lutfur Rahman has been condemned by the Tower Hamlets Council Tory Group leader Peter Golds.

In fact Peter Golds is on the record as having done most of the public running over Jubair and over the other “ethnicity linked satellite Channel” [the phrase is AADHIKARONline’s own creation, not Peter Golds’ or anybody else’s] as far as the “reporting’ by the EVENING STANDARD [one and the same as today’s paper] and the DAILY TELEGRAPH go.


The EVENING STANDARD website piece below was retrieved at 1630 GMT today Wednesday 06 March 2013

[To be continued]

The EVENING STANDARD website piece [at page 30 of the PRINT edition dated Weds 06 February 203] Revealed: Tower Hamlets mayor’s close links to TV station rapped for bias towards him

 Support: Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman received favourable coverage from Channel S (Picture: Nigel Howard) Facebook 16 Send 9   This page has been shared 9 times. View these Tweets. Share 0 Share    Related Articles 06 March 2013 The full extent of links between Tower Hamlets council and a controversial Bangladeshi TV channel can be revealed today.

An investigation by the Evening Standard has found Channel S provided such favourable political coverage to mayor Lutfur Rahman that regulator Ofcom ruled some of its programmes illegal.

Shows on the satellite station, based in Walthamstow, did not “inform and educate” but were broadcast to promote Mr Rahman “in a positive light”.

The problems occurred under previous owner Mohammed Ferdhaus, who was jailed for fraud in 2008. Ofcom is powerless to act as Channel S, which is watched by tens of thousands, is now under new management.

The mayor employs Channel S journalist Mohammed Jubair as a personal adviser on a publicly funded salary. Tower Hamlets — which has the highest child poverty rate in Britain, with four in 10 children living in poverty — spent £12,000 sponsoring a Channel S awards ceremony last May.

Mr Jubair appears to have played a role in the payment, according to documents released under freedom of information laws.

Ministers are so concerned about Ofcom’s inability to tackle the issue that they are preparing to introduce legislation. Local government minister Brandon Lewis said: “Such actions are not just a misuse of public funds, they are harmful to local democracy and an independent, free media.

“We are looking at putting [measures] on a statutory basis to address this abuse of taxpayers’ money.”

Mr Rahman, an ally of Ken Livingstone, was elected as an independent in 2010. He has been supported by coverage from Channel S, which broadcasts to the borough’s 80,000-strong Bangladeshi population. Ofcom has found that its coverage of Tower Hamlets breached broadcasting rules five times since 2008.

The latest censure, last month, said an advert featuring Mr Rahman misled the public. After the previous “serious breaches”, the regulator said it wanted a “significant fine”, but the station was beyond reach as its holding company had entered liquidation and re-formed under new owners.

In May last year, the council paid £12,000 to sponsor Channel S’s awards ceremony. An invoice approving the payment contains a note from Tower Hamlets director of communications Takki Sulaiman. “Please proceed with Jubair,” it reads.

Mr Jubair earns £175 a day for a three-day week. Peter Golds, leader of the local Conservative group, said: “There is a conflict of interest. Mr Jubair cannot be on the council payroll while reporting on the council.”

Mr Ferdhaus still presents shows on the channel.

At Croydon crown court in 2008, he was jailed for 18 months over “crash-for-cash” bogus accidents. Tower Hamlets said: “Ofcom censured the advertisers not the council. We are considering our position in respect of future advertising.”

It said Mr Jubair “supports the Mayor in fulfilling the commitments he has made to local people”.

Of the sponsorship of Channel S, the council added: “We sponsor a range of events across the community to promote council services.”

Channel S said: “Channel S Television Ltd in its present form has only been trading since the end of June 2012. Everything that you mention was prior to June 2012 and I cannot comment on it as it was under different management at that time.”

Brum No to Council cuts onslaught:

Brum No to Council cuts onslaught:
AADHIKARONLINE endorsing and solidarising with the BIRMINGHAM Campaign against COuncil Cuts:

NO to CUTS by Birmingham Council

INDYMEDIA UK Feature published online on Sunday 03 March 2013

Cuts Meeting at Birmingham Council House Blockaded



IMC UK Features | 03.03.2013 00:28 |

Public sector cuts

| Social Struggles | Workers' Movements | Birmingham

On the morning of Tuesday 26th February at 7:30am a group of Save Birmingham activists blockaded the entrance to the Council House underground car park. Later that day the annual budget meeting would take place where over £100m worth of cuts would be voted through.

Save Birmingham, who had previously occupied the balcony of the Council House in the lead up to the budget meeting, along with other anti-cuts groups had called for a public blockade of the Council House at 11:00am to prevent the councillors from entering the building and voting through the cuts. When 11:00 arrived the car park blockaders were joined by hundreds of people from around Birmingham angry at the way the cuts are being undemocratically forced onto the city by the council. Soon all major entrances to the Council House had been blockaded just in time for the councillors to start arriving.

Police tried to break up and force councillors through but eventually resorted to sneaking councillors into the Council House via secret doors in the Art Museum which is connected to the Council House. When the meeting finally got under-way activists twice managed to gain entry to the building to disrupt the meeting.

On the Newswire: Video of Blockaded: Birmingham Council House cuts meeting |

Council House Blockaded | Photos from Birmingham Council House blockade |



More photos of Council House Blockade | Council Have Voted Through £102m Cuts – Blockade & Demonstration Is Not The End | It’s Time To Shut The City Down – Day Of Action Against Council Cuts |

Save Birmingham - Blockade the Council House

Previous features: Anti-Cuts protesters occupy Birmingham Council House

Links: Save Birmingham

 BIRMINGHAM: By INDYMEDIA UK:

The Council have been heavily

criticised for the undemocratic way in which the cuts are being forced upon the city.

The public “consultation” the Council held over the budget was held over only four weeks where it was not possible to propose any resolutions. Communities Against the Cuts have described the consultation meeting as nothing other than a “sales pitches for austerity, dominated by monologues from the Council leader.”

In fact at all of these meetings the Councils plans where rejected by the public who were then ignored by the Council.

A planned anti-cuts meeting at the council house the day before the budget meeting organised by various groups in Birmingham to discuss alternatives to austerity was cancelled by the council for fear of protests happening inside the Council House.

Activists have vowed that this is just the start of a prolonged campaign to reverse the cuts and site a long list of previous victories as evidence that they can stop the cuts. Merrishaw Day Nursery was closed but then reopened after protests, Cotteridge Church OAP Day Centre had it's funding cut but was restored after protests, Charles House respite day care home was threatened with closure but was kept open after the parents of the children who use Charles House stormed constituency meetings and shamed their officials into backing down.

Parents campaigned and stopped the West-Heath school from becoming an academy.

The average reduction in Government funding for councils as a whole is £74 per person; Birmingham’s reduction has been more than double the national average, at £149 per person.

The £101m of cuts this year is part of £625m cuts to Birmingham by 2016/17 and on top of Cuts of £275 million since 2010.

The £101m of cuts to be voted on include a cut of £32.7 million to the Adults and Communities budget, £23.8 million to Children Young People and Families, and £28.3 million to Leisure Services. High on the hit list are:

Voluntary Sector Funding (£4.4m), Children Centres (£3m), Children Residential Care Homes (£1.6m), Children and Adolescent Mental Health Service (£1.4m), Home to School Transport (£1m), Youth Service (£0.47m) and reduced subsidy for the Meals Service (£0.4m).

Then of course there is the extra £15 extra a week many people will now have pay in bedroom-tax, the £5 a week extra that unemployed people will have to pay after losing their council tax relief. Its clear that in Birmingham, one of the most deprived areas in the country, it is the poorest who are being hit the hardest.

IMC UK Features

UPDATING the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2013

UPDATING the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2013
UPDATING the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2013:

By © Muhammad Haque.

1055 [0925] 0920 Hrs GMT

London

Sunday

03 March 2013



The “news” is that the “Opposition” councillors on Tower Hamlets Council have “expressed their determination” to scrap the funding for the “East End Lies” [Ooooops! ‘East End Life’] the in-house Propaganda title that is abused by whatever “administrations” is in place in the Council.

I doubt that the “East End Lies” will ever be scrapped. My inquiries find that every “side”, including the Cons, secretly craves a propaganda platform like the “East End Lies”. So the most that the “Opposition” will do is to make SOME persistent noise, thus “earning themselves” space in the “commercial newspapers”, the “Docklands” “Advertiser” etc.

The real evidence of the corruption of Tower Hamlets Council is to be found not in the shallow and token “debate” about the future funding of the “East End Lies” but in the absence of any probe by any side on the “elected Council” into the conduct of the very highly and the very undeservedly overpaid employees and contractors.



This corruption of elected local democracy has made Tower Hamlets Council a DUMBO-cracy and has denied the people, the overwhelming majority of ordinary people, the representations, the SAY that the people deserve on all the SERVICES that the Council IS PUBLICLY FUNDED to deliver, but have never quite been able to exercise due to the perennial dysfunction in the “elected” Tower Hamlets Council.



I say that Tower Hamlets Council has been a dysfunctional outfit ever since the 1960s when the platform was conjured up by putting together the three erstwhile boroughs of Stepney, Poplar and Bethnal Green

[To be continued]

Previously published on Sunday 14 October 2012. On how Tower Hamlets Council created a housing crisis that it must solve now by getting the transferred stock back from the RSLs

0845 [0840] [0800] [0730] [0700] [0640] Hrs GMT 

London 

Sunday 14 October 2012. 

EVIDENTIALLY EXCLUSIVELY 

UPDATING THE PREAMBLE 

to the 

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2013 

By © Muhammad Haque

  The fact that the “East End Lies” is published almost every week and its ‘news and features’ spaces are filled with plugs and PR for “the current administration” means that all “sides” that have ever been in power and control of the Council since this little pravda was introduced have abused their position and taken part in pretending that they were “doing things for the community” when the truth ids that they were inducing in propaganda for their own images and for their own cliques, factions that happened to be “in power” at that particular time.

They have, in effect over the years, abolished even the pretence that the locally “elected” “Tower Hamlets Council” is in place to represent ALL sides and parts of the population in the “London Borough of Tower Hamlets” fairly, without prejudice and without discrimination.

And the fact that the “East End Lies” is “in-house”, that is, it is produced by employees of Tower Hamlets Council means that there is no likelihood that the “manufacturers” of the lies will want to stop lying.

It follows that they will carry on telling the lies. For any questioning of the blind [='unquestioning'] PR for the given “current administration” will result in some sort of disciplinary step being taken by the same administration against the “truth teller/s” or against the raiser/s of the ethical questions.

It is thus not just after the model of the USSR-era Pravdas controlled from their Moscow HQs but also of the “Eastern bloc” type culture of fierce propaganda for the sitting regime so noisily associated with the regime of Nicolae Caucescue in Romania.

It is true that the apparatuses that the Romanian regime [which "ended" with the calamitous fall in 1989] had far outweighed in scale and detail those available to the little local regime based at the overly expensively “hired/leased” Mulberry Place in London E14 2BG [at the community's expense and in the name of the community that is treated with increasing obstructiveness and hostility].

But the detrimental purpose to undermine the local community and to sabotage democratic debate and to obstruct the creation of any atmosphere for good service to the local community has been operated to a traceably corrupting extent via the “East End Lies” just as effectively as any Romanian equivalent with a greater scale would have done in Romania before 1989.  

I here refer again to the lies that were perpetrated against the rights and the futures of the local Council housing tenants when the stock transfer of Council housing was mounted.

On the surface, the claim was that local tenants were able to exercise their utmost freedom to “choose”.

But the truth is that people were given false information, with the aim being to mislead most tenants into “believing” that IF THEY REMAINED WITH THE COUNCIL then their housing needs would suffer and that the ONLY way to make sure that they

  [a] got good housing service  in the immediate future and 

[b] even better hosing service after that was to OPT FOR YES to the transfer of the housing stock.

That that was a lie was confirmed again on Thursday during a radio programme that I presented. A caller [whom I know] made the assertion that the Tower Hamlets Council’s housing stock transfer to the identifiable registered social [!!!] landlords was contaminated by corruption  at all levels of the operation, before, during and after.

The caller, Carole, is a known campaigner AGAINST the transfer of the Council housing stock away from Council control and into the holds of the RSLs.

Carole said some of the things that I have known to be true as well.

Like the fact that quite a few people who sit on the so-called Boards of these RSLs are also involved with the Council where they occupy decision-making positions.

That is a conflicting position.

And it is made worse by the failure or rather the refusal on the parts of these individuals to publish the facts of WHAT they do on the Boards and what they SEE as being the behaviour of the “post transfer” RSLs.

The truth of the ROLE of Tower Hamlets Council in ENCOURAGING the CORRUPTING state of affairs to continue is beyond  denial.

How?

Answer: Four and a half years ago, I started to ask the “DEMOCRATIC SERVICES” [Tower Hamlets Council]  to let me know about Tower Hamlets Council’s “representatives” on the RSLs. I did ask to be given the evidence of these “representatives’ conduct” on OTHER external outfits and agencies too.  

But I particularly focussed on the Council’s “representatives” sitting on the RSLs.

I asked: what did they do? 

Did they report back to the “democratic Council” on what went on in those organisations and what they, these “representatives” saw there?

Initially, I had asked the then Chief Executive to tell me about these.

The then Chief Executive’s office suggested that I asked the Council’s Democratic Services about my questions.

I asked who in the Democratic Services would tell me what I had been asking to know.

I was told that a man named John S Williams would be the one to tell me all I wanted to know.

I took that in good faith and asked away.

I even sent – over the four years or so since starting to ask these questions – about a hundred separate, constantly updating communications including emails and telephone messages.

But ANSWER there came NONE from John S Williams.

To begin with, it was not John S Williams that I found myself speaking to, most of the times. Or sending emails to, most of the times.

It was a member of the staff, whom I shall not name here, in my voluntary compliance with the standards of ethics that I apply to my public statements and commentaries.

That member of staff turned out to be a partner in the business of misleading, fabrication and fakery too.

So after four years of efforts, I could not get any evidence from Tower Hamlets Council showing WHAT if anything, the same Council’s REPRESENTATIVES on the external “bodies” especially the “registered Social landlords” now controlling the majority of the transferred Council Housing stock DID as they SAT there in the name of the “elected Tower Hamlets Council”.

  [To be continued]

_______________________________________________________________ HERE are the texts of the online piece published by ARCHANT controlling the former East London Advertiser, now dubbed ‘Docklands and East London Advertiser’, dated 28 February 2013:



Tower Hamlets Council’s “Pravda” under threat in budget plan



Robin de Peyer

Thursday, February 28, 2013 
2:26 PM

The future of Tower Hamlets Council’s East End Life publication is in doubt after opposition councillors put forward plans to remove its funding.

Labour and Conservative members voted together to force the borough’s Mayor Lutfur Rahman to consider an amendment to next year’s budget which scraps funding for the weekly newspaper.

The coalition government has confirmed it is looking to introduce legislation clamping down on Town Hall publications. Local government minister Brandon Lewis recently castigated Tower Hamlets Council for “waste and unnecessary spending” on its “Pravda”.

Labour and Tory councillors last night confirmed their intention to push for £1.2million in funding to the weekly free sheet to be scrapped, while Independent councillors voiced their continued support for the publication.

The amendment backed by Tory and Labour councillors will be considered by Mayor Rahman this week, before both his original budget and the amended version are voted on at an emergency meeting on Thursday.





KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!
The UK Department for Transport is derailed and when it isn't derailed, it heads for the wrong destination. [To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO about the great British Rail robbers

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO about the great British Rail robbers


1045 [1035] Hrs GMT

London Saturday

02 March 2013.

The © Muhammad Haque Daly Ethical Commentary

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!

That UK RAILWAYS bureaucracy was stooged by Big Business crooks. Now EVEN Margaret Hodge admits that the UK DAFT Department fro Transport has been clueless while £Billions are looted by the manipulating Big Biz companies….

Hodge is rightly in the limelight as chair of the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee. However, Hodge's "height of indignation" must be put in ,perspective by remembering her record in office as a leader of the local Council in Islington.

The IDEA that Hodge is now almost identified with the democratic ethics of accountability is an overdue one which has YET TO GET ESTABLISHED in the House of Commons itself.

Even on the Select Committee that Hodge has been chairing there are many still active backers of the undemocratic Big Biz culture.

KHOODEELAAR! DEMONSTRATED on Wednesday 01 March 2006 outside the Mulberry Place, London E14 2BG against Tower Hamlets Council-Linked agents of Big Biz agenda peddlers who used Crossrail as their front and bid to destroy the community in the East End of London...
....



The UK DfT Colluded and the Khoodeelaar! campaign exposed the DfT and its other colluders including the stooged MPs and the stooged Peers.

[To be continued]

CON-DEM Collusion colludes with crooks controlling UK banks, looting the public

CON-DEM Collusion colludes with crooks controlling UK banks, looting the public
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Crooked Bankers Blatantly benefit from the openly permitted robbery regimes that are allowed to be run by the crooks in the publicly paid banks!

1005 Hrs GMT

London

Saturday

02 March 2013

CONDEM Collusion in the UK COLLUDES with crooks of the Banks!

The evidence continues to appear daily.

But there is no action to stop the crooks!

Cameron, Clegg and the Milibrand!

All inept and in cahoots with the crooks' practices.

All hot air from the publicly paid holders of positions in power and in 'opposition'.

[To be continued]

AADHIKAROnline retrieved the following item from the website of the CPGB [='Communist Party of Great Britain']-controlled [very thin] daily the MORNING STAR [London, UK] at 1010 Hrs GMT today Saturday 02 March 2013.

Failed banker handed £1.5m in bonuses

Friday 01 March 2013

by Rory MacKinnon Corporate Affairs Reporter

Lloyds boss Antonio Horta-Osorio was at the centre of a storm of criticism today after the bailed-out bank's board handed him £1.5 million in bonuses.

The 39 per cent state-owned bank posted losses of £570m before tax for the last year, burning away £4 billion just in compensation for ripped-off customers who were missold payment protection insurance (PPI) and interest rate swaps.

Mr Horta-Osorio already enjoys a basic salary of £1.06m each year on top of his "golden hello" of six million shares and more than half a million in cash in 2011.

But Lloyds's remuneration committee stuffed his pockets still further today, with new shares which will pay out after five years on a 73.6p share price - or if the government sells at least a third of its stake at a profit.

The Unite union representing cashiers and other low-level financial workers voiced dismay at the payoff. National officer Dominic Hook said there was no justification for Mr Horta-Osorio's rewards when the bank was tainted by scandal.

"Customers and staff have a right to be angry. They won't understand why those at the top are being rewarded," he said.

The announcement also followed reports the Con-Dem coalition was preparing to offload its 39 per cent stake in Lloyds once the share price - pegged last night at 54.5p - reaches 61p.

Mr Horta-Osorio himself declined to comment, saying only that he was "very confident" the government would recoup its investment.

But left Labour MP Jeremy Corbyn accused the coalition of kowtowing to the very bankers taxpayers had bailed out.

"The government seems to be trying to engineer a share price rise as a hidden bonus," he told the Morning Star.

The Islington North MP, who has long called for a state-owned bank as part of the People's Charter campaign, said governments should not be looking to re-privatise banks at all.

"They should be publicly owned, with profits going to fund the public services people need," he said.

The furore over Lloyds's largesse came just a day after RBS chief Stephen Hester announced £607m in bonuses after a "chastening year" detailing £5.2 billion in losses - including its own payouts over PPI and interest rate swaps.

The 82 per cent state-owned bank had been expected to award less than half that amount, with a widely circulating figure of £250m.

But it soon emerged the bonus pool had already been cut by £302m as a result of fines relating to the ongoing Libor-rigging investigation: the biggest scandal since the credit crisis itself.

Both Lloyds and RBS are among nearly two dozen banks under investigation. The inter-lending rate, which averages out the level of market confidence shown by loan terms between banks, determines rates for derivatives and consumer and business loans worldwide.

But Mr Hester confirmed last month that for years RBS's reporters colluded with their trader colleagues, falsely raising or lowering the figures hundreds of times in line with their trading positions.



KHOODEELAAR! mobilised community against Council role in the Crossrail hole 01 March 2006

KHOODEELAAR! mobilised community against Council role in the Crossrail hole 01 March 2006
1035 Hrs GMT London Friday 01 March 2013

“March on! march on! march on!”

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

MARCHING in defending the Community once again, SEVEN years on from the KHOODEELAAR! Demonstration of 01 March 2006 against the Crossrail hole-inviting role of the Tower Hamlets Council

on 01 March 2013, SEVEN years since we marched on 01 March 2006 against the Tower Hamlets Council’s role in colluding with the agenda of the Crossrail hole!

We also once again pay tributes to the work that Kay Jordan did on that day in making sure that due support was on hand to make our demonstrations a dignified success. Also recalling the role played in the Tower Hamlets Council Chamber by a then local Councillor [Weavers Ward] Louise Alexander. The then Councillor Alexander delivered a detailed argument in her speech as she substantiated the Motion in “full Council” asking that Tower Hamlets Council SAID NO to the Crossrail hole.

Louise Alexander and Kay Jordan had BOTH spoken at the 22 January 2006

KHOODEELAAR! rally held at the hanbury Street London E1-sited Brady Centre.

That rally was the subject of an attempted hijacking bid by the crooked clique that was linked with the controlling clique then on the Tower Hamlets Council.

The 22 january 2006 KHOODEELAAR! rally saw that crooks COULD be defeated by resolute defiance of their ploys.

We did that then.

today, Friday 01 March 2013, our resolve as the Campaign is the same:

stay commuted to the upholding of universal values for justice, fairness and accountability. It is much harder to implement than to merely say these words.

In carrying out the campaign we seek inspiration in the works of the Rebel Poet, Qazi Nazrul Islam.

As I had decided to do when launching the BENTH BULLETIN 30 years ago in May 1983.

In May 1983, I had created the Bangladeshis’ Educational Needs in Tower Hamlets Bulletin. Called the BENTH Bulletin.

In the launching issue, I published the first part of my original translation of the Rebel poet’s “Chall Chall Chall”.

I find Nazrul’s essence to be universal, humanitarian and internationalist.

“March on, march on, march on!”

That is the first line I had written 30 years ago when I sat down to interpret to English language readers the poetry of Qazi Nazrul Islam.

My English rendering of Qazi Nazrul Islam’s Bangla language “Chall, Chall, Chall”! is the nearest that any translation of it, so far published, comes to the Rebel’s thoughts and expressions.

It is the same universal spirit of telling the truth and marching for justice that I am inspired by every time I am doing a campaign.

As I did on Wednesday 01 March 2006, SEVEN years ago today, when the “local” Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique went ahead and repeated its support for the Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail, blatantly defying the objective truth that the AGENDA behind the Crossrail plan was [as it remains] a Big Biz agenda aligned with the motives of the City of London and other Corporate entities to smash the East End down and make the community disappear.

That is why it is important to stress today that “hopefuls” at the [so far “scheduled” October 2014] “election for executive mayor” in Tower Hamlets in the name of the Tower Hamlets Labour party, so far announced, must be held accountable to what it is that they even understand about the community whose name and whose votes they are in this scramble to bag.

What have they been doing with their time in the years since they became members of what embarrassingly they must think is their “exclusive club” - that is: being “councillors carrying the Labour Party name”- when the attacks on all aspects of the community in Tower Hamlets have continued from the Rightward agenda carrying central Government administrations in the UK for the past 25 years!

The KHOODEELAAR! campaign was made necessary because ALL the Labour Party councillors on 01 March 2006 and in the years starting in 2000 [when I had started the active research and investigation into the Crossrail hole plot] who also at the same time claimed to “deserve” the support of the Borough’s Bangladeshi voters, failed to show they even understood what the Crossrail hole plot was, let alone to show any recognition of the fact that the gigantic work that was needed to confront the combined forces of the UK Parliamentary bureaucracy as well as the City of London and the UK and the USA Multinationals pushing the Big Biz agenda that was propelling the Crossrail hole plot was being done by the KHOODEELAAR! campaign which nether asked for nor was offered AMNY resource by any of the State or Organised party machines or any of their remotest connectible colluders or tributaries.

This KHOODEELAAR! action is continuing today in making sure that the stopping of the agenda behind Crossrail hole plot is not left to any of the same elements.

The RESOURCES of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign are unique today Friday 01 March 2013 as they were on Wednesday 01 March 2006. As they had been on 31 January 2004 when the Campaign was launched to stop the Crossrail hole. These resources are and have been uniquely generated and created to benefit the universally understood and felt and defined needs of the people.

The KHOODEELAAR! campaign and the Khoodeelaar! resources will continue to be dedicated to defending the community that includes even those who lack the intelligence and the humanity to appreciate what we have ben doing to keep their homes, to keep their businesses and keep their freedom from demolition, destruction and displacement by the City, by the City’s agents and by others posing as the “representatives” of the community.



[To be continued]



DAILY MAIL: Scotland Yard stole the identities of 80 dead babies .."

DAILY MAIL: Scotland Yard stole the identities of 80 dead babies .."
The © Muhammad Haque Daly Constitutional Law Commentary: Britain’s Policing myths are in the spotlight as CONDEM assault on democratic Society continue with mounting pressure by the “Ministry of INJustice” bureaucracy bent on smashing for good the very idea of open justice. [1]

The UK Ministry of Injustice is getting nastier by the day, especially since the Far Right Neo Cons and Big Biz agent Chris Grayling got slotted in following cameron’s Capitulation to the Unjust Brigade in the Nasty party


THE EVIDENCE about wide spread and fast spreading dilution of the image of the integrity of Policing in Britain is thick and fast. So much so that the Communist daily the MORNING STAR is sharing similar concerns as being expressed by the very laid back UK House of Parliament. As is also clear in the reporting by the Pro-Police and very Rightwing DAILY Mail.

Here is a DAILY MAIL on line report published at the start of February 2013

Scotland Yard stole the identities of 80 dead babies so they could send police officers undercover

• Details were taken so officers could infiltrate protest groups

• Officers formed sexual relationships with their targets

• They modelled the process on the film, The Day of the Jackal

• Scotland Yard says practice no longer employed but launches investigation

• Former Director of Public Prosecutions called for a public inquiry

By ARTHUR MARTIN

PUBLISHED: 23:06, 3 February 2013 | UPDATED: 18:10, 4 February 2013

• 


Comments (160)

[THE DAILY MAIL online comments are NOT accessible from this AADHIKARONline report on Friday 01 March 2013]

• 
 The identities of 80 dead children were stolen by the police and used to create fake passports, it has been revealed. v The names and dates of birth were taken without the knowledge of the children’s parents and used by officers infiltrating protest groups.

For 30 years, detectives from Scotland Yard trawled through national birth and death records looking for suitable identities. They used the birth certificates to apply for a variety of identity documents to make their aliases appear genuine.  DAILY MAIL ONLINE CAPTION of the picture of John Dines [that picture is NOT accessible from this Aadhikaronline report on Friday 01 March 2013] an undercover police sergeant, as he appeared in the early 1980s when he posed as John Barker, a protester against capitalism

In some cases officers spent up to ten years in the same guise.

One, John Dines, adopted the identity of an eight-year-old boy called John Barker, who died in 1968 from leukaemia. Another officer said he felt he was ‘stomping on the grave’ of the four-year-old boy whose identity he used while working undercover in anti-racist groups.

And a third detective spent years living under the identity of a child who died in a car crash.   More... •

Officer who 'tried to blow whistle' on hacking probe jailed: Terror detective rang News of the World to say inquiry was 'a waste of resources'

• Timebomb at Elm Guest House: Pop stars, a bishop and a top politician appear on a list seized by police investigating child abuse at the London hotel in the 1980s

Under cover officers using assumed identities also formed sexual relationships with targets in groups they had infiltrated in the 1980s, which included environmental and anti-racist groups. Lord Ken Macdonald, former Director of Public Prosecutions, has condemned the practice and called for a public inquiry - warning that unacceptable practices might still be in use today. He said it was 'really worrying' that police chiefs appeared not to have entirely ruled out a repeat of recently-exposed cases of officers entering sexual relationships with targets. Speaking on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, he said: 'How are you supposed to maintain a level of fair and objective evidence-gathering if you are having sex with the person you are targeting, fathering a baby and then abandoning it, using a dead child's identity?' 'These are all examples of areas in which the police have completely lost their moral compass and have completely failed to understand the boundaries. 'We don't know quite how these units were operating in days gone by. It looks as though they've effectively gone rogue. I am not at all clear how high up in Scotland Yard these sorts of operations were being organised. He added: 'What we really need is a public inquiry into undercover policing which takes evidence, takes advice, sets out some guidelines, sets out some mechanisms so we can be confident these sorts of procedures are not being followed today. 'We need to know how we got there, where we are now and we need to be reassured that this sort of behaviour won't occur in the future and I think an inquiry is really the only way to achieve that. 'I do think the Government will think seriously about this because these sorts of stories seem to be endless. 'It is drip, drip, drip, it is corrosive, it is seedy and I think we really need to find ourselves in a position where we can reassure the public that this sort of behaviour is not going to carry on.' After initial protestations that undercover officers getting sexually involved with targets could no longer happen, there appeared to have been a 'subtle shift in which it is being suggested that it could be appropriate in some circumstances'. 'This is a deeply ethical issue which the police have to grapple with,' he said.  Police were inspired by the film, The Day of the Jackal Peter Bleksley, a former under cover detective for the Metropolitan Police, said: 'In the undercover unit of which I was a director, we were completely dedicated to combatting serious and organised crime. 'We had nothing to do with protest groups or environmental campaigns. 'The state gave us a fake identities we required; passports, driving licences, or credit cards. 'We would never dream of using a dead child's identity, I cannot comprehend why anyone would want to adopt an identity rather than create one. 'These people were largely staffed with people who didn't have detective experience, clearly the management was lacking in experience and authority. 'In our unit we always had clear end games, to take the drugs, stolen commodities or to prevent murder. It seems these units had no clear goals or end games. It's a recipe for disaster.' The technique of using dead children as aliases was borrowed from Frederick  Forsyth’s novel, The Day of the Jackal. Keith Vaz MP, the chairman of the home affairs select committee, said he was shocked by the ‘gruesome’ practice. ‘It will only cause enormous distress to families who will discover what has happened concerning the identities of their dead children,’ he said. ‘This is absolutely shocking. My disbelief at some of the tactics used has become shock as a result of these latest revelations. ‘It is clear that inappropriate action has been taken by undercover police in the past. But this has taken it to a new level.’ The practice was introduced 40 years ago by police to lend credibility to the back stories of covert operatives spying on protesters. It also guarded against the possibility that campaigners would discover their true identities. Since then dozens of officers, including those who posed as anti-capitalists, animal rights activists and violent far-right campaigners, have used the identities of dead children. One document appeared to suggest around 80 officers from a secret unit called the Special Demonstration Squad used such identities between 1968 and 1994. The total number could be higher. An officer who adopted the identity of four-year-old Pete Black compared the methods used by Scotland Yard to those of the Stasi – the secret police in the former East Germany. ‘A part of me was thinking about how I would feel if someone was taking the names and details of my dead son,’ he said. ‘I used to get this really odd feeling.’ The officer said he always felt guilty when celebrating the birthday of the four-year-old whose identity he took. He was particularly aware that somewhere the parents of the boy would be ‘thinking about their son and missing him’. To fully immerse himself in the adopted identity and appear convincing when speaking about his upbringing, Mr Black visited the child’s home town to familiarise himself with the surroundings. Black, who was under cover in the 1990s, said SDS officers visited the house they were supposed to have been born in so they would have a memory of the building. ‘It’s those little details that really matter – the weird smell coming out of the drain that’s been broken for years, the location of the post office, the number of the bus,’ he told the Guardian newspaper.

Fifteen separate inquiries have already been launched since 2011, when Mark Kennedy was unmasked as a police spy who had slept with several women, including one who was his girlfriend for six years, during his time under cover.

Scotland Yard said the practice was not currently authorised, but announced an investigation into ‘past arrangements for undercover identities used by SDS officers’.

Kay Jordan crucial role in defence of the UK Bangladeshi Community: The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign [2]

Kay Jordan crucial role in defence of the UK Bangladeshi Community: The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign [2]
An electronic image by AADHIKARMedia of the bottom of page 26 of the weekly title Bangla Post London dated Friday 28 February 2013, containing The © Muhammad Haque Commentary piece that pays evidential and historical tribute to Kay Jordan for her part in the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign



The © Muhammad Haque Commentary [this one written in Bangla] as published in the weekly Bangla language publication "Bangla Post”, dated Friday 28 February 2013, recognises the role played by Kay Jordan in jointly founding the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against the Crossrail hole in December 2003, just under 10 years ago.

The Commentary also confirms the equally important and epoch-making campaign against racism that Muhammad Haque had established immediately following the racist murder of Altab Ali in May 1978.

The key thesis is that both the campaign against racism around the racist murder of Altab Ali and nearly 30 years later [1978 to 2003] the campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the significantly Bangladeshi-populated Brick Lane London E1 area were founded by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign actively pushing ASIDE the “leadership” of the “Bangladesh-based” political groupings factions and parties operating in the UK where the presence of the significant Bangladeshi-Origin population is being obstructed by the exhibitionist and in many cases seriously irresponsible and divisive “politics” indulged in by the “Bangladesh-based political groupings”.

The Muhammad Haque Commentary also states that the same policy was adopted by Khoodeelaar! about the “mainstream” “British political parties” and their “Bangladeshi-Identified” “members” and “supporters” on the local political scene in Tower Hamlets.

The CONCLUSION of this analysis is that BOTH the Bangladesh-linked political groupings and the UK “Mainstream” Political Parties were irrelevant to the needs of the UK Bangladeshi community.

This has been seen time and again.

Illustrated so emphatically by the two most important campaigns both of which have played unparalleled part in protecting the overall and the key rights of the UK Bangladeshis.

And in the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole, Kay Jordan has played a very important part that must be fully appreciated recognised and emulated.



[To be continued]



Say No to COUNCIL SERVICE CUTS in Tower Hamlets: Say No to unfairness in Tower Hamlets [c]

Say No to COUNCIL SERVICE CUTS in Tower Hamlets: Say No to unfairness in Tower Hamlets [c]
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Report: [c] 1040 [0955] Hrs GMT

London

Wednesday

27 February 2013

How many “Commissions” have I actually founded and activated in the past half century?

By “Commissions” I mean the type of intellectual and consciousness-raising exercises that relate to and address the state of awareness of particular policies regarding Society.

I think I have done at least one major Commission every three years.

Dividing fifty years by 3, it is an easy 16 Commissions.

That is not including the “task forces” that I have had to assemble - “scramble” - at absolutely no notice at all over the past half century or so.

Defending Society and the idea of universal fairness and justice regardless of the individual origins or backgrounds in ethnicity, faith or no faith or gender of the people I have been advocating for! People PLUS beings, as in squirrels, pigeons and kittens and other creatures including Elephants and the thousands of species that are co-existing on our planet.

I begin the count in the early 1960s - doing so by ‘forgetting’ for a second, my stand, as the ONLY ONE in all the villages on both banks of my beloved river Kooeeahraa in October 1958, when Ayub Khan had imposed “martial law” on the then Pakistan-when the main intellectual and emotional attention had been demanded by the anti-social and anti-Societal diversion away from democracy that the Ayub Khan regime had set in.

For me, there was only one response: NO!

I continued to say No to Ayub Khan and then went on to say No to his successor Yahya Khan and also maintained by original diagnostic NO to their allies as typified by the flamboyant Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.

In my evidential finding, it was the Flamboyant Mr Bhutto who played a decisive role in creating the moral ground on which Mr Mujibur Rahman was able to later stand!

For “perpetuity”, politically speaking

Right now, at 26 and 27 February 2013, I am operating a series of task forces as well as maintaining at least four “Commissions”.

I shall be publishing the “fundings” of each in due course.


BACK to the Tower Hamlets Council’s PR exercise called “The Fairness Commission”. This is part of the currently “trendy” “commissions” that quite a few local Councils in England have set up in the past 18 months or so.

The idea behind these “Commissions” corresponding to each sponsoring “local Authority or borough Council” is definitely to create a sort of semi-academic, semi-neutral platform from where to point the finger at the Neo Conservative CONDEM Collusion over its CUTS policies.

This is why the “Commissions” have been found to be committing PARTISAN or “politically expedient” “investigations”.

The one in the name of the people of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets has The Tower Hamlets “Fairness Commission” abandons scheduled meeting and cuts short proceedings due to poor turnout in Stepney, London E1

Fairness Commission "Consultation Meeting" wrapped up early for poor attendance!

Amazingly, this meeting was supposed to be the last public event before the “Commission”, fronted by Giles Fraser, a trendy, Guardian-Friendly, Guardian-using London St Paul’s Cathedral-linked Anglican Clergyman, is due to report next month!

So when I arrived with a colleague from a Community organisation in EastOne London UK, minutes after 7 PM, an hour before the meeting was scheduled to close, I found that the clergyman Giles Fraser had just left and the rest of the “congregation” had gone home too!

“Poor turnout” was the reason, according to a young woman who spoke on behalf of the organisers of the meeting.

[To be continued]

Tower Hamlets “Fairness Commission” abandons schedule and cuts short last public meeting!

Tower Hamlets “Fairness Commission” abandons schedule and cuts short last public meeting!
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Report: [b] 1040 [0955] Hrs GMT

London

Wednesday

27 February 2013

How many “Commissions” have I actually founded and activated in the past half century?

By “Commissions” I mean the type of intellectual and consciousness-raising exercises that relate to and address the state of awareness of particular policies regarding Society.

I think I have done at least one major Commission every three years.

Dividing fifty years by 3, it is an easy 16 Commissions.

That is not including the “task forces” that I have had to assemble - “scramble” - at absolutely no notice at all over the past half century or so.

Defending Society and the idea of universal fairness and justice regardless of the individual origins or backgrounds in ethnicity, faith or no faith or gender of the people I have been advocating for! People PLUS beings, as in squirrels, pigeons and kittens and other creatures including Elephants and the thousands of species that are co-existing on our planet.

I begin the count in the early 1960s - doing so by ‘forgetting’ for a second, my stand, as the ONLY ONE in all the villages on both banks of my beloved river Kooeeahraa in October 1958, when Ayub Khan had imposed “martial law” on the then Pakistan-when the main intellectual and emotional attention had been demanded by the anti-social and anti-Societal diversion away from democracy that the Ayub Khan regime had set in.

For me, there was only one response: NO!

I continued to say No to Ayub Khan and then went on to say No to his successor Yahya Khan and also maintained by original diagnostic NO to their allies as typified by the flamboyant Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.

In my evidential finding, it was the Flamboyant Mr Bhutto who played a decisive role in creating the moral ground on which Mr Mujibur Rahman was able to later stand!

For “perpetuity”, politically speaking

Right now, at 26 and 27 February 2013, I am operating a series of task forces as well as maintaining at least four “Commissions”.

I shall be publishing the “fundings” of each in due course.


BACK to the Tower Hamlets Council’s PR exercise called “The Fairness Commission”. This is part of the currently “trendy” “commissions” that quite a few local Councils in England have set up in the past 18 months or so.

The idea behind these “Commissions” corresponding to each sponsoring “local Authority or borough Council” is definitely to create a sort of semi-academic, semi-neutral platform from where to point the finger at the Neo Conservative CONDEM Collusion over its CUTS policies.

This is why the “Commissions” have been found to be committing PARTISAN or “politically expedient” “investigations”.

The one in the name of the people of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets has The Tower Hamlets “Fairness Commission” abandons scheduled meeting and cuts short proceedings due to poor turnout in Stepney, London E1

Fairness Commission "Consultation Meeting" wrapped up early for poor attendance!

Amazingly, this meeting was supposed to be the last public event before the “Commission”, fronted by Giles Fraser, a trendy, Guardian-Friendly, Guardian-using London St Paul’s Cathedral-linked Anglican Clergyman, is due to report next month!

So when I arrived with a colleague from a Community organisation in EastOne London UK, minutes after 7 PM, an hour before the meeting was scheduled to close, I found that the clergyman Giles Fraser had just left and the rest of the “congregation” had gone home too!

“Poor turnout” was the reason, according to a young woman who spoke on behalf of the organisers of the meeting.

[To be continued]

East End of London Political Poetry called in to defend the idea of justice and fairness...

East End of London Political Poetry called in to defend the idea of justice and fairness...
2000 Hrs GMT

Whitechapel Road

London

Tuesday

26 February 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Political Poetry: How strange that you still put on hat smug confident face even when you are worse than dead! [1]

Naah!

I don’t decry you?

You alive?

If you are alive, I could never ever decry you!

Remember this.

Remember that.

Remember forever.

I could not ever decry a living you.

I could not decry you when deceased either.

So what I do decry and would decry and have decried

is your false position: neither dead nor alive.

Your pretence.

The pretence you is the most barren form of you

It is also the most treacherous

It is at once the worst fraud.

This is what I do decry

this is what I will decry

this what I must decry.

You fake it when you must oppose fraud and fakery

You lie when you must tell the truth uncover the lies

You betray when you must be the most trustworthy

You deny when you must be the first to recognise

the truth the poverty the deception the theft the looting

You must rush to the scene and take the stand

yet you scour you disappear and you lie!

This is worse than the worst gloom of death

you are dead even before you are dead

you are voluntarily dead even before your fated death

You put on the smile you wear the gear you walk the walk

you fake it and you can’t even look at the fakery of your fantasy!



[To be continued]





KHOODEELAAR! continues to point the way and provide the example of how to keep Brick Lane ....[2]

KHOODEELAAR! continues to point the way and provide the example of how to keep Brick Lane ....[2]
Deputy Mayor supports Muhammad Haque over Brick Lane future:



The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Brick Lane Curry Riestaurants face stark, bleak and sinking future: UPDATE [2]

0915 [0900] [0715] [0700] Hrs GMT London Monday 25 February 2013.

The Brick Lane Curry Restaurants featured in a tax dodge item run on BSKYB Channel 814 on Sunday 24 February 2013.

The real dodge is the fact that the "restaurant owners" are in denial about the very serious decline in the "Curry" trade as associated with "restaurants". This week also sees the end of the local Tower Hamlets Council's formal "consultations” on the future of “licensed” premises, which came into focus following widespread outrage felt by ordinary local residents as well as by the wider community in the “Brick Lane London E1 area”.

In that “consultation” one thing that has been noticed has been the ABSENCE of the “Curry House Restaurant Owners” from active participation.

With very, very minor exceptions.

So the “regulation” by the “local” Tower Hamlets, London Borough Council, of some of the worst offences done in the name of “promoting” individual restaurants’ “offers” to passers-by and others who could not be more uninterested in having anything at all to do with these “houses”, is once again going to become a topical issue among some.

Not enough activity is noticed on the part of the Council itself either.

When I attempted to speak - at the “consultation” meeting staged on 13 February 2013 at the Toynbee Hall, Commercial Street, London E1--about Brick Lane in the context of the “licensed premises and their implications for the local community and the curry houses”, an un-named [so far, to my knowledge] bureaucrat who ran the show which was apparently being chaired by Tower Hamlets Council “deputy” mayor Ohid Ahmed -- interrupted me three times and “accused” [!!!] me of having arrived late at the “event”!

The idiotic interruptions confirmed once again that Tower Hamlets Council employees were among the elements that were doing damage to the local community and to the local businesses.

The man was so ignorant that he thrice failed to show any recognition of what I was saying!

And the fact that I had been saying the right things that needed to be said, was proved by the statement that the Chair of the meeting, Ohid Ahmed, said when he stood up to make his comments by way of brining the "meeting" to a close.

Ohid Ahmed's first comments were made in support of me.

Ohid Ahmed hesitated for bait, as to whether to refer to me by my surname or to address me as his [older] Brother. He settled on the latter before saying that he agreed with me fully.

That was followed by Ohid confirming once again what I had said when he spoke to me on camera [which I then published as a youtube post on the BrickLane News youtube channel].

[To be continued]



KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Hour! Some key Ethical Sources for advocating for rights [2]

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Hour!  Some key Ethical Sources for advocating for rights  [2]
Muhammad Haque pictured by AADHIKARMedia while presenting the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Hour! on “Betar Bangla” radio, from the East End of London, UK, on Thursday 21 February 2013




0840 [0830] Hrs GMT London Sunday 24 February 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Hour [2]

I have been presenting this Campaign Hour since September 2012 on a “community” radio station, www.betarbangla.org.uk accessible online as well as on the band 1503 AM each Thursday from 1700 Hrs GMT to 1800 Hrs GMT.

I do not seek nor receive nor crave a remuneration for doing so.

I do this as part of the Campaigning advocacy for the rights of the people.

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Hour has been advocating the key values of establishing the rights of the ordinary people and in doing so it has also been empirically and evidentially spelling out and been originally updating the criteria for the defence and the advancement of universal values.

Those can be found in the United Nations’ Founding declarations upholding human rights.

The EVIDENCE for emphatic advocacy for the rights of the people being advocated for are present in the population in a widely labelled “most deprived, inner city, London, England” borough and its population [Tower Hamlets London Borough Council]. The same values and the same principles can be extrapolated and extended to apply to other people experiencing the same challenges and the same obstacles in other parts of London, England, the UK and the rest of the world.

The nearest Constitutional Law instrument that can be cited here is of course the European Convention on Human Rights [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_Human_Rights ] that spells out some of the key principles as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the founding declamations of the United Nations Organisation.

These in turn are derived from the traditions of earlier advocates, as exemplified by the philosophers in Greece, as represented by Socrates and his students and followers and later by the likes of the Caliph Omar, to name only a few.

The thinker Imam Ghazzali did a great deal to interpret and establish some of the key aspects of the same universal values.

The values have been taking a long time in coming across in real Society.

The campaigns for establishing universal values for a just and fair Society have continued, with a variety of interruptions, obstacles and delays.

In a more recent demonstration of the values, the thoughts of the English-born activist and campaigner Tom Paine [a typical but NOT definitive summary on his works and life can be seen online at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Paine].

The most recent contributions include the works, in aspects, of what is called the Marxist thinkers.

I say “in aspects” because of the centralist collectivist thesis on which the premisses of most of what is known as the Marxist thinkers is based.

The “synthesis” [to rhetorically borrow a term from one of the foregoing schools and sources] that I have made and the one that I have been advocating on the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Hour is the product of my recognising what I find to be the universally free and independent component of all the schools and sources.

Advisedly, I am not mentioning any of the “faith” texts and sources. This is not to exclude let alone deny the contributions that all the “faith” texts have made and continue to the make to the analysis and diagnostics that I advocate and represent. This is merely to leave out of the pragmatic equation the powerful forces of the “faiths” which would cause the discourse to be taken on to a different, almost deity-ruled definition. That definition would be a very different one from the definition that I am applying here and designating as the universal definition. Or as “a universal” definition.

The test has been the empirical perceptions of each issue of democracy delivery that the average listener experiencers.

So far, the feedback, in the main, shows a high the level of approval. Most of those who have called the programme about its current duration [the maximum of 60 minutes, from 1700 Hrs GMT to 1800 Hrs GMT on betarbangla.org.uk and betarbangla.co.uk] have asked for an extension to the duration.

The reason, as found in the comments on air, has been the exclusive and the appropriate and the overdue contents and the analysis.

Based on that, I can say that the programme has filled a need for evidence based comments on Society generally and a democratic audit and accountability as I have sought to apply on the duties of the elected holders of publicly paid offices at local, regional and UK central levels.

[To be continued]






Callers to the Khoodeelaar! Campaign Hour have once again reiterated the demand for an extended slot on the London community radio station “Betar Bangla”.

The calls came on Thursday 21 February 2013 during the latest once-a week programme presented by Khoodeelaar! Campaigns Organiser Muhammad Haque.

This edition was almost wholly devoted to the works of the Rebel Poet Qazi Nazrul Islam, who wrote in the Bangla script but encompassed in his writings the widest known vocabulary drawn from a very large number of sources, ‘languages’ way beyond the geography of the Bangla language speaking peoples.

Muhammad Haque, an avid student of the Rebel Poetry of Qazi Nazrul Islam, read short lines from the Nazrul Poetry collection [=] “Shauncheeta”.

The edition of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Hour ended with Muhammad Haque reciting the lines:

[here interpreted into English by Muhammad Haque]



“I shall rest only on that day when the cries and groans of the oppressed will not echo in the winds and the skies;

when the sharp knives ... of the oppressor will no longer reign in the battlefield...”



[To be continued]

CONDEMN CONDEM Cameron caught as a courier for causers of wars against innocent humanity!

CONDEMN CONDEM Cameron caught as a courier for causers of wars against innocent humanity!



CONDEMN CONDEM Cameron caught as a courier for causers of wars against innocent humanity!


[To be continued]


REMINDER of the time when a Kay Jordan Kitten engaged in an action with a fox...

REMINDER of the time when a Kay Jordan Kitten engaged in an action with a fox...
By © Muhammad Haque
0720 Hrs GMT London Friday 22 February 2013


THIS PICTURE, of a cat taking on a crock and winning, reminds of the night in Brick Lane when a Kay Jordan Kitten got engaged in an almost analogous action, defending his birth place against what he clearly thought was an invader fox. The Kitten 'won’.

For days and weeks and months afterwards, the very proud Kay Jordan regaled close friends with the details of the action!
CLICK on the picture to access the online DAILY MAIL news story of the Cat “winning” the action...
[To be continued]

"SAVE Altab Ali Park from hateful Bangladesh-linked political groupings" [1]

"SAVE Altab Ali Park from hateful Bangladesh-linked political groupings" [1]
2150 Hrs GMT London Thursday 21 February 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Linguistic Ethical Commentary:

[2] Altab Ali Park is targeted as the hottest political spot by Bangladesh-linked groups.

This © Muhammad Haque picture, taken in the mid afternoon today Thursday 21 February 2013, shows a leading speaker for the group, Mufti Sadruddin deriding current Bangladesh premier S.Hasina while M. A Malek [to the left in the photo] looks on.
In his harangue [pictured] this afternoon, Mufti Sadruddin was loud and noisy in using sub-parliamentary language when denouncing “opponents of Islam and Muslims in today's Bangladesh”.

If S. Hasina has any “lessons” for the likes of her flaunted opponents then it is one about the need to be modest and measured when condemning your opponents. S. Hasina is described as a mentally deranged woman in desperate need for a variety of high-velocity medical and psychiatric treatment. This appears as an “Opinion” [by readers’, piece] in this week’s edition of the London based Bangla language weekly title “Bangla Post”. The writer, according to sources at “Bangla Post” speaking to me this evening, is a clinically qualified doctor in practice.

The idea that your political opponents, because they oppose your views or programmes, “deserve to be hanged” belongs in the dark ages.

The DARK AGES are one huge justification for the arrival of the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad [Peace Be Upon Him].

So when the rally held at the Altab Ali Park this afternoon backing Ghulam Azam, Dilwar Hussain Saidee and Kader Molla - all undergoing various stages of trials in Bangladesh on alleged crimes “against humanity” including “war crimes” in “1971” -heard calls for the hanging of various members of the present Bangladesh Government, it becomes very hard to treat as rational the pleas by the same quarters for humanitarian and just treatment by the same regime!

If the S. Hasina-fronted regime in Bangladesh is as coarse, as gross and as criminal as the speakers of the Ghulam Azam-supporting groupings claimed it to be then the ALTERNATIVE to the S. Hasina-fronted “brutal Swami fascist” “Government” will not be likely to be sought from among the ranks of these speakers and their groups.

This would indeed be a doubly ironic outcome.

Because not only would the objects of their “international rallying of support”, namely G. Azam, DH Saidee and Kader Molla be left without a credible set of supporters but that the country itself, Bangladesh and its 160 million people, would be left without any choice out of the darkness that S. Hasina, according to this afternoon's speakers typified by Mufti Sadruddin, has plunged it into.

Time then to call for a campaign to liberate the Altab Ali Park from the hateful harangues of the Bangladesh-linked political groupings.

[To be continued]

Altab Ali Park Thursday 21 February 2013: very odd words! [1]

Altab Ali Park Thursday 21 February 2013: very odd words! [1]
This AADHIKARONline Montage is based on pictures by © Muhammad Haque taken at the Altab Ali Park this afternoon.

[To be continued]

POVERTY CREATED in Tower Hamlets by the State, local Council and Big Business....

POVERTY CREATED in Tower Hamlets by the State, local Council and  Big Business....
0955 Hrs GMT London Thursday 21 February 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Tower Hamlets Council as a location for the Neo Cons NEW aggravated POVERTY CREATION PROGRAMME
POVERTY-CREATED in Britain by Neo Cons CONDEM.
As it had been created before by Neo Cons Bliar Brigade occupying the “elected” offices of the UK State as they suriepd the universal human rights of the people they violated.
The CPGB’s organ the “Morning Star” [see below] failed to diagnose the Bliaring poverty creations programme as accurately, courageously and comprehensively as the evidence warranted.
The “organ” is still doing so [see below] under the CONDEM Collusion. There is a NEW AGE OF DARKNESS underway in Britain right now, at Thursday 21 February 2013, when the falsifiers, typified by the OTT-promoted “Quiet Man” the insidious faker and dismember Iain Duncan Smith is being flaunted as the “image of reason” [mostly based on the manufactured face of the “harmless bald” one!] when the fact is that it is the NASTY PARTY being relaunched every day. Every day that the Murdoch LYING Machine, [its ORIGINAL SITE OF SIN: SUN-SIN] based Multifariously ironically in Tower Hamlets, one of the most undeniably “deprived” boroughs in all of England [see even the EVENING STANDARD report on “child poverty” on Wednesday 20 February 2013] propagates the criminally distorted image of the poor “as the robbers of the rich...”!



AADHIKAROnline the © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary retrieved the following item from the website of the CPGB daily the Morning Star at appx 0935 Hrs GMT today Thursday 21 February 2013:

Half of urban kids in poverty

Wednesday 20 February 2013

by Luke James

A shocking new map of Britain which reveals almost half of all children living in major cities are growing up in poverty was unveiled today by a coalition of major charities.

Millions of children across Britain are "having to go hungry and miss out on the essentials of a decent childhood," according to the Campaign to End Child Poverty (CECP).

Its analysis of government figures shows that one in five children lives with the "corrosive impact" of poverty every day.

But that rises to over 40 per cent of children in areas of Manchester, Belfast, Glasgow, Birmingham, central and east London, Liverpool and Middlesbrough.

Barnado's chief executive Anne Marie Carrie insisted the statistics merely "mask the individual stories of millions of children, whose life chances are being compromised" by "government failure."

The Institute for Fiscal Studies has already warned 400,000 more children will be dragged into poverty by the end of this parliament in 2015.

And CECP chairman Enver Solomon said today a further 200,000 children are "set to become trapped in long-term poverty and disadvantage" as a direct result of their government's welfare reforms.

Mr Solomon urged local authorities to shield the poorest from the Con-Dem government's bedroom tax and council tax benefit cuts.

But TUC general secretary Frances O'Grady predicted services for vulnerable children will be put under "tremendous strain" as the Westminster government is also slashing funding for the local authorities who run them.

She said: "Countless studies have shown that children who grow-up in poverty are far less likely to do well at school or find long-term employment.

"The UK simply cannot afford for any more of its youngsters to be consigned to the scrapheap of inactivity."

Manchester Central, where almost half of all children were living in poverty last year, tops the toxic league table of Britain's constituencies.

Labour MP for the area Lucy Powell reacted angrily to the news, which she labelled a "horrible reflection of our society."

Ms Powell said her constituency also has "the highest number of people affected by the bedroom tax and a council facing some of the worst cuts of any local authority.

"What we deserve to know is: why are the government singling out Manchester to bear the worst of these cuts when figures like these show we can bear it the least?"

The report comes just months after a survey by Save the Children which revealed one in five children had to go without new shoes.

Prime Minister David Cameron and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg both represent areas with low levels of child poverty.

HOUSING is a universal human right being denied by Neo Cons ideology and rampant capitalist thieves

HOUSING is a universal human right being denied by Neo Cons ideology and rampant capitalist thieves
  Comment

Housing is a public right

Tuesday 19 February 2013



Plaid Cymru housing spokesman Rhodri Glyn Thomas's call for action over the housing crisis in Wales, exemplified by the phenomenon of about 26,000 empty homes, may seem a problem peculiar to that country.

Wales certainly has specific challenges in providing homes for its population, not least the tendency of people from wealthier parts of Britain to buy property in beautiful rural areas.

This prices local people out of the housing market and can also affect the viability of Welsh-language communities, although many incomers choose to learn Welsh.

People have an absolute right to move around Britain and it would be wrong to blame them for economic problems associated with housing in Wales, Cornwall, the Lake District or other locations where wage levels are low and property prices rising.

---- MORNING STAR [CPGB] Half-exposing the inherent and the rampant corruption that is market capitalism:

The reason behind the mismatch is politicians' inability to look beyond the supremacy of markets to formulate economic policy.

Governments are loth to intervene in markets as though this were a mortal sin even though the negative effects of unrestrained markets are easily seen.

The Westminster consensus to leave provision of homes to market forces has put additional pressure on what remains of council housing and thrown millions of poor people into the clutches of grasping private landlords. In little over a month, the Tory-led government will impose regulations to strip claimants, whether in work or not, of 14 per cent of housing benefit if they are adjudged to have an "underoccupied" bedroom.

The penalty for having two such bedrooms would rise to 25 per cent, leaving tenants facing a forced transfer or eviction for non-payment of rent.

Chancellor George Osborne and well-heeled Tory commentator Dominic Lawson see no problem with this situation, even seeking to pass it off as social fairness.

They are more taken with the plight of people unfortunate enough to be living in properties worth over £2 million after Labour leader Ed Miliband announced that he favoured a tax on such homes to pay for restoration of the 10p tax band.

Osborne claims that this would mean having "to send inspectors round the country valuing all the homes, not just the homes worth over £2 million but those worth less."

Why this should be necessary he doesn't say, any more than he explains how much bureaucracy would be entailed in identifying all the "underoccupied" bedrooms.

---- Lawson reverts to Thatcher-era mythology about the problem for a "little old lady" living in a "home above a certain value" being able to pay her tax.

No such sentiment attaches to people - little or large, woman or man - who have lived for decades in their homes and face eviction after the death of their partner or when their children leave home.

In any event, councils don't have enough one-bedroom homes to accommodate all these "underoccupiers," proving that the conservative coalition's main concern is undermining council tenants' right of tenure.

Housing remains fundamental to many of the social divisions in Britain today and will be so until it is treated as an essential service.

Homes, whether publicly or privately owned, should not be permitted to remain empty for nine-tenths of the year.

Westminster, Cardiff and Edinburgh should have the powers and the finance to tackle the failings of the housing market, raise finance from those who have grown rich through speculation and build or upgrade enough homes to house everyone.

The Neon Cons Railways Bosses Robbery is at one with PRIVATISING CRIME Trade

The Neon Cons Railways Bosses Robbery is at one with PRIVATISING CRIME Trade
0840 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
18 February 2013
Aadhikaronline © Muhammad Haque diagnosing Poverty-creation in Britain where Neo-Cons assaults on Society go on unabated across the disintegrating “Kingdom’:

POVERTY ON THE TERRACES as football fans suffer exorbitant ticket prices:
RETRIVED at 0830 GMT Monday 18 february 2013 from the web site fo the Glasgow DAILY RECORD




By Jack Mathieson

Special report:

Scots football fans face sky-high prices to support their team at matches 18 Feb 2013 00:01

FOOTBALL fans believe a drop in match ticket prices would encourage more people to attend games rather than watching Sky Sports News for results.

Send  A drop in prices would encourage more fans to go to games

William Thornton/Daily Record SPL football is still the most expensive show in town at a time when even the game’s European rulers are slashing ticket prices.

UEFA have cut the cost of the cheapest briefs for the Champions League final at Wembley by £90 compared with two years ago. The European governing body are selling 16,800 tickets for £60 each. In 2011, the category-four tickets were £150 plus a £26 admin charge.

UEFA president Michel Platini has admitted the earlier prices were “a mistake”.

Meanwhile, Scottish football bosses still stand accused of pricing ordinary working-class supporters out of the game.

Clubs point to the discounts available for fans who take up offers or buy season tickets.

But it is still prohibitively expensive for supporters to just turn up at a game – particularly if they have children in tow.

An Record investigation has revealed that the cost of taking kids to a game dwarfs that of going to the cinema, swimming pool or safari park.

Hearts season ticket holder Dean Borthwick, 46, who also goes to Jambos’ away matches with sons Jordan, 14, and Ryan, 12, ran his eye over our findings.

He said: “There’s no chance of us sitting in a cinema on a Saturday afternoon instead of going to a game.

“But a day out at the match is very expensive, especially when travel costs are factored in. You get little change from £100.

“We find we have to keep an eye on offers and get tickets early to try to knock a bit off the cost.

“A drop in prices would certainly encourage people to go to games instead of spending Saturday afternoons in front of Sky Sports News.”

 Football-daft dad Dean Borthwick with his sons Ryan, 12, and Jordan, 14 David Johnstone   In an exclusive Daily Record poll of fans last year, 92 per cent called for reduced prices, with 42 per cent saying £10-£15 per match would be fair.

Sixty-three per cent of fans said lower prices would make them go to more games.

But Kilmarnock chairman Michael Johnston, who has struggled to attract fans to Rugby Park, said yesterday that season tickets were on offer which worked out at just £20 a match for a family of four.

And Paul Goodwin, head of Supporters Direct Scotland, said:

“Reducing ticket prices might have a short-term impact but it is not the solution.

“The whole package has to be improved. It needs to be a joined-up approach, looking at many different facets including catering and facilities.”

TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL bureaucracy is in a state of crisis [22]

TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL bureaucracy is in  a state of crisis [22]
TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL bureaucracy is in a state of crisis that is looking increasingly in a terminal mode...

The © Muhammad Haque Daily ethical Commentary
2345 Hrs GMT London Sunday 17 February 2013


AADHIKAROnline retrieved the following item from the eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk website at 2335 Hrs GMT Sunday 17 february 2013

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/tower_hamlets_council_slammed_by_government_minister_brandon_lewis_over_ofcom_report_1_1936608

Tower Hamlets Council slammed by government minister Brandon Lewis over Ofcom report
Robin de Peyer
Saturday, February 16, 2013

6:34 PM
Government ministers have criticised Tower Hamlets Council and Mayor Lutfur Rahman for “a worrying pattern of divisive community politics and mismanagement of council staff and resources”.
Parliamentary under-secretary for local government Brandon Lewis launched the attack after a question from MP for Poplar and Limehouse Jim Fitzpatrick in the House of Commons.
Mr Fitzpatrick asked what sanctions the government was considering imposing after broadcasting watchdog Ofcom censured five television channels in January for carrying political advertisements promoting the Mayor, at the taxpayer’s expense.
Mr Lewis, a Conservative MP for Great Yarmouth, responded: “The use of taxpayers’ money for political campaigning is simply not acceptable, and this is in addition to Tower Hamlets’ disregard of the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity through its continuing publication of its weekly propaganda newspaper, East End Life.
“Such actions are not just a misuse of public funds; they are ultimately harmful to local democracy and an independent, free press.
“It is also further evidence of a worrying pattern of divisive community politics and mismanagement of council staff and resources by the mayoral administration”, he added.
It is the second time in as many weeks Tower Hamlets Council has been rebuked by ministers in the Commons, with Communities Secretary Eric Pickles on record as saying he is “very unhappy with what is going on in the borough”.
The borough’s Conservative group leader Cllr Peter Golds complained to Ofcom after an advertisement was shown across five Bangladeshi television channels in January last year.
It featured photographs of Mayor Rahman in the cab of a digger and inspecting a flat, and outlined his aims for improving the borough’s housing situation. His signature and title were also shown prominently on screen throughout the 30 second broadcast.
The watchdog’s report, published in January 2013, found the broadcasts breached its code of conduct. Tower Hamlets Council declined to comment on the report, and has previously dismissed ministers’ concerns over East End Life, insisting it complied with the code of conduct referred to by Mr Lewis.

Sunday Politics in the UK is barren, boring and timid 17 February 2013

Sunday Politics in the UK is barren, boring and timid 17 February 2013
Sunday Politics in the UK is barren, boring and timid 17 February 2013


“Tower Hamlets Council in a state of bureaucratic and administrative dysfunction” “Discuss” [N'th]

“Tower Hamlets Council in a state of bureaucratic and administrative dysfunction” “Discuss” [N'th]
This picture is a few years old
It has Carole Swords speaking against Council housing stock transfer by Tower Hamlets Council
Carole Swords spoke at a time when there was wider spread support to what is now felt to be an ancient feeling: a community feeling!!!!. The group in the picture even includes a current [2013] Labour Party councillor on Tower Hamlets Council
This councillor was NOT A COUNCILLOR, could not have been a councillor when the picture was taken. He would be very reluctant now to be seen anywhere near Carole Swords, politically speaking.

But has EITHER the ‘Respect Party’ [Carole Swords] or the Tower Hamlets Labour Party [Khales Uddin] anything to offer to the people in Tower Hamlets who are facing very real assaults under the CONDEM attacks on housing and social and environmental rights?

[To be continued]



The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Diagnosis and Commentary:

“Tower Hamlets Council in a state of bureaucratic and administrative dysfunction” “Discuss” !

[1]

0758 Hrs GMT

London

Saturday

16 February 2013

We [AADHIKAR Media, AADHIKAROnline, KHOODEELAAR! CBRUK, Kay Jordan Foundation,. All Volunteers News and 40 plus associated initiatives and action groups defending the East End of London] SAID in March 2012:

"Tower Hamlets Council is in crisis!" KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012, COMING

And in the YEAR that has followed, we stated and elaborated on an updated that Manifesto!

We are the only publication online and in print to have said this.

In all that time, every single day, we have witnessed the behaviour of certain Fleet Street-linked "writers" who have apparently reported on the "goings-on" in Tower Hamlets

That Manifesto has just got reinforced and factually evidentially empirically updated just a few minutes ago, at about 0730 Hrs GMT this morning Saturday 16 February 2013 in the Whitechapel Road ‘market’ where a vegetable stall-holder called out to your reporter and wanted to chat.

The chat began with a reference to one of the two ‘Respect’ councillors on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council. That the RESPECT councillors were not making any waves on the present Tower Hamlets Council was made very clear.

But the stallholder then said that the same could be said of the ‘others’ and that included the ‘MPs’ and all that! A very clear portrayal that early in the morning.

A Portrayal that accurately reflects our own diagnostic reports over the past year.

This morning, the task has gotten even more emphatic, given the DAILY TELEGRAPH has allowed yet another piece to be carried by Andrew Gilligan about Tower Hamlets Council

[To be continued

[The bits below are from our publication in March 2012]

IN THE COMING weeks we shall publish the Manifesto for a Tower Hamlets Council that is fit for purpose to meet the legitimate needs of the local community.

Here [below] are the contextual updates and campaigning introductions as we mark the 7th year since the first KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto of December 2005:

The Campaign agenda of KHOODEELAAR! No to “All attacks on the community typified and pronounced in the Crossrail hole agenda” has ALSO meant the demand for the legitimate recognition of the community in Tower Hamlets [made up of ordinary people] by the “legitimately established democratically verified” institutions.

Six years on from that Khoodeelaar! demo against the Crossrail hole-inviting role of the Tower Hamlets, have those who have made careers by the “claiming identity with” KHOODEELAAR! during that period and in the pre-Council election weeks” in 2006 acted properly SINCE THEN have they behaved accountably and selflessly?

Have they delivered to the community in Tower Hamlets as a whole, as opposed to operating in collusion with and as de facto parts of the agendas of the unaccountable and publicly illegitimate and ill-identified outfits, tendencies and groupings and interests?

Have they made the community proud or have they scandalised and let the community down?”

[TO BE CONTINUED]



THREE YEARS ago, in February 2010, Rania Khan spoke against Elected Mayor system in Tower Hamlets

THREE YEARS ago, in February 2010, Rania Khan spoke against Elected Mayor system in Tower Hamlets


The "news" [via the “local” “East London Advertiser” website] that Tower Hamlets Councillor "Motin-uz-Zaman" has "declared" himself a likely Labour Party candidate for the executive mayor election in 2014 must be treated with the only retrospective contextual analysis that the community campaign for a democratic Tower Hamlets Council can conduct.

That campaign is BHANGEELAAR!, the original NO to elected Mayor in Tower Hamlets Campaign, launched in january 2010.

This BHANGEELAAR! campaign picture taken in the Greatorex Street London E1 on Saturday 06 february 2010 shows [then George Galloway-led ‘Respect’ “party” Cllr] Rania Khan who spoke at the meeting against having an elected Mayor.

[To be continued]

When there was a campaign against an elecetd mayor system in Tower Hamlets: Feb 2010

When there was a campaign against an elecetd mayor system in  Tower Hamlets: Feb 2010
The "news" [via the “local” “East London Advertiser” website] that Tower Hamlets Councillor "Motin-uz-Zaman" has "declared" himself a likely Labour Party candidate for the executive mayor election in 2014 must be treated with the only retrospective contextual analysis that the community campaign for a democratic Tower Hamlets Council can conduct.

That campaign is BHANGEELAAR!, the original NO to elected Mayor in Tower Hamlets Campaign, launched in january 2010.

This BHANGEELAAR! campaign picture shows a group taking part in the NO campaign meeting organised by the Bethnal Green South Ward Labour Party in February 2010.

Significantly, the picture shows Mr Abu Taher wearing glasses who spoke at the meeting against having an elected Mayor.

[To be continued]

Lutfur's Brick Lane POVERTY crisis: What does he know, what should he do?

Lutfur's Brick Lane POVERTY crisis: What does he know, what should he do?
By © Muhammad Haque

0725 Hrs GMT London Thursday 14 February 2013

IS the “inner city London Borough” exposed in the COMMENT published on the Guardian, London, by any chance an East London Borough?

Could the Borough be “Tower Hamlets”, where Lutfur Rahman, the “executive mayor” has reportedly returned from a trip that has included his being filmed seated chatting with an Islamic religious official in the Holy City of Makkah [Mecca], as shown on the Rupert Murdoched BSKYB satellite Channel 814 in the evening of Wednesday 13 February 2013????


The COMMENT retrieved at 0700 GMT Thursday 14 February 2013 is reproduced below after minor editing. It is a damning comment on the shallow Opposition in the UK Parliament as well as the scandalous collusion by the Labour Party with the Neo Cons’ racist assault on the human rights of “Foreigners” and “immigrants”.


You report Ed Miliband as saying at the PMQs on 13 February 2013:

The Guardian web page containing the Comment is accessible by visiting:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/feb/13/justice-immigrant-david-cameron?fb=native&commentpage=1

"There's a living standards crisis for the many and all he does is stand up for the few at the top."

So what does Mr Miliband and his "Opposition" front bench in the UK House of Commons stand up for?

Logically speaking that would be the "many at the bottom"?

NOT SO if the evidence of the combined role in the relevant factual context of the "Labour" "MP" and the "Labour Councillor" in one inner city London Borough, frequently cited as one of the "poorest" boroughs in the Country, is any guide.

The “role” concerns the operation of what can only be called the social cleansing agenda in the particular borough by the employees in the housing benefits section of the given Borough council and the “Labour MP” and the “Labour councillor” allowed the series of attacks on the housing, the benefits and the health rights of the affected family that has been legally, legitimately resient in the UK Borough for over 40 years.

All relevant indications clearly point to what would happen were the “Miliband” name to be attached to the address called No 10 Downing Street as “the occupier” in the near future.

“Immigrants” - as a generic group in the vocabulary of the Neon Cons Right that Cameron is sucking up to - which your headline and story apparently sympathetically portrays as the targets of the Right-lurching Cameron assault will be treated with severe contempt by the [at the moment, notional] Miliband regime!

That is a bad enough prospect for decent life for “immigrants” in “the Mother of Civilisation” [!!].

You make the picture look even gloomier by your reference to one of the trading lawyers’ Closed Shops, the Bar Council which you only bring in because of the “legal aid”.

Had you cared to consider the real implications of the lawless and illegal pandering by Cameron you would have to admit too that the licensed law traders are violating their universal obligations to uphold universal values and rights of the people so routinely racistly stigmatised by the habitual propensity to criminal fabrication by the racists in Political office, in the Media and in the associated positions of power in the UK.



Slave labour by CONDEM, IDS, is EXPOSED and declared unlawful! Work NEEDED to KEEP it unlawful

Slave labour by CONDEM, IDS, is EXPOSED and declared unlawful! Work NEEDED to KEEP it unlawful
AADHIKARonline

Retrieved from the web site of the London EVENING STANDARD at 1720 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 12 February 2013:

Graduate wins court fight that 'slave labour' at Poundland was unlawful
- Government faces claims as judges say jobseekers can’t be made to work free
- Ruling 'means everyone who had dole stopped for non-compliance can get it back'
 Win: Cait Reilly scored a victory at the High Court

Nicholas Cecil


12 February 2013

A university graduate was unlawfully made to work for nothing at Poundland under a government scheme, the Court of Appeal ruled today.

Cait Reilly, 24, claimed that requiring her to work for nothing breached laws on forced labour. She said this afternoon: “I don’t think I am above working in shops like Poundland. I now work part-time in a supermarket. It is just that I expect to get paid for working.”

In a deeply embarrassing blow to the Coalition, three judges found regulations for most back-to-work programmes were flawed. Lawyers for Miss Reilly claimed thousands who have been docked benefit for not taking part in work schemes are now entitled to refunds.

But ministers are to appeal against the judgment and rushed to bring in emergency regulations to carry on legally with the schemes. The Government will also fight attempts to make it pay back withheld benefits.

Miss Reilly, from Birmingham, and 40-year-old  former HGV driver Jamieson Wilson, from Nottingham, both succeeded in their claims against the Government which was found to have failed to be sufficiently specific in regulations governing the programmes.

Letters sent to jobseekers put on the schemes also did not explain clearly enough what sanctions there would be for not taking up work offered.

Miss Reilly said: “I brought this case because I knew it was wrong when I was prevented from doing my voluntary work in a museum and forced to work in Poundland for free for two weeks. Those two weeks were a complete waste of my time as the experience did not help me get a job.”

Employment minister Mark Hoban said he was “disappointed and surprised” at the court’s decision on the regulations. He added:

“It’s ridiculous to say this is forced labour.

“There needed to be flexibility so we could give people the right support to meet their needs and get them into a job. We do not agree with the court’s judgment and are seeking permission to appeal, but new regulations will be tabled to avoid any uncertainty.”

In November 2011, Miss Reilly had to leave her voluntary work at a local museum and work unpaid at the Poundland store in Kings Heath, Birmingham, under a scheme known as the “sector-based work academy”.

She was told that if she did not carry out the placement she would lose jobseeker’s allowance. For two weeks she stacked shelves and cleaned floors.

Mr Wilson, a qualified mechanic, was told that he had to work unpaid, cleaning furniture for 30 hours a week for six months, under a scheme known as the Community Action Programme.

He objected to doing unpaid work that was unrelated to his qualifications. He refused to participate and as a result was stripped of his jobseeker’s allowance for six months.

In the summer, Mr Justice Foskett, sitting at the High Court in London, said that

characterising the Poundland scheme “as involving or being analogous to ‘slavery’ or ‘forced labour’ seems to me to be a long way from contemporary thinking”.

After today’s ruling Public Interest Lawyers, who represent Ms Reilly and Mr Wilson, said the Court of Appeal’s unanimous decision was a “huge setback” for the Department for Work and Pensions.

Solicitor Tessa Gregory, said:

“All of those who have been stripped of their benefits have a right to claim the money back that has been unlawfully taken away from them.”

Homelessness in Tower Hamlets has been CAUSED By Tower Hamlets Council - a 40th anniversary UPDATER

Homelessness in Tower Hamlets has been CAUSED By Tower Hamlets Council - a 40th anniversary UPDATER
The Homelessness in Tower Hamlets that has been CAUSED By Tower Hamlets Council - NOT by cuts! a 40th anniversary UPDATER Investigation [1] The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical REPORT 0920 Hrs GMT London Friday 08 February 2013

Tower Hamlets Council has been CAUSING homelessness for the past fifty years.

One set of homelessness created by Tower Hamlets Council in the 1960s is still continuing, with this exclusive report being based on the facts.

As we publish this, Tower Hamlets Council’s “executive mayor” Lutfur Rahman is understood to be on his way back to the Borough, after yet another trip to unpublicised destination/s away from Tower Hamlets

Whatever the destination, Lutfur Rahman’s return will NOT stop the wasteful behaviour of the causers of homelessness who are paid for by Tower Hamlets Council in the name of the people of the Borough.

Things have not changed in 45 years in Tower Hamlets Council

So bad is the absence of the application of due process from the constitutional law-related but UNCONSTITUTIONAL behaviour of Tower Hamlets Council’s highly paid “head of legal” that an MP, the Conservative Member for Bromley and Chislehurst was able to spend over an hour making allegations against the Council in an extraordinary “debate”.

Robert Neill, the MP known as Bob Neill, was scathing as he listed the many unconstitutional and abusive activities by Isabella Freeman in a specially called debate on 16 January 2013.

What Bob Neill appeared not to be aware of is the history of illegality and abuse over DECADES by highly paid, often overpaid, employees in Tower Hamlets Council.

Isabella Freeman has made things far worse than they would have been had there existed a democratic accountability regime in the Council.

There is no such regime.

As I have pointed out elsewhere in the past 3 weeks, the “Council meeting” held on 23 January 2013 was a typical example of the democracy deficit in Tower Hamlets Council.

Most of the “passion” on the part of “elected” “councillors” -the utter majority of “Bangladeshi origins, backgrounds”, etc, were wasted in unconcealed display of hatred and vulgar intolerance by the “two” “sides” - one the “official” “Opposition” [mainly Labour Party councillors] and the other the “official supporters of the executive Mayor’s” administration. They did not show any concern, at that meeting on Wednesday 23 January 2013, for the need to democratise the Council’s proceedings. There was, therefore, no reference to what I am addressing here: the abusive and the unconstitutional and the illegal behaviour of Council employees.

One such employee, brazenly backed by the “inner clique” that contains Isabella Freeman, has been going out breaking MOST of the Council’s Constitutional law and legal and democratic duties on housing in Tower Hamlets.

It is his rampant illegality that is at the centre of this INVESTIGATIVE UPDATER report.

[To be continued]

What's up Brick Lane and Tower Hamlets Council now? Another First REPORT and UPDATE, NEXT

What's up Brick Lane and Tower Hamlets Council now? Another First REPORT and UPDATE, NEXT


http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/plans_for_a_clampdown_on_brick_lane_boozers_1_1831729

COULD "career luck" "place Lutfur again in proximity to a similarly 'respected' Faith-linked name?

COULD "career luck" "place Lutfur again in proximity to a similarly 'respected' Faith-linked name?
Lutfur pictured walking along side the Imaam of Makkah. [To be continued]


No evidence that justifies the stigmatisng slurs as aired against THamlets Community

No evidence that justifies the stigmatisng slurs as aired against THamlets Community
No evidence that justifies the stigmatisng slurs as aired against THamlets Community


[To be continued]


Tory MP Tracey C carries a bag of evidence, usable to expose Channel 814 stigma slur re East End

Tory MP Tracey C carries  a bag of evidence, usable to expose Channel 814 stigma slur re East End
THIS is an image of Tory MP Tracey Crouch, who chairs the UK House of Commons ALL Party group on Alcohol misuse etc.

Her group is one of many that exist both within and outside the UK parliament concerning various social issues.

All the INDEPENDENT research and evidence that she can access or any MP cam access or come to that any other resourceful and thinking person can access, shows and is BOUND to show, that anxieties and stress are very often related to money and financial solvency or stability. There are many be other factors that may trigger money linked instability but money and finance are very important triggering factors.

Deeper investigations are equally bound to show that ethnicity, race, religion, faith, gender or gender orientation ARE NOT per se, as such, in their own contexts, the main explanations of behaviour that leads people to alcohol or drugs of any kind or make people dependant on them.

[To be continued]



AADHIKAROnline Editor© Muhammad Haque

The COMMENTARY will follow this piece
RETRIEVED at 1327 GMT London Saturday 26 January 2013 from the London DAILY MAIL web site:
Soaring number of career women 'killed by alcohol' and figure is rising faster than men By TAMARA COHEN PUBLISHED: 23:12, 25 January 2013 | UPDATED: 23:13, 25 January 2013

[ONLY ONLINE Comments (110) Share ] Warning
: MP Tracey Crouch said people drink more than they realise The number of alcohol-related deaths among career women has soared over the past decade and is now rising faster than among men, figures reveal. For women in high-flying roles such as chief executives, doctors and lawyers, the number of deaths caused by drinking has risen by 23 per cent.

And at lower management level, those losing their lives to liver disease and other conditions caused by alcohol rose from 247 to 290 – a 17 per cent hike. Among men, the number of deaths in both categories were higher but rose less sharply – the toll for 2011 was 15 per cent higher than in 2001. The rising deaths are just the ‘tip of the iceberg’ when it comes to measuring the total damage to the nation’s health caused by alcohol. Harmful drinking among middle-class and middle-aged women is also fuelling rising rates of liver disease, cancer and high blood pressure, which can cause strokes and heart attacks.

Tory MP Tracey Crouch, chairman of the All-party Group on Alcohol Misuse, said: ‘A harmful drinker is drinking more than 35 units a week. That’s the equivalent of half a bottle of wine a night.

‘A lot of people drink far more units than they realise, especially women. I think there are a whole combination of reasons – it’s become more socially acceptable, the availability and low cost of wine and the pressures on professional women when you are working and also have a house to run. ‘We need to look at education and raising awareness about this at the workplace.’

More... 4,000 grapes to choose from... but we stick to four wines 'Don't get drunk, don't be sick in the gutter and don't stagger about in the wrong clothes at midnight': Fury as Ab Fab's Patsy warns girls they are putting THEMSELVES at risk of rape One unit of alcohol is around half a glass of wine. Women are recommended to drink no more than 14 units a week, while for men the figure is 21. One unit of alcohol is around half a glass of wine.

Women are recommended to drink no more than 14 units a week, while for men the figure is 21 Among women. deaths caused by alcohol poisoning, liver disease, hepatitis or alcohol-related heart and pancreas failure reached 1,402 in 2011, the most recent figures available, compared to 1,177 a decade earlier – a 20 per cent rise. For women in ‘higher professional’ occupations, deaths rose from 42 to 52. In ‘intermediate occupations’, such as secretarial or other skilled office work, it rose from 142 to 209 – 47 per cent – according to data for England and Wales from a Freedom of Information request to the Office for National Statistics.

For women in low-skilled and technical jobs deaths from alcohol has remained the same since 2001. For ‘semi routine’ jobs such as shop assistants and hair dressers, it has risen 47 per cent, from 202 to 306. Research shows the price of alcohol has a major effect on drinking in every social class In men deaths from alcohol rose from 2,850 to 3,488 over a decade, a 22 per cent increase, of which the highest toll was among those in manual jobs.

Research last year showed that middle-aged professional women are drinking more alcohol than teenagers for the first time. Over-55s drink more than any other age group and are now the biggest burden on the NHS. Professor Ian Gilmore, chair of the UK Alcohol Health Alliance, said rates of almost all serious diseases in the young and middle-aged have fallen as we live longer, but liver disease is rising ‘dramatically’. He said: ‘These figures are just the tip of the iceberg, as they are the cases where alcohol is specifically mentioned on the death certificate. ‘When you look at diseases where alcohol is a major factor, such as oesophageal and throat cancer, or strokes, the true toll is much larger.

When I became a liver consultant 30 years ago, to see a woman dying with alcohol-related liver disease was really rare. ‘Today it’s not common, but every liver specialist will have seen women in their late 20s or early 30s dying of alcoholic liver disease.’ Professor Gilmore backs the Government’s planned introduction of a minimum alcohol price per unit. He argues research shows the price of alcohol has a major effect on drinking in every social class. Emily Robinson, director of campaigns at Alcohol Concern, said: ‘An increasing number of middle-class, professional women are drinking over safe limits and figures show they drink twice the amount of women in manual jobs. ‘If we’re to tackle this, it’s crucial that workplaces take this issue seriously which is why we’ve raised the issue with a group of MPs.’



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268526/Soaring-number-career-women-killed-alcohol-figure-rising-faster-men.html#ixzz2J5VsHHst

us: @MailOnline on Twitter

| DailyMail on Facebook

AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque EXPOSING the false claims on BSKY814 about UK Bangladeshis

AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque EXPOSING the false claims on BSKY814 about UK Bangladeshis
THIS IMAGE was electronically created by the Author at 1238 Hrs GMT today focussing ion the two-page spread by-lined to SUE REID in the print Editions of today’s DAILY MAIL

[More on that piece later]

1240 [1230] [1208] Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 January 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary, following up the silence from the "personnel" at "ChannelS"  on the last series of evidence challenging the false and irresponsible portrayal of the UK Bangladeshis [by general implication] and the “Bangladeshi Community” as identifiable by references to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. [2]

THIS is to ASSERT on the facts that the “title” of the BSKYB Channel 814 “programme” “Reality” as shown on Thursday 24 January 2013 was inaccurate, misleading, false and irresponsible.

This is ALSO to ASSERT that the “panel members”, the vast majority, in fact 75% of them [3 out of the 4 as shown] did not say ANYTHING at all about the AGENDA of POVERTY Creation that in fact had the greatest contribution to ANY person getting g drawn to betting g and gambling in this context.

This is THIRDLY to ASSERT that the composition of the panel was based on serious disregard for the facts and a likely calculation in order to let off the really culpable state and state-linked agencies from liabilities.

This became clear when Lutfur Ali failed to diagnosis the role of the abysmally malfunctioning and dysfunctioning controlling bureaucracy of the Tower Hamlets Council.

It is impossible logically, factually, contextually, evidentially or morally or ethically to justify on the facts and in the context of the serious implications on Society and on our own community  the package as it was presented to viewers and on the record.

The Question as always is: 

Why does [BSKBY satellite] Channel 814 do this kind of irresponsible, false and misleading things?


[To be continued]

Who is behind the ethnicity-linked Satellite "TV" "Channels" airing lies against UK Bangladeshis?

Who is behind the ethnicity-linked  Satellite "TV" "Channels" airing lies against UK Bangladeshis?
Who is behind the ethnicity-linked Satellite "TV" "Channels" airing lies against UK Bangladeshis? 1100 Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 January 2013



The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: [1]



The piece below has been retrieved today from the web site of the London daily mail

The High Street misery machines: Betting shops make £1billion a year from picking the pockets of the poor


• The number of Fixed Odds Betting Terminals (FOBTs) in Britain has doubled in the past five years to 32,000

• Betting shops started installing machines after gambling reforms made by former Chancellor Gordon Brown in 2001

• Gamblers in poorest constituencies are spending the most money • 'Labour started this - and its voters are suffering the most,'

campaign group Fairer Gambling

By SUE REID

PUBLISHED: 00:52,

26 January 2013 | UPDATED: 00:53, 26 January 2013

• 
Comments (8) • 
Share ◦ 
 ◦ 
 ◦ 
 Alan Wells has lost all he owns or holds dear. His house has gone, his job as a fork-lift truck driver too, and his wife and two children live apart from him.

They have all but given up on the incorrigible gambler who, for the past 10 years, has squandered every last penny playing casino games on the 69 high-stake slot machines at betting shops in Rochdale.

At 48, he admits his life is in ruins and he is deeply in debt. ‘I blame that on the dangerous machines,’ he said bluntly, as he emerged from bookmaker BetFred in the centre of the Lancashire town at one in the afternoon last Thursday. ‘I have lost £1,000 in one gambling session plenty of times. I even stole £8,000 from my own mother’s bank account to play on them. Now I live in a small flat alone on benefits of £200 a week and most of that goes the same way. Sometimes I can’t buy food because I have no money left.

 The machines allow gambles to bet up to £100 a time in seconds on games such as roulette, blackjack and poker (file picture)(accessible on the online edition of this pice published lhsed by DILY MAIL London)

‘I used to have a little flutter on the horses when I went to the betting shop. Then one day I saw they had introduced machines and I tried one. How I wish I hadn’t. Lots of people around here like me have become addicted to gambling on them before they knew it.’  

More...





• Tories are plotting to bring back 10p tax rate axed by Gordon Brown to kill perception they are a party of millionaires • Peter Ustinov's son 'close to bankruptcy' after judge rejects claim to his father's riches and blasts cost of nine-year legal battle





• Serial fraudster posed as undercover police officer to trick pensioners for 'wicked' £20,000 con Mr Wells cuts a dishevelled figure in a threadbare wool cardigan on a bitter winter’s day. But he is articulate and his words have a ring of truth. Thousands of Britons are caught up in a frightening gambling frenzy in the betting shops that today fill up Britain’s High Streets.

Most worrying, it emerged this week that it is often gamblers living in the poorest parliamentary constituencies of Britain with devastating unemployment who are risking the most money on machines known as Fixed Odds Betting Terminals (FOBTs).

These machines allow players to gamble up to £100 a time in seconds in games such as roulette, blackjack and poker. The touch screen works so quickly that it is possible to lose thousands of pounds an hour as users try to chase the top jackpot of £500, which can accumulate in a series of spins to £10,000.

Critics say they fuel addiction to gambling and wreck ordinary people’s lives. They have a much higher payout rate than the old-fashioned slot machines and it is this that sucks in those who play them (and are ultimately destined to lose more). Not for nothing are they known as the ‘crack cocaine’ of the betting world.

And it is in places like Rochdale, home to Mr Wells and the nation’s most deprived council estate, where addiction to this drug is particularly acute. Last year, 28,000 people coined in £98 million in State benefits. At the same time, residents were gambling £72 million (including winnings) on the machines, equivalent to £340 for every man, woman and child in the town.

 It is often gamblers in Britain's poorest constituencies who are spending the most money on Fixed Odds Betting Terminals (FOBTs) It is much the same story in jobless hotspots in London, such as West Ham, Bethnal Green, Hackney and Tottenham, as well as in Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester. Lucy Powell, the Labour MP for Manchester Central — a few miles from Rochdale — has complained: ‘There is more money being spent on gambling in my constituency than by the council on services.’

The figures are stark: people in the 50 poorest areas pumped £5.6 billion (including winnings) last year into 4,454 machines at 1,251 betting shops.

This total was four times more than that gambled by residents in the 50 parts of the country with the most people in work and, coincidentally, the fewest betting shops — prosperous Henley-on-Thames in the Home Counties, for example, has none.

And few will miss the ironic — if sad — point that the vast majority of the constituencies hardest hit by this craze are those of Labour MPs. For the lethal casino machines began to proliferate only after 2001 when Gordon Brown, then Chancellor of the Exchequer, abolished duty on individual bets in favour of a tax on bookmakers’ gross profits.

As a result, the betting chains, which had been in decline, began to enjoy a recovery and the increase in business continued as customers were increasingly drawn to the newly-introduced terminals. Betting shops with turnovers of hundreds of pounds a week found they were taking thousands when they installed FOBTs.

By 2007, there were 16,380 in  Britain. Last year, this had doubled to 32,000, with William Hill, Ladbrokes, Coral and Paddy Power collectively making more than £1 billion a year from the machines.

Few people are better placed to understand why this is such a problem than Adrian Parkinson. Adrian has had a lengthy career in the gaming industry and helped to develop the machines. He grew so concerned about them that he has now changed sides and runs the problem betting



'By 2007, there were 16,380 FOBTs in  Britain. Last year, this had doubled to 32,000, with William Hill, Ladbrokes, Coral and Paddy Power collectively making more than £1 billion a year from the machines.'  

campaign group Fairer Gambling.

He told the Mail: ‘The high stakes and speed of play make them attractive to punters. You see people on the machines for hours on end. No matter how big the win or the loss, they keep coming back for more. It is an addiction. In an area of high unemployment it is impossible not to conclude that a lot of the money going into these machines is coming from benefit payments.

‘We would like the FOBTs to be less profitable and less attractive to the gambler by making the maximum stake £2 and a much longer time allowed between bets. People are losing far more than they can possibly afford.

‘In the past the only people gambling these high sums of money so fast were high-rollers in the casinos. But the punters using the FOBTs have nothing like their skill or funds. They lose all sense of reality when they play these machines, as if it isn’t real cash.

‘I have seen High Street punters run out of money within minutes, leave the shop to go to the cash machine, then come back and start betting again. I am a member of the Labour Party, but I believe that it is the Labour Party that started this crisis and now it is their own supporters in their heartlands who are suffering the most.’

Fairer Gambling claims that betting companies are deliberately clustering their branches together on the High Streets of poorer towns (often taking over closed-down premises and nudging up to ‘pound’ stores, charity shops and pawn- brokers where rents are dirt cheap) so that a punter can move easily between machines in different betting shops and gamble away yet more money.

The Association Of British Bookmakers describes the allegations as ‘false and offensive’ and maintains that the figures quoted by Fairer Gambling are based on assumptions. However, it is unclear from its own figures how much money is involved.

But at the heart of this debate is whether the Government should intervene to rescue the High Street and protect gamblers from their own folly. Controversially, last year the House of Commons’s Culture, Media And Sport Select Committee called for the lifting of the limit of four machines per betting shop.

However, the Labour Opposition said this was wrong and sided with retail guru Mary Portas who, in a review of High Streets, called for betting shops to be subject to strict planning restrictions.

One has only to listen to the tragic stories related by Adrian Parkinson to know that unless something is done — and soon — thousands more people from all walks of life will be blighted.

He remembers a respected Yorkshire headmaster, in his 50s, who began using the machines in his home town one July during the school holidays. He was investing up to £8,000 a time (including his winnings) on them at one shop. He soon became addicted. Over a three-month spell he lost thousands and was deeply in debt. And by October he had lost the job he loved.





Gambling in betting shops rose dramatically after reforms by former Chancellor Gordon Brown to abolish duty on individual bets in favour of a tax on bookmakers' gross profits in 2001


Only a year ago, an upright working-class mother from a council estate in Salford, Greater Manchester, broke down in tears when she brought her son into a shop for which Adrian was responsible. The teenager of 19 with a job had lost all his money the same way.

Now she was taking her son to every betting shop in a five-mile area and begging them not to allow him in. ‘The lad said: “The machines are like a drug addiction,”’ recalls Adrian. ‘The mother was at her wits’ end with him.’

Then there is the case of Matt Zarb-Cousin. He is now 22 and picking up the pieces of his life after becoming addicted as a grammar school boy in Southend, Essex. The son of a businessman from a middle-class home with a caring mother, he used to pop into the betting shop occasionally to put a bet on the football.

 Matt Zarb-Cousin, a former gambling addict, is now a Labour party aide and campaigns on the issue But one day, when he was just 16, he saw the machines and staked a few pounds on a roulette game and won. It was the beginning of a downward spiral which ended when he threatened to commit suicide at 20 because of his £16,000 debts.

Matt recalled this week: ‘I remember feeding £10 into the machine, placing £2 bets on either red or black, and quickly doubling my money. From that day on, I played the FOBTs every single day for the next four years.

‘At the time I had a part-time job at a call centre while in the sixth form. I earned about £650 a month, which, for a 16-year-old, with no bills to pay, was a small fortune. But I would always go to the bookies before, and sometimes after, I went to work. I bet £30 to £40 a spin at first, but it soon increased to the maximum of £100.’

He was soon caught in a trap and betting to recoup his losses. ‘I would even go to the betting shop in my school uniform of grey trousers with a blazer which had braid on because I was a prefect. But I was never stopped by the staff from going on the machines even though I was obviously a teenager and shouldn’t have been gambling at under 18. ‘I was soon neglecting my studying and my A-level results were not up to scratch and I scraped into Birmingham University, my second choice.’

Once there, Matt found there were plenty of betting shops with the terminals. ‘I used to go in every  day, before lectures, after lectures, every spare minute. I didn’t tell my girlfriend at the time and I tried to keep it quiet from my friends.

‘I was gambling my student loan and constantly extending my overdraft. One day I won £3,500 on the machines but then lost it all in one morning. In the afternoon, I lost £2,500 of my own money.’

At rock bottom, he went to the top of his block of flats and sent a desperate text to his mother as he threatened to jump off. She talked him down by phone and, finally, he stopped gambling.

 'One day I won £3,500 on the machines but then lost it all in one morning. In the afternoon, I lost £2,500 of my own money.’ He last went to the betting shop in February 2010 at the age of 19 and has received therapy to wean him off his addiction.

When he left university with a good degree in politics and anthropology, he became a Labour MP’s researcher (making himself infamous last year by posting an unfortunate and rude tweet about the Queen’s finances for which he has since apologised). He has set up the campaign, High Streets First, to save town centres from their downward spiral. ‘The danger is that betting shops are turning people like me into addicts,’ he says. ‘I have changed my ways, but I am still paying off my debts from gambling. I know two people of my age personally who have the same problems as I had and half-a-dozen more who are in danger of getting addicted to these machines.’

This week, in Rochdale, I found how easy it is to gamble away a fortune on the High Street. I went into a betting shop at random and put £100 in cash into one of the machines. Then I placed all the money on a bet on red on the roulette game. I had to simply touch the screen and press a button. It was that easy.

As the roulette wheel spun, I hoped for the best. But I lost my money when the ball dropped into the black 28 slot. It was all over in less than 20 seconds.

Of course, no one knows better how easy it is to lose on these lethal machines than Alan Wells. Once he became so angry about them that he marched into a betting shop in Rochdale and smashed one up with a chair leg.

‘I am not a violent man and I still see my children, who live across the road, and try to be a good father,’ he says. ‘But these machines should be in the real casinos not on the High Street where anyone can  pop in — and destroy their lives like me.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268542/The-High-Street-misery-machines-Betting-shops-make-1billion-year-picking-pockets-poor.html#ixzz2J4si8Vrl Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Who 'decides' what Tower Hamlets Council actually does in Borough? WHO CREATES poverty

Who 'decides' what Tower Hamlets Council actually does in Borough?   WHO CREATES poverty
Why has Tower Hamlets Coun cil become associated with so ,many bad things?

WHAT is THIS?????

COMING HERE all this weekend: The 2013 POVERTY REPORT , Previewed

COMING HERE all this weekend: The 2013 POVERTY REPORT , Previewed
COMING HERE all this weekend: The 2013 POVERTY REPORT , Previewed

London: DAILY MAIL online report: "Race hate mail sent to Stephen Lawrence's brother"

London: DAILY MAIL online report:  "Race hate mail sent to Stephen Lawrence's brother"
1538 Hrs GMT London Thursday 24 january 2013



London: DAILY MAIL online:

"Race hate mail sent to Stephen Lawrence's brother"
Race hate mail is sent to brother of Stephen Lawrence An obscene message was sent to Stuart Lawrence after it was revealed he formally complained about being stopped by police up to 25 times It was sent via the Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust, which was set up in memory of the murdered teenager

01:10, 23 January 2013 | UPDATED: 02:25, 23 January 2013

Stephen Lawrence's brother Stuart received a racist threat after it became known he is suing Scotland Yard for harassment Stephen Lawrence’s brother received a racist threat after it became known he is suing Scotland Yard for harassment.

An obscene message was sent to Stuart Lawrence days after the Mail disclosed he had formally complained about being stopped by police up to 25 times. The ‘racially aggravated malicious communication’ was sent via the Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust, which was set up in memory of the murdered teenager.

It is the first time Mr Lawrence, a 35-year-old teacher, has been targeted directly in the two decades since the killing, his lawyer Imran Khan said. The letter or document, received by the trust on January 16, has been passed to police, who have vowed to track down its author. Mr Khan said: ‘I can only assume this was a result of the publicity that had appeared directly prior. The vast majority of communications are positive and from well-wishers.

‘There have been a few occasions that somebody has written something nasty or made a threat, and we take every single one of them seriously and they are all reported.’ A Scotland Yard spokesman said: ‘Police are investigating an allegation of racially aggravated malicious communication, reported to officers on Wednesday, January 16. This is after correspondence was received at an address in Deptford.’

Two weeks ago, Mr Lawrence told the Mail he believes he has been repeatedly stopped by police because he is black and explained why he has launched legal proceedings against Britain’s biggest force.



. I have a white fiancee. My son drives a toy police car. But 20 years after my brother's murder, I still live in racism's shadow: Exclusive interview with Stephen Lawrence's brother Stuart Teenage girl, 16, pulled hijab from Muslim woman's head and punched mother-to-be in racist attack Mr Lawrence alleges officers from the Met have targeted him as part of a sustained campaign of harassment.He said he was moved to act after he was pulled over by two officers who saw him driving his VW Scirocco near his home in Peckham, South London, in November.

He claims they did not give him a satisfactory explanation as to why he was stopped. Mr Lawrence made an official complaint to the Met and a formal investigation into his allegations is being supervised by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.





: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2266774/Race-hate-mail-sent-brother-Stephen-Lawrence.html#ixzz2IuLOaVey Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Council [Kingston, London] fatally let down victim of violence!

Council [Kingston, London] fatally let down victim of violence!
ASAD Niazi killed his "partner" after breakdown of "relationship"


Council [Kingston, London] fatally let down victim of violence!


[To be continued]

Can the corrupt, the greedy capitalism sustain the world?

Can the corrupt, the greedy capitalism sustain the world?


This "visual demo" on "sustainability" has been retrieved from the Internet blog published by a "sustainability" "professor" in London, Canada



[To be continued]

AADHIKAR top half of the frontage dated 16 January 1981

AADHIKAR top half of the frontage dated 16 January 1981


The action archive of the AADHIKAR MEDIA

AADHIKAR Online

The foundation of the weekly AADHIKAR

AADHIKAR top half of the frontage dated 16 January 1981

"Raanee Elizabeth Kawtha Bawloon"

Queen Elizabeth should speak!

All designed and created in New Road

London E1 1HE

in the "Basement Battleship"!

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! continues to show the way out of the morass for stranded Tower Hamlets Council 'admini

KHOODEELAAR! continues to show the way out of the morass for stranded Tower Hamlets Council 'admini


0300 Hrs GMT

London

Thursday

24 January 2013

By © Muhammad Haque Council in Crisis:



How the KHOODEELAAR! ethical way is the best way for the Community if the Council ‘decision makers’ show sense, before it is too late for them.

The Tower Hamlets Council’s administration in the last week of January 2013 is in a crisis that can only begin to be overcome when Isabella Freeman leaves the post she has held in the Council.

Only a beginning. Because even when she is replaced - and that is a big WHEN, given the ‘form’ in the malfunctioning bureaucracy which she has “monitored” with excessive overdoses of toxicity, abuse of remits and an infusion of insidious arrogance and obduracy against all reasonable expectations of good governance - it will take a good while and a lot of effort before the Council administration stands on clean, reliable and dependable feet as far as the people, the voters, the electorate of the borough are concerned.



WHAT A CONTRAST the KHOODEELAAR! Ethical defence of the community provides



Tower Hamlets Council MUST end the behaviour that casts it in such widespread bad light

Tower Hamlets Council MUST end the  behaviour that casts it in such widespread  bad light
For evidential reference, we publish the main texts of the DAILY TELEGRAPH piece condemning the Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘head of legal’ Isabella Freeman’s conduct, today


Isabella Freeman: Lutfur Rahman's little helper who brings council standards 'into serious dispute’

By Andrew Gilligan Politics


Last updated:
January 23rd, 2013







Among the most interesting members of the dreadful crew around Lutfur Rahman, the extremist-linked executive mayor of Tower Hamlets, is the council’s assistant chief executive, a woman called Isabella Freeman (above).

She is one of the borough’s shrinking band of senior white officials who has not been sacked or decided to leave.

Last year, it can now be revealed, both Labour and Conservative members of Tower Hamlets council overwhelmingly passed a motion recommending disciplinary action against Freeman.

It was passed in a secret session of the full council but has so far made no difference whatever to Freeman’s position. It has not even been reportable until now.

Freeman is responsible for the “standards regime,” the code of conduct for Tower Hamlets councillors.

Last week in the Commons, under parliamentary privilege, the former local government minister, Bob Neill, told how Freeman and Lutfur’s supporters have “abused” the standards regime to hound the mayor’s opponents and protect him, bringing it into “serious disrepute.”

Anti-Lutfur councillors – including the Labour leader, Josh Peck, his predecessor Helal Abbas and the Tory leader, Peter Golds – have, said Neill, been subject to a “history of vexatious complaints” by Rahman supporters and placed under costly and time-consuming investigations by Freeman for Kafkaesque supposed “offences” which amount, in essence, to “doing what many people would regard as their duty.” What Neill called the most “frankly scandalous” example involves me.

You may remember that my interest in Tower Hamlets began, in March 2010, when I made a Channel 4 Dispatches documentary describing how Lutfur won the then council leadership with the help of the IFE, an extremist Islamic group which wants to turn Britain into a sharia state. (For a full list of Lutfur's controversies, see here.)

One of Lutfur’s key actions after taking control was to appoint a man with close links to the IFE, Lutfur Ali, as assistant chief executive of the council, its second most important job. We showed the absurdity of this hire by quoting a leaked headhunter’s report of his job interview, which described him as a “marginal,” "limited," "superficial" and "one-dimensional" candidate who might "struggle intellectually” with the job.

The CV submitted by Mr Ali was also leaked, showing he’d given false dates for a previous post and had omitted the fact that he’d been forced to resign from it for breaching the local authority code of conduct. After we revealed his links to the IFE, and after it also emerged that he was moonlighting for a second public-sector employer, Mr Ali was forced to resign from Tower Hamlets, too.

During the making of the programme, in late 2009, we filmed Peter Golds, the Tory leader, holding and reading from these leaked documents.

Incredibly, in 2012, almost two and a half years later, one of Rahman’s supporters brought a complaint against Golds for “infringing” Lutfur Ali’s “right to privacy” in this interview and breaching council confidentiality by “leaking” the document to me.

At enormous public expense, Freeman hired an investigator to pursue this preposterous, bewhiskered claim, with a full panoply of interviews, witnesses and statements. Oddly enough, or perhaps not, the one person the fearless gumshoe didn’t manage to hook up with was the key witness, myself.

So I contacted the investigator to point out that the documents were not leaked to me by Golds; that they had in fact been circulating in the public domain since the previous year; that their contents had been referred to in the local newspaper, the East London Advertiser, as early as May 2008;

and that even if Golds had been guilty of any disclosure simply by reading them out on TV the year after, the deceits and disqualifications of the council’s second most senior officer were surely not private, but matters of the clearest public interest.

I asked why Tower Hamlets was spending thousands of pounds to defend a long-gone employee who was forced out for essentially cheating it – especially since Lutfur Ali himself had never complained, either to the council or to Channel 4.

I asked why this investigation was being launched so long after the supposed offence had taken place. And I also asked why, given something Golds said to me was the basis of the complaint, the investigator had made so little effort to contact me.

Answers came there none – presumably because the answer is that whole farrago was launched for the sole purpose of hassling Mr Golds, a regular thorn in Lutfur’s side, tying him up in legal knots, costing him big money in legal bills, and deterring anyone else from holding the Dear Leader to account too vigorously. Scandalous is almost too weak a word for it.

At the time of writing, despite a formal written statement from me making clear that the key allegation against Golds is false, the complaint against him grinds on. It was rightly rejected by the local government standards tribunal.

Astonishingly, Freeman and Tower Hamlets are now considering appealing against the rejection – perhaps they’ll end up at the European Court of Human Rights! In the meantime, Peter Golds is faced with yet more hassle and potentially substantial legal bills.

The poor old taxpayer, of course, is picking up the council’s side of the tab, which will not be small. It is far from the only such example. After a similar case, as I described in 2011, Tower Hamlets suspended its ex-leader, Helal Abbas, following a complaint by an IFE bigwig. Abbas’s offence was to reveal the truth:

about how that self-same IFE man – a council employee – had been disciplined by the council for interfering with the 2010 elections.

This too was deemed an “invasion of privacy.” Twelve thousand pounds has also been spent on a complaint from the Lutfur camp against the Labour leader, Josh Peck, for walking on the cracks in the pavement something too tedious to describe at length.

As Bob Neill said last week, councillors’ beef with Freeman is not just her zeal in pursuing these ludicrous cases.

It’s that, though theoretically a servant of the whole council, she seems rather less willing to pursue perhaps better-founded complaints against the mayor’s supporters – several of whom, as I’ve documented in the past, have somewhat burning questions to answer.

Freeman, as he outlined, has also helped Lutfur in various other ways, giving a clean bill to his absurd weekly propaganda newspaper, East End Life, and ruling on at least one occasion that the Dear Leader need not answer questions from councillors – at a council meeting! – because it might breach his human rights.

This alleged bias, essentially, is why councillors from left and right voted to discipline Freeman. The proximate cause was her advice, whose impartiality they strongly dispute, in Tower Hamlets’ ongoing failure to appoint a chief executive. The reason why the vote against Freeman hasn’t come out in public until now shows, however, that the hounding tactic is having the desired effect. No councillor, until Neill raised it under privilege in the Commons, has felt able to risk Freeman’s wrath by talking to me on the record about the subject.

They were worried about being subjected to yet another complaint.

As Bob Neill put it last week, Freeman’s behaviour “hardly gives the impression of an unbiased, open and transparent approach.”

The council’s antics under her, he says, constitute the sort of “abuse of the system [which] brings local government into disrepute.”

By way of reply to Neill the council claims that Freeman “had no powers to reject [complaints]. It was the Standards Committee [of councillors and lay members] who referred claims for independent investigation.

In relation to the substantive allegation of bias in investigating complaints about elected members,12 complaints were referred to [Freeman] in 2011 and 2012. Ten were subsequently referred by the Standards Committee for independent investigation:

4 relating to Independent members, 4 relating to Labour members and 2 relating to Conservative members.

  The facts show that the Standards Committee has made referrals in respect of all political parties and independents.”

Let me just say that Golds, and other councillors, have provided me with information which quite clearly shows Freeman taking a rather more prominent role in the disciplinary process than this statement claims.

I have a feeling you’ll be hearing more about Isabella Freeman.

  [To be continued]


I was there near Bhasani as he challenged Ayub Khan's 'Governor' Monem Khan in 'Dacca'

I was there near Bhasani as he challenged Ayub Khan's 'Governor' Monem Khan in 'Dacca'


I was there near Bhasani as he challenged and taunted [military dictator] [‘field marshall’] Ayub Khan's 'Governor' Monem Khan in 'Dacca’

.

Kay Jordan spoke against Crossrail hole in Hanbury Street SEVEN years ago today, 22 January 2006..

Kay Jordan spoke against Crossrail hole in Hanbury Street  SEVEN years ago today, 22 January 2006..
Kay Jordan spoke against Crossrail hole in the Hanbury Street.... on Sunday 22 January 2006

By © Muhammad Haque
0940 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 22 January 2013

This picture is of Kay speaking on 22 October 2004 at the Greatorex Street demonstration that Khoodeelaar! held against the role of the local Councillors. Two of those had ‘surgery’ address in the Greatorex Street.

They were Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ [in post then as “leader” of the Tower Hamlets Council] and Lutfur Rahman.
The main banner picture is part of the KHOODEELAAR! demonstration against the role of UK Parliament when the “Pee-rs” visited the site on 20 February 2008


[To be continued]

MP Austin Mitchell uses the term fiddle to describe what the Treasury is doing,

MP Austin Mitchell uses the term fiddle to describe what the Treasury is doing,
In this clip Labour MP Austin Mitchell uses the term fiddle to describe what the Treasury is doing



AADHIKAROnline Reporting the UK Parliament on Monday 21 January 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary

In this clip Labour MP Austin Mitchell uses the term fiddle to describe what the Treasury is doing.

The Treasury man mildly protests.

Th Treasury man also "reveals" [ever so 'nonchalantly'] the dubious values and criteria of defining liabilities...





[To be contemned]





MPs Public Accounts Committee has a low water mark afternoon!

MPs Public Accounts Committee has a low water mark afternoon!


1810 Hrs GMT London Monday 21 January 2013

Shallow
shallow
shallow
shallow!



UK House of Commons’ MPs’ ‘select committee’, the PAC, Public Accounts Committee has just had a very low water mark afternoon!

££ Billions and ££Billions of supposedly public money being lost and or wasted through fraud, inefficiency, PFI, “litigation” as perpetrated under “No win No Fee” etc in several UK central Govt departments were referred to without even Committee Chair Margaret Hodge raising her voice above a certain decibel!

The MPs didn’t appear at all bothered about any of these references!

Apart from making very cautious and sometimes barely audible “remarks” as if they were going through the motions! What is going on?

Isn’t this supposed to be the period when the UK central Government is imposing cuts and deprivation resulting in serious severe hardships and even deaths due to the hardship being imposed?

This unbelievable event happened on Monday 21 January 2013 and I only tuned in after spotting Margaret Hodge announce on her social network page that she was due to start chairing the session soon.

I will say that the CONDEM have at last found their secret weapon to use to counter all charges of lying and robbing that people have been making against them

And that weapon is as old as Empire
As well known as, what I devised in the 1980s GLC to diagnose Ken Livingstone’s very own shallow strategy, the “Ethnic Surrogate”!!

The CONMEN Cameron and Osborne it appears have caught up at last with the ETHNIC SURROGATE weapon t silence all legitimate criticisms against the given regime! [To be continued]

Brainwashing and mind control of the most subliminal liberal persuasion via Guardian, Private Eye

Brainwashing and mind control of the most subliminal liberal persuasion via Guardian, Private Eye
Here is a picture of the over-recognised USA-originated Heather Brooke, who is featured in an online piece on the ARCHANT company-owned

‘www.eastlondonasvertiser.co.uk’.



1115 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
21 January 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: When the Guardian’s Alan Rusbridger and Private Eye magazine are exposed as poodles prostrate at the propaganda image of “the mighty USA”! [4]

SKY NEWS in their their morning broadcast today ran piece [more than once] from China in which the SKY NEWS reporter promoted the idea that China would be the 'most powerful' country in the world in the next four years...

My Question is: would that also mean that "China-looking" persons who have been overlooked, neglected in the past despite making original contribution or thought...begin to be given the sort of treatment that "USA-originating" persons have been given for the past '100' years [to continue the SKY NEWS reporter’s line] ?

Heather Brooke has been feted by Alan Rusbridger of the Guardian as well as being promoted heavily by the allegedly ‘critical’ ‘organ’ the Private Eye’ magazine [‘prop’ Ian Hislop].

Neither Rusbridger nor Private Eye has made the point that in Britain for decades campaigners have been battling for the very rights that Rusbridger and Private Eye credit Heather Brooke for!

This evidential diagnosis can be multiplied over a million times to show the dishonesty and the backwardness that dominates even the so-called liberal bits of the “mainstream Media” Establishment in Britain.

This goes into the core of the “ordinary” propaganda, brainwashing that is ‘perfected’ via the ‘liberal’ organs of the “mainstream”.

Something that Heather Brooke is UNLIKELY to even recognise in her coming “lecture” to be held at a location in the “Petticoat lane” area of East London on Wednesday. [To be continued]



A most rewarding kicking off for "Baroness" Oona King!

A most rewarding kicking off for "Baroness" Oona King!
A most rewarding kicking off for "Baroness" Oona King!


The © Muhammad Haque Daily Lines of Hunger and Deprivation lived by millions in CONDEMed Britain: [

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Lines of Hunger and Deprivation lived by millions in CONDEMed Britain: [
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Lines of Hunger and Deprivation lived by millions in CONDEMed Britain: [8]

1915 [1855] Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 January 2013.

What are the words, could be the words, that the millions forced to choose between heating or eating, would use to convey their experience?

There would be no words!

They would be unable to speak

They would be unable to reason

They would be unable to restrain

The experience would be too bleak

They would not be disposed at all to hearing politicos

whom they despise for the latters’ obstructive porticoes

that ‘peoples’ reps erect as shields from the electorate

whom they relegate post-poll to a patronised protectorate

Words are not available to express feelings about political postholders

Except the strongest wish to be present as the guaranteed beholders

watching the fall of the despised ones from the perches of power and glory

That is the only feeling that can just about express the denied sense of fury!




[The Lines to be continued as the denial and the deprivations continue]


Is Ed Miliband feeling the chill??

Is Ed Miliband feeling the chill??
1820 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 January 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Bringing Ed Miliband out into the cold so he can taste, even for a few hours, the chill out in real live Britain [7]


If he is already standing in the cold facing cameras then even then he should tell us about how the chill feels!

So far, Ed has mumbled very safely structured sentences.

Not as poor as Liam Byrne's bankrupt note, notoriously stupidly left at the UK Treasury in May 2010 ['There is no money left'] but not very much different.

Ed Miliband has got to raise his intellectual game.

He is playing at a damp field. He has got to get up on the real field, where most people can see him.

Otherwise, he will end up a damp squib even if - that is a big EVEN IF - he finds the address in Downing Street unoccupied! [To be continued]

OBAMA's 2nd Big Oath: Remembering another Kenya: 3 March 1959

OBAMA's  2nd Big Oath: Remembering another Kenya: 3 March 1959


As Barack Hussain Obama prepares for his Second Big Oath for the Occupation of the White House in Washington DC, USA, thousands of miles away across the Atlantic, eager adoring pulses run at near-hysterical rates......

And Kenya, the word, once again gets included as part of the compulsory history and biography notes... But hardly a month ago, no less a place than a very America-worshipping [by media brainwashing ] UK population was told of Britain’s unique [imperial] achievements in Kenya that had taken place on 3 March 1959.

As reported [below] in December 2012 by a Kenyan English language news outlet from London UK:

http://www.nation.co.ke/News/africa/Secret-British-files-show-Kenya-massacre-cover-up/-/1066/1633980/-/14p4cq2z/-/index.html


Secret British files show Kenya massacre cover-up

By AFP

Posted  Saturday, December 1  2012 at  00:26 IN SUMMARY

• The files shed more light on the March 3, 1959 deaths during the Mau Mau uprising, which were initially blamed on contaminated water, though autopsies found the men were severely beaten. No prosecutions were ever brought

• Wambugu Wa Nyingi, one of three elderly Kenyans who last month won a High Court ruling allowing them to sue the British government for damages over torture in detention, claims he was beaten unconscious during the Hola incident

• At least 10,000 people died during the bloody 1952-1960 Mau Mau uprising against British colonial rule, with some sources giving far higher estimates

LONDON Secret documents released on Friday showed how British colonial authorities in Kenya tried to hush up the 1959 Hola detention camp massacre, in which 11 men were beaten to death.

The files shed more light on the March 3, 1959 deaths during the Mau Mau uprising, which were initially blamed on contaminated water, though autopsies found the men were severely beaten. No prosecutions were ever brought.

The papers revealed that prison camp staff made no attempt to tell the truth about what happened, while the government minister for Britain's colonies wanted the incident to "drop out of sight", according to the files.

Many more Kenyans were injured in the incident.

The testimony of a Kenyan colonial official that the camp commandant knew "perfectly well what was going on" was discounted by the attorney-general due to suspicions over his connections with a Kenyan nationalist politician.

The declassified Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) documents have been released by the National Archives.

Wambugu Wa Nyingi, one of three elderly Kenyans who last month won a High Court ruling allowing them to sue the British government for damages over torture in detention, claims he was beaten unconscious during the Hola incident.

"I suffered physical violence on my head, on my legs, I still have the scars today because of the beatings from the colonial administrators," Nyingi told AFP in an interview last year.

Britain is appealing against the judgement, arguing it is not liable and a fair trial would be impossible more than 50 years after the event.

Lawyers for the three veterans said that in light of the documents released Friday, Britain now "had nowhere to go other than to sit round a table and agree a settlement for the Mau Mau survivors".

Early public statements suggested the 11 men had died after being poisoned by a contaminated water cart.

But three days later Evelyn Baring, Britain's colonial governor in Kenya, wrote to Alan Lennox-Boyd, Britain's colonies secretary in London, to say such reports had been misleading.

"Result of first three autopsies is that in each case, death was due to violence," said his telegram to London.

On March 9, Baring sent another telegram, reading: "The injuries are reported to be consistent with being caused by heavy sticks or batons and/or boots."

As inquests into the deaths began, Baring told London in another telegram: "Government chemist told of examination water from cart and stomach contents. Both negative, no poisonous substances found."

Summing up the magistrate's findings, Baring said: "Broadly, death was caused by shock and haemorrhage due to multiple bruising caused by violence.

"Evidence as a whole so conflicting and unreliable that impossible to be certain of exact happenings on March 3 when things got out of control of one man.



Crossrail denial of "blacklisting" is exposed by the evidence

Crossrail denial of "blacklisting" is exposed by the evidence
0605 [0548] Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 January 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

Crossrail denial of "blacklisting" is exposed by the evidence that in 2012 many pro-trade union statements appeared against the Crossrail company's blacklisting activities. So where were the Crossrail propaganda personnel then? [2]
The “Eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk”
has published a claim from “Crossrail” denying that they had ever allowed blacklisting of workers to be carried out by any of their contractors.

But this is exposed as another lie because the OBSERVER [Guardian Media Group] carried a long piece in December 2012 claiming the opposite.

Crossrail has only now come out on the issue because of last week’s “debate” at the London Assembly [which we have commented on already].

We have EXPOSED ‘East London’ Member for the London Assembly John Biggs for his pathetic role, as we identified him as a player of the callous role over Crossrail’s other, the more serious attacks on the community, as had been planned.

Khoodeelaar! STOPPED Crossrail from doing the attacks, we reminded Biggs last week.


Here, just for reference, is a Internet piece from one of the pro-trade union sites:

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=29671




[To be continued]

London's transport crisis: Khoodeelaar! showed them the answer but MPs, Peers LIED: Ken is detached

London's transport crisis: Khoodeelaar! showed them the answer but MPs, Peers LIED: Ken is detached
KAY JORDAN

THIS © Muhammad Haque picture shows Kay Jordan reporting on the then latest state of the Khoodeelaar! campaign’s battles against lying MPs who were shamelessly making up utterances to peddle the Big Biz agenda for the Crossrail hole scam


The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: UPDATING the record and contextually commenting on the LYING role by the Big-Business-Stooged MPs and Peers who were stooged to peddle the Big Biz lies in the name of “transport” [6] 1400 [1345] Hrs GMT London Saturday 19 January 2013:

This morning’s “Ken Livingstone and David Mellor” slot on London’s LBC radio was a reliable piece of evidence about the real weakness in Ken Livingstone's “politics”. Livingstone failed in his three hour slot to show that he was bothered about the millions of people in London and in the surroundings areas who are in poverty. “Fuel poverty” is a catchy phrase. But in poverty and that the poverty is real and is hurting so many people so much more because of the policies of the CONDEM Collusion. And that POVERTY also impacts on peoples’ freedom and the financial capacity to travel.... And that London’s transport infrastructure is a letdown, because most of the existing tube network is in bad urgent need of repair that would need £Billions.
The £Billions that have been wasted by The UK Central Govt, by its daft Dft.....
These are the key points that KHOODEELAAR! has been making now for NINE years
These arguments are worth £Billions because if implemented they would have saved London and the UK Economy £billions.
What is even more worthwhile for humanity and for Society is that the improved transport in London would save lives!

But the UK Parliament has been stooged [made to serve the orders of wrongdoing forces] to those who ant to strategically divert public attention from the real issues and instead channel the funds to the pockets of Big Biz contractors. Those contractors got huge public cash into their pockets via their agenda pushed in the name of Crossrail and via the 2012 Games Hosting adventures.

When the UK House of PEERS ‘Crossrail hole agenda subcommittee’ chair lied about the campaign against the Crossrail hole plot that Khoodeelaar! has been mobilising.

Why did he lie?

Because the PEERS were TOLD to do so by a Big Business agent who had been told off by Khoodeelaar! for his previous lying.

What is more, Khoodeelaar! said to the liar that he, that liar, had no legal let alone Constitutional right to assume that he could speak to Khoodeelaar! on behalf of “the Parliament"..

But the fact that the PEER lied proved beyond any doubt that a PEER could be used to peddle a particular untruth.

There have been several instances of MPs and PEERS being used by Big Business to tell lies against the campaigners opposing the Crossrail hole.

So persistent were the lies and the inanities that Khoodeelaar! decided to demand that the would be appropriate amount of time and space given by the Big Business-stoogedBusiness-Stooged MPs for Khoodeelaar! to formally state the objections that had already been made to the DfT and to the Secretary of State and been published by KHOODEELAAR! in the public domain.

But the MPs/the PEERS did not have the intelligence or the ethics to face up to those grounds, those arguments.

So what did they do?

They decided to lie.

And what was the lie?

They LIED that Khoodeelaar! was not “appearing before the Committee to give the evidence against Crossrail”!

That was an utter lie.



[To be continued]





CLICK on image to view Video of MP's statement about serious crisis in Tower Hamlets Council

CLICK on image to view Video of MP's statement about serious crisis in Tower Hamlets Council
CONservative MP Bob Neill speaking against the serious problems linked with Isabella Freeman's conduct and role in Tower Hamlets Council


CLICK on image to view Video of MP's statement about serious crisis in Tower Hamlets Council

FROM The official record of proceedings in the UK House of Commons, London, Wednesday 16 january 2013:

Quoted by AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

London Friday 1540 Hrs GMT

Friday 18 January 2013

Quoted by AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

"The monitoring officer of Tower Hamlets, Isabella Freeman, is also the assistant chief executive for legal services, and the monitoring officer is also the person who advises the mayor. There is now a situation in which the monitoring officer, who advises the mayor and polices the regime, regularly investigates complaints by a member of the mayor’s cabinet. On the other hand, complaints against members of the group who support the mayor have not been taken forward for investigation, which inevitably raises concerns as to who monitors the monitoring officers in such cases. In that case, the monitoring officer is herself in dispute with her employer—the authority—and there is apparently an industrial tribunal case ongoing, but the monitoring officer still sits in and carries out her functions, even though they involve councillors who may be witnesses to those proceedings.

Tower Hamlets has reached the extraordinary stage of members from several parties passing a motion to have certain disciplinary steps taken in relation to the monitoring officer. We might have thought that the monitoring officer would have withdrawn from the meeting at that point; instead, she insisted on remaining, and noted what was said by every member, which hardly gives the impression of an unbiased, open and transparent approach. Freedom of information requests in relation to only two of the complaints have revealed that some £6,000 of public money was spent on investigating a complaint against the leader of the Conservative group and that some £12,000 was spent in relation to a complaint alleged against the leader of the Labour group. No such complaints have been taken forward in the same way against the group that supports the mayor.

That may be a particularly egregious example. At the same time, however, members raised complaints with the monitoring officer about a highly partisan publication, East End Life, which is the subject of great controversy, and the monitoring officer responded that everything that the mayor had put in that publication was in order. The same monitoring officer gave advice that the mayor was not obliged to answer certain questions from members in the council in relation to the exercise of his functions





[The COMMENTARY on the Tower Hamlets Council Crisis will be continued]

India Gang rapes, murders, violence: Who's banking on Bollywood DIVERSION Now?

India Gang rapes, murders, violence: Who's banking on Bollywood DIVERSION Now?
1532 Hrs GMT London Thursday 17 January 2013:

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:
Bollywood, here comes the next violation, a violent diversion away from the duty that the “biggest democracy” has simply failed to deliver: Protect the women, the children and the other targets and sufferers of violence that proliferate in india most ruthlessly daily [4]


I am concerned that the vast majority of violent attacks in India will be treated to a very powerful brainwashing "solution" with dozens if not more of "entrepreneurs" - including some e with links with so-called liberal outlets in the UK and the USA - getting into the "move-making" business.

This, in my view, is the biggest weakness of the Indian Society!

That it has relied too much on the power of the Bombay Movie brain washers to do the job that the real life decision makers cannot provide.

Send the people to sleep!

When I did some field work in central Calcutta [Oops! Kolkata] and included in my evidential itinerary a long list of "movies" which I suffered in some of the most terribly unhygienic and anti-socially configured and architectured of "cinemas", the one thing I invariably came across was the certain dearth of anyone to talk to about the stupidity of the script and the dense, coarse vulgarity of the contents with hardly any social commentary whatever.

Now, I hear that the "movie-wallahs" are moving in!

I shudder !!!

[To be continued]





Crossrail 'blacklisted' workers! That is CRASS ROLE by Crossrail. Too late for Biggs to bleat now!

Crossrail 'blacklisted' workers! That is CRASS ROLE by Crossrail. Too late for Biggs to bleat now!
By © Muhammad Haque

1150 GMT

London

Thursday

17 January 2013

The following has just been posted on the “eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk” web site, in initial diagnostic response to the role by John Biggs who has been in post as the East London member on the London Assembly

“KHOODEELAAR! told John Biggs so!

For years! That the antisocial elements that controlled the Big Public Money projects like Crossrail were disrespectful of Society, of ordinary people and that their "promises" of good conduct were false as they had been intended to BE FALSE.

John Biggs should have listened to KHOODEELAAR! then and should have supported the call for accountability, respectful conduct and honest delivery by Crossrail. Biggs didn't;t do so.

Now, YEARS after KHOODEELAAR! banners were first raised NINE years ago - to defend the community in the East End and to campaign for rights across London against Big Biz and their stooged holders of “elected publicly paid posts, slots and "careers"” - Mr “Biggs” is belatedly coming across as having some sort of concern about Crossrail’s behaviour!

And that too only after long and bitter campaigns by some conscientious members of a specifics number of trade union activists.

Must do much better that this, Mr "Biggs"!

1140 Hrs GMT London Thursday 17 January 2013





[To be continued]


Neo-Cons and Rightwing, Bliaring 'Labour' in Govt let Big Business attack and kill people in the UK

Neo-Cons and Rightwing, Bliaring 'Labour' in Govt let Big Business attack and kill people in the UK
THIS AADHIKARMedia POLITICAL STATEMENT MONTAGE has been created by © Muhammad Haque by using the Steve Bell cartoon and the accompanying cartoon that was taken from the Internet earlier this morning.

0855 [0850] Hrs GMT London Thursday 17 January 2013

Editor © Muhammad Haque

AADHIKAROnline retrieved the following news item from the website
below


http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/17816Disability activists held a vigil at lunchtime outside the High Court in London yesterday, highlighting Work Capability Assessment injustices.

The vigil was highlighting calls for a judicial review to assess whether the government's welfare benefits tests discriminate against people with mental disabilities and learning difficulties.

Two disabled people have taken the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) to court to demand a review of Work Capability Assessments, which are used to decide if people receiving Employment Support Allowance are "fit for work." A ruling in the case is imminent.

Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) and the Mental Health Resistance Network (MHRN) both point out that it is impossible for most people with learning difficulties to "self-report" on their ability to work, as claimants are required to do on pain of losing benefits.

People with mental disabilities often have changing and hidden symptoms that assessors employed by much-criticised private contractor ATOS ignore or are ignorant of, critics say.

This is one of several reasons why they are not properly competent to decide on a person's ability to work. Moreover, the government's Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) only seeks further, independent medical information in rare circumstances.

Those lobbying for change and against the government's current policy and procedures say that the DWP should look at specialist evidence in every case involving someone with a learning difficulty or disability.

Paula Peters, who suffers from both physical and mental disabilities, told the Morning Star newspaper: "There is a lot of ignorance around mental illness and most people, including Atos doctors, assume if they can't see your disability then you don't have one."

She added that the sheer number of successful appeals against Atos, which holds a multimillion-pound contract for the work, justifies fines.

DPAC's Andy Greene said" "The assessments are designed to rob disabled people of the benefits they need to survive while the government shovels public finances into the pockets of private businesses like ATOS. But disabled people will fight back - in the courts, in the streets, in Parliament, whatever it takes."

Meanwhile, the latest changes to ESA being proposed by the government have been criticised in detailed by an expert group of disabled people in a new Briefing on Employment and Support Allowance (Amendment) Regulations 2012 (http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/ESAbriefing), co-published by project leader and disability campaigner Sue Marsh and the beliefs and values think tank Ekklesia.

Additionally, at 9.30am on17 January 2013) the first House of Commons backbench business debate will be on ATOS Work Capability Assessments (member in charge: Michael Meacher, Labour, Oldham West and Royton).

* ATOS Healthcare Debate Briefing, by Mo Stewart (8.PDF Adobe Acrobat file): http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/files/atos_healthcare_debate.pdf

* ATOS Healthcare debate in the Commons: briefing - http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/17817

* Thousands of disabled and sick people will be hit by new ESA/WCA changes: http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/17812

* The new Employment Support Allowance emergency (#esaSOS), by Sue Marsh: http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/17814

[The AADHIKAROnline diagnostic reports and commentaries to be continued on the illegalities, criminal policies of poverty-creations in Britain]


The © Muhammad Haque Lines of Sixty Long Years waiting to hear a true word: REVOLUTION [1]

The © Muhammad Haque Lines of Sixty Long Years waiting to hear a true word: REVOLUTION [1]

The © Muhammad Haque Lines of Sixty Long Years waiting to hear a true word: REVOLUTION [1]

First response to a news headline on the internet

London Wednesday 16 January 2013.

Written between 1350 and 1410 Hrs GMT [appx]

with the help of Ginger [also known as The Tyke, the other name given him by Kay] sitting on my lap and demanding a bit of peace from my constant attempts at reaching for the key board across his body!

“ is it a true wind that i hear

is it at last the end of my fear

is it the call the people awaited

is it possible to revert the fated

and raise the people to their feet

is it ok to tell the crooks defeat

has arrived at your palaces now

give in surrender to truth & vow

to confess the crimes of sixty years

pay penance for the misery, the tears

you crooks caused to hungry masses

you cruelly caused to famished masses

is it dawn after endless night of shivers

is it daybreak and no more blood rivers?



[To be continued]





British Media treatment of "Milo" "the magnetic cat" [!] shows disrespect for animals in Britain

British Media treatment of "Milo"  "the magnetic cat" [!]  shows disrespect for animals in Britain
THIS IMAGE is of the moment on SKY NEWS in the evening of 11 December 2012 when the London DAILY MAIL’s Andrew Pierce declared “I’m mad about cats” when the newspaper page with a misleading picture of ‘Milo’ the cat carrying a foolishly fitted magnetic collar.... appeared on the Emma Jones [Presenter] IPAD display....

0840 [0830] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 16 January 2013.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:
The cruelty of so much of the Media in the ‘animal loving’ country exposes the sickness in the hype. There is scare respect for animals in Britain if the ‘mainstream media’ treatment is any guide. [5]

On 11 December 2012, the Daily Mail's congenitally Rightwing PR writer Andrew Pierce showed an almost different side to him when he declared that he was 'mad about cats'.
The topic was Milo, the innocent cat in Hackney, East London, who had been mis-reported all over the 'Media' as the 'burglar' of neighbours' keys.
That was a typically ignorant media hype.
The cat had been fitted by its human keeper with a magnetic collar as part of a way to let the cat flap open while [allegedly] keeping 'other cats' out.
The magnet did what magnets do: it collected all other items in the vicinity that Milo the cat was near.
Yet this was not at all the ficus in the ignorant head lies.
The focus was the wrong claim that Milo was the one who was pic,ing up the neighbours' keys.
An absolute lie.
But what do unthinking Media folk do when they are devoid of the true feeling and resect for other beings?
They callously paint an innocent cat as a burglar. As if such depiction is harmless. It isn't.
I will have something more, quite a lot in fact, to say about this in future pieces.
Here, for reference, is a typical Murdoch SUN report on their website about Milo.


[To be continued]


Boris Johnson is exposed as the oversold blond-haired buffoon....

Boris Johnson is exposed as the oversold blond-haired buffoon....
0700 [0655] [0645] Hr GMT London Wednesday 16 January 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary. Boris Johnson is exposed as the oversold blond-haired buffoon who is regularly caught doing serious harm to the cause of a safe, fair London.[2]

Boris Johnson keeps appointing 'deputy mayors' who are then exposed to almost certain ridicule. This one is the most ridiculous to date.

What does it say about Boris John's sense of ethics, morality, let alone his competence?

These questions apply to those lying LBC and EVENING STANDARD perpetrators who published lies with and for Boris at the time of the 'mayoral' poll in May 2012.

[To be continued]

One of the current online reports is accessible at the GUARDIAN web site

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jan/15/boris-johnson-deputy-police-watchdog



CONMEN Cameron, Osborne violent snatch lifeline from the sick

CONMEN Cameron, Osborne  violent  snatch lifeline from the sick
This IMAGE is of the top half of PAGE 8 of the Glasgow Daily Record 15 Jan 2013.

CONMEN Cameron, Osborne CAUSE NEW POVERTY by adding violent snatching of lifeline to the sick



NO! We DO NOT NEED 'MORE MINORITY OFFICERS'! WE NEED OFFICERS WITH INTEGRITY!!!!!

NO! We DO NOT NEED 'MORE MINORITY OFFICERS'! WE NEED OFFICERS WITH INTEGRITY!!!!!
Harriet Harman abuses her "position" as an "MP" "for" [!!!] a Constituency containing "ethnicity-linked" people, to peddle yet another vote-grabbing garbage stunt that is at least 40 years out of date.
How dare Harriet Harman promote the racist lie that BLACK people want "minority' "tokens" either in the Police or anywhere else?
Time for Harriet Harman to stop being a front for the subtle racist practices that the Bliared Party "perfected".
We need many more people with integrity.
For a very long time.
If after that criteria is met people come forward with ideas about the demography of the Metropolis then fine.
But NOT at the expense of integrity.
[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! NO to CONDEM COLLUSION CAUSING NEW POVERTY, DEPRIVATION and HARDSHIP

KHOODEELAAR! NO to CONDEM COLLUSION CAUSING NEW POVERTY, DEPRIVATION and HARDSHIP
KHOODEELAAR! NO to CONDEM COLLUSION CAUSING NEW POVERTY, DEPRIVATION and HARDSHIP.



Texts of MORNING STAR [below, right] story today, Tuesday 15 January 2013. "….However the National Pensions Convention (NPC) said that would be true - if millions of existing pensions were not excluded from the new deal. The NPC estimates that almost two million pensioners, most of them women, who are eligible for the means-tested Pension Credit do not claim it because it's too complicated. NPC general secretary Dot Gibson said the pension plan just "adds insult to injury to millions who have already made a contribution to our society but are still living in poverty. "The outlook for future generations of pensioners is even worse...{To be continued]

No to Tony Bliar! No to all the Bliar-toned liars doing damage to Society Now!

No to Tony Bliar! No to all the Bliar-toned liars doing damage to Society Now!
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: time for democratic debate by demonstrating across the streets in Britain against the “offensive elites” in power now embarked on destroying Society. The term “offence” being derived from the language of the Criminal law! Offenders against Society while they wear smarmy, smug-faced looks of being “democratically put in charge”. They are NOT put in charge to destroy the very democracy that they claim the “legitimacy” from! Violating the key core of Society is a crime. A Mega Crime by the Mega Big Business touts who are in the CONDEM Collusion [8]

0832 [0730] Hrs GMT

London

Monday

14 January 2013

If we left it to the ruling elite then nothing will ever change"

Len McCluskey, telling Dermott Murnaghan on SKY NEWS, Sunday 13 January 2013. See that full interview which I recorded and published online, via the link to the youtube publication that I posted yesterday [Sunday 13 January 2013] [cited below] :



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qr0FnwuZUoE

[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque Diagnosing Tower Hamlets Council that is UNFIT FOR PURPOSE [12]

Muhammad Haque Diagnosing Tower Hamlets Council that is UNFIT FOR PURPOSE [12]
In the evening of Sunday, 12 August 2012, I sent to Lutfur Rahman [and others] an email that has not been acknowledged to this day.
That makes it how long?
FIVE MONTHS and two days

Here is the full text of that mail that Lutfur Rahman was sent on 12 August 2012 which he has neither acknowledged receipt of nor replied to

KHOODEELAAR!

CBRUK

BRICK LANE COMMUNITY BUSINESS FORUM

In association with All Volunteers News,

Kay Jordan Foundation

&

CERTH

Action for a Community Education Programme in the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green and Stepney London E1 Area

___________________________________________________________   BRIEF 2012/08/04

ISSUED by CBRUK at

  2245 Hrs Sunday 12 August 2012:  

A Community Action meeting held in the Hanbury Street [off Brick Lane]  this evening agreed to add its support to the initiative as outlined by Mr Muhammad Haque to address the many day to day issues affecting the local people.

  The initiative was updated by CBRUK Chair and Coordinator Mr Muhammad Haque in the context of the latest evidence of the failures by the “elected councillors” in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets to deliver the basic democratic services to the community.  

Also participating in the discussions were members of a number of voluntary organisations active in the Bethnal Green and Bow Constituency.  

Details of the report will be published on Monday 13 August 2012 by AADHIKAR Media and will be included in the All Volunteers News.

  Issues to be addressed include;   The residents day to day matters that councillors should address but which the councillors have been failing to take up or intervene in.  

The future of young adults in the area, especially those who congregate in corners of the housing and other resin details estates thus creating varying degrees of anti-social atmosphere.  

The absence of any community education programme for all the age groups.

The meeting unanimously supported the programmes as set out by Muhammad Haque. Especial emphasis was placed by all who spoke on the glaring absence of any programme to address the crisis facing the young adults in the area.

  More to be published online and in print by AADHIKAR Media, KHOODEELAAR! ALL Volunteers News and the Kay Jordan Foundation.

 

[COMMENTARY on this to follow during Monday 14 January 2013]

INTENTIONAL POVERTY CREATION in Newham and Tower Hamlets

INTENTIONAL POVERTY CREATION in Newham and Tower Hamlets
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:

INTENTIONAL POVERTY CREATION in Newham and Tower Hamlets:

The rise in Gambling and debt in East London; Why the ’Newham Recorder’ and ‘The Docklands & East London Advertiser’ are wrong to promote ‘MPs” as the sources of morality, ethics and social action.

[3a]

1430 [1420] [0840] [0830 ][0805] [0745] Hrs GMT London Friday 11 January 2013

The image [above] has been created by AADHIKARMedia based on the main part of the front page of the print edition of the ‘Docklands & East London Advertiser’ dated Wednesday 9 January 2013 but ONLY available at the ‘newsagents’ on Thursday 10 January 2013.



This was one of the two items that I cited when starting my presentation of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Hour at 1700 Hrs GMT the same day.



I am continuing to examine the evidence of the behaviours of those 'concerned' in Tower Hamlets and Newham in the DELIBERATE creation of poverty and deprivation in these parts.

I am ASSERTING that there is overwhelming daily evidence of how poverty and deprivation are CREATED, added to existing perpetration.
I am also saying that those create poverty and deprivation also include elements that are not just the local Councils and the local "MPs" and the otter “locally’ "elected" and publicly paid for post-holders in the name of the local communities.

In this context, I shall look at the conduct of John Biggs [on the London Assembly] in a future Commentary and examine his role in the programme of deliberate poverty-creation and the deliberate infliction of deprivation.

In this part, I am looking at the role of the two “print newspaper” titles circulated in the name of the local peoples in new gam and Tower Hamlets as "independent" 'commercial" newspapers.


I analytically treated the front page as [one of two such] as denoting the same line of the same ‘news’ agenda.
That of overdoing a feigned shock horror social malaise and then citing ‘MPs’ as the repository [collectively, as 'MPs'] of wisdom and knowledge about how to deal with the malaise.


I rejected the behaviour of the publishers and questioned their perpetration of the view that “MPs” warranted that kind of platform.


The bit that I focussed on was the claim at the bottom of this image that "MPs" had called for the outlawing of what they reportedly had 'called' the 'Crack cocaine" of Gambling.


My introduction wasn't even half way through when I got a call from someone who mistakenly claimed that I was targeting an MP or more than one MP because I had a dislike towards that MP or those MPs.


That interruption meant that valuable time was spent in dealing with it instead of my completing the point about why such 'opinions' as pit on the front page of the Newham Recorder had no validity whatever.


To start with the "outlawing" of gambling because it was now the 'crack cocaine"-like habit carried with it multiple problems.


One, that MPs could not control it let alone outlaw it. Two, if gambling deserved to be outlawed because it resembled 'crack cocaine' then what do the MPs have to say about the use of cocaine? Do they say that the outlawed substance should be 'more' outlawed than currently is the case? They cannot say or mean that.


And they cannot be arguing for the legalisation of ‘crack cocaine.’


So what should MPs be saying, if their ‘sayings’ are worthy of any recognition?


They should be saying why they are not talking about the factors that make people go to gambling.


They should say what the role of the various state agencies that are kept in place at public cost are doing to address peoples’ reasons fro gambling.


They should be talking about intentional poverty creation by the local and the central government.


They should be talking about the culture of theft and robbery that dominates the strategies and the policies of Big Business capitalism and their business “ethos” that perpetuate, maintain and exacerbate socially destructive and costly disparity of income.


They should be talking about the role that the various “law enforcement’ agencies in wrongly targeting and stigmatising innocent, vulnerable people who are left abandoned when they need the various otherwise vaunted and flaunted state agencies’ support the most.


And the list continues of the agencies and the support service that are failing Society.


[To be continued]





HOW TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL has been made UNFIT FOR PURPOSE [9]

HOW TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL has been made UNFIT FOR PURPOSE [9]
HOW TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL has been made UNFIT FOR PURPOSE [9]

HOW TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL has been made UNFIT FOR PURPOSE by certain ‘key' staff [9]

1225 Hrs GMT London Thursday 10 January 2013:

Aman Dalvi, seen right in this © Muhammad Haque picture taken on Tuesday 15 february 2011, has refused to comment on it. He has been asked repeatedly to comment but has, so far, chosen to stay quiet. Lutfur has commented on it and has expressed shock. More on what Lutfur has to say in a later UPDATE.

So what is 'it' that Aman Dalvi has refused to comment on?

Perhaps his replacement, not for long after this week, if ‘reports are any guide, Stephen Halsey, has been prepared to comment? Sort of, 'yes'. But even Stephen Halsey has found it hard to face the questions from Muhammad Haque. Considering that Stephen Halsey is still "the Chief Executive" and he cannot bring himself to make a definitive statement and sign it and send it to Mr Haque, must say a lot.

So what is "it"?

Stephen Halsey was unavailable to tell us as at 1223, two minutes ago. But we shall be bringing the latest info and post it here. The Investigation is continuing.

[To be continued]



CONDEM Collusion caught in latest corrupt scam as it lets in Big Biz thieves to heighten crime

CONDEM Collusion caught in  latest corrupt scam as it lets in  Big Biz thieves to heighten crime
GRAYLING is absolutely failing, as even the Right's cheer-leading DAILY MAIL admits


Private firms and charities will be paid to stop ex-prisoners offending again under probation law overhaul Cash incentives will be offered if inmates are prevented from reoffending after release But the move has infuriated probation officers, who say 70 per cent of their work will be put out to tender By JAMES CHAPMAN and MATT CHORLEY PUBLISHED: 00:32, 9 January 2013 | UPDATED: 09:42, 9 January 2013 Comments (133) Share Private firms and charities are to be paid to meet offenders at the prison gate and seek to turn them away from a life of crime, the Justice Secretary announced. In a major shake up of prisoner rehabilitation, Chris Grayling set out plans to offer cash incentives if inmates are prevented from reoffending after release. But the move has infuriated probation officers, who say 70 per cent of their work will be put out to tender, heralding the effective ‘demise’ of the 105-year-old Probation Service. In a major shake up of prisoner rehabilitation, Chris Grayling will set out plans to offer cash incentives if inmates are prevented from reoffending after release They predicted it would lead to chaos and risk public safety. Mr Grayling insists that radical steps are needed, however, to address consistently high reoffending rates which mean almost half of all prison-leavers are reconvicted within 12 months. For those serving less than a year that figure rises to almost 58 per cent, and half a million crimes are committed by repeat offenders each year. More... Police have stopped me 25 times... just because I'm black: Stephen Lawrence's teacher brother launches damning race case against the Met On-the-run terror suspect Ibrahim Magag escaped surveillance by 'by jumping into a cab' In a major extension of ‘payment by results’ - pioneered by Mr Grayling in back-to-work programmes when he was employment minister - all lower risk offenders will be referred to businesses and voluntary groups who will only be paid in full if they succeed in keeping them away from crime. But he insisted rules would be tightly written to ensure private firms did not ignore the worst offenders. 'I want to have a grown up discussion with people across this world to say exactly how do we best build a pricing system - the incentives for the providers to make sure that they don't park the most difficult offender in the corner and ignore them,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'We can't afford that to happen.' Providers are expected to use mentors - including reformed offenders, or “old lags” - who will assist prison-leavers with issues like housing, seeking employment, addressing drug and alcohol problems and tackling literacy and educational problems. For the first time all offenders, including those serving less than 12 months, will be subject to mandatory supervision and tailored rehabilitation on release from prison. Harry Fletcher, of Napo, formerly the National Association of Probation Officers, said the public service would lose all of its core responsibilities Mr Grayling claims the new approach will deliver ‘steady year on year reductions’ in reoffending across England and Wales as different sectors pool knowledge and resources to help break the cycle of crime. Private providers will be paid an initial fee for taking on a prison-leaver but will only be paid in full if they succeed in keeping them on the straight and narrow for a fixed period and reducing reoffending rates. HM chief inspector of probation Liz Calderbank questioned whether a payment-by-results system was appropriate for the supervision of offenders. 'The probation service deals with a huge range of individuals, some of whom are very difficult, damaged individuals and who are very difficult to engage in the process of supervising them safely,' she told the BBC. 'What do you do with those individuals on a payment-by-results scheme? 'You can't say they are not worthy of the investment, they won't respond to the investment, so we leave them - because there is a public duty to manage them safely within the community.' A paper to be published by the Ministry of Justice insists the public sector Probation Service will still have an important role. Mr Grayling says it will focus on protecting the public by managing the most high risk offenders, including all serious sexual and violent offenders, providing advice to courts and making initial risk assessments on all offenders. As part of the plans, England and Wales will be divided into areas which align closely with local authorities and Police and Crime Commissioners. Private and voluntary sector organisations will then be invited to bid for work in these areas with each contract awarded based on best value and innovation in tackling reoffending. The new system is designed to be fully in place by early 2015. The scheme follows reforms to community sentences so each one contains an element of punishment and the roll-out of work in prisons so offenders have a greater chance of finding employment on release. Harry Fletcher, of Napo, formerly the National Association of Probation Officers, said the public service would lose all of its core responsibilities - representing the ‘demise of the 105 year old Probation Service in England and Wales’. ‘This decision is astonishing. It is being rushed through without proper thought to the consequences. If this plan proceeds it will be chaotic and will compromise public protection.’ Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2259309/Chris-Grayling-Private-firms-charities-paid-stop-ex-prisoners-offending-probation-law-overhaul.html#ixzz2HYD1HvMb Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

This picture contains evidence of 25 years

This picture contains evidence of 25 years
The © Muhammad Haque picture of [Tower Hamlets “executive mayor”] Lutfur Rahman, taken in Brick Lane London E1 6RU and published on Tuesday 11 February 2011



0555 [0540] Hrs GMT London Thursday 10 January 2013.
By © Muhammad Haque

In the last part [reproduced below for ease of reference] I finished by saying:

What is the evidence that the corrupt and the racist top-salaried post-holders in the Council are hampering the process of Tower Hamlets Council’s delivering that service?


As Lutfur would know from my statements this week, I have been telling the “elected” post holders on Tower Hamlets Council consistently that the corrupt and the racist employees in key position have been sabotaging the Council’s delivery of service.

This is to be found in the Council’s “housing”, “legal” “environmental” and “democratic” “service” areas, to name only four

The duty of any “executive mayor” is, first and foremost, to make sure that the employees of the Council are behaving with due diligence and that they are delivering the lawfully owed service to the community in accordance with the highest standard.
Take the case of the “housing” “department.
It is a much smaller operation in January 2013 than it would have been had the Council not got rid of the housing stock

The housing stock was transferred to what is misleadingly labelled “registered social landlords”.

Most of the elements involved in that stock transfer process were liars.
Some of these same liars have been caught and recorded in the case that the man called WOOSTER successfully brought against Tower Hamlets Council.
As I told an employee working not so far from Stephen Halsey the “Chief Executive” for another week [see reports by certain “Fleet Street” linked outlets] yesterday [Wednesday 09 January 2013], Tower Hamlets Council has a number of employees in post now who are known to be breaking their legal and their Constitutional duties to the community.

[To be continued]


TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL Is made UNFIT FOR PURPOSE by corrupt, racist emplyees in key posts [8]

TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL Is made UNFIT FOR PURPOSE by corrupt, racist emplyees in key posts [8]
0455 [0434] [0430] [0320] Hrs GMT London Thursday 10 January 2013.
By © Muhammad Haque

Lutfur Rahman, the “executive, elected mayor” in post in Tower Hamlets Council knows that I am OPPOSED to the elected mayor system.
I told him so again on polling day, 06 May 2010 in the Underwood Road where I also asked him why he had not stayed with the policy of the then Tower Hamlets Labour Party Councillors Group position of No to an elected mayor system.
He said that he had made his views known to the others in the Labour Group, still the ‘ruling’ Group on Tower Hamlets Council.
In that Conversation, I made again plain to Lutfur Rahman that having an elected executive mayor system would undermine what bits of democracy were still left in the Tower Hamlets Council.

In this democratic constitutional context one of the most crucial factors that affect the community is the behaviour of those after their elections in the name of the community, ANY part of the community, and then their behaviour as if they don’t even know the same people whose votes they, these ex-candidates, desperately begged for and whose votes put them in the posts.

And one of the flaws in the post-election flaws in their behaviour is this:

deep ignorance of their duty to the electorate, to the “constituency” AFTER polling day.

So WHAT is being done now about the role of the elected councillors?

If the “ethnicity” linked “satellite” “TV News Channels” is any guide then the ONLY thing that has “really awakened” at least some known faces and some known “councillors” in the past two months or so, is, has been the issue of the “Banglatown” word as part of the Ward name [Spitalfields and Banglatown”].
Apart from uttering and chanting phrases that are obviously scripted to appeal to those watching who may remember the ‘leaders’ ’ ‘faces’ and their chants on the next polling day, the community is left just as much in the dark after those performances as it was before, about the real democracy-delivering job that these councillors actually are in post to do and whether they in fact do that job during the the remainder of the time when they are not appearing on the highly fabricated “satellite TV news” slots.

It is on this point that Lutfur Rahman has a real scope to prove if he is any `better’ than those I have described: is Lutfur Rahman himself any good at dispelling my finding that the elected ones are not delivering to the community, the constituency?
Is he himself delivering to the community and if so, on what evidence is that true?
As I said 48 hours ago, the standstill, the morass, the unfitness for purpose that has now taken hold on Tower Hamlets Council, as SEEN in the failure to have a so-called Head of Paid Service in post, is, in large measure, a product of the corrupt and the racist holders of the key decision-making posts in Tower Hamlets Council.

Can Lutfur Rahman break this morass and if he can, how can he possibly do so without first admitting that the source of any legitimacy that he may claim is not to be found among the paid layers of employees or, as in his case his paid layers of advisers and temporary but rewarded cheer-leaders.

He should look for legitimacy beyond those paid ones

The source of that legitimacy is the ordinary community outside of the cliques that have the regressive, oppressive and wasteful grip on the Council and have thereby created the impasse in the way of the community’s getting a democratic service delivered daily.

Maintaining the necessary contextual reiteration of my principled stand against the system of elected executive mayor, I also have the duty as the ETHICAL COMMENTATOR to ensure that MY OWN ETHICAL position is also the most up to date on the facts on the ground
And what is NOW ON is this:
there is an executive mayor “in post” with the huge burden of responsibility which the community is affected by
What is the evidence that the corrupt and the racist top-salaried post-holders in the Council are hampering the process of Tower Hamlets Council’s delivering that service?

[NEXT]

[To be continued]


TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL is made UNFIT FOR PURPOSE by corrupt, racist employees in key posts [8]







MORNING STAR piece, below


Tuesday 08 January 2013

by Tony Patey

Health experts hit out at the special administrator brought in to sort out an NHS trust saddled with Pif debt after he recommended it be "broken up" and swathes of services closed today.

South London Healthcare NHS Trust was the first to be placed in administration after it reached the brink of bankruptcy.

Now special administrator Matthew Kershaw, who was parachuted in to run the trust last summer, says it should be "broken up" - with other organisations taking over the management and services.

Thousands protested against initial plans tabled by Mr Kershaw last October. Health professionals and politicians also voiced fierce opposition.

The trust was created in 2009 after the merger of three hospitals - the Princess Royal in Orpington, Queen Mary's in Sidcup and the Queen Elizabeth in Woolwich - and has been losing around £1.3 million a week.

Mr Kershaw also raised fears of privatisation when he said that any debts should be written off by the Department of Health so that "new organisations" were not "saddled with the issues of the past."

This would include bailing out massive Pif debts, which swallow up 16 per cent of trust income.

Campaigners warned that bringing in privateers elsewhere has already proven to be a failure.

Ali Parsa, boss of the first private firm to manage an NHS hospital, Hinchingbrooke hospital, Cambridgeshire, stepped down last month leaving its deficit twice as high as operator Circle had boasted.

Health Emergency campaign group chairman Geoff Martin said the South London Healthcare trust had been "ripped to shreds" through a "lethal combination of mismanagement, the brutal cost of financing Pif schemes and an obsession with a 'target-led' culture at the expense of patient care."

Under Mr Kershaw's plans Queen Elizabeth would link with Lewisham Healthcare NHS Trust, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust would get hold of the Princess Royal and Queen Mary's would be turned into a "hub" for health and social care in Bexley.

The report has gone to Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt, who will make a decision on the trust's future by February 1.

Unison branch chairman Conroy Lawrence said: "These recommendations are cost-driven. If you take millions out of the NHS as this government is doing then A&E departments, maternity units and hospitals will close."

And doctors working at the trust warned that plans to dissolve it could have a "devastating" impact on the nearby financially stable Lewisham Healthcare Trust, which faces losing its A&E and having its maternity ward turned into a midwife-led unit under Mr Kershaw's plans.

They warned that if LHT was downgraded it would lead to the closure of other departments at the hospital.

During an urgent question in the Commons Dame Joan Ruddock said Mr Kershaw's recommendations should not be used to justify closing essential hospital services and used to force through a "major reconfiguration of services via the back door."

She said: "In order to tackle the huge financial deficits the administrator proposes to close Lewisham Hospital's A&E services, including the acclaimed children's A&E, end medical and surgical emergency care and demolish maternity services.

"This cannot be justified - 120,000 use Lewisham A&E each year, over 30,000 children use the children's A&E, over 4,000 babies are born in the hospital each year."





Tower Hamlets Council is almost UNFIT for purpose[ 6].

Tower Hamlets Council is almost UNFIT for purpose[  6].
0635 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 09 January 2013 . The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: CONTINUING the exclusive investigative report on Tower Hamlets Council in the East End of London, UK, that has “gone into a preliminary mode of special measures", meaning that Tower Hamlets Council is almost UNFIT for purpose [6]. [To be continued]

Racist arson attack in Alex Salmond-ed Glasgow COULD happen in London's East End Again. We UPDATE

Racist arson attack in Alex Salmond-ed Glasgow COULD happen in London's East End Again. We UPDATE
THE GLASGOW DAILY RECORD Report on the RACIST ARSON ATTACK on Asian shop worker [victim and address pictured here] is accessible on the Internet via the web page http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/firebomb-horror-as-racist-thugs-attack-1523724



0555

[0355] [0342] [0335] [0330] [0305]

[0240] [0212]

Hrs GMT

London Wednesday 09 January 2013.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: CONTINUING the exclusive investigative report on Tower Hamlets Council in the East End of London, UK, that has “gone into a preliminary mode of special measures", meaning that Tower Hamlets Council is almost UNFIT for purpose [4b].

Does “Lutfur Rahman” know that an EDL-agenda MIGHT be already operating at various vital “decision-making” levels in Tower Hamlets Council? And if “Lutfur Rahman” “knew” that an EDL-agenda MIGHT be operating inside the Tower Hamlets Council, WOULD “Lutfur Rahman” do anything about it?

The EVIDENTIAL CONTEXT: Updated One:

When the "Benefit Service Manager" sent me an email requesting me to give him a call, he did so because he was placed under some considerable pressure by the office of the then chief executive in post.

The reason why the "Benefit Service Manager" FELT the pressure was again not so much to do with me as it was to do with the fact that in the Council's Chief executive's office at that time, July-August 2005, eight calendar years ago, there was an atmosphere that the "right thing should be done".

Whether that was achieved was a different matter. But the atmosphere did exist.

And I was only in contact with the office of the then Chief Executive as part of the "field work" that I had been doing investigating and diagnosing the operation of the agenda of POVERTY-CREATION by local Councils in England. And beyond across the rest of the UK.

I received several pleading Communications from various personnel inside Tower Hamlets Council pleading for me to ease up on the representations that I was making asking, as I was doing, for transparency, accountability and performance by the personnel on all the local service delivery matters that the local community was being given short shrift on by the Council.

In the course of the exchanges that then followed alongside my own conduct of the researches that had ti be mounted into the behaviour of the Council an d in the context of the very high profile community defence action that I was also mobilising in the KHOODEELAAR! context against the Crossrail hole plot, I was able to test the veracity and the applications of all the published and undeniably publicly stated key commitments as well as the legal and the democratic obligations in accordance with the law, ethics and morality: and what did I find?

I found that Tower Hamlets Council was one of the most corruptly administered local councils that there existed or could exist and that the corruption was endemic inside its “official bureaucracy” as well as among the “elected Councillors”.

I found that the corruption was destroying the progress of people and the community in the Borough.

Now, into the 8th calendar year since July-August 2005 when Tower Hamlets Council’s “Benefit Service Manager” made that request to me to NOT send complaint against his section to the then Chief Executive as well, I can confirm that all the reasonably valid and investigative scepticism that I had about the level of competence, acceptability [all very POOR indeed] as measured on the evidence of the behaviour of the people, the staff, who were making the day to day decisions that affected the lives of ordinary people in the Borough have been vindicated and been found to have been very valid indeed.

Valid scepticism about the low level and the low standard of service to the local community by Tower Hamlets Council staff and Councillors. And the prevalence of widespread corruption and abuse and discrimination.

And rampant racism.

I am now publishing these findings in the week that is also the time when the “Lutfur Rahman” administration is engaged in closed-door, behind -the-scenes and “external” meetings, contacts and communications.

The hectic activities are apparently about finding a “Chief Executive” so that Tower Hamlets Council doesn't “become a Lambeth”, to use the language of “Fleet Street” that has resurfaced in recent months.

That language is directly linked with the AGENDA that all racist elements in Whitehall want to carry out and they can only get away with a racist purpose if they can hide, in the publicly staged racist-discourse, their racist intent.

Hence the word “Lambeth”.

Because “Lambeth” is not immediately associated in “mass-media-brainwashed” “popular imagination”-“psyche” with an “ethnicity-linked” “Council administration” in the NON-white sense of that association.

The word “Lambeth” as used in the context of “local Councils” brings to “mind” images of “leftwing” “extremists” e.g. “Ted Knight” and [as is now amply exposed] the very falsely-created and “credited” “left” ogres of the likes of “lesbian left wing militant” Linda Bellos.

Like Diane Abbott [who too has now been established as part of the Establishment that she yearned to belong to, Linda Bellos has become part of the subsidiary list of “British national Treasures” now!

So the “dread” word “Lambeth” is a “VERY SAFE” word, tag, label for the racists dominating the CONDEM Collusion and its own Whitehall bureaucracy to use. To further their abuse of Society.

This way they can achieve [!] two of their most avidly pursued aims: Demolish what they “fear” is the remnants of the legitimacy for the call to end the insidious and the very active racist imperialistic patronising attitude to people who have established their universally valid human rights by struggles of the past 60 years in Britain and , two, they can also destroy the arguments for an end to the NeoCon agenda that is now being brought to the fore with increasing ferocity and nastiness.

It is with these words by way of diagnostic evidential update that I start, in the next part, to examine the matter of the “Lutfur Council” and how Lutfur Rahman has become the prisoner of the racists and the NeoCon crooks who are occupying key paid posts in the Council that he is supposedly the “executive” “boss” in!

[To be continued]



0348 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 09 January 2013.

The Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [5]:

KHOODEELAAR! SAYING NO to NeonCons and their stooges, tools and surrogates operating in Tower Hamlets today where they are bent on destroying the community and breaking up Society.

The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign in defence of the Community in the East End of London against the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole plot epitomised the united ethical, social, environmental, economic, demographic and democratic imperatives, and resolves towards DEFEATING the NeoConservative agenda and the racist bid to DISLOCATE and to drive the Community out of its home area...



The English Boundary Commission's bid to drop the word "Banglatown" is a small but solid part of the racist agenda that David Cameron personified when he appeared at Toynbee Hall [associated John Profumo] and declared, unfurled, launched war on Society [February 2011]

The NeoCons shall NOT Pass.



POVERTY created in Tower Hamlets, East End of London

POVERTY created in Tower Hamlets, East End of London
0900 Hrs GMT London TUESDAY 08 January 2013.
The Muhammad Haque daily Ethical Commentary
POVERTY created in Tower Hamlets, East End of London

LIVE reports throughout this afternoon TUESDAY 08 January 2013 here and on associated AADHIKAR blogs and KHOODEELAAR! Campaign web-sites and social network sites


Tower Hamlets Council cliques are out of order as they are exposed over acting lesson!

Tower Hamlets Council cliques are out of order as they are exposed over acting lesson!
Tower Hamlets Council cliques are out of order as they are exposed over acting lesson!


The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [1]

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary  [1]
0250 [0240] [0230] [0200] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 08 January 2013. The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [1]

I did a montage of three print titles on Monday, 7th January 2013.

[See the picture of that montage, I have published with this Commentary]

I used one of the 'East London"-linked titles operated by the Right-wing, pro-racist, pro-cuts agenda-peddling operation called “Archant” which controls what used to be the “East London Advertiser” and the “Morning Star” [the “Peoples’ Press’, another name for the CPGB] and the City of London, Cons-agenda backing, free sheet title [mostly circulated on buses and the City of London areas] CITYAM.

I highlighted the front-page of the “Morning Star” [Monday 7 January 2013] and kept parts of the other two in the relative background.

The reason for featuring the Morning Star in this way is to keep the focus of my work on the poverty-creation agenda that is underway in the CONDEMed Britain today.

The actual text underneath the “Morning Star” front page headline is less acceptable than the headline to me. The CPGB still pursues the “politics” of centralised bureaucracy and remains a million miles removed, away from the daily battles and the ordinary peoples across Britain today, the title [the ‘newspaper’ the ‘Morning Star’] is not representing the struggle of the ordinary people. Yet it, the Morning Star, is representing a different position as compared to the Guardian and or indeed the other “Fleet Street” titles that both SKY and the BBC feature and promote daily.

The core of the difference is to say that CONDEM Collusion [my words] is attacking Society and that it is enriching the Rich even further.

Where the “Morning Star” fails is in the “solution” to the problems being created, maintained by the agenda that CONDEM pursues.

In its apparent criticisms of the official British Parliamentary “Opposition” Labour front Bench the Morning Star is embarrassingly contradictory.

It has failed to examine the corrupting role of Parliament a and so it has failed to examine any part of the Parliament in any way that would show the truth.

The Morning Star is a thin, a very pale imitation of what a true and truth telling campaigning, democracy-backing daily newspaper for the people in Britain would be, could be. And should be. NOW!



[To be continued]







The London Guardian is exposed as party to the CONDEM assault on Society

The London Guardian is exposed as party to the CONDEM assault on Society
This is my impression of today’s ‘Morning Star’ which carries the correct headline to the accurate news about what is going on Britain today [Monday 07 January 2013].

IN CONTRAST to the “Morning Star” the London Guardian is exposed as party to the CONDEM assault on Society
I will examine in a later piece why the “Morning Star” is left out by both SKY NEWS and BBC News Channel from their nightly “Press Previews”.

2335 [2320] Hrs GMT London Monday 07 January 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Local Councils TOO are creating extra poverty, hunger in CONDEM-ed Britain: CONTINUING the report on Tower Hamlets Council "under special measures" [1]
NEXT on here


The faker Iain Duncan Smith has INDEED BEEN the Original ‘Benefit Cheat and Benefit Fraudster’!

The faker Iain Duncan Smith has INDEED BEEN the Original ‘Benefit Cheat and Benefit Fraudster’!
IN THIS IMAGE

IDS as accurately imaged on the front page of the ['ex'] CPGB [‘Communist Party of Great Britain’] daily the Morning Star on Thursday 03 January 2013.



0028 [0020] [0115] [0012] Hrs GMT London Saturday 05 January 2013.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: UK Neo ConDem Collusion with evil must be exposed, the 'Quiet Man' the frontman in the assault against the violated, the denied, the impoverished in Britain must be exposed [2b]

The Campaign for an end to the lying by the Neo ConDem must continue as must the battle for an end to the collusion by the Ed Milibrand-ed Ed Balls et al with that agenda.

[To be continued]





Who dared violate my child? Lines of Questions by Muhammad Haque at the Rapists [1]

Who dared violate my child? Lines of Questions by Muhammad Haque at the Rapists [1]
EXCLUSIVE PUBLICATION here within moments of composition

Lines of Interrogation of the violators of the infants, the weak and the innocents


By © Muhammad Haque

1238 Hrs GMT

London

Friday

04 January 2013.

WORD 1

I am going to reorganise you perpetrators, criminals, violators, from now on.

What do I mean by ‘reorganise you’? You have to ask after all you have done?



Here goes the first Word:



Which one of you scum decided it was okay to target my child?

What moment of sickness in your pathetic life did you do so?

Target a child?

Make the child afraid?

Make the child scared?

Make the child feel unsafe?

Make the child unsafe?

Which one of you scum decided it was okay to violate my child?

What evil aspect of your cursed being was it that threatened my child?

That made me child scared, afraid and unsafe?

That made my child feel exposed to danger so?

That made my child so anxious as to feel unable to rest?

That made my child so scared as to feel unable to breathe?

What evil cursed debris of the worst toxicity on planet earth had brought you to life?

That you dared target my child with the violence that you did, with the hatred that you did?



[Interrogations of the evil violators who frightened my child, to be continued]







Rape and murder in Delhi. the economist. London.

Rape and murder in Delhi. the economist. London.
A horrible attack could prove a turning point for India’s women

What "New Year"? What "Celebration"?

What "New Year"? What "Celebration"?
1930 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 01 January 2012

By © Muhammad Haque


This image is from Delhi, the Rape Capital of India, as women have been calling it.
The image, the picture tells its own story about the corruption at the core of the world’s “biggest democracy”, India, as the Washington and the London propagandist have been peddling it for decades
Delhi is the Rape Capital because in Delhi HUNDREDS of rapes get CONDONED by the Delhi Police!
And the over-hyped Kiran Bedi, the “first woman” this, the “first woman” that and the “first woman” the other, is plainly wrong to come on TV and what is worse come up with the stupid clinical solutions, like “top cops should visit every Police station...” garbage.
Kiran Bedi should know better than to take part in this criminally orchestrated claptrap that is only prolonging the denial of the truth:
that In India’s capital city, women are being systematically denied justice.
Daily.
As this picture shows so graphically.

The two women [in the visual frame] look absolutely helpless, petrified as the craziest one of the lathi-waving, baton-charging gang of Manmohan Singh’s Police aims his charge at one of the women while two others are at the ready to aid and abet him while the second woman visibly is unaware of the third of the gangster police looking as if he is about to hit her...

What is the DIFFERENCE between THIS gang of armed and violent police and the gang that raped and murdered “Amanat” and nearly murdered her fiancé too?
.
[To be continued]


The © Muhammad Haque Political Poetry on the “arrival” of the “New Year 2013” [1]



1905 [1840] Hrs GMT

London

Tuesday

01 January 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Political Poetry on the “arrival” of the “New Year 2013” [1]

Who, exactly, decides to "celebrate" "New Year"?

What IS NEW?

The deaths of the children in the stampede in the Ivory Coast in Africa?

Deaths of the children!

Deaths of innocent children!

Deaths of the children

is NOT NEW!

Just as EVIL is NOT NEW!

Just as violation of innocence by Evil

is not new!

Just as the influence of Evil on the ones crazy with "power" is not new!

Just as robbery of the poor by the rich is not new

Just as denial of humanity by the powerful everywhere is not new

Just as the pitying and the contempt shown to the weak and the vulnerable is not new Just as lying by the Government is not new

Just as covering up the crimes of Ministers by the Governments is not new

Just as looting by the ‘aid groups’ of the food allegedly meant for the starving

is not new

Just as a judge delaying and in the end denying a say to the unlawfully violated is not new....

Just as the smug, sniggering showing off of opulence by the “Mayor” in the name of this City or that is not New

Just as injustice on the Delhi Gang rape bus

followed by the Delhi armed police beating up protesters, women is not new!

What, EXACTLY, is NEW in the “New Year” 2013?



[To be continued]







Examining Tower Hamlets Council's POVERTY-CREATION programme: [2] : Whose idea was it to 'TELCO'?

Examining Tower Hamlets Council's POVERTY-CREATION programme: [2] : Whose idea was it to 'TELCO'?
1645 [1620] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 01 January 2013

The Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical commentary: Part TWO of the evidential diagnostic update on HOW Tower Hamlets Council CREATES POVERTY in the East End Borough

CLICK on this IMAGE to see twitter UPDATES by KHOODEELAAR! on the Manifesto for Tower Hamlets where the local Council has been all but abolished by the imposition of an antidemocratic "executive mayor” “non- system” [More on this word, ‘non-system’, our word, in later parts]


This IMAGE is based on the Internet "news" item that the Roman Catholic outlet “THE CATHOLIC HERALD” had published after Iain Duncan Smith, then still “Leader” of the Neo Conservative Party, "posed”, in the 1990s, as a champion of morality and pledged that he would make the Conservative Party reflect the Roman Catholic church’s values

Below are the texts of the "news" report in the CATHOLIC HERALD, also promoting TELCO, a strange outfit that made its appearance in Tower Hamlets a few years later and "successfully" demolished the local Tower Hamlets Council by intervening FOR THE INSTALLATION of an antidemocratic structure on the Coun cil.

AADHIKAROnline shall examine the role of this STRANGE, STRANGE outfit “TELCO” in destroying Society in the East End and ask questions about whether “TELCO” in the most bizarre role it has played in the manufacture of a “Platform” that has DISPLACED and in effect destroyed the majority of the ordinary community and its campaigning activities in the East End, truly - or “at all” - reflects the agenda of the Catholic Church in England.

We ASK: Whose IDEA was it to launch the anti-social COUP in the East End that has at once managed to displace the DEMOCRATIC ORGANISATION of the ELECTED LOCAL Council and worse, the independently active organisations in the ordinary po;population the the context of the Borough of Tower Hamlets??????


[To be continued]


Tory policy 'to reflect Church social teaching'

BY SIMON CALDWELL

THE LEADER Of the Conservatives has promised to make his Party's policies reflect the social teachings of the Catholic Church.

lain Duncan Smith, a Catholic, also described the Pope as "one of the greatest moral leaders of the modem age" during the launch of the Redbridge branch of Telco, a largely faith-based organisation that works to improve the quality of life for people within their own communities.

Mr Duncan Smith. the MP for Chingford and Woodford Green, applauded the work of Cafod, the overseas development agency of the Catholic bishops of England and Wales, and said that the Tories were preparing to "unveil aid and trade policies that will expand Britain's capacity to help the poorest people of the world lift themselves out of poverty".

He said he would find policies that would "support marriage", support Church schools, and help to build a "culture of life".

But while he voiced his personal opposition to abortion, he said that it would remain an issue of conscience in the Conservative Party. Mr Duncan Smith has always upheld the Tory policy opposing euthanasia.

He said that, if elected, the Tories would also protect faiths based voluntary and caring organisations from excessive red tape, political cor erectness and restrictions on appointments of staff.

Mr Duncan Smith began his talk, called "Building the Common Good in Redbridge", by praising the Catholic tradition of social teaching that began with Rerum Novarum, an 1891 encyclical of Pope Leo XIII.

He thanked the Catholic bishops of England and Wales fur the documents on the subject that they had released ahead of the 1997 and 2001 General Elections. He then said that the five greatest challenges facing the British people were rising crime, failing schools, substandard healthcare, child poverty and insecurity in old age — social problems which he said had worsened because "too much power has been grabbed by the state from people-sized institutions like the family".

"Introduced in the 1930s when Fascism was a growing menace, the Catholic idea of subsidiarity says that power should be as close to the peo ple as possible," he said.

"Subsidiarity reminds government not to rob institutions like families of the functions and resources necessary for them to flourish. A greedy know-all state elbows aside the self-help and charitable groups that lie behind it and individual people. It second-guesses a headteacher's leadership of a school. It ties up charities in red tape. It overtaxes families and denies them any choice about which school their children can attend."

He added: "The Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, Corrnac Murphy-O'Connor, rightly said that `marriage is at the heart of a stable society', and it is still the aspiration of the vast majority of young people.

"Government should support the aspiration to marry — because healthy marriages are good for children and good for society as a whole. This is not about preaching to people about how they should live their lives, but about what works.

"Government does, after all, support socially constructive ambitions like the ambition to learn, to save or to start a business. Conservatives are carefully studying the ways in which European tax and benefit support marriage, "We also want to learn how the American and Australian governments are using community and faith-based groups, to help people prepare for and sustain their relationships."

Mr Duncan Smith said the Tories would reduce poverty and crime by creating 20,000 extra rehabilitation places for drug addicts and recruiting 40,000 police officers to patrol Britain's streets, The meeting was held at Trinity Catholic High School, Woodford Green, Essex, and drew an audience of hundreds from with the Borough of Redbridge.

It was hosted by Dr Paul Doherty, the headteacher, and chaired by Bishop Thomas McMahon of Brentwood.

The bishop said afterwards that Mr Duncan Smith's speech was remarkable in that he put himself "firmly behind Catholic social and moral teaching" even though he was addressing an audience drawn from a wide range of backgrounds.

Bishop McMahon said: "He was explicitly backing Catholic moral and social teaching and quoting liberally from the Pope and previous popes and the bishops' documents on the common good. sI was extremely impressed with his speech ... he was very clear about his own Catholic faith and where he stood."

Dr Doherty described Mr Duncan Smith's speech as "charismatic" and said it addressed issues close to the audience. He said it was clear that the Tory leader was very concerned about the plight of Britain's "underclass", and by areas plagued by crime and by drug abuse.

Francis Keay and Carlene Gbeho, the head boy and head girl of Trinity, spoke during the meeting about their own commitments to the social teachings of the Church

What does ERIC PICKLES know about Tower Hamlets Council that local people in the East End don't ?

What does ERIC PICKLES know about Tower Hamlets Council that local people in the East End don't ?
0555 [0540] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 01 January 2013

By © Muhammad Haque

In March 2012, I wrote that Tower Hamlets Council “is in crisis”.
That was a part of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto that I said would be published in a few weeks time.
So, a few weeks time from March 2012 would have been in April 2012, at the latest.
What did the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto say then, in April 2012 that is?

The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto did not say much as a manifesto but we have been reporting daily on aspects of the crisis.

There have been several statements by way of the updates to the Preamble
The reason why the full length Khoodeelaar! manifesto was not published is precisely to do with the serious obstructions that Tower Hamlets council causes to initiatives like AADHIKAR Media Publishing.

We start by reporting on those obstruction.

In our NEXT reports here and on associated KHOODEELAAR! blogs and social sites
Before doing so and as a topical contextual item of reference, we publish below the position as conveyed via the DAILY TELEGRAPH by the current CONDEM COLLUSION Minister in the Cameron cabinet with the brief about local Councils, Eric Pickles.


[To be continued] [a]
The following has been retrieved from the web site of the London DAILY TELEGRAPH



England's local government system must be fundamentally reformed, says MP

England's local government system must be fundamentally reformed to stop ministers "humiliating" councils, a leading MP has said.



Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has told local authorities to dip into their funds rather than reduce key spending

 Photo: GEOFF PUGH By Tim Ross, Political Correspondent 10:00PM GMT 31 Dec 2012



  Graham Allen, the chair of the Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Select Committee, said councils were "on their knees" and needed a new remit.

Mr Allen was speaking after a dispute broke out between the coalition and local leaders over funding cuts.

Eric Pickles, the Communities Secretary, attacked councillors for threatening to close local services while "stashing" money in their cash reserves.

Mr Allen, whose committee publishes its report on the future of central and local government relations next month, said: "It appears there is no end to the indignities and humiliations that local government leaders are prepared to accept from Whitehall.

"Instead they need to work together and come up with a plan for their long term future.

Related Articles

"Such a plan needs to appeal to ministers and to rouse local government from its knees."

Mr Allen added:

"Neither the oppressor nor the oppressed are comfortable with this relationship, together they need to work out a sustainable relationship.”

Mr Pickles told local authorities to dip into their funds rather than reduce spending on libraries, parks, bus services and bin collections.

The Communities Secretary intervened after council leaders complained that his department’s cuts to their annual budgets threatened to incite rioting and a wave of crime in northern cities.

Conservative leaders of rural councils said the reductions in their grants would “crucify” the countryside and drive voters into the arms of the UK Independence Party.

More than half of councils are believed to be preparing to defy ministers and increase council tax to fill the gap left by central government funding cuts Mr Pickles has said councils have a "moral" duty not to raise council tax next year.

The dispute follows Mr Pickles’s announcement earlier this month of the finance settlements for local authorities for the next two years. This will see councils’ “spending power” fall by 1.7 per cent in 2013-14 and by a further 3.8 per cent the following year.

However, Mr Pickles said councils had significantly increased their reserves of funding in recent years and should be prepared to use this money rather than cut services.

Figures from the Audit Commission disclosed that English councils’ cash reserves stand at £12.9 billion this year, £4.5 billion more than in 2007.

“It is unacceptable that some councils are stashing away billions, turning town halls into Fort Knox, whilst at the same time threatening to cut frontline services,” Mr Pickles told The Daily Telegraph.

“Given the steady rise in reserves over the past two years, it is irresponsible that certain sections of local government have chosen to needlessly scare the public with unfounded and baseless accusations.

“Whilst local authorities should maintain a healthy cushion, it's time for them to dip into their substantial reserves to ensure they protect frontline services, with a view to building up their reserves again in sunnier days to come.”

The Coalition faced a twin assault from Labour and Tory town halls on Sunday. The council leaders of three of England's biggest cities - Newcastle, Liverpool and Sheffield - warned of increasing “social unrest” and community tensions in the north, which they said had suffered more as a result of austerity than the south.

There was also a backlash from rural authorities, mostly Conservative-led, who claim that the shires are disproportionately affected by cuts.

The Labour leaders of Newcastle, Liverpool and Sheffield - where Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg is an MP - wrote to a Sunday newspaper accusing the Westminster government of promoting “Dickensian” policies.

“Rising crime, increasing community tension and more problems on our streets will contribute to the break-up of civil society if we do not turn back,” they said. “The unfairness of the Government's cuts is in danger of creating a deeply divided nation. We urge them to stop what they are doing now and listen to our warnings before the forces of social unrest start to smoulder.”

Separately, The Sunday Telegraph reported that more than 120 rural councils were considering a judicial review of the spending settlement for local authorities because it was “grossly unfair” and would hit services in remote areas.

Roger Begy, leader of Conservative-controlled Rutland Council and chairman of a new campaign called "Sparse", said: “Rural authorities for the last 10 to 12 years have been seriously under funded in relation to urban areas.

“We are going to have to do something. This is totally unfair and is going to crucify a lot of rural areas.”

According to House of Commons research, the average cuts in central government grants to councils, excluding ring-fenced funding for schools and colleges, will be 3.9 per cent for 2013-14.

Cuts for the following year in central government funding in England will amount to 8.5 per cent.

Councils are expected to boost their own incomes through business rates, which will deliver more money as the economy recovers and local trade increases, and also receive about £24 billion in council tax.



Muhammad Haque telling India PM Manmohan Singh to make the overdue start: deliver justice for women

Muhammad Haque telling India PM Manmohan Singh to make the overdue start: deliver justice for women
The Muhammad Haque COMMENT directly addressing the Indian PM Manmohan Singh appears at the top of the COMMENTS section after the piece published by the leading English language Media Group the HINDU in India

If the controlling cliques in the Indian central Govt are honest and if their 
counterparts in the Indian States are honest then the shame and the disgrace that 
they have shown so far may begin to be reversed.

If they still fail to get it and if they refuse to apologise in kind for the past nearly 70 
years of failures following the move to oust the British began in earnest then the 
whole of the population will be diminished.

The women in India deserve absolutely no patronage.
No soothing reassurance. 
What women need and deserve is straight and simple. Justice. Now. Every time any 
violation actually happens against a woman, there must be the due remedy. Instantly.

This is the start that Manmohan Singh must make.

Quit making banal statements and patronising nosies. 
And the victims in Bihar, Manipur and elsewhere of ALL sexual, gender-linked 
violation, violence, assault and insult must be attended to right now, without delay.


1645 Hrs GMT London Sunday 30 December 2012.

from:  Muhammad Haque
Posted on: Dec 30, 2012 at 22:17 IST

The HINDU website carrying the above comment is accessible by the following URL [web page address]

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/b-s-raghavan/india-diminished-by-rape-victims-death/article4256297.ece#comments

Boasting, bragging, opportunist, class-warrior Conman Cameron heads for the cliff

Boasting, bragging, opportunist, class-warrior Conman Cameron heads for the cliff
0040 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
31 December 2012

Boasting, bragging, opportunist, class-warrior Conman Cameron heads for the cliff, just as the Wall Street Journal admits the USA itself is heading for the cliff!

Congress Meets Cliff's Edge

Senate Budget Talks Bear Little Fruit as Lawmakers Reach Year-End Deadline

BY JANET HOOK AND SIOBHAN HUGHES

Senate negotiations to craft a bipartisan budget deal proceeded in chaotic fits and starts Sunday, raising new questions about whether Congress would be able to steer the country away from the fiscal cliff.

The day featured 11th-hour negotiations between Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.), lengthy closed-door meetings by each party and a new effort to involve Vice President Joe Biden in the talks. The Senate had set itself a goal of hatching a deal by midafternoon Sunday, a deadline that slipped by as both sides instead bickered in public

[and then Rupert Murdoch blocked access to the rest of the WSJ story]

.

Kay Jordan built the lives of people in the community, not for herself: Ala Uddin

Kay Jordan built the lives of people in the community, not for herself: Ala Uddin
1315 Hrs GMT London Sunday 30 December 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque


THIS is the part of December that is related to the time two years ago when Kay Jordan became absent
THE PICTURE on the wall was taken by Khalid Hussain as Kay addressed the KHOODEELAAR! rally on Sunday 22 January 2006 at the Brady Centre, Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane London E1
The reality that Kay was going to be absent from December 2010 onwards came as a most unexpected surprise
A year later, almost to the day in December 2011 one of Kay’s most favourite members of the “ Family in the Brick Lane London E1 area” too became absent, almost without any previous indication
CLICK ON THIS image of Ala Uddin, a local activist and formerly a member of the Tower Hamlets Council who observed Kay Jordan for many many years
Ala Uddin said this in a short video published by AADHIKARonline in March 2011.
Ala Uddin says in the video that he wished that Kay Jordan were around for another 20, 30 years.
Ala Uddin was among dozens of pope, paying tributes to Kay Jordan at the “BDC”.
The occasion marked the start of Kay’s absence from the area.
The work for the community that Kay Jordan was doing will continue with the Kay Jordan Foundation and associated initiatives
[To be continued]

India violence against women: Why the NYT is utterly wrong to make justice for women conditional

India violence against women: Why the NYT is utterly wrong to make justice for women conditional
1000 Hrs GMT

London

Sunday

30 December 2012

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: ‘Amanat’ [5]

The New York Times [NYT], in its Editorial comment today [Sunday 30 December 2012] ruins its case against violence against women in India by “arguing” that women should be treated better because that way India will achieve its potential as a rising economic power!
I quote the NYT Editorial bit below
Why must women be only treated justly because that way will mark some OTHER achievement for Society?

Why mustn’t women be recognised, respected, left alone as being entitled to justice in their own rights, without any strings attached to that justice being made available?

The NYT says:

“India, a rising economic power and the world’s largest democracy, can never reach its full potential if half its population lives in fear of unspeakable violence.”

[To be continued]

Cry for 'Amanat' but don't only cry. Say No! Say Never again!

Cry for 'Amanat' but don't only cry. Say No! Say Never again!
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Women's rights: "Amanat" [7]

1640 Hrs GMT

London

Saturday

29 December 2012

Cry for 'Amanat' but don't only cry. Say No! Say Never again!

They are calling her 'Amanat', not her real name but it has captured the hearts. it is a trustworthy name. And this trust must never be betrayed. Never again must a noter woman be violated.

[To be continued]

India Gang rape Murders: President should quit in shame at his criminal son!

India Gang rape Murders: President should quit in shame at his criminal son!
1320 Hrs GMT

London

Saturday

29 December 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [1]

Shame on the leaders of India Govt who have let rapists add murder to their crimes:



Manmohan Singh failed to show that he really cared for all the women and right-minded people in India. He has yet to be heard or seen expressing any concern about the fact that in Manipur, north-east India the police shot dead a TV journalist covering one of the protest demos held against the violent sex attack in front of other people by an armed man on a young woman, the actress Momoko Khangembam.

Singh is an expert at muttering banal words and at hiding the awful reality that the huge mass of people in the vast country are beyond the protection of democracy that he, Singh claims to be delivering!

What kind of democracy is it that allows rapes and sexual violent murders to take place against women daily?

What kind of values does Manmohan Singh represent?

He has never spoken on the rights of women in the context of rapes of all kinds.

He has only done so because of the murderous attack on the 23 year and and more so because of the people coming out and demonstrating.

Manmohan Singh owes huge apologies to the women of India for the violations of decades. He must not be allowed to get away by muttering insulting words of “sympathy” that are contemptibly hypocritical. And the “President” of India must quit in shame because of his criminal son who has added insult to injuries by attacking women protesting against the murderous rapist gang!



[To be continued]



Momoko Khangembam  
She was attacked within days of the Delhi gang rape.

Actress molestation case rocks Manipur House



Posted by admin On 21 Dec 2012 |



Under North East News  

Tags: Manipuri actress, Molestation, Momoko Khangembam     

IMPHAL, Dec 20 – The alleged molestation and assault of a popular young Manipuri actress rocked the last day of the ongoing Manipur Assembly session today.

Acknowledging the seriousness of the issue after it was brought up by Opposition leader Dr I Ibolhalbi Singh of the All India Trinamool Congress, Manipur’s Deputy Chief Minister Gai Khangam assured the House that the Government will take up necessary steps to book the culprits.

Manipuri film actor Momoko Khangembam in her early 20s was allegedly molested and assaulted by one Livingstone Anal who is said to be an NSCN-IM cadre while the actor was anchoring a music concert at the Chandel district HQ, on Wednesday night.

“The State forces in association with the Assam Rifles will coordinate in launching a combing operation to arrest the said culprit,”

Gai khangam, who also holds the Home portfolio, informed the Assembly today.

Earlier, Opposition leader Dr I Ibolhalbi Singh raising the issue during the zero hour, demanded justice in the alleged molestation and assault case.

Expressing serious concern over the incident, Manipuri film personalities under the banner Manipur Film Forum tried to storm the Assembly complex this morning. However they were prevented by the police party on duty.

India President's son Abhijit needs lessons in respecting woman

India President's son Abhijit needs lessons in respecting woman
Get Abhijit to read the poetry of Qazi Nazrul Islam. [To be continued]

India President Mukherjee's son ADDS to the humiliation of Gang Rape by attacking women who protest

India President Mukherjee's son ADDS to the humiliation of Gang Rape by attacking women who protest
2005 Hrs GMT

London

Friday

28 December 2012

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [7]

Mr SCUMBAG Abhijit Mukherjee of the Indian Parliament, needs educating.

FAST.

He MUST BE sentenced to solitary confinement with the assignment to memorise all the WOMAN Poems written by Qazi Nazrul Islam.


[To be continued]

Gang Rape Delhi: How the BBC's lying PR for India cliques gave rapists the freedom to violate so [4

Gang Rape Delhi: How the BBC's lying PR for India cliques gave rapists the freedom to violate so [4
0730 [0715] Hrs GMT

London

Friday

28 December 2012

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [4]

STAGGERING proof that the mantra chanted by the BBC for decades that India was the world's "largest democracy" was probably the Corporation's biggest invention keeping up the traditions of “gifts” offered by Robert Clive in his dealings with the “natives” in the run up to the events in Polashee in June 1757.

By “praising” the fabricated mage of India in that way, the BBC suppressed the truth about mass violations of human rights across India.

How ELSE is it that Indian women are having to march across India for the right to be allowed to go about their lives without the threats and the perpetration of gang rapes flagrantly openly and nakedly tolerated and carried out in the streets of “new” Delhi, India’s capital now dubbed the “Rape Capital of India”?

[To be continued]







TOWER of LIES: The Canary Wharf tower stands as a tower of the lies that add to POVERTY in the area

TOWER of LIES: The Canary Wharf tower stands as a tower of the lies that add to POVERTY in the area
0700 [0645] Hrs GMT

London

Friday

28 December 2012

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [3]

TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL caught in acts of gloating in effect of its [Council’s] role in causing poverty in the East End.

Here is the first part of the AADHIKAR Media examination of the obscenity of the Council taking part in Propaganda that its housing staff [questionable] are donating to a food bank.

The Council mist publish the numbers of families that it [Tower Hamlets Council] knows have been served with eviction notices or have been "visited" informally by staff from various "social landlords" - all in "partnership with the Council" in the perpetration of policies of negligence and irresponsibility breaking all pledges and commitments given when the Council housing stocks where transferred to those falsely-called [registered] “social landlord” outfits that are in effect operations of organised violators of the rights of people and the breakers of families, persons and others in the population of the East End Borough - and been threatened with being ousted, moved out of their homes, their neighbourhoods and their communities. COUNCIL CAUSING POVERTY TO MANY and then concealing the facts. And managing to participate, vicariously via employees, in PR exercises that must be treated as the negligent Council’s gloating. Such irresponsible behaviour by Tower Hamlets Council can be seen in this [below] misleading, half-baked piece promoted via the website of the n”ow merged East London Advertiser”.


[To be continued]

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/housing_staff_help_poor_families_through_tower_hamlets_foodbank_1_1754336


EXPOSED too late! Shameless Savile's long running snare didn't spare even Maggie Thatcher!

EXPOSED too late! Shameless Savile's long running snare didn't spare even Maggie Thatcher!

0615 [0545] GMT London Friday 28 December 2012

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary .


This image of the serial, mass child sex abuser Jimmy Savile's "billet doux” to then British PM Margaret Thatcher is being published by the Tory Daily Telegraph and others today, as part of the topical “entertainment” “news” following the completion of a given cycle of the utterly false “30 year rule” concerning publication of “Official documents...”. Several “mainstream” British outlets are calling it a “love” letter to Margaret Thatcher or as Savile’s “expression” of “love” towards the PM.
I don’t think they are right.
The “love letter” should be treated more in the original sense of “billet doux”, and seen in context as a sweetener, as a means by which Savile was trying to recruit Thatcher’s help in his own PR and other aims.
What Savile is showing here [see the image of his hand-written note] is his “love” for proximity to the spot of power that Thatcher then typified, personified in her own “magnetic” way.
And contrary to certain quarters saying [so far publicly accessibly] that Thatcher had used her “femininity [elsewhere and at previous times] to get herself TO the Centre of the Tory and later British Political Power”, I think the truth, as based on the evidence as published so far as I write on Friday 28 December 2012, is that she didn’t use enough of her femininity and that had she wanted to, there would have been far more damage to Society in Britain than she managed to cause during the years that she occupied the “top” spot in the British Politician map.
I did speak, very briefly, to Alan Clark, long after the Tories were ousted from No 10 Downing Street and taking everything he has written in his Dairies about Thatcher and his own “character” I am convinced that it was the likes of Clark who were likely to have “deserved” any attention from Thatcher in that direction, if she was so minded.
As for Savile, I think she allowed him access because of the PR content and because he was nowhere near a threat to her political strategy that he could have been, had Thatcher been a different, weaker character.
If she DID display and weakness in response to his enticing style, then the evidence for that is yet to be identified, verified and then established.

[To be continued]


INVESTIGATING Tower Hamlets Council's Policy FOR KEEPING POVERTY IN [1]

INVESTIGATING  Tower Hamlets Council's Policy FOR KEEPING POVERTY IN [1]


This © Muhammad Haque picture of Lutfur Rahman [seen nearest in the centre] was taken and published on the Internet on Tuesday 15 February 2011
Lutfur Rahman was "meetinG" a group in Brick Lane London E1 6RU on that date. THIS INVESTIGATIVE SERIES will examine that “meeting” and also update on the role of the Council and its “officers” in the context of the Community
[To be continued]
1425 [1420] [1400] [1345] [1235] [1220] Hrs GMT

London

Thursday

27 December 2012.



UPDATER reports on UK State created poverty.



Editor © Muhammad Haque.



POVERTY IS CREATED DAILY BY TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL itself which uses “POVERTY” as a permanent tool in its bid for UK Central Govt and related grants and support.

EXCLUSIVE INVESTIGATIVE Reports based on actual evidence including written admissions by Council’s employees, confirmed in the de facto conduct of a number of sitting Councillors and one of the two “local MPs” show that Tower Hamlets Council has been following the POLICY TO KEEP POVERTY IN!

And that neither Councillors, from any “side” nor either of the two MPs “representing the Borough” are bothered about the role of Tower Hamlets Council in creating new facets of poverty or in keeping poverty in!

Individuals and families are pushed into poverty by Tower Hamlets Council as part of a key and de facto policy.

This [below] is a reasonably useful place to get a brief general idea about poverty: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty



But the wikipedia entry or entries is/are NOT exhaustive or specific to Tower Hamlets and OTHER genuinely independent and rigorous and reliable sources must be consulted and their evidence examined.

There are many other sources that contain useful information about what poverty is.

However, there are not many sources, known to us, that actually even admit that poverty is created by Tower Hamlets Council as part of deliberate policy. In our finding, we assert that this is the case in Tower Hamlets. We assert that Tower Hamlets Council does, is and has been CREATING poverty in the Borough for a very long time.

The reference to “we” is the reference to THE MOVEMENT DEFENDING THE COMMUNITY IN THE EAST END OF LONDON spanning the past 50 years. This MOVEMENT is represented by the work of the AADHIKAR Media Foundation and by the 44 associated initiatives that have been set up or been active in the borough since 1961 identifying, examining and addressing and opposing poverty, deprivation, denial and violations of universal human rights in Tower Hamlets.

By extension, we also claim that the same is true of nearby Boroughs like Newham, Hackney, Islington, Camden, all of them in London and most of them eligible to claim the negligent status of “inner cities”.

In fact one of the corrupting policies that has been institutionalised by successive UK Central Government “administrations” is the routine of annual bids for grants by the Local Councils.

The EXISTENCE of poverty within the population in the given Borough Council IS a, if not THE, deciding factor in the “considerations”.

Logically therefore the Councils would NEED TO SHOW that they are a Borough where POVERTY EXISTS.

If the Borough can show that POVERTY DOMINATES in their [Borough] population then that is also a PLUS point to be included in their EVIDENCE during the negotiations!

So WHY Tower Hamlets would NEED to have POVERTY in the population is logically understandable.

What is not understandable is the little matter of POLICY.

If a search is undertaken of all the known output in print or on the record of the "deliberations" [using this word generously as most of what is said by Tower Hamlets Council personnel concerned cannot be given the recognition of "deliberations"; they do something of far lower quality than the term deliberation denotes or connotes] of the Council, it is not possible to com across any real admission that they have such a Policy.

But an objective examination of their conduct will show that they must have a policy.

If their “response” to such finding of de facto policy to keep poverty dominant in the population of Tower Hamlets is that they are left with no alternative by the CUTS imposed by the UK Central Government then the fact to put to them is this: that Tower Hamlets Council has been pleading for money every single year, for decades.

And most of the decades have been passed without the word CUTS dominating the headlines.

Yet for decades Tower Hamlets Council has been on the record, in the pleas it deposits with or makes to the UK central Government [Departments, Agencies and Others] and to the wider public in statements to the EFFECT that it is “having to deal with a population which has substantial part that is in poverty”

If the Council - in this context defined as being made up of both the “key decision-making councillors and the key personnel holding posts in the Council in whose name both categories of people make the decisions” - actually wanted to OPPOSE Poverty maintenance policy then it would do a number of things.

Things that would be known to those who are OBSERVING the CURRENT TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL administration.

What are we referring to here?

Answer: We are referring to the law.

Question: Why the law?

Answer: Because of something very widely publicised about the CURRENT Tower Hamlets Council which is “imaged” via two words:

“Executive mayor”. And the aforementioned “Executive Mayor” has been the first “image” disseminated to the public and in public “in the name of Tower Hamlets Borough Council” who has made the largest number of statements either expressing an intention to go to court about something or actually going to court about something.

This is evident in two of the topics about which he has been on public record in the recent months: the Council’s [“proposed” and or “declared”] “action” over the Henry Moore Sculpture and the English Boundary Commission’s “proposal” to drop the word “Banglatown” from the name of the Council Ward known for the past 15 years or so as “Spitalfields and Banglatown”.

BOTH topics have had legal action [either by “the Council” or by the “executive Mayor”] attached to them.

The “Executive Mayor” stated a few weeks ago that the bid to drop the word “Banglatown” from the name of the “Spitalfields and Banglatown” Ward demonstrated an attack on all Bangladeshis throughout the world! His statements on that have included a statement repeated a few times that he would apply for a “Judicial Review” if necessary.

A few weeks after that, one of the “Executive Mayor’s” “cabinet” members, Aminur Khan, in fact stated that the “executive Mayor” himself would use [any powers available to him] to KEEP the word “Banglatown” in the name of the Council Ward “Spitalfields and Banglatown”[if necessary].

That the current administration at Tower Hamlets Council would either take legal acton by referring a matter to the courts or it would look at the scope within the Council’s own legal remits and apply the law to address the matter!

Which, in our summary of what the Council has been saying, makes the Council come across on these two issues as being almost competent.

But that is NOT what Tower Hamlets Council is, or has been like, especially in the context of the real duty: delivering a set of Council services that actually address poverty, deprivation and denial.

With this updater diagnostic introduction, we shall be looking at the disastrous role played FOR CREATING POVERTY by the Council’s “Benefits” bureaucracy.

According to the claims made in 2012 by that bureaucracy’s “service delivery head”, Steve Hill, Tower Hamlets has got about 40,000 claims or claimants for “Benefits”.

That is a very large number of people.

How is it that this is so?

The detail of the answer will - or in “fairness” [remember this phenomenon] should - surprise and shock and astound people who, including the Rightwing, gay Conservative media trader Iain Dale have described Lutfur Rahman as one of the UK’s 100 most Influential Personalities “on or of the Left” in Britain today!

WHAT, exactly, has Tower Hamlets Council’s “executive mayor” Lutfur Rahman been “influencing”?



[To be continued]





Sub-fascist Iowa State Supreme Court may be giving the "Taliban" comfort!

Sub-fascist Iowa State Supreme Court may be giving the "Taliban" comfort!
2110 [2100] [‎2055] [2035] Hrs GMT

London

Wednesday

26 December 2012

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Constitutional Commentary about the critical immorality that the “Constitutional” USA exhibits. [1]

Piers Morgan as contrasted with the Iowa all-male Supreme Court.

I think the Iowa State must pay Ms Nelson a huge sum in damages and that the White House should urgently look into the Iowa Supreme Court Judges and have them sacked if it is at all possible within the USA Constitution, under whatever Amendment.

It is not just the farce of the soulless USA gun lobby staging the "intelligent" e-petition to get Piers Morgan more publicity than he already manages to get via his contract with cNN and assorted outlets both in the USA-and in the UK but also the behaviour of the likes of the all-men "Supreme" Court of the Iowa state in the USA that has displayed the “height of intelligence" that deserve very through rejection everywhere.

Look at this story [web linked below] I have retrieved from the website of the TV Channel http://France24.com/ in the past few minutes. My Ethical Comment on the Iowa "Supreme Court" is this:



How dare you even think that you should be allowed to sit in that Court in the name of "law"?

What you should have done is to ask the question: what about the dentist idiot “Dr Knight” who flaunted his alleged libido as a JUST [!!!] reason for violating and humiliating the employee for her “attractive” looks?

What kind of dark age are you in?

Is there, by any remote chance, any one any of you know who might be out on patrol

“civilising” the “heathens” across the Middle East, in Afghanistan? If a self-confessed randy dentist can have an attractive woman sacked because of her looks then that is actually saying that she can lose her job, a penalty, for her innocence!

So what is the difference between Ms Nelson and the many Afghan women who are reportedly attacked, violated for ‘showing their feminine faces and bodies”?

And while we are on the subject of women’s humanity and men’s assumption that women must treat men as primitive beings unconcerned about human rights, are you the Iowa “ Supreme court judges” going to let off a rapist next because he could not control his urges before attacking a woman who was dressed in a certain way????





I think an e-petition on the White House web site must be started without delay demanding the sacking and trial of these judges for corruption of justice and demanding the exemplary award of damages to Ms Nelson from the Iowa State funds.



[To be continued]



http://www.france24.com/en/20121226-iowa-court-attractive-woman-fired-dentist




2012 Games Hosting-boaster Boris allows racist attacks on the TfL buses: NOT a good legacy is it?

2012 Games Hosting-boaster Boris allows racist attacks on the TfL buses: NOT a good legacy is it?
0405 [0355] Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
26 December 2012

This is an image of the back of a No 25 Bus aboard which an Asian male passenger was hit with a walking stick by an "old aged pensioner” [!], a white female for no reason whatever.
The Bus involved is or supposedly is regulated by Transport for London [TfL], headed by Boris Johnson, one of the first to benefit from the massive TV publicity of the 2012 Games Hosting
Boris Johnson has no remedy in place against racist attacks on either the buses or on other TfL transport vehicles.
Clearly the boasts about the “legacy” of the 2012 Games do not cover or include or extend to let alone ending racist intolerance on the TfL system of so-called public transport in London.

[To be continued]

This [below] COMMENT has been published on the GUARDIAN newspaper web site in the past hour.
The comment concerns the multi Billion waste of hosting the 2012 Games and the fact that the East End has NOT benefited from it.
THE COMMENT by RIGHTSADVOCATE is REJECTING the Guardian's claim that the Games hosting Billions spent was worth every penny

[Guardian headline to the piece on their website reads
“Britain's end-of-year Olympic verdict: it was worth every penny”]

THE COMMENT SAYS
It most certainly was NOT in Newham, not for ordinary people. Nor in Tower Hamlets, not for ordinary people.

Not in Hackney, ditto.

Not farther East nor in the North East in Waltham Forest.

Nor across the river in Greenwich.

Nor in Southwark.


Barely a 1000 people, in their teens, surveyed!


Where do they live?


What are their own family, personal income status, brackets, positions?


What are they doing by ay fop institutional Education or employment?
And a thousand other equally relevant, down to earth questions need to be answered.


Why on earth would the GUARDIAN be peddling this totally ridiculous, untenable, fabricated “good news” line about the Games that only benefited wasteful Big Biz operations and their tools.


There is no sustainable legacy.


There could not have been.


The whole thing was hyped up to allow Big Con Merchant “corporates” to loot, rob and steal from the public.


From the word go.


When Ken Livingstone boasted to David Dimbleby on the BBC Panorama “Mayoral Election” Special [April 2008] that he, Livingstone, had lied to get the Hosting site located in the East End of London, he justified that lying by claiming [in effect] that the patch of Newham borough [Stratford] where the 2012 Hosting stadium [now] is, would be regenerated in a way that could not be achieved by following conventional British political decision-making.


You should now ask him and the ordinary people of Newham and of Tower Hamlets and of Hackney if they accept the claim and how their economic and social and environmental lives have benefitted in any tangibles, sustainable way from the irresponsibly and wasteful misadventure.


If you do this and only when you have done this thoroughly and transparently impartially can you claim any legitimacy to run a headline and a story along the lines that you are running with this phoney poll.


The Guardian propaganda piece for the 2012 Hosting is accessible on their web site by following the link below:


http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/dec/25/britain-end-of-year-olympic-verdict


Osborne has DOUBLED number of Treasury staff on six-figure salaries since election

Osborne has DOUBLED number of Treasury staff on six-figure salaries since election
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2252912/George-Osborne-DOUBLED-number-Treasury-staff-figure-salaries-election.html#ixzz2G7ORIj6D Osborne has DOUBLED number of Treasury staff on six-figure salaries since election EXCLUSIVE: So much for austerity, George: Osborne has DOUBLED number of Treasury staff on six-figure salaries since election

• Treasury is one of four departments where number of civil servants on £100,000 or more has risen

• In 2011/12, there were 39 people in his department earning more than £100,000; up from 37 the year before. In 2009/10, there were just 20

• Home Office, Government Equalities Office and Department for Energy and Climate Change also employ more on four times national average wage

By DANIEL MARTIN

PUBLISHED: 00:00, 25 December 2012 | UPDATED: 00:00, 25 December 2012

• 
C

George Osborne was accused of failing to practise what he preaches last night after it emerged the number of staff he employs on six-figure salaries has doubled since the election.

The Treasury is one of four departments where the number of civil servants on £100,000 or more has increased – despite the age of austerity.

Theresa May’s Home Office has sanctioned a 50 per cent increase in the number of six-figure bureaucrats, despite overseeing budget cuts under which the number of police has fallen throughout the land.

The number of highly-paid staff on four times the national average salary has also increased at the Government Equalities Office and the Department for Energy and Climate Change.

 Chancellor George Osborne was accused of failing to practise what he preaches last night after it emerged the number of staff he employs on six-figure salaries has doubled since the election

Critics say it is unforgivable that the Chancellor is overseeing such profligacy at a time when frontline public services are being slashed, businesses are having a difficult time, and hard-pressed families are forced to tighten their belts.

In 2011/12, there were 39 people in his department earning more than £100,000; up from 37 the year before. In 2009/10, there were just 20.

Matthew Sinclair, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: ‘George Osborne and his ministers have rightly been demanding public sector pay restraint in order to tackle the eye-watering deficit.

• Osborne faces Cabinet revolt over road toll plans: Ministers fear it could be repeat of ‘pasty tax’ fiasco • Revealed: Real cost of petrol is now as high as in wake of Suez Crisis when supplies were rationed • Borrowing rise could cost Britain top credit rating: Osborne facing uphill battle as figures reveal more economic gloom

‘So taxpayers will be appalled to learn that he has singularly failed to practise what he has been preaching in his own department. When families are struggling to make ends meet, and most civil servants who have kept their jobs are supposed to be subject to a pay freeze, this smacks of hypocrisy.’ The figures were uncovered by Tory backbencher Dominic Raab, following a series of parliamentary questions. Last night he said: ‘Given the urgent need to pay off our national debt, whilst avoiding frontline cuts, the astonishing number of bureaucrats on six-figures salaries should be going down, not up, across Whitehall.’   Theresa May's Home Office has sanctioned a 50 per cent increase in the number of six-figure bureaucrats, despite overseeing budget cuts under which the number of police has fallen. The Department for Energy and Climate Change, headed by Ed Davey (right), now has 15 staff on £100k or more - up from 10 before the election The parliamentary figures show that the number of Treasury staff on more than £80,000 also increased – from 47 before the election to 75 last year. A spokesman said the huge rise was the result of the department’s absorption of an organisation called Infrastructure UK. This consists of former business leaders who advise the government on Britain’s long-term infrastructure priorities and bring in private sector investment.  The Government Equalities Office, which is led by Culture Secretary Maria Miller, has increased the number of civil servants on six figures from one in 2009/10 to two in 2012/13 As former business leaders they demand commercial pay rates. Before the election, these people’s salaries were only half-funded by the Treasury. Now they are fully funded by the taxpayer. The spokesman said that without Infrastructure UK, the numbers of six-figure staff would have fallen slightly. Yet even since the absorption, the numbers on more than £100,000 rose in the following year, from 37 to 39. He also pointed out that the total headcount in the department had fallen from 1,386 before the election to 1,187 in 2011/12. And the amount spent on salaries had fallen from £70.6million to £59.3million. At the Home Office, the number of staff on six figures has increased by a half from 24 to 36. The Department for Energy and Climate Change, headed by the Lib Dems’ Ed Davey, now has 15 staff on £100,000 or more – up from 10 before the election. And the Government Equalities Office, which is led by Culture Secretary Maria Miller, has increased the number of civil servants on six figures from one in 2009/10 to two in 2012/13. Other departments such as the Cabinet Office have seen increases over the past year, although the totals are still lower than when Labour were in power. In addition, Mr Raab’s figures show that in some departments – including the Foreign Office – although the number of people on £100,000-plus has fallen, there has been an increase among those earning more than £80,000.  Osborne looks flustered as he helps paint a moneybox with children at No.11. Critics say it is unforgivable that he is overseeing such profligacy at a time when frontline public services are being slashed, businesses are having a difficult time, and hard-pressed families are forced to tighten their belts Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2252912/George-Osborne-DOUBLED-number-Treasury-staff-figure-salaries-election.html#ixzz2G7ORIj6D Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Brick Lane KHOODEELAAR! UPDATING the latest scientific evidence on the "name'',"'names'"-1

Brick Lane KHOODEELAAR! UPDATING the latest scientific evidence on the "name'',"'names'"-1
2354 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday
25 December 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical and Linguistic Commentary [5] The word KHOODEELAAR!

and the related words...

The image below is one of my KHOODEELAAR! leaflets, written in Seelotee by using the Bangla script.

KHOODEELAAR! is a multifaceted Seelotee language word that I created in context in 2004 to mobilise the community to defence itself against the Crossrail hole plotted by the Big Business and the City of London interests against the Brick Lane London E1 area.

It is “the Brick Lane London E1 area” that also houses the spot they call “Banglatown”.

And Banglatown is the word that the Conservative Party councillors in the “local” Tower Hamlets Council ant dropped from the name of the Council Ward known as “Spitalfields and Banglatown”.

Although neither the Conservatives, nor the English Boundary Commission nor the Tower Hamlets Council, uses the phrase “the Brick Lane London E1 area”, the plain truth is that it is Brick Lane that is the most well known of all three components.

Spitalfields at this moment is attracting just over 3 Million results on Google while Brick Lane is exactly 17 million results!

That is, Brick Lane is more than THREE TIMES more widely known on the INTERNET than Spitalfields.

However mathematically or algorithmically the search itself is programmed the truth is that it is Brick Lane that comes out at the top with the highest number.

I have just done the tests.

So why is it that those who want to drop the word Banglatown appear “naturally” content with the word “Spitalfields”?

Why don’t they go for “Brick Lane” area?



[To be continued]





1828 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 25 December 2012 Questions raised by a Muhammad Haque picture of Lutfur

1828 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 25 December 2012 Questions raised by a Muhammad Haque picture of Lutfur
LINES of HUNGER IN BABYLON

The © Muhammad Haque Annual Political Poetry: [2]

1828 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 25 December 2012

Questions raised by a Muhammad Haque picture of Lutfur Raman taken in Brick Lane London E1 6RU on Tuesday 15 February 2011.



To Lutfur: do you know where you stood on that Tuesday?

Do you know what the burden of duties you have today?

To get the truth out and to make sure the duty is carried out?

Do you know how that word, about "Banglatown" will ring?

If the duty is not done, & the additional questions it'll bring?

Do you know the resources, environment, the air all included

in the unanswered questions about those who colluded

in the violations of the rights and in the cruelties meted out

to the wronged? The violators saying: Council had given out

a clear order for the attacks on the spaces, the people the lot

It is your duty to urgently act on that. Or talk will be of a plot

"against the community", against the "Bangladeshis worldwide"

just as you were shown saying on satellite tv viewed worldwide.



[The Political Poetry Lines of Hunger from Babylon are to be continued]







The © Muhammad Haque Annual Political Poetry: Christmas Day 2012 [1]

The © Muhammad Haque Annual Political Poetry: Christmas Day 2012 [1]
The © Muhammad Haque Annual Political Poetry: Christmas Day 2012 [1]

1655 [1555] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 25 December 2012.

This is part of my EPIC Lines of Hunger in Babylon

This version is dated 25 December 2012.

I first began writing the Political Poetry 21 years ago in any detail. I had done on occasions many years before then. But 1991 was the turning point when I was moved to write in extensive detail after hearing of the cyclone that had affected the coastal south and south Western Bangladesh.

I started THOSE LINES by calling them LINES OF HINGER FROM BANGLADESH. That was in the first week of May 1991.

I then added other lines and based on the studies, field work mostly, done in the UK, I created the LINES OF HUNGER in babylon.

I use the term Babylon in moral, ethical and intellectual and in embattled solidarity with those of the African-Caribbean [and the Other Black, non-European] backgrounds who have used that word to denote the racistly oppressive Britain.

But I add the dimension of white poor and the ordinary white people among the African, the Asian people who are violated daily by the numerical minority of whites that has the grip on the decisive power in Britain.

My work on the role played for racism by the contemporary Mir Zafar Ali Khans [June 1757] is represented in the theoretical syndrome I devised in the 1980s calling it ETHNIC SURROGATES.

The Lines of Hunger in Babylon takes into account the role of the ETHNIC SURROGATES very much.

Like my 1991 EPIC Lines of Hunger from Bangladesh, this, the 25 December 2012 Lines of Hunger in Babylon is also written as an Epic.

I start with the composite villain that is celebrating today’s, this week’s “seasonal” excuse of a feast and is indulging. I set the evidential components around the villain. The villain has probably “earned” the latest excuse to indulge after he or she has driven another family or group of people, children out of their homes.

My Lines are in the main in the interrogative, aimed to put the villain under the rigorous questioning pressure that the villain deserves to experience.

The political characteristics of my interrogative is stated in simple. The publicly paid political positions are held by people who are in the main either morally empty or morally totally bankrupt.

Words such as crooks, criminal,s thieves, robbers, looters etc are too often used to refer to ordinary con men and con-women.

In order to create a distinction between the petty criminals and offenders, I have gone to the distance of creating decisively identifiably different scenarios of the real wrongdoers, criminals so that the fakery, the lying, the excuses that the bigger time crooks use can be seen and seen through.

I am very conscious of the very short-lived expression of concern by the current “Undone Mayor” Boris Johnson who had stated that he was aware of a plan for “Kosovo style social; cleansing” of London and that he was against it.

It is more than a year since Boris Johnson said that and it is as long since he was shut down by the Con Party and his Big Business [=Big Biz] controllers.

Johnson has not said much since that put down.

In fact he has not said anything at all.

Whereas here in the East End of London, ordinary people are not able to pretend that Boris Johnson’s silence will stop the attacks on our families, on our rights and our communities.

The decision by the English Boundary Commission to even propose to drop the word “Banglatown” from the officially listed name of the Tower Hamlets Council Ward “Spitalfields and Banglatown” is the latest glaring evidence of the venom that the Big Biz agenda-setters hold towards communities like the Bangladeshis.
The venom is not so obvious when it is realised against “the poor”. The “the poor” if they are white, are taken to “choose to be” poor.
this is the explanation given by those who MAKE the poor poor
This psychosis, this mental flaw, this illness is also known as contempt and hatred.
The contempt and hatred that Conmen Cameron and Osborn reserve for those they condemn to poverty and then dismiss their humanity too
This day, Christmas Day, is supposed to be a day of piety, fellow feeling and compassion.
It is not so if the evidence of Conmen Cameron and Osborne's agenda of attacks on the poor is any guide.
Millions of people in Britain are being robbed of their basic human rights
As the “row” over Cameron’s treacherous behaviour to Andrew Mitchell has showed, there is no honesty, morality in the political character of Dave Cameron.
He is quite happy to throw Mitchell to the wolves [as has been pointed out by the DAILY MAIL, in a column] as long as, so Cameron thought, such treachery would secure him, Cameron, his place.
Likewise, Cameron has been exposed in the year during the “Leveson evidence” that he was in the context of his Constitutional, Democratic, Parliament role and positions unhealthily close to Rebekah Brooks in more than one untenable, unconstitutional particular and that his proximity to Rebekah Brooks had all the hallmarks of a man driven by the greed for power, the greed for office and the greed to stay in such office
It also shows Cameron to have scant regard or respect for the requirements of Constitutionality
How else was he sending so many, politically untenably explicit texts to a “mere” member of the public that Rebekah legally was and is?
It showed Cameron as being smarmier than he looked
Most certainly smarmier than he looked as he addressed the Toynbee Hall last year when he “unfurled” the attacks on “the poor” under the banner of “Welfare Reform”.

Reform that deform Society
Hence my phrase: Welfare Deform!
Cameron could not have known at that time that his “mate” Rebekah Brooks was destined to expose him to the kind of ridicule that she did do
Yet he has NOT betrayed her!
Unlike his ditching of Mitchell!



[These lines will continue for the duration of the “christmas and New Year” “Season” 2012-2013]


So you say you care?

So you say you care!

So you say you care.

So you say you care?

Prove it to me if you do

Show to me that you do

Say it to me that you do

Out loud truly if you do!

You say you care?

Name them for whom you care

Name them even once if you care

Name anyone from anywhere

Just name the one if you ever care

Name them from here

Name them from anywhere

Name them just generally

Name them plain universally

Name them in pure nouns

Name them by their home towns

Name them by their general states

Name them by their woeful fates

Name them as their parents would

Name them purely if you would

Name them as if you feel their lives

Name them as if you feel their hives Name them as if you gave them birth

Name them as if you felt the mirth

Name them as if you feel anguished

Name the moment they all vanished

Name the feeling of victory you had

as you drove them into hiding

as you took the drugs and went mad

Name the time you went chiding

away at the targets of your hate

Name the time you did berate

them as you hounded them out of their house

Name the law you had to treat them as louse

Name the day you took it on yourself to lie

Name the basis on which you assumed to lie

Name the book the rule the reason for your lying

Name the cause you CAN name for your toxic lying

Name the person personnel or the group that gave you backing

Name the one reason why you should avoid the coming sacking.

[These Lines of Hunger iN Babylon will continue]

England news! NHS Hospital starves patients to death!

England news! NHS Hospital starves patients to death!
1405 Hrs GMT today Tuesday 25 December 2012


The image of the front-page of the MORNING STAR is by AADHIKAROnline

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary on the Deadly Lies that the CONDEM Collusion is telling and the equally deadly silence by the so-called Opposition in the UK Parliament [1]


All the attacks that local Councils like Tower Hamlets are mounting on the people under the excuse that the CONDEM COLLUSION is MAKING THE CUTS THAT ARE FORCING THE ATTACKS must be examined on the facts.
The truth is that MANY of the abuses by the local NHS Trusts and by the local Councils are not new. Local Councils, like Tower Hamlets, have been abusing their ordinary powers and have been getting away with the abuses, misuses for years.
These abuses, failures, systemic and systematic acts of negligence have been going on for years. Even before the CONDEM Collusion was itself formed in May 2010.
Even when G Brown was in occupation at No 10 Downing Street.
So my approach is evidential:
Take the evidence and then examine it and then make the conclusion.
No automatic assumption for justifying the blaming of just the CONDEM Collusion. This of course does not mean excusing the CONDEM. What it means is that LOCAL Councils DO HAVE to explain why they say that THEIR failures too are excusable by citing the POLICY of CONDEM cuts.
Does the evidence support such excuses?

[To be continued]


The item below has been retrieved from the web site of the Morning Start at 1338 Hrs GMT today Tuesday 25 December 2012
Horrific NHS trust 'laden with PFI debt'


Sunday 23 December 2012
by Will Stone Health & Social Affairs Reporter

A nightmare NHS trust in charge of a hospital where a man starved to death is buckling under the strain of PFI debt, campaigners said today.
Worcestershire Acute NHS Hospital Trust is set to say sorry to the families of 38 people subjected to "appalling" treatment.
In one case an 84-year-old man starved to death at Redditch's Alexandra Hospital in 2009, while an elderly woman died after going unwashed for 11 weeks.
Lawyers Leigh Day & Co sued the trust 15 months ago on behalf of badly treated patients after the scandal was exposed by the Care Quality Commission health watchdog.
The trust's bosses have agreed to apologise but haven't admitted that it is liable for the shocking situations.
It is also paying out £410,000 to the families.
"Vulnerable and elderly patients were left starving and thirsty, with drinks left out of reach, buzzers ignored and people not being taken to the toilet and instead left to sit in their own faeces by the very people meant to be caring for them," said lawyer Emma Jones.
"There have been financial settlements, but what the families have always wanted all along is an apology. Some have been waiting years."
The letters are expected to be sent in January, she said.
All of the incidents took place between 2002 and 2011, with 35 at the Alexandra Hospital and three at Worcestershire Royal.
Health Emergency information director John Lister said: "The trust is laden with PFI debt.
"Such financial problems would have an enormous impact on staff numbers and the quality of care it delivers," he said.
"There's no excuse for individual failings in care but what must not happen in the wake of this is the scapegoat of a handful of nurses while the systematic failings of management are ignored."
Last September the Morning Star reported that the trust was one of 22 that could have its finances wrecked by PFI debt and government cuts.

This is dedicated to Kay Jordan. UPDATING Lines of Hunger from Bangladesh 1991, 2012 [1

This is dedicated to Kay Jordan. UPDATING Lines of Hunger from Bangladesh 1991, 2012 [1
I am dedicating today’s blogs, updates and related writing to Kay Jordan.
I am marking Kay Jordan’s conversations with me on 23 December 2010.
One of the things she said to me is of course about writing: WRITE THE BOOK!.
Kay Jordan is the one human that has understood the importance of my writing more than anyone else that I know.

I owe it to her humanity, her compassion and her enlightenment that I pay full credit to Kay.
This I am writing at the time two years ago when we were still talking in the vicinity of the Community library that she set up with my encouragement and initiative and as part of the many community education and leaning programmes that we had ben working on for the East End of London, in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
Then we walked along the Hanbury Street, into the Greatorex Street until we arrived at the place she called her Office.
[To be continued]
By © Muhammad Haque
1825 [1810] Hrs GMT London Sunday 23 December 2012

I am using a picture of that cyclone in 1991 that affected so many people across the southern coats of Bangladesh.
I am publishing on any of my blogs a pictures like this for the first time.
For obvious reasons it is very upsetting.
This picture has been retrieved from the Wikipedia web site a few minutes ago.
I never looked at a picture like this of the 30 April 1991 Bangladesh cyclone casualties
But I must look at a picture of this detail now so that I can get the full diagnosis of the state of the world done for the whole world, for all the relevant people, to do everything they can to prevent such tragic losses of lives and sufferings
Let there be no such losses and sufferings.
There can be huge reductions to such losses and such sufferings if we human beings care at all for our humanity.
Our fellow creatures.
For All creatures!
18,000 creatures that THE BOOK says have been created for human beings!
I believe that human beings have been too, too irresponsible in looking after the creatures on the planet.
Let the irresponsibility, the lack of care, the cruelties end and let compassion begin

[More later]



THIS PUBLICATION is dedicated to

Kay Jordan

who told me on 23 December 201o
to “Write the Book”!
This is part of my writing of the Book.
Kay has often urged me to “write the book”
She has said: “forget the stupid politicians in Brick Lane, write the book”
It is writing the book that I have indeed been doing
That task has been made a little more time-costing by the Blitzkrieg
I will update on the “Brick Lane Blitzkrieg” in due course

1705 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
23 December 2012.

Lines of Hunger from Bangladesh:
The © Muhammad Haque
UPDATER LINES,
21 years on,
on the original
Lines of Hunger from Bangladesh
that I had written in May 1991.
Here are today’s UPDATER lines recalling the campaigning moment when I went to the London office of the UNITED NATIONS ORGANISATION about the urgency to do everything to help the people in Bangladesh who had been affected by the cyclone of 30 April 1991.
It was part of my action that included telling John Major [then the occupant at No. 10 Downing Street, London] to stop uttering banal words and to show that his UK Government was up to the task. That it cared. That it was true to the routinely flaunted claims of the UK valuing human lives and of caring for the victims of natural disasters like the one that had just occurred in Bangladesh killing thousands.
He eventually gave in to the demands and his Govt made direct financial contributions to the then Bangladesh Govt.
I also spent the months that followed the cyclone in getting the UNO to put together a plan to PREVENT the huge casualties that the cyclones and storms were causing
My plan for the UNO was written in a few thousand words under the title “Bangladesh 2001.”
This was done while I was battling at the same time to get the UNO’s Geneva based bureaucracy to get off the comfy chairs, as it were and to do the urgent thinking that I was trying to share with them.
The lethargy of the UNO that I came across, both in Switzerland and in the USA and the almost lifeless zombie state in which the various personnel in the Bangladeshi “diplomatic missions” across the Western Hemisphere were found in in the weeks and months following the 30 April 1991 cyclone forced me to conclude that I had to do the fast and the comprehensive thinking. And the equally fast and urgent communicating.
How to save lives the next time the storm hits?
How to prevent such large scale loss of lives.
And the related issues.
I had written it 1991 but I gave it the title “ Bangladesh 2001”.
In the parts that follow the one below, I shall cover the campaign for relieving hunger and deaths in Bangladesh that I did in 1991 and in the years after that.
Here is how I recall the demonstration that I did outside the UNO offices in 1991. I was accompanied by two supporters: Shujata Luptajan and Peter Murray.
While Shujata held the action unit together, Peter Murray gave vocal support to my recitation of the lines of hunger from Bangladesh. We took it in turns to read out my lines of hunger from Bangladesh.
Peter Murray also read from my lines at a poetry reading event that I organised a few weeks after that in the Whitechapel Road.

[Updater on that event in due course]


THE LINES OF HUNGER FROM BANGLADESH were written in an international context seeking to raise awareness of duty to the humanity across the whole world.




We stood

We stood opposite

the tall building
we stood opposite the tall London building

We stood
to make a stand

We stood

We made the stand

We stood opposite

the tall London Building

housing the symbols

of the huge

United Nations bureaucracy

thousands of miles away

in Geneva

in New York NY USA

We stood Opposite

the tall London building

We stood making the stand

We stood

demanding action

We stood

we stood clear of the haze

of lies spread in the days

following the storm that had hit thousands

across the coasts of southern Bangladesh

the lies spread by Big Biz media

manufacturing daily diversions

away from the tears of the bereaved

bereaved parents

bereaved mums

bereaved dads

bereaved children

orphaned babies

floating signs

floating signs of life

floating signs of lives

swept away

by the harsh

killer storm

cursing the earth...

We stood

opposite the tall London building

demanding action...

[To be continued]






What part of my statement isn't clear? as Frankie would say!

What part of my statement isn't clear? as Frankie would say!
Retrieved by AADHIKAROnline from the DAIL MAIL web site at 2110 GMT Saturday 22 December 2012

Feud over Frankie the cat leaves family with £20,000 legal bill after 'foster owner' refuses to hand him back •


Rosalind Mahoney handed Frankie over to June Allan on what she thought was a temporary basis while her house was being renovated
• But Mrs Allan, 83, has refused to hand the cat back and a judge has ruled in her favour - leaving the Mahoneys distraught
By
NICK FAGGE
PUBLISHED: 23:16,
21 December 2012 |

UPDATED:
15:01,
22 December 2012

 The black dot on his nose and his white-socked paws do not single out Frankie as a particularly remarkable cat. So it must be his charm that has led this moggy into the centre of a bitter tug-of-love which ended in a courtroom drama and left one family £20,000 worse off. The extraordinary row, which has set two lifetime animal lovers against each other, began last year when Rosalind Mahoney handed over Frankie to June Allan on what she thought was a temporary basis.
But Mrs Allan, 83, has refused to hand the cat back and, in a controversial ruling, the judge found in her favour – leaving the pet’s original owners devastated.
The questions over custody of the cat began in June last year when Mrs Mahoney asked her vet for help to find Frankie a friendly family to live with while builders renovated their house. Mrs Mahoney and her husband Michael, a director of advertising agency Havas Worldwide, were finally ready to transform their property close to Richmond Park, South-West London, into their dream home. This involved gutting the house.
The Mahoneys and their two children Milo and Rosie had to move to a rented flat nearby and their landlord had said that nine-year-old Frankie was not welcome.  


Mrs Mahoney says she made it clear from the outset she was only looking for someone to foster her pet.
But she was forced to resort to the courts after attempts by mediators to persuade Mrs Allan to give Frankie back – including a visit by the police in December last year – failed.
However, elderly Mrs Allan, of Fulham, West London, who has taken in more than 30 cats over a lifetime of animal welfare, maintains she would never have accepted Frankie on a temporary basis.
She says that for her, a cat is for life.
The confusion led to court and a hearing to decide custody of Frankie was held at West London County Court on December 13. District Judge Ryan dismissed Mrs Mahoney’s civil claim ‘for the return of her personal chattel (cat named Frankie)’ but did not explain his reasons.
 


Upset: Rosalind Mahoney,
, insists she made it clear from the outset she only wanted somebody to foster her pet, but June Allan, right is adamant she is Frankie's rightful owner Mrs Mahoney was ordered to pay Mrs Allan’s legal costs and her own, which together total £20,000. She has been ordered to pay £10,500 by January 10.
Mrs Mahoney, 50, said: ‘We are all absolutely distraught.
I have been crying and the children are very upset. Frankie was such a lively member of our family. He brought us so much joy.’ She added:
‘I did everything I could do to reason with Mrs Allan but she wouldn’t listen. I asked the RSPCA for advice and I even called the police to get my cat back but they told me there was nothing they could do.
‘My solicitor said the only way was to go to court. He was certain we would win. But – despite all the evidence that Frankie is ours – the judge ruled in her favour.
'There is no justice. And now not only do we not have Frankie but I have a £20,000 legal bill, half of which I must pay in the next 28 days. I don’t have that kind of money – it’s Christmas.’

'Now not only do we not have Frankie but I have a £20,000 legal bill'
But widow Mrs Allan is adamant that she is Frankie’s rightful owner. The retired switchboard operator told the Daily Mail: ‘I wanted to be a vet when I was a girl but I couldn’t because of the war.
‘But I have always taken in animals who need a home. I never would have agreed to “foster” anyone’s cat.
‘I could not believe it when she sent the policemen after me.’
Mrs Allan, who has chronic asthma and arthritis, added: ‘He is very happy here. He follows me around everywhere I go and he puts his paws around my neck when we have a cuddle. ‘He is a great companion. He gives me a reason to get up and go to the shops. He is my best friend.

‘And at the end of the day the judge decided that Frankie is mine.’
As for Frankie, he simply divides his time between sitting on top of the fridge, rolling around in front of the electric fire and sitting on Mrs Allan’s lap when she watches TV.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2251937/Feud-Frankie-cat-leaves-family-20-000-legal-foster-owner-refuses-hand-back.html#ixzz2FojRlTag Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

How a London Council leader [not in post then] lied against Muhammad Haque & backed City of London

How a London Council leader [not in post then] lied against Muhammad Haque & backed City of London
2020 Hrs GMT London saturday 22 December 2012 KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organiser Muhammad Haque had been blocked by an ignorant Labour Party bureaucrat from becoming a Labour Party council candidate in 2002. The ignorant man is called Chris Robbins and his behaviour is exposed in a comment posted this afternoon on the London Guardian’s web site. The comment has been posted by rightsadvocate, which is associated with the Law Rights advocacy network that Muhammad Haque voluntarily Co-ordinates from London, UK. KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organiser Muhammad Haque had been blocked by an ignorant Labour Party bureaucrat from becoming a Labour Party council candidate in 2002. The ignorant man is called Chris Robbins and his behaviour is exposed in a comment posted this afternoon on the London Guardian’s web site. The comment has been posted by rightsadvocate, which is associated with the Law Rights advocacy network that Muhammad Haque voluntarily Co-ordinates from London, UK. Very odd “socialist” this Chris Robbins. He is scarcely credible as a champion of local people as against Big Business interests. When a man “appeared” before Chris Robbins sitting as an interviewer for the Labour Party of potential candidates for elections to Tower Hamlets Council, Robbins asked the man why he wanted to become a councillor. The man replied by saying that he wanted to play a role in defending the local community from the planned attacks by the City of London and others similarly included. The man was turned down as a Labour Party candidate. When the man wanted to find out why, the Labour Party told him that he had shown “lack of commitment” to the Labour Party’s aims! Given that at the interview there was no reference whatever to the Labour Party’s aims or the potential candidate’s stance on any of those, this came as a shock to the man concerned. Especially as he thought that Labour Party’s aims would include defending the local community! Now, whoever would have thought that as an excuse? Not enough commitments to Labour Party aims! The man later mobilised the community under the banner of Khoodeelaar! and stopped the City of London and others ramming the Crossrail hole through the East End of London. In so doing he defended not one but many communities of all backgrounds and groups of income! Something that any pragmatic political activist would be proud to be able to do. How many tenants from Council flats have been served with possession notices and been evicted by Robbins this past year in Waltham Forest Borough? Robbins has come unstuck with his deportation policy which he tried to implement by sending local people miles away to other towns. He deserves to be kicked out and so does the L&Q bid. Good luck to the campaigners against Robbins and L&Q and Boris John son and BNP Paribas… Your own organisation, the Guardian, had an excellent piece exposing moronic behaviour by Chris Robbins Waltham forest Council concerning housing http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/patrick-butler-cuts-blog/2012/nov/13/beyond-cynical-ministers-housing-benefit-cuts-homelessness So what would Chris Robbins know about decent housing and decent democratic discourse?

KHOODEELAAR! Action to defend the whole Community: UPDATER on the fight for health rights

KHOODEELAAR! Action to defend the whole Community: UPDATER on the fight for health rights
THIS cartoon FREEZE PROFIT NOT PENSIONERS has ben retrieved from the London daily the Morning Sitar's web site. The Morning Star is a small circulation title that is continuing from the days of the CPGB, the Communist Party of Great Britain that was patronised by the USSR.
WE shall carry a report here shortly examine the words and the actions of the Tower Hamlets Council “executive mayor” in this freezing climate of multiple deprivations, denials and dislocations:

Has “Tower Hamlets Council’s Executive mayor” Lutfur Rahman heard of anyone freezing to death under his Council policies this winter?

.

1750 [1730] Hrs GMT London Saturday 22 December 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Campaign Commentary:

How KHOODEELAAR! action and analysis applies to health as well [4]

THAT doing the right thing in the UK is treated by the power wielders as the ‘wrong’ thing is evident every single day.But that evidence is not obvious unless a certain amount of active thought is given to the matter.Look at the threat by BiG Business to the people who opposed a Third Runway at Heathrow and how the campaigners were “supported” by the Tories and the Lib Dems who are now doing the about turn!What that shows again is that without very strong action in opposing an attack, the community has no chance against the power wielders.

Be they UK central Government. be they one of their agencies. Be they the local Council.This is the universal lesson from all universally applicable fights, battles and campaigns.

This is the lesson of the Khoodeelaar! campaign in stopping the Crossrail hole attack on Brick Lane London E1 area.

This lesson is now being applied by Khoodeelaar! in defending the rest of the rights and advancing the rest of the demands for the future of the community.

Those rights and demands are very much linked with the state of “health” “care” available in the East End of London.

[To be continued]



I told Lutfur so: Tower Hamlets Council is IN CRISIS! The Muhammad Haque Daily Commentary

I told Lutfur so: Tower Hamlets Council is IN CRISIS! The Muhammad Haque Daily Commentary

This AADHIKARonline Diagnostic image of Lutfur Rahman’s “cabinet” member [Tower Hamlets Councillor] Rania Khan was created from an ITV London news bulletin shown on 21 December 2012
We shall examine the strategic folly of Lutfur’s getting involved in a new row with Bromley in a later edition



The Muhammad Haque Ethical Commentary about the Mother of 7 year old Neon Roberts has been postponed until later on Saturday 22 December 2012

0455 [0425] Hrs GMT London Saturday 22 December 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: Diagnosing the collapsing state of the Tower Hamlets Council administration [4].

When I spoke for the first time ever to this particular Tower Hamlets council employee [for legal reasons only and only temporarily, am I withholding his name here] in 1996, I told him that I was most concerned about corruption in that Council generally and that I was as seriously concerned about the “ethnicity-linked” corruption in it.
Note the year of my diagnosing Tower Hamlets Council’c corrupt state: 1996. The employee was and of course still is white.

I was telling him that the token number of Asians that had been employed in the Council and put on “high paid posts” was a distraction and could be used to undermine the Council if it turned out that any one of these post-holders was guilty of corruption, abuse etc.

SIXTEEN YEARS on, and the composition of Tower Hamlets Council’s PAID STAFF is unbelievably different with a very significant n number of Asian and African-descended personnel being in posts, my CONCERN is increased many times, the likelihood of Tower Hamlets Council getting down to delivering the services to the community in a manner and to the extent that the community deserves is less than it was in 1996.

What evidence am I basing this on?

Answer: Plenty of evidence.

SIXTEEN YEARS lengths and depths and details of evidence! Here is the central one:

I cover the entirety of the history in the summary below. I first came across that employee in 1996 as a direct result of the intervention of then Chief Executive] of Tower Hamlets Council, the first woman ti hold the post.

Sylvie Pierce intervened in a matter that she would not have to have intervened in, had the OTHERS, far down below her line-managerial position at the top of the bureaucracy in paid posts and fully aware of the task that had needed to be done had done their jobs at each point.

SIXTEEN YEARS later I am once again engaged in communications that directly relate to the VERY SAME issue and the very same employee! How is or COULD that be possible if the Council had been operated by personnel in paid posts doing their jobs? This is what I call CRISIS.

And this is what I ANTICIPATED on 7 March 2012 when I wrote the headline “Tower Hamlets Council is in crisis! KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 COMING” on the top of the front page of the blog “bricklanenews.blogspot.com”.

That webblog address is altered automatically by Google.com who control the internet service to “bricklanenews.blogspot.co.uk”.

The CRISIS is accentuated by the lack of democracy at the elementary level in the Council.

CONTRARY to the plugs by Andrew Gilligan via the Daily Telegraph and a few of his allies in the pro-racist and racist propaganda industry via “Fleet Street”, the “Opposition” councillors on Tower Hamlets are NOT functioning democratically.

The smaller faction made up of the Cameron Cons are openly promoting a pro-racist agenda and the larger one, called “Labour” is NOT either operationally or intellectually cohesive, let alone really ideologically or democratically united.

By all accounts, there are at least THREE sub-factions in that one “Labour” Group. That is clearly a very short summary of the Opposition.

The deficiencies of the Opposition are now being taken care of by Eric Pickles sending in the “LGA”.

The fact that the second “extraordinary meeting” “held this month alone to appoint a chief executive” on a “permanent basis” ended up by “accepting” this “special measure” is CONCLUSIVE proof that in just over nine months since I published that commentary and the headline, the CRISIS in Tower Hamlets Council has become admitted by all three parts of the ill-equilibrium called “Tower Hamlets Council: the elected state”.

This is the stage, I foresee now, that will be followed by collapse!

And the likes of Gilligan will make the wrong claims when that collapse does happen.





[To be continued]






CRUELTY of the Courts, Cruelty by the Health system and Cruelty by the careerists in PR, Media [2]

CRUELTY of the Courts, Cruelty by the Health system and Cruelty by the careerists in PR, Media [2]
1705 [1630][1610] Hrs GMT London Saturday 22 December 2012.



The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary:
A Mother's anguish for her cancer-ill child [1]


This is the face of the moment highlighting the lethal failures of the Health Professionals! Failing a child. Failing so badly that the child's life hangs on the balance.
Now multiply that child's agony by the millions of other children who in one way or another are daily being neglected, mis-treated by the same types of bureaucrats, the same types of careerists. We do NOT HAVE a CARING effective sensitive health system in the UK at all.

And failure by the UK Govt. and the institutions. Including the failures by the UK academic ones that are supposed to but are failing to conduct the necessary continuous sustained research.
And of course the failing Zombie British media.
I am saying this because of the unfeeling, unthinking careerist utterances by the "experts media commentators" [employed by other media outlets]" that are nightly hauled into the BBC News Channel and the SKY News studios in London. They speak without the aid of their brains. Only a small number of exceptions. So small that hardly register. What is a mother concerned about the serious side effects of "current cancer treatments" to do? Why is she having to take on the entire battalions of the Courts and the Health "systems" and their propaganda outfits?


Why isn't there that same anxiety, the same fear, the same concern on the part of the "health" officials?



[To be continued]


Who is keeping Brick Lane, 'Banglatown' poor?

Who is keeping Brick Lane, 'Banglatown' poor?
1155 Hrs GMT London Friday 21 December 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque

CLICK on this Jesse Jackson image to view the November 2011 youtube post with Jesse Jackson from Atlanta in the USA campaigning for economic justice throughout the world.
Who is denying economic justice to Brick Lane, 'Banglatown', East End of London, Tower Hamlets? [1]

Coming here next:
Denial of economic justice in the Brick Lane London E1 area containing “Banglatown” and in the rest of the inner cities... and beyond.

Tower Hamlets is not so far from the parts of the world where poverty is CREATED by the couriers of the agenda of the Big Banks and the Big Businesses.
We take an updater look at the reason for the Canary Wharf Group ‘championing’ the bid put forward in the name of the Tower Hamlets Council for “City” status.
Why would a Big Business agency “champion” a perennially-impoverished population, such as the ordinary folk in Tower Hamlets who are KEPT in one state of poverty or another, no matter what faces or what set up is installed in their name as the “decision-making” operation at the “town hall” that is justified by referring to Tower Hamlets Borough’s ordinary peoples’ “democratic vote”!

[To be continued]


Kay Jordan's Thursday in Brick Lane today

Kay Jordan's Thursday in Brick Lane today
Kay Jordan emphatically explaining an encounter in the UK House of Commons, as part of the KHOODEELAAR! No to “Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole plot...” Campaign review, held in the then "Eastenders” cafe in the Greatorex Street London E1.
Pictured by Muhammad Haque.

1510 [1445] Hrs GMT London Thursday 20 December 2012
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary Quoting Kay Jordan quoting her father who said [paraphrasing] that the British ruling gangs would make the ordinary people "eat grass" before the ordinary people would wake up and stop the wrongdoers ruling over them and driving them to states of hardship, deprivation and denial...

This is Kay Jordan's Thursday. the penultimate Thursday in December. This is the Thursday that Kay spoke about the hardship of the community in Tower Hamlets.

This evening, I will look for a spot, if I can find one, where I can watch the video of the BBC detectives that Kay would watch for relaxation. New Tricks! All the actors in it are Kay's favourites.

Not so the MPs!
On neither side of the Benches in the Westminster Palace.
I remember the scorn that MPs epitomise towards ordinary people.
So Kay and I only made ourselves see any collection of MPs with the utmost reluctance.
To show how they are going to make ordinary people eat grass, I will discuss the matter of democratic deficit in the ned few posts. For obvious evidential reason I will review my stand [January 2010 onwards] against allowing Tower Hamlets to have an elected executive mayor.

If Abbas Uddin Helal had stayed stuck to the initial opposition to that idea and if he had listened to my advice and worked with me in the BHANGEELAAR! Campaign then Tower Hamlets Council would still be an almost democratic local body, with the elected Councillors having much more say than they can do now.

All the evidence shows that elected Councillors are now defunct in Tower Hamlets where it comes to the key decisions and the key representations on key issues on behalf of the people in the Borough or on the course of the Council affecting the rest of the community’s life in the “deprived Borough”.

“Deprived” is not the word when it comes to the huge subterranean bureaucracy that is mushrooming under the auspices of the disrupted democratic edifice that they have erected foolishly at the most misleadingly branded Mulberry Place.

It would have been different with an ordinary Council being the democratic executive body. That is not so today. That cannot be so. And the antics today of the so-called Opposition Councillors are not helping create any sense of confidence among ordinary people in the Borough that come the next "Council election" things will get any better.

Tower Hamlets population, those, the most, who are not “in jobs with the Council”, can expect a worse time yet to come than can be predicted even today. Time thus to mobilise, organise and politicise the attacks. Deal with the attacks politically. NOT Party politically. Deal with the attacks politically by organising against the corrupt, the lying policies that are confected to justify the CONDEM cuts and assorted attacks.


[To be continued]




Hopelessness of homelessness caused by bankrupt politicos of Britain [1]

Hopelessness of homelessness caused by bankrupt politicos of Britain [1]
1535 [1530] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 19 December 2012

AADHIKARonine diagnosing the moral, political and democratic bankruptcy of the UK Politicos 19 Dec 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary on the moral, political and democratic and the economic and the social bankruptcy of the UK Politicos as seen on Wednesday 19 December 2012.

I am writing this bit at 1504 GMT at a spot not far from many of the tokens of bragging g and boasts by Bojo Boris Johns and the excruciatingly callous careerists occupying the sets of chairs pretending to be ‘Her Maj’s’ cabinet ministers who must have posed earlier this eek when Brenda [Oops! ‘Her Majesty’] paid a ‘historic’ visit to No. 10 Downing Street.

As I rush about to attend to the day’s list of tasks, mostly caused by negligent, wrongdoing and criminally irresponsible personnel that are in the way of defending the community and articulating the ethical and physical needs on its behalf, I am forced to reflect on the costly consequences that ordinary INNOCENT people daily have to suffer after the time-serving post-holding crooked careerists have done the day’s damages and perpetrated the day’s criminal irresponsibility before “resuming” their consumptions and other acts of corruption as “rewards” for their “achievements”.

This lunchtime, the “mainstream” news agenda has been dominated by three items: Tory ex-Cabinet Minister Andrew Mitchell’s need to get his “reputation” back over the Plebs-Police-PR tussle; The BBC’s Devil [Oops, again! the BBC’s Savile Report] by Nick Pollard and the UBS Bank’s token fine of its latest scarcely-penalised corruption in setting the inter-banks lending rates.
The unbearable violence done to those children in Connecticut has been relegated to a lower level of importance in the news line up.
It will get forgotten in due course!
Just as Cathy has been forgotten.
Cathy, of course is the lead character - in the Ken Loach-directed documentary drama called CATHY CIOME HOME - whose plight caught the “attention” of the “Nation” almost 50 [=46] years ago when the BBC showed it on a Wednesday.
Today is another Wednesday.
But the plight of hundreds of thousands of Cathys is not being featured by the BBC. For obvious reasons.
The BBC is gazing at its own toxic and corrupt navel for too long.
The BBC has got to get out of that over-expensive palace and start doing a bit of journalism and reporting.
And I WILL show the way forward for an accountable and transparent BBC unshackled by Chris Patten and the burdens that he typifies.
[To be continued]

Quoting [below] the Glasgow DAILY RECORD Editorial Comment Tuesday 18 December 2012: Time to solve housing crisis

18 Dec 2012 00:01

IN AN age where even the most poverty-stricken families should have some form of housing, it's an sad indictment that many still have to be labeled homeless.

 Derelict housing in Easterhouse

IT’S 46 years since the BBC broadcast Cathy Come Home, Ken Loach’s seminal drama about a young couple sinking into homelessness.

Watched by a quarter of the viewing population, it led to an outcry over the real, neglected issues of homelessness, unemployment and the rights of mothers to keep their own children.

Housing charities Crisis and Shelter were launched and became household names on the back of the public awareness and political momentum Loach’s play created.

Everything should have changed but, five decades later, the scandal of homelessness lurks like a lasting stain. There are still Cathys out there, still toddlers freezing.

Little Riley McIntosh will spend Christmas with his mum Lorraine in a damp flat allotted to them by Glasgow Council.

There are more than 5000 children in the same circumstances all across Scotland.

The Scottish Government owe it to these children to heed Shelter’s repeated calls for legally enforceable minimum standards to be introduced for temporary housing – standards that will prevent unsuitable, crumbling, private sector temporary flats being given to those in housing crisis.

Lofty plans to build 30,000 affordable homes have hardly moved off the drawing board at a time when the construction industry need a massive stimulus to safeguard precious building jobs.

And the current system not only shows a disregard for our most vulnerable children but also the taxpayer.

Private flats are managed by councils at inflated rents, which are paid for by housing benefit. In effect, one arm of the taxpayer is paying another arm of the taxpayer to keep the homeless in the sort of accommodation little Riley is left shivering in.

At all levels of politics – local or national, in opposition and in government – there needs to be a laser focus on solving this housing crisis for good.

It is simply not right that we are still waiting for Cathy’s grandchildren to get decent homes.

© Muhammad Haque picture of Lutfur at 164 Brick Lane, Tuesday 15 Feb 2011

© Muhammad Haque picture of Lutfur at 164 Brick Lane, Tuesday 15 Feb 2011
0935 [0905] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 18 December 2012. This © Muhammad Haque picture of Lutfur Rahman at 164 Brick Lane, Tuesday 15 Feb 2011 was taken after Lutfur Rahman had visited a project called HEBA.
INTERESTINGLY [as the “Chinese” proverb has it, in my picture is ALSO SEEN Aman Dalvi
I shall; have quite a bit to write and say about Aman Dalvi and 164 Brick Lane, in the not too distant future
That will be after MY LEGAL BILLS have been sorted, unlike Mr Dalvi’s.
I hear that he TOOK LUTFUR’s “Council” to court and has just reached a settlement and part of the settlement is that he gets his legal costs paid by the Council

Heba had been one of the “target” organisations in “the community” that both Lutfur Rahman and Abbas Uddin Helal had visited in 2010 in the run up to the “election”, held in October that year for an “executive mayor” in the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
I told Lutfur BEFORE he went into the meeting on Tuesday 15 February 2011 that he should support Heba and he gave me his earnest pledge that he would do.
As I spoke to Lutfur while getting him to pose for my pictures, Aman Dalvi whispered a question to Lutfur as to who I was!
Mr Dalvi has been reasonably aware of me since then. And he has been actively studying some of the reports about the address 164 Brick Lane in the very recent past.
More on that address in a day or two

My support for Heba is based on the work of Kay Jordan.
As in so many initiatives helping the local community in a "structured" way, Kay Jordan has been the soul and the spirit generating the Heba project.
I was moved to tears when she wept about Heba’s fun ding. That was in the middle of 2010.
Tired and exhausted, Kay said that she was heart-broken thinking that she might have ti let some of the women go as she could not pay them!
I told her that as soon as she was ready to get me going about defending Heba, I would would be there to do everything to raise funds for Heba.
She said she was still doing the other, equally urgent things that her community of paid staff needed her to keep in funds and in operating condition..
Another big worry was the renewal of the contract for the Montefiore Centre.
That came along as a priority which kept Kay worried for a good few weeks in a most intense, stressed way.
So she was down worried sick for the contract with Tower Hamlets Council over the Montefiore Centre which building [the look, the accessibility, the atmosphere] she had made so much better than it ever had been.
Again, I said that I would do everything to help raise the funds for the Montefiore as soon as she told me she was ready and that she had concluded the formal communications with the Council

And we were doing other activities for the community

The All Volunteers News! One of the most exciting things that she came up with was to start publishing the ALL VOLUNTEERS NEWS bulletins on the outside walls of the Montefiore Centre so the local community could see what was going on....
Two days from today, on Thursday 20 December 2012, we will be publishing the 2nd annual UPDATER reports on Kay Jordan in the community, since the lunch that I had with Kay on Thursday 23 December 2010.
I had that lunch at the Montefiore Centre where Kay set up the architecture for the creation of the community library that I had brought there......
That library was part of the community education and action resources centres that we had been working to set up at 160 Brick Lane and in other parts of the Brick Lane London E1 area........



[To be continued]

br>

Monday in the 3rd week of December 1980 to the same in 2012, 33 rd year of AADHIKAR

Monday in the 3rd week of December 1980 to the same in 2012, 33 rd year of AADHIKAR

THIS SCANNED Picture of the front page of the first issue of the weekly Bangladeshi title AADHIKAR is the only one accessible this minute.
Both the SCANNER and the entire archive of the AADHIKAR published in December 1980 and since, have been ‘affected’ by the criminal racist assault that took place on our spaces in Brick Lane in August and `September this year.
For legal reasons, the details are not being published here at this minute.
[To be continued]
0940 Hrs GMT London Monday 17 December 2012

The © Muhammad Haque Journalism Commentary [1]

Monday in the 3rd week of December 1980 to the same in 2012, 33 rd year of AADHIKAR

AADHIKAR Means Rights in MANY languages across Asia.
It is one of the thousands of words that have been adopted by Seelotee.
And the Battle for Rights continues as vigorously originally, ethically, accountably, transparently today as it had to be done 32 years ago when the late Shah Muhammad Azizul Haque [Ayzul] became too anxious to “publish our newspaper”.
I had already decided to launch the paper but the timing had to be right
But Ayzul insisted on the paper being published almost immediately.
Like today, there was no funds to pay for all the costs that were involved.
But the demand, the need to report to the community on the community’s rights was too urgent for the project to de delayed.
The reason was that the then EXISTING “newspapers” allegedly for the Bangladeshi community in the UK were failing to do the job.
They had got it absolutely wrong about the community.
They were mentally, culturally and morally not here in the UK at all.
And 32 years later, those titles, or the ones that are still “publishing” remain as far removed from the needs of the UK Bangladeshi community as they were all that time ago, as I have been exposing in my commentary
And the arrival of the plastic ethnicity-linked OFCOM-stamped satellite TV channels operated in the UK or rather “from the UK” [more on this later] in the name of the UK Bangladeshi has NOT made things any better whatever.

As was evident last night, Sunday 16 December 2012.

The obscenity of the Empire-servile “ethnicity-linked” satellite-carried “TV channels” allegedly ”serving the Bangladeshi community in the UK” became very clear last night when BOTH Rushanara Ali, the OTT-hyped “Bengali MP” and Lutfur Rahman, the OTT-hyped “first Bengali executive mayor”, FAILED TO SPEAK in either Seelotee or in Bangle when they delivered their OTT-hyped spiels at the “live event” dedicated to the self-promotion programme for the coteries and cliques involved in the “Channel” they now call “S” but which they had to launch as the “Sylhet Channel”, a key +CLAIM TO THEIR IDENTITY which they have now abandoned. [More on this in due course]
Both Rushanara Ali and Lutfur Rahman owe their “influential positions” [influential what???????] to ordinary UK Bangladeshis who SPEAK and use Bangladeshi languages in Tower Hamlets most of the times because of RACIST exclusions and discriminations by the “Society that Ed Miliprat” peddles the image of when serenaded by the counterpart surrogates to Rushanara Ali and Lutfur Rahman in Tooting, London SW17.
Both Ali and Rahman were PUT IN THIER POSITIONS, and are being KEPT there by ordinary, un-named, unrecognised, unmentioned Bangladeshis almost entirely speaking Seelotee and hailing and originating from Seelot [=Sylhet] and living in Tower Hamlets
BOTH KNEW who their audiences were: mostly Bangladeshis both in the UK and anywhere else
So what does their refusal to speak either Seelotee [both speak Seelotee as their mother tongue] or in token Bangla [because that is the most that either can do] tell the community and tell the general observers about their “influence”???
What EXACTLY are they INFLUENCING and to what end?????????[To be continued]



All children, babies DESERVE protection from ALL attacks! By USA gunmen and by USA military... [1]

All children, babies DESERVE protection from ALL attacks! By USA gunmen and by USA military... [1]
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Lines in condolence after the murders of countless children in the name of war [1].

Lines written in London after watching the continuous footage of Obama shedding tears over the victims of the school massacre in Connecticut, USA. 1205 Hrs GMT

London

Sunday

16 December 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Lines in condolence after the murders of countless children in the name of war [1].
Those OTHER children are the ones who have been murdered in the name of war!
Who is shedding any tear for them?
Who is weeping with the parents of those children?
Who is making special arrangements for comforting the bereaved siblings of those children?
Shouldn’t those other children too be treated with the same humanity, the same respect?
Shouldn’t all children murdered be treated with the same respect? Shouldn’t the murders of children be treated with the same revulsion and opposition as being urged about the Connecticut children and their murderer?

[To be continued]

Drone Strikes Are Causing Child Casualties: Video and Report

Why didn't Rabina Khan, Lutfur Rahman's cabinet member on housing, talk about housing?

Why didn't Rabina Khan, Lutfur Rahman's cabinet member on housing, talk about housing?
0115 [0110] [0045] [‎0040] [0005] Hrs GMT London Saturday 15 December 2012. AADHIKAR Media diagnosing the British Media in CONTEXT London Saturday 15 December 2012 This picture [of Tower Hamlets Councillor RABINA KHAN, a supporter of Lutfur Rahman] was screen-grabbed by AADHIKAR Media at 2323 GMT on Friday 14 December 2012 from the BBC NEWS Channel broadcast live that was showing a “PRESS PREVIEW” of today’s [Saturday’s] Fleet Street papers with her as the “guest” on the slot. Ms Khan made a telling remark “I think we need to look at our elderly in a more positive light....” WHICH FORCES the FOLLOWING QUESTION from MUHAMMAD HAQUE The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [2]. THE TOPIC: The day that had begun for the KHEYDAIEELAAR! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque [the author of this] publishing the first four liens of his Political Poetry AT Ed Miliprat, Millbrae's idiocy about English language, was “concluded” by the BBC’s News Channel offering a slot appearance to Rabina Khan, a member of Lutfur Rahman’s over-extended “cabinet” on the Tower Hamlets Council. I shall duly examine the “cabinet” in due course. But the point I am going to make is this: that the BBC are themselves ignorant when they invite someone and introduce that person with all manner of platitudes without making any evidential, rigorous reference to the context of why that person is there at all. Rabina Khan is of course not the first recipient of such treatment. But it shows why the BBC must get its journalistic act together. Fast. The presenter hosting the show should have asked her to talk about the treatment of the “elderly” by Tower Hamlets council. Instead, she was allowed to promote a thing or two that she claimed her administration [that is, Lutfur Rahman, the “elected executive” mayor] was doing suggesting that those things were helping to raise Tower Hamlets Council’s service to the “elderly” to a level that had not existed before! If that is the impression the viewers of that slot on the BBC got from what Rabina Khan said then that would not be a true position as it exist on the ground in Tower Hamlets. This is why my question remains valid: Did the BBC ask Rabina Khan about the REALITY of the attitude shown by some of her colleagues - 'independent' - who are in the 'cabinet' with her, to "our elderly"? [To be continued]

Does Tower Hamlets Councillor Rabina Khan know what is going on under the "power" of her 'cabinet'?

Does Tower Hamlets Councillor Rabina Khan know what is going on under the "power" of her 'cabinet'?
0045 [‎0040] [0005] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
15 December 2012.
AADHIKAR Media diagnosing the British Media in CONTEXT London Saturday 15 December 2012
This picture [of Tower Hamlets Councillor RABINA KHAN, a supporter of Lutfur Rahman] was screen-grabbed by AADHIKAR Media at 2323 GMT on Friday 14 December 2012 from the BBC NEWS Channel broadcast live that was showing a “PRESS PREVIEW” of today’s [Saturday’s] Fleet Street papers with her as the “guest” on the slot.
Ms Khan made a telling remark
“I think we need to look at our elderly in a more positive light....”
WHICH FORCES the FOLLOWING QUESTION from MUHAMMAD HAQUE
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [1].

Did the BBC ask Rabina Khan about the REALITY of the attitude shown by some of her colleagues - 'independent' - who are in the 'cabinet' with her, to "our elderly"?

[To be continued]

KHEYDAIEELAAR! UPDATE: Muhammad Haque Political Poetry “in English” at Ed Milibrat! [1]

KHEYDAIEELAAR! UPDATE: Muhammad Haque Political Poetry “in English” at Ed Milibrat! [1]
The © Muhammad Haque Political Poetry, written at 1000 GMT Friday 14 December 2012 “in English” at Ed Miliprat, in response to his planned spiel to be delivered via a location in the Tory Wandsworth borough in London:
[1]
Will ‘they’ then learn about racism, Ed if ‘they’ ‘learn English’ as you say?
Will ‘they’ ‘learn’ to tell the difference between Yvette C & Theresa May?
Will ‘they’ ‘learn’ to tell a bully in geek’s disguise from a Bullingdon C brat?
Will they laugh out loud at the very idea of being lectured by a political prat?

[To be continued]

Racists take sense out of the Census! [1]

Racists take sense out of the Census! [1]
Racists take sense out of the Census! [1]

To be continued.

CALLOUS, Careless 'care-workers' cruelty to vulnerable patients. Scandalous breakdown of Society

CALLOUS, Careless 'care-workers' cruelty to vulnerable patients. Scandalous breakdown of Society
from the DAILY TELEGRAPH web site:

Winterbourne View abuse scandal: care patients to be moved from private hospitals Vulnerable patients are to be moved from NHS-funded private hospitals over the next 18 months in the wake of the Winterbourne View abuse scandal, the Government said yesterday.

Demos damns disability cuts by Tower Hamlets Council -1

Demos damns disability cuts by Tower Hamlets Council -1


http://disability-cuts-map.demos.co.uk/local-authority/tower-hamlets/
Tower Hamlets •
Rank: 137 out of 152 councils in England

Cuts Level: Very High Cut

Coping Level: Bad


Below is some further information about cuts in your local area:
1. -18.31 per cent budget change to disabled children and families' care and support
2. -7.8 per cent budget change to adult care and support
3. -7.55 per cent budget change to older people's care and support
Tower Hamlets has increased the cost of community meals services by 5 per cent and the costs for other day centre activities. The council has also recently closed three short break and respite services for disabled children.

Creating history, catching a Conservative right in Brick Lane London E1 area: UPDATER due

Creating history, catching a Conservative right in Brick Lane London E1 area: UPDATER due
This library picture of Francis Maude is from a moment in his later disastrous role in the spotlight over the UK fuel crisis


0700 [0650] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 11 December 2012

HOW the KHOODEELAAR! defence of the Brick Lane London E1 area was conducted by taking the campaign to the very heart of the UK Parliamentary Party Establishment

Transcript of KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organiser Muhammad Haque’s Questions and Tory Chair Francis Maude Answers 24.04.2006 17:27

AADHIKARonline transcript of the question and answer between Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque and Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude, in Brick Lane London E1 at 1210 Hrs appx GMT on Monday 24 April 2006
Transcript posted on aadhikaronline web pages at 1345 Hrs GMT Monday 24 April 2006 1. Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area No to Crossrail hole Bill] : Hello can I ask you a Question from Khoodeelaar?
Francis Maude: Yes. Do.
2. Muhammad Haque: [Khoodeelaar is] the Campaign against Crossrail hole [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
3. Muhammad Haque What would you say is your Party’s position?
Francis Maude: Well, we’re very much in favour of CrossRail… which we think can deliver very serious benefits to the area but we’re concerned that there shouldn’t be [slight stammer] all of the digging up of [slight stammer] the [Brick Lane London E1 ] area to make it happen, We don’t see that it’s necessary.
4. Muhammad Haque: Do you believe Alistair Darling's
Francis Maude: No
5. Muhammad Haque: [UK Transport Secretary – the Crossrail hole Minister] Alistair Darling’s statement, said in a written statement on 30 March [2006] what do you say to that?
Francis Maude: No. You see that’s simply pre-election [hesitation]] manoeuvring. I wouldn't trust anything he [Alistair Darling] says.
6. .Muhammad Haque: Are you going to take it up as a formal motion against his
Francis Maude: my colleagues are. My colleagues will be. Thank you very much.
7 Muhammad Haque: When do you expect to do that?
Francis Maude: Well, very soon.

UK Govt is forced to concede need for massive review of the key Policing values [1]

UK Govt is forced to concede need for massive review of the key Policing values [1]
2035 Hrs GMT London Monday 10 December 2012


UK moves further in the operation of the project for the demolition of the idea of the “Police” as a “solid” pillar of Society and of Societal thinking.
This is for two reasons, brought into topical focus today, Monday 10 December 2012
: the announcement that Police will move into Tesco and similar shops and even into the Church, rather than be stationed at Police stations and, secondly, the announcement, reported below, by Dominic Grieve [QC, MP] the Attorney General that he is to formally move that the Hillsborough inquest verdict be scrapped.
Hillsborough, more than any other contemporary event in domestic UK history, epitomises the state of the claim, the validity of the claim by the Police as an institution of “reliability, fairness and safety”. Other, more recent events, especially the series of claims and counter-claims over the tragic death on 1 April 2009 of the newspaper vendor Ian Tomlinson in the City of London have shown that Policing in Britain is overdue for a very detailed review before it can be fitted with the requirements of Society claiming to be fair. [To be continued]


The following report has been retrieved from the web site of the London DAILY TELEGRAPH in the past 10 minutes


By Wesley Johnson,
Home Affairs Correspondent
5:57PM GMT
10 Dec 2012
Dominic Grieve QC said he believed the case to quash the accidental death verdicts at the inquest into the deaths of the 96 victims of the 1989 tragedy was “a good one”.
The move comes after a damning report into the disaster laid bare a cover-up which attempted to shift the blame for the tragedy on to its victims.
Ninety-six Liverpool supporters died in the crush at Sheffield Wednesday's Hillsborough stadium on April 15, 1989, where their team were to meet Nottingham Forest in an FA Cup semi-final.
Anne Williams, whose 15-year-old son Kevin died in the disaster, said the decision was one she had been waiting 23 years for.
“I can't believe it,” she said.
“This is my fourth submission to Attorney Generals over the years and they have always come back 'not in the interests of justice'."

Mrs Williams, 60, said she was now "one step closer" to knowing the truth about what happened to her son on that day.

Margaret Aspinall, whose son James, 18, died at Hillsborough, said: "We have waited over 20-years for these verdicts to be overturned and I'm sure all the families will be delighted to hear that these steps are being taken.

"It is a great step towards getting the justice we have fought for."

In a statement, the Attorney General’s office said the application was based on new medical evidence, along with the changes made to statements from the police and emergency services, which showed it was “necessary or desirable in the interests of justice that new inquests should be held”.

"I believe that the case for the High Court to quash the original inquests is a good one," Mr Grieve said.

No date for the hearing at the High Court has been set.

Related Articles Hillsborough: 'The biggest cover-up in history' 12 Sep 2012

Hillsborough: 41 of 96 victims could have lived 12 Sep 2012

'So many people could have been saved - it beggars belief' 13 Sep 2012



She is not likely to experience the grind most Muslim people, women and men, endure ...

She is not likely to experience the grind most Muslim people, women and men, endure ...
Guardian does it again! [To be continued]

Stop the mass murderers, war traders starvers of millions

Stop the mass murderers, war traders starvers of millions
OSLO, Norway
0030 GMT
Monday 10 December 2012 PROTESTERS gathered at midnight for the vigil against Monday's formal award of the Nobel Prize to be given to the second biggest war trader in the world, after the USA.
The EU

IRISHTIMES.com
EU not worthy Nobel winner,
say protesters

JUDITH CROSBY
A group critical of the EU held a vigil in Dublin last night ahead of the bloc's receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize today. Seven members of the People's Movement lit candles outside the European Commission's office to highlight what they said was a discrediting of the award.
"[Some] 32 per cent of global arms are exported from EU countries," said chairman Kevin McCoy.
"Most people's initial reaction was astonishment on hearing the prize was to go to the EU. "But after that, 'discredit' is the word that has been used."
Militarisation 
The group says the EU does not meet the criteria to be awarded the prize since it supports the militarisation of Europe through its support for the US and Nato.
Mr McCoy also cited the EU's track record in the Balkans, saying its "premature recognition" of Slovenia and Croatia "fuelled the flames of the war" in former Yugoslavia.
The group also criticised the EU's lack of action on human rights for Palestinians while allowing special trading status with Israel.
In Oslo about 1,000 people held a protest against today's ceremony. Mairead Corrigan Maguire, who received the award in 1976 for her work in Northern Ireland, attended.

AADHIKAR Online Diagnosing Starvation Brirain

AADHIKAR Online Diagnosing Starvation Brirain
The © Muhammad Haque Ethical Commentary
1945 [1930] [1915] Hrs GMT London Sunday 09 December 2012.
The picture shows an AADHIKAR Media image of the two page spread by today’s SUNDAY MIRROR newspaper, London. Commenting on the SUNDAY MIRROR’s investigation, one of the Ed Miliband-led Labour Party’s front bench spokespersons in the UK House of Commons, Angela Eagle almost told the whole truth but resisted the temptation. The truth is that Britain has been home [!!!] to hundreds of thousands of starving people for generations. The truth is that hunger and starvation are part and parcel of UK Govt Policy. The truth is that the Labour Party Parliamentary leadership has been as guilty of maintaining the hunger and starvation in Britain as has the Tory Party been. And now, as the CONDEM Collusion is.
But being the Shadow Leader of the House of Commons, and noted for her record in taking noticeable “care” in maintaining a secure place in the bureaucratic manifestation of the Labour Party, Angela Eagle was not going to rock the boat.
And she didn’t risk her career by her stint on SKY this morning.
She kept her words and her manner on camera very collected even though the contents of the food bank Britain story in the SUMDAY MIRROR that she was there to review were far from calm and collected.
But then in many ways, Angela Eagle has been a calm and collected and a steadfast follower of the front bench line that has NOT deviated from the “OFFICIAL UK GOVT STRATEGY” about hunger, famine and starvation inside the UK.
[To be continued]
The following item has been retrieved from the London DAILY MIRROR website


By Nick Owens

Food bank Britain:
Hungry Brits get 200,000 care parcels
Hundreds of thousands of parcels are being delivered to struggling Brits this year, the Salvation Army reveal


Crisis:
Food parcel deliveries rising say Salvation Army

More than 200,000 food parcels will be delivered to poverty stricken Brits this year, shocking new figures have revealed.
The Salvation Army say that number has DOUBLED in a year... and the charity fears things will only get worse in 2013.
The organisation delivers food packages to those in desperate need, including the homeless and OAPs.
But they say rising numbers of people suffering in the wake of cuts are now coming forward and saying they do not have enough money to eat and drink.
"The statement we hear over and over from people is that they are choosing between 'heating and eating' this winter," a Salvation Army spokesman said.
"The past year has seen demand for food parcels double and we are desperately trying to help as many people as we can."
The Salvation Army say the north east of England is the area with the highest number of people in need.
They use food donated by the public and supermarkets The spokesman added: "The public are so generous... but we urgently need extra donations to meet demand."
  Has your family had to rely on a local food bank?
We want to hear your stories to carry on raising awareness of the growing food poverty crisis in the UK.
Call the Sunday Mirror freephone on 0800 289441 or email scoops@sundaymirror.co.uk

The 1970s battle of Brick Lane Lon don E1 repeated now in Greece by besieged Bangladeshis [1]

The 1970s  battle of Brick Lane Lon don E1 repeated now in Greece by besieged Bangladeshis [1]
CLICK on the image to view the YOUTUBE KHEYDAIEELAAR Bulletin

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [4].
0105 [0050] Hrs GMT London Sunday 09 December 2012.
[2300 Hrs GMT London Saturday 08 December 2012]
Brick Lane experience is now being 'relived' in Greece by migrant Bangladeshis in the south-West European country which is itself at the centre of the calamity of debt and debilitating economic deficit.
The KHEYDAIEELAAR! Campaign to resist the racist attacks takes on a new meaning now and the need for mobilising against the new versions of racist assaults has not been greater.
Just as the supporters of the “Banglatown” word in the the Brick Lane London E1 area are saying that the racists shall not pass about “Banglatown”, so it seems they must show urgent unity on the wider democratic and politically legitimate platforms across Europe to stop the Greek-type racists’ assaults threatening Bangladeshis in the UK and in other parts of western Europe.
BRINGING the battle for the BRICK LANE LONDON E1 area back into focus in the context of the reigning culture in Europe that remains racist and violent against the Asians, Africans whose presence is always treated with intolerance and hostility.
The kind of hostility that could be written and given “respectable mainstream media” expression by the likes of Southern Africa born white politicians like Matthew Parris. Parris, who worked for Margaret Thatcher and even wrote a few pieces for her, came out with unconcealed venom against the electors in Bethnal green and Bow in the East End generally and in particular against the voters of the “Brick Lane London E1 area”, within weeks of the 2005 General election.
Parris claimed that the ouster of oona King and the election of George Galloway as MP for Bethnal Green and Bow in May 2005 had confirmed the “justifiable ground” [my phrase based on his prejudiced sentiment] for the Big Biz agenda assault plot against Brick Lane London E1 area to be carried out.
Parris singled out the Brick Lane London E1 area because of the political role that he saw the community around Brick Lane had played in making sure that Oona King got kicked out as ‘the MP’ at the May 2005 UK General Elections.
The KHEYDAIEELAAR! campaign youtube bulletin published here contains a clip that has been taken in the past 120 minutes from BSKYB’s satellite Channel 814 which is aimed at the UK Bangladeshis in the main.
The BSKYB Channel 814 is transmitted from London.
In this KHEYDAIEELAAR Bulletin [08 Dec 2012] which is using the clip, a rarely seen "news" item about is featured about migrant Bangladeshis marooned in a south-West European country. The Bangladeshis featured in the item showed their state of being surrounded by a fast deteriorating and dangerous racist environment.
This is a rare "news" item that the BSKYB Channel 814, operated from the east London borough of Waltham Forest. Channel 814 operates a “news agenda” that is often devoid of original, hard hitting, bread and butter news about the ordinary, daily life of the UK Bangladeshis. What it does transmit is mostly “news” either about the feting of one colonialist or another and then the events between only some of the most repressive and antidemocratic poor-grabbing outfits in Bangladesh itself. This item that Channel 814 showed on Saturday 08 December 2012 was the second of a two part “report” that it, the BSKYB Channel 814 has shown. But the accompanying words from the “reporter” lacked all the contextual historic or internationally relevant substance that would have to be contained in a report to get across the significance of the attacks on the Bangladeshis in Greece.. The people who are experiencing the racist siege on the non-European migrants in Greece today are going through what THOUSANDS of Bangladeshis in Britain went through in the 1960s, 1970s and into the 1980s. What the people speaking of the state of helplessness and fear remind of is what Tower Hamlets was in the late 1960s through the 1970s and most of the 1980s. [To be continued]

Zombie Britain! The Daily Mail catches up , 10 years after Muhammad Haque's latest diagnosis

Zombie Britain! The Daily Mail catches up , 10 years after Muhammad Haque's latest diagnosis


The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary UPDATING on my original diagnosis of British Society as a Zombies-led Society.

2120 Hrs GMT London Saturday 08 December 2012.

SEVEN YEARS AGO, almost to the day today, I published, on the internet the following pice that diagnosed in a telling way the British society as being dominated by Zombies.

I publish the piece again, on this Facebook account, because the DAILY MAIL has just discovered that there are quite a few zombies about in Britain occupying key powerful positions.

Before doing an updater diagnostic, I leave the piece first, below and will piece back to the them at a suitable later occasion.

That occasion may even occur on Monday when the Daily Mail - or its likes in the rest of the corrupt British media-dominated “Fleet Street” indulge in capitalising on the state of zombificaton that the majority of their “readers [and advertisers and financiers]” are in - may be caught in an unguarded moment of some scandalous description!

Even it it may not happen exactly in the way that I am here implying it may do, it is only a matter of time before I have to devote time, energy and resource to an updating comment on the Zombificaton of Western Societies.

Because whatever the likes of the embarrassingly unfazed and ignorant David “Dave” Cameron may say [imagine having to suffer his “clarity” about his “stance” on “marriages” - what a rampant fraudulent fakery that one was on Friday] about the “Western values”, I see mounting evidence of the active destruction of the idea of morality itself by the likes of Cameron.

LOL! indeed!

Just how much worse the “emerging” “democracies” are is something that I shall not leave to the imagination.

I shall focus attention on the “happy” embrcers of the “demonstration effect” foisted on the Asian and African continent by the Big Time Zombie-makers from the West whence emanate, also, the deadly uncivil sing, murderous lure of “trade” in arms sales and arms purchase.

Look at that tellingly unrepentant and guilty face of the Bullyingdone Cameron as he emerges from yet another deal after duping yet another “third world” “emerging” “ally” into buying utterly unnecessarily and avoidably piles of weapons of mass destruction made and manufactured and branded in Britain.. Compared to the pair of callous, criminal Australian DJs who duped their victims working as nurses at the King Edward the viii Hospital in London housing the OTT-news Kate Middleton, the damage done to morality, ethics, and human safety by the partners in arms trade [To be continued] Below I quote myself from Tuesday 06 december 2005: MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY WORLD NEWS COMMENTARY Tuesday, December 06, 2005 MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY WORLD NEWS COMMENTARY Tories in Britain have confirmed they don't care for ethics, morality or sense in politics. They are happiest being zombie led. Compassion, justice, fairplay are not for them. posted by MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY WORLD NEWS COMMENTARY @ 9:50 AM 0 comments Tories in Britain have confirmed they don't care for ethics, morality or sense in politics. They are happiest being zombie led 1720 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 6 December 2005 Tories in Britain have confirmed they don't care for ethics, morality or sense in politics. They are happiest being zombie led. Compassion, justice, airplay are not for them. There was no way that David Cameron was not going to be the Tory token. There is no leadership. Only emptiness. Only immorality, Deception, Concealment and fraud. That is what the forces that hide behind the facades of party democracy want in the party. Cameron is empty. He will remain empty. And he will contribute towards emptying society of whatever little signs of content and substance there remain after years of Tory Blair and his violation of substance and his breaches of ethics. The emptiness the immorality the total utter abject lack of ethics that dominate the British ‘political climate’ in December 2005 would not allow for any political substance to exist. That is why the entire BBC machine was geared into service to plug away for a Cameron result. As was the entirety of the so-called print media. The question is not what will now happen with this ‘new’ Tory leader. The question is, what scope is there now for people in Britain to get a political representation which will address the needs of the people and start the overdue moment for creating a semblance of society and democracy here.

Parliament is not doing the representation of the people in Britain. This was shown by Tony Blair’s utter contempt in March 2003. More than two million people marched thus creating a record of opposition to an unjust policy unparalleled in known history of this country.

The Tory Part backed that unjust onslaught on Iraq.

The number of the innocent casualties of that violation is still not published.

The Tory front bench has not bothered itself in Parliament at all with that.

In fact the Tory front bench is not bothered at all about anything that is deeply serious.

At ‘home’ or ‘abroad’.

There is not going to be any qualitative difference with Cameron. Only worse will follow this latest Confirmation of zombie ‘politics’. posted by MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY WORLD NEWS COMMENTARY @ 9:42 AM 0 comments Thursday, September 29, 2005 Blair's Brighton attack on freedom of speech confirms his authoritarianism Also published by ELYO FROM BRIGHTON TO BRICK LANE The Struggle against Blair’s assault on the weak and the truthful must continue...



EAST LONDON YOUTH ORGANISATION backing the Brick Lane London E1 Area NO to Crossrail hole

The Lessons for all from the ongoing struggle to defend the East End of London against Crossrail attack

The East End of London and the area around Brick Lane will stop Crossrail hole



"The East End of London will awaken and defend the community against the Crossrail hole.

There is no democratic alternative. The only way the people in the easy End of London in September 2005 know they can protect themselves against the Blair-set series of attacks on the environment, on the society in the Brick Lane London E1 area, is for the appeal, to get united against the local Blair agents. Or Brown agents. Or McCartney-agents.

After the audacious violence on the escapee from Hitler's Nazi regime, the Blair Party has no screens behind which to hide their robbery of democracy.

The Crossrail plan is a direct party of the project to silence democracy. To eject sense and to expel legitimacy from the arena of power.

Be that in the formal building of the UK House of Commons. be that from the actual structures and buildings where Blair and his operatives seek to contrail and to confuse the masses, there is no denying that Blair has turned the country into a very intolerant one in a matter of weeks.

Planned periods of hysteria and mass scare have been implemented as parts of the designed programme to test the people’s state of alertness against a totalitarian regime in Britain.

What the Brighton Nazi Style violence on the 82 year old 'Labour' Party member objecting to the leis of the man of straw [in contents] shows is that the people are unlikely to fall for the plastic charms of the face of the neo-totalitarian

That same thing applies to the East end of Lon don where the people can only defend themselves by getting united action against the Crossrail attack.

There is no economic justification for the Crossrail hole plan. There is no hole plan need for the Crossrail hole dust and dirt imposition programme.

There is no constitutional justification fort the Crossrail hole attack on the East End people.

To learn more about the evidence against Crossrail hole plan, visit http://uk.geocities.com/cbruk_khoodeelaar/today.html This has been written in London and posted on the World Wide Web at 0115 Hrs GMT

Friday 30 September 2005

posted by MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY WORLD NEWS COMMENTARY @ 8:24 PM 1 comments

Monday, September 19, 2005

MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY WORLD NEWS COMMENTARY

MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY WORLD NEWS COMMENTARY2240 Hrs GMT London Monday 19 September 2005

Why am I thinking about the dismal embarrassment that all thinking, good hearted persons must suffer at the sight of a banal band of overpaid morons disguised as ‘leaders of the people’ and jumping on preposterously over-decorated stages and platforms on certain British – mainly English – s



http://uk.geocities.com/cbruk_khoodeelaar/today.html 
uk.geocities.com

Counting the costs of defending "Banglatown" area from the Big Biz City of London Assault

Counting the costs of defending "Banglatown" area from the Big Biz City of London Assault
1015 Hrs GMT London Saturday 08 December 2012

This © Muhammad Haque created artistic part of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign literature and action archive shows Kay Jordan surrounded by Khoodeelaar! campaign placards
Who had created those placards?
Who had paid for those?
Where were they created?
These questions and a thousand more are at the centre of the real work for the mobilisation of a campaign NOW NEEDED and wanted in order to effectively defend the area against the latest Big Biz, Empire-revivalist, Rightwing, racist bid to dislocate the community from the Brick Lane London E1 area which houses "Banglatown".
DUE HERE NEXT

KHEYDAIEELAAR! campaign report: Youth at Altab Ali Park rally for Banglatown, was hurt in M1 BMW cr

KHEYDAIEELAAR! campaign report: Youth at Altab Ali Park rally for Banglatown, was hurt in M1 BMW cr

THIS is a picture of Raihan Islam, published by the EVENING STANDARD

The news outlet quoted a friend of his, Mr Farsi as follows: “He is very active in the community. Just last Saturday he was taking part in a Save Banglatown event in Altab Ali Park. Both he and Imran were really fortunate because they only narrowly escaped death as the impact happened on the driver side.”

KHEYDAIEELAAR! campaign report:
Youth at Altab Ali Park rally for Banglatown, was hurt in M1 BMW crash!
The following report has been retrieved from the web site of the London EVENING STANDARD

Josh Loeb
05 December 2012

The father of a critically ill victim of the BMW crash on the M1 which claimed the lives of two of his friends was today praying for his son’s recovery as the family maintained a bedside vigil.
Raihan Islam, 25, a youth worker from the East End, has punctured lungs and kidney damage and is being kept in a medically-induced coma at St Mary’s Hospital, Paddington.
His father Nurul, 54, said: “The whole accident was unexpected and we’re praying for a speedy recovery. I send my condolences to the families of the deceased.”
Five others were injured when two BMWs collided near Watford at 2.30am on Monday. Raihan was the front-seat passenger in the BMW being driven by father of one Mizanur Rahman, 24, who was killed along with Gulzar Ahmed, 22.
Mr Islam, a housing officer, spoke to the Standard through a family friend, Salman Farsi, whose brother-in-law Imran Hoque - travelling in the same car - is also in a critical condition.
Mr Farsi, 27, an East London Mosque press officer, said: “I saw Raihan and he was on a respirator.
"He was bruised all over his face and had cuts to his hand, a laceration on his face and he looked like he’d been stitched up.”
Mr Islam is well known in the tightly-knit Bangladeshi community for his work, which includes mediating between gangs for youth charity the Osmani Trust, Mr Farsi added.
He said: “He is very active in the community. Just last Saturday he was taking part in a Save Banglatown event in Altab Ali Park. Both he and Imran were really fortunate because they only narrowly escaped death as the impact happened on the driver side.”
Mr Hoque, 24, a father of two, suffered head injuries and was in a medically induced coma until yesterday.
His family are maintaining a bedside vigil and he is said to be mute and suffering from shock.
Speaking from Mr Hoque’s bedside last night, Mr Farsi said: “He’s not talking at the moment. I think he’s in a state of shock. He was not aware until today that two of his friends have passed away. Although he’s not talking he is able to acknowledge people that talk to him.”
Mr Hoque’s father Shamsul, 50, said: “I am extremely grateful that Imran is alive but extremely saddened by the bereavement of the other families.”
Mr Farsi said he hoped the police investigation would find answers to what happened, adding: “We’d like to know as everything is a bit sketchy and unclear at the moment.” He said families of the two dead men were making funeral arrangements in accordance with Islamic tradition, which stipulates that burials must take place as soon as possible after death.
Mentions of the dead and injured men are expected to be made at prayers at the East London Mosque in Whitechapel on Friday.
Yesterday Mr Ahmed’s father paid tribute to his “wonderful” and “popular” son.
Today Mr Rahman’s family declined to speak when approached by the Standard.
The other four injured men were all travelling in the other BMW.

NEXT: KHOODEELAAR! UPDATER Brick Lane London E1 Area housing "Banglatown"

NEXT: KHOODEELAAR! UPDATER Brick Lane London E1 Area housing "Banglatown"
This image of KHOODEELAAR! campaign activist Kay Jordan is a montage, created by the BBC graphics workers. It is from the BBC TV programme The Politics Show, broadcast on Sunday 26 March 2006. In the picture, Kay Jordan is shown against a Brick Lane background.
She spoke to the BBC as the Khoodeelaar! campaign reached a key moment in the demand that the UK GOVT dropped the plotted assault on Brick Lane
Today’s “furious row” over the word “Banglatown” would not merit any comparison at all with the battle to protect the area from actual physical destruction.
Especially after yet another week spent by the embarrassingly shallow and narrow-minded careerists making all manner of claims around the word “banglatown”, the campaign to defend the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area SUSTAINABLY has never been more necessary
Our UPDATE examines the current state of the area as represented by Kay Jordan and Muhammad Haque on the BBC in march 2006
COMING NEXT here and on associated AADHIKAROnline Media sites and KHOODEELAAR! Campaign blogs:
The KHOODEELAAR! UPDATER Brick Lane London E1 Area housing "Banglatown”



2200 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
06 December 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary. Khoodeelaar! Told the DAILY TELEGRAPH, George Osborne and assorted others so! UPDATING on the dishonesty, lying at the heart of the UK Department responsible for “transport” that KHOODEELAAR! exposed years ago!
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary. Khoodeelaar! Told the DAILY TELEGRAPH, George Osborne and assorted others so!
That the daft DafT, the UK Department for Transport was stuffed full of liars, fakers and fabricators! The Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Big Business agenda scam Crossrail hole plot exposed the lies and the liars during the seven years of non-stop action to stop the plot against the Brick Lane London E1 area community! On encounter after encounter, we told the UK DfT liars off as we spotted the litany of their lies. 
We published the evidence.
We said contemporaneously that that was how the liars were abusing their questions as they wasted public resource and risked more losses by the public whilst the lying careerists served the interest of the secret forces of Big Business controlling the agenda.
But the Daily Telegraph and other “mainstream” media steered clear of telling the truth despite our telling them to tell the truth.
Years of silence and £billions do wastes later, they are creepily publishing the “news” as if this is the first exclusive finding of some investigation by them! The DAILY TELEGRAPH should apologise once again for colluding in the suppression of the truth.
[To be continued]

CRUELTY by professional carers in Britain has become normalised!

CRUELTY by professional carers in Britain has become normalised!
0935 Hrs GMT London Thursday 06 December 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque
This picture was taken by AADHIKARDigitalarchievsinACTION last night by conducting a task known as screen-grab whereby a picture is saved off a video stream.
This screen-grab was done while the BBC NEWS CHANNEL was broadcasting a “PRESS PREVIEW” of today’s Fleet Street papers.
The Rev Rose Hudson Wilkin was one of the two guests on the slot. usually they have the all-purpose time-serving tool of the pro-racist Empire agenda Yasmin Alibhai Brown to serve as the “ethnicity” token in the generally pro-racist Imperialist BBC agenda which Yasmin AB does without ever failing her Imperialists masters and mistresses.
This time, last night, though, the “Rev Rose Hudson Wilkin” came across as a calm but clear ordinary human being. She enhanced the credibility of her comments when she also disclosed that she knew areas like Hackney in East London where the true brunt of the assault on Society ere already being felt.
She made herself almost real when she stated that theer were two Tiers ion Society as the bars and the places of entertainment were full on the one hand .. and the ordinary local people were left bare-pocketed in the main.. Those are the impressions.
Not her words.
But the point is made either way.
That there does exist a CRUEL BRITANNIA agenda that is being heighten up by the likes of the BULLYING DONE BOYS of Osborne’s and Cameron’s ilks!

[To be continued]
CRUELTY by professional carers in Britain has become normalised!

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary and CONTEXTUAL UPDATER on the racist Sunday Times attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area 39 years ago…


0920 [0820] [0812] [0700] Hrs GMT London Thursday 05 December 2012:
Leveson: Brian Leveson was a puny youth  of 24  when I embarked on the inquiry into the SUNDAY TIMES and Fleet Street, 39 years ago this week!
Incredible to think it has been 39 years!
I am in the neighbourhood of Brian’s age but what a different world he must inhabit! More on that world later!
But it is very very true.
Incredible to think that I have been campaigning in Britain for 39 years for a truthful Fleet Street!
But it is true.
It is incredible to think that I have been arguing almost in the same vain and following the same moral, ethical, evidential tools and standards that I am doing now!
But it is true.
It is also true that  all this time, I have also been very conscious of the inevitability that the liars, the fakers, the fabricators who operate via “Fleet Street” and via  the Sunday Times and the likes of the Sunday Times were not going to change their immorality and become moral, ethical in their practices.
Why?
Because for all the noise emitted about wanting truth, fairness and objectivity and above all freedom from “Fleet Street”, the occupant at No. 10 Downing Street isn’t really interested in seeing a truth-telling Press.
And he influences what the rest of the power holdng cabals in the British Establishment” do.
As we are witnessing now over Leveson.
Cameron does not want to implement what Brian Leveson has recommended.
And whatever Leveson has recommended is already too modest, too deferring to the main cabal of Media owners.
So where do those of us who want a truth-telling Press go from here?
Most emphatically not to the corruptly conceived insult called the Press Complaints Commission [PCC].
Almost equally emphatically not to the “professional” “trade organisations” “representing” “media workers”.
While the PCC is a proprietors’ corruption-justifying barrier to getting a truth-telling Press, the various trade workers’ organisations too suffer from the deficiency in this context  that their primary and the almost only aim is to protect their members’ interests.
That is where the Ann Clwyd
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Clwyd  family loss story and the accompanying lesson comes into play.
According to Ms Clwyd, and as reported widely as well as by the Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/dec/04/ann-clwyd-husband-died-hen
in the past 24 hours, her husband [of 50 years] died in October this year amid [or as she is most certainly feeling, “due to and caused by”] an “almost callous lack of care” by hospital nurses.
The Guardian web site leads the item with the following very significant words:
“Ann Clwyd: my husband died like a battery hen in hospital
Labour MP tells of inhumane treatment and says she fears normalisation of cruelty now rife among NHS nurses”.

Normalisation of cruelty by nurses!
Normalisation of lying by journalism workers!
Normalisation of poverty, denial, disenfranchisement by the CONDEM Collusion.
Normalisation of hardship by the Department for Want and Poverty creation [the DWP].
Normalisation of rent arrears by the rent-rebate-paying local Council now operating regimes of cruelty under the cover of the CONDEM Cuts.
There has got to be an objective element in the unequal equation that now reigns in the UK Society. Or in what has been allowed to remain of Society. [To be continued]

The Guardian web site report below this intro, about Ann Clwyd’s husband who died due to ‘normalisation of neglect by nurses..’ and the resulting cold and the contempt showed to him by those in posts in that hospital to ‘care’! Ann Clwyd: my husband died like a battery hen in hospital Labour MP tells of inhumane treatment and says she fears normalisation of cruelty now rife among NHS nurses Amelia Hill The Guardian, Tuesday 4 December 2012 21.03 GMT  Owen Roberts, husband of Ann Clwyd, was treated with ‘coldness, resentment, indifference and even contempt’ according to the Labour MP. Photograph: Ann Clwyd Ann Clwyd has said her biggest regret is that she didn’t “stand in the hospital corridor and scream” in protest at the “almost callous lack of care” with which nurses treated her husband as he lay dying in the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff. Clwyd, the Labour MP for Cynon Valley since 1984 and Tony Blair’s former human rights envoy to Iraq, told the Guardian she fears a “normalisation of cruelty” is now rife among NHS nurses. She said she had chosen to speak out because this had become “commonplace”. Describing how her 6’2” husband lay crushed “like a battery hen” against the bars of his hospital bed with an oxygen mask so small it cut into his face and pumped cold air into his infected eye, Clwyd said nurses treated the dying man with “coldness, resentment, indifference and even contempt”. Owen Roberts died on Tuesday, 23rd October from hospital-acquired pneumonia. The former television director and producer had multiple sclerosis for 30 years and had been in a wheelchair for the previous two years. He had been in the flagship hospital for ten days. “I have had nightmares about what happened,” said Clwyd, speaking to the Guardian after initially making the claims on BBC Radio 4′s World at One. Clwyd said that on the Friday before Roberts died, she asked if he could have a bigger oxygen mask. “I was just ignored,” she said. “I had to put my own Lypsyl on his lips because they became so chapped …by the cold air the mask pumped out and there were no nurses around. It was us, not the nurses, who put a pillow between him and the bars of the bed because the bed was too small and he was jammed so tightly against the bars. “It was us again who covered him with a towel because he was cold and we couldn’t get more than two thin blankets to cover him with. And it was us who put socks on his feet because they hung over the end of the too-short bed . “I can’t believe anybody calling themselves a nurse could fail to give someone who is very ill that kind of attention but it was completely missing,” Clwyd added. Nobody should have to die in conditions like I saw my husband die in. I have tried in the past to get Bills through parliament on the welfare of battery hens. My husband died like a battery hen.” Clwyd, chair of the All Party Parliamentary Human Rights Group, was on the Royal Commission on the NHS and served on the Welsh hospital board. But she said that regardless of her experience and knowledge, she found it impossible to make her voice heard. “It’s uncomfortable speaking out and I don’t like it but if I couldn’t get anyone to listen to me, how do other people manage it?” she asked. “I want people to know that they can’t leave things to the professionals in the NHS. You have to keep asking questions. Clwyd said she “will always regret that I did not ask more questions” but that whenever she tried, she was ignored or brushed off. “I was in on the day before he died from 2.30pm to 10.30pm, and I saw one, single ward round,” she said. “When I did manage to stop a nurse in the corridor – they were usually too busy to stop – I asked why he wasn’t in intensive care.” She added, a nurse “told me ‘there are lots of people worse than him’ and walked off. A few hours later, I asked another nurse if a doctor had been to see him. She said a doctor had been – but not to see Owen because they knew what to do. “From what I saw, that consisted of doing nothing,” she added. Clwyd described how Roberts’ suffered bitterly from the cold air of a fan kept on for a patient in a neighbouring bed. His ward was full while a second ward across the hall was empty, she said, but nurses refused to move him on the day he died because, they said, the empty ward “was being kept until tomorrow”. “At eight o’clock that morning, just before he died, all the lights in the four-bed ward went on and somebody shouted ‘Anybody for breakfast?’. It was obviously totally inappropriate when they knew somebody was dying in that ward,” she said. “I really do feel he died of cold and he died from people who didn’t care.” Clwyd said she met with a consultant two days after her husband’s funeral. “We spent one and a quarter hours talking but he eventually said it was a nursing matter.” The MP is now collecting evidence from friends who visited Roberts in hospital to send to the hospital authorities, “My husband had been very courageous over the years and should have been able to die with dignity. But he wasn’t,” she said. In a statement to the programme, the hospital’s executive director of nursing, Ruth Walker, said they had offered to meet Ms Clwyd so that a formal investigation into what happened could be launched. “We recognise how distressing it is when family members have cause to raise significant concerns about the quality of care their loved one received whilst also coping with bereavement. We take such matters extremely seriously,” she said.
“We will not tolerate poor care which is why it is so important that each incident is fully investigated so that we can drive up standards and provide patients and their families with the quality of care they need and deserve.”

"Bengali" "Seelotee" Channel BANS callers from speaking Bangla or Seelotee! "Gourober Beejoy" ! [2]

"Bengali" "Seelotee" Channel BANS callers from speaking Bangla or Seelotee! "Gourober Beejoy" ! [2]

AADHIKARDigitalarchivesinACTION
”Ajmal Masroor [seen, as pictured here, on Tuesday 04 December 2012] is the presenter who BANNED a caller from speaking Bengali when attempting to state his experiences as a victim of domestic violence. Masroor soon went on to stress that the slot, “lets talk” which he fronts, was “one hundred percent English” between 8.30 PM and 10 Pm on Tuesdays.”

2115 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 05 December 2012

CORRECTED the BSKYB Channel number.
A production error has crept in, showing 844 instead of the correct 814
OUR diagnostic report and commentary has been about Channel 814.

2330 [2320] [2240] [2155] Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 04 December 2012.
There is a Channel 844 but we shall discuss THAT one at a later time and on a later occasion.
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary

KHEYDAIEELAAR! the campaign I launched from the Khoodeelaar! platform to keep the word ”Banglatown” IN. Commentary on the absurd “policy” by Channel 814 [BskyB]. Even Channel S, running a “Bengali" slogan "Victory of Pride", BANS Bengali speech on the show, hosted by a “Bengali”, self-confessed to be so!
The Lib Dems’ “Bangladeshi Muslim” “hope” in “Bethnal Green and Bow” at the last UK general elections [May 2010] Ajmal Masroor is the presenter who BANNED a caller from speaking Bengali when attempting to state his experiences as a victim of domestic violence. Masroor soon went on to stress that the slot, “lets talk” which he fronts, was “one hundred percent English” between 8.30 PM and 10 Pm on Tuesdays.
He did not explain or apologise to the speakers of the Bangladeshi languages who were barred from speaking their own languages on the very channel that was founded by capitalising on the word “Sylhet” and is still exploiting the “Bangladeshi” and “Bengali” “core” for its commercial existence and the legal licensing claims as deposited with OFCOM, the UK broadcasting operations “regulatory” outfit.
Not only that, the boast “Gourober Beejoy” written in the Bangla script was flickering on the top left corner of the screen just as Ajmal Masroor was stopping “Bangla” speeches by those viewers who would prefer to speak in their own languages, including Seelotee and Bangla.

The “Gourober Beejoy” is apparently exhibited to impress the Bangladeshi viewers about the “Bangladeshi or Bengali nationalistic identity and dedication” on the part of the Channel now called “Channel S”.

It has not been clear as to what the letter “S” is supposed to mean. Since it was “Sylhet Channel” at launch, the safe assumption is that the “S” is still the continuation of the Channel’s dependence on “the Seelotee”. And on Seelot [Empire English spelling “Sylhet”].

When the present BSKYB satellite “TV” Channel 814 first began its “community” appeals some six years ago, it styled itself as “the Sylhet Channel”. The reason is obvious. Sylhet is the place where the vast majority of Bangladeshis in the Uk are from.

Or the Seelottees are the vast majority of UK Bangladeshi-Origin population whose “composition as the audience, the viewers, advertisers” is the foundation on which the operators justify their business as today’s Channel S.

In the past fortnight, they have pumped out bits and pieces about the various “campaign” activities in support of the name “Banglatown” in Tower Hamlets. They have staged a so-called “live” “debate” on consecutive Thursdays to show their “allegiance” to the community whose “leaders” have been shown as “invited guests with special knowledge...” to air their views. With a small exception of a Tory wannabe Tower Hamlets Councillor [22 November 2012] the absolutely almost obsessive suggestion has been that it is t do with “bengali culture, Bengali heritage, Bengali nationhood”.

The word “banglatown” therefore has been hoisted now on Channel 814 as the CURRENT topic that is “agitating the Bengali nation”.

Strange, is it now, that at such a time, the same channel should BAN speeches by callers in Bangla, let a,lone in Seelotee!

The question can arise, as strictly based on the contents, the thrust, the orientation, the bias of the speakers who did get to speak on air on the Broadcast slot: is Channel 814 serving perhaps the agenda of those interests whose purpose is to show the community of Seelotee/Bangladeshi/Bangla speakers to be at the centre of the “ scandal of tolerating, suppressing, allowing domestic abuse...”?

After all, the MAIN viewers are UK Bangladeshi [and by extension, their counterparts across Europe and elsewhere with access to BSKYB 814 Satellite TV Channel output]!

So what kind of “change” - which is what the “English” language imposers had INTENDED to be foisted on the behaviour of the community being targeted for this message from the English - speaking communications Empire via Ajmal Masroor - would that main community be able to bring about if that community was itself BANNED from even speaking in any of its own languages on the slot that was a dedicated one actually treating and addressing the same community as the “location and as the tolerator and the encourager of so much of the domestic abuse, violence and suppression”?



[To be continued]



Guido focuses on Guardian's guardian Polly T [1]

Guido focuses on Guardian's guardian Polly T [1]
Guido focuses on Guardian's guardian Polly T [1]

Motorway crash tragedy and there is a new spate of racist comment on...

Motorway crash tragedy and there is a new spate of racist comment on...
AADHIKAR Online UPDATER Commentary on this multiple tragedy will be posed on all Aadhikaronline and KHOODEELAAR sites and blogs during Tuesday 04 December 2012.


The following report has been retrieved from the web site of the London EVENING STANDARD at 1145 Hrs GMT Tuesday 04 Dec 2012

Ross Lydall  03 December 2012 A
Londoner was arrested today after two black BMWs crashed and two men died. The collision sparked a brawl among survivors as they fought over who was to blame for the crash that closed the motorway’s southbound carriageway for nine hours and caused widespread gridlock. Hertfordshire police announced this afternoon that a 25-year-old man from East London had been arrested on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving. The arrested man is thought to have been driving the second car, a BMW Seven Series, that collided with the first car, a BMW Five Series, after it crashed into the central reservation and a motorway bridge. The incident, which happened about 2.30am on the southbound carriageway south of junction five at Watford, resulted in the death of the driver and a back-seat passenger in the first car. Police said the two men who died were aged 24 and 22 and were from East London. They are expected to be named tomorrow. A statement from Herts police corrected inaccurate information released this morning which said the driver and front-seat passenger had been killed. In fact it was the driver and a rear-seat passenger who lost their lives. The police statement said: “A 25-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving following a collision on the M1 this morning. The arrested man is from East London. “The southbound carriageway was closed for several hours following the collision but is now fully open. Police were called to the scene between junctions 5 and 4, at 2.40am following reports of a collision involving two black BMWs. “The driver and rear seat passenger of one of the cars sadly died at the scene. Both men are from East London and are aged 22 and 24 years old. Two other passengers of this vehicle, who are both men, suffered serious injuries and have been taken to a hospital in London. “The four men in the second car were also injured and were taken to hospital. “Officers would ask anyone who witnessed the collision or events leading up to it, to contact Herts Police on the non-emergency number 101.” Motorist Basit Nasir, 47, who was overtaken by the two BMW cars and tried to help in the aftermath of the collision, said the scene was “like a plane crash”. He said the survivors who were able to escape the wreckage began fighting with the occupants of a Mercedes car containing more of the group, who he described as young Asian men, possibly Bangladeshi or Pakistani. Mr Nasir said the Five Series BMW went past him “about 140mph” closely followed by the Seven Series black BMW. He told the Standard: “It was total mayhem - it was like a plane crash. There was mangled metal everywhere. It was raining as well.” Mr Nasir, a car dealer from Kingston, said: “I was coming south in the slow lane. It was in the early hours of the morning, about 230am. “The first BMW, the Five Series, hit the central reservation, flipped round and hit the side reservation and a bridge and bounced back into the middle of the road. The car that was coming behind - the Seven Series - went into the side of him.” Four fire engines and six ambulances were sent to the scene but the two men were pronounced dead at the scene. The two passengers in the first car suffered “serious injuries” and were taken to St Mary’s Hospital in Paddington. The four passengers in the second BMW were less seriously injured and were taken to Watford General Hospital. It took firefighters about an hour to release all the casualties. It is believed that the driver was arrested after being released from hospital. Mr Nasir said he managed to help the front-seat passenger out of the Five Series BMW but he appeared badly dazed. The driver had been thrown across to the passenger side of the car and was “totally limp”. He said four men in a silver Mercedes C220 pulled up at the crash scene and began fighting with their friends. The group is thought to have been in Luton for the evening before heading north to Milton Keynes before heading back to London. Mr Nasir said: “They all jumped out and everybody started punching each other. They said: ‘What have you done?' I tried to break up the fight and called the police from my mobile. “The driver of the Seven Series, he was trying to say ‘I didn’t hit anybody, I was only doing 60mph.’ They crashed probably two minutes after the passed me.” He said one of the Mercedes passengers told him the reason their car was further back was because it had stopped at a service station to allow a passenger to use the lavatory. “The conversation I had with the Seven Series driver was that they just went to Luton to see somebody, then they went to Milton Keynes. I think they were just on a night out.”

LEVESON in Brick Lane! Continuing the arguments over "Banglatown" name [11]

LEVESON in Brick Lane! Continuing the arguments over "Banglatown" name [11]
1020 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 04 December 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary due here in the next hours.


East End of London’s very own Community Architect Kay Jordan’s community .....

East End of London’s very own Community Architect Kay Jordan’s community .....
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary

0300 [0245] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 04 December 2012.


East End of London’s very own Community Architect Kay Jordan’s community education and social struggle for the East End is centre stage in the latest battle to stop the community being plunged into darkness and reduced to eat grass: Contexting the KHEYDAIEELAAR! campaign to Say NO to the bid to delete the word “Banglatown” [10]

"I don't know how you do it!" she said. Mischief on her face as she said it. "I don 't know how you do it!" she said again. Looking sombre this time! Then smiling again as she continued: "Only you can do it!" I had no choice but to let her go on as I struggled in the dark to continue typing!

“Struggled in the dark to continue typing”! Now that is a sentence!
How could anyone type in the dark!
That is what Kay was commenting on!
She often saw me fiddle in the dark with all sorts of keyboards as I battled to complete a commentary.
Or a post.
Or a note.
She would stand behind me, running her own commentary on my attempted commentary!
I don’t know anyone who does this, she would say!

And with such words of apparent ordinariness Kay Jordan brought extraordinary support to the battle.

Battle to keep the community.

Just like the battle this fortnight to keep the word “Banglatown” in!

And the typing in the dark is, has been an identical parallel to the battle to defend the community. “Save” is another word for “defend”.

I have scarcely used the word “save”, preferring instead the less dire and the more inclusive ”defend”.

But the essential objective has been to protect the community from the attacks.

Attacks that loom.

Looming all around.

Lurking just about on every corner of the Society that Cameron is involved in smashing.

The forces of darkness that promise freedom are the forces that are bent on bringing about darkness upon Society.

These are the real ones in the dark.

They will plunge Society in total darkness unless the little people scattered all over the place struck to fiddling in the dark with the broken down computer and It equipment struggling to maintain the battle for light and liberation.

This difference Kay Jordan saw as she saw the difference between selfishness and sustenance.

Sustaining the community necessarily involves giving up selfishness.

To what extent her father had inculcated that difference in her as she was growing up I do not know but she often mentioned her father and she did that in a way that addressed the issue at hand.

One of the earliest comments that she made to me about Society in Britain was derived from her father’s wisdom.

She would say: My father said that people won’t see the bad ones that rule over us for what they are until the bad ones make the people eat grass!

They will make you eat grass!

This is my version of Kay’s recollection of her father’s wisdom.

And they are doing so now.

CONDEM Collusion’s so-called finance minister, the former [is he only a “former”] Bullingdon Club member George Osborne is saying that he will tax the very rich and the very poor!

And none of the designated, licensed, authorised [by the Big Biz that controls the script that the “mainstream media” peddles in Britain] commentators appearing on the talk-boxes on Sky or the BBC has shown, as far as I could catch a glimpse of any of the output during Monday 03 December 2012 ANY AWARENESS of the poisonous toxic untruthfulness and lie that Osborne’s “project” displays.

In one single, simply stated sentence, Osborne has committed a crime that it has taken the good people thousands of years to expose and delay: he has mixed right and wrong up!

He has abolished the difference between the very rich and the very poor!

He has committed the crime of saying that he will penalise the very poor for the robbery and the grand offences and the looting done by the very rich!

In other words, he has said that his PROJECT is to make the very poor eat grass!

In Tower Hamlets, where Kay Jordan sustained so many people and protected them and their families [some of those lived outside of Tower Hamlets but relied on kay Jordan’s kindness of heart to find them jobs through her own labour and her own work!] from being reduced to eating grass, interesting events have been taking place.

One of Kay Jordan’s own sustainable community architecture programmes has been run for a decade around the “Montefiore Centre”, situated at the corner of the Deal Street and Hanbury Street [off Brick Lane] London E1.

During the closing days of her battle to keep the Montefiore Centre available to the local community as an education and support centre, she repeatedly showed me the windows near the entrance to the Centre in the Hanbury Street and explained how she wanted me to do the Daily Bulletins and how she would put them on the windows for the community and any other users of the Montefiore Centre to see.

The other of course is the Library that she housed and was gradually expanding in the Montefiore Centre after I began [March 2006] to rescue the books and documents that the former Whitechapel Library had been throwing out as they had prepared to hand over the former library building to the “Whitechapel Art Gallery”.

By working together on such programmes for the enhancement of the lea in g and recreational resources for the local community, Kay Jordan and and I maintained the sustainable community ethos going.

In contrast to the emptiness and diversions into ignorance that have been imposed or foisted by the local Council bureaucracy and inaction and the others who have been allowed to take over the locally sited centres and facilities by default.

As I outlined in one of the KHOODEELAAR! CAMPAIGN HOUR programmes [1700-1800 Hrs GMT on Thursdays ever week] on ‘Betar Bangla’ a radio station [transmitted from a location in the borough of Tower Hamlets itself ] in October 2012, the community centres in Tower Hamlets are that only in name. Local people are either excluded or manipulated out of those.

And that is creating the pretexts and the lack of learning and awareness that George Osborne and his gang will find useful in order for Osborne to implement that agenda to condemn the people into eating grass!

This agenda by Big Biz-agent Osborne is not so far removed from the “stupid” suggestion inserted in the English Local Boundary Commission’ draft proposal for the deletion of the word “Banglatown” from the official name of the Tower Hamlets Council Ward of “Spitalfields and Banglatown”.

Even if theoretically I was prepared to allow the Tower Hamlets Council Conservative councillor Peter Golds the “benefit of the doubT” and theoretically allowed him the excuse that he did indeed make a mere,y “stupid” suggestion in the original representation to the Boundary Commission but I am now not able to do so any more.

This is because Peter Golds has himself fl showed his “political ethnicity” by comparing supporters of the word banglatown with kangaroos!

And what do kangaroos eat?

They do eat grass, of course!



http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_do_kangaroos_eat

 Answer to: What do kangaroos eat? wiki.answers.com Kangaroos are herbivores, primarily eating grass and other vegetation, feeding in the early morning and late afternoon/evening towards sunset.


[The ethical battle against Kangaroo-contemptful Conservatives to be continued]


KHOODEELAAR! putting the KHEYDAIEELAAR! action defending “Banglatown” in the wider perspective

KHOODEELAAR! putting the KHEYDAIEELAAR! action defending “Banglatown” in the wider perspective
By © Muhammad Haque
1330 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday 02 December 2012
PUTTINg the KHEYDAIEELAAR! action defending “Banglatown” in the wider perspective
The Whitechapel Road junction with Cambridge Heath Road and the Mile End Road is now in a permanent jam, traffic and pedestrian impasse
Unusable

Why?
Because of CROSSRAIL digging
This is only a tip of the digging iceberg that would have overwhelmed the Brick Lane London E1 area [containing ‘Banglatown’] if we had not stopped that plotted assault.
Shops would have been derelict as customers would be unable to get in the area. Homes would have become unusable as homes due to the noise, the disruption, the dust, the dirt that would have been dug out of deep holes running for years and years years and years
Khoodeelaar! said No! We shall NOT let the Crossrail hole pass!
And what did KHOODEELAAR! do that with?
We did that within our commitment, our dedication and our good sense
But in doing that we incurred costs daily. For days. For weeks and for months and years
Until the hole plot was scrapped
Now, we can see that £Millions are being spent in extensive court actions that campaigners against the HS2 are starting. We shall be continuing to contextually evidentially and financially analyse the movement of that campaign and bring the information into the CURRENT KHOODEELAAR! campaign action in defending the rest of the rights of the community in the East End of London.

Contexting the battle for the East End: 50 years of struggle to stop Big Business taking over [1]

Contexting the battle for the East End: 50 years of struggle to stop Big Business taking over [1]
0305 [0250] Hrs GMT London
Sunday 02 December 2012.
By © Muhammad Haque.
WORLD EXCLUSIVE REPORT on 50 years of defending the Brick Lane London E1 area that contains Banglatown: The battle continues [1]
I am marking the campaign that I had initiated on Sunday 02 December 1973 within hours of reading the Sunday Times Colour Magazine article attacking the Sylhetti speaking Bangladeshis in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
n doing so I do two things here.
Remember the part played by Mr Abdul Aziz [also known as Azir Uddin] and the group of our dedicated students led by Abdus Salam [Boro Salam].
I also pay tribute to my childhood best friend and an uncle the late Muhammad Nurul Islam [also known as Mona].
It was ‘Mona Mamu’ who was at ghat time my kind supplier of the daily papers in London. He took particular delight in arriving at my home in New Road from his in the Kinder Street off the Cannon Street Road carrying all the heavy newspapers, grinning from ear to ear as if to say to me: this will teach you to ask me to fetch you the entire shop full of papers!
On that Sunday, Mona Mamu came wearing his usual mischievous smile and as we began to have breakfast, I turned the pages of the Sunday Times Colour magazine. It had nothing that interested me until I reached a later page and the word hit me, quite literally: Brick Lane!

[To be continued]

The “UK Bangladeshis Community Life Action Resource and Library Network” has been enlisting Foundation Members.
Those so far signed up include:
Abbas Uddin Helal [Cllr]
Fozol Miah [Cllr]
Abjol Miah [ex-Cllr]
Kahar Choudhury [community campaigner]
Juned Ahmed Shundor [community campaigner]
Abdal Miah [social services worker and community activist]

[The list will be continued]

DIAGNOSING Shami Chakrabarti. The Right “agitator” for the Right agenda under Civil Liberty cover

DIAGNOSING Shami Chakrabarti. The Right “agitator” for the Right agenda under Civil Liberty cover
0055 Hrs GMT London Sunday 02 December 2012.
The © Muhammad Haque Constitutional and Civil Liberty Commentary:
DIAGNOSING Shami Chakrabarti. The Right “agitator” for the Right agenda under cover of Civil Liberty

Mail on Sunday OTT-plug for the OTT-hyped Shami Chakrabarti exposes the Civil Liberties con in the UK.
If Shami Chakrabarti hadn’t been a biological human being then the British Right Establishment would have gone to any length to invent her.
To manufacture her. For she has been the perfect tool to be paraded at all the right posts at all the right moments that have been so totally useful for the Right-ward march by the UK operators of the Military Industrial Complex and their subordinate stooges across the British Establishment installations.
One moment she is engaged at the very top of the particular bureaucracy staging the Leveson enquiry and the minute that that job is done she is perfectly paraded as the voice of reason to denounce the very enquiry that she has been so rewardingly advising!
You could not get more perfect than this.
Extrapolate this pattern by checking the record of her role during the Bliar years when she allegedly campaigned for civil liberty’ while letting Bliar do the most uncivil liberty atrocities and you see just what a complete insult to cvil liberty she has represented in all key areas.
The Right-ward agenda has been carried out often with her involvement in everything that the MIC Establishment could wish for!

[To be continued]

Empire strikes back to repel the moral rights of those exploited by imperialists bent on continuing

Empire strikes back to repel the moral rights of those exploited by imperialists bent on continuing
0810 [0750] [0705] Hrs
GMT
Thursday
29 November 2012
:
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary.
“The UK Economy badly needs illegal immigrants!”
That is what I am saying.
Again.
This Commentary is being written and published only six hours or so before the formal publication of the Leveson report.
Unless some emergency takes place that is not anticipated or known as I write, the majority of the official and dominant “media” will be leading with Leveson throughout the afternoon and the night.
And morality and ethics will be implied and remarked upon time after time by the talking heads that will be gathered together by the BBC, the SKY network and others.
And by the time David Dimbleby gets to chair Question Time on BBC1, the heightened state of angsts over aspects of Leveson will be at their peaks! After that, “Society” will return to normal.
And illegality, immorality and injustice will continue to rule.
And those who abuse their powers and their positions will make excuses in justifying and in excusing the illegalities, the immoralities and the injustices. As is clear in the latest findings on the behaviour of the UK Border Agency, the Home Office Executive Agency that is supposed to control illegal immigration into the UK. Another "damning" report about the UK Border Agency, thus exposing the thousands of lies that are told daily by yet another UK Govt Agency....
What does it all say about Society in Britain? It says that the “vah-loos” that Gordon Brown bragged of as he twisted the statistics and his lips in making the boasts were not ethical.
They remain unethical in Government.
They are corrupting.
And that they are persisting with the Con-Dem Collusion that is in place as the ‘UK Govt”. The customary statement has been made by a UK Home Office Minister justifying the unethical behaviour by the UKBA, his “strongest” point being that the high numbers of illegal immigrants recorded in this latest report are “historic”, meaning that they go back to Gordon Brown’s time at No. 10 Downing Street. And stretch to the longer period of Tony Bliar at the supposed “helm” of the governing bureaucracy.
As even Keith Vaz has shown, scandalised careers are no barriers to a post holder emerging as a “champion of morality and ethics”!
It is a remarkable achievement on Keith Vaz’s part that he is now almost routinely allowed TV and radio time [not to speak of semi-glowing space even by the DAILY MAIL] to come across as a supporter of high ethics and high morality in Government!
When the facts are that Keith Vaz almost “leads” on the rituals of attacks on the UKBA’s abysmal record, it is inevitable that the rest of “Parliament” will be even more unimpressed by the Government’s claims about “tackling” illegal immigration. But an examination of the role of Parliament itself, in “tackling” illegal immigration shows that MPs and Peers are themselves unable to tell the truth.
And if they appear to be telling the truth sometimes then they are unable to do so at the other times. And on still others, they are not even looking with their eyes open. This lack of ethical and moral behaviour by Parliament is not an accident. This is a product of the relationship that MPs and Peers have with interests that are interested in illegal immigration continuing. These are big businesses.
And other businesses.
Hence the man ridiculously praised to the skies as “Saint Vincent” Cable was, has been and will continue to remain unable to condemn illegal immigration. A reading of his [Vince Cable, the UK Business Secretary, to name one] published utterances on the subject will be convincing enough. And the reason for it is that the UK Society is being dominated at all levels by persons who are themselves morally, ethically and democratically challenged, suspect, unaccountable and not at all transparent.

Had the UK Society been dominated by ethical and accountable and truthful perperson then they would stop talking about illegal immigration at all. They would be talking about the broken society and the broken economy and the broken institutional and social infrastructure.
They would admit that there is no truth in their boasts about “world class education system” when the overwhelming majority of the products of that vaunted education system are engaged in lying, concealing the truth and other illegalities when in posts, in power.
Who are the so-called UKBA employees? Where were they schooled [Oops! ‘Educated’]? The plain truth is that the broken down UK Economy needs people who can be exploited. And there is ample proof that the exploited cannot be held down for long unless they can be coerced. The tool of that coercion is the stigma of illegality, as in this case attached to immigration. This stigma of illegal immigration into the UK by people from Asia and Africa is a monumental lie created by years of falsification of the facts about UK Economy. Empire! That one word explains it all.

[To be continued]


The following texts have been retrieved from the Guardian London web site between 0702 and 0750 Hrs GMT Thursday 29 November 2012 and reproduced here for a contextual reference to go with my Commentary [above]:

UK Border Agency has let thousands of overseas students overstay Chief Inspector of immigration, John Vine, acknowledges backlog of 150,000 notifications about changes in students' circumstances Alan Travis, home affairs editor guardian.co.uk, Thursday 29 November 2012 UK Border Agency staff have failed to check thousands of tip-offs about overseas students including whether they had actually enrolled on courses, a report has said. Photograph: Steve Parsons/PA Thousands of overseas students have potentially been allowed to stay in Britain when they should have been asked to leave as a result of a fresh "significant failing" by the UK Border Agency. The UKBA chief inspector of immigration, John Vine, says at the time of his inspection in May there was a backlog of more than 150,000 notifications about changes in students' circumstances, including discontinuing, failing to enrol on their courses or breaching the conditions of their visas. In his report, published on Thursday, Vine says: "As a result, there could potentially be thousands of migrants in the UK who were not complying with the conditions of their visa and whose leave should have been curtailed by the agency but had not been. "One senior manager informed us that at the time of the inspection there were potentially 26,000 students whose leave should have been curtailed and who should have had enforcement action taken against them." It is understood that the backlog of notifications about changes in the circumstances of overseas students dates back to March 2009. In May, UKBA launched Operation Mayapple to identify individuals who could still be in Britain but were not complying with their visa conditions. A team of staff in Sheffield analysed the outstanding notifications and showed that many infringements were minor such as a change of address. The chief inspector reports that for more serious notifications, which indicated that students were not complying with their leave conditions, the case was referred to the local immigration team for enforcement action. Operation Rosehip was launched by the at the same time to specifically target students who should no longer have been in Britain. UKBA said 23,000 students had been told to comply with their student visas or face enforcement action as a result. The immigration minister, Mark Harper, responded to the report saying: "We are the first government to tackle the historically high levels of abuse in the student visa system. We have toughened the rules to ensure that genuine students are not taken advantage of by organisations looking to sell immigration not education. "At the same time, we have a great offer for the brightest and best international talent who want to study at our world class institutions." But Labour's Chris Bryant described it as yet another damning report about UKBA and said the existence of the 150,000-strong backlog was a scandalous situation.

Tower Hamlets Council democracy and service deficit: but who will bring to life the Opposition? [1]

Tower Hamlets Council democracy and service deficit: but who will bring to life the Opposition? [1]
1850 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 28 November 2012


.The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary.[a]

This picture of the “No to an elected mayor” demonstration on 6 February 2010 was taken when the slogan was for a Unite Tower Hamlets, not divider the community [of all peoples].
Ken Livingstone and George Galloway, who joined Keith Vaz in creating a platform for an elected mayor YES vote on that day, claimed that having an elected execute mayor would rid the Borough of corruption and secrecy deals.
Keith Vaz went so far as to praise Lutfur Rahman, then still an unknown, to heights of unimaginable fantasy in his spiel delivered at the Brady centre in the Hanbury street.
The crisis in Tower Hamlets i s so deep that the chanters of "unite Tower Hamlets" are now mostly silent, as they have no confidence in the alleged "leaders" of the alleged opposition to Lutfur Rahman

[To be continued]


1830 [1820] [1655] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 28 November 2012.
UPDATER diagnostics as part of the KHOODEELAAR!
Manifesto for the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
1820 [1655] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 28 November 2012. UPDATER diagnostics as part of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for the Borough of Tower Hamlets. 
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [b]
. Tower Hamlets Borough Council is mired in allegations after allegations while the official Opposition on the Council is trailing behind. So who is holding the Council to account for the communities in the Borough? And what will it take for the official Opposition Councillors to start making their mark as the voices of the people who have elected them? 
I will be answering these questions in the course of this evening.
Before examining the allegations, let me say that when I said in January 2010 that the then bid to lumber Tower Hamlets Borough Council with an “elected executive mayor” was a very wrong move, I could foresee some of the things that are being referred to by the “very small number of people” who have gone on record as being the critics of Lutfur Rahman, the “elected executive mayor” in Tower Hamlets.
These people have been, without any contradiction, entirely non-Bangladeshi.
And this has ADDED to the already highly charged race and ethnicity and faith-related divide that has allowed the alleged wrongs or wrongdoing or improper doings to be continued!
This is a key conundrum.
And this cannot be understood let alone dealt with without referring to the central flaw that racist empire revivalist thinking is based on.
Because the “critics” have been non-Bangladeshi and because they have been seeking to paint Lutfur Rahman as a “Muslim” who is “backed” by “fundamentalist” “extremist” Muslims, Lutfur can rely on THESE critics and show them to his “Muslim” “backers” who have included ordinary non-partisan Muslims, as in the run up to the October 2010 [first] poll for “directly elected mayor” that he, Lutfur, is a victim of racist and anti-Muslim propagandists.
Perhaps the most open statement in defiance of these critics was made by Lutfur Rahman [or by his “strategic advisers”] when they confirmed that the “Lutfur Council” was going to spend a few £millions in funding “faith groups”.
To everyone except a most recent arrival from planet Mars, it is clear that these “faith groups” are overwhelmingly “Muslim faith” groups!
And these groups’ “leaders” are among the most known members in the population in Tower Hamlets who can be counted reliably as having provided support to Lufur Rahman in the past two years.
So Lutfur’s apparent critics are in effect aiding and abetting the “very wrongs” that they say he is responsible for as the “executive Mayor in post” at the “decision-making” top of an administration that has been allegedly doing the allegedly wrongful things and the abuses of the “power and the money” that should have been dedicated to serving the needs of the ordinary people of all backgrounds in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
And the official Opposition made up of the biggest group of elected councillors outside of the “cabinet” that Lutfur Rahman has been found lacking!
As I have chronicled and diagnosed before, they have sought to use an external party who turns out to be probably the most dedicated promoter of the Conservative Group Councillor Peter Golds.
And therein is found the second layer of the conundrum: 
What are the official Opposition Councillors to do?
They cannot really mount let alone sustain a democratic and accountable attack on the “Lutfur Rahman” administration on Tower Hamlets Council without appearing half-hearted and half-serious.
Why so?
Because some of their main “ammunition” “against” Lutfur has come from or been laundered in the non-Bangladeshi “media” via “sources very close to or propaganda-wise  very much in bed with” the very “Conservative Group Councillor Peter Golds” about whom they are OTHERWISE not at all pleased!!!
So we enter the third layer of the conundrum:
Can the official Opposition Councillors on Tower Hamlets Council hack it?
The evidence of their activities so far says: NOT!
They would like to say that they are doing it.
But their record is not at all supporting of any such claim.
This is also linked with the fact that the “Conservative Group Councillor Peter Golds”  is not without a grand strategy of his own.
He is playing three or four hands at the same time.
He is in part-time bed with Lutfur Rahman, as is evident in the relevant contextual contents of the draft proposals and report published by the English local Government Boundary Commission.
Peter Golds is also in  part-time bed [as I have shown above] with the official opposition councillors, whose ‘thanks’ he can deserve – whether he gets it is another matter altogether- for the “help” his chum/s and propaganda colleague/s via “Fleet Street”  are lending to them.
The last “full Council” meeting held on 19 September 2012 showed that the extremely rushed “Motion” against the expenses claims by Gulam Robbani, a key Lutfur Rahman aide and helper, was fronted by Abbas Uddin Helal, from the Opposition Labou councillors group.
There could have been MANY OTHER items that the Opposition Labour councillors group could have raised against the Lutfur Rahman administration. But they focussed on the Gulam Robbani expenses claims item.
Why?
By doing so, they felt “secure” and certain of “victory” on the Motion.
Why?
Because the allegations had been published already by Peter Golds’ chum Ted Jeory!
And this aspect of the conundrum makes the Opposition councillors weak and also very dependent on the Conservative councillors strategy!
Unless there emerges a game-changer event soon – and I detect none on the horizon as at the time of writing THIS at 1755 Hrs GMT on Wednesday 28 November 2012, less than two hours before the latest formal “full Council” is due to be staged – I cannot see the Official Opposition Councillors on Tower Hamlets Council holding Lutfur Rahman to account on their own or for any sustained period.
On the evidence that is before me this evening, Lutfur Rahman will be unlikely to lose any election for the same post that may happen in the foreseeable future.
This is not necessarily going to do good to the people in Tower Hamlets. But the two things are currently unrelated. The reason why the two things are unrelated is to be found in the detachment from the reality f ordinary life of ordinary people from all walks of life in Tower Hamlets that the official opposition councillors continue to show!
I will examine this detachment in the future parts of this continuing exclusive  UPDATER Commentary.
They, the official Opposition councillors on Tower Hamlets Council,  are following “media”  and propaganda operatives via the “media”; they are NOT leading the media!
Which brings us to the fifth layer of the conundrum: the role of “Channel S” and assorted other “ethnicity, faith and nationality-origins-linked” “satellite TV channels”  that are broadcast via Rupert Murdoch’s BSKYB satellite operations, claiming to be serving the objectively defined impartial information needs of the UK Bangladeshi community!
In private, most of the “official Opposition” councillors on Tower Hamlets Council share the evidentially justifier view that “Channel S” and the other “Channels” are broadcasting packs and packs of propaganda that are manufactured o create and then repeat an image that “Lutfur Rahman is the man who is doing things”!
In fact, these same Opposition Councillors and Opposition activists” [within quotes!] are not only keen but VERY KEEN to appear on anything that these “satellite” “TV” channels offer to them. On practically any subject under their very limited “broadcasting view”!
And thereby we enter the sixth layer of the conundrum about the moribund Tower Hamlets Council that is letting the people of the borough down daily by wasting time, wasting resource and by wasting and abusing the otherwise mostly tenable democratic mandate that the voters gave the last time they cast their votes genuinely for an elected, accountable Council for Tower Hamlets!

Theresa May may find herself speechless on reading the KHEYDAIEELAAR! report

Theresa May may find herself speechless on reading the KHEYDAIEELAAR! report

0020 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 28 November 2012
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary

Is Home Secretary Theresa May going to have to find a solution to rid Tower Hamlets Council of the residues of the "nasty Party'?
Peter Golds, who has compared Banglatown with Kangaroos, may have given a new headache for the small number of Conservatives who genuinely are embarrassed by the nasty propensities in their Party... The KHEYDAIEELAAR! Campaign will keep abreast of what Theresa May or others like her may yet come up as a near-honourable way out of the mess that Tower Hamlets Tories have got the "governing party" in ........[To be continued]
By © Muhammad HaqueWritten at 2350 Hrs GMT London 
Tuesday 27 November 2012
Published online at 2350 Hrs GMT from
London Tuesday 27 November 2012
The following is a short report on the meeting.
The KHEYDAIEELAAR! campaign in defence of the name "Banglatown" was boosted on Tuesday 27 November 2012 by a constructive meeting held with a good mix of activists, councillors and local residents and Brick Lane Banglatown business people.
The NEXT meeting will be held on 10 December 2012.
Venue and time details will be announced here.
The crucial outcome of Tuesday night;'s meeting was to forge ahead by combining all the diverse forces in the community and channelling the united voice in defence of the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area, that is also known as the Tower Hamlets Council Ward of Spitalfields and Banglatown.
The English "Boundary Commission" has published an ill-informed, ignorant and incoherent "recommendation" encouraging the dropping of the word "Banglatown" from the Tower Hamlets Council Ward of Spitalfields and Banglatown.
At the 10th December 2012, more action will be agreed.
Tuesday's agreements include the following:
1. Tell the Boundary Commission of the error of their proposal and tell them to drop their proposal, not the name Banglatown.
2.Tell the UK Parliament and the Leaders of the UK Political Parties in Parliament of the community’s rejection of the Boundary Commission’s proposal  and ask them to support the community and keep the word Banglatown in.
3. Speed up all the lawful activities in support of the campaign for the defence of the word Banglatown and do so preferably before the end of December 2012.
4. Tell all the satellite  TV channels as well as other modes of the “media”  including print outlets that do their business in the name of the Bangladeshi community in the UK to immediately make sure that they  give full and equal space and prominence to all the actual campaign events on the defence of the name and the word “Banglatown”, rather than prioritising for publishing any particular group or personality or post holder under the pretext of a ‘sort of a campaign’. Particular concern was expressed at the abuse directed at the Bangladeshi community in the interview broadcast on one satellite TV channel in which the Tower Hamlets Conservative group spokesperson was seen as comparing the community’s stance in defence of the word “Banglatown”  with a call to name another place after the Kangaroos! 
5. The Council’s role in the economic, environmental, social contexts was discussed and it was agreed to broadens the scope of the campaign in defence of the word and the name “Banglatown” to address all those day to day and immediate issues. Further activities will be discussed and adopted as the campaign moves on.
6. All supporters of the campaign to keep Banglatown in are to be welcomed and encouraged and those from non-Bangladeshi background too would be welcomed. It was agreed to include the call “Celebrate Diversity” which was contained in the penultimate suggestion by Muhammad Haque  unanimously agreed. Councillor Abbas Uddin Helal said that he was participating in his Labour Group Motion at Wednesday’s Tower Hamlets Council meeting and he thought that that call was a fitting one for the arguments in support of that motion for Banglatown.
The meeting ended at appx 1957 Hrs
The owners of the STANDARD curry house in Brick Lane treated the participants in the meeting to a pleasant meal.
UPDATES will be posted in due course as the Campaign continues to keep "Banglatown" in the Brick Lane London E1 area

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for a tolerant and civilised Tower Hamlets: "Banglatown" UPDATER 26 November

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for a tolerant and civilised Tower Hamlets: "Banglatown" UPDATER 26 November

This © Muhammad Haque picture taken in 2007 in Hanbury Street shows the very spot where Crossrail would have dug the lethal hole to devastate the community with. The participants in the KHOODEELAAR! street protest stood in front of the KAY JORDAN graffiti NO XRAIL HOLE [May 2006] on the wall behind
It is no coincidence that the latest attack via the `Boundary commission’ is focussed on the word "Banglatown" that is also the name of a Bangladeshi grocery supermarket called “Bangla Town`’ which situated yards from the scene of this photo
0710 Hrs GMT London Monday 26 November 2012.



COMIMG here later today, THE MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY ETHICAL COMMENTARY diagnosing the real agenda behind the latest attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area disguised as a “proposal” to drop the word “Banglatown” from the name of the local Tower Hamlets Council Ward “Spitalfields and Banglatown”.

KHOODEELAAR! launches Kheydaieelaar! to defend the Brick Lane London E1 area

KHOODEELAAR! launches Kheydaieelaar! to defend the Brick Lane London E1 area
0455 Hrs GMT London Monday 26 November 2012

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary

KHOODEELAAR! launches the Kheydaieelaar! campaign to defend the Brick Lane London E1 area against the latest attack by Big Business interests posing as a “mere, ordinary” Tory councillor on Tower Hamlets Council.
The bid to delete the word “Banglatown” is one of the latest exhibits that we can examine in the arsenal of institutionalised assailants.
They are motivated by some of the worst prejudices that Society must rid itself of: racist intolerance, profiteering greed, anti-social lack of care, religious and ethnicity-linked disrespect, selfish coercion and callous lack of neighbourliness...
The so-called proposal being peddled via the institutional fave of the pro-racist Boundary Commission to drop the word “Banglatown” as the second part of the name of the Tower Hamlets Council Ward of Spitalfields and Banglatown is the thin of a wedge that has been lobbed in the direction of Society i the East End by the forces of darkness many times in the past.
Those forces crave the land of the East End.
Whoever has been used to foment the anxiety, the disquiet in the East End by mounting this attack on “Banglatown” is, can only have been and must on the facts be deeply, undeniably embedded with some of the most anti-Social Capitalist Empire revivalists to be encountered anywhere today.
They must not pass!

[To be continued]

Bangladesh factory fire deaths: electricity fault is suspected as the cause, at first

Bangladesh factory fire deaths: electricity fault is suspected as the cause, at first
1655 Hrs GMT London Sunday 25 November 2012.

Editor © Muhammad Haque
The BBC picture here is from Ashulia, near Dhaka, Bangladesh where a blaze at a garments factory on saturday [24 November 2012] resulted in deaths of over 100 people.

[To be c continued]

Who is fomenting "faiths”-linked hatred and intolerance in Tower Hamlets-[1]

Who is fomenting "faiths”-linked hatred and intolerance in Tower Hamlets-[1]
Tower Hamlets Council gets new condemnation as Lutfur goes ahead with "faith group" funding. [1]


1555 Hrs GMT London Saturday 24 November 2012.
By © Muhammad Haque.
Secular groups have mounted a new campaign aimed at Tower Hamlets Council over “executive mayor” Lutfur Rahman’s decision to go ahead with making grants of £2million to “faith” groups in the Borough.
The Secular groups’ condemnation follows the SUNDAY EXPRESS-linked and Fleet Street-plugged “local East End blogger” Ted Jeory. According to the “analysis” published by Jeory at the start of November, the “thinking” behind the aforesaid Lutfur Rahman’s “grant-making” decisions is located in the strategy for Lutfur Rahman to get re-elected to the pst he now occupies.


Tower Hamlets council approves £2 million funding to faith groups

Posted:

Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:38

 The mayor of one of Britain's poorest boroughs is providing £2 million of funding to religious groups to help refurbish places of worship.

The mayor of Tower Hamlets, Lutfur Rahman (right), has approved funding to offer assistance to faith communities to repair, adapt and improve buildings in which faith-based activities occur.

The option of offering grants exclusively to religious groups was preferred over an alternative option to make the fund available to all community buildings.

An equalities analysis justified the scheme under the Council's aim to promote good relations between different faith groups and non-faith groups. The council says the delivery of the scheme will be discussed with the Interfaith Forum to ensure that it brings benefits to the wider and non-religious community. One East End political blogger has predicted that the bulk of the money will go to small mosques and community centres that occupy former shops across the borough.

Due to drastic cuts across the entire public sector, Tower Hamlets needs to find £75m of savings by 2014. The funding for the Community Faith Buildings Support Scheme has been identified by the Mayor "from reserves".

Tower Hamlets is one of London's most impoverished areas and has been identified as the worst area in the UK for child poverty. The area has a dire shortage of affordable housing with over 22,000 on the waiting list and considerable over-crowding issues. Tower Hamlets recently announced significant cuts to it's community and advice services.

Earlier this month the mayor approved the sale of a Henry Moore sculpture in an attempt to claw back money lost in budget cuts.

Mayor Lutfur Rahman said: "It is with considerable regret that I make this decision but I have a duty to ensure residents do not suffer the brunt of the horrendous cuts being imposed on us."

The artwork was originally sold to the council by Henry Moore at a below-market price in the 1960s with the understanding that it would be placed in east London.

Mr Rahman is no stranger to controversy.

He is reported to have close links to the extremist Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE).

Following his election as Mayor in 2010, The Telegraph journalist Andrew Gilligan quoted a senior Labour Party figure saying that Rahman's personal control of the Tower Hamlets billion pound budget makes Tower Hamlets an "Islamic republic."

One local resident angered by the Faith Buildings Support Scheme told the NSS: "I totally object to this. This money should be spent on schools and other essential services that benefit the whole community.

This feels more like a redistribution of public money, ahead of an election, to a particular section of society, aimed at currying favour and securing votes."

Stephen Evans, campaigns manager at the National Secular Society, said:

"Government cuts are hitting the people of Tower Hamlets especially hard. In such an impoverished area that faces so many challenges, one has to wonder if Mr Rahman has got his priorities straight. If money is going spare it should be made available to all local community groups equally, but the local authority certainly should not be prioritising the funding of religious activities and practices in this way."




http://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2012/11/tower-hamlets-council-approves-gbp2-million-funding-to-faith-groups



Clueless Councillors and MPs utter banalities over rising jobless numbers in Tower Hamlets [1]

Clueless Councillors and MPs utter banalities over rising jobless numbers in Tower Hamlets [1]
This [above] FLICKR picture of [Tower Hamlets, a London Borough] Tory Councillor Peter Golds, is being reproduced here to give contextual appearance to the Commentary [below] about the latest statistical evidence of the dire state of joblessness in Tower Hamlets
Golds, who is allowed regular publicity by the “mainstream news outlets and media” [backing his prejudices and anti-social agenda] has now added a new insult against the local community by deliberately uttering the word “Kangaroos” as an alleged “comparison” with the community defending the word “Banglatown” in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
Peter Golds uttered this insult as he spoke to an allegedly Bangladeshi-run satellite TV outlet which broadcast his insult on Thursday.
[To be continued]


0815 [0730] Hrs GMT London Saturday 24 November 2012:

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary on the banality of the Olympics Hosting legacy and assorted utterances in Tower Hamlets [1]
With the UK Govt Official Statistics on Jobless showing that in Tower Hamlets the number of young people without jobs has risen for the fourth month in a row, there is some talk that this Official admission proves that hosting the Olympic Games has not benefited the Borough of Tower Hamlets!

That is indeed true
But saying that takes us where?
According to the web site of the former “East London Advertiser” [now re-titled “Dockhands and East London Advertiser”] the jobless youth figures have been accompanied by comments from “Labour” party MPs and “opposition Labour councillors” on Tower Hamlets Council [having] [“] warned of a “lost generation” if independent mayor Lutfur Rahman and his cabinet did not tackle the problem.[”]
My question is:
WHAT exactly are the “Labour” councillors and the “[Labour] MPs asking the “independent mayor Lutfur Rahman” to do?
But before I could take my objective question to its contextual logical conclusion, I come across a spiel allegedly made by one of Lutfur Rahman’s “cabinet” members called Cllr Shafiqul Haque [no relation] allegedly uttering as banal a statement about the achievements of Lutfur Rahman as is the alleged “recipe” attributed by the “Docklands and East London Advertiser” to one of the [two Labour Party] MPs quoted on the subject, Jim Fitzpatrick.
The MP Fitzpatrick is allegedly quoted as saying: “These unemployment figures will provide little comfort to young people in Tower Hamlets.
“Closer to home they’re seeing a tough job market and no helping hand from the government or council. We must do more to help young people who are out of work before they’re completely isolated and forgotten.”
So WHAT “job” is there in what Jim Fitzpatrick says?
There is no job there either. So between them, the “independent mayor’s cabinet member Shafiqul Haque and the Labour MP Jim Fitzpatrick have been quoted as saying words but their words are not referring to real jobs or real problems that underlie the latest rise in the jobless numbers among young people in Tower Hamlets.
the first problem is that BOTH sides are uttering untruths!
they are not telling the truth.
And the truth is that neither side wants to address the needs of the local community. Both sides, as is evident in the utterances that they are reported to have made here, want to let the public know that they are “on the case” without actually having a clue as to what the “answer is”. And the reason why the clueless “contestants in the arena of publicity intended for the public..” are prepared to issue such banalities is simple: they want the public to know that they are “active”!
Even though their “careerist mental faculties” are not engaged with the truth!
Not as far as these reported utterances show them to be!
[To be continued]


Muhammad Haque diagnosing the unjust, the racist state of English law and the judiciary -4

Muhammad Haque diagnosing the unjust, the racist state of English law and the judiciary -4
The following Commentary has just been posted by © Muhammad Haque and published on the NEW STATESMAN website at 1217 Hrs GMT today Thursday 22 November 2012.

The Commentary is in response to a piece around “twitter libel” in the context of the McAlpine episode, written by a practising London solicitor Jonathan Coad.

Issues covered by this Muhammad Haque Commentary include: the racism of the English judiciary, the English courts; the injustice of the English courts System against the low income and the no-income people, the lack o due process for most people whose rights are violated.......

The writer is a very shrewd operator indeed! or he must be one to have written such an astonishingly ill-informed and empty piece that reinforces the bias for the unjust law trade and courts system in England and Wales.

What is the "NEW STATESMAN" doing parading this "expert" "solicitor" on a matter that demands truthful, wide and ethical examination and debate?

The McAlpine Propaganda Onslaught that has been aimed "at the BBC" has in effect been the "balancing" "revenge” by all the secret admirers, backers and colluders of Rupert Murdoch and all that that rival to the idea of the BBC represents.

Jonathan Coad shows no recognition of that in the piece. He also shows no awareness of the platforms that the real Right-wingers have had via the Leveson “evidence” sessions.  In none of these has there been any examination of the injustice of English legal system and the backwardness and the racism of the judiciary. 

No wonder that routine daily racist posts, comments are not taken into account by Jonathan Coad or indeed by anyone else that has had any persistent platform in the “mainstream” print or broadcast media outlets over the row that has given almost plausible legitimacy to Cameron and his political colluders. 

Everything that has been “reported” by Fleet Street around David Cameron after he was allegedly ambushed by the ITV programme has been in the main a propaganda line for him and at the expense of the facts involved. And the libel by innuendo invention has been probably the most extraordinary  aspect of the vengeance by the Margaret Thatcher Darkness Age Club members over the past fortnight! Mr Coad can calmly paint himself as a responsible lawyer whose best option as an expert commentator in the context of this subject is “to see no evidence”! He can thus be excused, as the utter majority of trading and licensed lawyers are excused daily across England and Wales the rigours to which ordinary mortals are subjected before being treated as having none of the rights or entitlements that the ECHR supposedly confers on them. 

With the promotion piece for “the law” trade that he has done via the NEW STATESMAN Mr Coad can justifiably expect to go quite far in his career as a “safe” commentator! 

Society, in contrast, will not gain at all as a result of his expertise as published by the NEW STATESMAN here. 

It is the same Society that was reviled in that toxic Thatcher utterance and it is Society once  again that is being smashed to bits by David Cameron who has adopted a posture as an alleged “soft” Rightist when in fact he is on record as having combined both extremes [as ideologically symbolic places] of Munich for his pro-racist manifesto and the Toynbee Hall [the OTT-hyped “place where saviours from the Establishment issue rescue calls to save the poor and the disenfranchised...”]  in the East End of London as his  dual-springboards for mounting the anti-Society Unfair Assault on the poor, the low income and the no-income and the most vulnerable in Society.

These facts denote the reality that happens “through the law”, including the fact that the absolute majority of ordinary income group people with rights, claims and entitlements that are violated and denied are barred from having any access to the due processes [flaunted as being available under the English legal system and via the English courts] when it comes to either having their full say in the court system or via the over-hyped “legally aided” “representations”!

It is only possible to be defamed in English courts and law trade system, if the subject of an alleged defamation has the requisite loads of money and it helps [as the “Mass” Misinformation media’s blanked and worshipful supplicatory coverage for the person McAlpine has shown] if they can show connections with either a sitting Premier or a former one!

1215 Hrs Thursday 22 November 2012

"Outrageous proposal to erase Banglatown from the map of Tower Hamlets." - RESPECT Cllr Fozol Miah

"Outrageous proposal to erase Banglatown from the map of Tower Hamlets."  - RESPECT Cllr Fozol Miah
0115 Hrs GMT London Thursday 22 November 2012
The Muhammad Haque Commentary on the abysmal role of the incompetent OFCOM in the UK -[2]

The failures by the UK OFCOM to show any care in regulating the claims made by the many "community TV channels" that seek and obtain broadcasting licence in the name of the UK Bangladeshis but then abuse that licence as they, these operators, serve as propaganda channels for either the given regime in Bangladesh at the given minute or their supposed opponents. There is scarcely any recognition given to the UK Bangladeshis in the [supposed programme!] planning and in the promotion of these propaganda events.
[To be continued]


0050 Hrs GMT London Thursday 22 November 2012

. The following statement has been issued to AADHIKAROnline by Fozol Miah, the “Respect” group leader on Tower Hamlets Council and one of the three sitting councillors for the present Ward of “Spitalfields and Banglatown” [in the Brick Lane London E1 area]
Tuesday
20 November 2012
16:09

Outrageous proposal to erase Banglatown from the map of Tower Hamlets.

As a long standing ward Councillor, serving the people of Spitalfields and Banglatown, I find the proposal to remove Banglatown from the map of Tower Hamlets completely outrageous, insensitive and deplorable.
The proposal by the Conservative Group is an insult to the Bangladeshi community, its heritage in the UK and its long and hard struggles for recognition in this country. Brick Lane and Banglatown are hugely important and significant; not just for the Bangladeshi community but the wider local population too, it helps to bring recognition, a sense of identity, generates income for local businesses and celebrates its recent history.

The Bangladeshi community have suffered racial hatred from the time they settled in Brick Lane and after decades of battling racism, the people have turned this area into a thriving and prosperous part of the borough.
Banglatown is recognised across the country for housing one of the most famous streets in the UK , Brick Lane , known as the curry capital of London .
The area is renowned for Bangladeshi heritage, cuisine, culture, arts and being home to the largest population of Bangladeshis anywhere outside of Bangladesh . 
After years of campaigning by local activists, the area surrounding Brick Lane was given recognition as Banglatown in 1997 and in April 2001, the ward was officially named as Spitalfields and Banglatown in recognition for the largest settlement of Bangladeshis in the UK .Surrounding streets were redecorated, with lamp posts painted in green and red, resembling the colours of the Bangladeshi flag.
Bangladeshis have made this area their “home” and the name Banglatown reflects this sentiment entirely.
The name Banglatown signifies the fabric and grain of the local Bangladeshi community; it is intertwined with the identity of each and every Bangladeshi living in the UK .

Much Bangladeshi blood have been spilled over the years in attaining the name Banglatown and the landmarks in recognition of the community’s heritage from Brick Lane Mosque to Altab Ali Park to Shaheed Minar Monument.
This attempt to erase the British Bangladeshi history is to ignore long suffering, violent racial attack and struggles.

From the Rivers of Blood speech in 1968 by Enoch Powell, skinhead attacks on Brick Lane in 1970s to racially motivated murder of Altab Ali in 1978 and attacks on Quaddas Ali 1993 and Muktar Ahmed 1994.


The Bangladeshi community has fought back and challenged direct racism for decades, however there are more subtle and more sophisticated forces at play to remove any signs of Bangladeshis from Banglatown and the wider Tower Hamlets. In recent years, the proposed Cross Rail digging in Brick Lane was designed make the lives of local Bangladeshis impossible to remain here, however with the support of the local community, we led successful campaigns stooping the proposal in its tracks.

This proposal by the Conservative Group to erase Banglatown from the map of Tower Hamlets is yet another attack on the local Bangladeshi community.

At a time when the coalition government is promoting community empowerment with its Localism Act and Equalities Act, it is ironic that their local Conservative Group is keen to destroy a long established community and its identity with complete disregard for the local people.


I call upon each and very Bangladeshi across the political arena to unite and fight this absurd proposal and retain the name Banglatown and protect Bangladeshi heritage in the UK .

https://twitter.com/horailaar

Kheydaieelaar!  DEFEND SOCIETY in  Banglatown too.

Kheydaieelaar!  DEFEND SOCIETY in  Banglatown too.
1705 [1515] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 21 November 2012:

KHOODEELAAR! initiates Kheydaieelaar! campaign… Kheydaieelaar! 

By © Muhammad Haque, spelling out the priorities in the context of the latest attack on the community as is evident in the David Cameron Party attack on the East End and the name “Banglatown” – 3





1444 [1440] [1430] [1410 ] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 21 November 2012: SPELLING OUT the context, the evidence and the urgency of the new action in defence of the community in and the East End of London:

KHEYDAIEELAAR!

If the UK Bangladeshi community is made unstable and is treated as of secondary importance and as a secondary item by the “media” businesses trading in the name of the UK Bangladeshi community then the future for all these businesses is certainly worse than their controllers appear to assume.

This is why all the “media” traders who have been appearing on the UK platforms in the most recent years continue to behave in the misleading and inaccurate way then they will be damaging the community. They will be also damaging their own claim that they are doing the businesses in order to help the community.

It is an affront to the community whose name, whose existence and whose campaigning profile these “media” businesses use, and worse abuse daily.

These “media” businesses, most of whose satellite TV Channel platforms are tram smitted via the Rupert Murdoch BSKY operations, must realise that even Murdoch’s “media power” is being exposed to the kind of scrutiny that he, Murdoch had never appeared to expect. So the “media” businesses that are trading in  the UK by claiming to be reflecting the Bangladeshi community in  the Uk have the primary duty to  practise that claim.

We can confirm that KHEYDAIEELAAR! will  – as part of our acton to stop the attack on the community as is seen in the latest attack via the Boundary commission- raise with the UK Media regulators the role of these “media” outfits. We will do so with the utmost reluctance.

We are therefore asking these “media” outfits to stop being partisan and stop carry reports that show fair representation of the  whole Bangladeshi community and others’ support for us at this, the latest historic moment in the embattled chronicle for the defence of the universal rights and dignity of the UK Bangladeshis.

The central role played by the Brick Lane London E1 area in that LIVE history is proven by the fact that the attackers have chosen a part of the same “Brick Lane London E1” area, “Banglatown” for their attack!

The attackers have thereby contradicted themselves and stood their own prejudiced and ignorant logic upside down. If, as the attackers claim in the Boundary Commission “report” it is true that [and it isn’t] “Bangladeshis live in other parts of the Borough of Tower Hamlets” other than in the area containing “Banglatown” then why did they, the attackers, focus on the word “Banglatown”? They must feel uneasy at the cultural, the demographic and the social implication of that word! 

Hence the attack.

They would not be that uneasy had it not been for the fact that David “Dave” [!!!!]  Cameron himself had set the basis for prejudice, ignorance and intolerance in his spiel as uttered from the Toynbee Hall  operated from an address in the Commercial Street in the very East End of London.

So the community under the Cameron Con party attack as singled out via their intolerance of the word “Banglatown” is the whole of the East End of London. For it is in the same East End of London that Cameron’s onslaught on the already disenfranchised, impoverished, the deprived, the denied live as well.

So SAY NO NOW to Cameron’s attack on “Banglatown”.

SAY NO NOW to Cameron’s attack on the low income and on the no income-ed families, persons and groups. Stop cameron’s attack on the UK Bangladeshis.
Stop cameron’s attack on the poor, the denied and the deprived in the UK.
DEFEND Banglatown the word, the community and the culture that the word implies.

Defend Society against the latest attack on it by the couriers of the flag of intolerance that had been flaunted and capitalised on  by maggie Thatcher who brazenly bragged “There is no such thing as Society”!
Defend SOCIETY, DEFEND SOCIETY in  Banglatown too.
JOIN and SUPPORT the KHEYDAIEELAAR!  campaign against Cameron’s cons!

Back the East End of London. Support the individuals, small traders who are battling to keep the community out of the worst effects of the Con Economic and Social attacks. Create an East End of London fit and safe for all groups of all ages and of all backgrounds.Keep “Banglatown” active, busy and united! Kheydaieelaar! 

[To be continued]

Created, written and Edited in London UK by © Muhammad Haque and published on the internet at 1400 Hrs GMT on Wednesday 21 November 2012 by AADHIKAR Media Foundation in association with KHOODEELAAR! All Volunteers News, the Kay Jordan Foundation and 40 associated and related initiatives, actions, resources including CBRUK, CERTH and the SBFS.



__________________________________________________________

Boris Johnson-peddling, nakedly ambitious "Christian”-“ethical” Dorries "MP" exposed as a liar

Boris Johnson-peddling, nakedly ambitious "Christian”-“ethical” Dorries "MP" exposed as a liar
0745 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 20 November 2012

Editor© Muhammad Haque

Boris Johnson-peddling, nakedly ambitious "Christian”-“ethics” Dorries "MP" exposed as another liar!

Item below has been retrieved from the website of the London Guardian at 0740 Hrs GMT Tuesday 20 November 2012
Andrew Mitchell denies agreeing to Nadine Dorries's I'm A Celebrity leave Daughter claims MP was given green light by former chief whip to take a month off from her parliamentary duties Share 1 inShare 0 Email Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk, Monday 19 November 2012 17.00 GMT Jump to comments (14) Nadine Dorries on I'm A Celebrity … Get Me Out Of Here. Photograph: ITV/Rex Features The former government chief whip Andrew Mitchell has denied claims made by a daughter of Nadine Dorries that he gave the MP for Mid Bedfordshire permission to take a month away from parliament to appear on I'm A Celebrity … Get Me Out of Here. Dorries was suspended from the Conservative party by the new chief whip, Sir George Young, five days before the reality show went on air when it emerged she had flown out to Australia to be one of the contestants, apparently without seeking permission. Her local Conservative association said it had also been kept in the dark. But Jennie Dorries said on Monday her mother had been given the green light by Mitchell to take a month's leave from her parliamentary duties. She did not say whether he had been aware the MP intended to take part in I'm A Celebrity. "She did ask for the month off. The chief whip gave her permission. She did all she had to do before she left. She made arrangements for someone to take her place on Remembrance Sunday," Jennie Dorries told ITV's Daybreak. Mitchell quit as chief whip on 19 October after abandoning a month-long fight to save his career and fend off claims that he had referred to a police officer as a "pleb". His office released a statement responding to Dorries's claim, saying: "Andrew Mitchell was neither asked nor did he agree to Nadine Dorries going off to Australia for a month to take part in I'm A Celebrity ... Get Me Out of Here." Press material released by ITV before the series began on 11 November stated that Dorries "didn't tell any of her fellow politicians" before she flew out to Australia, and quoted her as saying she expected a "backlash". The MP mused that David Cameron would be relieved she was going away because she was a "thorn in his side". Dorries has now been in the jungle for nine days, and viewers have seen her taking part in stomach-churning trials including eating a camel's toe and an ostrich's anus. Another of Dorries's daughters, Cassie, said she had repeatedly voted for her mother to take part in the bushtucker trials and could not help but laugh at her mother's efforts. "I have voted for my mum for both of the trials – it's much more interesting to see her do it," she said. Article history Politics Nadine Dorries · Andrew Mitchell · Conservatives Television & radio I'm a Celebrity ... ·

Brick Lane: what is in a 'name'?

Brick Lane: what is in a 'name'?
0650 Hrs GMT London Sunday 18 November 2012
The Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary
The KHOODEELAAR! No to “Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole attacks on the community....” Campaign is based on the principle that the “elected” “representatives” on the local the regional and the central levels have the duty to tell the truth and to do so demonstrably and to do so by manifestly defending the key interests of the local people and the community
The picture here shows the KHOODEELAAR! action held in the Hanbury Street London E1 during the week following the announcement that the Crossrail hole was not going to be dug in the Brick Lane London E1 area
The particular comprehensive democratic, community, Constitutional law action against the particular Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole programme was carried out by Khoodeelaar! despite the collusion with the Big Business forces by the local Tower Hamlets Council

The Khoodeelaar! campaign now asks:
What has the “elected” Tower Hamlets Council been doing to represent the needs of the community after we stopped the Crossrail hole?
In this context, Khoodeelaar! examines the alleged concern about the 'name' of the Tower Hamlets Council ward that includes the Brick Lane London E1 area.

[To be continued]

John Prescott shows that at the centre of the Bliaring worldview, there is one constant: ignorance!

John Prescott shows that at the centre of the Bliaring worldview, there is one constant: ignorance!
0545 Hrs GMT London Saturday 17 November 2012

The Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary focussing on John Prescott’s latest fallacies
Part 1

This is an image that we, AADHIKARMediaOnline, have based on SKY NEWS, as broadcast during the evening on Friday 16 November 2012.
Of the three persons, the one in the middle is an elderly American female who was allowed to utter more falsehoods and fantasies than would a counterpart from any other background be.
She also expressed words to the effect that John Prescott’s failure to get elected in Humberside was just about the right and the predictable outcome.
Looking at her gear, her outfit, her physical appearance, it would not be obvious that she held the kind of attitude that she did express.
But that is the crux of the SKY NEWS PRESS REVEW “guests”.
The three instalments of the exercise as broadcast last night conveyed the same message: bias against the truth and concealment of the real impact of the corrupting Conservative ideology that has been carrying the entirety of the “mainstream” “Labour” Party leadership [!!!]

[To be continued]

CONDEM assault on Society is OK but "cuts to Empire Influence tools" not quite so!

CONDEM assault on Society is OK but "cuts to Empire Influence tools" not quite so!
CONDEM assault on Society is OK but "cuts to Empire Influence tools" not quite so!
2200 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 14 November 2012.


Rightwing, anti-Society, Cuts-backing Propaganda careerist Nick Ferrari [of London radio LBC] blatantly contradicted himself on cuts on SKY NEWS Live when he exchanged “discussion” points with the ethnicity-linked token Mehdi Hassan a few minutes ago.

Ferrari soon proved how sick the political agenda he backs was when he mounted a wholesale denunciation of the weak, the impoverished, the vulnerable in Society and blamed them for the attacks on them....
Then Ferrari shifted his stance and “understood” the Military boss’s criticisms of cuts to Army spending!

[To be continued]

DAY of ACTION against CUTS on Society: Wednesday 14 November 2012

DAY of ACTION against CUTS on Society: Wednesday 14 November 2012

European TUC day of action: London protest & rally

Protest:
Assemble: 5pm - 5:30pm Monday 14 November

European Commission
32 Smith Square
Westminster, SW1P 3EU


for march past Parliament to rally


Tubes: St. James's Park / Westminster 




BELOW the headlines below: two images sum up

REALITY of RIGHT WING CULTURE in Western Europe on the Day of Action by the Workers against Cuts

REALITY of RIGHT WING CULTURE in Western Europe on the Day of Action by the Workers against Cuts
DAY OF ACTION AGAINST CUTS on SOCIETY:
Two images of reality brought about and imposed by the Right wing regimes across western Europe.

{To be continued]

Kay Jordan at another historic KHOODEELAAR! Action demo that RESCUED the land and the local MP

Kay Jordan at another historic KHOODEELAAR! Action demo that RESCUED the land and the local MP
Caption KAY JORDAN

Kay Jordan at another historic KHOODEELAAR! Action demo that RESCUED the land and the local MP
Kay organised the support for that demonstration and stayed the whole course, encouraging participants as usual and making sure that the materials needed to make it an effective event were there
Kay spoke briefly but was focussed on the logistics of the action. That day was organisationally and politically one of the most rewarding, as Kay remarked afterwards.
[To be continued]

Another KHOODEELAAR! Action day that saved not just the land of the community but also RESCUED MP!

0650 [0630] [0540] Hrs GMT
London
Monday
12 November 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical and Constitutional Law Commentary. And EVIDENTIAL UPDATER
[1]

What began as the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign action day to mark the then latest NO to MPs’ stooge role as supplicants to the masters whom they worshipped for the purpose of career enhancements - and perhaps a few ££ in extra allowances - extended into an additional acton to also rescue the very grievously [in the sense of political credibility, democratic legitimacy and ethical acceptability] threatened and the fast sinking career of the still theoretically sitting local Constituency MP as well! For it was George Galloway, MP for Bethnal Green and Bow [on 17 January 2006] whose existence as the MP for Bethnal Green and Bow was under the severest attack on the ground that he was “staying” as a guest of the Big Brother House, DIScourtesy of the real pornographer behind that kind of “reality TV”!

Just like Nadine “Nakedly ambitious” Dorries [Mid Sadfordshire!] is discovering this very moment[0535 GMT Monday 12 November 2012] albeit from the “comforts” of the gratuitously indulged jungle in the occupied land of the Aborigines peoples.

I launched a campaign to rehabilitate the local MP, which action was to see the eventual end to the then Bliar-regime’s PR against Galloway.

So strong and ferocious was the feeling of antipathy towards Galloway among the ordinary members of the community in Bethnal green and Bow that until that day [when this KHOODEELAAR! demonstration took place in Brick Lane, 17 January 2006] and for the entire whole week that had preceded it, there was no publicly traceable sign of anyone from Galloway’s “supporters” “group/s” making any case in support of the ill-advised venture into the House of DISREPUTE!

I shall update more on that day and what I said in defence of Galloway.

The reason I shall do so is to also put on the record the fuller extents of the facts in order that one councillor, Lutfa Begum [who became a councillor by aligning herself with Galloway’s “Respect” group], can see what I meant when I told her [about 10 days ago] that Galloway could NEVER USE ME.

Why did I say that to Lutfa Begum?
Because she had remarked, unprompted and in passing [that all the careerists in Tower Hamlets... had been] “using” my help. In my understanding of what she was saying: the opportunists were using my help to get what they wanted for themselves and then failed to either acknowledge my help let alone show any support or solidarity to the campaigns that I continued after each of their opportunistic engagements ended. Lutfa Begum added: “As did Galloway!”.

I briefly told her that I had HELPED Galloway on the basis of my own Conscience and in the context of the needs of the community at that time. I did not do anything that I wasn’t sure about ethically, morally, democratically and politically, whatever it was that I said and wrote in going on the record and backing Galloway in the Bethnal Green and Bow Constituency.

Everything that I said and wrote in the context of George Galloway’s role whilst he was installed in the House of Commons as MP for the Bethnal Green and Bow Constituency, has been vindicated.

Including the predictions that I made about the agenda, the “visions” and the career plans of the many ETHNIC SURROGATES who surfaced as “politicians” under the banner of Galloway’s [then active] “Respect” and did their career things and have now vanished into holes of their own mainly pathetic and selfish “achievements”!!!

More on that conversation with Lutfa Begum in a later part of this commentary.

Back to 17 January 2012 and to the then hectic selfish roles being played by the then Bliared Party time-servers who were very nosily c.aiming that the fact that Galloway was in the Big Brother House PROVED that he had failed to “represent the Constituency on such an important issue as the Crossrail project”!

That is where Galloway’s haters focussed their energy.

And they would have succeeded.

Galloway’s stock was at its lowest in January 2006 since he had had that period in May 2005 when he lambasted Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight and also APPEARED to have CONQUERED the USA!

In fact Galloway was feted as a “British National Hero” after his “CONQUEST of the USA”. This was proven by Anne Robinson showering praise on Galloway!

“Didn’t he do well” they muttered, as they exchanged glances of fulfilment inspired by the footage from across “the pond” of Galloway trouncing that “hapless” “American Senator”! And before the honeymoon could take effect, Galloway must have met the evil tempter in the shape of the Big Bother House offer. And suddenly, the era of an internationally famous conqueror of the American Senate [!!!!] had gone straight into the hole reserved for disgrace, ridicule and mocking!

As if his going was not bad enough.

He APPEARED to make matters worse by agreeing to do those “acting” stints that have now become unforgettable in the images and the footage that show Galloway not as a “populist” or “popular” “politician” gibing out a message of political al and social liberation to the masses that “Parliament usually fails to reach...” but depict him at the lowest possible level of “standing”.

No wonder that his “supporters” were mostly silent!

Confused as to why he had done that.

Embarrassed that he had done that!

No crafty political claim could get anywhere near the massive wall of ridicule and rejection that was being built against Galloway’s claim as a campaigning MP for the Constituency.

So what campaign was on at that time?

Why the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole, of course!

And who better to put the facts on the political table and hurl them back at the Bliar-ites who had aided the propaganda of the lie that Galloway had missed a vital Crossrail event in Parliament?



[To be continued]

The CON Party Brigade's attack on the BBC is another ploy to attack Society- 1

The CON Party Brigade's attack on the BBC is another ploy to attack Society- 1
1735 [1720] [1658] GMT Sunday 11 November 2012: No chance of Society getting the truth when so many Con Men are involved from every angle in "governing" "us":
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Constitutional Law  and Ethics Commentary - the departure of the BBC DG -1
McAlpine claims an entirely new concept in the so-called law of defamation" defamation by INNUENDO!
His solicitors then instruct a fellow Con Man Edward Garnier QC MP to be his counsel in the threatened acton against the BBC.
The BBC Trust is chaired by the notorious Hong Kong Con Man Chris Patten who is brazenly ungracious towards George Entwistle as he, Patten, battles to keep his own job!
Disgraced Con Man David Mellor ups the anti, especially buoyed by the fact that he was one of the very small number of the "boldest" sounding brayers who demanded pretty early one that Entwistle had to go, now "adds" C Patten to the list of those who he reckons must "go". Mellor noticeably is much too soft with his "condemnation" of Patten as compared to his denunciation of Entwistle.
And Con  Men all over the DAILY MAIL GROUP and their likes crawling all over SKY NEWS studios, perform anthems of alarming idiocy and hypocrisy as they chant on against "the BBC".
The BBC as an institution!
All on the basis of what?
INNUENDO!
Innuendo spread by the CON Party to condemn the idea of Society, for that is what THEY associate the BBC with. And as Maggie T said, there is no such thing as Society!
Back TO MAGGIE T  and one of her colleagues McAlpine!
All the Thatcherite Con Man McAlpine had to do was to moan “INNUENDO” by the BBC! And that was enough to set off the avalanche that has now engulfed the idea of the BBC!
[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU before ALL of Fleet Street: that the BBC was CORRUPT, incompetent..[1]

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU before ALL of Fleet Street: that the BBC was CORRUPT, incompetent..[1]
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU before ALL of Fleet Street: that the BBC was CORRUPT, incompetent..[1]

SIX YEARS AGO, exactly this week!
ONLY KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the BBC lied
That the BBC lies

[To be continued]Muhammad Haque updating on BBC lies for Crossrail hole Bill

AADHIKAR in association with KHOODEELAAR! No to CrossRail hole Bill campaign About AADHIKAR Media Foundation, LEGAL DISCLAIMER in brief on accessing these contents and what the word AADHIKAR means Updated Saturday 23 September 2006
AADHIKARONLINE
The 5th edition at 1350 Hrs GMT/UK Time on Wednesday 15 November 2006

AADHIKARonline Wednesday 15 November 2006

1. Khoodeelaar! responds to "Queen’s Speech” inclusion of ‘CrossRail hole Bill’ - [1] Updater on the Khoodeelaar! legal action programme against all concerned who have been promoting the CrossRail hole Bill

By © Muhammad Haque London 1335 Hrs GMT Wednesday 15 November 2006 This is the updated Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign demand on BBC to publish the truth about the Government’s 'about turn' on the Crossrail hole plan - as broadcast in the package in the 'Politics Show' on Sunday 26 march 2006 ". This demand has been sent to the BBC this afternoon, following the retention of the Crossrail hole Bill in the ‘Queen’s Speech’ delivered today Wednesday 15 November 2006. To all those with a reasonable grasp of reality generally and with a requisite level of understanding about how the court system operates in the UK, no court action that involves the gamut of the UK constitution [real or fictional] can be effectively mounted without getting the law and the evidence backing the law sorted out. That is why the Khoodeelaar! legal action programme is taking as long as it is taking. Our resolve is to get the work done when we get inside the court. Or within the court system. We have therefore renewed our demand to the BBC which had been sent in March this year for them to publish the truth on CrossRail. They have failed to do so. And in the run up to today’s Queen’s SPEECH inclusion of Crossrail, the BBC had been leading with the brazenly one-sided, untruthful promotion of the crass Crossrail hole Bill. As I have pointed out in the past week as well, the BBC has plugged the City of London Corporation’s Michael Snyder's own pack of CrossRail hole lies and promotions without asking for a view from either Khoodeelaar! or from any other known or identifiable commentator critical of the Crossrail hole Bill. . There have been no comments expressed over the BBC against any aspect of the hugely flawed and wasteful CrossRail Bill. Here is what we have sent to the BBC today [15 November 2006], reiterating the contents of our communication originally sent to them on 31 March 2006: . " As already published by the khoodeelaaronline service with effect from about 1430 Hrs GMt on Sunday 26 March 2006, the khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole attacks on the East End has maintained that the BBC refused to or failed to show the full range of facts about the CrossRail hole and it did not give enough time to showing the facts. 8. Based on this afternoon’s [31 March 2006] assertion by the ‘programme editor’ of the alleged debate in studio in the package on CrossRail, it is reiterated herewith and hereby that that was not a ‘debate’ that elicited the facts that must be drawn to the attention of viewers of BBC programmes on such topics as CrossRail and their impact on the lives of people and communities. 9. The programme editor is hereby and herewith being asked to substantiate his statements or to apologise for making false and defamatory statements." [Extracted from the Khoodeelaar! legal communication as sent to the presenter of the BBC Politics Show package as broadcast on Sunday 26 March 2006 which contained contributions on Crossrail from a number of MPs and from a man from CLRL at that time that were untrue and false. Khoodeelaar! has been waiting for the BBC to publish the truth on Crossrail ever since 26 March 2006. Now, as the legal action programme gets nearer to being implemented, the Khoodeelaar! legal claims will include claims against the BBC [To be continued]

# Khoodeelaar! mandate from the meeting held on 22 January 2006: get Tower Hamlets Council to pass No to Crossrail hole Motion - Update here during Wednesday 15 November 2006
# How many times do the 'electors', 'local community' have to remind the 'councillors' that they [the councillors] have to behave with dignity rather than lie ?
#What have the voters been telling councillors on Tower Hamlets Council since 4 May 2006?
What is George Galloway 'local MP' for Bethnal Green and Bow, able to show as his 'achievements' since he was elected by a majority of just over 800 votes in May 2005? What doe George Galloway’s record as 'elected MP' say about how much 'respect' he has for the parliamentary constituents in whose name he enjoys the 'notices' and access as 'MP'?
# Khoodeelaar! No to a lies-filled, illegitimate charter and pledge for looters of the common resource, disguised as a democratic mandate as flaunted in the scheduled Queen's Speech today
# Breaking news here

# The Muhammad Haque Political commentary on a ‘political day’ in Blaired Britain when the public will be told a pack of lies, which will be in the main accepted and tolerated by the brainwashed public. The process of brainwashing will be perpetrated via the BBC and broadcasting and electronic media. Nothing will be heard of the rights of the people, only how they can be told lies and how much of the lies they will put up with and accept. By the evidence of the past few hundred years, the public will accept almost all the lies, even though there may be mild murmurs to suggest the contrary!
In the pack of lies, one particular element will be featuring the latest demands and dictates of Big Business as conveyed via the media already and issued from the City of London Corporation.
The lying component will go something like this- that ‘business’ in Britain is doing well, so [utterly illogically!] the public must fund the next plot hatched by Big Business…
This will be a plea for the public funding of Crossrail hole project..
There will be no evidence to support any assertion or claim they will make for the crassly conceived CrossRail hole scheme. No questions will be asked in the formal halls of the so-called democratic Houses of British Parliament. Nor in the public paid studios of the so-called free speaking media.. And the mainly parasitic careerists and small-timers, styling themselves 'Parliamentarians', will not be heard, other than in ritualistically making the odd noise for the benefit of the Big Business agenda setters and their controlled agents now in Government. So much for democracy! So much for the open and transparent and the democratic accountability by the Executive to the democratic parliament!!!!….

It is against this context that the Campaign for the defence of the community in the East End against CrossRail will have to be maintained and progressed.

[To be continued]

Diagnosing the false image being spread by the CONSTRUCTION TRADE conglomerates....

Diagnosing the false image being spread by the CONSTRUCTION TRADE conglomerates....
This image of Chuka Umunna taken from the web site of CONSTRUCTION NEWS

Misleading image being spread by the CONSTRUCTION TRADE conglomerates and their media outlets by suggesting a line on the role of a "front bench Opposition Labour Party MP" as an alleged critic of anything at all to do with the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hype!



The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary. London Friday 09 November 2012
VERY STRANGE "news" "stance" indeed!
A front-bench "Labour" "MP" finds ANYTHING at all wrong with the Big Biz agenda PROPAGANDA scam Crossrail construction!
It is quite clear that the parliamentary questions put on the House of Commons record in the name of Chuka Umunna we're not at all spontaneous ones.
In fact they very clearly are imitations of the questions that some trade unions might have asked themselves! And must have asked themes.
And this is where any "novelty" about the questions disappears from the scene.
HAD they been original and spontaneous then there might be SOME conceptual basis to assume that the FRONT BENCH of the Labour Party Opposition in the UK House of Commons was being allowed to engage and was engaging in independent thinking based on the objective;y verifiable; evidence of the desirability or the undesirability of certain practices.
As the facts show, the Chuka Umunna Questions were a tame imitation of those devised and promoted by some of the very closely involved trade unions in construction work.
If it were a non Trade Union bureaucracies-linked question, Chuka Umunna would have been VERY ABSENT from THIS PLATFORM!
And there lies the evidences of a stooged parliament. Stooged to power that resides somewhere other than the ethically democratically sited constituency.
During the Big Biz promotion of the Crossrail Construction scam via the "Crossrail Bill", ALL the "Labour" MPs toed the BiG Biz agenda line. As did the Lib Dems. as did the Tories!
It is against that solid background of stooged behaviour by "MPs" that I say, again: time to free the people from the shacles of stooges wearing guises as "elected MPs"!
[To be continued]

Kay Jordan's community plan: the Montefior Centre -1

Kay Jordan's community plan: the Montefior Centre -1
SHORT factual title: A Muhammad Haque picture of Kay Jordan, speaking in the Greatorex Street London E1 about the Khoodeelaar! battle against MPs peddling the Crossrail hole Bill.

In her report finalised in December 2010, Kay Jordan described the Montefiore Centre as the local community education Centre. Exactly as it should have been. But for years before Kay took charge of managing the premises [for a period of almost 10 years], the place had been allowed to become alien to the community.
So how is the Montefiore Centre now? Is it being used as the Community Education Centre for the local community? Answer to this question and other evidence will be published here, shortly

The next item is about CROSSRAIL making workers redundant in West London

Posted on the "Socialist Party" web site on 5 November 2012 at 10:49 GMT

Crossrail blacklisting - video of protests

Below is the link to a Reel News video about the on-going campaign against the sacking of 28 Crossrail workers at Westbourne Park and in particular the victimisation and blacklisting of the Unite shop steward Frank Morris, who is also a member of the RMT and was similarly mistreated on the Olympic site.

The video is almost a daily diary of last week, which included a lobby of the Office for Rail Regulation, which forced them to meet Frank and Dave Smith.

The protests are continuing daily at Westbourne Park in this the 7th week, from 7am-12noon.


http://youtu.be/ZQie9SW8400

OUR earlier trailer

0245 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 05 November 2012

How Kay Jordan has tried to turn the Montefiore Community Education Centre into practical community educational use by the community.
An UPDATER report, next [To be continued]

EXCLUSIVE UPDATE on the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole plot – 3

EXCLUSIVE UPDATE on the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole plot – 3
THIS IMAGE of another ideological peddlar for Imperialist and capitalist, interests wearing "Bengali" and or "Bangladeshi" guises, was captured from a satellite "TV Channel" during another of the outrageous assaults on the rights of the UK Bangladeshis perpetrated via satellite "TV channels" suppressing the needs of the community here in the UK. OFCOM UK is a toothless "regulator". But the ordinary Bangladeshis in the UK can make a difference. A campaign is afoot to stop the insulting behaviour by Channels that seek and keep their "licence" by claiming to be serving the needs of the Bangladeshi in the UK. But they persistently fail. They do NOT WANT to serve the community's needs here. This was on Sunday 04 November 212. More on the actual programme in a later commentary.


0645 [0635] [0620] [0610] [0600] [0535] Hrs GMT London Monday 05 November 2012: By © Muhammad Haque continuing the UPDATE on the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole plot – 2

By © Muhammad Haque

0645 [0635] [0620] [0610] [0600] [0535] Hrs GMT
London Monday 05 November 2012:

Continuing the UPDATE on the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole plot – 2
UPDATING the KHOODEELAAR! campaign call for the observance of a International Humanitarian History Month with a especial emphasis on the role of the Sylhetti speaking Bangladeshis in the UK in the creation of Bangladesh
That a caller to the programme KHOODEELAAR! HOUR being broadcasts from a part of the East End actually dared to question the name Khoodeelaar! and then went on to make the aggravating assertion that I should be spacing in “SHOODHOW” [+"correct"} Bengali showed that the need for campaign to eradicate the deep ignorance and backwardness which had prevailed in November 1973 had remained as valid.
Why refer to November 1973?
It was in November 1973 that the then editors of the London SUNDAY TIMES finalised their texts and editorial agenda for the COLOUR MAGAZINE which was to contain the first openly published [in a "recognisable" "mass circulation" British outlet/title] attack on the Sylhettis “of Brick Lane, London E1″ and by extension, all the then UK Bangladeshis [who were mostly Sylhetti speaking].
And who were the attackers?
Why some “Bengalis” of course!
And why did they attack the “Sylhettis”?
Answer: they attacked the Sylhettis by claiming that the Sylhettis in the UK in 1971 had NOT SUPPORTED the  cause of Bangladesh!
Was that claim true?
Answer: It was absolutely untrue. It was so untrue that I assert here in this update that had there been no Sylhettis in the UK in 1971 in the numbers that they were and in the places that they were then the “cause of Bangladesh” in the “west” in 1971 would have not existed. Not for another few decades.
Question: How do I know?
Answer: Because my own father was very deeply involved in the UK campaign to get the West’s support for Bangladesh cause. Other relations too.
My father ran a practical HQ for Bangladesh from his home in New Road London E1.
It is probably going to have a memorial placed on its door as an address of monumental historic significance for the UK Bangladeshis but also for the very existence of Bangladesh.
A great deal of original work for the idea of Bangladesh has been created and done from the address in New Road London E1.
I was in constant communication with them – as Constant as it was possible to do at that time- throughout the contentious year.
And if it wasn’t for the Sylhetti workers, there wouldn’t be the marches and the parades in the streets of London, specially in Hyde Park that drew the attention of the West to the “cause of Bangladesh”.
As an Anglican Clergyman let slip during the memorial meeting held in the Greatorex Street, off Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane London E1 in 2001 on the late Mr Tassadduque Ahmad [A Sylhetti from my "area" in Sylhet], the “independent state of Bangladesh was conceived of in Brick Lane..”
The Clergyman gave the credit for that to Mr Tassadduque Ahmad!
It is no coincidence then that Brick Lane holds such a special place in the hearts of the Bangladeshi community in the UK.
When I mobilised KHOODEELAAR! with the support of Kay Jordan  and as the latest of my campaigns to defend the community, this one  against the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole attack, I HAD TO DEVISE A WORD that carried all the acute messages: that the community was being dug out of its location. That some intruders were at it to get our community out of here. That the attack was already afoot and we must rush out of our complacency and stop it…
That was during 2004.
Two years later and into the most hectic phase of the campaign in defence of the “community in Brick Lane London E1 area..”, on Sunday 22 January 2006 at the rally held in the Brady Centre in the Hanbury Street London E1, I elaborated on the contextual history underlying my coining of the word Khoodeelaar!
There is no other word like Khoodeelaar!
And there most emphatically is none purer than it in any language.
The short but absolutely solid speech given at that same rally by Kay Jordan also contained the truth about the importance of the Brick Lane London E1 area to the wider Bangladeshi community in the UK. Kay spoke spontaneously and stressed that the future of the Bangladeshi community was being threatened by the Crossrail hole plot. So the “Bengali” caller to the KHOODEELAAR! HOUR on Thursday 01 November 2012 could not be more wrong, more in the darkness of ingratitude, spite, prejudice against the community than any words could describe.
Defending the community is among the most sacred, noble and laudable things that any human being can do.
And doing that defence is the most CORRECT act. And speech. As in STATEMENT! The KHOODEELAAR!  campaign speaks volumes for a vigilant conscientious active awareness on the part of the community!
KHOODEELAAR! carries lessons for all, the universal humanity: fight wrongs. Fight wrongdoers! Fight those that attack your community!
KHOODEELAAR! has been advocating lawfully, logically, reasonably, evidentially, ethically, morally and with compassion, solidarity and selflessness.
KHOODEELAAR! HOUR is continuing that correct campaign for the current needs of the community.
On housing, on jobs, on social cohesion, on education and a great deal more..

And keeping an eye on the CURRENT hole-digging, disrupting, DIVERSIONARY effects of the Crossrail scam. As in the disruption and the diversion of business for the stall holders and shop keepers in the Whitechapel Road, near the Cambridge Heath road.
And the long diversions of buses e.g. routes 106, 254 etc etc.
AND DOING THE UNIVERSALLY positive thing for the WHOLE multi-racial, multi-ethic contents of the local area:
Like defending many non-Bangladeshis who would be out of jobs, out of businesses without the KHOODEELAAR! campaign.
In the Brick Lane London E1 area, Khoodeelaar! has saved the jobs of more non-Sylhetti, non-Bangladeshis than would be supposed by referring to some of the racist referring to the area and its net life.
That “Bengali” caller, on the facts, on the evidence, is, was and will remain incorrect in very respect.
[To be continued]

Thursday's news topic in Tower Hamlets: "Poplar solicitor jailed for murdering wife" -1

Thursday's news topic in Tower Hamlets: "Poplar solicitor jailed for murdering wife" -1
0535 [0515] [0500] Hrs GMT

London

Friday 02 November 2012

The Muhammad Haque Friday Commentary:
"Poplar solicitor" Habib Rahman is "jailed for life" -'news', Thursday 01 November 2012:
1

The community - where is 'the community'? - should have an ongoing programme of education for all its members of all ages. About the value of life and about the duty on everyone to show the utmost respect to life.
Token, half-hearted, insincere utterances peddling all support and solidarity to the victims and their attackers, are NOT enough.
This life, the life of the convicted, sentenced man, only in his early 30s, is destroyed. Why did he do what he did?
Why hadn't the earlier incidents brought to the attention of those who could and should have helped?
These questions are vital every time something like this happens.
These questions are even more vital even before something as awful as this is seen as likely to happen.
Where are all the "support services"?
Where was the local Council and its many "specially trained, dedicated" staff when the woman was already being attacked?
Did the husband, now described by the Police as quoted below, show any signs of disquiet, unhappiness, to any close friend, associates, relatives?
What is the history of this double, no, multiple tragedy?
First the young mum is murdered, then the young dad jailed for life and now the orphaned children.
There truly is no words that can begin too reflect the depth of these losses, the pains and the questions:
why?
why? why?
One answer is for anyone who feels frustrated, upset or unhappy about their marriage is to: pause, think deep and think for the whole future!
Seek real, humane, urgent, genuine help.
Listen to real, genuine, humane advice: Stop your rage against the person!
Violence does NOT solve anything.
Imagine the feelings of the bereaved children in this tragedy!
No child should be caused this anguish!
No woman must be treated this way.
Mother or no mother!
And only because Habib Rahman became a "solicitor" did not stop him being a murderer too! So this is a moment to reflect on things and put things in the right perspective.
All humans are fallible.
All humans are fragile.
The brilliance is to keep all those feelings in control.
And think about the whole future.
If human beings can learn to fly to the outer space then they must be also able to hold their frustrations and anger in check.
Think of the children!
They deserve the utmost protection.
And respect.
If you love your children then show this by respecting their feelings.
Do not do anything that will upset or let the children down.
Do everything that will bring looks of joy on the faces of the children.
That should be the way to live the rest of your life!
[To be continued]
0500 Hrs GMT
London
Friday 02 November 2012

Acting Chief Inspector John Nicholson, from the Met Police, said:
“Rahman is a violent man and it is clear his wife had suffered at his hands before.
During the investigation a friend of Jasmin’s told us she had seen her with previous ‘accidental’ injuries including a black eye and a broken finger, although Jasmin never contacted police.”

REMEMBER AGAIN! The DANGER: Crossrail digging deep in Whitechapel

REMEMBER AGAIN! The DANGER: Crossrail digging deep in Whitechapel
0750 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
01 November 2012
By © Muhammad Haque
DANGER:
Crossrail digging deep in Whitechapel
The danger that Crossrail hole plot posed to the Brick Lane London e1 area.
That danger is absent
But how was that danger made to go away from Brick Lane London E1 area?
How ?
Would that danger have been averted and would the Brick Lane London E1 area be protected from the attacks by relying on Tower Hamlets Council?

These and other questions will be answered in the updater commentary here and on related Khoodeelaar! blog and social network sites, starting later today, Thursday 01 November 2012 and containing right the way through the weekend and into the next week.




[To be continued]


EVENING STANDARD makes the CONDEM Jobless lie worse by doing a racist flaunting of ITS "charity"

EVENING STANDARD makes the CONDEM Jobless lie worse by doing a racist flaunting of ITS "charity"
EVENING STANDARD makes the CONDEM Jobless lie worse by doing a racist flaunting of ITS "charity"

Truth is out at last! At least on SOME of the criminals calling themselves carers

Truth is out at last! At least on SOME of the criminals calling themselves carers
FULL REPORT and the MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY ETHICAL COMMENTARY, later.

A contrasting UPDATER commenatry on Mervyn King -2

A contrasting UPDATER commenatry on Mervyn King -2
1236 [1228] Hrs Wednesday 24 October 2012:
There is hype on now in many media outlets suggesting that "house prices bonanza" is to greet many property owners along the "Crossrail line".

This hype is a most misleading one. Typically attached to the hype that anti-social agenda-pushing pluggers of Big Biz-prompted projects tend to indulge in, this line fails to report the truth about the housing shortage and homeless crisis that mars thousands of lives and ruins the local and the wider UK economy in the long, the short and the medium terms.
You can only have a "bonanza" if you can afford to own the property in the first place.
How many people in the hyped-up areas own their own houses and properties?
That depends on income and earnings. How many people in your area are unable to find jobs despite trying very hard?
Or is the hyper for Big Biz still claiming that the Economy is doing really fine, when even Mervin King, of the Bank of England, has felt in necessary to say the prospects of the UK economy are really dim, so dim that he foresees generations to come to live in the shadow of the poor Economy!
Muhammad Haque
Organiser
Khoodeelaar! No to Big Biz Agenda Crossrail



The Bank of England's Mervyn King sheds crocodile tears for the children!

By © Muhammad Haque 2340 GMT London tuesday 23 October 2012.

What an absolute outrage! Mervyn King, who has intellectually tottered for years as he has kept his job as the nominal boss of the bankrupt central bank the Bank of England is now being given a plug by Paul Dacre's DAILY MAIL as if King knows what he is on about at all!

Throughout the past years, King has delivered banalities and scripted words of optimism to suit the prevailing opportunists' political weather. He has not been the teller of the truth about the bankrupt Bank of England role or indeed about the rest of what passes for the UK Economy. Fakery has been King's hallmark. He has even faked bank notes. In their millions.

So when he is paraded as a citizen concerned about the future of the children, he really exceeds his own record in failing to grasp reality. All those fake bank notes must have totally altered Mervyn's entire personality and outlook on the world as it really is.

He must now believe in make-believe in everything. So he expects that he will be believed as a true guardian of the future generations. Pass the sick back, Richard In grams!

[To be continued]

How was it that this man was allowed to peddle outrageous lies for the corrupt Council bureaucracy?

How was it that this man was allowed to peddle outrageous lies for the corrupt Council bureaucracy?
The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 for  a decent Tower Hamlets, served by a Council that is staffed by decent people, not by liars making a deprived borough even more deprived.   UPDATER PREAMBLE        By © Muhammad Haque
1630 GMT London Sunday 21 October 2012
The housing crisis operated by the place men and the placewomen in place in the Tower Hamlets Council is a crisis too many.
Most of the people in employed posts in the "housing" "sections" in the Council are doing a poor job.
They are not held to account by the elected Council.
And it shows.
It shows in the high number of people experiencing housing problems in Tower Hamlets.
What are those problems?
More shortly.

MORE ANSWERS to explain the CRISIS in Tower Hamlets Council, coming here shortly.


The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 for a decent Tower Hamlets, served by a Council that is staffed ONLY by decent people, not by liars making a deprived borough even more deprived. The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 for  a decent Tower Hamlets, served by a Council that is staffed by decent people, not by liars making a deprived borough even more deprived.   UPDATER PREAMBLE        By © Muhammad Haque    0255 [0250] [0225] [0210] [0120] Hrs GMT     London Tuesday 16 October 2012               Who is KEEPING the housing crisis festering in Tower Hamlets?      It is the corrupt bureaucracy in the Council itself, the evidence shows this conclusively!     Why did Channel 4 TV allow [the then Tower Hamlets Council "town clerk"] Kevan Collins to peddle outrageous lies for the corrupt bureaucracy?     How a significant number of people are being made homeless by Tower Hamlets Council’s very own “homeless persons” unit, whatever the “operation” is now called!           Why did Channel 4 TV allow Kevan Collins in July 2010 to peddle outrageous lies for the corrupt bureaucracy operating via one of the UK’s “most deprived”, “inner cities” “East End” borough of Tower Hamlets Council?               I have asked this question before.       In fact I published a number of comments on the Channel 4 Series UNDERCOVER BOSS  featuring Kevan Collins shortly after it was broadcast.       Has there been any other comment to the same effect?     May be.       But none comes to mind that caused any  real attention to be paid to the scandal that a [as Collins was at the time] “employed” “town clerk” in a widely admitted deprived borough could stage such a complete fakery at the expense of the people whom the corrupt bureaucracy had failed to serve so miserably.     The corruption in Tower Hamlets Council’s “housing option” [!!!!!!] operation is rampant.     So why is there no outrage about it?       Why, for instance, isn’t there any call from the “combined front” of Peter Golds, the Archant “local” papers [typified by the former "East London Advertiser"] and the assortment of “Fleet Street ‘insiders’ in Tower Hamlets” [who are strangely dedicated to "scouring for gossip about the peripheral issues of faith and politics, rather than those of corruption, bribery and so on] for something to be done by, say, Eric Pickles about the corruption?       Why isn’t [wasn't] there an outcry deploring the fact that Kevan Collins actually fronted a project of blatant lying and called himself “Colin” on camera when also at the same time standing next to the “real” Colin [Cormack] who must have known that Kevan Collins was engaged at the time in peddling a fraudulent PR line for the Council’s relevant corrupt bureaucracy and promoting the image of the Council’s “homeless” “service” ["headed by Cormack"] as a “caring, efficient and responsible” one to the “hapless who found themselves homeless”!!!      The truth is that Tower Hamlets Council’s corrupt bureaucracy has been CAUSING homelessness in the borough on purpose. And where it has not been doing so, it has been allowing a significant crisis in housing provisions to fester forever.     The segment of the Channel 4 PR programme “UNDERCOVER BOSS” that showed the faking Kevan/Colin doing an incredibly unrealistic “matey” “chat” with a young “staff”  at the “homeless” “service” cannot be related to by a single one of the real people who have been made homeless by Tower Hamlets Council’s corrupt bureaucracy.     Here is the summary of one person’s testimony [Colin Cormack caused that person to be homeless for years].       This is evidence  involving the role played by Colin Cormack from  May 1996       The scene is a “kitchen” of a flat not far from the Fieldgate Street, London E1.     For legal reasons, the full postal address is not being given here, just for now, but will be published in the very near future.       The scene is a very small kitchen dominated by “work tools” and little else  There are only two person sitting at opposite sides of a small table in that kitchen       One is Colin Cormack and the other is the “homeless person” “staying” at that flat [that did not belong to him, "obviously"!] for just under a year or so mostly in order to look after their “work tools”       The person telling Colin Cormack that the flat was too small to house the person’s work tools. The phrase “work tools” will be elaborated on in the later pieces.     Colin Cormack is visiting the address as part of his “work” that he had been ORDERED to do by the then Chief Executive of Tower Hamlets Council.      That – for newcomers to the antics of Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy which never misses the slightest of opportunities top overdo the glory and the tokenism – was also the first woman town clerk [Ooops! "chief Executive"] employed in Tower Hamlets Council.       he reason why Colin Cormack had been ORDERED by Sylvie Pierce [for it was she! the "Chief executive"] was so that the Council could avoid a protracted legal battle with the person who had prepared the legal action claims.       Cormack had been introduced to the homeless person by the head of the Chief Executive’s Office communicating to the homeless person ON BEHALF of Sylvie Pierce in May 1996.     Sylvie Pierce had already spoken to and had  communicated with and exchanged communications with the homeless person several times before.       So this meeting was taking place in the flat near the Fieldgate Street against the background of a number that had already taken place between the two, Colin Cormack and the homeless person.           How did Colin Cormack look?       Not as he did when posing next to the faker Colin on the Channel 4 UNDERCOVER FRAUD [Oops! Boss!]      It looks, on reflection, that Sylvie Pierce, may, just get something that she must have resigned to thinking she would never get: a reprieve! In “legacy”. And it looks even MORE LIKELY that I may bring about the things that will give Sylvie pierce that reprove     it may even be the case that Sylvie Pierce will be the most unprepared person to receive such a boost from me  !!!!!!!! [THE SCENE with Colin Cormack in 1996 oozing "solidarity, understanding and support" for the "homeless orson", in that flat near the Fieldgate street, is to be continued]p

PUSSY RIOT, London style, to stop the CONMEN cuts on Society? That must be a sick joke!

PUSSY RIOT, London style, to stop the CONMEN cuts on Society? That must be a sick joke!
1740 [1730] Hrs GMT London Monday 15 October 2012

By © Muhammad Haque

Last night's "stunt" at the central London Anglican Church venue, St Paul's Cathedral, was obviously done to maintain the tradition of "moderation" by the faithful "rebels".
Done by emulating the recent Moscow "original" stunt-makers calling themselves the PUSSY Rioters, the London version was far less hysterically handled by the local ["City of London'] Police than had been the case when Moscow Police came across the fragrant females! They reacted with much-recorded revulsion and detained the women who later faced prolonged prosecution
The St Paul's PUSSY RIOTERs did not get arrested. But the point has been made, that the CONDEM CUTS are uncivilised, "barbaric", unchristian, etc etc.

These women are obviously sympathetic to the overly bureaucratised English TUC, the Trades Union Congress, which has now sponsored yet another very loyal and very demure "rebellion" against the cuts!
The TUC's day of resistance is already looking set to be another political joke, with no real challenge to the Conmen Cameron and Osborne on the horizon.
For generations, starting in fact in the 1920s, the "British" TUC has played second fiddle to the power-wielders in the country and the power-holders in the UK.
The 20th October demo will be a political damp squib like hundreds of previous show-demos by the TUC have been.
The real DEMO will have to come from the millions of ordinary people whose lives have been violated by the hundreds of creepy attacks that the CONDEM Collusion has mounted in the past two and a half yard.
Will the ordinary people do what is required by their own human needs and Social demands? Or will the millions choose, instead, to be dragged downwards and into the more of ever deeper denials, deprivation and depletions in their possessions?

[To be continued]

Members of the Occupy London movement, which camped outside the cathedral for four months last winter, interrupted last night's (October 14) evensong by chaining themselves to the base of the pulpit. 
 

While the choir sang, four women dressed in white shouted their own sermon to mark the anniversary of the start of the Occupy camp outside St Paul's, accusing the cathedral authorities of colluding with banks and failing to help the poor, The Guardian reports. 



Activist Alison Playford shouted: "Your collusion with the City Of London Corporation led to our violent eviction on your doorstep. You testified against us which acted to uphold injustice and inequality that is growing by the day. St Paul's Cathedral, you must stand up and be counted at this great trial of history."



The women later cut their chains and have since declared the action a success. In a statement issued today (October 15), one of the activists, Siobhan Grimes, an Anglican who works for an environmental charity, said: "I chained myself to the pulpit in St Paul's Cathedral in protest about women's economic inequality. As a Christian, I know that my faith teaches through the example of Christ's radical action to protect the poorest and most vulnerable members of society.”



During the group's occupation of St Paul's Cathedral a year ago, a raft of musicians including Billy Bragg, Kate Nash and Enter Shikari turned out to support the movement.

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 [4]. Tower Hamlets Council MUST STOP using lying and propaganda ...

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 [4]. Tower Hamlets Council MUST STOP using lying and propaganda ...
CAPTION TITLE BY © MUHAMMAD HAQUE

This picture has been found circulating mainly among the Bangla-language titles found at addresses in Tower Hamlets. This particular one has been used here after the image being electronically inserted from a title called "SURMA". The Bangla-language contents are NOT at all about what I am writing here [below] but an apparent "news release" from the "Tower Hamlets Council of Mosques", an organisation of the COMMITTEES of the Mosques in Tower Hamlets.
The reason I am using this image here is to be found in the fact that Lutfur Rahman appears in the photo alongside two others that i will be referring to in later parts of this PREAMBLE and Commentary: One is Muhammad Ali and the other Hafiz Maulana Shamsul Haque, both seen in the same picture. The occasion was the elections of the Executive Committee at which Lutfur Rahman is reported to have acted as the "chief Election Commissioner".


0900 [0845] [0840] [0800] [0730] [0700] [0640] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday 14 October 2012.
EVIDENTIALLY EXCLUSIVELY
UPDATING THE PREAMBLE
to the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012
By © Muhammad Haque
The fact that the "East End Lies" is published almost every week and its 'news and features' spaces are filled with plugs and PR for "the current administration" means that all "sides" that have ever been in power and control of the Council since this little pravda was introduced have abused their position and taken part in pretending that they were "doing things four the community" when the truth ids that they were inducing in propaganda for their own images and for their own cliques, factions that happened to be "in power" at that particular time.
They have, in effect over the years, abolished the community of real people, electors and non-electors, who make up the population in Tower Hamlets. In fact, the pravda-like "East End Lies" has been mistreating a false record, populating the RECORDED Tower Hamlets with phantom faces, of eve-smiling images that could only be real in a world of zombies.
And the fact that the "East End Lies" is "in-house", that is, it is produced by employees of Tower Hamlets Council means that there is no likelihood that the "manufacturers" of the lies will want to stop lying. It follows that they will carry on telling the lies. For any questioning of the blind [='unquestioning'] PR for the given "current administration" will result in some sort of disciplinary step being taken by the same administration against the "truth teller/s" or against the raiser/s of the ethical questions.
It is thus not just after the model of the USSR-era Pravdas controlled from their Moscow HQs but also of the "Eastern bloc" type culture of fierce propaganda for the sitting regime so noisily associated with the regime of Nicolae Ceaușescu in Romania.
It is true that the apparatuses that the Romanian regime [which "ended" with the calamitous fall in 1989] had far outweighed in scale and detail those available to the little local regime based at the overly expensively "hired/leased" Mulberry Place in London E14 2BG [at the community's expense and in the name of the community that is treated with increasing obstructiveness and hostility].
But the detrimental purpose to undermine the local community and to sabotage democratic debate and to obstruct the creation of any atmosphere for good service to the local community has been operated to a traceably corrupting extent via the "East End Lies" just as effectively as any Romanian equivalent with a greater scale would have done in Romania before 1989.
I here refer again to the lies that were perpetrated against the rights and the futures of the local Council housing tenants when the stock transfer of Council housing was mounted.
On the surface, the claim was that local tenants were able to exercise their utmost freedom to "choose".
But the truth is that people were given false information, with the aim being to mislead most tenants into "believing" that IF THEY REMAINED WITH THE COUNCIL then their housing needs would suffer and that the ONLY way to make sure that they
[a] got good housing service in the immediate future and
[b] even better hosing service after that was to OPT FOR YES to the transfer of the housing stock.
That that was a lie was confirmed again on Thursday during a radio programme that I presented. A caller [whom I know] made the assertion that the Tower Hamlets Council's housing stock transfer to the identifiable registered social [!!!] landlords was contaminated by corruption at all levels of the operation, before, during and after.
The caller, Carole, is a known campaigner AGAINST the transfer of the Council housing stock away from Council control and into the holds of the RSLs.
Carole said some of the things that I have known to be true as well.
Like the fact that quite a few people who sit on the so-called Boards of these RSLs are also involved with the Council where they occupy decision-making positions.
That is a conflicting position.
And it is made worse by the failure or rather the refusal on the parts of these individuals to publish the facts of WHAT they do on the Boards and what they SEE as being the behaviour of the "post transfer" RSLs.
The truth of the ROLE of Tower Hamlets Council in ENCOURAGING the CORRUPTING state of affairs to continue is beyond denial.
How?
Answer: Over four years ago, I started to ask the "DEMOCRATIC SERVICES" [Tower Hamlets Council] to tell me about Tower Hamlets Council's "representatives" on the RSLs. I did ask to be given the evidence of these "representatives' conduct" on OTHER external outfits and agencies too.
But I particularly focussed on the Council's "representatives" sitting on the RSLs. I asked: what did they do? Did they report back to the "democratic Council" on what went on in those organisations and what they, these "representatives" saw there?
Initially, I had asked the then Chief Executive to tell me about these.
The then Chief Executive's office suggested that I asked the Council's Democratic Services about my questions. I asked who in the Democratic Services would tell me what I had been asking to know.
I was told that a man named John S Williams would be the one to tell me all I wanted to know.
I took that in good faith and asked away.
I even sent - over the four years or so since starting to ask these questions - about a hundred separate, constantly updating communications including emails and telephone messages.
But ANSWER there came NONE from John S Williams.
To begin with, it was not John S Williams that I found myself speaking to, most of the times. Or sending emails to, most of the times.
It was a member of the staff, whom I shall not name here, in my voluntary compliance with the standards of ethics that I apply to my public statements and commentaries.
That member of staff turned out to be a partner in the business of misleading, fabrication and fakery too.
So after four years of efforts, I could not get any evidence from Tower Hamlets Council showing WHAT if anything, the same Council's REPRESENTATIVES on the external "bodies": especially the "registered Social landlords" now controlling the majority of the transferred Council Housing stock DID as they SAT there in the name of the "elected Tower Hamlets Council".


[To be continued] ___________________________________________________________________________ Is Tower Hamlets Council really that dysfunctional when it comes to standards, ethics and legality? 0700 [0640] Hrs GMT London Sunday 14 October 2012. By ©Muhammad Haque. It must be if the evidence reaching the Khoodeelaar! campaign is anything to go by at all. Take the latest series of claims promoted via East End Lies [Oops! "East End News"}. Apart from the ever-smiling faces gracing [!] the pages of the very seriously wasteful and misleading little 'pravda', the "title" [!!!!!] scarcely contains any facts that resonate with the lies of most people who constitute the electorate, the community, the neighbourhoods that are still allowed to be in this East End Borough. This has been the case with the "East End Lies". When the title was first hyped up and promoted under the "political" administration of the then SDP now Lib Dems there were a lot of promises made about what it would seek to do. Portray the community as it really is and tell the truth. Almost! For it is not a given policy on the part of ANY bureaucracy, whatever the bent [INDEED!] or the orientation, to say things like "we shall tell the truth". But there is a significance in the fact that the "East End Lies" as it was when I publicly gave it the true title in September 2000 during a session of a meeting held in the Town Hall Chamber, has degenerated even further in the 12 years that have passed. I shall diagnose and share the key symptoms of the dysfuntionality and the dishonesty peddled by the "East End Lies" that I come across, in the later parts of this PREAMBLE to the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012. [To be continued]

How many people does it need to stop a bad person or a gang?

How many people does it need to stop a bad person or a gang?
0852 [0840] Hrs GMT London Friday 12 October 2012
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary

How many persons does it take to stop a bad person like Jimmy Saville?
Like the person that the OTT-hyped FIXER Jimmy Saville is now being alleged to have been for decades?
And what to make of the British Society when faced with the kind of allegations that are now being against Saville?
Is this Society functioning? Is there anything sacred here?
Every time a "scandal" of this type hits the headlines - and it is the headlines that capture the "sentiment" most acutely - there is an almost neurological expectation that "something will be done as a result of this outrage now staring us in the face..". But what is done? If the list of scandals is evaluated, the answer must be NOTHING.
Whatever is done is done to minimise the damage to the reputation of those "in control now" of whatever outfits, agencies, institutions are supposed to have allowed the perpetrations for so long.
Here the outfit is of course the BBC!
Why is the DAILY MAIL again leading the charge on the BBC?
I say WHY? because I know that the DAILY MAIL itself is guilty of suppression of the truth. On thousands of occasions, the DAILY MAIL has concealed, covered up.
As for my own evidence, the DAILY MAIL has afield to run my comments or commentary on hundreds of occasions.
And what had I been saying in those commentaries?
I had been saying things like the BBC was an outfit controlled by liars!
But the DAILY MAIL would take the side of the BBC anytime I have to say anything about the BBC!
And there is the real scandal, the real cover up.

[To be continued]

BRING COUNCIL HOUSING STO K BACK TO COUNCIL OWNERSHIP and control !

BRING COUNCIL HOUSING STO K BACK TO COUNCIL OWNERSHIP and control !
1735 [1655] [1640] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 10 October 2012. By © Muhammad Haque.
The answer to the rampant local crisis caused in the East End of London generally and in the Borough of Tower Hamlets in particular by the UK CONDEM Collusion heaping new weights of deprivation on the already seriously deprived and the marginally enfranchised is a simple one: Bring Council housing stock back into Council [="public"] control.
This is the way forward, according to a spontaneous conversation I have had with Carole Swords, again sitting in a Brick Lane tea house.
Carole and I are now co-convening a meeting for campaigners to boost the housing nights movement in the East End of London. Our key aims including the demand BRING COUNCIL HOUSING STOCK BACK to COUNCIL OWNERSHIP and CONTROL.
In the days to come, we are going to expand, elaborate on this theme and on related practicals steps that the campaign will be taking to get the local Tower Hamlets Council toy start the process s of reversing one of the biggest social errors of the past 100 years.
That error was and remains the transfer of Council hosing stock to the RSLs.
What in truth are the RSLS?
Reactionary Slimy LYING Schemers?
Rightwing Stormtroopers Legalised by Stooges?
These RSLs are now embarked on the programme of destroying lives, breaking up families and fragmenting communities.
The RSLs acting in cahoots with the CONDEM regime are fomenting ghettos in inner cities England.
[To be continued]
FROM the previous editions


HOW THEY ARE MAKING PEOPLE POOR in the East END of London:
The Housing Nightmare and the central failures by the local Tower Hamlets Council.

The MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview.
Carole Swords, Housing rights campaigner [3]

1015 Hrs GMT
London Monday 08 October 2012.
"It is only affordable if you can afford it!"
That is how Carole Sword summed up the farcical slogan that successive stooges of anti-social housing market have peddled it.
In the East End of London where Carole Swords has been a campaigner for housing rights, "Nothing is affordable", she told me yesterday when we met in Brick Lane.
"Nothing at all" is affordable. Carole Swords stressed.
In the context of the nightmare housing crisis that local Councils and the CONDEM Collusion are creating. The Housing crisis is in the cuts for everyone to see. The policy causing the crisis, for which Carole Swords blamed the "New Labour Party" is "destroying communities", she said. "Its breaking up families. There';s families that 've lived in the East End [London] for generations. And there's children, grandchildren [being] shipped out [of their neighbourhoods, their communities]…" Carole Swords didn't say it. She didn't have to say it but she was in effect echoing what had already been going on via Tower Hamlets Council for years. She was in fact updating the demand for the due delivery of the legal duty by the local Tower Hamlets council. Which is exactly what had been the demand in the 1980s. In the 1980s, a year after the then SDP "alliance" came into power in Tower Hamlets for the first time [1986], there was the most almighty row over the SDP group's leaked proposal for shipping out of the East End mostly homeless and low income families, the majority of whom just happened to be from the Bangladeshi community.
So outraged was the local community that in one action, activists and campaigners symbolically occupied for a very short time the then Tower Hamlets Council Chamber based in Bethnal Green in protest against the SDP Council's plan to put homeless families either on barges or send them away from their communities and neighbourhoods and far away from and out of London itself.
A good quartet of a century later in October 2012 we are back on campaign mode for housing and human rights and as against the local Tower Hamlets Council and we are in for a long haul, by the looks of things.
It is more than ironic that Carole Swords remains "banned" by Tower Hamlets Council. That status of being probably the ONLY BANNED CAMPAIGNER is most likely to receive a boost in the near future. Why?
Because OTHER activists may indeed decide to exercise their democratic right and start attending Tower Hamlets Council meetings in some numbers and they may find the Council's relevant "proceedings" to be unacceptably anti-social. This may cause new outrage and that may in turn cause some of the campaigners to express the outrage by loud and noisy protests. Which may "induce" Isabella Freeman, the Council's "assistant chief executive [legal]" and the "Monitoring Officer" to some more "banning" of protesters!
[To be continued]HOW THEY ARE MAKING PEOPLE POOR in the East END of London:
The Housing Nightmare nd the central failures by the local Tower Hamlets Council.

The MUHAMMAD HAQUE interview.
Carole Swords, Housing rights campaigner [3]

1015 Hrs GMT
London Monday 08 October 2012.
"It is only affordable if you can afford it!"
That is how Carole Sword summed up the farcical slogan that successive stooges of anti-social housing market have peddled it.
In the East End of London where Carole Swords has been a campaigner for housing rights, "Nothing is affordable", she told me yesterday when we met in Brick Lane.
"Nothing at all" is affordable. Carole Swords stressed.
In the context of the nightmare housing crisis that local Councils and the CONDEM Collusion are creating. The Housing crisis is in the cuts for everyone to see. The policy causing the crisis, for which Carole Swords blamed the "New Labour Party" is "destroying communities", she said. "Its breaking up families. There';s families that 've lived in the East End [London] for generations. And there's children, grandchildren [being] shipped out [of their neighbourhoods, their communities]…" Carole Swords didn't say it. She didn't have to say it but she was in effect echoing what had already been going on via Tower Hamlets Council for years. She was in fact updating the demand for the due delivery of the legal duty by the local Tower Hamlets council. Which is exactly what had been the demand in the 1980s. In the 1980s, a year after the then SDP "alliance" came into power in Tower Hamlets for the first time [1986], there was the most almighty row over the SDP group's leaked proposal for shipping out of the East End mostly homeless and low income families, the majority of whom just happened to be from the Bangladeshi community.
So outraged was the local community that in one action, activists and campaigners symbolically occupied for a very short time the then Tower Hamlets Council Chamber based in Bethnal Green in protest against the SDP Council's plan to put homeless families either on barges or send them away from their communities and neighbourhoods and far away from and out of London itself.
A good quartet of a century later in October 2012 we are back on campaign mode for housing and human rights and as against the local Tower Hamlets Council and we are in for a long haul, by the looks of things.
It is more than ironic that Carole Swords remains "banned" by Tower Hamlets Council. That status of being probably the ONLY BANNED CAMPAIGNER is most likely to receive a boost in the near future. Why?
Because OTHER activists may indeed decide to exercise their democratic right and start attending Tower Hamlets Council meetings in some numbers and they may find the Council's relevant "proceedings" to be unacceptably anti-social. This may cause new outrage and that may in turn cause some of the campaigners to express the outrage by loud and noisy protests. Which may "induce" Isabella Freeman, the Council's "assistant chief executive [legal]" and the "Monitoring Officer" to some more "banning" of protesters!
[To be continued]

Carole Swords: exclusive: damning verdict on Tower Hamlets Council's disastrous housing failures -2

Carole Swords: exclusive: damning verdict on Tower Hamlets Council's disastrous housing failures -2
2330 Hrs GMT London Sunday 07 October 2012
By © Muhammad Haque
Carole Swords is like a living organism in Society.
Without her likes, Society would cease to be
Society needs lots like her
I first came across her over six years ago
Carole Swords passed a note, containing her name and her telephone number, as soon as I had sat down after speaking about Tower Hamlets council's corrupt clique and its collusion with the Crossrail hole agenda.
That was on Saturday 11 February 2006.
The place was the Brady Centre in the Hanbury Street. Off Brick Lane.
That event was also attended by a sizeable number of the then Respect party and its then MP George Galloway representing this constituency.
Today, Sunday, 07 October 2012, I was in the Brady Centre as well.
Shortly after visiting the Brady Centre, I walked down Brick Lane, only to be stopped by a Carole Swords literally running to catch up with me from behind.
We sat down and talked about the campaigns that Carole had been doing recently.
We resumed discussing Tower Hamlets.
And how the Housing Crisis was being made worse by Tower Hamlets Council.
Carole Swords, who played a key role in the campaign called Defend Council housing, recalled a local campaign in the Brick Lane area where she and Dennis Flood had helped stop the Spitalfields Housing Association taking over the control of a big chunk of Council housing stock in the area.
The situation was now even worse than it had been a few years back, said Carole.
She thinks that Tower Hamlets Council was now following a policy on housing that was favouring the rich at the expense of the low income groups.
Asked to comment on the phrase that Boris Johnson had used - "social cleansing"- Carole Swords went further and said:
"It is social AND ETHNIC cleansing"
She pointed to the high proportion of individuals and families who relied on Housing Benefits and said that the social cleansing will affect people who are also ethnically identifiable as belonging to certain groups.
To them, the harshness of the benefits cuts and restrictions would be doubly devastating.
To summarise and paraphrase the key point Carole Swords made about the cleansing:

The role of the local Council, in administering the Social and Ethnic Cleansing is going to be very crucial. Tower Hamlets Council so far has shown that it is "ready" to cleanse at BOTH levels.

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 - Introduction. Part 1

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 - Introduction. Part 1
Kay Jordan pictured by Muhammad Haque

We said on Wednesday 07 March 2012 that Tower Hamlets Council was in crisis!
We also said that the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 was coming!
Tower Hamlets Council is in a worse state on 07 October 2012 than it was on 07 March 2012. And the need for a real Action and campaign Manifesto has never been greater for the defence of the East End community against the Council-operated assaults that are going to get worse.
The KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2012 has come now.
KHOODEELAAR! is today and hereby launching the 2012 Manifesto for the whole of Tower Hamlets.
As with our first published Manifesto of December 2005, we are NOT about grabbing elected posts. We are NOT about getting elected Councillors, London Assembly member/s or MPs. We are, strangely enough, about bigger things!
From this day on, the Manifesto will be published in suitable sections here and on all aid web sites, pages and of course in the local community in print.
And by word of mouth.
To effect serious and overdue repo;cement of the culture of collusion, secrecy, abuse, wastefulness and corruption in the existence, the operation and the application and the funding of the local Tower Hamlets Council and of the other two, the regional and the Westminster-linked, "democratic" platforms via "elections".
UNLIKE the uttered spiels of Ken Livingstone and George Galloway on that notorious Saturday 06 February 2010 when both those individuals were mounted on a platform in the Brady Centre in the Hanbury Street [off Brick Lane London E1] and both mouthed words that have not only lost all credibility but have begun to come back with increasing irony to expose both of them to serious ridicule. On the subject of getting rid of corruption in the Tower Hamlets Council.

[To be continued]

AADHIKAROnline Questions for Lutfur Rahman about Brick Lane -1

AADHIKAROnline Questions for Lutfur Rahman about Brick Lane -1
0545 [0535] [0445] Hrs GMT London Sunday 07 October 2012

Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary
Before those questions are posted, here is a contextual updater on the dire state of Tower Hamlets Council itself, as at 0545 Hrs GMT on Sunday 07 October 2012


UPDATING on the contaminated Environmental Health of Tower Hamlets Council - 3

To get an idea of just how the controlling bureaucrat in Tower Hamlets Council has been contaminating the environment in Tower Hamlets, it is important to take a regular look at the corrosion of democratic accountability and values.
I have studied the behaviour of the elected councillors for more years than I should have done.
Why?
Because I "have" and "had" legitimately expected that after the terms of the really incompetent and lazy and ignorant councillors ended, there would be a time when alert, accountable and competent councillors would take their places and they would start the long overdue culture of "elected Council's accountability to the community".
That was my legitimate expectation.
Like all ordinary, "law-abiding" [and "law-querying"], society-serving people in the East End.
But I was assuming, expressly, that the behind-the-scenes pullers of the levers that were applied to control the careers and the "consciences" of the elected councillors, were themselves behaving honestly!
They are not behaving honestly!
They were not behaving honestly
The result is everywhere to be seen
As it became very clear in the TELLING case of Mr WOOSTER [the man who successfully sued Tower Hamlets Council for a multiplicity of lying and dishonesty, thus ending up with a hefty sum in de facto damages, whatever terms the trading lawyers put to the actual "outcome"], Tower Hamlets Council's controlling bureaucracy is corrupt to the core.
It is that corrupt core that has caused the many losses to be experienced by the community at large.
And unless the elected Councillors in place now [at the time of writing this at 0350 GMT London Sunday 07 October 2012] pull their limbs out of the places that they should not rest them in, then the entire idea of a Tower Hamlets Council will vanish by the fact that an elected Tower Hamlets Council has shown itself to be UNFIT FOR PURPOSE!

Not the Boundary Commission, but the Boundless Omission of duty by the elected Councillors will do the devastating discrediting.
Both at the anecdotal level as well as at the formal level, the elected Tower Hamlets Council has become severely redundant.
The flag carriers for the career-councillors argue that this is down to the "fact" that the democratic authority and the powers have been taken away from the elected councillors and placed fully and squarely in the hands of the "elected executive mayor".
I do not agree with this excuse.
Not for a split second.
Why? Because I argued, starting in the first week of January 2010, that a move to installing an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets was bound to end with a disastrous further deterioration in the standard of accountability by the Council to the community
I went on the record to elaborate extensively on that.
I showed emphatic evidence that has been vindicated ever since.
So the issue is not whether an elected executive mayor SYSTEM is the cause of the CURRENT FAILURES.
An elected executive mayor CANNOT deliver democracy.
Any person - whoever it is that is in post as the "elected execute mayor" at any given time- must fail to deliver a democratically accountable service to the community.
It is in the nature of "elected solo executive power holding" that it will act against multiplicity of voices, suppress the universality of values and tend to be secretive, coercive and corrupting.
To what exert all these negative things have happened in Tower Hamlets is being measured now and it is only a matter of time before the very tenuous bubble will burst.
[To be continued]

UPDATING on the contaminated Environmental Health of Tower Hamlets Council -2

UPDATING on the contaminated Environmental Health of Tower Hamlets Council -2
UPDATING on the contaminated Environmental Health of Tower Hamlets Council -2 1725 Hrs GMT

London
Tuesday
25 September 2012
By
Muhammad Haque

The atmosphere in the Tower Hamlets Council Chamber on Wednesday 19 September 2012 was truly toxic. Contaminated.
Hatred and hostility was fierce.
So who was the target of the hatred and the hostility?
Who else but “other councillors” in the same Chamber.
And that pillar! The pillar did not help at all
As one of those who stood up and spoke during at least the “public” “presentations ” pointed out, she could not see the memeb4r5 of the public who was presenting a concern
M
Why couldn’t she see him?
Because of the pillar.
There is a pillar bang in the middle of the floor of the Council, Chamber that divides the seated councillors in a most awkward, indecent way. Undemocratic, inelegant way.
Like the endless numbers of stinking staircases cases that are littered across Tower Hamlets borough with the refuse of the anti-social elements, the pillar in the middle of the Council Chamber stalks everyone struggling to address in a decent way. In an unobstructed way.


Rabina Khan, as she stood up to speak, came across as too elegant in her outlook to get too hung up on the unsightly sight of the pillar that was blocking her vision, irritating her and deviating her focus away from what she wanted to speak and get across. Whatever that was in accordance with the due rules of a really democratically devised, drafted and agreed Tower Hamlets Council Constitution.

But then why should it be left to a single councillor to make that point about the pillar barrier? Why not the entire chamber that should explode in democratic outrage at this barrier?


The answer perhaps lies in the fact that very elegance that came across from Rabina Khan’s particular moment of contribution is absent from the vast majority of what was on offer from the majority of participants seating on either side of the barrier pillar.
Spiel after empty spiel came forth allegedly about something of substance but carrying none of the rigour nor the relevance that the Poplar Councillors [1920s, Poplar Borough, led by George Lansbury, 1920s East End of London] would represent.

The vacuity and the emptiness of the contributions by speakers at the “Full Council” on Wednesday 19 September 2012 were truly shocking and offensive to all democratic people observing or rather suffering the evening.

None offended more than Denise Jones, who claimed that she had been a councillor for 18 years! No mean feat that! Especially not as seen from the prostrated position of one or so “admirers” that Denise Jones still had in the “public gallery”.

Denise Jones is in no position to give ethical lectures about shame and honour.
And when it comes to her time as “leader” of the Council, she performed so undemocratically that when the time did come for her ouster, not many even pretence tears were shed at her demise

Except in the strangely personality-cult-like dedicated slot carried in the then East London Advertiser, now merged with a Docklands based PR and marketing operon for the Big Business occupiers of the Docklands.
Denise Jones said that she was “ashamed” that Lutfur Rahman was silent and was refusing to answer the questions
I spoke to Lutfur Rahman a day later and he assured me that he deliberately allowed the floor to be taken up by Councillors.
HE said that at cabinet meetings, he, Lutfur, does take a different stance and does speak. I am going to observe some of his cabinet and will come back and report.

Back to Denise Jones and her time as a councillor for 18 years

Does Denies Jones know about shame and honour?
I shall be seeking evidential answer to this very important question in the next part of this commentary. [To be continued]


0815 [0755] [0730] Hrs GMT London Thursday 13 September 2012.
By © Muhammad Haque.

I was in a conversation at 0013 Hrs GMT this morning with a man from a Bangladeshi community-linked radio outlet based in Bethnal Green, Tower Hamlets.
He called me on the contact mobile number [which was working at the time] and asked me about taking part in a programme or more on the particular problems that he had been seeking to highlight and draw the community’s attention to. I shall come to the specifics of those in a later part.
For now, the point is that he called me after watching the satellite channel on SKY 844 where I had been appearing for the previous hour or so. And there I was talking what turned out to be mostly about the deficit in local democracy in Tower Hamlets. The majority of the callers to the programme, hoisted by Shoaib Choudhury, wanted to focus on the failures of the local Tower Hamlets Council. It became very clear that the failures of Tower Hamlets Council were in a most ir9inc way the most popular among the callers.
The follow on from that will include a documentary report that I will be doing from Brick Lane tomorrow, Friday 14 September 2012.
That report will focus on the rampant failures of the Tower Hamlets Council’s Environmental Health bureaucracy.
One caller from the Princelet Street, off Brick Lane, gave a new catalogue of anti-social, filthy mess that is left on the doorsteps every week by “visitors” to Brick Lane. Local councillors know about this from their own experience and from the repeated calls to them by residents who are overwhelmed by the problems caused by the mess. So how is it that the “Environmental Health” has allowed the health of the local community to be exposed to the mess for so long?
Is it the case the Tower Hamlets Council’s Environmental Health is so diseased that it does not know the difference between a risk to health and a risk-less state of the environment?
To answer this question, I now begin to address the role played by at least one set of the officials in the section in allowing the criminal damage, theft, removal and destruction of the libraries, archives, manuscripts, IT files, storages, IT equipment of the Foundations.
This series of attacks has taken place in the past two weeks. But the plotting must have lasted longer than a mere fortnight.

If Isabelle Freeman fails again [she has form] then I shall focus on her past failures item by item here.
If she stops the rot and starts to tell the truth about the attacks then I shall report that too.
A note about the phrase “the Foundations” in this context: They refer in effect to the University institutions that I have been creating, adding to and supervising.
The Foundations also include the Kay Jordan Foundation, Aadhikar Media Foundation, M K World, All Volunteers News and Khoodeelaar! Plus CBRUK and 40 other similar learning and research and diagnostic initiatives.
[To be included]


Democracy deficit in East End borough deepened by Boundary Commission blunders!
The texts below may not have been fully checked and remain subject to later verification by the c
What exactly is this thing called “accountability”?
added at 1645 [1600] Hrs GMT Sunday 09 September 2012
I spoke at the gathering held at the Darul Uloom premises last night. The premises are in Lukin Street off the Cannon Street Road off the Commercial Road.
The Cannon Street Road is directly opposite the New Road, which has been my home for the longest period ever.
I am not home as I write.
I left New Road on 10 November 1993
It is just under 20 years since then.
I am still moving!
At a later stage of THIS commentary, I shall update on the state of that move
BACK to the Shadwell “community” meeting held last night [Saturday 08 September 2012] to register the community’s rejection of the Boundary Commission’s blunder against democracy in Tower Hamlets.
As I was called to speak, as the last person to address that gathering from the dais, I was aware that not long before that, one of the currently installed “advisers” to Tower Hamlets Council’s “executive mayor” had spoken. His name is Alibor Choudhury. Alibor Choudhury made some bold claims. Like the claim that a directly elected mayor system had made life better for the people of Tower Hamlets. That DIRECT COMMUNICATION and accountability had been established! Alibor had sat next to me on the platform as the Shadwell “community” meeting moved on. So I have a feeling that he was conscious of a heavily stuffed Smartphone programme which he was set up to deliver. And he almost did deliver that. In Alibor’s Smartphone, I noticed the name Carlo G! Alibor’s brief had Carlo G as one of the people who had done been politically at some fault. Now the way Alibor was primed to treat Carlo is not the way I will look at this juxtaposition. For me, BOTH ALIBOR and Carlo are failures. They failed to deal with a most brazen case of social cleansing exactly a year ago this week. I know of a man called Mr Ali.
Of course that too is demographically too common a name in context to point to any particular person. Then I say he is Mr Muhammad Ali. That too can be a generic name. In Tower Hamlets.
However, this Mr Muhammad Ali was one of the most dedicated backers for the gathering of votes for Lutfur Rahman two years back.
And how did he sum up his “appreciation” of Lutfur Rahman after the date of the gathering of the votes?
After Lutfur Rahman got the votes that he needed in October 2010?
The language of Mr Muhammad Ali’s answer is unprintable. Really.
So What Alibor Choudhury should do is to make an appointment to meet Mr Muhammad Ali.
Once he has that meeting, he will learn the truth and hopefully will desist from making claims like the ones he did at the Shadwell gathering.
As for Carlo Gibbs, he failed to notice that I was NOT in communication with him because I had got lost somewhere.
He also failed to notice that I placed the fact of my membership of my Political Party on an important foundation.
That I belie that Party political members or members of Political parties owe a duty to be honest, accurate, fair and thoughtful.
That Carlo Gibbs had been on the Board of a so-called Registered Social landlord which had been participating the programme of Social Cleansing.
That Carlo Gibbs failed to comment on that fact and that he failed to ask questions about the many complaints about racist violations that Tower Hamlets Community Housing had been engaged in and remains engaged in.
That Carlo Gibbs should NOT assume that his failures, his contemptuous attitude to a “ward constituent”, his blasé attitude towards reporting back to the democratic constitutional entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council on his Board membership of THCH is not an example of “better conduct” than what is on offer by any citable “adfvbsier2 that surrounds “Executive Mayor” Lutfur Rahman.
This abysmal similarity of low standards exhibited by BOTH types of “representative” is a disservice to the ordinary people, voters and electors alike, in Tower Hamlets.
Because of the failures of the “elected executive mayor” side and of the “elected councilors” side, there have been serious damages being done to the local community by the personnel who ought to have been held to account. But they are not being held to account.

At the Shadwell meeting on Saturday, I said that the Poplar Councillors had set an example that no other group of councillors had done anywhere else in the UK.
With such morally and ethically high standard in our history, the East End people must have no trouble defending democratic say in our Borough. [To be continued]
____________________________________________________________________ London Saturday 08 September 2012

By © Muhammad Haque CBRUK/Khoodeelaar!
Indymedia.org.uk had run this at the time of our posting it last night but has now 'hidden' it. We hereby and herewith unhide the exclusive report on the high need in Tower Hamlets for democratic accountability. The defence of the community by Khoodeelaar! in association with CBRUK continues. Tower Hamlets has been targeted by Big Business operatives as a fertile ground in which to sow the seeds of social deprivation, in cohesion and denial so that Corporations can take over the rest of the borough. This is part of the Boundary Commission banality that has claimed that the Borough with over 200000 people now needs LESS representation than when it had fewer people 1930 Hrs GMT London Saturday 08 September 2012 The way to stop the further desertification of the Borough is to reinstate some of the universal democratic values that the 1920s Poplar Councillors had exemplified. So said Muhammad Haque, speaking at the end of a community gathering at Shadwell that has ended in the past 40 minutes. Most of the other speakers at the meeting agreed. Tower Hamlets has been targeted by Big Business operatives as a fertile ground in which to sow the seeds of social deprivation, in cohesion and denial so that Corporations can take over the rest of the borough. This is part of the Boundary Commission banality that has claimed that the Borough with over 200000 people now needs LESS representation than when it had fewer people Read the fuller reports later at twitter.com/Khoodeelaar [Spelling in this post has NOT been checked] CBRUK/Khoodeelaar!

Campaign begins against the callous disrespect to the memory of Altab Ali by Tower Hamlets Council

Campaign begins against the callous disrespect to the memory of Altab Ali by Tower Hamlets Council
2200 GMT Sunday 26 August 2012
Campaign begins against the callous disrespect to the memory of Altab Ali by the Tower Hamlets Council
The Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2012

ALTAB ALI memorials Part 2

Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign to end morass on Tower Hamlets Council


The EXCLUSIVE diagnosis by KHOODEELAAR! organiser Muhammad Haque of the callous disrespect to the memory of Altab Ali by the Tower Hamlets Council has been vindicated today by the former member of Tower Hamlets Council who had been involved in proposing the naming of the Altab Ali Park in the 1980s.

Soyful Alom spoke exclusively to Muhammad Haque and confirmed today [Sunday 26 August 2012] that he was deeply disturbed by the Tower Hamlets Council’s failures over the “celebrations” of the “redesign” of the Park.

He also pointed out that the Council’s controlling bureaucracy had insulted the community by making the event a “Council-only thing”, thus leaving out the very community whose struggle and whose humanity are at the heart of the memorial work of showing due respect to Altab Ali.

Alom also expressed dismay that there was evidence that certain individuals were being allowed to appear to make claims about their supposed parts in the community’s response to the murder of Altab Ali when the facts are that those individuals didn’t even know at the time that the tragedy had happened - so engaged with booze had they been! [To be continued]

UPDATER Context: The Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Part E

© Muhammad Haque /CBRUK /Khoodeelaar! / LCAN 2006 Written and published on the internet at 0950 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 24 January 2006

________________________________________ These contents are original and forum Part of the Khoodeelaar! MANIFESTO 2006 which is currently being published in separate parts. The complete Khoodeelaar! MANIFESTO 2006 will be published in print form and in a single volume later on in 2006. These materials may be quoted fore educational purposes only. No commercial or unethical or anti-democratic or unlawful use of any of these materials is allowed.
_________________________________________
a. The morass that exists on the London borough of Tower Hamlets council is manifold. It is a morass of democracy. There is no manifest democratic activity on the council. The morass is also cultural and historic.
b. And the two are intertwined. The lack of political accountability is the direct result of the absence from the agenda of political selection of candidates [for election to the London borough of Tower Hamlets council] of any criteria based on voluntary compliance with the requirements of democracy and of constitutionality that is compatible with the requirements of democracy.
c. The culture that dominates the behaviour of those who control the access to the powers available to the LBTH council is a corrupt culture. It is a corrupt culture. It has been a corrupt culture. It is bound to remain a corrupt culture. That is why there is the absolute need and demand for the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006.
d. This manifesto is unlike any other that has ever been published anywhere in the UK. it has been prompted by the immediate and dire absence of democratic representation on the tower hamlets council that would and should protect the brick lane London e1 area from the Crossrail hole [attacks plan and programme and] bill and it is the product of the evidence of the reaction to the Khoodeelaar!! campaign of all the elements and forces and agencies and beneficiaries of the corrupt status quo that has created the Crossrail threat to the local community in the London borough of Tower Hamlets. e. This Khoodeelaar! manifesto 2006 will provide the frame of democratic reference for the community to ethically and constitutionally probe the entirety of the operation and use of the London borough of Tower Hamlets council and serve as the definitive democratic guide for exposing corruption and wrongdoing of holders of ‘elected’ posts and of those others whom the holders of ‘elected’ posts use to carry out their anti-democratic, corrupt agenda against the mandate, the wishes, the needs and the demands of the local community in the London borough of Tower Hamlets. f. here is no bigger instance of abuse of democracy at the present time [24 January 2006] than the Crossrail threat that has been brought into this area by the undemocratic behaviour of the allegedly democratic holders of the particularly Crossrail-promoting ‘elected’ and the powerful positions in the London borough of Tower Hamlets council in the past relevant years. g. The historic reasons include the access to the application of the finance – and the financial powers - that the users and abusers of the ‘powers’ of the London borough of Tower Hamlets council have. that access has been used to either perpetuate institutional and personal discrimination in violating human rights and in maintaining a discriminatory and corrupt regime by first denying human and equal rights and then posing as the ‘saviour’ of the victims of the violations. This is most noticeable in the antics of the very corrupt and the very contradictory and the very unethical players that the ‘mainstream’ British media has afforded spots to between 9 January 2006 and 23 January 2006. The Khoodeelaar! the brick lane London E1 area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill 1. THAT Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 Area Campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the analysis of the crisis and the betrayal and the denial of local democratic accountability. This will be a service that the local community deserve need and want from their local council. 2. Towards the publication of such analysis Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 Area Campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will take into account the facts of the behaviour of those who are [or have been or were] in control of the LBTH Council at the time that the anti-democratic decision/s were made or instigated or incited. 3. That the meanings of the two words ‘instigated’ and ‘incited’ will be determined by reference to contemporary use and treated in the context of the current and the temporal uses of the two words in ordinary life. 4. That Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 Area Campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the political account of the representations made by and on behalf of the pro-accountability, pro-democratic activists, organisations and persons to the occupant in the highest-paid post in the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council who is officially also the chief adviser to the controlling group on the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council on compliance with the law and the ‘constitution’. 5. That Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 Area Campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will use all statutes, precedents and dicta as well as all applicable decisions and opinions that have been expressed by any relevant judicial body or forum or court in the UK or internationally to focus attention on the utter duty of holders of elected posts and on the others ‘carrying out their decisions’ within or in the name of or on behalf of or on the implied authority of the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council to tell the truth on what they say and do and on what they do not say and do not do when they invoke or use or claim authority on their ‘elected’ and ‘democratic’ rights to exercise and use the powers available to the ‘London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council’.

VOTE fraud is tip of the iceberg of abuse in the “East End” of London

VOTE fraud is tip of the iceberg of abuse in the “East End” of London
2150 [2135] [2130] [2032] [2020] [1902] Hrs GMT Saturday 25 August 2012:

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary

FILING these from the front lines in the “East End” of London where the “installed leaders” are either ostriches or they are drunk, on the real liquor or the exaggerated impact of the brainwashing they receive in daily dosages: they are the approved leaders.

AS such they do not know the people in whose name they trade as such nor do they care for the rights of the people...

[UPDATE Part 1]

The fight for the defence of the community is a fight that must be fought on several, parallel levels.

It is not just the City of London interests and Big Business.

The fight is as intense against the ingrained ignorance of the “masses” who collectively constitute the first “body” that is “defended.

The calamity of ignorance is so huge that it is most often the case that the Big Business wins simply because the masses are submerged in the ignorance that is their first contacted form of the real oppressor.

The concept of universality of values may be so “easy” for me to write about as I battle against indescribable physical obstructions in a rainy evening in the “East End” of London to get across to a “section” of “leaders” the plain importance of documentary evidential sources which warrant the highest respect, care and protection.

This is not the first time at all that the critical moment of my contextual encounter with the agencies of darkness has occurred during the past decades of battle.

There is the charade of amity that is put on by the perpetrators “possessing the levers of locally based power of the moment” DULY [unduly] followed by their sharp denial of all pretences at being consciously COMPLIANT with the morality and the ethics of their duties. That denial is of course aggravated further by their countering all claims against them with a charge that the claimant is at fault for the callousness of the obstructors.

There, in the above summary, is a concise picture of the routine that is witnessed right across the “East End” of London every single day. So the OPPRESSORS are not remote. They are most closely located and sited to the targets of the oppression.

Sometimes the proximity is so close that any recent observer who might have landed from Mars on this part of Planet Earth would be left with no logical alternative to concluding that these behavioural displays denote the absence of all distinctions between the right and the wrong, between the good and the bad, between the just and the unjust. And between the contaminated and the clean.

[To be continued]

TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL must apologise for this outrage against the memory of Altab Ali....

TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL must apologise for this outrage against the memory of Altab Ali....
TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL must apologise for this outrage against the memory of the victims of racist violence in the East End of London.

ALTAB ALI “memorial” gives TWO different years when he was murdered!

ALTAB ALI “memorial” gives TWO different years when he was murdered!  

  TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL must apologise for this outrage against the memory of the victims of racist violence in the East End of London.

2140 [2125] [1810] [1800] [1730] [1630] Hrs GMT London Thursday 23 August 2012.

  By © Muhammad Haque.

Altab Ali is the name of the Brick Lane London E1 area youth [aged about 24 years] who has become the central figure in the active history of the struggle for justice against racism in the East End of London. It is this potential that I had been thinking of when I chaired the first historic campaign against in the Commercial Road on the Sunday after Altab Ali was brutally murdered by a small gang of racists.

Had I not been aware of the perspective stated above, I could have allowed the anger that then filled the Grand Palais Cinema Hall to spill out into the streets and leading almost certainly to a serious act of violence with God knows what consequence/s.

  Fortunately for all concerned, I had succeeded in containing the anger in that hall, as far as I could be heard by the mostly very angry and outraged Bangladeshi people who had gathered there despite it being a Sunday.

  The event took place on 07 May 1978, effectively within 78 hours of the brutal murder of Altab Ali.

  The gathering was held dispute the total negligence and indifference of the entirety of the then James Callaghan-fronted Labour Party.

  The fact that we averted a violent end to that gathering meant that the Bangladeshi community was spared the indignity of being condemned in the UK media on Monday 08 May 1978.

  Had the gathering moved to commit any of the hundreds that the most volatile of those present had wanted to carry out then the papers would have condemned US for responding to the attack on Altab Ali.

As things turned out, the later coverage by the UK mainstream media was very restrained and gave the impression that the community that the martyred Altab Ali had belonged to was as m deserving of support on objective, universal humanitarian grounds,.

  Contrast that with the front-page of the London DAILY MAIL of Saturday 11 September 1993. That front page was devoted to the faces of a number of Metropolitan Policemen who had been “violently attacked” by angry demonstrators who had gathered outside the Royal London Hospital on Friday 10 September 1993 as a “vigil” for Quddus Ali.

  That the community’s first spontaneous rally against the Altab Ali murder was a dignified but vocal and furious expression of outrage was a credit to all those present and backing action.  

I shall later in these commentaries examine the implications of the staged response on 10 September 1993.  

  Our restraint on Sunday 07 May 1978 has served the argument of the community well ever since.

  Yet the local Tower Hamlets Council has not shown the basic decency of respect and recognition to either the martyr himself or indeed to those of us who mobilised the political response to that outrage and violence.  

This insult by Tower Hamlets Council must be withdrawn immediately and the Council must apologise to the Bangladeshi community at once. That apology must start with the Council apologising for insulting the memory of the martyr Altab Ali.  

Tower Hamlets Council also must remove the two texts of the “history” about the murder of Altab Ali and the community’s response.  

The first insult is that the two texts put on the so-called memorial board near the Adler Street bus stop on the Whitechapel Road are carelessly written. So much so that the date of Altab Ali’s murder is relegated to a later section and the “introduction” starts with “in 1994…”  

Not 1978. The date of the murder 4th may 1978 occurs later into the texts.  

The rest of the texts misrepresent the community’s response and I shall examine those one by one in this series.  

But the worst insult is the variety of dates that the texts provide. The English language version, which occurs first, gives the correct date of the murder, 04 May 1978

But the next language, Bangla, gives two dates when Altab Ali was murdered! It mentions the correct date, 04 May 1978  

But then it ADDS another, different year when it says Altab Ali was [also!] murdered!  

It states that Altab Ali was murdered on the local elections day in 1977. But in London there were no local elections in 1977 at all.  

That the TWO years are mentioned as being Altab Ali’s years of death is bad enough.

that it was allowed to be plastered on the “memorial” committed under the “control of Tower Hamlets Council” is outrage and ignorance beyond condemnation.

  [To be continued]

ADHIKARMedia has world exclusive about the 1980s reign of Asil Nadir in East London

ADHIKARMedia has world exclusive about the 1980s reign of Asil Nadir in East London
2320 [2015] [2000] Hrs GMT
London
Monday
20 August 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
AADHIKARMedia has world exclusive access to material about the 1980s reign of Asil Nadir in the East End of London .
For the very general cause of supporting active morality, active ethics and active responsibility BY all in Society, we shall reflect in due course on that time.
It is quite possible that some of our reflections on the “money and the power” that Asil Nadir had ‘collected’ may have some bearings, some relevanc for today, 30 years on....
[To be continued]

Assange: residual “journalist” and congenital hate-monger John Torode is given a spot by the BBC

Assange: residual “journalist” and congenital hate-monger John Torode is given a spot by the BBC
0455 GMT Monday 20 August 2012

Editor © Muhammad Haque
Totally bonkers toxic talking head John Torode’s tedious tirade against Assange.

How very wrong is the Keith Josephite Right [miscalled “Thatcherite”] becomes so very obvious, so alarmingly clear whenever the residual “journalist” and congenital hate-monger John Torode is given a spot by the BBC.
As it was on Sunday 19 August 2012 at the BBC News Channel. Torode was terse, typically toxic and offensive in his tirade against Julian Assange.
As is often the case, the totally bonkers Torode got the key facts about the Swedish “judicial system” very wrong.
He inaccurately lavished it with praise and unjustifiably likened it with his fantasy “free-est” or “most lilberal” society.
Sweden is no such place.
As he did in his equally corrupt summary of what was actually going on at the Obama White House or indeed anywhere else in the USA “Security apparatuses|” whose invincibility Assange has done so much to expose to ridicule.
Within literally minutes of Torode’s ending his stupid Tirade, the same BBC presenter who had “hosted” Torode cued in a commentator from the USA capital Washington [DC ] who comprehensively questioned everything that Torode had said, suggested or implied.

[To be continued]

UK Govt policy causing the poverty-struck to commit suicide

UK Govt policy causing the poverty-struck to commit suicide
AADHIKARMedia report UK Govt policy causing the poverty-struck to commit suicides
[To be continued]

Suicide rates rocket in wake of economic downturn recession
 
NINA LAKHANI
WEDNESDAY 15 AUGUST 2012
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/suicide-rates-rocket-in-wake-of-economic-downturn-recession-8049446.html
Suicide rates have rocketed since the economic downturn, with the biggest rise in areas suffering most unemployment, new research reveals.
Around 13,000 people committed suicide in England between 2008 and 2010 – 1,000 more than expected – after a 20-year low in 2007.
Men accounted for 85 per cent of these extra deaths – two fifths of which were directly associated to job losses, according to the research published in the British Medical Journal.
Before the recession, which began in 2008, suicides rates in England had fallen every year since 2000, with an average of 83 fewer deaths annually. Although suicides began to decline again in 2010, coinciding with a slight fall in unemployment, the numbers are still higher than 2007.
The research analysed suicide data and unemployment figures from 93 counties and local authorities across England. In general, the areas which have had the biggest increase in new unemployed, especially men, have had the most extra suicides.
For example, the number of people claiming jobseekers allowance in north and north-east Somerset and south Gloucestershire doubled over the three years and suicides increased by 50 per cent. Unemployment increased by 24 per cent in Outer London, and suicides by 9 per cent. The figures should not come as a great surprise to the Government – the link between suicides and economic recessions is well known. There is also strong evidence to suggest the risks are mitigated and people protected in countries which have good employment programmes and social support, such as Sweden.
Debt, a drop in income, and housing problems associated with the recession are also likely to increase the risk of suicide, according to Ben Barr, of the University of Liverpool.
Beth Murphy, head of information for the mental health charity Mind, said the problems were being exacerbated because mental health services were still seen as a soft option for cuts.
"People with mental health problems are being squeezed on all sides, as they face cuts to benefits and services as well as a very challenging job market. This situation can be very distressing, potentially making mental health problems worse and, in some cases, triggering suicidal thoughts," she said.
"While we understand the Government has had to make difficult financial decisions because of the recession, this research serves to reinforce our concerns that cuts to local services are leaving people more vulnerable than ever. This is particularly true for areas where unemployment is high and mental health support service numbers are low."
The share of households in Britain whose income is not enough to pay their bills has risen from 14 per cent a year ago to 16 per cent, Legal and General's Money Mood survey has found.

Muhammad Haque Political Poetry: The Greed of Eid

Muhammad Haque Political Poetry: The Greed of Eid
The © Muhammad Haque Political Poetry
UPDATED texts of

The Greed of Eid
This theme conceived of during 1987-1993
In London E1 1HE UK.
THESE texts are being written
At 1010 GMT London
Sunday 19 August 2012 AD
Eid Al Fitr
01 Shawaal 1433 AH
THIS post was edited at 1935 Hrs GMT 19 August 2012
Eid should be shared
The joys of Eid
Spread across the population
Regardless of status in faith
Just as a child
Neglected and starved
Is brought back to ordinary
Breath and life
On being found food
And fed
The sight of such a state
Of such a child
Is beyond words
Universally joyous.
Have you fed such a child this Eid?
Have you enquired after the woman?
Hidden in indescribable misery
Lacking food
Even clothing
Unknown even to those who “once” knew her
And to others who even once admired her
Now reduced to multiplicity of denial
Deprivation
Where is she?
You have no idea?
Indeed!
So what Eid are you celebrating today?
You say that you pray to God
For the privilege of allowing you
The ability to observe the
Holy month of Ramadaan
That ended yesterday
That is your privilege and your
Right in faith to do
But did it occur to you
That God
Would rather that
You ADDED some real concern for
Some really deprived neighbours
Who are your neighbours?
You don’t know your neighbours?
And you spent almost the whole month
Of Ramadaan asking for God’s forgivingness
And probably hoping that you were
Getting the forgiveness.
You need to stop being so lazily hopeful.
Look around
And you will see that
In your neighbourhood
There are some faces
That are not smiling.
In fact those faces
Could not put on ANY expression
That could amount to a smile
Even if they were told to smile
The souls whose faces those are
Are violated souls
Violated the whole year round
[To be completed]

The image used here was retrieved from the internet via the web page quoted below

http://theartofmisinformation.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/pooverty.jpg



BBC reinforced in February 2011 its own role as the premier propaganda outlet for prejudice..

BBC reinforced in February 2011 its own role as the premier propaganda outlet for prejudice..
0855 GMT Sunday 19 August 2012
Eid Al Fitr 1433.

Editor © Muhammad Haque.

18 months after David Cameron launched his VERY irresponsible & fabricated Munich Manifesto [05 February 2011], the UK Media is carrying on the prejudice and the blockage that Cameron wanted.
The BBC presented these “contrasts” that D Cameron would have approved of!
In promoting such blatant prejudice, the BBC reinforced in February 2011 its own role as the premier propaganda outlet and perpetrator of prejudice in Britain.
[To be continued]

Cameron's Munich Manifesto: UK Media is in denial about Eid today!

Cameron's Munich Manifesto: UK Media is in denial about Eid today!
0820 [0755] GMT Lodo 19 August 2012. Editor © Muhammad Haque. 18 months after David Cameron launched his VERY irresponsible & fabricated Munich Manifesto [05 February 2011], the UK Media is carrying on the prejudice and the blockage that Cameron wanted. The UK Media is in denial about Eid today! But in Paris by contrast the French Media is admitting the fact that today is Eid, the most important social and cultural event in the Muslim community calendar. Cameron has set a very discordant social note and a very bad example. As if his Munich Manifesto was not itself a serious disservice to “Big Society”, Cameron rammed home the extra inflammatory message of intolerance, ignorance and prejudice by arriving in the East End of London location Toynbee Hall [28 Commercial Street London E1] where he performed an even more strident message fuelling suspicion, intolerance and misunderstanding between people of different religious & cultural interests, inclinations, backgrounds, affiliations and associations. [To be continued]

A flicker of business hope on a Brick Lane Curry Restaurant window. AADHIKAR Eid Mubarak report

A flicker of business hope on a Brick Lane Curry Restaurant window. AADHIKAR Eid Mubarak report
AADHIKARMedia reports a flicker of hope on a Curry Capital restaurant window
By © Muhammad Haque
2310 [2240] GMT
London
Saturday 18 August 2012.
This is a most coveted piece displayed on a window at the ‘Eastern Eye’ Curry restaurant situated at the corner of the Princelet Street and Brick Lane.
It is a gem!
Worth as much as a table full of customers.
Why?
Because the restaurant is among the 50 or so going through a slow season in the Curry Capital, also known as Brick Lane. The gem is a Certificate of Excellence that came in the post.
It is issued by a trade service that carries out surveys of customers reporting degrees of satisfaction after visiting a restaurant.
My video shows one of the proprietor's sons explain the Certificate.
Last fortnight, the same window was featured in media reports showing the severe disppoitmet Brick Lane restaurants experienced at the flop of the Tower Hamlets Council’s 2012 Games Propaganda.
We too have reported the image of the restaurant i the past 10 days.
[To be continued]

Exposing and rejecting the lies of the House of "Lords" [!!!!] Crossrail hole Bill Stooged Committe

Exposing and rejecting the lies of the House of "Lords" [!!!!] Crossrail hole Bill Stooged Committe
Exposing and rejecting the lies of the House of "Lords" [!!!!] Crossrail hole Bill Stooged Committee [2007-2008] - 1


By © Muhammad Haque.

1345 [1320] [1255] Hrs GMT

London Saturday 18 August 2012

The logistics of campaigning are such that there is hardly time to sit back and reflect.

Campaigning is, has got to be a way of existence. One Campaign leads to another.

In the still rampant CULTURE of Big Biz corruption and toxicity that affect the rights of the Community thus undermining its ethics and the morality that are then pushed on to shaky footings, there is no end to the list of things that are wrong and are crying out to be put right.

Thus there has been a four year lag between a series of published untruths by a stooged group in the UK Houses of Parliament and this rejoinder, rebuttal, rejection and detailed diagnosis.

I start here to update my diagnosis  and the urgently overdue REBUTTAL And reiteration of how so many members in the UK two Houses of the UK Parliament are simply not fit for purpose.

I here concentrate on the published “minutes” of the particular session [2007-08] of the UK House of Lords “Crossrail Bill Select committee”.

in  retrieved the following web page at  appx 1108 GMT today Saturday 18 August 2012.



http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldcross/112/8031101.htm



That page is a piece of evidence - of how liars put untruths on the official records published under the cover of the UK Parliament.

There are several lies contained in the  “House of Lords Session 2007-08 Publications on the internet Crossrail Bill Committee Publications Crossrail Bill - Minutes of Evidence”

Those lies could only have bee perpetrated after a deliberate  plan to commit the lies. And who mouthed the lies? It was “The Chairman” of the stooged select committee who mouthed the lies. The lies were to the effect that the Khoodeelaar! campaign did not  reply to emails and that  we did not answer the phone!

The lies were perpetrated  just over two weeks after the Khoodeelaar! Campaign held another very clear demonstration against the Crossrail hole Bill.

We had done that right in the middle of  the Brick Lane, Whitechapel , Bethnal Green South And Stepney odo E1 Campaign area against the Crossrail hole plot.

So why did the “House of Lords” Crossrail hole Bill stooged Select Committee of  Session 2007-08, utter the lies?

Answer: Because they could not face the truth.

And the truth is that it is the Khoodeelaar! campaign that devised, authored  and created the framework of Ethics, Morality, Accountability and Constitutionality in what was an empty, barren wasteland that had been exposed in the UK Parliament where Big Biz agenda rules the proceedings.

It is Khoodeelaar! that has conducted the most extensive diagnosis and dissection of all the claims made by the perpetrators of the Crossrail hole plot.

It is Khoodeelaar! that unearthed the huge gaps and holes of lies that had been already perpetrated by the peddlers of the Big Biz agenda scam fronters.

KHOODEELAAR! initiated and maintained the upfront, transparent and detailed questioning of the peddlers, the stooges and the touts installed in  and via the UK Parliament. KHOODEELAAR! anticipated the lies of the Peers! So much so that months before the actual “session”, Khoodeelaar! introduced a series of Constitutional law parameters, preambles & questionnaires for the very “select committee” bureaucracy that was even at that stage only just being assembled. 

In addition to those, it was also KHOODEELAAR! that had addressed the formal House of Commons and ITS stooged “Crossrail Select committee” and put to them  the most extensive series of questions covering all aspects of the Crossrail hole scam lies.

KHOODEELAAR! also questioned the many identifiable and unidentifiable bureaucrats inside the VERY DAFT DfT, the UK Department for Transport that was officially the Department that was “in charge” of the Big Biz agenda that was being promoted via the Crossrail hole Bill.

KHOODEELAAR! also challenged - in one of the widest ranging series of mainstream media engagements in the past 60 years  as compared with ANY OTHER known COMPARABLE issue affected by a Parliamentary Bill or proposed legislation -  ALL the core lies and myths of Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail hole plot that the “promoters” were putting forward.

How did KHOODEELAAR! do all those things?

By “not answering” the phone? By “not replying” to emails?

[To be continued]

SLUM DOG ROCKET LAUNCHER

SLUM DOG ROCKET LAUNCHER
POVERTY OF RACIST EMPIRE RAJ CORRUPTING RELATIONSHIP!

Explosive call to halt "British aid for India, which totals £1.6billion"

Explosive call to halt "British aid for India, which totals £1.6billion"
From the DAILT EXPRESS web site: Thursday 16 August 2012




ANGER erupted last night after India unveiled plans to launch a mission to Mars while receiving £280million a year in aid from Britain.

The £50million project aims to put an unmanned spacecraft into orbit around the red planet next year.

The ambitious plan was announced by Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in a speech to mark the 65th anniversary of his country’s ind?dependence from British rule.

Critics last night [Thursday 16 August 2012] demanded an immediate end to British aid for India, which totals £1.6billion and is scheduled to continue until at least 2015.

Tory MP Philip Davies said:

“This is a perfect illust?ration of why it is absolutely ridiculous for us to be giving nearly £300million a year in aid to India. If they can afford to have some high-tech mission to Mars they can afford to look after their own people without British taxpayers having to put their hands in their pockets for money they haven’t got.”



DAILY EXPRESS web site Thursday 16 Aug 2012

[AADHIKARMedia Commentary to be continued]

Dirty Digger's spell on Eton boys as faker Leftie Lewis oozes to the wrong Web

Dirty Digger's spell on Eton boys as faker Leftie Lewis oozes to the wrong Web
Dirty Digger's spell on Eton boys as faker Leftie Lewis oozes to the wrong Web! [To be continued]

CRASSrail hole stopped: As they had to admit their Big Biz scam Xrail hole was not tenable

CRASSrail hole stopped: As they had to admit their Big Biz scam Xrail hole was not tenable
0945 [0935] Hrs GMT London Thursday 16 August 2012

Editor © Muhammad Haque

KHOODEELAAR! is hereby EVIDENTIALLY republishing the full texts of the item that had appeared on the then web site of the East London Advertiser on 18 December 2007
That site has been replaced since and the item below is not accessible via the current web site used by the “owners” of the “East London Advertiser” , the commercial “media group” “Archant”
[The Editor, AAADHIKAR Media]

Crossrail U-turn as protesters smell victory over disruptions

18 December 2007

By Ted Jeory

ted.jeory@archant.co.uk

ANTI-Crossrail campaigners have scored a major victory after transport bosses signalled a U-turn on the scale of disruption they are likely to cause in London's East End.

Crossrail chiefs announced today (Dec-18) they no longer need to build a huge ventilation shaft in Spitalfields, after years of insisting it was needed... including evidence given to Parliament.

It caused fury in the community with protests from traders in Brick Lane and Hanbury Street.

Instead, Crossrail planners intend to 'downgrade' construction work to a simpler and smaller emergency access shaft. It is believed they are now even examining doing without that.

The decision marks a victory for the anti-Crossrail group Khoodeelaar! and its energetic organiser Muhammad Haque. It has been lobbying Tower Hamlets council which supports the entire £16 billion 'super tube' project, urging the Town Hall to represent the concerns of East Enders. "This is a major victory for the community and the campaign," said Mr Haque. "It shows if we continue to campaign the way we have, we can get what we want and that the council can be led." He plans to continue campaigning against other earmarked ventilation shafts in Whitechapel and Stepney Green. But Tower Hamlets council leader Denise Jones said the Town Hall and other community groups deserved credit. She insists: "We have all petitioned hard to lessen the disruption in Brick Lane. "Together we have already achieved massive concessions. "It is fantastic news, a great testament to what can be achieved when the council and people work together."

Crossrail, however, says it is continuing working on 'ventilation and emergency strategies' with Tower Hamlets council "to see if the need for the Hanbury Street excavation shaft could be removed." But the company insisted no firm decision had yet been made.

The Crossrail Bill goes to the House of Lords on January 9 for the next stage in the approval process, after sailing through the Commons last Thursday.

Government ministers were buoyant on Monday that London's biggest construction controversy since Docklands in the 1970s was now all but over.

Transport Minister Tom Harris said: "Crossrail is expected to add 21 per cent rail capacity to the City of London and 54 per cent to the Isle of Dogs, relieving congestion and overcrowding on the national rail and London Underground networks."

The new 'super tube' with its direct link westward from Thames Gateway to the East End, City, West End and Heathrow will run 24 trains an hour at peak times, one every five minutes in either direction.

The route eastward under Oxford Street and Liverpool Street splits at a major junction planned at Whitechapel, with one branch going to Stratford to join the Shenfield line to Essex, the other under Stepney and Limehouse to the Isle of Dogs, then under the Thames to join the North Kent line to Abbey Wood.

0835 [0825] GMT Tuesday 14 August 2012
Editor Muhammad Haque
As they had to admit their Big Biz scam Xrail hole was not tenable.
Contextual UPDATER commentary due here about the “legacy” PR that Big Biz agenda stooged men and women in place are now embarked on in foisting upon the “proud Nation”, post the season of overthetop self-praise and bemedalled banalities. The East End of London is going to be subjected to yet another carve-up. It is upto the people to spot all signs and ploys and stop the crooks in their new tracks.
The crooks do not recognise the East End people as either equals or as parts of any of the “big decision making” which are done at the expense of the people of the East End

[To be continued]

Latest IDIOTIC Spectacle by Tower Hamlets Council and its Councillors

Latest IDIOTIC Spectacle by Tower Hamlets Council and its Councillors
0325 [0240] Hrs GMT London Monday 13 August 2012  

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical, Democratic and Economics Commentary: the Latest IDIOTIC Spectacle by Tower Hamlets Council and its Councillors who bring their abuse of the elected position into further disrepute [1] 

The SHEER IDIOCY of  behaviour concerned of those involved on BOTH sides of the latest “spectacle” staged around the name and the institutionality of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets YET AGAIN confirms my thesis that it is very important to consider the ethical, moral and the universally understood fitness of persons who crave “elected posts or office” before any of them is processed through to “stand  for election to a public position for the Party”. Otherwise, the community affected ends up being hoisted in the most unwanted way!  

How is it possible that during the last week of the “Games”, allegedly “hosted” by “Four local Councils” including Tower Hamlets Borough Council, when the UK mainstream media and all the conceivable OTHER media outlets have  been engaged in playing the “very high feel good” tune, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council manages to get itself into the “local” “newspaper” outlet by staging a spectacle concerning claims, counter claims about a guest  allegedly invited or not - from a Party in Bangladesh!  

  The MAIN DUTY in context of the Tower Hamlets Council in the past week should have been to make sure the local community was in line to “receive the benefits from the staging of the “2012 London Olympic Games” within their “Borough”!  

Yet there has been no row, no squabble, and no exchange of bitter verbal accusations over any of that!  

I said in March 2012 that Tower Hamlets Council was in crisis. Why did I say that? I was not remotely thinking of any Political Party or faction or agency from Bangladesh or from any other overseas country or region being linked with the Tower Hamlets Council. Although evidence suggests that there is a higher incidence of Bangladesh-based Party Political influence in the composition of the majority of the recently recruited Bangladeshi personnel in the Council.   

I was thinking of the dozens of “elected councillors” IN PLACE “on Tower Hamlets Council” who were drawing daily benefits by claiming to be serving the local electors and the local community. I know that most local people have nothing but contempt for most councillors they know about. Why? I could write hundreds of pages. But at least for this piece I don’t have to. One active member of the Tower Hamlets Labour Party shared his own estimation of “councillors”. 

  He said during an unplanned action seminar which I held in the Hanbury Street [off Brick Lane] last night [Sunday 12 August 2012: the day that the 2012 Games were formally “concluded”] that he himself rarely recommends a councillor to anyone seeking help about things to do with the Council!  

And he is someone with years of canvassing experience behind him. He has canvassed hard for the election of several Labour Party candidates for election to Tower Hamlets Council. So he is in a good position to know what he is talking about. 

If he says that he cannot be confident about the competence of a single councillor, how bad is that state of affairs?  

And how shockingly unfit the average Councillor of his knowledge must be!   

  So low is the standing of current Tower Hamlets Councillors that the spectacle about a “Bangladeshi Party Political guest”  involving a number of councillors would not merit any dignified attention from the ordinary members of the community.  

The ordinary Tower Hamlets resident’s [elector or not; voting or not] thought process goes something like this :  If an event, an incident involves a councillor or more than one councillor then it must be treated with the maximum scepticism. And derision. Even contempt.  

And often ridicule. 

And this item of “news” is one such. 

Had the Tower Hamlets Councillors and the Council’s in-situ, incumbent bureaucracy were having a spat with the supposedly independently operating “Opposition” Councillors over the number of young adults out of job or education or away from productive, creative, compatible training programme and the provision for getting the thousands of youngsters out of the scrap heap future then that would be a real matter to get worked up about. Then the councillors [if there were any of them involved in a row of that description] would deserve due recognition. 

But in Tower Hamlets, Councillors, especially those from the “Bangladeshi part of the population”- who are and have been numerically the most prominent for the past decade or so - are most detached from day to day lives of the community. 

THAT it has done so is prima facie the case. Undeniable. On the headline. On the web site of the former “East London Advertiser” [texts reprised below]. 

The texts of the piece by-lined to Mike Brooke do not do much credit to the “East London Advertiser” either.  

They have got most facts wrong.  

At least according to the information which I have gathered over the past three days.  

Firstly, Tower Hamlets Borough Council is NOT an extension of ANY political party operating in and based in Bangladesh.  So whatever the claims after the facts, there was no constitutional right for any Bangladesh-based Political party to claim any access on that basis to the Council.  

Secondly, the matter of protocol has to be complied with. And it was not complied with.  

Finally, Lutfur Rahman has been known to have expressed his neutrality about any invited guests. So what actually happened?  

  SOME, not the majority of the “supporters of the invited guest” were in a state of confusion about where the main proceedings were taking place.  

When it became clear where they were, it was clear that space was a serious issue and all the standard safety procedures had to be adhered to.  

If there was a mischief in setting of an alarm then the correct thing should be to collect all the evidence and then make an authentic finding and then make it public.  

This has not happened yet and people are making comments before the full facts of the fire alarm going off have been established. 

Why should any councillor accept the suggestion that THEIR own Council is staffed by personnel who might be acting unprofessionally? The answer is: The councillor concerned must know that there are Council employees and others with access to the Council’s installations that might be dodgy, unreliable!  

Which sums up the case: Tower Hamlets is not a fit Council!  

The blame for that should be laid at the doors of those who are responsible.  

It is easier said than done.  

As the Council is an undemocratic outfit, finding the chain of command, control and responsibility in an honest way may prove harder than it ought to be!  

Ands therein lies the basis for my preliminary finding: Tower Hamlets Council is prone to idiotic spectacles! [To be continued]  

      

Olympic Town Hall blames ‘violent guests’ over VIPs barred from council chamber Mike Brooke Friday, August 10, 2012   

12:08 PM    Town Hall officials have today slammed back at opposition councillors calling for an investigation into why fire-alarms were mysteriously set off which disrupted yesterday’s civic visit by a Bangladesh government minister to Tower Hamlets Olympic ‘host’ borough. 

Labour and Tory councillors were already furious over executive Mayor Lutfur Rahman banning use of the council chamber when the alarm rang 15 minutes into the visit by Bangladesh Minister Syed Ashraful Islam. The town hall had to be evacuated with hundreds of VIPs and office staff spilling out onto the street. 

Tower Hamlets council has now accused some guests of being “disruptive and abusive” and is insisting the invitation from the council chairman to the Bangladesh government member was “a private meeting.” 

A Town Hall statement said: “The fire alarm went off shortly after the guests entered. Some had already been very disruptive and abusive and there have been allegations of threats of violence against our staff. 

“We will think carefully before allowing any similar functions in the future.” Councillors deny there were any threats—but agree many guests were angry when they were kept in the lobby and barred from entering the reception because of overcrowding, which they blamed on the council chamber being locked. 

Mr Islam, in London for the 2012 Olympics, had earlier been herded into a side office along with other VIPs because Mayor Rahman had ordered the chamber to be kept locked. 

Labour and Tory councillors now want CCTV footage examined to find out if the fire-alarm had been malicious. 

Labour’s deputy group leader Motin Uz-Zaman said: “We want to make sure anyone responsible should be reported. It’s totally unacceptable.” He had earlier asked if he could give the visiting minister a tour of the chamber—but was refused. 

Tory group leader Peter Golds said: “Locking up the council chamber was embarrassing and put Tower Hamlets to shame.” 

Poplar & Limehouse MP Jim Fitzpatrick, one of the VIP guests locked out of the chamber, said the ban was an insult. 

He told the Advertiser: ¨It’s sad when we should be offering the hand of friendship during the Olympics that the mayor decides to withdraw any opportunity to see what Tower Hamlets is all about. 

“It’s a big mistake by Lutfur Rahman, whose refusal could be regarded as offending international guests. 

“His ban seems perverse, petty and demeans the mayor’s office.” 

Council chairman Rajib Ahmed, Tower Hamlets’ First Citizen who had invited Mr Islam, had to hold an impromptu gathering in the street where the Bangladesh minister gave his speech, after the Town Hall near the Blackwall Tunnel was evacuated. 

Mr Islam, a member of the ruling Awami League government which heavily defeated the Bangladesh National Party’s Jamaat Islam alliance in the 2009 elections, later went on to a civic reception in Islington—where he was welcomed into the council chamber!  

The © Muhammad Haque Ethical Commentary
"Greatest" is far too over the top even for a Farah.

The © Muhammad Haque Ethical Commentary <br>"Greatest" is far too over the top even for a Farah.
0045 [0040] Hrs GMT London Sunday 12 August 2012.
The © Muhammad Haque Ethical Commentary
"Greatest" is far too over the top even for a Farah.

Keep the adulation to “one of the fastest runners.." in the very limited time and space-frame of the Olympic competition.

No human being is the “greatest” anywhere.

Learn to look for the truth about some of the truly human & humanising endeaovours.Beyond, far beyond the glitz and the hype and the corruption of the Big Business Games hosting circuits [To be continued]

Brick Lane bared lines of "Curry Capital" Customers at the height of the most idiotic Games hypes!

Brick Lane bared lines of "Curry Capital" Customers at the height of the most idiotic Games hypes!
2125 Hrs GMT London Saturday, 11 August 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque

Brick Lane bared lines of "Curry Capital" Customers at the height of the most idiotic Games hypes!
WE are here reporting that Tower Hamlets Council is operated by a corrupt, incompetent and dishonest clique.
We are also at the same time giving space to an empirical diagnosis, just published this evening [Saturday 11 August 2012] on the London Guardian newspaper’s  web site, which  analysis accuses the decision-makers on behalf of the Curry Restaurants in Brick Lane, of their own ignorance, narrow mindedness. .
We are doing so to bring out and put on the record the full extent of the evidence of the factors underlying the compound  degeneration of the area. .
We are about to publish, later this weekend, more  and updater evidence to support the thesis that there is an orchestrated agenda for the degeneration of the “Brick Lane area” so that multinational corporations operating via surrogate outfits, can make the move that they have been plotting for decades and take over the area.
. We shall show how the corrupt elements controlling the relevant operational agenda ion behalf of the formal Tower Hamlets Council have been sabotaging all attempts at uniting the traders of the Curry Restaurants and other small outfits. .
[To be continued]

THE following comment has just appeared on the Guardian web site, about the lack of trade by Curry restaurants in Brick Lane. .
The comment is signed by “linesofhunger”. . THE following comment has just appeared on the Guardian web site, about the lack of trade by Curry restaurants in Brick Lane. .
The comment is signed by “linesofhunger”. .
The comment is the fifth one on the Guardian’s London blog in response to Dave Hill’s piece .
”Olympics diary: losing out in Leyton and Brick Lane While the big picture appears mixed, its clear that some east London small businesses have not received an Olympics boost “
The LINESOFHUNGER comment on the Guardian web site is definitely from the Tower Hamlets area.
It focuses on the failure by the individuals who make the decisions on behalf of each of the Curry restaurants for the lack of trade and for the declining trade.
Here is the comment [with one spelling error corrected]:
Your promotion of the "East London Advertiser" needs to be qualified. It is actually the website that you are referring to, the previous, long running; "East London Advertiser" has been merged with another of the current owners' titles.
Secondly, you repeat a claimed comment that there was a lack of marketing, as the key reason for the dearth of business as far as the "Curry" restaurants are concerned.
How then is it that so man " restaurants-linked" "associations" become available to at least parts of the media yet they cannot get organised enough to do THEIR own marketing?
Why do they need the Council to do their marketing, especially when certain individual “restaurant owners” and proprietors are too eager to make their points whenever they get a spot in the media?
The truth is that the "Curry" restaurants are not united. 
The individuals who “decide” on behalf of each of the known Curry restaurants in Brick Lane and in the neighbouring streets don’t have the necessary respect for the standards of genuine economic and social organisation to understand that only by genuine and sustained unity can they make any significant and lasting impact on the Council and more importantly in the “open market” of customers. 
They have been missing the opportunity to get the basic unity on strictly common trading, economic and the crucial community bases. 
They have also failed to respond to or cooperate with the local community initiatives - specially created for the benefits of the Curry trade over the past forty years in the area - to organise the Curry restaurants on a level from where the really important issues could be addressed, thus making the Curry restaurants sound and attractive to customers all year round. 
The comment is the fifth one on the Guardian’s London blog in response to Dave Hill’s piece

. ”Olympics diary: losing out in Leyton and Brick Lane While the big picture appears mixed, its clear that some east London small businesses have not received an Olympics boost “

The LINESOFHUNGER comment on the Guardian web site is definitely from the Tower Hamlets area. It focuses on the failure by the individuals who make the decisions on behalf of each of the Curry restaurants for the lack of trade and for the declining trade.
Here is the comment [with one spelling error corrected]:
Your promotion of the "East London Advertiser" needs to be qualified. It is actually the website that you are referring to, the previous, long running; "East London Advertiser" has been merged with another of the current owners' titles.
Secondly, you repeat a claimed comment that there was a lack of marketing, as the key reason for the dearth of business as far as the "Curry" restaurants are concerned.
How then is it that so man " restaurants-linked" "associations" become available to at least parts of the media yet they cannot get organised enough to do THEIR own marketing?
Why do they need the Council to do their marketing, especially when certain individual “restaurant owners” and proprietors are too eager to make their points whenever they get a spot in the media?
The truth is that the "Curry" restaurants are not united. 
The individuals who “decide” on behalf of each of the known Curry restaurants in Brick Lane and in the neighbouring streets don’t have the necessary respect for the standards of genuine economic and social organisation to understand that only by genuine and sustained unity can they make any significant and lasting impact on the Council and more importantly in the “open market” of customers. 
They have been missing the opportunity to get the basic unity on strictly common trading, economic and the crucial community bases. 
They have also failed to respond to or cooperate with the local community initiatives - specially created for the benefits of the Curry trade over the past forty years in the area - to organise the Curry restaurants on a level from where the really important issues could be addressed, thus making the Curry restaurants sound and attractive to customers all year round. 
[To be continued]

When an ex President of the USA can condemn Obama, the silence of "British MPs" is very TELLING

When an ex President of the USA can condemn Obama, the silence of "British MPs" is very TELLING
1815 GMT London Saturday 11 August 2012
AADHIKARMedia Commentary about our world today
Editor Muhammad Haque.
When an ex President of the USA can condemn Obama, the silence of "British MPs" is very TELLING indeed. Obama is exposing the very foundations of the USA’s claims to fatal collapse: [2]
The London daily the INDEPENDENT web site carries a piece dated in June 2012 which reports ex President of the USA Jimmy Carter as comprehensively condemning the Obama practice of drone attacks against targets inside Pakistan.
Although the concept of Pakistan’s sovereignty being violated is not treated with anything like the respect and attention that it deserves, this is what is fuelling the outrage that is now rising across Pakistan and among people of all backgrounds in Asia against the USA Military Agenda

The London INDEPENDENT newspaper web site attributes the term assassinations to Carter’s denunciation of Obama.
Carter is in a good position, evidentially and empirically, to know what is stake. The very credibility of the “good American things”.
The first and the foremost “good American thing” is, as we have said in the earlier part of these commentaries today, the “American Constitution”. The reputation of the “American Constitution” is put at grave risk every time the sitting USA President commits an act of murder or condones a massacre. Carter is in the good position because he encountered the Iran of pre-Islamic era and then he fatally suffered in career terms because of the failures of the USA machine under his watch.
So when Cartrer CONDEMs Obama he is doing so to protect the American interests. The first interest being the image of the USA as a “good” force for “the world”. What Obama has succeeded in doing is to expose the USA Military machine as is the most powerful force on earth as a concentrated unit to do lethal volumes of evil. Evil against innocent people. And this is precisely why Carter is so outspoken, so vocal. Carter is concerned that the mid and longer term losses to the "American interest" will far outweigh any short term careerist gains that Obama is bent on reaping by authsrs8ng murders and massacres of people that Obama is convinced cannot draw “important public attention”. Carter knows that Obama is very wrong on that. That the voice of the innocent victims of USA Presidential drone massacres will be heard but that when that voice gets the critical mass stage, it will be impossible to catch Obama who will be out of office and out of reach. So Carer wants to get the drone attacks and other acts of massacres murders in the name of the USA and under the pretence of the AMERICAN CONSTITUTION to stop. NOW. [To be continued]

1755 [1730] [1650] [1630] Hrs GMT London Saturday 11 August 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque
The AADHIKARMediaonline picture of the banner of the Free Mumia Abu Jamal UK campaign shown here was taken at Bishopsgate [the “City of London” thoroughfare which includes the railway station Liverpool Street] on 06 August 2012.
The Free Mumia Abu Jamal campaign has also drawn attention to an extent to the over-representation of “black” inmates in British jails.
As the campaign’s blog “democracyandclasstruggle” states that [Hackney, London] British parliament Member Diane Abbot has said: “some prisons in the South East [of England] are now virtually all-black”.
The Free Mumia UK campaign has demonstrated at Bishopsgate before. On the 06 August 2012, we conducted a filmed interview with the man who holds up the banner. In later parts of this series, relevant bits from that interview will be published.

. The Mumia Abu Jamal case or the STATE of that case in the USA today just about reinforces the undeniable truth about the very dangerous failures of the “most powerful” “Nation on earth today”.

The fact that Abu Jamal was sentenced to death in the 1980s is not a particularly exceptional fact at all.
Because the USA has the death penalty, as is widely known.
The Abu Jamal case shows that despite routine and aggressive assertion of the “humanising and the human rights-advancing” “protections” under the “American Constitution”, most people, who fit the socially, ethnically and culturally “profiled” characteristics of Mumia Abu Jamal, remain totally deprived of all the fancy “rights” so frequently and so vigorously vaunted at all the trading stages and platforms.

. The awkward Englishman who helped define so much of the founding USA’s Constitutional rhetoric, Tom Paine, would himself be very very outraged if he were about today.
But Jimmy Carter is about. As a former USA President, Carter has been hitting the headlines especially over the regular massacres of children, women and other civilians that B Hussein Obama had promised to carry out [during his "challenge" as against the Republicans' John McCain in 2008] and has been regularly authorising since getting into the White House.
The massacres were the subject of another heated demonstration in Pakistan today [Saturday 11 August 2012]. The “Oxford University”-stamped former cricket “star” Imran Khan has been involved in the growing political mobilisation by the ordinary people across Pakistan against the Obama White House’s massacres programme against the people in the regions bordering on Afghanistan.
The British legal professional Clive Stafford Smith has been at the forefront of the Pakistan protest, as far as the British links are concerned. Stafford Smith has been widely reported in Pakistan [but has been suppressed by the British mainstream media] as giving extensive accounts from the legal standpoint, of how Obama has been committing illegal acts and how the massacres are crimes against humanity. Apart from Clive Stafford Smith, other lawyers, international jurists and human rights specialists have been vocal “about” Obama carrying out the massacres.
But the Murdoch-led British "mainstream media" outlets have suppressed all the news.

Only the Guardian has been, perhaps to show part of its "liberal" face, carrying some of the "news". But the Guardian has been careful to not allow the victims of Obama’s massacres of the Pakistani children, women and other innocents to be seen as victims as compared with the victims of any regime that could be identified as remotely "like the Pakistanis"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But the very widely publicised “friend of the Muslims” [!!!] and the Bradford West MP George Galloway was not able to even refer to the Obama massacres of the Pakistanis when Galloway allowed his name to go with the piece published by the Glasgow daily RECORD on Monday 06 August 2012. Instead, Mr Galloway ended his piece by invoking the supposed wisdom of Marylyn Monroe [on the holder/s of the office of “Mr President”] and doing a sub-reminiscent textual impression of what had become so spectacularly “famous” impersonation by him of a feline as he had feigned to savour the delicacies amid performing an act while posing prostrate at the presence of Runa Lenska.
It is these voids, these empty spaces in the “professional” utterances by “elected politicians” that the Free Mumia Abu Jamal UK campaign highlighted when it denounced the British and the USA regimes and institutions as being not only racist and imperialist but also as being more so than they had been in some of the recent decades.
The campaign also pointed out that the over-hyped resurgence in the Chinese economy and Society must not be confused with the Cultural Revolution under the banner of Chairman Mao’s leadership. “These are fundamental contradictions”, the campaign referred to its stand on today’s China. As it did so in relation to its stand about the regimes and Societies across the West.
In the context of Jamaica which it treats as a typical case of what has been stalling the true liberation of the Caribbean peoples, the “class struggle” was continuing but it would not overthrow the stooged, corrupt regime only because a “charismatic” “leader”, such as Fidel Castro, might emerge one day or suddenly.
The class struggle does NOT depend on a Charismatic leader, the campaign asserted.

[These commentaries will continue]

The following is an extract from an entry on MUMIA ABU JAMAL on the Wikipedia, retrieved at 1545 GMT Saturday 11 August 2012

Abu-Jamal was given the name Mumia in 1968 by his high school teacher, a Kenyan instructing a class on African cultures in which students took African classroom names.[12]

According to Abu-Jamal, 'Mumia' means "Prince" and was the name of anti-colonialAfrican nationalists conducting warfare against the British in Kenya at the time of its independence movement.[13] He adopted the surname Abu-Jamal ("father of Jamal" in Arabic) after the birth of his son Jamal on July 18, 1971.[12][14]

His first marriage at age 19, to Jamal's mother, Biba, was short-lived.[15] Their daughter, Lateefa, was born shortly after the wedding.[16]

Abu-Jamal married his second wife, Marilyn (known as "Peachie"),[14] in 1977.[17] Their son, Mazi, was born in early 1978.[18]

By 1981, Abu-Jamal was living with his third and current wife, Wadiya.[17]

[edit]Involvement with the Black Panthers

In his own writings, Abu-Jamal describes his adolescent experience of being "kicked ... into the Black Panther Party" after suffering a beating from "white racists" and a policeman for his efforts to disrupt a George Wallace for President rally in 1968.[19]

The following year, at the age of 15, he helped form the Philadelphia branch of the Black Panther Party,[20] taking appointment, in his own words, as the chapter's "Lieutenant of Information", exercising a responsibility for writing information and news communications. In one of the interviews he gave at the time he quoted Mao Zedong, saying that "political power grows out of the barrel of a gun".[21]

That same year, he dropped out of Benjamin Franklin High School and took up residence in the branch's headquarters.[20] He spent late 1969 in New York City and early 1970 in Oakland, living and working with BPP colleagues in those cities.[22]

He was a party member from May 1969 until October 1970 and was subject to Federal Bureau of Investigation COINTELPRO surveillance from then until about 1974.[23]


The UK campaign for the Release of Mumia Abu Jamal from prison in USA is being led by an organisation some of whose publications can be read at their blog. The latest accessible blog address is given below :

http://democracyandclasstruggle.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/free-mumia-abu-jamal-march-from-brixton.html

DRESSAGE is outrageous cruelty to horses [1]

DRESSAGE is outrageous cruelty to horses [1]
Call this love of horses? The over-hyped Dressage is OUTRAGEOUS CRUELTY to horses. And it is increasing.


Here is a very mild, almost ‘sedate’ report from the as a scene-setter to our investigaive series on the cruelties that the Olympic Games are used to encourage, justify and promote . AADHIKARMedia here repubhses a report from a New Zealand’ web site 3news.co.nz.


[To be continued]



http://www.3news.co.nz/SPCA-condemns-cruelty-in-elite-Olympic-sport/tabid/423/articleID/262868/Default.aspx



by Nikki Mandow As New Zealand’s Olympic dressage hopeful Louisa Hill begins her final preparations for the games in London, cruelty allegations have hit this most elite of sports.
With less than two weeks before the opening ceremony, the SPCA has joined a group of the world’s most influential animal welfare organisations calling for the practice of excessive tightening of horses’ nosebands in dressage competitions to be outlawed – starting with the Olympics.
Vets say the hunt for a perfect performance (or at least perfect marks) has led many top dressage riders to crank their horses’ nosebands so tight the animals risk painful mouth ulcers, restricted blood flow and, in some cases, permanently deformed nasal bones. Ironically this practice, referred to in the Australian Financial Review as “like torture for horses”,  happens because competition judges deduct marks when a horse opens its mouth – a sign, the rules say, the horse could be resisting its rider.
Because the tight nosebands stop the horses opening their mouths, the animals look as if they are happily obeying their riders, who therefore get extra marks for “submission”, says equine researcher Dr Paul McGreevy, professor of animal behaviour and welfare at the University of Sydney’s vet school and president of the International Society for Equitation Science (ISES).
In fact, Dr McGreevy says, the horses are suffering. X-ray images of horses that have worn very tight nosebands show permanent damage to the nasal bones. Photos taken during competitions show horses with tongues “sporting a suspicious shade of blue”, most likely the result of reduced blood flow from the tight bands. Pictures from inside horses’ mouths show ulcers and other soft tissue damage consistent with trauma from the animal’s cheeks being clamped against its molar teeth and a noseband digging into its face, he says.
Along with top welfare and veterinary organisations in the UK, New Zealand, Australia and Denmark, Dr McGreevy is calling on the sport’s international governing body, the  Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI), to urgently introduce a rule change requiring Olympic dressage officials to check horses’ nosebands before competitions. Stewards already check for other equipment, such as illegal spurs.
“Over time, tight nosebands can effectively crush a horse’s head. This cannot be tolerated in the name of sport,” Dr McGreevy says.  “Horses are the only animal in the Olympics. London 2012 organisers have to understand this is a cruel practice and needs to stop.”
Louisa Hill is New Zealand’s only Olympic dressage qualifier, on her horse Bates Antonello, although New Zealand also has a five-strong eventing team. The six Olympic equestrian events are taking place in London’s Greenwich Park between July 28 and August 9.
Dressage New Zealand rules officer Soo Wells says tight nosebands are “a quick fix” for training problems and the practice is unacceptable and unnecessary. She says nosebands can and should be policed by competition stewards under existing rules promoting the welfare of the horse.
However more than one top New Zealand dressage competition steward says without a specific  rule governing the amount of space there should be between a horse’s nose and its noseband, tightness is very hard to police.
“It is the exception, not the rule, but I have seen nosebands [in New Zealand competitions] I consider too tight,” one says. “However, there are no guidelines to go by as to how tight is too tight. The only time we can act is if it is really obvious a horse is in distress, or if there is an obvious sign, like blood. I would like to see a rule that gave us sure guidelines as to what is acceptable and what isn’t.”
The FEI considered the issue of tight nosebands at a recent meeting. However dressage director Trond Asmyr and veterinary director Graeme Cooke say there are no plans to introduce any change. The existing code of conduct states that “tack must be designed and fitted to avoid the risk of pain or injury”, and the FEI directors say this is enough.
“The FEI rules are clear and our officials do their best to ensure they are strictly applied... Nosebands as well as any bit or other item of saddlery likely to wound a horse is forbidden. Stewards officiating at FEI events [including the Olympics]... are briefed to check nosebands as well as bits. “We would like to emphasise, however, that the main responsibility for the welfare of the horse rests with the rider.”
And there’s the rub. Top riders are campaigning hard against any rule change.  At a recent International Dressage Riders Club meeting many of the world’s best dressage riders – including UK Olympic dressage medal hopeful Carl Hester, veteran German Olympian Klaus Balkenhol and former Danish international Hasse Hoffmann – signed a letter protesting against compulsory noseband checks.
In a column in British magazine Horse and Hound, Hester said there were already too many checks being done on “persecuted” dressage riders.
But welfare experts believe the real reason many riders are against the checks is they are worried horses trained using the tight nosebands wouldn't perform as well if they were loosened. They say it’s more about points than persecution.
A rule change in New Zealand would need the support of riders, says Dressage New Zealand chairman Karen Trotter. “It would need to go through with a majority of delegates. All bar one delegate is a rider.”
At an international level, riders don’t need to formally endorse rule changes, the FEI’s Asmyr says, but if the riders don’t want it, it’s unlikely to be effective. “The support of the riders is important as the main responsibility for the welfare of the horse rests with the rider.”
Although the FEI’s statute gives a commitment to “preserve and protect the welfare of the horse”, the organisation disbanded its welfare sub-committee in 2009, ISES says.  It also abandoned an earlier “two finger” rule for stewards to judge space under a noseband, saying it was too imprecise. Now there’s nothing.
At the FEI’s request, Dr McGreevy this week sent over a prototype “taper gauge” – a wedge the size of two adult fingers that the International Society for Equitation Science has developed. But the FEI says it won’t be considering the issue before the Olympics. The sport of dressage, like the Olympic Games themselves, started in Ancient Greece. Ironically, the earliest writings about the (even then) elite sport show horse welfare was paramount. Xenophon (430 – 354 BC) insists riders must win their horses’ friendship and willing cooperation, because otherwise dressage training will have very little value, aesthetic or otherwise. Early images show dressage horses ridden without a noseband at all.
SPCA New Zealand executive director Bob Kerridge says his organisation has not had a lot of complaints on the issue of tight nosebands in this country. However he says he endorses the comments from sister organisations overseas. “There is a potential there that we would see as of real concern.”
3 News Related Articles • Antyukh claims 400 hurdles • Diamond loses edge – first to fourth • US, France win final group games • Phelps ends career with 18th gold Tags • Animal Cruelty • London 2012 Read more: http://www.3news.co.nz/SPCA-condemns-cruelty-in-elite-Olympic-sport/tabid/423/articleID/262868/Default.aspx#ixzz23285o95Z

Who gave Jacquie Smith so much TV slots spots?

Who gave Jacquie Smith so much TV slots spots?
0215 GMT Thursday 09 August 2012

Editor © Muhammad Haque

Does Jacqui Smith say anything moral or ethical?
Far less revealing about the real forces that propel post holders and stooge MPs into “state” action that is more often to rob people of liberty, freedom and humanity than to add to the looted rights.
So what on earth is going on here with Jacqui Smith popping up as an increasingly frequent fixture on the Sky news “paper review” slot, the BBC News Channel paper review slot and even the perennially dumbed down ITV’s very own OUTBREAK [oops! “Daybreak”] of NEW IDIOCY slot?
Whose idea was it that after the programmed voters at Redditch ditched Jacqui Smith [May 2010] in the wake of revelations about Smith’s very questionable “accounting” methods and her semi-domestic viewing preferences, she DESERVED to be spread across the “mainstream” TV outlets as if she were a product of a treasured brand of [vintage...] beverage?
Somebody somewhere must be having a laugh at the expense o “ELECTORS GB”!
[To be continued]

Khoodeelaar! did what the Council failed, neglected to do: defend the community!

Khoodeelaar! did what the Council failed, neglected to do: defend the community!
2135 Hrs GMT SU 05 August 2012
ACTION FLASHBACK SIX YEARS ago:

Khoodeelaar! Open Letter to local MP George Galloway about Crossrail



AADHIKARonline |

05.09.2006 13:09 |

Social Struggles |

London

The Khoodeelaar! campaign in defence of the East End against Crossrail hole Bill attacks was the first and the ONLY independent local campaign [or grouping] in the area to stand up for George Galloway in public when Galloway was being politically assaulted by the Blairing brigade over his absence away in January 2006. In the past 8 months, the Crossrail hole Bill has been given undue backing by a committee of MPs which has been targeted as a poodles committee. Khoodeelaar! is now wanting to know what, if any, position George Galloway has on the subject of the role of the Select Committee so far and what he has said to oppose the Crossrail hole plot after the announcement on 25 July 2006 that the poodles committee was backing the CRASSRAIL hole plot on the East End

How local Tower Hamlets MP summed up KHOODEELAAR! role Defending London, East End

How local Tower Hamlets MP summed up KHOODEELAAR! role Defending London, East End
1250 [1200] Hrs GMT London Sunday 05 August 2012. Editor© Muhammad Haque

“It is marvellous what vigourous political challenges can bring.

All of the concessions won over Crossrail can be attributed not to the [Tower Hamlets] Council’s cuddling up to Crossrail but to the community campaigns, PARTICULARLY LED BY KHOODEELAAR....”.

George Galloway MP [then] MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, 21 June 2006, in the TOWER HAMLETS RECORDER [issue 980]

[To be continued]

“Voice of Protest” by the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER was taken in May 2006 on the Whitechapel Road

“Voice of Protest” by the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER was taken in May 2006 on the Whitechapel Road
1500 [1430] [1420] [1405] [1335] Hrs GMT London Friday 03 August 2012.

Editor © Muhammad Haque. Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 area campaign against “the Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail hole plot Bill” which we have now effectively stopped from being used as a devastating weapon of mass deprivation dislocation and denial in the East End of London is actively opposing the OTHER, related tools and fronts of Big Biz looters of the community’s rights, resources & SAY who are still operating their programme to take over the East End of London.

As the picture [being published here for the first time by the KHOODEELAAR!Campaign UPDATER since it had been originally published by the ‘local’ weekly the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER in May 2006] shows, the KHOODEELAAR! campaign had to ALSO campaign against the role of the MPs! This photo captioned [in the context of East London as “the”] “Voice of Protest” by the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER was taken in May 2006 on the Whitechapel Road DURING THE VISIT of the area by a group MPs from the then Crossrail Bill Select Committee. That visit itself had been FORCED on the batch [as upon the rest] of stooged MPs ‘select committee’ by OUR CAMPAIGN against the Crossrail hole plot.

As their later “report” showed, the MPs remained as ignorant after the visit as they had been before it!

And the ‘local’ “Tower Hamlets Council” was engaged in playing the quisling role for the Big Biz agenda plot promoters. So the KHOODEELAAR! campaign could not rely on the “elected” MPs or their “locally” elected bureaucratic subordinates, the ‘Tower Hamlets Council, to even show due recognition to the local community. We most certainly had know that the MPs & their locally pa;placed ‘acolytes’ and bag-carriers, were recklessly negligent of and disrespectful to their duties to the local community as against the agenda of Big Biz which the MPs’ stooged “committee” was in place to “advance”!

The KHOODEELAAR! campaign had to continue to voice the demand: “No to Crossrail hole...”

ALL of this was going on YEARS before the world was extensively told about the depth of sleaze, greed & of corruption that MPs - and Pee-rs!!!!- in the ridiculously glorified “Palace of Westminster” were submerged in....

We Knew that MPs were untrustworthy as were their “pee-r”-ing “colleagues”.

[To be continued]

How to stop Bankers’ agent Boris the twisted zip

How to stop Bankers’ agent Boris the twisted  zip
Alastair Campbell, Blair's mouthpiece for years, says the following:

I reflect on how much Boris owes Tony Blair – without him, there would have been no London mayor position, no Olympics to exploit and possibly, no Ken Livingstone as candidate last time.
BHANGEELAAR! The campaign against an elected executive mayor tells the Guardian how to stop Bankers’ agent Boris the twisted zip
0700 GMT Thursday 02 August 20120730 Hrs GMT Thursday 02 August 2012 PUBLISHED a few minutes ago on the Guardian website:

So there we have it from the over-hyped by-line of none other than Tony Blair’s very own Faker-in-chief! He has not given up has he, Mr Campbell.
To him, Tony Bliar belies the truth and he still prevails!
The source, the endless source of all things immoral. It is a gratuitous admission and claim to make so late in the context of empirical proceedings.
The admission does get one or two very important facts wrong, too.
Firstly, contrary to the Reactionary and sub-fasistic mythology created via Fleet Street about “Red Ken”, the true records of Ken Livingstone’s political strategy wil vindicate the analysis that Livingstone’ had always been a pragmatic with an eye focussed on the events yet to come.
His ERROR was that he trusted too many subterranean Bliarites this time round. He was also the target of a sickly antidemocratic orchestra that was playing loudly from most of the “Labour Houses” that got taken over by ghosts of the Blair devil
The conductors of that orchestra did not have democracy as their objective.
They smeared Ken Livingstone ruthlessly and Mr Boris Johnson was a loud & amoral participant and party to that brazen smear war on Ken Livingstone.
His glee was a disgraceful spectacle as he savoured the atmosphere of “smear Livingstone” that ruled the waves of PR for four weeks in April 2012.
The other fact that Mr Campbell has got wrong is to credit Bliar with the introduction of an elected mayor thing in London.
There again, Ken Livingstone was short-changed by the Bliar.
Had Livingstone remained committed to the key values of the original pro-democracy programme for London that had been widely agreed among Labour movement activists against Thatcher's assault on the Greater London Council, the “London mayor” office would not have been created.
Nor could it be democratically sustained. Livingstone must have trusted the devil in a moment of deeply “apolitical detachment” or of personal disillusion. Hence his acceptance of the "elected executive mayor" lure!
That shows that Bliar has politically bankrupted the former Labour Party and Bliared the democratic fervour off it. Mr Campbell is the last person to be allowed to even suggest that he is here making a truthful or objective assessment of any of that.
As for Bojo’s desperate displays of decomposing “dignity”, they have less to do with Bojo’s occupation of the Onion and more to do with the still heavily corrupt influence that dominates the agenda of most of the British media outlets and certainly of Fleet Street-except probably a slender Guardian.
They know the many fabrications and fakeries that Boris has been party to but they are allowing him to behave as if he can do whatever he fancies.
This is why it is most irresponsible for any community of electors [either at London level or at local borough levels] to allow elected executive mayor posts to be continued. Scrap the office.
Everywhere. Start rebuilding a democratically answerable, accountable community represented and served by accountable public spirited servants.
Ken Livingstone has a role here: he can still join the movement for creating a democratic London.
That will see off the clown-faced agent of the toxic Big business & assorted forces of robbery and plunder of Society faster than Alastair Campbell can fabricate another fantasy by associating with the untenable image of an even less tenable figure so deeply submerged in the tears & blood of violations of so many innocent people.
BHANGEELAAR! tells the Guardian how to stop Bankers’ agent Boris the twisted zip

BHANGEELAAR! The campaign against an elected executive mayor.
0700 GMT Thursday 02 August 2012


AADHIKARonline Original world exclusive caption: "Boris caught on zip wire as he dashes to escape questions over his latest date with Rupert Murdoch"

2355 [2330] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 01 August 2012:

Editor © Muhammad Haque

AADHIKARonline Original world exclusive caption: "Boris caught on zip wire as he dashes to escape questions over his latest date with Rupert Murdoch"

“Boris Johnson caught out as he makes a desperate dash to escape questioning public after news leaked that he had secretly invited Rupert Murdoch to a Olympic event..."

Boris Johnson has had several reasons to want  to escape the questioning about his latest date with the Dirt Digger.

AFTER ALL it was only a few weeks ago that full details came out as to how Boris Johnson made untrue and untruthful statements about his links with Murdoch. He was caught lying about his motives for dismissing the  Murdoch Dirty Digging wrongdoing as being the products of Labour Pray propaganda. It was nothing to do with the Labour Party.

Innocent people had been targeted by Murdoch papers and Boris knew that to have been the case.

Yet he backed the Dirty Digger while hiding the fact that he was in conversations with Murdoch and more than one of Murdoch’s employees at Wapping, situated in London E1 in the “London Borough of Tower Hamlets"!

. Wednesday’s stunt by Boris to avoid questioning over his latest Murdoch date will not succeed and Boris Johnson will be exposed for the toxic agent of the shadier, cruder and the corrupting ends of Big Business that he has been.

Boris Johnson is desperate to deflect attention away from his sleazy relationships with Big Business that is looting the UK public and making the UK economy bankrupt.

But Boris cannot hide the truth for long.

No amount of fakery including his dire display of the “English flag” will be enough to protect him from the inevitable audit that he must face.

Boris Johnson has abused the public office every time he has made a statement backing the crooked ends of Big Business including the Barclays Bank. Boris is not fit for public office, whether in the name of the public of London or at any other level of the state in the UK.

[To be continued] 

Ramadaan Resolve: Khoodeelaar! mobilised diversity of people to defend the community

Ramadaan Resolve: Khoodeelaar! mobilised diversity of people to defend the community
0735 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 01 August 2012.

By © Muhammad Haque

Ramadaan Resolve:
Khoodeelaar! mobilised a diversity of people on Friday 22 October 2004 - another Ramadaan day by a series of coincidences - to defend the community against the attacks that were being mounted via the Crossrail hole part of the Big Biz, City of London agenda against the community in the East End of London.
[To be continued]

Nobody should have bragged of fooling UK public by "bringing" the Hosting to London

Nobody should have bragged of fooling UK public by "bringing" the Hosting to London
2335 [2305] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 31 July 2012
By © Muhammad Haque, the Editor, AADHIKAROnline

As we had warned, YEARS ago, the over-the-top hype and lies for the Big Biz agenda scam carried in the image of the “Olympic Games”, have confirmed the worst observations about “regenerating the East End of London”.

I will update later in this commentary my comment about the particular part or role played in this peddling by Ken Livingstone.

Then I shall examine the lies that Boris “the Big Biz and the Barclays Bank Bag Carrier” Johnson has been perpetrating at the expense of the ordinary people immediately in the four so-called “host boroughs” [see more about the COST of the Hosting, later in these commentaries] and that of the rest of the UK's PAYING public.

Most of the public who pay are low paid or not paid at all in return. Paying is the operative concept which I shall elaborate on in the later parts of these commentaries.

As I had exclusively observed and diagnosed just over four years ago in April 2008, Ken Livingstone [at the date still the “incumbent” as “the occupier at the Onion” in the name of the electors of London] was allowed to first tell a lie and then to CLAIM CREDIT FOR LYING and then was allowed to PREDICT that his lying was the “best thing” that ever happened to the “East End of London”!

[To be continued]

Scandalously pathetic "demonstration" by an aptly named outfit called CON! Just as Con Cameron

Scandalously pathetic "demonstration" by an aptly named outfit called CON! Just as Con Cameron
Editor © Muhammad Haque
0315 Hrs GMT

London Sunday

29 July 2012.



Pathetic timing and even more pathetic “rejection" of two Cons: the "Counter Olympic" net workers are themselves out of touch and are tokenistic in their "anger" -1

Saturday’s display of “rejection” of Cameron and Coe was controlled by the same operation that had been sabotaging local genuinely community protests for decades.

The real controllers behind the display were [collectively] part of the corrupted agenda of the racist patriotic elitists “left” outfits that have operated against the ordinary communities in Britain for over a hundred years.

This “demonstration” was too late and lacked any real political agenda.

It was corrupt because it deliberately and ignorantly did not address the core of the corrupt capitalist imperialist forces that control the agenda of these Games and those of everything else that goes with the “Spectacular” displays promoted via the selected codes of some of patriotism’s worst common denominators.

The CON is itself a Con.

It has shielded the zombies-filled local Tower Hamlets Council from the attention that that zombies-filled Council badly warrants.

There is no evidence that the CON would know ordinary deprived real people if they hit the CON in their faces with the stark starving skeletons of bankrupt local democracy, the corrupt local housing disservice and the sick-mockingly deadly local GPs and their terminator NHS outfits that are routinely getting away with a programme of destroying patients’ lives across East London.

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! advice for Osborne, Cameron, Balls... Stop digging a hole in Economy, Society

KHOODEELAAR!  advice for Osborne, Cameron, Balls... Stop digging a hole in Economy, Society
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Economic and Social Commentary:

Exposing UK Fiancee Disaster George Osborne makig it even worse by wearing a Crossrail hat as he blinks!

Osborne is pictured wearing a promotional “Crossrail” hat.

Several media outlets have used the Press Association image to depict Osborne variously as asleep,incompetent and plain wrong.

As he is captured while during a Crossrail plug, perhaps this is additionally fitting in context as a reminder that the Crossrail project has failed to deliver the jobs - let alone the sustainable thousands of jobs - and the benefits the Big Biz elements bragging of it had promised.

Most of the serious economic criticisms of the 2012 Hosting wastes of “UK Public” resources as apply to CRASSrail as they do to the so far publicly revealed scams that the Condem Collusion has been crassly “funding”.

Today’s UK media hype for Condem front man “Dave” Cameron claiming that the UK “economy” would benefit to the tune of [at least!] £1 Billion by staging the “Games” that it is not just Osborne who is caught sleeping on the job! Cameron is positively sleepwalking into an economic & social nightmare.

True that they both deserve to go. But the more acute truth is that the Balls “alternative” so far mouthed is not THE alternative this Economy and this Society needs. That alliterative can only be found by the “Government” and the “Opposition” [of the day] stopping the massive lies they confect and perpetrate on the ordinary public about the power & the platforms that they daily abuse and misuse.

More public £££ has been wasted this year in boosting the pockets of Big Biz crooks than has been ethically accountably and competently used in economically and socially viable and necessary programmes.

This analysis can be evidentially extended to cover the rest of “government” .

This is true of central as well as regional and stretching down to the locally "formalised" levels of the “state” in its most corrupted and antidemocratic exhibitions undermining the local communities across the UK.

The corrupt-corporatist shrieking, [Maggie-] Thatchering, Bliaring lying denial of the truth is the order at every level.

1215 GMT

London

Thursday

26 July 2012

Voicing East London’s NO to Big Biz PR lies: The BBC gears up ITS very own army for the “cover up”

Voicing East London’s NO to Big Biz PR lies: The BBC gears up ITS very own army for the “cover up”
1145 [1115 ] Hrs GMT.
London Tuesday 24 July 2012.
Exclusive, Original East Enders’ Commentary
By © Muhammad Haque.

Kay Jordan Photo Caption: KHOODEELAAR! Action photo of Kay Jordan as she described her then latest encounter [2007] with the Big Biz agenda-backing MPs [pro-Crossrail ‘select committee’] who were as ignorant about the community in the East End as they were devoid of the requirements of democratic accountability by the “Executive” or of ethical behaviour when facing the community caMPAIGn Against the Crossrail hole plot.



The BBC gears up ITS very own army for the “coverage” of the 2012 “Games” centred in an East London location that the “British Establishment” “Media” has been referring to as the latest symbol of what the “leaders” have “achieved” [here they definitely patronise the people of the East End of London!]: “regenerate” the “most deprived part of do” .

Looking at the number of “specialist” “commentators” that the BBC has already brought on air, it is clear that the BBC is once again engaged in the over-hyping of another Big Lie at the expense of the most ordinary people in Britain.

As the robbery of the Isle of Dogs [ now “restyled front of the “Docklands”] by the Big Biz Corporations shows, “regeneration” of the Big Biz capture-crave is Degeneration of the local community, the depletion of the local capacity...the OTT -hyped 2012 Games Hosting too has been being done AWAY from the reality of the most scandalous deprivation that affects thousands of families, individuals across the four “host Boroughs”! The BBC has been covering up the truth of the massive poverty, deprivation and denial that daily dog the lives fo so may people across these Boroughs and beyond.

[To be continued]

Mother seeks justice after "degree level educated" hospital staff neglected her son to death!

Mother seeks justice after "degree level educated" hospital staff neglected her son to death!
0855 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 16 July 2012
Editor © Muhamad Haque

Hospital staff with “degrees” lacked the right attitude! They should have showed that they cared.

They failed to do that.

They acted without care!

They were callous and the mocked the very

dangerously unwell youth.

They showed contemptuous lack of care to a young lad desperately seeking whatever help he could get. He was denied the vital help!

He died!

[To be continued]

Click image for AADHIKAR Media original © Muhammad Haque Video of 21 june 2012

Click image for AADHIKAR Media original © Muhammad Haque Video of 21 june 2012
Click image for AADHIKAR Media original © Muhammad Haque Video of 21 june 2012

A young patient who died of dehydration at a leading teaching hospital phoned police from his bed

A young patient who died of dehydration at a leading teaching hospital phoned police from his bed
DAILY MAIL web site: Patient dying of thirst rang 999: Inquest hears of mother's fury at nurses who neglected son


• Nurses forgot to give Kane Gorny his medication and he became so delirious he called 999

• His mother said she spent hours trying to convince staff he needed attention but was told he was alright

• Alarm finally raised an hour before his death when a doctor realised how serious his condition was

By CLAIRE ELLICOTT PUBLISHED: 15:30, 2 July 2012 | UPDATED: 22:40, 2 July 2012
A young patient who died of dehydration at a leading teaching hospital phoned police from his bed because he was so thirsty, an inquest heard yesterday.
Officers arrived at Kane Gorny's bedside, but were told by nurses that he was in a confused state and were sent away.
The keen footballer and runner, 22, died of dehydration a few hours later.
images left out of this pubicatio
Hospital: Kane Gorny, 22, pictured with his mother Rita, needed drugs to regulate his hormone levels after successfully beating brain cancer. However, during a hospital stay nurses forgot to give him his medication

A coroner had such grave concerns about the case that she referred it to police. Yesterday an inquest was told how Mr Gorny died after blunders and neglect by 'lazy and careless' medical staff at St George's Hospital in Tooting, South London. His mother Rita Cronin, a civil servant told Westminster Coroner's Court that staff tutted at her and repeatedly refused to listen to her concerns that her son hadn't been given vital medication.   More... • First pictures of child who suffered 80% burns recovering after revolutionary 'grown skin' grafts • Grandmother dies from kidney failure after Indian doctor misdiagnoses her condition as HOOKWORM common on sub-continent • Joy of mother-to-be told baby would be stillborn after boy starts breathing after he is delivered At one point he became so desperate and upset that staff sedated and restrained him – and on the night before his death, his mother said, he was not checked on by medical staff, despite being in a room on his own. Following his death, a nurse allegedly inquired whether the family, from Balham, South-West London, was 'finished' and asked a matron in front of them whether she could 'bag him up'. Mr Gorny, who worked in Waitrose and was training to be a locksmith and shoe repairer, had survived a malignant brain tumour in 2008. Inquest: Rita Cronin, left, and Kane's father Peter Gorny arriving at their son's inquest. Rita told the court she had tried to convince the staff at the hospital her son needed urgent attention but they insisted he was alright The cancer affected his pituitary gland, which controls the body's mechanisms, such as fluid levels. Part of his treatment included a course of steroids to regulate the fluid levels in his body. These drugs, however, weakened his bones and he was in hospital for a routine hip replacement. Doctors told him that, without regular medication to control his fluid levels, he would die. When he arrived at hospital for the hip operation, nurses assured the family they would give him his medication and said: 'Don't worry, he's in good hands – we'll look after him.' But, despite the repeated reminders and insistence by both Mr Gorny and his family, staff failed to give him the tablets and he became severely dehydrated after being refused water. In an interview with the Daily Mail in 2010, Miss Cronin said of the nurses who treated him: 'They were lazy, careless and hadn't bothered to check his charts and see his medication was essential. He was totally dependent on the nurses to help him and they totally betrayed him.' Yesterday Miss Cronin told the inquest she received a distressed phone call from her son on May 27, 2009, in which he told her he'd called the police because he was so desperate for a drink. Help: Police raced to St George's Hospital in Tooting, south London (pictured) but were turned away by staff She then went to the hospital where she found him 'confused and angry', shouting at staff and behaving in an uncharacteristically abusive manner. Despite this, one doctor asked if he was 'coming off the booze' and another asked if he was 'always like this'. Miss Cronin said: 'He sounded really, really distressed. He said "They won't give me anything to drink". 'He also said "I've called the police. You better get here quickly: they're all standing around the bed getting their stories straight".' When Miss Cronin arrived, she recalled: 'They weren't doing anything. They seemed out of their depth. It felt like the two locum doctors were nervous about calling anyone more senior than them.' The inquest heard Mr Gorny was restrained by security guards and sedated with strong medication to calm him down. Later, he was put into a side room and left alone. Miss Cronin said she sat in his room for three hours the night before he died without a single nurse checking on him or giving him vital medicine. 'He was starting to enjoy his life again, even though he had pains in his hip.' Kane's mother Rita Cronin She said she told a nurse who walked past the room that Mr Gorny had not had his medication.  When Miss Cronin volunteered to return to the hospital should he wake, another nurse allegedly told her: 'You don't need to do that. If he makes noise, I'll close the door and then he won't wake everyone up.' She added: 'I later realised that her comment was unbelievable but I was so distraught that it didn't register.' The morning of her son's death, May 28, 2009, Miss Cronin arrived at the hospital early to find him delirious with swollen lips and a swollen tongue. She recalled: 'I then heard three nurses outside his room and I said: "There's something wrong with my son. He doesn't look right." 'The nurse said to me "He had a good night. There's nothing wrong with him and he's just had breakfast and a chat with us." 'I thought: "How could he have had breakfast? There's no evidence (of breakfast)." 'The nurse carried on her handover then I interrupted again and said: “He's not right.” 'The other nurse then tutted and said: "She's already told you he had a good night." And with that the three of them walked off.' Miss Cronin said she then noticed that her son hadn't been given his medication because the packet was still on the table by his bed. She told the locum doctor about her concerns, but the doctor said it wouldn't do him any harm. A doctor doing the rounds then checked on Mr Gorny. Miss Cronin said: 'He took one look at him then he started calling to everyone “Get in there quickly”. 'It suddenly dawned on me he hasn't had his medication, hasn't had his bloods done, nobody's given him a drink, nobody's bothered to put his drip back on him. 'Nobody's done anything since yesterday afternoon when he became aggressive.' She said there was a 'flurry of activity' and everyone 'had a very sad look on their face' as they battled to save her son's life. Miss Cronin said: 'The main doctor came out and you could tell he was really angry. He said: “You need to go and see your son. He's dying.”
The couple then found their son lying in blood and fluid-soaked sheets and a nurse came in and asked them to help her to change them. The same nurse later came into the matron's office and asked whether they were 'finished', adding: 'Can I bag him up?' The death certificate said Mr Gorny died of a 'water deficit' and 'hypernatraemia' – a medical term for dehydration.
Mr Gorny had radiotherapy and chemotherapy following his diagnosis of brain cancer. He was eventually given the all-clear and led a normal life until his mother noticed he was having trouble with his hip.
As he waited for the surgery, his life started to return to normal.
'He was out and about like everybody else,' said Miss Cronin yesterday.
'I always used to make him take his tablets for the next morning, just in case he stayed at a friend's house – and he knew the importance of his medication. We all did. 'He was starting to enjoy his life again, even though he had pains in his hip. He was upset he was having a hip replacement - he was worried he would be in a wheelchair when he was 50.'
Nurses at the hospital were said to have been offered counselling as a result of Mr Gorny's death.
The inquest continues. The case is still being considered by the Crown Prosecution Service.

© The Muhammad Haque Political Poetry Against the Lies of Big Biz-gripped 2012 [1]

© The Muhammad Haque Political Poetry Against the Lies of Big Biz-gripped 2012 [1]
The © Muhammad Haque Political Poetry

designed


degeneration
[1] 1440 GMT
London
Monday
02 July 2012.


Designed
Degeneration
Doomed to
Drive
Dominating poverty across the East End to harsher
Depravity by the dirty business of greedy entrepreneurs
Descending upon the 2012 Games Hosting zone
Determined to further tighten their grip on the proffered fruits of
Deficits immorally defying democratic values
Deficits illegitimately denying dire cries of the locals need
Deficits displayed by the double standards of the plastic-smiling
Dummies grabbing the status as “locally recruited ”
De facto deranged
Delegitimate
Dignitaries....




[The Lines of © The Muhammad Haque Political Poetry to be continued Against the Lies of Big Biz-gripped 2012 Hosting Agenda ]

USA pressure real force behind missiles in East London, reported Channel4News on 14 November 2011

USA pressure real force behind missiles in East London, reported Channel4News on 14 November 2011
USA pressure real force behind missiles in East London, reported Channel 4 News on 14 November 2011

NHS trust on the "brink of bankruptcy" spent nearly £1 million on a consultant

NHS trust on the "brink of bankruptcy" spent nearly £1 million on a consultant
He was paid £3000.00 per day for what?


He told Trust to SACK others while HE got £3000.00 per day for saying that! [To be continued]

Evening Standard web site: Crossrail is killing business, says celebrity fashion store owner

Evening Standard web site: Crossrail is killing business, says celebrity fashion store owner
Evening Standard web site

Crossrail is killing business, says celebrity fashion store owner

f: Building work on South Moult 22 June 2012
A fashion store whose celebrity clients include Eva Herzigova, Claudia Schiffer and Kate Moss is calling on the Government to help the plight of retailers on a West End street blighted by Crossrail and building projects.
Browns, which has five inter-connecting shops in South Molton Street, is facing “a nightmare that is killing business”. It claims shopper access has been restricted by the Crossrail work and re-development of the Hog in the Pound pub, which is to become a store for Chinese retailer Bosideng.
Browns was founded in 1970 by Joan Burstein and her late husband Sydney, credited with talent-spotting designers John Galliano and Alexander McQueen. It is now run by their son, Simon Burstein.
He said: “We’ve been surrounded for the last year. It has been an absolute nightmare and has killed our business. We have had no support at all.
“You hear about government trying to help independent retailers but they have done nothing here. We want to make people aware of the plight of retailers here.”
Browns has hired adviser Conneely Tribe to claim at least a 30 per cent reduction in business rates for the past three years to help it off-set losses it has incurred due to the poor state of the street and the fall in shopper numbers. Mr Burstein said: “We are a high-end business and our customers used to get dropped off on Davies Street but they can’t do this any more. We have lost customers.” Browns’ rent has gone up 50 per cent in the past year and its rates bill is more than £500,000 a year.
Mike Conneely, a partner at Conneely Tribe, said: “The redevelopment of the pub and Crossrail is really a double whammy for the street. It is just one big development site causing many issues for the retailers just at a time when the economic climate is extremely difficult.”
Mr Conneely said the Valuation Office Agency, the government department that deals with business rates, has written to say it is looking into the claim and other claims by retailers in the street. A spokesman for Crossrail said: “Crossrail is sensitive to the concerns of businesses in the South Molton Street area and is working closely with them to ensure that it remains attractive to customers.
"We are installing new and attractive hoardings to help reduce the visual impact of our works and promote local businesses affected by them. We have also created a ‘living wall’ to help improve the appearance of our Hanover Square site.”

Bright red shoes may fail to hide the nasty plot of Theresa May

Bright red shoes may fail to hide the nasty plot of Theresa May
THERESA MAY as imaged by the DAILY MAIL web site 12 May 2010

0155 GMT Tuesday 12 June 2012
Bright red shoes may fail to hide the nasty plot of Theresa May

UPDATED version of a comment published on the London Evening Standard web site Monday 11 June 2012.

When Theresa May launched herself as a “critic” of the “Nasty Party”, she was allowed to BANK on that confession that had been long overdue from a front lined Tory.
Regardless of the design of the shoes that she ALSO launched at about the same time, Theresa May has marched forward from that moment ad has done so by ADDING plus points to her career CV.
She has ALSO struggled to come across as a Cabinet minister who is at Home [sic!] with her brief.
So why has she “relapsed” into the Nasty mode?
The answer is that Theresa May has always been at home with the nasty culture SO LONG AS THAT enabled her to make the career move of that moment. Thus she was pals with a leading front man for the FCS which was considered too Far to the Right even by Norman Tebbit.
But Theresa May kept that as a near-secret.
The thing that has most aided Theresa May is [one of ] the MPs’ “Select Committees” .
It is the Home Affairs Select Committee i the UK House of Commons.
It has repeatedly allowed her to get away with seriously unasked questions and unconstitutional conduct, omissions and abuses of office.

Calls for investigation into Warsi's £12,000 flat expenses

Calls for investigation into Warsi's £12,000 flat expenses
Sayeeda Warsi seen barefoot-behind a barely credible “Dave” the pro-racist Cameron


AADHIKARMedia diagnosing the Media. By © Muhammad Haque.

The item below was retrieved from the DAILY TELEGRAPH Media group web site at 1355 GMT Sunday 27 May 2012

Calls for investigation into Warsi's £12,000 flat expenses



Baroness Warsi faces an investigation into her expenses claims after the Conservative Party chairman was alleged to have claimed more than £12,000 in overnight accommodation expenses while staying rent-free at a friend's house and admitted failing to declare thousands of pounds in rental income.







By Jason Lewis, and Patrick Hennessy

1:41PM BST 27 May 2012 Baroness Warsi charged the taxpayer £165.50 a night for attending the House of Lords while staying at a house in Acton, west London. The owner of the house said she had her own bedroom and front-door key and said he received no money in rent from Warsi or from Naweed Khan, the party official who was also staying there, it was reported. She claimed £12,247 in over-night subsistence within six months of taking her seat in October 2007, records show. It was the equivalent of 74 nights' stay. The Lords sat for 84 days in the period. She was then the youngest peer at the age of 36.

The property was owned by Dr Wafik Moustafa, a GP. He said Warsi had stayed at the house over four months between Mondays and Thursdays and occasionally at the weekend.

He said: "Baroness Warsi paid no rent, nor did she pay any utilities bills or council tax. It was an informal arrangement, so no tenancy contract was drawn up.”



Moustafa, 63, added: “I’m not exactly sure how many days she stayed in total, but I believe my home was her main London residence [at the time].” Warsi also said she did not tell House of Lords authorities that she was receiving income from a London property she had bought and rented out. She apologised last night for the breach of parliamentary guidelines, blaming “an oversight, for which I take full responsibility”. However, she claimed she had paid tax on the rent. Warsi last night said she had stayed in the flat on "occasional nights" as the guest of Khan at the house but during the period she had "predominantly" stayed in two hotels. She said when she did stay with Khan she gave him "an appropriate financial payment equivalent to what I was paying at the time in hotel costs". Mr Khan, who later became Warsi's special adviser, said: "I confirm she made a financial payment on each occasion, which compensated for the inconvenience caused and additional costs incurred by me as a result of her being there.” But Mr Moustafa said: "Naweed Khan never paid me any money." Labour MP John Mann said he would write to the Lords commissioner for standards asking him to investigate Warsi's expenses. "If you are paying no rent where you are staying, you can't possibly be claiming subsistence for staying there," Mann told the Sunday Times. "It all seems very murky. We need a full investigation into the matter." Shadow business minister Chuka Umunna told BBC1's Sunday Politics: "To rebuild trust and demonstrate this is being dealt with in a proper way there has to be a proper, independent investigation. "So long as these stories endure, we are going to struggle to rebuild the trust and confidence we need there to be between Westminster and the people it exists there to serve." Conservative deputy chairman Michael Fallon said the controversy was "embarrassing" but said Lady Warsi believed she acted within the "spirit and letter" of the rules. The failure to make a declaration about the rental income from her flat means that the public was unaware that she had another source of income, over and above her salary, which is paid by the Conservative Party, and the £300 a day allowance which she is eligible to claim when she attends the Lords. The baroness updated the register of interests for members of the House of Lords last Monday. It now states under “land and property”: “Flat in London NW from which rental income is received.” The Prime Minister and Baroness Warsi have spoken of the commitment to transparency by the Conservatives and the Coalition. In November 2010 Mr Cameron said “it is our ambition to be one of the most transparent governments in the world”. In July last year the peer said: “This Government is delivering unprecedented transparency.” The total amount that she failed to declare is not known because Baroness Warsi did not disclose it last night. Peers are required to register any rental income worth more than £5,000 in a calendar year but do not have to say how much. However, the amount is likely to run into five figures because it involves rental income from a home in London for at least 12 months. As well as raising questions over her own financial affairs, it will further strain relations with grassroots members, among whom the 41-year-old baroness is not believed to enjoy widespread popularity. The political career of her special adviser was also in question last night. The revelations follow a dispute that emerged between Baroness Warsi and the Egyptian-born Conservative donor and fund-raiser, Dr Wafik Moustafa. He was upset when the Conservative Arab Network, which he founded, was told earlier this year to sever its links with the party and was subsequently threatened with legal action by Baroness Warsi. That prompted him to disclose that he had given her and her special adviser, Naweed Khan, accommodation in London. In the course of inquiries made because of his public statement, the failure to make a disclosure about her rental income was discovered. Baroness Warsi said last night that she bought a flat in Wembley, north-west London, in September 2007 to use after being ennobled. However, she said that the property transaction was not “due for completion” until 2008 and so she had to find accommodation elsewhere, “predominantly” in two hotels. “Not having made advance bookings for these hotels, there was a period of about six weeks when I spent occasional nights at a flat in Acton, which was occupied by Naweed Khan, at the time a member of Conservative Campaign HQ staff,” she said. “For the nights that I stayed as a guest of Naweed Khan, I made an appropriate financial payment equivalent to what I was paying at the time in hotel costs.” However, Mr Naweed was actually staying rent-free at Dr Moustafa’s home in London, meaning that by extension Baroness Warsi was receiving his hospitality. Baroness Warsi said she moved into the Wembley home in March 2008 and stayed there until June 2010, when “upon security advice, I moved to another address closer to the House of Lords”. She said that some months later she began, “with the prior approval of the Cabinet Office and the Leader of the House of Lords, to let out the Wembley property”. “Due to an oversight, for which I take full responsibility, the flat was not included on the Register of Lords’ Interests when its value and the rent received came to exceed the thresholds for disclosure,” she said. “When the discrepancy became apparent this week, I immediately informed the Registrar of Lords’ Interests of its omission. I repeat: at all times my ownership of the flat and the fact that it was being let out was fully disclosed to Cabinet Office officials and HM Revenue and Customs, and was appropriately reported on the register of Ministers’ interests held by the Government.”

The disclosure means that she failed to declare rental for at least 12 months, and up to 18 months. An average rent for a one-bedroom flat in Wembley is currently £1,000 a month, meaning the amount undeclared could be as high as £18,000.

Conservative deputy chairman Michael Fallon said: "These sorts of thing are always embarrassing but the key thing here is that Lady Warsi has admitted she's made a mistake, she's apologised for it." "She's corrected the record now and she's very happy to cooperate with any investigation back into her claims and I think it should be left at that until any investigation is reported."

Speaking to Sky News, Mr Fallon said Lady Warsi had paid the other tenant but not the owner of the Acton property.

"She stayed overnight in the other property before her own house was available and she believes she was fully entitled to claim the overnight allowance from that and to pay the other tenant for some of the costs involved," he said.

"She believes that was within the spirit and the letter of the rules as they were then and she's very happy to cooperate with any investigation." Baroness Warsi has been criticised over her performance as Tory party chairman.

Some Conservative MPs want Mr Cameron to replace her with Grant Shapps, the housing minister. Earlier this month the Conservatives performed poorly in local elections, losing more than 400 council seats. Baroness Warsi became the first Muslim woman to be selected as a parliamentary candidate by the Tories, contesting the Dewsbury seat in 2005, but failed to win. She went on to be a special adviser to Lord Howard, the former Conservative leader, but saw her career take off under Mr Cameron, who made a special effort to promote ethnic minority candidates and party officials as part of his drive to modernise the Tories. This month she said a small minority of Pakistani men saw white women as “third-class citizens” and “fair game” — following a case which saw nine Muslim men found guilty of grooming young white girls for sex.





RELATED ARTICLES • Profile: Sayeeda Warsi, the trailblazing peer who divided the Tories 27 May 2012

• Warsi: Some Pakistani men see white women as 'fair game' 18 May 2012

• Warsi attacks 'secular fundamentalists' during Pope meeting 15 Feb 2012

• Baroness Warsi attacks 'lilberal elite' 15 Feb 2012

Sayeeda Warsi serves the racist PR machine as she is exposed as another ethnic surrogate ....

Sayeeda Warsi serves the racist PR machine as she is exposed as another ethnic surrogate ....
THIS PICTURE of Sayeeda Warsi [carried on the Sunday Mirror web site] must have been taken at a point where Sayeeda Warsi was at her most confident about her place with the racist Establishment who had recruited her as a tool.....

They are not anywhere to be heard today [Sunday 27 May 2012] when she faces the music over her reported theft......

[To be continued]


0900 GMT Sunday 27 May 2012 AADHIKAROnline ORIGINAL DAILY ETHICAL Diagnostics:


Editor © Muhammad Haque


Another Ethnic Surrogate is exhibited as aiding and abetting the cause of racists who ca parade her as a thief who is a disgrace to the public office she was elevated to.

Citing a “journalism” piece as a reference:

From the London DAILY MIRROR GROUP [“SUNDAY MIRROR”] website London
Sunday 27 May 2012

Cabinet Minister Baroness Warsi last night admitted breaking Parliamentary guidelines by failing to declare rent from a flat.

The Tory co-chairwoman also revealed she used taxpayers’ cash to pay a friend “hotel rates” to stay in his flat while builders were finishing work at her home.

The disclosures will pile pressure on the Baroness, who has already faced calls from Tory backbenchers to quit over her lacklustre performance as party boss.

Last night she apologised, blaming an “oversight” for her failure to declare rent from her North London flat in the Register of Lords’ Interests for more than a year. She claimed she had paid tax on the income.

Baroness Warsi, who became the first Muslim woman to serve in the Cabinet in 2010, could now face sanctions from Parliamentary authorities.

The total sum she failed to declare is not known.

Peers are required to register any income or benefits of more than £500 a year.

The Baroness said she stayed at the home of Naweed Khan, now her special adviser, and gave him “an appropriate financial payment” to match what she was spending on two hotels. Tory sources said she stayed for “eight to 12 nights”.

The Baroness said she told the Cabinet Office she had the flat when she became a minister. She had the approval of the Cabinet Office and House of Lords Leader to let it out when she went to another property.

But she added: “Due to an oversight, for which I take full responsibility, the flat was not included on the Register of Lords’ Interests when its value and the rent received came to exceed the thresholds for disclosure.”



AGENCY PHOTO AS “PALS TONY AND MUAMMAR EMBRACE”!

AGENCY PHOTO AS “PALS TONY AND MUAMMAR EMBRACE”!
AGENCY PHOTO OF THE DEVILS EMBRACE!

REUTERS news agency too may come to admit ITS role in spreading lethal lies to the world’s people:



Lockerbie bomber Megrahi dies in Libya leaving unanswered questions Mon May 21, 2012 12:04am GMT  





By Hadeel Al Shalchi and Ali Shuaib

TRIPOLI (Reuters) - Abdel Basset al-Megrahi, the Libyan convicted of the 1988 bombing of a PanAm flight over Lockerbie, died of cancer on Sunday aged 60, leaving many questions on the attack and its aftermath unanswered.

Megrahi, who said he was not responsible for bringing the jumbo jet down on the Scottish town and killing 270 people, was found guilty in 2001 but was freed in 2009 and returned to Libya because he had terminal cancer and was not expected to live long.

The decision by officials in Scotland to return Megrahi to Libya angered relatives of many victims, 189 of whom were American, and was criticised by Washington as Megrahi returned to a hero's welcome from Muammar Gaddafi.

That he survived for nearly three more years, outliving Gaddafi, who was overthrown last year, caused discomfort in Britain. Prime Minister David Cameron, visiting the United States on Sunday, said Megrahi should never have been freed.

Megrahi's brother Mohammed told Reuters he had died at his home in the Libyan capital from complications from prostate cancer and the funeral would take place on Monday.

"He was too sick to utter anything on his deathbed," another brother, Abdulhakim, said. "Just because Abdul Basset is dead doesn't mean the past is now erased," he said. "We will always tell the world that my brother was innocent."

Scottish leader Alex Salmond said his death confirmed his medical condition had been serious. "Mr Megrahi's death ends one chapter of the Lockerbie case, but it does not close the book," he said, noting Scottish lawyers were seeking other suspects.

Megrahi, the only person convicted for the bombing, was found guilty under Scots law of secretly loading a suitcase bomb onto a plane at Malta's Luqa Airport, where he was head of operations for Libyan Arab Airlines in December 1988.  

Sylhet energy rescues ailing Bangladesh economy, again!

Sylhet energy rescues ailing Bangladesh economy, again!
A Sylhet waterfall [pictured]

1425 GMT Sunday 20 May 2012 The Chinese news agency, ‘XINHUA’ ["New China News Agency") reports on the newest Sylhet natural energy reservoir, saviour of the ailing Bangladesh economy. [To be continued] RETRIEVED the following texts from the web site of the Shanghai Daily carrying the item from ‘XINHUA’ the "New China News Agency" , at appx 1415 GMT 20 May 2012


Energy-starved Bangladesh announces discovery of 137 mln barrels of oil

Source:

XINHUA

2012-5-20 |

DHAKA, May 20 (Xinhua)

-- Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation, well known as Petrobangla, Sunday announced discovery of 137 million barrels of oil in two old gas fields in the country 's northeastern Sylhet district. Petrobangla has estimated that there are 53 million barrels of proven extractable oil in Kailashtila and Haripur gas fields in Sylhet, some 241 km northeast of the capital Dhaka.

The reserves have been discovered by state-run Petrobangla.

Petrobangla chairman Dr Hossain Mansur told a press briefing in Dhaka Sunday evening the oil in the Kailashtila field is light in nature, which is easily extractable, while that in the Haripur field is heavier. He said Kailashtila's reserve, spread in five to six layers, was almost three times of that in Haripur.

Oil was first discovered in Bangladesh's Haripur field in the late 1980s but it had been abandoned later as the relevant authorities considered the field commercially not viable.

The latest discovery of extractable oil elates Bangladesh as the south Asian nation of about 150 million people is in dire need of locating new sources of energy. The Bangladeshi government has forecast that current gas reserves of the nation will run out in the next five years at the present consumption rate. The discovery also comes as a big bless for the impoverished economy when it has been bearing the burden of higher fuel consumption in the wake of insufficient and unreliable electricity in the country. Mansur said though the amount of extractable oil from the fields is nothing compared with the country's annual demand of fuel oil but "we're so happy because we are going to join the oil producing nations."

He said they will soon float an international bid to select foreign firms to extract oil from the fields within one year to support the government's efforts to ease pressure on the economy due to soaring oil import bills.

Annual demand for fuel oil in Bangladesh rose sharply due mainly to the installation of many oil-fired power plants in recent years. The country's fuel oil consumption had been hovering around 3 million tones a year until it jumped to 4.8 million tones fiscal year 2011-12 (July 2011-June 2012).

The amount is likely to surge to 6.8 million tones in the current fiscal year, said an official of state-run Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC).

The official who preferred to be unnamed said BPC had also to buy more oil as farm equipments were also dependent more on diesel generators in the wake of frequent loadshedding. The country's overall electricity generation is now reportedly hovering about 5,600 megawatts (mw) per day against a demand of around 7,000 mw.

The BPC official said the fuel import costs of Bangladesh will be a record of more than 5 billion U.S. dollars in the current fiscal year compared with 4 billion U.S. dollars last fiscal year. Recently Bangladesh's two development partners -- the Asian Development Bank and the International Monetary Fund --

said one of the major reasons for macroeconomic pressures in the country is the rising oil import.

Muhammad Haque tells EVENING STANDARD to tell the truth [1000th]

Muhammad Haque tells EVENING STANDARD to tell the truth [1000th]
By © Muhammad Haque

I quote the London Evening Standard web site [Friday 18 May 2012]

A Greater London Authority spokesman said: “Members of the London Assembly who are not re-elected qualify for a resettlement grant, the formula for which was agreed by the former Mayor and London Assembly in 2008.”

Unquoting the London Evening Standard web site [Friday 18 May 2012]

This must be a historic occasion when the “legacy” of Ken Livingstone as “the mayor of London” has been treated by the London Evening Standard as a positive thing!!!!!

How corrupt too of the bureaucracy that Boris Johnson now calls his own again at the “Greater London Authority”!

The time has come for the London Evening Standard, Nick Ferrari [that famously ‘non-political’ LBC philanthropist] Tom Watson and assorted other bag-carriers of the lying mini-movement that went over the top to deny Ken Livingstone any credit for the work he had done for London, to confess to it all and apologise to the man.

He deserves nothing less. On his records. On the facts. In context.

And Boris Johnson should at last show that he has some residual morality and civic grace left in his “administrative” outlook whilst he claims to be the [“elected”] rightful occupant of the Onion, by makig something more substantial than an Olympic Games ticket gesture to Ken Livingstone for the significant work that the two terms of Ken Livingstone represented for achieving a nearly-tolerant London for the people here.

1920 Hrs GMT

London

Friday

18 May 2012



Alan Johnson owed his Home Office stint to the loose morals of the Smiths

Alan Johnson owed his Home Office stint to the loose morals of the Smiths
By © Muhammad Haque

0755 GMT Friday 18 May 2012
Alan Johnson has apparently told the UK House of Commos “in-house” magazine about his own thoughts on standing for mayor of London [presumably for the Labour Party] at the 03 May 2012 poll. I shall examine the crassness of this Johnson utterance, here, later today Friday 18 May 2012. [To be contiued]

'Death threat' at Tower Hamlets council meeting

'Death threat' at Tower Hamlets council meeting
From the ES web site, retrieved this version at 0124 GMT Friday 18 May 2012


'Death threat' at London 2012 Olympics borough council meeting



Peter Dominiczak

17 May 2012

A London councillor has been arrested for allegedly threatening to kill a rival in a packed town hall chamber.

The Labour politician was seized following the extraordinary confrontation last night with a woman councillor in the Olympic borough of Tower Hamlets. Screams were heard coming from the town hall as the midnight debate descended into a “violent fracas”.

Kosru Uddin, 45, is said to have made death threats to Rania Khan, a supporter of Independent mayor Lutfur Rahman. Mr Uddin was still in custody today. One source, who was present at the meeting, said: “There was violence. It was just chaos.”

The clash is the latest political crisis to hit Tower Hamlets — dogged by allegations of voter fraud and claims that Mr Rahman is linked to groups supporting extremism.

It erupted at about 11.35pm after the chamber had been cleared of the public and press. One eyewitness said today it started when Ms Khan referred to Mr Uddin as a “chamcha” — a Bengali word which translates as spoon but is used to mean lackey or lickspittle.

Mr Uddin is then said to have had an angry confrontation in the council chamber with Ms Khan’s mother, Independent Limehouse councillor Lutfa Begum, over the use of the word. He is alleged to have threatened Ms Khan before the police were called.

Mr Rahman had been present earlier but is not thought to have been in the chamber at the time of the altercation. Independent councillor Ms Khan today said she was “on the verge of mentally and physically collapsing” following the clash. Sources today told the Evening Standard the mayhem unfolded after a disagreement about the appointment of a new chief executive.

Labour and Tory group members were arguing that the recruitment process had been “flawed” and refused to reach an agreement over the appointment of Aman Dalvi.

The borough has been dogged by political controversy in recent years. Mr Rahman was ousted from the Labour Party over alleged links to Islamic extremists before successfully fighting the mayoral election as an Independent candidate. He has denied all the allegations about his links to extremism.

It also emerged this month that the council was facing a police investigation into allegations of voter fraud during a by-election.

Ms Khan, who is the cabinet member for culture on the council, said she was “a bit shaken up” as a result of the confrontation.

She added: “I don’t want to say anything more than that at the moment because I don’t know how far it will go. I am on the verge of mentally and physically collapsing. It is just not right for me to be talking about it. I can’t deal with it at the moment.”

Councillor Peter Golds, the leader of the Conservative group on the council, said: “The meeting was extremely acrimonious and unpleasant. My group were out of the way when this incident happened.”

One source, who was present at the meeting, said: “There was a violent fracas. It was chaos. But frankly, we’ve seen worse in Tower Hamlets before. People have asked for the police to be called during meetings in the past.”

The Met said: “Tower Hamlets police arrested a 45-year-old man on suspicion of making threats to kill. It was in relation to an incident that occurred during a meeting at the town hall at about 11.35pm. The man is still in custody at an east London police station.”

A council spokesman said: “Following an alleged incident in the council chamber last night, we can confirm that the police were called. We understand they interviewed members of the council. We will be helping the police with their inquiries as required.”

British NEO-CONS’ Party’s ex-leader defies Society as he unleashes worst assault on the "weakest"

British NEO-CONS’ Party’s ex-leader defies Society as he unleashes worst assault on the "weakest"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9263502/Iain-Duncan-Smith-Im-not-scared-to-light-the-fuse-on-disability-reform.html





Iain Duncan Smith: 'I’m not scared to light the fuse on disability reform’

Iain Duncan Smith is ready to overhaul an area of benefits others have shied away from .

“If we get the economy back on an even keel then we create the environment that will reward savers”, says Duncan Smith 

By Robert Winnett, Political Editor 10:00PM BST 13 May 2012



As Iain Duncan Smith strides into his office, complete with military tie, he is keen to report back from the front line.

There is nothing to worry about, most of “them” are more interested in getting drunk and getting to the shops before they close than mounting any further attacks. The Work and Pensions Secretary has been wandering unrecognised among thousands of civil servants and other public-sector workers on strike in Whitehall, overhearing conversations and generally taking the temperature.

For most Conservative ministers such an exercise would trigger either a security scare or a call to a clinic, but Mr Duncan Smith is not easily stereotyped. The original Eurosceptic fought John Major from the back benches in the 1990s and was then the darling of the Right wing who led the Conservative Party briefly before reinventing himself as a social justice campaigner. David Cameron soon handed him the task of overhauling Britain’s benefits system and he is one of the most popular Cabinet ministers.



To the surprise of many colleagues he is working harmoniously with the Liberal Democrats in his department – while still being seen as a key voice in the Cabinet for the Eurosceptic arm of the Tory party. While plans to help the long-term unemployed back to work and stop the abuse of incapacity benefit are popular politically, this year his task may prove more problematic. Mr Duncan Smith has decided to take on disability benefits and reform of the state pension – two issues which are potentially so toxic that even Tony Blair, with his huge parliamentary majority, shied away from them.

Millions of stay-at-home mothers and carers will emerge as big winners in the state pension reform, but wealthier workers with their own pensions may lose out. The Chingford and Woodford Green MP has sympathy for savers who are bearing the brunt of the Bank of England’s attempts to avert another financial crisis, but says the state pension is chaotic and a disincentive to put money aside.

“General saving is really important to us,” he says. “We are a nation that doesn’t save … We drifted into a culture where consumption was all, and you borrowed to spend … So we change the culture so that you save, you invest and you prepare for the worst. Like we insure our cars, this is basically insuring our lives.

“If we get the economy back on an even keel then we create the environment that will reward savers.” While the rhetoric may be laudable, the reforms are causing anxiety among wealthier pensioners and savers who are suffering from multiple assaults on the value of their nest eggs. Conservative MPs and ministers may feel this concern on the doorsteps, but the plans for restricting disability benefit, known as disability living allowance, which is to be replaced with a new allowance, are even more contentious. Disability benefits, which will cost the taxpayer about £13billion annually by next year, are paid to help people with mobility or caring needs. The Work and Pensions Secretary hopes to cut at least 20 per cent, almost £2.2 billion annually, off the bill. Some believe the figure could be far greater if the experiences of tackling the abuse of incapacity benefit are repeated.

“This is the benefit that is effectively a support mechanism for you, in or out of work, it doesn’t m

atter,” he says. “Whatever income you have, it doesn’t matter.” Mr Duncan Smith says the system is riddled with abuse and fraud. From next year more than two million claimants will be reassessed. The Government is braced for fireworks as, under the plans, even a soldier who has lost limbs but no longer has mobility problems, because of a prosthetic limb, may have the payment cut. While cuts to incapacity benefit have been popular, as many members of the public see it as a crackdown on those who are unwilling to work, this challenge is of a different order. “It’s not like incapacity benefit, it’s not a statement of sickness,” Mr Duncan Smith says of the benefit. “It is a gauge of your capability. “In other words, do you need care, do you need support to get around. Those are the two things that are measured. Not, have you lost a limb?” Most politicians would sell their own children before seeking to tackle the disabled lobby. Why is Mr Duncan Smith determined to push ahead?

“We are creating a new benefit, because the last benefit grew by something like 30 per cent in the past few years. It’s been rising well ahead of any other gauge you might make about illness, sickness, disability or, for that matter, general trends in society. “A lot of that is down to the way the benefit was structured … Second thing was that in the assessment, lots of people weren’t actually seen. They didn’t get a health check or anything like that. “Third problem was lifetime awards. Something like 70 per cent had lifetime awards, [which] meant that once they got it you never looked at them again.”

Mr Duncan Smith is furious with judges, blaming “judicial activism” for widening the definition of disability. It is alleged that many people, who the public would not regard as disabled, can claim the allowance. But, can he guarantee that every person in a wheelchair will still get this benefit? “Yes,” he says firmly before adding: “But, again I can’t jump the gun and say it, but my assumption is yes.”

The reforms to disability benefits, which will tighten the definitions with a more simplified system assessed by medical experts, will be accompanied with a programme to help disabled people back into work. Many think mistakenly that they cannot return to employment without losing the help.

“One of the things we are trying to do is make sure there are much greater levels of support available,” Mr Duncan Smith says. “So there are positives in all this because we will be bringing forward some major reforms that help people get back to work.”

High profile paralympians such as Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson have voiced their concern and tried to amend the plans. But Mr Duncan Smith insists that he is “now beginning to settle people down”. He says that the plan is different from those that Mr Blair was forced to dump. However, with the Conservatives languishing in the polls and Mr Cameron sensitive to accusations that his Government appears shambolic in the wake of the Budget, the will may dwindle in the face of protest.



UPDATER on Jan 2006 East London Advertiser: “CROSSRAIL SCHEME “WILL COST LABOUR” "

UPDATER on  Jan 2006 East London Advertiser: “CROSSRAIL SCHEME “WILL COST LABOUR” "
1540 Hrs GMT Saturday 12 May 2012

Editor © Muhammad Haque

UPDATER on Jan 2006 East London Advertiser: “CROSSRAIL SCHEME “WILL COST LABOUR” "

Coming here in the next hours

Voters Say NO to "DAVE" Cameron’s idiotic fantasy for cloned Borises!

Voters Say NO to "DAVE"  Cameron’s idiotic fantasy for cloned Borises!
CLICK o image to view the video clip diagnosed in this commentary

"DAVE" Cameron’s idiotic fantasy for cloned Borises across England has been thwarted. But why did the BBC have Pete Waterman in their “Salford Media City”?
What a really stupid mess Peter Waterman made over Salford, Manchester on BBC Breakfast programme on Saturday morning!
1715 [1700] [1550] Hrs GMT

London
Saturday
05 May 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque

Exhibit: AADHIKAR Media clip of a BBC Breakfast item Saturday 05 May 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YwsLTSHQYo&feature=youtu.be
AADHIKAR diagnosing the BBC, The toxic lying mainstream Media that serves Big Biz interests and agenda , elected executive mayors ejected, Salford, Manchester, Pete Waterman is a political mess, idiocy is a prerequisite for an appearance on the zombie slot on BBC TV Breakfast programme, Saturday 05 May 2012

UPDATES
http://twitter.com/khoodeelaar

[To be continued]

Campaign to expose media lies that were orchestrated and perpetrated against Ken Livingstone

Campaign to expose media lies that were orchestrated and perpetrated against Ken Livingstone
0940 [0915] GMT
Saturday
05 May 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque
Constitutional and Legal Campaign to expose media lies that were orchestrated and perpetrated against Ken Livingstone over the 03 May 2012 election for “London Mayor”. [2]
Exhibit A.
Tom Watson “MP”
Platform BBC TV
Item:
David Dimbleby straight question to Watson Details:
Listen to what he says in response to Dimbleby. Notice that he says Boris Johnson’s name first! How could that be possible?
Had Tom Watson been doing the same as he “canvassed” [if he did indeed canvass] for Labour Party candidates at the 03 May elections?
[To be continued]

How "Fleet Street" retailed the lies to stop Ken Livingstone -1

How "Fleet Street" retailed the lies to stop Ken  Livingstone -1
By © Muhammad Haque

Editor
AADHIKARonline
0050 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
05 May 2012
We are publishing the item from the DAILY MAIL web site [brow this commentary] where it is shown as being posted just 15 minutes ago [at 0035 GMT] 05 May 2012.
We are doing so purely as evidence and for reference.
We shall diagnose the role of the entire “mainstream media” in the assault on elections and show how they were determined to stop Ken Livingstone from getting a fair chance at this election.
“Fleet Street”, as typified in the openly illegal behaviour by the Evening Standard was above the rule of ethics and morality.
What the many participants in the particular campaign to lie against Ken Livingstone have exhibited of their contempt for basic democratic values is a most dangerous threat to Society.
To them, a Leveson inquiry could not ever happen about their conduct.
They are above all rules, laws , ethics, morality and requirements of legitimacy. They have the “propaganda power “ and they had decided to stop Ken Livingstone. And “they have done that”.
[To be continued]


The DAILY MAIL web page:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2139816/Ken-Livingstone-announces-retirement-politics-losing-London-Mayor-election.html#ixzz1txE1Gv1s

'This is the defeat I most regret': Emotional Ken Livingstone announces retirement from politics after losing London Mayor election to Boris Johnson
• Veteran campaigner Livingstone: 'This is my last election'
• Took 992,273 votes to Boris Johnson's 1,054,811
• Ken: 'These are the worst times for 80 years and Londoners needed a mayor to help them get through this very difficult period'
By NICK ENOCH PUBLISHED: 01:33, 5 May 2012 | UPDATED: 01:37, 5 May 2012

• •
Comments (0)

• • • For four decades, he has negotiated obstacles placed in his way by foes and erstwhile friends alike.
But tonight, an emotional Ken Livingstone announced his retirement from frontline politics after he was defeated by Boris Johnson in the election for Mayor of London.
He said it would be his 'last election' and that he was 'sincerely sorry' he had failed to win for Londoners in 'the defeat I most regret'.
Mr Livingstone, 66, said: 'This is my last election. Forty one years ago, almost to the day, I won my first election promising to build good council housing and introduce a free bus pass for pensioners.
'Now I have lived long enough to get one myself. I did not think I necessary would at the time. Since then, I have won 11 more elections and lost three.
The candidates listen after the announcement of Boris Johnson's victory in the London mayoral elections at City Hall tonight. Ken Livingstone wells up with emotion at the news of his defeat
As Boris Johnson was returned as London Major tonight, a watery eyed Ken Livingstone announced he would not stand again

Ken stood in the background as Boris took centre stage in City Hall tonight
'But the one that I most regret losing is this. This is the defeat I most regret, because these are the worst times for 80 years and Londoners needed a mayor to help them get through this very difficult period.'
In a closely fought race, Mr Johnson garnered 1,054,811 votes (51.53 per cent) to Mr Livingstone's 992,273 (48.47 per cent).  

But there is no denying that 'Red' Ken has had a good innings. Way back in 1971, when he first stood for Lambeth Council, he proved the master of the dark arts of political manipulation, propaganda and campaigning.


A NARROW VICTORY FOR BORIS Boris Johnson was re-elected as Mayor of London in a surprisingly narrow victory that saw him beat rival Ken Livingstone.
The Conservative polled 1,054,811 to the Labour's candidate's 992,273 following a deeply personal and bitter campaign battle that saw the two men clash furiously in public and in private.
Mr Johnson vowed to continue 'fighting for a good deal for Londoners' from government as he thanked voters for giving him a 'new chance'.
The Mayor outperformed his party, which suffered a significant drubbing nationally, but failed to secure the massive win predicted by polls over recent days that had put him as far as 12 points ahead.
Early results in the contest also suggested the incumbent was significantly in the lead and even senior Labour figures conceded the Tory was poised to win. But later count declarations saw the gap reduce, fuelling speculation Mr Johnson's victory was not the done deal that had been tipped.
No candidate won enough votes in the first round to secure victory, meaning second preferences had to be counted.
Labour secured eight of the London Assembly's 14 first-past-the-post constituencies, gaining two from the Tories, which left them with six.


In his most controversial years during the Eighties and Nineties, first as leader of the ultra-radical Greater London Council and then as a hard-left MP for Brent, he was untouchable at the ballot box.
Even when Tony Blair kicked him out of the Labour Party in a desperate bid to stop him becoming London mayor in 2000, Mr Livingstone still emerged triumphant having run as an independent.
Exactly four years ago, his political obituary was penned by many pundits after Mr Johnson dramatically brought to an end his eight-year reign at City Hall.
Reports of his demise proved as exaggerated as Mark Twain's: within two years, he had not only secured the Labour candidacy for a fourth tilt but appeared well-set to return in triumph.
But a seasoned campaigner famous for defying the odds has proved unable to win even when they were stacked in his favour - neither his personal nor political magic working on Londoners.
And now that door has firmly closed.
It is impossible to imagine Labour - the party which once begged him to return to the fold - will ever again invest in Mr Livingstone as the answer to its prayers in the capital. As his campaign unravelled - in the main thanks to controversy over his personal taxes - high-profile Labour figures lined up to express regrets at his return and tell voters not to back him.
Such was the poisoned atmosphere that Labour election chief Tom Watson went so far as to say that voters should 'hold their noses' and vote for his own party's candidate. That was a sentiment echoed by an eve-of-poll editorial in The Guardian.
In his heyday he was the left-wing thorn in the side of the Tories - Margaret Thatcher resorted to legislation to remove him in 1986 - as well as Tony Blair's Government which was so determined to exclude him that it stitched up the selection process, to disastrous effect.


Within two years of joining the Labour Party in 1969, Mr Livingstone was elected as a councillor in his native Lambeth in south London before joining the Greater London Council in 1974.
Soon notorious as 'Red' Ken, he became a bete noire of the Right, supporting everyone from striking miners to Sinn Fein's leaders at the height of the IRA's bombing campaign.
He famously goaded Mrs Thatcher across the Thames in Parliament during the turbulent 1980s by hanging a banner from County Hall with the unemployment figure on it. After she secured revenge by abolishing the GLC, he joined the ranks of Labour's left wing MPs, harrying the Tories but also clashing frequently with the New Labour modernisers.
When Mr Blair restored devolved government to the capital - and created the powerful post of mayor - he certainly did not anticipate that it would open the door for his foe's return.
But his every attempt to prevent his worst-case scenario backfired - and such was Mr Livingstone's popularity that he was forced to ensure he was the official candidate in 2004.
During that second term, Mr Livingstone won widespread praise for the way he stood up for London after the July 2005 suicide bombings and helped win the 2012 Olympic Games for the capital.
There were a string of popular policies too - though tempered by the sorts of personal and professional controversies that have followed him throughout his career.

In 2005, he narrowly avoided serious punishment when he likened a Jewish reporter to a Nazi concentration camp guard - a theme that also dogged this most recent campaign. A close aide was forced to quit over claims he misused public funds and Mr Livingstone's unusual private life, involving five children by three partners, was the subject of intense scrutiny.
Despite that - and the dismal opinion poll ratings of Gordon Brown's unpopular Labour government - he may have clung on but for an equally maverick and colourful opponent in Boris Johnson.
With the roles almost exactly reversed four years on, for some time it looked possible that Mr Livingstone could cut short the Tory's tenure.
But his momentum was dramatically arrested by a row over claims he set up his business affairs to avoid paying large sums in income tax - and his refusal to publish accounts in full.
A bitter personal battle between the two main rivals ensued - one which today's results demonstrate was won by the incumbent.
As he contemplates defeat, Mr Livingstone will be a spectator rather than a key participant for the London Olympics he helped secure.
And he looks destined to be a spectator too when the contenders next line up for the race for the mayoralty. Just don't expect him to be a quiet one.


Cameron openly neutralises impact of his "evidence" to the Leveson inquiry!

Cameron openly neutralises impact of his "evidence" to the  Leveson inquiry!
1130 GMT Friday 04 May 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque

Cameron openly neutralises impact of his [yet to be staged] "evidence" to the Leveson inquiry!

This picture was published i 2009 showing a significantly less stressed Rebekah Wade as she then was. The picture was published with a news item on her being appointed Murdoch’s operational head in Wapping. It has been reported [see item from the Guardian below] that she was in intense electronic commutations with “Dave” Cameron. As many as 12 messages a day between her and “Dave”. Whatever were they communicating about? [To be continued]

From the Guardian web site
Government applies for advance access to Leveson written inquiry evidence

Move could give David Cameron and other ministers chance to read statements from Andy Coulson and Rebekah Brooks •
• Lisa O'Carroll • guardian.co.uk, Friday 4 May 2012 11.26 BST •
Conservative leader David Cameron. Photograph: Murdoch Macleod The government is applying to the Leveson inquiry to get advance access to all written evidence submitted, which could give David Cameron and other ministers the chance to read statements from former spin doctor Andy Coulson and Rebekah Brooks the former chief executive of News International.
The coalition government has made an official application to be a core participant in the third module of the inquiry into press ethics and an emergency hearing has been scheduled for 2pm this afternoon – just ahead of what is expected to be a difficult week for the Conservatives, with Coulson giving evidence on Thursday and Brooks on Friday.
Core participant status gives those who have it advance copies of all written statements submitted along with attached material – evidence such as the 164 pages of emails written by Frédéric Michel to James Murdoch describing the success or otherwise of his lobbying in favour of the BSkyB takeover by News Corp.
Such participants are also able to apply for material to be redacted, which could have given the culture secretary the chance to propose redactions to the Michel emails. Currently the list of core participants include News International, the Met police, phone-hacking victims and the owners of the Daily Telegraph, Guardian, Daily Mirror and Daily Mail.
The inquiry is expected to hear some of its most controversial evidence shortly, amid suggestions that Brooks has retained her text communications with Cameron, messages that it has been suggested are as frequent as 12 a day.
Evidence from senior Labour figures, such as Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, is expected in the next few weeks, as well as from Cameron as the Leveson inquiry turns towards module three, which is dealing specifically with the relationship between the press and politicians. Coulson's testimony next week will be the first time he has spoken publically since quitting Downing Street last January. He was arrested in connection with alleged phone hacking last July.
The application is being made on behalf of the government and not Downing Street, which means all government departments can be copied in on evidence including the Treasury and the Culture departments, both of which have been under fire over their role in Murdoch's £8bn takeover bid for BSkyB last year.

Muhammad Haque diagnosing the threats to Society that Cameron-Boris carry

Muhammad Haque diagnosing the  threats to Society that Cameron-Boris carry
1920 [1905] GMT Thursday 03 May 2012.

By © Muhammad Haque

ITV London’s Alex Forrest warrants serious exposure
[To be continued]

1905 Hrs GMT
Thursday 03 May 2012
The serious problems facing Society in Britain are getting worse by the day.
And why is this so? There is no audit of the power holders. Or rather there no audit of the holders of positions.
The Parliamentary rituals, taking as a shorthand guide the most “interesting” ones of the past say ten months, have been about Murdoch.
Yet it could have been so different, had it not been for the rigourous work of a handful of determined journalists, including Nick Davies of the Guardian. This is a very worrying state of Society.
The utter majority of “Fleet Street” is peddling untruths and behave even more dishonestly than could be found in the “editorial policies” of the word’s officially decried dictatorships and fascist , totalitarian states. The behaviour of the London Evening Standard is a toxic tip of the sub-fasistic iceberg that threatens Society today.
How they are dressing up Boris to make the next assault o Society look “desirable”!
Boris is the ideological Trojan horse for the forces that Cameron touts for and serves.
Boris deserved to be stopped today!
Examine those who berated the Labour candidate in a synchronised orchestra played daily via the broadcast Media in this context.
All of these factors need to be taken into account when considering Cameron and his “importance”.
The “Labour Party” is not coming across as the ideological alternative. The Trade Unions are at their weakest when it comes to articulating agenda for a Society which is at once ethical, just, democratic and safe.
“Dave” Cameron is only able to come across as being “substantial” because the Opposition is neither deeply ethically coherently expressed nor is it sustained.
It must be both.
Urgently.
[To be continued]

AADHIKARonline Video report

AADHIKARonline Video report
AADHIKARonline Video report

1640 GMT

Thursday

03 May 2012

St Mathias Primary School Off Brick Lane.

Editor © Muhammad Haque. Filmed at 1622 GMT Thursday 03 May

2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZXE9ijt3kc&feature=youtu.be

Dave is desperate for Murdoch-covered Boris!

Dave is desperate for Murdoch-covered Boris!
Muhammad Haque questions Dave Cameron’s judgment in asking “London voters to back a perpetrator of an attempted cover up for the highly antisocial role by Murdoch Media Empire”.
The Muhammad Haque comment was posted on the Evening Standard web site in the past 40 minutes.
Here is the comment in full:

Is "Dave" Cameron aware of the Leveson inquiry’s revelation as reported by the Guardian today that Boris Johnson had knowingly made a misleading statement about the phone hacking scandal?
And the disclosure that Boris was faking it all along until the BBC’s Tim Donavon got him into a corner that resulted in Boris dropping his “bluff ” disguise?
With such undeniable evidence, how can any responsible Prime Minister ask London voters to back a perpetrator of an attempted cover up for the highly antisocial role by Murdoch Media Empire?
1320 GMT
Weds
02 May 2012

Sunderland votes “services” “boss” is found gone to Slumberland!!

Sunderland votes “services” “boss” is found gone to Slumberland!!
1208 Hrs GMT Weds 02 May 2012

TEXTS below from the SUNDERLAND ECHO web site: 01 May 2012.



Election box found in street after falling from van


Published on Tuesday 1 May 2012 09:01
VITAL election documents were found in the middle of a road after falling from the back of a lorry.
The box, containing papers for Thursday’s elections, was handed in to police after it was discovered in Belvedere Road, Ashbrooke.
Although no ballots were contained in the sealed box, the papers included the dates of birth and signatures of voters.
Investigations found it fell from the back of a Gentoo van while it was being transported from Sunderland Tennis Centre to the civic centre following verification ahead of Thursday’s count.
Politicians today called for a full investigation into the incident.
Coun Paul Dixon, a Liberal Democrat running for re-election in the Millfield Ward, said: “I’m disappointed that something like this has occurred. It is embarrassing for the council.”
Dave Smith, Sunderland City Council’s chief executive and election returning officer, said: “It is believed that the weight of the container may have pushed open an unlocked rear van door.
“This is the first time anything like this has ever happened in Sunderland.
“The container was in a sealed condition when it was handed into Northumbria Police at Gill Bridge Police Station by a member of the public.
“As council staff unloaded the van, they were contacted by police. The numbered seal on the container was not broken and its contents not disturbed. “The contents have been verified and we can confirm that nothing is missing.
“We would like to thank the public-spirited person who handed this container in. “As a result of this unfortunate incident, the council has reviewed its procedures to minimise the risk of this happening again, and informed the Electoral Commission.”
The council added the papers would have been available for public inspection following Thursday’s final count.
Among those to refer the incident to the Electoral Commission is the UK Independence Party, which has seven candidates running this year.
Richard Elvin, chairman of the party’s North East branch, said: “The loss of material relating to postal ballots is a serious matter a lawful democratic process and calls in to question the transportation of papers.
“We expect Northumbria Police to stage a full investigation.
“We’ve been told the Electoral Commission that from the information provided, they are happy with the security of the papers.
“I’m sure it’s probably OK, but I think something as important as this should be fully investigated, because what would have happened if it had been ballot papers?”
Council leader and Labour member Paul Watson said: “It’s just unfortunate that we’ve had something like that happen. “It’s one of the most fundamental and tenacious parts of democracy, not being able to tamper or interfere with the voting process.
“But it is reassuring that this public-spirited person handed this in.” Coun Dixon added: “I would definitely call for an investigation but I would say I’m surprised because to give the council its dues, the elections are really well run and it does a good job.”
Coun Robert Oliver, leader of the city’s conservatives, added: “It’s a mistake on someone’s part and we were concerned, but we feel it’s not an issue which will affect the outcome of the council election and we are happy that it’s been recovered.”
Ian Porter, managing director of Gentoo Sunderland, added: “On Friday afternoon we were alerted that a container had been found and was being held at a local Police station.
“The container containing postal vote statements was sealed and intact and there was no damage to the contents.”

A Morning Star front-page: Cameron’s two fingers to Society!

A Morning Star front-page: Cameron’s two fingers to Society!
A Morning Star front-page: Cameron’s two fingers to Society!

Boris Johnson failed these people ....

Boris Johnson failed these people ....
SACK BORIS Thursday 3 May 2012

Boris in foul-mouthed rant at TV interviewer ....

Boris in foul-mouthed rant at TV interviewer ....
AADHIKARonline UPDATER Commentary
0158 GMT Saturday 05 May 29012
This AADHIKARonline [screen grab from BBC TV] is not the BBC Reporter Tim Donavon who caught Boris Johnson lying. This is a very stupid ethnic surrogate called Riz Lateef that is installed by the corrupt BBC bureaucracy to front the BBC London TV news bulletins. She is in effect the continuation of her predecessor ethnic surrogate Nina Hossain [who was decanted to ITV London] .

We shall examine the part that Riz Lateef played in peddling the lies her colonialist employers and managers gave her to undermine Ken Livingstone [To be continued]



1835 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 01 May 2012
The BBC lets Boris Johnson off. Allows him to avoid grilling over his deal with Murdoch...

[To be continued]

From Daily Mail web site:

"Mr Johnson lost his famous sense of humour after facing questions about attempts to secure commercial deals with News International while Scotland Yard was probing phone hacking by the company.

Mr Johnson asked the Murdochs’ firm to sponsor a cross-Thames cable car in East London while he was chairman of the Metropolitan Police Authority.

At the time, the force was investigating the firm over phone hacking."

[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque rebutting the latest antidemocratic propaganda by the London EVENING STANDARD

Muhammad Haque rebutting the latest antidemocratic propaganda by the London  EVENING STANDARD


Muhammad Haque rebutting the latest antidemocratic propaganda by the London EVENING STANDARD Tuesday 01 May 2012.

Is it by any chance the same Charles Clarke who was part of the electoral disaster when Neil Kinnock was in place as Labour Party leader?
Clarke is one of the fakers that have always abused the Labour Party for their petty careers.
The needs of the ordinary London people are as alien to Clarke as they are to Cameron and to Cameron's “Bullyingdone” Club backers.
I would give Clarke the time if he could show any evidence to justify his Cameron-peddling presumptions to tell the electors of London that taking away the Society from them was a "good" thing. Which is what is happening already with ConDem. Boris is part and parcel of everything that Cameron and Osborne are about.
So why would Clarke even speak now unless he wanted to damage the rights of London people to stop the CONDEM Bullies’ assaults?
Is it possible that the Plan B strategy that Murdoch is now working on includes the subsidiary parts for careerist Blairing rejects who are overly keen to diss the residual democratic say that people are still just about entitled to?

Boris Johnson has been allowed far too much space by the STANDARD which will be forced to regret its abuse of “MEDIA” “power” that has been taking place over this particular poll scheduled for Thursday 03 May 2012.
The STANDARD must stop its abuse of its own proprietor’s slogan about “press” “freedom”.
1710 GMT Tuesday 01 May 2012

Boris Johnson swears on camera about investigative work of BBC journalist

Boris Johnson swears on camera about investigative work of BBC journalist
1818 GMT
30 April 2012

This picture of Immigration Minister Damian Green [left] from BBC Parliament today , shows [right] a very tense-looking Lynne Featherstone. She looks very remote, bored, as the Heathrow airport queues shambles are explained by her colleague... It is a few weeks since Featherstone was branded Featherbrained by the Daily Mail’s Parliamentary Sketch-writer Quentin Letts. It was on the role that Featherstone was playing in promoting gay rights. Today she looked featureless!

[To be continued]



From he web site of the INDEPENDENT .
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-swears-on-camera-about-investigative-work-of-bbc-journalist-7697648.html

Boris Johnson today launched his second expletive-strewn tirade of the London mayoral election when he swore on camera about the investigative work of a BBC journalist.

With the campaign to run City Hall entering its final 72 hours, Mr Johnson sought to swat aside questions about his dealings with News International by accusing Tim Donovan, the political editor of BBC London, of talking “fucking bollocks” following a report about the London Mayor’s attempts to secure sponsorship from Rupert Murdoch’s empire.

The outburst, which was broadcast by the BBC in a lunchtime news bulletin, followed an earlier incident last month in which the Conservative incumbent called his Labour opponent Ken Livingstone a “fucking liar” in a lift following a dispute over their tax arrangements.

Mr Johnson’s latest brush with controversy followed a report by Mr Donovan which focused on the Tory candidate’s meetings with senior NI figures in 2010 shortly after he had dismissed the News of the World phone hacking scandal in front of the London Assembly as “codswallop”. Mr Johnson continues to lead Mr Livingstone in the opinion polls.

A survey for the London Evening Standard, which today came out in favour of Mr Johnson, gave him a 52 per cent to 48 per cent advantage.

But he faced criticism from opponents after details were revealed of his meetings with James Murdoch, the heir-apparent to the Murdoch throne, and NI chief executive Rebekah Brooks in the wake of an announcement by Scotland Yard that it was reviewing new claims about phone hacking published by the New York Times in September 2010.

The London mayor, who dismissed the allegations which later led to the closure of the NOTW as “politically motivated” and has questioned the level of police resources being devoted to the phone hacking scandal, went on to hold discussions with Mr Murdoch about NI’s proposal to open an academy on land owned by the London Development Agency, a body overseen by Mr Johnson.

On a separate occasion, Mr Johnson had lunch as a guest of Mr Murdoch and Ms Brooks during which NI’s sponsorship was sought for the mayor’s cable car project across the Thames.



In each case, no deal was secured. When asked yesterday about criticism that such meetings were inappropriate given the mayor’s supervision of the police, an irritated Mr Johnson said: “I think it’s right to work with the private sector to get contributions that will be for the benefit of London... I’m very proud that over the last four years that we’ve got more than £100m in sponsorship. “You’ve got to get this on air. Come on, this is the most important thing. Stuff Donovan and his fucking bollocks.”



BBC London today broadcast the footage, recorded as Mr Johnson made his way to the final hustings of the campaign, in its lunchtime bulletin with the expletive bleeped out. Mr Livingstone’s campaign called for Mr Johnson to publish all emails and details of other contacts between himself and NI. A spokeswoman said: “There are serious questions for Tory Boris Johnson over his refusal to press the Metropolitan Police over hacking and his dismissive response to those who have raised this issue with him over the last two years. He needs to open the books and publish all the email and other contact between him, News International and the Murdochs.”

Mr Johnson’s campaign did not respond to a request for a comment about his outburst.

His deputy mayor, Kit Malthouse, told the BBC this weekend that there had been no ongoing police investigation when the meetings with NI were held. Mr Malthouse said: “Boris has behaved with complete throughout this issue. He was a victim of phone hacking himself.”

ES "Six jet attack missile sites across London during Olympic Games"

ES "Six jet attack missile sites across London during Olympic Games"
From Times web site
Published 7 minutes ago

Boris Johnson was today jeered by the crowd at The Times’s cycling hustings for stereotyping cyclists as dreadlocked, lycra-clad men who jump red lights and believe they are “morally superior”.
The incumbent mayor was also criticised by his Labour opponent Ken Livingstone for jeopardising cyclist safety with high transport fares that make it cheaper to travel by car.
Liberal Democrat candidate Brian Paddick compared Mr Johnson to an “irresponsible general” for his insistence that, although cyclist casualties have increased in recent years on London roads, this is mitigated by the increase in overall cyclist numbers, encouraged during his mayorship with bike-hire schemes and cycle superhighways.
Mr Paddick said: “Boris is talking like some irresponsible general, saying: ‘It doesn’t matter if we take a few casualties, as long as we get more people cycling’.”
Mr Johnson said in his summing up comments: “We have seen a reduction in [killed and seriously injured cyclists] on TfL roads and across London. That does not mean that things are perfect and that there is not more we can do. “
The accuracy of the facts quoted by the incumbent mayor were called into question by Green Party candidate Jenny Jones, and the mayor was then jeered by the capacity crowd at the Institute of Civil Engineers for claiming he did not conform to the image of what he called a “stereotypical” cyclist.
Despite a Leader in The Times on Saturday which affirmed that cyclists “are not a special interest group. They are you, and us, and everybody,” Mr Johnson said: “I can humbly say to you, I may not conform to your idea of a stereotypical cyclist: I do not have whippet-thin brown legs or dreadlocks, I do not charge around in lycra, I do not jump lights […] but I ask you to recognise that I have cycling in my heart. I love cycling I think it is a wonderful and I will continue to invest in cycling.”
He was interrupted by heckles from the crowd, calling his comments “insulting”.
Mr Johnson criticised Ken Livingstone’s proposed fare cuts on the London Underground, saying that this would affect the budget available for cyclists. He said: “You can’t do these things with no cash and I cannot see how a Labour programme that involves cutting transport investment can deliver these goals.” Mr Livingstone was cheered for his reply, however, that: “You can’t make London safer for cyclists if you’ve got fares so high that it is cheaper to get in your car,” and said he could fund fare cuts and cycle provisions due to a “£250 million underspend” in the TfL budget.
Mr Livingstone confirmed that he would appoint Green Party candidate Jenny Jones as his cycling commissioner if he is elected on Thursday, and pledged to make cyclists and pedestrians the top priority within the Transport for London (TfL) highways authority “from day one” of his mayoralty.
He also said that, under his mayorship from 2000 to 2008, the proportion of journeys made by bike in the capital had doubled from 1 to 2 per cent and his aim had been to raise this to 5 per cent. He added that, even more ambitiously, this could be raised to 10 per cent of all journeys.
Jenny Jones pledged to extend 20mph zones to ten boroughs within London, following the lead set by the borough of Islington, while adding that, under Boris Johnson, London has “gone backwards” on the “scandal” of air pollution.
“The whole issue of air pollution is a great scandal and in a couple of years no-one will believe that Mayors did not do anything about it.”
Brian Paddick called for action to make lorries on London’s streets safer for cyclists and pedestrians, including measures to make sure they do not use the roads at peak times, and promised to start implementing 20mph zones in busy areas within his first year in office. He also called for cycle safety experts to be appointed to the board of TfL and for lorries
Mr Paddick said that TfL has to “change the priority of traffic flow” and said he would put pressure on the Government to insist on “mandatory sensors” on HGVs to reduce blind-spots.
Independent candidate Siobhan Benita, who travelled to the event in an HGV that had been fitted with state-of-the-art cycle safety accessories, called for segregated cycleways “wherever possible” and promised a “complete, relentless focus” on dangerous junctions. Before the debate, the London Cycling Campaign, a strong voice for cyclists in the capital, rated Jenny Jones as the best candidate for cycling, with Ken Livingstone in second and Brian Paddick in third. Boris Johnson, known by many as “the cycling mayor” came in a distant fourth.
However, Mr Johnson said he would appoint a cycling commissioner and press on with TfL’s review of 500 dangerous junctions in the capital, and also said he would consider the introduction of cycle lanes to the Hammersmith flyover, in response to a question from a member of the audience.
Mr Johnson also pledged to continue extending the bike-hire and cycle superhighway schemes, although a survey of 1,400 cyclists by British Cycling showed that only 2 per cent of Londoners think that rolling out the scheme to new areas should be the mayor’s top priority, with 52 per cent saying they would like to see more dedicated space for cyclists on London’s roads.

BBC web site: Tower Hamlets London 2012: Missiles may be placed at residential flats

BBC web site: Tower Hamlets  London 2012: Missiles may be placed at residential flats
From the BBC web site:

London 2012: Missiles may be placed at residential flats

[COMMENTS] (730)



The Ministry of Defence is considering placing surface-to-air missiles on residential flats during the Olympics. An east London estate, where 700 people live, has received leaflets saying a "Higher Velocity Missile system" could be placed on a water tower.

A spokesman said the MoD had not yet decided whether to deploy ground based air defence systems during the event.

But estate resident Brian Whelan said firing the missiles "would shower debris across the east end of London".

The journalist said: "At first I thought it was a hoax. I can't see what purpose high-velocity missiles could serve over a crowded area like Tower Hamlets.

"They say they'll only use them as a last resort, but... you'd shower debris across the east end of London by firing these missiles." Mr Whelan, who claims to have seen soldiers carrying a crate into the building, said his property management company put up posters and gave out the leaflets on Saturday.



He continued: "They are going to have a test run next week, putting high velocity missiles on the roof just above our apartment and on the back of it they're stationing police and military in the tower of the building for two months.



"It [the leaflet] says there will be 10 officers plus police present 24/7." Resident Brian Whelan:



"It creates a lot of fear. It's a massive inconvenience" Rushana Ali, MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, said: "It looks like it's been imposed without proper consultation.

"I will be asking the government to explain why. The MoD does need to look at this again."

The leaflet states that members of the Armed Forces will be at the location for a military exercise between 2 and 7 May.

It goes on to say there will be a "major national exercise" from 2 to 10 May to test the Armed Forces' capabilities for providing security during the Olympics.

The document added that if the government decides to use the missiles during the Games, the soldiers could be "operationally deployed for a period of up to two months this summer". The weapon being considered is a High Velocity Missile (HVM) system, which would be based on the Lexington Building Water Tower. The tower contains residential flats.

'Excellent view'

The MoD says in the leaflet that the missiles will not pose a hazard to residents and "will only be authorised for active use following specific orders from the highest levels of government in response to a confirmed and extreme security threat". The document states: "Having a 24/7 Armed Forces and police presence will improve your local security and will not make you a target for terrorists.

This part of the leaflet assures residents that their residence will not become a terrorist target

"The location has been chosen as it is situated close to the Olympic Park and offers an excellent view of the surrounding area and the entire sky above the Olympic Park.

"The top of the tower also offers a flat, uncluttered and safe area from which to operate."

The Army website says the HVM system is "designed to counter threats from very high performance, low-flying aircraft".

It says the missile travels at more than three times the speed of sound, using "a system of three dart-like projectiles to allow multiple hits on the target". The missiles can be fired from the shoulder, from a lightweight multiple launcher or from armoured vehicles.





A MoD spokesman said:



"As announced before Christmas, ground based air defence systems could be deployed as part of a multi-layered air security plan for the Olympics, including fast jets and helicopters, which will protect the skies over London during the Games. "Based on military advice we have identified a number of sites and, alongside colleagues from the Metropolitan Police, are talking to local authorities and relevant landowners to help minimise the impact of any temporary deployments.

"As part of our ongoing planning, we can confirm site evaluations have taken place."

The MoD has previously said it was considering plans to install surface-to-air missiles in south-east London at Blackheath and Shooters Hill during the Olympics.



"East London rooftops to carry missiles during Olympic Games"

"East London rooftops to carry missiles during Olympic Games"
1320 GMT 29 Apr 2012
From the Guardian web site
“East London rooftops to carry missiles during Olympic Games

Ministry of Defence tells residents high-velocity rockets will be fitted to apartment blocks close to the Olympic Park”

Evening Standard so desperate to keep the Tories in power it defames all of Tower Hamlets

Evening Standard so desperate to keep the Tories in power it defames all of Tower Hamlets
ARE the TORIES so desperate that they deploy their “strategically CONDEM cabinet-sited [without portfolio] ” “ethnic surrogate” to defame and diss the whole Tower Hamlets electorate ? More on Sayeeda Warsi here later.

Quoting your [Joe Murphy piece on the Evening Standard Friday 27 April 2012] headline

Tory chief warns of voter fraud links to Ken Livingstone backers

Unquoting the headline to the Joe Murphy piece on the Evening Standard Friday 27 April 2012


By© Muhammad Haque

Having read the piece, there is neither any legally verifiable evidence nor any other reasonable proof or even a suggestion that either Ken Livingstone in particular or anyone else in his campaign has been linked with any fraudulent vote whatever. So the logical and the evidential conclusion must be that you have run a deliberately untrue piece which is likely to mislead at least some potential voters. That will be a criminal offence if you are taken to court after polling day. Your publication will almost certainly fa within the category of criminal libel too. especially as you have shown no regard for the incitements to racist hatred that appear as part of your publication albeit as “comments’. That is a foreseeable consequence of your original publication. On 23 April 2012, a mere 4 days ago, the proprietor of the Evening Standard and the Independent wrote as follows:- “Our libel laws are among the most repressive in the world. Further legislation, particularly the removal of a public interest defence or the introduction of a privacy law, would be disastrous.” I am now calling on Mr Evgeny Lebedev to put a halt to what you have been publishing under the supposed cover of freedom of the press. Your latest piece seriously undermines Evgeny Lebedev’s claims, which you can access via the following web page address. http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/evgeny-lebedev-levesons-legacy-must-be-to-keep-our-press-free-7670241.html 1520 Hrs GMT London Friday 27 April 2012

adhikaronline Original diagnosis of the mainstream MEDIA: G Galloway [1]

adhikaronline Original diagnosis of the mainstream MEDIA: G Galloway [1]
1115 Hrs GMT Friday 27 April 2012

Aadhikaronline Original diagnosis of the mainstream MEDIA
UPDATED in context on Friday 27 April 2012.

This CONTEXT being the perpetuation of a racist untruth to the effect that George Galloway was somehow

[a] representing “the Muslims” and/or

[b]that he was even a “convert” to Islam.
If the core evidence of G Galloway’s
statements, role and affiliations/s associations over the past say 20 years is any guide then the most that can be evidentially justifiably said about him with reference to “the Muslims” is that he has come across and demonstrably embraced as his own a mode of quasi-democratic operation for the continuation of certain usable effects of the British Empire and that he has done so while successfully being allowed access by communities where the relevant operating sub-democratic outfits have found in G Galloway a plausible image that has been put to use for temporary opportunities for their own linkages and even “branding”.

There have been other involvement too that could come straight from the universally defined traditions of the movements for justice and fairness.
But the “brand” Galloway has had to be invented every so often especially after a setback in the career side.
And that “brand” Galloway has been most cost-effectively reconfigured with the availability of “people without a voice”, “without representation”, “without hope”.

[To be continued]



The 1st Edition
at 0530 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 24 January 2007
The only thing that the world at large has been made aware of about the contribution to politics made by George Galloway is his widely reported stand on Iraq. The second thing, internationally, is that he has almost without exception been described as being not only biased in favour of Muslims but as being excessively biased in favour of Muslims.

How valid is that perception as based and tested on the evidence of Galloway’s conduct and comments?

AADHIKAR Media Foundation
Aadhikaronline
The 1st Edition
at 0530 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 24 January 2007
Breaking news at 0530 GMT Wednesday 24 January 2007 East London [Bethnal Green and Bow] Member of British Parliament, George Galloway, says on BBC News 24 'Muslims hate' his 'Respect' 'party'! Galloway said this in the last sentence of the programme 'Hardtalk' as broadcast at 0455 GMT today, Wednesday 24 January 2007. Interviewed by Stephen Sackur, one of the BBC's 'former' Washington correspondents, who by that description, is a 'journalist' with no record of independent practice free from the White House Pentagon Neo Con line on the world that is battered by that axis..
Galloway was asked in the last part of the interview to explain some of the rash comments and stamens that eh had made in the recent past.
Galloway’s answer contained a detailed list of justifications from his standpoint. He denied that he ever made the most quoted remark about Saddam Hussein.
He claimed that it was a comment he had made about the 'Iraqi people'.
Then he was asked about his 'RESPECT' 'party' which was said [by Sackur during the broadcast edition of HARDTALK 24 January 2007] to be full of 'Muslim' 'extremists'. Galloway included the words “extremists” and “Muslim”/”Muslims” in the first part of his reply but failed to do so in the final part as broadcast. He made a negative reference to “Muslims” and Blair in the same last sentence as broadcast!
Without further clarification, that remark is bound to be treated as a remark that shows that Galloway is hostile to Muslims generally.
A view that will be examined in the forthcoming commentaries to be published by AADHIKARonline in the near future

Boris must withdraw the Big Biz lie

Boris must withdraw the Big Biz lie
0400 [0325] Hrs GMT
London Thursday
26 April 2012
By © Muhammad Haque

Boris must withdraw the Big Biz agenda Crossrail jobs lie as he claimed on Wednesday
Telling the Huffington Post
I note that Boris Johnson again said [ as reported by Huffington Post] that Crossrail create “14000 jobs”. What jobs, where, for whom? Starting when?
You [Huffington Post] should get Boris to publish the full list of the 14,000 jobs.
If he can boast of the number then he should have no problem in listing the jobs!
If he will not or cannot do so, then he must withdraw that untruth and apologise for makig that untruthful utterance aimed at the voters on the 3 May 2012 poll when he is a candidate.
Boris should also explain his sudden discovery of someone he called “President Obama”!
When was the last time he had mentioned that individual with so much “apparent” “approval” as he did during the “London Citizen” “hustings” on Wednesday 25 April 2012.
Finally, Boris should explain how he would get his Bullingdon Club chums to agree with him on his “new” “ economics persona” as a sub-converted fan of Gordon Brown’s!

Corrupt beyond words!

Corrupt beyond words!
2315 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 25 April 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque
We are witnessing in the UK via the proceedings of the LEVESON inquiry only a very tiny tip of the deep heap of corruption that the “ruling” - no, the controlling class of time-servers are and constitute and represent.

By their own extracted confessions the corrupt ones are crooked beyond words! [To be continued]


The following is being quoted here simply for evidential cited from the Telegraph web site

Leveson Inquiry: Jeremy Hunt faces calls to resign over ' illegal' News Corp advice Jeremy Hunt, the Culture Secretary, was on Tuesday night facing demands for his resignation after emails released by the Murdoch family disclosed that his office offered “absolutely illegal” advice to News Corporation executives.


By

Robert Winnett,

olitical Editor

9:37PM BST 24 Apr 2012

In a series of disclosures on by far the most dramatic day so far of the Leveson Inquiry, the Cabinet Minister’s key political adviser was revealed to have given apparently confidential information on a regular basis over several months to a lobbyist working for James Murdoch.

At the time, Mr Hunt was acting in a “quasi-judicial” role charged with ruling on whether News Corporation could take over BSkyB, the satellite broadcaster.

In public, the Culture Secretary insisted that he was acting in an independent and impartial manner, but the release of the emails has led to allegations that he was privately colluding with the Murdoch family. The emails were published on Tuesday as James Murdoch gave evidence at the inquiry.







RELATED ARTICLES



• Jeremy Hunt emails: 'We are in a good place, no?’ 'Jeremy happy’

24 Apr 2012 • Times editor James Harding 'used as lobbyist'

25 Apr 2012 • Iain Martin: Government is being foolhardy in dumping on Michel

24 Apr 2012 • Frederic Michel's emails to James Murdoch on lobbying Coalition

24 Apr 2012 • Video round-up: How the spotlight shifted to Jeremy Hunt

24 Apr 2012 •



I discussed bid with David Cameron, says James Murdoch



24 Apr 2012



The Prime Minister — who now faces the spectre of renewed accusations of Tory sleaze — is expected to come under intense pressure today to explain whether there was any conflict between his relationship with Mr Murdoch and the behaviour of Mr Hunt’s department.

Last night, Downing Street was forced to issue a statement saying that David Cameron had “full confidence” in the Culture Secretary. Mr Hunt strongly denied wrongdoing and warned against a “knee-jerk reaction” to the revelations.

Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, demanded his resignation. “Jeremy Hunt should have been standing up for the interests of the British people,” he said. “In fact, it now turns out he was standing up for the interests of the Murdochs.

“He cannot stay in his post. And if he refuses to resign, the Prime Minister must show some leadership and fire him.”

News Corporation released more than 170 pages of “evidence”, consisting of internal emails and text messages, detailing the company’s extraordinary efforts to lobby the Government. The emails largely contain messages sent by Frederic Michel, the head of public affairs, to James Murdoch and other senior executives at News Corp detailing his discussions with the Government. The company also released emails and text messages between Mr Michel and Adam Smith, Mr Hunt’s main special adviser.

In one message, Mr Michel detailed what the Culture Secretary would say to Parliament the next day on the BSkyB takeover, noting that it was “absolutely illegal” for him to obtain the information.

Another email, dating from January last year, reported Mr Hunt’s belief that it would be “game over” for opponents of the BSkyB takeover once plans to spin off Sky News into a separately listed company were announced. On Sunday, Jan 23 2011, he sent another email to James Murdoch, relating “a very constructive conversation with JH” which mentions a “plan” that would help create “game over for the opposition”. Two days later, Mr Hunt said he was minded to refer the BSkyB takeover to the Competition Commission but delayed doing so while he considered proposed concessions from News Corp. Later that day Mr Michel emailed Mr Murdoch to say: “JH believes we are in a good place tonight.”

In total, there were at least 38 separate contacts between Mr Hunt’s office and News Corporation about the proposed deals. Some of the emails suggest that Mr Hunt’s adviser gave News Corporation’s lobbyist suggestions on dealing with the media regulator.

Although Mr Michel’s emails typically referred directly to him having spoken to “JH”, the lobbyist told the inquiry that this was shorthand for contacts with the Culture Secretary’s office — usually Adam Smith.

However, Mr Michel also said in one email that Mr Hunt had told him to liaise with his special adviser.

Mr Hunt had previously told Mr Murdoch he backed his bid but had received “very strong legal advice” that it would be improper for him to meet the media tycoon. News Corporation abandoned the £8?billion bid in the summer of last year after the phone hacking furore at the News of the World. The email exchanges dominated proceedings at the inquiry.

Mr Murdoch insisted that the reference to the “absolutely illegal” advice being offered by Mr Michel was “a joke”.

Whitehall lawyers and the parliamentary authorities are now expected to analyse whether the information transmitted to News Corporation was legal and ethical.


Should Jeremy Hunt resign?

No
Yes

Vote
View Results Share This In a statement on Tuesday night, Mr Hunt said: “Now is not a time for knee jerk reactions. We’ve heard one side of the story today but some of the evidence reported meetings and conversations that simply didn’t happen. “Rather than jump on a political bandwagon, we need to hear what Lord Justice Leveson thinks after he’s heard all the evidence.” He added: “I would like to resolve this issue as soon as possible which is why I have today written to Lord Justice Leveson asking if my appearance can be brought forward. “I am very confident that when I present my evidence the public will see that I conducted this process with scrupulous fairness.”   Share 16 Facebook 5 Twitter 11 Email LinkedIn 0 0 Leveson Inquiry • News »
• Politics »
• UK News »
• Robert Winnett »
• Editor's Picks »


IN LEVESON INQUIRY  
  Murdoch: Brown was not in balanced state of mind  
  Murdoch 'never asked a PM for anything'
    Murdoch endorsed Blair 'after getting all he could'  
  Murdoch and Hunt spoke despite legal warnings    
Murdoch 'discussed BSkyB bid with PM'  
Share 16 Facebook 5 Twitter 11 LinkedIn 0 0 More from The Telegraph

• Leveson: James Murdoch's witness statement
24 Apr 2012 • Leveson Inquiry: disclosure puts 'quasi-judicial' role in spotlight
25 Apr 2012
• Leveson: Frederic Michel's emails to James Murdoch on lobbying the Coalition24 Apr 2012
• News International 'considered sponsoring academy school'25 Apr 2012
• James Murdoch discussed BSkyB bid with David Cameron over dinner
24 Apr 2012
More from the web
• The Children of London's Spitalfields Slums in Photographs 100 Years Ago
Environmental Graffiti
• Why no British staff at Pret A Manger?

Financial Times
• Spain Stings Argentina Over Oil Company NationalizationThe New York Times
• How Iran Could Trigger Accidental Armageddon: Jeffrey GoldbergBloomberg.com
• How To Secretly Record A Conversation  Videojug

latest saga in the corrupt and the unconstitutional behaviour on the parts of the UK CONDEM Collusi

latest saga in the corrupt and the unconstitutional behaviour on the parts of the UK CONDEM Collusi
1440 [1435 [1430] Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
19 April 2012

Editor © Muhammad Haque


The AADHIKARonline Original commentary on the latest UK Constitutional law crisis will appear at a later time. This latest saga in the corrupt and the unconstitutional behaviour on the parts of the UK CONDEM Collusion, the Official Opposition and the UK Media about the UK law, legality and Constitutionality


The following item was retrieved from the London Guardian newspaper web site at 1425 GMT today Thursday 19 April 2012

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/apr/19/theresa-may-x-factor-qatada?newsfeed=true

Home secretary faces ridicule in Commons over disagreement about deadline for cleric's deportation appeal

Alan Travis, home affairs editor

Thursday 19 April 2012 14.10 BST
Theresa May was mocked for 'partying with X Factor judges' while Abu Qatada’s lawyers submitted their appeal. Photograph: Matthew Lloyd/Getty Images
The embarrassed home secretary, Theresa May, has spent more than an hour under fire in the Commons over her handling of the "chaotic" deportation of the radical Islamist cleric Abu Qatada.
She was even mocked for "partying with X Factor judges" on Tuesday night while Qatada's lawyers were busy submitting their last-minute 11pm appeal to the European court of human rights.
Labour MPs repeatedly criticised the home secretary for not waiting 24 hours before pressing ahead on Tuesday with her fresh attempt to deport Qatada, amid evidence of confusion over whether the Strasbourg deadline for appeals had expired.
She also faced anger from her own backbenchers that the actions of a European court had again thwarted the attempted deportation of a terror suspect and demands that she simply put him on a plane to Jordan and ignore the legal injunctions.
The shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, accused May of turning chaos and confusion into farce and not knowing what day of the week it was. "On the Tuesday night deadline, the home secretary, who thought it was Monday, partied with X Factor judges, while Abu Qatada was appealing to European judges," she said.
The row over whether the home secretary blundered in her handling of the Qatada deportation comes as Britain opens its prestigious 47-nation Council of Europe conference in Brighton to agree reforms to the work of the Strasbourg court.
May insisted she had been right that the deadline of three calendar months after the 17 January date of delivery of the original Strasbourg judgment on the case was midnight on Monday. "It is a matter of simple mathematics," she told a crowded chamber.
But Keith Vaz, the chairman of the Commons home affairs committee, and other Labour MPs cited two previous Strasbourg rulings – Otto v Germany and Praha v Czech Republic – casting doubt on that conclusion. Both rulings show that the Strasbourg court counts its deadlines from the day after a judgment is delivered rather from the day on which it is delivered.
The home secretary dismissed these precedents as irrelevant as they involved initial referrals to the court rather than appeals to its grand chamber. But she did tell MPs that the minimum effect of this week's events would be to delay Qatada's deportation for at least another two months while a panel of Strasbourg judges met to decide whether his appeal was made in time.
May went on to muddy the waters by insisting to Labour MPs that delaying this week's televised arrest and detention of Qatada by 24 hours would not have made any difference because the Strasbourg judges had the discretion to decide whether or not to accept late appeals.
The home secretary stood by her claim that Qatada's appeal should now be thrown out by the Strasbourg court because it was made after the deadline. She was repeatedly pressed on whether she had been officially advised to wait 24 hours and whether the question of the precise deadline had been clarified with Strasbourg.
May said Home Office civil servants had been in repeated contact with Strasbourg officials about the case. "It was always clear we were working to a deadline of Monday," she said, but failed to clarify whether those Strasbourg officials agreed. The court's press office told the Guardian on Wednesday that the deadline had always been Tuesday at midnight.
• • • •

Extraordinary violation of human rights and rule of law! Jack Straw is exposed again

Extraordinary violation of human rights and rule of law! Jack Straw is exposed again
1230 [1210] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 18 April 2012.
Editor© Muhammad Haque

Jack Straw is exposed again as a man of straw who has contempt for human rights as he has for the rule of law
This is evident in Straw’s creepy mutterings against the ECHR.
[To be continued]

The following item has been retrieved from the web site of the firm of solicitors who are now acting for a man called Abdel Hakim Belhadj

Abdel Hakim Belhadj
Belhadj lawyers announce fresh legal action in rendition case
9 April 2012
Lawyers for the Head of the Tripoli Military Council, Abdel Hakim Belhadj, have announced that they are extending their legal action against The UK Government and its security forces, for the alleged illegal rendition of Mr Belhadj and his wife to Libya in 2004, to include the Commissioner for the British Indian Ocean Territory.

Law firm Leigh Day & Co filed legal papers at the High Court against the Commission for the British Indian Ocean Territory on Thursday 5 April. In them they claim the Commission was complicit in the extraordinary rendition of Mr and Mrs Belhadj via Diego Garcia in March 2004 and their subsequent torture in Libya, as well as their unlawful imprisonment whilst in the Territory. Legal action charity Reprieve is instructed as US counsel and providing investigative support.

The claim will be brought in the Supreme Court of the British Indian Ocean Territory under Article 6 of the British Indian Ocean Territory Ordinance No. 3 of 1983.

Mr Belhadj and his wife Fatima are currently also taking legal action against The UK Government and its security forces for their part in the rendition, which features in tonight’s (Monday 9 April 2012) episode of Modern Spies on BBC 2.

Mr Belhadj, also known as Abu Abd Allah Sadiq, became a symbol of the new Libya as a commander of the anti-Gaddafi forces in the 2011 Libyan civil war.

In 2004 Mr Belhadj was living in China, having led a low level insurgency against the Gaddafi regime during the 1990’s as the leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. He lived in Beijing with his wife Fatima Bouchar.

In early 2004, with Ms Bouchar pregnant and fearing they were under surveillance, they decided to seek asylum in the UK. However, on trying to leave the country they were detained and deported to Malaysia, from where they had previously travelled.

On arrival in Kuala Lumpur they were immediately taken into the custody of Malaysian authorities. After being detained for a couple of weeks, they were told by the Malaysian authorities that they would be allowed to travel to the UK, but only via Bangkok. The couple were then forced to board an aircraft, which flew them to Bangkok.

On reaching Bangkok, the couple were separated, handed over to US authorities and taken to what they believe was a US secret prison. There allege they were subjected to a barrage of barbaric treatment.
Mr Belhadj was hung by his wrists from hooks in his cell for prolonged periods, while hooded, blindfolded and viciously beaten. Ms Bouchar was also mistreated so severely that she finds it difficult to discuss even today.
The couple were then rendered by US authorities to Libya out of Bangkok. Mr Belhadj was hooded and shackled to the floor of the plane in a stress position, unable to sit or lie during the entire 17-hour flight, which stopped to re-fuel in Diego Garcia, the British Indian Ocean Territory.
A US government memo headed “Secret Release Libya Only” discovered at the headquarters of the former Libyan security services. Dated 6 March 2004 supports this account by providing the “Schedule for the rendition of Abdullah Al-Sadiq”.
This confirms that the flight would land on Diego Garcia at 03:30 GMT on 9 March 2004, receive fuel and depart at 05:30 GMT.
Mr Belhadj was later informed by the then head of the Libyan security services, Moussa Koussa, that the stopover had in fact taken place on Diego Garcia with the permission of the British authorities.
On reaching Libya Mr Belhadj was detained for 6 years in some of the country’s most brutal jails and was interrogated by ‘foreign’ agents, including some from the UK.
He was savagely beaten, hung from walls and cut off from human contact and daylight before being sentenced to death during a 15-minute trial about 4 years in to his detention. The beatings and inhumane treatment continued until 2010 when he was eventually released.
Ms Bouchar was imprisoned in Libya for four months. She was released just three weeks before giving birth, by which time her health, and that of her baby, was in a precarious state. She was also subjected to aggressive interrogations during her detention.
Rosa Curling from Leigh Day & Co said: "The evidence we have seen suggests that our clients were sent back to Libya via Diego Garcia, with the UK government's involvement and knowledge. Our clients want to know the truth about what happened to them and who was responsible. This government needs to be open and transparent about the mistakes of the past, so as to ensure they are not repeated in the future."
Cori Crider, Legal Director at Reprieve, said: 'we have asked the government for months to say whether Belhadj and his wife were sent to Gaddafi via Diego Garcia as planned. They refused. If he did, then ministers right up through David Miliband in 2008 have either been deceived, or lied. All the family want is for the whole truth of their fate, and Britain's role in it, to be known, so these mistakes never occur again.”

Chilling curb on due process by Mrs May! Is she back with the “nasty” lot?

Chilling curb on due process by Mrs May!  Is she back with the “nasty” lot?
Chilling curb on due process by Mrs May! Is she back with the “nasty” lot?

Apt word by the Daily Mirror

Apt word by the Daily Mirror
Apt word by the Daily Mirror

Muhammad Haque tells EVENING STANDARD that its OTT PR for Boris may backfire

Muhammad Haque tells EVENING STANDARD that its OTT PR for Boris may backfire
PICTURED here is the EVENING STANDARD’s writer of the piece who is being told off by Muhammad Haque today [Tuesday 17 April 2012.] In the comment posted on the Standard web site this afternoon, Muhammad Haque tells the paper the following

This overdosing of PR for the incumbent in the London Onion may well backfire. After all the phrase you use closely brings to mind another [perhaps contrasting] phrase, “womanising ways” as well!
So for your own credibility, please tamper the hype with a bit of a reality check from time to time.
And tell us the statistics on housing, homelessness and actions for possessions granted by the courts in London in the past four weeks.
Perhaps a comparative table showing the numbers in each category will explain the reality of feelings by the women in the electorally relevant boroughs in the past four weeks.
It will be a starting point before you also give us the details of the losses being suffered by individuals, couples and families across London in all the key areas of their lives.
And then tell us how many of the unjustly treated and violated & deprived women would even want to know the name of the candidate you are hyping so furiously let alone vote for him!
1305 Hrs
Tuesday
17 Apr 2012.

Evening Standard piece about RICH BORIS censured [retrieved] 1434 GMT 16 April 2012

Evening Standard piece about RICH BORIS  censured [retrieved] 1434 GMT 16 April  2012
1440Hrs GMT London Monday 16 April 2012. The following has been tajken from the London EVEning STAndard web site:

Black trainee ‘forced out of City police’

16 April 2012
A trainee was forced out of the City of London police after claiming he was a marked man and had been accused of cowardice because he was black, an employment tribunal heard today.
Anthony Joseph, 43, said he was subjected to “hostile” treatment and was also accused of drinking on the job, despite being teetotal.
He claims race discrimination.

The tribunal continues.

A chilling prospect: A backer of cruelty to foxes plots to be 'Mayor'

A chilling prospect: A backer of cruelty to foxes  plots to be 'Mayor'
Retrieved from the BBC web site:

Profile: London mayoral candidate Siobhan Benita
Siobhan Benita supports a third runway at Heathrow airport
Former civil servant Siobhan Benita is the only independent candidate standing in this year's London mayoral race. She has high-profile backers, including former Cabinet Secretary Sir Gus O'Donnell and actor Tom Conti.
The Times newspaper has named her "the one to watch", while the Evening Standard has dubbed her the Borgen candidate, after the Danish television series in which a female outsider takes victory in the general election.
Policy-wise, she's the only candidate backing a third runway at Heathrow airport, and wants to make the Tube run later on Friday and Saturday nights.
She has also promised to "tackle London's fox menace", something she says is "a serious issue" for many residents. But she argues she's been shut out by the media and hasn't been given the air time to put her case. NHS shake-up
The daughter of an Anglo-Indian mother and Cornish father, Ms Benita has lived in London all her life.
Siobhan Benita
Age: 40
Marital status: Married with two children
Political party: Independent
Previous jobs: Civil servant, working for the Cabinet Office and the Department of Health
A married mother of two, she joined the Civil Service in 1996, working her way up to head of corporate management at the Department of Health. Before that, she had served as head of Civil Service governance and communications at the Cabinet Office. Ms Benita quit the Department of Health in October 2011, in part over the government's shake-up of the NHS. She told the Guardian she believes the changes have "not been endorsed democratically", adding: "I saw a health secretary behind the scenes arrive with a fully worked up set of reforms that no one in the public knew about."
She says civil servants, herself included, did not do enough to challenge the plans "because we were trying to show we were flexible and responsive to a new administration". 'Free London' While at the Civil Service, Ms Benita helped found women's network Tabelle, but she found herself excluded by the sisterhood, so to speak, when the Fawcett Society - dedicated to the promotion of women in politics - reportedly refused her a seat at its hustings. She also says BBC rules on the coverage of mayoral candidates have prevented her getting her message out to voters.
“ Start Quote
We should set some specific bespoke target for specific groups across London”
Siobhan Benita
She says: "I am not naive, and I know it is hard for big institutions to change, but I think with the strength of feeling against party politics, it is important some media organisations think how their rules restrict politics."
The ideas she wants Londoners to hear include a commitment to expanding Heathrow - in part on the basis that it would create tens of thousands of jobs in the west of the capital.
Also on the subject of transport, she is pledging to provide free travel for jobseekers and reduced fares for low earners, as well as a monthly "Free London" day, where locals can travel for free and have access to discounts and offers in restaurants, shops and attractions.
Elsewhere, she wants to appoint a Young Mayor for London and make education, particularly of the poorest and most disadvantaged, a top priority.
"We should set some specific bespoke target for specific groups across London. That is absolutely in the mayor's remit to help boroughs to do that," she says.
In her capital, a new education commissioner would take overall control of this mission, while a new youth assembly would be able to hold the politicians to account.
On her two main rivals, Ms Benita is scathing. She says Conservative candidate Boris Johnson has made some "outrageous" spending decisions, pointing specifically towards the new Routemaster bus. Despite admitting voting for him in the past, she now describes Labour's Ken Livingstone as "a bitter, divisive figure" and someone for whom she could never again place a cross in a ballot paper box.
Ms Benita says she believes the London mayor shouldn't be a party political role and as an independent, she can be more open to new ideas and constructive criticism than those encumbered by the party machine.

DAILY MAIL joins the fray:

DAILY MAIL joins the fray:


Red Ken and the truth about video that reduced him to tears ('Real' Londoners were actors and he had watched video before)
• He is forced to admit that Labour activists were paid expenses to star in his own party political broadcast
• Mr Livingstone is already trailing Boris Johnson in the race for City Hall because of his alleged tax affairs

By GERRI PEEV

AADHIKARonline diagnosing the Media coverage of Ken Livingstone crying

AADHIKARonline diagnosing the Media coverage of Ken Livingstone crying
1440 [1410] [1400] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
14 April 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque

AADHIKARonline diagnosing the Media coverage of Ken Livingstone crying ES +BBC R4.
Click HERE to view our diagnostic video with R4 panel as well as short film of the EVENING STANDARD web piece
The audio clip [recorded on Saturday 14 April 2012, BBC Radio 4] starts with Harriet Harman speaking. She is followed by Ken Clarke, Wil Self and Bronwen Maddox.
The Muhammad Haque Comment on the EVENING STANDARD web site has not bee matched by any of the BBC R4 panel members. or by the others who have so far commented elsewhere including the BBC news Channel and SKY news
We shall examine the issue extensively in the days to come. [To be continued]


The Muhammad Haque Comment on the EVENING STANDARD
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/mayor/londoners-who-made-ken-livingstone-weep-were-hired-by-ad-agency-7643412.html

Muhammad Haque
23 hours ago
Quote:
Labour bloggers today suggested that everyone in the film was in fact acting. A spokesman strenuously denied this. Unquote.

If the above is the truth of the matter the it shows that the Labour Party bureaucracy may be being used to give credibility to the pro-Con propaganda.
Legally and constitutionally speaking, a party political broadcast is not and cannot be a sworn affidavit to the electorate. It is a party political broadcast. And as such it is, as it has to be “acted”. It is about general attitude. General being the operative word.
To be seen to be fair in your reporting and editorial agenda, you have to be seen to be probing the behaviour of the other side as assiduously as you have so far done about the Ken Livingstone side.



Reply
5 replies
+3

2012: Olympics Sportswear By Adidas 'Made In Sweatshop

2012: Olympics Sportswear By Adidas 'Made In Sweatshop
London “2012 Hosting” fashion fabricated on the “smart” fantasy erected on the backs of unnamed thousands of slave labour in Indonesia! How wrong Bullingdon Clubber Cameron’s smug certification for the “arms-buying” “acceptable Muslim regime” in Indonesia has been!!!! [To be continued]

Muhammad Haque ethically advising Sarah Sands the Editor of the LONDON EVENING STANDARD

Muhammad Haque ethically advising Sarah Sands the Editor of the LONDON EVENING  STANDARD
Quote:

Labour bloggers today suggested that everyone in the film was in fact acting. A spokesman strenuously denied this.

Unquote.

If the above is the truth of the matter then it shows that the Labour Party bureaucracy may be being used to give credibility to the pro-Con propaganda.

Legally and constitutionally speaking, a party political broadcast is not and cannot be a sworn affidavit to the electorate.

It is a party political broadcast. And as such it is, as it has to be “acted”. It is about general attitude. General being the operative word.

To be fair in your reporting and editorial agenda, you have to be seen to be probing the behaviour of the other side as assiduously as you have so far done about the Ken Livingstone side.

Muhammad Haque tells the London EVENING STANDARD its "mayor" election campaign report is empty

Muhammad Haque tells the London EVENING STANDARD its "mayor" election campaign  report is empty
0330 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 11 April 2012
Muhammad Haque tells the London EVENING STANDARD its "mayor" election campaign report is empty
Your [London EVENING STANDARD] report, which has been featured as the front-page splash in your print edition [Tuesday 10 April 2012], is lacking in substance. Which is a pity.

Considering that you mention as many as three "mainstream" "London news outlets" as being involved in the commercial outfit “ComRes” carrying out the contracted Opinion poll of your particular splash and report, the ordinary decent and fair-minded London voter would be entitled to expect something by way of bread and butter information from you.

On this occasion, there is no such information.

Might the London EVENING STANDARD be "celebrating" for Boris Johnson a bit too soon?

Might the London EVENING STANDARD be "celebrating" for Boris Johnson  a bit too soon?
1645 [1630] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 10 April 2012.

By © Muhammad Haque. It is clear today that the particular media campaign to stop Ken Livingstone getting back it the London Onion is apparently “bearing fruit”!

The EVENING STANDARD front page [CLICK on the picture left to view a clip of the latest ITV London news bulletin on the poll] this evening sums that “cheerful” mood up! Is that “it” then for Ken Livingstone this time round ?

The joint Op-Poll for LBC, ITV London and the EVENING STANDARD appears to show that Boris Johnson is ahead by 6 points.

There must be more to it that that? Surely! If I have anything to say! Which I will do. Soon!

[To be continued]

UPDATING on the negligent and the callous bureaucracy at Tower Hamlets Council: 10 April 2012

UPDATING on the negligent and the callous bureaucracy at Tower Hamlets Council: 10 April 2012
1220 Hrs

1110 [1100] [1050] Hrs GMT

London Tuesday 10 April 2012.

By © Muhammad Haque.



UPDATING on the untruths that a Tower Hamlets Council town clerk asserted about "quality of service" and the outrageous disrespectfulness that “Dr” Kevan Collins exhibited towards “the poor” people of Tower Hamlets borough. [“Dr”] Kevan Collins was quoted by Ross Lydall of the London EVENING STANDARD as saying the following: "I liked the fact that what we were doing was high quality. Not in any way was it the case that because people were poor the services they got were poor."



1. How many “ways” had “Dr” Collins been aware of the “poor” people’s treatment by Tower Hamlets Council?

2. Who were the “poor” people in Tower Hamlets?

3. How many “poor” people had been pushed into poverty by the “services” “they got” from Tower Hamlets Council?

4. How many “poor” people were trapped into poverty because of the “services” “they got” from Tower Hamlets Council?

5. How many such “poor” people were prevented from getting any answers from “Dr” Kevan Collins during his time when they experienced very poor, nay, downright offensively poor and bad “service” from Tower Hamlets Council employees?

6. Will “Dr” Collins publish the evidence so that an objective and fair assessment can be made of his particular utterance of the untruth as quoted b y Ross Lydall of the London Evening Standard?

7. How did someone who faked his name and his descriptions for the manufacturing of the Channel 4 stunt programme even assume that all the thinking people of Tower Hamlets would be either too “poor” to notice his crafty behaviour or be so overwhelmed under the mountains of problems created by the his “favourite” “staff” that they would not be able to counter his fakery?

8. Do “Dr” Collins and the man whose name he impersonated and the [same] man whom he flaunted on the fabricated programme as broadcast on Channel 4 actually believe that his [their jointly perpetrated] deception on the general viewer was justified?

9. Does “Dr” Kevan Collins assume that because he has proven to be a crafty self-server and opportunist who “got away” with the significant rewards via Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy that therefore justifies his insult to the vast majority of Tower Hamlets people who daily experience and suffer bad service or no service from tower Hamlets Council?

10. Where is the list of “whatever we were doing” that “Dr” Kevan Collins boasted as being “high quality”?



[“Dr” Kevan Collins will be EVIDENTIALLY and contextually and ethically and democratically and transparently diagnosed further and the updates posted here and on associated AADHIKARonline and KHOODEELAAR! tweets and blogs as well as on related web sites]
[To be continued]

Executive mayor system is a dangerous "power freak politics", says GUARDIAN writer

Executive mayor system is a dangerous "power freak politics", says GUARDIAN writer
0955 [0850] [0605] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 10 April 2012. BHANGEELAAR! The Tower Hamlets Community campaign against an elected executive mayor system has published the following comment on the Guardian web site this morning.
What the great mayoral delusion really highlights is the modern establishment's talent for messing with things for the sake of it, with no sense of history, experience, or even clarity about what exactly they want. All that, and dangers that have barely even been talked about.

Quoting the Guardian piece, the last paragraph
Your [the Guardian writer ] summary [quoted] is an accurate representation of the crisis and threat against local democracy that a executive mayor system poses if the evidence in the “inner city” [“one of the poorest” boroughs...] Tower Hamlets is any guide. You may recall, on the published facts, that an abysmally unaudited claim was made in May 2010 by the then holder of the post of “chief executive” in the local Tower Hamlets Council to the effect that a “referendum ” had been duly held and that the electors had voted “YES” to having an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets. Serious concerns were raised by campaigners against the dangerously undemocratic, authoritarian and wasteful “executive mayor system” with the then Council Chief Executive post-holder who also doubled as “the Returning officer” for the Borough. He failed to legally, constitutionally or transparently address those concerns. As did the Electoral Commission. Tower Hamlets, thus, was sent into a state where those who disrespected the values of democratic representation could indulge the whims and the abuses that authoritarian republics are notorious for. Your summary therefore needs evidential examination in light of what has been occurring o in this Borough since May 2010. ALL the electorally active “Political” parties and groupings in Tower Hamlets staged a de facto synchronised U-turn. It was exhibited as a unanimity on having an “elected, executive mayor” . This was in stark contrast with the stance “against” an elected executive mayor system that had been “shown” during January 2006 and April 2010 by the “lead” post holders on behalf of the Labour, the Conservative and by the Lib Dems as councillors on Tower Hamlets Council. Why had these “main” Parties and groupings behaved in that contradictory way? This is ode question that contains the main components of the moral and the ethical problems that afflict all the three parties. and their acolyte sub-parties that too pander to the most undemocratic urges in the opportunist, morality-free “"political" post holder, local, regional and “national”. The imposition of the antidemocratic mayor system is in effect the imposition of the worst form of “governance” and those behind this deeply regressive imposition should be stopped now from destroying what remains of local democratic accountability. The Guardian can play a very positive prodemocratic part in this time of widespread antidemocratic initiatives being imposed and spread across the country. There is a serious void as seen in the opportunistic, ethics-free, morality-free behaviour of the majority of MPs as witnessed during the recently memorable period of the “expenses scandal” . The collective “power” of the Trade unions has not been brought to be exercised in defence of local democracy. Local people, ordinary people are now being scrapped as far as the deterrence against authoritarian drift of Society goes. Elected executive mayor system typifies that chilling antidemocratic iceberg. Boris Johnson’s persistent refusal to withdraw a remark against his rival is a mere but typical sample of the toxic antisocial arrogance that the incumbent is allowed to feel. A comparable instance can be found in Ken Livingstone's last months in office in the London Onion before the May 2008 poll, especially over Livingstone’s defiance of the particular London Assembly members at the time who had the “temerity” to EVEN express concerns about the financial affairs over the LDA, one of the funding outfits that had been placed at the disposal of the incumbent in the London Onion. Such incumbents cannot be expected to recognise ordinary people who do not have the resources that the Labour Party's candidate in context has. Time to urgently return English local areas to a form of democracy that had been fought for by so many valiant, selfless people who made the difference and who founded the Society that is now being subliminally crumbled. [Ends the substantive texts of the BHANGEELAAR! piece posted on the Guardian web site early this morning – Tuesday 10 April 2012 ] [ The evidential, contextual diagnosis of the antidemocratic imposition of the over-contrived and over-disguised “elected executive mayor” system on English local communities is o be continued by the campaigns and the campaigners.]
Following is the piece b y JOHN HARRIS in today's Guardian

dangers of power freak politics

A comfy consensus has been reached on the merits of elected mayors, despite an absence of any real debate on the issue

• John Harris

• guardian.co.uk, Monday 9 April 2012 20.30 BST •



The north-south divide, the tyranny of the City, the decline of mainstream politics, and more: to listen to a range of voices that have now settled into comfy consensus, no end of British problems can be solved by the introduction of elected mayors.

Strange that such a unanimous chorus should be going up just as Boris Johnson and Ken Livingstone are again proving that the first casualty of mayoral elections may be serious politics. But anyway, 3 May will see referendums on the adoption of directly elected mayors in another 11 cities, including Birmingham, Bradford, Manchester, Newcastle and Sheffield, imposed by central government and apparently supported by the entire political establishment.

What powers might they possess?

From the minister in charge, the assuredly modernised Greg Clark, there have been only vague half-ideas. Even the idea's supporters admit than in most places, real debate has failed to materialise. Liverpool, though, has decided to jump straight in, and nominations closed last week. By way of heralding a fresh start, all 12 candidates are white men, the frontrunner is the current leader of the city's Labour council, and as if to decisively push things into the 21st century, the field also includes Tony Mulhearn, whose had his last turn on the national stage when he and Derek Hatton were pioneering municipal Trotksyism. How any of this is meant to get Liverpool going is anyone's guess. It also fits with the dreary, monocultural history of the elected mayors we've had so far. Maybe it's down to the way that, to quote one of the Liverpudlian candidates, "big personality politics appeals to testosterone-charged male egos".

For all the claims that mayoral contests can weaken the grip of party bureaucracies, it's probably also traceable to the fact the usual machines remain very powerful. Whatever, the figures are remarkable: of the 14 people currently serving as elected mayors in England, two are women and only one is from an ethnic minority. Much the same picture applies in Salford, where a referendum in January saw a "yes" vote on an 18% turnout, leading to an election this May. Out of a field of 10, only two candidates are women, and all are white.

Meanwhile, up in Doncaster, they are looking forward to a vote on whether to keep their mayoral system, introduced in 2001 in the wake of the infamous "Donnygate" council corruption scandal. The present incumbent is Peter Davies, of the English Democrats, who won the job in 2009, with 22% of first preferences on a 36% turnout (that is, 8% of the total electorate). Following on from the amazingly troubled tenure of his predecessor, he then commenced three years of misrule: among his greatest hits are the claim that there is "no such thing as child poverty" and the suggestion that Britain could learn about something about family values from the Taliban.

In 2010, the audit commission declared that Davies lacked "the political skills to build and maintain consensus" and acknowledged that his public statements had served "to worry sections of the community who are already vulnerable". Eric Pickles duly sent a team of commissioners to South Yorkshire to "support, challenge and monitor" the running of the town and report back to Whitehall – an arrangement that remains in place.

This is what happens when two very dangerous factors collide: low and unrepresentative turnouts and powers that can be exercised with surprisingly little scrutiny, let alone checks and balances (both Davies and Doncaster's previous mayor have ignored votes of no confidence). Note also that contrary to all those claims that elected mayors are ideally positioned to lead local economic revivals, there is no evidence to this effect, nor any proof that mayors' arrival on the political scene increases political engagement – indeed, if the narcissistic tedium that currently grips the London contest is anything to go by, sooner or later you may well get the opposite.

Can we at last recognise the risks and delusions of Superman politics, whether national or local? In Birmingham, the current "No" campaign is titled "Vote No to a Power Freak", and local nerves are being jangled by the momentum behind two of the Labour contenders: Liam Byrne, who has some claim to being New Labour circa 2001 incarnate; and Siôn Simon, last seen establishing his credentials for high office with his miserable online spoof of David Cameron's "webcameron" wheeze. Neither looks like the kind of figure who might single-handedly lead a city to unheard-of heights of renown and success.

By contrast, look at Manchester, whose spectacular regeneration has been accomplished with the leadership of a boring old traditional city council, and where plenty of local opinion is completely bamboozled by the imposition of a mayoral referendum. "Structural change rarely does anything other than take time and energy away from more important things," reckons its eminently successful leader, Richard Leese. "What is on offer at the moment does not – in any way, shape or form – help us with what we want to do."

Quite so. What the great mayoral delusion really highlights is the modern establishment's talent for messing with things for the sake of it, with no sense of history, experience, or even clarity about what exactly they want. All that, and dangers that have barely even been talked about.

• Follow Comment is free on

Twitter @commentisfree

London GUARDIAN: Executive mayor system is ruining democracy in England

London GUARDIAN: Executive mayor system is ruining democracy in England
0605 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 10 April 2012.
What the great mayoral delusion really highlights is the modern establishment's talent for messing with things for the sake of it, with no sense of history, experience, or even clarity about what exactly they want. All that, and dangers that have barely even been talked about.

Quoting the Guardian piece, the last paragraph
Your [the Guardian writer ] summary [quoted] is an accurate representation of the crisis ad threat against local democracy that a executive mayor system poses if the evidence in the “inner city” [“one of the poorest” boroughs...] Tower Hamlets is any guide. You may recall, on the published facts, that an abysmally unaudited claim was made in May 2010 by the then holder of the post of “chief executive” in the local Tower Hamlets Council to the effect that a “referendum ” had been duly held and that the electors had voted “YES” to having an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets. Serious concerns were raised by campaigners against the dangerously undemocratic, authoritarian and wasteful “executive mayor system” with the then Council Chief Executive post holder who also doubled as “the Returning officer” for the Borough. He failed to legally, constitutionally or transparently address those concerns. As did the Electoral Commission. Tower Hamlets, thus, was sent into a state where those who disrespected the values of democratic representation could indulge the whims and the abuses that authoritarian republics are notorious for. Your summary therefore needs evidential examination in light of what has been occurring o in this Borough since May 2010. ALL the electorally active “Political” parties and groupings in Tower Hamlets staged a de facto synchronised U-turn. It was exhibited as a unanimity on having an “elected, executive mayor” . This was in stark contrast with the stance “against” an elected executive mayor system that had been “shown” during January 2006 and April 2010 by the “lead” post holders on behalf of the Labour, the Conservative and by the Lib Dems as councillors on Tower Hamlets Council. Why had these “main” Parties and groupings behaved in that contradictory way? This is ode question that contains the main components of the moral and the ethical problems that afflict all the three parties. and their acolyte sub-parties that too pander to the most undemocratic urges in the opportunist, morality-free “"political" post holder, local, regional and “national”. The imposition of the antidemocratic mayor system is in effect the imposition of the worst form of “governance” and those behind this deeply regressive imposition should be stopped now from destroying what remains of local democratic accountability. The Guardian can play a very positive prodemocratic part in this time of widespread antidemocratic initiatives being imposed and spread across the country. There is a serious void as seen in the opportunistic, ethics-free, morality-free behaviour of the majority of MPs as witnessed during the recently memorable period of the “expenses scandal” . The collective “power” of the Trade unions has not been brought to be exercised in defence of local democracy. Local people, ordinary people are ow being scrapped as far as the deterrence against authoritarian drift of Society goes. Elected executive mayor system typifies that chilling antidemocratic iceberg. Boris Johnson’s persistent refusal to withdraw a remark against his rival is a mere but typical sample of the toxic antisocial arrogance that the incumbent is allowed to feel. A comparable instance can be found in Ken Livingstone's last months in office in the London Onion before the May 2008 poll, especially over Livingstone’s defiance of the particular London Assembly members at the time who had the “temerity” to EVEN express concerns about the financial affairs over the LDA, one of the funding outfits that had been placed at the disposal of the incumbent in the London Onion. Such incumbents cannot be expected to recognise ordinary people who do not have the resources that the Labour Party's candidate in context has. Time to urgently return English local areas to a form of democracy that had been fought for by so many valiant, selfless people who made the difference and who founded the Society that is now being subliminally crumbled. [Ends the substantive texts of the BHANGEELAAR! piece posted on the Guardian web site i the past 3 hours ] [ The evidential, contextual diagnosis of the antidemocratic imposition of the over-contrived ad over-disguised “elected executive mayor” system on English local communities is o be continued by the campaigns and the campaigners.]

EVEN the Clegg-clinging Guardian confesses that DWP is CAUSING poverty in the UK

EVEN  the Clegg-clinging Guardian confesses that DWP is CAUSING poverty in the UK
0510 [0438]
[0415] Hrs GMT
London
['Easter Bank Holiday', Christian calendar] Monday 09 April 2012.
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary.
The BBC remains an actively corrupting, untruthful organisation., As is seen in the following ‘report’ abut the trend in joblessness it has published in the past four hours.
The item refers o a research outfit which is mainly labour PARTY SUPPORTING. But the key facts that the BBC report refers to and has t refer to, have nothing at all to do with that reach outfit's political “leanings”. yet the BBC piece says of that outfit:
“The left-leaning IPPR said it expected 50,000 more men and 50,000 women to become unemployed this year as public sector jobs continued to be cut.”
My question is: what has the IPPR’s “left-leaning” to do with the umber of jobs being cut by the CONDEM Collusion?
Is the BBC saying that those jobs would not be cut and the IPPR is makig the figures up?
And is the BBC by logical extension also saying that “right-leaning” research counterpart to the IPPR would dispute the numbers of public sector jobs that the CONDEM is cutting?
And that that dispute on the numbers would be validated by the fact of the political leaning of the IPPR and its Right-leaning counterpart?
And is the BBC also saying thereby that the millions of jobless people across the UK are really ot jobless ad that the umber is a fiction cooked up by “left leaning” observers ad commentators?
[To be continued]

Lib Dems ARE Dumb. They are also advised by IDIOTS. So why do BBC and Sky indulge the idiots?

Lib Dems ARE Dumb. They are also advised by IDIOTS. So why do BBC and Sky indulge the idiots?
2340 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday 08 April 2012

The Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary on the concept and the practice of “democratic” UK
The BBC News Channel featured a woman called Jo Phillips just over a hour ago. She was apparently doing the "newspaper review" of the “Feet Street” papers for "Easter" "Bank Holiday" Monday [09 April 2012]. She LOOKED as if she were an ordinary member of the public. That is to s ay,s he wasn't dressed up, far less dolled up, as some or as the majority of alleged experts appearing on TV appear to be. However, her ordinary appearance belied an extraordinary reminder of how thick the “"politics"” she was peddling o the BBC sot she was. Or at least how shallow her "understanding" of today's British Society was. Less than two hours earlier, a ma, called “James Max” appeared on the SKY NEWS [2030 Hrs GMT] “previewing” the same day’s “Fleet Street” “newspapers”. The “Max” was introduced as an “LBC radio presenter”. What are these labels supposed to mean? That the person being so described has a special knowledge, insight, expertise to impart on the subject to the [assumed to be “less knowledgeable”] “lay” viewer? If so the that supposition was blatantly exposed as a sham oe by this James Max. So brazenly irrational were the “expert comments” uttered by this James Max that at one point the Sky News presenter hosting the slot himself felt impelled to intervene. He had to say to Max that he was talking “bonkers’! With which I entirely agree. On the facts. In context. On the evidence! So I ask: why do the BBC and Sky News keep inviting so many to their programmes allegedly possessing special knowledge and skills about Society, the Economy, the state f :"democracy" ad the conduct ad the roe of the press who the BBC and SKY must know to be idiots and “bonkers”?


[To be continued]

Theresa May be U-turning back to the Nasty Society

Theresa May be U-turning back to the Nasty Society
1330 Hrs GMT London Sunday 08 April 2012.

the TEXTS below have been taken from the DAILY TELEGRAPH Media group web site:


By Matthew Holehouse6:40AM BST 03 Apr 2012 Chief among the Conservative rebels was Jacob Rees-Mogg MP, who suggested the proposals were hypocritical given the Prime Minister’s previous stance against the “control state”.

In a 2009 speech Mr Cameron said: “Faced with any problem, any crisis, given any excuse, Labour grasp for more information, pulling more and more people into the clutches of state data capture.” Mr Rees-Mogg said: “The Government ought to remember why it favoured liberty in opposition. The powers it creates may in future be used by less benevolent administrations.” David Davis, the former Shadow Home Secretary, said the plan was “an unnecessary extension of the ability of the State to snoop on people.” “What this is talking about doing is not focusing on terrorists or criminals. It’s absolutely everybody’s emails, phone calls, web access,” he said. totalitarian' 02 Apr 2012 Internet activity 'to be monitored' under new laws
Senior Liberal Democrats are also planning to rebel. They want the Government to clarify whether the legislation will allow GCHQ to access information “on demand” and without a warrant. The party passed a motion at its spring conference banning communication interception without “named, specific and time-limited warrants.” Tim Farron, the President of the Liberal Democrats, wrote on Twitter: "We didn’t scrap ID cards to back creeping surveillance by other means. State mustn’t be able to trace citizens at will." Julian Huppert, a Liberal Democrat MP, called for the Home Secretary and the Head of the Office of Security and Counter-Terrorism, Charles Farr, to appear before the Home Affairs Select Committee. He wrote yesterday: “The security services insist they have good reason for keeping lots of things, but frankly, I’ve never found the argument ‘we know but we can’t tell you’ very persuasive. Especially when it is overused by the same people to argue for every power they want, from 90-day detention to control orders to the existence of WMDs in Iraq. “Liberals everywhere must watch this space with caution.” He added the proposals were a "complete mess". While Downing Street insists the content of messages will not be accessed, Mr Huppert said it would be impossible for an internet service provider to see who a person is contacting on Skype or by Facebook without accessing the content of a message.
One Liberal Democrat MP told the Guardian newspaper: “These proposals are entirely contrary to the core beliefs of the Liberal Democrats and the position we adopted in opposition.” Theresa May, the Home Secretary, said last night the data captured would help catch murderers like Ian Huntley and allow the police to break up child pornography rings. Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, insisted he was “totally opposed to the idea of governments reading people’s emails” but that was not the proposal. James Brokenshire, the security minister, said the emphasis was on solving crime rather than “real-time snooping on everybody’s emails”.

AADHIKAROnlineblogs

Muhammad Haque tells London Onion seekers Boris Johnson & Ken Livingstone to confess to ALL lies

Muhammad Haque tells London Onion seekers Boris Johnson & Ken Livingstone to confess to ALL lies
Muhammad Haque tells London Onion seekers Boris Johnson and Ken Livingstone to confess to ALL the lies that they ust have perpetrated in their bid for the publicly paid for office

Elected executive mayor in Lewisham abuses powers by hiding the bad news...

Elected executive mayor in Lewisham abuses powers by hiding the bad news...
0125 Hrs GMT London Friday 06 April 2012.

The following texts have bee taken from the SOUTH LONDON PRESS web site:

LEWISHAM Council’s AGM last week saw the announcement of three changes to the cabinet.
At the meeting on March 28, Councillor Janet Daby was made portfolio holder for community safety, while Councillor Crada Onuegbu was given responsibility for the new portfolio of youth.
Announcing the new role, the Mayor of Lewisham Sir Steve Bullock said:
"Every part of the council has a contribution to make and to make sure that this is overseen at cabinet level I have created a new post of cabinet 

UK Courts to be subject to USA executive priorities, reports the Telegraph

UK Courts to be subject to USA executive priorities, reports the Telegraph
UK Courts to be subject to USA executive priorities, reports the Telegraph

BHANGEELAAR! “No to executive mayor” Campaign: way forward for a democratic Britain

BHANGEELAAR! “No to executive mayor” Campaign: way forward for a democratic  Britain
1130 [1120] [1110] Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
05 April 2012
BHANGEELAAR! THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST AN ELECTED EXECUTIVE MAYOR IN TOWER HAMLETS is leading the call for a democratic halt to the assault on basic democracy that is occurring via the dictatorial executive mayor system being added across the UK
This latest original BHANGEELAAR! diagnosis, which has be caused by the ongoing ad emerging evidence of serious flaws in the "elected executive mayor" "system" in the name of London, also exposes the equally serious flaws and shortcomings in the BBC’s undemocratic agenda and performance
Here [below with a one-word editorial note being added] are the full texts of the BHANGEELAAR! comment published this morning on the Guardian web site.
The comment as always also contains original insights and in formation about the BBC’s launching of the ego called Jeremy Paxman. This revelation by BHANGEELAAR! now puts in context a ot of the failures that have bee massaged by the BBC as “successes and achievements”.
The BHANGEELAAR comment is another original and prodemocratic contribution for the rescuing of Society in Britain that faces an increasingly authoritarian take-over.
Mr> [BBC2] performance on Tuesday night was so poor is the fact that the BBC has been bankrupt in term s of covering prodemocratic activities in Britain. Assuming, that is, that a 'debate' is 'intended' to be prodemocratic.
The previous 'episode' that Newsnight had run four years ago was as futile.
As was the "Panorama” version fronted by David Dimbleby on BBC 1 literally days before polling day in 2008. So what is the answer to the BBC’s dismal political coverage.
When the BBC launched the cult of personality by featuring Jeremy Paxman on the cover of their own magazine, they showed that they were indifferent to their task: informing the UK public on important issues of democracy and society and the economy objectively accurately and impartially.
They were peddling an ego or rather they were manufacturing one.
Likewise, Tony Blair’s introduction of the antidemocratic "elected executive mayor" diversion is proving just as antidemocratic. And wasteful. In more ways than just money terms.
If the likes of the guardian can provide serious space and exposure in creating a democracy debate environment on a sustained basis, perhaps this, the British or the UK Society will begin to find a democratic answer to the logjam that is now closing in on communities, boroughs, and regions in Britain.
Is it too much to ask or too hard a task for the people to attempt to do?
One thing is certain: the BBC is not delivering a democratic news and documentary service. Nor is SKY NEWS. It is time for ordinary people to have our say. And fill the lethal void being created and deepened by the failures of the mainstream “mass communication media” often now denoted by the electronic ones such as the BBC, SKY and their lesser counterparts. And have that SAY in a sustained, prominent and seriously centrally platformed way across the country.
Parliament doesn’t deliver. Councils do not deliver. Mayors abuse and digress and waste. And the people continue to pay for all those failures, betrayals and wastes.
0450 GMT
Thursday 05 April 2012
BHANGEELAAR!
THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST AN ELECTED EXECUTIVE MAYOR IN TOWER HAMLETS.

BHANGEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Mayor-ing makes them maniacal! Scrap mayors!

BHANGEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Mayor-ing makes them maniacal! Scrap mayors!
0550 [0530] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 04 April 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque

BHANGEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Mayor-ing makes them maniacal! Scrap mayors!

BHANGEELAAR! is a Seelotee language word devised by Muhammad Haque. It denotes the pro-democracy, pro-accountability campaign against the inherently antidemocratic system of an “elected” executive mayor . The campaign has been going on in Tower Hamlets for over two years [To be continued]
Johnson to Livingstone: 'It's all f****** liThe following is a report that has bee accessed from the Channel 4 news web site
es' Tuesday 03 April 2012
Joh--------------------------- Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson clash furiously on a radio show about their tax arrangements, after which Mr Johnson tells Mr Livingstone that accusations levelled at him are "all f****** lies".
Joh---------------------------
Joh--------------------------- In a heated debate hosted by LBC 97.3, Conservative Mr Johnson denied suggestions he had used a company to channel his media earnings to avoid paying income tax - a claim that he has levelled at his Labour opponent.
Joh--------------------------- Mr Livingstone accused the mayor of having "the same arrangements" for dealing with his media earnings as he had, insisting he had used a company called Finland Station.
Joh--------------------------- Mr Johnson called the claim "lies", adding: "I have never used a company to minimise my tax.
Joh--------------------------- "There was a TV production company which I was briefly a director of but I certainly never... I have always paid full income tax." The row continued off-air when Mr Johnson swore at his Labour opponent.
Joh--------------------------- Travelling up to the roof terrace to be photographed, the Mayor said to Mr Livingstone: "It's all f****** lies, it's all f****** lies".
Joh--------------------------- Channel 4 News understands the mayor had talked to his opponent privately weeks ago to tell him what he had been saying about his tax arrangements was not true.
Joh--------------------------- Mr Livingstone has come under attack in recent weeks over claims that he was paid via a company so he was liable only for corporation tax at 20 per cent.
Joh--------------------------- Mr Johnson was said to be "very frustrated" that the Labour candidate attempted to claim during today's public debate that he adopted the same practice despite having previously been told it was not true.
Joh--------------------------- Mr Johnson issued a statement rebutting the allegations over his tax affairs.
Joh--------------------------- He said: "In relation to my business affairs and tax arrangements, specifically do I have any company or other arrangements constructed to enable me to pay less tax and do I, as has been claimed by the Labour mayoral candidate and the opposition leader, have the same arrangements as Labour's mayoral candidate?
Joh--------------------------- "The answer is simple and unequivocal in both cases. No. "My salary as mayor is taxed as an employee of the GLA. In the same way as when I was an MP my salary was taxed as an employee.
Joh--------------------------- "Any other income that I have received from outside endeavours has been received on a self-employed basis, to me as an individual (no company or other structure has been involved).
Joh--------------------------- "No income earned by me has ever been paid to a "service" company, through which a person or person's freelance earnings can be channelled so that they pay corporation rather than income tax.
Joh--------------------------- "To suggest otherwise is a complete and utter fabrication. "Of course the real point is not about my tax arrangements. It is about the hypocrisy of a man who for years has railed against those who use special arrangements to reduce their tax and who has then been caught - bang to rights - doing the very same thing himself."
Joh--------------------------- A spokesman for Ken Livingstone said: "Boris Johnson lost his temper because he lost the debate - he talked about cable cars, not cutting fares and the squeeze on Londoners."
Joh--------------------------- A spokesman added later: "After the 2008 election Ken’s work was based on a range of private sector sources, including speaking, broadcasting and other media. The best way to organise this was through a company, Silveta, supporting the work of the business including paying for the work of others to make this viable.
Joh--------------------------- "Thousands of others with small businesses do the same. In later years the company has paid for the work of other people to provide with research and assistance and of course has overheads. As has been widely reported, Emma Beal has also worked for the company. The company will be closed if Ken is elected."
Joh--------------------------- The declared candidates for the London mayoral elections are:
Joh---------------------------
Joh--------------------------- Boris Johnson (C)
Joh--------------------------- Ken Livingstone (Lab)
Joh--------------------------- Brian Paddick (LD)
Joh--------------------------- Jenny Jones (Green)
Joh--------------------------- Carlos Cortiglia (BNP)
Joh--------------------------- Siobhan Benita (Ind)
Joh--------------------------- Lawrence Webb (UKIP)
Joh---------------------------

"Galloway said he had entered into the history books sharing space only with Winston Churcill.."

"Galloway said he had entered into the history books sharing space only with Winston Churcill.."
FROM the website
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-13659-After-historic-victory-Galloway-targets-Bradford-City-Council
BRADFORD:

The newly elected Bradford West MP George Galloway has announced that he will field the "winning team" of his supporters in the next month's council elections after the Respect leader swept to a historic and unbelievable victory, beating the three mainstream parties into almost oblivion by gaining more than 18,000 votes, overturning a Labour majority of more than 5,000 at the 2010 general election, in only two weeks' time.

  Speaking to around a 2,500 strong rally in the city's Infirmary Fields on Sunday evening, the Respect leader and renowned anti-war campaigner described his victory as the "Bradford Spring" and predicted that the phenomenon will be repeated all over the countries as the young and disaffected were ready to reject the conventional politics.

  For the major victory rally, Galloway was joined by his long standing colleague and founder Councillor Salma Yaqoob, Naweed Hussain, who defected from the Labour camp and ran Galloway's campaign, Iqbal Rathore and Ayub Yousuf, the veteran local community leaders and Arshad Ali.

  He said the political landscape of the city had changed "forever" and the council elections on May 3 will be a further proof of that. Galloway described his victory from the district which has almost 40 percent Pakistani voters as the "mass popular rejection of the existing political system, racism, policies of war and the politics of Baradriism".

  It is understood that Galloway will mainly field young candidates in 30 wards who worked day and night canvassing to ensure the victory in the by election that shocked the political establishment, defying all expectations.  

He told the jubilant crowd which included families, men and women of all ages and all races: "The political weather which was dark clouds over Bradford for so many years has now been swept away. In this new politics, in this new atmosphere which you, and us, have created together." He said Bradfordians have created a political earthquake in the country.

  Galloway claimed that his victory had made the city a talking point of the whole country - including many world capitals - 5 days after the shock victory, and vowed that he will ensure that the long-neglected city is never forgotten again. He announced that his party will campaign for the directly elected mayor in the city for accountability and transparency.   Galloway said he had entered into the history books sharing space only with Winston Churcill by becoming the only second politician who has won 6 elections in four different constituencies in two countries.  

He vowed that he will continue to campaign against the belief that "UK has a duty to invade other countries as part of the imperialism adventurism project, setting fire to other people's countries."  

Salma Yaqoob read message on behalf of the widow and daughter of Abu Baker, the local Respect campaigner who died suddenly while campaigning with Galloway in the city a few days before the voting day. Abu Baker's widow said she fully understood why her husband campaigned for the right reasons and vowed that she will continue to stand by Galloway and his party for as long as they campaign on the ethical issues.

 

Yvette Cooper

Yvette Cooper
BBC1 April 2012 Last updated at 11:01 Help Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said Labour needed to learn lessons from the "deeply disappointing" Bradford West by-election where George Galloway took the seat with a 10,000 majority. She said Labour was "not connecting" with some of the young people and issues raised, but it had knocked 20,000 doors through the by-election campaign. At the 2010 General Election, Labour's Marsha Singh, who resigned on health grounds, won with a majority of 5,763. Watch the full programme on BBC iPlayer for seven days and see more clips on the Andrew Marr programme website. Read More

George Galloway's vote-seeking special appeal to Muslims

George Galloway's vote-seeking special appeal to Muslims
1528 Hrs GMT
London
Friday
30 March 2012
This letter was referred to in several "news" items on the Bradford, West by-election result during Friday 30 March 2012

. [To be continued]

Ex-MP for East London seat “Bethnal Green and Bow” claims sensational win

Ex-MP for East London seat  “Bethnal Green and Bow” claims sensational win
Ex-MP for East London seat “Bethnal Green and Bow” claims sensational win in Bradford West by election held on Thursday 29 March 2012.

Jacqui Smith's role as a sublime propagandist for the Blair-like 'status quo'

Jacqui Smith's role as a sublime propagandist for the Blair-like 'status quo'
AADHIKAROnline summary of Jacqui Smith’s intimate thoughts, as originally discerned from her utterances and appearances o “ media slots’ o TV channels in the past 24 hours. As Edited by © Muhammad Haque 0610 Hrs GMT [0710 UK] London Thursday 29 March 2012. I hear that down in the East End, many struggle to make ends meet. So they may even have to give the Games a miss. But I can’t wait for the Games. I ‘m with the Prime Minister [Cameron] on this. Ecstatic diversion from the common peoples worries. Last night I purred my Hockey Tickets excitement into my new best chum the Right-of-Thatcher propagandist Tory Iain Dale on Sky News Channel. They kindly put on plausibly phrased descriptions that didn’t make it too obvious that I share another sublime propaganda job with Iain Dale on LBC too! On to this morning when I shared my enthusiasm for the Games with Kate Garraway on the ITV DAYBREAK just under an hour ago..... Can’t wait for the fun of the Games...I have so many fulfilling slots on mainstream British broadcast Media outlets these days that I don’t know what I was doing pretending to be a politician. ......I have found my true calling now. Far more exciting than being a Cotswold teacher as well! And I slipped in a good word about my old mate Tony Blair as a naturally mingling ordinary sportsman too. Sorta like a peoples sportsman! Nobody could object. I don’t have to answer to Ed Miliband. Although I was thrilled to see him and Ed Balls and Rachel Reeves pop into one of the two Greggs outlets in my own constituency of Redditch last night! [To be continued]

The heart-breaking violation of women in the Subcontinent: "Sex slaves" in India

The heart-breaking violation of women in the Subcontinent: "Sex slaves" in India
Sex slaves sold in the name of religion

• By Emily Jupp
• Notebook - A selection of Independent views -, Opinion
• Wednesday, 28 March 2012 at 12:03 am

Once upon a time there was a woman who was the wife of a great Hindu sage. The sage and his wife had taken a vow of celibacy. One day she was at the river and she saw two sprites “frolicking” with each other. She wished that she and her husband could be sexually free too. The husband sensed her sexual desires and was so angry he ordered her to be beheaded. However, the sage bitterly regretted the decision, so he tried to fix it. He found the head of  another woman from the lowest caste, and attached this to his wife’s body. She was resurrected, but instead of staying with her husband, she roamed by the river, a liberated, sexually free woman, like the sprites. She became the goddess “Yellama” and lived happily ever after. This is the story told to some of the young girls in Southern India, in the region of Andhra Pradesh, where Yellamma is the patron goddess.  

At the age of between five and ten they are dedicated to the goddess in a special marriage ceremony, where they are given pretty clothes, strewn with petals, offered gifts and then forced to become sex slaves.

They are too young to fully comprehend what is happening to them until the ceremony is over and their fate is sealed. Saimma, aged 40 explains: *”I felt happy and great as a child saying that I am married and I used to say all the other children, ‘you also should get married to the goddess and then you will  get new clothes and can have thali in your neck like me’.

Only later did I realise what is the marriage really. In our society, if you have a husband you also have respect, but we die of shame.” Venkatamma, 45, says, “My mother told me I was the goddess of our villagers. With time I came to know that what type of goddess I was. All are playing games with our life. Today we are living by dying. In the society we don’t have respect and we are subservient to everyone.”

The girls who have been put through this dedication ceremony are known as “Jogini”. Estimates say that 17000 girls are Jogini. They have the glamourous image of being a temple prostitiute, and like Yellama, they will never marry, which to outsiders gives an impression of freedom, but they will always be Jogini and cannot escape their fate. Although there are no physical restraints on them, the community will shun them if they try to take another profession.

“Sometimes they are locked in rooms and battered until they have no will to escape,” explains Dr Beryl D’souza Vali, the Director of Anti-Trafficking at Pratigya India, a charity which campaigns for an end to slavery in India.  “But after that they are seen as a sex worker and there is no escaping that, so they are exploited at that level, even if they try to do something else, they will always be a sex worker.”

The young girls usually come from the lowest caste, the Dalits (‘untouchables’). Dalits have few rights and the majority live in extreme poverty. The practice of selling their children as Jogini is said to bring good luck to the families and they are also given a very small  percentage of the money made from the sale of the child.

Ashamma, 45,  was made a Jogini when she was eight years old. “My father was blind since birth. They made me a Jogini to get  financial support. But I still have to go begging with my son because of my horrible situation and lack of food.” D’souza Vali says that often the men involved in buying the girls are often respected members of society. 

”There are stakeholders; they are people from the sex trade industry – politicians, religious leaders or prominent locals,” she explains, “the brothels in larger cities usually get a religious middle man in the village to visit the family to say this should happen.” The only “escape” from being a Jogini comes from no longer being useful for sex, says D’souza Vali:  ”Eventually they have had several children and contracted HIV and Aids, so they are no longer working, then they escape it”.

Jogini women sometimes dedicate their own daughters, because once they stop being useful as Jogini, there is no other way to get an income, or their children are taken and made into Jogini.

Savithramma, 22, was made a Jogini by her mother and grandmother after she gave birth to an illigitimate child when she was 14. “ I asked him after the child birth to marry me but he didn’t respond to me. So, my mother took me to temple and made my avva (grandmother) to tie thali to me. From that time onward all give me the title jogini. ”

“They use our children also after our death,” says Ashamma. “When we die, they take our children as their slaves. By that our children’s lives are also spoiled. Our children’s lives are also in darkness like ours.”

Laws do exist to protect the girls and women, but are rarely enforced. In the 1930s the British were the first ones who challenged the system and outlawed it. This was seen as disrespectful to the religious customs and culturally unaware. In some ways the law backfired and simply made Jogini life much harder.

“One Jogini told me that the women used to enjoy a much higher patronage and they were like the Geisha girls in Japan” explains D’souza Vali. “They could do their own thing and not have to be married. It’s true that after the law was introduced they had to be more secretive and so exploitation increased.”

Later, in 1983, those laws were strengthened, but did not have an effect. D’souza Vali says there has not been a case using these protective laws for the last five years. “It’s hard to look at something clearly that is so entrenched with culture and religion, so what happens is a Jogini may get some but not enough help. The police themselves are not always aware of the law or are aware, but don’t really know how to implement the law.”

Malcolm Egner, of the Dalit Freedom Network (DFN),  a charity that helps Dalit people (low-caste people) across the world to fight injustice against their caste, says there are many other barriers to getting help. “In some parts of India, Dalits are not allowed into police stations.”

D’souza Vali explains,  ”In 95 per cent of cases, if a Dalit woman goes to the police they won’t be helped. They are likely to get further harassment. In the unlikely case that the police are helpful there may be other barriers.” Against all the barriers, a small group of ex-Jogini women are finally speaking out against the tradition.  

DFN  is currently working with Pratigya India, D’souza Vali’s organisation,  on a 12-month project in the region to help these women to help educate the Jogini and their families about their legal rights and also to intervene before the dedication ceremonies take place. 

The stories of abuse go on, but with some help, the ex-Jogini activists are working to prevent this abuse happening in the future. “They want an alternate life for

their descendents,” says D’souza Vali. To find out more or support the campaign visit www.dfn.org.uk or

www.pratigyaindia.org

*Verbatim transcripts from the Jogini were compiled and translated by DFN and Pratigya India.

Tagged in:



Andhra Pradesh, hinduism, Jogini, Religion, sex slaves, trafficking, Yellama

London Mayor poll: EVENING STANDARD suppresses real comment on ITS coverage [4]

London Mayor poll: EVENING STANDARD suppresses real comment on ITS coverage [4]
[1600 Hrs GMT
London
27 March 2012]




Your [London EVENING STANDARD] piece is correctly topical. Could you look at the contents of the known candidates' known records "for the wider public" as opposed to "for their own careers"?
It would also serve the cause of democratic accountability to hear from you about how you have found the conduct of the London Assembly members over the years that you have been covering the Onion. Have they justified the £Millions of public money that is spent on keeping and on maintaining them? And a hundred other questions like this about the Assembly. There is still a month of reporting time left before the “key” to the London Onion is allocated to whoever! And another period of silence descends about the “suitability” of these persons to claim to be in the offices [Assembly and the Onion] in the name of the people London.So far as I can verify, neither the London EVENING STANDARD or any of the “Fleet Street” titles nor their broadcasting counterparts has EVER published any in-depth and democratically relevant investigation ito the democratic usefulness or otherwise of the “London Assembly”.
Yet the London Assembly and the Onion-"holder" have been allowed £Billions to spend IN THE NAME of the people of London without any known real audit or justification being made in the democratic arena and in accordance with the demands fo democracy for so much of their spending decisions! It is about time that the “mainstream” Media did scrutinise both the London Assembly and the Onion-"holder"! The tokenistic “interview” that the BBC London did last night [with Ken Livingstone] did feature four BBC “persons” apparently asking highly sophisticated questions of that candidate but it was such a shallow event!
I suspect their [the BBC London ‘news unit’] promised one with Boris Johnson to be shown in the next hour, will be equally shallow and as banal. Unless some historic, epoch-making CHANGE has happened in or about the BBC’s ENCOUNTER with Boris Johnson.
The people of London deserve much more evidence, rigour and far higher standard of journalism than the charades that the broadcasting outlets stage and call them as specially dedicated events about the “Mayor of London elections” typify. ”


[To be continued]

AADHIKARonline reporting on traps near Brick Lane mosque

AADHIKARonline reporting on traps near Brick Lane mosque
AADHIKARonline reporting on traps near Brick Lane mosque [To be continued]

Questions for Kevin Maguire who faked it on Sky News over Guardian 'style'!

Questions for Kevin Maguire who faked it on Sky News over Guardian 'style'!
Questions for Kevin Maguire who faked it on Sky News over Guardian 'style'!
0840 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 27 March 2012.
Kevin Maguire last night on Sky News “Press Preview” slot [2230 -2300 GMT 26 March 2012] faked it in “tune” with Andrew Pierce, the over the top Reactionary propagandist [who has a ot to hide especially abut his own “biography’] who has been doing his “journalism” for Right-wingers for the past at least 20 years. The fakery by Maguire was all the more astonishing because it is his role on Sky News to come across as being the “left’ of the “establishment spectrum.
In an extraordinary outburst of idiocy, Maguire agreed to go along with Andrew Pierce and diss the Guardian’s “style” and in doing so serve Rupert Murdoch’s agenda on Sky News. Sky News’ on-site controllers and editors must have been “relieved’ that the pair of touts [Maguire and Pierce] did the job and allowed viewers to be diverted from the real facts alleged in the Guardian front-page piece to the effect that serious criminality had been alleged against another Murdoch operation: this one too close for comfort for the SKY NEWS controlling outfit BSKYB.

..[To be continued]

AADHIKAROnline had told CONDEM SO!Their spelling on that card was vulgar!

AADHIKAROnline had told CONDEM SO!Their spelling on that card was vulgar!
0800 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
26 March 2012.
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical, Moral Commentary on the latest exposed state of selfish "politics and power grab" culture exhibited around the "Cash-for-private-access to the Camerons" confessions!
Almost exactly two years and two weeks ago on Saturday, the DAILY MAIL had plugged the same SAM CAMERON whom they are mocking, nay, almost pitying, today!
The publishing behaviour of the DAILY MAIL sums up, once again, the crude, the cruel and the crass agenda that both the DAILY MAIL pursues and the CONSERVATIVE Party follows: selfish, lacking in compassion. The lack of compassion brought into sharp focus by the CONDEM Collusion’s attacks on the old, the frail and the vulnerable in the Big-wealth-owners-backing Budget uttered by Cameron’s Bullyingdone co-assailant George Osborne only a week earlier.
The episode in the long running historic scandal of the “British Establishment” being deeply sunk in immortally, institutional and strategic corruption at the expense of ordinary “British” people is one which must serve as a warning to the CONS’ supposed “opponents” waiting in the wings for THEIR own "deserved" [!!!!!] return to power, to do the same!
As soon as they are “secure” in post, that is! DO NOT BE TEMPTED TO assume that life will g on being “wonderful:” once in power, again! Be honest. Be decent. Above all, be compassionate to the people, the ordinary people in whose name you seek, grab and cling on to power for as long as you can “manage” to do so. The FUTURE may bring a surprise! And even in Britain, the zombified masses may yet find the spur and strike truly and in a lasting way for democracy. The foundations of the Palace of Stooges at Westminster may not even be necessary to be rocked [cf: Guy Fawkes].
SOCIETY may, yet, offer the Open parliament for open democracy and the very overdue democratic verdict for the legitimate consigning of all the crooks, the liars and the charlatans posing now and for too long [over the centuries that have followed that physical critique Guy Fawkes represented] as the peoples’ representatives and as the peoples’ “rulers” to the deep dustbin of history that hey have deserved but have managed to avoid for so long. A pro-democracy Spring may, yet, happen even in the over-disenfranchised remainder of Society in Britain! And that Spring will more likely come because the corruption and the selfishness became too much for decent, hard working, hard-deprived, hard-denied ordinary people to watch and bear.
[To be continued] AADHIKAROnline had told CONDEM SO!Their spelling on that card was far too explicit, the "charge"far too vulgar! [To be continued]

AADHIKAR! told you so, again, on Sunday 25 March 2012

AADHIKAR! told you so, again, on Sunday 25 March 2012
0140 GMT London Monday 26 March 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.


from the London DAILY MAIL web site


Donors' secret No. 10 dinners: How Dave and Sam's meals with millionaires forced Tory treasurer to quit • Peter Cruddas offered access to PM in return for cash
• He suggested donors who agreed to give £250,000 a year would have their ideas 'fed in' to Downing Street
• Undercover reporters told they could dine with Mr Cameron, George Osborne and senior ministers

'Bigger donors' visited David and wife Samantha's apartment, he claimed • Mr Miliband called revelations 'disturbing'
• Mr Cameron said Cruddas's comments were 'unacceptable' By
JASON GROVES

PUBLISHED:

UPDATED:
00:25, 26 March 2012 •
• Comments (0)

• Share • •
• David Cameron was engulfed in a sleaze storm last night as it emerged he and wife Samantha have hosted secret dinners in their Downing Street flat for millionaire Conservative donors.
Government sources were forced to admit the existence of the intimate dinners after Tory Party treasurer Peter Cruddas was secretly filmed boasting that he could provide direct access to the Prime Minister for ‘Premier League’ donors. Sources insisted that guests at the secret No 10 dinners were not invited because they were donors and they had no influence on policy. Close relationship: Tory treasurer Peter Cruddas, left, boasted that he could give donors private access to David Cameron, right A source said it was ‘simply untrue’ to suggest donors were able to buy access or influence, adding: ‘This was never in exchange for anything. 'The PM is entitled to meet with people even if they happen to have given money to the party.’    More... • Tories lurching from 'one City spiv to the next in their search for a Treasurer' • ANDREW PIERCE: Barrow boy with the Midas touch • It'll be awesome for your business: Tory treasurer told donors they could have access to PM and influence policy But the revelation threatened to bring the ‘cash for access’ scandal to the very heart of Downing Street. Mr Cruddas, a multi-millionaire who was forced to quit as soon as the revelations became public, suggested major donors who agreed to give £250,000 a year would have their concerns and ideas ‘fed in’ directly to the Downing Street policy unit. Enlarge  
He told undercover reporters posing as wealthy foreign businessmen that they could expect to attend dinners with Mr Cameron, Chancellor George Osborne and senior ministers if they donated enough cash.
'Business deals': Mr Cruddas was secretly filmed telling undercover reporters he could arrange private meetings with senior Conservatives
He went on: ‘Some of our bigger donors have been for dinner in No 10 Downing Street, in the Prime Minister’s private apartment, with Samantha.’
Tory donors invited for dinner are believed to have included billionaire City businessman Michael Spencer, himself a former party treasurer.
Government sources last night said no donation had been offered or accepted, and claimed that Mr Cruddas was acting as a rogue operator whose boasts broke party rules.
But the revelation that the Prime Minister has hosted private dinners for  donors could leave him open to accusations that he has breached his own ministerial code, which requires ministers to avoid any activity that could be perceived as improper.
In another ominous twist, the Metropolitan Police were last night asked to investigate suggestions that Mr Cruddas or others may have accepted donations from wealthy foreigners – which is illegal under British electoral law.
Mr Cameron described Mr Cruddas’s comments as ‘completely unacceptable’, adding: ‘This is not the way that we raise money in the Conservative Party, it shouldn’t have happened.’
The Prime Minister said he was ordering an internal inquiry into the affair. Sources initially suggested it would be led by the party’s co-chairman Lord Feldman, who recruited Mr Cruddas and was effectively his line manager. But the idea was dropped after critics questioned whether Lord Feldman, Mr Cameron’s former tennis partner and closest friend in politics, was sufficiently independent.
Appalled: Sir Christopher Kelly, Chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said the revelations were 'not an isolated incident' while Labour leader Ed Miliband called the news 'disturbing'
Labour called for an independent inquiry and will today press Mr Cameron to make a full Commons statement on the affair.
Ed Miliband said: ‘These are very disturbing revelations. The Conservative Party has been seeking cash in exchange for access to the Prime Minister and Chancellor and indeed influence over policy making. ‘It’s no way to run a Government or a political party and these allegations can’t be swept under the carpet. There needs to be a proper independent investigation into whether influence was sought, what influence was gained and what impact it had.’ 
Sir Christopher Kelly, chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, last night warned that the revelations were ‘not an isolated incident’.
He added: ‘As long as we have a system in which the main political parties are reliant on very large donations from very rich individuals – or organisations, in the case of the Labour Party – then events of this kind are almost bound to happen.
‘It is a cancer which needs to be addressed.’ Downing Street last night said it was fast-tracking cross-party talks on reform of party funding. A source said: ‘Clearly the current set-up is not ideal.’ The revelations are deeply embarrassing for Mr Cameron, who pledged two years ago to crack down on the shadowy world of lobbying.
The existence of secret dinners with donors also undermines the Coalition’s much-vaunted transparency drive, which allows the public to see who ministers have met in their official capacity.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2120293/Donors-secret-No-10-dinners-How-Dave-Sams-meals-millionaires-forced-Tory-treasurer-quit.html#ixzz1qBJXbckJ


[To be continued by AADHIKARonline]

Lest we overlook a dead weight of "Fleet Street": Vincent Moss!

Lest we overlook a dead weight of "Fleet Street": Vincent Moss!
1620 Hrs GMT London Sunday 25 March 2012.
Lest we forget the dead weights of "Fleet Street"! Vincent Moss!


The © Muhammad Haque Daily Evidential Diagnosis of the Morass that dominates the UK today.
The first brief comments on the “Tory sting” by the SUNDAY TIMES “insight” team, dated 25 March 2012.

The introductory words, about the DEAD WEIGHT that is the the “British Media”. One type of that dead weight is to be seen and found in a man called Vincent Moss. Moss is supposedly the political editor at the SUNDAY Mirror. He is the one seen on the left by the viewer in this picture [published here by AADHIKAROnline] taken from the BBC News Channel “press review” slot fronted in the evening of Saturday 24 March 2012 by the equally unenlightening and ignorant Anita Mcveigh contracted by the BBC].
And the Sunday Mirror is supposed to be “left”! leaning! However, neither Vincent Moss nor the Sunday Mirror has any sustainable, PUBLISHED record that could either justify the tag “left” in either of their cases, if the tag “left” is used in the context fo the “status quo” “profession of” UK politics and political propaganda or [objectively speaking on universal criteria of evidence] credibly allow the claim that either [Moss or the Sunday Mirror] is engaged in context in the work of journalism.
Moss is not only NOT “left” politically, intellectually, ethnically or evidentially but he is ALSO not a journalist,either, as defined by universal objective criteria. And that probably sums up the morass that is the Sunday Mirror. And the rest of the overwhelming, majority of “Fleet Street” and the remainders of the “print” titles still “going” across the UK today.
[To be continued]

Sunday Times "Tory sting" scratches at the surface. Cameron IS vulnerable to far more "buyers"

Sunday Times "Tory sting" scratches at the surface. Cameron IS vulnerable to far more "buyers"
1440 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
25 March 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
The London Sunday Times "Tory sting" scratches at the surface. Cameron IS vulnerable to far more "buyers"


AADHIKAROnline EXCLUSIVELY asserts that the “availability” of David Cameron to “pay-as-you-access” the British Prime Minister “events” has been far wider than anything that the SUNDAY TIMES has disclosed today [Sunday 25 March 2012] .
We can reveal that very strange and dubious elements in the UK have been heard to be boasting of their ability to get Cameron “into” THEIR pictures, for at least the past two years, and quite possibly for far longer. And Cameron HAS appeared at “events” that are quite clearly inconsistent with the democratic framework that currently exists in the UK.
So how has Cameron found himself in the “pictures” of certain otherwise very dubious or strange characters? We report more later.
[To be continued]

AADHIKAROnline world Exclusive Brand New Edition of Private Eye magazine CONs Cover

AADHIKAROnline world Exclusive Brand New Edition of Private Eye magazine CONs Cover
1215 Hrs GMT London Saturday 24 March 2012.

Editor © Muhammad Haque


AADHIKAROnline world Exclusive Brand New Edition of Private Eye magazine CONs Cover
A fully texted caption follows later [see the rhetorical, satirical page 95 for further details] [To be continued]

Real Poverty-creation via a pliant Parliament in UK. Campaigners take initiative to awaken MPs

Real Poverty-creation via a pliant Parliament in UK. Campaigners take initiative to awaken MPs
1040 Hrs GMT London Saturday 24 March 2012. Real Poverty-creation via a pliant Parliament in UK. Campaigners take initiative to awaken MPs again! [To be continued]

Osborne's "economic recovery" Empty shops number rising

Osborne's "economic recovery" Empty shops number rising
BBC web site:

Empty shops rate hits record, Local Data Company says There is increasing evidence that all is not well for retailers in Britain Continue reading the main story UK Economy How to get a job in... guides Watch How to write a successful CV 'I applied for 1,639 jobs' 'Job hunting is full-time job' The proportion of shops in Britain lying empty has hit a new record of 14.6% in February, according to figures compiled by the Local Data Company. Vacancy rates had begun to stabilise at the end of 2011, but they have risen in January and February, the LDC said. It is further evidence of a difficult start to the year for retailers. Consumer confidence also slipped back in February, the latest survey from Nationwide indicated, largely due to concerns about employment prospects. There was an increase in the number of respondents describing their economic situation as bad. "Consumers also scaled back their expectations for the future, with the forward-looking aspects of the index weakening during the month," said Nationwide chief economist Robert Gardner. However, he added that the number of consumers planning to buy household goods - an indicator of confidence - was higher in February than a year earlier. Continue reading the main story “ Start Quote It is a timely reminder to the government... of the significant challenges facing town and city centres up and down the country” Matthew Hopkinson Local Data Company High Street casualties Sharp decline in UK retail sales Next says outlook still cautious Profit up at B&Q owner Kingfisher This reflects official retail sales data for the month, published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Thursday. Sales volumes declined by a larger-than-expected 0.8% in February, the ONS said. But they were still 1% higher than a year earlier. 'Damaged' High Streets The Local Data Company said the rise in empty premises was "not unexpected" as retailers continue to cut back and even go bust. Game, which has 600 High Street branches in the UK, said this week that it was going into adminstration after key suppliers stopped doing business with them. It is continuing to trade while it tries to find a solution to its debt problems. "It is a timely reminder to the government, who are due to respond to the Portas Review this month, of the significant challenges facing town and city centres up and down the country," said LDC director Matthew Hopkinson. Retail consultant and TV presenter Mary Portas was asked by the government to look at ways to revitalise struggling town centres. Her report, published in December 2011, recommended cutting regulations and proposed a bigger role for street markets in town centres. "It's crucial that the government responds to Mary's review with a menu of recommendations next week that local people, councils and businesses can 'pick and mix' to help start to reverse the damage that many of our high streets have suffered," said Ian Fletcher, director of policy at the British Property Federation. "Our high streets need vision, trade and investment, and landlords therefore welcomed a key recommendation from the Portas report in December that allows property owners to match the funding that retailers put in to Business Improvement Districts - successful vehicles that allow traders to come together to plan and fund improvements in their area." Currently, only retailers can contribute to Business Improvement Districts. It will require a change in the law to allow landlords to take part in these intiatives, which are currently funded by increases in business rates. More on This Story UK Economy Unemployment How to get a job in... guides Watch Industry experts explain how to get a job in retail, engineering, manufacturing and special effects, and how to start your own business. How to write a successful CV 'I applied for 1,639 jobs' 'Job hunting is full-time job' Coventry jobs club struggles to keep up Where to find help for financial problems Basics High Street casualties Three years of record-low rates Q&A: What is inflation? Q&A: Quantitative easing Q&A: What is GDP? Chunks of data to calculate inflation Who is hardest hit by inflation? Calculate your inflation rate Economy tracker: Inflation Latest Sharp decline in UK retail sales Union fury over public pay plans UK AAA rating on new credit watch UK unemployment rises by 28,000 UK considers super long-term bond Watch/Listen Chancellor to reveal how tax is spent Watch The Chancellor will set out plans in the budget tomorrow to give 20m tax payers more information about how their taxes are spent. Should government intervene in business? Listen Investment needs 'joined-up

Nasty Party CONDEM Govt attacks poor granny, makes her poorer...

Nasty Party CONDEM Govt attacks poor granny, makes her poorer...
From the web site of the London DAILY MAIL
Granny tax backlash: Fury as full scale of Chancellor's raid on pensioners emerges Around 700,000 people turning 65 next year will be hit the hardest The tax will take £3.5billion from more than 4.4million pensioners Senior Tories say the move is the Chancellor's biggest blunder By TIM SHIPMAN and JAMES CONEY PUBLISHED: 22:52, 22 March 2012 | UPDATED: 00:20, 23 March 2012 Comments (72) Share The full extent of George Osborne’s stealth tax raid on pensioners was laid bare yesterday. Around 700,000 people turning 65 next year will be hit the hardest – losing £323 annually with the end of age-related income allowances. In all, the ‘granny tax’ will take £3.5billion from the pockets of more than 4.4million pensioners. Senior Tories have denounced it privately as the Chancellor’s biggest blunder. Burden: Around 700,000 people turning 65 next year will be hit the hardest - losing £323 annually with the end of age-related income allowances The new rules are so arbitrary that some OAPs will lose far more than others born a day before them. Ros Altmann of Saga said: ‘Middle-class pensioners are outraged. My inbox is full of angry emails from those who did save for their future but are now hit. ‘The message of this Budget is, don’t bother to save for the future and if you’re too old to work any more you don’t count.’ More... Pie tax wipes £30m off Greggs after Osborne's decision to put VAT on hot take-away food Another 1.3m dragged into 40 per cent tax band I earn too little to pay 50p tax, claims Osborne (who owns a £3m home and a slice of family firm) Soak-the-rich plans won't bring in as much as Chancellor thinks as it will stop them moving house, say experts RIGHTMINDS: The elderly are now being punished for being thrifty MAIL COMMENT: Chancellors cross the elderly at their peril The Institute for Fiscal Studies said the Chancellor should have given advance notice of his plan to freeze the £10,500 tax-free allowance for the over-65s. Lord Tebbit described it as an assault on pensioners who have put money aside. ‘The freezing and gradual abolition of the age-related tax allowance is an error,’ said the Tory grandee. ‘It hurts those who have saved enough for modest pensions. It is unfair and lousy politics.’ Part of the justification for the move was the promise of a more generous state pension of around £140 a week. But this is not expected to be introduced until 2016 – and even then only for those who hit pension age at the time. That means that those who retired between these dates would lose both a higher allowance and the better pension – a double attack on their incomes. This will affect around 2.8million pensioners – 700,000 a year for four years. Existing pensioners are likely to be forced to see out their days living on the current state pension which, from April, will pay £107.45 a week. Senior Tories have denounced the so-called Granny Tax privately as the Chancellor's biggest blunder The IFS found that all pensioners with incomes of between £10,800 and £26,200 turning 65 next year would lose out on £323 as a result of the Budget. They will be part of the 4.4million to be punished, with average losses of £83. Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls said: ‘The most unfair part of George Osborne’s tax raid on pensioners is the effect on people turning 65 next year. ‘How can it be right that someone born a day too late loses over £300 with little advance warning? Just as on his botched changes to child benefit, the Chancellor has simply not thought through the effect of his policies on ordinary people. ‘The poorest pensioners are not affected since they do not pay income tax and the richest pensioners do not get the allowance in any case.’ In Wednesday’s Budget statement, the Chancellor said no one would be out of pocket as a result of his changes since the tax allowance for the over-65s would be frozen rather than cut. He boasted that it was an attempt to simplify the tax system. But Paul Johnson of the IFS said Mr Osborne ‘should have avoided dressing up what is clearly a tax increase as merely a simplification’. He suggested that, for the change to be presented as a reform rather than a tax hike, it should have been delayed until personal allowances reach £10,000 – expected to happen in 2014 or 2015. But in a rare boost for the Chancellor, the IFS said there was a justification for making cuts on pensioners because they had done better than younger people from the Government’s austerity measures. Mr Johnson said: ‘Our analysis shows that they have lost considerably less from recent tax and benefit changes than any other demographic group. And over the past decade and more pensioner incomes have risen faster than those of the working age population. ‘This looks like a relatively modest tax increase on a group hitherto well sheltered from tax and benefit changes.’ David Cameron dismissed claims that pensioners were going to be hit, calling it a ‘fair Budget for all our people’. Speaking to reporters in Bradford, the Prime Minister pointed to the future increases in the state pension. ‘The first thing is that every granny around the country is going to be benefiting from the biggest ever increase in the pension that comes in in April – an extra £5.30 a week. ‘And at the same time, the Budget also delivered a tax cut for 24million people in our country, and also we’ve now taken 2million of the lowest paid people out of tax altogether. It’s a good Budget for our economy and it’s a fair Budget for all our people.’ A Treasury spokesman said: ‘This is an important simplification. It’s sensible to have a single tax-free personal allowance for everyone. ‘The poorest half of pensioners will still pay no tax in 2013/14 and nobody will pay more tax in cash terms than they do today. ‘Compared to the plans the Government inherited, an existing pensioner with a full basic state pension will gain more from the triple lock in each of the next three years than they will lose from the age-related allowances freeze.’ Mr Cable said the major feature of yesterday’s Budget was the large increase in the personal tax allowance to £9,205 from April 2013. He said: ‘We are giving people the freedom to choose how to spend their own money, not taking it from them and then giving it back in a complex, means-tested system of tax credits.’ And defending the changes to pensioners’ tax allowances, Mr Cable said the Budget was transferring £1.7billion to pensioners –against £360million taken away by the allowances changes. He said pensioners on lower incomes would benefit from the growing personal tax allowances under the simplified system, while increases in the basic state pension would give cash in real terms. The Business Secretary said: ‘There is a small group of people, frankly my contemporaries, who have high retirement income and considerable asset wealth and it is right in principle they should pay a bit more. There is a group of people who are not wealthy, on not particularly high income, and who could be affected to a limited extent as a result of inflation eroding the value of the allowances. Those people will benefit enormously from the increase in the basic pension.’ Mr Cable accused Labour of failing to fix the state pension system, ensuring the value of the pension fell back further and further from incomes. Mr Osborne stuck to a previous promise to increase the allowance to £10,500 for those aged 65, and £10,660 for the oldest pensioners. This meant the over-65s appeared to be gaining an extra tax break. But what he didn’t make clear was that by freezing allowances after this, any pensioner who already pays tax will get only 80p for every £1 increase in their pension. This is because the amount they can earn tax free will not change and, as a result, every extra pound in income above the allowance is taxed at the basic rate of 20 per cent. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2118993/Granny-tax-backlash-Fury-scale-Chancellors-raid-pensioners-emerges.html#ixzz1ptfTYAan

Call for far reaching Campaign Action to stop neglect by health and Social services

Call for far reaching Campaign Action to stop neglect by health and Social services
The Muhammad Haque Commentary has been posted on the ES web site at 1230 GMT today.
This is one of the pieces that I am publishing on the negligence, in  the UK Health and Social services.
This one has already ben published on the London EVENING STANDARD web site in the past 30 minutes.
_____________________________________________
Your [the London EVENING STANDARD web site Thursday 22 March 2012] report reminds of literally THOUSANDS of cases of negligence that go unreported and unattended to across East London. 
Without pre-empting any aspect of what may formally still remain of the “procedures” to be gone through by the respective agencies in the case you report on, the overwhelming observational evidence of the culture of negligence dominating the “health” institutions and “social services” across East London suggests that nothing noticeable will change fro the better fro other such “patients” as a result of those “procedural complaints and grievances”.
Regardless of any number of claims by “health service” “professionals” who are mostly active and vocal about their own terms and conditions, the ordinary people who need the services but are denied them for any number of failings by the “institutions” and the “services” are permanently treated in the “protests” as mostly mute parts of displays.
Those displays are mostly public demonstrations.
The voice that ought to be heard and heard loudly and consistently and as the major factor in the equation is that of the users, the people who need the services but are often neglected, ignored or systematically maliciously and irreversibly undermined by the bureaucracies. There is nothing in any published or known “manifesto” or agenda of any Party that says that the status quo of unaccountability, obstruction and denial in the “health” institutions and by the “health” and “social services” “professionals” will EVEN change, let alone be reversed and replaced by an accountability culture that is real, humane and worthy of the claims that these institutions, professions and personnel make on behalf of themselves.
There is no real audit of the “health service” or the “social services” that can be of real, accessible use to ordinary people in any part of East London or indeed in the rest of the UK. The NHS and the Councils’ Social Services are not treated by the mainstream Parties or by the mainstream Media as being subject to the audit of the ordinary public.
This is brought out in the most blatantly antidemocratic way during the routine periods of “crisis”, as typified by any “reform” Bill processed through Parliament, such as the mega-confusing one that has just got “passed” earlier this week about the NHS and marked by “Dave” Cameron’s bragging and by Wednesday’s Daily Mirror front page as ushering in the start of the end of the NHS [1948-2012].
The antidemocratic aspect is in the fact that the “protesters” are almost always shown to be “professionals”. This leaves out the utter majority of ordinary people, who, after all, are the supposed recipients of the supposedly “world class” “services” and “care”.
This is what needs to be changed and the public must be “allowed” in as the major source of the commentary and the democratic diagnoses of the crisis of antidemocratic, morality-free “professional disservice and unaccountability” that dominates what remains of “Society” after the latest CONDEM assaults.
The public must also become citizens, coming out democratically, morally, ethically and electorally continuously fighting for dignity, rights and services and thus also leaving behind the servitude, the morass of neglect and negligence of mere subjects. behind and for ever.

KHOODEELAAR! Telling off RMT Union for idiotically ignoring our warnings on CRASS Crossrail -1

KHOODEELAAR! Telling off RMT Union for idiotically ignoring our warnings on CRASS Crossrail -1
KHOODEELAAR! has been telling the RMT Trade union and others that Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail was not to be trusted. But RMT ignored warnings

2320 [2315] Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
21 March 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
KHOODEELAAR!  the Campaign against the ”Big Business-agenda scam Crossrail hole assault on the Brick Lane onion E1 area...” Told the RMT Union fir tears that Crossrail was callous! WE did so every day.  But the RMT Union  ignored our warning. as the rest of they ignorant, prejudiced bureaucracy, the RMT Union  has behaved like another bureaucracy. They now bleat that Crossrail tunnel collapse is a major incident requiring investigation. We say to the RMT: get a grip and stop lying about Big Business.  Quit lying according to your selfish interests.
Widen the vision and recognise that the community and the ordinary wider public knows better than  your bureaucracy does o r ever will do.  So show due recognition to the and respect to  the commentary and  if you credibly honestly do this then TOGETHER the community and you working with the community can start what has been overdue for more than  two hundred years in Britain Trade unions ceasing to be representative of vested interests and representing wider public interests. 
Show that you are mature enough to stop being petty and selfish in the way that e have summed up here and then we can work together and beat big Business. 
Beat the corrupting Cons and defend the best values for as genuine Society for whose establishment many selfless people over centuries have given so  much of their talents, their imaginations and of their skills.
They have done so without ever asking for or expecting monetary or material gains for themselves.
They have a`been motivated a far more valuable and important return: the aim for the creation  of a much needed JUST AND FAIR SOCIETY in Britain.
Get this now and we can still stop the Cons! br> [To be continued]

Commentary on the latest salvo against the unintentionally impoverished by the Bullying-done

Commentary on the latest salvo against the unintentionally impoverished by the Bullying-done
1720 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday 17 March 2012

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical and Economics Commentary on the latest salvo against the unintentionally impoverished by the Bullyingdone Buy Boy George Osborne. {to be continued] The following has been taken from an online report published on www.bbc.co.uk
Union fury over public sector pay plans

Mr Osborne is set to outline his Budget plans Continue reading the main story UK Economy Unions have reacted angrily to plans to scrap national pay rates for some public sector workers in the UK.


Chancellor George Osborne is expected to say civil servants, such as Jobcentre and DVLA staff, should have pay brought into line with private sector salaries in their regions. The Public and Commercial Services union says it would cut regional wages. The Treasury says public sector pay in some parts of England and Wales is up to 18% higher than the private sector. Shadow chancellor Ed Balls said he feared the plans would end up in a "free-for-all" and would be difficult to keep public sector pay under control. Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union - which represents civil servants - told the BBC the plans would be "cruel, economically incompetent and counterproductive" at a time when public sector salaries and pensions were being cut. Continue reading the main story Analysis Susana Mendonca Political correspondent, BBC News The chancellor wants to rebalance the economy and that means getting private sector companies growing. Scrapping national pay deals for public sector workers might level the playing field... or so the theory goes. In places where public sector workers are paid more than those in the private sector, Treasury sources say private firms are "crowded out" because they cannot compete with the wage levels. George Osborne is expected to say in his Budget that factors such as the cost of living in an area, and how much local private sector companies pay their staff should be taken into account when setting the pay of civil servants like job centre workers. But that would mean setting pay levels locally which the trades unions warn would lead to huge disparities across the country and could drive down pay in the regions.
The move would mean local factors, such as the cost of living and private sector pay rates, would now be taken into account for public sector workers. Treasury research suggests the pay gap ranges from 18% in Wales to 0.5% in the south-east of England. The plans would initially affect 160,000 civil servants working in Jobcentres, the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), and border guards at ports and airports. But local pay rates affecting up to six million public sector workers could be rolled out from next year.
Treasury officials say it would ensure the UK has "a responsive, modern labour force". Business Secretary Vince Cable would not confirm or deny the plans but said the idea of having more flexibility in the public sector was "surely right".
Continue reading the main story Public sector 'pays once again' Shelley, 50, from the west Midlands, has three children and works at a Jobcentre in one of the more depressed areas of Britain. This is yet another part of the process of making the public sector pay once again for the crime of being those who spend the nation's wealth, albeit on essential services, rather than those who create it. This government, like previous Tory governments (for such it is, despite the notion of a coalition) consistently views public expenditure as unnecessary spending, not as the provision of public services. Moreover, they attempt to present the flow of more going to the fortunate and less going to the bereft as somehow fair and just.
This is, in my view, all part of an ideology dedicated to the ascendancy of the private over the public, of capital over civic. This Tory coalition won't be happy until we have a Britain they can buy and sell to the highest bidder. He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "What we're trying to do is make sure that throughout the public sector there's more genuine decision making at a local level and you have to take into account pay and conditions." He added: "But it has got to be done very carefully because in the civil service, for example, you have to have career progression and that kind of national consideration has to be woven into the story as well." A Treasury source told the BBC's Chris Mason the move was not about saving money but about ensuring the UK has "a responsive, modern labour force".
The source told our correspondent the move is seen as "pro-growth" because it would help make the private sector become more competitive. Wales's First Minister Carwyn Jones said the government should be trying to improve regional disparities in pay, not making them worse. "Surely we should be looking at a situation where we look to close the gap in income between different parts of the UK rather than make it worse, which is exactly what this will do." And Northern Ireland's Finance Minister Sammy Wilson said he would opposed any attempts by Westminster to set local pay variations in the public sector.
The director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Paul Johnson, said the government faced a difficult task because public sector pay was frozen until 2014, and only then due to rise by 1%. Continue reading the main story “
Start Quote All this will do is drive workers to the better paid regions” Brendan Barber TUC general secretary "If you want to introduce differential, it's much easier to do it at a time when pay's increasing more quickly so you can, for example, freeze pay in some regions and raise it more quickly in others," he said. "If it's only going up 1% on average and you're freezing in some regions, you actually can't do very much unless you're waiting a very long time." The NASUWT, the largest teachers' union, also criticised the suggestion. General secretary Chris Keates said: "As usual the chancellor holds up the private sector as the comparator. The inconvenient truth he chooses to ignore is that large organisations in the private sector have national pay and conditions frameworks." TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: "Moving to regional pay will not just reduce the pay of millions of public servants, but hit regional economies outside London and the South East when people have less to spend." Len McCluskey, Unite's general secretary, added: "All this will do is drive workers to the better paid regions, leaving large parts of the country without the professionals essential to sustain local services."
And Ravi Subramanian from Unison, Britain's biggest public sector union, said Mr Osborne effectively wanted nurses and care workers in the Midlands to take a pay cut to fund his 50p tax cut for millionaires in southern England. "It's the politics of division and it shows that the Tories really are the nasty party," he said. Mr Osborne initially set out the idea in the Autumn Statement. At the time, he announced a review of national pay rates ofr public servants and asked the independent pay review bodies to report back in

Will the "British Media" EVER restrain themselves over a glamourous royal female?

Will the "British Media" EVER restrain themselves over a glamourous royal female?
LOOK: they're at it again! Over-hyping pop-glamour plugs for Diana's daughter in-law! Will they ever earn to leave a royal glamour girl alone?


AADHIKAROnline 16 March 2012, diagnosing UK Media agenda, ITV Daybreak, Kate Garraway, Media honeymoon strong with Kate Middleton, Hockey, 2012 Games Duchess of Cambridge in East London 15 March 2012, [To be continued]

Another English mum worried sick for her young son facing Extradition Ordeal to the USA.

Another English mum worried sick for her young son facing Extradition Ordeal to the USA.
0715 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 14 March 2012
Contextually introducing the © Muhammad Haque Daily;y Ethical and Constitutional Law Commentary. To see the satisfied face of David "Dave" Cameron fro the perspective; of an English mother [another English mum going through the ordeal] worried sick for her “young son” facing extradition to the uSA [To be continued]

AADHIKAROnline citing a clip from the ITV UK, one of the terrestrial “mainstream” TV outlets [that rivalled the BBC before the Murdoch-led introduction of BSKY B and SKY NEWS] as part of the evidence of the Mainstream News on Wednesday 14 March 2012. This will be examined in the © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary [due to be posted online at 1200 GMT 14 March 2012] in the context of the crass role being played by UK Politicians in the CONDEM Collusion who are colluding in the abysmal discrediting of the idea of Universal due process of law and the further undermining of the very hard fought-for values of due constitutionality, sovereignty and universal humanity. Extradition of UK 'Citizens' to USA -1. [To be continued: at 1200 GMT 14 March 2012]


Ken Livingstone may lose at the May 2012 London Onion Parade on Morality Deficit -1

Ken Livingstone may lose at the May 2012 London Onion Parade on Morality Deficit -1
By ©Muhammad Haque. 0350 GMT London Tuesday 13 March 2012.
Editions of the Monday [12 March 2012] London EVENING STANDARD [a highly-hyped “free” newspaper that is artificially kept going by so many dubious ploys that will require a whole commentary of its own to be fully demonstrated] front page splash against Ken Livingstone fares cut “promise” was not so much a Morality bias but part of the strategy to make Ken Livingstone look morally deficient.

The Morality Crisis which Ken Livingstone had apparently dodged for decades now catches up with him over his alleged tax dodging ploys-1

By © Muhammad Haque
0140 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
13 March 2012

I publicly advised Boris Johnson in 2007 that he would have to SHOW that he had a HIGHER morality than Ken Livingstone.
Boris didn’t show it. His “partners” in the “mainstream Media” did. One of those has struck k again. It is Andrew Gilligan. He spent the period pre-May 2008 London Onion Parade in digging up as many stories as he could. Some of those were splashed on the London EVENING STANDARD. The most damaging one involved the LDA [“London Development Agency”].
And I remain convinced that Ken Livingstone lost the May 2008 London Onion Parade as a result of the scandal which the disclosures about his lack of moral and ethical dealership confirmed in the run up to the Parade.
But I had already foreseen such an outcome and had pointed out, starting in September 2007, that Livingstone COULD be beaten by Boris Johnson on Morality ground.
It looks certain that this time too, the London Onion Parade may end with either Ken Livingstone or Boris Johnson losing on Morality ground more significantly than on any other.
The beginnings of such an outcome oem are already being seen on the London Electoral Promotions wall!
[To be continued]

Clegg continues to cheat his way into daily headlines! Is he "related" to Sarkozy?

Clegg continues to cheat his way into daily headlines! Is he "related" to Sarkozy?
0525 [0455] Hrs GMT London Sunday 11 March 2012.
By © Muhammad Haque Ethical Commentary on the corruption that “democracy-loving European leaders practise to show their respect for true democratic values...” Nikolas Sarkozy [1] .
So what is the most dominant feature of “democracy in actin in Europe” this weekend?
The overdue confession by al the seekers of the peoples’ votes to failing, to letting the people down?
An even more overdue commitment to quit failing the electorate and to start delivering the democratic representation that has been promised but not delivered?
No way.
That is not dominating the “news” on “democracy in action across Europe” this weekend.
It is fraud.
Tune into any half objective “mainstream” media outlet and what you hear is one version of an excuse for fraud or another. Se fraudulence is blatant. As has been shown in the past hours from Moscow where “opposition to Vladimir Putin's election” is now being given a “post-fraudulent-election-day” appearance of boldness. That is easier to understand than the phenomenal perniciousness that is evident over in France.
And no candidate, not even Marine Le Pen of the French NF, has so far come across as being as creepy as Nikolas Sarkozy. He has embarked on yet another pro-racist stunt. Or on a series of pro-racist stunts.
And there isn’t anything more “certain to grab the attention of the genuine French voters than the spectre of “the Halal Meat “traders taking over, no, occupying France! That is what Sarko thinks will do the trick for him.
So he is worried about “Halal Meat” !. And about the rest of the contents that he keeps in his Palace for times of emergency.
This weekend he has unleashed the lot... Will it save Sarko’s “bacon” [this pun is trebly intended]?
Most commentators even in France doubt that Sarko has got the right target. He may yet sink come the full exercise of the complicated French electoral “franchise”..

[To be continued]

Daisy Sampson demonstrates the shame that the gang culture has brought

Daisy Sampson demonstrates the shame that the gang culture has brought
will the Spitalfields and Brick and Council ward by-election make any difference for the better? [To be continued]

UK DWP exposed as the Department for Want and Poverty-creation with a revivalist Empire bent

UK DWP exposed as the Department for Want and Poverty-creation with a revivalist Empire bent
UK DWP again exposed as the Department for Want and Poverty-creation with a revivalist Empire bent
0615 Hrs GMT London Saturday 10 March 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque

As the London INDEPENDENT newspaper web site has so far reported it:

More than half of young black men wanting work are unemployed and they are twice as likely to be jobless as their white counterparts, new statistics show.

Figures provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that in the last quarter of 2011 unemployment among black 16- to 24-year-olds stood at 55.9 per cent, almost double the 28.8 per cent in the same quarter of 2008. The figures, reported last night, contrast with proportion cited by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), which considers 22 per cent a more accurate figure because it includes students and other people who are not available for work.

The ONS also warned that its figures needed to be treated cautiously because they are produced from a relatively small sample.

Unemployment rates for young black men and women combined at the end of 2011 was 47.4 per cent, up from 28.8 per cent three years ago. By contrast, for whites in the same age group, it rose from 15 per cent in 2008 to 20.8 per cent in 2011.

A DWP spokesman said: "We have introduced a number of measures designed to give all young people the right skills and experience to match them to vacancies. We are also spending £1bn over the next three years to help young jobseekers."

[AADHIKAROnline updater diagnostics on the UK CONDEM Collusion’s worsening assault on universal human rights of dignified and sustainable, affordable, independent, non-dependent, self-reliant economic life in a Society of pro-civilised values will be continued]

Brick Lane to Southall: Where is the “EDUCATION” that the communities must provide?

Brick Lane to Southall: Where is the “EDUCATION” that the communities must provide?
1940 Hrs GMT
London
Friday
09 March 2012

Editor © Muhammad Haque

Southall: two women with Asian names, found guilty of abusing care home residents.
IN THE CONTEXT of post 1960s Britain: Southall is to the Indian Republic what Brick Lane is to Bangladesh.
It instantly reminds of India.
So today, we report via a local web site, ealingtoday,co,uk, the court case which has ended with the disclosures that two women with emphatic Indian [lin guistic] names working at a care home in Southall, were filmed abusing elderly and frail and helpless residents in that care home.
What does this tell the wider Society about any values that may be associated with the community to which the two convicted women workers “belong”?
Where is any evidence that compassion not cruelty is being actively advocated and emphasised in the community as a whole?
Later this evening [Friday 09 March 2012], AADHIKAROnline reports in full on another court case published today that has again referred to Tower Hamlets in the worst possible context. The conviction of a man, with the address said to be in Stepney [Tower Hamlets] , whose picture was shown on the BBC this evening. In that picture he has very long beard.
What does that picture show ti the viewer?
That in “East London” they do the sorts of things that have been alleged against the man fro Stepney with a very long beard!
So as a small counter to that image, a group of other men, older and with shorter beards, appeared in a number of frames where one of the was shown to be saying that “Islam is not terrorist”.
In AADHIKAROnline’s evidential knowledge, that is a very significant event.
The shorter-bearded men were shown by the BBC TV London News as saying that “Isam is not terrorist”.
That is of course true.
Yet that view is nt shown when images and events are shown in the Media that suggest that “Islam” "is linked to” people who are alleged to be terrorists.
This “Link” has now become established, exclusively, as far as the Media is concerned, with Isam rather than with any other known religion with the number if adherents that Isam has.
So is the small event, typified by the men with the shorter beards "protesting" on BBC TV news that “Isam is not terrorist” perhaps the start of something “new” that should have happened a very long tie ago?
Will the “Muslims” in Stepney and elsewhere in Britain and beyond speak out against “terrorist” activities?
Or will they ignore the “news” and let the perpetuation of the image and “perception” continue: that ”Islam” “is” ”terrorist”?
[To be continued]
______________________________________________
The following item dated today Friday 09 March 2012 contains some details about the two convicted women with the Asian names from Southall, is taken from the web site  ealingtoday.co.uk
The full web page address:
http://www.ealingtoday.co.uk/default.asp?section=info&page=condormers001.htm

A moment to reflect on the infinite limitations of the planet earth! But will the human beings "in

A moment to reflect on the infinite limitations of the planet earth! But will the human beings "in
A moment to reflect on the infinite limitations of the planet earth! But will the human beings "in power” remember this limitation?

Tower Hamlets Vote fraud scandal: Time to practise the lessons of the Poplar Councillors [1]

Tower Hamlets Vote fraud scandal: Time to practise the lessons of the Poplar Councillors [1]
1600 Hrs GMT.
London.
Tuesday.
06 March 2012.
By © Muhammad Haque. .
.Original contextual commentary and democracy-building constitutional law perspective about Tower Hamlets vote fraud and the disgrace that the controlling cliques on the Tower Hamlets Council have created in the borough over the past decades. It is daunting to have to admit that it is geographically the same Borough which contains the smaller Poplar area that had once been brilliantly democratically represented by true local fighters and activists like George Lansbury and his fellow Poplar councillors
It has been said in Tower Hamlets in the past weeks that “if a by-election is called” in the Tower Hamlets Council Ward in the Brick Lane London E1 area “because” of Shelina Akhtar’s “absence” [very strange this notion of accommodating legalised corruption already in the electoral system that is fast become a farce!] then the “Parties and groups” will stage their own frauds and put forward “candidates” after performing internal irregularities!
How so? Because they will not allow "ordinary members" the choice to choose a candidate! Imposed candidates will be produced for the charade that will be the by-election in the banana republic atmosphere that will be created for the purpose of procedural compliance etc.
There is nothing in the records of the clique that operates the Council at any given time [and that includes] going back more than 40 years to inspire confidence at all. And that is reaching the point shortly after the creation of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets in the middle of the 1960s.
I have observed Tower Hamlets events from before the Borough was created. And I am not impressed by anything the controlling clique has done for democracy… This is one reason why I have found it necessary to keep mentioning the fact that in the same area that we now a days know as Tower Hamlets, there once was a small group of elected councillors who did set an example of really locally delivered democratic representation. They had their most famous colleague who went on to be an MP. I only refer to this two letter word “MP” not for any democratic quality that attaches to it now but because of its link to Lansbury getting to be the most remembered one of the groups. There were others in that group who were as dedicated and as committed as Lansbury.
But because of the institutionalised, pro-bourgeoisie brainwashing that is involved in the recording and in the reciting of "history" in Britain, anyone who is "MP" no matter for how long, is given automatic status as a “superior person” by that fact alone!! Which is utter rubbish and the time has been due for ages, for centuries in fact, to scrap that two letter word from the automatic place at the top of the records and at the head of all "ceremonies”.
Having said that, and c contextually, because he was an MP, all the later references to the Poplar Councillors battle have been made by giving them the collective identity as if they were George Lansbury’s subordinates. They were not
They warrant as much recognition as George Lansbury has been given.
I am engaged in updating on the Poplar Councillors and will post the approximate pieces here in due course
It will be a hundred years soon since the Poplar Councillors were active in their borough and since they historically marched all the way from polar to the to the High Court in central London and braved and endured imprisonment for their principles against the then CON attacks [1920s East End and the London Reactionary atmosphere of that time as far as “probity” of “public spending” ands related issues of democratic representation was concerned] on local democracy at its best.
Nearly a hundred years later in the second decade of the 21st century and we have not seen anyone or anything in the behaviour of any other councillors “elected” to Tower Hamlets Council SINCE the 1920s doing anything democratically remotely comparable to those Poplar Councillors
Now THAT is a backward record for the thousands who have been known as “councillors” since the time of the Poplar Councillor rebels!
[To be continued]

Doreen and Neville Lawrence at the beginning, in 1993?

Doreen and Neville Lawrence  at the beginning, in 1993?
1045 GMT London Tuesday 06 March 2012. By © Muhammad Haque.
Question is: why hadn't they believed Doreen and Neville Lawrence at the beginning, in 1993? when they voiced their suspicions of wrongdoing by those in charge of investigating Stephen's murder???


The Rebekah Brooks horse may have unleashed OTHER links that expose worrying flaws in Society’s key institutions
[To be continued]

DAISY SAMPSON [McAndrew] sums up Britain’s “gang culture” politics as seen in the row over Raisa!

DAISY SAMPSON [McAndrew]   sums up Britain’s “gang culture” politics as seen in the row over Raisa!
DAISY SAMPSON [McAndrew] sums up Britain’s “gang culture” politics as seen in the row over Raisa!
Raisa, the horse!
0930 [ 0330] [0310] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 06 March 2012. The © Muhammad Haque Ethical Commentary.
A horse to cover for CAMERON, now a certified member of the gang carrying out the assault on Society.
By demolishing the truth. As even the CONDEM-backing DAILY MAIL Group has found, Number 10 Downing Street PROPAGANDA Machine had been lying about that horse link.
Or rather about Cameron’s riding Raisa!.
In this clip, one of the Westminster journalists, ITN’s Daisy Sampson tells Kate Garraway [DAYBREAK, ITV, London ] about the gossip in the Parliamentary Lobby. And the top of the topics of course has been that horse!
The one that David Cameron never rode. The horse that No 10 Downing Street PR people had never heard of. The horse that was “lent” or “loaned” by the London Metropolitan Police to Rupert Murdoch's SUN’s ex-editor Rebekah Wade [Brooks]!
The horse that has maintained her presence as the single most interesting topic engaging parliamentary journalists and assorted “Westminster Villagers” for more than a week now.
So let’s hear Daisy Sampson [McAndrew] summarise what the lobby [that is, “journalists” covering the British Parliament and Whitehall] are saying and what the implications of the denials by Cameron about riding the horse entail.
Daisy Sampson discusses “Raisa”, the horse, at the start of this clip of the DAYBREAK programme at 0635 Hrs [GMT] on 02 March 2012. AADHIKAROnline recorded the clip externally from the live broadcast. [To be continued]

ANOTHER fraudster is allowed to rob the public of £millions and the "judge" is "understanding.."

ANOTHER fraudster is allowed to rob the public of £millions and the "judge"  is "understanding.."
0500 Hrs GMT London
Monday 05 March 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque

The London Evening Standard reports on another fraudster robbing the public in the UK. This one is Virendra Rastogi who has cost more than £5Million in reported legal aid fees paid for his defence! While at the same time he owns Mayfair property worth £6Million! ]
Where is any sense in that?
Yet the Rastogi fraud is not being treated by the main tabloids have not made anything of it. [The MIRROR, the SUN, The Daily STAR, Daily Express and Daily Mail of London]
The tabloid "newspapers"’ decision to treat this fraudster with kid gloves is very strange...
What would those same tabloids say if Virendra Rastogi had been accused of being poor and on “benefits”?
Divide £5 million by 1000 representing the number of benefit claimants in a London Borough and you can begin to see how huge the Virendra Rastogi legal aid bill is.
Yet no newspaper has called Virednrda’s humanity into question. No one ahs given any information about his family or about the number of children he has if he is married and so on.
I am NOT arguing that those details ought to have been palsied. What I AM arguing for is that the treatment of this fraudster by the British tabloid "newspapers" so far shows that they have shown [whether willingly or under any secret injunctions] remarkable restraint in the face of overwhelming evidence of massive amount of fraud by a known crook at the expense of the UK public, something they would not show if he were caught claiming benefit!
The question is: what was his “defence” based on? It looks that even the “Judge” was “understanding” of the fraudster’s entitlements to £millions of public money for his “legal defence” “team”!
[To be continued]
From the London EVENING STANDAERD web site accessed at 0450 Hrs GMT London Monday 05 March 2012.
artin Bentham 02 March 2012
A fraudster with a Mayfair home who became one of Britain's richest men has received m
more than £5 million in legal aid, the Evening Standard reveals today.
Virendra Rastogi still owns a £6 million seven-bedroom flat in Portman Square and was chauffeur-driven everywhere before being jailed for an international trading scam that earned him more than £1 billion.
He also owns properties in India and a judge has ruled he has millions of pounds hidden in secret bank accounts and other assets. But he was granted taxpayers' money for his defence at a six-month trial because he had been sued by the banks he had cheated and was ruled bankrupt, despite still living in his London home.
In total he was given £5.17 million in legal aid. Just over £3 million was paid to his solicitors and £1.9 million to his barristers. They included Tory MP Geoffrey Cox QC. The rest was spent on other legal costs. The size of the handout prompted calls for reform from senior lawyers.
The Criminal Bar Association wants suspects' assets to be used to pay for their defence and its chairman Max Hill said scarce public money was being squandered.
"Too many wealthy people are receiving legal aid," he said. "If this man hadn't been declared bankrupt, he would still have received legal aid as his assets would have been under restraint and he would have been deemed to have no money - even though there were vast sums available. The Government cannot go on denying the truth that providing legal aid in these sort of cases is unnecessary and wrong."
At Westminster magistrates' court last month, Rastogi, 44, was jailed for seven years on top of his original nine-and-a-half year sentence, after he failed to pay a £20 million confiscation order.
He was put on The Sunday Times Rich List as one of Britain's wealthiest Asian businessmen after earning £4.1 million in five years from an "empire" of fictitious metal trading firms.
But in 2008 he was convicted of conspiracy to defraud at Southwark crown court, after the Serious Fraud Office found his network, RBG Resources, was a sham. The address of one supposed firm was a cowshed in India, and another was a US launderette.

He was jailed for nine-and-a-half years and given a £20 million confiscation order, which would be used to pay victims.
But he got a further seven years after Judge Michael Snow heard he had not handed over a penny. The judge said Rastogi had shown a "wilful" refusal to pay.
The Legal Services Commission said the case was "extraordinarily complex" and the legal aid bill would have been even higher if it had not been subject to special management.

Murdoch Media still plugging Cameron, proves Big Biz IS riding horse called CONDEM!

Murdoch Media still plugging Cameron, proves Big Biz IS riding horse called CONDEM!
0640 [0635] [0535] [0530] Hrs GMT London Sunday 04 March 2012.

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary in the context of the utter unconstitutionality, illegality, wrongfulness and moral deficit that is brazenly exhibited in the behaviour of Dave Cameron as he fronts the Big Biz agenda attacks on Society [or what is just about still surviving of Society after a little under two years of CONDEM assaults].

WHERE exactly does Bullyingdone “Dave” think he will end up taking the UK to if he is allowed by the still ineffective Opposition in Parliament failing to halt the attacks on “Society”?
The Society-free wasteland that Cameron is heading for will be one definitive confirmation of the CORRUPT Capitalism that he has suggested he does not support.
He not only supports it, he has gloried in its agenda as has been rampant in his scripted utterance on Saturday in London aimed at the “hidden and the unaudited and the unaccountable but actively in control forces” who are doing the choreography of the propaganda presentations of the CONDEM Collusion. His spiel in London on Saturday was promoted by those same forces in parallel with their “patronising” of Vince Cable as a “nearly-converted” believer in their Right-wing agenda. So much so that they dedicated a fulsome praise to Vince Cable via Sky News last night where one of the currently engaged PR men for the Murdoch Empire Agenda, called [surname] Wooding now installed “satisfactorily” at the SUNday SUN, did a performance of a fulsome plug for Vince Cable. A very rae event indeed and the more important and significant because of that. Back to the Guardian’s and the Observer’s treatment of “Dave” Cameron’s alleged ideology supply dilemma: CONTRARY to the bogus “shock and acute observation” carried on the Guardian-Observer web site in the past 10 hours or so about Cameron’s “policy loss” linked with his Right-wing adviser's “departure” to the USA, there is no shortage of Right wing ideas, strategic and short term, that are flowing in the direction of “Dave” Cameron so long as his “tenure” at No. 10 is considered as sufficiently sustainable and “sustained” for whatever length of time is crucial for the completion of the operations of the unseen but Big Biz looters of Society

[To be continued]

Gove, Neil, Nelson all propagandists for Murdoch, Big Business and backing the ending Society as we

Gove, Neil, Nelson all propagandists for Murdoch, Big Business and backing the ending Society as we
Gove, Neil, Nelson all propagandists for Murdoch, Big Business and backing the ending Society as we know it.


.0025 GMT
London
Saturday 03 March 2012.
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary on the morality-free state of CONDEM Britain. Michael Gove as propagated by Andrew Neil’s Fraser Nelson, all of the sign significantly and rampantly ideologically and beneficially linked to Murdoch.

Is “Dave” Cameron’s “Education Minister” Michael Gove the war-on-Iraq propagandist and backer of GW Bush and Blair still succeeding in concealing the vile role he played in justifying the assault on Iraq that led to the deaths of so many thousands of chidden, women and elderly in innocent people in Iraq ?
This question arises from the latest propaganda done by Andrew Neil’s co-peddler of poisonous Tory untruths, Fraser Nelson for Gove’s illegitimate behaviour in office.
Gove’s illegitimate behaviour as the current cabinet minister ‘in the name of Education’ is only slightly hinted at in this “row” featured on the front page of the “i” micro-newspaper this is my coinage, ”micro newspaper”] today. Fraser Nelson sought to undermine the item and said that this was proof that the alleged LEFT IN BRITISH politics were targeting gove. Nelson argued that Gove was the only one who was “succeeding” as compared to ANDREW Lansley who was a ‘disaster’.
Fraser Nelson is one of those callous reactionary right-wing idiots who mysteriously get media slots. But he is as crafty as Gove. BOTH have done serious PR job for the untruthful agenda that Rupert Murdoch has been peddling via his NoW and the SUN.
Fraser Nelson was so arrogant of his still unexplained “links” with the Secret Elements running the British State that he claimed his rewards from Murdoch's News of the World under the boast “Nelson’s Column”. And WHAT was it that Gove was ”succeeding” in? Making public provisions private, of course. Fraser Nelson was referring to Theresa May’s “getting on with doing it”
[privatising the Police forces!]
[To be continued]

Another brutality highlights the Age of Darkness that dominates our times...

Another brutality highlights the Age of Darkness that dominates our times...
“Experts warned that misguided belief in witchcraft now posed a greater threat to children in Britain than those in Africa.”
Nic k Britten, writing on the Daily Telegraph web site,
London
Friday
02 March 2012

From Brick Lane London E1 to Edinburgh, Scotland: NO to corruption in every part of Labour Party

From Brick Lane London E1 to Edinburgh, Scotland: NO to corruption in every part of Labour Party
1200 [1012] [0840] [0815] Hrs. GMT. London
Friday
02 March 2012.
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical and Democracy Commentary in the Context of the morass that is the generally low quality, low calibre contents of the average Labour Party candidate:

Topic: Douglas Alexander’s latest, reluctant] confession.

Muhammad Haque Commentary Part 1 .
Another Original Publication on the internet by AADHIKAR Media Foundation. .

This morning’s confession by Douglas Alexander to Labour Party candidates being of poor quality and standard as reported by the Daily Telegraph is unlikely to be the last such stunt. Why is it a stunt?
Because if there is any blame to be attached to anyone in the “Labour Party Leadership” for the morass that Alexander is still not fully admitting to but which I have been pointing out for years then it is the likes of time-serving placemen like Alexander who are substantially to blame for the appalling poverty of quality candidates floating all over the UK. .
Not just in Scotland. Not just in relation to the SNP. I have been arguing for ages that the Labour Party is in fact controlled by an antidemocratic cabal that has no mandate from ordinary Labour party membership and the cabal is a deeply corrupted “inner” party operating inside the ordinary perceived, general membership-based Labour Party. .
That cabal has not been brought under accountability by Ed Miliband. It was not held to account to the Laboured Party membership by Gordon Brown and most certainly not by Tony Blair. and I am unimpressed by the fact that it has taken Douglas Alexander so many years before he could say what limited things by way of admitting to the most stunning lack of quality among Party-named candidates he has done so far. He has not said anything that is remotely original let alone courageous. .
Why Alexander has staged the stunt is not unconnected with the fact that for a whole number of reasons, Alex Salmond’s SNP is making far greater strides in Scotland than the in-house, life-time placemen like Alexander had the sense to foresee. The Labour Party faces increasingly tough challenges in Scotland which is why Alexander is speaking in these terms. .
Not because Alexander has had a sudden realisation that he should have no part in perpetuating ill-prepared, ill-briefed, ill-educated morality-free, ethics-free and ill-disposed collection of petty time-servers posing as Labour party politicians anywhere in the UK had Alexander had such a realisation then I would welcome it. .
As it is, I condemn Alexander as much as I condemn all the others who have allowed low standard or no standard to perpetuate across the UK in the name of the Labour Party. The poverty of candidates lets down the Party, without a doubt. .
What is worse, it betrays and lets down the electorate as whole. This is not good enough. And Ed Miliband had better face up this too. Without hesitation, deviation or distortion. .
[To be continued]

AADHIKAROnline brings the latest news, events, backgrounds and likely future trends

AADHIKAROnline brings the latest news, events, backgrounds and likely future trends
CLICK on this image to view the latest video clip being carried by AADHIKAROnline e on the eviction this morning [Tuesday 28 February 2012] of the protesters against Big Business from the St Paul's Cathedral.
Then read on
0355 [0255] Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
28 February 2012.
By © © Muhammad Haque.
This clip was recorded by AADHIKAROnline externally off Sky News.
The contents of the two commenters about the roe that Rupert Murdoch's SUN and the News of the World has played [and in the case f the SUN is still playing], were unusually significant.
For Sky News often has guests who are paraders of the status quo. On this occasion, however, the two commenters actually said more substantial things than has been seen on this occasion before. So why do I think did the two commenters acme across as they di so forthright in their condemnation of Rupert Murdoch and his “Media empire”?
The first reason is of course that neither commenters could be described as in any ay being on the “left”. So their comments were linked with and were derived from wit the fact that during the day the LEVESON inquiry into phone-hacking. That title must now be called something like or something that includes the statement] the LEVESON INQUIRY into MEDIA CORRUPTION OF Society in Britain. was given some very serious information by the Police Officer who appeared before Leveson during the day [Monday 27 February 2012].
Sue Ackers.
So the commenters were in effect reinforcing what Ms Ackers had said. So when the source of the particular dsc disclosures is a senior Police Officer then the commenters had hardy any reason to be afraid of being harassed by the Establishment.
On this occasion, the commenters were in a rare moment of irony reflecting the Establishment.
[To be continued]

Murdoch's Wapping based conglomerate "sorry because they got caught. Not because they were foul.."

Murdoch's Wapping based conglomerate "sorry because they got caught. Not because they were foul.."
2358 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
27 February 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
AADHIKARonline continuing the exclusive diagnostic commentary on the latest revelations about the Murdoch's SUN being the key machine in Rupert Murdoch's morality-free Media Empire to corrupt public life in Britain.
Rupert Murdoch's "Sun on Sunday" launch WAS a pre-emptive bid to undermine the impact of new allegations.
[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! Told Ken Livingstone so in June 2007. Has Livingstone learnt? UPDATE soon

KHOODEELAAR! Told Ken Livingstone so in June 2007. Has Livingstone learnt? UPDATE soon
KHOODEELAAR! Told Ken Livingstone so in June 2007. Has Livingstone learnt? UPDATE soon

INSTANT REBUTTAL OF THE BIG BIZ LIES by the DAILY MAIL against poverty-stricken people

INSTANT REBUTTAL OF THE BIG BIZ LIES by the DAILY MAIL  against poverty-stricken people
0215 Hrs GMT London Monday 27 February 2012 Editor © Muhammad Haque.
INSTANT REBUTTAL OF THE BIG BIZ LIES by the DAILY MAIL against poverty-stricken people
This picture of A4E “boss” Emma Harrison, taken by CAMERA PRESS photographer Tom Stockill, shows the satisfaction that she experienced as she was pocketing literally £Millions of public money while the jobless, the no income peoples he was supposed to hep find credible, sustainable and worthwhile jobs were being driven harshly into neglect and suffering. The DAILY MAIL has today been publishing re revelations of Ministerial collusion with Emma Harrison., What the Daily Mail is NOT doing is to tell tell truth of hundreds f thousands of people across the UK being PUSHED into hardship, starvation that they do nt deserve. The perpetrating bureaucracy foisting the starvation and the humiliation and the helplessness on innocent people is the DWP. In their campaign against so-called benefit cheats, the DAILY MAIL has in fact created the morality-free envy of the poor culture in the Uk where the looting has been made possible. That looters like Emma Harrison are being still treated with “respect” shows the sleaze that the poverty-creating DWP is. Our investigation continues into the roes of David Fraud, Chris Grayling and Iain Duncan Smith.



0200 Hrs GMT London Monday
27 February 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque

Time now for the DAILY MAIL to come clean on ITS role as propagandist in the CONDEM Big Biz agenda dirty campaign against people in low or no income being pushed into starvation by the DWP aided and abetted by IDS, Grayling and David Fraud.

Ed Miliband too has a heavy duty to discharge: why has HE been awing the multiple violations of the laws, breaches of the UK’s Constitutional duties by the CONDEM cruelty perpetrated against innocent people across the country by a cabal of ministers and propagandists paid for via the DWP to the tunes of millions?

The House of Commons “Work Pensions” Select Committee itself should be scrapped. It has performed the role of any of the stooged group in a really totalitarian regime.

Compared to that stooged committee, Margaret Hedge’s Public Accounts Committee has shown remarkable teeth especially as the A4E disclosures so far have proven We have serious reservations abut Margaret Hog on her long record as part of the stoogers and this ideological affiliation that she has had al her career has influenced her chairing of the PAC committee too. But as compared to the Anne Begg-"chaired" stooged outfit supposedly there to scrutinise the DWP, the Hodge-chaired period has so far produced valuable pro accountability work. Credit is given where credit is due. But a long distance has yet to be covered by Hodge and the PAC too.

A Select Committee has got to be created to audit the likes of Liam Byrne. Drag them out of their shadowy op[opportunistic roes in the ironically designated zone of Shadow cabinet. He has been a disaster as far a holding IDS, Chris Grayling and David Fraud to account goes. Why won’t Ed Miliband shift Liam Byrne off that patch and put someone with knowledge and more importantly commitment against poverty-creation in pace to audit the lying cabal at the DWP? .

[To be continued]

AADHIKAROnline Exclusive: It was Murdoch whose heart must have stopped...

AADHIKAROnline Exclusive: It was Murdoch whose heart must have stopped...
0140 Hrs GMT London Sunday 26 February 2012.
AADHIKAROnline Exclusive: It was Murdoch whose heart must have stopped...
NEXT here we start examine the record of the untruths and lies that Murdoch Media has perpetrated over the past 40 years in Britain ands has spread the poison beyond the shores fo Britain.

We shall also expose as shallow the Guardian’s report below in so far as it “accepts” Murdoch's “Pledge to be ethical”



[To be continued]

from the guardian.co.uk web site

Rupert Murdoch: 'Sun on Sunday will be fearless, fun … and ethical'


New title hits the news stands promising to hold its journalists to the highest standards as inquiries into phone-hacking continue
• Cass Jones

The Observer,
Sunday 26 February 2012
• s
Rupert Murdoch's Sun on Sunday launched with a manifesto that attempts to set out a fresh agenda for the tabloid replacing the News of the World, which was closed by the media mogul last July.
The newspaper pledged to be "fearless, outspoken, mischievous and fun", while setting out its commitment to high ethical standards in the wake of the scandals that have rocked News International and led to the arrests of 10 of its own journalists for alleged corrupt payments to public officials. The front page has an exclusive interview with the Britain's Got Talent judge Amanda Holden, the first since the birth of her daughter in January, which left her in a critical condition in hospital. The story is headlined: "My heart stopped for 40 seconds", and is accompanied by a picture of Holden cradling her daughter, Hollie. She told the newspaper she was "moments from death" and describes her ordeal in an interview spread over five pages.
An editorial on page 12, titled "A new Sun rises today", admits News International is going through a "challenging period" and states that it will hold its journalists to account and abide by the ethical code set out by the industry watchdog, the Press Complaints Commission. It reads: "As we launch the seven-day Sun, we want to strengthen that connection [with the readers] with a new independent Sun Readers' Champion to accept feedback and correct significant errors.
"Our journalists must abide by the Press Complaints Commission's editors code, the industry standard for ethical behaviour, and the News Corporation standards of business conduct. We will hold our journalists to the standards we expect of them. After all a newspaper which holds the powerful to account must do the same with itself. You will be able to trust our journalists to abide by the values of decency as they gather news." The paper said it would remain "fearless, outspoken, mischievous and fun" and said the Sun has been a "tremendous force for good", adding: "It is worth reminding our readers, and detractors, of that as we publish our historic first Sunday edition during what is a challenging period. News International closed our sister paper the News of the World over the phone-hacking scandal.
"Since then some of our own journalists have been arrested, though not charged, over allegations of payments to public officials for stories. We believe those individuals are innocent until proven guilty. It has been a sobering experience for our entire industry."
Murdoch personally supervised the final stages of production on the new title and watched as more than three million copies came off the printing presses.
The media tycoon wants the title, edited by Dominic Mohan, to adopt a less strident, more female-friendly tone, as he hopes to regain market leadership on Sunday with a sale of at least two million – and preferably at or around three million. The Sun's six-day sale average is 2.75 million. He has also been closely involved in a seven-figure marketing campaign, pledging the Sunday newspaper will hold its reduced 50p price to at least the end of the year. The Daily Star Sunday reacted by slashing its price from £1 to 50p, while the cost of the Sunday Mirror remains £1. As the new title arrived, there were allegations that former Sun editor Rebekah Brooks received details of the original failed phone-hacking investigation into the News of the World from a senior Metropolitan police officer. There is no suggestion that the officer was paid or that Brooks is implicated in the investigation which is being conducted by the IPCC police watchdog. A spokesman for Brooks declined to comment.
Murdoch has spent freely on marketing the Sunday edition of a title he took over in 1969 and described this month as "part of me".

Slave-labour-imposer Chris Grayling witlessly exposes Big Biz TESCO to losses..

Slave-labour-imposer Chris Grayling witlessly exposes Big Biz TESCO to losses..
0015 Hrs GMT London Sunday 26 February 2012.
Editor © Muhamad Haque.
From HANSARD [the House of Commons]
09 February 2012.
Barry Sheerman MP:
"..may we have a debate on the role of Tesco, which is ravaging our town and city centres throughout the country?
It is a dangerous monopoly and it is about time that it was curbed."
[To be continued]

Social Cleansing by CONDEM: review of Boris Johnson's Kosovo-style social cleansing in London

Social Cleansing by CONDEM: review of Boris Johnson's Kosovo-style social cleansing in London
FLASHBACK to 28 October 2010 and Boris Johnson's comments about "Housing benefits cuts" and "social cleansing” of "London". Followed by Lib Dumbs So was Boris accurate on the facts? Was he speaking of a policy that he knew was being implemented as he spoke in October 2010? Or were his critics, including Cons and mainly Lib Dumb “ministers” about right? Was Clegg right? Was Cable right? Or was Douglas Alexander who at the time shadowing the Department for Work and Pensions [DWP] right? Was Chris Bryant right in echoing Boris Johnson or stating stuff that was the very similar to those Boris Johnson was stating on the issue at the time? Two years and four months is a significant passage of time to review the “row” and the facts. Especially so when Chris Grayling, the man who is doomed to end his career in front line politics by abysmally failing is exposed as a shallow user of an “email” account! Has he just landed from a very obscure place and discovered that a thing called “hacking of emails” is technically possible? Someone as grossly abusive of other peoples’ basic human rights and who is one of the most notorious attackers of the very concept of human rights, Chris Grayling has come across as additionally unfit for public office with his offensively jingoistic attacks on the unintentionally impoverished. That “activists” have hacked into his email account makes Grayling a truly pathetic occupant in post. His email account may have been hacked into. But what could the alleged hackers find that would deprive Grayling of anything the truly belongs to him? Contrast the alleged hacking to the open looting and robbery that Grayling has been backing against the “poor”. What about THEIR losses? But Chris Grayling is one of those cruel practitioners of the art of publicly paid for posts and powers that does his “job” by adding extra cruelty to the assault project that he has been fronting. Given that the Department for Want and Poverty-creation [DWP] already specialises as the “civilian army” carrying out some of this century’s foulest violations of universal human rights, Chris Grayling is at once engaged in an additional lying propaganda and is also breaking |English laws, the DOMESTIC English laws concerning basic subsistence rights of people who have been being pushed into low income or no income against their will and through no fault of their own. If Boris Johnson had, in October 2010, anything like a fraction of the knowledge of what Chris Grayling’s DWP portfolio has been doing then Johnson was not only right to say what he said in October 2010 but that he fully deserved to be supported by all rational, right thinking, fair-minded people on that matter. [To be continued] ______________________ 28 October 2010 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11640219 Boris Johnson criticised for 'Kosovo' benefits remark Boris Johnson tells BBC London he would not accept "Kosovo-style social cleansing" Continue reading the main story Related Stories Analysis: Who loses out? Cameron 'sticking to benefit cut' Clegg fury over 'cleansing' claim Ministers have criticised Boris Johnson for saying he would not allow "Kosovo-style social cleansing" in London, amid a row over housing benefit reforms. Many London MPs are concerned the £400-a-week cap will force people out of the city and the Conservative mayor said that would not happen "on my watch". Vince Cable accused the mayor of using "inflammatory language" while No 10 distanced itself from the comments. Mr Johnson later said his remarks had been taken out of context. The row came as MPs debated planned changes to housing benefit, announced in last week's Spending Review, which it is estimated will affect about 17,000 people in London if introduced in full. Several London-based MPs have attacked the proposed new caps, due to come into effect in April and their likely impact on the poorest people living in the capital. 'Families evicted' Mr Johnson, who faces re-election in 2012, told BBC London on Thursday morning that "the last thing we want to have in our city is a situation such as Paris where the less well-off are pushed out to the suburbs". "I'll emphatically resist any attempt to recreate a London where the rich and poor cannot live together," he said. Continue reading the main story HOUSING BENEFIT CAP £250 for a one-bedroom property £290 for a two-bedroom property £340 for a three-bedroom property £400 for a four-bedroom property Have your say Commentators debate cap How does housing benefit work? Watch the debate live at BBC Democracy Live from 1.15pm "We will not see and we will not accept any kind of Kosovo-style social cleansing of London. "On my watch, you are not going to see thousands of families evicted from the place where they have been living and have put down roots." A number of coalition MPs, many representing London constituencies, have concerns about the cap and have called for a rethink on this and other plans such as the 10% proposed cut in housing benefit for people on jobseeker's allowance for more than a year from 2013 onwards. Earlier this week Labour's Chris Bryant talked about people "being socially engineered and sociologically cleansed out of London" - a remark criticised by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg as deeply offensive to people who had witnessed ethnic cleansing in other parts of the world. 'Scaremongering' On Thursday Mr Clegg said he "very strongly disagreed" with the way that the London mayor had expressed himself while other Lib Dem ministers went further. Business Secretary Vince Cable accused him of "inflammatory language on a difficult and sensitive issue" while employment minister Ed Davey called on both Mr Johnson and Mr Bryant to withdraw their comments. "I think Chris (Bryant) and Boris Johnson should apologise," he told BBC One's Question Time. "The language they are using is appalling. It's scaremongering and their analysis is completely wrong. We should have a grown up and adult debate." Asked about the prime minister's reaction, No 10 said he "does not agree with what Boris Johnson has said or indeed the way he said it". Vince Cable: 'We have to reform housing benefit' BBC political editor Nick Robinson said it was inevitable that once Mr Johnson decided to run again for mayor in 2012 he would have to confront Mr Cameron head on at some stage. Mr Johnson's office later issued a statement saying he had been "quoted out of context" and was confident that negotiations would result in the reforms being introduced with "minimal problems" for London. "My consistent position has been that the government is absolutely right to reform the housing benefit system which has become completely unsustainable," it said. "I do not agree with the wild accusations from defenders of the current system that reform will lead to social cleansing. It will not, and if you listened carefully to what I said, no such exodus will take place on my watch. "But the point I was making this morning is that London has specific needs due to the exceptional way in which the housing market works in the capital and it is my job as mayor to make the government aware of these." 'Ill-thought out' Ministers have mounted robust defence of the proposals, arguing that the housing benefit bill had got out of control under Labour and people would still be able to claim a maximum of £21,000 a year. Continue reading the main story “Start Quote This is much more than a dispute between David Cameron and Boris Johnson” Douglas Alexander Shadow Work Secretary Nick Robinson: Boris v Dave "That is more than the equivalent of what most working families have to spend on their housing costs," Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander told MPs during a debate on the Spending Review as a whole. According to government figures, 21,000 people will be affected by new caps on the amount families can claim for five, four, three, two and one-bed room properties across the UK including 17,000 in London, the majority of whom are out of work. Housing minister Grant Shapps acknowledged "some people" may have to move as a result but insisted there would be plenty of other properties in their area that would still be affordable under the new conditions. But Labour has warned that the changes will be "devastating" for hard-working families on low incomes both in and outside London. "This is much more than a dispute between David Cameron and Boris Johnson," said Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Douglas Alexander. "This is an ill-thought out policy which is going to have significant, indeed, damaging effect on the lives of many thousands of families across the country." And housing charity Crisis said it was a myth to suggest a cap was needed to tackle spiralling payments and that most recipients were unemployed. "Overall the bill is not 'out of control'", said its chief executive Leslie Morphy. "Costs have risen because rents have risen, in the main driven by the huge rise in house prices over the last decade and a lack of social housing." Housing benefit has artificially inflated rents, and hence the "buy-to-let" sector. If benefits are cut, cuts to rents will follow as sure as night follows day, and ultimately nobody will loose out except possibly in the short term. Peter Wood, Peterborough I'm sad the Mayor of London using that language about "Kosovo Style", I'm from Kosovo. Mr Valdrin Hoxha, London As a medium size landlord who has about 15 tenants, more or less in two bed flats and ALL paying ALL of their own rentals of average £700 per month, plus Council Tax and Services I have to object to any MP, robbing these people of their Tax to pay for out of work persons who live in expensive areas. I do see that families have a need to keep their children in school, but many parts of the country have perfectly acceptable schools and are far less costly for the taxpayer. Let's put the working population first for a change. Give the housing benefit population the option to move to another area and some choice for their family needs, this still shows a caring society - just one that has a limit to how much it can afford. Mike Meadowcroft, Oxford I have just had someone resign because she is better off not working. Her partner stays at home to look after the baby, and she was working 20+ hours a week, but the council deduct 100% of what she earns from the housing benefit, so she is actually about £100 a month better off not working. Mike, Enfield, Middlesex A few years ago I ended up living in a studio flat with my girlfriend and our baby. The other flats in our block were all brand new one-bedroom flats. I was the only resident working and I was paying £780 for a studio. The other residents were single males on benefits with their rents of £1,300. I remember speaking with the estate agents and they told me the landlords had two types of rent - for those working and those on benefits. Nathaniel Bernard, London I completely agree with the government's plans. I was born and brought up in Islington. I had to move away some years ago as I could no longer afford to live there. Why should I subsidise other peoples housing in an area I can no longer afford myself? Giles Middleton, London More on This Story Related Stories Analysis: Who loses out? 27 OCTOBER 2010, POLITICS Cameron 'sticking to benefit cut' 27 OCTOBER 2010, POLITICS Clegg fury over 'cleansing' claim 26 OCTOBER 2010, POLITICS Housing benefit rebellion threat 25 OCTOBER 2010, POLITICS Clegg defends housing benefit cut 24 OCTOBER 2010, POLITICS Benefit cuts: Your stories 03 OCTOBER 2010, UK

Blair-Cameron's CORRUPT "tsar" "quits" retaining £Mns of public’s money & still dubious “contracts.

Blair-Cameron's CORRUPT "tsar" "quits" retaining £Mns of public’s money & still dubious “contracts.
Blair-Cameron's CORRUPT "tsar" "quits" retaining £Mns of public’s money & still dubious “contracts...”
2215 [2135] Hrs GMT London Friday 24 February 2012.
Editor ©Muhammad Haque
RBS, Lloyds lose £Billions while denying public the services but Emma Harrison hits jackpot even as she “quits”
[To be continued] http://www.scotsman.com/business/banking/lloyds_losses_top_3_5bn_and_bank_warns_of_more_to_come_1_2136611

Lloyds losses top £3.5bn – and bank warns of more to come.. Antonio Horta-Osorio warned of a tough year aheadmore to come By MARTIN FLANAGAN


Published on Friday 24 February 2012 20:53
LLOYDS chief executive Antonio Horta-Osorio, back in the hot-seat after a bout of ill-health, warned of a tough year ahead as he announced a £3.5 billion loss.
Britain’s biggest mortgage lender, forecast revenues would fall further this year, after dropping 10 per cent in 2011 to £21.2bn. The bearish outlook caused Lloyds shares to close down 2.3 per cent at 35.73p, making the stock the worst performer on the benchmark FTSE 100 index.
The taxpayer bought a 41 per cent stake in Lloyds at an average price of around 63p, which means he is currently sitting on a £9bn loss after pumping in £20bn to save the business during the 2008 crisis.
A three-year freeze on pay-outs to investors by the European Commission expired last month, but the bank is no shape to resume dividends, it said. “We need to have absolute clarity about our capital requirements [under new regulatory rules].
We are in discussions with the Treasury,” Horta?Osorio said. He added that Lloyds was one year into a “three- to five-year journey” to get back the money pumped in by the taxpayer after the bank rescued rival HBOS. Lloyds’s loss, against £281m profit in 2010, was mainly triggered by a £3.2bn provision taken in 2011 to compensate customers for the mis-selling of payment protection insurance, and some continued restructuring costs. Excluding exceptional items, the group did better, with combined Lloyds/HBOS businesses profit before tax up 21 per cent to £2.68bn. But Horta?Osorio warned: “We expect the external environment to remain challenging in 2012, with a subdued economy, continued high levels of regulatory scrutiny and political uncertainty relating to the banking sector, and the continued potential for downside effects from financial market volatility and instability in the eurozone.” Losses on bad debts fell 26 per cent on the year to £8.1bn, £3.2bn of which related to a still struggling Irish property market that Lloyds was exposed to through its acquisition of HBOS. Scottish Widows was one of the better performers for Lloyds last year, contributing the lion’s share of the insurance division’s 7 per cent rise in profits to £1.4bn. Toby Strauss, who joined Lloyds from Aviva as the director for insurance last October, said: “Widows had a very good year despite a negative climate in terms of policyholder sentiment. It has moved away generally from savings and pensions to protection because in uncertain times people focus on savings.” Strauss said Widows also saw a business opportunity in targeting the “baby boomer generation” with products. SWIP, the asset management arm, boosted its profits £11m to £99m. Lloyds’s linchpin UK retail business, which includes Bank of Scotland and Halifax, saw profits dip 9 per cent to £3.6bn, partly hit by historically low interest rates. The bank said it met its Merlin business lending targets. John Maltby, director of commercial banking, said 7 per cent of lending to small businesses was in Scotland, higher than the country’s estimated 6 per cent share of the UK economy. Lloyds, which has the smallest wholesale banking business of the big four, said it would pay out £375m in bonuses for 2011, down 30 per cent. The average bonus was £3,900 for each staff member, down 24 per cent. • LLOYDS Banking Group has plunged to a £3.9 billion loss in the first nine months of the year, sparking a warning that it may be forced to put back some of its recovery targets until after 2014. • • • • LLOYDS Banking Group is set for up to £4 billion of investor?disappointing headline losses this week. But, either side of his recent leave of absence from the part-nationalised bank, the group’s boss, Antonio Horta?Osorio, and the board have shown surefootedness in understanding the animosity toward the sector and appearing on the unaccustomed side of the angels. • •

Tower Hamlets Vote fraud scandal. Is “minister” Grant Shapps jumping on a tricky bandwagon?

Tower Hamlets Vote fraud scandal. Is “minister” Grant Shapps jumping on a tricky bandwagon?
0900 GMT.
London
Thursday 23 February 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
Is CONDEM Minister Grant Shapps getting involved in the inquiry call into “Tower Hamlets vote fraud” because of what we have been calling for again?

To be continued

Muhammad Haque comments on EVENING STANDARD reports on Tower Hamlets Council's vote fraud

Muhammad Haque comments on EVENING STANDARD  reports on Tower Hamlets Council's vote fraud
The BHANGEELAAR! Campaign against a system of an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets, which I co-ordinate [and which I founded in February 2010] has been reiterating the call for Tower Hamlets Council’s Electoral registrar post or office to be itself investigated because of the serious evidence of neglect shown by that office in the past to allegations of Electoral abuse, frauds and corruption in the Borough going on now for many years. The option for using postal vote that was introduced by the Blaired regime was a clearly corrupting option. It has significantly corrupted the process of voting in Tower Hamlets without any doubt whatever. Yet not a single “mainstream” Party is on the record as having any programme of campaign against Electoral malpractice generally let alone against the related electoral crime and corruption in Tower Hamlets. What does that tell you?
The ordinary people in Tower Hamlets who want a decent, honest and accountable voting system in the Borough, have a long battle ahead to attain any of these objectives


.Re Tower Hamlets voting fraud.

You say

"The Metropolitan Police investigated claims of voter fraud after the borough's 2010 mayoral election; no-one was convicted"

Where can a member of the public find a full, unexpurgated report of that investigation?

Who in the Metropolitan Police can members of the public contact and get the full information from?

As far as I know, there has been no report published about the investigation giving the full facts of what the investigation entailed, even without naming any yet unprosecuted and or unconvicted person, what the alleged grounds for the stated investigation were or how long the said investigation go on for.
For the record I can confirm that I asked the then Chief Executive, Kevan Collins, to publish the details of the alleged REFERENDUM held on the question of whether to have an elected mayor in Tower Hamlets. Mr Coins totally failed to acknowledged. recognise, let alone fully and constitutionally deal with the representations.
He showed no evidence of any interest in or any legitimately expected willingness to even consider the possibility that my concerns could have been based on facts and evidence with far reaching implications for both the state of “democracy” as it affected the people in Tower Hamlets but also for wider sections and number of people in the rest of Society in Britain. In your editorial today, you are in effect saying what I had said to Kevan Collins in May 2010. He did NOT reply let alone act. Muhammad Haque, London, 21/02/2012 16:21

[ The above Muhammad Haque comments will be updated and our further device reports on electoral corruption in Tower Hamlets will be continued]

Blackfriars Tube revamp adds weight to call for scrapping Big Biz agenda lies-scam HS2

Blackfriars Tube revamp adds weight to call for scrapping Big Biz agenda lies-scam HS2
Blackfriars the refurbished Tube station in central London reopened today, exposes the Big Biz lies of the peddlers of Crossrail agenda. Now SCRAP HS2 and show respect for the EXISTING infrastructure resources across London and the South East of England.
1450 [1420] Hrs GMT
London
Monday
20 February 2012. By © Muhammad Haque.
The ITV London [the regional “news” slot] reported at [appx] 1400 GMT today the reopening of the Blackfriars Tube station in London.
Crossrail-backer Boris Johnson too was bragging of the “Scandinavian airport”-like cleanness of the refurbished Blackfriars station!
What neither ITV London said nor Boris had the decency to admit was what the Khoodeelaar! “No to Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail hoe assault...” Campaign has been saying for 8 years.
Originally.
Exclusively.
And what Khoodeelaar! has been vindicated by all relevant independent studies, research findings and contextual events.
And by the movement and state of the “London” “Economy”.
That the EXISTING transport infrastructure in London was far more important and useful than the hyped up, Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail. Or the latest item of monumentally DAFT DfT idiocy, HS2.
The ignorance of those [currently typified in the person and the absurd utterances of Boris Johnson, who have peddled the Big Biz agenda Crossrail PR, hype and OTT lies for petty careeristic opportunistic “reasons”] gets exposed every single time there is anything like a near truthful recognition of the valuable EXISTING transport [contextually in the main the railway railway] infrastructure in London.
All that infrastructure needs is proper maintenance, upgrade and improvement.
That is true sustainability and it is genuinely much more economic, cost-effective and "value for money", recession or no recession. Will the currently “new” contender Ken Livingstone have the modesty to admit this, at last?
[To be continued]

Even more 2012 Hosting lies exposed as even "patients are put at risk"

Even more 2012 Hosting lies exposed as even "patients are put at risk"
1938 [1020] [1010] Hrs GMT
London Sunday
19 February 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
The criminality as exposed by the Channel 4 DISPATCHES programme in the last few weeks, both before broadcast and after, confirms what the Movement [of which the KHOODEELAAR! the campaign against “Crossrail Big Biz scam agenda...” is a part] defending the communities in the East End of London has been saying for years. The latest scandal is exposed in today’s OBSERVER newspaper.
AADHIKAROnline is publishing the TEXTS below from the web site of the Guardian that features today's OBSERVER front page item about the 2012 Games Hosting company giving VIPs more importance than to the safety of patients transport in the routes that are all situated in the Games Stadium area in Stratford in East London .
.As KHOODEELAAR! has been arguing [coming on for 8 years now] the over-hyped Big Biz scams promoted as “bringing huge benefits” to the East End of London ...have been built in foundations of lies They have been brining risks, more discriminations and and denials t the Eats End of London. [To be continued]



The TEXTS below are from the web site of the Guardian that features today's OBSERVER front page item about 2012 Hosting company giving VIPs more importance than to patients in the East End routes areas...
Olympic VIPs take fast lane leaving patients at risk Games organisers accused of risking health of Londoners by banning ambulances without blue lights on from


Daniel Boffey guardian.co.uk, Saturday 18 February 2012 21.00 GMT Article history The Olympic stadium will be accessed by VIPs in 'Games lanes' - but they are likely to worsen traffic congestion. Photograph: ODA/Getty Images Europe Sick and vulnerable NHS patients will be left stranded in ambulances in traffic jams while dignitaries and sponsors race past in a fleet of expensive cars on specially designated lanes during the Olympics, healthcare providers fear. Games organisers have been accused of risking people's health by banning the routine use by ambulances of the "Games lanes" introduced to ensure that VIPs can travel quickly to events. The decision to reject a request for access from NHS London, the capital's strategic health authority, has led to a storm of anger. Medical Services, an independent business that transports patients for the health service, and whose clients include the hospitals closest to the Olympic stadium, says it fears that the ill, including those on dialysis, will be trapped in vehicles as London suffers unprecedented congestion, with traffic on key routes expected to slow to a crawl. The Games lanes comprise 30 miles of road in central London on which only the "Olympic family" will be allowed to travel – athletes, officials and sponsors, including Coca-Cola and McDonald's. BMW has donated 4,000 3 and 5 series cars to be used during the Games. Following consultation with the NHS, ambulances will be allowed to use the lanes when they have their blue lights on, but critics say there are many urgent journeys that cannot justify the use of blue lights. They can only be employed in a genuine emergency and those entitled to use them generally require special training. Leah Bevington, head of communication at Medical Services, expressed astonishment that even appeals for bus lanes to be opened up to ambulances and vehicles transporting patients had been rejected by Transport for London (TfL) and the London Olympic Organising Committee so that public transport was not held up at peak times. Bevington said: "This means that sick people, often elderly and frail, urgent blood supplies, oxygen, will all be made to wait in traffic with the rest of us. Congestion can be bad enough around London on a regular day so you can imagine that we are concerned that patients will be on a vehicle for much longer periods of time." She added: "As much as the NHS and everyone else is trying to run business as usual, without some help it won't happen." Medical Services is also concerned about a potential increase in cardiac arrests and breathing difficulties and about the lack of toilet facilities on its vehicles. "[TfL] are generally quite sympathetic and understand that we have patients we need to look after. But their hands are very much tied because they won't give an exemption to anybody," said Bevington. "But I really, really can't see how elderly sick people who live here aren't as important. They should be at the top of the list. From a healthcare side of things I think it is crazy that they are not offering an exemption." Sara Gorton, senior national officer for health at the medical union Unison, said: "The Olympic organisers need to get their priorities straight. That means making sure that patients needing care, whether that's kidney dialysis or cancer treatment, do not get stuck in long traffic queues, especially in the heat of summer. Now is the time to sit down and plan the best way to ensure the Olympics are a benefit to all Londoners, not just a few." Imperial College healthcare trust, whose four London hospitals will be particularly affected by the Olympics, submitted an appeal to use the 100 miles of the Olympic Route Network, the arterial roads which will service the Games. TfL responded: "There is significant demand from the police, utilities and others to use the Games lanes for critical operational reasons which fall short of actual emergencies. To give blanket approval to all these would undermine the performance of the whole Olympic Route Network and Paralympic Route Network and in particular jeopardise the journey time commitments in the host city contract." There are also fears that mobile phones crucial to the work of healthcare workers will suffer because of an increase in usage in east London. Routine deliveries of blood and oxygen to hospitals are being moved to the night in order to avoid congestion. A report from NHS Blood and Transport warns of an impact on its ability to transport potential organ donors to hospitals. Catherine West, who chairs the London councils' transport and environment committee, commented: "We are concerned that allowing sponsors to use the Games lanes will cause unnecessary disruption to Londoners." NHS London said: "We have been working closely with other key NHS suppliers to add flexibility to the system, moving deliveries and working with hospitals to try to reduce demand." The organisers emphasised that the Games lanes "will only be in place on a third of the network. These will only be in place on the busiest parts of the ORN, and where there is at least a dual carriageway to ensure the Games lane is alongside a lane for general traffic."


Reminding Ken Livingstone of his ethical option: quit manipulating and you have a chance in May

Reminding Ken Livingstone of his ethical option: quit manipulating and you have a chance in May
2130 GMT
London
Saturday
18 February 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
It is never a good policy for anyone with any “power” that affects other people to use that power carelessly. It is always counterproductive to ignore wise advice. What the “power”-holders must understand is that “power” is a mirage. It is not to be taken for granted. What matters more is character.
In a week that has been dominated partly in Britain by the row started by David Cameron’s manipulative use of Sayeeda Warsi as a Champion of “Christianity” and generally of theism as the CON-DAVE propaganda cover, we can say that what we are saying here about character is true of those who are believers in God as well as of non-believers.
Without such moral character, there is no true point in anything any human does. By character we mean the unambiguous evidence of honesty, integrity and reliability AND unselfishness AND true generosity of heart. Assuming of course the normal blessings of all the human faculties working in a person.
The crisis that faces Ken Livingstone’s re-election campaign has now engulfed Tower Hamlets Council. Something we have been exclusively examining.
We can say without any hesitation and most transparently that Ken Livingstone must ditch his manipulating behaviour.
There is nobody in Tower Hamlets Council or in any ”grouping” or “individuals” beneficially linked with the controlling elements in that Council who can say that they have any claim on the electoral intentions or behaviour of the people of the borough.
So Ken Livingstone must address the people of Tower Hamlets as a whole and come across and mean to come across as a modest servant of the community here. If he can do that, and if he DOES do that then the community will reciprocate and generally support him. Ken Livingstone cannot get re-elected in May 2012 unless in the next few weeks he can genuinely credibly demonstrate that he is no longer a manipulator of other people. [To be continued]

Tony Winterbottom’s contract confession further undermines the claims by Tower Hamlets Council [2]

Tony Winterbottom’s contract confession further undermines the claims by Tower Hamlets Council [2]
1650 GMT
London
Saturday
18 February 2012
© Muhammad Haque continuing the original, exclusive and diagnostic reports on the latest series of scandals that has hit the interests of the people of the country’s “most deprived” inner city East London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
Through no fault of our own, we the ordinary people in and of Tower Hamlets are lumbered with these “new" scandals.

I am therefore looking for an ethical, democratic and sustainable way to get the community out of the morass that is closing in on us. Unless these scandals are reversed, the people of Tower Hamlets will lose out even more.
Whose abysmal idea was it to give Tony Winterbottom, Ken Livingstone's ex LDA “aide” a contract costing Tower Hamlets people at the rate of £125.00 per hour payable to him?
And how many hours “advisory” “work” does he have to show before making the “contractually valid” claim for the equally contractually valid and neat sum of £1,000 at that rate?
If he “works” seven hours then that will take the total to £875
He has to show only an extra hour’s worth of “work” to be counted to reach the magic sum of £1,000.
That is exactly the sum that has been highlighted by the EVENING STANDARD!
Nice hourly rate if you can show what you actually do and deliver for it.
So on to the next question: what has Tony Winterbottom done since he acquired contractual access to the Tower Hamlets £Billion?
And is it unheard of that in every ordinary day there are at least 8 hours available to be spent doing any “work”, whether real or faked, as long as there is “agreement” that the necessary logging in and logging out arrangements are all accepted by the parties concerned?
So when Mr Winterbottom put up within the real hard work and actually turned up yesterday [Friday 17 February 2012] to take part in a very private meeting inside the bureaucracy of the Tower Hamlets Council which had arranged the "do” to get him to confirm that the EVENING STANDARD had published a “biased” claim about the contract being worth £1,000, why didn’t Mr Winterbottom deny that claim and thus “help prove” that on that occasion the EVENING STANDARD had published an untruth?
Mr Winterbottom is not the first obsolescent “expert” who has “tasted"
proximity to Ken Livingstone’s “power”. In addition to him, there are several dozens of his likes running around London looking suitably useful and promoting themselves for hire.
There is nothing that they could really offer that the local people in Tower Hamlets have not already provided and with no charge on the Council’s expenditures.
The problem is that in Tower Hamlets, the “elected” councillors, judging plainly on their published and publicly known records, have been in the main, a collection of dormant time-servers and collectors of various perks and petty allowances.
They have not been representatives of the people on the Council on issues that matter.
And the Tony Winterbottom scandal reports merely illustrate the irrelevant existence of those councillors.
To them, the concepts of “morality, ethics, accountability, transparency” do not constitute anything.
Those councillors have shown no respect to the people of Tower Hamlets.
If they had shown that respect and had done so genuinely, there would be no such scandal as we are here diagnosing.
But the councillors are not with the people. In fact they are weary of the community whose scrutiny they are unable to survive. So the councillors are escapists. Escaping the community.
Hence the fact that it took a very small number of Thatcherite Tory elements who dug up the details about Winterbottom and made those public.
As for the majority of the councillors, they are as useless now as they ever have been.
They are “in post” collectively and they scarcely hide their arrogance of that CAPITAL fact!
Capital as in cash-generating enterprise.
To them, being a “councillor” is like being in a sort of business.
There is no evidence that whoever nominates these as candidates has a clue as to why they should be councillors at all.
As for Mr Winterbottom, the plain fact is that he has already become a liability as has the controlling clique concerned that has been responsible for “hiring” him in the first place.
There is nothing proper that ordinary efficient and accountable employees of the Council could not do.
Quite apart from the fallout that has begun from the publication of the FACT of the EXISTENCE of Mr Winterbottom's particular contract, the people of Tower Hamlets will lose out even more as a result of this latest scandal.
As has been observed, none other than Eric Pickles the man occupying the front seat on “local Councils” has already held forth and has condemned Tower Hamlets people by association as he has lambasted those who have wasted this money on hiring the likes of Tony Winterbottom.
Pickles should not matter. Why?
Because he is already prejudiced against communities like Tower Hamlets.
This is why it is a bad thing that Pickles can now claim ANY moral ground at all over the one held by the ordinary people of Tower Hamlets.
And there is nobody in any of elected posts put there by the people of Tower Hamlets who can really claim a clean moral ground and answer back!
So widespread is the stream of informal reports about the incidence, whether formally reified or not and of abuse, dishonesty, nepotism and fraud associated with people allegedly in “charge of” Tower Hamlets Council that the entity called the “democratically elected local Council” is very near to being a laughing stock.
And that, remarkably, is not the worst of it!
Shockingly, the ones who are “opining” allegedly on behalf of Tower Hamlets Council are in denial about all of it.
Isn’t it extraordinary that a Borough that is also being called the most deprived in England is also the one which is being presented in the "mainstream" AND in the experience of most ordinary members of the public in Tower Hamlets itself as the least deserving of whatever public-sourced financial support it [the Borough Council] needs?
[To be continued]

Let's boycott all idiotic MPs and councillors across London

Let's boycott all idiotic MPs and councillors across London
1315 Hrs GMT London Saturday 18 February 2012. By © Muhammad Haque. Quoting the London EVENING STANDARD about the Streatham MP: the Labour MP for Streatham who has carved out a high profile under party leader Ed Miliband Perhaps that is what his problem is. He is more interested in that “rising” curve than in the contents of common sense beings spoken by the community backing the Country Show. Haven't we encountered across London similarly "carved" careers hitherto? We indeed have. From “Brent, South” had come in 1987 that boastful slogan about “Soweto, tomorrow". In Brent EVEN today, almost a quarter of a century later, we see the local Brent Council behaving [collectively] like a deranged power-grabber in the Dark Ages EVERYWHERE! But we don't have to be confined to "Brent, South" or to Lambeth. It is true that “the Labour MP for Streatham” is currently featuring as an Ed Miliband “front-bench” “star” in your vocabulary. But the truth of life under CONDEM as being daily experienced by most people of all ethnicities, nationalities, genders, orientations and cultures and backgrounds is this: that no matter what their claimed affinity with whatever “special interest in electoral terms” is, the elected holders [or seekers] of publicly paid for posts in contemporary Britain are as unrepresentative of the objectively defined ordinary life and perspectives as they always have been. This is a central defect in a “democratic” settlement in Society. [To be continued]

Muhammad Haque rebutting latest anti-Ken Livingstone propaganda via the EVENING STANDARD [1]

Muhammad Haque rebutting latest anti-Ken Livingstone propaganda via the EVENING STANDARD [1]
1220 Hrs GMT
London
Friday
17 February 2012
By © Muhammad Haque
First comment on the latest piece by the London EVENING STANDARD “agains” Ken Livingstone.
[1]
As the London Expert on Ken Livingstone’s careerist opportunistic “politics”, I should welcome anything that appears in the London EVENING STANDARD that claims to be uncovering some shady deeds by the faked newt. But I don’t…Why don’t I? The simple short answer is that the EVENING STANDARD is clueless about Tower Hamlets which is where it appears to be focussing its attention. Secondly because I am not impressed by the pretentious claims that Peter Golds makes or those that are made for him by some very notorious time-servers in and around “Fleet Street”.

Mr Golds is a prejudiced, ignorant man.
If he were honest and fair and unprejudiced then he would have joined me years ago and he could then begin to see that a democratic, ethical campaign was [and still IS] possible in the community.
And we could as a community begin to see the beginning of the end for the cabal of insidious time-servers, opportunists and nest-featherers at the expense of the community who have for YEARS AND YEARS AND YEARS been in effective control of the key agenda that is promoted via Tower Hamlets Council
Mr Golds is not only a Conman in the sense of being a flag carrier of the arrogant branch of the Thatcherite Conservative Party but he is also a deeply ignorant man. This will shock his un-named but secret line of “friends" in and around the City of London.
It is because of the deep ignorance and even deeper prejudice against Society on Peter Golds' part that the Tories will NEVER make the link with the ordinary people in Tower Hamlets that theoretically they could do.
Peter Golds exposed his ignorance by playing double standards when during the 2010 campaign against an elected mayor system, I witnessed him first saying No to an elected mayor system and then saying YES to the same thing!
His offensively tokenistic and nonsensical “explanation” “justifying” his “conversion” to YES as sent to me as the Honorary Coordinator of the BHANGEELAAR! Campaign against an elected, "executive" mayor system in Tower Hamlets Borough, did not wash at all.
For the above reasons and more, their current, Fleet-Street-linked anti-Ken Livingstone propaganda will not succeed. Not in Tower Hamlets. As far as I can see! [To be continued]


Ken's friends in the East
Stephen Robinson
16 Feb 2012
On the streets of Tower Hamlets, councillor Peter Golds tends to stick out. For a start, he is a contentedly "out" gay man. In what is now a heavily Asian borough, he is of Jewish origin, and even more unusually, in a neighbourhood where few are proud to be Tory, he is a strident Conservative.
These factors combine so that when Cllr Golds stands up to speak in the council chamber, things can turn very ugly in the public gallery.
"I get the hissing, the calls of 'poofter', they shout 'Zionist scum' at me," he says, sitting in his office at the Town Hall. This sort of treatment can be equally disturbing for a lesbian Labour councillor, who is subjected to other strange heckling.
More shocking still than these eruptions from the public benches is that this behaviour is seemingly tolerated, even though Tower Hamlets's first directly elected mayor, Lutfur Rahman, says he is relentlessly intolerant of sexist and racist bigotry.
As Golds said in a formal complaint to the borough police commander, were white skinheads observed yelling abuse at Muslim east Londoners, it would not be tolerated. The worst of the abuse occurred shortly after Rahman's election in October 2010 but Golds says it continues to this day.
Rahman is a controversial figure. The Labour Party barred him from running as Tower Hamlets mayor, partly over concerns about his links to those around the hardline Islamic Forum of Europe, though he denies any formal contact with the IFE.
Under Ken Livingstone's control of City Hall, hundreds of thousands of pounds of Londoners' money was granted to the East London Mosque, which is strongly under the control of the IFE. Activists linked to the IFE, via their lobby group Muslims 4 Ken, campaigned for Livingstone's re-election against Boris Johnson in 2008.
Two years later, thwarted by Labour in his bid to run as official candidate for the Tower Hamlets executive mayoralty, Rahman changed his designation to Independent, essentially an offshoot of Respect.
He beat the Labour candidate Helal Abbas on a turnout of about 26 per cent, amid allegations of concerted electoral malpractice and mass intimidation at polling stations.
The campaign was exceptionally dirty, with Abbas smeared as a wife-beater and a "racist". But Livingstone travelled into the borough not to bolster the embattled Labour candidate but very publicly to back Rahman.
Ed Miliband, the new Labour leader, failed to follow through on what many activists said should have been Livingstone's automatic expulsion from the Labour Party for disloyalty.
For those in Labour who have always distrusted Livingstone, his alliance with Rahman is proof that Ken remains an undermining force constantly fighting factional battles on the Left of London politics.
But the connection between Rahman and Livingstone runs far deeper. Key loyalists from the days of Livingstone's control of City Hall have been installed in Rahman's expanding executive office as London's mayoral election nears.
Tony Winterbottom, who left Livingstone's London Development Agency on a year's sabbatical followed by a £75,000 pay-off and £160,000 top-up of his pension fund, is now charging Rahman's office £1,000 a day. The council says he is working at this rate for "approximately" three days a month.
Murziline Parchment is head of Rahman's executive office. She was one of Livingstone's tight circle of political appointees on six-figure packages whose finances were further augmented when, as outgoing Mayor in 2008, he changed the rules to allow her to share a severance pot of £1.6 million.
Parchment is now earning for her 30 hours a week less than half of the £126,000 she was paid in City Hall.
Also drafted in is Mark Seddon, an old Livingstone supporter and ex-editor of Tribune, as a one-day-a-week "media adviser".
There are seven other paid contractors in Mayor Rahman's executive office, one of them Axel Landin, an undergraduate at Selwyn College, Cambridge, and Livingstone youth supporter, who is paid £8.39 an hour to advise on "boundary review matters".
"A prototype cabinet for the next Livingstone administration in City Hall has been created inside the mayor of Tower Hamlets' private office, at public expense, built around Livingstone's cronies," says Golds. "It is a vision of what they hope to be the next phase of Livingstone's rule."
The Jewish Chronicle believes "Ken has calculated that backing Mr Rahman's brand of Islamism-lite will win him enough support to justify sacrificing the votes of Jewish, gay or more moderate Muslim Londoners".
In his memoir You Can't Say That, published last year, Livingstone suggests that his "campaigns against racism and homophobia and for women's rights" made him a hate figure in the Eighties. Many on the Left wonder why he is now allying himself in Tower Hamlets with forces that wish to see women veiled and are hostile to Israel and Jews in general.
When Livingstone last week suggested the Tory Party was "riddled" with closet homosexuals, few who know him well suggested that he is at heart a gay-basher. But why is he so close to groups hostile to the causes he espouses?
The White Swan, a gay pub in Limehouse, is being targeted by the Rahman administration. Hundreds of regulars have signed a petition to stop the council closing down the regular Wednesday night drag queen strip event, which they say is a harmless camp show that could be blamelessly attended in any city centre in Britain.
Sections of the gay press worry that the targeting of the White Swan is part of a wider concession to the homophobic impulses of core supporters of Rahman and Livingstone.
A spokeswoman for Tower Hamlets, echoing Livingstone's position, emphasises that the council "has an innovative and proactive approach to tackling inequality and strengthening community cohesion".
Yet despite the rage of many London Labour activists over the original Livingstone switch to support Rahman, most of them now suggest they will support him nonetheless.
MP Rushanara Ali, who won Bethnal Green and Bow from George Galloway of Respect in May 2010, says of Livingstone's backing of Rahman later that year: "He should know better. He is a leading member of the Labour party with a high profile and coming into my constituency and the borough of Tower Hamlets and playing divisive politics, essentially, and not backing up your party at a very difficult time was a low point in his recent political activity."
Nevertheless, she says she will be turning out with much of the rest of the Tower Hamlets Labour base to campaign to re-elect Livingstone in May because "he stands for a set of ideas to improve people's lives in London that's better than what Boris Johnson's about."
Councillor Shiria Khatun, spokeswoman for the Labour group, is equally adamant that she will support his mayoralty bid. "Ken is a living legend down here in Tower Hamlets, where people are more interested in issues that affect them on a daily basis, such as housing and fares," she says.
A generation after Livingstone first turned on colleagues at the old GLC, he still has the capacity to enrage, confound, yet win over sections of his party, despite the unlikely allies, some with rather dubious links, he finds along the way.
Boris Johnson has probably learned the same lesson, that the more he embarrasses David Cameron and George Osborne, the better he does with the wider electorate.
Both candidates seem to understand that to run for London, you have to run against your party.
The question is whether voters will be as forgiving of Livingstone's disloyalty as his Labour allies in east London seem to be.

Guardian's ex-Ed P. Preston "stars" in a Street of Shame report that exposes Murdoch

Guardian's ex-Ed P. Preston "stars" in a Street of Shame report that exposes Murdoch
0640 [0520] [0455] [0450] GMT London Friday 17 February 2012.
By © Muhammad Haque.

Chris Huhne, UK CONDEM Collusion’s Cabinet Minister[ex] for Energy and Climate Change who appeared in court yesterday [Thursday 16 February 2012] with his co-accused and ex-wife Vicky Pryce, may have been the victim of a still active war agenda by Rupert Murdoch's. As the following report by PRIVATE EYE magazine asserts, the criminal charges being faced now by Huhne and his ex-wife Vicky Pryce may not have been brought about by the scorned ex-wife after all but by Rupert Murdoch’s SUNDAY TIMES betraying its source. [To be continued]
STREET OF SHAME Column, Private Eye
PRYCE DROP AT THE SUNDAY TIMES
THE reputation of former Guardian editor Peter Preston has never recovered from his decision almost 30 years ago to obey a court order and return leaked Foreign Office documents, thus enabling the government to identify and jail the leaker, civil servant Sarah Tisdall.
Many hacks protested that Preston had committed a cardinal sin of journalism – shopping a source. Why are there no such protests at the behaviour of Sunday Times editor John Witherow?
For three months his newspaper resisted a court order requiring it to give Inspector Knacker copies of a private email correspondence between Chris Huhne’s ex-wife Vicky Pryce and ST political editor Isabel Oakeshott.
On 20 January, without explanation, it suddenly agreed to hand over Pryce’s emails after all.
Given the lack of fuss or outrage, some people assumed Pryce herself must have consented to the paper’s U-turn.
Not so. Pryce tells friends that she certainly did not consent and finds the Sunday Times’s failure to protect its source “a strange way to behave”.
The effect on Pryce may be devastating.
Director of public prosecutions Keir Starmer said last week that the “new material” supplied from Wapping allowed prosecutors to declare that they had “sufficient evidence to bring criminal charges against Mr Huhne and Ms Pryce for perverting the course of justice”.

Rupert Murdoch won’t be unhappy
Witherow and Oakeshott have not just betrayed their source but also landed her and Huhne with a criminal prosecution. Their master Rupert Murdoch won’t be unhappy to see Huhne out of the cabinet and in the dock. Last July, when the phone hacking scandal went ballistic, Huhne upped the pressure on the Digger by holding him personally responsible for the crimes of his underlings. “I believe we should have a personal assurance from Rupert Murdoch, for example, that these illegal practices were confined to the News of the World,” he said. “There are rumours at the moment that there are civil actions against the Sun. There have been rumours even that the Sunday Times may have been involved in this.”
A few days later, while the Murdochs’ doomed attempt to take full control of BSkyB was still in the balance, Huhne said the scandal threatened the family’s ownership of any stake in the satellite cash cow, however small, since it raised the question of whether they were “fit and proper” people under the Ofcom test to hold a television licence at all: “If he doesn’t pass that, it won’t be a question of just stopping the BSkyB deal – it will be a question of him having to get rid of Sky altogether.”

The Sunday Times has been pursuing him ever since, first pumping and then dumping Vicky Pryce.

The question is: why not scrap the Bank of England which is failing to do its job?

The question is: why not scrap the Bank of England which is failing to do its job?
The question is: why not scrap the Bank of England which is failing to do its job?

On Pola Uddin and the "mystery" of Rushanara Ali's gloating promotion of the ethically bared

On Pola Uddin and the "mystery" of Rushanara Ali's gloating promotion of the ethically bared
Tower Hamlets Council is failing to stand up for ethics, legitimacy and morality!


0515 GMT
London
Thursday 16 February 2012.
Who has been writing the script for Rushanara Ali “the” “MP”?

Does she realise, yet, that the “novelty” has long gone, if it ever genuinely attached to her at all?
Or is she so deluded that she has no understanding of what she can say and do whilst still being an “MP”?
These are some of the hundreds of questions that validly arise from the astonishing part Rushanara Ali was seen playing at one of the faked “events” entirely linked to a Sky satellite “TV” Channel she keeps featuring in with increasing political and ethical inappropriateness.
This one was shown at the weekend on the Sky satellite Channel 814. In the segment she appeared, Rushanara Ali performed recklessly irresponsibly as she gloated of Pola Uddin in glowing terms. She introduced Pola Uddin in effect as THE ROLE MODEL.
Moments later, Pola herself complemented Rushanara Ali and performed a simulated hug!
The two were joined by a third woman who was introduced as a “Bangladeshi” “judge” in Britain!
Then the three posed for photos as they performed another slogan, as embarrassingly gloating as Rushanara Ali's introductory ones .
Apparently, they were “celebrating the achievements of Bangladeshi women” in Britain! The only “star” [in the twisted “logic” as mouthed by Rushanara Ali as shown on that Channel] was Shelina Akhtar!
You would never imagine that it was the same Pola Uddin who is featured in the East London Advertiser the web site, which we are updating on here.
[To be continued]

EVENING STANDARD reports: "Mayor of poverty-hit council hires adviser in £1,000-a-day deal"

EVENING STANDARD reports: "Mayor of poverty-hit council hires adviser in £1,000-a-day deal"
AADHIKAROnline publishing the following item for reference from the website of the London EVENING STANDARD reporting on the latest scandal by Tower Hamlets Council

Mayor of poverty-hit council hires adviser in £1,000-a-day deal
Tom Harper and Simon Freeman
15 February 2012

One of the poorest boroughs in London today came under fire for spending £1,000 a day on a personal aide for its mayor.
Tony Winterbottom is an "executive adviser" on regeneration and development to Lutfur Rahman, the mayor of Tower Hamlets who was ousted from the Labour Party over alleged links to Islamic extremists.
Local government secretary Eric Pickles accused Mr Rahman of wasting taxpayer money. He said: "It is astonishing that one of the poorest boroughs in the country sees fit to squander such colossal amounts of public cash in this way.
"Tower Hamlets seems to be living the ultimate champagne socialist lifestyle, leaving taxpayers to pick up the tab. I fail to see the business case for shelling out this money, which should be diverted towards protecting frontline services."
Tower Hamlets has the worst child poverty in the UK, with 52 per cent of children below the breadline. Campaigners warned planned £70 million cuts to the local budget could cause an "economic and social disaster".
Mr Winterbottom, 67, insisted he was not overpaid and was "embarrassed to be charging so little".
Jim Fitzpatrick, Labour MP for Poplar and Limehouse, said: "At a time when Tower Hamlets is being buffeted by cuts from central government, every penny is precious and a £1,000-a-day contract seems to be way over the top." London Mayor Boris Johnson said: "I'd better investigate the circumstances but it sounds like a lot of money to me."
A former adviser to Labour mayoral candidate Ken Livingstone, Mr Winterbottom won the contract to advise Mr Rahman last October. An investigation by the Evening Standard found the £1,000-a-day deal is with LDP Projects, run by him and his wife, Kathleen, based at his home in Aston Clinton, Buckinghamshire. The consultant works three days a month for Tower Hamlets.
Emma Boon, campaign director of the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "Deals like this for consultants should not be allowed at a time when the rest of the public sector is taking a pay freeze."
Mr Winterbottom was previously a senior official at the defunct London Development Agency. He was criticised in 2008 after he left on a year's sabbatical, followed by a £75,000 pay-off and £160,000 top-up to his pension fund. An investigation into the LDA, ordered by Boris Johnson and headed by former financial journalist Baroness Wheatcroft, found a string of failings including "ineptitude" and "massive misspending".
Mr Rahman became the first directly elected mayor of Tower Hamlets in 2010. He originally stood as a Labour candidate, but was deselected amid claims about his links with fundamentalist group the Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE). He has denied the allegations. He won the poll as an independent backed by Mr Livingstone, and controls a £1.3 billion budget.
Mr Winterbottom, who has also advised Tottenham Hotspur on stadium development, said: "I'm embarrassed the Standard knows I am charging so little. My company has done work in the private sector for a lot more than £1,000 a day."
He claimed he would not ask for the full amount: "I tendered a bid for £1,000 a day. In reality, I get paid £125 an hour but I have not yet put in an invoice. I wanted them to respect me as an individual so I asked them to pay me a proper price but I'm not going to charge them.
"I'm absolutely squeaky clean. This is not a money-making operation. This is about fighting for Lutfur Rahman who's trying to do good work."
A Tower Hamlets spokesman said: "We do not comment on payment of individual employees unless the information is on the council website as part of our responsibility towards transparency."
[AADHIKARonline commentary on this “news” will appear in due course]

Pollsters YOUGOV reports most British people say “NO” to “City Status” for Tower Hamlets Council!

Pollsters YOUGOV reports most British people say “NO” to “City Status” for Tower Hamlets Council!
0300 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
15 February 2012.
By © Muhammad Haque
City Status for Tower Hamlets Council?
A YouGov poll reports that Tower Hamlets Council is one of the LEAST favoured by the British public!
If the Big Business agenda peddlers fronted by the Canary Wharf Group had plotted on a “celebration” in their slow but sure control of the “Council” “representing” the area corresponding the inner London Borough of Tower Hamlets by tricking the public into believing that Queen Elizabeth II “had” [in a intents an purposes] awarded the Borough “City status” then they should be rethinking their celebration party plans.
YouGov, one of contemporary Britain’s most successful pollsters, has just found that Tower Hamlets, as the Borough Council, is not much liked by the nearly 2000 people polled on the issue of whether it deserves to be given the City status by the Queen.
Bournemouth led the way followed by Reading as the favourites deserving the CIty status, according to the YouGov poll.
[To be continued]

Insidious poisonous, toxic racist Daily Mail crosses the line 14 Feb 2012

Insidious poisonous, toxic racist Daily Mail crosses the line 14 Feb 2012
1600 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
14 February 2012.
The © Muhammad Haque London Ethical Commentary:
Scrap the London Assembly!
BBC should get people, especially Coleman’s targets in the very small group of pro-democracy activists in Barnet, to come in and review HIM.
Scrap the London Assembly!
© Muhammad Haque
I am working on an updater piece I will be posting about the wastefulness and offensive mediocrity of a thing called the London Assembly.
The stud pity of having a thing called the London Assembly is seen in the criminal careers of some of the "AM"-ers!
How is it that with so many people in London, there is this ghastly Assembly of sub-intelligent time-serving, ignorant persons claiming to speak for the people of London? Who EVER finds these elements and then puts them up for "election"?
Isn’t the London Assembly a standing indictment of the collective lack of care by all the London people?
Extrapolate and you can see how worrying the entire “democratic” scenery across the UK is!
No wonder that the BBC shows ITS own contempt for morality, ethics and dignity by repeatedly!” inviting” [“London Assembly” “AM”] Brian Coleman to – God helps us! – review the papers!
Where is the shame!
The BBC should get people, especially Coleman’s targets in the very small group of pro-democracy activists in Barnet, to come in and review HIM.

[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque commentary endorses John Sergeant as against CONDEM "Dave", et al

Muhammad Haque commentary endorses John  Sergeant as against CONDEM "Dave", et al
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Political Commentary 1155 Hrs GMT London Sunday 12 February 2012. John Sergeant has once again disproved the BBC Establishment and exposed it as being ed by a bunch of ignorant morons. . Contrary t the BBC’s tag [see the link to the BBC web page we have reproduced below] on him that he is an “ex-Political Journalist”, John Sergeant more than devastated that stupid tag today. He is the one who has made the only comment about the CONDEM Collusion’s NHS DEFORM [our rearrangement of that word!] Bill that sums up the real situation. Because the UK park,ent is useless otherwise. That there is nothing else going on in that Parliament And so on ... [To be continued] * Test below the BBC’s silly clip from one of the editions of their STRICTLY DANCING... What the BBC’s offensively over-pampered “judges” did in that period was to flick insulting remarks in Sergeant’s direction. The more they did so, the more the ordinary public out across the country backed John Sergeant. So overwhelming was the public’s outrage at the offensive, overpaid BBC cabal in studio and in the "Management" that it was John Sergeant who had to take the initiative and “fade himself out” of the spotlight that he reluctantly got presented to him by massive popular applause... There is a lesson in that. It is this: those who occupy positions of power anywhere can be challenged. Often they forget this simple but powerful truth... Until it is too late for them... “Fortunately” for the BBC, John Sergeant is not vengeful. Otherwise, he could get a number of BBC pampered post-holders’ “heads to roll”... The question for CONDEM Cameron today is: has HE the sense to understand what John Sergeant has said today on SKY NEWS “Murnaghan” programme? And does “Dave” Cameron recognise the words of wisdom that EVEN David Mellor uttered on the same programme today about the disastrous NHS Deform Bill and abut another former Tory Minister who had earlier spoken wise words about the NHS???[To be continued] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7737447.stm

FEATURING RAY HONEYFORD, "Dave" Cameron AND "PEACE IN USA"

FEATURING RAY HONEYFORD, "Dave" Cameron AND "PEACE IN USA"
1120 [1110] [1050] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
12 February 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque
ANOTHER WORLD EXCLUSIVE DIAGNOSIS of Society in Britain and how CONDEM Collusion is wrecking Society under “Dave” Cameron’s disguise of a “chummy, cosy” “doer”.
As John Sergeant has just confirmed in his comments on SKY NEWS in the past 20 minutes, the real reason why there is at all an “NHS Reform Bill” “in Parliament” now is because the UK Parliament,ent is a bankrupt parliament. John Sergeant did not say that word.
We are saying that word. Bankrupt.
We shall be elaborating in that later today. Back to examining the conduct of “Dave” Cameron as an attacker of Society.
AADHIKAROnline will EDIT the London Daily Telegraph Group's claims for Ray Honeyford, whose obituary the Telegraph Group has been running today [Sunday 12 February 2012, when we first accessed it] .
Honeyford was the head teacher of school, Drummond Middle School, in Bradford, Yorkshire, England where he contributed to the heightening of pro-racist tensions in the mid 1980s by publicly attacking people in Society as based on culture, language, religion and nationality origins.
What Honeyford had said then, in the 1980s, haas since been ADOPTED with brazen racist approval by the likes of David "Dave" Cameron.
So brazen has Cameron been in his endorsement of racist prejudice the he made a forma, public point, twice, of attacking the very idea of Society as based on people of different cultures living side by side. It is called "multiculturalism". ray Honeyford had attacked ":multiculturalism".
David Cameron has escaped any rigourous examination of his pro-racist utterances.
Has he thereby "helped' "Society"?
Or has he HINDERED Society? We shall continue to examine the record and show how Cameron has been doing serious damage to the cause of a decent, tolerant and a pro-civilised Society in Britain.
[To be continued]

Big Business brazenly looting people while Bank of England fakes some extra £Billions.

Big Business brazenly looting people while Bank of England fakes some extra £Billions.
1105 [1055] [1050] GMT
London Saturday
11 February
2012.
By © Muhammad Haque.
The images on the front pages of the London print daily the INDEPENDENT and its offshoot i today feature some updates on the looting of the public by UK Big Biz “energy” conglomerates.
Big Business brazenly looting people while Bank of England fakes some extra £Billions.
But this critical violation of the people across Britain is not being examined or adequately or significantly by the broadcast British media
The proliferation of satellite TV channels carrying apparently longer slots on the day’s PRESS is not producing any qualitative improvement in the contents of the “media”.
I shall be updating my diagnostic review of the shallowness f the SKY PRESS REVIEW and the BBC Press Review slots, here, shortly.

[To be continued]

CONDEM Cameron kicks the elderly into starvation as he woos his "family" image faker with £8.6 Mill

CONDEM Cameron kicks the elderly into starvation as he woos his "family" image faker with £8.6 Mill
1835 [1800] Hrs GMT
London
Friday
10 February 2012.
By © Muhammad Haque.

BRAZEN CORRUPTION is at the centre of Cameron's CONDEM ‘culture’!
The motto is: “ IF you can do it, loot whatever remains of Society!”.
“Abysmal” Emma Harrison [pictured below, right], a champion fake “thinker” on “family” and patronised by David Cameron, is "untouchable" as colluder Cameron shields her!
She pockets £8.6 Million in one year while CAMERON punishes the elderly with starvation and hunger [see, below, the Daily Telegraph news item today [Friday 10 February 2012].
Society cannot be safe in Cameron;’s hands! Nor is the best of the NHS, as protesters showed to Andrew Lansely in Scotland earlier today.
[To be continued]

DAILY MAIL web site: Cameron's families tsar gets £8.6m in ONE YEAR,.. mostly the public's cash

DAILY MAIL web site: Cameron's families tsar gets £8.6m in ONE YEAR,.. mostly the public's cash
England DPP, Crown Prosecution Service must charge Emma Harrison and the CONDEM Collusion with r corrupting Society.... [To be continued]

CONDEM CAMERON CONDEMNS the old to hard labour!

CONDEM CAMERON CONDEMNS the old to hard labour!
This is the reality of broken society that Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith have achieved. So stark is the contempt for Society that even the Tory Daily Telegraph reports it in stark terms... AADHIKARonline

KHOODEELAAR! continuing to say NO to "no standards" in public office

KHOODEELAAR! continuing to say NO to "no standards" in public office
KHOODEELAAR! continuing to say NO to "no standards" in public office

Editor © Muhammad Haque.

0945 Hrs GMT London Friday 10 February 2012.
KHOODEELAAR! The campaign against Crossrail hole is an integral part of the Movement defending the community in the East End of London.
The Movement is leading the call for standards in the conduct of those who crave, seek or occupy publicly paid for posts in the name of the community.
We again renew this call to Pola Uddin: Quit before you bring even more shame on the community.
We are NOT bothered about Pola Uddin’s “returning the money”. She must quit as a “peer” and do so with the limited scope for a “graceful” exit that she can still use.
Her resignation must happen voluntarily. If she does resign then that event will help stop the particular disgrace linked with her behaviour that currently surrounds the entire community.
Pola Uddin in the context of legitimacy and morality has lost all acceptability to be anywhere near the Houses of Parliament.
Let alone still claim to be a “baroness”...
[To be continued]

OFCOM abuses standards just as brazenly as elderly are abused in CONDEM UK

OFCOM abuses standards just as brazenly as elderly are abused in CONDEM UK
SKY Channel 814 continues to PRAISE "baroness" Pola Uddin!
As it did again last night, Tuesday 07 February 20`12.
In incredibly ambitious slot called” News” ordinarily broadcast between 2200 and 2230 Hrs GMT, SKY Channel 814 claimed, in a form of Bangla language script, that “baroness” Pola Uddin was among [it listed the “implied dignitaries” ] who included the Bangladesh High Commissioner in the UK.
This promotional piece occurred within seconds of a segment showing a man called Muquim Ahmed extolling unnamed others to “come to Tower Hamlets and do business”.
The SKY Channel 814 has featured “baroness” Pola Uddin on more than one hundred separate occasions in the past three years.
If not in the ambitious slot called” News” then in the many other slots… One excuse is found after another show “baroness” Pola Uddin, always parsing her!
Sky Channel 814 finds one way or another to show her as being among the supposedly “recognised leaders” “of the community”.
This latest praise comes less than 24hioyrs after the BBC reported that Shelina Akhtar, an actually elected Tower Hamlets Councilor, had been jailed for fraud.
[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque challenging David Miliband to show humility ......

Muhammad Haque challenging David Miliband to show humility ......
By © Muhammad Haque
2115 Hrs GMT
London Monday 06 February 2012.
I have to ask some questions today and put them in the direction of Ed Miliband. That is if his brother David will leave any space in the media for any ordinary Labour Party member to dare to examine the evidence of the morass that Blair and Co have succeeded in creating in areas like Tower Hamlets.
What more evidence does the “Labour Party” need before it ditches the corrupt practices that have allowed SOME of the most unfit individuals to get nominated as “Labour Parity candidates for Council election” in Tower Hamlets?
No, I am NOT confining my enquiry to the “events” surrounding Shelina Akhtar. I am, in fact, demanding to know why the “Labour Party” has stubbornly PROMOTED corruption in Tower Hamlets.
What do I mean by “the most unfit individuals” here? I mean individuals who have neither empirical bases to even claim to get elected as councillors nor posses the slightest moral suitability to deserve to be considered for the position.
Yet the RECORDS show that the utter majority of those whom the “Labour Party” has favoured, promoted, imposed and confirmed and backed and approved of and supported as “Labour Party candidates” over the past 25 years, have been UNFIT for the office, as defined above.

[To be continued]

Big Biz agenda peddlers are now “wishing" they hadn’t backed a mayor system

Big Biz agenda peddlers are now “wishing" they hadn’t backed a mayor system
1855 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
05 February 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque.

Isle of Dogs, Tower Hamlets:
A strange comment by peddlers of Big Biz suddenly discovering the banana republic council they aided and abetted in...
Why are we calling it the Isle of Dogs?
Because this is a reference back to the reality of the culture. The culture being that people who are ordinary residents of that part of Tower Hamlets, have “by their own choice” [!!!!] lacked the sense let alone the entitlement to comment authoritatively about Tower Hamlets Council.
The same corrupt, ignorant and anti-democratic culture has been responsible for the deficit in recognising the arguments that having an elected, executive mayor system foisted on the borough would make things worse for the public than would be the case if there were a really active democratic and accountable council.
The crooked elements that joined the bandwagon for foisting an executive mayor system on Tower Hamlets did so because they plotted direct personal and group gains from having access to executive decision-making in the name of a Council that was frequently being linked with having a £1 billion budget.
Sixteen months after the imposition, some of those corrupt elements are now confessing that having an elected executive mayor does not mean that there is even the basic transparency.
This is one of the many things that the following comment, published by the WHARF, a Big Biz forces outlet based in what we are calling the Isle of Dogs, confirms:


Spiral Notebook: A deafening silence

By Giles Broadbent on February 2, 2012 2:01 PM |
By Giles Broadbent
Taciturn executive mayor Lutfur Rahman's unfortunate timing continues. Each time he was asked a question at last week's Tower Hamlets Borough Council meeting he had his mouth full of the jellied fruits he received from his aunt over Christmas (for that, surely, is the only reason for his studied reluctance to speak).
Pity really. Because the silent treatment (think the little sister rather than The Artist) may be considered unbecoming, not to say rude, behaviour to the average observer unfamiliar with the mayor's predilections.
And it also may go some way to explaining why Tower Hamlets submission to become a city is more likely to be stabilising that wobbly table in reception of Buckingham Palace than inching closer to the royal Mont Blanc.
Incidentally, there is a theory going around (mostly going around my head it has to be said) that the Crossrail works out front are the cover for a much grander infrastructure project.
Rather than constructing a railway line, secret work has begun on a giant zip.
Come the day of the Great Unzipping, Wharfers will be asked to put their backs against the mainland and push the Isle of Dogs into the Thames and further away from the Sullen Republic of Tower Hamlets thus vastly increasing its chances of wooing the Queen and attaining city status.

As Chris Huhne quits, will Pola Uddin and Shelina Akhtar do the decent thing and quit too?

As Chris Huhne quits, will Pola Uddin and Shelina Akhtar do the decent thing and quit too?
AADHIKARonline Media UPDATER research on our commentary in the context of the resignation earlier today of the UK Energy Secretary Chris Huhne and the Football Association’s sacking of footballer Terry pending Terry’s scheduled trial a few months hence.
Neither Huhne nor Terry has been found guilty of an offence so far. Yet both have left and or lost the posts that they held.
This has been accepted across the country as the right and proper thing. Yet in Tower Hamlets, the community remains lumbered with the occupants in two posts both of which are linked to the Borough. And then flak is being aimed at the community for the misconduct and criminal behaviour of the individuals named.
Neither of the individuals has been prepared to quit their positions and let the community’s reputation and the standards in public office to be begun to be restored ands reinstated.
1730 Hrs GMT .
London.
Friday.
03 February 2012.
.
THE EVIDENTIAL RESULTS ON a search carried out from London UK on The Google.com search engine web site at appx 1720 GMT Friday 03 February 2012 shows the range of items about Pola Uddin. It is clear that ours remains the latest piece and also ours is the only source - from "the community" affected by the misconduct in public office - that is calling for Pola Uddin to do the decent thing and quit. [To be continued] .
AADHIKAROnline will comment at the weekend on this front page item in the DAILY STAR, the London tabloid and will expose the truly racist record of this apparently anti-racist "newspaper"
AADHIKAR Media Foundation has world exclusive material and reports about the disgraceful records of the London tabloid THE DAILY STAR.

BACK to the DUTIES of two "political post holders" in the name of the people and communities ion the East End of London
Muhammad Haque

Will Pola Uddin resign and say sorry to the community for bringing so much shame on the whole community by failing to show that she even knows the community in while name she has been allowed by Tony Blair, Clair Short and assorted other abusers of Empire to trade?

What about Shelina Akhtar?

Tower Hamlets Council’s self-designated “Monitoring Officer” Isabella Freeman has shown that she cannot even understand the concept that she allegedly attaches to her little reign. Had Isabella Freeman been a genuinely competently monitor of legality, ethics morality not to speak of constitutionality then she would have found the many legal ways to ensure that Shelina Akhtar no long sat as a “councillor” while so much is being said about her criminal conviction for benefit fraud and to the detriment of so many innocent people.

Anyone who is in any way involved in allowing the “confidence” to prevail inside Tower Hamlets Council to the effect that Tower Hamlets Council’s currently controlling clique will be able to live down its de facto collusion with the disgrace-making “councillor” because of her [“hoped-for”] alleged role in an alleged budget-making process, should think beyond the minute and consider the serious harm that is being done to the reputation of the entire community.

Both Pola Uddin and Shelina Akhtar have created very clear condemnation for the “Bangladeshi"+"Muslim” and related people who are also associated with the Tower Hamlets Borough as well as with the “baroness of Bethnal Green” embarrassment. Neither Pola Uddin nor Shelina Akhtar has said why their personal conduct should be allowed to bring so much venomous comments against the community. Most of those comments are being published by known racist groups who would not be allowed to say those things if Pola Uddin and Shelina Akhtar had done the decent things and quit their positions.
The community deserves that these two step down for each of their disgraced posts and thus allow the process of restoration of the lost reputation of the community to begin.


[To be continued]

Will CON CAMERON let Justine Greening reach the logical conclusion?

Will CON CAMERON let Justine Greening reach the logical conclusion?
Will CON CAMERON let Justine Greening reach the logical conclusion? [To be continued]
The following item has been taken from the website of METRO, a London “news” outlet


Network Rail bosses attacked by transport secretary over bonuses Bonus packages of up to £340,000 to Network Rail bosses were have been branded 'unacceptable' by transport secretary Justine Greening. Related Tags:David Higgins Transport secretary Justine Greening called on Network Rail to 'exercise restraint' (Picture: Alex Lentati) Chief executive Sir David Higgins is in line for the biggest payout of £340,000 – 60 per cent of his £560,000 salary. But a host of other directors face bumper packages despite Network Rail this week admitting health and safety breaches over the deaths of two teenagers killed at a level crossing. Those who could get a 60 per cent bonus include group finance director Patrick Butcher, whose salary is £350,000, operations director Robin Gisby (£330,000), director of asset management Peter Henderson (£440,000), investment projects director Simon Kirby (£330,000), and planning and development director Paul Plummer (£310,000). 'This proposed package is unacceptable,' said Ms Greening yesterday. 'Network Rail needs to be responsible and exercise restraint.' She blamed a 'flawed' system which meant ministers could not block bonuses. A spokesman for Network Rail said the firm's members would meet later this month to decide on the structure of a bonus scheme but no decisions had been made. Network Rail also faces prosecution over the 2007 Grayrigg train crash in Cumbria in which one passenger died.


Read more:

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/889269-network-rail-bosses-attacked-by-transport-secretary-over-bonuses#ixzz1lJaNctRl




KHOODEELAAR! campaign is voice for communities across London

KHOODEELAAR! campaign is voice for communities across London
0605 [0340] Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
01 February 2012

An AADHIKAROnline action report in association with Khoodeelaar! The campaign against Crossrail hole….
From Whitechapel London East One to Westbourne Park station in the Westminster west London borough
Local people get Cross  with Crossrail attacks and demolition


Now Westminster local campaigners ECHO Khoodeelaar! campaign slogan of 2004 and shout out their anger as they too get VERY Cross with Crossrail
  0500 [0340] Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
01 February 2012

An AADHIKAROnline action report in association with Khoodeelaar! The campaign against Crossrail hole….
From Whitechapel London East One to Westbourne Park station in the Westminster west London borough
Local people get Cross  with Crossrail attacks and demolition


Now Westminster local campaigners ECHO Khoodeelaar! campaign slogan of 2004 and shout out their anger as they too get VERY Cross with Crossrail


“The Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole…” campaign organiser Muhammad Haque has written “Khoodeelaar! Told you so!” This is eight years after he coined the slogan “Cross with Crossrail” in February 2004.
It has taken the Westminster borough-based “Victorian Society” as long as eight years before they cottoned on to the fact that Crossrail makes you cross when it attacks London’s communities and traditions.
The banner that the Victorian Society campaigners have been using is also an echo of the 2004 Khoodeelaar! Campaign slogan: Cross with Crossrail. The Victorian Society placard adds for emphasis
“VERY VERY CROSS with Crossrail”.




For years we have called for an end to the lies that the Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail-peddlers have told in claiming that it was bringing benefits to London. All main Political parties are guilty of being stooges to the Big Biz agenda setters pushing for Crassrail.

The arguments for sustainable transport practices have been denied space in the UK Parliament where MPs and Peers have themselves played the parts of stooges to the Big Business secret machine operating inside Parliament and in Whitehall and indeed in the local Councils ion and around London promoting the hybrid “Crossrail Bill”.

The Victorian Society should join our campaign for a genuinely democratic and really transparent parliament which only legislates for things that re tested to be necessary and are demonstrably compatible with a decent, healthy Society.

Muhammad Haque

< 0300 Hrs GMT

London

Wednesday 01 February 2012



see the web site of the Westminster-based news outlet that has reported on the campaign against Cross rail’s demolition attack


http://westminster.londoninformer.co.uk/ Victorian Society criticise Crossrail plans
Posted by Emma Heseltine on Jan 31, 12 01:03 PM
in News

Historical campaigners have hit out at plans to build a Crossrail substation on the site of a Victorian coffee house. 
Protesters campaign to save Big Table bed shop
The Victorian Society, the national charity fighting to preserve remnants of the era, has written to the firm asking them to reconsider demolishing the building, which now houses the Big Table bed company, near Westbourne Park tube station. 
The 1901 coffee house is the last remaining purpose-built Temperance Bar built by the Great Western Coffee Tavern Company, which ran seven such premises for use by railway workers as an alternative to the pub. 
But Crossrail says it needs to build an electricity substation on the site, leaving the unique building facing demolition. 
James Hughes, conservation adviser for the Victorian Society, said: “This is a relatively rare building type and a strong local landmark. 
”It would be a great shame if it was lost and we would like Crossrail to find a way to incorporate at least part of the historic building into their plans for Westbourne Park.” 
The basement of the tavern, where the bed shop trades from, was originally known as Carlton Hall, and was used for educational talks and meetings. 
Because of the nature of the development, Crossrail does not need to apply for planning permission to demolish or redevelop the site, only for the design of the replacement building. 
The Victorian Society has written to Crossrail to try and persuade them to take a ‘responsible and sustainable approach’ to the development. 
A Crossrail spokesman did not comment on the Victorian Society objections, but said: “Crossrail has received several representations concerning the building’s long-term future. 
”The site at 56 Great Western Road is required for a major substation to provide a power supply to the Crossrail trains along the whole line. 
”We are sensitive to the concerns of the Big Table and have been making every effort to enable the business to stay at its leased premises for as long as possible.”
Muhammad Haque said

  © Muhammad Haque has posted online a comment on the latest crass attack on London’s historic legacy by Crossrail.

  0300 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 01 February 2012 February 1, 2012 3:04 AM Khoodeelaar! Told you so! For years we have called for an end to the lies that the Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail-peddlers have told in claiming that it was bringing benefits to London. .

  All main Political parties are guilty of being stooges to the Big Biz agenda setters pushing for Crassrail. .

  The arguments for sustainable transport practices have been denied space in the UK Parliament where MPs and Peers have themselves played the parts of stooges to the Big Business secret machine operating inside Parliament and in Whitehall and indeed in the local Councils ion and around London promoting the hybrid “Crossrail Bill”. The Victorian Society should join our campaign for a genuinely democratic and really transparent parliament which only legislates for things that re tested to be necessary and are demonstrably compatible with a decent, healthy Society. .

  Muhammad Haque .

  0300 Hrs GMT London.

   Wednesday 01 February 2012

Now Westminster local campaigners ECHO Khoodeelaar! campaign slogan of 2004: Cross with Crossrail!

Now Westminster local campaigners ECHO Khoodeelaar! campaign slogan of 2004: Cross with Crossrail!
From Whitechapel London East One to Westbourne Park station in the Westminster west London borough
0500 [0340] Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday

01 February 2012

An AADHIKAROnline action report in association with Khoodeelaar! The campaign against Crossrail hole…. From Whitechapel London East One to Westbourne Park station in the Westminster west London borough Local people get Cross with Crossrail attacks and demolition
Now Westminster local campaigners ECHO Khoodeelaar! campaign slogan of 2004 and shout out their anger as they too get VERY Cross with Crossrail
“The Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole…” campaign organiser Muhammad Haque has written “Khoodeelaar! Told you so!” This is eight years after he coined the slogan “Cross with Crossrail” in February 2004.
It has taken the Westminster borough-based “Victorian Society” as long as eight years before they cottoned on to the fact that Crossrail makes you cross when it attacks London’s communities and traditions.
The banner that the Victorian Society campaigners have been using is also an echo of the 2004 Khoodeelaar! Campaign slogan: Cross with Crossrail. The Victorian Society placard adds for emphasis “VERY VERY CROSS with Crossrail”.
For years we have called for an end to the likes that the Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail-peddlers have told in claiming that it was bringing benefits to London. All main Political parties are guilty of being stooges to the Big Biz agenda setters pushing for Crassrail.
The arguments for sustainable transport practices have been denied space in the UK Parliament where MPs and Peers have themselves played the parts of stooges to the Big Business secret machine operating inside Parliament and in Whitehall and indeed in the local Councils ion and around London promoting the hybrid “Crossrail Bill”.
The Victorian Society should join our campaign for a genuinely democratic and really transparent parliament which only legislates for things that re tested to be necessary and are demonstrably compatible with a decent, healthy Society.
Muhammad Haque
0300 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 01 February 2012
see the web site of the Westminster-based news outlet that has reported on the campaign against Cross rail’s demolition attack
http://westminster.londoninformer.co.uk/ Victorian Society criticise Crossrail plans Posted by Emma Heseltine on Jan 31, 12 01:03 PM in News

Historical campaigners have hit out at plans to build a Crossrail substation on the site of a Victorian coffee house. Protesters campaign to save Big Table bed shop The Victorian Society, the national charity fighting to preserve remnants of the era, has written to the firm asking them to reconsider demolishing the building, which now houses the Big Table bed company, near Westbourne Park tube station. The 1901 coffee house is the last remaining purpose-built Temperance Bar built by the Great Western Coffee Tavern Company, which ran seven such premises for use by railway workers as an alternative to the pub.
But Crossrail says it needs to build an electricity substation on the site, leaving the unique building facing demolition. James Hughes, conservation adviser for the Victorian Society, said: “This is a relatively rare building type and a strong local landmark. ”It would be a great shame if it was lost and we would like Crossrail to find a way to incorporate at least part of the historic building into their plans for Westbourne Park.”
The basement of the tavern, where the bed shop trades from, was originally known as Carlton Hall, and was used for educational talks and meetings.
Because of the nature of the development, Crossrail does not need to apply for planning permission to demolish or redevelop the site, only for the design of the replacement building. The Victorian Society has written to Crossrail to try and persuade them to take a ‘responsible and sustainable approach’ to the development. A Crossrail spokesman did not comment on the Victorian Society objections, but said: “Crossrail has received several representations concerning the building’s long-term future. ”The site at 56 Great Western Road is required for a major substation to provide a power supply to the Crossrail trains along the whole line. ”We are sensitive to the concerns of the Big Table and have been making every effort to enable the business to stay at its leased premises for as long as possible.” Muhammad Haque said © Muhammad Haque has posted online a comment on the latest crass attack on London’s historic legacy by Crossrail. 0300 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 01 February 2012 February 1, 2012 3:04 AM Khoodeelaar! Told you so! For years we have called for an end to the likes that the Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail-peddlers have told in claiming that it was bringing benefits to London. . All main Political parties are guilty of being stooges to the Big Biz agenda setters pushing for Crassrail. . The arguments for sustainable transport practices have been denied space in the UK Parliament where MPs and Peers have themselves played the parts of stooges to the Big Business secret machine operating inside Parliament and in Whitehall and indeed in the local Councils ion and around London promoting the hybrid “Crossrail Bill”. The Victorian Society should join our campaign for a genuinely democratic and really transparent parliament which only legislates for things that re tested to be necessary and are demonstrably compatible with a decent, healthy Society. . Muhammad Haque . 0300 Hrs GMT London. Wednesday 01 February 2012

ROTTEN BOROUGHS feature in PRIVATE EYE mag has Tower Hamlets at top of list with SHELINA AKHTAR

ROTTEN BOROUGHS feature in PRIVATE EYE mag has Tower Hamlets at top of list with SHELINA AKHTAR
ROTTEN BOROUGHS feature in PRIVATE EYE mag has Tower Hamlets at top of list with SHELINA AKHTAR

Could Zac Goldsmith fall prey to the “Bill Gates Syndrome”?

Could Zac Goldsmith fall prey to the “Bill Gates Syndrome”?
Could Zac Goldsmith fall prey to the “Bill Gates Syndrome”? [To be continued]

Big Biz agenda courier CONDEM Cameron carrying on callously failing to grasp the backwardness

Big Biz agenda courier CONDEM Cameron carrying on callously failing to grasp the backwardness
CAMERON is heading madly into a deeper economic and social nightmare mostly of his exacerbating... [To be continued]

Zac Goldsmith worried about his own CON Party-led CONDEM destroying local democracy in Britain

Zac Goldsmith worried about his own CON Party-led CONDEM destroying local democracy in Britain
0355 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
31 January 2012
By © Muhammad Haque

Why is the reportedly "wealthy" Zac Goldsmith worried about his own CON Party-led CONDEM destroying local democracy in Britain? Yesterday [Monday 30 January 2012] Zac Goldsmith put a very brief question during Eric Pickles’ slot license called Question Time for Pickles and cabal to abuse the House of Commons. Goldsmith wasn’t too demanding in his question. But in the ordinary words, he captured perhaps one of the most powerful aspects of the CONDEM destruction of Society that is on in Britain. The Zac Goldsmith observation could be made equally aptly if Eric Pickles were not the occupant in that bureaucratic office but it was held by John Denham instead. Denham is the denier of the truth of social destruction in Britain by successive “regimes” who fakes it still as a “touchy, feely” sort of a “guy”. Denham occupied Pickles’ present box until the Brown regime was ushered out of the various Whitehall London SW1 addresses. Until that ouster which took place in a display of spectacular slow motion manoeuvres brought to the ordinary households across Britain via BBC and SKY live broadcasts in May 2010, Denham behaved as a brazen denier of the truth about the damage that his regime was doing to Society. Denham came across as if he was acting almost in imitation of the monumentally corrupt disguises and masks that Tony Blair had put on and was aided and abetted in that outrageous violation of the universal values of "democracy and decency" by queues of self-seeking, time-serving opportunists bent on feathering their own pathetic little bases. So when someone as unimpressed by CON Cameron as Zac Goldsmith stands up and registers his scepticism to one or more than one of the Deform Bills [that phrase DEFORM is the original AADHIKAR Media Foundation digastrics device], an important narrative substance is added to the equation. The battle between honesty and corruption in CONDEM society has just witnessed one MP who is not likely to buy into any of the CONMEN scams that CONDEM are still cooking. Society at large and outside of the "Palace" [!!!] of Westminster, however is not likely to be protected by that one brief Zac Goldsmith question. And lament. Society is ain a dire state. Not only because of the CONDEM has assault on all that constituted Society. But it is also the fact that the Bliar-G Brown remnants are not helping Society at all. Take another look at the sub-authoritarian line-up that Ed Miliband flaunts in his “Shadow” “cabinet”. [To be continued]

How Lib Dems in Tower Hamlets were blatan tly lying about their "link" with the community!

How Lib Dems in Tower Hamlets were blatan tly lying about their "link" with the community!
0955 Hrs GMT London Monday 30 January 2012.

KHOODEELAAR! UPDATER REPORT on the Crossrail Big Biz agenda assault on the community in the East End of London
The © Muhammad Haque picture of the Crassrail “activities” taken this morning [0839 GMT Monday 30 January 2012] in the Durward Street [off Vallance Road London E1] [and behind the Whitechapel Underground station, Whitechapel Road London E1 shows real live personnel. Yet the Lib Dems in Tower Hamlets had taken no notice of the Crassrail plans when KHOODEELAAR! Intensified the mobilisation against another hole dinging, dirt-spreading, noise-creating assault on the community. That was in the summer of 2007.
KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organiser Muhammad Haque contacted the Lib Dems group and had to spend considerable time literally guiding them to the location where the planned assault by Crassrail was going to take place, all the communication contacts had been done by Khoodeelaar, the signatures collected and the doors knocked and the details of the impact explained over a period of months.
after all that work, done by Khoodeelaar! And coordinated by Muhammad Haque, the Lib Dems were openly given a democratic opportunity to use their “elected position” on the local Tower Hamlets Council to raise questions about the Crassrail attack on that part of the Borough’s population.
By the time they managed to “say” something about Crossrail in the Council Chamber, they were astonishingly but brazenly reluctant to tell the truth of how they had got to be a\ware at all about the Crassrail assaults on the community in the area concerned.
Why?
Because the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems, in common with the Cons and the former Labour Party “bureaucracies” in the Borough, were couriers of the agenda that was the “position” of the “central” Party HQs.
But the Lib Dems, just like their bureaucratic counterparts in the other two Parties, were also anxious to be seen that they were “with the local community”! Which they never were.
But they had to make a pretend appearance of being with the community while remaining clueless as to the depth or the implications of the assaults by the Big Biz\ agenda scam Crossrail and about the range of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against it.
Five years on, the Lib Dems as part of the CONDEM collusion are exposed to the wider UK population as hypocritical and many-faced just as we found their bureaucratic “locally based, Tower Hamlets Council-linked leadership” to be.
Not a surprise then that there is not a single word about Crossrail “activities” anywhere in the published output of “Lib Dems” “politics” “about” or “in” or “in the name of” Tower Hamlets. [To be continued]

CON CAMERON caught again as crass backer of criminally outrageous robbery

CON CAMERON caught again  as crass backer of criminally outrageous robbery
The following compilation of agency reports on RBS criminality has been issued by UKPA via http://www.google.com


RBS boss urged to waive his bonus (UKPA) – 3 hours ago The chief executive of the taxpayer-funded Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) is facing mounting pressure to follow the bank's chairman and waive his bonus of almost £1 million. News of a double bonus scheme that could greatly inflate Stephen Hester's £1.2 million annual salary to a possible £8 million over the coming years has fuelled calls for him to forgo a shares bonus worth £963,000. A stark contrast came to light on Saturday when it was announced the bank's chairman Sir Philip Hampton had decided to decline a £1.4 million payout. Sir Philip, chairman of RBS since 2009, had been on course to claim 5.17 million shares in the financial institution in February, but it is thought he told the bank's remuneration committee it would "not be appropriate" for him to take the shares to which he is entitled. He was given the scheme when he was appointed at the 83% state-owned bank as part of a three-year long-term incentive deal. An RBS spokesman said: "Sir Philip Hampton will not receive the 5.17 million shares he was awarded in 2009 when he joined RBS." Mr Hester is entitled to both short-term bonuses and long-term incentive bonuses based on factors such as performance and meeting targets. The £963,000 he was awarded last week was a short-term bonus equalling 3.6 million shares, relating to the 2011 calendar year. Short term bonuses are capped at 200% of his annual salary, so his last payout was not as large as it could have potentially been. The long term scheme is based on the previous three years, so Mr Hester is approaching the point at which it can come into effect. It is thought the long term bonus could potentially reach £8 million, but it is unlikely that maximum target will be met. On Saturday, Prime Minister David Cameron sidestepped calls to personally block Mr Hester's award, saying: "It is a matter for him."

Speaking at Chequers, Mr Cameron told journalists:

"It's obviously his decision. My decision is to make sure the team at RBS get on with the job of turning the bank round and we made our views very clear on the bonus and that's why it was cut in half compared to last year."

Copyright © 2012 The Press Association. All rights reserved.

Local Councils in England are robbing widows too!

Local Councils in England are robbing widows too!
From the web site of the London DAILY EXPRESS Group web site
0050 Hrs GMT Sunday 29 January 2012


COUNCILS PICK WIDOWS' POCKETS

Eric Pickles castigated Labour for the huge rise in council tax bills

Sunday
January 29,
2012 By Kirsty Buchanan
WIDOWS and divorcees are being targeted for a huge rise in their council tax bills.
Labour-run councils want the eight million people living alone to pay the same rate as couples or households with several working adults.
Their plan to scrap the 25 per cent single person discount would push up bills by nearly £360 a year on the average Band D home. Communities Secretary Eric Pickles last night condemned the move.
He said the unfair “widows tax” would affect millions of pensioners living alone after the death of their spouse. Single parents would also be hit.
“There is clearly a well-orchestrated campaign being run by the Labour Party to target the elderly, single mothers and the most vulnerable,” Mr Pickles said.
“They want to punish people who have worked hard all their lives and paid their taxes simply because they live on their own. There is a gross sense of injustice at raising taxes that could force people out of their homes. This is a widows tax and shows how out of touch Labour is.” The demand by Labour-run town halls to scrap the discount, which has been in place since council tax was introduced in 1993, emerged from a Government consultation on how to save 10 per cent of the cost of council tax benefit.br>
In scores of submissions from Labour councils, town hall chiefs argued that working single people or pensioners not on benefits could afford to pay the full council tax bill to cushion a £500million cutback on benefit claimants.
The London borough of Southwark said: “The unconditional award of a single person discount regardless of income seems inappropriate when asking local authorities to manage a 10 per cent reduction in funding while protecting vulnerable claimants.”
Oldham’s treasurer Steven Mair said the “universal discount irrespective of income” should go, while Bradford’s strategy delivery manager Mark Widdowson said its exclusion from debate was a “major missed opportunity”.
Among those backing the call were Luton, Doncaster, Bedford, Colchester, Burnley, South Tyneside, Exeter, Sheffield and Oxford councils as well as the London boroughs of Islington, Hounslow, Brent, Harrow and Newham. Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “It beggars belief that some town halls are suggesting abolishing one of the few reliefs on council tax at a time when so many are struggling with that incredibly burdensome bill. “Getting rid of single occupancy discount would be a tax rise for millions of people in order to sustain generous council tax benefits for a select few. Council tax has almost doubled in the last decade. Some local authorities need to stop treating taxpayers as an endless source of revenue and focus on finding savings instead.” Of the 23 million households in England, eight million claim the discount.
Of that total an estimated 560,000 are working single parents. A further 2.9 million homes are occupied by a single person over 65. The average Band D bill is £1,439. In its submission, South Tyneside council said it would be “easier to collect an increase in council tax as a result of a discount being withdrawn from someone who can afford it than someone on benefit who can’t”.
Kirklees council in Yorkshire said: “Not all those in receipt of single person discount can be said to need the 25 per cent reduction in liability.”
Stockton-on-Tees council calculated “removal of the automatic entitlement of 25 per cent single person discount would generate 2.5 times the 10 per cent savings target”.
The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy said: “Given the costs of the single person discount scheme it has to be asked whether this continues to be a fair way to use limited resources when others on much lower levels of income are facing reductions in help and therefore increase in the amounts they will have to pay in respect of council tax.”
The political row over council tax discounts emerged as Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith vowed to overturn defeats inflicted on the Welfare Reform Bill in the House of Lords.
Bishops led the revolt against plans for a £26,000 benefit cap and watered down proposals on child maintenance and Employment Support Allowance.
The Bill returns to the Commons on Wednesday.

The Guardian has failed to tell the truth on 'race', say the facts!

The Guardian has failed to tell the truth on 'race', say the facts!
1740 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
28 January 2012
The Guardian has failed to tell the truth on 'race', say the facts!

AADHIKAROnline continuing the exclusive diagnosis of the Guardian and the rest of the “mainstream” “mass communication” “media” in Britain.
This part of the diagnostic report says that The Guardian has failed to tell the truth on 'race', say the facts!

KHOODEELAAR! told you so! 2012 Games Hosting is a huge wasteful stunt widely mocked by most people

KHOODEELAAR! told you so! 2012 Games Hosting is a huge wasteful stunt widely mocked by most people
KHOODEELAAR! told you so!

0620 Hrs GMT London Friday 27 January 2012.

from the Guardian web site which has published the following item only 18 minutes ago:

London 2012 faces hurdles on the home stretch London's Olympic Games organisers have had a smooth ride so far, but the next six months will be crucial in securing its legacy reddit this Comments (0) Owen Gibson, Olympics editor The Guardian, Friday 27 January 2012 Article history Londoners rejoiced at winning the bid to host the Olympics: will the cheerleaders be out in force again during the Games? Photograph: Adrian Dennis/AFP/Getty Images If medals were awarded for celebrating milestones, London 2012 organisers would already be groaning under the weight of precious metal. With three years to go, Lord Coe and his Locog team grinned for the cameras on the new Javelin train to Stratford (roughly translated – don't worry the trains will run on time); two years out, Sir Chris Hoy sped around the already celebrated Olympic Park velodrome (forget Wembley – the venues will be ready, too). With 12 months on the countdown clock, Boris Johnson played his traditional Paris-baiting role in the newly unveiled aquatics centre and David Cameron invited the world to the capital from Trafalgar Square. Accompanied, incongruously, by Princess Anne and The Feeling. But with six months to go and the organising committee kicking for home, or whatever other sporting metaphor you choose to employ, things have got serious. The cavorting one-eyed mascots – sinister to adults, oddly appealing to kids – have been pushed to one side; the east London schoolchildren in matching T-shirts given the day off. Instead, the world's media will be walked painstakingly through plans for the next six months, from the final batch of ticket sales to the torch relay and all the way to the opening ceremony on 27 July. The years spent poring over spreadsheets and models are about to be put to the test under the glare of a world media not necessarily predisposed to London after the cheerful kicking doled out to previous Games by our press. Until recently, progress appeared remarkably smooth. The organising committee had reached Olympic year without the mass resignations, sackings, government splits and huge cost overruns that have defined previous Games. The venues were built, sponsors brought onboard despite the economic crisis and tickets all but sold out. But the pressure of imminent delivery has caused cracks in the facade. While ticketing has been a triumph in terms of revenue, it has dented public confidence as technology failed and disappointed punters complained of unfair treatment. The scramble for the final batch of 1.3m sales in April will be a stern test. Locog's reputation for painstaking attention to detail took a dent when security numbers inside venues more than doubled from 10,000 to 23,700 – requiring a call on the military and pushing the £9.3bn budget to the limit. Then there is the ongoing drip, drip of negative publicity over Dow Chemical's sponsorship of the wrap that surrounds the stadium, fuelled by campaigners who believe it has yet to fully answer for its links to the 1984 Bhopal disaster. It is a wholly unnecessary row, especially given that many believe the stadium looks better without the wrap, and taps into the worst fears of some about the relationship between the Games and big business. For all that, organisers could not hope to be in much better shape ahead of the home straight. The three biggest imponderables remain the same as when the bid was won: London's crowded transport system, security and the British weather. There will be plenty of doom laden prognoses issued for each but organisers believe they have done all they can. Transport for London chiefs are relying on entreaties to commuters and ticket holders alike to consider alternative routes and change their travel plans. Security costs and numbers have soared, but organisers insist it won't affect the atmosphere. And, short of investing in cloud seeding technology like the Chinese, the weather remains in the lap of the gods. The stage is ready – now Locog needs to put on the show and build the public mood. At one end of the scale are the professional cynics and "Gloomadon poppers" (as Johnson has christened them). At the other, the evangelical cheerleaders – led by Coe and the politicians who have staked their reputations on its success, who insist it will result in huge legacy benefits for UK plc and the health of the nation. Most of the public remain somewhere in the middle – excited by the sporting spectacle and an excuse to party but unsettled about aspects of the International Olympic Committee juggernaut about to hit London. As the focus switches, probably sometime around the torch's arrival in May, from logistics to the scale of the sporting spectacle, the lesson of previous Games is that cheerleaders will start to drown out cynics. Most importantly, the cohort of Team GB athletes who will have the biggest impact on the mood of the nation appear in fine shape following a period of unprecedented public investment. Organisers hope for an early "moment" – perhaps a gold for cyclist Mark Cavendish on the first weekend – to catalyse support.Ministers and organisers are banking on a repeat of the wave of giddiness that gripped the country during the royal wedding to trump the pervading gloom of a dark economic cloud they had at one point hoped might be about to lift by the time of the Games. The mixed bag of expansive legacy promises that went a long way to securing the Games for London and justifying its price tag will fade into the background the closer the Games get – only to return more loudly afterwards. In the meantime, a viable future must be found for the main stadium if it is to avoid the dreaded white elephant tag. In truth, we won't really know just how gaga the British public will go for these Games until Danny Boyle unveils his Underworld-soundtracked opening ceremony. In the meantime, there's just 82 days until the 100-days-to-go milestone.

Muhammad Haque diagnosing ex EAST LONDON ADVERTISER over Shelina Akhtar "resignation"

Muhammad Haque diagnosing ex EAST LONDON ADVERTISER over Shelina Akhtar "resignation"
0520 [0505] [0425] Hrs GMT London Friday 27 January 2012.
Shelina Akhtar :
the Archant-controlled ex “East London Advertiser” is being lazy.

By © © Muhammad Haque

The latest “news” item about Brick Lane London E1 area Ward Tower Hamlets councillor Shelina Akhtar, is not at all a news item. It is a dodge. It is a fudge. It is trite. It is of no consequence It is so futile that I am going to examine it in every detail. The ex “ELA” has the duty to report on what Tower Hamlets Council is doing about fraud in the Council. What the Council is doing about poverty. About unemployment. About failing schools. About failing projects. About Council funding. About the abuses of the links with the Council that many councillors are involved in. The item about Shelina Akhtar as carried on the website still published in the name of the “East London Advertiser" does not say anything about the Council. Nor does it say anything about what the Council is “doing” about Shelina Akhtar.
S what SHOULD the ex East London Advertiser have said?
It should have said what the OTHER COUNCILLORS are doing to “democratically” persuade Shelina Akhtar to resign
The reporter of the ex “East London Advertiser” item is Mike Brooke who cannot pretend ignorance about what many in Tower Hamlets are saying about the very low level of accountability by the Council. So why isn’t Mike Brooke saying what he knows people are saying about the Council as a whole and not just about the issue of Shelina Akhtar?


[To be continued]
From the ARCHANT-controlled web site of the ex EAST LONDON ADVERTISER
Disgraced Tower Hamlets councillor Shelina Akhtar refuses to step down Mike Brooke Thursday, January 26, 2012 4:51 PM The disgraced Tower Hamlets councillor who admitted in court dishonestly claiming housing and council tax benefit continues to defy calls for her resignation. • Cllr Shelina Akhtar didn’t turn up for last night’s key council meeting—but sent apologies instead. Mayor Lutfur Rahman had been the latest to call for her to step down, after demands from both the Labour Group leader and Tory Group leader for her to go. She pleaded guilty on January 9 to three charges of failing to notify a change of circumstance and continued claiming benefits and will be sentenced on February 6. Akhtar won her seat on the council in 2010, representing Spitalfields for Labour, but then defected to become an independent working alongside Mayor Rahman. The mayor said earlier this month that council procedures had to be followed and the authority was waiting for the outcome of the court sentencing before deciding any further steps.

DAILY TORY GRAPH CONFESSES: "UK heading for first double-dip recession since 1975"

DAILY TORY GRAPH CONFESSES: "UK heading for first double-dip recession since 1975"
"Britain is heading for its first double-dip recession in 37 years after the economy slumped in the final quarter of 2011 and officials warned of a new threat to jobs....."

Mick Jagger snub shows the really neat model that Miliband could consider! Instead of aping CONDEM

Mick Jagger snub shows the really neat model that Miliband could consider! Instead of aping CONDEM
From the web site: www.electric.banana.co.uk


Sir Mick Jagger snubs David Cameron tea party
January 25, 2012

Sir Mick Jagger has snubbed an invitation to a UK event at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland.
The tea party, hosted by Prime Minister David Cameron at a ski resort in Davos, is being held to promote British creativity in other countries.

The Rolling Stones frontman blamed “inaccurate” comments on his political allegiances for the snub. Sir Mick has since issued a statement following reports in UK media claiming he was backing the prime minister and claims that he is being used as a “political football” by the government.
The 68-year-old said: “During my career I have always eschewed party politics and came to Davos as a guest, as I thought it would be stimulating. I have always been interested in economics and world events.
“I now find myself being used as a political football and there has been a lot of comment about my political allegiances which are inaccurate. I think it’s best I decline the invitation to the key event and curtail my visit.”
Others expected to attend the event include model Lily Cole, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, and London Mayor Boris Johnson.

Mick Jagger is the week's Leader of the Opposition to the Nasty party!

Mick Jagger is the week's Leader of the Opposition to the Nasty party!
What can it mean for Society when a Mick Jagger spurns a David Cameron? And a Boris Johnson, “to boot”?

ITV London fails abysmally to tell the truth, choosing instead to peddle ITS own type of untruth

ITV London fails abysmally to tell the truth, choosing instead to peddle ITS own type of untruth
0420 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
25 January 2012
Diagnosing the Dishonest Mainstream CONDEM Media in Britain and the Big Business agenda for Multi£Billion Corruption and Robbery of Society that they promote and peddle and support
By© Muhammad Haque
ITV London’s broadcast edition of 1800 Hrs Tuesday 24 January 2012 promoted Boris Johnson in a positive light...
The London TV news programme reported that it was doing so because an alleged recipient of Boris Johnson’s “Englishman” abroad “good manners” as apparently witnessed in relation to an Italian family, had paid public tributes to the occupant of the Onion on the South Bank of the river Thames.
What the ITV London programme SHOULD have reported but didn’t, was the fact that Boris Johnson was a participant and openly admitted practitioner of what was and remains a massively dishonest trait. That is of being party to what can only be a paid lobbying arrangement between the offices that Boris Johnson holds with the significant influence that those offices carry and the business interests of the London Daily Telegraph media group. .
Call it chicken feed or peanuts, the sum of £250,000.00 [or £200,000.00 if the “scholarships” he reportedly launched are taken into account] cannot be justified as being just “remuneration” for likes than 50 pieces of allegedly Boris-authored pieces for the TELEGRAPH.
It is unheard of that any “writer” for a newspaper can be paid that sum.
So outrageous is Boris’s paid links with the Daily Telegraph that many blogs have been written about this.
Including the one that is accessible via the UREL we have reproduced with this AADHIKAR Media REVIEW OF THE UK MEDIA dated 25 January 2012.
Ken Livingstone, Boris Johnson's opponent at the scheduled poll on 03 May 2012, made a point of referring pejoratively to Boris’ paid links with the Telegraph Group. Livingstone made the remark at an event held in the East End of London on Monday evening. It was noted however that no-one from the audience at the Toynbee Hall, Commercial Street London E1, really came back on that remark. .
Does that absence of a response from an audience that was got together for a “TELL KEN” performance, proof that people had given up on telling Ken Livingstone about London?
Not so on other subjects.
So why the silence on Boris’s Peanuts pavements by the Telegraph, a known factor in the “movers and shakers” for the Right wing and for Big Business in Britain? [To b

Dishonest Britain. Lying is now the most booming trait in CONDEM Society

Dishonest Britain. Lying is now the most booming trait in CONDEM Society
from the web site of the London DAILY TELEGRAPH MEDIA group
High Speed Rail: broken Britain's latest new suicidal gesture
By
James Delingpole

Last updated: January 7th, 2012

A total and utter waste of money
When I read the letter in yesterday's Telegraph in which a bunch of self-described "business leaders" (ugh!) urged the government to push through its High Speed Rail plans, two things sprang immediately to mind. The first was the similarly bullying and wrongheaded letter from the 364 economists who wrote to tell the Times in 1981 that Margaret Thatcher's monetary policies would be a disaster for Britain. And the second was just how dishonest its argument was.
The main thrust of it was: lots of "world-class economies" have HS2, so we should too because, er, we should.
On these grounds you could justify all sorts of things. China, for example, is estimated to execute as many as 5,000 people a year. Their economy is much bigger than ours and much faster growing, so clearly we need to bring back the death penalty now. Israel, has an economy growing at around 5 per cent per annum (much faster than ours), and it has compulsory national service – so clearly we should introduce that too. And in Singapore, you can be hanged if you're caught chewing gum in the street after the curfew – something like that, anyway – so clearly we should make our legal system much more draconian in order to catch up with them.
Inserted earlier on in the letter was an impressive-sounding argument with statisticky factoids about infrastructure:
The United Kingdom’s infrastructure has fallen behind that of competing countries over the past decade. The World Economic Forum has ranked the United Kingdom a mediocre 28th for “quality of overall infrastructure” and 19th for our railroads. Between 2000 and 2007 the United Kingdom was the lowest investor in infrastructure of all the OECD countries. The United Kingdom has a massive infrastructure deficit, estimated at £3,500 billion over the next decade, lagging significantly behind our closest trade partners in northern Europe, such as France and Germany. This places British business at a competitive disadvantage.
I don't think anyone would dispute that our infrastructure is woeful. But I also think you'd be hard-pushed to argue that Britain's most pressing infrastructure problem right now is the inability of rich commuters to get from Birmingham to London half an hour earlier than they would otherwise have done. If we really must blow £32 billion on capital projects rather than pay off our deficit, there are many more productive ways we could spend it. Fast broadband would be one. Increasing our number of airport runways or – better still – building a new airport would be another.
My loathing of HS2 is currently only at its inchoate stage.
No doubt as the weeks progress, plenty more arguments will emerge to support my objections – but this uncharacteristically sound critique from the Economist is a good place to start. What I very much sense is that HS2 is shaping up to be a cock-up as big as the NHS supercomputer, as teeth-gnashingly expensive, wasteful and corrupt as PFI, as environmentally damaging as Chris Huhne's bird-chomping, landscape-blighting Eco Crucifixes (TM) and as successful and on-time as Edinburgh's marvellous tram system. Oh, and Siemens are involved: say no more.
 

Why UK Parliament became bankrupt and "the Bishops" had to restore credit!

Why UK Parliament became bankrupt and "the Bishops" had to restore credit!
0925 [0910] [0845] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 24 January 2012
By © Muhammad Haque

Even a Christian religious leader has to denounce UK Nasty Party agenda for more poverty-creation!
This extraordinary Collusion between the Nasty party and the Sick-Clegg party [note the small p here] is even more significant for the bankruptcy of the Official Opposition in the UK House of Commons over the state of Society in Britain today.
Monday’s routine promotion on the floor of the House of Commons of the Nasty party agenda against the already economically and socially disenfranchised as fronted jointly by the formerly disguised [“Quiet Man”] military man Iain Duncan Smith and the City Big Biz-funding linked “moral high ground claimant” and fanatical Nasty agenda-peddler Chris Grayling was only possible because there was no “Opposition”.
When the token Opposition “leader” on the Department for Want and Poverty-creation [=DWP] stood up, he exhibited more symptoms of his immorality and unfitness for purpose than had been evident in the callous note he had left in the UK Treasury boasting that there was “NO money left”!
Not a surprise then that Iain Duncan Smith came across as “morally” loud in comparison with the mechanical, morality-free ritual “critic” Liam Byrne!
When Byrne made an apparent attempt to put a “follow up” “challenge” to Iain Duncan Smith, the al most rehabilitated Far Right agitator and openly anti-democratic John Bercow of the “Federation of Conservative Students” [of the 1980s] was able to act as if he was indeed a legitimate almost “reasonable” chair of a\ DEMOCVARIOC Assembly. Bercow refused to let Byrne come back. Thus showing that he was as much active in letting the Nasty agenda peddlers have their say than in having even a pretend opponent make a comprehensive “retort” to the utterances…
Those who have been giving too much credit to Sally Bercow ought to examine the actual role that Bercow the “Labour Party poodle” has been playing in guiding the “debates” increasingly away from a semblance of democratic opposition to the resurgent reactionary House of Commons that has been visible since May 2010.
There was no evidence in the contents that Bercow allowed to be put in from the “Opposition” that the facts of the Poverty-Creating, Cruelty-increasing “Welfare Reform Bill” entails.
Outside of the Houses of Parliament and in the studio used by the BBC’s “Daily Politics” slot fronted by Jo Coburn on the day, Patricia Hollins, now being decorated as "Baroness" was physically earnestly displaying HER OWN BANKRUPT record as a Nasty agenda-prompter when in Tony Blair’s cabal.
Patrician came across just as empty of content as Liam Byrne

It is against the background of such dire lack of substance that the public and Society - now held hostage by a Nasty gang pretending to be a democratically formed Parliamentary alliance – is having to look to an otherwise minority group like the Bishops in the UK House of Peers for some sort of moral leadership against the Nasties who have taken over the UK State and are bent on unleashing a riot of violence against all the basic tents and values on which the Society has been reliant so far… [To be continued]

Can Ken can it in 2012? Exclusive reports from Brick Lane

Can Ken can it in 2012? Exclusive reports from Brick Lane
0130 [0100] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 24 January 2012.

By© Muhammad Haque
There is a cultural revolution on in Britain today. It is a regressive one tending to the dark ages.
This is what haas come across all day Monday in the contents of the mainstream propaganda media. My reports will counter that. I start with a look at the Labour Party’s candidate for the London mayoral election in May Ken Livingstone who spent the evening “rush hour” in Whitechapel and then appeared at a Question and Answer session at the Toynbee Hall. Toynbee Hall is of course the same venue where David Cameron had mounted one of his Nasty, racist promotions not long ago. Did Ken Livingstone expose David Cameron in his Q& A session on Monday? [To be continued]

Zainab Badawi aiding Empire zombifiers, colonisers

Zainab Badawi aiding Empire zombifiers, colonisers
The Economics of lootery disguised as "capitalism" is updated daily by the likes of the BBC.
The idea behind the updates is t keep capitalism in dominant position so that most of society pays for the greed, the thefts and the looting by the few who also set the agenda that dominates the BBC.
Re-designating the ”economics” of LOOTERY "responsible" Capitalism does not change it.
So David Cameron  knows it when he fakes it as another "driver" in office to make "British market" stop being a "crony capitalist" operation.
Cameron has to show that he has only one standard.
It will be hundreds of years before anyone in Cameron's position can even admit that he or she banks on multiple standards. Not just “double standards”..
Over to BBC NEWS Channel who has been doing Cameron’s job for hi, in extrapolating the fraud at home by faking a grilling over Al-Jazeera, the so-called Arabic media operation. It may contain Arabic language inputs but is is far from being the answer to the lies that the BBC daily dishes out as the main agenda.

0505 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
23 January 2012.
EDitor © Muhammad Haque

The BBC’s decision to slot in Al Jazeera’s founding  executive Wadah Khanfar for a grilling [in the “Hardsell” misdescribed as HRADTALK]  by one of the Empire Propaganda Industry's leading ethnic surrogates, Zainab Badawi brings up to date the state of the zombifying agenda.
It is the same as it has been for the entirety of the last 50 years of the 20th century. Zainab never fails to serve the zombifiers.
And with Wadha Khanfar, she was not going to. And the both of them would deserve all the pats on the backs that they have earned by their servitude to the status quo.
[To be continued]

Shaming a community must be enough for confessed benefit fraud councillor to go

Shaming a community must be enough for confessed benefit fraud councillor to go
1800 Hrs GMT London Saturday 21 January 2012.
STATEMENT and commentary on councillor fraud in Tower Hamlets. the BHANGEELAAR! Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets and the campaign for an elected council made up of democratically conscious and socially responsible and active councillors
BHANGEELAAR!
The Campaign against an executive elected mayor in Tower Hamlets
[Calling for a NO to elected mayor since 06 February 2010]

“No to an elected executive mayor” CAMPAIGN comments on the latest convicted fraudster Councillor
The following comment was prompted by a piece published on the former "East London Advertiser" and was posted within a very short time on the same web site [three typing errors have been corrected in the version below]:
Our Movement has called for the sacking and or resignation and or the lawfully implemented removal for life from office of ALL wrongdoing occupants or wannabe occupants of public office in the area covered by the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
Please do bear in mind the fact that ALL councillors and others "elected" to publicly paid for positions in Tower Hamlets have been silent on all those issues. The fact that they are just beginning to open their mouths is not good enough. To be a fraudster is not any worse than being a colluder and tolerator of fraudster.
Shelina AkhtarAkterAktar is not the first Tower Hamlets Councillor who has been caught out over Council tax benefits abuse and in the present case, theft.
There are OTHER frauds and abuse. The worst fraud is of course the one that most people appear to leave out of the list. That fraud is the ritualistic fraud that is given a "legitimate image and label". It is called council election [and or by-election]. What the candidates say at the door when canvassing for votes they totally forget for years.
What the councillors and the voters do about that fraud is the question that we are campaigning on this week and for the next years.
Councillors who are not yet convicted as criminals but are tolerating crimes of mass negligence by the local Council must be held to account.
Do they have the honesty and the conscience to face the audit?
BHANGEELAAR! The Campaign against an executive elected mayor in Tower Hamlets [Calling for a NO to elected mayor since 06 February

below is the full text of Peter Golds letter to the self-appointed but totally strange “Monitoring Officer” Isabella Freeman. Peter Golds has not got the focus right in his letter.
However, his is the only text that we have been able to get hold of.
Mr Golds must explain why he failed to stay firm and continue to oppose the executive elected mayor system. Had he done so, we would have a council now that at least in theory could be subject to a semblance of a democratic process that would have more people on the council having a say IF THEY POSSESSED the intellectual, the m oral, the ethical and the democratic abilities, the collective will and the necessary basic social sense of responsibility.


We shall continue on this theme in the coming weeks, months... [To be continued]








London Borough of Tower Hamlets
Mulberry Place
Clove Crescent
London
E14 2BG
0207 364 4830 (office)
Cllrpetergolds@aol.com
Ms Isabella Freeman
Monitoring Officer
London Borough of Tower Hamlets
Mulberry Place
Clove Crescent
London
E14 2BG
16th January 2012
Dear Ms Freeman
Re: Shelina Akhtar (Aktar)
I am writing with regard to the motion to council submitted by myself and Cllr Archer on behalf of our group. Mr Williams has spoken to me and I have agreed an amendment, merely calling for this corrupt and disgraced individual to resign her membership of this council as I was told that as a council “we cannot suspend her”.
Shelina Akhtar was elected Labour councillor for the Spitalfields and Banglatown ward in May 2010 giving her address as 37 Toynbee Street, E1. During April 2010, after her selection, the number of electors at 37 Toynbee Street increased and subsequently all voted in the election.
Following her election she demanded that her name be changed on council records to Shelina Aktar and quickly left the Labour Party, joining the Independent group supporting the candidature of Cllr Lutfur Rahman as Executive Mayor.
In July 2010 Shelina Akhtar of 112 Blackwall Way, E14 was convicted on three counts of benefit fraud. Of course, had anybody merely researched the name Shelina Akhtar she might have escaped public scrutiny as she had insisted all entries on her regarding council information be changed to Aktar. Luckily for the public this ruse failed.
In April 2011 she was charged on three counts of failing to notify a change of circumstances, which would have affected her entitlement to benefit.
Shelina Akhtar of Blackwall Way is the same Shelina Aktar of 37 Toynbee Street. She currently appears to occupy two properties. In one case receiving a councillor’s allowance and in the other being convicted for fraud, whilst varying the name to, hopefully, prevent discovery.
In January 2012 she pleaded guilty to further charges of benefit fraud and is awaiting sentence.
She has without a shadow of doubt, brought this authority into disrepute.
I am therefore surprised that our existing Standards process has made no recommendation about her position. They currently have the power to suspend her membership of this council, indeed a councillor has recently been suspended for reasons which seem, somewhat arcane. I know for fact that there are at least five current investigations being undertaken by Standards which are vexatious and driven by malice on the part of councillors from the Independent members of whom Shelina Akhtar (Aktar) has been an active member as late as December 2011, attending Mayoral engagements and “group” meetings on a monthly basis.
The fact that she has been found guilty on two occasions (the first within two months of being elected) should have ensured that the Standards Committee met and considered her situation.
There are concerns amongst councillors and residents that her position will be supported to provide a prop for the Mayor in the budget process. How will this show Tower Hamlets if the Mayoral budget is approved on the vote of a convicted benefit fraudster?
She is convicted. This information is public; surely the Standards Committee could meet and take action before January 25th. After all they cannot change the verdict as she admitted a plea of guilty. They have also had eighteen months from the first conviction to consider her bringing the council into disrepute.
One reason the Standards regime has been fallen into disrepute nationally are the number of simply vexatious complaints which have seen councillors suspended for misplaced remarks or foolish “tweets”. Here we have a law breaker, who now appears to be permitted to take part in the budget process of an elective body spending over £1billion of public money.
In any other body, she would have been suspended. Why not here?
Yours sincerely

(Cllr) Peter Golds




BBC is again exposed as a peddlar of lies and for self-seekers

BBC is again exposed as a peddlar of lies and for self-seekers
Editor © Muhammad Haque..
AADHIKARonline is publishing this CONTEXTUAL and exclusive analysis of the role played by the likes of Gus O Donell at 0115 GMT Friday 20 January 2012, just an hour after it was published via Google.com on the internet. O Donnell, for ages the “head of the Civil Service” is now retired. He has just been kicked into the UK House of Peers.
O Donell is also a multi £Millionaire, having pocketed £Millions as HIS pension bounty.
The Copyrights an other relevant IPRs of the UK Press Association are acknowledged.
. The Muhammad Haque Constitutional Law commentary about Gus On Donell will appear here during the day Friday 20 January 2012.

Civil Service changes 'concern' MPs (UKPA) – 1 hour ago 


David Cameron's shake-up of the top jobs in the Civil Service "may not be sustainable" and risks reducing Whitehall's most senior mandarins to the status of "political courtiers", a cross-party committee of MPs has warned.
The Commons Public Administration Committee warned that splitting the roles of Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Home Civil Service "could lead to weaker leadership and disperse power at a critical time of change in government".
Four former Cabinet Secretaries have expressed "deep reservations" about the changes, said the committee, in a newly published report which called for a review of the new structure within six months.
The report recommended the appointment of a full-time Head of the Civil Service, who should also be Permanent Secretary of the Cabinet Office and should attend Cabinet regularly and have the ear of the Prime Minister.
When Sir Gus O'Donnell retired as Whitehall's most senior official at the end of last year, the Prime Minister appointed Sir Jeremy Heywood as his successor as Cabinet Secretary - effectively the top civil servant at 10 Downing Street.
But, in a significant shake-up of responsibilities, Mr Cameron gave Sir Gus's former job as Head of the Home Civil Service to Sir Bob Kerslake, who also retained his role as top civil servant at the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). Meanwhile, Sir Gus's old post of Permanent Secretary at the Cabinet Office went to Ian Watmore.
Mr Cameron told MPs in November that the changes would "modernise" the way government worked, adding: "I absolutely feel this is the right thing to do." But the report raised concerns that Sir Bob may be left with "unequal status" to Sir Jeremy and limited access to the Prime Minister.
And the MPs said they doubted that Sir Bob would be able to fulfil his duties as Head of the Home Civil Service in the two days a week allotted to the role, while running the DCLG in the other three.
The committee said: "We are concerned that this could lead to weaker leadership and disperse power at a critical time of change in government. The Civil Service needs to have clear and effective leadership and a strong reforming head to make the necessary changes.
"We are disturbed that all four surviving former Cabinet Secretaries have expressed deep reservations. We therefore believe it would be right for the Government to monitor these changes and review their effectiveness in due course."
Copyright © 2012 The Press Association. All rights reserved.

Even worse confessions to invasions of people's privacy from Murdoch "Media"!

Even worse confessions to invasions of people's privacy from Murdoch "Media"!
From Channel 4 News web site accessed at 2228 GMT Thursday 19 January 2012:


Thursday 19 January 2012 In his most comprehensive interview since his arrest, former News of the World chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck tells Andy Davies he was a "coward" for not telling Rebekah Brooks about phone hacking. In 2004, as the newspaper's chief reporter, he broke the story of David Beckham's alleged extramarital affair with Rebecca Loos. Four years later he penned a News of the World piece which claimed, incorrectly, than an orgy attended by former Formula 1 boss Max Mosley had a Nazi theme. Mr Mosley was subsequently awarded £60,000 for invasion of privacy. It was the discovery of a transcript of an email now known as the "For Neville" email in private investigator Glenn Mulcaire's papers, with lists of alleged phone hack transcriptions, which confirmed that hacking at the paper extended beyond just one "rogue reporter". It is Thurlbeck's position on the "For Neville" email that this had involved hacking by other News of the World journalists - not him. Furthermore, he claims he named those journalists to his editor and legal manager in 2008. On 5 April 2011, three months before the closure of the News of the World, Thurlbeck was arrested as part of the Operation Weeting investigation into phone hacking at the paper. The NoW subsequently sacked him. 'I look back with shame' In an interview with Channel 4 News Home Affairs Correspondent Andy Davies, Neville Thurlbeck calls himself a "coward" for failing to alert the most senior News International management about phone hacking at News of the World. On the subject of whether or not he himself ever commissioned the action of phone hacking, Thurlbeck reasserts his innocence. But he admits that he should have spoken to his then NoW editor, Rebekah Brooks, about what was going on. "I look back with shame and say, 'I should have knocked on Rebekah Brooks's door. I knew Rebekah very well. I was her news editor when she was editor. We had a very good relationship." Thurlbeck says he discussed the issue with his closest friends but could never make up his mind whether or not to go to the chief executive officer. Complicated allegations On his newspaper's coverage of the Milly Dowler affair, Thurlbeck reveals that he was in charge of the newsdesk for one of the three weeks in which the paper investigated her disappearance. He claims neither he nor other executives were made aware at the time that the Surrey schoolgirl's phone had been hacked by NoW. "The Milly Dowler story and the allegations surrounding that story are very complicated, and they will have to be unravelled by the police," he tells Andy Davies. "But at no time was I aware that the phone had been hacked by the News of the World - if it was hacked by the News of the World. I was not aware of that." He continues: "They (the voicemails) could have come from a police source. It's a mistake to jump to the conclusion that the people on the News of the World knew that these voicemails had been hacked." And he maintains that had the NoW been aware that the Milly Dowler's voicemails had been hacked, the newspaper would never have printed them. 'Formalising a relationship' Neville Thurlbeck tells Channel 4 News that in the mid-90s he became a registered confidential source with the National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS). He went by the codename "George", was registered for nearly 10 years, and gave the police information on a weekly basis. Asked by Andy Davies if he had any qualms about signing up as a confidential source with the police at this time, Thurlbeck explains: "I needed to get information. The police were volunteering information in return for me giving them information." He acknowledges that some people might think the relationship was a little too "cosy", but points out that all journalists need to get information - by whatever legal means they can. And he denies he was working for the police. "I was formalising the relationship between journalist and police."

Harriet Harman's "MP" husband Dromey made to admit he is a cash-receipts concealer too!

Harriet Harman's "MP" husband Dromey made to admit he is a cash-receipts concealer too!
2140 [2125] Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
19 January 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
The item below about Harriet Harman's controversially parachuted-in “MP” husband Jack Dromey's partial exposure as an abuser of the most pathetically soft "rules" on MPs "interests", is being published here by AADHIKARonline after we accessed it from BBC online at 2122 GMT Thursday 19 January 2012:


MP Dromey apologises for breaching Commons rules

Mr Dromey admitted he had made mistakes and updated the Commons register
A Labour MP has apologised for breaching Commons rules by not registering payments connected to his former job as a top trade union official, until a year later.
Jack Dromey did not record £27,867 received from Unite between May 2010, when he was elected, and October that year - until October 2011.
He also did not reveal a separate one-off £30,000 payment for seven months.
A Commons committee said the breaches were "serious" but not "intentional". Mr Dromey, who is married to deputy Labour leader Harriet Harman, was deputy general secretary of Unite before being elected MP for Birmingham Erdington.

Rules breached

The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, John Lyon, investigated Mr Dromey's entries in the members' register of financial interests, following a complaint by Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen. Publishing its analysis of the watchdog's report, the Commons standards and privileges committee concluded that Mr Dromey had breached a number of rules about prompt registration of interests and their declaration in Parliament.

Continue reading the main story

“ Start Quote I want to apologise unreservedly to the House and I will in future fully abide by the rules of the House” Jack Dromey

Labour MP

In June 2010, Mr Dromey stated in the register of members' interests that he was leaving his job as deputy general secretary of Unite, following his election as an MP, and had declined his salary in the meantime.

However, he updated the register in October 2011 to state that he had received £27,867 in pay from Unite between the day of his election and 30 October 2010 - when he stopped working for the union. The committee said Mr Dromey had worked between 10 and 15 hours a week for the union during this period - excluding August when he was on holiday - effectively fulfilling his notice period.

Failing to disclose what he was paid for this work within the recommended four-week period was a "clear and incontrovertible" breach of the rules, it stated.

One-off payment

It also found that the MP had not registered a £30,000 one-off payment from Unite - made in recognition of his long years of service to the union - until July 2011, even though he had received it the previous November. He also did not disclose his use of a car and phone paid for by Unite between May and September 2010 until the following autumn.

Start Quote He should have known he needed to register his union payments” Andrew Bridgen Conservative MP The committee also upheld Mr Bridgen's complaint that Mr Dromey should have declared his connection to Unite before speaking in Parliament on three occasions, when his financial interest was "relevant" to the matters being discussed. But it rejected a similar complaint about three other interventions made by Mr Dromey in Parliament. The committee said the breaches were "serious" matters and Mr Dromey should have given a "much higher priority" to updating his entry in the register of interests. But it said there was no evidence the breaches were intentional and the MP had co-operated fully with the watchdog's inquiry. Addressing MPs on Thursday, Mr Dromey said: "I failed to update, in time, my initial registration in respect of payments received from my previous employer during the months of June to October 2010. "This I have now done. I also failed to declare an interest in speaking in two debates on June 16, 2010 and September 16, 2010. "Notwithstanding that the commissioner and the committee noted that the breaches were unintentional, I want to apologise unreservedly to the House and I will in future fully abide by the rules of the House." Mr Bridgen welcomed the investigation into Mr Dromey and said; "As a former Labour Party treasurer and with his wife, Harriet Harman, having been an MP since 1983, he should have known he needed to register his union payments."

Can Muhammad Haque stop the Nasty parts of UK Media from reviving their "demon" Ken?

Can Muhammad Haque stop the Nasty parts of UK Media from reviving their "demon" Ken?
© Muhammad Haque updating his exclusive diagnosis of the UK Media’s Nasty parts trying to ruin "Ken Livingstone’s plans".
0920 Hrs GMT London Thursday 19 January 20p12.
One of the utterly nefarious things that the really nasty organs and segments in the British “mainstream” media did during the entirety of the 20th century, was to overdo their attacks on what they falsely fabricated as a demon.
And it was left to Rupert Murdoch’s SUN to sum up and typify the sheer venom that they wanted to unleash in the direction of that demon.
It was of course early days. The early 1980s and looking back on Thursday 19 January 2012 at the events of the early 1980s as they unfolded around me and in London’s County Hall literally aimed at stopping me from torpedoing Ken Livingstone’s then infant bids at self-promotion, there is no word that can describe the difference.
Except that the agenda and the equation at either end of that agenda and that divide has not changed a bit in over 30 years.
How can I say that?
I can because I know what I am on about.
And I am on about what is about to happen electorally about Ken Livingstone. I am concerned that the image of ken Livingstone that the Nasty ends of the Media are building up, putting up will stick sufficiently to destroy his bid to return to “…..y Hall”.
I am Ken Livingstone's original analyst and evidential dissector and democratic opponent.
I am the one who has demonstrably dissected and rejected most of Ken Livingstone’s "careerist activities, ploys and manipulative justifications” because I am motivated by ethics and morality.
Not by career.
Never.
So it is time to update my engagement on ethical and moral grounds.
[To be continued]

AADHIKAR Media review of UK Press 19 January 2012

AADHIKAR Media review of UK Press 19 January 2012
AADHIKAR Media review of UK Press 19 JaNUARY 2012

Shelina Akhtar still fails to quit, as known to us at 1755 GMT...

Shelina Akhtar still fails to quit, as known to us at 1755 GMT...
This is a picture taken a few years back of ISABELLA FREEMAN.


The scandal in Tower Hamlets linked to the criminal conviction of and the confessions in a criminal court by the Tower Hamlets councillor Shelina Akhtar

Tory Tower Hamlets Councillors call for action by the mysteriously powerful Ms Isabella Freeman.
The person is of course the self-appointed but totally secretive and unaccountable Isabella Freeman.
She is kept in a very highly paid post with no one in the Council auditing her at all.
No wonder then that it has been Isabella freeman who has been sitting on her comfy post while Shelina has been getting on with “her stuff”!!!!!!!!!!
Question is what on earth is Isabella Freeman in that post for? And who gave her the authority to designate herself the “Monitor” IN THE FIRST PLACE? Is that how she “monitors” when the likes of Shelina Akhtar get away with the thefts, the lies, the deceptions that have now been admitted by the perpetrating person? And NOT by Isabella Freeman? How many OTHERS have been doing how many other thefts while sitting on the Council or getting paid as “officers” employed in the name of the voters and the community who in fact hold the main democratic claim on the Council but are fobbed off, frustrated and lied to by the bands that Isabella Freeman is supposedly the Monitor on? Sack Isabella Freeman, we say! [To be continued]


BHANGEELAAR! the Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets today [Wednesday 18 January 2012] received a copy of Tory Cllr Peter Golds’ letter dated 16 January 2012 addressed to Isabella freeman


Ms Isabella Freeman
Monitoring Officer
London Borough of Tower Hamlets
Mulberry Place
Clove Crescent
London
E14 2BG
We shall examine that letter in the next updates.
[To be continued]

DAILY EXPRESS ADMITS to BRAINWASHING all five of its readers!

DAILY EXPRESS ADMITS to  BRAINWASHING all five of its readers!
DAILY EXPRESS ADMITS to BRAINWASHING all five of its readers!

Public should prosecute the lying Departments of the UK Central Govt

Public should prosecute the lying Departments of the UK Central Govt
1125 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
18 January2012

AADHIKARonline Commentary


Public should prosecute the lying UK Govt Departments.
This is the most responsible thing that the people can do to stop the rot that CONDEM Cameron is now carrying in his COLLUSION<>
The updated revelation by the London DAILY MIRROR today about Cameron-Grayling oiling the Deloitte Big Biz fraudulent operation comes barely a week after Cameron’s Saudi trip.
There too he was oiling furiously as he posed for those hurried snaps as he renewed his Collusion "Government" loyalty to preserve the "Royal Saudi" House intact. No hint of the “Arab Spring” in the Saudi “kingdom”£ then. And a billion worms will be unleashed if Cameron darted utter even a monosyllabic line in that direction.
Which shows that Cameron is as compromised morally as the next occupant in No 10 Downing Street.
Which means that no moral leadership can come from David Cameron. The man has no moral position that can be demonstrated as significant enough to command respect. This leaves the option [if the context makes it an option at all!] only to ordinary people. When compared to Cameron in Office [+No 10 Downing Street] and when the evidence is shown of how he has been playing the stooge to the City of London as exposed in his service to the “Big Biz Big Fraud at the expense of the UK Public like Deloitte”, it is logical to conclude that there is no point in expecting Leadership from Cameron or his likes. Ordinary people must take the initiative to build society into one that has traction, has substance for the legitimate expectation to be fulfilled: fairness and rights for all.
In view of the disastrous regression into idiocy that is coming from the two Eds, the sooner the ordinary public took up the constitutional, the ethical and the moral positions to uphold a fair Society, the better.
In fact in light of the latest toxic assault via the reactionary press against the involuntarily poor in Society, there is no time to waste before mounting the challenge in the courts and in all the available public forums against Big Biz fraudsters who are the most lethal wasters of the maximum amount of the public's s resources. Including the largest sums of money from the DWP. The war of the Big Biz looters against the poor as mounted via the DWP is class war so ferocious that a new lexicography must be created to attend to the challenges. This is because of the misconduct, the illegalities being perpetrated for Big Business via one of the UK central Government’s fraudulent outlets, the Department for Want and Poverty-creation [DWP]. It is the DWP that has been the channel for Deloitte’s CON Robbery of the UK public.

[To be continued]

Why doesn't the DPP prosecute the DWP for the £Billions it gives to City, Big Biz?

Why doesn't the DPP prosecute the DWP for  the £Billions it gives to City, Big Biz?
Extracts being published here by AADHIKARonline acknowledging the Copyrights of the London DAILY MIRROR
Wednesday 18 January 2012.
City fat cats Deloitte awarded contracts worth almost £774million after bankrolling the Tories
Exclusive
by James Lyons
Daily Mirror
18/01/2012


David Cameron has been accused of cronyism after a City firm which bankrolled the Tories was handed contracts worth £773.5million.

Deloitte won the deals as part of the Government’s work programme. The firm has given the party £700,000 since Mr Cameron became leader in 2005 including a £28,000 donation in kind to Welfare Minister Chris Grayling. It has a 50% stake in Ingeus Deloitte, which will pocket the £773.5million if it meets targets on cutting jobless figures. Ministers insist the work was awarded fairly. But Labour’s John Robertson claimed the cosy deal smacked of the kind of “crony capitalism” Mr Cameron vowed to end. The Glasgow MP, who uncovered the figures in a written Parliamentary answer, also revealed Treasury Minister Chloe Smith worked for Deloitte before she entered ­Parliament.



Mr Robertson added: “The close relationship between Deloitte and the Tories is very fishy. One of the most senior MPs in the Treasury was on their payroll and they are getting eye-watering contracts. It brings back the image of the sleazy Tories of the past.” The Department for Work and Pensions denied there was any link between the ­donations and contracts. A spokeswoman said: “Contracting followed a strict code of practice and was open and fair. ­­Ministers did not ­intervene or attempt to dictate the outcomes.” Deloitte stressed the amount of ­Government work it receives has fallen since the Tories took power. A spokesman insisted: “All our work for the ­Government is let through open ­competition.”


Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/2012/01/18/city-fat-cats-deloitte-awarded-contracts-worth-almost-774million-after-bankrolling-the-tories-115875-23705003/#ixzz1jnohfera


Guardian's ill-cooked Brick Lane curry houses "dish" again leaves damaging effects

Guardian's ill-cooked Brick Lane curry houses "dish"  again  leaves damaging effects
0530 Hrs
GMT
London
Tuesday
17 January 2012

Editor © Muhammad Haque

AADHIKARonline will update on the Guardian’s flawed colonialist piece about "Curry crisis".
The Guardian piece is fronted by a typically Guardian-agenda-ed ethnicity-linked image but it is as misleading as most of the Guardian’s pieces over the decades about the East End of London, about Brick Lane and about the UK Bangladeshis have been.
The paper cannot get the facts about Brick Lane right. Ever.
And the reason is not far to seek.
The Guardian operates on the same colonialist, pro-racist lines that the Daily mail and the Daily Telegraph and the Daily express and the BBC's Jonathan Dimbleby do..
Why is Jonathan Dimbleby being included in this dissection of the “liberal” end in the [!!!!!!!!!!!] “mainstream British Media”?
? Because it was Jonathan Dimbore's much-touted and much-flaunted "radical liberal" "CV" that was used by the BBC in the campaign against the collective Muslim population not long after September 2001.
Soon afterwards, the BBC Radio 4 repeatedly broadcast a sentence in which Jonathan Dimbleby repeatedly called for people to INCITE others and make anti-Muslims comments. The piece by the Guardian, more than a decade later, may be about "curry houses" but it is just as prejudiced, just as ignorant and just as offensive.
and unproductive.
The juxtaposition of the crisis-ridden the Brick Lane curry Houses with a named and commercially thriving "curry house” in the Fieldgate Street is false on so many grounds. Our updater diagnostics will expose the details of the Guardian’s flaws.
The answer to the latest package of untruths, ignorance and fabrication by the Guardian is NOT to be sought in plausibly positioned legitimisation of the anti-Bangladeshi, anti-social ideas on the Guardian or in the perpetration of some Guar8van-aided self-servers peddling their own selfishness at the expense of the community.
The answer must be sought, found and sustained in the original, historic and unadulterated, uncolonialised of the resources of the community itself.

[To be c continued]

BBC sexes up Martine Croxall then packages her with alleged abuser of perks

BBC sexes up Martine Croxall then packages her with alleged abuser of perks
UPDATES on http://twitter.com/khoodeelaar

Bangladeshi "entrepreneur" steals from Bangladeshis in Portsmouth, England

Bangladeshi "entrepreneur" steals from Bangladeshis in Portsmouth, England
0150 Hrs GMT London Monday 16 January 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque
AADHIKAROnline publishing the following report from BBC online 13 January 2012
Pictured in the BBC reports is the convicted fraudster the Bangladeshi called Golam Rashed Chowdhury
QUOITING the BBC
Portsmouth Bangladeshi conman Golam Chowdhury jailed for fraud
Golam Rashed Chowdhury claimed money was loaned to him rather than invested

A man has been jailed for defrauding hundreds of thousands of pounds from Portsmouth's Bangladeshi community.
Golam Rashed Chowdhury, 27, from Portsmouth, was well known in the close-knit community but scammed them out of £750,000, the court heard. He offered attractive returns on business deals, but in reality the ventures did not exist.
He was found guilty of nine counts of fraud at Winchester and jailed for three-and-a-half years.
A further charge of fraud against Chowdhury, of Penhale Road, was ordered to lie on file

The court had heard how Chowdhury posed as a legitimate businessman offering attractive returns on investments, cheap air tickets and preferential rates to transfer money to Bangladesh.

Bangladeshis in the city handed over thousands of pounds, jurors at Winchester Crown Court heard. 'Lost families'

In court he claimed the money was only loaned to him and in one case said he had to give one of his victim's money to the Mafia after being kidnapped.

Community leader Muhammed Badruz Zaman Community leader Mr Muhammed Badruz Zaman said many families have been affected Community leader Muhammed Badruz Zaman said Chowdhury's crimes had affected many Bangladeshis in Portsmouth.

He said some people had invested money without the knowledge of their wives or husbands.

"Some of them have lost their families because the wife said, 'why did you do that business?'," he added. "Some of them [are] mentally injured. "I doubt the money is ever going to be seen by them again, but I think they will be happy that justice has been done."

Chowdhury's wife was initially charged along with her husband but the case against her was later dropped.

Det Sgt Gary Cable, of Hampshire police, said: "This was a long and thorough investigation with enquiries in this country and abroad.

"We are really pleased that the Bangladeshi community had the confidence in us to come forward and report the matter, working with us at every stage of the investigation."
UNQIUOTING the BBC online report on Portsmouth Bangladeshi conman

AADHIKARonline comment on this latest shameful behaviour will appear on this blog [http://bricklanenews.blogspot.com/] and on associated AADHIKAR Media Foundation web sites, blogs and twitter sites later this week.
[To be continued]

USA GW Bush-Republican Adviser promotes Obama defeat idea

USA GW Bush-Republican Adviser promotes Obama defeat idea
AADHIKAR Online daily commentary accessible on twitter.com/khoodeelaar

Miliband backs Con cuts & poverty-creation, homelessness and destitution

Miliband backs Con cuts & poverty-creation, homelessness and destitution
1200 [1130] Hrs GMT London Sunday 15 January 2012-01-15 AADHIKAROnline commentary: Editor © Muhammad Haque Miliband continues to back CON cuts and further poverty-creation, homelessness and destitution...Miliband comes out as the cuts-backing, Right-winger that he always has been. The impact of the exposure of Ed Miliband as another backer of Tory agenda occupying the lead spot in the former Labour Party is already being felt in the inner cities. In Tower Hamlets, the Miliband brothers have enjoyed persistent platforms given to them by locally-sited self-serving opportunists. There is no sign locally in Tower Hamlets of any discernible let alone consistently manifest opposition by the "elected" post-holders in the name of the local people in and of Tower Hamlets. Yet some of these very same locally-elected post-holders are the only ones being given space by the ethnncity-0linekd propaganda outlets to utter scripted spiels interned to make them come across as the opposite of the cuts-backing Miliband band! The situation in inner city England is being made far worse by the betrayal of the “locally-elected” post-holders mostly either aligned to the Miliband band or engaged in reconnecting themselves with the bureaucracy in the former Labour Party. No local democracy. No local say. Mostly local denial, local deprivation and local discontent brewing. Ed Miliband’s initial “promise” that his “leadership” would “reconnect” with the people has been exposed as another sham promise, another plastic platitude, and another untruth. Another wanton and outrageous lie.. The former Labour party’s dominant bureaucracy is as corrupt or as tolerant of corruption now as it was under Tony Bliar. Cherie Blair being fingered as a ferocious capitalist bent on aiding and abetting the remainder of the NHS as she [Cherie] carries on her business with a “former” GW Bush Republican Party strategist], the scene is set for even more outrageous confessions by the many “stars” of the former Labour Party in “power”. The people can only get poorer. The poorer the people the poorer they are going to be made in England by the corrupt agenda being carried out by the careerist occupants in posts on the so-called Opposition benches in the UK elected House of Parliament. Local Councils in all the affected areas are being operated by faceless clerks doing the cuts while the faces of the elected councillors are being covered up by rising denials, silences and complicit frames of frozen, cruelly disguised and mock smiles. [To be continued]

Blair's wife features in big anti-NHS clinic business bid and 'FSA' row

Blair's wife features in big anti-NHS clinic business bid and 'FSA' row
From the DAILY TELEGRAPH media group web site


Financial Services Authority says it has no knowledge of Cherie Blair's company
Cherie Blair faces questions over why her investment company claims it is authorised by the Financial Services Authority

Financial Services Authority says it has no knowledge of Cherie Blair's company

Cherie Blair's involvement with Allele came to light last year when she lent her name to a fund-raising prospectus for the company

By Tim Walker
7:30AM GMT 10 Jan 2012

As Tony Blair’s financial affairs are subjected to fresh scrutiny after The Sunday Telegraph disclosed that he paid just £315,000 in tax last year on an income of more than £12 million, the former prime minister’s wife, Cherie, faces questions about her own investment company.
The Allele Fund, which Mrs Blair co-founded with her American friend Gail Lese, a former Republican political candidate, states on its website that it is “authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority”.
However, a spokesman for the FSA tells Mandrake: “We have no record of Allele as an FSA authorised or recognised fund.”
Yesterday a spokesman for the Allele Fund told me: “FSA registration is not required for the Allele Fund, as – under the FSA definition – there are no Allele Fund management activities undertaken in the UK at present. When, and if, the Fund decides to undertake regulated activities in the UK, it would of course apply for registration to the FSA in the normal way.”
When Mandrake acquainted the spokesman with what it states in black and white on his own website, he persisted: “To the best of our knowledge, our website does not make this claim.”
Mrs Blair’s involvement with Allele came to light last year when she lent her name to a fund-raising prospectus for the company. One of its investments is in the health care company MEE, which aims to set up health care clinics in British supermarkets.


Related Articles

Cherie Blair steps down as a patron of Lady Meyer's charity 09 Jan 2012 Cherie Blair seeks high net worth individuals 01 Jun 2010 William and Kate find a man who can resist their charms 10 Jan 2012 This caused controversy because the Labour Party is opposed to greater private involvement in the health care system. Miss Lese later insisted that the company’s aim “is to support the NHS”. Allele states on its website that its strategy is to “invest in high-growth health care and technology companies worldwide”. Allele’s claims in relation to the FSA are made within the privacy policy and terms and conditions section of its website.

Cherie and Tony Blair in £Millions while the Eds head for disaster

Cherie and Tony Blair in £Millions while the Eds head for disaster
CLICK on the picture for the AADHIKARonline exclusive commentary via http://twitter.com/khoodeelaar


From the DAIL MAIL Media Group web site [Mail on Sunday version]
Labour MPs revolt against 'Barmy Ed' and 'Weak Ed' for caving in to Tory agenda Bookies say Ed Miliband is odds-on to step down as Labour leader before next general election By Brendan Carlin Last updated at 10:21 PM on 14th January 2012 Comments (23) Share Embattled Ed Miliband was told by Labour MPs last night to stop copying David Cameron and start showing some leadership of his own. The Labour leader sparked a furious backlash after the party abandoned opposition to the Coalition’s public-sector pay freeze and refused to reverse cuts. The U-turn was unveiled by Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls, who insisted the party had to set a ‘credible’ alternative to the Coalition and be ‘honest with the British people’. Under fire: Labour leader Ed Miliband and Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls have both been accused of 'dancing to the Tory tune' Under fire: Labour leader Ed Miliband and Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls have both been accused of 'dancing to the Tory tune' But Labour MPs accused the two Eds of caving into the Tory agenda. Labour veteran Austin Mitchell attacked ‘barmy’ Mr Balls’s cuts somersaults and also lambasted ‘weak’ Mr Miliband. More... 'Shut your mouth... war is hell': Ex-Army state politician attacks 'self-righteous' critics of Marines caught urinating over Afghan bodies on video Former U.N. Ambassador says Obama can't take credit for Osama bin Laden's death He told The Mail on Sunday: ‘This is a desperate attempt to get respectability but it’s barmy. Miliband is acting out of weakness. We are not the Government and we will get nowhere by going around wearing a hair shirt like this.’ Fellow Labour MP John Mann accused the party leadership of ‘signing up to Plan A on the economy – the Tory agenda’. Rachel Reeves is 14-1 to succeed Mr Miliband as Labour leader, according to bookmakers William Hill Rachel Reeves is 14-1 to succeed Mr Miliband as Labour leader, according to bookmakers William Hill And Blyth Valley MP Ronnie Campbell said: ‘The activists are livid. We are dancing to the Tory tune. We’ve been opposing their cuts, now we’re saying we agree with them. We don’t know whether we’re coming or going.’ Privately, some senior Labour MPs claim the policy volte-face has been forced on Mr Miliband by resurgent ‘Blairite’ MPs who have seized on the leader’s faltering poll ratings. But last night, Mr Miliband shrugged off the criticism from his own side and said he was determined to lead the party into the next Election. A senior aide said: ‘Ed is very focused. He knew this would be tough and he has chosen a hard course. ‘Cameron trailed Gordon Brown by a huge margin at one point – that is what happens in opposition.’ Mr Balls’s policy shift comes after mounting fears within the party high command that despite the stalling economic growth and rising jobless figures, Mr Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne are more trusted by voters on the economy than Labour. In the dramatic shift during a speech yesterday to the Left-wing Fabian Society, the Shadow Chancellor said: ‘However difficult this is for me, we cannot make any commitments now that the next Labour Government will reverse tax rises or spending cuts. 'We don’t know how bad things will be on jobs, growth and the deficit.’ And in a statement which infuriated the party’s union backers, Mr Balls signalled the public-sector pay freeze was here to stay even if he attempted to blame that on Mr Osborne. He said: ‘It is inevitable public-sector pay restraint will have to continue for longer in this Parliament. Labour cannot duck that reality. Jobs must be our priority before higher pay.’ But a senior Labour MP said: ‘First we say the Tories are choking off growth by slashing too deeply – and next we agree with them.’ Last night, Tory deputy chairman Michael Fallon said Labour was ‘totally confused’. He said: ‘By U-turning and claiming cuts are now needed to deal with the debt crisis, Balls and Miliband look as if they’re conceding defeat.’ BOOKIES BET ON NEXT GENERATION Bookmakers William Hill have now made Ed Miliband odds-on to step down as Labour leader before the next General Election, with rising star Chuka Umunna their second favourite to replace him. Shadow Business Secretary Mr Umunna, 33, is now 6-1 to be the next Labour leader, behind Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, the 7-4 favourite. Mr Umunna, dubbed the ‘British Obama’, is at the head of a new cadre of ambitious young MPs seen as the party’s future. Others include: Rachel Reeves, 32, below, appointed to the Shadow Cabinet as a Treasury spokesman. She is 14-1 to succeed Mr Miliband. John Woodcock, 33, a frontbench transport spokesman, has become one of Labour’s most effective new MPs. Gloria De Piero, 39, the former TV correspondent, is a home affairs spokesman. Tristram Hunt, 37, a high-profile television historian and one of the new faces of the party on political shows. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2086817/Labour-MPs-revolt-Barmy-Ed-Weak-Ed-caving-Tory-agenda.html#ixzz1jUHzZDkP

Bliar wife bids to profit from anti-NHS CONDEM CUTS agenda!

Bliar wife bids to profit from anti-NHS CONDEM CUTS agenda!
AADHIKAROnline commentary on Cherie Blair involvement in capitalism against the NHS will be published on twitter.com/khoodeelaar throughout Sunday 15 January 2012. [To be continued]

If the Italian cruise liner sank by accident, Ed Balls didn't. He went down crassly!

If the Italian cruise liner sank by accident, Ed Balls didn't. He went down crassly!
0010 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
15 January 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
CLICK on the picture to access our latest commentary published throughout Sunday on twitter.com/Khoodeelaar
[To be continued]

The poverty of the "Labour" Opposition in Parliament is KEEPING poverty rising in Society [2]

The poverty of the "Labour" Opposition in Parliament is KEEPING poverty rising in Society [2]
1050 [1045] [1035] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
14 January 2012
AADHIKAROnline
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
When Neil Kinnock does get his few minutes on the BBC’s Radio 4 slot “Week in Westminster” as scheduled to be fronted in the next 50 minutes by the Independent’s Steve Richards, what will the world of “British politics” be like as a result?
There won’t be any substantial, lasting difference to the politics in the UK as a result.
. Except that the “24 hour” “rolling” channels and web sites will have a momentary “peg” to run a few extra “comments” that will contain no substance whatever.
It is the same sort of morality-free, ethics-free “important event” that was so fully typified by and exhibited in the previous 24 hours by Con Cameron’s trip to the UK’s biggest colony the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Running also during the same time-frame were a few other news items, like the USA’s expanding claim on the UK as the latest State, de facto, that the USA bureaucracy has been seeking to “regularise” by the use of the complicity “English courts of justice”!
English courts of justice!
Sounds a fully contained mouthful!
But it is an empty phrase
As has been seen in the publishing conduct of even the flag-carrier for that slogan, the Daily Mail
In the past 48 hours the Daily Mail has had to contradict itself on “British Justice” in a spectacular way on its front-pages of Friday 13 January 2012 and today Saturday 14 January 2012.

The Daily Mail has had to recant this morning and cry “abandoned by British justice”, thus contradicting [with some reason to be embarrassed] the very opposite headline about “British Justice” that it had run the previous day!
Like the over-the-top hype for “British justice” as practised by the Daily Mail, the former Labour Party’s claim to be the Parliamentary and the “democratic” Opposition to CONDEM today is shallow.
It is very bad for Society when the officially touted Opposition Party in the supposedly elected democratic Parliament seeks shelter under the patronage of a fraudulent, Big Biz-serving Collusion in power.
[To be continued] WHEN even NEIL KINNOCK has to come out of his 10th retirement phase [in 20 years] and speak out against the “cowards” and certify Ed Miliband as fit for purpose, it is clearly the moment that a serious democratic audit took place of the “MPs” that allegedly form [as in constitute] the Parliamentary Labour Party.....

With the Daily Telegraph’s very own ideologically compatible Right-wing, pro-cuts “diarist/sketch-writer” Tim Walker expressing open surprise [in the past 20 minutes on the BBC News Channel] at the idiocy of the comment as reportedly made by Rachel Reeves, the so-called shadow chief secretary to the Treasury [“....we are not ready...”] that audit could not be held soon enough. Rachel Reeves has been parachuted into coveted state offices at the speed of light. What, exactly, are the supposed attractions of this individual for holding the posts that she has on her CV already? If her utterances are any guide, not much! Rachel Reeves now “occupies” in a shadow mode the same post that Liam Byrne had “vacated” as he left HIS IDIOTIC note bragging that there was no money left! Ms Reeves shares another “trait” with the "ethical, moral, and democracy-deficit and liability" that is Liam Byrne She is clueless about “Welfare” More on this in due course [To be continued]


1010 [1005] [0845] Hrs GMT London Saturday 14 January 2012 AADHIKAROnline Editor © Muhammad Haque. WHEN even NEIL KINNOCK has to come out of his 10th retirement phase [in 20 years] and speak out against the “cowards” and certify Ed Miliband as fit for purpose, it is clearly the moment that a serious democratic audit took place of the “MPs” that allegedly form [as in constitute] the Parliamentary Labour Party..... With the Daily Telegraph’s very own ideologically compatible Right-wing, pro-cuts “diarist/sketch-writer” Tim Walker expressing open surprise [in the past 20 minutes on the BBC News Channel] at the idiocy of the comment as reportedly made by Rachel Reeves, the so-called shadow chief secretary to the Treasury [“....we are not ready...”] that audit could not be held soon enough. Rachel Reeves has been parachuted into coveted state offices at the speed of light. What, exactly, are the supposed attractions of this individual for holding the posts that she has on her CV already? If her utterances are any guide, not much! Rachel Reeves now “occupies” in a shadow mode the same post that Liam Byrne had “vacated” as he left HIS IDIOTIC note bragging that there was no money left! Ms Reeves shares another “trait” with the "ethics-free, morality-free and democracy-deficit political liability" that is Liam Byrne She is clueless about “Welfare” More on this in due course [To be continued]

Madonna's "confession" pales into insignificance compared to Balls, Reeves et al

Madonna's "confession" pales into insignificance compared to Balls, Reeves et al
0845 Hrs GMT London Saturday 14 January 2012
AADHIKAROnline Editor © Muhammad Haque.

WHEN even NEIL KINNOCK has to come out of his 10th retirement phase [in 20 years] and speak out against the “cowards” and certify Ed Miliband as fit for purpose, it is clearly the moment that a serious democratic audit took place of the “MPs” that allegedly from the Parliamentary Labour Party.....

With the Daily Telegraph’s very own ideologically compatible Right-wing, pro-cuts “diarist/sketch-writer” Tim Walker expressing open surprise [in the past 20 minutes on the BBC News Channel] at the idiocy of the comment as reportedly made by Rachel Reeves, the so-called shadow chief secretary to the Treasury [“....we are not ready...”] that audit could not be held soon enough.
Rachel Reeves has been parachuted into coveted state offices at the speed of light. What, exactly, are the supposed attractions of this individual for holding the posts that she has on her CV already? If her utterances are any guide, not much!

Rachel Reeves now “occupies” in a shadow mode the same post that Liam Byrne had “vacated” as he left HIS IDIOTIC note bragging that there was no money left!
Ms Reeves shares another “trait” with the "ethical, moral, and demcafric deficit and liabiity" that is Liam Byrne
She is clueless about “Welfare”
More on this in due course

[To be continued}

FLASHBACK to September 2010 when Tower Hamlets Council was the target....

FLASHBACK to September 2010 when Tower Hamlets Council was the target....
1650 Hrs GMT London Friday 13 January 2012
AADHIKARonline “local” commentary about Tower Hamlets Council

This youtube.com video [URL as at 1650 Hrs GMT on Friday 13 January 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJRNZ8Bg-ZM&feature=related ] was posted by those who wanted a directly-elected mayor system installed on Tower Hamlets Council.
The youtube.com video contains a frame showing Shelina Akhtar standing to Lutfur Rahman’s left at one of the many ethnicity-linked publicity events encouraged by the setters of the agenda for altering the democratic structure of the Tower Hamlets Council
[To be continued]

Sack fraud shame Councillor, rare call by 'East London' 'local' paper

Sack fraud shame Councillor, rare call by 'East London' 'local' paper
0935 Hrs GMT
London
Friday 13 January 2012
Editor © Muhammad Haque

In a very rare event, the former ‘East London Advertiser”, which callously backed the bid to undermine the already tenuous democratic structure of the local Tower Hamlets Council in 2010, has confessed that it was wrong to back an elected mayor system in Tower Hamlets. Oops! The Confession has been covert. In effect. The confession comes in a front page comment about Shelina Akhtar. In it, the Advertiser says words and phrases that amount to a confession. But the Advertiser’s failures to tell the truth about the corrupt culture in Tower Hamlets Council has cost the community far more than the Advertiser will be able to understand. This is because of the ignorant base on which the Advertiser's “journalism” trades. We shall update on the Advertiser in due course. Back to “Benefit fraud Councillor” for the “Bangla town” ward, Shelina Akhtar. The point made by the Advertiser on the specific occasion is a valid and timely one. Although the Advertiser holds back on most issues that it should have a say on as far as the poor level of ethics and morality and the now almost utterly absent democracy on Tower Hamlets Council are concerned. Shelina should herself resign and thus save herself the bigger disgrace of being forced to quit. [To be continued]

Cameron has a really tough challenge to show he is not a colluder like Blair

Cameron has a really tough challenge to show he is not a colluder like Blair
An AADHIKARonline Commentary on the state of ethics, morality and MIC Strategy and BigBiz agenda in operation in the mainstream media in the UK in the context of the LEVESON INQUIRY.
Editor ©Muhammad Haque.

This is a picture we took from the BBC of Clive Stafford Smith this lunchtime.
A “campaigner” with close links with the UK Establishment has been getting mainstream media publicity .
Clive Stafford Smith carries a lot of Establishment links. This is why he gets those slots. Most of the others campaigning for justice don't get anything like the platforms that Clive Stafford Smith has been getting from the BBC for the past many years. In fact most of the others are NEVER even recognised by the BBC.
Why? [To be continued]



From the website of the London GUARDIAN Thursday 12 January 2012

Police to investigate MI6 over rendition and torture of Libyans Criminal inquiry announced as DPP says there is not enough evidence to prosecute agents over Pakistan and Afghanistan allegations reddit this Ian Cobain guardian.co.uk, Thursday 12 January 2012 14.16 GMT Article history Anti-Gaddafi military commander Abdul Hakim Belhaj was allegedly detained in Bangkok after a tip-off to MI6. Photograph: Francois Mori/AP Scotland Yard has opened a criminal investigation into secret MI6 rendition operations that resulted in leading Libyan dissidents being abducted and flown to Tripoli where they were subsequently tortured in Muammar Gaddafi's prisons. The announcement came as police and the director of public prosecutions, Keir Starmer, said there was insufficient evidence to prosecute any individual MI5 or MI6 officers following lengthy investigations into allegations of British complicity in the torture of terrorism suspects in Pakistan and Afghanistan. The new investigation is to focus on Abdul Hakim Belhaj and Sami al-Saadi, who lodged complaints with the police last November after the chance discovery of a cache of classified documents in an abandoned Libyan government office laid bare the role that MI6 played in their rendition. Saadi was detained in Hong Kong in 2004 and then forced on to a plane to Tripoli with his wife and four children in an operation that MI6 mounted in co-operation with Gaddafi's intelligence chief, Moussa Koussa. Saadi says he suffered years of torture. Belhaj was detained in Bangkok along with his pregnant wife after an MI6 tip-off, and allegedly tortured by American agents for several days before being flown to Tripoli where he says he was tortured and detained for several years. His wife, who was detained for several months, has not spoken publicly about the manner in which she was treated. British officials have not sought to deny the involvement of MI6 in either rendition. Instead, they have stressed that each resulted from what they describe as "ministerially authorised government policy", raising the possibility that the new Yard inquiry will require the questioning of ministers of the last Labour government. In addition, the police and the Crown Prosecution Service announced that they were establishing a joint panel that would examine other allegations of UK complicity in torture and rendition levelled by a number of former Guantánamo inmates and others detained in the so-called war on terror. These complainants include Shaker Aamer, the last British resident still held at Guantánamo. The panel will decide whether the allegations should be examined first by the official inquiry that was established by David Cameron 18 months ago, and which is waiting to start hearing evidence, or whether police should investigate immediately. A statement issued on Thursday by Starmer and Lynne Owens, an assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan police, said the panel would consider "whether there is any significant risk that any available evidence would not be available or would be weakened" if an investigation did not take place immediately, or whether "the allegation in question is so serious that it is in the public interest to investigate it now". This panel advised on the Libyan cases, and the police decided that "the allegations raised in the two specific cases concerning the alleged rendition of named individuals to Libya and the alleged ill-treatment of them in Libya are so serious that it is in the public interest for them to be investigated now rather than at the conclusion of the detainee inquiry". Scotland Yard detectives have spent 30 months investigating allegations that the UK's intelligence agencies had become so close to the torture inflicted by overseas governments that their officers had committed serious criminal offences. One inquiry, codenamed Operation Hinton, focused on the events surrounding MI5's interrogation of Binyam Mohamed in May 2002, several weeks after he had been detained in Pakistan, and later events in Morocco. Proceedings brought on Mohamed's behalf showed that MI5 knew he was being mistreated before an officer was sent to Karachi to question him. The CPS decided more than a year ago that that officer – identified only as Witness B – should not face charges, but Operation Hinton continued while detectives pursued what Starmer described as a "wider investigation into other potential criminal conduct". This involved attempting to trace responsibility for Witness B's actions up MI5's chain of command and beyond. The investigation showed that "members of the Security Service provided information to the US authorities about Mr Mohamed and supplied questions for the US authorities to put to Mr Mohamed while he was being detained between 2002 and 2004", the statement said. However, the CPS has also concluded that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute any individual on the basis that they "knew or ought to have known that there was a real or serious risk that Mr Mohamed would be exposed to ill treatment amounting to torture". The statement added: "Nothing in this decision should be read as concluding that the ill-treatment alleged by Mr Mohamed did not take place or that it was lawful." A second investigation, codenamed Operation Iden, concentrated on events in 2002 at Bagram airfield north of Kabul, where the US military had established a prison, and where both MI5 and MI6 officers interrogated a number of suspects after being given written instruction from London that "the law does not require you to intervene to prevent" the mistreatment they were witnessing. That investigation was triggered after MI6 referred one of its own officers to the attorney general in September 2009. "The offences considered were aiding and abetting torture, aiding and abetting war crimes, false imprisonment, aiding and abetting assault, and misconduct in public office," the statement said. That investigation foundered on unsuccessful attempts to take a statement from a particular individual who was said to have been mistreated in the presence of an MI6 interrogator. It is thought that this was because it was not possible to be certain about the identity of the individual. In addition, US officials who were thought to have been present refused to be interviewed by police. "On the account that has been given by the member of the Secret Intelligence Services and taking into account all other available evidence, there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of convicting him of any criminal offence," the statement concluded. It is unclear when the official inquiry, chaired by Sir Peter Gibson, a former appeal court judge, will begin hearing evidence. In a statement on Thursday, the inquiry panel said: "The detainee inquiry panel will now carefully consider its next steps and Sir Peter Gibson will make an announcement in due course." Most major human rights groups are boycotting the inquiry, claiming that it will be too secretive and is insufficiently independent of government, but the Foreign Office is mounting a renewed effort to persuade them back on board. The head of MI6, Sir John Sawers, said he welcomed the decision not to charge any of his officers at the conclusion of the twin investigations and said that the "courageous individual" at the centre of Operation Iden would now be able to continue his work in support of national security. He added that MI6 would co-operate with the Libyan investigations. "It is in the service's interest to deal with the allegations being made as swiftly as possible so we can draw a line under them and focus on the crucial work we now face in the future." Detectives are thought to have already begun examining the documentation that was uncovered in Tripoli last month by an investigator with Human Rights Watch, the New York-based NGO. The documents will also form the basis of civil claims that Saadi and Belhaj and their families are bringing against the British government. It is not yet clear which ministers may have authorised the secret Libyan rendition operations in the way that well-placed Whitehall sources have asserted. After the documents were discovered, Tony Blair, who was prime minister at the time, insisted he knew nothing about them. Similarly, Jack Straw, who was then foreign secretary, said in a radio interview: "The position of successive foreign secretaries, including me, is that we were opposed to unlawful rendition, opposed to torture or similar methods and not only did we not agree with it, we were not complicit in it, nor did we turn a blind eye to it." He added: "No foreign secretary can know all the details of what … intelligence services are doing at any one time." Shortly after Blair and Straw issued their denials, Sir Richard Dearlove, who was head of MI6 at the time, said: "It was a political decision, having very significantly disarmed Libya, for the government to co-operate with Libya on Islamist terrorism. The whole relationship was one of serious calculation about where the overall balance of our national interests stood." The year after the joint UK-Libyan operations were mounted, Straw told MPs they must disbelieve allegations of UK involvement in rendition "unless we all start to believe in conspiracy theories and that the officials are lying, that I am lying, that behind this there is some kind of secret state which is in league with some dark forces in the United States". Asked following Dearlove's statement whether he still maintained that he was unaware of the Libyan rendition operations, and whether he knew which ministers Dearlove could be referring to, Straw said he had no further comment to make. Blair also declined to make any further comment.

CRASS role-player, faker academic Stephen Glaister now says "No" to HS2!

CRASS role-player, faker academic Stephen Glaister now says "No" to HS2!
STEPHEN GLAISTER in this ITV London picture shown on Wednesday 11 January 2012

CRASS role-player, faker-academic Stephen Glaister now says "No" to HS2!

By © Muhammad Haque.
Why am I pointing this out? .
Because Stephen Glaister has been one of those fakers who have been peddling the lie that Crassrail would bring MILLIONS of jobs and add £Billions to the UK GDP. .
So what is wrong with saying that? .
Everything. Because NO railway line can do that. Not in the UK. Not in France. Not anywhere in Europe. .
There simply are not the necessary physical resources, let alone the requisite demand far less the specially oriented and skilled and trained personnel or the programme - which would have to exist for that boost to occur. .
With this week’s job losses admitted by medium sized and mega sized conglomerates including TESCO shows that the UK economy is TENDING still to depression. So where would the HIGH SPEED rails take the supposed passengers to? .
With fares rising faster than even the adding machines and similar gadgets can keep up, the propaganda that is coming from the UK DAFT DfT about railways boosting the economy has been persistently untruthful. .
And Glaister has been part of the big DfT Big Biz Military Industrial Complex-controlled lie. .
So when he says [totally contradicting his plugs for Crassrail] No to HS2, he is in effect admitting that he has been lying for Crassrail all those years. [To be continued]

Daily Mail drags backwards to Dark Age hatred, injustice

Daily Mail drags backwards to Dark Age hatred, injustice
0020 Hrs GMT London Thursday
12 January 2012.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
The Guardian is at it again as well. Just when Tower Hamlets Council is mired in a succession of anti-democratic tendencies and activities, the Guardian chooses to create a link between the Council and Brian, also known as Charles.
The Guardian’s double standards may appear to give comfort to the place-men and place-women but the Borough is still at the top of the UK poverty League.
The Guardian has played its part in perpetuating poverty of knowledge about Tower Hamlets.
More lethal than the poverty exposed in the fraudulent behaviour of councillors who should never have been selected by Labour to stand in the party's name

Tower Hamlets Council, Lutfur Rahman feature in a councillor's benefit fraud news

Tower Hamlets Council, Lutfur Rahman feature in a councillor's  benefit fraud news
From the web site of the London EVENING STANDARD 11 January 2012.
Councillor makes fraudulent claim for housing benefits for a second time Mark Blunden 11 Jan 2012

A close colleague of Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman today faced cross-party calls to resign after fraudulently claiming housing benefits for a second time. Shelina Akhtar, an independent councillor, pleaded guilty to three counts of dishonestly claiming housing and council tax benefits for a property in Poplar at Snaresbrook crown court on Monday. Despite committing benefit fraud for a second time she has been allowed to keep her council seat. The housing benefit falsely claimed totalled £1,085 and £29 council tax benefit. The charges related to two periods between November 2009 and September 2010 at her Swan Housing Association-owned property. Before Akhtar entered guilty pleas on Monday, a warrant was issued for her arrest after she failed to turn up at court. She sent a doctor's letter saying she was unwell and unfit to stand trial. But the judge threw out her plea and threatened to issue an arrest warrant if she did not turn up. Akhtar was bailed and is due to be sentenced on February 6. After her first conviction, at Thames magistrates' court in July 2010, Akhtar was sentenced to 100 hours of unpaid work and ordered to pay £250 costs. The independent councillor won her Spitalfields and Banglatown seat in the 2010 local elections, where she originally stood as a Labour candidate but defected to become an independent and work alongside the directly-elected independent mayor, Mr Rahman. Opposition councillors now want her to resign. Tower Hamlets Labour group leader Joshua Peck said: "In most local authorities, it would be inconceivable that she didn't resign on the first occasion."

Bringing dishonour to the whole community in Tower Hamlets

Bringing dishonour to the whole community in Tower Hamlets
AADHIKARonline publishing a news item from the web site of the former “East London Advertiser” [now merged as a title in the Archant-company-owned and Docklands-fronting titles that are now based in Ilford, East London]

Poplar sham marriage pair jailed for total of six years

By Nadia Sam-Daliri
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
12:15 PM
An east London “couple” who devised an elaborate immigration scam have been jailed for a total of six years.
Mohammed Tanin, 26, and Maria Marques, 47, arranged to take thousands of pounds to arrange sham marriages between Bangladeshi men and Portuguese women.
Tanin, of Willis Street, Poplar, was sentenced to four years and Marques, of East India Dock Road, Poplar got two years at Snaresbrook Crown Court on Monday.
The couple themselves had married at the Registry Office in Bow Church in November 2009.
Atiq Haque, who led the UK Border Agency’s investigation, said: “This case shows the desperate nature of immigration crime with large sums of money changing hands and people being prepared to enter into a full marriage with someone they barely know.”
The couple were stopped at Luton Airport in June 2010 after they were found travelling with several Portuguese women, whose travel documents they were carrying.
The following month, the UK Border Agency received applications for four Bangladeshi men in the UK on valid student visas to marry four of the women.
The men were arrested and later made full admissions implicating Tanin and Marques, admitting they had paid between £2,000 and £3,000 for their services.
Later probes showed that Tanin had tried to create a back story for each bride to be and further incriminating documents were found on his laptop.
He and Marques were charged with conspiracy to facilitate a breach of UK immigration law. .

They had both denied the charges. .

Two Portuguese ‘brides’ pleaded guilty to conspiracy to arrange their own sham marriages and were each given 14 day jail terms. .

The UK Border Agency said the remaining ‘brides’ have not been traced and are believed to have returned to Portugal.

AADHIKARonline quotation of the “East London Advertsier” website item is concluded

No to HS2!

No to HS2!
Even the FT has to admit, HS2 is not worth it!

UK Department for Want and Poverty sunk in denial

UK Department for Want and Poverty sunk in denial
0200 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 10 January 2012. By © Muhammad Haque. For over 50 years I have been witnessing the poverty-creation programme as it is carried out in Tower Hamlets. in fact, my observation of Tower Hamlets began even before this name was created. Even before Tower Hamlets existed. It was just after the start of 1961 that I began to do the paperwork for the then young underemployed villagers in Seelot [Sylhet in English is actually Seelot in the Seelotee language] who had desperately needed to escape. I was a one man campaign to implement that escape. Fifty years later, I am still doing it. Observing the state of poverty. And today, Tuesday 10 January 2012 the news is the same. For me the most important item in the news is the confession that Tower Hamlets is blighted by the UK’s worst “chid poverty”. I don’t agree with the phrase. But this is a point of detail. The main collective issue is that “Child poverty” is within the facts of poverty. And the fact that this aspect of poverty is admittedly in its worst form in the current Tower Hamlets population is proof once again that the “elected” postholders in the name of the people of and in Tower Hamlets have been participating in various miniature projects of lying. They do not admit that the borough is so blighted. In fact their lie is carried out by exhibiting the fantasy that Tower Hamlets is doing very well. So poverty in Tower Hamlets is not limited to just material poverty. It is spiritual poverty as well as moral, ethical and democratic poverty. [To be continued]

Brick Lane London E1 area Ward "councillor admits benefit fraud"

Brick Lane London E1 area Ward "councillor admits benefit fraud"
From East London Advertiser web site Monday 09 Jan 2012.

Tower Hamlets councillor admits another case of benefit fraud

Nadia Sam Daliri

Monday, January 9, 2012 6:02 PM

A Tower Hamlets councillor has today admitted fraudulently claiming benefits for a second home that she did not live at.

Cllr Shelina Akhtar, an independent for Spitalfields and Banglatown ward, pleaded guilty to three counts of dishonestly claiming housing and council tax benefits for a property in Blackwall Way, Poplar.
She was actually living somewhere else during the time of the offences - which ran for two periods between November 2009 and September 2010 - and sub-letting the first property.
This is the second time the 33-year-old has committed such an offence. During today’s hearing at Snaresbrook Crown Court, His Honour Judge J Platt indicated that her sentence could be tougher than would normally the case because of her past actions. He told her: “I make you no promises today.
This is the second time you have committed fraud against the state regarding benefits to which you are not entitled.
The court needs to know more before deciding on the appropriate sentence.”
Akhtar, of Blackwall Way, was handed 100 hours of unpaid work and ordered to pay £250 costs after being found guilty of dishonestly claiming jobseeker’s allowance, housing benefit and council tax benefit during a case at Thames Magistrates’ Court in July 2010. Prosecutor Michelle Fawcett said: “She is a local councillor and the case, therefore, was more serious.
This defendant has previous convictions for identical matters.”
The housing benefit falsely claimed totalled £1,085 the council tax benefit £29. The independent councillor won her seat in the May 2010 elections, where she originally stood as a Labour candidate but later defected to become an independent to work alongside mayor Lutfur Rahman.
Earlier in the day a warrant was issued for Akhtar’s arrest after she failed to turn up at court. She submitted a doctor’s letter saying she was unwell and therefore unfit to stand trial but the first judge threw it out and threatened to issue a warrant for her arrest if she did not turn up by the afternoon. The warrant was later withdrawn when Akhtar surrendered herself.
Her sister, Hazera Akhtar, 22, of Glasshouse Fields, Shadwell, faced similar charges but they were all dropped.
She is due to be sentenced on February 6. Electoral Commission rules state that a councillor will only be automatically barred from office if they are sentenced to three months in jail or more. It is down to Tower Hamlets Council to decide what action will be taken against Akhtar.

UK POVERTY rising fastest while Cameron toys with fakery and stunt

UK POVERTY rising fastest while Cameron toys with fakery and stunt
Income inequality growing faster in UK than any other rich country, says OECD".
Top 10% have incomes 12 times greater than bottom 10%, up from eight times greater in 1985, thinktank's study reveals ".
o • Randeep Ramesh, social affairs editor • guardian.co.uk, Monday 5 December 2011 10.39 GMT ".
Protesters against income inequality in London. The OECD said the share of the top 1% had increased from 7.1% in 1970 to 14.3% in 2005. Photograph: Mike Kemp/In Pictures/Corbis".
Income inequality among working-age people has risen faster in Britain than in any other rich nation since the mid-1970s, according to a report by the OECD. ".
The thinktank says the gap has come about due to the rise of a financial services elite who, through education and marriage, have concentrated wealth into the hands of a tiny minority. ".
Economists from the group, which is funded by developed-world taxpayers, say the annual average income in the UK of the top 10% in 2008 was just under £55,000, about 12 times higher than that of the bottom 10%, who had an average income of £4,700. ".
This is up from a ratio of eight to one in 1985 and significantly higher than the average income gap in developed nations of nine to one. However, the report makes clear that even in countries viewed as "fairer" – such as Germany, Denmark and Sweden – this pay gap between rich and poor is expanding: from five to one in the 1980s to six to one today. In the rising powers of Brazil, Russia, India and China, the ratio is an alarming 50 to one. ".
The OECD warned about the rise of the top 1% in rich societies and the falling share of income going to poorer people. ".
This trend is especially pronounced in Britain, where the dramatic rise in inequality has been fuelled by the creation of a super-rich class. The share of the top 1% of income earners increased from 7.1% in 1970 to 14.3% in 2005. ".
Just prior to the global recession, the OECD says the very top of British society – the 0.1% of highest earners – accounted for a remarkable 5% of total pre-tax income, a level of wealth hoarding not seen since the second world war. ".
At the same time as accumulating great wealth, the rich have seen tax rates fall. The top marginal income tax rate dropped from 60% in the 1980s to 40% in the 2000s, before its recent increase to 50%.".
The buildup of riches was partly economic: the higher-paid worked longer. Since the mid-1980s, annual hours of low-wage workers remained stable at around 1,050, while those of high-wage workers rose almost 10% to 2,450 hours. But the concentration of resources in the highest rungs of Britain's society was also a social phenomenon. Unlike in many other nations, the earnings gap between the wives of rich and poor husbands in Britain has grown from £3,900 in 1987 to £10,200 in 2004. ".
Although the OECD figures stop just before the recession, experts say the trend continued into the downturn. ".
Paul Johnson of the Institute for Fiscal Studies said that in the UK "2009-10 incomes went up incredibly fast (at the top end) possibly because the new top rate of tax was coming in".".
He pointed out that the growth in the City and bankers' bonuses had played a large part in creating this divide. "If you look at who is racing away, then half the top 1% of high earners work in financial services," he said. ".
He cited the research of Mark Stewart, a professor of economics at Warwick University, who has shown that "almost all the increase in inequality has come from financial services" in the past 12 years. ".
Such disparities, the thinktank said, could not be blamed on globalisation but a trend in labour and social policies in rich nations that had helped the wealthy. ".
Although spending on public services in Britain had gone up in the past decade, at the same time benefits to the poor were worth less and taxes were less redistributive. The effect has been a dramatic weakening in the state's ability to spread wealth throughout society. From the mid-70s to mid-80s, the tax-benefit system offset more than 50% of the rise in income inequality. It now manages just 20%.".
The OECD warned of sweeping consequences for rich societies – and pointed to the rash of occupations and protests, especially by young people, around the world. "Youths who see no future for themselves feel increasingly disenfranchised. They have now been joined by protesters who believe they are bearing the brunt of a crisis for which they have no responsibility, while people on higher incomes appeared to be spared," the OECD said. ".
It was a paradox, said the OECD, that such moves had not been grounded in popular support. Michael Förster, author of the OECD's Divided We Stand report, said: "In almost all countries apart from the US and Japan, more than 50% of people say that inequality is too high. In the UK, it is 65% so I think everyone agrees it is a problem." ".
To rebalance society "for the 99%", the authors call for a series of measures focusing on job creation, "increased redistributive effects" and "freely accessible and high-quality public services in education, health and family care".".
When it was pointed out that British government plans would instead lead to public sector job cuts of 710,000, more child poverty and a hike in university fees, the OECD's authors said debt was an issue for governments but urged them "not to cut social investments".
Monika Queisser, the head of OECD's social policy division, said: "The OECD agreed that fiscal consolidation was important. We want to governments to see social expenditures as investment so we would want to see, say, early years [funding] rising."

Kay Jordan's 2009 call for community-based economic policy in Tower Hamlets

Kay Jordan's 2009 call for community-based economic policy in Tower Hamlets


What is required is a far more diverse economy that reflects the true entrepeneralskills, aspirations and economic base of the current as well as past generations of people who have made the East End their home.

It is inexcusable and shocking that the council still has no economic strategy, no forums at which local SME’s and micro business can air their views and does not consider local businesses to be part of the community it has a duty to consult even though the Government requires it to do so.

It is regrettable that big business (the East London Partnership and Canary Wharf) play all roles in the shaping and delivery of the LSP economic delivery programmes and no doubt in the preparation and shaping of the Core Strategy. Local SME’s and micro business sit outside these frameworks and do what they can to provide much needed employment for local people.

At times like this local communities must look to their own devises and economies to survive. They have equal rights in influencing the policies of a council which should serve them. In Tower Hamlets the local small business community has not been consulted about or participated in the development and shaping the Core Strategy making the process illegal and the document unsound.
Kay Jordan MBE
26/10/09

Lib Dems have a toxic record of creating poverty via robbing housing

Lib Dems have a toxic record of  creating poverty via robbing housing
From the web site of the BBC.
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque Daily Economic Commentary on the state of the CONDEM-ed UK
Quoting the BBC web site:

6 January 2012 Last updated at 06:44

Housing benefit cap 'puts 30,000 homes out of reach' Benefit changes could mean thousands are unable to get homes, according to the Chartered Institute of Housing Continue reading the main story Related Stories Affordable housing shortage fears Eight radical solutions to the housing crisis Benefit cut 'will hurt worst off' Over 30,000 homes in Wales will be put out of the reach of people on housing benefit because of new restrictions on how much they receive, it is claimed.
The Chartered Institute of Housing (CIH) said changes by the UK government will mean a shortage of homes to rent in some places. Demand will outstrip supply in all but two of Wales' 22 councils, it said.
The UK government said its reforms would restore fairness to a system that has "spiralled out of control". From this month, housing benefit payments will be capped - from £250 a week for one-bedroom homes to £400 for a four-bed. The CIH said Wales would be particularly badly affected leaving some local authorities with three people chasing every affordable private home to let. It said that the biggest impact would arise from pegging housing allowance - the benefit paid to tenants of private landlords - to the bottom third of rents in any area.
“ Start Quote
The human consequences of the changes will be immense with thousands of people unable to access local housing” Vikki Hiscocks Chartered Institute of Housing The CIH estimates that 30,640 homes will be lost to the market as a result of the changes. Cardiff will see the biggest loss, with 5,590 homes put out of reach. CIH Cymru policy and public affairs manager Vikki Hiscocks said: "These changes have a worse impact in Wales compared to other parts of the UK in terms of the imbalance between supply and demand they create.
"The human consequences of the changes will be immense with thousands of people unable to access local housing and forced to migrate raising the possibility of creating benefit ghettos." She added there was concern that many private tenants will be faced with the choice of losing their home, borrow more or cut back on what they spend on food. 'Restoring fairness' "It is also a common misconception that these reforms will only impact on people who are unemployed - there are an equal number of people affected who are currently in work," she said.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said after the reforms housing benefit will still meet rents of up to £20,800 a year. A DWP spokeswoman said: "There is no reason why our welfare reforms would leave anyone homeless. "They are about restoring fairness and sense to a system that has spiralled out of control and left communities trapped in a cycle of benefit dependency." Councils are being provided with an additional £130m "to help smooth the transition of these changes".
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque Daily Economic Commentary on the state of the CONDEM-ed UK [To be continued]

UK Poverty Creation Department DWP is brazen in its abuses

UK Poverty Creation Department DWP is brazen in its abuses
Proof from cases of how Peter Hain and DWP force poverty on people
Case against Peter Hain and the DWP | 21.01.2008 13:45 | Repression | Social Struggles | World
As Rupert Murdoch ['SUN'] 'clears' Peter Hain's wife 'Dr' Elizabeth Heywood from any involvement in Hain's sleaze, it may be only a matter of time before the others also 'clear' Hain of any wrongdoing.
London
1345
Monday
21.01.2008

As Rupert Murdoch ['SUN'] 'clears' Peter Hain's wife 'Dr' Elizabeth Heywood from any involvement in Hain's sleaze, it may be only a matter of time before the others also 'clear' Hain of any wrongdoing.
The ‘others’ include the ‘Electoral Commission’ and the ‘watchdog’ component operating within the British Parliamentary establishment .
They may have a propaganda word or two to say about Hain but they will not do anything to really expose Gordon Brown’s sleazing ‘colleague’.
Already the Guardian's axxxxxxxxxx 'writer and broadcaster' Andrew R has done his bit to rubbish those who dare to call a theft and a crime a theft and a crime.... It is looking certain that the Establishment will get the propaganda support to their predicted bid to legalise paying crooked MPs and public post holders even more to stop them 'being caught' so publicly again….
So what has been the point of a the news headiness and screaming dispatches?
Not about the suffering that poor people under the DWP are going through.
This page is about to put on the record some of the contemporary cases of just how the DWP does force poverty on people in Britain .
Case against Peter Hain and the DWP
e-mail: caseagainstpeterhainanddwp@yahoo.co.uk

Muhammad Haque's diagnosis of UK Poverty creation by all Parties: UPDATE from 2006

Muhammad Haque's diagnosis of UK Poverty creation by all Parties: UPDATE from 2006
REITERATING the diagnostic commentary published in August 2006. It is just as valid today, Thursday 05 January 2012.
The [London] Guardian's Zoë Williams, who again appeared on SKY News last night at the 1130 "Press Preview" slot along with the deeply disingenuous Right wing propaganda outlet Iain Dale and put in the more than decent share of her giggly contributions to the farcical slot, is showing signs that she is beginning to understand the errors in using the notion of "child poverty" to the exclusion of and separately from "income inequality".
Income disparity is something that the Movement that Khoodeelaar! is part of has focussed on now coming to 50 years.
The British context of income disparity has been typically additionally falsified by the institutions that cause the disparity and those whose self interest propels them to do everything to keep income disparity as a going concern in the overall "framework of the UK Economy"..
The UK Society is operated as an exploitative one by the majority of its agenda setting elements holding or controlling most levers of power.
The exploitation of the zombified by the zombifiers.
The “ethos” therefore is an unethical one, in the main.
This is why the lies of Liam Byrne can be found among “elected” “MPs” in the name of the Party that was supposedly founded to create a just society in Britain.,
Byrne is the one whose unfitness to even be in parliament should have been the first PLP topic following the latest “general election”. The PLP failed to do that. Why? Because the PLP too is controlled by the bureaucracy that has never been for justice let alone for an accountable Party in Parliament.
Instead of apologising to all the victims of involuntary impoverishment [those who are unintentionally pushed into poverty, hardship and deprivation in Britain] caused and exacerbated by the many layers of state “intervention”, the Party that was supposedly created for making Britain a just society, has decided to allow its ruling bureaucracy to en courage the same Liam Byrne to offend all decent people.
Byrne has colluded with one of his likes, Patrick Wintour on the Guardian, to incite further disaffection against the victims of injustice, denial, deprivation and lies by the UK Department t for Want and Poverty Creation [DWP].
Against Liam Byrne’s latest assault on the victims of injustice in Britain, the Guardian’s Zoë Williams makes a minor attempt to correct the lie that has been built on the shallow basis of “child poverty”.
[To be continued] By © Muhammad Haque
London
31 August 2006
Poverty can only be created with a weak society, as is true in inner cities
31.08.2006 17:47
That poverty can be created and maintained by the interests who want poverty so they can rule and control with a weakened and or weak society or social area is true in the UK inner cities.
Over the past half century or so, the inner cities have been used as probably the most open areas for the expedients and experiments on creating poverty.
Not just material or environmental. It has been spiritual impoverishment on a scale that would be unthinkable by anyone who has not directly lived in or at least observed the reality of poverty creation and maintenance.
I have long argued - and have been vindicated over the past more than 30 years - that the UK society has been the subject of an unnatural assault by the enemies of humane and tolerant social environments. Those have been allowed to creep into positions of state power locally and centrally without the informed participation of the population.
The 'left' in the UK is no longer politically active. What may appear to be 'Left' is not so.
Closer scrutiny will show that the majority of what sued to be aligned with the former USSR has joined the natural movement, the reactionary sections of all three so called main political parties. What remains outside of those essentially conservative and reactionary 'ex-Stalinists' is not intellectually any more rigorous than it ever was.
There is therefore the ideological poverty that has imperilled society in the inner cities.
With the abolition of what sued to be the Labour Party, Blair has proven that what remains as the ramshackle pretence to democratic organisation can be easily switched off.
There is no item on the Blair Party’s annual Coronation [this year scheduled to be staged in Manchester] agenda to recognise poverty as an issue at all. Not to speak of as even A Major issue. Far less as THEC major issue in domestic UK terms.
There never has been.
Not for almost 30 years.
What they have is a very cruel, corrupting typically Blaring set of words that jumble up poverty and hide it under other things. Those are diversions and dissemblers
They link it with CHILD poverty.
And Gordon Brown is no different from Blair on this. They are blatantly lying about poverty while busily creating new poverty and marinating the old ones.
No party or movement has shown any evidence that it recognises poverty at all as the issue to raise to a level that it deserved to be.
The problems in African and Asia have long been the problems of deliberately created poverty.
Without recognising those and linking the various chains together which enslave three big continents to virtual slavery to the Big Business and their local agencies, there is no freedom, let alone peace in the world. Not that the poor are going to cause disquiet as such. It is the poverty creators who want and need war and disquiet. A most avoidably terrifying world the poverty creators have created.
In the poverty-stricken East End of London, the role of the apparently democratically elected Tower Hamlets Council in creating poverty and in disenfranchising local community is seen in all that Council’s actions. Two are Crossrail and the destruction of Council housing and the virtual transfer of public housing stock over to batches of criminals who are now engaged in finishing off the job - driving out former council tenants off from their homes and from their communities.
Khoodeelaar! is about to start publishing the findings of our contextual investigation into the “ Tower Hopeless Council – the tool for the Blairing abolition of society in the East End “
Regionally in Greater London, we have a dud Assembly that is treated with hourly contempt by Ken Livingstone who is above any accountability whatever. He has been making his own 'mayoral contribution' to the creation of poverty on a scale that would have been unthinkable even on 30 April 1997.
In the UK House of Commons, there is no democracy. So there is no debate on anything. What appears to be like a debate turns out to be faked.
And Frank Field is , quite frankly, an ardent, almost fanatical creator of poverty.
Internationally, the UNO is correctly discredited because of its bureaucracy. But the UNO has been disabled by the very Big Business interests who want the world to remain unsafe and insecure. And shackled to poverty in strategically created locations.

© Muhammad Haque/ Khoodeelaar!/CBRUK/LAWMEDIA 2006

Is this justice, then?

Is this justice, then?
0045 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
04 January 2012.
By © Muhammad Haque

When SKY NEWS hauls in a “Bush adviser” from the USA and Rupert Murdoch SUN’s ex-Editor Kevin Mackenzie to praise Trevor Philips and the Daily Mail as “proof” that “justice” for Stephen Lawrence has been done, the mind not only just boggles, the entire sensory system is turned upside down. As if that were not shocking enough, research reveals that the SKY News also had Toby Young in the 2130 slot “previewing the press’ coverage of the “justice done for Stephen n Lawrence” press. Toby Young is not an acceptable copmmenter about race and racism. He is one of the persistent perpetrators of the deeply sophisticated racism that has followed Stephen Lawrence's murder. [To be continued]

Morality-free faces of Dishonouring Party Bureaucracies on empty parade

Morality-free faces of Dishonouring Party Bureaucracies on empty parade
Editor © Muhammad Haque

David CAMERON is warned of the corruption system miscalled the Honours System


From the Press Association [England, UK] as published via Google. Accessed by AADHIKARonline at 1850 Hrs GMT London Monday 02 January 2011

Watchdog in warning over honours (UKPA)
– 8 hours ago

The honours system is at risk of being brought into "disrepute" by rewarding wealthy individuals who donate money to political parties, the standards watchdog has warned. Sir Christopher Kelly, the chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, called for reform of the rules on party funding to avoid damaging confidence in politics. His comments, to The Daily Telegraph, came after four millionaire Tory donors received awards in the New Year Honours list. They included knighthoods for hedge fund tycoon Paul Ruddock and package holiday entrepreneur Doug Ellis, and CBEs for investment banker James Lupton and construction magnate James Wates. Together they have given almost £1 million to the Conservative Party. Two major Labour donors, Capita boss Rod Aldridge and the founder of online gambling firm bet365, Denise Coates, were also honoured at the weekend. Sir Christopher said: "For as long as you can make political donations, when there is a coincidence between honours and donors you get this sort of story.
It implies corruption even when there isn't any.
It is unsatisfactory.
It is bad all round.
They risk bringing it (the honours system) into disrepute."
He added that the present arrangements were "very bad for confidence in the political system and unfair to donors who give for altruistic notions".
Labour MP Michael Dugher, a shadow Cabinet Office minister, said the honours list reflected the Tories' priorities in office.
"David Cameron promised to clean up politics, but in office he has shown he is utterly out of touch with decent British people," he said.
"He is giving a knighthood to Paul Ruddock, who made millions from the collapse of Northern Rock and has given over £500,000 to the Tories. This tells you everything you need to know about the Tories' priorities. When millions of families are struggling to get by, it's the Tories' friends in the City who get the rewards."

Copyright © 2012 The Press Association. All rights reserved.

New year 2012 arrives with old poverty-creating habits of inner London councils...

New year 2012 arrives with old poverty-creating habits of inner London councils...
This picture, taken as a screengrab from the BBC Parliament web site broadcast on 31 December 2011, shows Robert Devereux, the current top paid civil servant in the Department for Want and Poverty Creation, also known as the DWP. Devereux is a typically ambitious permanent secretary. He came across as being unprepared to recognize the constitutional duty that he is under to account to Parliament. That is only part of the problem that Devereux personifies. More on the Dossier of Dodgy DWP as displayed by the demeanour and the denials of Devereux [Robert], soon


1505 Hrs GMT London Sunday 01 January 2012. Editor © Muhammad Haque.


Muhammad Haque diagnosing poverty-creating role of inner city Councils including Tower Hamlets.
This is the latest summary of the diagnostic as posted by Muhammad Haque on the London EVENING STANDARD website at 1455 Hrs GMT today Sunday 01 January 2012.

[Muhammad Haque Addressing the London EVENING STANDARD]

“Your piece is dated 12 December 2011.
Today is 01 January 2012.
And I am probably the first person to post a comment on this. What does that say about the state of interest in deprivation funding and the myth that Big Biasness brings benefits to the local areas it imposes itself on?
The "diagnosis" you attribute to the subject of your item could very well apply to Tower Hamlets. Newham, Hackney, Southwark, Lewisham, Lambeth and Islington.
Poverty creation is alive and kicking across inner London. No holder of the elected post has been within a million miles of confessing to their role in this disaster.
The role I speak of is in their failure, inability and negligence on the entire range of events in the chain of corruption around the degeneration funding that has been going on in one form or another in inner cities for the past 40 years.
Your piece contains no evidence that the Cameron-endorsed and Boris Johnson-proximate Stephen Greenhalgh himself knows the answer.
His appointment and the EVENING STANDARD's prominent reporting of it has more to do with propaganda than with the addressing of the problem of poverty creation in London via local councils.
[Further diagnostic reports will appear here and on related sites and bogs carrying Muhammad Haque’s commentary]

Tower Hamlets Council postholders are still tainted by abuse allegations

Tower Hamlets Council postholders are still tainted by abuse allegations
from the web site of the "Press Gazette".

PCC finds inaccuracies in Telegraph blog posts 20 December 2011 By Press Gazette Two Daily Telegraph blog posts about Tower Hamlets Mayor Lutfur Rahman were inaccurate and misleading, the Press Complaints Commission has found. The complaints related to one blog headlined "Lutfur Rahman councillor charged with fraud" on 13 April and another titled "Lutfur Rahman: all his controversies in one place" on 20 October. The first reported that a Tower Hamlets councillor had been charged with fraud and made reference to Rahman having been "accused of failing to declare substantial donations" to his campaign, which was a criminal offence under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act. In his complaint Rahman said that following a full investigation the Crown Prosecution Service and the police confirmed in February 2011 that there was no case to answer. He also pointed out that the newspaper had not contacted him before publication. The Telegraph “stood by the statement that the complainant had been accused of failing to declare substantial donations”, according to the PCC, claiming that “the allegations had been, and continued to be, levelled against him by individuals who considered that the police investigation had been inadequate". It said the allegations had been reported in detail on numerous occasions by the newspaper in blog posts during September and October 2010 without complaint, but was also willing to add a statement to the post making clear that the police investigation had been concluded and found there was no case to answer. The October 2011 blog post was a summary of Rahman’s first year in office in the form of a timeline of his “controversies" – with one entry reading: "September 18 [2010]: Lutfur is accused of failing to declare thousands of pounds in donations from Shiraj Haque - a criminal offence, if true". Rahman complained that the paper had again failed to make clear the outcome of the investigation, and the Telegraph offered to add a similar statement to the April blog post. Claims were 'regrettable and preventable'. In its adjudication the PCC said the paper had “been wholly entitled to refer to these allegations, which were serious and a matter of public interest”, but added: “under the Editors' Code, the newspaper was also required to take care not to present the allegations in a manner which would be inaccurate or misleading to readers. “This included reporting the outcome of the relevant police investigation, which had concluded in February 2011 that there was no case to answer. “The Commission considered that, by failing to include this information, readers would have been misled into believing that the investigation was ongoing. This raised a breach of Clause 1.” The PCC said the Telegraph’s offer to update the blog post in April was a sufficient remedy but described the repeat of the allegations in October as “regrettable, and preventable”. “The blog had made reference to the claim being ‘a criminal offence, if true’ without any mention of the position in regard to the police investigation. This would have clearly misled readers in breach of Clause 1. “It was the publication of this second blog that has led to the Commission finding an outstanding breach of the Code, and the complaint has been upheld on that basis.” Rahman also complained that the April 2011 blog contained additional inaccuracies but the complaint was not upheld. He felt the headline “gave the misleading impression either that he had been charged with fraud, or that he had been connected to the charges against the councillor, which was not the case". He also raised concerns over claims he was “extremist-backed” and had close links with an organisation called the Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE). The PCC found “owing to their brevity” headlines should be “considered in the context of the article when read as a whole” and did not uphold the complaint. On the issue of the phrase “extremist-backed" it added: “The Commission was satisfied that the article at no point stated that the complainant himself was extremist, or that readers would have been misled into thinking that he was. “The claim in the article was rather that the complainant was 'extremist-backed'. It was not in dispute that members of the IFE supported the complainant.” COMMENTS Disqus Like Dislike Showing 0 comments M Subscribe by email S RSS Login Add New Comment Post as … Image RSS Feed: All Comments MORE OPTIONS RSS Feeds Latest News The Knowledge more… Blogs The Wire Media Money more… Contact Press Gazette Press Gazette on Twitter Press Gazette on Facebook Press Gazette Digital Edition

Cuts to Society for British vahloos date far back beyond G Brown years

Cuts to Society for British vahloos date far back beyond G Brown years
BBC Online: Thatcher 'considered arming police' during 1981 riots By Sanchia Berg Today, BBC Radio 4 Historian Lord Hennessy says there are "uncanny" similarities between the riots of 1981 and 2011 Continue reading the main story Related Stories Thatcher 'Liverpool decline' urge Papers show BBC censored Panorama Police 'need riot tactic rules' Margaret Thatcher considered arming the police during the riots of 1981, newly-released National Archives files have shown. These were the worst civil disturbances in England since 1919, according to contemporary historian Lord Hennessy, and had no parallel, in scale, until the riots last summer. While there are many differences, the similarities between the riots of 1981 and 2011 are "uncanny", he says. The then prime minister's personal file on the riots reveals she was warned in April that "spontaneous disorder" was "likely" among the country's ethnic minority communities by a secret Home Office report. Mrs Thatcher and her home secretary agreed sending in the Army "could not be contemplated" Britain was in recession. Unemployment was high, especially among the young, and among Britain's black and Asian population. There was also considerable tension between police and some communities. There had been fierce riots in Brixton, south London, that month lasting several days. TV news had shown police officers in their everyday helmets and uniforms, cowering behind flimsy-looking riot shields as bricks and bottles were hurled at them. That happened again, as riots broke out in Toxteth, Liverpool, on 3 July, before erupting in other English cities. Like last summer, police struggled to keep control of the streets and mass media were blamed for encouraging copy-cat rioting. But in 1981 the disorder took place mostly in the deprived inner city, rather than spreading to the suburbs. The file gives an unusually detailed picture of how Mrs Thatcher responded, according to Lord Hennessy. He describes it as "almost blow by blow, minute by minute". The police appealed for new legislation and a shopping list of riot gear For instance, on 11 July, in the morning, she talked to her Home Secretary Willie Whitelaw. He had just visited Manchester and Liverpool and reported that there was now "widespread anxiety" about civil unrest in London, and properties were being boarded up across the city. There had been reports of disorder in many parts of the capital. Just the night before, according to the file, there had been rioting in Brixton, Battersea, Clapham, Streatham, Hackney and Acton. Cars had been burned in Southall, and petrol bombs thrown in Dalston. Stoke Newington police station had been attacked. Mrs Thatcher and Mr Whitelaw discussed how to get better equipment for the police, and briefly touched on the idea of sending in troops - something a Liverpool MP had called for. They agreed that using the Army "could not be contemplated". They would prefer to arm the police, the record notes. That very evening Mrs Thatcher visited the Metropolitan Police and spent more than seven hours with the commissioner, only leaving New Scotland Yard at three in the morning. The police had appealed for a new Riot Act and they had also given her a shopping list of riot gear - shields, protective clothing, water cannon, CS gas, rubber bullets and surveillance helicopters. New tactics, new equipment, "saturating" the cities with police, ended the riots. "An age of innocence" had ended, according to Lord Hennessy. "People thought riots couldn't happen here - but they did." The police got their equipment but they didn't get the new law immediately - it was only in 1986 that a new Public Order Act was passed. Is there any lesson for today's politicians? Lord Hennessy says while there is a great danger of excessive prime ministerial power in this country, in such circumstances "the prime minister has to speak out, to take a lead" as Mrs Thatcher did.

Those who make "the Season of goodwill" a month in hell include the housing bureaucracy in UK

Those who make "the Season of goodwill" a month in hell include the housing bureaucracy in UK
1850 Hrs GMT
London
Boxing Day/Bank holiday
Monday
26 December 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
One of the unethical tricks used by the Channel 4 series about “empty homes”, shown in the past 6 weeks, was to flash a supposed cheque that was apparently issued by or behalf of a man called Grant Shapps.
This is a very delicately chosen name. Great care must be taken to spell it. A slight misplacement or transposition of a single letter would spell disaster. Like Grant Shapps could easily be misspelt, unintentionally of course, as Grant Sharp! Sharp being the operative word in that presentation.
How did an apparently campaigning piece of TV journalism about empty homes mainly across the English North-East, end up being faded out with the lingering image of a Conservative junior minister [on Housing] being “the natural supporter” of the TV programme?
Not only was the man not able to show anything in his “portfolio” as a CONDEM minister that could be objectively treated as a genuine solution to the policy-linked creation and perpetuation of housing crisis in the inner cities and in the English North-East but the presenter of the particular programme too came across as a tricky, dodgy “journalist” himself. In studying the “politics” of poverty creation in Britain of a period spanning over 50 years, I have yet to come across a single minister or “civil servant” or indeed MP who has shown the requisite evidence of knowing what the housing crisis is. The agenda for the perpetuation of housing crisis is set, as always in my finding, by Big Business.
Crucial collusion is extended to Big Business via the local Coucnil, in each affected area.
Little wonder then that Channel4 TV was not going to investigate the agenda.
The partial symptoms of the operation of that agenda were misrepresented because the role of the local Councils in creating or allowing the creation and the perpetuation of the housing crisis in their area, which has been crucial in the empty homes realities across most of the North-East, was left unaddressed. But then the same has been true of other tokenistic TV programmes allegedly investigating empty homes. Mostly done by ITV.
There is thus a de facto agreement between the main media and the local authorities that the truth shall not be told.
The same applies to the Big Business elements that are engaged in the housing crisis industry.
Look at the evidence of the “social landlords” and you cannot escape the weight of evidence that points to Peter Rachman being alive and kicking the downtrodden via housing harassment that is enabled and or facilitated by the layers of the necessary negligence and collusion provided to the crisis-causers via the “local Councils”.
The likes of Tory Grant Shapps are very complacent with that Peter Rachman situation.
Eric Pickles, the largely visible image of what used to be called the Communities Secretariat in the UK central Bureaucracy, has failed so far to find time to show whether he can make a start in recognising the truth: that he has inherited a Department that is toxically guilty of adding to the nightmare that hosing in most areas was for most people in low and lowest income groups. Society therefore has ceased to exist for millions of people trapped in wrong housing or no housing across the UK. [To be continued]

Panjayree by Farrukh Ahmad:How long before the end of the night, how long before dawn?

Panjayree by Farrukh Ahmad:How long before the end of the night, how long before dawn?
By © Muhammad Haque 1215 Hrs GMT London Sunday 25 December 2011 Muhammad Haque introducing Panjayree, one of Farrukh Ahmad’s best known poems.
However, Panjayree has remained an enigma for most of the times. Even when Farrukh Ahmad himself was around, he hardly spoke about Panjayree the poem. Nor did many of the “experts” on his works. Not in the way that Panjayree meant any relationship with real life.
In the nightmare years culminating in the still unreported events that ended with Farrukh Ahmad’ demise, so many episodes occurred that could be said top be foretold in Panjayree.

Raat poohabaar Kauto Deri Panjayree.

How long before the end of the night, Panjayree?

How long before the night ends, Panjayree?

In the two versions, I have tried to bring to life the poet’s plea. Life means life as it is across the world today.
[ As it is being endured by millions across the world today. As it is even being suffered in the UK. As the Christian religious bureaucracies issue their routine words and messages of comfort aimed at reassuring the victims of hunger, famine and injustice about their “salvation”, and as the Queen of England [and of “the Commonwealth”!!] herself is engulfed by the over-the-top coverage of live BBC and Sky news “reports” on the state of her husband’s health at Papworth hospital this lunchtime, there are hundreds of millions of people struggling to survive the pangs and withstand the lethal threats of famine and starvation across the world.
[As the Queen is shown to be recognising the role of community and family and of particularly appreciating the ”Commonwealth” of 53 Nations, there are uncounted numbers of people being neglected by the leaders of their own communities. Even more are being oppressed, violated by regimes among those 53 Nations. To every single one of those individuals being denied justice and dignity of food, shelter and stability, the words conveyed in these ritualised high-octane messages are hollow. They are empty. To those people what appeals is a message that a poet states. Just as Farrukh has done in Panjayree.
[
[ Throughout the poem, Farrukh comes across as determinedly resigned. Yet he is anxious, impatient too. The paradox is no paradox.
[This is exactly what happens in nightmares. Nightmares that are true in life.
[ Today’s news [as reported on BBC News Channel between 1100 and 1200 GMT Sunday 25 December 2011] that dozens of hunger migrants have died somewhere in the sea trying to reach a "land of hope and a meal" captures the truth of the feelings the emotions that Panjayree conveys.
[To my knowledge, which is very limited indeed about Farrukh Ahmad’s life, the poet himself, before writing Panjayree had not encountered anything like the nightmares he endured later.
[ So his thoughts and the imagery he used in Panjayree must have been inspired by something other than empirical engagements with the oppression of the dark lone night.
[
[To be continued]

Big Business has big civil servants aiding it evade £Bn worth of tax

Big Business has big civil servants aiding it evade £Bn worth of  tax
0105 [0050] Hrs GMT London Sunday 25 December 2011.
Editor © Muhammad Haque. CLICK on the image to view the HANSARD record of the Public Accounts Committee examination f the UK Central Government Tax department;'s annual report. I quote below from the HANSARD report as published by the UK Parliament web site:

HM Revenue and Customs 2010-11 Accounts EXAMINATION OF WITNESS Witness:
Anthony Inglese , General Counsel and Solicitor, HMRC. Q230
Chair: Welcome. I gather this is your first appearance before a Select Committee, so I hope you do not find it too onerous. I hope that we won’t take up too much of your time, but it depends on how the questioning proceeds. May I refer you first to the note of the meeting of 8 December 2010 in your offices? Can you tell the Committee whether those minutes are correct?
Anthony Inglese : May I say at the beginning, Chair, on that note that I cannot comment on the contents of the document? It was prepared as an aide-mémoire by two- Q231 Chair: Why can’t you comment?
Anthony Inglese : For various reasons. I think the Committee understands the constraint I am under. It’s a note that- Q232
Chair: No, we don’t quite.
Anthony Inglese : It is a note that is legally privileged and it also- Q233 Chair: Why is it legally privileged?
Anthony Inglese : Because it was part of the evidence gathering that, as a lawyer, I was doing in order- Q234 Chair: For whom?
Anthony Inglese : In order to advise the department. Q235
Chair: May I just make it clear to you that you are also a civil servant, are you not?
Anthony Inglese : Yes, I am. Q236 Chair: As a civil servant, to whom you are accountable?
Anthony Inglese : I am accountable to my department. Q237
Chair: No, you’re not. You’re accountable to Parliament.

Anthony Inglese : But I do believe the Committee understands the constraint I’m under- Q238
Chair: No, we don’t, actually. We think that you, as a civil servant, are accountable to Parliament. If there are issues in the public interest, it is beholden on you to answer them. That is the first thing to say. These issues are all in the public domain, anyway. Rather than evading the questions, which will end with you being here for rather longer than we had hoped, it would help if you could actually answer them.
Anthony Inglese: I would very much like to try to help the Committee, Madam Chair, but there are some constraints that I am under. May I tell you how I can help the Committee? Q239 Chair: You have explained that you have given advice to another officer of the Crown, who is also accountable to Parliament-namely, the department or Mr Hartnett or whoever-so we consider that both of you are civil servants, both of you are accountable to Parliament, and both of you should give us an account of yourselves and the content as well as the process. I do not see how you can quarrel with that interpretation.
Anthony Inglese : Can I begin by talking about the process? Q240
Chair: No, you can begin by answering the questions. You have said that you feel you cannot answer all the questions. You said one of your constraints was that you gave advice to the department. You agreed you are a civil servant; you are therefore accountable to Parliament. Any other constraints, Mr Inglese?
Anthony Inglese : I would like to be able to say something, and I can go on to say something more helpful, but the constraints that I am under, as well as legal privilege- Q241
Chair: I do not understand the legal privilege point. I have just said to you that the legal privilege point is not a point, because you are civil servants, and you were giving advice to a civil servant who is accountable to Parliament.
Anthony Inglese : There are conventions in Parliament about what can be answered on legal privilege-Ministers, for example. There are various ramifications of the legal privilege point. At the moment, there is a judicial review being brought against HMRC. Q242 Mr Bacon: Oh, really? Can you give us the case number, please?
Anthony Inglese : We have had the pre-action protocol letter by a pressure group and we are now looking at our response. Q243 Mr Bacon: Are there any proceedings?
Anthony Inglese : Proceedings are imminent. Q244 Mr Bacon: What is the answer to my question?
Anthony Inglese : The way judicial review works- Q245 Mr Bacon: What is the answer to my question, Mr Inglese? Are there any proceedings?
Anthony Inglese : For the purposes of the sub judice rule, we have had a letter before action- Q246 Mr Bacon: Yes, I understand that you have had a letter before action. Once again, what is the answer to my question: are there any proceedings before the courts?
Anthony Inglese : Proceedings are imminent. Q247 Mr Bacon: Are there any proceedings before the courts now? Yes or no?
Anthony Inglese : At this moment, no. Q248 Chair: Can I draw your attention to Erskine May? I want to draw your attention to two things before we get on to the matter in relation to proceedings. Erskine May explains that when matters are considered sub judice: "Civil proceedings are active when arrangements for the hearing, such as the setting down for a case for trial, have been made, until the proceedings are ended by judgement or discontinuance." In your answer to Mr Bacon’s questions, there are no proceedings, so this is not sub judice. Erskine May then goes further: "where a ministerial decision is in question,"-indeed, this is not a ministerial decision; it is an official decision-"or in the opinion of the Chair"-that is me-"a case concerns issues of national importance…reference to the issues or the case may be made in motions, debates or questions." So under Erskine May, I put it to you, Mr Inglese, that you ought to be answering our questions fully.
Anthony Inglese : Chair, with the greatest of respect, I cannot answer those questions. I am under the constraints of legal professional privilege, which is a privilege that I owe to my clients. Q249 Chair: Are you saying that you as a civil servant override Erskine May? You are a civil servant, Mr Inglese. You are here as a civil servant.
Anthony Inglese : My understanding of the rules is that they apply where proceedings-the type of case that a judicial review is involved in-involve a protocol before action, but that protocol still has effect. Q250 Chair: There is no action. We have established that. Mr Inglese, can I read to you again the Erskine May reference? We have established there are no civil proceedings, but "where a…decision is in question"-that is what we are dealing with this afternoon-"or in the opinion of the Chair a case concerns issues of national importance"-I think this does, because many, many millions of taxpayers’ money are involved-in those cases, "reference to the issues or the case may be made in motions, debates or questions." I put it to you that, as a civil servant answerable to the Crown, you have to abide by the rules of Erskine May.
Anthony Inglese : I am accountable in this respect to my department and to Treasury Ministers. Q251 Chair: Actually, I do not think you are very accountable to Treasury Ministers, but you are accountable to Parliament, if I may say so. We see a lot of officials in front of this Committee. In fact, we do not even bother with Ministers; we just see officials, and they-you-are accountable to Parliament.
Anthony Inglese : If I may say, I have prepared as much as I can for this session. There are some things which I- Q252 Chair: No, you have to answer the questions, Mr Inglese. This is not a Committee that takes statements. We want answers to questions-just directly, simply. I think it is beholden on you to answer our questions directly and fully, under Erskine May and as a civil servant.
Anthony Inglese : I do not have a statement, but I think it would be helpful if the Committee could understand the- Q253 Chair: No. I put it to you that you should be accepting Erskine May. Let me just me ask you another question. James Eadie, who I understand is the first Treasury counsel, advised-advice that was considered at HMRC in 2009-that "as PAC are a parliamentary body with an oversight role over HMRC it follows that HMRC’s functions would extend to assist PAC with that oversight role. So there is no absolute bar on disclosure". Do you agree with that statement? Do you agree with what Mr James Eadie said?
Anthony Inglese : The legal advice is contained- Q254 Chair: Do you agree with what Mr James Eadie said?
Anthony Inglese : You have to see the legal advice in context, and the legal advice is- Q255 Chair: Do you agree with what he said? Shall I quote it to you again: "as PAC are a parliamentary body with an oversight role over HMRC it follows that HMRC’s functions would extend to assist PAC with that oversight role. So there is no absolute bar on disclosure"? Was Mr Eadie right or not right?
Anthony Inglese : The current legal advice that we have in HMRC- Q256 Chair: Was he right or not right, Mr Inglese? It is a very simple question.
Anthony Inglese : We have taken the unusual step of writing-Mr Hartnett has written to you on 19 October. Q257 Chair: Mr Inglese, was Mr Eadie right? Do you agree with Mr Eadie? He is first Treasury counsel. Do you agree with James Eadie’s view or not?

Anthony Inglese : Mr Hartnett has written to you on 19 October- Q258 Chair: Mr Inglese, do you agree with him or not?
Anthony Inglese : And Mr Eadie has agreed with that letter. Q259
Chair: Do you agree with Mr Eadie’s advice? Do you agree?
Anthony Inglese : All the advice on this subject has to be seen in its full context. Q260
Chair: Do you agree? I will quote it again. This is nothing to do with context or anything. He said, "as PAC are a parliamentary body"-that is what we are-"with an oversight role over HMRC"-you, as a civil servant, in the HMRC-"it follows that HMRC’s functions would extend to assist PAC with that oversight role. So there is no absolute bar on disclosure". Do you agree with that? It is a very simple question.

Anthony Inglese : What Mr Eadie has said is that HMRC-this is in the letter of 19 October- Q261 Chair: I picked out that bit of advice, because it is the key bit of advice that you got from Mr Eadie that will influence the content of this hearing, and it would just make our life one heck of a lot simpler if you could decide whether or not you agreed with it.
Anthony Inglese : The letter- Q262 Chair: Do you agree ..[Incomplete]with it, Mr Inglese? Why are you finding it difficult to answer the question? Anthony Inglese: Because what you have done is refer to a part of an opinion that was written in 2009, whereas- Q263 Chair: It is a pretty basic part. It is a key element in the status of you and your department in relation to us and our Committee. It is a key bit, which is why I have picked it out. It is the key element. Do you agree? Anthony Inglese: This is an opinion of 2009. There is an up to date piece of advice, which the department has communicated. Q264 Chair: So was Mr Eadie wrong in 2009? Anthony Inglese: The department has communicated- Q265 Chair: Was he right or wrong? Anthony Inglese: I do not think it helps to go in that direction. Q266 Chair: Why? Anthony Inglese: Because the up to date advice is in the letter of 19 October- Q267 Chair: Has he changed his view since 2009? Anthony Inglese: The 19 October- Q268 Chair: Please, it will make it a very much simpler hearing if you will just answer the questions. Maybe the notes will help you to give us a yes or no. These are very, very simple and quick questions. Both the reference to our proceedings within Parliament and the reference to the advice from Treasury counsel will then give us a context in which we can get clarity in the questions you ask us. That is all. Just give me a yes or no. Anthony Inglese: Well the answer is that the words you have used are a partial quotation that you cannot draw a wider conclusion from. Q269 Chair: No. What it says is that you have a duty to Parliament. Do you? Do you have a duty to Parliament? Anthony Inglese: The letter of 19 October says- Q270 Chair: These are such simple questions. Do you have a duty to Parliament? Let me draw it down. Do you consider that you have a duty to Parliament? Yes or no. Is that easier to answer? Anthony Inglese: Yes. Q271 Chair: You do. Okay. Is there an absolute bar on giving evidence to us about individual cases where they have national importance? Is there an absolute bar? Anthony Inglese: That is what the letter of 19 October says. HMRC has consistently taken the view that it is lawful to pass non-identifying information to Select Committees through the gateway that we have. However, it does not follow from this that it is necessarily properly part of HMRC’s functions to provide disclosure of taxpayer-specific information to a Select Committee. Q272 Chair: Are you now saying that, as I take it, James Eadie was wrong? I just want that for the record. Anthony Inglese: No. I am saying that you have taken the James Eadie sentence out of context. Q273 Chair: I have not taken it out of context. I have taken it as the key way in which he wanted to distinguish-I do want to get on to the content, because we want to answer questions on the actual content of this case. If you are going to evade them, I think you will end up with an exceedingly cross Select Committee, but let us see. Q274 Stephen Barclay: If I am hearing correctly, Mr Inglese, you have accepted two points-that HMRC owes a duty to Parliament and to the Public Accounts Committee. Is that correct? Anthony Inglese: I have said- Stephen Barclay: You have just said it. Anthony Inglese: I have said that it is part of our functions properly to assist Parliament, and we have taken a view that it is lawful to pass- Q275 Stephen Barclay: Please stick to the question. It even says on page 5 of the 19 October letter-so this is not a trick question-that "HMRC recognises that it is part of its functions properly to assist Parliament", so can we just please stick to the questions? I thought that you had already accepted this point. Can we just go again? Do you accept that HMRC owes a duty to assist Parliament and the Public Accounts Committee? Yes or no? Anthony Inglese: Yes. Q276 Stephen Barclay: Good. Do you therefore accept that information can be provided that is non-identifying? Anthony Inglese: Yes. Q277 Stephen Barclay: I thought that those were the two points that we had got to with the Chair. Where does the legislation draw a distinction between identifying and non-identifying information? Anthony Inglese: Because the legislation looks at each disclosure- Q278 Stephen Barclay: But can you refer to the legislation? Where in the legislation is a distinction drawn between identifying and non-identifying? Can you tell me which section that is? Anthony Inglese: That is the context of the legislation, so if you look in sections 18 and 19- Q279 Stephen Barclay: No, it is not. There is no distinction. Anthony Inglese: That is the advice that we believe is right, and that we have confirmed with the first Treasury counsel. That is our legal advice, and it is the advice that we act on. Q280 Stephen Barclay: Can I come back to the question? There is no distinction drawn. Can you take me to the section that draws a distinction between identifying and non-identifying information? Anthony Inglese: It stems from the notion of what one is disclosing, so one has to look at each disclosure; that is the point of the 2011 letter. Q281 Stephen Barclay: No, the 2011 letter lists five policy reasons, Mr Inglese, which I will come to, and which we can go through. Chief among them is that of it having an effect on voluntary compliance, but the Act, on my reading, does not draw a distinction between identifying and non-identifying information. The department is calling for five policy reasons, which we can come on to, but in law there is no distinction, is there? Anthony Inglese: In law, one has to look at the specific piece of information that is being disclosed. Q282 Stephen Barclay: There is no statutory justification for the distinction, is there? There are perfectly reasonable policy reasons why you may want to take a decision not to disclose, and we can come on to those. The letter from Mr Hartnett sets out five policy reasons, but there is no statutory justification for distinguishing between identifying and non-identifying, is there? Anthony Inglese: The sentence that I read out is the sentence that says that we look at each specific piece of information when it is being disclosed. Q283 Stephen Barclay: I am asking for the law. Can you take me to where in statute it defines a distinction between the two? Anthony Inglese: The best answer that I can give, I think, is that one has to read the whole of this letter to get the context right. Q284 Stephen Barclay: With respect, the letter is not the law. The letter sets out a range of factors that are policy considerations. What I am asking you is where in statute it says that. What we have here is a door; the door says that where there is a gateway, which is if you have a duty to assist Parliament, you can provide information. In the case of this Committee, the gateway is open. In statute, there is no distinction between those two things. Referring to the letter is a totally different issue to what is in statute. Do you accept that in statute no distinction is drawn? As I understand it, you are general counsel for HMRC. Anthony Inglese: Yes, I am general counsel. Q285 Stephen Barclay: As general counsel of the department, do you accept that in statute there is no distinction between identifying and non-identifying information? Yes or no? Anthony Inglese: Looking at the context of the legislation, there is a distinction. Q286 Stephen Barclay: Can you take me to the distinction? Anthony Inglese: I can take you to it, if you would like, by looking at the letter. Chair: No, the letter is no good. Q287 Mr Bacon: It is the Act that we are after. Anthony Inglese: If I can pick out the highlights of the letter- Chair: We are not interested in the letter; we are looking at the Act. Q288 Mr Bacon: It would be quicker if you went to the Act. That is the actual legislation. Anthony Inglese: In order to read the legislation-sections 18 and 19-one has to look at the legislation as a whole, and then one takes one’s meaning from the words used in the legislation and the purpose and the context. That is how legislation is interpreted. Q289 Stephen Barclay: There is nowhere in law where it distinguishes between those two things, is there? It is policy consideration, and we can come on to that, but in statute you are not prevented from disclosing. Anthony Inglese: No, it is more than policy. Q290 Stephen Barclay: Where? You are a lawyer. Anthony Inglese: If you have the patience, I must refer you to parts of the letter, which are very clear. Q291 Chair: Honestly, Mr Inglese, with the greatest respect, the letter reflects the current policy of HMRC, with which we as a Committee have a problem. You are trying to hide a policy behind an imperative of legislation. If you can demonstrate to us that the imperative of legislation is genuine, you may find a different response from the Committee. It is no good going back to the letter, because the letter is your policy. What my members are drawing to your attention is the legislation. Again, it is a simple question. You seem to find it really difficult to answer these simple questions. Is there something in the legislation that tells you that you cannot reveal details of a particular taxpayer, or is it policy? Anthony Inglese: It is more than policy; it is what the legislation means. There are two levels to this. The first level is whether the legislation allows us to pass over indentifying information-whether we are permitted to do that. To get there, one has to look at the duty of confidentiality under section 18 and the criminal offence under section 19. I am sorry if the letter acts as a red rag to a bull, but that is- Q292 Chair: This is the third question you have failed to answer. Just to make it clear: you failed to come back on "Erskine May"; you have failed to answer whether or not you agree with what seemed to me to be at the heart of the advice that you got from James Eadie as first Treasury counsel; and you are now failing to answer whether there is a constraint on you in legislation. You must recognise, as a lawyer, that that is a pretty poor show so far, and we are only 20 or 25 minutes in. We are happy to stay all night. Anthony Inglese: I am sorry if that is the impression that I am giving. I thought we were just about to start an interesting discussion between two lawyers about what a statute meant, and I can carry on with that. Q293 Mr Bacon: I think we should pursue that point. I do not understand what you are saying, Mr Inglese. It is fairly clear to me, reading the legislation, that there are lots of circumstances in which disclosure is possible. That is plain on the face of the Act. Basically, section 18, which you have referred to a couple of times, says in subsection (1): "Revenue and Customs officials may not disclose information which is held by the Revenue and Customs in connection with a function of the Revenue and Customs." Subsection (2) then states: "But subsection (1) does not apply to a disclosure", and it lists paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h) as exemptions to the rule that information may not be disclosed. So there are lots and lots of cases just under section 18 in which one can disclose information. The Act goes on to say in section 20 that "Disclosure is in accordance" with section 20 "if"-and it then gives a whole load of possible examples, one of which is disclosure "to a person exercising public functions". Lots of things are plain on the face of the Act, with regard to why disclosure may, in certain circumstances, be allowable. Mr Barclay has been pursuing you for seven or eight minutes, perhaps longer, on the simple question of where the statute draws a distinction between-I think you said, Mr Barclay-identifying and non-identifying, and you have failed to answer him. You have answered a different question, which he did not ask, which leads me to believe, although I am not certain of this, that the correct answer to Mr Barclay’s question is that there is nowhere in the statute that draws a distinction between identifying and non-identifying. Is it correct that nowhere is a distinction drawn? I do not know why you are getting all these notes from people behind you; you are supposed to be the general counsel for HMRC. You are the top dog in the legal area; in so far as one has legal dogs, you are the top one, so why you have these people woofing behind you I am not clear. You are the one who should be advising them, frankly. Is what Mr Barclay was pursuing correct? Is there no statutory definition that distinguishes between non-identifying and identifying? Is that correct? Anthony Inglese: This legislation, as with all legislation, takes its meaning from the purpose and the context. Words such as "disclosure" and "functions" take their meaning from the context, and part of the context is the criminal offence under section 19. The letter- Q294 Stephen Barclay: Parliamentary privilege applies, the Bill of Rights would apply, in terms of criminal offence, but in any event-we have not gone into the detail with Vodafone-that is information in the public domain. That gets us into the issue of policy decision. Even the letter from Mr Hartnett accepts the fact. He says, "Where there is a power to disclose", which is obviously different from the position taken by Sir Gus O’Donnell letter to Edward Leigh, in which he said that we cannot disclose, much as we would like to do so. Mr Hartnett is saying, "Where there is a power to disclose, a decision whether or not to disclose must be taken in respect of each identifiable piece of information". So there is an acceptance in this letter which, indeed, talks about the need "to reach (in summary) a reasonable decision." The point is that in law you’re not prevented from disclosing, but the department is taking a decision, which it is perfectly entitled to take, at its own discretion as to whether it discloses. We then need to establish whether that decision is being exercised reasonably or not. The point is that you are not prevented in law from disclosing. Anthony Inglese: As I was saying earlier, there are two levels. First, is it part of our function to disclose identifying information? The letter says that it does not follow that it is properly part of our function, and the question about whether it would be the case is far from free of doubt. Because of the potentially criminal context in which the question arises, it is entirely appropriate for the Commissioners to take the view that they do not want to have that doubt. Q295 Stephen Barclay: You are saying that criminal sanctions apply. We are talking about passing information to Parliament, so parliamentary privilege would apply. Anthony Inglese: It is also necessary to look at the other provisions of the Act that, for example- Q296 Stephen Barclay: You have gone off on to another point. Your point was that criminal sanctions apply. Surely this would be covered by privilege. Anthony Inglese: No, it is important to look at the other provisions because, for example, we comply fully with the NAO and expose all our papers to it. The NAO has constraints on it, but powers to disclose. Q297 Stephen Barclay: Again, that is an entirely different issue. You have no choice over that; the NAO has the right to demand whatever information it needs. We covered that last time and it is absolutely irrelevant as to how you exercise your discretion. You have no discretion in terms of the NAO. The NAO, by law, can ask for whatever information it requires. Anthony Inglese: I haven’t commented on the second level yet. At the first level, it is entirely proper for the Commissioners to take the view that this isn’t a function because of the advice- Q298 Chair: What isn’t a function? Anthony Inglese: That it is not a function to give identifying information. As the letter says, it is far from free- Q299 Chair: Ever? Anthony Inglese: I think that one would have to find a highly exceptional case- Q300 Chair: Well, in the minutes that we are going to come back to in a minute, you said that particulars of the claim in the county court were public documents and could be copied by anyone interested in comparing the settlement sum with the claim. Is that true? Anthony Inglese: I don’t- Chair: Is that true? Anthony Inglese: I am not going to comment on the contents of that document. Q301 Chair: Is that true, Mr Inglese? Is it a fact or not a fact? You are not asked for a comment. Is that true? I will read it again. You are said to have said that the particulars of claim in the county court were public documents and could be copied by anyone interested in comparing the settlement sum with the claim. Is that true? Are there public documents in the county court that could be copied by anyone interested in comparing the settlement sum with the claim? Is that true? Anthony Inglese: I’m afraid I cannot comment on the content. Q302 Chair: Why can’t you? It is completely ridiculous. This is just an issue of fact. Can you say whether that is true or not true? Anthony Inglese: I can say at a general level that if there is litigation in the county court, the documents will be available. Q303 Stephen Barclay: It is here. I’ve got a comment on the Goldman Sachs case. It is interesting-we may come on to why you issue proceedings in the county court, which tends to get less reported than the High Court, given the value of the sum. The documents are here; they are a matter of public record, as are the data in the Vodafone accounts that show the amounts of assets it has. It is a policy issue about where you are, and there are various policy points concerning the impact on voluntary compliance or the issue about the prosecution of officials. Those are policy questions. I am very happy to spell out why I don’t think they apply, but we have not addressed the starting point, which is the legal decision. Anthony Inglese: If I come on to that level, an issue set out in the letter says that if it were the case that a function existed, that power would still have to be made in a way that was consistent with both public law principles and the department’s statutory obligations. Q304 Chair: Right, Mr Inglese, we are taking a very unusual step this afternoon. From here onwards, we are going to examine you on Oath-that is a power that we have. The Oath will be administered by the Clerk. I gather there are two forms of words that you can give, which the Clerk will read out to you. Anthony Inglese: Can I have a minute’s time out? Q305 Mr Bacon: No, I don’t see why you should have a minute’s time out at all. This Committee has the power to make witnesses give evidence under Oath, and we are doing so because we have not been able to get answers otherwise, so I think we should just get on with it. Anthony Inglese: I swear by almighty God that the evidence I shall give before this Committee shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God. Q306 Chair: Thank you. I am no lawyer, but clearly, as you have taken the Oath, you will not want to give answers that are incorrect, because you might find yourself with an accusation of having committed perjury, as I understand it. May we now return to the minutes of the meeting on the 8 December 2010 in your office, and can you confirm whether they are correct? Anthony Inglese: I cannot comment on the contents of the document, but it was prepared as an aide-mémoire by two of my litigating lawyers after a meeting that I held. The note was not cleared with me. You have heard my general reasons for not commenting on the note itself, but if it helps the Committee, I will tell you why I had the meeting and what I was trying to achieve, so that you can understand the context. Q307 Chair: There are a number of bits that really interest the Committee, but we will look at the final sentence of that minute, which says, "AI"-you-"said he would always want to assist DH,"-Mr Hartnett-"but not if this were ‘unconscionable’. He"-you-"referred to the difficulty all those present at this meeting were having in justifying a settlement without an interest element". Is that correct? Did you consider the settlement in that light? Was that a correct reflection of your view of the settlement? Anthony Inglese: At that meeting, I was trying to understand what had happened. Mr Hartnett asked me for advice. He said, "A mistake has been made, will you advise me on what-" Q308 Chair: He did not tell you then that a mistake had been made; as I understand the chronology, it was after you had the meeting. Did you, at that time, in that meeting, consider-even taking out the "unconscionable"-the difficultly all those present at the meeting were having in justifying a settlement without an interest element? Is that correct? Was that your view? Anthony Inglese: Having sworn the Oath, I do need time to tell you the context, which is that I was trying to understand what had happened. I did not know anything about the- Q309 Chair: You are trying to evade the question again, Mr Inglese. It is quite simple: was that your view or not? It is a very simple question. Giving me context is a way-which I hate in this Committee-of evading an answer. Anthony Inglese: I am not evading the answer, but you do not often get advisory lawyers coming to talk to you, and it is important that I have an opportunity to explain what I was trying to do at that meeting. I was trying to gather information about what had happened. We talked around what the case involved, because, by reaching a settlement in that case, effectively, a piece of litigation that we had on the go was being de facto settled. So I had to speak to my litigation lawyers, who were handling the litigation, to ask, "What’s it all about? What’s going on? What do you know? What are the issues?", so that I could try to understand what the mistake was. Q310 Chair: You keep referring to a mistake. At that point, nobody admitted to a mistake. At that point, did you think that the settlement was unconscionable? Anthony Inglese: No, I don’t even believe that I used the word "unconscionable." Chair: It’s actually in quotation marks. Anthony Inglese: I know, but I don’t believe- Q311 Chair: Was it difficult for those present to justify a settlement without an interest element? Anthony Inglese: I think that the juxtaposition of those things in that paragraph produces an unfortunate interpretation that I believe is not the case. Q312 Chair: You have a wonderful memory of everything except for using the word "unconscionable." Is that right? Anthony Inglese: No, what I believe that that sentence is getting at is that one of the things at which we looked at the meeting was to see whether a mistake had actually been made. Sometimes, people say they have made a mistake, but then, when you think it through, you find that, actually, they had it right all along. We talked it round, looked at what was going on, and concluded that, as far as we were concerned, we believed that a mistake had been made. Q313 Chair: What did you advise Mr Hartnett? Did you advise him that the settlement reached was binding or not binding? Anthony Inglese: As Mr Hartnett has explained to this Committee, I advised him on what the options were. Q314 Chair: Did you advise him that it was binding? You are being so evasive. Was it a binding agreement or not a binding agreement? Anthony Inglese: I am not being evasive. Ian Swales: Mr Hartnett has already asserted the point. Anthony Inglese: If I may say so, Chair, you have put the question in a binary way. I advised that it was open to the department to go back and revisit the settlement, or that it was open to the department to carry on and accept the mistake. Q315 Ian Swales: Does that mean non-binding, to a non-lawyer like me? That sounds like what you are saying. Anthony Inglese: No, that is not a word I am using. Q316 Mr Bacon: It was a word that Mr Hartnett used-that is the point. He said that the legal advice-one takes it that he was referring to the advice from the general counsel’s office and from you-was that the agreement could be unwound, or that you could choose to be bound by it. Mr Barclay said at the time, in question 37, "you accept that legally you were not bound by that decision. Legally you could have rectified it." Mr Hartnett replied, "I received advice that we could regard ourselves as bound by it, or not bound by it." Does that refer to your legal advice? Anthony Inglese: It was my personal advice. Q317 Mr Bacon: Let me clarify that that sentence that I just read out was your advice. Anthony Inglese: My personal advice was that they could bring back and reopen the settlement, or we could go on and leave things as they were. Those were the two options. Q318 Mr Bacon: Indeed-you could let the thing lie. The words that Mr Hartnett chose to use were, "I received advice that we could regard ourselves as bound by it, or not bound by it." Mr Barclay said, "In other words, you were not bound by it." Is it not correct to say, following what Mr Swales asked a moment ago, that your advice was that HMRC was not bound to stick to the agreement? That is correct, isn’t it? Anthony Inglese: I have said previously that this is the subject of a judicial review that will put the spotlight- Q319 Mr Bacon: First, we have established that there are no proceedings-we established that earlier. I am just asking you about Mr Hartnett’s evidence last time, and you have already agreed that you were one of the people who gave this advice. When we see Mr Hartnett saying, "I received advice that we could regard ourselves as bound by it, or not bound by it", was Mr Barclay correct when he responded, "In other words, you were not bound by it"? In other words, my question is whether it is correct to say that the advice was that the agreement was not binding-yes or no? Anthony Inglese: And my advice was that we could go back and reopen. Q320 Chair: Your advice was to go back and reopen the negotiations. Anthony Inglese: Or that we could- Q321 Mr Bacon: Good, that’s clear-your advice was that you could reopen it. Once again, we can, I hope, get to the question that I asked. Was it correct to say that your advice was that the agreement was not binding-yes or no? I do not know why you have this reluctance to answer a question when the answer seems obvious to everyone else. Anthony Inglese: I am doing my absolute best, within my constraints of legal privilege, to give you the headline of my advice. The headline was that we could go back and reopen. Q322 Mr Bacon: Thank you. Anthony Inglese: Or-and I have to say verum-and not. Q323 Fiona Mactaggart: I’m interested in this. I wasn’t at the earlier sessions, but this sounds to me as though this advice was given by you after Mr Hartnett thought he had concluded a deal, but you said earlier that this was part of your litigation strategy. Would it not have been normal for him to have asked you for advice before he went out to agree a deal, and if he did not, why not? Anthony Inglese: The answer to the very first question about the litigation and settlement strategy is that this was a mistake- Q324 Fiona Mactaggart: What was a mistake? Anthony Inglese: I was giving advice on the basis that a settlement had been made, and a settlement under the litigation and settlement strategy is a good thing if settled appropriately. If a mistake is made, the advice that I was giving was on the mistake, so the answer to the second part related to whether, because there was litigation going on, the team should have consulted the litigating lawyers. The answer to that question is yes, the team should have done. Q325 Fiona Mactaggart: And did they? Anthony Inglese: They did not. Q326 Chair: Can I get it clear? When you thought it was a mistake, the litigation strategy was not properly followed in this particular instance. Anthony Inglese: That is because it was a mistake. Q327 Chair: It doesn’t matter why. I accept that you say it was a mistake, but the litigation strategy as set out in HMRC was not properly followed in this instance. Anthony Inglese: I am sure the team was doing its absolute best in good faith to follow the strategy, but it made a mistake. Q328 Chair: Can I ask you a question? If you give clear advice, and it’s not heeded, who do you go to? Anthony Inglese: The first port of call, if it’s not heeded, is that I would go to the person I gave it to. Q329 Chair: Yes, of course. They’re the ones who don’t heed it. Go on. Anthony Inglese: I’m sorry. I probably don’t need to say this to you, Madam Chair, with your experience of Ministers and so on, but you go to the person you have advised, and say, "Is something not clear about the advice? What are you doing with it?" I’m not drawing myself up to my full height, but in my very long experience of working in many Government Departments that usually does the trick, because we are working under a rule-of-law culture and people want in their hearts to follow the rule of law, even if sometimes it irritates them immensely, and they want to question the legal advice. Sometimes the legal advice needs to be questioned, so you go back to the person and you say, "Is the advice not clear? Has it not hit the target? Is there something you don’t like about it? What should we do about it?" You sit down and you talk it through with people. That usually does the trick. Q330 Chair: And then? If it doesn’t do the trick, who do you go to? In this instance, your advice was you have permission for overturning the deal on which there was a handshake. In this instance, they didn’t listen to your advice that they could return to it. Who would you go to beyond Mr Hartnett? Anthony Inglese: My advice was listened to in this case. I said, "You can go back, or you cannot go back." So my advice was listened to. Q331 Chair: I see, so you cover yourself by not giving clear advice. You can do, yes or no, and everything’s all right. That’s not very strong advice. Q332 Fiona Mactaggart: How does that comply with the litigation and settlement strategy, which in strong cases-and in view of the fact that the other cases, which were on all fours with this one, did concede-says, "Settle for the full amount HMRC believes the tribunal and courts would determine or otherwise litigate." How does it comply with that? Anthony Inglese: In this particular case, the aim was to settle the case appropriately and a mistake was made. It was a mistake. Amyas Morse: I think you sort of slipped on a point there. I think I heard you say that normally the advice would be taken before a settlement was made and the advice was not taken before the settlement was made. You then gave advice about mitigating the mistake that resulted from the settlement being made. Is that right? Anthony Inglese: Yes. Q333 Stephen Barclay: On the chronology, can we clarify what date you became aware that a mistake had been made? Anthony Inglese: 7 December. Q334 Stephen Barclay: So when Mr Hartnett shook or did not shake hands with Goldmans two days afterwards-sorry, it was three days, because it was the weekend: he had the meeting on the Friday and he said he spotted the mistake on a Monday-he did not get in touch with you at that point? Anthony Inglese: I believe he got in touch with me as soon as he was able to. I do not think anything turns on that. Q335 Stephen Barclay: The chronology is interesting, because I have always found it odd whether the mistake was spotted before or after the meeting on 30 November. Can we go through the chronology? The meeting was held on 19 November-actually, why don’t you take us through the chronology? The meeting with Goldman Sachs and Mr Hartnett was on what date? Anthony Inglese: I believe it was 19 November. Q336 Stephen Barclay: So the deal was done on 19 November, yet you did not learn of the mistake until 7 December, yet you are the chief lawyer advising on whether this is a binding or non-binding deal. Can you talk us through what happened after 19 November? Who first brought it to your attention? When did you first learn of a mistake having been made? Anthony Inglese: 7 December. Q337 Stephen Barclay: Okay. Who brought that to you? Was it Mr Hartnett or one of your lawyers? Anthony Inglese: Mr Hartnett. Stephen Barclay: So- Q338 Mr Bacon: So-thank you, Mr Barclay, this is totally relevant-when Mr Hartnett said in answer to question 33, which asked when he spoke to Mr Inglese, he said: "I think on the Monday"-that is, Monday the 22nd, after Friday the 19th-that was wrong, wasn’t it? Anthony Inglese: There was a point between-I cannot remember the dates at that point-the settlement and 7 December where Mr Hartnett spoke to me. Q339 Mr Bacon: Yes, but we are talking about Monday the 22nd. The meeting occurred on Friday the 19th. Mr Hartnett said, in response to my question asking him when he spoke to Mr Inglese: "I think on the Monday, but I need to check, Mr Bacon. I’m sorry." I asked him: "You think it was the 22nd, after the Friday." He said: "Very soon after, yes." Well, actually, we are talking about a couple of weeks, some 15 days after. If you did not find out until 7 December, that is a couple of weeks. I know that Mr Hartnett was travelling-we established that he was abroad most of that week-but there are telephones. You are telling us that you did not find out until 7 December. Anthony Inglese: I did not find out until 7 December. Q340 Mr Bacon: That makes sense, because you immediately convened a meeting, which took place on 8 December. That is right, is it not? Anthony Inglese: On 7 December, I started to gather information. I convened meetings on 7 and 8 December. There is one other thing. I heard about the case from Mr Hartnett before 7 December. In that conversation he said to me: "One of the cases that you are litigating has just settled." At the time, I did not think any more of it. Q341 Stephen Barclay: Did he tell you what case it was? Anthony Inglese: He might have done, but-I am not trying to be funny-we have 8,000 cases, and if I do not need to know, I do not ask. Q342 Stephen Barclay: Can you clarify whether, ahead of today’s hearing, you read the minutes of the 30 November meeting? Anthony Inglese: Which meeting was that? Q343 Stephen Barclay: That was the high-risk group meeting that was held on that date. Anthony Inglese: I think I read them, but I don’t have them in front of me. Q344 Stephen Barclay: I presume that there is a detailed minute of that meeting. Anthony Inglese: I cannot recall that. I do not have it in front of me. Q345 Stephen Barclay: Well, it’s difficult to read it if it doesn’t exist, but one would assume a meeting of that gravity would have minutes taken. Do those meetings usually have minutes taken? Anthony Inglese: Yes. Q346 Stephen Barclay: But you haven’t read them prior to coming today? Anthony Inglese: I have read them, but I don’t have them in front of me now. Q347 Stephen Barclay: So they do exist. Was any of your team at that meeting? Anthony Inglese: Yes. Q348 Stephen Barclay: Did any discussion take place around the Goldman Sachs deal at that meeting? Anthony Inglese: Yes. Q349 Stephen Barclay: Was the mistake spotted or discussed at that meeting on 30 November? Anthony Inglese: I believe so. Q350 Stephen Barclay: So at the meeting on 30 November, the mistake had been identified then, more than a week before Mr Hartnett telephoned you? Anthony Inglese: Mr Hartnett spoke to me on 7 December. Q351 Stephen Barclay: Sure. Did no one from your team communicate that a mistake had been made, on something of this gravity, between 30 November and 7 December? Anthony Inglese: Did anyone from my team tell me? Stephen Barclay: Yes. Anthony Inglese: No. Q352 Stephen Barclay: So your team-your lawyers-went to a meeting where they established that a serious mistake had been made, but they didn’t tell you, as general counsel? Anthony Inglese: My lawyers are appropriately senior and they can engage on this sort of thing if necessary. They don’t need to tell me everything. Q353 Chair: We don’t know the precise sum, but this is £8 million to £10 million of taxpayers’ money gone missing. That’s a lot of money. That’s jolly serious. Anthony Inglese: At the time, I am assuming from- Chair: But you consider that serious, don’t you, Mr Inglese? Anthony Inglese: At the time, people were looking at the mistake and working out what to do- Q354 Chair: Yes, Mr Inglese, but you agree with the Committee’s view that whatever the sum is, £8 million to £10 million is a lot of money? Anthony Inglese: Of course it is. Chair: Right. It is serious. I would have expected someone on my team, had I been their boss, to tell me. Stephen Barclay: In terms of the discretion given to your team-we have been focusing on Goldmans, whereas the bigger-value item was the Vodafone settlement and the mystery as to how the figure of £1.25 billion was arrived at-did your team provide legal advice on whether £1.25 billion was the correct amount? Anthony Inglese: Sorry, I missed the first part. Stephen Barclay: The Vodafone settlement was for £1.25 billion. Did your legal team advise on whether that was the correct amount of tax due? Anthony Inglese: As Mr Hartnett is saying, lawyers were involved throughout, at different stages of that. Q355 Stephen Barclay: Sure. I appreciate that lawyers were involved-I would assume that lawyers drew up the contract, so it is a statement of the obvious, to an extent, to say that lawyers were involved. What I am saying is that you alluded to, in terms of your answer to the Goldmans meeting, the fact that you have senior lawyers to whom you give discretion as a result of their expertise. Are you a tax expert yourself? Anthony Inglese: I am not what you call a tax lawyer. Q356 Stephen Barclay: And the three lawyers you hired-the three people beneath you-are they tax experts? Anthony Inglese: The three directors whom I have, who have come to work for HMRC under fair and proper procedures-rather than people whom I’ve hired-are not what you would call tax experts. Q357 Stephen Barclay: I am sure that it was fair and proper; I wasn’t suggesting otherwise. We discovered at the last hearing that there is only one tax Commissioner who actually has detailed knowledge of tax. What you are saying is that out of general counsel and the three senior lawyers hired, none of them are tax experts. Coming back to the Vodafone settlement at £1.25 billion, it may be perfectly logical therefore, if you are not a tax expert, for you to give senior lawyers within your area a degree of discretion. What I am trying to establish is whether they advised, with their expertise, that £1.25 billion was the correct amount. Anthony Inglese: My answer to that is as before: I can confirm that lawyers were involved throughout, but I cannot go into any more detail. Q358 Stephen Barclay: Okay. I think the quantum is much more important than Goldman Sachs. Between 2001 and 2011, as far as Vodafone is concerned, we are looking at in the region of £25 billion in profits. The settlement-the 30%; obviously, it came down in the latter years-seems strange on a number of levels. First, it includes the 2011 and 2012 profit, but given that the settlement was reached in 2010, I would welcome your thoughts on how they knew what the profit would be for 2011 and 2012, given that those profits had not been realised. Also, the £1.25 billion looks like it has been based on about 20% of Vodafone’s profits. That means the Exchequer may have lost around £8 billion in tax, which makes Goldmans look paltry in comparison. The reason why I am saying that is that potentially-we cannot get the figures, because Mr Hartnett will not answer the questions-we are looking at £8 billion of tax lost, a company that was given five years to pay even though it was sitting on a cash pile and a settlement based on future profits that were unknown, even though the department does not allow such considerations to be given and the legislation had not been passed by Parliament, so the department could not have given undertakings. I am trying to establish, Mr Inglese-although you and your deputies might not be tax experts-who among your lawyers was advising Mr Hartnett, so that we can satisfy ourselves that the £1.25 billion was correct. Anthony Inglese: I am afraid I cannot comment on that. Q359 Stephen Barclay: Why not? Anthony Inglese: Because that is covered by legal privilege, and I cannot comment. I would like to say something about the fact that you keep mentioning tax expertise. Can I do my job without being a tax lawyer? Of course I can. Q360 Fiona Mactaggart: Can you do it well without being a tax lawyer? Anthony Inglese: Yes, I can, because I have lots of tax lawyers who know a lot about the technicalities. Q361 Stephen Barclay: But we don’t know what involvement they had. That is the issue. We don’t even know if interest was charged on the £1.25 billion. One assumes it was not, because Vodafone released £900 million that they had set aside. They stopped setting money provision aside in 2006, incidentally, probably assuming that they were going to win the case, and then found that they did not. They would have had to set aside far more, had they known they were going to lose the case. But we do not even know what interest the £1.25 billion included. Are you able to tell us? Anthony Inglese: I cannot comment on any of that. Q362 Stephen Barclay: But who were the experts from your department that were providing the tax legal advice to Mr Hartnett? Anthony Inglese: All I can say is that lawyers were involved throughout. That is all I can say. Q363 Chair: But not in-house lawyers. You sought advice from paid lawyers outside the service-more consultants? Anthony Inglese: Again, I cannot comment on specific cases, but where necessary-obviously, where there is litigation, we always involve counsel. Q364 Chair: You said how many cases of litigation? Anthony Inglese: We have 8,000 cases on the books at the moment. Where there is litigation, obviously, counsel approved by the Attorney-General is always involved. Sometimes, in cases where we want special advice from a silk or a skilled counsel, we bring in external counsel through a solicitor’s office. Q365 James Wharton: Mr Inglese, I have listened very carefully to the evidence you have just given to Mr Barclay. I apologise, as I am sure this is a matter of my failing to interpret the discussion properly rather than of an evasive answer on your part. Can I take you back a couple of steps to the gap between when your lawyers became aware of the issue and you became aware? Mr Barclay asked you if your lawyers had told you, and you started to explain that the people who work for you are sufficiently senior to make decisions, operate and so on. I may have missed it, but I do not think you actually gave a direct answer, a yes or no, to the question whether they told you or not. Anthony Inglese: I think I said no. Q366 James Wharton: Sorry. It is my fault if that is the case. I may have missed that. They did not. The other question-again, I will keep it very brief-is slightly to the side. One issue that we have looked at, apart from the fact that we often cannot discuss what is in notes and cannot get the information we need as a Committee properly to assess what has gone on, on the basis of documents that we none the less have, can you tell me whether proper records of Mr Hartnett’s meetings with big companies are now being kept, and whether, on your advice, there have been any changes in procedure so that proper and verifiable records are kept in future? Anthony Inglese: That’s really more of a question for him, but I expect he’ll say yes when you ask him. Q367 James Wharton: Allow me to rephrase it. Has there been a discussion about the quality of record keeping on which your advice has been sought which may change the procedure, so that when we next ask him, we know what, if any, your involvement has been? Anthony Inglese: We have had a discussion about whether, in the previous case we were talking about, lawyers should be consulted before a settlement, so that the submission for Mr Hartnett on the settlement would include the views of the litigating lawyers and the record would have- Q368 James Wharton: And have you had a discussion on the sorts of records that should be kept of Mr Hartnett’s meetings with private companies, with taxpayers-whatever it might be? Anthony Inglese: No, I have not. Q369 Austin Mitchell: I have just a couple of factual questions. I’m not a lawyer, although I admire your ability at fencing. It’s better than the Austrian Archduke before the collapse of the empire. It was agreed in a previous session that Goldman Sachs was warned that if it persisted in resisting, which it did, it would be liable for interest. It resisted for five or six years. Did that warning come from you, or was it just a routine thing passed on as a threatening gesture by HMRC? Anthony Inglese: That was in the litigation that was being brought. Q370 Austin Mitchell: Right, but you were consulted in the issue of that warning? Anthony Inglese: I wasn’t in HMRC at the time. That was 2005. Q371 Austin Mitchell: Okay, but it would take advice from its legal people in issuing that warning? Anthony Inglese: Well, it was part of the litigation, so the lawyers and counsel would have been involved. Q372 Ian Swales: It would be normal practice in any case. Wouldn’t it be normal practice to do that? It wasn’t a one-off decision that Mr Mitchell is referring to. Isn’t it normal practice in litigation of that nature to charge interest? Anthony Inglese: It depends. If I can come away from that case, it depends on whether it is appropriate and the litigation settlement strategy says that we would normally charge interest where there is a crystallised sum of tax due. Q373 Austin Mitchell: Okay. We now come to the meeting in December. Mr Hartnett told us in the examination on 12 October that he had consulted you: "There were a number of issues to be taken into account. Mr Inglese said to me that there were two entirely acceptable approaches in law"-we’ve agreed that-"one was to stay with the proposed settlement and one was to put it to one side." You’ve agreed that? Anthony Inglese: Yes. Q374 Austin Mitchell: Okay. Was that meeting minuted? Mr Hartnett didn’t know. Anthony Inglese: The meeting with Mr Hartnett itself was not minuted. Q375 Austin Mitchell: Okay. Did you express any preference or offer any advice as to which of these two courses should be followed? Anthony Inglese: I gave the options-what the options were. It was then very much for the Commissioners to decide, on the basis of the relevant facts, which was the preferred option. Q376 Chair: Lawyers usually give advice as well as options. Did you give advice? Anthony Inglese: I- Chair: You are on oath. Anthony Inglese: I am on oath, and I did not give legal advice. Q377 Chair: Well, what sort of advice did you give? Austin Mitchell: What advice did you give? Mr Bacon: Did you express a preference? Anthony Inglese: Yes, I did. Q378 Mr Bacon: Which of the two did you say was the preferable option? Anthony Inglese: I have no vote in these matters. Mr Bacon: I understand- Q379 Austin Mitchell: But your preference was for- Anthony Inglese: But my preference was for not going back. Chair: Not going back? Anthony Inglese: Not going back. Q380 Mr Bacon: Even though the litigation strategy is clear that in the right kinds of case, it would be normal to charge interest? Anthony Inglese: Because a mistake had been made and the question then was, having made a mistake-this is not the most uncommon of questions all over Government organisations all the time-we have to find a way of coming up with the best solution that doesn’t make things worse. Q381 Chair: Is it true, Mr Inglese, that in July 2010 you received advice from Malcolm Gammie that the Government’s position was strong and that you could be confident about getting all the money owed to the taxpayer, including interest? Anthony Inglese: All I can say is: a mistake was made. Q382 Chair: Is that true-that you got that advice? Anthony Inglese: I’m honestly not sure if I can say what advice we got because- Chair: Well, it’s in the public domain, so you might as well say whether it’s true. Anthony Inglese: The thing I can say is: we were carrying on with the litigation but then there was a- Q383 Chair: I assume from that that it is true. Can you also tell me whether it is true that in April 2010 there was a judgment in the British Virgin Islands in which the judge dismissed a claim that the employer of the bankers-Goldman Sachs-was in the Virgin Islands? Anthony Inglese: I would have to write to you about that. Q384 Chair: Why? Because you can’t remember? I can’t believe that in preparing for this hearing this afternoon, which I hear you spent a lot of hours on, you don’t know the answer to that one. Anthony Inglese: I think I may know the answer, but I just want to make sure that what I can say is right. Q385 Chair: What do you think the answer is? Anthony Inglese: What do I think? Chair: It’s either true or it isn’t. Q386 Mr Bacon: You’ve just said that you think you know the answer. What do you think? Anthony Inglese: I would prefer to be allowed to write to you on that one, to make sure that- Q387 Mr Bacon: We accept that you are not 100% certain, but the question is: what do you think the answer is? Anthony Inglese: When the question is put like that, I am just not sure. So instead of being po-faced and saying, "I really don’t know", I think I might know but I do need the opportunity to write. Q388 Mr Bacon: Well, we need the opportunity to get the answers, and you are under oath, Mr Inglese. Anthony Inglese: I promise I will write very soon, because the answer is out there, but I just- Q389 Chair: Can I come back to a question I asked you before? Is it true that the particulars of claims in the county court are public documents and could be copied by anyone interested in comparing the settlement sum with the claim? Anthony Inglese: Is that the same as the question you were asking before? Chair: I’m asking it now, when you are on oath. Anthony Inglese: I believe from what I have heard from my litigating lawyers that that is indeed the case, that the public can see them. Q390 Chair: If that is the case, can you therefore tell us what the claim was and what the settlement sum was? Anthony Inglese: No, I can’t. Q391 Chair: Why not? If it’s in the public domain, can’t you tell us? Anthony Inglese: I can’t tell you what the settlement was. Q392 Chair: Sorry, but to go back again, you have said it is true that these are public documents that could be copied by anyone interested in comparing the settlement sum with the claim. So if it is true that they are in the public domain, could you help the Committee by telling us what the claim was and what the settlement sum was? Anthony Inglese: If a figure is in the public domain I can help the Committee by writing to it with that figure, but I do not believe that the settlement figure is in the public domain. Q393 Chair: Well, it says, "could be copied by anyone interested in comparing the settlement sum with the claim." "Settlement sum" with "the claim"-those are the two figures I am asking for, and you said you could get them because they are in the public domain. Anthony Inglese: No. I can certainly write to the Committee about anything that is in the public domain through the county court. Chair: Can those people passing you endless notes from behind tell us what those two figures are, to help the Committee this afternoon? Clearly they don’t want to. Q394 Stephen Barclay: In terms of Vodafone, could you clarify whether with the settlement any discretion was exercised over the £1.25 billion, or was that the correct amount in law? Anthony Inglese: I’m afraid I cannot go into that; I cannot comment on it. Q395 Stephen Barclay: I am just asking from a legal process point of view whether any discretion was exercised. Anthony Inglese: I can say at a general level that when a settlement is reached it is reached by agreement. Q396 Stephen Barclay: But Mr Hartnett said that no discretion was exercised: he did not take a penny less than the correct amount in tax. As a matter of law, I want your confirmation as to whether that is correct. Anthony Inglese: It is my understanding that it is correct. Q397 Stephen Barclay: So, no discretion over interest was exercised? Anthony Inglese: My understanding, from speaking to all my colleagues, is that the Vodafone settlement was correct. Q398 Fiona Mactaggart: We have learnt that you are a cautious lawyer from the way in which you have responded to us, and I am wondering what advice you gave to Mr Hartnett before he went to talk to Goldman Sachs, and whether you think he followed it. Anthony Inglese: I wasn’t involved in the settlement at all. Q399 Fiona Mactaggart: That was not what I asked you. I asked you what advice you had given him before he went to talk to Goldman Sachs. Anthony Inglese: Sorry, I wasn’t involved in the Goldman Sachs matter at all until I was asked for advice on the mistake. Q400 Fiona Mactaggart: He never asked you for advice in advance? Anthony Inglese: I personally was never asked for advice in advance. Q401 Mr Bacon: And nor were any other lawyers, were they? Mr Hartnett made that clear. Anthony Inglese: I have just said that. Q402 Mr Bacon: No, you said you; but it is correct, isn’t it, that no other lawyers were asked either? Anthony Inglese: Sorry, I think that I have missed- Q403 Mr Bacon: One of the things that struck me in your answers to Mr Barclay about Vodafone was that you said that lawyers were involved throughout. One of the issues in relation to the Goldman Sachs negotiations was that lawyers were not involved. So it is no surprise to me to hear that you were not involved. I was just getting you to confirm that no lawyers were involved. In a recent evidence session, when I asked Mr Hartnett whether there was a legal error in thinking that you could not charge interest, he said, "Yes". I then said, "Whereas you actually could." That is to say, that you could charge interest. Then I asked him, "In coming to the conclusion that you could not charge interest, did you consult lawyers about that?" Mr Hartnett said, "No". It was not just that he did not consult you; he did not consult lawyers. Yet in the Vodafone case, lawyers were involved throughout. If he had consulted lawyers, he would have presumably been told that the apparent legal impediment to the charging of interest-a rather odd apparent impediment anyway, as charging interest is fairly standard, as we’ve established-was no such thing. There was no impediment, and one could charge interest. That’s correct, isn’t it? Anthony Inglese: Sorry, that is a very long question. That’s correct at the end. Q404 Mr Bacon: It is correct that there was no impediment? Anthony Inglese: I think- Q405 Mr Bacon: Sorry, it was a long question. Let me break it down. It is correct to say that there was no impediment to the charging of interest? Anthony Inglese: I can’t comment on that. Q406 Mr Bacon: Okay, but it is certainly correct that neither you nor any other lawyers were consulted? Anthony Inglese: I have already said that one of the things that Mr Hartnett and I have discussed as a learning point is that where there is litigation afoot and a settlement discussion takes place, it is always good practice to consult the litigating lawyers in case something is there. Q407 Mr Bacon: Yes! You have answered what to me is one of the most astonishing sentences. It is blindingly obvious to everyone-except, apparently, to Mr Hartnett-that what you have just said is sensible and good practice. Mr Hartnett said to you, "Oh, one of those cases-it’s settled." To say that without having talked to a lawyer about the terms on which it is settled is one of the most extraordinary aspects of this. Do you not think that it should be not just good practice but required that when HMRC is settling cases, legal advice is obtained? Anthony Inglese: I think that where there is a piece of litigation on the go-I need to take a step back because obviously, I am going to say yes to that-one has to remember that in HMRC our clients, if I can call them that, include many thousands of highly skilled tax professionals. They know quite a bit of law as well, and they have the carriage-in other words, they have the lead-on all these cases. They are the ones whom the lawyers work to. They involve lawyers when it’s in their judgment that they need to. I won’t spend any time now on it, but there are lots of very good reasons why lawyers should be involved. There are also lots of cases where a settlement discussion is taking place and the law is well-trodden: it’s about the facts and it’s about accountancy; lawyers don’t need to be involved. The main thing that I sought to help this Committee with right at the beginning is that it’s a fallacy to think that every single settlement needs to have heavy legal involvement. But where there is litigation, then yes, because the lawyers should be able to offer advice on maybe a key issue in the litigation, or maybe costs or something like that. Chair: That is very helpful. Q408 Mr Bacon: Particularly when the bone of contention-for example, whether or not interest was payable-was that HMRC had threatened that if a particular client held out, in the way that Goldman Sachs did, interest would continue to be payable. That was one of the nubs of contention, wasn’t it? Anthony Inglese: I do not want to go into that case, but every case has something and it is always worth checking what that thing is that people need to look out for when arriving at a settlement. Q409 Chair: In thanking you for your evidence, can I just ask two very short final questions? Given that a mistake was made, do you agree that the courts should quash the settlement and then reconsider it on a proper legal basis? Anthony Inglese: That is the subject of this imminent judicial review. Q410 Chair: Well, there is not a judicial review, but do you agree that that would be the best way forward? Anthony Inglese: I cannot comment on that. There is an imminent judicial review, and I expect the application will happen soon. HMRC will be responding to the pre-action protocol letter with a letter of our own, and at the moment we are still considering it. Q411 Chair: It is a pre-action. Can I just ask a very final question? I understand that you were obviously concerned with giving evidence on an issue like this. Can you just tell the Committee how much taxpayers’ money was spent coaching you for today’s appearance? Anthony Inglese: Zero-I hope it does not show. Q412 Fiona Mactaggart: Chair, can I squeeze in one small question? Would it not be in the interests of the taxpayer not to contest this judicial review, but to concede, to collect the tax that we are owed because of this mistake and to not spend money on lawyers defending a judicial review? Anthony Inglese: I cannot comment on that. Chair: Okay, thank you. EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES Witnesses: Dave Hartnett, Permanent Secretary for Tax, HMRC, and Sir Gus O'Donnell, Cabinet Secretary, gave evidence. Q413 Chair: Welcome. Sorry to have kept you waiting. It is a bit cold in this room, so you were probably warmer in the corridor. Can I start with you, Sir Gus? Do you accept- Sir Gus O'Donnell: May I say, Madam Chair, that, after our meeting, there are a couple of things that I can update the Committee on? Could I do that first-a bit of news for you that might be interesting? Q414 Chair: Go on. Sir Gus O'Donnell: As you know, we talked about oversight and the accountability of large tax deals. We had those discussions and talked about some ways forward. One of the issues you raised was the issue of tax Commissioners, and I am pleased to be able to announce that the Queen has approved two new tax Commissioners: Steve Banyard, the acting director general for personal tax, who started life as a tax professional in the Inland Revenue, has been there all his life and has a deep knowledge of tax; and Simon Bowles, the chief finance officer in the department, who is an accountant by profession, for which I forgive him, because he was at Trinity College, where he read economics-that is close to my heart. So there are two new Commissioners, which I think is good. Secondly, as you know, David has written to you about the whole issue of how we move this forward in terms of having some extra accountability, in terms of external professional input into these large deals, and of how we extend the oversight. If you would like, you could go into more detail about those, because he gave just the outline in that letter. There was not time, but the plan will be to work on getting that process in place and having some final proposals go to Ministers by the end of the year. It would be good to get your reaction to that, but if want Dave to go into the details, I am sure he will be happy to do that. Q415 Chair: Okay, I am sure we will come to that. I really am grateful for that and for the meetings that both Mr Hartnett and you held with a representative group from the Committee. In a way, however, those were private and it is important that we get some of the stuff on the public record. Let me start by saying that I think that "Commissioners" is a misnomer, because it suggests to both Parliament and certainly the public that there is a bunch of people overseeing the work of HMRC who exist outside the executive structure of HMRC, and that is not right. The two Commissioners that you have announced both have tax experience, which is welcome, but they are both part of the HMRC structure, are they not? Sir Gus O'Donnell: Indeed, yes. Q416 Chair: I think that is a problem. It brings me to the key issue-I hope you will accept this, because then we can have a discussion about how we take the process forward-that there are structural problems with the present settlement of how HMRC administers itself, particularly in relation to tax disputes with large corporate bodies. I will present those as two issues and I wonder whether you will accept them on the record. One is that we have to have a proper separation between those who negotiate a particular deal with a corporate body and those who authorise that deal, hence my concern about the Commissioners. Indeed, I think that, in 75% of the cases that were looked at by NAO, there was no separation between those who negotiated the deal and those who authorised it. Dave Hartnett: Chair, I am sorry, but that is not correct. Q417 Chair: There was no proper separation in 75% of the cases. I would give you the quote, but I have not brought it, because I did not think it would be of contention. It was in paragraph 11 of the NAO Report. I have not brought it, but I have a bit of a memory for it. Sir Gus O'Donnell: I think it’s the other way around, Madam Chair. I think that 75% were fine. Chair: No. Paul Keane: We looked at 27 cases all together. There were four where the department put in place specific governance arrangements-this is paragraph 11-and in three of those four, one or both of the Commissioners were involved in both negotiating the case and approving the settlement. Q418 Chair: Three out of four is 75%. You might say that it is not a representative sample, but it is 75% of the ones they looked at. That is the first issue. The second is that, when you are talking about £25.5 billion, which, again, is the figure in the NAO Report, there has to be a proper system of accountability for those settlements to Ministers and to Parliament-a system that is independent of the machinery of government that is responsible for it. Do you agree that those are the two structural issues with which we have a problem? Sir Gus O'Donnell: Yes. I think it would be fair to explain the context. This is in a world in which we are moving towards doing the large settlements in a very different way from how we used to. That has resulted in very big increases in revenue. I would like to put on the record my thanks to Dave Hartnett for the things that HMRC has done. We would be in a really bad situation if we had not got the extra billions that have been achieved through some of the things that the Revenue has got through in the past few years since the merger. Q419 Mr Bacon: Are you saying that we are not in a bad situation? Sir Gus O'Donnell: We are in a less bad situation than we would be. Q420 Mr Bacon: All the newspaper headlines say that we are in a very bad situation. Sir Gus O'Donnell: Well, we are not in the euro, Mr Bacon. Q421 Mr Bacon: Thank goodness. But that money coming in also depends on how much is being lost through the settlements. Sir Gus O'Donnell: Indeed, but I would say that the real savings of £1.4 billion, starting at a time when staff are being cut by about a quarter- Mr Bacon: No, no. Sir Gus O'Donnell: -when compliance increases have gone up and there is a reduction in the tax gap, all those sorts of things are big, objective, real billions of pounds of savings. To come back to your question, Madam Chair-it is important that we answer the questions that are put to us-first, on the negotiations and trying to get the appropriate degree of separation, absolutely, there is work in hand to do that. I agree. As we evolve through sorting out how to get the best out of these things, that is exactly right. We need more tax Commissioners to do this, which is why the point that I made right at the start is the crucial one. Secondly, the question of external independence is a very good point. I discussed with you how do we ensure that we can get some external, professional oversight that can look at individual cases. Q422 Chair: You will get a lot of opportunity to tell us what you are doing, Mr Hartnett. Sir Gus O’Donnell, can I come to you with this? As head of the civil service, what is your priority? Is it to protect taxpayer confidentiality, or to protect the public interest in ensuring that moneys are due to the Exchequer? Sir Gus O'Donnell: It is absolutely not an either/or. Both. Chair: Okay, but at the moment, it is. Sir Gus O'Donnell: No it’s not. Q423 Chair: Because in the evidence that we have had from HMRC, taxpayer confidentiality has taken precedence over our duty to protect the public interest in terms of ensuring that we get the revenue. Sir Gus O'Donnell: There is a statutory requirement on taxpayer confidentiality-we do not want civil servants breaking the law, that is certainly true. But it is absolutely crucial that when it comes to individual cases, the National Audit Office has complete access to all the papers-no ifs, no buts; it gets to see them all. I hope that the NAO, as I detect, gets absolute access to all the papers. Amyas Morse: Yes. Sir Gus O'Donnell: That is exactly as it should be. Q424 Stephen Barclay: Of course, no one would want civil servants to break the law; that is a statement of the obvious. If there is a gateway that permits disclosure, they wouldn’t be breaking the law, would they? Sir Gus O'Donnell: No. Q425 Stephen Barclay: So could we come to the point about what in statute prevents you from disclosing information to Parliament? Sir Gus O'Donnell: I will be governed by professionals on that. Dave Hartnett: Mr Barclay, as I have said before, I think we agreed at the last sitting that providing assistance to Parliament is one of our functions. But it is quite a big step from providing assistance to actually providing detailed information about individual taxpayers. As I think we explored before-this is in my letter to the Chair; I’m sorry, I can’t remember the date but it was when I set out the law on taxpayer confidentiality-the Commissioners of HMRC have a role in determining the approach to taxpayer confidentiality, and in 2009 they made a decision about that. Last time we also explored very tentatively whether there was a way of having a confidential briefing before the Committee, which was maybe manageable within the general strictures but did not become public. Q426 Stephen Barclay: Sure, but those are different issues. If a mistake has been made or the law has been broken, does Parliament not need to know so that it can consider whether the law needs to be amended? Dave Hartnett: Taking a mistake that we have discussed before, Parliament does know about it because the NAO reported it. Q427 Chair: No, Parliament knows about it because The Guardian reported it, and Private Eye-not because the NAO reported it. Paul Keane: We did report a mistake in the Report we just produced- Chair: But that was after The Guardian. Paul Keane: No, it’s in the Report. Q428 Stephen Barclay: But we don’t know the size of the mistake; we don’t know the value of the mistake. Dave Hartnett: With respect, didn’t Mr Morse give you a number at the last hearing? Q429 Chair: A range. Can I just put it to you this way? If it had been a grant to Goldman Sachs of anything between £5 million and £10 million, or whatever, we would all know about that. That would be in the public accounts. In effect, this is a grant-the forgoing of interest is a grant-yet we don’t know. Sir Gus O'Donnell: I think it has been very clear. It was in the Report. You were told about it. Q430 Stephen Barclay: We are trying to establish the legal position rather than the NAO view. From a legal position in terms of statute, I will come to the question that I put to Mr Inglese: is there any distinction between identifying and non-identifying information in the 2005 Act? Dave Hartnett: I cannot recall a clause that says that, but-this won’t surprise Mr Barclay-we have looked back over tens of years, decades even, to see how taxpayer confidentiality has been applied, and it has constantly been applied like that. This goes back to your point about the role of the Commissioners, and they have made a distinction between identifying and non-identifying information. Q431 Stephen Barclay: But we were not looking at the historic legal position. You have been quoting the 2005 Act, which does not draw a distinction, so it is policy reasons that go to the heart of why you are not disclosing. The point is, you have discretion, but the argument you have been putting repeatedly is that by law you are prevented by the 2005 Act from disclosure, and yet that Act has a gateway, so do you accept that you are not prevented from disclosure by the 2005 Act? Dave Hartnett: All my advice so far has been that my colleagues and I are prevented by the Act and by the decision of the Commissioners. Q432 Stephen Barclay: Even when information is in the public domain. Dave Hartnett: Even when information is in the public domain, unless it is in the public domain lawfully. Q433 Stephen Barclay: Well, one assumes that appearing in Vodafone’s company accounts is lawful disclosure in the public domain. Dave Hartnett: Frankly, it depends what appears in Vodafone’s accounts. Q434 Chair: I shall go to Ian and then I want us to get back to the principal stuff before we come to the specifics. Q435 Ian Swales: On this organisational and accountability question that the Chair started with, I think I am right in saying that-it is very welcome news that we have two new tax Commissioners-six of the 10 executive committee members are also tax Commissioners. The ones missing are the chief people officer, the chief information officer and, ironically, Mr Inglese, whom we have just had in front of the Committee. But six of the executive committee are now Commissioners. Of those six, four are actually on the board of HMRC, and the rest of the board is made up of five non-executives. The key point here, as I understand it, is that the non-executives do not have access to what you would regard as confidential taxpayer information, which is the type of problem that we have in this Committee. In other words, we have a little circle here at three levels, which are basically the same people, but slightly fewer at each level. In terms of assuring us, how do you feel about the levels of control and scrutiny of large deals, given that structure? Dave Hartnett: I think, Mr Swales, this is one of the things I am rather hoping to be able to say something about during this hearing. We think there is potentially a significant role, a non-executive role, for looking at the large settlements. What do I mean by large? Perhaps £100 million or more. We have to make this manageable. Q436 Chair: How many each year are the £100 million or more that you would consider? Dave Hartnett: I’d have to guess, Chair. Q437 Chair: Well, guess. Dave Hartnett: A few tens, but they are very complicated cases. Q438 Chair: Okay. How many in the £50 million to £100 million range? Dave Hartnett: I am guessing again-a number of more tens. A higher proportion. Q439 Chair: And how many under £10 million to £50 million? Dave Hartnett: I don’t know the answer to that. May I write to you with the numbers? Q440 Chair: On the issue that we raised in the meeting with you, it seems to us-the Goldman Sachs issue is £10 million; the taxpayer lost £5 million, £8 million, £10 million, or whatever the figure is-any oversight system needs to capture that. Dave Hartnett: I do not want to get into difficulty here with either taxpayer confidentiality or with the Committee. The figure of £10 million in relation to Goldmans is a number that has been put out in relation to interest. I would not want the Committee to think-I am trying to be very careful here-that that number fixes that matter in the ranges you talked about. Q441 Chair: So what number does? Dave Hartnett: I can’t go there, for reasons of taxpayer confidentiality. Q442 Chair: You can go there in numbers. You are not identifying any individual. Dave Hartnett: What we are talking about is Goldman Sachs. I think the issue will be resolved if the NAO goes ahead with their more detailed study of cases, with some tax expertise. Q443 Chair: I am really talking about the general here, not the specific. On the general, it seems to me that we still have not resolved the matter. I welcome the new Commissioners, but they are all executives; they are all guys who have worked in HMRC. That does not give you the separation that we are after, and then there is the other thing-the oversight. We were at £200 million when we talked to Mr Hartnett last week. He has come down to £100 million. Actually, there is an issue beyond that. Let us take £10 million as the figure. That is a lot of money. We need to have some assurance here in this Committee that there is a proper system of accountability that digs down. Sir Gus O'Donnell: We need to work on the details, but the general point is accepted. We actually need to extend the governance structure to bring in some external, professional input that can look at these cases. Precisely the degree of input you need at the different levels of-sometimes, it is about tax and sometimes, it is about complexity, so there is more than one dimension to this. Q444 Mr Bacon: Sometimes, it is about process. Sometimes, it is about observing the governance that exists. Sir Gus O'Donnell: Indeed, in which case, you might want to go through a different route for the very big ones. You might want to have someone there all the time, as you go down the track. You might want to eventually get to a point where you are doing sampling, for example, so you will want to graduate it according to your degree of concern, which is absolutely right. I think we can manage both of those things. Q445 Ian Swales: Have you got any proposals on how you might actually achieve that? How could you have more confidence? As we discussed in the private meeting, it is in the interests of HMRC to have such an assurance, not just for the outside world, but within your own processes. Dave Hartnett: We completely agree. Q446 Ian Swales: If you haven’t got any answers now, how are you going to get to them and what sort of proposals do you think you will be making? Dave Hartnett: Let me raise seven that we are exploring. The first is something we have already put in place on the back of the National Audit Office Report, and that is much greater or, indeed, complete separation between those who negotiate settlements-there are not many negotiated by Commissioners, but some are-and those who actually approve the settlements. We have done that already. Secondly, we want to bring much more transparency to the process. Q447 Ian Swales: Just to confirm, you say that you have done that already. Dave Hartnett: We have. Q448 Ian Swales: You have separated negotiation from approval. Dave Hartnett: Yes. Secondly, we want to increase transparency by publishing our guidance around this, so that everyone knows what we expect of our people. The third possibility-it is not in our hands to do this-is to see whether large settlements could in some way be referred to the first-tier tax tribunal. Q449 Chair: I said to you that I think that is complete nonsense, because they are the ones who would sit in judgment if there is any litigation. You cannot expect them to be judging-that is just a non-starter, Mr Hartnett. Dave Hartnett: Chair, what I was trying to do was cover the ground. Q450 Chair: Okay, but it is a non-starter. Dave Hartnett: The fourth is to see whether we could have some role like an independent assessor, or assessors, to sit alongside Commissioners in the decision-making process. It was put to us at one stage that maybe these individuals could be Commissioners. The difficulty with that is that the Commissioners are charged, in the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act, effectively with running the department, so the concept of a non-executive Commissioner would require some change in law, or for the role to be as though it were a Commissioner-so, a commissioner-like role-without actually being one. Q451 Mr Bacon: On that point, if the situation is as you described it, which I believe it to be, there might be a need for a minor change in the law. Although the Committee does not get involved in policy matters, in terms of the direction of Government policy-whether we spend more on roads or rail-it would be within the Committee’s purview to recommend that the Government looked at legislation if it were to tidy up the administration of HMRC. It would be a relatively minor adjustment, would it not? Sir Gus O'Donnell: I really want to make progress on this. I can tell you how to slow things down dramatically and that would be to go down that route. If you are really interested in changing these things quickly, I would suggest trying to go down the non-legislative route. Q452Mr Bacon: What I am interested in doing is getting it right. The present architecture is obviously not adequate. In fact, in our earlier meeting, Mr Hartnett said to us that it just won’t do to have tax Commissioners doing deals and then scrutinising them, as it were-and he accepts that-so the architecture is plainly not there yet. It is important that we have the right architecture and that the institutions are properly staffed up with the right personnel. I am not clear why it would delay things hugely to have a small adjustment. Sir Gus O'Donnell: I suppose I have a bit of inside information here, because I was sitting in Cabinet when they discussed the legislative programme, so I am very aware of the constraints on that programme. I can just imagine the discussions about precisely what level of priority this would have. All I am saying is- Q453 Mr Bacon: But you are talking about-let us see what the relevant piece of legislation is-the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005, which was presumably being prepared when you were permanent secretary at the Treasury. That is right, isn’t it? Sir Gus O'Donnell: Yes-it spanned my period as permanent secretary and then Cabinet Secretary. Q454 Mr Bacon: This could be amended. We are talking about a really quite small change. This could presumably be amended either through a Finance Act or through a small-the Treasury is shaking its collective head. Paula Diggle: I am absolutely certain that that could not go in the Finance Bill, I’m sorry, Mr Bacon. Q455 Mr Bacon: It could not go in the Finance Bill, so it would have to be done separately. Paula Diggle: Yes. Q456 Ian Swales: To some extent, we are talking about what’s in a name, because I think when you launched this- Sir Gus O'Donnell: I want to give you an answer to this, which is effective and quick and does what you want. Q457 Ian Swales: When you suggested this fourth option, you said that it could be implemented in a shadow way, so that the person might not have legal status as a Commissioner but could act. It could be a two-stage process: you could have that situation and then, if you wanted to make the change in law, you could do that. Does that make sense? Sir Gus O'Donnell: We did it with the shadow Monetary Policy Committee-set it up straight away, and it operated- Q458 Mr Bacon: We did it with the Comptroller and Auditor General. Sir Gus O'Donnell: Exactly. Both ways. You can do that. All I am saying is that you do not wait for progress and say, "Don’t worry, it will be in legislation, we won’t do anything until then." I am saying, "Get on with it, you can do things now." Q459 Ian Swales: So that is four of the seven. Chair: And then Meg who is waiting to come in, very patiently. Dave Hartnett: The next option, which I do not think will hold much attraction for the Committee but which we have been thinking about, is to create an external regulator of some sort. Q460 Chair: Yes, there is no attraction because there is no money. Right? Dave Hartnett: So, no Oftax- Q461 Mr Bacon: Did you say, "No tax", Mr Hartnett? Dave Hartnett: Sadly, Mr Bacon, you and I have been here before, and no I did not say, "No tax." Then, an increased role for the NAO. I have not discussed that with Mr Morse, but the idea would be- Q462 Chair: That’s not a starter either, because that muddies it. It is like the tribunal-you cannot have the tribunal or the NAO taking on a dual role. That is why the only options, out of the ones you have given us, are to have external-Mr Bacon would like to call them commissioners-bodies, people with credibility and experience to dipstick into the cases with lower monetary value and really look at the ones of a higher monetary value. I would take £50 million plus as a high monetary value. Dave Hartnett: The last one would be to see-we would need to explore this with the National Audit Office-whether it is possible, as part of whatever the solution is, to put more information into our annual accounts. We would like to see whether we can find a way of picking up Mr Barclay’s point, and that is that you don’t know how much of that tax is at stake, how much we should collect and how much we actually collect. I think there is a case for finding a way, if we can, of meeting that challenge. Sir Gus O'Donnell: So we do it in the aggregate, as it were, and not in individual cases. Q463 Chair: Yes, the aggregate would be brilliant, and we have asked for that. We asked for that figure last time around. Sir Gus O'Donnell: And we are responding. Q464 Meg Hillier: On the independent assessors, just to be clear, you are effectively saying that they could be appointed by Ministers in shadow form tomorrow-more or less. Legally, would HMRC be able to let them have access to that tax information? We have heard all this issue about criminal sanctions, and it is far from free of doubt whether information can be revealed; but it could be if it was a ministerial appointment. Dave Hartnett: There is a question of whether Ministers are the right approach. Another approach, which builds on what Mr Swales and Mr Bacon were saying, is that maybe these were-I cannot think of a better badge-special non-executives of HMRC for a single purpose, which was overseeing the large settlements. Because they would be non-executives of HMRC, issues of taxpayer confidentiality and the like would be easier to manage. Q465 Meg Hillier: So as an interim, that could happen. On making it statutory, I know that independent assessors exist, and I have worked with them in government very effectively, but they are very independent. They are able to dip in where they choose. Primary legislation is obviously an option, but I completely take the point about how long it could take. Do you know whether, under current law, it could be introduced under secondary legislation, or is that something you could write to us on? What I am trying to drive at is how quickly this could be done at a very independent level and whether it could be independent of HMRC. There has been a blurring, which we have gone through-it was rehearsed by the Committee before I was on it. Could it be done so that assessors are independent and statutory? Sir Gus O'Donnell: I wanted to get these issues out with the Committee now, because I would like to be able to discuss those sorts of things. You can get something up in shadow form, but maybe there is a question of what you mean by independence. Ultimately, you might say that it has to be statutory independence, in which case there would obviously be some kind of legislation. We can think through the options. All I am saying is that I think we can solve what I regard as the real problem: getting across to you that HMRC does this very well. I happen to believe that, but you need to be happy that it is happening. We could go through the various options of shadow, whether it could be done in secondary and how we would adjust primary, and all the rest of it. Q466 Meg Hillier: I take in good faith what you said, Sir Gus, about having a new way to do these deals to make sure that money is brought in and that taxpayers get some money from the big players. But it is very clear from the Committee that as representatives of the taxpayer, we want to see an independent watchdog. How quickly can that be done? Could you write to tell us? A statutory instrument could be introduced very quickly if it could be attached to the Act. That is easy and could be done relatively quickly with political will; other things could take a lot longer. Sir Gus O'Donnell: The plan is that we would come to you with proposals before the end of the year. You would then have a graduation-different things that will take different amounts of time. But I would like to think that there will be at least one option that will give you something fairly immediate. Dave Hartnett: Ms Hillier, may I come in? I cannot immediately think of an enabling power in the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act that would enable this to be done through secondary legislation. We then get back to the issue that the Treasury Officer of Accounts raised, but we will explore it. Q467 Mr Bacon: Who appoints HMRC non-executive directors? Dave Hartnett: HMRC, by open competition. Q468 Mr Bacon: And who runs the competition? Dave Hartnett: A civil service commissioner, I believe. Q469 Mr Bacon: So the competition is separate from HMRC. Dave Hartnett: The competition will be chaired by a civil service commissioner with senior officers of HMRC and, usually, someone from another department on the panel. Q470 Mr Bacon: Is the Cabinet Office involved in the appointment of non-executive directors? Sir Gus O'Donnell: Absolutely. The lead non-executive director for Government, Lord John Browne, is based in the Cabinet Office. We have gone through a process of selecting new non-execs on the new boards that have been set up, which are chaired by Secretaries of State across the whole of Government. I cannot say this highly enough: I am really pleased that we have been able to attract very good non-execs who have come in to help in departments and are proving really worth while in terms of their ability to give us, sometimes, commercial input and sometimes to challenge Ministers as to whether we need another new initiative just now. Q471 Mr Bacon: I applaud all that. As you know, Lord Browne has appeared before this Committee. Sir Gus O'Donnell: Indeed. Q472 Mr Bacon: My specific question is about HMRC’s non-executive directors. Although the structure that you are describing and the way that it is developing is welcome, it seems to me that HMRC non-executive directors must be in an almost unique position in relation to non-executive directors of other departments. Non-execs elsewhere probably feel that they have everything they need in order to scrutinise successfully their departments, with possible exceptions in security and intelligence or defence, although one hopes that those people are security-cleared. But in relation to what we have been discussing about confidentiality, non-executive directors in HMRC are in the same position as pretty much everyone else. They are in the same position as members of the public. They get the same answers. Mr Hartnett has confirmed to us that this actually happens in HMRC board meetings: the answer is given, "We can’t discuss that with you as a non-executive director, because it would be breaking taxpayer confidentiality." My question is this: aside from what you are talking about doing in relation to the independent assessor or whatever we end up calling it-the shadow function that may or may not lead to statute changes-is the structure of HMRC and its non-executive directors adequate to enable those people to do their jobs as scrutineers? Sir Gus O'Donnell: Remember that HMRC is different from, say, DCLG. When you are talking about DCLG and setting up a board, you have a Secretary of State chairing that board. In HMRC, you are talking about a non-ministerial department. Right away, you’re in a different world. You are right that the analogy is not one for one. HMRC has had a different structure to a standard Department led by a Secretary of State. It is not quite the same. In terms of the non-exec directors, my experience of the board is that they have been quite a challenging lot, to be honest, but they have not got into individual cases. They have been challenging more on overall processes, structures and organisation. Q473 Mr Bacon: But what I am saying is that if they wanted to, they couldn’t. There ought not to be limits on where they can challenge. There is a structural, architectural problem, is there not? Dave Hartnett: Mr Bacon, there is another issue, which we have wrestled hard with over the years. As I said to you before, we have the sense of a need for more oversight, and we have had for a while. The difficulty with non-executives and tax is that, like many other non-executives, they have other roles as well. Picking a non-executive who has no other role, and therefore no conflict, or potential conflict, of interest, could have difficulties. Q474 Mr Bacon: That often happens. Somebody will be the director of a bank that lends money to all kinds of corporates, and also a non-executive director of some other plc that is the recipient of loans from a bank or vice versa. Conflicts can arise, but it is all solved by company law and by the requirements on directors to observe their fiduciary duties. Why is it any different here? Dave Hartnett: We have done it the other way round. For a period of time a number of years ago, we allowed one or two of our executive directors to pick up non-executive posts. We found the conflict impossibly difficult. Q475 Mr Bacon: I thought you were going to say they kept on being paged. Dave Hartnett: Impossibly difficult. That has been one of our concerns. At one stage, three of our non-executives were immediately retired chief finance officers, two of banks and one of a large global manufacturer. They were great people to have as non-executives, but we could not have talked to them about tax-that was our view-because even though the fiduciary duty was there, we needed to be able to tell the world that these individuals were not seeing tax issues. Q476Mr Bacon: All the more reason to create a special architecture to- Sir Gus O'Donnell: Just on that one point, remember that there is-I brought it with me; a hot seller-the Cabinet manual, first edition thereof. It refers in the ministerial code not just to the question of conflicts of interest but of perceived conflicts of interest. Q477Mr Bacon: Yes, I wanted to come to that later. Sir Gus O'Donnell: You can imagine that if you had as a non-exec one of the people you wanted, and you just did some of the things you mentioned casually-saying "Okay, they can recuse themselves from that"-there would still be some issues of perception. Q478 Chair: Can I ask you something about this non-ministerial department status? After we had our discussion when HMRC lost all those disks- Sir Gus O'Donnell: Two disks, of which nobody has ever lost a penny. Can we go back to that? Q479 Chair: Okay, I am not trying to rake up issues. Sir Gus O'Donnell: And who knows whether they existed or not? It is an interesting question. Q480 Chair: What I wanted to ask you was this. At that time, Alistair Darling felt he was accountable, and he came and explained himself to Parliament. Sir Gus O'Donnell: And, if you remember rightly, the person in charge of HMRC at the time, Paul Gray, resigned. He knew nothing about the disks and was not involved with them- Q481 Chair: But the point is that the Minister was accountable. Sir Gus O'Donnell: He took it on his shoulders and he resigned. Q482 Chair: The Minister felt accountable. Sir Gus O'Donnell: But the official resigned. Q483 Ian Swales: But it is this question about a non-ministerial department being accountable to Parliament. One thing to be explored is what do we mean by and how do we exercise that point about being accountable to Parliament? This is what, I think, the Chair is getting at. How that link operates in practice also needs clarifying. Sir Gus O’Donnell: I think very much through the Minister and the Treasury-the Minister responsible. Q484 Stephen Barclay: You referred to that in your letter of 19 October. In fact, one of the reasons for not disclosing to Parliament is because you also don’t disclose to Ministers. Sir Gus O’Donnell: No, we don’t disclose individual tax matters to Ministers. That’s right. Q485 Stephen Barclay: Why is that? Surely Ministers are coming to information in various forms all the time? If there is a conflict of interest, you would get another Minister to act. Sir Gus O’Donnell: No. Well, you could argue that if you want to go down that route, where we give Ministers access to individuals’ tax records, but I would strongly oppose it. Q486 Stephen Barclay: We are not talking here about individual people; we are talking about large corporates. This is like the nonsense in this letter that talks about the European Court of Human Rights. We are not talking about people’s family life; we are talking about settlements with large corporations. Sir Gus O’Donnell: What if it is an individual who is in charge of a large corporation? Q487 Stephen Barclay: Sure, and you have that within the governance. The two cases that we are trying to get to in these hearings, which are Vodafone and Goldman Sachs, are not dealing with individuals’ family life-we are talking not about sole traders, but about large corporations. Yet this letter sets up a number of policy red herrings, where they could be managed in other ways. Likewise, one of the other reasons you put forward is that it has a damaging effect on other Government Departments. If a company is breaking tax law, why is disclosing that damaging another Department? Could you give me an example of how that would be damaging another Department? Dave Hartnett: I am just trying to think of an example where disclosure could impact another Department. It may be, Mr Barclay, that we learned something through our inquiry. Sir Gus O’Donnell: Let me give you some examples. There have been tenders for contracts where a number of companies are involved, and one of them may well be in a situation where they are in litigation. Q488 Stephen Barclay: If an individual Minister has a conflict, you get another Minister to deal with it. Sir Gus O’Donnell: No. I have not mentioned a Minister at all. I am saying that there is a procurement issue that a Department is dealing with-it may have gone nowhere near a Minister. It is a procurement issue, where we are talking about a tender and where one of those companies is in a very difficult place with HMRC. There are some difficult issues for us as to how we handle those sorts of issue. Q489 Mr Bacon: They did try to solve that one with EBS, when I think about it. It wasn’t the prettiest. It actually strengthens your argument. They did try to go down that route. I have to say, Sir Gus, that I completely support what you are saying about keeping the separation. It is absolutely vital that we keep the separation, otherwise you will end up with the equivalent of President Nixon chasing his enemies, which he did, using the IRS. There is potentially a slippery slope, and I think it is very good to have clear boundaries, but there is a separate issue, which is given that that is the case, that it is a non-ministerial department, that tax Commissioners have all the authority they need to sign things off and that they are the ones who do the signing off, rather than Ministers, there is all the more need to have the right structures of transparency and assurance in place. I think we are agreed-are we not?-that those are not there to an adequate level at the moment. Sir Gus O’Donnell: Absolutely. What we are saying is that in the way in which these large tax cases have been negotiated, we have been evolving the governance structure. I think the structure needs to evolve a bit further to have, as Dave mentioned, what is now in place-a separation between the negotiators and the people who do the oversight. In addition, if we can find a way through the legal issues, we should get ourselves someone external and professional-we probably can’t call them a Commissioner, for various reasons, because Commissioners have to run the department, and you want to separate them from running the department-who can have oversight of the process. Then we find a way to calibrate the degree of oversight, depending on the size, so we are very intensive on the very large and we go down towards a smaller and more selective sampling process. Q490 Ian Swales: Before we leave it, there is the issue of how you are accountable to Parliament, if it is a non-ministerial department. We’ve got a situation where you can’t talk about detailed taxpayer records with your own non-exec directors and you can’t talk about them with Ministers. We have talked about the independent assessor route, but what about the parliamentary side of it? If Parliament is directly responsible for your activities, how are we going to exercise that function if we have legal barriers thrown up in front of us? Dave Hartnett: One of the things that we would envisage, if we have this independent assessor-let me use that badge for a moment-that that individual, or those individuals, could report to Ministers on an anonymised basis. They could report to you on an anonymised basis. Q491 Ian Swales: As a member of the Committee. Dave Hartnett: I meant the Committee, yes. We thought that that would be a big step forward. Q492 Chair: Can I ask you one final thing, because of this odd constitutional settlement? HMRC is a non-ministerial department. If a mistake is made, as there was in this instance, there should be a disciplinary procedure. You may decide at the end of the day that you do not want to take action and that is perfectly fair. Up to £10 million of taxpayers’ money went, so there should be a disciplinary procedure. Who is responsible for that? Sir Gus O'Donnell: If a mistake is made in any department-let us be honest, HMRC is dealing with multiple cases and billions of pounds all the time, and its turnover is enormous. There will be mistakes all the time. Dare I say it, but all of us make mistakes? None of us is perfect. That is the way of things. It is right for the department to have, within its structures, ways to look at individuals and accountability. All of us are accountable to someone. David is accountable to Lesley Strathie, who is the chief executive of HMRC. Lesley is accountable to me. She is one of my direct reports. I have a large number of direct reports, as you can imagine. That is the structure. It looks at whether people are performing well and whether they are operating in accordance with the code of honesty, which is required of all civil servants. That is absolutely clear. Q493 Chair: So in this particular instance with Goldman Sachs, where, because of Lesley Strathie’s leave, David Hartnett is fulfilling both her job and his own job, are you undertaking a disciplinary or an investigation of the particular circumstances that have caused this Committee quite a lot of concern, to see whether any disciplinary action should be taken? Do you see that as your job? Sir Gus O'Donnell: Can I just ask Dave to come in first? Dave Hartnett: Sure. Again, Chair, I need to be careful, but there was a thorough review of this mistake. Q494 Chair: Who carried that out? Dave Hartnett: The head of the large business service. Q495 Chair: Was he one of the people-I do not know who that is. Dave Hartnett: It was a woman, who is now retired. The learning points were identified and the error was taken into account in someone’s annual appraisal. Q496 Chair: In? Dave Hartnett: In someone’s annual appraisal. It affected their non-consolidated pay, because there was no pay rise that year. Q497 Mr Bacon: They didn’t get a bonus. Dave Hartnett: That is another way of putting it, Mr Bacon. I am not allowed to call them bonuses. Q498 Mr Bacon: Presumably you do not have any of these structures in place where the bonuses are paid in such a way that they do not attract national insurance. Dave Hartnett: No. Q499 Mr Bacon: But you do have a property deal whereby your buildings are evading or avoiding tax, don’t you? Dave Hartnett: Don’t I remember the NAO determining that that was a very good deal for the nation? Q500 Mr Bacon: You possibly do, yes. Sir Gus O'Donnell: I can assure you that they are all paid in cash, subject to tax and full national insurance. Q501 Mr Bacon: I thought you were going to say in brown envelopes. Sir Gus O'Donnell: No. Fully taxable and nickable, as they say. Q502 Mr Bacon: Mr Hartnett, there are a few things that are established things between us, based on our previous hearings. They are a things that I think are facts, rather than conjecture. I want to confirm whether they are right. The first is that you invited the head of Goldman Sachs tax in New York to come to London for a meeting to settle the matter of the unpaid national insurance contributions and other matters. Dave Hartnett: Well, I was trying, as I said last time, to manage the relationship, which was broken. Others were leading on the settlement. Q503 Mr Bacon: But you invited him? Dave Hartnett: I invited him. Q504 Mr Bacon: You believed-wrongly, as it turned out- that there was a legal impediment to the charging of interest to Goldman Sachs on the unpaid national insurance contributions. Dave Hartnett: I did. Q505 Mr Bacon: There was in fact no legal impediment to the charging of interest as it turned out. Dave Hartnett: Yes. Q506 Mr Bacon: Not only was there no legal impediment, but HMRC had actually warned Goldman Sachs, back in October 2005, that if it didn’t settle at the same time as the other banks which had been trying to run with the same national insurance avoidance scheme but which had given up and agreed to pay HMRC the money that it had demanded, interest would continue to pile up. Dave Hartnett: Mr Bacon, you’re asking me to comment on a leaked document, but I want to try to be helpful. There were 22 letters like that. That is my understanding. I haven’t seen them all. They carried a calculation of interest to 31 October 2005-from memory. If I’ve got that wrong, I’ll come back to the Committee. Then they said that HMRC was offering to settle without a charge to interest, and I believe that was because there was a legal impediment and the legal impediment applied to all in 2005, or if it didn’t apply to all, I’m not aware of that. Q507 Mr Bacon: Thank you; that was very helpful. It’s correct, isn’t it, that you didn’t consult lawyers about whether or not HMRC could charge interest? Dave Hartnett: We did not consult lawyers. Q508 Mr Bacon: And with regard to the meeting that took place, you didn’t know whether there had been a note of the meeting. Dave Hartnett: There was a note- Q509 Mr Bacon: At least not initially. Dave Hartnett: No; I can answer that question now. There was a note prepared of the meeting-in fact, by Goldman Sachs, and our people believed the note was a fair reflection of what had taken place. Q510 Mr Bacon: And once the mistake was discovered, you were given legal advice-Mr Inglese has basically said this-that there were a number of options, one of which was to unwind the agreement that had been reached and, indeed, to charge interest after all, and another option was to let matters stand. That’s correct, isn’t it? Dave Hartnett: Yes. Q511 Mr Bacon: You didn’t unwind the agreement, but you let matters stand. That’s right, isn’t it? Dave Hartnett: Yes. Q512 Mr Bacon: Also-you said this to us last time-several times you met the leading QC David Goldberg, who was an adviser to Goldman Sachs, for lunch. That’s right, isn’t it? Dave Hartnett: I have met Mr Goldberg for lunch. I’m not sure that I was aware that he was an adviser to Goldman Sachs- Q513 Mr Bacon: Indeed. I fully accept that that’s possible. I don’t necessarily think that you’ve done anything wrong- Dave Hartnett: Thank you. Q514 Mr Bacon: And I’m certainly not accusing you of anything. There’s a separate question of how one feels. I think the Chairman accused you of having had 107 lunches. I only counted 94 on the schedule, but think how it makes us feel when you’ve had that many lunches and we weren’t present at any of them. That aside- Dave Hartnett: May I just say one thing about the lunches? I was concerned about what I saw-probably I was the only person in the room who saw it-some suggestion of improper behaviour. I went back and had a look at them all and I found three which involved a taxpayer. Q515 Mr Bacon: Right. All that was a predicate, because the point, surely, is not whether you’ve acted improperly or not. The point is whether the impression could be created that you had acted improperly, regardless of whether that was a fact. Just as the ministerial code is very clear that Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between public duties and private interests, financial or otherwise, there’s a similar, analogous sentence in the civil service code, which says that you "must not…accept gifts or hospitality or receive other benefits from anyone which might reasonably be seen to compromise" your "personal judgement or integrity". I am not questioning your personal judgment or integrity-I’m just not. For what it’s worth, I think that Sir Gus is correct in saying that you have done a lot to bring in extra revenue. But you must surely accept that the pattern of all this behaviour has led some people to conclude-quite possibly not wholly unreasonably, if I can use a sort-of double negative-that there might be a connection. You have allowed-to take the words from the ministerial code-the possibility of a perception to arise that there could be a conflict, even if there isn’t one. Do you accept that? Dave Hartnett: I find it a very difficult proposition, Mr Bacon. I have tried very hard indeed to ensure that my line manager, my colleagues and-by publishing these engagements-people generally understand. The thing I have done most often, I think, is to meet representative bodies to speak over lunch and, occasionally, to meet tax leaders of the major accounting firms to explore difficult issues. Looking back, I have often done that with a colleague so that I am not on my own. We could have explained that much more fully than we have done, but that is the truth of it. Q516 Mr Bacon: I am fully prepared to accept that as completely the truth. I am not really talking about the truth; I am talking about- Dave Hartnett: We are talking about perception. Q517 Mr Bacon: I am talking about perception. It is perfectly reasonable for people to conclude, however wrongly, that your pattern of behaviour, in blunt terms, looks like you have done a deal with Goldman Sachs, which was done without consulting lawyers, when you are seeing Goldman Sachs’s advisers for lunch. That is what it looks like, and people will put two and two together and make seven. That is what people do. It is entirely possible that that is quite wrong-I am sure it is wrong-but it is not completely unreasonable for people. It just feels a bit odd, even though I am not for one minute suggesting that what you have done is actually wrong. I do not think you have done anything wrong, but do you see the point I am making about perception? Sir Gus O'Donnell: The fundamental flaw with that argument is that, if you discovered that Dave was secretly having these lunches and had not told anybody, it is a fairly weird conspiracy when it is all published, and we took the initiative to publish all of these things. I publish all of my hospitality to a very low level-a much lower level, I might say, than a certain other group. Q518 Mr Bacon: You mean MPs? Sir Gus O'Donnell: Yes. It is 650, isn’t it? Q519 Mr Bacon: Perhaps we should publish everything. Sir Gus O'Donnell: But then you will get people coming up and saying, "Aha, Mr Bacon, you had lunch with X. Can I put forward a conspiracy theory about you having lunch with X?" Q520 Mr Bacon: "And what he told me about Sir Gus was-" Sir Gus O'Donnell: Exactly. The ministerial code has the word "reasonable," which you rightly mentioned the first time. I think that is right. Q521 Chair: The problem with this-I hope you would accept this-is that David Hartnett’s position is very different from that of other people, other Ministers and other permanent secretaries, because the decisions he takes are shrouded in secrecy. Do you think it is appropriate that he has these regular lunches-not necessarily with individual taxpayers, and even I went through the list-we all know that the big corporates do deals either through lawyers or through tax advisers-but with those lawyers and tax advisers, when he, in this secret way, is charged with going off and protecting the taxpayer’s interest and doing a deal? Sir Gus O'Donnell: You have to get a particular balance in these cases, because it is important that the person who is doing these deals has a relationship and sorts out with them how to manage getting the billions in. It is important, I think, that that relationship should be absolutely transparent. If you have those two things, they are the most important things. I would certainly say that I would not expect Dave to be taking any lavish hospitality. Q522 Chair: Well, 107 lunches is quite a lot. What sticks in my gullet is that I have a lot of people in my constituency who get tax credit. I probably have more who get tax credit than many other constituencies. Every week, my surgery is full of people who come in absolutely desperate-these are poor, poor people-because, usually, there was a mistake by HMRC or because they made a genuine error and didn’t give a bit of information to HMRC about a change of circumstance. They are then lumbered with a debt which, if they carry on taking tax credit, is taken off them week by week. These are poor people living on the edge, and it feels so wrong that nobody there thinks, "We want to get the best we can out of them. Let’s treat them humanely." But when you are talking about the Vodafones or the Goldman Sachses, we have got to have relationship, we have to come to a deal and it does not matter if £10 million goes missing. It is a completely different set of principles, which feels unequal in front of the law. Sir Gus O'Donnell: I think you and I probably share, although we would have to keep it quite quiet, a strong desire to help the most disadvantaged and the poorest in society. I completely agree with you that I would be very much on the side of trying to sort out policy decisions that ensured that when we were dealing with groups that had dynamic changes to their income at low levels we had a better way of managing that. Q523 Mr Bacon: The getting of a relationship seems to be something that privileged groups such as Goldman Sachs and Vodafone find easier and ordinary taxpayers find more difficult- Sir Gus O'Donnell: No. To be fair, it is very hard to get at the most disadvantaged groups, so we work very hard with the people who represent them, citizens advice bureaux for example, to understand the nature- Q524 Mr Bacon: We’re talking at slightly cross-purposes. I’m talking about people who are paying tax, know that they have obligations to pay tax, and are having or trying to have a conversation with HMRC. An accountant came to visit me in my surgery the week before last. He does the books and the tax for a lot of small businesses in the east of England, and he came to see me because in just the past six months he had noticed a perceptible change in the pressure that HMRC was applying to his small business clients. One of them was a company that owed £11,000 in VAT and was trying to get a time-to-pay arrangement. HMRC wouldn’t help-there were reasons for that-so in the end he just started paying £1,500 per week because it was not in dispute that he owed the money. The sum of £1,500 per week settles £11,000 quite quickly, but instead of accepting that and agreeing that he could keep it up, HMRC just levied him a fine of £1,300. He is now sacking two of his three staff in order to meet the tax liability because he can’t do both. I have another case- Sir Gus O'Donnell: If I could just say on that case, remember that the time-to-pay arrangements were introduced-the advice from HMRC to Ministers suggested this-as a good way of helping SMEs. I think it’s fair to say that the programme has been taken up dramatically. Q525 Mr Bacon: But in that particular case he wasn’t given time to pay, while Vodafone was given five years, even though it has a lot of cash on its balance sheet. Sir Gus O'Donnell: But before that change, put forward with advice, there wouldn’t have been any of this, would there? There would have been a much stricter regime before the time-to-pay arrangements came in, which was an issue that we put forward under the previous Administration-the national economic council. That was a substantial help to SMEs, and it had not existed before. Q526 Mr Bacon: I accept that if time to pay is available and is offered and agreed to, it is very helpful, but my point is that it is inconsistently applied. If you are Vodafone you have several billion pounds of cash on your balance sheet and you’re given five years to pay a liability, but if you’re a small business in my constituency you’re not, and you have to lay off staff to meet your liabilities. Another case that this accountant drew to my attention and which, having checked with his clients, he gave me permission to mention, was of a business person who not only was having to fight with cancer but found, as she says in this letter: "In addition to my period of illness, we have had a number of clients go out of business owing us money, others who are paying but only what they can afford and others who have taken their work in house to try and save money." That is the context in which people are operating and, going back to my original point about developing a relationship with HMRC, she says: "When I rang the number on the letter to ask if I could speak to someone to explain our situation and come to some mutually acceptable solution, I was told that this was not possible." On another case, Mr Hartnett, you know what CIS is-the construction industry scheme-but there are plenty of people in PAYE who don’t. This particular individual had paid his liabilities, and the rest of it was to be offset through the CIS, but when eventually the accountant chased PAYE because he couldn’t understand why his client was continuing to get these letters threatening distraint proceedings, PAYE said that it didn’t know what CIS was. When he talked to CIS, it said that that it didn’t know that it had to hand the information over to PAYE. These are small businesses that are under huge pressure, and they do not seem to get the same kind of treatment. I appreciate that there is a quantum here-a bell curve. There are lots of small businesses and you can’t have the same frequency of discussion with a large number of people, but it feels very much as if small businesses are getting a much harder time of it, and big businesses are able to have a much more sensible conversation with you. Dave Hartnett: The first thing I want to say, Mr Bacon, is that if you want to send me the cases I will happily have them looked at and will look at them personally as well. I would actually find that very helpful, because I was troubled by one or two things that you said to me. Given that CIS actually gets collected in part through the pay-as-you-earn system, it is an extraordinary idea that our people did not know. If that is right, I want to know all about it. The second thing to say is that we have a developed strategy for small business that is one of support and guidance. I myself chaired a meeting with the software industry just the other day, to see whether a free app could be developed to help the bookkeeping of small business, and I think we are going to get there and that that will be helpful. Those cases will help me understand whether we have got tougher. Q527 Chair: I hope you will take the same view of my poor constituents, who are having to struggle without tax credit. Dave Hartnett: Of course. Chair: They are as needy as a small business. Sir Gus O'Donnell: You should be really pleased that, because of the money that we are getting in through some of the big things that Dave has done, there is less pressure on- Chair: We don’t know how much money he has not got in-that’s the problem. Sir Gus O'Donnell: I know that in the past, from places like Switzerland, we were getting zero. We are getting a lot more than zero, and it’s in very large numbers, so I am delighted with that. And I intend to say it again. Q528 Austin Mitchell: I just want to make it clear that, in the eyes of my constituents, I am a very high taxpayer-a very high earner. My tax affairs are in their usual chaos and I am available for lunches on Tuesdays. Dave Hartnett: We have a board meeting every Tuesday, so I can’t help you. Q529 Austin Mitchell: Damn! Dave Hartnett told us on the 12th that, in December, there was a meeting with Mr Inglese and he said that there were two entirely acceptable approaches: "one was to stay with the proposed settlement and one was to put it to one side." After much deep quarrying on oath, he agreed that he had not given a legal opinion as to which option you should take, but he expressed a personal view that you should not put it to one side. Why did you put it to one side? Dave Hartnett: We didn’t. Austin Mitchell: This is the interest payment. Dave Hartnett: We followed through. If I have understood that correctly-I did not listen to Mr Inglese’s testimony-and if what you have said is right, Mr Mitchell, Mr Inglese gave two options. I think you just said that his personal view was that we should not set aside the settlement, but if I have misunderstood, can you tell me again? Sir Gus O'Donnell: I.e., they shouldn’t reopen Chair: It is what he said. Q530 Stephen Barclay: As Austin has raised Mr Inglese’s evidence, can we come back to the chronology? As I understand it, Mr Inglese said that you first raised the error with him on 7 December, yet at our last hearing, in response to Richard, you indicated that you had told him on Monday 22 November. Dave Hartnett: I think I said several things, Mr Barclay, in an attempt to be helpful. Would it be helpful if I set out the chronology? Q531 Stephen Barclay: Yes, if you want to take us through it. To refresh your memory, Mr Bacon asked, "When did you speak to Mr Inglese?", and you replied, "I think on the Monday, but I need to check, Mr Bacon." "You think it was the 22nd, after the Friday." "Very soon after, yes." Dave Hartnett: Okay. There was another passage when I also said perhaps it was the week later. The meeting with Goldmans was on 19 November. Over the weekend that followed, our banking sector lead became concerned that a mistake had been made in governance-it is really important that I stress "in governance." He concluded that the matter had to go through our high risk corporate governance process, and discussed the matter with his director, who agreed that that should happen. At the same time, I began to have a nagging doubt about the interest position. Q532 Stephen Barclay: When you say "at the same time", you mean over the weekend? Dave Hartnett: Over the end of that weekend. Q533 Stephen Barclay: Was the banking sector lead at the meeting on the 19th? Dave Hartnett: Yes, he was. Q534 Stephen Barclay: So both of you were at the meeting, but neither of you spotted the error at the meeting? Dave Hartnett: On the interest? Stephen Barclay: On the 19th. Dave Hartnett: No, not at all. In the week of the 22nd, I mentioned to Mr Inglese that I had settled-or we had settled, or whatever the right term is-one of his litigation cases. Q535 Stephen Barclay: That was when, sorry? Dave Hartnett: That was in the week of 22 November and I did not say more because, by then, this issue of the interest was going through the high risk corporate programme, which was our governance mechanism. I think it is matter of history now that the high risk corporate programme rejected the settlement. The papers for the high risk corporate programme were prepared by the banking sector lead and the customer relationship manager responsible for Goldmans, and they brought out the interest issue. I was abroad on business the following week. I think Mr Bacon brought out all my movements, at the last hearing, around this time. I was abroad on business for the whole week, and I was informed while I was away that the high risk corporate programme had rejected the proposed settlement on adjustable options because of the interest issue. On returning to the UK, I spoke to Mr Inglese on 7 December, and I asked for his advice as to what the options were in relation to the Goldmans interest issue, and he went on to give me the advice, as Mr Mitchell has described, that there were two options. Having gone back and looked it-I was trying to be helpful before. Q536 Stephen Barclay: That is very helpful. There is a slight tension in what you are saying between, in the week commencing 22nd, saying that you notified Mr Inglese that you had settled his case, whilst at the same time saying that by then you had also identified a flaw in the settlement. Would it not be normal when referring to a litigation case with your general counsel, to say, "I have settled the case, but I’ve spotted a mistake"? Dave Hartnett: I have no idea what would be normal, Mr Barclay. I mentioned it to Mr Inglese, and I was confident that this matter was going to be explored by the proper governance process. Q537 Stephen Barclay: The point I am driving at is that you are saying you spotted the mistake over the weekend and yet the following week you are saying to general counsel, "We’ve settled it," but not telling him there is a mistake. It just seems inconsistent. Dave Hartnett: Because I wanted to be sure-as I said to you, I had a nagging doubt. The high risk corporate programme board, with lawyers on it, went on to examine that issue on, I think, 30 November. Q538 Stephen Barclay: So there were no lawyers, I think we established, at the meeting on the 19th? Dave Hartnett: There were no lawyers for HMRC. Q539 Stephen Barclay: So when the banking sector lead and you spotted a mistake, this was a mistake- Dave Hartnett: There were different mistakes. Stephen Barclay: These were two different mistakes? Dave Hartnett: Yes. I have said that before. Q540 Stephen Barclay: In terms of the file note, at both your last two meetings you said you hadn’t actually found the time to read it. I assume you have- Dave Hartnett: It wasn’t a question of finding the time to read it, Mr Barclay; the issue was being managed by the banking sector lead and the customer relationship manager. Q541 Stephen Barclay: I think, actually, you did say, "No, not yet, but I will do so" and "I have not yet had a chance to check", and this was at the second hearing. Dave Hartnett: And I went and found it. Q542 Stephen Barclay: So you have now read it. Sir Gus mentioned the importance of transparency. Was a note of this settlement meeting-a settlement meeting of such importance that you phoned in advance the head of global tax at Goldman Sachs, which is a very senior post, to fly over from New York-produced by HMRC? Dave Hartnett: I don’t think so, because- Q543 Stephen Barclay: You "don’t think". Haven’t you checked? Dave Hartnett: Well, I haven’t found one, Mr Barclay. I have not searched for it; I have asked. But the important issue is this: what the team said to me is that the note from Goldmans about what had taken place came in very quickly-I’ve seen that note-and they found it an acceptable note of what had taken place. Q544 Stephen Barclay: Is it reasonable to conclude, therefore-given that this is your third appearance on the same issue before the Committee-that if you have not to date found one, there was not a note produced? Dave Hartnett: I don’t think HMRC produced a note of that meeting. Q545 Stephen Barclay: Is it not odd, given the importance of transparency, emphasised by Sir Gus himself, that settlement meetings attended by yourself as a tax Commissioner are going ahead without a note being produced? Dave Hartnett: That is because the team thought the Goldmans note, which came in very fast, was acceptable. Q546 Austin Mitchell: After much correction, which colleagues might to comment on, you said the opposite-evidently-of what Mr Inglese told me. It is a virtue in politics to be deaf, but it is not a virtue on this Committee. Why did you not claim the interest? His opinion was that you could. Dave Hartnett: Mr Inglese certainly said that. There is in our papers a full note of the decision that was made. I’m afraid that I am going where you hate me going: it is a taxpayer confidential issue. This is a very comprehensive note that covers a number of things. I don’t think I can go any further. Q547 Chair: Have you seen it, Sir Gus? Sir Gus O'Donnell: No. I try to keep out of individual taxpayer issues. Q548 Chair: I will bring it to an end now, but it just seems that the whole saga-[Interruption.] Have you seen it? Amyas Morse: Yes. Q549 Chair: It just seems to me that this is a big advert for Goldman Sachs; they toughed it out and got let off interest. Don’t you feel that that is true? That’s what it feels like to me. Dave Hartnett: One of the things that is really important to HMRC-and I hope this will happen-is that the NAO will come back with tax expertise and look at this. Q550 Chair: You haven’t answered the question. What I am drawing this to is that the perception is that there has been huge reputational damage to HMRC. If I was in Goldman Sachs, I would be rubbing my hands and thinking, "God, we beat ’em to it! We got off the tax bill." Sir Gus O'Donnell: I am actually going to defend the vampire squid here. I don’t think they would regard such an interpretation as being at all positive for their reputation. Chair: What about HMRC’s reputation? Q551 Fiona Mactaggart: Don’t they want to look like the tough guys, compared with all the other banks that folded and had to pay interest? Sir Gus O'Donnell: No. Q552 Fiona Mactaggart: I would have thought, if I was trying to be a hard-nosed deal banker, that that’s what corporates are looking for. Goldman Sachs have proved themselves to be the hardest-nosed deal bankers, because they have stuffed the British taxpayer out of I don’t know how many millions of pounds in interest. Sir Gus O'Donnell: I think that there were some people some time ago who thought that that was a sensible place for financial services companies to be. When you heard Bob Diamond’s lecture, as opposed to his earlier evidence, you began to see people in the financial sector realising that "Yah-boo, we got one over on the taxman" is actually massively bad for their reputation, and not good. Goldmans would think that, as well. Q553 Chair: Do you accept there’s reputational damage to HMRC? Dave Hartnett: There is reputational damage to HMRC by what has been written in many quarters about this. I also think that, because of the information that has been leaked out of our organisation and gone out there, the story is seriously incomplete. Q554 Chair: That is why we want better accountability. Dave Hartnett: And that is why we welcome the NAO looking at this. Q555 Chair: Finally, given the sort of coverage there has been over the Goldman Sachs deal and over the Vodafone deal, which we touched on this afternoon, have you considered your own position? Have you considered resigning, or do you feel that you still have the confidence of Parliament? Dave Hartnett: I have thought very hard about both those issues. I have read just about everything that has been written about them. It is incomplete. I have work to do and I have no plans to resign. Chair: Thank you. Sir Gus O'Donnell: It needs to be put on the record yet again that whatever the circumstances of this case, I am extremely grateful to Dave for the work that he has done, particularly with regard to Switzerland and Liechtenstein, which will bring in billions of pounds for the taxpayer that we would not otherwise have got. Chair: Thank you.

On the eve of the "season of goodwill", how millions are condemned to dread the hyped up "holidays"

On the eve of the "season of goodwill", how millions are condemned to dread the hyped up "holidays"
0740 Hrs GMT London Saturday 24 December 2011
by©Muhammad Haque
When Margaret Hodge a former Islington Council leader and now MP for the East London constituency of Barking came across a number of “civil servants” last month in her role as the chair of the UK House fo Commons Pubic Accounts Committee, she was consistent in making a few visually noticeable gestures during her chairing of the session. Ms Hodge made sure that she looked sufficiently glum and even outraged at the wastes that had been admitted by the Tax and revenue bureaucracy and admitted de facto by the still in post Cabinet secretary Gus O’Donell. In her quizzing of Anthony Inglise, the legal fend off man at the UK central Government's financial bureaucracy, she made sure to come across as telling him off in no uncertain style. There is something about that version of the textbook style that Margaret Hodge has adopted. She showed it on the general election night or morning [after] when the results were confirmed on the polling at her constituency in May 2010. She came across visually very firmly telling the British National Party’s Nick Griffin to get out and “Stay Out”. I shall show in later parts of this “seasonal commentary” how false Margaret Hodge’s “outrage” has been. For now, over to the Daily Mirror and their piece about the dire income disparity that the Cowekl piece illustrates.

>
Simon Cowell earns £28m in just a year Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2011/12/24/simon-cowell-earns-28m-in-just-a-year-115875-23657356/#ixzz1hR0RD2Be
HE’S already rich beyond his wildest dreams. Try telling that to Simon Cowell though – whose bank balance has got even fatter after he raked in £28million in 12 just months. The windfall takes his fortune to £200million and follows a bumper year in which he reclaimed the rights to the X Factor and Britain’s Got Talent in a massive deal with Sony BMG. Last year’s agreement saw a new company – Syco Entertainment – formed and its success was laid bare in new documents filed at Companies House. Advertisement >> For a 50% stake in the venture, Cowell was paid £26,754,967, according to Syco’s first annual accounts for the 12 months up to March 31 this year. Simco, which produces Cowell’s programmes including gameshow Red or Black?, recorded revenues of £28million. Accounts also showed TV network Fox has commissioned a second season of his US X Factor – meaning his pay will soar even further. The documents noted: “This expansion offers a major opportunity for the future growth of the company.” The number of staff employed by Simco nearly doubled, from eight to 15, as a result of “future expansion plans”. Fox decided to renew the talent show – featuring judges Cowell, L A Reid, Nicole Scherzinger and Paula Abdul – after its initial ratings success. Fox president Mike Darnell said he was delighted with the average of 13.5 million viewers per episode the show pulled in. He declared: “The show’s been a monumental success.” Despite this, it still has half of the viewers of American Idol, which Simon left to create a US version of his talent search. But a source said: “There is massive scope to make US X Factor even bigger – and this is very much just the beginning. Advertisers have been impressed with the constantly good ratings and the audience will only grow – as will Simon’s pay packet.” Cowell, meanwhile, was yesterday anxiously awaiting the ratings for the US show’s final on Thursday night. An emotional Melanie Amaro won the competition – and a £3.2million recording contract. Leona Lewis made a triumphant return to performing after a spell out of the limelight. Leona, who won X Factor UK in 2006, sang Run by Snow Patrol. It wasn’t such a good night for host Steve Jones, who looks certain to be axed from the show after a stuttering performance. Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2011/12/24/simon-cowell-earns-28m-in-just-a-year-115875-23657356/#ixzz1hQymSqsX HE’S already rich beyond his wildest dreams. Try telling that to Simon Cowell though – whose bank balance has got even fatter after he raked in £28million in 12 just months. The windfall takes his fortune to £200million and follows a bumper year in which he reclaimed the rights to the X Factor and Britain’s Got Talent in a massive deal with Sony BMG. Last year’s agreement saw a new company – Syco Entertainment – formed and its success was laid bare in new documents filed at Companies House. Advertisement >> For a 50% stake in the venture, Cowell was paid £26,754,967, according to Syco’s first annual accounts for the 12 months up to March 31 this year. Simco, which produces Cowell’s programmes including gameshow Red or Black?, recorded revenues of £28million.
Accounts also showed TV network Fox has commissioned a second season of his US X Factor – meaning his pay will soar even further. The documents noted: “This expansion offers a major opportunity for the future growth of the company.” The number of staff employed by Simco nearly doubled, from eight to 15, as a result of “future expansion plans”. Fox decided to renew the talent show – featuring judges Cowell, L A Reid, Nicole Scherzinger and Paula Abdul – after its initial ratings success. Fox president Mike Darnell said he was delighted with the average of 13.5 million viewers per episode the show pulled in.
He declared: “The show’s been a monumental success.” Despite this, it still has half of the viewers of American Idol, which Simon left to create a US version of his talent search. But a source said: “There is massive scope to make US X Factor even bigger – and this is very much just the beginning. Advertisers have been impressed with the constantly good ratings and the audience will only grow – as will Simon’s pay packet.” Cowell, meanwhile, was yesterday anxiously awaiting the ratings for the US show’s final on Thursday night. An emotional Melanie Amaro won the competition – and a £3.2million recording contract.
Leona Lewis made a triumphant return to performing after a spell out of the limelight. Leona, who won X Factor UK in 2006, sang Run by Snow Patrol. It wasn’t such a good night for host Steve Jones, who looks certain to be axed from the show after a stuttering performance.

Kay Jordan: A spiritual upliftmentt a year ago today

Kay Jordan: A spiritual upliftmentt a year ago today
0800 Hrs GMT London Thursday 22 2011
This picture is NOT of Kay Jordan. But I am running this picture of Pola Uddin as part of the references that she has caused to be made by others about the East End of London. I shall examine Pola Uddin's behaviour in this space shortly.
It is the same day in the last part of December that I feel I am going through, with thoughts about the ongoing battles to defend the community in the East London borough of Tower Hamlets. The best champion among the people that I am thinking of is of course Kay Jordan. Exactly a year ago, on Thursday 23 December 2010, I experienced a few minutes of spiritual upliftment as I talked about physics, mathematics, new technology, nano technology and space journeys.[To be ccontinued]

So where are these Big Firm Tax cheats' names?

So where are these Big Firm Tax cheats' names?
1735 GMT London Tuesday 20 December 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. For years, I have said that the UK Government was stooged to Big Business. Now it is admitted by even the MPs! And being reported by the Daily Mail! Does it mean they will tel the truth n other such stooge behaviour by UK Government serving Big Biz?[To be continued]

BBC R4 bars Qs about poverty, in live programme from Stepney

BBC R4 bars Qs about poverty, in live programme from Stepney
0748 Hrs GMT London Saturday 17 December 2011: Full exclusive reports only on the AADHIKARonline blogs and “social network” sites [including on twitter.com/khoodeelaar ] during Saturday 17 December 2011

Kay Jordan at the centre of this campaign picture by Muhammad Haque

Kay Jordan at the centre of this campaign picture by Muhammad Haque
By © Muhammad Haque
0908 Hrs GMT
London Friday 16 December 2011
Kay Jordan in another December, another action event supporting Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole assault. [CLICK on the image of the DAILY EXPRESS TO VIEW the Muhammad Haque picture of the KHOODEELAAR! action visit of the “Mulberry Place”]. I took this in a flash as I and a dozen Khoodeelaar! campaign supporters were visiting the Tower Hamlets council in 2007. I took it in just a fraction of a second. Everyone was in a rush.. I wanted to keep this record of the campaign to stop Tower Hamlets Council from selling the East End out to Big Business agenda Crossrail interests.
One of the persons in this picture later complained that they were not shown in a more positive light!
Im a certain that they swill not so comp,complain now.
They will be forever grateful that they were in my picture.
Kay, as always, was in the best f dispositions about such complaints and rights said to me words t the effect: Ignore the complaint They don’t understand!
How so very true.
[To be continued]

Slum landlords grip on East End akin to RACHMAN!

Slum landlords grip on East End akin to RACHMAN!
Fromtheexternal websiteindymedia.org.uk
[Quote]Social cleansing in Tower Hamlets by social landlords! Boris will gain socialcleansinglondon
| 12.12.2011 12:26
| Indymedia | Public sector cuts | Social Struggles

Boris will gain because the Labour councillors and the socalled INDEPENDENT' mayor are both playing hostages at the hands of the anti-social LANLORD outfits like HARCA and THCH. Appallingly poor service and even worse attitude to tenants and residents are being concealed by an evil entente that the anti-social landlord outfits have set up with apparently vile fundamentalist groups. This is very worrying. And one definite loser will be Ken Livingstone. read more Ken Livingstone may not want to admit it but Housing and slum housing are threatening peoples’ lives in London in a phenomenal way that was inevitable when looking at the failures of the GLC and the “partner” boroughs in inner London to face up to the crisis as it was building up. The GLC failed. The inner London boroughs failed. And neither had any excuse for their ignorance. The fruits of the failures are now rearing their heads as the creatures of the anti-social landlords. . Nowhere more acutely than in Tower Hamlets, the inner London Borough notorious for bei

The BBC's scrapping of the Politics Show made even worse by its expansion of Andrew Neil

The BBC's scrapping of the Politics Show made even worse by its expansion of Andrew Neil
1400 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday 11 December 2011
By © Muhammad Haque.
Today the BBC ended the Politics Show. The end of that edition of the Politics Show was followed by a sick note. The sickness as must be associated with the appearance of Andrew neil’s face. He confirmed another very worrying trend in the BBC. That the BBC was being made even more contemptuous of the truth. How else could the face of Andrew Neil be inserted as any thing legitimate ? The AADHIKAR Media Foundation has had dealings with the Politics Show. The most extensive contacts occurred five years ago, in arch 2006 when Kay Jordan and I took part in one edition of the Politics Show. For days before the particular edition went out and for weeks after it was broadcast [Sunday 26 March 2006],. I had reason to communicate the facts of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign to the manufacturers of the Politics Show, London segment. What I had to tel them and what they actually included in that sot on Sunday 26 march 2006 will be published here in the next weeks. I know that Kay Jordan found taking part in that programme very positive indeed. And her contribution made the reportage on the KHOODEELAAR! campaign perfect. [To be continued]

Can CLEGG be revived by Cameron crass?

Can CLEGG be revived by Cameron crass?
2345 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
10 December 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque. As pa
rt of the diagnosis of the year just ending, the Kay Jordan Foundation is next looking at the HERON TOWER and why the DfT claim about the evidence as submitted by Kay Jordan about the alignment was flawed. Why? Because the DfT never even acknowledged the ink between the Heron Tower developer and Ken Livingstone who was paid thousands in election “donation”. A matter that Ken Livingstone would never own up to had it not been for the SUNDAY ties. [More on that here in the next hours]

For the records: the Murdoch SUN stinks of ignorance and callous disregard for the truth

For the records: the Murdoch SUN stinks of ignorance and callous disregard for the truth
COMING HERE in the next 2 and half hours : The Kay Jordan Foundation Community Cohesion UPDATE A Month of action... Edited by © Muhammad Haque. Starting here at 0004 Hrs GMT Sunday 11 December 2011

Is it a mark of "success" for a deprived borough to keep people in poverty?

Is it a mark of "success" for a deprived borough to keep people in poverty?

By © Muhammad Haque
1730 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
05 December
2011.
Today’s print editions of Richard Desmond’s DAILY EXPRESS and the Daily Telegraph cover two aspects of the same thing. Poverty as it is maintained in Britain today. The headlines in the INDEPEDEMNT titles plugging Nick Clegg and Executive pay curb are misnomers. So where in the day printed press [“Fleet Street”] is is the truth to be found about Society?
Is poverty causing denial of justice?
Is it true that in one London County Court on a single day earlier this year, there were more than a hundred cases of people being thrown out of their “homes”?
How unusual is that?
And do the people evicted from their “homes” warrant the punishment?
Do the evicted have families?
Children even?
And do the children in the families experience trauma, stress and worse in the process of their families being kicked out of their homes?
Is this what David Cameron means by “Big Society”?
And does Iain Duncan Smith agree with the treatments being meted out to those who are “deemed” to have committed the offence of being “poor”?
Is the current Head of England’s “Civil courts”, also known as the Master of the Rolls, really bothered about a thing he referred to as Justice? He actually uttered the word Justice as he gave “evidence” before a group of parliamentarians last month.
I have been continuing my very own empirical engagement with the “judges” fort longer than the Master of the Rolls has been even a practising lawyer. But Justice I have not yet met in court. Glimmer of it, yes. But the actual thing is not visible anywhere at all. This morning [Monday 05 December 2011], I spent almost an hour talking to a Man from a Mediation service in a London county Court. I plan to examine the state of mediation vis a vis the court system in a short while. May be I will start later this month.
Back to the EVICTIONS.

Does anyone remember the “threat” of “eviction” against the “rioters” only a few months ago? How many rioters have been evicted by now?
Any news about the numbers if the social cleansings of housing estates being liberated of rioters?
I have not seen any reports about the actual evictions being carried out against rioters.
But I have seen evictions of those at least one court judge has branded as “not respecting authority”.
I shall examine this one in due course. Suffice to say for this minute that the “judge” is most probably not even conceived of by “Lord” Neuberger of Abbotsbury, the current Master of the Rolls. I shall address the Master of the Rolls on the dysfunctional state of most courts in London. This is where my empirical engagements have been taking place. So this is the place where I am able to empirically comment on before I can do so about other parts of England and the state of “justice” in those parts.
Going by what I have encountered in London courts, justice is not a word that is heard in the courts. Not within my knowledge. And in that frame I can say that justice is not the driving agenda in the courts’ proceedings. As far as I have seen those.
[To be continued]

POVERTY and HUNGER are being created by robbers grabbing hold of wealths of nations..

POVERTY and HUNGER are being created by robbers grabbing hold of wealths of nations..
From the Mirror Group Newspapers web site.

By Paul Routledge

THE misery of it, the agony of it, the despair of it. And what an utter waste of human life. Former soldier Mark Mullins and his wife Helen, both 48, died in a suicide pact after giving up on a life of grinding poverty. They are not the first, and sadly they will not be the last, to take this horrendous way out of Cameron’s Cruel Britain. We’re ­beginning to see a replay of the Tory 1980s, when jobless lads threw themselves off the Tyne Bridge in Newcastle. Advertisement >> Thatcher promised on the steps of Number 10 to bring hope, but she brought misery. And her natural heir, the rich little Old Etonian, is ­faithfully following in her ­footsteps. Mark and Helen were found dead side by side in their council house in Bedworth, Warks. They’d been living on Salvation Army food handouts, for which he walked six miles each way every week to collect. They were reduced to keeping food out in the cold night air of the garden because they couldn’t afford a fridge. They lived in one room because they couldn’t afford to heat the whole house. Something went very, very wrong for this devoted couple. It’s not as if nobody knew. A year ago, they appeared in a film about living below the ­breadline, despite heartless DWP ­officials claiming they got what they were ­entitled to. But Sally Army leader Kervin Julien, who runs the soup kitchen that fed them, says Mark worried about getting ­benefits, especially for Helen who had severe learning difficulties. And neighbours said the devoted couple feared another freezing winter in their rundown home. This is the desperate reality behind Tory talk of workshy benefit ­claimants. Sure, there is a minority of scroungers, but they’re outnumbered by people like Mark and Helen who are at risk of falling through the safety net of the welfare state. It makes my blood boil to hear the likes of Iain Duncan Smith, the well-fed, well-off Work and Pensions Secretary, condemn the poor for being poor. This is where their despair ends, dead on a settee for up to three weeks before anybody thinks to wonder how you are. On the day their tragic story broke, I watched Prime ­Minister’s Questions in the House of Commons. Nobody saw fit to bring up this tragedy. Labour and the Tories beat each other up about a minor ­immigration scandal, oblivious to the fact that Mark and Helen were lying in the morgue. They were more interested in England’s filthy-rich footballers being allowed to wear a poppy on the ground than the fate of a middle aged couple about to be put under it. Therein lies the grief. Our ­politicians are distant from the impact of their policies. They will never walk six miles for a bag of food. They would be missed by their aides after three minutes, not three weeks. If this parable does not sicken you at heart, you haven’t got one left. [Unquote] [To be continued]

Tory-graph shamelessly peddles D Cameron's aid to Big Biz neoconniving scam while starving Society

Tory-graph shamelessly peddles D Cameron's aid to Big Biz neoconniving scam while starving  Society
1420 GMT London Monday 31 October 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
Today's Daily Telegraph [on its FrontPage] is shamelessly peddling the same fakery and showing it as an achievement by CON-DEM Cameron as had been exhibited by Gordon Brown about "new jobs announcement".
Gordon Brown abused the position as “The Prime Minister" of the day by allowing Big Biz Agenda lies about “infrastructure projects” to be given heavy-duty “Government imprimatur”. I use the word imprimatur to stress the implied gravity and reliability that are associated with State announcements.
The Tory-graph is correctly condemned as the propaganda organ for the worst of the neoconniving Consevative party. I say neoconniving on the facts. It is the Neo-con House Journal in Western Europe.
How can the Tory-Graph claim that an "announcement" [at the time as yet] to be mouthed by Cameron, amounted to the realisation?
Yet the headline went as boldly fraudulently as the Tory-graph designers could make it appear on the front page.
Hours later, the Channel 4 News web site is itself committing the same misrepresentation of the facts as it had done so often for Gordon Brown. Present the claimed job creation as not only a credible utterance but that its realisation had already begun even before the script writers had left their desks.
It goes without saying that the Daily Mail is as fabricating for the Cameron image as a job creator as that paper [and its entire Editorial agenda operating team fronted by Paul Dacre] would have been unhesitant in their condemnation of anything Gordon Brown would have said.
In between the front pages, neither the BBC News Channel nor Sky news has had any rigours put into the coverage of the Cameron callousness about “job creation” and “kick-start” projects to that alleged end...
The fact is that the “jobs” and the “projects” that Cameron has unleashed are nothing at all to do with ordinary people deserving to be employed for their skills and for their readiness to earn their living. The jobs are in the main another cover for Cameron’s real agenda designed for his CONDEM Collusion’s stooged service to the demands Military Industrial Complex. Most of the “jobs” and the associated propjets are in strange areas of the “economy” not at all reaching the needs or the capacities of ordinary people.
This same MIC agenda drives the rest of the UK Government strategy. That was also uppermost in Gordon Brown’s “infrastructure” announcements. The only difference being that those who had been overly hostile to the remotest hint of J M Keynes in anything G Brown claimed, are not going to say anything noticeable about that over-assaulted villain in the mythology of economic planning and macro economic policy-making.
[To be continued]

Cathedral caught in mega laundering operation for the MoneyMen and Women!

Cathedral caught in mega laundering operation for the MoneyMen and Women!
© Muhammad Haque recording an initial comment exposing the hollowness of the Spectator’s Fraser Nelson who has suddenly turned into a fan of the BBC! 2125 Hrs GMT London Saturday 29 October 2011

UK Media sunk in sea of lies about cause of crisis and on cure..

UK Media sunk in sea of lies about cause of crisis and on cure..
UK Media sunk in sea of lies about cause of crisis and on cure.. © Muhammad Haque daily Ethical, Economic, Social and Constitutional law Commentary on the state of Mainstream media and the mainstream [that is stooged by Big Business] Politicians in the United Kingdom today Saturday 29 October 2011. This morning’s “mainstream” media in Britain was dominated by lies and untruths. It was not an exceptional day at all. The only thing that was different was the change of names and topics from the day before. But the causal links between the crisis and the possible cure remained as confused and unexplained today as they had been the previous day. What then is the point of the media? Surely the media as the "mainstream media" is still referred to, is there to get across the facts. Bring to the people, the public, the ordinary society the news of the actual decisions being made that affect the way the economy works, or is made to work "again".. The media is failing to do that basic task. It is not serving the cause of the truth. It is not telling the truth. And if there is any effective and genuine identification of the real cause or the causes behind the current state of the crisis that is capitalism [here thinking of the banner put up by the "OCCUPY CAMP" still in place outside London’s St Paul’s cathedral] [that Cathedral is engaged in doing the business for the Anglican Church bureaucracy, that says “Capitalism is crisis”] then the media should be bringing the news of that identification. But the media is not doing so. Instead, the media is a braying, bleating, servile echo of the voices of unreason and prejudice and ignorance. The headlines on the mainstream print titles collectively called “Fleet Street” and pub shed from London today [Saturday 29 October 2011] prove this analysis. They are hiding the truth and they are not telling the truth. One of the tabloids [by definition, a tabloid is still more” popular” than its broadsheet counterpart] that leads the day’s braying is of course the Daily Mail. It grandly tells Dave Cameron to speak for Britain. As if Cameron is doing something other than speak for “Britain”. Cameron is speaking up for Britain as had G Brown, as had Tony Blair. As had John Major and Thatcher. As had every single one of the occupants at No.10 Downing Street in the past SEVENTY years. [To be continued]

Torygraph doesn't even care about faking its cruel agenda:

Torygraph doesn't even care about faking its cruel agenda:
0635 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 26 October 2011. Editor Muhammad Haque.

From the web site of the London EVENING STANDARD
'Let bosses sack bad workers' move 26 Oct 2011 Pensioners lobby for better deal Cameron heads for EU crisis summit Review after breast screening row Babies dying amid agency failings First-time jail figure increases Vince Cable 'fined over VAT bill' Firms warned about losing top staff Knifeman stabs policeman and dog Crime set to rise as clocks go back Sponsored links Ads by Google Unfair Dismissal Direct National employment law experts. Free on-line assessment. www.uddirect.co.uk How Much Compensation? How much could you claim? Find out in 30 seconds. www.AccidentAdviceHelpline.co.uk Jobs for Skilled Workers Skilled British Workers Wanted Register for Jobs with Sponsorship www.emigrationgroup.co.uk Companies should be able to sack unproductive workers without explanation, according to a leaked government report. The right to claim unfair dismissal should be scrapped to free up business and boost economic growth. The controversial call for a dramatic overhaul of UK employment laws comes in a report commissioned by David Cameron from venture capitalist Adrian Beecroft. The proposals are said to have support in Downing Street. However, they will encounter furious resistance from Liberal Democrats. Senior figures in the party have already suggested Mr Beecroft's ideas will be "swiftly swept away". A draft seen by the Daily Telegraph warns that incapable workers are being left to "coast along". Firms also fear expanding because new staff may prove "unknown quantities" who are impossible to sack. The document, dated October 12 this year, says the first major issue for British enterprise is "the terrible impact of the current unfair dismissal rules on the efficiency and hence competitiveness of our businesses, and on the effectiveness and cost of our public services". It continues: "The rules both make it difficult to prove that someone deserves to be dismissed, and demand a process for doing so which is so lengthy and complex that it is hard to implement. This makes it too easy for employees to claim they have been unfairly treated and to gain significant compensation." Mr Beecroft says managers in the public sector have been forced to offer under-performing staff large settlements because they fear costly tribunal rulings. Public bodies "accept inefficiency that they would not tolerate if dismissal of unsatisfactory employees was easier". He adds: "A proportion of employees, secure in the knowledge that their employer will be reluctant to dismiss them, work at a level well below their true capacity; they coast along." Mr Beecroft argues that there is nothing in European law that would prevent the Government from abandoning unfair dismissal laws. Rules preventing dismissal on the basis of a person's gender, race or sexuality would remain.

Cameron wrong to whip pre-loyal EU scpetic MPs, wrong on causes of "riots". Wrong to be smug too

Cameron wrong to whip pre-loyal EU scpetic MPs, wrong on causes of "riots". Wrong to be smug too
From the web site of the London DAILY MIRROR GROUP Home News Top Stories Click here to find out more! David Cameron is WRONG on poverty says Mandy By Lord Mandelson, Business Secretary 15/11/2009 Peter Mandelson (Pic:Getty Images) David Cameron said he wanted to eradicate poverty, help the disadvantaged and unemployed by rolling back government and creating a new culture of responsibility. He said he doesn’t believe in big government, but in big society. Cut back government, he said in a speech last week, and we will become a stronger society. It’s part of David Cameron’s drive to convince us that he is a new type of Tory. But it’s an old and familiar Tory line. Of course we care about the less fortunate, they say. But let private charity sort it out. What we need is to look after each other, rather than looking to government for help. But it can’t answer the question: What if charity isn’t enough? What about the people who fall through the gaps? Those gaps are why government exists. David Cameron says we have become more selfish and individualistic because of government. Well, some of the least selfish people in our society spend their working lives in hospitals, schools and our police and military. David Cameron had a long list of things Britain needs. Early education through Sure Start. Good schools. Better adult education.

UK MPs, the "Palace" of Westminster are playing stooges, NOT rebelling at all today

UK MPs, the "Palace" of Westminster are playing stooges, NOT rebelling at all today
0540 [0500] Hrs GMT
London
Monday
24 October 2011.

UK MPs, the "Palace" of Westminster continue to remain as far removed from the people today as they have done for hundreds of years. NOT rebelling! © Muhammad Haque Daily Constitutional and Ethical commentary on the state of morality-free, ethics-free, democracy-free “Parliament” in the UK.
Exposing the “mainstream” media untruth about “Tory MPs rebelling against the EU”. Pointing out the day's example of the stupidest assertion by the "mainstream" as typified by the BBC. The stupidity is in the fact that the Tory MPs' latest display of "opposition" to the UK's membership of the EU is genuine. It is not genuine. It cannot be genuine. It is a bargaining ploy. And this is going to remain the case for as long as I can foresee. The so-called "Labour Party Euro sceptics" too are guilty of the same thing. And the "rebellion" is no such thing. Whenever MPs appear to be taking a stance that is not the same as that of the Party Whip" [notice the sadistic language they use there too] the "media" confounds the linguistic abuse by calling such behaviour "rebellious". There has not been a genuine rebellion by UK MPs for more than three hundred years. Every single ploy is staged for the purpose of the week or the year. Had there been a rebellion, it would have changed Parliament. Parliament has not changed for hundreds of years. MPs behave as stooges. Stooges for the agenda-setting forces that remain unaccountable, unidentified by name. Those forces are the ones that set the agenda of each "mainstream" Party. And Mps carrying the "Party" cards behave as stooges managed via each” Party’s" "Whips"!". The fact that there is this word "Whip" still "actively used" shows that there is not a Democratic Parliament in being. It is a Whipped Parliament. It is a sadistic, sub- fascist operation. So whoever still suffers from the delusion that there is a thing called “The Westminster Model of Parliamentary democracy” is not only a treble moron but is also in need of serious therapy for multiple health issues. How can it be a model when the thing itself is devoid of the real representative characteristics? [To be continued]

Miliband has got to arrive in the 21st century fast if he is to show he is "the future leader"

Miliband has got to arrive in the 21st century fast if he is to show  he is "the future leader"
1650 [1625] Hrs GMT London Saturday 22 October 2011 a Brick Lane Report Editor © Muhammad Haque For the past three days, long queues have been forming of mostly young people [aged under 30] in Brick Lane. What are they queuing up for? And where, really, do they come from? Answers to these questions will tell more about the state of the UK Economy than any number of spiels attributed to George Osborne. If the young people have been queering to take advantage of a show or a sale that doesn’t cost them anything then of course the event would not be as definitive an indicator. However, they are evidently joining the queue and also paying to do so. So what does it tell us about the “Economy” in the East End of London? The event doesn’t tell us anything much really. Except that the people on the queues are mostly NOT from the East End. And whatever they have been queuing up for is NOT an East End of London product or service. And therein lies one key anomaly that also again exposes the untruth that is being peddled every week by the “local” “elected” Tower Hamlets Council. The “Council” is reportedly in the running for the [allegedly] “coveted” “City” status, that the Queen, Elizabeth 2, is expected to grant to one of about 30 “aspiring” applicants. And as part of the promotion for that application for that “status”, a local “MP”, Jim Fitzpatrick, has been given publicity by a Canary Wharf-based propaganda outfit, also called the Wharf, as having delivered a spiel in the House of Commons last week allegedly singing praises of the Tower Hamlets Council. Jim Fitzpatrick’s spiel was as free of substance about the real life day to economic, social and democratic experiences of ordinary people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets as it was blank on the state of “accountability” available to the people from or via the varieties of pliant “elected” occupants of offices that are funded by the public and in the collective name of the people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. A substantive argument would have showed just how ill-advised the “City” “status” “bid” is and how appallingly dismal the role of the “elected” occupants had been. One area of abysmal failure would have been shown to have been the Council-controlled local schools in Tower Hamlets. In the main, the overwhelming majority of school-leavers in Tower Hamlets are leaving schools every year without achieving the necessary foundation in education. Education as defined in the context of socially responsible and accountable and able human beings. [To be continued]

POVERTY of the "Developed" Governments' "policies" that are starving the world -1

POVERTY of the "Developed" Governments' "policies" that are starving the world -1
ALSO PUBLISHED on Muhammad haque's account on the facebook.com site earlier today: © Muhammad Haque 0810 Hrs GMT London Saturday 22 October 2011 In the run up, so to speak, to the then UK Prime Minister John Major's "address" at the United Nations General Assembly, I broadcast a brief Manifesto for the world. I did that on the UK terrestrial Channel 4 ‘Slot’ [that has been carried in the few minutes immediately after the Channel 4 News of 1800 GMT is broadcast on ordinary weekdays] which has had various tags or titles. The Political slot is probably the most frequently associated one. In that broadcast, lasting only a few minutes, I predicted that the POVERTY MIGRATION of massive numbers of people from the Asian and African continents [and by implications elsewhere in the other continents and parts of the world] would become the bigger challenge for the "rulers" of the world. I told John Major in that broadcast that he was wrong to overdo the "concerns" about nuclear threats that he and his "allies" associated with "Third World" regimes. I said that the most economic and sustainable action would be to address poverty in the countries of origins of the people who were migrating or going to want to migrate. Has anyone taken any notice of what I said then? Did John Major pay any attention? Did the United Nations General Assembly itself? Did the UK’s very own and very “modest” United Nations Association pay any attention to what I said about the challenge of hunger and famine that was looming 20 years ago? [To be continued]

Day when "top Fleet Street heavies" "agree" that NHS hospitals break t' law and neglect t Old

Day when "top Fleet Street heavies" "agree" that NHS hospitals break t' law and neglect t Old
From Skynews.com web site accessed and linked here at 0414 GMT London Thusrday 13 October 2011
Fifth Of Hospitals Break Law On Elderly Care 0 Comments 2:48am UK, Thursday October 13, 2011 A fifth of NHS hospitals are breaking the law on care of the elderly, according to a report. Euthanasia Nearly 50 hospitals are failing to provide good nutrition to elderly patients Two trusts given prior warnings are still leaving patients without intravenous fluids and one incontinent patient was left unwashed despite asking for help, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) said. Just under half of the 100 hospitals investigated in England between March and June were found to be failing on nutritional standards for elderly people, while 40% do not offer dignified care. The inspections were ordered by Health Secretary Andrew Lansley amid concerns raised by patients' groups. In two hospitals, Alexandra Hospital, part of the Worcester Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, and Sandwell General Hospital, part of Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, inspectors had major concerns about the way people were fed and given drinks. Another 15 hospitals resulted in moderate concerns and a further 32 were listed with minor concerns. How many reports do we have to look at and how many times do the public need to hear about this before the right action is taken? Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association Overall, one in five hospitals was found to be breaking the law on one or both standards relating to dignity and nutrition. Just under half (45 hospitals out of 100) were fully legally compliant with the standards. The CQC told how a follow-up unannounced inspection to Alexandra Hospital found its concerns have been addressed and the hospital is now meeting essential standards. However, when inspectors returned to Sandwell General, they found that, although standards on nutrition had improved, people's dignity was not always respected. During a follow-up inspection to James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in Norfolk, inspectors found patients not being given appropriate support to eat and drink and "people in need of intravenous fluids did not have infusions". A warning notice has been issued to James Paget calling for swift improvements. Prosecution or restriction of services could occur if improvements are not made, the CQC said. Katherine Murphy, of the Patients Association, said: "Yet another report to add to the plethora of other reports, all highlighting the same issues around poor care of elderly patients in hospital. "How many reports do we have to look at and how many times do the public need to hear about this before the right action is taken?" Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: "Everyone admitted to hospital deserves to be treated as an individual, with compassion and dignity. We must never lose sight of the fact that the most important people in the NHS are its patients." There are currently no comments for this story. Be the first to comment below, and let us know what you are thinking.

Fox boxed in an awkward hole of his own mischief! Worse yet to come

Fox boxed in an awkward hole of his own mischief! Worse yet to come
© Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical and pro-democracy Commentary on the state of the UK
1325 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 11 October 2011
Fox boxed in an awkward hole of his own mischief! Worse yet to come
My word! Fox boxed in a hole of his own mischief is my phrase of the moment about Liam Fox. What could I be referring to by Fox’s mischief?
I would be referring to years of bragging of his reactionary, cruel ideology. Underneath the bragging and the pursuit of power at the same time whilst brandishing the overstated affiliation with the myth of Maggie Thatcher, Liam Fox has been allowed to violate every single bit of pro-civilisation values in the UK.
This week, his apologists and fellow-opportunists of the Rightwing of the Corruptocracy in the UK could not find anything more “potent” than the supposed threat to Cameron that Fox posed as a “Back Bencher” in the heavily poodled UK House of Commons.
That idiotic “analysis” of the “potent Fox…” [‘as broadcast on SKY NEWS last night] was delivered by that very embarrassingly oversold “commentator” Andrew Pierce in Pierce’s feeble but deceptively disguised as stern!] diagnostics on Sky News.
With the likes of Pierce abandoning their once genuine dedication to investigative journalism, there is no likelihood that the ordinary people in Britain will be the beneficiaries in terms of knowledge of Liam Fox’s eventual disappearance from the sort-of-centre stage. And Kevin Maguire, the jocular “critic” of his mate Pierce, has got to do much better than the lazy, predictable “Tory boy” “tirade fit for toddlers” routine at “Pierce’s expense”. “The country” deserves better than that. Much much much better than that! [To be continued]



Newham Council clique in crass collusion with sleazy elements!
Time after time, the corrupt clique in control of the "deprived" "inner city" East London borough of Newham Council has been exposed as a most undemocratic obstruction against the democratic needs of the local community covered by the "Borough".
And time after time, the "elected" councillors on that Council have been exposed as being unworthy of their claim to being the democratic representatives of the people in the area.
Newham, London Borough Council's "elected" councillors are, COLLECTIVELY, tame and timid and are known for their “efficiency” in serving one purpose without fail: their own personal and petty and private and undisclosed interests.
How else can they explain their failure or refusal to stop that "deal" having gone as far as it had gone until the Court action by the relevant party caused the "review" by the equally corrupt clique in control of the 2012 Games Hosting cabal-type outfit that has now "announced a halt" ?
The people across the so-called Olympic Boroughs have been being abused by the cabals of corrupt careerists and time-servers sitting in the many "offices" in the name of the respective Borough’s populations.
The Boroughs' "MPs" too are political poodles who have shown themselves to be nothing more than obsolete organs of pathetic praise for the unethical, the amoral and the most abjectly undemocratic vested interests and self-seekers in these Boroughs..[To be continued]

Newham Council clique in crass collusion with sleazy elements!

Newham Council clique in crass collusion with sleazy elements!
1230 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 11 October 2011

AADHIKARonline citing the following texts from the SKYNEWS.com and some of their online comments on the exposed deal.
We shall be publishing our own investigative report here later today Tuesday 11 October 2011.

West Ham's Olympic Stadium Deal Collapses br>
10:43am UK, Tuesday October 11, 2011 The Government has confirmed that West Ham United's deal to take over the Olympic Stadium has collapsed. br>
Ministers are said to be concerned that legal action by Tottenham Hotspur and Leyton Orient could drag on for years during which time the showcase venue would remain empty. The stadium, in Stratford, east London, will instead remain in public ownership and be leased out to a tenant following a new tender process. Under the new process the cost of transforming it after the 2012 Games will be met by the Olympic Park Legacy Company (OPLC). The successful tenant will then pay an annual rent to the OPLC, which could actually prove to be less costly for the likes of West Ham. Some £35m of public money has been set aside to convert the 80,000-capacity stadium into a 60,000-seater venue after the Games next year. Prospective tenants will then be asked to bid for the stadium, with the running track remaining in place. Spurs' bid for the stadium had included removing the running track, while West Ham had elected to keep it and allow the venue to remain central to London's bid for the 2017 World Athletics Championships. br>
There has been an anonymous complaint to the European Commission, claiming that the £40m being provided by Newham Council to West Ham represented "state aid". The football club had wanted to convert the £537m stadium into a 60,000-capacity venue for football, athletics, concerts and community use. But it has experienced financial problems since it was relegated from the Premier League last season. It is understood that no contract has been signed with West Ham, allowing the move to a fresh tender process, but the club will be encouraged to bid again. Leasing the stadium is expected to cost around £2m, which would be a much more affordable option for the Championship outfit. br>
Artist's impression of what Olympic Stadium would look like for West Ham match The decision is also likely to have been influenced by concerns that the application for a judicial review by Spurs and Orient could drag on and, even if their bids failed, they could appeal. Sports minister Hugh Robertson: "The key point is the action we have taken today is about removing the uncertainty. The process had become bogged down in legal paralysis. "Particularly relevant has been the anonymous complaint to the EC over 'state aid' and the OPLC received a letter from Newham Council yesterday saying because of the uncertainty they no longer wanted to proceed. That was the straw that broke the camel's back and we thought it better to stop it dead in its tracks now." The move has been welcomed by Karren Brady, vice-chairman of West Ham United, and Kim Bromley-Derry, chief executive of the London Borough of Newham. In a joint statement they said: "Uncertainty caused by the anonymous complaint to the European Commission and ongoing legal challenges have put the Olympic legacy at risk and certainly a stadium, as we envisioned it, may not be in place by 2014 due as a direct result of the legal delay. Karren Brady welcomes the decision "Therefore we would welcome a move by OPLC and government to end that uncertainty and allow a football and athletics stadium to be in place by 2014 under a new process. "If the speculation is true, West Ham will look to become a tenant of the stadium while Newham will aim to help deliver the legacy. "Our bid is the only one that will secure the sporting and community legacy promise of the Olympic Stadium - an amazing year-round home for football, athletics and community events of which the nation could be proud." Leyton Orient chairman Barry Hearn told Sky News the whole bid process had been "flawed". "This is a total vindication of Leyton Orient, a tiny club, saying this is a bad deal, this is a flawed process and the powers that be have had to listen and hold their hands up and say 'you're right'." "I hope they've learnt their lesson, they've got to go back and consider everybody," he added. The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) is expected to make a formal statement at lunchtime. Posted by: Richard Says on October 11, 2011 1:09 PM Another roaring success stroy to come out of the Olympic debacle. So, the bid was some £10bn out (remember the oh we forgot to add VAT saga), the transport system clearly will be unable to cope, the "legacy" is seeming like a distant joke, Londoners who are paying extra for the privilege can't get tickets, TfL are asking business to "encourage working form home" during the event, and now the stadium will become another monument to civil service failure - makes me proud to be British!

Posted by: barron bay on October 11, 2011 12:57 PM What a bunch of morons we are if all we can think of is football teams to take over the Olympic Stadium. Track and Field, cricket, rugby, music, theatre, the list of good sports and cultural use could be a mile long and not include one football club. br>
Posted by: martyjg from north east on October 11, 2011 12:56 PM Someone's had their nose pushed out, aah! Posted by: Saxon bob on October 11, 2 br>
011 12:53 PM West Ham be honest,you will not fill it maybe to start off with but being an average side you will get average support. As mentioned my side is an average team which now ( due to a rich owner) wins alot. Do they want the likes of me going....no...They want all the glory hunters and fan base from around the world and I go when I can (funny normally when we play West Ham, so very seldom ), and now go and watch 2nd division football instead, standard is rubbish but it gives the buzz of days gone by. Tottenham have got a large following from North and East London always have and always will,they will fill that Olympic Stadium. br>
Posted by: Aggrieved on October 11, 2011 12:25 PM 1) Orient - Briansmith. You and the other half a dozen supporters will continue to watch Orient regardless. 2) European Parliament tip off - Well thats Spurs again! 3) Spurs let them have the stadium. 4) West Ham stay at Upton Park. 5) West Ham fan base. 4th highest attendance in the country for the game against Peterborough so lets put it into perspective. The fan base is there. 6) Lets hope the Hammers case against the alleged Spuds hacking of private information continues and the Spuds are shown for what they are. Spoilers making a big noise. Who thing they are in the promised land having narrowly neaten the gunners. Wait til Harry goes to England then your trouble swill really start. Look at the financial situation of all clubs after he left as manager! Southampton, POrtsmouth, even West Ham had to many average players on inflated salaries under him. Posted by: briansmith62 from London on October 11, 2011 12:07 PM Everyone seems to have forgotten about Leyton Orient - if one of the bigger clubs moves to the area this club will die after more than a hundred years of history. Posted by: onside on October 11, 2011 12:01 PM All this is just one reason why I and some of my friends have turned away from professional football. It’s so sad. Do you remember when it was the people’s game, with proper footballers who would sweat blood for the club and the country they played for, when every single player had skill, when every single player could trap, head, pass and shoot at goal? When players were seen in their local community, when players would visit the local school and actually talk to the kids? When the ground was in the area the club was named after (apart from Chelsea that is). Posted by: PaulF1978 on October 11, 2011 12:00 PM Blame Labour!! Posted by: popsy on October 11, 2011 11:46 AM Another Tory mess Posted by: Saxon bob on October 11, 2011 11:31 AM Lets face it can't blame Tottenham for wanting to move. Recent events in that part of London have justified it. Happy Hammer, sorry mate your team will be an average side with Average support as it always has been with a cup win possibly every 30-40 years. My side would be the same par as you, though Luckily we had an Old Tottenham player build a decent side then a foreigner with loads of money come in at the right time. Your better off at Upton Park better atmosphere,or it will be like the game on Sky at Oldham last night an empty stadium.if you moved in to the olympic place.

East End photographer adds tributes to Kay Jordan

East End photographer adds tributes to Kay Jordan
1425 Hrs GMT London Monday 10 Octopber 2011.

Editor Muhammad Haque

East London-based photographer Lucinda Douglas-Menzies today added her own tributes to Kay Jordan. In an email to the Kay Jordan Foundation, Ms Douglas-Menzies wrote: "I shall always be grateful to Kay Jordan for her work in this area which has enabled so many of us to be able to work in such nice and affordable workspaces in Spitalfields over the last 25 years including Links Yard where I have worked and now Heba, my present address. At Heba you can see the visible face of all she strived for: creating a set up to enable the women to come to the classes here to improve their English and to learn sewing skills all in such a friendly and supportive atmosphere with the rental of the workrooms above at a modest cost to women running small crafts and jewellery and creative businesses to help support the work going on below. I do hope that Heba will find the will to meet the present challenges it faces with funding cuts but feel that the memory of Kay's unstinting work in the past can only be an inspiration to make it happen! Best wishes Lucinda Douglas-Menzies

[Morfe tributes to kay Jordan will be published]

UK satellite TV Channel [SKY 844] tributes to KHOODEELAAR! defence of the community

UK satellite TV Channel [SKY 844] tributes to KHOODEELAAR!  defence of the community
1735 Hrs GMT London Sunday 09 October 2011.


from the print edition of Brick Lane News, being published in the Brick Lane London E1 area during this evening.

BRICK LANE NEWS Editor©Muhammad Haque UPDATER edition Sunday 09 October 2011
http://twitter.com/Khoodeelaar


http://bricklanenews.blogspot.com The Khoodeelaar! Campaign’s defence of the community in the East End of London has again been recognised in a factual programme broadcast by a satellite TV station from London last Sunday [02 October 2011]. Without the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area, the centre of the Bangladeshi community would have been seriously damaged. This was the summary of the words spoken by R A Foisal Choudhury “Shoaib” the presenter of the “STRAIGHT DAILOGUE” programme on the Sky satellite channel 844 [“ChanneliEurope”]. The main guest on the programme was KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organiser Muhammad Haque. It is understood that the eight year long Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the CrossRail agenda would be detailed in a series of programmes in the near future. Khoodeelaar! is now asking all the supporters of the campaign to prepare their contributions for inclusion in a series of video interviews that will be recorded starting in the next week. One of the most important backers of the Khoodeelaar! campaign, Kay Jordan, will be featured with the help of documentary files that made throughout the six years that the campaign was at its most intense. Our profile on “the journalist Shoaib Choudhury” appears first online early ion Monday on the blogs http://bricklanenews.blogspot.com and later in print in this bulletin on Tuesday 11 October 2011.

Graham Hobbs, an architect and a close friend and colleague of Kay Jordan’s, has been commenting on the very important contributions she has made to the community in the East End of London.
Mr Hobbs was also involved in the hard work that Kay Jordan did in the creation of the Business Development Centre [or the 'BDC'] in the Greatorex Street. The BDC is one of the most easily accessible local "communally used" centres and its easy accessibility is an undoubted symbol of Kay Jordan's genius as a community architect. She chose that description for herself and it is one that cannot be easily improved on. We shall be running a longer factual pierce on Graham Hobbs and his thoughts about the community in the East End of London soon.

[To be continued]

UK SKY-channel 844 updater tributes to KHOODEELAAR! defence of East End

UK SKY-channel 844 updater tributes to KHOODEELAAR! defence of East End
1735 Hrs GMT London Sunday 09 October 2011.


from the print edition of Brick Lane News, being published in the Brick Lane London E1 area during this evening.

BRICK LANE NEWS Editor©Muhammad Haque UPDATER edition Sunday 09 October 2011
http://twitter.com/Khoodeelaar


http://bricklanenews.blogspot.com The Khoodeelaar! Campaign’s defence of the community in the East End of London has again been recognised in a factual programme broadcast by a satellite TV station from London last Sunday [02 October 2011]. Without the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole attack on the Brick Lane London E1 area, the centre of the Bangladeshi community would have been seriously damaged. This was the summary of the words spoken by R A Foisal Choudhury “Shoaib” the presenter of the “STRAIGHT DAILOGUE” programme on the Sky satellite channel 844 [“ChanneliEurope”]. The main guest on the programme was KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organiser Muhammad Haque. It is understood that the eight year long Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the CrossRail agenda would be detailed in a series of programmes in the near future. Khoodeelaar! is now asking all the supporters of the campaign to prepare their contributions for inclusion in a series of video interviews that will be recorded starting in the next week. One of the most important backers of the Khoodeelaar! campaign, Kay Jordan, will be featured with the help of documentary files that made throughout the six years that the campaign was at its most intense. Our profile on “the journalist Shoaib Choudhury” appears first online early ion Monday on the blogs http://bricklanenews.blogspot.com and later in print in this bulletin on Tuesday 11 October 2011.

Graham Hobbs, an architect and a close friend and colleague of Kay Jordan’s, has been commenting on the very important contributions she has made to the community in the East End of London.
Mr Hobbs was also involved in the hard work that Kay Jordan did in the creation of the Business Development Centre [or the 'BDC'] in the Greatorex Street. The BDC is one of the most easily accessible local "communally used" centres and its easy accessibility is an undoubted symbol of Kay Jordan's genius as a community architect. She chose that description for herself and it is one that cannot be easily improved on. We shall be running a longer factual pierce on Graham Hobbs and his thoughts about the community in the East End of London soon.

[To be continued]

Gloating headline on Royal Extravagance in an era of cuts of NHS!

Gloating headline on Royal Extravagance in an era of cuts of NHS!
Poverty-stricken families join a lengthening queue for food handouts Charities and voluntary groups are sounding alarm bells at the number of people going hungry as benefits fall and prices rise reddit this Comments (237) Jay Rayner guardian.co.uk, Saturday 1 October 2011 19.46 BST Article history Anthony Anthony, a resident of and Emmaus halfway house in south London, eats a FareShare meal. Photograph: Antonio Olmos for the Observer Stuck around the walls of the church hall at St Paul's in the heart of Leicester is a series of green laminated signs. There's one for the Centre Project and another for The Bridge. There's the Welcome Project, the Leicester Aids Support Service, the St Paul's over-60s group and more besides. Stacked up tidily in front of each one, awaiting collection, is food. Lots of it. Boxes of fresh vegetables sit alongside bags of freshly baked bread; jars of seafood pasta sauce, still under plastic wrap, are tucked in alongside sacks of rice. Each one of these heaps, obtained by the Leicester branch of the food waste charity FareShare, is a marker for chronic hunger; a profound hunger that, as the economic forecasts worsen and the Conservative party meets in Manchester this weekend to argue over what can be done about it, is only deepening. "There's a big increase in demand," says John Russell of the Centre Project, a drop-in project in the heart of Leicester supporting people in need. "We used to feed 30 or 40 people a week. Now it's 70 or 80." Housing provision and benefit rules have changed, he says, and that's creating need. Keith Harrold of Project 5000 in Loughborough, which runs a hot food service once a week from a local church, agrees. "People are struggling. Supermarket prices are shooting up and they aren't coping." Yvonne Welford, who runs the over-60s group for St Paul's, is seeing the same picture. "There's been a major increase in demand, especially in the last six months, and I'm afraid it's only going to get worse." Poverty has al ways been a fact of life, even in good times. But FareShare is now seeing a serious growth in the number of people without the resources to feed themselves properly that is, experts say, without precedent in modern Britain. All of the organisations in Leicester that are supplied by FareShare describe themselves as being dependent on the charity, which obtains food from manufacturers and supermarkets that might otherwise end up rotting in landfill sites, and supplies it to groups helping those in need. Founded in 2004, the charity works from 17 sites in the UK and shifts 3,600 tonnes of food a year, worth more than £8m. In the past 12 months the number of people it feeds has risen from 29,000 to 35,500. The number of organisations signed up to receive food has risen from 600 to 700. And 42% of those organisations are recording increases of up to 50% in demand for their services. John Willetts, a former NHS trust chief executive and now the volunteer project director for FareShare in Leicester, said: "It's a constant ramping up in demand all the time. The volume of food we're distributing has risen from 41 tonnes a year three years ago to 98 tonnes now, and that's to the same number of organisations." He takes me to meet Diana Cank of the community action social project (Casp) in the deprived Northfields district of the city. Much of the food FareShare distributes goes to drop-in centres and homelessness hostels that cook meals on site, but Casp distributes food bags directly to those in need. "The demand has always been there," says Cank, a sturdy, cheerful woman who has worked in community care for 25 years. "But that demand has escalated. At the beginning of this year I suddenly realised there were just more people coming. To be honest, I think most people would be shocked by the growing need for basic food." Three grandmothers from the estate admit that times are indeed tough. "We'd be lost without the food from here," says Joan. "It's the fresh fruit and vegetables that are so good," says Julie. "The benefits are just not enough to get us through." Each of them is the matriarch of a family blighted by unemployment and need. "The food from FareShare helps us to make things go further." The Joseph's Storehouse project in Loughborough, run out of a pub that's been converted into a homelessness hostel, has also seen more and more people coming to its doors for food parcels. "We've gone from about a dozen a week to over 100," says project manager Judith Spence. The main change, she says, is the type of people coming. It used mostly to be single men; now she is seeing many more families. Bruce Bateson, who acts as carer for his wife and for his young child, knows the pressures families are under. "We're all unemployed in our household and simply didn't have enough to feed ourselves," he says, as though it is a blunt fact of life. So how important is the food? "What I can get here saves me £15 or £20 a week, and that enables me to get other bills paid." I ask Spence if there's been a very recent increase in demand. At first she says no, but then she begins flicking through the list of registered users. Every user of the service has to show they are on benefits to register. Once every three months, she says, she goes through the list and takes off those who haven't come to them for food in the previous three months. She squints at the list. "I take it back. In the past three months I haven't taken anybody off the list, but another 200 have come on. The number of users has doubled." The FareShare headquarters is on a light industrial estate in Bermondsey, south London. Here, major food manufacturers and supermarkets deliver their leftovers to an airy warehouse filled with industrial-scale fridges. Some of it is the result of poor forecasting of demand, resulting in oversupply. Some of it is too close to the use-by date to go on sale, or has a misprint on the labelling or damage to the packaging. The warehouse is stacked with pallets of instant gravy granules and jars of pickled cucumbers. The fridges are filled with boxes of apples and tomatoes, with fresh milk, and a curious amount of jarlsberg cheese. Because they are there to make use of what the food industry does not want, they can be a repository for anything from the most banal to foie gras parfait and rib-eye steaks. Lindsay Boswell, the charity's chief executive, makes no secret of the fact that the original motive was making better use of the environment. "We started out purely interested in liberating waste," he says. "We are an environmental charity that gets bloody angry about food being wasted." Hence much of the early effort lay in getting the supermarkets to admit they were wasting food, and to make use of the surplus rather than use landfill sites to get rid of it. Despite FareShare's efforts, it estimates that it only handles 1% of the three million tonnes of food that goes to waste every year. Now, though, the work of the charity has moved on. "We're clear that alleviation of poverty has become the side that leads. I think most people in this country would assume that generally people can feed themselves. But they can't." If all FareShare was concerned with was waste, he says, it could just give food away to commuters. "But that's not what we're about. Demand for our food is going up faster than we can source it." Its findings are backed by the experiences of the Trussell Trust, a Salisbury-based charity that runs around 100 food banks all over the country, providing emergency supplies to people referred by frontline social services and care agencies. In the past year, it has seen a 50% increase in the number of people the food banks are feeding, from 41,000 a year to 61,500. Part of that, the trust says, is simply due to the expansion of the charity's work. "But there is also a definite increase in need," says Jeremy Ravn, the charity's food bank network director. "We're seeing a larger number of younger people who are unable to find work. But there's also an increase in those who were, for want of a better term, normal working people. Those who have lost jobs or who were running their own businesses and still need to feed their families." The problem, he says, is a failure by the welfare state to react quickly enough to need. "There can be a terrible lag between an application for benefits being accepted and the money coming on stream." Martin Caraher, professor of food policy at City University London, says recent research confirms what both the Trussell Trust and FareShare are seeing. "There are around 13 million people in Britain living in poverty, which is defined as earnings of 60% of the national average. Of those, four million are suffering nutritionally related consequences. And the big new group who are really suffering are working families." FareShare is dependent on volunteers, to help get deliveries in, catalogue them, and then make up the packages for distribution. Each delivery day, community food members are phoned up, told what's on offer and asked what they would like. Organisations pay a small weekly fee for the service, which is a tiny portion of the cost of the food they receive. For a day I join the volunteers in London. Out in the van we travel from homeless hostel to drop-in centre to homeless hostel and across to the Refugee Council. At each place the story is the same. More and more people are coming to them for the hot meal service. There are more and more people who need to be fed. "We couldn't live without the FareShare deliveries," says Grant, a resident at an Emmaus community, a halfway house for homeless people coming off the streets. Grant used to be a chef and now helps to cook the meals for his fellow residents. "It makes a serious difference," he says. Cecilia Mpamugo, chef at the Refugee Council's drop-in centre in Brixton, south London, cooks food for at least 100 people a day, many of whom have no other way to get a hot meal. "It's shameful that the food would otherwise go to waste. And the quality is very, very good." So is FareShare part of the solution to Britain's growing food poverty crisis? Lindsay Boswell thinks not. "We're in the business of addressing the symptoms without addressing the disease. We are simply part of the alarm system." And the warning bells are ringing very loudly indeed. Food poverty is on the rise. The question remains: as politicians and lobbyists wine and dine each other around Manchester this weekend, is anyone listening?

UK SCrooge DWP rushes to aid Con Party lies against EU Benefits Claimants!

UK SCrooge DWP rushes to aid Con Party lies against EU Benefits Claimants!
© Muhammad Haque original diagnosis of the latest evidence of the UK Central Government Scrooge Department. The Department for Want and Poverty creation. The DWP is lending an additionally poverty creating hand to the Con Party by aiding and abetting the latter’s falsification project on benefit claims by EU Nationals in the UK. As the Con party craves maximum benefits of a benefits row on the eve of an otherwise gloom-laden Party jamboree at the weekend...

2340 Hrs GMT
London Friday 30 September 2011

Sarah Smith presented a short item about the UK CON Party getting into a state about "benefits". That word, "benefits", is likely to cause no end of rows. Regardless of who is talking about it? It has a particularly strong impact when a Con Party project is floated around it.
And so it was on Friday 30 September 2011. The project in need of the "benefit of a benefits row", to put it accurately, was of course the Con party's annual jamboree. It gets going on Saturday and is intensified on Sunday and made ready for the adulation that Cameron needs during the first half of the week.
A row about "benefits" is misleading enough at the best of times. A row about "EU meddling in our internal affairs" is bound to be far worse. And so the Con party strategists hope that this row will "benefit" them during the next few days.
The more hatred, intolerance and misgivings can be generated in the direction of the falsely promoted image of the "EU" the better it will be for the electoral purposes of the moment of the Con party following their implementation of the staged row. And signs are that there is collusion in the manufacture of the row as the Daily Mail is leading its Saturday front page [editions seen up to 2300 GMT Friday 30 September 2011] on the very same "attack" by the EU.
The apparently sinister word "DIKTAT" is also used in the Daily Mail's splash against "EU Benefits claims imposition" on what they suggest is a "hapless, helpless" UK "surrounded by marauding hordes of benefit claimants marching towards the UK from across the perceived poorer parts of the EU"!
The Channel 4 News item [Friday 30 September 2011] on the latest staging of this routine anti-EU [façade] row pretty much put paid to the ambitions of the Con party stirrers [focussing on the Con Party jamboree attendees and hand-clappers] on this one.
As Sarah Smith said, the truth was hundreds of miles away form what the CON Party was claiming it to be.
Channel 4 News item also made a pointed reference to the untruths that the UK Department for Want and Poverty creation [DWP] has proffered to aid and abet the Coin party Propaganda item.
Channel 4 News did NOT say that the DWP had done so with the de facto approval of Robert Devereux, the “Permanent Secretary” who had been “launched” by the Cabinet secretary Gus O’Donnell with such a fulsome propaganda backup for the new top man at the DWP that even the “originators of UK Civil Service spin jobs” would feel embarrassed at the transparently dishonest contents of that Party performance by the supposedly neutral and objective mandarins in charge of the DWP.
The truth which Sarah Smith headed for but did not quite reach in the item is this: that the UK central Government Department that is admittedly the most corrupt is the DWP.
This is not my conclusion.
This is the recurring finding by the otherwise very tame “Select Committee” of MPs on the DWP.
So the latest Con Party con against the involuntarily impoverished is already coming apart. Not only has the DWP been caught lying about the £2 Billion “loss that they claim would be “suffered” by “the UK” if EU nationals in the UK were allowed to claim “benefits in the UK” but the EU has already hit back at the banality of the bluff in the name “GB”.
As if that were not proof enough that the UK CON party strategists were morally and ethically and constitutionally bankrupt the comparative figures that Sarah Smith presented in the item about rates of benefits in some major partner countries in the EU showed that no self-respecting “claimant” would consider the UK benefit rates to be worthy of their ambitions!
Most other countries paid far higher rates of benefits to their nationals than the UK was doing!
Even on those figures, the UK DWP was typical of the scrooge-mentality that many of CON party propagandists claim has been left far behind in this country! [To be continued]


Why did SKYNEWS peddle the SPECTATOR mag teen last night doing plugs for Osborne?

Why did SKYNEWS peddle the SPECTATOR mag teen last night doing plugs for Osborne?
1405 GMT London Monday 12 September 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. Why else? It is big business that the SPECTATOR magazine serves? And of course its teens do as well.

Lib Dems' London 'repeat' Brian Paddick already fails as he apes Cameron's spin!

Lib Dems' London 'repeat' Brian Paddick already fails as he apes Cameron's spin!
1225 [1200] [1150] [1134] GMT London Saturday 03 September 2011
© Muhammad Haque diagnosing David Cameron and exposing the shallowness that Brian Paddick has embarked on in his latest “bid” to enter ‘The Onion” in the name of the ordinary people in London.

Brian Paddick has not said a single original thing in his "new" appearance on the 'London stage'.
During his last "outing” four years ago as a London Onion-candidate, I had made express points of arguing for him.
But I found in time that he was “unaware” of or was playing being in denial about the crucial ethical, democratic and constitutional law requirement that I had placed on the record for him to meet: that he had to show he was consistent and that he was genuinely independent minded and that he was courageous on principle.
Paddick failed on all counts as he caved in dutifully to the secret forces that were in control of the practices and the roles of the Lib Dem Party at that time and so Paddick stopped condemning the Big Biz agenda scam Crossrail which had been the main point of reference that had drawn my initial attention to his then utterances.
In the item that I am here commenting on, Paddick is delivering another version of spin about ‘targeting and zeroing in on identified families’ that David Cameron has been uttering, in the wake of the "oxygen-of-publicity" [Maggie Thatcher] he was handed by the MIC operators who successfully dodged the real questions that arose at Tottenham just a month ago this weekend, and gave Cameron the twisted excuse to attack Society even more contemptuously and falsely than he had the legitimacy to do previously.
. BOTH Cameron and Paddick are way off reality.
Neither Cameron as Prime Minister nor Paddick as a potential, or, rather, wannabe London ’mayor’ can deliver anything without the democratic and the accountable and fairness-delivering framework of and infrastructure for Society being in place.
On that vitally defined ‘service’ Cameron and Paddick are, significantly, silent as they “deal with gangs, gangsters" and “broken families’!
Jokers is not the word to be used about Cameron and Paddick in this context.
Fakers almost is. Both are faking.
Worse, they are doing so opportunistically and irresponsibly. [To be continued]

Cameron continues the MIC war on the poor, aided by Dirty Desmond's Sunday Express

Cameron continues the MIC war on the poor, aided by Dirty Desmond's Sunday Express
0208 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday 28 August 2011.
Taken by AADHIKAROnline from the website of the Guardian and the Observer.

What makes a "family champion"? Could I be one? Could you? If you think so, Emma Harrison, prime mover behind the Working Families Everywhere programme, would like to hear from you.
If you measure up, she might well choose you to work with one of more than 100,000 "troubled families" (a word of warning for would-be applicants who hesitate over that phrase, either its precise meaning or its connotations – Harrison counts it as a significant achievement that she has persuaded David Cameron to use it in place of "problem families") and ease their passage into the kind of productive, self-reliant lives that the broken society needs in order to mend itself.
Throughout that society, a discourse is taking place that has at its core notions of improvement and amelioration – of people's circumstances, of their prospects, of their ability to participate. In that process, questions emerge.
Who are the improvers? Who is to be improved? What are they being improved for? And at what cost? There are certain qualities that you need to be a champion. In a nutshell, according to WFE's guidelines, it's all about the three Cs: if you're not Caring, Capable and Creative, then the scheme is probably not for you. But if you're not sure whether you fulfil one, let alone all three, of those criteria, then it provides further information to help you decide.
You might, for example, be the kind of person who thinks: "I could sort all this out in a jiffy given the chance" (does this person exist?). You might hold the firm belief that "actions speak louder than words" or be inclined to say: "Let's try it like this and see what happens"; you might even, somewhat curiously, be "naturally nosy".
If this is you, then you will be encouraged to work with not only your assigned troubled family but also a range of agencies and organisations to "help families face up to and sort out their problems", problems that encompass parenting challenges, poor health, debt, addiction, dependency, lack of motivation, low self-esteem, lack of contacts and lack of opportunities.
Suddenly, when faced with a roster of issues so various and potentially crippling, having a can-do attitude and being a bit of a nosy parker doesn't quite seem enough. Others have chosen to put slightly different constructions on the WFE manifesto.
The Yorkshire Post, for example, reported last week that middle-class families in Hull, one of the scheme's pilot areas (Blackpool and Westminster are the other two), were being asked to "adopt workless families". Vernon Coaker, shadow Home Office minister, called it "gimmicky", while opinions on online forums ranged from the supportive to the sceptical, with dissenting voices either questioning the efficacy of such intervention or indignantly resisting the idea that the more "fortunate" be cast as saviours of the less.
But is it really on to be a naysayer? Is it OK to pounce on every new idea and expose its flaws, theorise about its possible pitfalls, write it off before it's begun?
Does anybody volunteering for this or similar schemes deserve to be branded a do-gooder or accused of masking a lack of coherence or substance in government policy? Do we mistrust the "middle classes" to such an extent that their actions, however well-meaning – and how freighted that word is – are instantly seen as patronising or misguided?
Certainly Emma Harrison has little truck with such negativity: in common with many of the entrepreneurs (she founded the company Action for Employment, later A4e, which today manages £300m of government training contracts) who have become such a visible part of British life in recent years, she favours action over reflection, commitment over diffidence, immediacy over reserved judgment.
The problems she seeks to confront are clearly not imaginary. WFE is particularly concerned with families in which work has become not merely temporarily hard to come by or disrupted, but permanently absent in successive generations, leaving their members dependent on benefits and vulnerable to hardships that, although they may afflict people of any background or income bracket, are amplified to sometimes devastating effect by poverty and its consequences.
But one can be broadly supportive and still sound a note of caution. The speed with which Harrison's initiative has been mapped on to a class scenario reveals a multitude of assumptions, backed up by rhetoric that may no longer do the job: on one side, the language of loss and abandonment, of dispossession and entrapment; on the other, of professionalism and enterprise, of purpose and duty.
No communal endeavour can take into account the variousness of individual lives, but neither should we be lured into a bogus simplification that sees citizens as two halves of an equation that merely has to be balanced.
As "mentoring" in its various forms becomes an increasingly pervasive part of contemporary life – from outreach programmes to unpaid work placement – the tendency to turn us into a nation of teachers and pupils does not come without its dangers, chief among them the belief that there exists a distillation of experience, knowledge and prowess that can and must be transmitted from one group of people to another.
We might also examine further the keystone of this idea: that work is in itself transformative, that it automatically confers identity and power and hope. "Work," said Harrison in a recent interview, "is the answer." It is unconscionable for those who have it to tell those who do not that it isn't, but they can surely point out that it is not a total solution. Having a job does not grant immunity from feelings of alienation and anxiety that have their roots in a far longer-standing process of social atomisation.
Nor is it homogenous: not all jobs are equal. And do we ignore, as if they weren't happening, the disappearance of job security, the increases in working hours and the decreases in remuneration, the fragility of pensions, the lengthening of working lives? Or do we think that those who have nothing should be grateful for what they can get? I grew up in a working-class family heavily geared towards my education; having left school in their early teens, my parents were determined that I shouldn't. Their aspirations for me contributed beyond measure to the life I count myself exceptionally lucky to have. But it came at an immense cost in their labour and effort and, alongside the gratitude I feel towards them, there is also a certain degree of guilt. Work might create opportunities (in this case, for me), but it also does something else: it takes your time and your energy in exchange for money. When my mother died, not long enough after her retirement from more than 50 years of working, one of my greatest sadnesses was that she had experienced so little leisure in her life.
Beware the age-old myth that work ennobles, for it also exhausts.

So who is creating community incohesion in Tower Hamlets over Cable Street anniversary?

So who is creating community incohesion in Tower Hamlets over Cable Street anniversary?
So who is creating community incohesion in Tower Hamlets over Cable Street anniversary?

MORAL COLLAPSE got a lot worse for Cameron, Obama et al this past one day...

MORAL COLLAPSE got a lot worse for Cameron, Obama et al this past one day...
1150 GMT London Wednesday 24 August 2011

© Muhammad Haque files yet another historic exclusive comment the real moral collapse in Britain.
This moral collapse will haunt David Cameron for far longer than Andy Coulson could “reassuringly” [!!!] script it for him!

Also published on the web site of the London weekly the SPECTATOR earlier today 24 August 2011

I recall so many things that were being said in the early 1980s on the corridors of the London County Hall that had successfully been linked with several individuals in "political office" who had received gifts from the Libya Colonel. Typically, I was successful in staying away from the gifts and also from the gift-takers. But the observation remains: how did they justify taking the Libyan dosh and how , now, are they able to stay so calm and say nought! It must be down to those "British vah-loos" that Gordon Brown was so fond of boasting about! The same vah-loos that took Tony Blair to Tripoli where he did receive his equivalents of the Libyan's gifts! I wonder what will be revealed as being the "moral" equivalent that David Cameron and his CONDEM allies have done with Libya!
Moral Collapse indeed!
What Brown, cameron and Blair, to name only the recent three tokens, must remember is this: ordinary humanity will never forgive the crimes that suit-wearing stooges and agents of Big Business do at the behest of the Military industrial Complex.
If Libya Gaddafi was undermining humanity and democracy then he was doing so for decades. He was not attacked then. So the only reason he is attacked now is because he is refusing to proffer enough gifts. This is not responsible politics. This is not legal war. This is not legal occupation. And Cameron will never live down the dire betrayal of the UNO’s founding Conventions that he has taken part in perpetrating. Society cannot but lose from such examples of law-breaking by any sitting Prime Minister. People are watching as Cameron goes from one moral contradiction and hypocrisy to the next. Who will bring Cameron to moral order and discipline? Society needs a movement precisely to bring that overdue moral and ethical and democratic accountability about.

Pakistan yearns for a ‘Hazare' too

Pakistan yearns for a ‘Hazare' too
Even India's "rival" Pakistan hears of popular demand for a Pakistani version of anti-corruption campaigner Anna Hazare in Pakistan too:
Written for Gulfnews by Farhan Bokhari a commentator on Pakistani social, poitical and economic affairs


" The crisis unleashed by anti-corruption protests targeting India's graft-tainted government offers many lessons for Pakistan. While public rallies in India have lifted the credentials of the 74-year-old veteran campaigner, Anna Hazare, Pakistanis have watched the situation across the border with much interest. Pakistan is no stranger to corruption in high places. Scandal after scandal involving senior politicians, high-ranking officials and other prominent individuals have become public, underlining the nature of the beast. While there have been high-profile arrests in the past, Pakistan tragically has a poor history when it comes to successful prosecution and sentencing. Across the country, however, there is widespread popular lament over graft being more than just a mere fact of life. Calls for a revolution come frequently from ordinary Pakistanis, notably those who consider themselves disempowered and marginalised. In recent days, TV coverage in Pakistan of the anti-graft campaign in India appears to have vividly illustrated the way that events in Delhi have struck a chord across the border. For long, Pakistanis have waited for a messiah but to no avail. Today, the yearning for such a deliverer from corruption appears to be much stronger than ever before. To make matters worse for the country, Pakistan's ruling class appears to show no signs of responding to the challenge posed by corruption in high places. Unlike India where a veteran campaigner in his 70s has become the lightning rod for popular opinion and has inspired the public at large to take the cue from him, there is no similar individual who has become a comparable figure in Pakistan. But like India, Pakistan's ruling politicians including members of the country's parliament have seldom considered corruption an important enough issue to be vigorously discussed and debated in parliament. Ironically, for a country where politicians are keen to note the importance of strengthening the evolving democratic framework, it is important to recognise the equal if not greater significance of aggressively battling corruption. Politicians in Pakistan appear to give no heed to corruption as an issue of vital significance. But what is even more disturbing is indeed the fact that questions raised on the conduct of politicians in relation to impropriety are quickly shoved under the carpet as if they were an attack on democratic values. In this background, the time has now come for Pakistan to recognise the overwhelming significance of fighting corruption, not just for the country's overall well-being but also for its ability to sustain its still young democratic order. Abject poverty If Pakistan continues to become an even more tainted country where values related to clean governance remain subservient to so-called discussions on democracy and civilian rule, sustaining the latter may remain an uphill task. While reverting to military rule as has been the case in Pakistan's history may not be an option, it can be stated with a significant degree of certainty that chaos will increasingly become a fact of life going forward. The popular yearning for an end to corruption coincides with what appear to be difficult economic times for Pakistan. The country's elite have neglected the poorest of the poor for too long. At least a third of Pakistan's population, or by some accounts even a higher proportion, continues to live below the poverty line. This essentially means that a large segment of the country's population, which on its own may be larger than the entire population of many countries, lives in extreme and abject poverty, facing conditions that can simply not be imagined by the ruling elite. The missing element for now may indeed be that Pakistan has yet to discover a prominent individual like India's Hazare who becomes the hope for the country's downtrodden and those in need. Given the desperation felt by many Pakistanis, it is possible that such an individual may be found sooner or later, who then leads calls for a long-overdue change. The consequences of such an eventuality may be difficult to comprehend at the moment. But given the popular yearning for an abrupt change, it is more than likely that such a change could be tumultuous and even possibly bloody. The easier option for Pakistan's complacency-driven ruling elite which they are unlikely to embrace going by past precedent, is simply that of learning a lesson from events across the border. The ‘Hazare factor' in India's landscape is a breath of fresh air. Farhan Bokhari is a Pakistan-based commentator who writes on political and economic matters.

FT joins belated British bandwagon in feigning affiliation with anti-corruption campaign in India

FT joins belated British bandwagon in feigning affiliation with anti-corruption campaign in India
Govt trying to stop Lokpal from becoming a reality: Team Anna

Times of India web site

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-trying-to-stop-Lokpal-from-becoming-a-reality-Team-Anna/articleshow/9674790.cms
NEW DELHI: Anna Hazare's fast demanding a strong Lokpal entered the fifth day on Saturday saying that the government has been trying to delay the Lokpal Bill for decades. It sent a clear message to the government that the protest will not end till a strong Lokpal Bill is passed. In a media interaction at the historic Ramlila Maidan from where Anna Hazare on Friday launched his protest fast, Team Anna took on the government for delaying the Lokpal Bill and accused the government from making the law a reality. The 73-year-old Gandhian said, "They (government) have linked us to the US and now they will link our agitation to Pakistan." Team Anna also dismissed reports that the movement has got any backing from any political parties or has links with any political parties like BJP, RSS. "Our protest is not political, it is against corruption" Team Anna said. "Those who are saying the BJP and RSS are behind our agitation should be sent to a "mental hospital," Anna Hazare said. Team Anna also added that the government should stop wasting time in making false allegations. Civil society member Prashant Bhushan questioned the government, "How long will the nation wait for the Lokpal Bill." Hazare's close associate Arvind Kejriwal said they were ready to talk to the government but no such communication channels have been opened. Accusing the government of using divisionary tactics, Team Anna said that it is not holding the government to ransom and added that everyone has the right to protest in this country.

"Dad who lost job in quake is refused benefits in UK". Cambridge-news.co.uk

"Dad who lost job in quake is refused benefits in UK". Cambridge-news.co.uk
0715 Hrs GT London Thursday 18 August 2011


Dad who lost job in quake is refused benefits in UK Ramond Brown Lonnie Booth, 26, whose parents are English and has lived in England most of his life A British father who lost his job in New Zealand because of the earthquake is furious after being refused benefits on his return to Cambridge. Lonnie Booth, 26, who left the UK five years ago, came home in June after working in New Zealand as a security guard. Mr Booth, of Coolidge Gardens, Cottenham, had moved to Christchurch with his partner, who is also British. She is still in New Zealand with their 3-year-old son Toby, and intends to follow Mr Booth over later. She did not wish to be named. When Mr Booth went to Cambridge’s Jobcentre Plus in Chesterton Road to apply for jobseeker’s allowance he was refused. Mr Booth said: “I was working in security in Christchurch but like many other people I lost my job after the earthquake. Some people I knew lost their lives. “I came home and decided to apply for jobseeker’s allowance and was told I couldn’t get it. “My parents are English and we’ve lived in the UK for most our lives. It took them a month to make a ‘habitual residence’ decision and they refused it. They said, and I quote: ‘We cannot treat you as habitually resident in the UK at this time.’ “So basically, I’ve lost my British rights somewhat. It is an absolute disgrace that British people are treated like this. I am absolutely furious. “The Government expects us to find work and has put things like jobseeker’s allowance in place to help individuals like me who are laid off and need some support until we get back on our feet and find employment again. “I think it’s disgusting how our own Government treats us British like third class citizens in our own country.” A Department of Works and Pensions spokesman said the habitual residence test was set up to prevent British citizens who may live in a foreign country popping back to Britain and claiming benefits. He said: “The habitual residence test ensures that income-related benefits are paid to people with reasonably close ties to the United Kingdom and who have an intention to settle here. “Anyone can appeal a decision and we will look at any new evidence they supply.” The test is applied to everyone, including British nationals returning to the UK from abroad, who claims income support, jobseeker’s allowance, state pension credit, employment and support allowance, housing benefit and council tax benefit.

AADHIKAROnline comment: Cameron fronts the biggest fraud on Society since the word had been coined!

AADHIKAROnline comment: Cameron fronts the biggest fraud on Society since the word had been coined!
AADHIKAROnline comment: Cameron fronts the biggest fraud on Society since the word had been coined!


CONTEXTUALLY citing a Daily Mirror web site piece published a few months ago: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2011/03/25/row-as-cash-strapped-council-brings-in-800-a-day-cuts-consultant-115875-23013876/

Row as cash-strapped council brings in £800 a day cuts consultant 25/03/2011 A TORY council shedding 1,500 jobs has caused uproar by hiring an £800-a-day cuts consultant. Lesley Ottery has been taken on for six months to reduce Somerset County Council’s £350million debt mountain. Bosses say her appointment is good value but Lib Dem councillor Alan Paul stormed: “It beggars belief.” Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2011/03/25/row-as-cash-strapped-council-brings-in-800-a-day-cuts-consultant-115875-23013876/#ixzz1VGkGwNYP Go Camping for 95p! Vouchers collectable in the Daily and Sunday Mirror until 11th August . Click here for more information

Desperate Cameron and his gangster colluder Telegraph's contempt for law and order!

Desperate Cameron and his gangster colluder Telegraph's contempt for law and order!
IGNORE the rule book and lock up protesters! [To be continued]

Dysfunctional Cameron getting it wrong everywhere!

Dysfunctional Cameron getting it wrong everywhere!
0710 Hrs GMT London Sunday 14 August 2011
AADHIKAROnine commentary on the latest evidence of UK CONDEM Collusion's corrupt opportunist hype-reliant "governance".
As part f our commentary, we cite a USA-based news web site that has published the following critical item in the past 10 minutes
From the web site
http://truthdive.com/2011/08/14/UK-cops-blast-Cameron-s-US-supercop-riot-advice-move-as-slap-in-the-face-of-Brits.html
London, Aug 14(ANI): UK Police are sceptical of the government’s plan to seek advice of US ‘supercop’ Bill Bratton to quell violence in the wake of riots affecting several cities in the country. British Prime Minister David Cameron has called for Bratton to seek his advice to restore law and order in the country. Former New York Police chief Bratton had helped restore law and order during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. “It seems to me, if you’ve got 400 gangs, then you’re not being very effective.
If you look at the style of policing in the States, and their levels of violence, they are fundamentally different from here”, the Independent quoted Association of Chief Police Officers’ head Sir Hugh Orde, as saying.
“What I suggested to the home secretary is a more sensible approach, maybe to look across far wider styles of policing and – more usefully – at European styles; they, like us, are bound by the European Convention. My sense is, when we’ve done that, we will find the British model is probably the top”, he added. Other senior police figures have also echoed Hugh’s sentiment, the BBC reports. Acting Metropolitan Police Commissioner Tim Godwin said that the riots had led to unprecedented chaos and “inconsistency from parliament” made it harder to police the affected cities.

Ian Hanson, of the Greater Manchester Police Federation, described the move as a “slap in the face” and added that UK did not need someone from “5,000 miles away”. Metropolitan Police Federation Chairman John Tully said American advice would not help in bringing the situation under control. “Although he has a glittering record across in the States, it’s a different style of policing. The gang culture’s different,” he said. British Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, however, played down any dispute between the government and the police, ahead of his visit to Manchester. (ANI)


[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! backs the Brick Lane Community and Curry restaurants: backing those arrested in July

KHOODEELAAR! backs the Brick Lane Community and Curry restaurants: backing those arrested in July
1800 Hrs GMT London Thusrday 11 August 2011.. Editor © Muhammad Haque. East End mobilises in defence of the community batting to protect businesses by focusing on creating an en environment of tangible respect and sustained tolerance. KHOODEELAAR! backs the Brick Lane Curry restaurant workers who were arrested in a controversial series of raids on the Lane on 19 July and 27 July 2011. Constitutional and demoniac campaign is now afoot to organise legal and community support behind the Brick Lane Curry restaurants and related enterprises. By co-operating in a dignified way the community and the businesses can sustain the environment that is vital for successful operation. That in turn can take us to heights of success that has so far eluded the community and the Curry restaurants We are now setting out to change the past trends and are embarking on a course of activity that should make Brick Lane Community and Businesses become united role modes for others in the rest of London and beyond. Acton to get local Tower Hamlets Council to deliver proper service on 'trading' standards in an accountable and co-operative way. In the days, weeks and months ahead campaign and education activities will be organised locally and due and substantial attention will be drawn UK-wide to the unique programme of our work for the area, We shall ask the local Council to support the programme. A Petition is currently being signed by member sf the community and businesses and our supporters as part of our backing fir the workers entrepreneurs and of the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area. Brick Lane Community Business Forum action UPDATES currently of KHOODEEAAR! on http://twitter.com/khoodeelaar Also bricklanecommunitybusinessforum.blogspot.com Editor© Muhammad Haque 1800 Hrs GMT London Thursday 11 August 2011

Kay Jordan the community architect leading the way for recognising community defence campaigners

Kay Jordan the community architect leading the way for recognising community defence campaigners
1700 Hrs GMT London Thursday 11 August 2011.

NOTING RHODA BRAWNE a supporter of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign

[To be continued]

BBC web site:"British Bangladeshis battle against drugs"

BBC web site:"British Bangladeshis battle against drugs"
0645 GMT London Monday 08 August 2011: From the BBC web site: "The benefits of generations of Bangladeshis migrating to London's East End, with its rich and colourful array of Asian shops and businesses, are everywhere to be seen, But, as Moazzem Hossain of the BBC's Bengali service reports, there is a dark side behind the exotic colours, sounds and smells. Brick Lane on a Friday evening is full of life and vividly depicts the success story of many British-Bangladeshi immigrants. Their restaurant trade helped turn this once somewhat rundown area into one of the most vibrant and iconic streets of London. But a few hundred yards away in the dark alleys of Whitechapel, you come across a completely different world. "I can see young Asian boys and girls… they wait in the streets, late at night. They beg money from you. I know they are involved in drugs," says local resident Fakhruddin Ahmed, a cab driver. Continue reading the main story “ Start Quote We can put it down to a number of issues... ranging from social deprivation and lack of space within houses” Kabir Ahmed Tower Hamlets councillor Mr Ahmed's two children are 16 and 17, and he now fears for their future. "I am now very worried about my own children, because I can see what's happening to these young boys and girls. They are involved in marijuana and other activities, you know." Compared with other immigrant groups in the UK, drug abuse among British-Bangladeshis is still low. "But that picture is changing, especially in areas like Tower Hamlets, where there is a huge British-Bangladeshi population. It's the largest Bangladeshi community outside Bangladesh," says local councillor Kabir Ahmed. Social workers and community leaders are perplexed as to how a very traditional and hardworking community, with conservative religious and social values, aquired this problem. "We can put it down to a number of issues... ranging from social deprivation and lack of space within houses," Mr Ahmed says. "As a result [we have] this kind of culture of standing around on street corners and [from that] everything develops." In the beginning it was mostly British-Bangladeshi men who got involved in drugs. But drug workers are now reporting that drug abuse among British-Bangladeshi women is also on the rise. Social workers say that some of them have been forced into prostitution, and some have children. The fear of having their children taken away has stopped many of them from engaging in treatment services. 'Sex and drugs' Kia Abdullah is a British-Bangladeshi writer who grew up in East London. Kia Abdullah has first-hand experience of a loved one falling victim to drugs When she published her first book, Life, Love and Assimilation - based on her own life story - it immediately created a huge uproar among the Bangladeshi community in the UK. The main character in the book, a young Bangladeshi girl, has a drug addict brother. He steals things from home to fund his drug habit and is in constant fights with his sisters. Says Ms Abdullah: "What I described in the book is fairly true to life. Some of the conflicts, the outbursts, the description of how we had to live - by that I mean locking up all our possessions for fear of them being stolen, being sold for drugs, - all of that description was based on my experiences," she said. Drug addiction among the younger generation of British-Bangladeshis has been known about for years, but her book was the first insider's view of the problem. The strong reaction Kia Abdullah received from the community took her by surprise. Her own family denounced her for what they saw as "hanging out dirty laundry". She received numerous hate mails calling her "a traitor". State of denial "Everybody knew what was happening. Young Bangladeshis, just like in any other community, were abusing drugs. You just didn't discuss it openly. They were in a state of denial," says Tohel Ahmed, who runs a drug rehabilitation centre in east London. Continue reading the main story “ Start Quote One day they're going to realise that there is life without drugs” Shamsuddin, reformed drugs taker On a Friday afternoon, a group of British Asian men gather in a ground floor room of a large Victorian house in Whitechapel. Most of them are in their 20s and 30s. They are trying to return to normal life after suffering long periods of drug addiction. In this rehabilitation centre, run by a charity called Nafas, they play table tennis and pool before joining a session of group therapy. "Every year we get about 300 clients and 60% of them are British-Bangladeshis," says Mr Ahmed. He says that more and more Bangladeshi men and women are coming forward to get treatment. Shamsuddin (not his real name) is one of the people attending the sessions. "It started with cannabis basically," he tells me. "Then I was introduced to heroin by somebody older. He gave us a few tasters, showed us how to do it... and that was it. For about 16-18 years, I have been doing the same thing, you know - drugs, drugs and drugs." 'Honour' concept Shamsuddin says that when his parents came to know about his problem for the first time, they did not know what to do. The community is slowly coming to terms with the scale of the problem "But they never had any idea as to how to help me. There was help out there but they didn't know it. They felt isolated." Social workers say that a lack of drug education among British-Bangladeshi parents is a serious problem. But writer Kia Abdullah thinks the so-called "honour" concept within the Asian community has also played a big part in repressing the problem for so long. Shamsuddin is now on the road to recovery and looks forward to working with others to help them beat their addictions. But when he steps out on the street, it pains him to see how other young people are being sucked into the habit. "I know who they are, I know what they are going through. What situation they are in. Some people I see, you know, wobbling around… drunk… clutching bottles, their trousers halfway down to their knees. "Bless their souls, one day they're going to realise that there is life without drugs. What I want to say is: without the drugs life is beautiful."

Peaceful political action powered by principle stopped the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole

Peaceful political action powered by principle stopped the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole
1715 [1700] [1645] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday 07 August 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
This picture was taken seven years ago.
Like this month, it was the month of Ramadan then.
We held that historic demonstration an hour before the time for breaking fast was due.
It shows Kay Jordan is seen holding the megaphone and standing to my left [right in the picture] as I spoke at the first ever public demonstration that we organised to defend the community against the Crossrail hole attack. Kay had begun the proceedings by being the first to speak. Then she maintained her support for the remainder of the demonstration by holding up the banner and the placards as well as by speaking to supporters who were standing with us. [To be continued]

ACROSS THE THAMES Lambeth Deputy Mayor denies assault

ACROSS THE THAMES       Lambeth Deputy Mayor denies assault
LAMBETH COUNCIL DEPUTY MAYOR ARRESTED Deputy Mayor denies assault Wednesday, 03 August 2011 By Nadia Gilani LAMBETH'S Deputy Mayor "strongly denies" allegations that she attacked a man at her home. Councillor Judith Best was arrested and bailed in the early hours of Friday following a report of a man having been attacked by a group of people at an address in Madeira Road, Streatham. The victim, Neil Potter, 41, of Fullsbrook Road, Streatham, was taken to a south London hospital and later discharged. Councillor Best, 51, was arrested on suspicion of committing ABH with conspiracy to commit GBH. She has been bailed to return to a South London Police station on September 19. A statement from Cllr Best's solicitors, Emmanuel & Company in Camden, north London, issued yesterday stated: "Cllr Best states categorically that she was not aware of the attack on Mr Potter until she was informed of this incident by the police and played no part in causing it. Police charged Scott Richards, 31, of Beadnell Road, Forest Hill, with GBH on Monday. He remains in police custody at a south London police station. Anyone with information should call, the Lambeth police GBH unit on 020 8649 2012 or Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

EXPOSED: even in the USA, they are finding that the WORLD is being robbed by Big Biz.......

EXPOSED: even in the USA, they are finding that the WORLD is being robbed by Big Biz.......
1310 Hrs GMT London Thursday 04 August 2011, From the web site of
“The Huffington Post, February 28, 2011
Report: Wartime Contractors Waste, Steal Tens Of Billions -- Then Come Back For More
A State Department cable obtained by WikiLeaks revealed late last year that Afghanistan's vice president had been caught carrying million in cash
By Dan Froomkin
WASHINGTON -- The chairmen of the bipartisan Commission on Wartime Contracting decried on Monday a federal system that has allowed contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan to commit fraud -- then get hired again and again.
"For the 200,000 people employed by contractors to provide support and capability in Iraq and Afghanistan, accountability is too often absent, diluted, delayed, or avoided," Republican co-chair Chris Shays, formerly a longtime congressman from Connecticut, said while calling to order a hearing of the commission Monday.
McClatchy Newspapers, Feb. 14, 2011: A U.S. contractor who's continued to receive government contracts despite criticism of its work in Afghanistan got low ratings for its performance on two more high-profile projects in the war-torn country than had been disclosed previously. McClatchy Newspapers has learned that the U.S. government criticized Black & Veatch for poor oversight and delays on a Kabul power plant project and for a study of the viability of developing a natural gas field in the Sheberghan region in northern Afghanistan. (Photo: 12d Solutions Pty Ltd)
There are so many barriers to suspending or banning contractors with violations that "untrustworthy contractors can continue profiting from government work, responsible businesses may be denied opportunities, and costs to taxpayers can climb," Shays said in a statement co-authored with his Democratic co-chair, Michael Thibault, formerly the deputy director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency.
The commission last week issued a blistering interim report to Congress: "At What Risk? Correcting over-reliance on contractors in contingency operations ( http://www.wartimecontracting.gov/docs/CWC_InterimReport2-lowres.pdf )," which concluded that "misspent dollars run into the tens of billions" out of the nearly $200 billion spent on contracts and grants since 2002 to support military, reconstruction and other U.S. operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
And that could well be an understatement, the commission noted ( http://www.wartimecontracting.gov/docs/CWC_NR-39.pdf ), because "it might not take full account of ill-conceived projects, poor planning and oversight by the U.S. government, and criminal behavior and blatant corruption by both government and contractor employees." The report suggested that the government stop using contractors so routinely, start taking oversight more seriously and establish strong interagency standards.
It called for an end to contractors' current role in hiring other contractors, concluding that they tend not to erect the appropriate oversight firewalls. And most controversially, the report said the extensive use of private security contractors -- which has surged under President Barack Obama ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/15/three-years-after-massacr_n_718397.html ) -- raises use-of-force issues and creates a gap in legal accountability
So rather than let them run wild, the commission recommended that agencies relying on private security contractors be required to embed government personnel among them who would be "responsible for leadership, command and control, and oversight of all security contractors and operations." (The commission also promised that its final report, due this summer, will further address the over-reliance on private contractors to provide "movement security" for government workers in war zones. That's a shot across the bow of the State Department.)
The commission's findings, however, are just the latest in a litany of official and journalistic reports about the enormous cost of waste, fraud and corruption in Iraq and, particularly, Afghanistan.
Just last month, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction warned that the entire $11.4 billion for constructing and maintaining nearly 900 Afghan National Security Forces facilities is at risk due to inadequate planning.
The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction said in 2009 ( http://www.wartimecontracting.gov/index.php/hearings/commission/2-2-09-ig-lessons ) that an estimated $3 billion to $5 billion in U.S.-funded infrastructure contracting had been wasted there.
McClatchy Newspapers ( http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/01/12/106681/troubled-us-afghan-projects-mushroom.html ) have exposed example after example of waste and abuse in contracts for Afghan reconstruction.
A State Department cable obtained by WikiLeaks revealed late last year ( http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/world/29cables.html?_r=2 ) that Afghanistan's vice president had been caught carrying $52 million in cash in a Persian Gulf tax haven. (See 10 more examples ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/30/billions-down-the-drain-i_n_790043.html ).) In his remarks at Monday's hearing ( http://www.pogo.org/pogo-files/testimony/contract-oversight/co-iarc-20110228.html ), Scott Amey, general counsel for the nonprofit watchdog group Project on Government Oversight (POGO), testified that "contract award dollars have increased from approximately $200 billion in fiscal year 2000 to over $535 billion in fiscal year 2010." Meanwhile, however, "contract administration and oversight have decreased because the acquisition workforce is stretched thin," he said.
Since 2002, POGO has maintained a Federal Contract Misconduct Database ( http://www.contractormisconduct.org/ ), which served as the model for the government-created Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), due to become publicly available starting in April. Witnesses at Monday's hearing said, however, that the federal database doesn't adequately record contractors' past performance. As it happens, the Obama administration recently caved to pressure ( http://www.pogo.org/pogo-files/alerts/contract-oversight/co-fcmd-20110124.html ) from contractors and won't be making that past performance data available publicly.
But even internally, witnesses said, the state of the data is abysmal. Of the 1,485 past performance reports required from the Department of Defense, only 140 had been entered into the database. Of the 174 required from the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development, not a single one could actually be found, although USAID insisted 24 had been entered. And Dan Gordon, President Obama's administrator for federal procurement policy, said three-quarters of the performance reports that were filed still lacked required documentation. But judging from POGO's database, Amey testified: Some of the largest service contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan have checkered histories of misconduct, including instances of shooting civilians, false claims against the government, violations of the Anti-Kickback Act, fraud, retaliation against workers' complaints, and environmental violations. Amey also raised an all-too-familiar concern, though from another context: The government's inability to hold all contractors accountable begs the question: Is the government so reliant on large contractors that bad actors are required to preserving legitimate competition and mission accomplishment? This might be the contracting version of "too big to fail." Dan Froomkin is senior Washington correspondent for the Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail, bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed, follow him on Twitter, friend him on Facebook, and/or become a fan and get e-mail alerts when he writes.
Characters Count: 8759
URL for news «Report: Wartime Contractors Waste, Steal Tens Of Billions -- Then Come Back For More» http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2011/02/28/report-wartime-contractors-waste-steal-tens-of-billions-then-come-back-for-more.html

NHS bosses delay surgery "until you die or go private'. D Telegraph

NHS bosses delay surgery "until you die or go private'. D Telegraph
29 July 2011. NHS bosses delay surgery "until you die or go private'. Daily Telegraph

Wapping, London E1, is minutes away from Brick Lane, London E1....

Wapping, London E1, is minutes away from Brick Lane, London E1....
1050 Hrs GMT London Friday 22 July 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. Wapping where Rupert Murdoch [in the SHAPE of the sub-pornographic core and REAL SOURCE of INCOME for his morality-free “media” Empire , the SUN] has been based since the second half of the 1980s, is millions of miles from ordinary people and community that is around it. Brick Lane Today starts here another exclusive survey of the roe that Rupert Murdoch has played in the past 30 years in perpetrating the poverty creation agenda of successive UK regimes. We start, next, with a brief look at the role of the Times newspaper in giving unjustified and wanton platforms to some of the most corrupt perpetrators of financial fraud on the pubic generally and on the low income people and the no-incomed people in the UK society, via the City of London [To be continued]

LEGAL updates on the contents of this and associated web sites as at 0820 GMT 18 July 2011

LEGAL updates on the contents of this and associated web sites as at 0820 GMT 18 July 2011
0820 [0810] [0740] Hrs GMT London Monday 18 July 2011. The © Muhamad Haque Commentary. LEGAL DISCLAIMER UPDATED at 0820 Hrs GMT London Monday 18 July 2011. This commentary is original and is published on the AADHIKAROnline and associated blogs and web sites. This and all our original materials put online are written, published and made available online solely as a an accessible, contemporary, contextual and authentic service to the cause of universal objective non-profit education, learning and understanding of human society in our times. The publications are also carried out to immediately aid the campaigns and the movements for justice and accountability. All contents here and in the associated documents, notes, briefs and references created by the Editor and or by any other named author or by unnamed AADHIKAR Media Foundation author belong to the author and the AADHIKAR Media Foundation. The publications take place at all times in accordance with the UK Authoring Rights and the corresponding international law provisions. This note is important in view of the indications spotted again of some dishonest 'bloggers' and or 'social network account users' stealing our exclusive and original authoring ideas and contents from our published blogs, sites and contents.

[To be updated in due course]

SHOCKED BY the famine and the starvation....

SHOCKED BY the famine and the starvation....
"Kristin Davis visits drought stricken Horn of Africa"

“I feel shocked to see what these people have gone through. I met women who have walked for 20 days through the desert, with children dying on the way, only to arrive at a camp where there is hardly any food and water to go around. We must not allow this to happen in this day and age. Anything that you can give will help people who have absolutely nothing.”

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD BLAIR so! And we told Brown too. Now we are telling Cameron as well!

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD BLAIR so! And we told Brown too. Now we are telling Cameron as well!
0905 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 05 July 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Campaign against "Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole assault n the community in the East End of London....". On 6 June 2006, KHOODEELAAR! held a demonstration on 'the Green', the space opposite the 'Palace of Westminster', as part of our preparation then to formally put on the record the fact that the community was opposed to the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hoe scam. To make the demonstration a reality, Kay Jordan and I had spent the previous week organizing. On the day, we travelled by road to the spot. Two weeks later, the most significant, historic tussle took place between our campaign against Crossrail hole scam and the Palace of Westminster bureaucracy that was corrupt to the core. [To be continued]

Muhammad Haque renewing call for "Fleet Street" to start telling the truth on banks robbing....

Muhammad Haque renewing call for "Fleet Street" to start telling the truth on banks robbing....
1400 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
03 July 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque. As posted on the NEW STATESMAN web site in the last 50 minutes.
[Quote]
What is most noticeable in these "revelations" is the fact that they are being made at all.
There is NOTHING at all new to me about this Mr Hari or any other of the same name or of the same political culture that I could list.
It is staggering that "journos" are getting ever so excited about Mr Hari's distorted achievements.
But they ought to pause and reflect on the contents of Fleet Street over the past two hundred years.

Even Michael Foot [Evening Standard, Daily Express, Tribune] was taken in, as he exhibited in his "debt" of "honour" to Beverbrook.
There is in this Hari peddling yet another consciously created conundrum as a cover to justify lying.
The test surely is this: how many peddlers of Big Business lying in the "Feet Street" culture will quit the wrongdoing habit?
An even tougher test is: how many will show true grit and tell on the many other Hari like perpetrators and fakers? How many will break ranks and start reporting what they already know about how banks loot and plunder the public.....

[Unquote]

Kay Jordan holds a "No Crossrail digging here" placard as Muhammad Haque speaks 22 Oct 2004

Kay Jordan holds a  "No Crossrail digging here"  placard  as Muhammad Haque speaks 22 Oct 2004
2040 Hrs GMT London Saturday 25 June 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. The words and the critical thinking being today;s Wrexham, Wales “launch” by Ed Miliband f the “change” project will are doomed to be as a sham. Unless he takes our advice and investigates the Tower Hamlets Labour Party. Why was this sham allowed to remain in place despite being on special measures. Why was it allowed to defy the community and back the Crossrail hole. agenda scam?….. CONTRAST the role of the Tower Hamlets Labour Party clique with the work that Kay Jordan did in defending the community and Ed Miliband will have his problem substantially solved already. In this picture [above] Kay Jordan holds a "No Crossrail digging here" placard as Muhammad Haque speaks 22 Oct 2004 at the very first KHOODEELAAR! demonstration against the Crossrail hole-inviter "locally elected Tower Hamlets Council". The demonstration took place in the Greatorex Street, opposite the site where the two "local councillors" "surgeries" would take place. The two "local" councilors, then belonging to the Labour Party, were Lutfur Rahman and Abbas Uddin "Helal" who were supposed to have represented the community's OPPOSITION to Big Biz scam Crossrail hoe attacks on the local community that exists around Brick Lane, Hanbury Street, Princelet Street... They did not do so. Despite calls for them to issue statements clearly putting their true role and their true position on the Crossrail hole, BOTH Abbas and Lutfur failed to make a single statement. If any of them said anything, that was at most peripheral or worse irrelevant. The community defence campaign KHOODEELAAR! created a landmark unique in the history of the East End by successful stopping the Crossrail hole attack on the community that we have described as the "Brick Lane London E1 area" to denote the adjoining streets and thoroughfares that together make up the area that is identified with and as the local community. In that historic achievement for the community, Kay Jordan played a crucial role and the community will be in Kay Jordan’s debt forever for that role alone. KHOODEELAAR! continues the task of defending the community beyond the immediate goal of stopping the Crossrail hole. In this we are in association with the Kay Jordan Foundation, the ALL VOLUNTEERS NEWS and the Brick Lane Community Business Forum, initiatives that are very closely linked with Kay Jordan’s philosophy and her personal support and dedication. [To be continued]

Educating, resourcing and informing UK Society with original dispatches from the East End of London

Educating, resourcing and informing UK Society with original dispatches from the East End of London
0430 [0420] [0405] Hrs GMT London Saturday 25 June 2011

Educating, resourcing and informing UK Society with original dispatches from the East End of London.

THE AADHIKARonline Essay on the sick state of the NHS in Tower Hamlets, London, UK
Part 2.
The sickness is at the heart of the NHS operation. In every single unit. Be it in a hospital setting or at a GP practice. Be it at the reception or in the consulting room. Be it with a "medically qualified" practitioner or a licensed assistant or another type of accredited ancillary staff paid by the NHS for their "professional job". Everywhere across the NHS “network” in the East End of London borough. And the price is being paid by the uncounted, unrecognized, unlisted casualties who ought not to have suffered the fates and the consequences that hey have invariably been caused whenever they have made the contacts with the NHS units concerned.
The NHS has NOT been a safe place for any of the casualties who have suffered in its hands in the Borough in the past decades. The situation is alarmingly worse today because of the additionally deeply violating layer created with and operated by the use of the Surrogates.
[To be continued]

AADHIKAROnline KJI previous edition [various dates in] May to 24 June 2011

AADHIKAROnline KJI previous edition [various dates in] May to 24 June 2011
AADHIKAROnline KJI previous edition [various dates in] May to 24 June 2011

AADHIKAROnline KJI previous edition [various dates in] May to 24 June 2011

Sick state of the NHS in Britain. Why is the NHS so sick? An Updater ESSAY NEXT

Sick state of the NHS in Britain. Why is the NHS so sick? An Updater ESSAY NEXT
GPs warned of fatal risk to elderly patients from common drug combinations 24 Jun 11 By Amy Fallon Elderly patients have an increased risk of early death or cognitive impairment when prescribed a combination of common drugs, GPs have been warned. Researchers at the University of East Anglia made the discovery during a study into the long-term impact of drugs which block acetylcholine, a key neurotransmitter. Lead author Dr Chris Fox, clinical senior lecturer at Norwich Medical School, said: 'This is the first large scale study into the long-term impact of medicines which block acetylcholine - a common brain neurotransmitter - on humans, and our results show a potentially serious effect on mortality.' 'Clinicians should conduct regular reviews of the medication taken by their older patients, both prescribed and over the counter, and wherever possible avoid prescribing multiple drugs with anticholinergic effects.' 'Further research must now be undertaken to understand possible reasons for this link and, in particular, whether and how the anticholinergic drugs might cause the increased mortality. In the meantime, I strongly advise patients with any concerns to continue taking their medicines until they have consulted their family doctor or their pharmacist.' The study involved drugs being given to more than 13,000 men and women aged 65 and over across the UK. Each drug was ranked on the strength of its anticholinergic activity, or AntiCholinergic Burden (ACB). They were ranked 0 for no effect, 1 for a mild effect, 2 for a moderate effect and 3 for a severe effect. The two-year research found that 20% of participants taking drugs with a total ACB of four or more had died by the end of the study, compared with only 7% taking no anticholinergic drugs. This is the first time anticholinergics has been linked to mortality. For every extra ACB point scored, the odds of dying rose by 26%. Those taking drugs with a combined ACB of five or more scored more than 4% lower in a cognitive function test than those taking no anticholinergic medications, confirming evidence from past studies of a possible link between anticholinergics and cognitive impairment. The increased risks from anticholinergic drugs were found to be cumulative, based on the number taken and the strength of their effect. Those who were older, came from a lower social class and had more health conditions tended to take the most anticholinergic drugs. Many medicines with some degree of anticholinergic effect are are regularly taken by older people, including anti-depressants such as amitriptyline, imipramine and clomipramine, tranquilisers such as chlorpromazine and trifluoperazine, bladder medication such as oxybutynin and antihistamines such as chlorphenamine. The study was the first systematic investigation into the long-term health impact of anticholinergic activity. It was launched as part of the drive to find ways of reducing risk factors for dementia, which affects 820,000 people in the UK. The UEA researchers worked with colleagues at University of Cambridge, Indiana University and NHS clinicians. The findings were published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Get the latest stories with Pulse newsletters Sign up here Want to keep receiving Pulse magazine? Click here to secure your copy Post and bookmark this story at the following sites:What is this? Delicious Digg reddit Newsvine Facebook TELL US YOUR VIEWS Please note: You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or content of member comments. If you notice a defamatory or illegal comment, please let us know at feedback@pulsetoday.co.uk. You must fill in all fields marked * Story date24 Jun 11 Your Name* Comment* You must be logged in to add a comment

"I am Rebel! Tired of war!" Muhammad Haque pays respect to Brian Haw by citing Qazi Nazrul Islam

"I am Rebel! Tired of war!" Muhammad Haque pays respect to Brian Haw by citing Qazi Nazrul Islam
I am Rebel! Tired of war! Coming here shortly..

Community architect Kay Jordan in command of the demand: NO to Crossrail hole...!

Community architect Kay Jordan in command of the demand: NO to Crossrail hole...!
0220 Hrs GMT London Monday 20 June 2011. © Muhamad Haque Action Reports in defence f the community against Big Business Big Society Breakdown agenda of the CONDEM regime. Kay Jordan in action at the Montefiore Centre [then still lumbered with a burdensome name that centre] at a May 2004 campaign meeting against the Crossrail hole plan agenda...That was also the meeting where I told the man from the Crossrail company [that had been cooked up by the Daft DFT and assorted interests promoting Big Business contracts agenda] sitting to Kay's left in the picture, that we would NOT allow Crossrail to dig our community out of our home area and environment .[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque.....about the values of George Lansbury

Muhammad Haque.....about the values of George Lansbury
Jon Cruddus [MP, a contender to Labour Party leadership, pulled out before the finish] tells Muhammad Haque about the values of George Lansbury- resist peoples dispossession....

Dirty Tricks propaganda by Dirty Desmond of the EXPRESS Group hides the real gravy trains!

Dirty Tricks propaganda by Dirty Desmond of the EXPRESS Group hides the real gravy trains!
1915 Hrs GMT London Sunday 05 June 2011PUBLISHED BY AADHIKARonline with the following full acknowledgement of the DAILY MAIL and of their by-lined author.
TEXTS follw

The tycoon behind the controversial U.S. firm that made £640million from the embattled Southern Cross care-home business boasts one of the world's most magnificent property portfolios.

USA Big Biz bank Goldman Sachs has confirmed robbing Libya of $$$. D Trump has confessed too!

USA Big Biz bank Goldman Sachs has confirmed robbing Libya of $$$. D Trump has confessed too!
USA Big Biz bank Goldman Sachs has confirmed robbing Libya of $$$. D Trump has confessed too!

CONFIRMING YET MORE PROOF OF THE CORRUPTOCRACY THAT CONDEM CAMERON FRONTS AS HE AFFRONTS DECENCY!

CONFIRMING YET MORE PROOF OF THE CORRUPTOCRACY THAT CONDEM CAMERON FRONTS AS HE AFFRONTS DECENCY!
0925 [0910] Hrs GMT London Friday 03 June 2011. AADHIKAROnline © Muahmmad Haque Ethical Commentary in the context of CONDEM Cuts and assaults on society. Confirming yet more proof of the corruptocracy that CONDEM Cameron fronts as he affronts society!
This item of news as featured on today’s London DAILY MIRROR frontpage is an appropriate confirmation of our own diagnostic findings on the behaviour of UK MPs and members of the House of Peers! Like MPs and “Peers”, “civil servants” with their hands on the till are a disgrace and expose as sham everything that Gordon Brown used to boast about whenever he opened his twisted bragging line and uttered the dreadfully offensively misleading [in every context imaginable] two words “British vah-loos”!
Are they worthy of being called “civil” servants?
Surely not!”
Yet they are being called that and they will get off as well shows that the only way that communities like the East End can fend off the attacks that the same MPs and the same “civil servants” confect and foist on us will be the mobilised community ourselves.
That mobilisation must happen.

As I have argued all of May 2011 in the updater context of the remembrance of the role played by George Lansbury and the defiant Poplar Councillors in the 1920s, the deadly silence of the “elected” councillors on today’s “Poplar” Council, that is Tower Hamlets Council, could not be more telling as an alarm bell.
That the East End of London is being put up for institutional takeover by Big Business is no longer a secret. Not even by the fakeries of the controlling clique on the remnants of the Borough of Tower Hamlets Council. The adverse consequences to be added to the already dire state of poverty and underachievement on all levels that the ordinary people in the East End have been landed with will get ever worse.
[To be continued]

Admission at last! That some "wars" are faked from the start! While others are waged on innocents!

Admission at last! That some "wars" are faked from the start! While others are waged on innocents!
Admission at last! That some "wars" are faked from the start! While others are waged on innocents!

0420 [0400] Hrs GMT London Thursday 02 June 2011.
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary on the CONDEM-Society is breaking down in the East End of London……!
Today’s “news” headings [Thursday 02 June 2011] once again reinforce the truth that the mainstream media is hiding the truth! How is that possible when I am saying that “news” headlines reinforce the truth….?
It is indeed possible.
This is how: the media admission that the so-called war on drugs isn’t working is not at all the truth about what is actually happening society. That is to say, why the ills that can be and ought to be tackled and defeated keep happening and keep dominating so much of the lives of so many in the community. . Yet the media admission yields the truth about something else! The truth about the real agenda of those who control the weapons of war. The weapons of war in the context of society are not applied at all, let alone being applied well to dealing with the ills in society.
Why? Because those who control the weapons have a lot to lose of their greed if society is rid of ills. It is a vicious cycle that is kept in place and in operation in by the fact that there is no democratic audit of those with the weapons.
Look at Tower Hamlets Council. It must be years since any even a mild squeak was heard from a single elected “councillor” about anything going on in society.
Contrast this silence with the proliferated displays of images of the said sets of “elected” councillors released “in society locally in the area known as the East End borough of Tower Hamlets” via ethnicity-linked “media”!
Propaganda sheets that are very odd! Nobody has seen any actual evidence of where these outlets get the money from! Yet there are reams and reams of newsprint displaying the images of “elected” councillors in one guise or another. Never, however, telling anything about what rampant anti-social behaviour is going on all around while the very same imaged “elected” councillors and other “elected” occupants of various slots remain silent or in effect silenced by unseen but very active forces pulling the strings from behind the “elected” imaged ones!
Society is sinking generally in Britain. But it is sinking faster and more unjustifiably in areas like the East End.
It is more than very odd that so much UK central Government cash has been claimed by and allocated to the “local authorities” in the name of addressing [in the sense of attacking and reversing and finally SOLVING] the very ills that are proliferating!
If there ever was a time and a reason for democratic audit of the local Council in Tower Hamlets covering all its duties and failures, the time has been overdue for years….
[To be continued]

ABORTION CLAIMS MILLIONS OF GIRLS IN INDIA

ABORTION CLAIMS MILLIONS OF GIRLS IN INDIA
AADHIKARONLINE.

THE following item is based on posts and comments edited from external sites including the BBC


Kay Jordan 23 February 2005 as originally reported by AADHIKRonline © Muhammad Haque

Kay Jordan 23 February 2005 as originally reported by AADHIKRonline © Muhammad Haque
Kay Jordan 23 February 2005 as originally reported by AADHIKRonline © Muhammad Haque [To be continued]

'Metropolitan Police officer involved in the G20 protests death of Ian Tomlinson has been charged'

'Metropolitan Police officer involved in the G20 protests death of Ian Tomlinson has been charged'
1600 GMT Tuesday 24 May 2011 Edited summaries and links to external news outlets as checked at 1555 GMT Tuesday 24 May 2011 Pc faces G20 manslaughter charge PC Simon Harwood, the Metropolitan Police officer involved in the G20 protests death of Ian Tomlinson has been charged with manslaughter and will face trial.
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/pc-faces-g20-manslaughter-charge-16003595.html



Ian Tomlinson's widow sobs as she tells of her loss
The widow of Ian Tomlinson sobbed uncontrollably today as she told how she had lost the love of her life.

Skies Cloud about obama.......

Skies Cloud about obama.......
At least 18 loud explosions have been heard in the Libyan capital in what appears to be the heaviest night of bombing since Nato's campaign against Colonel Gaddafi began. http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Libya-Tripoli-Rocked-By-At-Least-18-Explosions-As-Nato-Targets-Gaddafi-Compound/Article/201105415998059?lpos=World_News_Carousel_Region_2&lid=ARTICLE_15998059_Libya%3A_Tripoli_Rocked_By_At_Least_18_Explosions_As_Nato_Targets_Gaddafi_Compound

Would the "press" be THIS KEEN for "freedom of expression" over a non-sex-linked story?

Would the "press" be THIS KEEN for "freedom of expression"  over a non-sex-linked story?
Would the "press" be THIS KEEN for "freedom of expression" if the 'subject' been a non-sex-related one? [To be continued]

Muhammad Haque contextually updating on the abysmally poor standard of UK Parliament [3]

Muhammad Haque contextually updating on the abysmally poor standard of UK Parliament [3]
By © Muhammad Haque London Parliamentary Commentary.
1212 [1150] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
22 May 2011.

The two words: McNulty Report! They conjure up a neat scenario translated as follows: Could this be related to anything another McNulty [Tony McNulty who was at the UK Transport Dept when Alistair Darling was the Secretary of State at ‘the Daft!’ ] had said about transport in London as at the time adequately prominently and almost accurately reported by the [twice-weekly printed] ‘South London Press’?
If it could be related then whatever THEN happened to the aforesaid Tony McNulty who mysteriously [!!!!] got derailed so publicly [albeit years later] and thus was unable to deliver on the promises that he had made at the start?
The word knitting [as used by the reporter on the London EVENING STANDARD, as a joke and in irony] may also be extrapolated to contain the superfluity of today's untruths that are being issued by the same Daft stooges of Big Biz contractors.
The truth is that the abysmal transport experience that people have in the UK is mainly to do with the abysmal standard of Parliament that we have here.
Refer back to the events on the floor of the House of Commons on 19 July 2005 and you will see the list of utterers of untruths who vied with one another to be seen as the most shameless suckers up to the hidden hands that were setting the promotional plug for the Crossrail scam that the stooged ‘MPs’ were ‘debating’ !!!! Read what they uttered then and you will see just how corrupt the proceedings can be. Those braying MPs were NOT on this planet.
Of course that was a good five years before the full extent of the thefts and dishonesty by MPs [in a long while] was at least begun to be admitted [via those ‘revelations’ called ‘expenses’] as a notion!
So what is the excuse now for allowing lies to be uttered by MPs for Big Business and similar interests that continue to deny the public a decent accountable Parliament?
In our view, MPs will NEVER tell the truth if telling the truth is a moral matter.
They will tell; anything, mostly lies, if that will suit them!
The gap remains as wide between the need for having a truthful Parliament and the reality of a zombified electorate or a zombified electoral system that makes sure that we have SUCCESSIONS of liars in place[s] as elected holders of “democratic posts”! CONTRADICTIONS eternally confounded
[To be continued]

Huhne's confession points to the time when he will tell all!

Huhne's confession points to the time when he will tell all!
0920 Hrs GMT London Sunday 22 May 2011. The Muhammad Haque Ethical commentary will be posted here shortly. [To be continued]

Ken Clarke is not the only one unfit for purpose. His predecessor, Jack Straw too is [1]

Ken Clarke is not the only one unfit for purpose. His predecessor, Jack Straw too is [1]
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque Constitutional Law Commentary.
0640 [0610] Hrs GMT
London
Friday
20 May 2011.

Ken Clarke’s captivity in the “hole of his own making” is nothing as compared with his deeply flawed contempt for constitutionality, as the failures of his “Justice” portfolio to deliver constitutional compliance by the various entrenched bureaucracies confirm.
Come to think of it, his “detractor” on record and surfaced yesterday via Rupert Murdoch's endorsement as displayed as a page one slot about Ken Clarke, is no better: Jack Straw is as contemptibly disrespectful of the ethics and the morality of universal constitutionality as Ken Clarke has been.
I shall diagnose Jack Straw's unfitness in the course of this series of Comments. First Ken Clarke.
I have first hand experience of the brazenness of Ken Clarke’s mind. Even without such experience, I would find him guilty of disrespect to constitutional ethics and morality. The man is, truly, a disrespecter of constitutionality. That he has managed to say the “sorry” word “at last” should not be allowed as an excuse for his disservice to universal norms of constitutionality.
This Clarke, like the other one bearing the same surname and also occupying the “high office” called the British Home office in the recent past, is not fit for UNIVERSALLY valid and warranted constitutional purpose. What his “choice of words” has exposed is not his lack of linguistic dexterity but his fundamental disrespect to the universal rights of people he considers to be at a level below they should be to warrant his respect. On this latest row, Clarke has been shown up for his disrespect to women.
On other occasions, Clarke has been directly seen for hs disrespect top people of African and Asian backgrounds. And of “:other” faiths other than the or any “faith” that alone warrants his respect, “according to him”..
That Clarke has had to be cornered from so many sides in the hours following his abrasive and contemptible expression of contempt to victims of the violence called rape is not something that ends with him alone.
It goes straight into the mind of David “Dave” Cameron who failed to answer the charge when confronted at the PMQs with the evidence of Clarke's unsuitability.
What does THAT say about just how much, if at all, Cameron has “changed’ from the mindset of the likes of those who claim he is not a genuine Reactionary Right-wing Conservative?
[This “AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque Constitutional Law Commentary” is continued on http://twitter.com/aadhikaronline]

CLICK on image © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 19 May 2011 [2]

CLICK on image © Muhammad Haque  London Commentary 19 May 2011 [2]
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque EXCLUSIVE London ECONOMIC SOCIAL ETHICAL MORAL SPIRITUAL HISTORIC Commentary. 0610 [0445] [0435] [0340] Hrs GMT Thursday 19 May 2011. This is a very short clip taken externally from Channel 814 on the UK satellite facilitator SKY.com from a broadcast accessed at 0005 to 0030 Hrs GMT today Thursday 19 May 2011. The content of the scripted ‘news’ refers to Seelot and the Seelotee speaking people in [mainly] western countries. The line is about the money expressed in USA dollars, that is remitted to “Bangladesh” by the Seelotee people. The item is typical illustration of the disconnect between the necessary components that actually make up a “society” and the [supposed and the claimed -a s claimed by these petty operators of the “news” agenda that is retailed via these petty operators by the real setters of the agenda who have conspired, plotted and contrived so far to remain hidden from obvious observation. they are NOT hidden. As these commentaries will itemise and detail and reveal in the forthcoming updates and examinations] servants or service-provers in the name/s of the communities concerned. In the actual targeted audience which is again Seelotee speaking[as localised in the alienating ‘visual narratives’], the rest of the “news theme” is not about the life of the same people in the same very pressurised, depressed and embattled locations in the ‘same’ western countries. This factual and reality-devoid disconnect has been deliberately created by the alienating agenda that has been foisted on and followed via the so-called “community” channels of which channel 814 is and has been since its de facto operational commencement in 2006 the more pronounced type and illustration. On the ground in the parts of the UK and the USA [and for that matter of Italy, Germany, France, the Netherlands] where the Seelotee speaking people as a community exists, their day to day, main tropics or concerns or their “thinking” is not supported by any of those channels or their programmes. In fact the “thinking” is stultified, silenced to daily distortion, diversion and disorientation. Every single day, the outlets broadcast items that are at odds with each other [on sheer mundane facts] but even more seriously they are at odds with the realities of the struggles that individual Seelotee speaking “immigrants” [more on that concept in later parts of these COMMENTARIES] have to endure in these societies. Instead of being supported, they are treated as SOURCES OF FOREIGN CURRENCY IN THE MAIN, as is shown in this video clip recorded manually with an external device off the Channel 814 on SKY.Com. [To be continued]

© Muhammad Haque Political Poetry : In solidarity with universal freedom struggles everywhere: [1]

© Muhammad Haque Political Poetry : In solidarity with universal freedom struggles everywhere: [1]

© Muhammad Haque Political Poetry
Written in London at 0340 Hrs GMT
First published online by
AADHIKAROnline
at 0410 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
19 may 2011

Lines in solidarity with the defenders of justice
and human dignity who have inspired
generations of people everywhere
We need no apology!
Neither from the oppressors head
nor from their stooged apologists.
Not today.
Never!
What we need today
and have done every day
for centuries
is the spirit, the energy
to keep up the fight
to stay true to freedom ..

[Extracted]

Khaleda Zia in a Council Chamber looking so empty! Whose idea was it to "receive her like THAT"?

Khaleda Zia in a Council Chamber looking so empty! Whose idea was it to "receive  her like THAT"?
0620 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 18 May 2011

0435 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 18 May 2011 © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. To the “East London Advertiser” as based on their online report about a few activities in and around the “Mulberry Place” in London E14 2 BG on Tuesday 17 May 2011. TEXTS as published by AADHIKAROnline at 0435 Hrs GMT Wednesday 18 may 2011:
Your [The “East London Advertiser” online] headline “Protests greet Bangladesh Opposition leader Khaleda Zia arriving in Tower Hamlets” is an unambiguous message saying that the visiting Bangladeshi Political Party leader is at the centre of a controversy here.
Your [The “East London Advertiser” online] pictures too support your message. The words you use refer to a “reception” held in the Tower Hamlets Council-controlled premises. Your [The “East London Advertiser” online] account is broadly supported by other information circulating in the evening of Tuesday 17 May 2011.
So what should have happened? The local Council should have arranged any “reception” that would not associate the Council with any Party Political side in another country.
Did Tower Hamlets Council consult with local people about how to go about holding such an event that would also give a genuinely inclusive representation of the Borough's population and diversities? If they did, where were the local community in the “reception” or in any other part of the "activities" that you cover?
There is a long-standing tradition in both locally elected councils and in the central parliaments both in the UK and in broadly democratic territories elsewhere in the world that they do not allow their contacts with leading members of political parties in other countries to be entangled in obvious "controversies".
Ironically, Khaleda Zia’s late husband, Ziaur Rahman too visited Tower Hamlets 20 years ago when he held the post of President of Bangladesh. But he was not subjected to a manufacturing by the local Tower Hamlets Council. In contrast to Tuesday’s events featuring Khaleda Zia, her husband 20 years earlier had been given a rousing welcome by probably the biggest gathering of Bangladeshis assembled in an open air event of that kind ever in the UK. There were under 20 persons who did chant slogans against him. But the Ziaur Rahman reception, held at the Allen Gardens, off Brick Lane, had been an event that was open to and attended by Bangladeshis of all backgrounds and political views.
Why?
Because that event was NOT organised by Party Political clique or grouping.
Non-Partisan Bangladeshis wanted to offer the person in Post in Bangladesh a broad welcome. Can that lesson be repeated next time in Tower Hamlets?
Will the Bangladsesh-based Political Parties evidently operating with increasing frequency in the UK generally and in Tower Hamlets with particular concentration over the past five years or so, show the distinction that will do lasting and democratic good to them and to the vast majority of ordinary Bangladeshis who do not belong to any of the parties?
Will Tower Hamlets Council stop behaving as a segregation corner as well on such occasions and will they instead start inviting people from all backgrounds in the borough to be part of any “reception” that is held in the “town hall” that is supposed to belong to all the people here? 0535 Hrs Wednesday 18 May 2011

Don't get Mary P started! She's hardly started peddling Big Biz TESCO! [1]

Don't get Mary P started! She's hardly started peddling Big Biz TESCO! [1]
0905 [0845] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 17 May 2011. AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque “World Mainstream Media is a tool for Big Business Military Industrial Complex agenda of robbing the world and of keeping the status quo of robbery on the world stage...” Commentary.
This is a picture of Mary Portas.
She is part of the image they use to mislead the ordinary public.
More on Mary P later on in this updater diagnostic series.
Do the headlines hide more than they reveal today? Under the cloud DSK, Muammar Gaddafi and Chris Huhne!
The answer is a resounding YES.
No to the AV scam that Huhne was so fervent about. But YES to the question about the headlines.
Just like Huhne is in denial so is Muammar Gaddafi as is Dominique Strauss-Kahn. But the very media that is doing the hiding is doing so with far deeper thought than may appear entailed from even this diagnosis. So what is the deeper thought? Take a look at each of the items and see if you can work out the element that is the at the core. And that element is the consistency. Without fail, the three items focus on the individuals. They do NOT even have a hint about the agenda that is, on the facts, Big Business.
Muammar Gaddafi is now the target because that is what suits Big Business. That is what MIC wants now. MIC does not want Syria to be treated the same as Libya. That is why Assad Junior is not being targeted with the additional ICC crawler. Nor is anyone in Yemen or indeed in Bahrain. Or indeed in Tunisia...Flick back to New York and you find that there is no instant interviews with a single person that can tell on how the IMF created poverty, famine, hunger and starvation all over the world, especially in Asia and in Africa and in parts of South America......
Contrast that with the instant finding of the blond - yes the Hungarian one for a start or, to put it in a gradual way, to count one....] - with tales of IMF bureaucracy's “outrage” because, the blond now reportedly asserts [she is cutely based in London now with a more lucrative job!] they had undermined her true feelings as they had closed franks and in effect deterred her from going all the way with her genuine complaints against DSK over her affair with him!
There is not an iota of concern for the MILLIONS of women in Asia and Africa whose very breath was [collective] taken out of them by the hunger, famine and starvation that the IMF IMPOSED as part of the conditions for austerity measures on those “little” countries. “Little” in the context of the world-stage power that those regimes could exert as against the TERROR that the IMF creates on any regime in economic crisis..
[To be continued]

Do they remember how many perished of hunger, starvation and famine in Ireland? [1]

Do they remember how many perished of hunger, starvation and famine in Ireland? [1]
AADHIKRonline © Muhammad Haque Irish Commentary,
07056 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
17 May 2011.
At the time of writing this at 0705 [0650] Hrs GMT Tuesday 17 May 2011, the BBC TV Breakfast pogramme had not, so far as I could ascertain, broadcast an interview with anyone about the Irish famine.
Yet the atrocity of the Irish famine was just slipped into a despatch filed from Dublin a few minutes after the pogramme let the presenting duo do their routine flicking through the papers! There was no follow up to the item and the running order, so far, doesn’t suggest that there will be. So what should the BBC do? They should read what I am going to tell them about famine today and they should stop lying to the ‘viewers’ and listeners about the economy regality in Ireland and in the UK as well.
[To be continued]

Kay Jordan's work very much resonates with the best of the "Poplar Councillors" work.

Kay Jordan's work very much resonates with the best of the "Poplar Councillors" work.
0435 Hrs GMT London Monday 16 May 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. I am saying that Kay Jordan's work very much resonates with the best of the "Poplar Councillors" work. They had battled for ordinary people in the East End of London in the 1920s. Kay Jordan began her work nearly sixty years alter. . I shall show just how universal values of humanity link people who are chronologically apart even by as many almost 100 years.
[To be continued]
ç [From previous post] Jon Cruddus [MP, a contender to Labour Party leadership, pulled out before the finish] tells Muhammad Haque about the values of George Lansbury- resist peoples dispossession.... AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London “democracy deficit and poverty-creation, deprivation by elected antidemocratic agencies” Commentary: The Paralysis of Tower Hamlets Labour Party and the morass that is Tower Hamlets “elected local Council” [Part 62] 0410 Hrs GMT London Monday 16 May 2011. I only had a few seconds to get Jon Cruddus to comment on the situation in Tower Hamlets in the context of the traditions of George lansbury. Cruddus was able to sum up as follows, continuing his phraseology as based on my question to him: [Jon Cruddus] [it is all about] resistance to people’s dispossession, from their land, from their own labour, from their franchise That was a very brief statement. But it captures the essence. The battle in Tower Hamlets is against the dispossession that has been going on via the VERY elected local Council which is supposed to be helping people mount that resistance. And Jon Cruddus, the ‘left’ MP who nearly got in where Ed Miliband now is, had spoken in more detail about George Lansbury earlier at the event [Bow Church Sunday 08 may 2011]. What he had said there and what he later told me [quoted above] confirm one thing. That had George Lansbury been around now in Tower Hamlets along with his fellow Poplar Councillors, the borough would be witnessing a very different scene of acton every day than what is being foisted on the community now. And George Lansbury would have been outraged by the antics of the “chief executive” “Dr” Kevan Collins who posed with a man known on the facts and undeniable evidence to have been guilty of causing significant dispossessions to people in the East End borough of Tower Hamlets over the years. [To be continued]

Jon Cruddus [MP] on George Lansbury's values: resist and fight dispossession...

Jon Cruddus [MP] on George Lansbury's values: resist and fight dispossession...
Jon Cruddus [MP, a contender to Labour Party leadership, pulled out before the finish] tells Muhammad Haque about the values of George Lansbury- resist peoples dispossession....
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London “democracy deficit and poverty-creation, deprivation by elected antidemocratic agencies” Commentary:
The Paralysis of Tower Hamlets Labour Party and the morass that is Tower Hamlets “elected local Council” [Part 62]
0410 Hrs GMT London Monday 16 May 2011.
I only had a few seconds to get Jon Cruddus to comment on the situation in Tower Hamlets in the context of the traditions of George lansbury. Cruddus was able to sum up as follows, continuing his phraseology as based on my question to him:
[Jon Cruddus] [it is all about] resistance to people’s dispossession, from their land, from their own labour, from their franchise
That was a very brief statement. But it captures the essence. The battle in Tower Hamlets is against the dispossession that has been going on via the VERY elected local Council which is supposed to be helping people mount that resistance. And Jon Cruddus, the ‘left’ MP who nearly got in where Ed Miliband now is, had spoken in more detail about George Lansbury earlier at the event [Bow Church Sunday 08 may 2011].
What he had said there and what he later told me [quoted above] confirm one thing. That had George Lansbury been around now in Tower Hamlets along with his fellow Poplar Councillors, the borough would be witnessing a very different scene of acton every day than what is being foisted on the community now.
And George Lansbury would have been outraged by the antics of the “chief executive” “Dr” Kevan Collins who posed with a man known on the facts and undeniable evidence to have been guilty of causing significant dispossessions to people in the East End borough of Tower Hamlets over the years. [To be continued]

Paralysis in the Tower Hamlets “Labour Party” and morass afflicting the UNDERHAND Council

Paralysis in the Tower Hamlets “Labour Party”  and morass afflicting the UNDERHAND Council
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London “democracy deficit and poverty-creation, deprivation by elected non-democratic agencies” Commentary:

0340 Hrs GMT London Monday 16 May 2011 The paralysis in the Tower Hamlets “Labour Party” and the democracy deficit and morass afflicting the “elected” Tower Hamlets Council [Part 61] .

One of the world-scale scandals that has been documented over the past 40 years but is yet to be featured in any “mainstream” media outlets warranting the “mainstream” attention is the case of the neighbourhood which has been uprooted by the collusion of Tower Hamlets Council... And the only beneficiary is a property speculator who has made a multi million £ fortune in an overseas country where he has been able to “invest” part of the proceeds that he was allowed to loot from the neighbourhood in Tower Hamlets.
So how does THAT “achievement ” takes the commentary back to “Dr” Kevan Collins? Why the “postholder” in the post of “chief executive” of the Tower Hamlets Council has been more than adequately aware of all the facts and despite that awareness has failed [as in 'negligently refused'] stop the robbery of an entire neighbourhood by the property speculator. Did “Dr” Kevan Collins even suggest that such possibilities might exist in the Tower Hamlets Borough Council's’ “delivery of service” to the community? Most certainly not.
Why wouldn't’ “Dr” Kevan Collins admit such robbery that Tower Hamlets Council has been complicit in being committed against the people in the neighbourhood? Was it because “Dr” Collins might not have been personally in post at the time that the robbery was being committed? That questions is irrelevant. Why? Because in the COURSE of the preparation for his appearance as “the star” [the word used by “EAST END LIES”, the TH Council’s very own propaganda sheet or ‘pravda’!] in Channel 4 TV ’s “The UNDERCOVER BOSS” “Dr” Kevan Collins did acquire sufficient knowledge about one particular individual carrying serious liabilities for that very same robbery committed by the property speculator speculator against a neighbourhood in Tower Hamlets. So what did “Dr” Kevan Collins do about the individual's liabilities and those of the Council on whose behalf the individual had acted in collusion with the particular property speculator in the completion of the perpetration? Did “Dr” Kevan Collins take steps to make amends for the robbery, even though no amount of material compensation could go anywhere near compensating the victims of that robbery? “Dr” Kevan Collins most certainly did not. In fact “Dr” Kevan Collins did not show any hint that anything could be anywhere near as criminally negligent inside Tower Hamlets Council as the particular facts show. Far from admitting any faults, “Dr” Collins was on that “UNDERCOVER BOSS” as the “star” of the propaganda show! And how satisfied his grins looked as the viewers who were “fortunate” to catch even a momentary glimpse of “Dr” Collins during his “I am THE BOSS! And I conned you posing as Colin! Ha Ha Ha!” Roundtable DOUBLE SMUG SESSION, also staged on film at a location inside the “Mulberry Place” must have only too acutely been forced to realise!!!!!

“Dr” Kevan Collins uttered a series of untruths on “UNDERCOVER BOSS” as broadcast on Channel 4 [22 July 2010] as he promoted that man who is responsible for a serious part of the damage done to the neighbourhood. That man is an employee in Tower Hamlets Council where he has been in a paid post for almost [if not more than] [number withheld for very good legal editorial reasons] years.

The magnitude of the damage that that employee has been responsible for causing to the victims of his collusion with the particular part of the property speculator’s scam can only be guessed at. Why? Because the facts are that CONTRARY TO being a democratic local authority “with its services being lawfully ethically democratically dedicated to serve the people in the borough”, Tower Hamlets Council is a private business IN FACT and it is controlled by a clique of uncaring self servers bent on making a fast gain for themeless regardless of the cost of their callouts conduct that the community has to bear. Why is that so? Because the “elected” councillors, the majority of them, are democratically inactive and in several cases incapable of even being democratically active.
For this paralysis, a great deal of fault lies with the main [numerical] Political Party that claims the largest number of elected councillors on the Council. The Labour Party in Tower Hamlets has been effectively paralysed itself for ten long years.
Although the records show that the Labour Party had been democratically malfunctioning in Tower Hamlets even before that, the paralysis in the past decade has reached a new low even for the Tower Hamlets Labour Party.
How?
[To be continued]

The STRAUSS-KAHN SHOCK WAVE hits France Politics

The STRAUSS-KAHN SHOCK WAVE hits France Politics
0328GMT Monday 16 May 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. Will Big Business succeed in absorbing the shock wave of the propaganda that has spread over the Strauss-Kahn arrest and will it be able to contain the impact on the rest of Capitalism? Our answer is: Yes it will. Just look at the OTHER huge scandals that occurred in New York, New York in the last year alone. All the Big Biz perpetrators have been reinstated one way or another. Capitalism rules! And that is bad news for ordinary people. Everywhere. If there ‘might’ be alternative economic, political ‘systems’ to expose and to permanently replace capitalism, those systems have not surfaced. Not yet. And so long as that is the case, capitalist abuses and violations and looting continue. Phase after every scandalous phase. And as the bureaucracy has confirmed, the IMF is in business as usual, despite Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s ‘difficulties’. Whether he has been trapped or not, the fact is that MONEY Talks. And the IMF should know that more than anyone else! And MONEY has begun to talk around Strauss-Kahn already.... [To be continued]

ANGELA Lansbury speaking of her grandfather George Lansbury's fight for justice for all humanity...

ANGELA Lansbury speaking of her grandfather George Lansbury's fight for justice for all humanity...
Examining the paralysis in Tower Hamlets “Labour Party” and the morass that is the “elected” Tower Hamlets Council [60]
2108 [1735] Hrs GMT London Sunday 15 May 2011. AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London “Democratic deficit and poverty of principles in the behaviour of the elected careerists in the UK..” Commentary. Examining the paralysis in Tower Hamlets “Labour Party” and the morass that is the “elected” Tower Hamlets Council [60]
HASTENING to ADD that the role of Jim Fitzpatrick in destroying all values of universal democracy, ethical; representation and accountability in the East End of London remains as persistent this weekend as it was in February 2010.
If an objective thinking, non-careerist person took a random look at the utterances of Jim Fitzpatrick, [still the claimant to one of the two ‘parliamentary seats’ in the name of the electors in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets] on the subject of the democratic needs of the community that makes up the “Borough” then the only consistent thing they are going to find is the fact that Jim Fitzpatrick has been at the top of the league for inconsistency, unreliability on democratic demands and needs of the people.
No wonder that he was not seen to be playing any known, let alone noticeable p[art in celebrating the work of the ‘Poplar councillors’ or indeed of George Lansbury! That Jim Fitzpatrick has not been so seen proves that alarm bells should keep ringing all across the East End.
Examining in context the role that Jim Fitzpatrick played in confusing the community about the democratic needs in the Borough:
Jim Fitzpatrick has oscillated from saying NO to an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets to doing YES without exhibiting a shred of conscientious obligation to account for his unreliable "principle" on the matter. But, then, Jim Fitzpatrick is not alone in the unreliability stance in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. He is part of the collective bankruptcy damaging the democratic rights of the East End people across Tower Hamlets that is encountered in the conduct of the publicly paid for postholders that crave and seek the places they hold in the name of the local voters and at the expense of democratic representation in the area. They undermine the values of Society and they give succour to the likes of CONDEM Golds who, like them, lacks any traceable moral consistency. Peter Golds too changed his 'stance' without giving a moral, ethical, democratic account for his betrayal of the principles that he had so publicly claimed to espouse when he made that appearance at the routine, unenlightening, uninformative, stultified ‘do’ allegedly staged in support of the “NO” ‘campaign’ by the time-servers concerned taking every fibre of life and incentive out of the proceedings. So barren were the proceedings that the “gathering” became a vacuum with the passage of every minute and while “speakers” were still being “called”. By the time the emptiness was complete, “everyone present was a speaker” and there was no-one left to EVEN “hear them” let to “listen to them’! This is how Jim Fitzpatrick,k and his then “friends in the NO to a directly elected mayor” put paid to the sustenance of a tangible grass roots movement and this is how they aided and abetted the very elements that had conspired to undermine the already fragile democratic foundations on which the still “elected” London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council “stood”.
[To be continued]
[Previous editions] Introducing the words as actually spoken by Angela Lansbury in Tower Hamlets in honouring George Lansbury [and the “Poplar Councillors” who fought alongside with him in the 1920s and defended the community in the East End] [Part 2]
In this introduction, I am setting out very briefly the context of the overdue and rightly deserved honour and respect paid to the Poplar Councillors and to George Lansbury. They stand out as being among the rare numbers who made the East End really proud. Would that the same could be said of a single one of their “followers” as ‘elected councillors” over the last 90 years!
What a painfully long time those 90 years represent!
By © Muhammad Haque 1000 [0900] [0845] [0825] Hrs London Sunday 15 May 2011.

It may have escaped the attention of most “professional” “journalists 'working in London" “at the present time” but a little piece of true history was created a week ago today in the East End of London. And I am talking of course about the stunning moment in 1921 that was recalled at a well-deserved celebration of all those involved in the original act. The name most mentioned was of course that of George Lansbury. For the obvious reason that he was the one who had the more high profile positions in the ‘Lansbury Party’.
However, the Poplar councillors who had taken the stand and who were prepared to risk being sent to jail and and in the event did go all the way and did spend time in jail were also honoured in the words that were spoken. Those words may sound familiar to people who know about the struggle that took place on that “democracy deficit” stage that prevailed in the 1920s in the East End. The deficit was addressed by the “Poplar councillors” and their supporters who took the stand that did credit to the cause of democracy generally and to the people of the East End in particular.
What a refreshing change t makes even to refer to ANY group of councillors about Tower Hamlets in this positive way, in May 2011!
In May 2011, there is no sign of any democratic activities by the “elected councillors”. Instead, there is plenty of evidence that if anything most of the “elected councillors” “in the name of wards in the London borough of Tower Hamlets” who are on the public payroll as “elected councillors” are at once in effect ignorant of the “Poplar Councillors” [associated with George Lansbury] and are equally abysmally contemptuous of any call on them to get active and in a democratically accountable and honestly transparent way. [To be continued]

Westminster City Council's Ms Roe has got to do much better than stage an accessible fakery [1]

Westminster City Council's Ms Roe has got to do much better than stage an accessible fakery [1]
0930 [0925] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 11 may 2011. © Muhammad Haque London Communities Commentary. KHOODEELAAR! TOLD Westminster City Council so for years! As we have told other London councils over the same period. That spinning, faking and lying won’t do. Now they are faking about housing and pretending to have some sort of ‘sympathy’ with the people in low income housing but Westminster Council generally and their fronter Phillipa Roe in particular are forgetting that their looting of the low paid and the nopaid is still hurting more people than they will ever admit. THAT should be addressed. that si, Westminster must stop robbing the poor. [To be continued]

The Power of the Old! The Lansbury's race way ahead of todays 'young' 'leaders' [2]

The Power of the Old! The Lansbury's race way ahead of todays 'young' 'leaders'  [2]
The Power of the Old! The Lansburys race way ahead of today's 'young' 'leaders' [2]

2350 Hrs GMT London Sunday 08 May 2011.
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque contextual Action Commentary in honour of the Poplar Councillors and the campaigners’ leader George Lansbury.
Will those ‘movers and shakers’ from today’s ‘democratic’ positions who also turned up at the memorial event [Bow Church, Bow Road, london E3] dedicated by name to George Lansbury and including of course the contextual acknowledgement of the work of Lansbury’s fellow campaigners the batch of Poplar councillors [1921], behave as those had done? Will they be honest?
Will they be truthful?
Will they care? How much will they care? How will they show that they care?
Will they be traceable by their records or will they vanish before the public's eyes as opportunities knock?
How many of today’s councillors on Tower Hamlets Borough Council even know about the Poplar Councillors?
Given that I have been writing about them and talking about them. admittedly on and off, for more than 30 years, I have yet to come across one single member of Tower Hamlets Council who has mention a single word about the Poplar Councillors who went top prison 90 years ago in order to defend the community that they genuinely, legitimately represented e [To be continued]
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque Economic Reports in the context of the “memorial in recognition of the Poplar Councillors of 1921 and of the loadership of George Lansbury as exclusively commented on and reported on saturday 07 May 2011 and earlier today Sunday 08 May 2011.
THIS UPDATER report is published at 1935 Hrs GMT London Sunday 08 May 2011.
CONTRAST these [previous posts] statements being made in May 2011, two months after the 08 March 2011 decision by Tower Hamlets Council to APPROVE the CONDEM CUTS budget! What does that say about Tower Hamlets Council?
ADD also the fact that since we created the awareness about the CONDEM CUTS agenda-backing 'tabloid' [as well as the other, ‘broadsheet’ CON media] assault on the “Ethiopian arrival family in Tower Hamlets”, the controlling clique on the same Council has stayed silent about what they are doing to stop the attacks on the lawfully entitled and the lawfully needy in the Borough. Contrast and observe, secondly, also the profusion of propaganda by the same Tower Hamlets Council clique in the same period [the last two weeks, since our investigative reports were first published here by AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque] . That profusion of propaganda has been for the Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique making all manner of untruthful claims about the clique ‘saving the community’.
We [the KHOODEELAAR! Movement] are warning here and in our related posts on associated sites, that Tower Hamlets population is now at the front of the targets for poverty attacks by CONDEM. We also WARN that the poverty attacks are being MOUNTED with the collusion of the controlling bureaucracy in the UK Labour Party in Parliament.
[To be continued] [from a separate post] AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 0115 Hrs GMT London Sunday 08 May 2011: They marched to the High Court and possibly to prison! Who were they? East End councillors, of course! And the reason for their march? To protect the deprived community from the unfair, unequal burden of tax that was being imposed to keep the wealthy London boroughs and institutions going while the poor deprived East Enders lost out and went without! I have written too much already. Time to pause! Of course I have left out the little matter of the time when these events took place. They did not march this past week. Nor in the past year. In fact the march took place nearly a hundred years ago! In 1921! [To be continued]

Kay Jordan speaking at a KHOODEELAAR! NO to “Crossrail sham exhibition” Demo. Left in the pix HARDE

Kay Jordan speaking at a KHOODEELAAR! NO to “Crossrail sham exhibition” Demo. Left in the pix HARDE
Kay Jordan speaking at a KHOODEELAAR! NO to “Crossrail sham exhibition” Demo. Left in the pix HARDEEP KAUR

Muhammad Haque Comment on the local Council in the context of the democracy deficit in the UK today

Muhammad Haque Comment on the local Council in the context of the democracy deficit in the UK today
0040 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
05 May 2011.
Muhammad Haque Comment on the local Council in the context of the democracy deficit that is plaguing the entire UK today, of all days, the day when there is a local councils election programme on as well as a so called referendum on the ALTERNATIVE VOTING ‘system’
[More Muhammad Haque Commentary on this separately]


I quote you [Mike Brooke, East London Advertiser online, dated 04 May 2011] :
[“] Angela Lansbury unveils a commemorative plaque on Saturday to honour her grandfather’s life and the legacy he left behind—an East End that fights for social justice against the odds. [”]
So how are the current “elected Councillors” on Tower Hamlets Council keeping up the tradition of the Poplar Councillors and of George Lansbury?
On 8 March 2011, I had arrived at the “Mulberry Place” “Town Hall” intending to observe the “Budget setting” session of the “Full Council”. I was surprised to find that iron barriers had been placed all over the entrance to the building with a number of uniformed Metropolitan Police officers present. There was hardly anybody else around on the outside of the building Then I spotted about five persons standing on a side. When I asked them why they were there instead of being inside the Council chamber, they said they had been refused entry.
I saw a semi-uniformed, security-guard-type person who told me that the “chief executive” [“Dr” Kevan Collins] had “advised” that just under 50 person would be allowed to enter the “public gallery”. No reason was available. I also saw the clearly displayed notice to the effect that person wanting to get into the meeting would have to submit to searches and if they rescued they would not be allowed into the building. Did your paper report any of this?
And did you come across any precedent for the Stockade-style barriers that the current clique on Tower Hamlets Council has taken to putting up in order to suppress the people of the Borough from even being able to observe what little the “elected” councillors actually show of their true roles when attending the cuts-making procedures that are reducing the East End’s ‘democratically elected local Council” to an ever authoritarian entity colluding with the agenda ofd making the population here even more deprived than it is already?
0100 Hrs Thursday 05 May 2011

SAY NO on Thursday 05 May 2011.

SAY NO on Thursday 05 May 2011.
SAY NO on Thursday 05 May 2011.

Time to SAY NO to Greg Dyke one more time! No to another war monger faking furiously for Clegg!

Time to SAY NO to Greg Dyke one more time! No to another war monger faking furiously for Clegg!
Time to SAY NO to Greg Dyke one more time! No to another war monger faking furiously for Clegg!

What about the freedom of the millions of innocent people being starved by BigBiz agenda 'media'?

What about the freedom of the millions of innocent people being starved by BigBiz agenda 'media'?
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque “World Press Freedom Day” Commentary.
1435 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 03 May 2011.
Truth telling is impossible without journalists telling the truth.
Most of the world’s - and the localities’- injustices would be worse without some sort of journalistic intervention that is broadly equivalent to a check on those excesses and the latent propensities for worse if the real motive sans mental makeup of the given power holder or the power seeker is examined on their conduct and their complicit parts.
But WHICH category or COLOUR of Journalist is this WORLD PRESS FREEDOM DAY supposed to protect, respect, honour, recognise and reward with the security that the plugs all day have been calling for?
How warmongering, environmental pollution, big biz crimes and concerted attempts at maintaining authoritarian regimes in the West and in the rest of the world?
What are the relationships and the comparisons between the UK ‘local press’ and the ‘Fleet Street’ titles? Does Anna Wintour get the same access as say any other Anna who too is on the staff of a ‘news’ organisation?
How many Asian journalist are EVER heard of in the West as per routine?
How many Asian news media corporations in fact are voluntarily servile to the Western media outfits e.g. the Big ones that operate from the USA, UK, France, Germany, Canada and Australia?
How many journalists have quit what Western media conglomerates and Corporations [typified by the BBC] as proof of their [those journalists’] rejection of the wrongful agenda of the employer corporate
on and or conglomerate or Big business? [To be continued]

London Guardian over exaggerates another Murdoch Media miniature mishap: Obama 'as' Osama!

London Guardian over exaggerates another Murdoch Media miniature mishap: Obama 'as' Osama!
0100 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
03 May 2011.
AADHIKAROnline London Commentary.
The Guardian should look at ITS record over the past 70 years. Long before Rupert Murdoch or FOX TV of the USA had ANY presence anywhere in the world. the Guardian had a very serious place, as an EMPIRE promoting organ of the British Empire. Looked at on a day to day basis, the Guardian has worn the veneer of ‘the definitive liberal daily newspaper in the English language ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD’ and under the that lethally untruthful and deceptive veneer the Guardian has conducted the CRUSADE more effectively than the entire collection of the rest of Fleet Street and the regional English newspapers put together have done. As has the Guardian done again during ‘Bank Holiday’ Monday 02 May 2011. it has served the cause of Empire more effectively than all of its so-called rival titles of the allegedly reactionary Right put together have done. So who will expose the Guardian?
[To be continued]

End inhuman cuts! Sustain Society! One demand, millions chorus: Stop the cuts! Deliver humanity!

End inhuman cuts! Sustain Society! One demand, millions chorus: Stop the cuts! Deliver humanity!
Kay Jordan’s work sustaining the Community in the East End of London
UPDATER REPORT By © Muhammad Haque
1430 [1140] GMT London [Bank Holiday] Monday 02 May 2011.
Space, shape, size and strength. These are the four qualities that I think are vital for any structure. And these came through with apparently natural ease when Kay Jordan got to work as the community architect that she allowed herself to be known as. The community that Kay Jordan built has all those ingredients. And more.
The most important of the other ingredients is the force of life that Kay Jordan sustained for thirty years. In each of the individuals that she came across, the ones that approached her, the ones that were introduced to Kay, she saw this force in their most acute forms. How? Because the people that Kay Jordan has been supporting, in the 30 years of devotion, have appeared to her to be in need of sustenance. And Kay has made that sustenance available as if she herself has not been in need of any!
During this past week, I have been continuing to speak to people in the Brick Lane London E1 area. These conversations have been quite by chance.
I have been speaking quite a bit this past week or so with Shamsuddin. Two days ago, he introduced me to his daughter who is now aged ten. As soon as he had done that, Shamsuddin got excited as he remembered a meeting when his daughter had been four years old. He said that Kay Jordan was walking towards him. When he told her about his daughter, Kay immediately picked the child up and gave her an affectionate embrace and then hugged him as well. Something very special for everyone she met. Something that is so special that those who felt it still cherish the moment.

Thursday 5 May 2011 marks No way for a democratic future for ordinary people in Britain

Thursday 5 May 2011 marks No way for a democratic future for ordinary people in Britain
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary
1510 Hrs GMT London Sunday 01 May 2011.
The latest set of promises and pledges being paraded by the contenders at Thursdays “elections” and the REFERENDUM.
In Britain, “democracy” continues the slide into deficit under compelling corruption of CONDEM COLLUSION:
As even the BBC admits in this despatch, the contesting parties in Scotland are all offering cuts. The contest for votes is overwhelmed by the contest to come across as convincingly cuts-committing! Crass. Corrupt.
No way to claim that democracy has anything to do with what the candidates are after! They want to ‘get in’. It is typical scramble for the ‘seat’, literally speaking. Not for upholding anything if it is to do with any universal ethical transparent value or principle for domestic audit and or accountability. Except the claims for the expenses and the push for a place in the [any, the given] ‘controlling’ cabinet. And therein lies another compelling proof that a YES on the referendum about AV will make the disaster a nightmare for ordinary people. [To be continued]

"Sylhet Channel" to "Channel S"! What should OFCOM do with the contents ? [1]

"Sylhet Channel" to "Channel S"! What should OFCOM do with the contents ? [1]
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary on the contents of SKY.com satellite channel 814 dated 30 April 2011.

I am asking the main question as follows: How far has "Sylhet Channel" moved away from the pledges it had given to the community when it applied to UK OFCOM for licence ?
This is the evidential theme of this series of examination of the ole being played by the SKY.com satellite channel 814.
1405 [1350] [1340] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
01 May 2011. I am using this clip merely to illustrate the point that the ordinary events in the ordinary day to day life of the Bangladeshi community is not truthfully or informatively recognised in the contents of any of the channels.
As Channel 814 has been promoted more than any of the others, I am focussing on that channel. In due course, I shall examine the other channels as well.
The bit that I am examining here is stated to be from Seelot. It shows a relatively long piece about the funeral of a member of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party who had died in the UK the previous week.
If the footage shown is truthful, objectively edited and presented and if it is any guide to the objective reality about the ordinary peoples’ true attitude towards ‘Political Parties’ then there is no doubt that at least for the present time, the Seelotee speaking Bangladeshi people who are ordinarily resident in the UK do not have their heart for playing any real part in the ‘democratic process” in place in the context of “life” in the UK. Their main “[party] political energies” are being used for the Bangladesh-based Political Parties.
Is this odd?
In more ways than one.
For a start, the OFCOM licence is [has been] sought and justified on the main claim that the Channel would serve the relevant information needs of the Seelotee speaking Bangladeshis in the UK.
This is the true explanation of why the same Channel had been started as “Sylhet Channel”. Suddenly, the word “Sylhet” was dropped from the name. And with that dropping was confirmed the dropping of the stated aim. I shall examine that fact in the necessary detail in this series.
[To be continued]

BBC's concealment of the truth costing the world incalculable amounts in every respect [1]

BBC's concealment of the truth costing the world incalculable amounts in every respect [1]
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.
0610 [0540][0530] GMT
Friday
29 April 2011.
The ITV News bulletin shown at 0430 GMT ended with their preview of the day’s Fleet Street newspaper front pages. One theme dominates everything the media is spreading today the wedding of Kate and William.
The one item which the mainstream media in Britain is hiding is of course the cost of it. The DAILY TELEGRAPH accepts [in a piece that it is not displaying prominently in th version shown on the BBC previews] that the wedding is going to cost the UK Economy more than £5 Billion.
Not so the BBC.
In their first bulletins of the day so far, ‘BBC London’, fronted by the very tellingly named Asad Ahmed, put on the state of denial on the part of the BBC. Asad Ahmed read a script that boastfully claimed that the [London] ‘economy’ was set to ‘benefit’ to the tune of £Millions because of the arrival in London of the extra number of visitors drawn by the Wedding! Now at that rate, the BBC will declare the UK Economy one of the most prosperous in the world today by the time the formalities of the Wedding are finished! The mind boggles at the BBC’s capacity to lie to the public about events in the rest of the world. How much is the BBC’s lying costing the world every day! [To be continued]

From petitioning the Council "against Brick Lane touting" to touting for notoriety

From petitioning the Council "against Brick Lane touting" to touting for notoriety
1615 Hrs GMT London Thursday 28 April 2011.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.

Brick Lane London E1 area "Tory activist" surfaces in Wales and is reprimanded for last year attacking the Respect Party in Tower Hamlets.
The news item is carried by the BBC and of course by the regional online and related media outlets in Wales this afternoon

This little incident does not rank as a world-level event whose impact should include the bringing down of the UK CONDEM ‘Foreign Minister’ William Hague and his empire of cards as they continue to look ridiculously unsteady across the huge north African and Middle Eastern horizons.
Bahrain, Yemen, Egypt, Syria, Libya, Tunisia, to name only a few of the many locations that the current CONDEM Collusion as fronted by Matt Smith’s ‘leader’ David Cameron has been busily engaging in ‘business’ in in the name of the ‘citizens’ [are there really legal ‘citizens’ in the UK? On a day of all days, the ‘eve of’ the ‘Royal Wedding’ [29 April 2011], surely there are only ‘subjects’!] of the UK!
The most persistent theme being flaunted on top of everything else as the ‘reason’ for the UK’s military and related involvements in the North African and Middl Eastern countries listed above, is the alleged - nay, the ASSERTED, ‘moral impulsion’ as IN EFFECT touted by the likes of Mr William Hague, the Foreign Minister! That the Dave Cameron CONDEM is “morally outraged “at the violations of so many innocent civilians’ rights.. in Libya that it [the Dave Cameron CONDEM] is left with no options but to do the business in Libya for which the Empire flag carriers are known for......However deserving the CONDEM Collusion may be for disintegration, the antics of the minor CONDEM backing Matt Smith as exposed in this incident do not constitute anything remotely relevant to politics.
This irrelevance of Matt Smith to UK politics may be his own version of ‘reality’. That fantasy as reality was on display at the start of this year. In February 2011,, Matt Smith flaunted a persona that very nearly suggested that he was not only physically present in inner city East End of London but that he was quite democratically and constitutionally exercised about the state of societal standards and values here. He materialised as a petitioner and appeared formally in the notional Town Hall inside the Mulberry Place [ a month before that building was treated as a Stockade by the allegedly non-CONDEM Council carrying out CONDEMN cuts! by barring MOST potential opponents to the CUTS BUDGET dated 8 March 2011] at 5 Clove Crescent London E14 2BG and almost succeeded in coming across as a genuine opponent of Curry Restaurants-linked touting that raged in Brick Lane and outraged the ‘local residents’ according to his presentation.
So where HAS MATT SMITH been in the months since he staged that wee stunt at the Town hall dated 2 february 2011? Has he been ‘continuing’ the contacts [he boasted of as he stood before the full Council on 2 February 2011] with the other local residents as well as the 'local businesses’ and has he returned to the Tower Hamlets Council and updated that body on his achievements? Has he, incidentally, noticed any local activities by any volunteering and campaigning organisation engaged in really brining an edn to the touting nuisance and scandal?
As far as we can ascertain, Matt Smith has been VERY quiet on all these fronts.
And we have to ‘thank’ the BBC and the Welsh regional news outfits for bring a semblance of an explanation as to why!
Matt Smith has been getting his arms every so gently twisted by the Party High Command which in turn had come under calls to apologise! For some untoward businesses that Matt Smith himself has been engaged in! Touting notoriety! [To be continued]

Word in Brick Lane about Komor Uddin

Word in Brick Lane about Komor Uddin
1625 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 27 April 2011: By © Muhammad Haque.
I have spoken in the past 80 minutes to a Brick Lane London E1 area resident and supporter of the Khoodeelaar! campaign.
He volunteered the information that he had been to the Whitechapel Road London E1 shortly before, attending the Islamic funeral prayers at the East London Mosque of a Bangladeshi Party person who has died in the past few days.
The man also mentioned that he had noticed a very large number of people that had tu
rned up for the occasion today. He said that several thousand people had gathered to pay their respects to the Bangladeshi Political Party person.
The name of that person is Mr Komor Uddin.
The Brick Lane London E1 area man also said he had seen the son of the Bangladesh Opposition Begun Khaleda Zia [a former Bangladesh Prime Minister and widow of the former Bangladesh Military President Ziaur Rahman] at the "East London Mosque" today. He said that he had noticed that Tareque Zia [the son of Begum Khaleda] was being helped by supporters as he himself looked frail and was having difficulty walking easily.
[UPDATES may follow, if necessary]

Sustaining the achievements of kay Jordan in sustaining the community: Foysol

Sustaining the achievements of kay Jordan in sustaining the community: Foysol
1440 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
27 April 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
Foysol’s very brief statement is viewable by CLICKING on this image [picture]
Foysol says in that clip that he was born and brought up in the area. And he also has positive memories of Kay Jordan helping everyone. He mentions in particular Kay’s help for the small businesses. This theme is part of the overall Kay Jordan Foundation programmes. More on that and related activities will be posted here and on associated wen sites and blogs. [From the ]
1245 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 27 April 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. Foysol [in my picture, below] has been inspired by Kay Jordan's support and encouragement. Foysol hopes that others will follow Kay Jordan's example. In fact Foysol feels very strongly about that. To him, Kay Jordan has set a phenomenal example that must be continued by others. Some of Foysol’s words to me at the ‘Easter Weekend’ are on the video report that will be accessible from here after 4 PM London time today Wednesday 27 April 2011
[To be continued]

“Brick Lane assault” report by BBC London reinforces Imperialistic prejudices still dominating BBC

“Brick Lane assault” report by BBC  London reinforces Imperialistic prejudices still dominating BBC
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Report.

0220 [0200] [0140] Hrs GMT
Tuesday
26 April 2011.
The BBC London TV news bulletin carried a report about an attack at the 'Easter Weekend' in Brick Lane.
The BBC report was run on the London news slot on the BBC news bulletins but it did not say anything about the alleged attacker or the alleged victim of the attack in Brick Lane three days ago. So what is the point of the BBC reporting a line that only identifies the Police? Even that reference to ‘the police’ is only as the assumed source of the information that the BBC report is based on!
Surely the alleged crime should be fully reported so that Society can get the protection from crime that Society deserves? This incident, the BBC’s minimalist [or minimising] coverage of the attack in Brick Lane, illustrates something about the ‘wider’ British society that is very disturbing indeed. That disturbing thing is the growing acceptance of crime.
Evidence of that acceptance of crime is not just confined to the items that I am diagnosing here. The evidence is found in all the rest of the factual and the editorial contents of the BBC. This may not be immediately apparent to ‘the viewer’. Not so if people make up their mind about the BBC by looking at the packages of ‘violent images’ the BBC delivers to the screen. Those violent images are about ‘other’ people in ‘other countries or territories or even spheres’. That is the sanitisation. And the agenda or the bias operates in relation to the various contemporary segments of the British Society domestically. The corporate agenda or bias in the BBC is now dominated by and is servile to the world view that the Neo Cons have been practising for the past 10 years. So contrary to suggestions that the BBC would like to make, it is in fact operating an imperialistic agenda even about what may at first look like local, ‘very British’ ‘domestic’ events The Brick Lane assault ’news item’ is a very serious example of the lethally prejudiced BBC agenda in operation.

[To be continued]

Exclusive exposure of the brazen failure by OFCOM to do its job on 'ethnicity' TV channels

Exclusive exposure of the brazen failure by OFCOM to do its job on 'ethnicity' TV channels
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.

0900 [0855] [0820] Hrs GMT
‘Bank Holiday’ Monday
25 April 2011

. UPDATER diagnostics on the UK ‘broadcasting regulator’ ‘OFCOM’.
I am citing as evidence a clip shown in the last 60 minutes on SKY.COM satellite channel 814. This is supposed to be a slot operated by an outfit claiming to be providing service to the UK Bangladeshi community. But as the clip shows, the needs of the UK Bangladeshi community or population are not given priority in the ‘news’ ‘bulletin’. In fact in the past five years of OFCOM-licensed operation, the channel has NOT shown any consistent, productive, relevant theme that is in demonstrable accordance with the objectively verifiably contextual UK Bangladeshi community’;s needs for news and information service via this channel.
OFCOM has never published any report of any audit of the contents or of the irrelevance of the contents to the claim that the licence-owner is keeping to the stated undertaking given when seeking and being granted the broadcasting licence.
I shall be examining the key failures of OFCOM starting later today. My examination has been going on for the past five years, the real period from the start of the ‘broadcasting’ via satellite of a ‘dedicated’ satellite TV service IN THE NAME OF THE UK Bangladeshis.
In this context, there is no evidence that any other commentator or writer has published a similar review. Let alone maintaining a regular commentary on or reporting of the ‘operations’.
So why do I bother? Because the overwhelming numbers of those who are subjected to the “service” by what I have have been diagnostically describing as the “ethnicty-linked” are causing serious damage to the community by delivering garbage in the “news” which is replacing the facts that people should know of what is going on in the wider society with day to day and real life implications for the members of the Bangladeshi community.
The absence of OFCOM’s regulatory activity and the absence of any institutional or democratic auditing of these outfits is making the operators increasingly defiant of the legal, contractual, democratic, , ethical, evidential requirements that they must fulfil.
If there is any layer or channel through which pollution is being pumped into the minds of the target community then these channels brought to the ‘living rooms’ and to the various IT devices in use must rank at the top of the list.
Society is being seriously harmed by the agenda of the falsehood being followed by these channels. It is not clear how many years it will take OFCOM tow wake up to this but I can see no indication that the even know that there are contents on these channels. Why do I say this? Because based on their inaction., OFCOM must be treating these channels as sources of revenue. This is capitalist at its most naked. In every sense of the term. In this system, Society has no pl;ace at all. Is Cameron enjoying this assault on Society via a deactivated OFCOM?!!! After all, Cameron cannot be a believer of a thing called Society if the agenda he is following and if the words and the imagers and the fabrications being carried against Society via Dirty Desmond and the Dirty Desmond Express is anything go by. This week.,And even today, “Bank Holiday” Monday [25 April 2011] when the DAILY EXPRESS is relaunching one of the most persistently poisonous hateful front pages aimed against the brainwashed ‘Enders’ subliminally identified targets of venom, intolerance and contempt: the African and the Asian “immigrant”.
OFCOM will fail to notice that on this display of the lowest common denominator racism by the Dirty DAILY EXPRESS , the OFCOM-licensed satellite Channel 814 has no real content in its bulletins.
I shall in the course of this series also examine each of the other ‘factual’ slots as charred on the same channel and show that those are as faked, as fabricated and as false as the so-called ‘news’ bulletin which is where I am focussing for this p[art and for the next four parts of this diagnostic updater commentary being published at 0900 Hrs GMT today Monday 25 April 2011. [To be continued]

East End community tribute to the Unbelievable Kay Jordan: CLICK image to view

East End community tribute to the Unbelievable Kay Jordan: CLICK image to view
0650 Hrs GMT
London
"Bank HolidaY" Monday
25 April 2011
Editor © Muhammad Haque
Another East End community tribute to the Unbelievable Kay Jordan: Shams Uddin. Shams Uddin spoke to me about Kay Jordan in the Greatorex Street off Hanbury Street off Brick Lane London E1 in the evening of Sunday 24 April 2011.
It was in the Greatorex Street that Shamsuddin last saw Kay Jordan. Kay, myself and shamsuddin had tea there in November.
[To be continued].

Ed Miliband nose the answer to the latest CONDEM internecine lies indulgence [1]

Ed Miliband nose the answer to the latest CONDEM internecine lies indulgence [1]
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.
2150 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday 23 April 2011
.
Does Ed Miliband have any answers to the CONDEM crisis? He nose the answer! Yes! he is having his nose done to solve a serious domestic problem. He is said to be set to be free to sleep without snoring! That is not how most of the sanctioned ones feel. They feel they are being teated as criminals. It is now an offences in Britain to be poor! And it is an achievement to be a big time bank looting the poor.
It is all getting upside down, falling apart, going to pieces! Society si fragmenting at a faster speed than could be imagined.
Making Britain poorer is what Big Business is doing.
A tiny fraction of the population is getting richer as a result. Ed Miliband is making the news with his nose! He wants to get more sleep. The poor he neglects can’t afford to sleep!
[To be continued]

BRISTOL! [2] Another contextual update due from Muhammad Haque about Ken Livingstone's "career"

BRISTOL! [2] Another contextual update due from Muhammad Haque about Ken Livingstone's "career"
1000 Hrs GMT London Saturday 23 April 2011. AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.
We ask today: WHAT exactly is the legal basis for Tower Hamlets Council’s IMPOSING NEW POVERTY and hardship on the already impoverished in the Borough?

The question about the “legal basis” is deliberately being published for the attention of the UNDERCOVER BOSS, the Tower Hamlets Council’s top bureaucrat “Dr” Kevan Collins for a number of reasons. The first reason being the boasts that he himself made when he appeared in a Channel 4 TV promotional item called “UNDERCOVER BOSS” shown in 2010. Of the many boasts that “Dr” Collins uttered in that pogramme as shown was one that suggested that he personally and the Tower Hamlets Council.. - as the “local authority” involved in the servicing of the needs of a population of the complexity of Tower Hamlets - were caring to, conscientious about and respectful of the population in the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
The evidence that our investigation has produced is founded on previous findings that we had collected over decades.So showing that Tower Hamlets Council was NOT justified to make the claims that we have now linked “Dr” Kevan Collins with.
The current evidence shows that the BUREAUCRACY in control of the Tower Hamlets Council is behaving very differently from what “Dr” Collins claimed on that Channel 4 TV.
In that TV programme he paraded a number of individual employees and the parade was such that it left no room even for raising the question, let alone for asserting any basis for any such question, that Tower Hamlets Council was in any way failing the community.
We have raised in the months that have followed “Dr” Collins’ promotional appearance on that Channel 4 TV SLOT [“Undercover Boss”] many questions as part of our MOVEMENT in defending the community .

[To be continued]

POVERTY CREATION in East London: How many East London Councils are AIDING and abetting CONDEM ?

POVERTY CREATION in East London: How many East London Councils are AIDING and abetting CONDEM ?
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 0620 GMT Saturday 23 April 2011 Topic in brief: POVERTY CREATION in inner city East London by the CONDEM Collusion: Updater survey Saturday 23 April 2011. This is an updater event online which is being organised to assess the current state of knowledge in the community about the effects the HousinG benefit, Council tax benefit "reviews" will have and are having on people in the area. The primary focus, for the time being and in the context of this week is Tower Hamlets but the main enquiries taking place over a longer time scale include Newham, Hackney, Barking, Redbridge and other East London areas. We are also looking at evidentially comparable and socially and demographically related areas like Ealing, Brent, Westminster, Islington, Camden, Waltham Forest, Southwark, Lambeth, Greenwich and Lewisham [and other boroughs] in London and in the regions in the Midlands and in other parts of England. We shall be publishing the necessary ACTION information here and on our related twitter sites and blogs. twitter.com/aadhikaronline twitter.com/khoodeelaar bricklanenews.blogspot.com This is aimed at creating the action to defend the communities against the poverty-creation programme and attacks by CONDEM and by the state agencies that are supposed to be ‘helping’ the people. In association with: AGENDA Inner Cities AAGAMIEUK AADHIKAR Media Foundation Asian Education Advisory Service [AEAS] AV News CBRUK CERTH Kay Jordan Foundation KHOODEELAAR! Inner Cities Education and Policy Institute [The full list will be updated in due course] [To be continued]

REMEMBER the 'riots! A name to conjure with! Bristol. How are the TWO April riots related?

REMEMBER the 'riots! A name to conjure with! Bristol. How are the TWO April riots related?
Inner city riots! A name to conjure with! Bristol is where the 1980s 'riots' began [Updates]
[1]
1640 Hrs GMT London Friday 22 April 2011. AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.

In Tower hamlets, there were no ‘riots’ that could be mentioned in 1981. So what had happened in the Eats End that made the area so different from even Southall in 1981?
[To be continued]

SAY NO! to CLEGG. Muhammd Haque exposes Nick Clegg's EMPTY AV diversion!

SAY NO! to CLEGG. Muhammd Haque exposes Nick Clegg's EMPTY AV diversion!
© Muhammad Haque COMMENT as published on the web site of the London NEW STATESMAN on Friday 22 April 2011 at 11:06 [UK local Time] The COMMENT rejects the paraded plea for a so-called alternative vote system for election to the UK parliament as scheduled for 05 May 2011. The COMMENt is a comprehensive and brief survey of the democracy deficit that has afflicted society in Britain for a long time The way forward, according to the Muhammad Haque comment this morning , is for ordinary people to take acton ourselves. The acton is spelt out in summary in the texts of the COMMENT, reproduced in full below: Nothing that Nick Clegg has done either as an MP or as Cameron's image-accessory evidentially let alone ethically far less universally accountably should persuade voters to realistically accept that he is telling the truth on his latest farce! But then there is nothing that his current Party, the Lib Dems, has done as a whole in the House of Commons to show that they constitute a coherent, necessary, ethically sound and accountable constitutional pogramme to make society better and enable justice, fairness and safety for ordinary people in their communities and on their estates to come into being through the Lib Dems’ governance. This is true centrally as it is locally. Say NO to Nick Clegg and vote out the tricksters of CONDEM. Start the movement for a just, democratic and accountable society in Britain. Stop the MPs, the peers’ and the CONDEMs’ role as stooges of Big Business Military Industrial Complex and their irresponsible, wasteful indulgences in warmongering. Hold the colluding MPs to account by democratically, constitutionally and sustainably sacking them at the earliest opportunities. Start the movement of local, regional and uk wide democracy and accountability by publicly asking the elected post holders questions about what the people need and in what particulars the elected ones are failing to deliver on all the needs and on all th

Bristol rekindles a faint reminder of protest, long suppressed in Bliared, Thatchered Britain

Bristol rekindles a faint reminder of protest, long suppressed in Bliared, Thatchered Britain
© Muhammad Haque
COMMENT as published on the web site of the London NEW STATESMAN on Friday
22 April 2011
at 11:06 [UK local Time]
The COMMENT rejects the paraded plea for a so-called alternative vote system for election to the UK parliament as scheduled for 05 May 2011
The COMMENt is a comprehensive and brief survey of the democracy deficit that has afflicted society in Britain for a long time
The way forward, according to the Muhammad Haque comment this morning on the NEW STATESMAN, is for ordinary people to take acton ourselves. The acton is spelt out in summary in the texts of the COMMENT, reproduced in full below

Nothing that Nick Clegg has done either as an MP or as Cameron's image-accessory evidentially let alone ethically far less universally accountably should persuade voters to realistically accept that he is telling the truth on his latest farce! But then there is nothing that his current Party, the Lib Dems, has done as a whole in the House of Commons to show that they constitute a coherent, necessary, ethically sound and accountable constitutional pogramme to make society better and enable justice, fairness and safety for ordinary people in their communities and on their estates to come into being through the Lib Dems’ governance.
This is true centrally as it is locally.
Say NO to Nick Clegg and vote out the tricksters of CONDEM. Start the movement for a just, democratic and accountable society in Britain. Stop the MPs, the peers’ and the CONDEMs’ role as stooges of Big Business Military Industrial Complex and their irresponsible, wasteful indulgences in warmongering.
Hold the colluding MPs to account by democratically, constitutionally and sustainably sacking them at the earliest opportunities.
Start the movement of local, regional and uk wide democracy and accountability by publicly asking the elected post holders questions about what the people need and in what particulars the elected ones are failing to deliver on all the needs and on all their pre-poll pledges, promises and ‘assurances’.

EVIDENCE of today's dirty war by Daily EXPRESS on Britain's poor and vulnerable

EVIDENCE of today's dirty war by Daily EXPRESS on Britain's poor and vulnerable
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.
1835 [1830] GMT Thursday 21 April 2011.

Evidentially citing Dirty Desmond's DAILY EXPRESS attacking the poor people and the people in low income in Britain today EVIDENCE of today's dirty war by Daily EXPRESS on Britain's poor and vulnerable. It is not just the poor people. it is also people with NO INCOME. This state of NO INCOME is being Bliared by the Official Opposition in Britain. This tolerance is a tolerance of injustice. Ed Miliband has no excuse for keeping silent on this

[To be continued]

Kay Jordan has personally shown human care for the community under CONDEM attacks [3]

Kay Jordan has personally shown human care for the community under CONDEM attacks [3]
Kay Jordan has personally shown human care for the community under CONDEM attacks [3]
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Report for KHOODEELAAR! Campaign .
UPDATED post here at 1755 [1745] GMT Thursday 21 April 2011.

Harun Miah, a local community businessman based in the Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane London E1, has spoken of his gratitude to Kay Jordan who has been a rare human being. Kay Jordan’s qualities have been felt by all who have known her in the Brick Lane London E1 area. Harun Miah is one of them. He has spoken a few times with deep sense of gratitude for all the humanity that Kay Jordan has shown. Harun Miah is not alone. All his close friends and colleagues in the area feel the same way. The span of Kay Jordan’s sustaining approach to the people in the area can be imagined whenever someone like Harun Miah speaks.
To understand the special qualities of universal humanity that Kay Jordan has shown to so many people in the East End, it is instructive to recall an event that had taken place way back in the 1980s.
I am leaving out the distressing details of the incident 'near' what was then known as the ‘Alma’ Public House in the Hanbury Street
We spoke yesterday [Wednesday 20 April; 2011] about that incident.
It was one of hundreds that took place in that decade where a certain type of ‘indigenous’ ‘person controlling shops and similar amenities’ based in the Hanbury Street had given rise to racially charged locally engaged hostilities and confrontations and tensions that lasted for a long time.
What a breath of fresh air even the mention of the name Kay Jordan represents when compared to that sort of person! [To be continued].

After the 1989 Brick Lane murders of Esmoth Ali and Watir Ali, that Nick Gibb made callous gesture

After the 1989 Brick Lane murders of Esmoth Ali and Watir Ali, that Nick Gibb made callous gesture
Another exclusive report exposing another CONDEM COLLUSION disaster!
When Nick Gibb outraged the community in shock after Mr Esmoth Ali’s murder as he slid into a meeting barely clothed...

1535 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 20 April 2011
Editor © Muhammad Haque Contextual Commentary on the CONDEM COLLUSION

Considering that the meeting, held in July 1989, had been about the then latest tragedy of Mr Esmot Ali’s murder in the hands of assailants, still not known to have been properly brought to book if at all, Nick Gibb’s appearance at the community meeting exposing some part of his body that should have been covered, was an additionally distressing spectacle.
Contrary to the claims that he could make - and his CONDEM COLLUSION colluders will make today - the supporters of a colonialist culture never want to show that they treat the world with equal dignity!
Appearing at a meeting of the community in shock, Gibb scarcely bothered to say anything by way of an apology. What he said about the tragedy itself was equally of no substance. That was 32 years ago! But the years of careeristic gavels across the other parts of the country have not taught Nick Gibb the modesty to show respect to people in any community. Including those who dedicated their best years to the cause of education in Society! [To be continued]

Department for creating Want and new Poverty in the UK ‘reducing deficit’, bailing out banks

Department for creating Want and new Poverty in the UK ‘reducing deficit’, bailing out banks
ALMOST 100 Jobcentre workers went on strike in Exeter in a dispute over working conditions. A picket line was set up outside the centre in Pynes Hill during the morning as the employees held aloft banners which read "defending jobs and services." And out of the 100 union members among the Exeter workforce – just 10 per cent were said to have crossed the picket line and gone into work. Industrial action was taken after an escalating dispute around working conditions and targets that leave staff "chained to their desks," with planned breaks throughout the day was unresolved, according to union leaders. The members of the Public and Commercial Services Union at the Jobcentre Plus in the city joined thousands across the country in staging the 24-hour strike and said they did so with "regret and extreme reluctance." Callers to the centre were told to ring back once the strike was over. But the union also issued a warning that further industrial action could take place if management would not address their concerns. Jack Davies, one of the union workplace representatives at Pynes Hill, was among the six members of the picket line that stood outside between 8am and 10am. He said: "We are very pleased with the turnout and there were only about ten members of the union out of 100 that crossed the picket line. The rest showed their support by staying at home. People driving past were beeping their horns in support. "Morale here is low and has been for some time and we are faced with a very uncertain future. No further days of strike action have been arranged yet but this could well happen. "I would just like to say a big thank you for the strong support we have had from our members and the public." In a ballot of the union's 7,000 members in the call centres, 70 per cent of those who took part voted for strike action. The union says it wants to improve the levels of customer service in call centres, end a target-driven culture, particularly by changing the way "unrealistic" average call times are used, and introduce proper flexible working arrangements. Mervyn Ellis, the branch secretary for PCS in Devon, said: "The response was very good and support among members was very solid. Based on the success of that we hope to convince management to talk to us and come forward with some sensible proposals. "If we cannot agree, bearing in mind the overwhelming support against the policies and work practices in place, we will have to look at taking further action. "But we hope this can bring the management back to the negotiating table "We have been negotiating with the executive board for more than a year to try to resolve our differences in managing our business without this inflexibility." The strike came on the same day that the shadow minister for work and pensions Liam Byrne was in Exeter and he visited St Thomas shopping centre in Cowick Street. A DWP spokesman said: "We are disappointed that despite three-quarters of staff across the centres not voting to strike, the PCS has decided to take industrial action. "The contact centre staff at DWP have good terms of employment, including generous holidays, and have a good amount of flexibility. "But we have to ensure that our service is available when our customers, who include some of the most vulnerable people in the country, need us."

CONDEM pushing people into poverty at home plays parasitic role for Big Biz bent on robbing abroad

CONDEM pushing people into poverty at home plays parasitic role for Big Biz bent on robbing abroad
1435 [1425] [1410] Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 19 April 2011.

AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad haque London Commentary on the callousness at the centre of Cameron’s and Clegg’s Condem collusion.
How dare David Cameron have even uttered in a fake way any words that remotely suggested that he even knew where society was, let alone to justify any pretence that he ‘cared’ for whatever society was?
Had Cameron met Society, he would not have uttered those irresponsible words. But then how could he get anywhere near meeting society which is so far way from where he inhabits?
Cameron has to come to planet Earth and make his way carefully and humbly before he reaches society in the UK. But he has got to start fast. If he seriously wishes to learn where society is, which way it is heading and what he has to do to support society very quickly, there will be at least a few people in Society who will be bale to help him.
Except that he must not look for guidance from the Official Opposition in the British [democracy-shorn and Big Biz-stooged] of Commons on this. Looking at the latest rendering [Tuesday 19 April 2011 witnessed via the BBC News Channel and assorted other 'rivals' to the Corporation] of the script that Ed Miliband has performed today, it is not looking very reassuring as a ‘guide’, is it? Cameron needs to head instead to and for ordinary communities, unshielded by his Big Biz agenda-operating operatives, eyes, years and other such details. He has got to shred the script and show that he has the courage and the honesty to face some real people. If he can do that then we have a possible beginning there for the urgent needs that Society has today. For everyone's future. Staring with the short term future of Cameron himself in that office in that Street in London SW1.
Before he can do that, Cameron has got to understand that he cannot expect to be taken at all at face value unless he public renounces the agenda of attacking people’s homes, attacking people's’ income, attacking peoples’ most treasured shelters, resources and supports. To make a beginning there, Cameron has got to end forthwith his aping of Thatcher and Bliar.
He has to call a halt to his war mongering adventures that are SINKING the UK PUBLIC into disastrous additional debts and liabilities.
Cameron needs to drop the spin, the leis and the fabrications that he has uttered thus far on housing, on welfare, on health and on education.
This is far more challenging than indulging the thuggish temptations for warmongering! [To be continued]

What MORE horrifying atrocities against the world's innocents will it take before BBC tells truth?

What MORE horrifying atrocities against the world's innocents will it take before BBC tells truth?
0635 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 18 April 2011.
The Muhammad Haque London Caption.
A metaphorical fantasy caption for Louise M, BBC TV breakfast programme presenter:
“Are we reading too many scripts on BBC TV giving people far too much fabrications, untruths, lies! How CAN society get the service it deserves if the BBC feeds it on diets bereft of the truth!”

[To be continued]

Diane Abbot visually displays the importance of her 'criticism' of Dirty Desmond attacks on Muslims

Diane Abbot visually displays the importance of her 'criticism' of Dirty Desmond attacks on Muslims
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 0950 GMT Sunday 17 April 2011

Is the Polly Toynbee-ed Guardian aiding starvation-causer Cameron in his contemptuous assaults?

Is the Polly Toynbee-ed Guardian aiding starvation-causer Cameron in his contemptuous assaults?
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.

1115 [1100] [1030] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday 17 April 2011

Is the Polly Toynbee-ed Guardian aiding starvation-causer Cameron in his contemptuous assaults?

This question arises from the behaviour of the Guardian which has suddenly stopped publishing the reports on how the UK Department for Want and Poverty [=DWP] has been FORCING people to go without thus forcing millions to stay below the poverty line and publishing many others into undergoing hunger and starvation...
The SUNDAY TELEGRAPH’s front page piece about the “Catholic Church” [London] expressing concern about Society is not anywhere near the truth of what is going on. That clerical concern is not addressing the truth either.
NOT in a way that the urgency of the experiences of the starving million s warrants
I shall be examining that lack of truth telling in a later part of today's diagnostic commentary.
Does David Cameron know what he is talking about?
I am of course referring to his short utterance made to the Sky TV programme as fronted by Dermot Murnaghan shortly after 0900 Hrs GMT today.
If Cameron knew what he uttered, he would not have uttered it!
Or, to put it differently, Cameron would have known the disgrace that he was associating himself with had he the morality and the sense to recognise what he has been confessing to!
I am talking about Cameron’s casual utterance delivered in a complacent style that he knew that it was hard for families who were affected by the cuts that he was having to make!
When Cameron uses that word “families”, he does not mean families in the context of the famine that is sweeping across the inner cities. He knows that the famine, the hunger and the starvation that he has continued to cause by maintaining the Big Business agenda assault on the involuntarily impoverished since assuming the post at that address, No 10 Downing Street, just 11 months ago, are not the topics that either SKY TV or the BBC let alone the journalistically fast vanishing ITV are focussed on.
So he can treat those in famine, hunger and starvation with the same contempt that these “mainstream” broadcasting media have been showing despite mounting and undeniable evidence that millions of people in the UK are existing below the poverty line, below the bread line. The CONDEM cuts that Cameron flaunts and fronts are making the lives of those millions that much harder, their hardship and their distress that much deeper. How is it [has it been so far] that the “mainstream media” are in denial about this?
The Guardian, which between 01 April 2011 and 12 April 2011 published a number of pieces online showing the forced removal by the UK DWP [=The Department for Want and Poverty] of benefit claimants from the lists, suddenly stopped publishing. this can only have happened because the Guardian's editorial controllers decided to stop the disclosures and the reporting.
that they would have done so under some pressure from somewhere that they followed or were beholden to is not in doubt.
Was it CONDEM Cameron himself who [has] had a “quiet word” with one of his pre-poll [06 may 2010] fans, Polly Toynbee, the “known influence” behind Alan Rusbridger at the Guardian?

[To be continued]

MURDOCH and his News of the World, based in the East End, have lied and been in denial [1]

MURDOCH and his News of the World, based in the East End, have lied and been in denial [1]
MURDOCH and his News of the World, based in the East End, have lied and been in denial [1] [To be continued]

Leading article: Who will police the police?

Saturday, 16 April 2011
Scotland Yard is considering a criminal investigation into claims that journalists have been paying police officers for information.
This is a belated response to the 2003 admission by Rebecca Brooks, then a senior editor at Rupert Murdoch's News International media group, that her journalists have "paid the police for information in the past".

The matter is certainly worthy of investigation. If the police have been releasing sensitive information to journalists, in return for payment, that would meet most people's definition of corruption. And this is a particularly insidious crime because it undermines faith in the police, in whom the power of enforcing the law has been entrusted. Ms Brooks, who has since risen to become the chief executive of News International, tried to backtrack this week, saying she does not have information about specific payments. But there are plenty of other good reasons to believe that this has been widespread. The former News of the World journalist Paul McMullan alleges that a fifth of Metropolitan Police officers have taken backhanders from tabloid journalists for information.
Yet the idea that Scotland Yard should be in charge of this investigation – or should decide whether there are grounds for a probe – is surely a bad joke. It is inappropriate enough that the Metropolitan Police is investigating News International over the separate News of the World phone-hacking scandal after the force's lamentable (and suspicious) failure to do the job properly the first time around in 2006. But the notion that Scotland Yard can be trusted to investigate itself directly over corrupt dealings with tabloid journalists is even more ludicrous. An outside police force must be called in to conduct this probe.
There are very few organisations that, if accused of serious wrongdoing, would look credible if they volunteered to investigate themselves. And, after everything we have learned in recent months, the Metropolitan Police certainly cannot be counted among their number.
[AADHIKARonline London UK Unquoting texts from the London daily INDEPENDENT online Saturday 16 April 2011]

Tower Hamlets Council is ACTIVELY backing benefit cuts while faking a claim to be opposing them [1

Tower Hamlets Council is ACTIVELY backing benefit cuts while faking a claim to be opposing them [1
1550 GMT London Friday 15 April 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque.
Tower Hamlets Council is ACTIVELY backing benefit cuts while faking a claim to be opposing them [1
Full examination of latest evidence follows here shortly.

Somebody should stop CONDEM Dave from exposing his naiveté like this any more [2]

Somebody should stop CONDEM Dave from exposing his naiveté like this any more [2]
0900 Hrs GMT London Friday 15 April 2011.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
AGENDA of today’s AADHIKARonline reporting
AADHIKAR means RIGHTS. Universal rights as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights.
And the right to tell the truth to and about society. This is most urgent,y needed in the inner cities today. Tower Hamlets still leads as the top area for multiple denial and deprivation. On all levels and on all fronts. So how is this fact being reflected in the ‘mainstream’ media? Short answer is NOT noticeably at all. Not at all adequately. Hence the need for the AADHIKAR rights campaigning reporting.
Today’s and this week’s main social theme is of course the economic attacks on the community by the CONDEM regime that is implementing the poverty-creation polices via the local agencies situated in Tower Hamlets area. Nowhere is this more profound and devastating than in the behaviour of those employees and decision-makers who are actually sited inside the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council. So is there any evidence in the “main” media of this going on? Not really. In fact there is the opposite ‘journalism’, puff, spin and propaganda being carried in the “mainstream”.
Our journalism includes not only the conduct of the state, locally and centrally in the UK , as far as that affects the lives and the rights of the people. AADHIKARonline Media investigative focus also includes the role [and the underlying agenda and objects] of and by the servile media. This is what defines the campaigning journalism that we have been advocating and conducting fort the past decades. Campaigning journalism for a dignified community in and with the East End of London. Kay Jordan has been a staunch member of that campaign for the human rights and for the dignity of the most diverse collection of people present in the East End of London, as witnessed in her active participation in the KHOODEELAAR! campaign in defence of the East End of London and against the Crossrail BIG BUSINESS agenda hole plot on the Brick lane London E1 area.
Today’s agenda [Friday 15 April 2011] of our campaigning reporting is centred on the latest exhibition of the CONDEM Dave’s desperate bid to cling on to the CONDEM Collusion and thereby to power. The ‘power’ that Dave has been as grossly callous in abusing as his most recent role model Tony Bliar...
We examine the DAILY MAIL's bizarre endorsement in the past 24 hours of desperate Dave’s LATEST condemnable con trick against society, against civilisation, against legality, morality, liberty and human integrity as alarmingly seen in his unsightly grab for the most intimate tools for misguiding the public available to the two Nicks thus sullying the good name [!!!!????] of the pro-democracy movements [!!!!!!!!] in Britain today...
[To be continued]

Daves lethal game of nicking off the two Nicks! [1]

Daves lethal game of nicking off the two Nicks! [1]
0650 GMT
London
Friday 15 April 2011.
Editor ©
Dave's lethal liaisons with two Nicks!
AADHIKAROnline reports continue our update on GEORGE ORWELL in the context of David Cameron’s latest exposure as the Empty Man of England. Like the Quiet Man, Iain Duncan Smith who is now fronting the real agenda that he ‘quietly’ had pretended over all those years he had no idea about - the Norman Tebbit wing’s cruel agenda for forcing people to a state of eating grass in return for being allowed to breathe in parts fo England - the all-smarmy, all-embracing faker clone of Tony Bliar is now embarked on another atrocious campaign of his own: foisting atrocities on people for no other reason than the fact that doing so makes Cameron feel gratuitously great! Now that is not great at all for society.

[To be continued]

GUARDIAN Pol Correspondent aiding and abetting David Cameron's racist line 14 April 2011

GUARDIAN Pol Correspondent aiding and abetting  David Cameron's  racist line 14 April 2011
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary diagnosing the many faces of David Cameron 14 April 2011 [To be continued]

CAMERON is racing on a risky roller coaster as he revives the NASTY PARTY in Britain [2]

CAMERON is racing on a risky roller coaster as he revives the NASTY PARTY in Britain [2]
CAMERON is racing on a risky roller coaster as he revives the NASTY PARTY in Britain [2]
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 0405 [0330] [0215] Hrs GMT London Thursday 14 [2305 GMT Wednesday 13] April 2011.
The real challenge to what remains of Society in Britain as forced by CONDEM Collusion's front man David Cameron is to deny him the oxygen of legitimacy. If Cameron is denied that oxygen then he will end up the same way as Gordon Brown did immediately before him: come unstuck. As Brown has been confessing in the last few days - while in the USA shamelessly aping Bliar as a lecture circuit ‘prospector’ - he was faking it for the benefit of Big Business , while still in No 10 Downing Street. Now Cameron is sounding increasingly more like Brown. In fact today’s [Thursday 14 April 2011] over-hyped resort to racist rhetoric is very much reminiscent of one of those weeks in the last year of G Brown in office when Brown was coming over as a very confused, desperate ‘leader’ clinging on to every last straw in order to show that he was still afloat! That David Cameron has come to such a pass so fast is worrying. One day he is caught making an opportunist utterance of indescribable implausibility in that he claims to be outraged by Oxford University taking in only one ‘minority’ student. And then he is embarked on making yet another “Munich Manifesto”! And in between he is slapped down by the Oxford University bureaucracy itself, telling him off for getting the facts wrong! How can this same man be taken seriously on the economy? On Society? On anything that affects the ordinary people who are lumbered with the laws that the CONDEM Collusion is set to bring in and promote? Who is the pied piper that is leading the infants that make up the marauding CONDEM Collusion that threatens ordinary people and ordinary communities with each passing ‘sermon’ of hate, intolerance and incohesion? How long before they descend on our neighbourhoods with their intimidating slogans and the equally unsettling undisguised noise of their bold boots which CAMERON is evidently trying on for size? [To be continued]

CAMERON is very dangerously coming apart! [3]

CAMERON is very dangerously coming apart! [3]
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 0215 Hrs GMT London Thursday 14 [2305 GMT Wednesday] 13 April 2011. The ECHR is a term of abuse by the “Establishment” in Britain. It is the antithesis of what that “Establishment” feels comfortable with. Thus the spectacle of Jack Straw - occupant in almost all the minor-major offices of the UK State during the Bliar-G Brown years, spewing out periodic words of derision, indifference and insult about the generic idea of human rights. It is a telling comment on the Blair G Brown years and the “vah-loos” that those years “represented” to the people in the UK and the “message” it sent out to the world. The telling comment is in the fact that Jack Straw came across as the Sick Straw whenever he derided the ECHR and undermined the UK’s own domestic and very modestly humanising HRA or the Human Rights Act 1998 itself. Why? Because that Act was fronter in its promotion through the UK Parliament by Jack Straw himself. So the fact that it was Straw and no other member of the Bliar G Brown gang in power that came over time and again echoing the “Establishment” showed that the Bliar regime was a lying one. That the G Brown “vah-loos” were lying “vah-loos”. That the DAILY MAIL on Thursday 14 April 2011 is publishing yet another account of how many thousands of times [8,000 times, and counting] the HUMAN RIGHTS CONVENTION has been violated by OTHER countries shows that the campaign by the “British Establishment” against the Human Rights Convention is not only active but that it is now on a level that can easily be compared with a sub-fascistic ferocity. So why is this so? This commentary is continued on http://bricklanenews.blogspot.com. [To be continued]

One day Cameron is crazy on Oxbridge ethnic numbers! Next he's scary on too many migrants......!

One day Cameron is crazy on Oxbridge ethnic numbers! Next he's scary on too many migrants......!
CONDEM CONFUSION SOCIETY! One day Cameron is crazy as he sheds croc tears over low black Oxford student numbers, the next he is scary about mass migration!

UPDATING Orwell on starvation in East End by updating diagnosis on Ken Livingstone's failures

UPDATING Orwell on starvation in East End by updating diagnosis on Ken Livingstone's failures
0855 [0850] [0835] [0815] [0800] [0750] [0740] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 12 April 2011.
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.
One of the things that Kay Jordan in the past 30 years in the East End of London has done is to keep her projects going DESPITE the fact that they merited support by the likes of the “Greater London Council” [the GLC]. But they never got the GLC’s support.
Why? The reason is that Kay Jordan would not accept the corrupt terms and she would not go along with the institutional lying and fraud.
Instead of going along with the institutional corruption, Kay Jordan devoted her best to creating the resources that her projects needed. Evidentially, the vast majority of the people who have been benefiting personally and collectively from Kay Jordan’s work would not even know the details of just how special she has been in standing up not just for them but for values of honesty and compassion. In contrast wit Kay Jordans’ work, the local bureaucracies, maintained at high costs to ‘the public’ both in the local Tower Hamlets Council and via that Council’s linked sub-bureacracies and cabals, have operated petty enterprises of their own.
This is why there is such deprivation in Tower Hamlets. The over-hyped, ‘ethnicty-linked’ and ‘etnnicity-links-appreciating’ ones that are put in place to [on paper] eradicate deprivation are in most cases THE DEPRIVES themselves.
Locally, they are the ones who injure the most. They are the ones who deprive the most. It is some of THESE that have featured as fellow cheer leaders for the propaganda for an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets with Ken Livingstone playing the part of the lead trumpeter and the lead vocalist all at one and the same time. In his spiel on Saturday 6 February 2010, as published on the same day in a package carried on an ethnicty-linked outfit on Sky.com, Ken Livingstone claimed that a directly elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets would get rid of the back room deals and squabbles. What he meant was that the corruption that had so dominated the Tower Hamlets Council;s actual power abuses would vanish with the election of one individual with the powers of 50 plus different councillors. It was noted that Livingstone did not state any evidence for his claim. He didn’t have to. He was surrounded by visually gasping supporters who could not wait for there to be a single individual with the powers of so many!
We next visit Commercial Road London E1 to show just how wrong Ken Livingstone was and remains. We trace some of the starvation that people are undergoing in Tower Hamlets today to Ken Livingstone’s personal ambitions and his failure to face up to the fact that corruption has been a key causer of poverty and hunger in the inner cities. And that he has persistently allowed some of the most lethally corrupt careerists to get into jobs and positions by endorsing them so casually and so often
[To be continued]

Simon Cowell in £2Bn plot on a day that we focus on Ken Livingstone's collusion in poverty creation

Simon Cowell in £2Bn plot on a day that we focus on Ken Livingstone's collusion in poverty creation
0800 [0750] [0740] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 12 April 2011. AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad haque London Commentary.

The “World Bank found, there had been too little focus on ending corruption or reforming state institutions and justice systems. For instance, reform of justice was not one of the Millennium Development Goals.”
This is from an online report by the BBC.
My attention is focussed on the 8-words: “ending corruption or reforming state institutions”
Why?
Because in my knowledge of state institutions and regimes across the world, corruption is at the centre of the critical mass that constitutes failure.
Yet the World Bank has not paid any attention to ENDING corruption so far. Not in the way that it should have done. There is a reason for this: surprisingly [!], the bureaucracy that is the World Bank, corruption is a ruling ethos inside it and so it actively impedes the stated World Bank goals from being achieved at every stage. I am not even relying on GW Bush’s fellow neo-con’s humiliating departure from the top World Bank office a few years back as ‘proof’ of the World Bank’s insidious and world-destroying corruption.
The reason why the ‘world’ institutions like the World Bank can get corrupt, are corrupt and are likely to remain corrupt is because of the big fraud called democracy. It has been the currency of crooks for too long. Once in post via the ‘democracy’ card, the crooks get going with their loot. They are, in those INSTALLED positions, as contemptuous of accountability as their rivals are. Or as their rivals in the same positions would be. There is no voluntarily created or spontaneously encouraged culture of accountability inside any of the “democratically installed institutions”. Not in their CONDUCT. Not in their abuses of assumed democratic authority or powers. Neither when the post or office holders are part of an assembly nor when they are inserted as solo couriers of a or the given “democratic authority mandate”.
This is the real reason for poverty in so many countries in the West too.
And in London, one man that has been synonymous with the “smooth operation of peoples democracy in action” in London is of course Ken Livingstone.
How do I find him linkable to the fraud of democracy and the operation of corruption in London?
By looking at a long running poverty creation programme that has a lot of records sited in the Commercial Road London E1. [To be continued]

Why has the Guardian been barring comments online on the "exclusive" about CON-DEM starving t poor?

Why has the Guardian been barring comments online on the "exclusive" about CON-DEM starving t poor?
1030 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
11 February 2011
. Editor © Muhammad Haque.
Why has the Guardian been barring comments online on the "exclusive" about the CONDEM Collusion and IDS [Iain Duncan Smith] DWP [Department for Want and Poverty] illegally starving people in the UK?
[To be continued]

EAST END OF LONDON updating Silvio Berlusconi in updating George Orwell: [5]

EAST END OF LONDON updating Silvio Berlusconi in updating George Orwell: [5]
EAST END OF LONDON updating Silvio Berlusconi in updating George Orwell: [5]

0355 [0345] Hrs GMT
London
Monday 11 April 2011.
By© Muhammad Haque.
AADHIKAR means RIGHTS.
Universal rights as enshrined in the Declaration of human rights And the right to tell the truth to and about society. Campaigning journalism for a dignified community in and with the East End of London.
For more than 30 years, Kay Jordan has done battle for the most diverse collection of people imaginable in the East End of London.
We shall share Kay Jordan’s achievements of justice against so much that could easily have thwarted so many... A universally human human being..
This exclusive series of reports resulting from our continuing investigation in the East End of London on UPDATING against poverty in the UK and in the rest of the related world is also the contextual continuation of Kay Jordan’s work.
..[To be continued]

POVERTY of CONDEM IMAGINATION adds new poverty, hardship to existing ones: Berlusconi in re Orwell

POVERTY of CONDEM IMAGINATION adds new poverty, hardship to existing ones: Berlusconi in re Orwell
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.
0315 [0300] [0240] [0230] [0200] Hrs GMT
London
Monday
11 April 2011
. What Silvio Berlusconi has done without losing any dignity is to acknowledge a truth that I spoke about twenty years ago. I did so in Britain.
I addressed my thoughts primarily to John Major, who was in occupation at No 10 Downing Street.
When I spoke I did so in the immediate context of John Major’s then imminent address to the United Nations Organisation. Twenty years ago, the world was significantly less tense.
But it didn't feel that way where I was witnessing events.
The tension then was not around “terrorism”. But there was a kind of terrorism in the air in the mainstream western media. That tension was being fuelled by daily “media” stories of an invasion. Invasion of the West by the non-Europeans. Mostly people from Africa.
Thousands of people were risking their lives trying to get into the West by getting on boats and sometimes boarding ships. The spectre that was being painted by the mainstream media was as it was intended to be.
To frighten the people, the indigenous people in the West. So what did I say? I said to John Major - and the leaders of the Western Governments - that they had to face it.
Address the issue. Start a programme of dealing with and eradicating hunger and starvation from the countries of origins of the desperate people, seeking new lives in Western Europe. I said that the issue was not as it was being painted by the media in the West.
Th media painted the hungry, the starving as something else. Something like an invading army. Like an army of occupation.
Nothing could be further from the truth. The widespread social impact of large numbers of hungry starving people arriving anywhere was something that could not be denied.
Ought not to be denied. So I argued that the “leaders” of the Western governments had to stop being indifferent to the challenge. I said that the hungry, starving people would increase in number and the Western societies could become very tense if the challenge was not resolved.
The way to solve hunger and poverty is to deal with t in the countries of the hungry people.
Twenty years on, the leaders of western Governments have stayed silent. Only Berlusconi has now made a most reluctant admission of the problem. How long will it take the others before they face it and start addressing hunger and starvation in Africa?
In parts of Asia?
[To be continued]

Stiff Society indeed! No wonder CONDEM Cameron is callous about Starving Society too!

Stiff Society indeed! No wonder CONDEM Cameron is callous about Starving Society too!
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. 0930 [0920] GMT Sunday 10 April 2011.

Their faces tell the true story.
If CONDEM front man David ‘call me Dave even though I am offended by the very suggestion’ Cameron looks a right one as he is caught in a moment of truth showing his contemptuous discomfort at being the one who had to again run the gauntlet of bring quizzed by the proletariat press! Martha Lane Fox has a face that personifies her vexed feelings inside. And then there was Francis Maude who too didn't;t care whether he hid or heightened the feeling that had overcome him! He, like Cameron and lane Fox, hated being there and was in no mood to gang around a moment longer than the damned protocols said he had to! That is what Big Society looks like! [To be continued]

UPDATING George Orwell from the East End of London [3]

UPDATING George Orwell from the East End of London [3]
0510 [0450] [0405] [0255] [0245] [0200] [0150] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
10 April 2011
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary
UPDATING George Orwell from the East End of London
The key reason why I organised the “Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Big Business agenda Crossrail hole attacks on the Brick Lane LondoN E1 area....” [late December 2003 as a concept and in January 2004 as an active ongoing phenomenon] was and remains the utter necessity and need to diagnose, identify, expose and thereby to also stop and to undermine the CREATION OF ADDITIONAL poverty in the East End of London.
That was the key motivator for the Khoodeelaar! campaign being established and advocated. That poverty creation is still on. That is why Khoodeelaar! is expanding the scope of the activities from being about the initial target of “the Crossrail hole..” to the other actual couriers of the same agenda as the Crossrail scam was and has been a courier of. If the affected East End community had allowed the Crossrail hole to be dug and the other Crossrail attacks mounted on the East End as part of the “Crossrail hole onslaught” on our area as had been originally plotted by Big Business as the agenda setter and by the UK DfT and other assortment of stooges that are run by appearances of democratic legitimacy they routinely obtain via the UK “Houses of Parliament” then there would have been quite literally thousands of immediate casualties whose numbers would have increased many times over the months and years that followed.
By stopping the Crossrail hole attacks on the immediate area in and around Brick Lane, we have saved the existing small businesses, the families and individuals from being economically, socially wiped out of the area
The “Brick Lane London E1 area’ thus has remained intact as far as the physical infrastructure that would have been destroyed if Crossrail hole and related attacks were nit scrapped are concerned.
In later parts of this examination and update, I shall show how the “community” aspects have been being undermined by the same sources - Big Business and their other agents and operatives
When we stopped the Crossrail hole attacks, the agenda setters for Big Business who were pushing fir the hole attacks to be mounted went on with the OTHER poverty-creation scams that are still running in the area.
In addition to those ones, the CROSSRAIL Big Business agenda activities are taking place in parts of the East End that are not in the Brick Lane London E1 area. That those other parts are being implemented by the pushers of the Crossrail hole scam and the Khoodeelaar! is not maintaining a daily campaigning opposition to those specially identifiable particular ones is not an accident.
The poverty-creating local Tower Hamlets Council and its counterpart poverty-creating agencies and operatives that are engaged and paid by the UK state [as manifest in the “local Council”, the locally based units of the UK central State and its agencies] [that in turn acts as the agency enforcing the agenda for Big business and the Military Industrial Complex] are now being increased in number and they are being aided and abetted by even more organisational support imposed by the UK State and Big Business than has been the case ever before.
Not even in the 1920s or the 1930s has there been such a disproportionately high number of poverty-creation personnel employed in the ordinary population in the East End of London as now. their deployment is being done in a subtle way. They are the 21st century version of the outreach workers, only they are not called that at all.
They are funded through enterprises and they all share the tag of being economically viable.
Which is a calculated fraud that is being perpetuated by Big Business and the UK state colluding in this. The economic and the social aspects of their agenda on the East End is to first of all subliminally or surreptitiously occupy the area and then to dislodge the ordinary population from the area.
This they are doing by the application of the scams that together make up the poverty-creation programme.
The key features of the ongoing poverty-creation programmes in the East End of London include the failing and or the negligent institutions and agencies. These institutions and agencies are collectively also known as the “welfare state”.
They are the parts of the “locally elected” Council which in effect are the “delivery units” of the “welfare state’.
Then there are the various malfunctioning entities' of the so-called “National Health Service”, the NHS.
In the VAST majority of the cases, the NHS personnel are the ones that are at fault.
Those that are in post and are kept in post at considerable salaries and wages are not accountable for the quality or the standard or the FACTS their services.
they most certainly are not accountable to the people who need the services listed and catalogued when the salaries and the costs are collected from the state in the name of these services.
this has been the case for DECADES in the East End.
There is no accountability that could and ought to make the real, tangible and sustained difference for the better for the ordinary people in the East End of London.
In the absence of that accountability, the presence of poverty-creation is taking place at an ever faster ever more solid pace. [To be continued]

Muhammad Haque in the East End of London UPDATING George Orwell [2]

Muhammad Haque in the East End of London UPDATING George Orwell [2]
0255 [0245] [0200] [0150] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
10 April 2011
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary
UPDATING George Orwell from the East End of London
How is poverty being created in the East End borough of Tower Hamlets today? On 20 March 2011, the London Sunday Express referred to starvation going on in the UK . It splashed on page one on starvation and said that child poverty was acute and that children were now being criminalised because of being so poor that they had been resorting to criminal acts. It mentioned one child being arrested for in effect begging.
Now, this weekend, the DAILY MAIL online is running a piece blaming Ed Balls [the Opposition shadow finance minister in the current UK House of Commons] for creating one of many Bliarist, Brownist scams that could not help the “too poor, too not-middle-class parents in Tower Hamlets” where the minority middle class would get in on the act too fast and far too quickly for the poor and the not-middle class parents to spot in time or beat.
So how real is poverty in Tower Hamlets?
And before going to examine the evidence, what is the DAILY MAIL piece really saying?
Let us see
The DAILY MAIL online has been saying that Ed Balls had been responsible for creating one of the many bourgeois middle-class 'public money waster scams' that were also linked to Tower Hamlets where the deprived people [=implied as being predominantly “NOT middle class”] would not know how to take advantage of the particular Balls scam.
As is always the case, the DAILY MAIL is motivated by Tory intentions.
And therein lies the defeat of the otherwise potential moral case against any actual balls up by any of the Eds, Balls or Milibands.
First off, the DAILY MAIL piece [which is reproduced in texts at the end of this updater and diagnostic commentary] gets the philosophy wrong. The DAILY MAIL piece suggests that CLASS as in Marxist 'thinking', is the faulty factor involved.
I suggest otherwise.
On the facts. Here is why:
The word “class” is less relevant here than “careers”.
In Tower Hamlets, the policies of the local institution, the “elected” Tower Hamlets Borough Council, have not been affected by any discernible class factor so much as by the configuration of careers that have been organised and created by the needs of those concerned to have their own careers by facilitating others.
This has been going on now for a very good 30 years, starting first with the launching by the then Greater London Council [and by its subsidiary bureaucracy of the then ILEA] of what I have called the ETHNIC SURROGATES or, to update that coinage even more expressively now, the creation of the ETHNIC SURROGCRACY in Britain.
The GLC and the ILEA created examples and the inner London boroughs then adopted and then proliferated thousands of careers that have now enabled their beneficiaries to sabotage the lives and prospects of many people.
The difference is that the former belong to the corrupt networks created via the local Council bureaucracies and legitimatised under the banner of elections held as a routine, not for democratic accountability. It is something that ALL three Parties have been guilty of.
Look at the Parties, not at just the odd Balls in one of them!
'Dominated by the middle-class':
Farce of Labour's culture drive for poorer children
By SARAH HARRIS
Last updated at 1:19 AM on 9th April 2011

Comments (8) Add to My Stories

Former children's secretary Ed Balls launched the £25m pilot initiative in 2007 Labour's £25million scheme to treat children to weekly ‘cultural experiences’ was a farce because it was dominated by middle-class parents, research suggests. The Find Your Talent initiative was designed to increase the number of children from all social and ethnic groups taking up typical middle-class pursuits. It was intended to encourage children to do things such as visit museums and galleries, learn instruments and take acting and singing classes. The initiative was supposed to ‘remove barriers to access’ and increase ‘choice’ and ‘opportunity’ for youngsters regardless of background. But a study by Ipsos Mori and consultant SQW, published by the Department for Education, found that the poorest pupils and those from ethnic minorities were least likely to take part in the music, drama and arts activities.
Younger children, girls and those from ‘white and less deprived backgrounds’ were most likely to participate. Former children’s secretary Ed Balls launched the pilot initiative in 2007, announcing an entitlement of five hours per week of ‘high-quality cultural experiences’ for pupils up to the age of 19. He pledged to spend £25million between 2008 and 2011 in ten ‘pathfinder’ areas, in which local authorities would work with arts organisations to run activities.

These areas, including Tower Hamlets, Liverpool and Leicestershire, were ‘relatively more deprived than the national average’.
The initiative was managed by the charity Creativity, Cultural and Education and overseen by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. It was scrapped by the Coalition last June. More... Labour's cherished schools building programme attacked for wasting 30 per cent of its cash The report said: ‘The amount of time spent participating seems to decline with age: it is highest among children in school years one to three and lowest among children in school years ten to 11. ‘Levels of participation varied among specific groups. Older boys, ethnic minority groups and those eligible for free school meals were least likely to participate… while younger children, girls and those from white and less deprived backgrounds were most likely to do so.’ The report concluded that there needed to be increased participation among ‘older children, boys, those from ethnic minority backgrounds and special educational needs/disability and those from low income and single parent households’.
Professor Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at Buckingham University, said: ‘It’s difficult to intervene in this way as you are relying on parents to take the opportunity for their children. The middle-class parents are more likely to be able to see the opportunity and seize it while too many parents of poor children and also from certain ethnic minorities are indifferent so their sons and daughters will miss out.’
Nick Seaton, spokesman for the Campaign for Real Education, added: ‘This seems very similar to many other Labour educational initiatives in that a lot of taxpayers’ money has been spent with little effect. ‘It’s obvious that the aspirational parents have taken advantage of this scheme and the others that it’s supposed to help haven’t.’

Harriet and her meaningless forays into morality as again exposed as hypocritical [4]

Harriet and her meaningless forays into morality as again exposed as hypocritical [4]
2315 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
09 April 2011
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary
Mail on Sunday bats for CONDEM Clegg and hits back at Harriet “the Ultimate Opportunist Careerist Hypocrite” Harman with a piece about Harriet’s own domestic practice of privilege and contacts and network.
Down with nepotism, opportunism, selfishness, greed and sleaze!
[To be continued]

Opinion POLL reveals! MOST Britons not interested in the OLYMPIC GAMES 2012

Opinion POLL reveals! MOST Britons not interested in the OLYMPIC GAMES 2012
Opinion POLL reveals! MOST Britons not interested in the OLYMPIC GAMES 2012

The GUARDIAN has to explain ITS role as a peddler of MIC, Big Biz agenda lies on Society [2]

The GUARDIAN has to explain ITS role as a peddler of MIC, Big Biz agenda lies on Society [2]
2100 [205 [2050] [2040] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
09 April 2011.
By AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary
The Guardian web site carries a piece saying that a former cabinet minister in Gordon Brown’s administration [so far refusing to be named or refusing to identify themselves in the Guardian piece published online in the past hour] is ‘revealing’ that Rupert Murdoch had tried to get Gordon Brown to ‘halt’ the various investigations into the News of the World and other Murdoch media abuses and invasions into peoples’ privacy. The Guardian is taking a typically over-the-top [almost’ morally high ground claiming almost all credit for the alleged ‘confessions’ by Murdoch so far. The GUARDIAN’s conduct as verifiable by reference to its own publishing records, however, do not support this. Why? Because the Guardian, as AADHIKAROnline has chronicled over the past many years, has been as servile to the corrupt agenda operated by MIC in the UK as any other ‘Fleet Street’ organ. Crossrail is the prime example, as we have been exposing the peddlers of it since we began our exhaustive and consistently vindicated diagnostics [which we have been publishing online since in July 2004].[To be continued]

Time for the London Guardian to come clean and stop being a stooge of Big Biz MIC agenda operators

Time for the London Guardian to come clean and stop being a stooge of Big Biz MIC agenda operators
2100 [205 [2050] [2040] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
09 April 2011.
By AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary
The Guardian web site carries a piece saying that a former cabinet minister in Gordon Brown’s administration [so far refusing to be named or refusing to identify themselves in the Guardian piece published online in the past hour] is ‘revealing’ that Rupert Murdoch had tried to get Gordon Brown to ‘halt’ the various investigations into the News of the World and other Murdoch media abuses and invasions into peoples’ privacy. The Guardian is taking a typically over-the-top [almost’ morally high ground claiming almost all credit for the alleged ‘confessions’ by Murdoch so far. The GUARDIAN’s conduct as verifiable by reference to its own publishing records, however, do not support this. Why? Because the Guardian, as AADHIKAROnline has chronicled over the past many years, has been as servile to the corrupt agenda operated by MIC in the UK as any other ‘Fleet Street’ organ. Crossrail is the prime example, as we have been exposing the peddlers of it since we began our exhaustive and consistently vindicated diagnostics [which we have been publishing online since in July 2004].[To be continued]

AADHIKAROnline measuring BBC Kate's ego on a Saturday morning! Almost as big as Rupert Murdoch's!

AADHIKAROnline measuring BBC Kate's ego on a Saturday morning! Almost as big as Rupert Murdoch's!
1110 [1050] [1040] [1035] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
09 April 2011.
Editor
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. Instead of being focussed on the rare admission by Rupert Murdoch made during Friday that he has been the key corrupter of morals for decades in Britain by his acquisition and control of the SUN and the allied titles and outlets, viewers of the BBC Breakfast TV programme this morning were often distracted by the antics of Kate Silversone. Not only was she behaving in the aggressive way - at one point gesturing that looked as if she was almost touching the BBC sports presenter of the hour- reminiscent of her years of over-publicised singledom, she was also as abrasive and as ignorant as ever she had been when she was being mounted before the viewers of the Nation via Channel 5 and its ‘Wright [Wrong!] Stuff ‘slot. She thus caused the commentary to be directed instead to a diagnostic measurement of her ego on a Saturday morning!
Almost as big as Rupert Murdoch's!
Which is a pity. It is also a telling indictment of the BBC which has failed to pursue with anything like the vigour required the literally HUNDREDS if not thousands of still valid and still active and still overdue [for investigation] allegations of corruption by Rupert Murdoch and his ***ews International.
The BBC is hampered by lack of a consistent and high and manifest moral code and it is made even more handicapped by the employment of the likes of Kate Silversone and Emily Maitlis and jane Hill, to name only three of at least one hundred ‘BBC presenters and or executives’ who have been abusing the GENDER AGENDA for self-promotion and in effect to undermine the BBC’s duty to provide the standard and the rigour of news and factual service that it is there to provide. These three are seen to muscle their way in front of the main BBC camera crew whenever there is a hot ‘breaking’ news story unfolding. In so doing - and what is worse, in being allowed to do so - they are breaking the BBC’s real foundation. [To be continued][FROM PREVIOUS editions] 1050 [1040] [1035] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
09 April 2011.
Editor © Muhammad Haque
AADHIKAROnline measuring BBC Kate's ego on a Saturday morning! Almost as big as Rupert Murdoch's!
Which is a pity. It is also a telling indictment of the BBC which has failed to pursue with anything like the vigour required the literally HUNDREDS if not thousands of still valid and still active and still overdue [for investigation] allegations of corruption by Rupert Murdoch and his ***ews International.
The BBC is hampered by lack of a consistent and high and manifest moral code and it is made even more handicapped by the employment of the likes of Kate Silversone and Emily Maitlis and jane Hill, to name only three of at least one hundred ‘BBC presenters and or executives’ who have been abusing the GENDER AGENDA for self-promotion and in effect to undermine the BBC’s duty to provide the standard and the rigour of news and factual service that it is there to provide. These three are seen to muscle their way in front of the main BBC camera crew whenever there is a hot ‘breaking’ news story unfolding. In so doing - and what is worse, in being allowed to do so - they are breaking the BBC’s real foundation. [To be continued]

Rupert Murdoch's culture of lies and funding corruption by big money is only part exposed-1

Rupert Murdoch's culture of lies and funding corruption by big money is only part exposed-1
From uardian.co.uk web site as published on 08 April 2011: Quote

News of the World phone hacking victims get apology from Murdoch
Admission of liability over phone hacking likely to cost News International
millions of pounds in compensation
James Robinson
The Guardian, Saturday 9 April 2011
Sienna Miller, who is suing the News of the World for hacking into her mobile phone voicemail messages, is one of 24 public figures given an 'unreserved apology' by the paper's parent company, News International.

Rupert Murdoch's News International has issued a public apology to eight victims of phone hacking, including the actor Sienna Miller and former culture secretary Tessa Jowell, and admitted for the first time that the practice was rife at the News of the World.
In a move likely to cost the company many millions of pounds, it said it would offer compensation to some of the 24 high-profile figures who have started legal proceedings against the paper in the high court for breach of privacy. It also admitted its previous investigations into hacking had not been "sufficiently robust".
The unprecedented statement of contrition is a remarkable volte face for the country's most powerful news organisation that was claiming until the start of this year, in the face of growing evidence to the contrary, that hacking was the work of a single reporter. It comes as a Scotland Yard investigation into phone hacking gathers pace.
The News of the World's chief reporter, Neville Thurlbeck, was questioned by police on Tuesday, as was Ian Edmondson, who was sacked as associate editor (news) in January. The company said it had decided to offer an "unreserved apology" in certain cases but it would continue to fight others, including claims brought by Steve Coogan and the jockey Kieren Fallon. "Past behaviour at the News of the World in relation to voicemail interception is a matter of genuine regret," it said. "It is now apparent that our previous inquiries failed to uncover important evidence and we acknowledge our actions then were not sufficiently robust." At least one of the victims indicated privately that she was unlikely to accept News International's offer, although others – including Miller – are believed to be considering the proposal. Lord Prescott, who is suing the Metropolitan police over its handling of the original 2006 phone-hacking inquiry, said: "The NoW has now admitted mass criminality." He repeated his call for Murdoch's bid for BSkyB to be blocked until the hacking allegations have been investigated fully. The eight people to be offered compensation, likely to be an estimated £100,000 each, include Joan Hammell, one of Prescott's former advisers, and Jowell's estranged husband, David Mills. Jowell was the minister responsible for media policy at the time of the alleged hackings. The others are football agent Sky Andrew, Andy Gray, who was sacked as a Sky Sports presenter this year, publicist Nicola Phillips and Kelly Hoppen, the interior designer who is Sienna Miller's stepmother. News International insiders said more offers are certain to follow. The action is an attempt to prevent further damaging revelations about hacking at the paper emerging in the course of court hearings, the first of which is due in the autumn. Over the next few weeks, NI will be forced to hand over hundreds of internal emails sent by reporters and executives relating to Miller and Andrew in order to comply with a high court order. They could reveal how much senior executives at the paper knew about the activities of Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator who worked for the NoW. Asked at a New York media conference about the damage hacking has inflicted on the company, Rupert Murdoch's son James, who was promoted last week to become the third most powerful executive in his father's media empire, said it had isolated the issue. He said: "What we were able to do is really put this problem into a box. If you get everybody sucked into something like that, then the whole business will sputter which you don't want." But Rod Dadak, of law firm Lewis Slikin, said dozens of potential victims would now scramble to launch legal claims in the expectation of receiving generous payouts. That could leave NI facing a bill of up to £40m. "The admission of liability is just the beginning," he said. "The list of people who will now claim their phone may have been hacked will grow immeasurably." Evidence seized from Mulcaire by the Met suggests that he targeted more than 3,000 people on the instructions of executives at the paper. MP Simon Hughes was one of the original hacking victims named in the indictment against Mulcaire and Clive Goodman. He said yesterday: "It was always obvious that other people must have been involved in the phone hacking and other victims must have had their privacy invaded. It is in the public interest that we get to the bottom of this." Andrew Neil, an ex-Murdoch executive who edited the Sunday Times for a decade, said: "This is one of the most embarrassing apologies I've ever seen from a major British corporation. I don't think NI had anywhere else to go. The evidence was piling up against them. It may cost them a lot more than they think. There are plenty of other people involved. They are trying to close it down with their chequebook but I don't think they're going to succeed." Charlotte Harris, of Mishcon de Reya, who represents Andrew, said: "An admission from the News of the World is something we've been working towards for years now. They persisted with their 'one rogue' defence for far too long. It was clear for a very long time that the practice of phone hacking was rife and that the News of the World should take responsibility. I hope these apologies do not come at the cost of finding out precisely what happened and who was responsible for covering it up." larger | smaller Media UK news More news More on this story News International could face prosecution Hacking admission will put pressure on Scotland Yard inquiry to pursue corporate criminal charges Phone hacking apology designed to keep cases out of court
Unquoting guardian.co.uk web site

Kelvin Mackenzie is one of the latest bourgeois critics of CONDEM Cameron [1]

Kelvin Mackenzie is one of the latest bourgeois critics of CONDEM Cameron [1]
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. 0750 Hrs GMT London Friday 08 April 2011. When even Kelvin Mackenzie is impelled to have a go at CONDEM Cameron and then proceeds to condem Cameron for getting involved in a diversionary war on Libya, things must be getting really seriously wrong. When Kelvin Mackenzie then adds that CONDEM Cameron has been making a habit of changing his mind on things, there cannot be an excuse for Cameron to think that he enjoys the confidence of the bourgeoisie at all. [To be continued]

UNFIT SCHOOLS! Barking at the BNP will NOT save Margartet Hodge's next career! [1]

UNFIT SCHOOLS! Barking at the BNP will NOT save Margartet Hodge's next career! [1]
0705 [0700] [0635] Hrs GMT
London
Friday
08 April 2011.
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.
This morning [Friday 08 April 2011] , the BBC is broadcasting a local news item about race and the composition of one of the self-claimed racist Parties, the BNP in Britain.
The report is based on alleged research about so-called mixed populations and the not so mixed populations. I am giving this commentary the following heading:
“Race, ethnicity, poverty and human rights in inner city East End of London: Face the facts [1]”.
The first factual point is self evident in the reported research and the topic. The real difficulty lies in the facts and in the authorities’ failure to face up to the facts. Those facts first off are about quality of life, Society, in fact. Is there Society in Britain for most people generally? Is there Society for most people in the East End of London? Do people feel that they belong to their neighbourhood, their community? Or do they feel alienated? Do they feel safe or do they feel unsafe? Do they feel fear or do they feel confident in walking about in their own neighbourhoods? If the negatives add up and dominate the answers then there is something very wrong with society. If there is, and it is clear that a significant number of people continue to feel uncomfortable, unsafe in their own neighbourhoods then the thing to do is not to file this under a subject topic. It may suit the BBC archive makers. And it may also suit the Government, whether they are Pickled in idiocy or in light, the concerns must be faced upto.
Which takes us straight to the barking area where brazen noise has been being made by one of the last century’;s most opportunist time-servers, margaret Hodge. She hit the London BBC circuit last night when she posed with CONDEM cabinet minister Ian Duncan Smith and featured in some footage standing within Downing Street London SW1.
It was in Barking that Hodge inaugurated herself as a sub-racist AS CONCERNED ABOUT SO MANY AFRICAN AND ASIAN faces in the area as any of the official BNP’s supporters might be.
And after she was aided by BOTH the Conservative party and the Lib Dems in beating the BNP on 06 May 2010, the most memorable utterance that Hodge made was a hateful, intolerant and very foul one at the expense of the BNP’s personnel.
It is noted that she did not make a conciliatory statement. Let alone one that showed any readiness or ability on her part to address the people’s concerns. [To be continued]

Kay Jordan at the KHOODEELAAR! No to "Crossrail hole Ken Livingstone" demo April 2006

Kay Jordan at the KHOODEELAAR!  No to "Crossrail hole Ken Livingstone" demo April 2006
1810 [1750] [1740] Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
07 April 2011.

By © Muhammad Haque.

This is the first week of April 2011. Five years ago, the KHOODEELAAR! campaign made a numbver of strategic gains in defeating the Big Business agenda Crossrail hole assault on the Brick Lane London E1 area. One of course was our demonstration outside Ken Livingstone ‘HQ’ opposite the Tower of London, on the south bank of the river Thames. It was a windy day. And it was an obstructive environment outside the Ken Livingstone building. Privately hired security personnel, who happened to be of the “ethnic attitude” that had been used by Livingstone in a long career of making “ethnic surrogates” as a part of his careerists ploy and policy. They kept coming out of the building and asking our perfectly legal, perfectly peaceful demonstration to move on....
Kay Jordan and a number off other KHOODEELAAR! campaigners went into the building and were caused to spend a long time in delivering our legal action demand letter addressed to the postholder Ken Livingstone. Kay Jordan also spent the rest of the demonstration in speaking against Crossrail hole and truing to keep the spirits of everyone up as the weather was proving very oppressive and most of the participants were showing signs of fatigue and exhaustion. We stayed there for a few hours and the event was noted by a number of visitors to the area.
Another important campaign event by Khoodeelaar! in April 2006 was to get hold of the then Chair of the Tory Party Francis Maude during his rare [but Council electrons linked] trip to Brick Lane. Maude himself was not very elaborate, desperate to get away by making as short a statement as he could manage. But he was caught in a short but critically central interrogation. The result was that he was able to be nailed to actual undertakings on behalf of the Tory Party MPs on the issue. We then followed those up. Although the politically stupid “supporters of the Tory Party locally” were lacking in nuance, Francis Maude’s relevant “local adviser” [someone who failed to get elected to Tower Hamlets Council but who showed better understanding of the area than any of his fellow candidates that DID get elected at the 2006 May Council election had done] proved to be a “Tower Hamlets Tory activist” without the pernicious steak so starkly associated with the ones currently making the “news: in the name of the Tories in Tower Hamlets.
[To be continued]

Violent culture of Tower Hamlets Council that ADMITS to setting 40,000 bailiff attacks on people

Violent culture of Tower Hamlets Council that ADMITS to setting 40,000 bailiff attacks on people
TO "East London Advertiser"
You quote a Tower Hamlets Council spokesman:
“We are bound by law to collect all local taxes; these taxes are used to pay for the local services that our residents depend on.” This is not a fact.
This is an opinion. Unless you include universally objective and verifiable evidence showing [any] steps that had in fact been taken in each case before the bailiff was used, the “bound by law” utterance is and can only be seen as a blanket excuse, just like the excuse that is often used before sending the bailiffs in.
Our Campaign supporters’ experience over the past decades totally contradicts that quoted position.
Once again the question arises: where are elected councillors on all these violations?
There is no evidence of a single Tower Hamlets Councillor EVER making any democratic case for the community as against the violent culture of bailiffs being used as a NORM and much before the otherwise logical stage of last resort is reached

1735 Hrs Thursday 07 April 2011. BHANGEELAAR! The Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets

What has been going on in the UNDERCOVER COUNCIL?

What has been going on in the UNDERCOVER COUNCIL?
1145 hrs gmt london Thursday 07 april 2011 . Editor © Muhammad Haque. We shall uncover the undercover boss as he stays silent over his council letting people starve here coming next

The BBC stages ferocious fakery dressed up as cosy breakfast news pogramme

The BBC stages ferocious fakery dressed up as cosy breakfast news pogramme
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary
0845 [0825] GMT
Thursday
07 April 2011.
This is updating the daily diagnosis of the BBC role in selling lies to the British public focussing n the BBC’s role at breakfast on Thursday 07 April 2011.
The mornings running order was led by the Portuguese crisis.
Followed by the BBC conceding a sort of continuing economic stagnation in the UK.
One item even referred to the rise in depression and the pogramme had an depression expert in.
Nowhere however was there any hint of a y real hardship being experienced by either families or individuals anywhere in Britain as resulting from the newer cuts to income that the CONDEM Budget has brought into force staring Wednesday.
Instead, the mood on the programme was contrived jollity. Underneath the conceit, as evident in Sian William’s smile she put as she hurriedly started talking about the wonderful sunshine while the BBC camera very clearly avoided the front page top headline on the DAILY TELEGRAPH and zoomed on the baby’s ‘jolly picture’.
That DAILY TELEGRAPH headline that the BBC camera concealed is of course about the sickest patents being neglected by the ‘health service’ in the UK! “Sickest patients are being neglected says the DAILY TELEGRAPH. But the MOTIVATION behind that headline may itself be suspect, in that the sickness that has now engulfed Cameron’s own crusade to carve ip the NHS may be that the Daily Telegraph is trying to help heal!
But the fact that the Tory Telegraph;h is engaged in a sort fo dirt truck does not justify the BBC Breakfast pogramme being so ferociously full of lies, denials, untruths and fakeries.
[To be continued]

Society allows violence against women, children and there is no sign of moral outrage!

Society allows violence against women, children and there is no sign of moral outrage!
CAMERON's CONDEM Society allows violence against women, children and there is no sign of moral outrage! [To be continued]

Alleged British Labour Party activist Sally Bercow could not laugh on SKY if she truly opposed war

Alleged British Labour Party activist Sally Bercow could not laugh on SKY if she truly opposed war
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 2330 [2325] [2305] GMT Wednesday 06 April 2011. Rupert Murdoch-influenced Skynews.com hosted the so-called Labour Party activist Sally Bercow who appeared under the excuse of newspaper reviewer on the Skynews sofa which Sally shared with arch Right-wing propagandist and warmonger Ian Dale. Dale is so brazen in his imperially hateful ideology that he even condemned Jemima Khan and gave as reason Ms Khan’s support for the Wikilist fronter Julian Assange! [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/assange-case-set-for-july-2264136.html ] [over Assange’s current contest with the UK, USA and Swedish states continuing their pursuit of him]. The spectrum did not include any recognition of the world outside of the European continent! The characters, the sources, the authoritative components of the SKY NEWS sofa were all made up of ‘the same unreal, fantasy elements. Such is their utterly empty outlook that neither the SKY news presenter nor her ‘guests’ Sally and Ian came across as being from planet Earth. Not even when they were confronted with the front-page two line heading on Thursday's early edition of the Murdoch-controlled Times newspaper running an unusual story about ‘non-white’ catering workers on a sea side town running grooming programmes enticing mainly white girls [= in effect children] into prostitution...[To be continued]

As the CONDEM pair stage yet another double-appearance, will they come unstuck again, for good?

As the CONDEM pair stage yet another double-appearance, will they come unstuck again, for good?
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary on tabloid press & TV confirming UK Nick Clegg coming unstuck again. AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary on Society deserving different and better than Clegg and Cameron
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXulh8Dn8Eo


0815 [0750] [0740] [0710] [0650] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 06 April 2011.
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary on the operation of the political agenda via the ITV Breakfast [an AADHIKARonline coinage follows] soapy sofa as fronted by the deceptively accessible faces typified in this clip I am diagnosing this morning.
The contents are broadcast under a safe ITV agenda. It is a solidly status quo agenda and it carries no evidence of any intent to audit the ones in power.
The clip also contains the predictable references to Nick Clegg having again come unstuck. But the ITV 'experts', Sue and Cordelia fail to show the contents of their own brains. They play it safe by relying on the tabloid papers' own in-house little tricks and biases. This is not good enough. Society, or what is left of it, deserves the likes of Sue and Cordelia to justify their own positions by talking substance when they are presented to the public as being worthy of our ‘watching’ them. Do THEY know of any real parental links?
How ARE the British broadcasting hierarchies created and maintained? How are they Graded [Oops! a name was intentionally dropped here]? What is MORE to the point, what sort of LINKS actually determine the contents of the ITV and the BBC and the SKY agenda?
How are the guests a who appear as s talking heads selected?
And a host of similar questions and issues.
It would be incredible if either Sue or Cordelia got where they are today without SOME sort of help similar In KIND [not in volume perhaps] to the double-measured one to which calamity Clegg admitted during his feigned frankness during Tuesday 05 April 2011.
In the East End of London, the sort of links and word of mouth privilege that Clegg has now confessed to will be scarcely unheard of. What IS heard of and is on the increase, in some SIGNIFICANT part of the population in the borough is the ‘next’ type of ‘link’. This is a link that is created by the pursuit and acquisition of the funding and the publicly funded positions and facilities. I have been head-banging about this as one of my original empirical and diagnostic areas since before Ken Livingstone staged his coup against Andrew Macintosh in May 1981 following the 'official' announcement of the then just held Greater London Council [=GLC] elections [May 1981]
What ideology do I follow in this? My own. I have this quite easy to convey ideology: look for the evidence and tell the truth. It includes all the people who want the truth and it is very useful in exposing those who want to hide things. Now, do the CONDEM pair want to tell the truth or are they on another hype trip today? Is Cameron going to hype on yet another facet of his assault on Society? Of course he is. So what will it take before Cameron makes another series of confessions and actually does it: starts to tell the truth and nothing but the truth?
Will that ‘habit’ spread to Society too? Will there be any evidence of the local Councils telling the truth to the local people? Chances are that the ones in power won’t want to tell the truth to the people. This creates the same question: are the people in Britain awake enough to expose the lying politicos of all parties and Parties? This remains the question. NOT the fakery and the fraudulence fabricated by CONDEM Clegg and CONDEMNABLE Cameron . This ought to be answered by the end of the day. In context. In ethics. In morality. in true democracy and accountability. But it will not be. [To be continued]

EAST END CAMPAIGN FOR A DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL, BHANGEELAAR! Challenges Tower Hamlets Councillors

EAST END CAMPAIGN FOR A DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL, BHANGEELAAR! Challenges Tower Hamlets Councillors
0220 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
06 April 2011.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
EAST END CAMPAIGN FOR A DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL, BHANGEELAAR! Challenges Tower Hamlets Councillors ...
That challenge is to “all the elected councillors on Tower Hamlets Council joined the community and took part in a political march calling for the people of Tower Hamlets to be properly recognised”.
This genuine grassroots democratic action campaign challenge has been made in the last 30 minutes on the London GUARDIAN web site.
The Guardian LONDON BLOG had earlier published a piece by Dave Hill bringing upto date [in his subjective view] the facts of Tower Hamlets being the only Olympic London Borough that is being left out of an Olympic event.
Responding to that comment, the BHANGEELAAR! Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets has posted this on the Guardian London Blog:
[The full texts of the BHANGEELAAR! comment on the 2012 Games Hosting bureaucrats excluding Tower Hamlets from the main events schedules] FOLLOWS

Dave, at the time of writing, we notice you have presented five separate items of your ‘case’. This editon of your blog plus three ‘responses’ and then a reference to your long plug for the Lutfur Rahman-imaged Tower Hamlets Borough Council dated in February 2011.
You may not have the space or the editorial scope to carry all the evidential replies that arise. However, we shall record a few of the most pressing evidential points for the time being. We shall attempt to come back should that too become evidentially necessary in context. We entirely agree with your statement in your main blog:
“What is beyond dispute is that Tower Hamlets has become an Olympic borough that will not host an Olympic event." Your blog makes all causal references for this state of affairs to Locog , Seb Coe et al.
It presents Tower Hamlets Council as being left helpless to much beyond their claimed bid for judicial review. You have left out some key facts.
While we agree that the 2012 Games Hosting bureaucracies and Seb Coe have made the decisive decisions leaving out Tower Ha,tes as you state, we do not see any evidence to substantiate any claim by Tower Hamlets Council -whether already made or potential likely to be made - to the effect that they had been left helpless. We have argued - and we have told you in very brief terms but consistently since we agreed to post on your blog beginning in September 2010 - for the appearance of an active and a democratic council in Tower Hamlets.
Here is a clue as to what we mean: wouldn't Seb Coe et al get a good political reminder if all the elected councillors on Tower Hamlets Council joined the community and took part in a political, march calling for the people of Tower Hamlets to be properly recognised ?
We are making this call here and we shall post responses or lack of them for your visitors and readers after a reasonable time in context.
0150 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
06 April 2011
BHANGEELAAR!
The Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets

East End of London is deprived even today. As Tessa Sanderson has highlighted.... Kay's caseload

East End of London is deprived even today. As Tessa Sanderson has highlighted.... Kay's caseload

2140 [2130] [2125] Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 05 April 2011
Editor © Muhammad Haque
Kay Jordan has carried a case load for the community for thirty years. In fact for more than 30 years. With the passage of each day, Kay’s caseload for the Community got bigger. I have known of that case load for more than 23 years. The number of years is not important to me in this context. Whatever the number of years, the principles that I share with Kay make the number peripheral. What is meaningful and what must be shared is the universality of Kay Jordan’s care for the other people. People that she has had no need personally to care for or care about. Yet she has been showing that care for so long that it must be shared with other people. In this updater, I shall highlight some of that case load. Then I shall delve deeper into the details. The most important item has been the campaign to stop[ the Crossrail hole assault. I have already published in the past three months some,e of the crucial contributions Kay has made in the campaign to stop the Crossrail hole. In the next parts I shall share some more insights into Kay Jordan the conscientious community defender. [To be continued]

Justice for Ian Tomlinson and family : Updater Commentary 05 April 2011[3]

Justice for Ian Tomlinson and family : Updater Commentary 05 April 2011[3]
2050 [2015] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 05 April 2011.
Editor© Muhammad Haque
CALLING for BBC News Channel presenter Chris Eakin to be held to account for blaming Ian Tomlinson for his own death as Eakin 'broke' the news of Mr Tomlinson's death on that April night in 2009
Why are we making this call?
Because Ian Tomlinson was innocent. He did not commit a wrong. He was walking home. Or that was what he was trying to do, on his way home. He would have got home eventually had he not been denied that freedom. He was instead treated as a wrongdoer. For nothing. Not only did they take away his freedom, they took away his life too. No matter how many other permutations to their excuse they may yet try to come up with, those responsible must answer.
And they must be held to account fully and conclusively. Those who blamed Ian Tomlinson after his tragic loss of life must answer comprehensively, comprehensively and all the lessons that are due must be learnt and due respect and recognition must be paid to Ian Tomlinson for the aggravated extra disrespect that was heaped on his soul by the BBC and the News Channel presented Chris Eakin. So far we cannot identify or name anyone else inside the BBC who might have contributed to that attack on the character and the soul of Ian Tomlinson
Minutes after the “authorities” had confirmed that a man had died at the G20 demonstration still ongoing in the City of London area, Chris Eakin was reading the “breaking news item” and one of the assertions he made a few times was that the death had been due to violence by the demonstrators! Eakin did NOT name any other person. The only person that he identified was the person who had died. Added to that was Eakin’s statement as to the CAUSE. He stated that CAUSE to be the violence by the protesters, the demonstrators. There was no doubt whatever that Eakin was linking the three elements there. The Death itself. The violence. And the doers of that violence. He only described the man. The one who had died. In that statement containing the elements, the only person in effect identified was Ian Tomlinson's. He was blamed for his own death. He was also blamed for the violence. He was also called a demonstrator. Now, after the events, ALL THREE components of Eakin’s “news: statement have been exposed as untrue, as lies too. So how long before there is justice for Ian Tomlinson in so far as any justice can be established by the BBC and Chris Eakin being held to account for lying and for blaming the victim?

[To be continued]

CAMPAIGNING for Justice for Ian Tomlinson and family [2]

CAMPAIGNING for Justice for Ian Tomlinson and family [2]
Justice for Ian Tomlinson and family 2015 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 05 April 2011.
Editor© Muhammad Haque
CALLING for BBC News Channel presenter Chris Eakin to be held to account for blaming Ian Tomlinson for his own death as Eakin 'broke' the news of Mr Tomlinson's death on that April night in 2009
Why are we making this call?
Because Ian Tomlinson was innocent. He did not commit a wrong. He was walking home. Or that was what he was trying to do, on his way home. He would have got home eventually had he not been denied that freedom. He was instead treated as a wrongdoer. For nothing. Not only did they take away his freedom, they took away his life too. No matter how many other permutations to their excuse they may yet try to come up with, those responsible must answer.
And they must be held to account fully and conclusively. Those who blamed Ian Tomlinson after his tragic loss of life must answer comprehensively, comprehensively and all the lessons that are due must be learnt and due respect and recognition must be paid to Ian Tomlinson for the aggravated extra disrespect that was heaped on his soul by the BBC and the News Channel presented Chris Eakin. So far we cannot identify or name anyone else inside the BBC who might have contributed to that attack on the character and the soul of Ian Tomlinson
Minutes after the “authorities” had confirmed that a man had died at the G20 demonstration still ongoing in the City of London area, Chris Eakin was reading the “breaking news item” and one of the assertions he made a few times was that the death had been due to violence by the demonstrators! Eakin did NOT name any other person. The only person that he identified was the pertain who had died. And added to that was Eakin’s statement as to the CAUSE. He stated that CAUSE to be the violence by the protesters, the demonstrators. There was no doubt whatever that Eakin was linking the three elements there. The Death itself. The violence. And the doers of that violence. He only describer the man. The one who had died. In that statement containing the elements, the only person in effect identified was Ian Tomlinson's. He was blamed for his own death. He was also blamed for the violence. He was also called a demonstrator. Now, after the events, ALL THREE components of Eakin’s “news: statement have been exposed as untrue, as lies too. So how long before there is justice for Ian Tomlinson in so far as any justice can be established by the BBC and Chris Eakin being held to account for lying and for blaming the victim?

[To be continued] [from previous editions] 1905 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 05 April 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. CALLING for BBC presenter Chris Eakin to be held to account for blaming Ian Tomlinson for his own death as Eakin 'broke' the news of Mr Tomlinson's death on that April night in 2009 [To be continued]

When EVEN the CONDEM-dictator R Murdoch's SUN can mock Cameron's cluelessness, he needs a cover!

When EVEN the CONDEM-dictator R Murdoch's SUN can mock Cameron's cluelessness, he needs a cover!
0045 Hrs GMT London Monday 04 April 2011. AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary QUOTING from the London daily MIRROR web site: [Quote]

B l o w t o a r m e d f o r c e s a s t h o u s a n d s o f t r o o p s m a d e r e d u n d a n t
b y T o m M c T a g u e , D a i l y M i r r o r 5 / 0 4 / 2 0 1 1 T H E A r m e d F o r c e s w e r e d e a l t a h u g e b l o w y e s t e r d a y w i t h n e w s t h a t 2 , 6 0 0 s e r v i c e m e n w o u l d l o s e t h e i r j o b s . T h e a n n o u n c e m e n t c a m e a s D a v i d C a m e r o n p r a i s e d f i g h t e r p i l o t s i n v o l v e d i n t h e L i b y a n c r i s i s o n a v i s i t t o a n a i r b a s e i n I t a l y .
T h e m i l i t a r y a x e w i l l i n c l u d e 1 5 0 G u r k h a s a n d a q u a r t e r o f t h e N a v y s t o p g u n p i l o t s .
A r o u n d 1 , 0 0 0 A r m y p e r s o n n e l w i l l b e f o r c e d o u t b y S e p t e m b e r 1 , w i t h 1 , 6 0 0 N a v y s e r v i c e m e n g o i n g b y S e p t e m b e r 3 0 .
I n a l l , m o r e t h a n 1 0 , 0 0 0 ≠ s e r v i c e m e n h a v e b e e n p l a c e d i n t h e f i r s t ≠ r e d u n d a n c y p o o l a w a i t i n g t h e v e r d i c t o f t o p b r a s s , w h o w i l l d e c i d e t h e i r f a t e b y t h e e n d o f S e p t e m b e r . B u t y e s t e r d a y s b r u t a l j o b l o s s e s a r e j u s t t h e f i r s t o f F O U R r o u n d s o f a r m e d f o r c e s r e d u n d a n c i e s .
O v e r a l l , t h e G o v e r n m e n t w a n t s t o c u t 1 7 , 0 0 0 j o b s 1 1 , 0 0 0 o f t h e m f o r c e d r e d u n d a n c i e s .
T h e o t h e r 6 , 0 0 0 w i l l c o m e f r o m n a t u r a l w a s t a g e a n d n o t f i l l i n g v a c a n c i e s .
N o o n e s e r v i n g i n ≠ A f g h a n i s t a n o r L i b y a f a c e s t h e a x e b u t t r o o p s w h o h a v e r e c o v e r e d f r o m i n j u r i e s a n d r e t u r n e d t o s e r v i c e w i l l n o t b e p r o t e c t e d .
T h e i n f a n t r y e s c a p e d y e s t e r d a y s c u l l a p a r t f r o m t h o s e i n t h e N e p a l e s e G u r k h a r e g i m e n t . M r C a m e r o n s v i s i t t o t h e G i o i a d e l C o l l e b a s e w a s t o t h a n k t h e w o r k o f a i r m e n b u t h e d u c k e d a m a s s a d d r e s s t o t h e t r o o p s a f t e r h e w a s h e c k l e d a t R A F N o r t h w o o d l a s t a u t u m n b y a H a r r i e r p i l o t f u r i o u s o v e r t h e ≠ s c r a p p i n g o f t h e f i g h t e r j e t .
T h e A r m y a n d N a v y w i l l l o o k f o r ≠ v o l u n t e e r s t o g o f i r s t b u t t h e M o D i s a x i n g 1 7 , 0 0 0 s e r v i c e m e n a n d w o m e n b y 2 0 1 5 a n d a r o u n d 1 1 , 0 0 0 a r e s e t t o b e l a i d o f f a g a i n s t t h e i r w i l l .
A r o u n d 7 , 0 0 0 w i l l c o m e f r o m t h e A r m y , 5 , 0 0 0 f r o m t h e R o y a l N a v y a n d 5 , 0 0 0 f r o m t h e R A F .
T h e R A F h a s a l r e a d y a n n o u n c e d d e t a i l s o f t h e s e r v i c e s f i r s t t r a n c h e o f r e d u n d a n c i e s .
P i l o t s h a v e b e e n s p a r e d b u t m o r e t h a n 1 7 0 t r a i n e e s a n d h u n d r e d s o f g r o u n d s t a f f a r e b e i n g s a c k e d .
A r m e d F o r c e s M i n i s t e r N i c k H a r v e y s a i d : O n t h e d a t e s ≠ r e d u n d a n c y n o t i c e s a r e i s s u e d , n o p e r s o n n e l p r e p a r i n g f o r , d e p l o y e d o n , o r r e t u r n i n g f r o m c o m b a t a n d o n p o s t - t o u r l e a v e w i l l b e c o m p u l s o r i l y l a i d o f f .
A i r C h i e f M a r s h a l S i r S t e p h e n D a l t o n w a r n e d t h a t m o r e c a s h w a s d e s p e r a t e l y n e e d e d .
B r i t i s h s p y p l a n e s a n d t a n k e r s u s e d f o r a i r - t o - a i r r e f u e l l i n g a r e i n v o l v e d i n t h e o p e r a t i o n a g a i n s t C o l o n e l G a d d a f i i n L i b y a , w h i l e R A F T o r n a d o s a r e i n H e l m a n d , A f g h a n i s t a n , a n d j e t s a r e i n t h e F a l k l a n d s . H e s a i d t h a t w i t h o u t g e n u i n e i n c r e a s e s i t w o u l d b e v e r y d i f f i c u l t t o m a i n t a i n l e v e l s o f c a p a b i l i t y .
S h a d o w D e f e n c e S e c r e t a r y J i m M u r p h y s a i d : F o r c e s f a m i l i e s w i l l b e s h o c k e d a n d w i l l w a n t t o k n o w t h a t t h o s e s e r v i n g o n c r u c i a l o p e r a t i o n s w i l l n o t b e s a c k e d o n t h e i r r e t u r n . O n t h e d a y t h e A i r C h i e f M a r s h a l w a r n s a b o u t t h e p r e s s u r e s b e i n g p l a c e d o n t h e R A F , t h e c o u n t r y w i l l w a n t t h e G o v e r n m e n t t o e x p l a i n t h e i m p a c t o f i t s c u t s . T h e G o v e r n m e n t m u s t p a u s e a n d t h i n k a g a i n .
[Unquote]

MUHAMMAD HAQUE on the NEW STATESMAN web site, ticking off CONDEM for POVERTY SOCIETY

MUHAMMAD HAQUE on the NEW STATESMAN web site, ticking off CONDEM for POVERTY SOCIETY
Muhammad Haque London Commentary about the paralysis of democratic accountability in Britain as published on the NEW STATESMAN website at 1348 GMT Monday 04 April 2011.
That Commentary is n response to the NEW STATESMAN piece by OLLY GRENDER a Lib Dem party ex-employee as a publicity ‘expert’ now having a sub-career as an apparently accessible part of the propaganda war on behalf of the CONDEM COLLUSION.
QUOTE MUHAMMAD HAQUE to OLLY GRENDER:

Your recent career has been a transparently positive one, as an insider expert whose appearances on the election linked broadcast media slots have been solely based on your erstwhile job! However, you are failing to face up to the truth: the crisis is NOT because of the alleged and or claimed differences between the ‘main’ [numerically relevant] ‘Political’ Parties, it is because there really is no difference when the various services as empirically objectively consistently tested on the ground at points of contact between the supposed deliverer of service and the ‘citizen’.
Empirical evidence verified this very afternoon, in the past 40 minutes in Tower Hamlets IN CONTEXT, confirms that there is no democratic accountability at work at any level of the maintained [that is publicly- paid for] agencies including in the actualities of the contacts [as defined above] with the "elected" local Council. I say Tower Hamlets for a very good reason: it is going to become one of the most cited names of an inner city area in England in the coming period when the poverty-creation programme being carried on under the CONDEM COLLUSION begins to hit where it will hurt even more than it did under the Blair and the Brown years.
On all measures known to students of analysis and evidence, the 'welfare state' typified now by the NHS and the Department for Want and Poverty creation [ =DWP] has been failing because the real agenda setters who wield the real powers in the name of the people in this society never wanted it to succeed.
Face it. This is the truth.
Had they wanted it to, they would have made sure that there were accessible, tangible and transparent audit, accountability and honesty built into the processes.
Instead, there is wanton and brazen self serving going on at all levels of the bureaucracies. And inevitably, there are massive failures at every point. It does not require a person to be all that clever to find faults. So the two agencies get kicked under the given regime. This analysis can be extrapolated so easily to take in the schools, the colleges and the universities and the legal trade as well as the Police and the seriously malfunctioning courts of law.
The crisis is one of the whole society. What kind of society do the majority want? Well, there is a problem finding an answer to this question too.
With AV being peddled as furiously now as the word ‘change’ was being promoted by Nick Clegg after that launch via the Granada TV, there may not be an answer as to the majority! Society is not broken. Society is soon to vanish into institutionalised electoral confusion! Bank on that!

UNQUOTE MUHAMMAD HAQUE to OLLY GRENDER:

WE BEGIN OUR EXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE OF STARVATION in Tower Hamlets - 1

WE BEGIN OUR EXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE OF STARVATION in Tower Hamlets - 1
0755 [0740] [0715] [0650] Hrs GMT London Monday 04 April 2011. AADHIKAROnline © Muahmmad Haque London Commentary.
On 28 March 2011, two days after the 26 March demonstration in London against “CONDEM CUTS”, one of the most ferocious, persistent and poisonous supporters of the war on the people of Iraq stood up in the UK House of Commons and pretended to be concerned for the welfare of the poor ‘at home’. So much so that he was allowed to make a statement faking it all the while and actually uttering a boast which showed that as far as he was concerned CUTS meant INCREASES! As is the RECORD, the UK House of Commons is not known for allowing a genuinely democratic audit of Cabinet ministers. So what took place on 28 March 2011 was another charade that was taken up by the likes of Gove making banal statements that added nothing to the sum of knowledge about the impact that the cuts that he was part of executing would have on the already deeply impoverished people and families in the inner cities and the counterparts locations and situations in society in Britain. But then how could he utter otherwise? After all, it was Michael Gove who along with the [‘Liberal’ !] Guardian’s widely-described ‘policy-maker’ Polly Toynbee and their fellow war propagandists Janet Daley and David Aaronovitch made such a very serious contribution to selling the lie that waging war on innocent people had to be done! These four were among the most vitriolic attackers - over the key Blair-GW Bush war years on Iraq - of overall societies and people in the countries that Blair and Bush invaded. So how is it that anyone, including Andy Burnham [who was himself exposed as a world class idiot after he was forced to apologise to a lobby interest operating in Britain, after he made a defamatory suggestion about David Davis and late night phone calls] expected Gove to become “naturally human and feel empathetic with the targets of the attacks” that Gove had been a long time planner of?
In any case, how could a latter day de facto practitioner of the art of propaganda that is so often associated with Joseph Goebbles as the master of, be expected to tell the truth about anything?
What would Gove know of involuntary impoverishment of families? Families which the SUNDAY EXPRESS described [20 March 2011] in some detail as having to raise children who were going hungry ?
What would Gove know of the fundamental contradictions in the job that is done by the man in Tower Hamlets who says he has been employed in poverty creation for the past 30 years ?
How would someone of Michael Gove’s ignorance and perniciousness distinguish between poverty creation and poverty? Between lack of jobs and being work shy? Between the people held prisoner in their own homes in estates after criminally silenced estates across the inner city deprived East London borough of Tower Hamlets? Between the role played by ALL the state agencies in the borough that are paid handsomely IN THE NAME of delivering services to the community actually and routinely failing and even refusing to do their jobs and agencies who are in fact made up of employees doing the jobs to their communities? What “elected” “representative” of which constituency in Tower Hamlets would tell Gove the truth when the dominant consideration, factor, influence in both [“Parliamentary”] constituencies [in Tower Hamlets] is that of the “elected” ones belonging with the raging grouping and or the grouplet that keeps only functioning as based on its hatred of their rivals in the community?
How would any one know the truth when there is no one looking for the truth in Tower Hamlets? Or are they?
Is that why Gove felt confident before he uttered a statement to MPs on 28 March 2011 that contained the following fabrication?

“Tower Hamlets continues to be among the best-funded local authorities for students between the ages of five and 16, why Tower Hamlets will benefit disproportionately from the pupil premium...”

Iain Duncan Smith UPDATES the pejorative reason for being also called IDIOT Duncan Smith...

Iain Duncan Smith UPDATES the pejorative reason for being also called IDIOT Duncan Smith...
0245 [0230] [0215] [0210] Hrs GMT
London
Monday
04 April 2011.
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.

CONDEM’s Want and Poverty-creation minister Iain Duncan Smith is the really vulnerable one in the tottering cabinet kept marginally afloat by the bullying pair.
IDS’ vulnerability is to scrutiny. On evidence, he will fall. He must fall. He cannot stand. We shall be exposing his lying streak here and on associated sites in the days, weeks and months to come. They [The CONDEM Collusion] are bullying the most vulnerable in society in terms of economic and social needs and rights. However, their adventure is set to explode in their faces.
Contrary to the contrivance of confidence by the VERY vincible Cable on the BBC on Sunday 03 April 2011], the corruptly complicit CONDEM is going to come apart because its real assumption - that ordinary people are better off than they actually are - is going to be shown up as the sham and the fraudulent lie that it is.
This lie is particularly fraudulent in view of the fact that a significant part of its contents are the products of a very dishonest Right-wing and ideologically driven fanatic careerist not unfamiliar to David Fraud, the man that has been foisted on the DWP because David Fraud could not answer any of the key questions about evidence about his ‘crusading’ zeal against the people below the poverty line in Britain. More on david Fraud here and on our associated sites soon.
All objective indices and measures show that the IDEOLOGY of attacking the ordinary people[le in society cannot pay. But the Bullies that front and dominate the ramp COLLUSION are not prepared to look at their behaviour in a rational way. They are by their very ideology social thugs and louts.
They want to deprive the deprived and they want to rob the looted. Nothing short of stark acton will stop them. That stark action starts with the truth. [To be continued] Quoting the SCOTSMAN Online Edinburgh SCOTLAND

Benefits: Poorest may suffer Published Date: 04 April 2011 By Staff Reporter GOVERNMENT plans to reform council tax benefit are set to remove £50 million from support for some of Scotland's poorest families. Radical new proposals in the Welfare Reform Bill will see council tax benefit chopped by 10 per cent, which critics warn will disproportionately hit Scotland. However, even more controversial plans to devolve it to Holyrood and English councils could mean that some families will lose the benefit altogether. The proposal would mean that the money which used to be automatically passed on to claimants would no longer be ringfenced and councils could decide whether to pay it out. While it will make it easier for any attempt to replace the council tax in Scotland with another local tax, it means that thousands of families may find that they are no longer exempt from paying. The issue has been raised by Glasgow Central Labour MP Anas Sarwar, who is serving on the welfare reform bill committee, looking over the legislation. He argues that the benefit should be wrapped up into the new universal credit being set up by Tory Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith to replace most other benefits. He said: "The proposed changes to council tax benefit haven't been thought through and pose particular risks for Scotland. By devolving it to local authorities it goes against the principle of simplicity of the universal credit, reduces transparency on individual financial benefits and creates a postcode lottery of entitlements and benefits." But a Department for Works and Pensions spokeswoman said: "We want to localise council tax benefit so local councils can better target help and support to those that need it whilst ensuring the most vulnerable in their communities are protected."

BANKS BAN SHOPPING! This is the heading on Richard Desmond's SUNDAY EXPRESS! Ban Society! next!?

BANKS BAN SHOPPING! This is the heading on Richard Desmond's SUNDAY EXPRESS! Ban Society! next!?
BANKS BAN SHOPPING! This is the heading on Richard Desmond's SUNDAY EXPRESS! Ban Society! next!?

Haringey London Council's cruel negligence of its duties and the tragedy of Baby P : An update

Haringey London Council's cruel negligence of its duties and the tragedy of Baby P : An update
© MUHAMMAD HAQUE London Commentary
1815 Hrs GMT Sunday 03 April 2011
It is exactly a year since I wrote about Sharon Shoesmith, the Guardian, Ed Balls [then still in post as UK Cabinet Minster o Schools and Children] and Christine Gilbert and OFSTED. A year on, things have not quietened down at all. Not on the Sharon Shoesmith front. She is still defiant. She is still brazen. And nobody is really held to account for the cruelty that the controlling clique on Haringey Council showed to the infant Baby P [since named as Peter Conolly] [and to countless others who no doubt are still being let down in one way or another by the same clique and by their likes on other councils across England]
The London EVENING STANDARD web site item is headlined “Sacked Baby P boss's legal war could cost the taxpayer £3.5m”. That says it all. All over again that is. That London Haringey Council’s corrupt controlling clique-member [‘sacked’ by a Secretary of State UNDER PUBLIC PRESSURE, NOT by the corrupt clique in ‘control’ of that Council that Shoesmith was a part of] Sharon Shoesmith is as blatant in April 2011 as she had been in that fateful period that saw Haringey Council social services neglect another helpless innocent child... Shoesmith’s public utterance of cruelly delivered callousness when asked about the responsibility of those who had betrayed the poor child Baby P will remain a few seconds of unforgettable evidence of bureaucratic cold-heartedness. Those who had thought that Ed Balls’ sacking of Shoesmith, which he was FORCED to make under pressure from the public, would be allowed to remain unchallenged will be thinking: what else can the 'poor public' do to hold someone to account for what happened to the poor infant? For Sharon Shoesmith is not only unrepentant about all of it, she is defiantly embarked on costing the ordinary public a few more £millions. In legal costs. If this is another comment on Shoesmith's own brazenness, it is ALSO a bigger condemnation of the UK legal aid and legal trade system. It is even MORE CORRUPT than the most corrupt local Council! [To be continued] MUHAMMAD HAQUE London Commentary on Friday 02 April 2010 said: [Quote]
2355 Hrs GMT London Friday 02 April 2010.
Editor © Muhammad Haque. The London Guardian is running stories giving Ed Balls' side of the controversial decision...
It is too early to conclude if the Balls denials will stand. In fact released documents point the opposite way. Which is where KHOODEELAAR! ‘renews’ encounter with the Guardian, OFSTED and Christine Gilbert.
As Khoodeelaar! said in December 2005, Tony Blair had himself acted dishonestly, ignorantly and corruptly in awarding Christine Gilbert a CBE whilst she was still in post in London E14 2BG as a mere town clerk. If the hype about these honours, such as a CBE, is to be believed then Gilbert should have demonstrated evidence in her career of doing something truly remarkable, out of the ordinary and good. There is nothing in her known record to suggest so. In fact Gilbert had done nothing to deserve being officially decorated with a CBE.
So we say again, on 02 April 2010 that every single one of the peddlers of the Big Business agenda CrossRail scam [in context] has been exposed as being involved in lying. In one way or another. We say so here in light of the disclosures of OFSTED’s role under Christine Gilbert as its boss in covering up parts of the evidence and hyping up other parts. In other words.
In planned lying.
That is a serious criminal offence, even in the Blaired state of the UK. With such evidence of lying and criminality being firmly fixed on these individuals, Khoodeelaar! ethically observes: We told you so! Could not trust any of the liars to be telling the truth of the devastating effects of b the ‘MIC’ Big Biz Crossrail agenda.
[To be continued]
[Unquote]

Servility of the mind is many times worse than enforced servility of the body! Liberate them now!

Servility of the mind is many times worse than enforced servility of the body!  Liberate them now!
1440 Hrs GMT London saturday 02 April 2011
. Editor © Muhammad Haque.
.
You could not make it up! Over-shielded ethnic surrogate regales overrated racist with his rendition [!] of anti-Muslim racism as he peddles pernicious propaganda. David Lammy was the one who mounted the evening’s obligatory [as the SKY.com agenda setters wished] attack on Muslims. Although the Daily Mail's Ann Leslie appeared delighted by this, it was she who in fact made an accurate statement about two of the words that the ignorant Lammy was stooged to be guided by. Leslie said that the so called honour killing had NOTHING TO DO with Islam. Which is absolutely true. So how come that the over-promoted ethnicity careerist david Lammy had not heard that one before? Had Lammy been so convincing as an idiot that the idiocy served as a mark of intellectual achievement on his part and on that basis he got given a ‘ministerial’ slot in the last Bliared regime? HOW do they do this in the Bliared Party bureaucracy? What do they do to ’ethnicity-linked’ ‘MPs’ who turn out to be parrots of poisonous propaganda as soon as they are confirmed ‘elected’?
. [To be continued]

As CAMERON's Libyan rhetoric continues to suffer from lack of truth, the ECONOMIST reports on EVIL

As CAMERON's Libyan rhetoric continues to suffer from lack of truth, the ECONOMIST reports on EVIL
THE ECONIOMIST magazine, London

Morality and the brain Medical diagnosis of malfeasance Mar 31st 2011 | from the print edition

Zero Degrees of Empathy: A New Theory of Human Cruelty. By Simon Baron-Cohen. Allen Lane; 190 pages; £20. Buy from Amazon.co.uk
WICKEDNESS has long been the preserve of religion. For an act to be evil, it must be significantly wrong, embarked upon with full knowledge of its wantonness and embraced wholeheartedly by the person doing the deed. In “Zero Degrees of Empathy” psychologist and psychiatrist Simon Baron-Cohen argues for a scientific explanation of why some people act in a way that appears to be evil. He thinks that they are sick and that they can be treated.
The past offers all sorts of unsavoury stories of behaviour brought into the realm of medicine with dire effects. Remember, for instance, the eugenic sterilisation of the feckless? Yet Mr Baron-Cohen’s agenda is liberal and his arguments at least merit inspection. Can a baby be born bad? Or does poor parenting explain why the cherub has grown up to become a psychopath? There is an element of both nature and nurture in explaining the evil actions of individuals. Though acknowledging that there is a genetic basis for acting like a rotter (men are more likely to behave cruelly, for example), Mr Baron-Cohen notes that “genes cannot code for a high-level construct like empathy. Genes simply blindly code for the production of proteins, blissfully unaware of their ultimate long-range effects.” Empathy—the ability to appreciate that a stranger struggling with a suitcase not only finds his situation challenging but also needs help which, assuming you are not incapacitated yourself, you can and do provide—is key to Mr Baron-Cohen’s thesis. He reckons that only those who can empathise with their fellow man (and who consequently act in a considerate way) can hope to be without malice.
Cruelty comes from failing to empathise with others, whether through being inconsiderate or through wilfully ignoring their pain. Some people lack empathy permanently, others switch it off when they are tired, stressed or impatient—telling a child not to bother you because you are working, for example—and experience regret for their harsh words when their empathy returns.
Those whose minds never consider their fellow traveller are not bad but disabled, Mr Baron-Cohen argues. For some, there is a genetic explanation for why crucial parts of their brains seem disengaged while other people suffer. For others, activity in those brain areas has been subdued by some awful experiences in childhood.
The author champions his own parents for instilling in him what he calls an “internal pot of gold”—a measure of self-reliance and self-confidence which he thinks is vital for developing empathy. Children learn to consider the thoughts of other people only when the minds of those who care for them are safe places to enter. A child whose mother wishes he did not exist will not want to contemplate the thought, and will fail to develop empathy as a result.
Travelling through the book, the reader is introduced to a range of character studies complemented by descriptions of real people, including Marilyn Monroe, whose early sorrows blighted the rest of her life. Are the people he describes odd? Yes. Is there a consistent underlying explanation for their oddness? No: brain function is complex, many different personality types are involved and all such categorisations are bound to be messy.
Is it feasible to cure evil? That is a far more interesting question than Mr Baron-Cohen acknowledges. He suggests that society should have empathy for those who lack it and that they should receive treatment: a puff of the hormone oxytocin, might do the trick. Whether it can be right to cure someone of what is not yet considered a disease remains unaddressed.

Over-opportunistic 'neutral commenter' 'barrister' objects to all criticism of those in power!

Over-opportunistic 'neutral commenter' 'barrister' objects to all criticism of those in power!
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.
1350 [1330] [1240] [1230] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday 02 April 2011
.
I am here focussing on the massaged message that is retailed via a UK OFCOM-licensed satellite Channel carrying the propaganda for the particular vested interests in Bangladesh as evident in the contents of the TRITIO MATRA broadcast today in the past two hours.
The clip I have used with THIS COMMENTARY was externally recorded between 1140 and 1155 Hrs GMT today Saturday 02 April 2011. That clip is now viewable AS AN ITEM OF EVIDENCE on our video channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ro5V2P7tqMw.
On that clip: the two faces on either side of the slot presenter are said to be ‘lawyers’ in recent practice in Bangladesh. If the contents and style used by either is any guide as to what the future of Society in Bangladesh is going to be like then ‘God help us all’, as the ordinary saying goes in England when exclaiming an emotion of disbelief and or outrage!
The two complacent bourgeois participants would put the original indulgers in bourgeois self-indulgence to shame!
While the one on the left, D Zohir, uttered inanities amounting to a nag to the effect that he was not getting any benefits from ‘the Government’, the one on the right poked him in his pocket and made a lengthy statement mocking him about how the former was a multi Million [Bangladeshi Taka] earning lawyer...
.The slot-presenter [Zillur Rahman] showed that he too had got off the agenda that the slot is USUALLY hyped to be a specialist for. The title ‘Third Degree’ was absent with the edition ending without Zillur Rahman making much of a point!
That was a departure from Zillur Rahman’s ‘usual practice’. The manifest pointlessness of the two participants as seen and heard on that slot in that particular broadcast proves the real point that the elements who set the agenda and those who fund the channel must have decided [for the vested 'reasons'!] that the time had come for them to treat the Third Degree to a dose of its own medicine:
Prepare to send it to sleep!
[To be continued]

[Previous editions] AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary on Bangladesh-based satellite TV programme Tritio Matra relayed via an OFCOM-licensed channel in the UK. 1230 Hrs GMT London Saturday 02 April 2011 .The one seen in the clip on the Right spoke VERY RIGHT when he said, “don’t be harsh on the Police. We are blaming the police for everything...” [To be continued]

CAMERON and CLEGG's war at home is a social war, disabling the disabled, making poor poorer!

CAMERON and CLEGG's war at home is a social war, disabling the disabled, making poor poorer!
0840 GMT London Saturday 02 April 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. CONDEM [that is the CORRUPTING COLLUSION made up of the CON party and the Nick Clegged Lib Dumbed Party MPs] war on society is creating NEW POVERTY and justifying existing poverty. The onslaught is engulfing the main body of the inner cities people including the Bangladeshis in areas like Tower Hamlets [To be continued]

Smiling face of CONDEM's war in British cities on the poor, the disabled and the vulnerable...

Smiling face of CONDEM's war in British cities on the poor, the disabled and the vulnerable...
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 0700 GMT Saturday 02 Aporil 201 The misleadingly-titled City of Westminster Council is closely involved in The CURRENT CONDEM COLLUSION Goverbnment’s assaults on the low income and the no-incomed groups in Society. CONDEM RIGHT wing-personality Phillipa Roe is PEDDLING the Department for Want and Poverty’s [=DWP] assaults via the reduction and/or removal of housing benefit... [To be continued]

Seb Coe will never feel easy in the East End. He will be on the look out for a fast way out!

Seb Coe will never feel easy in the East End. He will be on the look out for a fast way out!
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. 1100 Hrs GMT London Friday 01 April 2011. Sebastian Coe looks undeniably off stage while standing on stage on location in the East End of London! How revealing! He has been able to gloat every time he opens his mouth about the 2012 Hosting banalities. Personally, Coe has been enormously helped as far as his promotion and branding enterprises go. The same cannot [and ought not to be attempted to] be said of his role in the context of the East End of London. Although the propaganda line about the “Brick Lane Curry Capital” “announcement” has been overly servile and untruthful as far as many of the “:ethnicty-linked” promotional outlets go, the relevance of the “CURRY RESTAURANTS” will not be altered by the simple claim that Coe and Co have been making this week. A lot more needs to happen. I shall set out what. [To be continued]

Boris Johnson’s comments staged on the BBC Question Time last night is a calculated vote-grab !

Boris Johnson’s comments staged on the BBC Question Time last  night is a calculated vote-grab !
AADHIKARonline © ©Muhammad Haque London Commentary
0550 Hrs GMT
London Friday 01 April 2011.
Boris takes a risky step to unsettle Cameron AND [Boris hopes] stop Ken Livingstone in HIS tracks
Boris Johnson’s comments staged on the BBC Question Time last night could be just a stunt. It could be. In context,m however, it is hardly a stunt. It is most likely a calculated step by Boris Johnson to strike when the rod is still red hot and can burn where it needs to: Cameron’s complacent careerist hind site!
This weekend domestically seems set now to include Boris Johnson, badly shaken by last weekend’s poll findings showing him staring at defeat by Ken Livingstone.
However strategically useful the stunt may turn out to be, the fact still remains that Boris Johnson is no Michael Moore! Contrary to his opportunistic suggestions that he was an American by birth, Boris Johnson remains quintessentially calculating and therefore a very very sheepish politico. He will not tell the truth any more than Complacent complicit Cameron or the pernicious Nick Clegg.
The truth is that Boris has failed to address the economic, social,environmental issues facing people in the East End of London. In that failure, Boris Johnson has been as irrelevant and contemptuous to the people as had been Ken Livingstone! No wonder Boris is increasingly looking like the capricious courtier of the “Muzzle-em” votes! “Muzzle ‘em” as in KEEP THE MUZZLEMS a peg or pegs below par and keep them looking up to me [Boris]. Just the way Livingstone did. And with this diabolically unfunny intervention in which Boris successfully APPEARS to almost identify with the people of the Muslim [Arabic speaking] countries. Given that this is at the height of the ‘West’s latest war on yet another defiant ‘Arab’ head of state, Boris has cultivated quite a lot of votes already!
Contemptible!
Crass!
Boris has still not accounted for his servitude to Big Biz agenda Crossrail scam pushers. Nor has he explained why he is touting for the Nuclear lobby. Nor why he has been so miserable in addressing the biggest issue that London public has faced for 80 years: the oppressive lack of civil liberties in London today..! [To be continued]

Ian Tomlinson's grieving family wait for justice as lying pathologist faces mild penalty

Ian Tomlinson's grieving family wait for justice as lying pathologist faces mild penalty
2340 [2335] [2330] Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
31 March 2011.
Editor © Muahmmad Haque.
Too many professionals in positions of ‘official authority’ are lying about people and are destroying lives.
UPDATE on Ian Tomlinson
Disgraced 'Dr' Patel [pictured in glasses] acting as a pathologist, gave false cause of death on Ian Tomlinson, the Tower Hamlets [Isle of Dogs] resident who was killed in April 2009 during the G20 demonstration in the City. Mr Tomlinson’s family still wait to know what really happened. Just how hard it is to get justice in England has been seen at every stage so far since the newspaper vendor from the ordinary parts of the East End’s Dockhands was killed in the City of London on that fateful occasion of the demonstration against the G20 leaders’; ‘summit’ being hosted by then UK Premier Gordon Brown. As AADHIKARonline has exclusively revealed within minutes of the report, the Ian Tomlinson death was DISMISSED on the BBC News Channel by the presenter of the evening’s news bulletins, Chris Eakin. Eakin repeatedly said that Ian Tomlinson's [he did not name Mr Tomlinson the victim at first] had ATTACKED Police and as a result of a clash THAT followed, Mr Tomlinson. Of course that was a blatant untruth and a lie. So who was responsible for that outrageous attack on the victim within literally minutes of the innocent man’s death? [To be continued]

Updating on Boris Johnson's fumbling all over the place in October 2007 in view of his CRASS role

Updating on Boris Johnson's fumbling all over the place in October 2007 in view of his CRASS role
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. 2218 [2208] [2200] [2145] Hrs GMT London Thursday 31 March 2011. Boris Johnson is fumbling all over the place even now, four years on. In October 2007 when his fumbling was spotted....Boris came unstuck even though he grabbed a Barclays business Bike paid for by the people of London and faked on as he embarked on a photo opps pedalling procedure along side the man who had so aptly diagnosed his act back in 2007. It was not Boris who was on hand to take the flack for the latest evidence of allegations that the “law and order” agencies in London were failing to perform to the required standard. Fronting those forces, of course, were the London Metropolitan Police who were castigated for the latest batch of failures. Protesters mounted the imaginary wall from where they issued a few seconds of chanting calls apparently for the consumption of the attending servile media of the “mainstream”. That the media in the British mainstream - and come to that on the majority of the side streams - is servile became clear in the hours that followed when the first of the two ‘mainstream London TV news bulletins’ failed to report the events at all. ITV London Tonight did not report the events and the BBC London News gave the occurrences as little contextual coverage as they could carry off. The people in and of London deserve much better than either ITV or the BBC are willing to provide. The people deserve the truth. And nothing but the truth. Nothing less than the truth. I shall be examining the key issues in the later parts of this London Commentary. [To be continued]

Boris Barclays Bike business comes unstuck while Ken Livingstone's ex aide utters 'uprising' words!

Boris Barclays Bike business comes unstuck while Ken Livingstone's ex aide utters 'uprising' words!
1950 [1940] Hrs GMT London Thursday 31 March 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. London ‘democracy’ regime suffered a rare moment of exposure today at the Boris-occupied Onion on the south bank of the river Thames opposite the Tower of London was the ‘Secy’ of exchanges between protesters demanding answers on how a south London artiste, Smiley Culture, had died whilst being arrested by Police and Boris Johnson's Police affairs deputy mayor Kit Malthouse. Malthouse duly suspended the meeting for ten minutes before he could exercise control again. The Tower of London is what lends the name ‘Tower Hamlets’ the inner city, deprived East End of London borough of that name. The Borough is home to the wife and the family of Ian Tomlinson, the newspaper seller who died while walking home two years ago. Mr Tomlinson died after being pushed by Police during the April protest in the City of London against the G20 summit at the time still ‘led’ by Gordon Brown. Hundreds of video footage of the incident and as broadcast by the BBC, ITV have shown the same sequences. However, today’s demonstration of anger witnessed at the Onion was not linked with ian Tomlinson’s family or to anyone else from the Borough. Yet signs are that the Borough of Tower Hamlets may again be dishonestly implicated to justify the attacks on civil liberties and on human rights. This may happen by some agents of the Establishment acting as agent provocateurs and staging some bogus ‘act of criminality against the forces of law and order” and then creating the pretext to say that they were some sort of “revolutionaries” intent on revolution in the East End! [And the story can continue along these lines]. This has been suspected by observers of the proceedings or the events during the proceedings held at the London assembly of the Met Police Authority....


[Our earlier commentary today SAID]
Chaos and pandemonium - almost - breaks out in the heavily guarded London Assembly MET POLICE ‘Authority’ meeting today. Boris deputy suspends sitting of the MPA, followed minutes later by Ken Livingstone's ex adviser Lee Jasper issuing a rare statement. Jasper has this afternoon been quoted by the Croydon local outlet CROYDON GUARDIAN as follows:
“Boris, the City, the commissioners, the IPCC, they had better be aware that this is the community at boiling point and we are ready to take action. We are back to the 80s. This is uprising.”
This is unprecedented stuff. The making of the claim that is. In the context of the truth as verifiable;e and checkable by reference to the most truthful available and accessible evidence and records of the events and the activities about ‘uprisings’ in London that is. There is no evidence to support even a suggestion that there has been a genuinely sustainable revolutionary uprising led by people of any non-European backgrounds in London for the past 100 years.
The word ‘uprising’ however, has been used a lot in that same time. But the use of the word and the actual level and standard and impact of political action led by a universally objectively describable revolutionary group of African or Asian or African and Asian people in London or in any other part of the UK are millions of years apart.
The fact that the lexicon of revolution has been repeatedly abused and misappropriated by agents and stooges of the Big Agenda makers and setters does not make the acts genuinely revolutionary. So whoever may be being tempted to throw the word uprising around or to insinuate to the effect that there may be an uprising brewing round the corner must make sure that objective evidence exists that a genuinely revolutionary group in fact exists and that it can and will carry out a sustained revolutionary campaign in any part of London. On the facts as we can access them at the time of writing this at 1915 Hrs GMT London we cannot see that such a possibility is real. So on that basis, we conclude that the Croydon Guardian should do a bit of reality check before attributing to a former Ken Livingstone aide and [still] close ally of Ken Livingstone such outlandish claims. [To be continued]

“...Just remember, if it is not broken do not mend it, but if risk is identified... AVOID it"

“...Just remember, if it is not broken do not mend it, but if risk is identified... AVOID it"
1630 [1620] Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
31 March 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
One of the aims of the Kay Jordan Foundation is to share the Kay Jordan management principles and strategy with the local community and beyond.
The lessons that can be learnt for the projects that Kay Jordan has set up and run for so long are most important now that the central Government is following the agenda of undermining precisely the kinds of projects local communities need in order to survive. In the decades of her defence of the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area, Kay Jordan has helped many families who would not have survived the economic crises had she not been there with her particular philosophy: do not risk it if you can avoid risk ...The families that Kay Jordan has helped have also been situated in other parts of London. Several in South and South West London. Those families would have crumbled without Kay Jordan’s help. In the particular way: by identifying risk and by avoiding the risk. Kay Jordan has avoided risk wherever she has seen it. By so avoiding risk, she has maintained the sustainability of the projects for the benefit of all concerned...
This principle has worked for Kay Jordan for over thirty years in the defence of the community in the East End of London. Given the possible risks that could threaten the projects, their numbers could run into hundreds. By intelligent approach, Kay Jordan has avoided the risks. We shall examine some of the risks that are now lurking about that might do damage to the projects that Kay Jordan has protected for so long.
Starting here NEXT. [To be continued]

Caring mother under CONDEM CUTS attack! Disabled daughter faces even bleaker future!

Caring mother under CONDEM CUTS attack! Disabled daughter faces even bleaker future!
0515 GMT Thursday 31 March 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque

Three generations march against the ConDem cuts FROM THE London daily MIRROR web site: by Damien Fletcher, Daily Mirror 26/03/2011 STAFF nurse Helen Ann Cantwell says she is usually the last person to get involved in politics. But she is so incensed by the savage cuts imposed the Tory-led government, she’s catching a train at 5am today to make it down to London to join the March For The Alternative. The 37-year-old is among three generations of her Glasgow family, with a proud history of working for the NHS, heading to the capital from Scotland to protest. Helen Ann, who has worked for six years in a medical receiving unit at Hairmyres Hospital, said yesterday: “I’m so concerned about cutting frontline staff at hospitals. Less staff means more stress for the remaining staff and it has a knock on effect. Patient care is going to suffer. “I am not a very political person but I know that it should not be frontline staff being cut, they must be able to come up with an alternative plan. “If the Government goes ahead with these cuts, Britain will suffer in so many respects. “It’s time to stand up and march and make a change. I hope they listen.” Joining Helen Ann will be sister Liz Young, 36, who works in the finance department at Monklands Hospital in Airdrie, their mum Helen Duddy, 59, who also works in finance for the NHS and Helen Ann’s daughters Leanne and Laura-Jane Hawkins, 14 and 11. Advertisement - article continues below » “We are so proud to have worked as a family for the NHS,” says Liz. “It’s a vital service and cutting frontline staff – nurses and doctors – is just a terrible mistake. “We are all getting the train from Motherwell train station at 5am because it’s so important to us. “We have to send a message to the Government that this is not the way to rebuild our economy. “The area we live in is classed as a technical exclusion area, it’s pretty run down and we have higher unemployment than other towns. We have curfews and anti-social behaviour. “So the idea of cuts that mean more youth unemployment and less hope for our communities is terrible.” Her mum Helen says now is the time to stand up and be counted to convince the ConDem government the cuts must stop, as too many of the most vulnerable in society – the young, the disabled and the old – are suffering. “We do not make this journey lightly,” she says. “We won’t be home until midnight. It’s important to send out a message that cuts are not the answer.”

CONDEM CUTS OFF vital lifeline desperately needed by disabled students like this young woman....

CONDEM  CUTS OFF vital lifeline desperately needed by disabled students like this young woman....
0455 [0450] GMT London Thursday 31 March 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. Kay Jordan has spent the past decade in building up a disabled young persons' service based in the Brick Lane London E1 area. In this acutely hard-hitting time when the arms-dealers and warmongers are faking it as 'caring makers of cuts to the caring services', AADHIKARonline will be publishing extended EXCLUSIVELY researched and written features and factual updates on how Kay Jordan has been anticipating so much of the CONDEM assaults on Society. The care, the dedication and the utter universal love for the ones with less ability to look after themselves that Kay Jordan has been showing deserve to be shared with the wider society and humanity. [To be continued]

Cricket World Cup? Celebrations? Not in the slums! Neither in Mumbai. Nor in Delhi! Or Karachi!

Cricket World Cup? Celebrations? Not in the slums! Neither in Mumbai. Nor in  Delhi! Or Karachi!
0055 Hrs GMT London Thursday 31 March 2011. [from the previous editions] AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 2250 GMT Wednesday 30 March 2011.This has been a very historic moment in the recorded history of British ‘mainstream’ media-made myths about the states of relations between the stated independent States of India and Pakistan. Indeed! The “stated independent states” is a phrase that I have just coined to refer to the fact of the fraudulence about the Sub Continent that the ‘mainstream’ British media - or the ‘mainstream’ media agenda-setters in Britain -have contrived and perpetrated over the past decades. Sixty four years in fact. The ugliness of the lies are all there in the volumes of printed words and the millions of hours of the sound archives made up of the untruths that they have told about the Subcontinent that is very generally identifiable by the three States of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. The peg today has been the so-called cricket diplomacy activities during the current ‘world Cup’. And the outpourings of solemnly-delivered references to the four major wars between the two States of India and Pakistan almost completed the routine image.Then of course there is the facto of the two States being armed with nuclear weapons. As ‘news script-presented’ by Jon Snow over at Channel 4 News this [Wednesday] evening. So why am I not joining in the ‘celebrations’? I would happily consider joining the ‘celebrations if I knew the answer of the ‘mainstream media’ to this simple question: HOW MANY of the people in the slums have been able to even breathe at a healthy rate during the hours of the overly-hyped Cricket match between India and Pakistan today? [To be continued]

CONDEM continue to condemn society to cut up society!

CONDEM continue to condemn society to cut up  society!
EVIDENCE MOUNTS OF CONDEMNABLE CONDEM CARRYING OUT AGENDA FOR BREAKING UP SOCIETY! [TO BE CONTINUED]

Where was Mr Alex Kenny exactly on the evening of 8 March 2011, only three weeks ago?

Where was Mr Alex Kenny exactly on the evening of 8 March 2011, only  three weeks ago?
1455 [1445]
[1430] [1420]
Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday 30 March
2011.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
Why is Mr Alex Kenny posing 'against' CUTS?

We have shocking questions for him. Those questions include this one: where was Mr Alex Kenny exactly on the evening of 8 March 2011, only three weeks ago when the Tower Hamlets Council was doing the cuts that it WASN'T UNDER A LEGAL DUTY to make? Was Mr Alex Kenny demonstrating against THAT? If not, why not?
Mr Alex Kenny is fast becoming a fixture in the propaganda parades of the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets CORRUPT Council.
The clique is a corrupt Clique and as it controls the Council, the Council, to that extent gets to be corrupted and on the facts is corrupt. Mr Kenny has nought to say about the Council. Not if he is required to tell the truth about the lies that Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique tells about its being under a duty to make the cuts that it has made [dated 08 March 2011] by defying the constitutional duty and obligation to show to the people in the Borough why it must make the cuts. That is why Mr Alex Kenny was not to be seen demonstrating truthfully outside the Council at the Mulberry place on 8 March 2011.
Mr Alex Kenny wasn’t demonstrating EITHER against the “UNDERCOVER” Chief executive “Dr” Kevan Collins who on that same date [08 March 2011] officiated as the issuer of the ‘stamp of official authority’ justifying the BLOCKING of people in Tower Hamlets from being able to even THINK that they were entitled to attend as “OBSERVERS” as the Council claque went about making the cuts that CONDEM Cameron craved but had no legal let alone moral right to demand. So what was Mr Alex Kenny doing when hundreds of Tower Hamlets residents, electors, camapgners, thinkers, commentatrors got denied the right to attend as observers at the public gallery on 08 March 2011? [To be continued]

A SPLASH TOO LATE! Why the 'EAST LONDON ADVERTISER' should have wholeheartedly SAID NO to 'mayor'

A SPLASH TOO LATE! Why the 'EAST LONDON ADVERTISER' should have wholeheartedly SAID NO to 'mayor'
A SPLASH TOO LATE! Why the 'EAST LONDON ADVERTISER' should have wholeheartedly SAID NO to an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets. Instead of doing that and reporting the BHANGEELAAR! Campaign against an elected mayor, the East London Advertiser pandered to the most backward of urges and massaged the capricious egos of the most undemocratic and the short-sighted opportunists that trade in the name of the local community as they maintain their careers of variously jumping on board one bandwagon after another. By the time that the East London Advertiser ‘cottoned on’ to the fact that the elected mayor thing was set to end up being an added deficit that would cause losses to the local people, it was organisationally unlikely to mobilise the necessary numbers of men and women to deliver the NO! votes in a clear way. But that is only a comment on the timing of the ‘East London Advertiser's then act of residual stupidity by editorial alienation. There is much more to that ‘referendum’ and that ‘vote’ than has been told by anyone. So far on any media. We here start the process of correcting that lack of action evidence and archive. [To be continued]

The BHANGEELAAR! Campaign, also organised by Muahmmad Haque, published the following comment on 4 October 2010 on the web site of the London GUARDIAN in response to the reference to the then “directly elected mayoral campaign” in Tower Hamlets as had been being made by the Guardian's London Bog editor Dave Hill.

Your latest blog [Guardian's London Bog] about Tower Hamlets serves to vindicate what we have argued all along: that there is a manifest lack of compliance with the basic requirements of democracy, transparency, constitutionality and legality in the conduct of some of the most mentioned individuals, post-seekers, their groups, factions and parties and their agents around the Currently topical issue of the role of the locally elected Tower Hamlets Borough Council. Your positive reference to a blogger, the “well connected John Gray” should be put in context. He has been, on the facts, a de facto publicity blogger for the ‘Labour Party’ controllers [as distinctly different from any affiliation with any objectively defined democratic movement inside the Blair Labour Party of the past decade or so] at any given time. Perhaps you would like to look back at some of the optimistic things he had said about another of the apparent celebrity names that you have mentioned today Michael Keith when the latter sought to get elected to Tower Hamlets Council at the Shadwell ward in 2007. The truly local reasons for Michael Keith’s failure on that occasion included the very deep rift that Keith experienced with a [still-unnamed here] former councillor on Tower Hamlets Council and HIS followers in the Ward. Some of the faces displayed on the blog you have linked to belong to the very same persons that had also ENDORSED Lutfur Rahman! And still others belong to the Tower Hamlets CONSERVATIVE Party! So much so that one of those Conservative Party [member] faces that the “well connected John Gray” displays ALSO appeared on a satellite TV programme on the day before [that is, on Friday 01 October 2010] making the appearance as part of the ‘Conservative Party contingent in the ‘studio’ lending support to the Conservative Group of councillors leader Peter Golds who was standing in for Neil King…

[To be continued]

When EVEN the filthy SUN finds the UK judicial system idiotic it is time to get seriously worried!

When EVEN the filthy SUN finds the UK judicial system idiotic it is time to get seriously worried!
0525 GMT London Tuesday 29 march 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. When EVEN the filthy SUN finds the UK judicial system idiotic it is time to get seriously worried! And when we have to PREFER the SUN and the DAILY MAIL to any of their marginally moral rivals then it is time to demand an end to the violent blatant break up of society that the CONDEMNABLE CONDEM COLLUSION is carrying out..[To be continued]

Very little intimidated Kay Jordan! Says Buz Hurrell, fellow student and friend for decades!

Very little intimidated Kay Jordan!  Says Buz Hurrell, fellow student and friend for decades!
0805 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 29 March 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
Baz Hurrell told me on film [click on the image next to this commentary to view the video I have published on youtube] a week ago today that in his knowledge of Kay Jordan “very little intimidated her!”
I agree with Baz.
Is there however someone somewhere who might know something that could conceivably suggest otherwise? I will be very interested to know all about any of THAT! . [To be continued]
From the previous editions
Baz Hurrell on the work of Kay Jordan- OUR FULL REPORT DUE HERE later than previously scheduled
1445 Hrs GMT London Monday 28 March 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque. Architect Baz Hurrell has been a fellow student with Kay Jordan at the Architectural Association. He has been one of Kay’s friends. Baz spoke to me briefly last week about Kay Jordan's work for others. He has known Kay for forty years and been immensely impressed by Kay's outstanding humanity...[To be continued]

AADHIKAROnline focus on the Mirror splash is followed by BBC TV programme 28 March 2011

AADHIKAROnline focus on the Mirror splash is followed by BBC TV programme 28 March 2011
0520 Hrs GMT London Monday 28 March 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. AADHIKAROnline focus on the Mirror splash is followed by BBC TV programme 28 March 2011

How is this vulgarity 'news' presentation on a day full of innocent people getting killed, starved?

How is this vulgarity 'news' presentation on a day full of innocent people getting killed, starved?
How is this vulgarity 'news' presentation on a day full of innocent people getting killed, starved?

Who allowed Stonehouse to insult all Bangladeshis after he got caught stealing and lying?

Who allowed Stonehouse to insult all Bangladeshis after he got caught stealing and lying?
0400 Hrs GMT London Monday 28 March 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. As the Guardian report shows [CLICK on the image of the daily MIRROR to view] the then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's part in 1980 in covering up for John Stonehouse was a moment that brought to life the existence of The Establishment! [To be continued]

CLICK on the image below and you get a Billy Connolly video containing a song on John Stonehouse

CLICK on the image below and you get a Billy Connolly video containing a song on John Stonehouse
Monday’s DAILY MIRROR splash on canoe man vanishing at the beach echoes the 1970s John Stonehouse at Miami!

The real message from the demonstration is that Big Business must go! Say No to Big Business [4]

The real message from the demonstration is that Big Business must go! Say No to Big Business [4]
0355 Hrs GMT London Sunday 27 March 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. WE HAVE BEEN POSTING 24.7 commentaries on the crisis caused by MIC and Big Biz and their stooges. The latest evidential posts that we have made exposes the two Eds [Ed Balls and Ed Miliband] and of course Ken Livingstone who made an appearance via sound on the Iranian TV channel PRESSTV. In his statement there, Ken Livingstone appeared to be criticising the Super Rich who had lied! Strange that! As Ken Livingstone remains on the record as having lied himself and of boasting g of being the liar that played such a party in lumbering the UK public;ic with the 2012 Hosting wastes...[To be continued]

With BOTH EDS BACKING CUTS, what was the point of the staged anti-cuts rally at Hyde Park? [3]

With BOTH EDS BACKING CUTS, what was the point of the  staged anti-cuts rally at Hyde Park? [3]
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.
0215 GMT Sunday 27 March 2011.
This footage is being cited as evidence of the BBC’s central violation of its duty to tell the truth.
This particular footage was broadcast at the beginning of March 2011 on the BBC TV London news programme.
Although presented by the BBC London ‘Political Editor’ Tim Donovan, the segment was devoid of the real political ingredients that mist have been included if it was intended to convey the true facts to viewers. Instead the segment was entirely artificial in that it did not show the truth of the role of the pro-CONDEM ‘Labour’ time-servers like Steve Bullock the ‘directly elected executive mayor’ in the south London Borough of Lewisham.
Instead the BBC’s reference to Lewisham's setting the cuts budget was totally irrelevant to the real struggle. If anything, that reference itself condemned anti-cuts protesters as a nuisance in effect and thereby gave legitimacy to Bullock’s stealth of the right to say NO. Bullock did that by hiding the CUTS budget in the morning, an unprecedented act for an allegedly democratically elected local Council!
And that struggle continues today, Sunday 27 March 2011 within the 24 hour frame of the formal staging of a hugely orchestrated show demo against CONDEM CUTS by the State-controlled Trade union Congress [=TUC] in London.
The illogicality and the artificiality of the State-controlled agenda of the BBC and that of the TUC was given full confirmation and endorsement by Ed Miliband who duly delivered the bogus speech that he has made his speciality!
The day’s real politics was observed in the BBC’s overzealous over-faked dedication to following what its succession of scripted ‘news’ bulletin presenters and reporters kept denouncing as diverters, the ‘anarchists’ ‘bent’ on clashing with the police and attacking some buildings in Oxford Street and then massing in the Trafalgar Square.
The truth is that the NO CUTS DAY OF ACTION was nothing of the sort. BOTH Eds BACK CUTS!
[To be continued]

TODAY the BBC lied and the BBC lied very effectively.

TODAY the BBC lied and the BBC lied very effectively.
1905 [1855] [1845] Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 March 2011. AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. IF the BBC were recognised for its pivotal part in the perpetuation of poisonous propaganda for Big Business paraded as mundane news and factual delivery then it would also be recognised as to how almost perfect its preparatory image-making and graphics can be. By slotting in Martine Croxall, one of the propaganda Corporation’s most accomplished flaunters of ice-cool deception, to present the day’s peak viewing hours so vital for the delivery of the BBC’s scripted line on the Day of Demonstration against the Cuts, the BBC achieved its own triumph over the truth. The BBC lied and the BBC lied very effectively. And in her fronting of the attack on the thinkers and the truth-tellers, Martine Croxall maintained the same unaffected appearance that she would do had she landed here from ouster space and chnaced upon a crowd of really time-wasting infants messing about in the muddy pond! Martine Croxall has not starved. [To be continued]

"Police seem to be quite determined to extract this individual from his colleagues' -Joe Lynam, BBC

"Police seem to be quite determined to extract this individual from his colleagues' -Joe Lynam, BBC
1855 [1845] Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 March 2011. AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. IF the BBC were recognised for its pivotal part in the perpetuation of poisonous propaganda for Big Business paraded as mundane news and factual delivery then it would also be recognised as to how almost perfect its preparatory image-making and graphics can be. By slotting in Martine Croxall, one of the propaganda Corporation’s most accomplished flaunters of ice-cool deception, to present the day’s peak viewing hours so vital for the delivery of the BBC’s scripted line on the Day of Demonstration against the Cuts, the BBC achieved its own triumph over the truth. The BBC lied and the BBC lied very effectively. And in her fronting of the attack on the thinkers and the truth-tellers, Martine Croxall maintained the same unaffected appearance that she would do had she landed here from ouster space and chanced upon a crowd of really time-wasting infants messing about in the muddy pond! Martine Croxall has not starved. NOT if her m,manicured mannerism was any guide to her life to day [To be continued]

CONDEMN the CONDEM CUTS! And take a sneak look too at the Libyan State TV joke!

CONDEMN the CONDEM CUTS! And take a sneak look too at the Libyan State TV joke!
AADHIKAROnline reporting on the SKYNEWS explaining how Libyan State TV is misreporting the London demomnstratioin against CONDEM cuts 26 March 2011

Balls on the march! But has EITHER Ed got a clue as to WHAT THE ALTERNATIVE to the CONS CUTS is?

Balls on the march! But has EITHER Ed got a clue as to WHAT THE ALTERNATIVE to the CONS CUTS is?
No CUTS demo: what happens AFTER the massive turnout? Has either of the Eds the answer ? [1]
Muhammad Haque London Commentary
1220 Hrs GMT
Saturday
26 March 2011
. The march taking place in central London this very minute against the UK CONDEM COLLUSION ‘Govt’ as fronted by Bullyingdone ‘Dave’ Cameron and sub-fronted by the equally Tory Nick [‘call me Lib dem’!] Clegg and their agenda, is massive even by the admission of the BBC. This march, however, is NOTHING as compared to the two million people who gathered in central London on Saturday 15 February 2003 against the Bliar Collusion with GW Bush and their war plans against the people of Iraq. On that day, UNLIKE TODAY, the BBC was in denial and it failed to report that demonstration in anything like the ‘almost positive way’ it is doing today's ‘NO CUTS’ demo!
On Saturday 15 February 2003 the BBC had hundreds of camera crew recording the entire demonstration and yet it did NOT broadcast the news! The FIRST substantial report on BBC TV of the demonstration of 15 February 2003 was in an editon of the PANORAMA programme in which Vivian White, one of the BBC’s now veteran reporters, did cover the events! That action by the BBC showed the total contempt for the campaign against war that the BBC has shown. So today's BBC coverage of the demonstration against the CONDEM COLLUSION CUTS will also show the BBC;’s agenda. We shall be covering the BBC’s behaviour throughout the day and over the remainder of this weekend.
[To be continued]


From PREVIOUS editions

Kitty USSHER is NOT truly exposed by the CPGB's daily. We shall take the lid off her, here, soon!
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 2200 [2145] Hrs GMT Thursday 24 March 2011. Kitty USSHER! The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign helped expose her three years ago. That was over Kitty USSHER’s then dodgy role as a peddler of some VERY DODGY elements in Tower Hamlets. The “part” that Kitty Ussher then played was in aid of elements who had been - and have remained ever since - linked with some of the most undignified and shameless elements who stole money from ordinary Bangladeshis in the UK via an outfit called First Solutions that had its ‘HQ’ dubiously sited at an over-promoted address in the Whitechapel Road London E1 the detractors of ordinary Muslims always connect with a still private and allegedly suspicious political operation.
Kitty USSHER was “targeted” by a number of self-seekers and idiots at the time, who played their part to dampen the community based campaign that we were organising to get the people their money back. Those elements abused the community’s anger at the thieves and they allowed the thieves’ ‘mates’ to use “links” [that were very tenuous at best] with the G Brown “government” and by doing so they allowed the thieves to get away with their crime against the Bangladeshis. Whatever HER motives, Kitty USSHER went along with the line that the thieves desperately wanted. She aided and abetted the thieves’ promoters and she was able to create the mirage that the “UK Govt was on the case and that the Bangladeshis would get their justice”! NO such luck! The Bangladeshis who had been robbed got nothing. And Kitty, whop managed to feature in the list of scandalised MPs despite her corrupt bragging that her family had been “a superior one”, is now set to be embroiled in even dirtier scandals all derived from her greed and her lack of ethics in her conduct concerned [To be continued]

No CUTS demo: what happens AFTER the massive turnout? Has either of the Eds the answer ? [1]

No CUTS demo: what happens AFTER the massive turnout? Has either of the Eds the answer ? [1]
Muhammad Haque London Commentary 1220 Hrs GMT Saturday 26 March 2011. The march taking place in central London this very minute against the UK CONDEM COLLUSION ‘Govt’ as fronted by Bullyingdone ‘Dave’ Cameron and sub-fronted by the equally Tory Nick [‘call me Lib dem’!] Clegg and their agenda, is massive even by the admission of the BBC. This march, however, is NOTHING as compared to the two million people who gathered in central London on Saturday 15 February 2003 against the Bliar Collusion with GW Bush and their war plans against the people of Iraq. On that day, UNLIKE TODAY, the BBC was in denial and it failed to report that demonstration in anything like the ‘almost positive way’ it is doing today's ‘NO CUTS’ demo! On Saturday 15 February 2003 the BBC had hundreds of camera crew recording the entire demonstration and yet it did NOT broadcast the news! The FIRST substantial report on BBC TV of the demonstration of 15 February 2003 was in an editon of the PANORAMA programme in which Vivian White, one of the BBC’s now veteran reporters, did cover the events! That action by the BBC showed the total contempt for the campaign against war that the BBC has shown. So today's BBC coverage of the demonstration against the CONDEM COLLUSION CUTS will also show the BBC;’s agenda. We shall be covering the BBC’s behaviour throughout the day and over the remainder of this weekend. [To be continued]
From PREVIOUS editions

Kitty USSHER is NOT truly exposed by the CPGB's daily. We shall take the lid off her, here, soon!
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 2200 [2145] Hrs GMT Thursday 24 March 2011. Kitty USSHER! The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign helped expose her three years ago. That was over Kitty USSHER’s then dodgy role as a peddler of some VERY DODGY elements in Tower Hamlets. The “part” that Kitty Ussher then played was in aid of elements who had been - and have remained ever since - linked with some of the most undignified and shameless elements who stole money from ordinary Bangladeshis in the UK via an outfit called First Solutions that had its ‘HQ’ dubiously sited at an over-promoted address in the Whitechapel Road London E1 the detractors of ordinary Muslims always connect with a still private and allegedly suspicious political operation.
Kitty USSHER was “targeted” by a number of self-seekers and idiots at the time, who played their part to dampen the community based campaign that we were organising to get the people their money back. Those elements abused the community’s anger at the thieves and they allowed the thieves’ ‘mates’ to use “links” [that were very tenuous at best] with the G Brown “government” and by doing so they allowed the thieves to get away with their crime against the Bangladeshis. Whatever HER motives, Kitty USSHER went along with the line that the thieves desperately wanted. She aided and abetted the thieves’ promoters and she was able to create the mirage that the “UK Govt was on the case and that the Bangladeshis would get their justice”! NO such luck! The Bangladeshis who had been robbed got nothing. And Kitty, whop managed to feature in the list of scandalised MPs despite her corrupt bragging that her family had been “a superior one”, is now set to be embroiled in even dirtier scandals all derived from her greed and her lack of ethics in her conduct concerned [To be continued]

David Cameron is [NOT pictured] complacent about crime in the community. On the world market

David Cameron is [NOT pictured] complacent about crime in the community.  On the world market
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 2100 [2042] Hrs GMT Thursday 24 March 2011. David Cameron, the Tony Bliar-heir-in-his mind is fast confirming the truth of his deep ignorance of and contempt for society. If his utterances, prompted by the BBC today as part of THEIR ignorance about their duty to tell the truth about Society, are to be believed. He has uttered another idiotic ‘sermon’ extolling the virtues of parental role and duty about crime. He has not visited the estates in the inner cities at all. And he most certainly has no idea about the bankrupt councillors that trade in the name of the ‘Conservative Party’ on many of the inner city local borough councils. Including Tower Hamlets Council.
In my empirical studies of London over the past four decades, I have not once met or come across or been aware of a single “elected councillor”, of any Party affiliation [or none] in any part of London who has shown ANY sign of being EVEN AWARE of their duty to be a “democratically elected representative of the electors” first and foremost. It follows that the idiotic words delivered in the off-puttingly complacent accent by David Cameron as broadcast by the BBC today [Thursday 24 March 2011], are irrelevant at best and contemptible in their implications. And the context of Cameron’s complacence about crime in the community makes his position even less acceptable. Cameron is an arms-salesman in the “interenational market” who is now engaged in a business enterprise that is causing deaths to innocent people while creating the “need” for any amount of arms to be destroyed and others. even more ‘efficient’ ones to be manufactured. The BBC have avoided all references to CXamerobn’s arms-salesman role altogether in their plugs for Cameron via the BBC’s own “charity” work as a bargaining strategy claiming that the BBC does “support” the little ones! [To be continued]

Brick Lane Community & businesses have been ignored & under-served by T. Hamlets Council...

Brick Lane Community & businesses have been ignored & under-served by T. Hamlets Council...
2020 Hrs GMT London Thursday 24 March 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
Tower Hamlets Council has been in receipt of reports about the state of the Curry restaurants and their level of business in Brick Lane. One of the contacts has been updated this week. Those taking part in it have spoken extensively to AADHIKAR Media. We shall be publishing the summarised reports here next. And then we shall publish our comments on what the Council must do as a matter of urgency so that the POTENTIAL for economic stability and improvement for the local community is realised by using the existing capacity.
We examine the evidence and show how Tower Hamlets Council has been failing to use the existing capacity and economic and environmental abilities. COMING HERE in the next hours [To be continued]


1835 Hrs GMT London Thursday 24 March 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
AADHIKAR Media Foundation in association with the ALL VOLUNTEERS NEWS, the Kay Jordan Foundation and KHOODEELAAR! has been CAMPAIGNING for a community-based clean environment for all in the Brick Lane London E1 area:
for customers of the businesses and for the ordinary members of the public.

NEXT REPORTS update on Tower Hamlets Council’s role over the next months and year
EXCLUSIVE reports, investigations in texts and on video [To be continued]

CONTINUING TO CHALLENGE ED BALLS on the ECONOMY: WHY is the Bliar Party bureaucracy poverty-prone?

CONTINUING TO CHALLENGE ED BALLS on the ECONOMY: WHY is the Bliar Party bureaucracy poverty-prone?
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. 1115 [1100] [1050] Thursday 24 March 2011.
What Ed Balls has not mentioned in his interviews given to the BBC or to SKY News this morning about George Osborne's budget is the persistence in the Bliared Party bureaucracy for poverty creation. The same tendency is also very much active in the CONDEM Collusion. But that fact is no excuse for Balls’ failure to face up to HIS poverty.
What is Balls’ poverty? It is the entirety of the Balls’ ‘Party’ bureaucracy [=the time-serving cliques across the UK wherever there is a batch of votes-linked and thus votes-’legitimatised’ ‘decision-making’ ‘right/claim,’ in the name of the given area being operated] that is primarily and mainly about grabbing and grubbing. It is NOT about serving and delivering. The fact that Balls’ motor-mouth delivery of the sound and video bytes has been [and often is] noticeably faster and Kevan more coherent than anything either of the Milibands could ever do, is not the same thing as Balls being morally, ethically, materially preferable to whatever the Milibands could put on offer. And what THEY have to offer is not only not enough. It is offensively prejudiced, biased and ignorant. So why is it that Balls cannot see that and make the overdue amends om HIS ‘economics’ statements and policy alternatives? That is assuming that he doe actually believe in there being an alternative to the CONDEM Collusion. And that he, Balls, is actually an honest carrier of the responsibility of being the official; Opposition Chancellor! If Balls has got what it takes, at least intellectually, then he should start to answer my questions. I am making them verb simple for Balls.
What has he got to say about HIS solutions to the jobless plight? How does he deal with poverty, low income, hunger, famine and

MUHAMMAD HAQUE focussing on Balls' blasting of CONDEM CON. But CAN BALLS guarantee quality?

MUHAMMAD HAQUE  focussing on Balls' blasting of CONDEM CON. But CAN BALLS guarantee quality?
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. 1020 [0930] [0825] Hrs GMT Thursday 24 March 2011.
I am commenting this morning on the contents of a 3 minute appearance by Ed Balls on the BBC Breakfast programme [video based by AADHIKARonline on the BBC broadcast, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql1onAfaavg]
. Balls is the name that Michael Heseltine had used in a bid to create a sense of serious anxiety and fear in the assembled Con Party members of the time.
It is clear from Balls’ perofrmance on the BBC Breakfast slot that Ed Miliband too is not feeling too easy after Osborne's trickery.
Why? On the evidence of this appearance, Balls is miles ahead of Miliband.
Whether Balls will be able to escape the plotters inside the Bliared Party bureaucracy is a moot point at this stage.
The bigger question is: has Balls really got the grit and the integrity to face up to the failures of the Party STILL in de facto power on local Councils and in thousands of posts and positions across the country?
HOW are THEY being audited [IF AT ALL] on the economic impact of their continuing failures?
Does Balls recognise the central role that those play in the real ordinary day to day activities that make up the real Economy? [To be continued]

Kay Jordan's friend Dorothy Jones: an update here soon

Kay Jordan's friend Dorothy Jones: an update here soon
Kay Jordan's friend Dorothy Jones: an update here soon

COMMUNITY ARCHITECT Kay Jordan designed spaces that invited humanity to move in natural symmetry

COMMUNITY ARCHITECT Kay Jordan designed spaces that invited humanity to move in natural symmetry
0600 [0555] [0550] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 23 March 2011. By © Muhammad Haque.The is far too much to do! So you must excuse me if I don’t go on talking about how I met Kay Jordan. And one of the things that still requires a lot of work is the defence of the East End against the Agenda of Big Business that has been driving the Crossrail scam. Crossrail is wrongly described as a ‘biggest’ thins or “biggest’ that. It is in fact the thin edge of the wedge. Much more waste and much more environmental damage is entailed in it than the sum of £17 Billion or £15 Billion recited about it conveys. Kay Jordan understood this. Hence her dedication. Although at any time she could call on any of the few dozen people who she was in daily contact with as part of their work contract, she scarcely did that. Instead, Kay put in extra hours so that the campaign against the Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole plot was active and on the road. Many that stood to gain personally from a successful outcome to the immediate aspect of the campaign against Crossrail were unable to appreciate the impact of the plotted hole on their lives and on those of their families and neighbourhoods. Kay Jordan personally did not have anything to lose even if Crossrail hole had been allowed to be dug in the Brick Lane London E1 area. Yet she is the one who came forward and stood next to me and said, “ I am with you. We shall campaign and we shall stop them.” [To be continued]

KAY JORDAN FOUNDATION and ALL VOLUNTEERS NEWS partners in the inquiry into Council role in poverty

KAY JORDAN FOUNDATION and ALL VOLUNTEERS NEWS partners in the inquiry into Council role in poverty
1840 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 22 March 2011. .
By © Muhammad Haque The Editor ALLVOLUNTEERSNEWS and the Kay Jordan Foundation 2011.
We begin publishing this exclusive report based on our investigation of poverty creation in Tower Hamlets in inner city East London.
We shall publish key facts of cases based on actual policy operated whereby very highly motivated and capable individuals being pushed into poverty by the local Council.
Our series of exclusive reports will feature places and activities that will be very familiar to many both in Tower Hamlets and in other boroughs. One of the many such individuals is a long standing member of the community in the East End. She is well educated and very well motivated. Yet she is without income. Despite years of representation, she has been let down by the Council. The Council operates the poverty-creation scams as part of the agenda that David Cameron and his CONDEM Collusion is pursuing through the DWP [the Department for Work and Pensions].
The most important strategic aim in the running of that agenda is to get people in low income out of their homes and out of what remains of their communities. The brazen blitz on benefits is being pursued in war like manner with each and every legal claim being teated as an illegal one to begin with.
Thousands of families are being kept on tenterhooks by being submerged in litters of eviction threats. Those threats in turn are being made to appear legitimate by the creation of arrears that turn out to have been invented and fictional. Some of the lawfully mace clajms for rent rebvate arte denied and or osbructed by the Council whkich never piub shes the raesoins and is never held to account. The cycle of poverty creayon is the moist perssunet growth area in the East Ebnd of London.
[To be contiunued]
We begin publishing this exclusive report based on our investigation of poverty creation in Tower Hamlets in inner city East London.

1800 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 22 March 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. KAY JORDAN FOUNDATION for a sustainable community is based on universal common sense.. [To be continued]

Aman Dalvi in Brick Lane: HOW is Tower Hamlets Council doing?

Aman Dalvi in Brick Lane: HOW is Tower Hamlets Council doing?
1305 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 22 March 2011. Edsitor © Muhammad Haque. Is Tower Hamlets Council delivering a service that the local community fairly deserves? A © Muhammad Haque investigation into schools, schooling, colleges, colleging and crime and criminality as being delivered by Tower Hamlets Council.. as [still, just about] the Local Education Authority [‘LEA’]. Here, shortly.

BRICK LANE TODAY rephrasing the description of the TRINITY OF EVIL: Sarko, BULLYINGDONE Dave+MIC

BRICK LANE TODAY rephrasing the description of the TRINITY OF EVIL: Sarko, BULLYINGDONE Dave+MIC
1745 Hrs GMT London Monday 21 March 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. GUARDIAN online picture updates on the CONDEM POVERTY at home and abroad! Dave CAMERON is doomed to fail in his wars on the poor and the dispossessed... [To be continued]

SUNDAY EXPRESS does NOT believe in the human rights of the involuntarily impoverished!! [1]

SUNDAY EXPRESS does NOT believe in the human rights of the involuntarily impoverished!! [1]
1850 [1845] [1830] [1800] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
20 March 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
The strange thing is that the Richard Desmond-ed SUNDAY EXPRESS has shown ‘awareness’ of something that it is usually in denial of. POVERTY in Britain.
So why is the SUNDAY EXPRESS running the front page story today about the country being in starvation: “UK BEGINS TO STARVE”?
Is it part of Desmond’s state of mind that is doing it? That he cannot bear to mention either Libya or Muammar Gaddafi without feeling unwell?
So powerful is the hatred of Gaddafi in Desmond’s ‘journalistic culture’ [!!!!] that he is forced to accept the bit of the truth about the really horrible agenda that the CONDEM COLLUSION in the UK is all about: to CREATE MORE POVERTY in Britain!
Desmond has not personally signed the piece as such. But his true agenda is behind the SUNDAY EXPRESS diversion.
The SUNDAY EXPRESS does NOT represent the rights of people who are already in poverty.
Nor has it any true evidential ground to claim to have conducted a sustained and consistent campaign to expose the real villains who cause poverty and who keep poverty going as part of the agenda of corrupt politics that the SUNDAY ENDERS shores up and backs.
The DESMOND-owned ‘newspaper and media’ outlets are among the worst offenders who daily violate the universally recognisable; rights of the people who are pushed into poverty involuntary. Hence the cheap, dishonest and misleading and untruthful tales peddled by these outlets; that paint the people in involuntary poverty as being willingly so.
The DESMOND ‘media’ outlets also conceal the evidence that would in fact expose such villains as David Fraud [currently engaged in perpetrating a morality-free act of robbing the people of their rights to dignity and decency] to be a political careerist and opportunistic defrauder of the rights of millions of people who are and have been in involuntary poverty, destitution in Britain for years and even longer. So long as DESMOND - or for that matter the ‘rest’ of ‘Fleet Street’ - keep shielding the real villains [the placemen and placemen as ministers in CONDEM and in other varieties of ‘Government’ who in fact front the even realler [there is another coinage by your diagnostic commentator] agenda-setters namely the Big Business Military Industrial Complex and their assortments of agents, stooges across both ‘Whitechapel’ and in local agencies including inside the locally “elected” Councils, and regional assemblies] there cannot be the environment that is very urgently needed whereby the democratic voices of the people thus economically disenfranchised can be effectively, sustainably and credibly heard and the appropriate rules, regulations and legislation can be put in place and updated so that there is no denial of rights, no hunger, no destitution and most emphatically no starvation.
The DESMOND media will NOT campaign for such change either centrally or via the elected House of Commons or the elected charades of regional assemblies or indeed their still ‘continuing’ local boroughs and or parish versions .
With the DESMOND-like agenda being pursued by the “rest’ of “Fleet Street’, STARVATION in Britain will not only continue but it will get wider spread than the SUNDAY EXPRESS splash recognises today.

Question time from the East End for "Mr Speaker" John Bercow! Has he got what it takes to answer?

Question time from the East End for "Mr Speaker" John Bercow! Has he got what it takes to answer?
2335 [2305] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
19 March 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
Organiser of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against “Big Biz agenda Crossrail hole Bill ...”.
One of the things that I experienced in June 2006 and to which I have been waiting to get a definitive truthful and constitutional answer has been the physical provocation I and others with me encountered from the personnel on alleged duty to guard the building. This is the reason why the Speaker of the UK House of commons will have to do a good deal of explaining. I last contacted the office of the ‘present holder in the office of’ the Speaker, John Bercow in February this year and was not abel to get from the individual who answered the call the constitutional reason why the personnel put in place in controlling our entrance into the main building in June 2006 behaved in the hostile, offensive, inciting way that they did behave.
And the reason why I am writing here expressly about this is the obstruction that Michael Martin’s ‘regime in the Speaker’s domain’ had put in the way of practical communication to his office.
The present one is said to also be in d denial about IT.
John Bercow's office told me that Mr Bercow does not accept emails. I shall be updating on this strange claim here in due course.
[To be continued]

AADHIKAR means Rights in many languages across the Sub Continent

AADHIKAR means Rights in many languages across the Sub Continent
AADHIKAR the weekly masthead Monday 19 December 1980 London E1 1HE UK

Exposing CON CONDEM Cameron's ridiculously over-hyped globe-trotting very costly adventures

Exposing CON CONDEM Cameron's ridiculously over-hyped globe-trotting very costly adventures
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary
1440 [1405] Hrs GMT London Saturday 19 March 2011.
This is a very small clip from the British TV station ITV reviewing in a pro-Government way the UN Security Council Resolution about Libya.
The ITV agendas is VERY much as a propaganda arm of the UK Govt. Which means that the BBC is NOT the only state-backing propaganda courier for the relevant regime in the UK.
The way that Cameron has been faking Bliar’s globe-trotting grandstanding pose as the REAL USA Military Industrial Complex [the dissector of the MIC is of course the late John K Galbraith] AGENT shows that Cameron, like Bliar, has 'full confidence' in the UK Media backing HIS Mid East adventures.
As Muhammad Haikal would have reminded Cameron, that CONTINUES to be a grave error on the part of the occupant at No 10 Downing Street.
The sick-making antics of France’s Niko Sarko are not to be dismissed as being only that. Underneath his dismissible exterior, Sarko carries the germs of true intolerance, prejudice and hatred. And that, as much as anything about Muammar Gaddafi and HIS violations and threats, explains why the two of them are having this inciting rendezvous today!
[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! action defending East End against Big Biz CON con CONDEM Cuts and more

KHOODEELAAR! action defending East End against Big Biz CON con CONDEM Cuts and more
1355 [1335] [1320] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
19 March 2011.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
The MOVEMENT defending the East End of London generally and the Brick Lane, Whitechapel Bethnal Green South and Stepney London E1 area began the Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail on a Saturday, 31 January 2004.
It was a meeting that had been called by Kay Jordan as based on the agreement with the Movement made in December 2003.
From that day on, Kay Jordan and Muhammad Haque have maintained the campaign against the Dirt hole that had been plotted by Big Biz and the City of London interests against the Hanbury Street and Princelet Street off Brick Lane That Dirt hole itself is scrapped. But the OTHER environmentally economically and socially destructive and anti-East End poverty-creating, internally exclusional, dispossessing aspects of the Crossrail hole agenda remain.That agenda is being still pursued by Big Business that has been using the “locally elected Council.. and the other “locally elected” occupiers of posts in the UK regional and central state apparatuses. They and the other state-controlled agencies are active in promoting the interests of BiG Business by undermining the democratic rights and the economic and the social needs of the people of and in the ordinary East End of London.
The MOVEMENT defending the ordinary people in and of the East End of London must do the defending and is doing so by expanding the base and the frame of campaign references in light of the CONDEM attacks that have added a set of extra layers and fronts against the people in inner cities UK.
The Khoodeelaar! campaign continues to defend the ordinary people who constitute the East End community against those remaining attacks and the remnants of the Big Biz agenda that Crossrail hole scam is and has been a strategic part of. [To be continued]

UPDATING on UK CONDEM Cameron's war on the poor at home and on the oil-owning Mid East States

UPDATING on UK CONDEM Cameron's war on the poor at home and on the oil-owning Mid East States
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary. 1050 [1015] [1000] Hrs GMT London Saturday 19 March 2011 By © Muhammad Haque On the lethal ignorance of the desperate imperialist. The desperate imperialists are endangering the safety and the security of our world once again.
As exposed even on the BBC TV channel this morning [Saturday 19 March 2011] albeit in an unintentional way. That exposure occurred in a clip on the BBC TV programme “Breakfast” where a guest promoter of the front pages of “Fleet Street” dailies [sounds so “ancient”, thus making another statement about our times!] ‘Inadvertently’ made the reference to Tony Blair’s roles on Libya. Mann also wondered how David Cameron could substantiate what he was claiming as the real purpose behind the UN Security Council’s Resolution about Libya.
I say Mann ‘inadvertently’ did that because had he done the minutes’ long stint on the BBC as an integral part of a universally objective and ethically warranted theme, he would have asked what the official Opposition in the UK Parliament was doing on the matter.
But Mann did not do connection.
The contrast with the Olly Mann de facto perpetuation of the Cameron neo-imperialistic stance [now being fomented via the incredibly opportunistic and diversionary occupant of the post of the President of France Sarko] had been provided by a Washington DC based commentator, Phyllis Bennie, on USA role in the Middle East. Phyllis Bennie [her comments about UNSC on Libya, as recorded on the video with this URL makes the key points http://www.ips-dc.org/media/phyllis_bennis_on_libya_and_no-fly_zones], speaking to BBC News Channel from Washington within hours of the scandalously fabricated UN Security Council Libya Resolution, warned that that would lead to dangerous consequences for the world. NOT that the BBC News Channel has maintained that very important observation. Instead the BBC has reinstalled the Empire Agenda and has revived Tony Bliar in all but name.
It is Cameron the ‘globe-trotter’ aping the Bliar! Strangely enough, Bliar is not far behind! In fact he is even busier now than he has ever been!
Although Mann said that Bliar had embraced Gaddafi and given him approval, Bliar is popping up today by claiming that he has never done a U turn and that his ex pal Muammar Gaddafi deserves in effect the same treatment that he [Bliar] and his pal GW Bush gave to Saddam Hussein. [To be continued] Written and Edited by © Muhammad Haque. Published in London at 1110 Hrs GMT Saturday 19 March 1011 by AADHIKAR Media Foundation in association With ALLVOLUNTEERS NEWS, Kay Jordan Foundation, KHOODEELAAR! Research and Policy Support by London Community Audit Network, Inner Cities Policy Institute, Agenda Inner Cities, AAGAMIEUK. Production service by ICEPUSS London Graphics by fotografix London 1973

Games 2012 Sham in London's East End and Games Sham in Glasgow's East End!

Games 2012 Sham in London's East End and Games Sham in Glasgow's East End!
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary
0840 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
19 March 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
From London's “East End” and a callous clique in control of the local Council to Glasgow’s “East End” and a callous clique in control of the local Council!
BOTH Callous cliques are contemptibly indifferent to the consequences of their complicity with the crooked profiteers and greed-merchants who are wantonly abusing and over-hyping the “legacy” of the grandstanded “Games” flaunted via “world stage” claims that conceal the real costs being forced on local people...as this morning typified once again by Margaret Jaconelli’s continuing battle to beat the bulldozers against her rights and those of her local community across the “East End” of Glasgow in the offensively re-named “2014 Games Regeneration” ‘zone’!
Margaret Jaconelli’s experience has already shown to her that the “Regeneration Zone” is in fact a war zone....
A war of attrition against her by the corrupt clique on Glasgow local Council bent on bereaving her of her home and of her hopes for her family and loved ones.
The corrupt clique on that Council is in cahoots with the property speculators and their likes and their sights are set on others like Margaret...
The battle must continue for the whole of the community and for a democratic local Council
“Games Hosting Legacy” in the UK is EXPOSED AGAIN as a sham! Why? Because a “Games” site local Council is exposed as being in the grip of a cruel, unthinking and callous clique! That is how the role of Tower Hamlets Council has been described by KHOODEELAAR! for years. Now, a similar tag aptly applies to Glasgow City Council which is this morning hogging key headlines because of its wanton attacks on Margaret Jaconelli in the “East End” of Glasgow. The “East End” of Glasgow has featured before in the AADHIKAR Media and KHOODEELAAR! diagnostic commentaries. We have investigated the evidence and looked for evidential links across the UK. On our exclusive investigation we have made the link before on the evidence of the callous behaviour of the local Councils in BOTH “East Ends”. This morning, we update that link and so we also update our diagnostics. This diagnosis yields the finding that the behaviour of the two cliques on the two Councils has been the direct product of the absence of basic democratic audit and accountability of and by the “elected” councillors. The sub-fascistic attitude displayed by the local Glasgow Council towards Margaret Jaconelli has finally been exposed this morning after the local community stood up and backed her and forced the Council to stop its attacks on her. The EVICTION is on hold, for the moment. But the campaign against the callous Council will go on. It will HAVE to go on. We shall continue this series of reports and updater commentary throughout today Saturday 19 March 2011. And on dates after today as and when the events warrant them. [To be continued]

CAMERON deploys his own “female guards" to counter Gaddafi’s version as he CAMERON attacks t' poor

CAMERON deploys his own “female guards"  to counter Gaddafi’s version as he CAMERON attacks t' poor
1450 [1430] Hrs GMT
London
Friday
18 March 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
On the day that UK CONDEM Collusion CON Cameron contrived a scenario of confected convincibility about his conviction to wage war on the Middle East by uttering a lower-key version of Tony Bliar and delivered a series of untruths about the costs in all particulars justifying sending young British personnel to their deaths [BBC One O'Clock News, Nick Robinson reporting] and failing to make any comment about the latest market reports showing a record low in consumer confidence in the UK, one of the pro-war, pro-Big Business, pro-MIC Bliaring MPs, Nick Raynsford was seeking to stay in ‘the local news’ [preferably in and around his House of Commons seat] by referring to something that was in fact also happening. Nationwide was closing down branches across the most deprived parts of inner London and in the south East [not the “affluent South east” but the South East that is CONDEMNED by the EFFLUENCE of negligence that is being now carried out by the CONDEM regime] thus expediting the internal deportation programme mounted against the low income and the vulnerable even further. How can that be justified? How can ANY of the CONDEM assaults be justified? How can the CONBDEM denials be justified?
How can the CONDEM deprivation be justified?
How can Nick Clegg be justified as he keeps up the appearance of ‘parliamentary legitimacy’ behind the CONDEM violations of the most basic and universal of rights fos so many in the UK Now being targeted for internal cooperation and intensified depravation by CONDEM Collusion carrying out this CON agenda. [To be continued]

Marion Roe's happy-riding daughter riding roughshod over the poor...A look back at 1987 soon

Marion Roe's happy-riding daughter riding roughshod over the poor...A look back at 1987 soon
0400 [0340] Hrs GMT
London
Friday
18 march 2011
By © Muhammad Haque ...
Yesterday’s London EVENING STANDARD’s denunciation of Karen Buck, MP who is also one of Ken Livingstone's ‘mayoral candidacy campaign team members’ [2012], is very timely reminder of where the DISPOSSESSION-creating journalism is heading.
The EVENING STANDARD WANTS MORE DISPOSSESSION in London, not less. And the Karen Buck ‘tactics’, AS REPORTED by the EVENING STANDARD, will make things even worse for people in areas like Tower Hamlets unless she and anyone else who may actually want to stop the Tory attacks on the low income sections of the population get a fast grip of the so-called ‘evidence’.
Evidence that Tories like ex MP [CON] Marion Roe’s daughter Phillipa Roe [Housing chair, City of Westminster and one of the most Right-wing ‘local’ Councillors to be found anywhere in the UK today] have been abusing in their promotion of internal deportation of people already denied basic equality of income and all that goes with income parity.
The ‘tactics’ that Karen Buck has used are false, as they really rely on the emotion of the matter rather than the substance. She should go for the substance and concentrate her energies on showing the truth of HOW the Tories are CREATING POVERTY by using Housing as they have been for the past three years of the reinforced propaganda bandwagon following the take-over of ‘the Onion’ by the truly Right-wing brigade brought in by Boris Johnson.
We shall be detailing the REVERSE of the Tory Right Assault in London via Housing and show just how inept and useless the so-called Official opposition on the London Assembly has been about Housing.
And about CREATING NEW POVERTY via Housing. [To be continued]

UNO is used to rubber stamp go-ahead for ANOTHER war on the Middle East! BBC overruns schedule 4 PR

UNO is used to rubber stamp go-ahead for ANOTHER war on the Middle East! BBC overruns schedule 4 PR
UPDATES will be posted overnight

KEY POINTS of the EAST LONDON COMMUNITY CHARTER AGAINST THE CONDEM CUTS AGENDA [CCACCA]

KEY POINTS of the EAST LONDON COMMUNITY CHARTER AGAINST THE CONDEM CUTS AGENDA [CCACCA]
1815 [1600] [1544] [1520] hrs gmt
london
thursday
17 March 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
THE KEY POINTS of the EAST LONDON COMMUNITY CHARTER AGAINST THE CONDEM CUTS AGENDA [CCACCA] will be about the AUDIT of the CUTS-carrying out Council and the audit of the CUTS-compliant London Assembly and the audit of the CUTS-carrying Houses of Parliament.
The details of that audit will be spelt out here and on our twitter sites in the next 24 hours. UPDATES will follow
We shall also simultaneously publish the exclusive AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Reports our video reports overnight and on Friday 18 March 2011. Those web links will be published here overnight for ease of access . The CCACCA is therefore embarked now on a new Constitutional movement which will be the democratic device to hold the ones doing the cuts accountable and thereby to expose their weaknesses of ‘reason’ and thereby defeat them and finally to stop and reverse the cuts. It is going to be a detailed elaborate and deeply engaging campaign. This is the latest phase of the Movement for the defence of the community in the East End of London.
[From the previous editions]
the east end of london’s very own community charter to beat the condem cuts agenda is being published here next. as i finalise the contents, here is a contextual preview of what it is about: it is a charter updating the agenda for the community that comes closest to the values that the democratic group of councillors fought for almost a hundred years ago. i here refer once again to george lansbury and his colleagues who fought against the core agenda at the conservative assault on local democracy. i have already reported here and on the fast developing aadhikaronline video news and reporting web site via youtube, the outrageous absence of a serious mobilisation against cuts in tower hamlets. i have published only snapshots of the scenes outside the mulberry place [the ‘town hall’] as i photographed on 8 March 2011. the scene was a stockade. the only clear images that could be spotted at the ‘entrance’ to the mulberry place on that evening were those of the metropolitan police personnel. that was not a scene to be proud of in any democratic context at all. police officers should be seen in proportion and on the sidelines. they were the only people that could be seen for hours! which means that the people, the public, had gone! where had they gone? what had happened? what was so unacceptable about ordinary people being around the mulberry place to register a resounding no to the agenda of cuts? the first part of the answer to this question is that on that evening, democracy had been reported from tower hamlets. from tower hamlets council. and those who took part in that deportation of democracy were the “elected” councillors. as i pointed out on the evening, that was a betrayal of all the basic duties owed to the community by the “elected” ones. their betrayal has meant that they had flouted the democratic mandate. they had also forfeited their claim to being democratically installed any longer. so where is the ‘democratic opposition’ to that then? where are the “true democratic campaigners from all the true genuine democratic groups, parties and movement” that surface on suitable occasions claim that they mobilised the people in and of the east end? These mysterious elements surface when the very ordinary people are spontaneously gathered, assembled by certain tangible treats to the very existence of the people, Such as happened in June last year with the threat of a racist onslaught. Then the many ‘left’ grouplets materialised and made all manner of claims about THEIR achievements and their leadership! So where were THEY on 8 March 2011? Where have they been the past ten months that the CONDEM has been refining the assaults on the East End of London? Do ‘the left’ even know what the CONDEM operatives look and talk like “in the community”? The truth of the matter is that “the Left” is not there. It does not exist. It has not done so in Britain for decades. What the BBC “helpfully” does is to maintains a parade of updated images disguised as “the left”. The “mass day of demonstration against the cuts” planned for the last week of March 2011 is a typical “left” stunt! It could not be more Right! Just like the overly-hyped “Stop the War” banality lasting for the entirety of the Blair-Bush-Obama fronted Military Industrial Complex occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan and other parts of the resourced and naturally endowed world, the rest of “the left” is embarrassingly transparently [a tellingly ironic place for transparency in this context] active in diverting the people from democratic mobilisation against the corrupt agenda that is operated at home and morality-dressed abroad where occupation, looting and robbery are done in the nam,e of “vah-loos” that Gordon Brown had faintly uttered and those that William Hague has been exposed as being too incompetent even to coherently display without being caught up in his own serial errors and ‘events’!!!. William Hague NEVER deserved to be propelled to the “place” that he got propelled to in the first place. From the moment he was given that platform via the BBC and other Right media in Britain as the teenager that best personified “the Thatcherite future”, it was quite obviously that there was no real future for a democratic just and sustainable society ion Brian with any agenda that William Hague could be associated with. THAT he has been tolerated, nay even feted for over 30 years shows the real ignorance and bankruptcy of the “British establishment”. And the fact that “the left” has allowed that to go on for 30 years has once again vindicated my analysis of “the left”: that it does not exist. What is paraded as various “groups, factions and sub factions of the British Left” holding up banners and handing out leaflets at entrances to various bogus ‘campaigning events’ fronted and staged by the “British Trade unions, the TUC and by the fronter Labour Party bureaucrats” are fakes. [To be continued]

East End’s very own Community Charter to beat the CONDEM cuts agenda. Texts NEXT

East End’s very own Community Charter to beat the CONDEM cuts agenda. Texts NEXT
1815 [1600] [1544] [1520] hrs gmt london thursday 17 march 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. the east end of london’s very own community charter to beat the condem cuts agenda is being published here next. as i finalise the contents, here is a contextual preview of what it is about: it is a charter updating the agenda for the community that comes closest to the values that the democratic group of councillors fought for almost a hundred years ago. i here refer once again to george lansbury and his colleagues who fought against the core agenda at the conservative assault on local democracy. i have already reported here and on the fast developing aadhikaronline video news and reporting web site via youtube, the outrageous absence of a serious mobilisation against cuts in tower hamlets. i have published only snapshots of the scenes outside the mulberry place [the ‘town hall’] as i photographed on 8 march 2011. the scene was a stockade. the only clear images that could be spotted at the ‘entrance’ to the mulberry place on that evening were those of the metropolitan police personnel. that was not a scene to be proud of in any democratic context at all. police officers should be seen in proportion and on the sidelines. they were the only people that could be seen for hours! which means that the people, the public, had gone! where had they gone? what had happened? what was so unacceptable about ordinary people being around the mulberry place to register a resounding no to the agenda of cuts? the first part of the answer to this question is that on that evening, democracy had been reported from tower hamlets. from tower hamlets council. and those who took part in that deportation of democracy were the “elected” councillors. as i pointed out on the evening, that was a betrayal of all the basic duties owed to the community by the “elected” ones. their betrayal has meant that they had flouted the democratic mandate. they had also forfeited their claim to being democratically installed any longer. so where is the ‘democratic opposition’ to that then? where are the “true democratic campaigners from all the true genuine democratic groups, parties and movement” that surface on suitable occasions claim that they mobilised the people in and of the east end? These mysterious elements surface when the very ordinary people are spontaneously gathered, assembled by certain tangible treats to the very existence of the people, Such as happened in June last year with the threat of a racist onslaught. Then the many ‘left’ grouplets materialised and made all manner of claims about THEIR achievements and their leadership! So where were THEY on 8 March 2011? Where have they been the past ten months that the CONDEM has been refining the assaults on the East End of London? Do ‘the left’ even know what the CONDEM operatives look and talk like “in the community”? The truth of the matter is that “the Left” is not there. It does not exist. It has not done so in Britain for decades. What the BBC “helpfully” does is to maintains a parade of updated images disguised as “the left”. The “mass day of demonstration against the cuts” planned for the last week of March 2011 is a typical “left” stunt! It could not be more Right! Just like the overly-hyped “Stop the War” banality lasting for the entirety of the Blair-Bush-Obama fronted Military Industrial Complex occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan and other parts of the resourced and naturally endowed world, the rest of “the left” is embarrassingly transparently [a tellingly ironic place for transparency in this context] active in diverting the people from democratic mobilisation against the corrupt agenda that is operated at home and morality-dressed abroad where occupation, looting and robbery are done in the nam,e of “vah-loos” that Gordon Brown had faintly uttered and those that William Hague has been exposed as being too incompetent even to coherently display without being caught up in his own serial errors and ‘events’!!!. William Hague NEVER deserved to be propelled to the “place” that he got propelled to in the first place. From the moment he was given that platform via the BBC and other Right media in Britain as the teenager that best personified “the Thatcherite future”, it was quite obviously that there was no real future for a democratic just and sustainable society ion Brian with any agenda that William Hague could be associated with. THAT he has been tolerated, nay even feted for over 30 years shows the real ignorance and bankruptcy of the “British establishment”. And the fact that “the left” has allowed that to go on for 30 years has once again vindicated my analysis of “the left”: that it does not exist. What is paraded as various “groups, factions and sub factions of the British Left” holding up banners and handing out leaflets at entrances to various bogus ‘campaigning events’ fronted and staged by the “British Trade unions, the TUC and by the fronter Labour Party bureaucrats” are fakes. [To be continued]

Complete text of the Brick Lane Community Charter 2012, here next

Complete text of the Brick Lane Community Charter 2012, here next
London Communities Charter launched from Brick lane London E1. Full texts here next and then rolling 24 news and commentaries online and on video.

Campaign now to spot the sock puppets on UK Media braying for another war..

Campaign now to spot the sock puppets on UK Media braying for another war..
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary 0905 Hrs GMT Wednesday 16 March 2011. I am starting a new movement for spotting the latest variety of fakers and assorted liars that serve the propaganda agenda of Big Business Military Industrial Complex. I could not start with a more topical and visible sock puppet than Bill Buckley. With his frequent twisting of the miniature constitution complete with the hair-freed top, Bill Buckley sits before Chris Eakin on the BBC News Channel as an almost visible puppet mentally and structurally prostrate at the feet of The Cooperation for Lies He has now been spotted on Rupert Murdoch's Sky News outfit too. This time he was serving as the ghost of GW Bush or may be as the ‘new-look’ puppet of the Pentagon agenda now being prompted by Obama and implemented in Iraq, Afghanistan and increasingly in parts of Pakistan under the command of Hillary Rodham Clinton. The look on his face was a betrayal of the concept of universal humanity and compassion because the man was in fact thinking of ways to articulate a justification to attack millions of innocent people in the Middle East. Sockpuppet Bill Buckley was making the ‘case for war on Libya’ and in that servility to the Military Industrial Complex, he was jointly appearing on SKY.com with ultra warmonger and neo-Con propagandist the ‘soft-soundbyted’ Ian Dale. They repeated with no evidence of any concern for the UNO’s Declarations for Human rights or for the UNO’s other Charters emphasising the requirement for due process, legality, constitutionality and universality the call published by the warmogers-edited and the Guardianed Observer as by-lined to one of Tony Blair’s persistent marketeers, Andrew Rawnsley. [To be continued]

Very strange call by two British 'commenters' via Sky.Com. THEY brayed for war on Middle East!

Very strange call by two British 'commenters' via Sky.Com. THEY brayed for war on Middle East!
0020 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 16 March 2011. AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary on SKY.com as a Right platform for warmongers15March2011. Ian Dale and Bill Buckley abused the SKY.COM slot and instead of concentrating on the Front pages. they both embarked on a propaganda for a new war in the Middle East. They vied with one another as they got fanatical in their demand that 'the world' took action and started a war on Libya. Ian Dale demanded that Sky News also returned to warmongering and resumed propaganda for war. So full war zeal was Ian Dale that he even committed a historic act of ‘treachery’ and feigned that he even knew a thing called ‘the Arab League’! Never in the history of humanity had so much ground been conceded by such a superior human being to a pathetic bunch of moneybags such as the Arab League! The fact that Ian dale, a superior human being allowed himself to hold his nose and ‘recognise’ the Arab League must count as a ‘world first’! Unbelievable. Ian dale, of all people, actually departing from the script and utter [albeit only froi aboiut 5 seconds] as if the Arabs - any Arabs, could amount to anything worth referring to without uttering words of ‘suitable’ [!] contempt! The length and the depth of sacrifice that patriotic people would go to protect Big Business Military Industrial Complex Arms sales promotion !!!![To be continued]

BORIS echoes the BRAZEN disrespect for the people that BASILDON COUNCIL bragged of last night

BORIS echoes the BRAZEN disrespect  for the people that BASILDON COUNCIL bragged of last night
AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque London Report at 1405 Hrs GMT Tuesday 15 March 2011.
Exclusive commentary exposing Boris Johnson as he again contradicts himself and lets down the people of London.
The 2012 Games Tickets web site’ has gone live earlier today. But it has dampened the hopes of those people in London who legitimately expected that THEIR contributions by way of giving up in so many ays for helping with and participating in the facilitating of the Games would be recognised by their getting some tickets at a reasonable expense.
Speaking to ITV's London Today, broadcast in the past five minutes, Boris Johnson has justified his failure to Londoners. Instead, the overstated linguist resorted to a classic cover up and dodging device as a ploy to avoid facing the facts. Just like Sebastian Coe told the same ITV London NEWS Channel yesterday [Monday] of HIS failures to show that he was leading a fair and competent management of the Hosting of the Games.
Which adds up to show once again that the people of London generally and the people across East London in particular are not getting much of an access to the OTT-hyped Hosting.
Takes us straight back to almost three years ago when, at the end of April 2008 the then ‘mayor’ in the name of the people of London was boasting on the BBC Panorama Programme MAYORAL SPECIAL that he, Ken Livingstone, had LIED about the London Bid [in the period in the lead up to July 2005 when at Singapore the Bid was ‘successful’] in his overselling of Stratford in East London as THE MOST IMPORTANT site and argument for the bid......
We said then and we have shown ever since that Ken Livingstone's lying has only been matched by other lies by Boris Johnson and Seb Coe. All their lies have shown that they have no true respect for the feelings of the people, ordinary people of East End of London,. Goes to show that these careerists and time-servers do not respect people from other parts of the UK either.
The Seb Coe and the Boris Johnson lies and fakery have not been CHALLENGED by the erstwhile man of ordinary people Ken Livingstone.
And there in lies the true tragedy for all of them. Not as bitterly telling in the two Tories as it is in the alleged Old Labourite [in the alleged sense of being an] Old socialist Ken Livingstone.
The people of the East End have to fend for ourselves against the massive CONDEM assault made even more arduous by the callous indifference of Boris and Seb Coe and the failure of Ken Livingstone to stand up and be counted on ANY principle that he may still claim to have about the “deprived” people in East London and elsewhere in the rest of London [that has a vote ‘bank’! for him]. [To be continued]

Brick Lane CURRY 'touting': How to stop it and to find jobs for those who depend on 'touting'

Brick Lane CURRY 'touting': How to stop it and to find jobs for those who depend on 'touting'
Brick Lane CURRY 'touting': How to stop it and to find jobs for those who depend on 'touting' - the Muhammad Haque London Report - Part 1
[Edited again at] 1841 [1825] Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 March 2011 AADHIKAROnline © Muhammad Haque CAMPAIGN reporting on Curry restaurants and touting in Brick Lane [Linked video Interview filmed 08 March 2011M2U02624] This is a commentary that I am publishing online today Sunday 13 March 2011 along with footage of a series of interview I have recorded with one of the restaurant owners in Brick Lane. I have already published detailed accounts about the views held by this one particular restaurateur, Azmal Hussain. What I am doing here is putting in historical context the whole issue of touting passersby as potential customers for the Curry restaurants. are a total of about fifty such restaurants in Brick Lane going into Osborne Street to the south towards the Whitechapel Road. The estimated number of people working as staff in the restaurants would vary from three to five hundred.
Then there are the ‘touts’. All the staff are Bangladeshi. Exceptions are very rare.
This is the core of the identity of these restaurants. And their real strength. Without Bangladeshi staff, these restaurants would not be able to function. In latter parts of these reports, I shall examine the history and the current state of staff, training and the prospects of business for these restaurants. Right now, and in view of the deliberate creation of joblessness that is going on under the CONDEM regime in Britain, the issue that I shall be focussing on in the next part after this particular updater is the nEED FOR JOBS and the relevance of those needs of the availability of young people to ‘work’ as touts. I shall then look at the role of each of the following and examine their particular duties and performances:
The local Tower Hamlets Council
The London Metropolitan Police
The London Mayor in the context of the 2012 Hosting
Why I am concerned about the matter of touting in Brick Lane:
I have defended the community in the East End now for forty years, give an take a year or so. However, I have been part of and have in fact founded the Movement for the defence of the East End Community that has now existed for over 50 years.
And so to me Brick Lane has been at the metaphoric and the physical heart of the frame of action steps taken by the movement at the start and the ones being still taken today.
As I spelt out in my speech to the large gathering of the people who had assembled at the Hanbury Street ‘Brady Centre’ on Sunday 22 January 2006 in support of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Crossrail hole, I had been walking the streets of the East End for years raising awareness on the imminent and the lethal attack on the very existence of Brick Lane that we had known it to be.
And the reason why I had paid so much of time and resource to the cause of defending the area was as live then as it is today and as it has always been Apart from housing a whole host of people from all over the rest if the world with their own backgrounds and identities, Brick Lane has been the second home for Bangladeshis outside of Bangladesh. That is general. The more acutely true thing is that Brick Lane is the only place where it feels as if we are at home in Seelot!
At least that is the feeling when we forget about the unease, the nuisance, the hassle and the embarrassment that touting has now brought on the collective and the individual being of the community in the East End of London.
So it was a shock when I was treated as possible ‘customer’ by a stranger who almost blocked my passage as I took the turn left from the Hanbury Street into Brick Lane.
That was eleven years ago. In the year 2000. [To be continued]

Legal Disclaimer for attention of ALL visitors to and viewers of this blog and of its contents

Legal Disclaimer for attention of ALL visitors to and viewers of this blog and of its contents
AADHIKAR Media Foundation PUBLISHING LAW UPDATE. AADHIKAR Media Foundation PUBLISHING LAW UPDATE.
Editor © Muhammad Haque
UPDATED at 1310 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 March 2011
Urgent legal disclaimer for the attention of all viewers of and visitors to this blog series. Please note that ALL our work here is our copyrights and IPR and that we forbid ANY copying in any shape or form. Permission for reproduction will only be granted on written request in advance of any proposed publication. Please remember that our work is the product of SIXTY years of studies and will be protected in accordance with the law.
Where we use external materials, we make it plain and clear. The rest of the material is our work. It is thus our Intellectual Property and is covered by UK and international IP laws.
UPDATED at 1310 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 March 2011

Axeman Alexander [Danny] exposed with biting his tongue when quizzed on his cuts!

Axeman Alexander [Danny] exposed with biting his tongue when quizzed on his cuts!
1145 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 May 2011 By © Muhammad Haque Sheffield stalled! The axeman Danny Alexander was left biting his tongue when faced with some of the most basic questions caused by the drastic, insane cuts to the strategic areas of the economy and Society, a few minutes ago. Alexander, probably the closest crony groomed by Sick Clegg the fantasist ‘deputy prime minister’! It was ‘Danny Boy’ who was a closet colluder for the CONDEM Collusions long time before the country went to the polls on 06 May 2010. Clegg and Alexander were together in the long plot against democracy and against the welfare foundations of the UK Society. Alexander is styled ‘Chief Secretary to the Treasury’. This is an over-hyped title. It does NOT represent either the ability of the postholder or the agenda that the postholder peddles and executes whilst in that post. And it does not refer to any probity whatsoever about the conduct of the Nation's finances. It is a bloated badge that belongs to the boasting aspect of a careerist's ego than to any sober far less responsible conduct in serving the people with the treasury powers. And so it proved when Alexander appeared on Sky.com news programme hosted by Dermot Murnaghan in the past 20 minutes. On every key question put to him, Alexander was unable to answer with credibility or even application. He was wide of the mark. And that is going to be repeated in the time left for the Colluders as being ‘in power’. That phrase, ‘in power’ does not sound the same any more. Not since Nick the Sickmaker Clegg has overused it in justifying his collusion with the Bullyboy ‘Dave’ Cameron in the latter’s assault on Society under the guise of ‘deficit reduction’. Cameron has been cutting vital health and welfare support provisions which cannot be rationally justified by his claim that it should hurt to make sense. For BIG BUSINESS is in fact retaining the agenda that it had placed on Gordon Brown. Typical of that retention is the HS2 and the Crossrail projects. Neither has been found to be economically vital. In fact even Conservative Boroughs like Bromley are now openly defying CONDEM over CROSSRAIL. As are conservatives [and Conservatives] along the route of the planned HS2 attack on the English countryside. the vast majority of the people opposing HS2 are conservative and not motivated by any party political leanings whatsoever. And this analysis extends to the rest of the scams that CONDEM is still FINDING at costs of £Billions of UK Public [=’taxpayers’]. This is not only too fast [as Ed Balls reminded all when HE spoke to SKY presenter Murnaghan a few minutes before Danny Alexander did] but it is also too far. That is to say that the CUTS are NOT Necessary. Especially those, as Ed Balls also reiterated, that were causing people to lose their jobs! How can that be justified? [To be continued]

Stockade-sheilded Council Budget Meeting’

Stockade-sheilded Council Budget Meeting’
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque diagnosing UK broadcasting regulator OFCOM in the context of OFCOM’s ethnicity-linked licenses to outfits that are failing to serve the communities in whose names they seek and procure those licences UK.
1930 [1915] [1900] Hrs GMT London Saturday 12 March 2011.
In a TV clip [which we shall link to from here, in later editions of these exclusive reports] we have been examining is a vision of a politician in Bangladesh making a statement about alleged breakdown in law and order in Bangladesh today.
However, the same Channel, SKY 814 does NOT broadcast contextually speaking, anything like that same sort of ‘comment’ by Bangladeshis in the UK about the Society in the UK.
So OFCOM has been failing in its basic regulatory duty to ensure that operators controlling licensed outlets comply with their own undertakings given to OFCOM and to the public in THE UK that they would address the issues here in the UK.
OFCOM has been behaving like a very negligent outfit which only ever gets involved in the business of regulating when people make a fuss. Otherwise OFCOM lets the foul behaviour to go on unchallenged.
This is not good for society in Britain at all. In the context of THIS particular channel and its output, the failures by OFCOM has been letting the community in Tower Hamlets down very badly.
The depth of ignorance, misinformation and diversion away from the issues affecting the Bangladeshis in the UK that are daily perpetrated on the OFCOM-licensed outlets and carried on SKY channels linked to the UK Bangladeshi community is very serious.
So far, there has been no comment let alone investigation into the conduct and the agenda of these Channels. [To be continued]

UPDATING on Paddy Streeter who has a City Sicker record. He BROUGHT the City Assault on t' East End

UPDATING on Paddy Streeter who has a City Sicker record. He BROUGHT the City Assault on t' East End
The Muhammad Haque London Commentary. The Lib Dumbs erect a wall of Steel in Steel City Sheffield as they brace to put up with Nick CLEGG getting sick all over the issues as he confuses opportunism with principle and outrage with being in power and all that.
1035 Hrs GMT London Saturday 12 March 2011. The Sheffield wall of steel, exposed in this picture carried on the UK Indymedia “politics” “campaign” [questions remain about the site’s claim to being ‘politically neutral and independent”] web site, has yielded a glimpse of Paddy Streeter, doing what he does best. Streeter fakes.
This picture has been described by the poster on UK Indymedia as Streeter waffling some really incredibly offensive and patronising sing “promise” about being ‘rebellious’.
He is NEVER rebellious. His entire life and career have been about NOT rebellion but collusion. His role during May 1986 to May 1994 when the formerly styled SDP were in control at the Tower Hamlets Council included seriously questionable de facto deals with the City of London.
Now he is exhibiting another contemptuous outrage to local people in the Brick Lane London E1 area and the rest of the inner city deprived London Borough of Tower Hamlets by faking about being the Lib Dumbs’ ‘mayoral’ candidate in the name of London people in 2012.
Unless something unprecedented happens, there is no realistic likelihood that the Lib Dumbs can hope to succeed any incumbent in the Onion. Yet for the sake of evidence, we can allow Streeter and the Lib Dumbs the fantasy and say that it is conceivable that their ‘candidate’ can get in to the Onion. The real questions then begin: Firstly, “and then what?” CONDEM like, they will do what CONDEM has been doing from the ‘centre’ of ‘UK Governance’. The last candidate they had was Brian Paddick. Paddick was probably the ‘best’ Lib Dumbs candidate in the name of London. So how did he do? Not very well at all. And that is saying something very rare. The only other ’candidate’ material before Paddick of whom we have direct knowledge which we exclusively share below, was Slimy Hughes himself. In 1999, our Movement got hold of a transcript of a statement that Hughes had made about the Bangladeshis in Tower Hamlets living on Council estates. [To be continued]

Can Clegg learn from Salmond? Or is Clegg TOO SICK already to educate himself about tuition fees?

Can Clegg learn from Salmond? Or is Clegg TOO SICK already to educate himself about tuition fees?
The Muhammad Haque London Commentary
0830 Hrs GMT London Saturday 12 March 2011.
By© Muhammad Haque.
Alex Salmond in Edinburgh shows Nick Clegg one way to avoid
sickness! But can Sick Clegg get the message?
Clegg is sick because he keeps talking about ‘being in power’. He
misses the message coming loud and clear from Lib Dems themselves.
He says they should get used to protests. that is what happens when
you get into power, he says. He fails to see that being in power for its
own sake is not really being in power. If the foundation collapses then
there is nothing that any power can do to keep him in the state of
fantasy that he is in. Clegg’s sojourn to Davos in Switzerland when he
was supposed to be in charge of things during CON Cameron’s arms-
selling trip to the Middle East was made even more callous and stupid
when he justified that by dissuasively saying that he had forgotten that
he was supposed to be in charge! It is this contempt to duty that is
sinking Clegg. This is why he is truly sick and unfit for purpose. [To be continued]

Brick Lane Letter to Japan Saturday 12 March 2011

Brick Lane Letter to Japan Saturday 12 March 2011
Letter for Japan By © Muhammad Haque. Brick Lane London UK “We are with you in this your hour of
distress. We are with you in this your
moment of sorrow. We are with you in this shock, disbelief and
amazement! We are with you in spirit
and we are with you in sharing
with the rest of humanity
your deep sadness. How could this
happen to us! How could this
to us! The strings of our hearts extend
thousands of miles and touch yours
with that message that is utterly human:
we are with you.
We give you all our support .
And we promise you we shall stand by you
for as long as your needs require.
We shall do so all day today, tomorrow,
the day after that
and the day after that and beyond ...”

A look from Brick Lane in East London at the urgent call for help from Japan. Here, next

A look from Brick Lane in East London  at the urgent call for help from Japan. Here, next
0710 Hrs GMT London Saturday 12 March 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. A look from Brick Lane in East London at the urgent call for help from Japan, Here, next

EAST ENDERs are continuing to be ill-served, let down by the Council and by others in posts...

EAST ENDERs are continuing to be ill-served, let down by the Council and by others in posts...
1700 [1650] Hrs GMT London Friday 11 March 2011 Editor © Muhammad Haque EAST END democratic audit campaign BHANGEELAAR! makes a second response to the Guardian today 11 March 2011. This too focusses in context on the failures of the “locally” elected Tower Hamlets Council. This one is another exclusive evidential comment on the report on the Guardian web site by journalism professor and media commenter Roy Greenslade about the in-house propaganda sheet “East End Lies” and its counterparts published for the careers of the controlling cliques on other local Councils. BHANGEELAAR! exposes the real hole in the Roy GREENSLADE analysis by referring to the serious issues that the local ‘ordinary press’ too is failing to report on. Here is the full text of the BHANGEELAAR! comment published in the last 30 minutes or so on the Guardian web site. It examines the role of the Guardian piece itself and the roles of the local “East London Advertiser” and the Tower Hamlets Councils PRAVDA the “East End Lies” in denying local democracy and suppressing the truth of the most appallingly unaccountable decision-making by the Council which continues to neglect the people over the needs and the facts demand.. [To be continued] You say
I pointed out some weeks ago that the Pickles code had one huge loophole. There are no penalties for ignoring its "guidance."
Why should you refer to that as if it were an exception, Roy?
Look at the so-called ‘local democracies’.
What are the penalties for their failures to serve the local communities in accordance with the universally recognisable codes of democratic requirements?
How have they been setting the CONDEM imposed CUTS budgets?
Don’t THOSE matter more than the estimated impact on the business of the ‘local press’, associated most often in your pieces to the “East London Advertiser” when referring to Tower Hamlets?
Shouldn’t the approach be guided by an aim to correct the disservice being done to the ordinary public in any area covered [or left bereft of substance and the truth] by the relevant local authority and their local ‘independent titles’ in context?
Have you actually done a sustained contens analysis of the “East London Advertiser” and that of a comparable “real local newspaper”?
Would be interesting to see what you have found.
As far our campaign has found there is no point in simply reciting the fact that the “East London Advertiser:” has been losing out as a result of the Tower Hamlets Council’s persistent PRAVDA publication we have long described on the facts as the “East End Lies”.
What needs to happen is an objective awareness about what BOTH types of ‘newspaper’ or medium actually bring to the local communities. Do they bring real news or do they bring untruths?
Going by the absence of rigourous investigative and arduous journalism [as opposed to gossip and hypes for certain Right leaning Councillor leaking in a bizarre indulgence of his own] about all the key decisions and policies affecting the real parts of the peoples’ lives in the East End, we can say that the general atmosphere among ordinary people is not a fraction as committed to the “East London Advertiser” as it could be ! And this is more like a reason why the “East End Lies” is set to be perpetrated. Mr Starbrook or whoever in his place over at Ilford now “Editing” the “East London Advertiser” may like to ask themselves why that title has been failing to publish stories that could have awakened a lot of local people to the massive failures that we have been faced with by the CUTS-compliant Council since before the period of CONDEM cuts! 1635 Hrs GMT London Friday 11 March 2011 BHANGEELAAR! The Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets

EAST END democratic audit campaign tells off Cherie Blair over latest fakery, stunt

EAST END democratic audit campaign tells off Cherie Blair over latest fakery, stunt
1515 Hrs GMT London Friday 11 March 2011 Editor © Muhammad Haque East End NO to elected mayor campaign tells off Cherie Blair on latest marketing stunt for low lawyers The ticking off comes as a comment published on the London GUARDIAN website in the past 30 minutes rejecting the wife of Tony Blair over her marketing of the UK 'legal profession' dressed up as a ''rescuing' bid' for the alleged disadvantage youngsters attending the under achieving schools etc. The BHANGEELAAR! campaign tells Cherie Bliar to look at the real creators of the disadvantage, the failing schools and the agencies of state that are supposedly there funded so hugely to do their job and equip youngsters with high standards of education and qualification to get on in life. The BHANGEELAAR! Campaign also points out the persistent practice of lying for the failures that is carried out daily by the local media and also in particular by the OFCOM-licensed and ethnicty-linked satellite TV channels. [To be continued] Expanded text of the BHANGEELAAR! diagnostic rejection of Cherie Blair's stunt today on the GUARDIAN: Our Movement has been defending the "underprivileged" in the East End of London for the past half century. Our half centenary report, being finalised for publication this year, shows that the “professions” are as entrenched and as indifferent to social justice now as they ever were. Most certainly as they were in the 1950s and 1960s.
The way forward on the entrenched injustices of the professions in the UK is that there is no way forward with the agents of the same professions doing the marketing for the professions on occasions strategically selected by their agenda setters. Cherie Booth ‘QC’ could find, if she really wanted to, that the most intractable factor obstructing justice via the professions is the failure of those who are promoted as ‘icons’ and or ‘celebrities’ peddling the marketing mantras phrased in suitably socially disguised language to tell the truth.
The legal profession is as much a morality free zone now as it was two hundred years ago. The only thing that is different is the odd, exceptional events when one incident or other forces the practitioners to confess to some always manageable flaws in their updating of their grip on the rest of society. The thing that Ms Booth overlooks and has overlooked throughout her career as a recorded member of the Bliared promotion trade is the failure of the existing agencies and institutions that are fully or adequately funded to provide the high standards of education and qualifications to the young people they already process but whom they persistently betray, undermine, under-encourage and under-appreciate. If these institutions and agencies had been identified as the really large factor for the backwardness and failures that they are and have been for ever of so many who fail because they have not got their potential learning and qualifications then the kind of promotion Ms Booth is now embarked on would become unnecessary.
Does she have what it takes to face up to THAT challenge and start campaigning for truly transparent, accountable and honest locally elected councillors delivering their democratic duties encompassing all sectors including schooling and Education? If she ever visits Tower Hamlets again, she may like to examine the actual role being played by those who control the academic destinies and horizons of the overwhelming majority of young people enrolled in the various institutions. Any truthful audit of these would show that really disadvantage is being created and maintained by so much failures within those walls that ought not to be tolerated. But the failure is being tolerated.
We know the consequences of the failure are being borne bitterly by mostly silenced people across the borough who daily limit their own freedoms so as not to come face to face with the products of the criminalising institutions and agencies!
CONTRARY to the reassuring sound bytes and mythological safer neighbourhoods’ stunts perorated routinely via the lazy local ‘media’ and by the even lazier and the OFCOM-licensed ethnicty-linked channels carried by BSKYB, life in the East End will NOT change for the better following Ms Booth’s latest strategically placed propaganda for her profession! 1500 [1448] Hrs GMT
London Friday 11 March 2011
BHANGEELAAR!
The Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets

Muhammad Haque's East End exclusive commentary on the struggle for democracy OBSTRUCTED by Council

Muhammad Haque's East End exclusive commentary on the struggle for democracy OBSTRUCTED by Council
© Muhammad Haque picture of Terry McGrenera struggling to hear about what was going inside the Stockade! at Tower Hamlets Council on Tuesday 08 March 2011


2125 Hrs GMT London Thursday 10 March 2011
This is my picture of Terry McGrenera, seen struggling to hear about the Council's so-called ‘Budget meeting’. He was one of many that were denied entry into the Council building. Although he may not have encountered this in the UK in the normal run of things before, the evening was turned into one of a sub-authoritarian theatre involving banning people, barring most of them from gaining access for no other reason than the ‘fact’ that ‘the chief executive’ had spoken with the statement of a decree to the effect that only 47 people were to be allowed into the ‘notional’ ‘public gallery’. A very ‘familiar’ exercise in internal deportation of democracy in fact.
One of the much-touted ‘benefits’ of disposing of the constitution that had a multiplicity of councillors in ‘control’! Again,. notionally in control. For the fact is that the number of councillors which has remained almost unaltered by the staged departure from a collective decision-making constitution has remained the same IN EFFECT.
That has not, however, meant that the councillors are saying much by way of democratic audit of the Council’s controlling bureaucracy.
Shortly before this picture was taken, Terry McGrenera had seen the ‘security’ let an apparent journalist get into the Mulberry Place on his way to the Council Chamber!
As the apparent journalist was seen being shown into the Mulberry Place, Terry McGrenera repeatedly hurled an insult at the apparent journalist. Show your press pass!he exclaimed. Then he muttered within the hearing of others standing at the barrier, “wanker!” as if the apparently journalist would hear his word of reproach.
It was not all that long ago that Terry McGrenera would be seen sitting behind a desk apparently designated for ‘the press’. Mr Terry McGrenera was often the main fixture at that desk.
Occasionally it would accommodate another one almost brazenly, boastfully and arrogantly privileged to be seen as ‘the press’.
What they did with that ‘access’ to and the ‘seat’ at that ‘press table’ during ‘Council Chamber’ proceedings on “Tower Hamlets Council” was not always apparent afterwards. Neither in print nor otherwise. Nor, most certainly, in terms of any discernible emergence of exclusively gathered insights into the workings of the undemocratic Council that Tower Hamlets Council has always been. What was very apparent and clear on Tuesday night was that everyone was ‘tarred with the same brush’! Of being undesirable!
As if Mulberry Place had been transformed into a port of entry into the land of unlimited opportunity! And the faces waiting at the barriers had been swept ashore after their ships sank in the ocean they were crossing in desperate bid to escapee the gloomy lands of their origins, births! And this tiny construction by the ‘authorities’ at the Mulberry Place would make such a life-changing difference to the lowly ones waiting for the clearance. That clearance never came. Not on Tuesday night. It is quite likely that the rate and the frequency fo entry clearance will get tougher every day.
A Republic of REPRESSION has been foisted on the East End borough. Had Terry McGrenera foreseen this state? If he had, where had he published his words fo wisdom and when? All we could find on the archives are letters in the ‘East London Advertiser’.
They were not very encouraging of other who were doing the genuine campaign against a corrupt council. Mr Terry McGrenera should have looked at the barricades inside the minds of those who had blocked out and barred certain people and denied their work in defending the community. Had he done that then perhaps on Tuesday night he would not have been reduced to having to rely on a swear word and may be the pavement outside the Mulberry Place would have some people on it shouting such passionate calls for democratic audit that the creepy careerists colluding with CONDEM inside the Stockade would have been unable to feel so smug themselves as they were doing the CUTS to the essential services and chopping off vital democratic rights and civil liberties. [To be continued]

What wrongful words from the Book of Careerist Opportunism were being transferred there? [1]

What wrongful words from the Book of Careerist Opportunism were being transferred there? [1]
© Muhammad Haque EXCLUSIVE Picture 2010 shows Lutfur Rahman, Motin Uz Zaman [middle] and Steve Bullock


AADHIKAROnline examination of the dire deficit of democracy-free local Councils in thrall to CONDEM continues today Thursday [To be continued]

UK CONDEM's cuts on Society made almost legitimate by 'Socialists' like Lewisham's Steve Bullock

UK CONDEM's cuts on Society made almost legitimate by 'Socialists' like Lewisham's Steve Bullock
© Muhammad Haque picture of Steve Bullock, Lewisham London Borough Council's 'elected' 'executive’ mayor.

The MUHAMMAD HAQUE LONDON COMMENTARY
0330 Hrs GMT London Thursday 10 March 2011.
Bullock was a de facto 'role-model' cited on 6 February 2010 by peddlers of the bureaucratic tool that was being foisted as an idea at that stage [at the ‘Brady Centre’, Hanbury Street off Brick Lane London E1] on the already democracy-deficit Tower Hamlets Council.
UPDATER diagnostic report from the Stockade at Mulberry Place London E14. We focus on the mass paralysis that has been created in the Tower Hamlets population by the complicity of the Bliared Party local bureaucracy that is now increasingly as much the implementer of the ‘CONDEM’ agenda FOR CUTTING Society down as the official ‘Parties’ making up the CONDEM COLLUSION’ are doing on the same Council. We have exclusively devised the diagnostic conjunction ‘CONDEM COLLUSION’ to convey the facts as well as the most far reaching impact that we have found this agenda is intended to have against society. We also update our diagnostic findings on the aspect of Ed Miliband's lack of political identity in the context of the stooged Parliament that is now undergoing domination by Bullyingdone [another of our linguistic devices] CAMERON. We expose the shallowness of the entire Miliband scam by dissecting the crass role being played by the locally sited stooges of the same agenda in Tower Hamlets. The paralysis that the ordinary majority of the Tower Hamlets population has been caused is a direct consequence and result of the political morass that is the locally ‘elected’ Council. On Tuesday [08 March 2011], Tower Hamlets local borough Council.. became a Stockade. It was a Stockade for the ‘protection’ of the perpetrators, ‘dressed as locally elected councillors representing the local population in the deprived inner city East London borough of Tower Hamlets’ of CONDEM assaults from the ordinary public’s gaze! In seeking to be thus protected from the people, the locally sited stooged bureaucracy also INTRODUCED a SECURITY STATE-style vetting procedure. The procedure is a tip of the iceberg of the bigger assaults against civil liberties that the stooged Council, is set in the months and years to come in Britain to be used to implement. That procedure at once confirmed what Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy has been turned into: an extension of the antidemocratic, Big Business Military Industrial Complex [= ‘MIC’] agenda-courier FORTRESS accommodating and providing platforms to perpetrators, under guises of ‘local elected representatives’ [!] of wrongful acts with long term and in many cases irreversibly negative repercussions and far reaching damages to the fabric of the local community. So they decided to EXCLUDE the public from the supposedly public charade of a public budget! [To be continued]

COMING NEXT: Cuts by crass mayors across London. Barbara Wins even more cash as public endure cuts!

COMING NEXT: Cuts by crass mayors across London. Barbara Wins even more cash as public endure cuts!
Eastenders can get stuffed! Says Barbara W who is in newer public dosh, peddling insulting lines about East End! [To be continued]

CONDEM Cuts complicit Council in Stockade mode barred even an ex-Lib Dems Cllr

CONDEM Cuts complicit Council in Stockade mode barred even an ex-Lib Dems Cllr
© Muhammad Haque picture at the Mulberry Place Stockade of ex-Cllr, Weavers ward, Tower Hamlets LBC, Tuesday 08 March 2011

'Stockade' at the Mulberry Place, 5 Clove Crescent London E14 2 BG

'Stockade' at the Mulberry Place, 5 Clove Crescent  London E14 2 BG
0300 [0245] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 09 March 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. AADHIKAR Media Exclusive report and commentary. Confronted by the Stockade at Tower Hamlets Council erected by the controlling cabal carrying out the CONDEM cuts agenda to further oppress the already oppressed and the most economically and socially disadvantaged parts of the inner cities population in the UK. This © Muhammad Haque picture [Tuesday 08 March 2011] shows [nearest to camera, left] Terry McGrenera one-time Green Party candidate and occasional sitter at what used to be the “press desk” in the faked-up “Council Chamber”, unable to stand still after finding his attempts to get into the “Council Chamber” blocked by a barrage of barriers and uniformed personnel. In the centre of the picture, in green, is Ismail Saray, a very regular attendee at publicly known events held to support the promotion of the brand new “local” “political" [CORRECTION: career-linked, career-motivated, career-based] personality” called “Lutfur Rahman” during the months of July-October 2010 in Tower Hamlets. Mr Saray was snapping away as he also chatted in solo mode with the nearest uniformed personnel during the minutes... To Mr Saray’s left [in the picture] were two members of the public, who passed time by accurately noticing and sharing their finding that there was a severe enforcement of security check introduced by the bureaucracy controlling access to the “Town Hall”. Things were distinctly looking grim, physically, metaphorically and in uniform outside the Mulberry Place on Tuesday night! The atmosphere was antidemocratic and chilling. It was almost a carbon copy of what had taken place in the fortnight before in Lewisham. Lewisham is linked to Tower Hamlets in only the foulest and the most antidemocratic of ways. Lewisham had been on the list churned out and chanted by the peddlers of the “progress” called a directly elected executive mayor. Those who had done the chanting on Saturday 06 February 2010 [13 months ago last weekend] for a “directly elected mayor in Tower Hamlets” had claimed that ‘nearby’ Lewisham [it is NOT ‘nearby’] had been one of the London boroughs with an elected mayor. Those peddlers were not to be seen outside the Mulberry Place Stockade [in London E14 2BG] last bight. Were they to be seen, there casued not be a more stunning exposure of the lie that they had peddled. Tower Hamlets is now a ‘democracy free’ zone and it is definitely going to gte even worse as the controlling clique carries out more assaults on the community on behalf of the CONDEM agenda . [To be continued]

Brick Lane curry restaurants owner Azmal Hussain continuing to say he is against touting

Brick Lane curry restaurants owner Azmal Hussain continuing to say he is against touting
We shall be reporting later today [Wednesday 09 March 2011] Brick Lane "Curry Houses" restaurateur Azmal Hussain’s latest statements on the "touts" in the Lane [To be continued]

Full TEXTS to Hasina, PM Bangladesh: Scrap unfair Biman fares or Biman gets to scrap yard of market

Full TEXTS to Hasina, PM Bangladesh: Scrap unfair Biman fares or Biman gets to scrap yard of market
Too unfair fares on BIMAN TEXTS of UK Bangladeshis' letter to Bangladesh Premier, coming here soon UK Bangladeshis launch Scrap Biman fares rise campaign, tell Hasina to act NOW! 2005 [1940] Hrs GMT London Monday 07 March 2011 By © Muhammad Haque Fair fares for Overseas Bangladeshis Campaign launched in Brick Lane London UK. Urgent call to Sheikh Hasina to stop the foolish rise in Biman fares. FULL TEXT of the letter to Sheikh Hasina Wazed by the FAIR FARES FOR OVERSEAS BANGLADESHIS Campaign today [Monday 07 March 2011] to be published EXCLUSIVELY here, NEXT. [To be continued]

Brick Lane Community + Business: Environment is being damaged, Council is failing [2]

Brick Lane Community + Business: Environment is being damaged, Council is failing [2]
0955 Hrs GMT London Monday 07 March 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. I interviewed Brick Lane [London E1 area] resident Askir Miah yesterday [Sunday] and published one of the video clips later on in the evening. This event was preceded by weeks of effort to find Askir Miah. I paid several visits to his street looking for him. I could have asked other residents. I decided to ask Askir Miah his views because I recall that he had been involved in collecting signatures to a petition about touting in Brick Lane during 2010. Here in this second segment of my interview I am publishing some key points about the role of Tower Hamlets Council in this context. The Council.. is coming across as being ABSENT. As far as the local residents know, Tower Hamlets Council is NOT doing what it should do about the matter of touting in the ‘Curry’ restaurants part of the Lane. This is the reason why anyone, including the strategically active CONDEM-backing ‘local residents’ who are ALSO Conservatives, are able to make appearances as if they were plain ordinary residents operating for the sheer love of the local environment and the quality of the Brick Lane business Street. Although Askir Miah is also a Conservative Party supporter, my knowledge of his views on touting is that he would be opposing the touting regardless of his Party sympathies. Askir Miah makes the additional comments about the fouled up pavements and streets that the Council is failing to attend to in the vicinity of Brick Lane. I shall not be surprised after these reports to find that Askir Miah has been given extended platforms by some of the ethnicty-linked [or other] media outlets![To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole agenda is ALSO uniting the community for a dignified environment

KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole agenda is ALSO uniting the community for a dignified environment
2120 Hrs GMT London Sunday 06 March 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. KHOODEELAAR! campaign is uniting Brick Lane Community and Business [via BLCBF] for a sustainable and healthy future for all... creating the community consciousness for a dignified environment for residents and businesses so that all visitors, customers, ordinary people can stop talking about Brick Lane as a place that gives you any hassle at all and start talking about Brick Lane as a decent place....[To be continued]

Brick Lane Curry restaurant touting. The Truth [2]

Brick Lane Curry restaurant touting. The Truth [2]
Local resident ASKIR MIAH exclusive interview with AADHIKAROnline Sunday 06 March 2011

Examing the problem of touting in the Curry restaurants parts of Brick Lane [1]

Examing the problem of touting in the Curry restaurants parts of Brick Lane [1]
This exclusive AADHIKAR Media interview was recorded in Brick Lane London E1 with Azmal Hussain of the Preem and the Prithi restaurants, between 1800 Hrs and 2000 Hrs GMT Saturday 05 March 2011. [To be continued]

Lines from Brick Lane London to Rubina Ali in GaribNagar Mumbai

Lines from Brick Lane London to Rubina Ali in GaribNagar Mumbai
Lines from Brick Lane London for Rubina Ali who has just lost her home in the Bombay [Mumbai] slum called GaribNagar
By © Muhammad Haque

“....So, still alive, she rots. A heart of granite would melt at this unremitting sequel, Lord, How can this be justified, how can it be justified? ”
My Mother’s Sister Cecil Day Lewis

*** 1630 Hrs GMT London Saturday 05 March 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
I am acknowledging Cecil Day Lewis as I am using one of his lines to end this Part of my Lines from Brick Lane London for Rubina Ali who has just lost her home in the Bombay [Mumbai] slum called GaribNagar.
My Lines are deliberately NOT in rhyme.

The BBC brings another item of news from Bumbai, India with perfect display of cruel detachment completely free from all irony untouched by any trace of familiarity with justice.
The BBC online item is accompanied by a picture of the ‘child star’ Rubina Ali.
The news is that Rubina and her family have just lost their home in a fire last night [Friday]
The last time that Rubina was in the news, reported by the BBC, was when her home was being demolished by bulldozers!
There then followed a long pause.
No more news about the ‘child’ ‘star’ who had featured in another ‘British success’ ‘Slum Dog Millionaire’ enabling significant number of actors on life to taste even more success than they had done before
and then they stopped all mention of Rubina Ali they never again qualified her name with the phrase ‘child star’.
May be they will get to hear of Rubina’s home being burnt down in last night’s fire!
And cook up another script! Gosh! they’ll exclaim! Wouldn’t THAT be fab too!
As ANYTHING depicting that ‘golden slum glamour’ [!] can still fetch another Oscar or two!
And then they will let her be lost again in the interminable mists of forgotten fantasy only to be revived when THEY may need to again recite her role in making them millions!
They know she is down
They knew she was down But they picked her up as a handy face to lift themselves even higher than they craved
No more niche special effects interviews No more appearances
No more contrived delivery of cool praise for the incredibly real life slum child!

God!
How can this be justified! [To be continued]

Justine Greening is left speechless over Bank of England Governor's little confession!

Justine Greening is left speechless over Bank of England Governor's little confession!
1330 [1250] [1105] Hrs GMT London Saturday 05 March 2011. By © Muhammad Haque.

Justine Greening has been fast-tracked into political office at such a speed that it will take years to make an adequate list of the people whom she has been allowed to overlook, ignore, deny or violate in her determination to get where she has been going. This has been obvious every time Justine Greening is given a spot in a broadcast slot. Like this morning on the BBC Breakfast news programme. Justine came across as green as ever. [To be continued]

City of London is in fact the ToxiCity that damages the community, ruins true economy...

City of London is in fact the ToxiCity that damages the community, ruins true economy...
0705 [0640] [0605] Hrs GMT London Saturday. By © Muhammad Haque. One of the forces that DEMANDS poverty and therefore causes the pressures to ensure that poverty is kept being created is of course the conglomeration widely known as the City of London [which is NOT a Metropolitan or a democratic entity at all but] the collection of the most secretive money-linked, money-laundering operations that have been taking place from the so-called ‘Square Mile’ situated between the metropolitan London borough known as [another ‘City’] City of Westminster and the “inner cities, one-of-the-most-de;proved” East London Borough of Tower Hamlets! And the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets! starts from the east of Bishopsgate which is the bit of London more identified with the Liverpool street train stations [Overgrown Rail and Underground rails] in the popular frame of daily life activities Brick Lane is a mere five minutes’ walk eastwards from Bishopsgate. The gross poverty-creating lies that the City of London conceives of and then perpetrates are not confined to members of the cabal in or of the City of London itself. A significant population of time-serving ‘professionals’ operates AS THE ARMY OF PERIPHERALS CARRYING THE plethora of excuses and lies to make acceptable and reasonable the pernicious AGENDA OF POVERTY-CREATION and to stooge the ordinary people in the ‘peripheries’ contemptuously labelled ‘City Fringe’ areas. The utter majority of those ‘areas’ are to be found in the Brick Lane London E1 area. Some, only some, are in fact situated in the London boroughs of Hackney and Islington to the north and the north-east of Tower Hamlets. These ‘fringe’ areas ‘to the City of London’ are not so called because of any democratic decision by the ordinary people in the areas so condemned. These are pejoratively misrepresented as “City Fringes” because of the confidence that the inner circles of the City of London has in its operatives being successful in stooging the target people in the areas so called. Thus the Section 106 lure! One of the fakers parading as a candidate at the so-called mayor election [dated 21 October 2010] for the post of “executive, elected mayor” in the name of the people of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets was emphasising his claim to being for accountability by the “City of London”. One ‘method’ which he lobbed in front of the ‘audience’ [average number 30, in a po;population of almost 200,000] assembled at tokenistic ‘question and answer’ events was this dubious phrase ‘Section 106’! This phrase is not as pernicious sounding when uttered on its own. Its true toxicity is apparent only when the phrase is followed by ‘gains’! When scrutinised, he was as false, as fake and as untruthful as any of his ‘rivals’ as candidates for mh same post. This ‘candidate’ has NEVER once made one single objectively democratically accountable and transparent comment let alone adverse comments about the encroaching on the East End by the City of London:. The ToxiCity! Here, then, is the devsing of a new word: ToxiCity! [To be continued]

The Kay Jordan Foundation for Society

The Kay Jordan Foundation for Society
Kay Jordan recalling wise words of her father: "My father clearly said, "Look, just remember, if it is not broken do not mend it, but if risk is identified then what you should do is avoid it if you can".

East London democracy campaign exposed UK PM Cameron's stunt on Society. He is ignorant of East End

East London democracy campaign exposed UK PM Cameron's stunt on Society. He is ignorant of East End
BHANGEELAAR! Campaign tells the GUARDIAN online at 1510 Hrs GMT Friday 04 March 2011 about David Cameron having got the facts wrong about Society. The full text of the BHANGEELAAR! comment on the Guardian is as follows: The headline to your online piece is accurate and sustainable. Unlike the many areas of Tower Hamlets where perfectly usable buildings are socially deserted and condemned to be occupied by strangers who are neither deterred nor discouraged let alone being ethically morally legally and democratically disciplined. This is a brief comment just updating the ongoing degeneration of society that once used to be lived on these former human neighbourhoods across Tower Hamlets. Yet these pl;aces are not even four miles from where Denis Mcshane uttered those inappropriate comparative words about ‘third world’ countries in the House of Commons yesterday. And they are in fact in the same borough where Toynbee Hall in the Commercial Street London E1 is. It was from Toynbee Hall that David Cameron last month issued his justification for the de facto assault on those parts of society that weren’t working according to him. In Tower Hamlets, cameron need not have bothered. Crime is now the received culture on many parts where no known culture of responsibility is visible. How wonderfully alive and kicking the British values that Cameron boasted of have been in these parts! You will be lucky to meet even one elderly lady walking her dogs on any of the streets, let alone come down any of the stairs that are not littered with lethally unhygienic human discharges! These strangers are from ‘other parts’ of the same borough. They are treated as aliens who cannot be seen by CCTV nor can be approached by the police. These strangers are making the visible people invisible. Now, Cameron has already cleansed the decent society out of their homes and made the place open and occupiable by these strangers! This is the real death of housing! 1508 hrs Friday 04 March 2011 BHANGEELAAR! The Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets

"Anna Lynch: Will she hold or will she flinch?"

"Anna Lynch: Will she hold or will she flinch?"
Lines on the litanies of life in and around Tower Hamlets in the inner cities East End of London
1425 Hrs GMT
London
Friday
04 March 2011
By© Muhammad Haque

anna a councillor, surnamed lynch
was ott-hyped by a mob-linked PR
who puffed her ‘words’ to ott gear

Anna 'Happy to see..' who? Exclusive Brick Lane Today report, here, next

Anna 'Happy to see..' who? Exclusive Brick Lane Today report, here, next

Lines on the litanies of life in and around Tower Hamlets in the inner cities East End of London

1425 Hrs GMT
London
Friday
04 March 2011

anna a councillor, surnamed lynch
was ott-hyped by a mob-linked PR
who puffed her ‘words’ to ott gear
will she hold & resist

or will she flinch?
[To be continued]

East London Advertiser resumes cosy arrangement with Tower Hamlets Council

East London Advertiser resumes cosy arrangement with Tower Hamlets Council
2020 Hrs GMT London Thursday 03 March 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. The “East London Advertiser” web site has resisted the attempts by the BHANGEELAAR! campaign to post a comment about an online item promoting Tower Hamlets Council around the ‘relaunch’ of the former St. paul’s way secondary school today. Here is the BHANGEELAAR! Comment in full.
You have altered the item, amending not only 'special measures' into 'notice to improve' but have also created a new abbreviation for the 'previous' 'OFSTED' as 'ofted'. Given such accommodating attitude to the Tower Hamlets Council, we expect that you will be soon reporting in the particular spirit that was so prevalent until your management decided to raise commercial concerns over the Council’s propaganda outlet, the Pravda formally called "East End Life". It appears that you are already showing signs of resuming that old form in that you are promoting the scripted line that the school is now 'forging ahead' in the 'league tables'. All of this is almost permissible except that there is no evidence in your item of the relationship between the school and the council on the one hand and the local ordinary community that is supposed to be being served by the school. This is a serious detachment which devalues the evidential claims that might be made for the item. The fact is that all across the Borough there is persistent underachievement in every aspect of life and in particular with regard to the level of care and service that the publicly funded agencies are there to deliver. Schools are correctly defended by all in society as deserving the best funding and the highest level of social and community backing. But the population out in society is experiencing hurdles that are directly linked to what the schools are actually equipping the young adults to accomplish. Shouldn't this be begun to be the priority and topic in the news reports about schools like this one?
1955 Hrs Thursday 03 March 2011 BHANGEELAAR! The Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets" [To be continued]

Kay Jordan amused by the David Cohen 'performance'

Kay Jordan amused by the David Cohen 'performance'
0920 Hrs GMT London Thursday 03 March 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. In this picture I caught Kay smiling at the response to David Cohen the DISPOSSESSOR of 'the Dispossessed'...[To be continued]

Five years ago on Wednesday 01 March 2006 * Defending the community in the East End against Xrail..

Five years ago on Wednesday 01 March 2006 * Defending the community in the East End against Xrail..
ABOUT THIS ACTION ANNIVERSARY KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Campaign demo PHOTO....Five years ago on Wednesday 01 March 2006 * Defending the community in the East End against big business agenda Crossrail hole attack. Demonstration on Wednesday 01 March 2006 outside Mulberry Place, Tower Hamlets Council ‘town hall’ against the Council clique’s Crossrail hole-inviting complicity, ‘deals’ and denials. Pictured [below, left, holding mouth piece] addressing the very hectic demo on that day is Louise Alexander [at the time representing the Weavers ward on the Council] while Organiser Muhammad Haque [right of picture] holds the familiar Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Campaign loudhailer. PUBLISHING DATA Designed, Written and © Edited by Muhammad Haque. Published by AADHIKAR Media Foundation London E1 UK. In association with AVNews, the KAY JORDAN FOUNDATION and KHOODEELAAR! 0850 Hrs GMT London Thursday 03 March 2011

THE POVERTY that Tower Hamlets Council CREATES exclusive INVESTIGATION into DEGENERATION

THE POVERTY that Tower Hamlets Council CREATES  exclusive INVESTIGATION into DEGENERATION
1415 [1410] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 02 March 2011 WITNESS TO DEGENERATION: THE POVERTY that Tower Hamlets Council CREATES . INVESTIGATION By ©Muhammad Haque., Tower Hamlets council in East London is regularly listed as the or one of the most deprived borough[s] in all of England. This is factually true. By almost all the major criteria of measuring poverty, the ordinary Tower Hamlets person falls in that category. Or the majority of the people in this borough do. In fact it is this undeniable fact of high level of deprivation, low achievement and low social amenities, poor health and life expectancy and high incidence of all manner of illnesses and the propensity to those that has guaranteed Tower Hamlets an almost permanent place at the very top of the most undesirable list: the really economically and socially and environmentally deprived population in the entire United Kingdom. Once that fact is recited, most often routinely and as part of the annual or the periodic funding bids and negotiations that take place between the ‘local Council’ and the UK Central Government [and anything in between like meagre sums put on offer via the so-called Greater London Assembly and the London ‘mayor’ and or the various EU-linked agencies], no real initiative is taken by the Council to create fundamental and sustainable change to the economic or the social state of the persons pushed into involuntary impoverishment. Instead the Council indulges in making propaganda claims at regular intervals almost entirely to register the FACT THAT TOWER HAMLETS is one of the country’s most deprived boroughs! The sole purpose for this claim is to keep the attention focussed on the fact of deprivation. Not on doing anything that engages the people pushed into deprivation in a really sustainable action to overcome and reverse the deprivation. This then is very briefly how Tower Hamlets is DEGENERATING the DEPRIVED. NEXT: What the woman at the counter told an overcrowded family needing proper housing to do with its ‘too many bright children’! [To be continued] [From previous editions] East London MP Timms exposes poverty creation by CONDEM regime DAVID CAMERON is accused by East London MP Stephen Timms of COOKING POVERTY NUMBERS! AGAIN! Brick Lane Today exclusive on how Tower Hamlets Council has been doing ITS own poverty-creation. 1320 [ 1300] [1245] [1225] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 02 March 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. The East London MP Stephen Timms has exposed David Cameron's fakery. Timms said that Cameron should check the figures next time he uses DWP statistics. DWP is the UK ‘Department for Work and Pensions’ that is in charge of the so-called welfare state. Welfare is fast becoming a zone of social warfare under the CONDEM regime. In the inner cities East End of London, poverty-creation, David Cameron-style has been going on for decades. We start with THIS REPORT the witness to east end poverty creation by the local council. We assert that David Cameron SHOULD be left speechless when faced with the evidence of HOW POVERTY HAS BEEN being created via the local Council and, most shockingly ofd all, via the very Department of Work and Pensions whose image Timms presented as almost benign as he put Cameron on the spot about Cameron’s having given misleading interpretations to DWP figures. Read our full report today. witness to degeneration: How POVERTY IS BEING CREATED by Tower Hamlets COUNCIL. [Full report on this site -scroll down the page- and in print]

BRICK LANE FORUM is getting underway now in the Greatorex Street London E1 defending East End again

BRICK LANE FORUM is getting underway now in the Greatorex Street London E1 defending East End again
BHANGEELAAR! To 'East London Advertiser' in the past 40 minutes: Your report has once again confirmed that the majority of the Councillors are not doing the job of holding the Council’s bureaucracy to democratic and transparent account. Or to ANY account! As you are aware, our campaign has long argued that ordinarily “elected” councillors on Tower Hamlets Council should be required to justify their being on the Council. There is no evidence in your report of any councillor seeking to expose the serious economic, managerial and socially-measured incompetence of the controlling bureaucracy on Tower Hamlets Council. There is no law, no precedent, no constitutionally valid code that stops a Councillor from behaving in a democratically transparent and accountable way. No Party Line could pass the test of constitutionality if it forbade or interfered with a duly elected councillor’s democratic inquiries. How is it that in your relatively lengthy piece there is no reference to any of these core activities by ANY councillor on Tower Hamlets? The reference to a Lib Dem-Respect ‘one off’ alliance is also most telling as a loud statement as to how free from democratic fervour the currently sitting ‘Councillors” are! NO wonder that the controlling bureaucracy is coming across as being most smug! It is only a matter of time before all this conceit, democracy deficit and betrayal of democratic remit will come back to make these time-servers pay for their irrelevance to the struggle that people in all ordinary parts of Tower Hamlets are having to do in order to cope with and survival the weight of new poverty and hardship being foisted by the CONDEM Cuts. So ‘wonderful’ to note that the CONDEM at least in one part is being given the positive promotion by the Council bureaucracy that would not behave in this way had there been a democratic movement by the Council against the AGENDA behind the latest cuts. 1650 Hrs Monday 28 February 2011 BHANGEELAAR! The Campaign against an elected executive mayor

Kay Jordan on 18 October 2010 listened attentively to the promises and the pledges...

Kay Jordan on 18 October 2010 listened attentively to the promises and the pledges...
0540 Hrs GMT London Sunday 27 February 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. The work of sustainable community architect and supporter is never done in luxury. And nobody epitomises the truth of this in the East End more comprehensively than Kay Jordan has been doing for 30 years. In this picture [above] I took of her on 18 October 2010, Kay [facing camera] is evidently keen as she listens to the words being uttered by Lutfur Rahman at a local accountability forum for would be ‘leaders’ of the local Tower Hamlets Council. Kay had encouraged a number of young persons to hold the forum under the auspices of the SSBA [Directed by Kay]. [To be continued]

Has Tower Hamlets Council 'got what it takes' to show that it backs unique initiatives like HEBA?

Has Tower Hamlets Council 'got what it takes' to show that it backs unique initiatives like HEBA?
2305 [2250] Hrs GMT London saturday 26 February 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. The importance to the East End community of a women’s education and training project like HEBA is that it has been a unique initiative. Then there is the fact that despite seeking £Millions from central Government by using the FACT of the East End Borough of Tower Hamlets as a ‘most deprived’ borough, the locally installed occupiers of 'positions' IN THE NAME OF THE LOCAL COMMUNITY and PAID FOR by the public [on the claim that these position-holders and position-seekers were gravitating around those positions in order to serve and to support the community] have failed to support this valuable service. So how in that case has HEBA been running all these years with the uncertainty of funding? ‘Kay Jordan’ is the answer to that question. For almost 20 years, Kay Jordan has been mothering the project in one way or another and has done everything possible to keep HEBA funded. I shall be reporting on the Kay Jordan battle for HEBA Women's’ project’s funding. Starting on Sunday 27 February 2011 [To be continued].

Kay Jordan's 30 year dedication to the East End community includes HEBA Women's proejct:

Kay Jordan's 30 year dedication to the East End community includes HEBA Women's proejct:
2240 [2140] [2130] [2115] Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 February 2011. Editor©Muhammad Haque. [Extracted from fuller report]. Speaking to me before the meeting with HEBA on Tuesday 15 February 2011, Lutfur Rahman confirmed his support for the HEBA women’s project and described it as a strong community project for the local women. The HEBA project is one of the unique community initiatives in Tower Hamlets established by Kay Jordan working with very , very limited funding. Under the new CONDEM Govt’s CUTS agenda, the availability of public funding is going to get even more difficult. This creates a paradox for David Cameron and his ‘Big Society’ advisers. Do they want women in the undeniably ‘most deprived inner city borough’ in all of England to be even more deprived? Do they want to BREAK Society even more? Or do they want to support such initiatives? If the latter then they must make it clear to the likes of Tower Hamlets Council.. that projects like HEBA must be funded in a sustained way so that women do receive the educational and training encouragement that Kay Jordan has struggled for more than a decade to make available. In the summer of 2010, Kay Jordan gave up her weekend supporting a group of ‘HEBA Women’ doing ‘The Walk to Buckingham Palace’ in a bid to raise funds for HEBA. In the next updates of our extended report FOUNDATION of the HEBA Women's Project, we shall detail the lengths to which Kay Jordan has gone over the years to place HEBA on a secure funding foundation. [Updates will be published in due course here and on our associated media]

Kay Jordan saw far & created one of East London's answers to CONDEM breaking Society: HEBA

Kay Jordan saw far & created one of  East London's answers to CONDEM breaking Society: HEBA
2140 [2130] [2115] Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 February 2011. Editor©Muhammad Haque. [Extracted from fuller report]. Speaking to me before the meeting with HEBA on Tuesday 15 February 2011, Lutfur Rahman confirmed his support for the HEBA women’s project and described it as a strong community project for the local women. The HEBA project is one of the unique community initiatives in Tower Hamlets established by Kay Jordan working with very , very limited funding. Under the new CONDEM Govt’s CUTS agenda, the availability of public funding is going to get even more difficult. This creates a paradox for David Cameron and his ‘Big Society’ advisers. Do they want women in the undeniably ‘most deprived inner city borough’ in all of England to be even more deprived? Do they want to BREAK Society even more? Or do they want to support such initiatives? If the latter then they must make it clear to the likes of Tower Hamlets Council.. that projects like HEBA must be funded in a sustained way so that women do receive the educational and training encouragement that Kay Jordan has struggled for more than a decade to make available. In the summer of 2010, Kay Jordan gave up her weekend supporting a group of ‘HEBA Women’ doing ‘The Walk to Buckingham Palace’ in a bid to raise funds for HEBA. In the next updates of our extended report FOUNDATION of the HEBA Women's Project, we shall detail the lengths to which Kay Jordan has gone over the years to place HEBA on a secure funding foundation. [Updates will be published in due course here and on our associated media]

CONDEM CUTS CAN CAUSE CONSERVATIES concern, too!

CONDEM CUTS CAN CAUSE CONSERVATIES concern, too!
DAILY TELEGRAPH. Schools in more than a third of council areas are selecting low-ability students or using lotteries in an attempt to break the middle-class hold on the most sought-after places.

‘SAVE THE COMMUNITY’ and STOP the POVERTY-creating CUTS agenda 5 PM Monday 28 February 2011

‘SAVE THE COMMUNITY’ and STOP the POVERTY-creating CUTS agenda  5 PM Monday 28 February 2011
1100 Hrs GMT London Thursday 24 February 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. Tower Hamlets is STILL TOP OF THE LEAGUE TABLE! As THE Borough where the largest proportion of children - that is families - are experiencing the worst poverty anywhere in the UK! You will not hear this from the Council which just held its CUTS BUDGET meeting in the last 20 hours. Nor will you hear it in any of the grotesquely promoted ethnicity linked ‘meeja’ channels brought to you via the negligently careless and inactive OFCOM’s scandalously proffered and renewed licences and carried on Rupert Murdoch's SKY.Com! THEY have been busy peddling the lying image that Tower Hamlets is now the alleged centre of the extension of all things Bangladeshi ‘success’! There is not one ‘bulletin’, one slot that goes on air without uttering that lie. Ordinary people in Tower Hamlets from ALL backgrounds are undermined or denied the existence of. The image created is unreal on these satellite channels or scandals channels to be more factual. Just as unreal on the satellite outlets now as it has been for nigh on 20 years on the pages of the Council’s in-house propaganda sheet our MOVEMENT has been calling the EAST END LIES. And the less said about the ‘elected councillors’ the better it is for the moral health of the community that is already so overwhelmingly crassly and utterly betrayed by the local Council. So what do we the ordinary people do to stop the slide that is affecting all of us in so many ways? We mobilise. We pout the evidence together. And we act. We act in the ANNUAL FORUM of the Brick Lane Community Business Forum. The BLCBF was founded in 2007 jointly by Muhammad Haque and Kay Jordan with the democratic resources of AADHIKAR Media Foundation, CBRUK and KHOODEELAAR! pulled together.
On 18 October 2010, Kay Jordan stated her concerns about the future of the community in the Brick Lane London E1 and in the rest of the borough. At this Monday’s BLCBF ANNUAL FORUM [28 February 2011], we shall address Kay Jordan’s concerns in light of the confirmation [since 18 October 2010] of the size and the extent of the CONDEM CUTS AGENDA being operated against the people in the East End of London. We shall also do what Ruth Kelly in 2007 had failed to do.
In 2007, Ruth Kelly, a notoriously reported ‘Tower Hamlets Borough resident’ was in what Eric Pickles [God help us!] is currently confined to: a post as cabinet minster while imprisoned by a Prime Minister who is showing increasing lack of knowledge of the subjects that he gallivants around opining on! We had, typically generously, asked Ruth Kelly to come and see us at a location that we had chosen in the Brick Lane London E1 area for the learning session so she would learn the basic facts about Tower Hamlets peoples. Being a blitheringly blasé Bliarite, Ruth Kelly failed to get the message. She lost out.
As we could also have predicted. Now we shall be updating the necessary community based action in order that the massive CONDEM COLLUSION assault being now mounted to destroy and probably also structurally dislocate the community can be understood for what it as and the community defended on every front. [To be continued]

Community AND Small trade will be losers under CONDEM cuts. Poverty will get even worse. Mobilise!

Community AND Small trade will be losers under CONDEM cuts. Poverty will get even worse. Mobilise!
Future of small businesses in the East End of London. The cause that dedicated campaigner, community champion, community architect, social entrepreneur, educationalist and humanitarian Kay Jordan helped set up & encouraged on 18 October 2010 will be taken further forward with the Community Business Annual Forum 5 PM Monday 28 February 2011 at 7-15 Greatorex Street London E1 5NF

EAST END of London daily target of Dave Cameron's 'new best mate' EXPRESS Desmond

EAST END of London daily target of Dave Cameron's 'new best mate' EXPRESS  Desmond
1140 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 22 February 2011. By © Muhammad Haque.The image of ‘migrants’ as daily fuelled by the likes of Richard Desmond’s DAILY EXPRESS is that of an invader from the outer space. Not from territories and countries where “the British” had invaded, occupied and colonised lasting for centuries Although more people arrive in the UK from the so called former Eastern European countries, the TARGET audience that the DAILY EXPRESS incites does NOT SEE THAT! It sees Asians, Africans and people who do not look the same colour as the main population of Europe. And when this happens, the target audience also likes to associate the migrants with London streets such as the Whitechapel Road market [the bit of Whitechapel Road between the London Hospital and the Whitechapel tube Station] that have simultaneously been over-photographed and overemphasised as part of the third-tier propaganda being conducted on the minds of the ordinary population in the name of ‘national’ aims and ‘interests’. How is this kind of ‘journalism’ advancing any aspect of any values of any remnant of ‘civilisation’? [To be continued]

Is Tower Hamlets Council doing the right things for the local community?

Is Tower Hamlets Council doing the right things for the local community?
Is Tower Hamlets Council doing the right things for the local community? We examine the latest boasts by Tower Hamlets Council on jobs and housing

CONDEM CAMERON CONDEMNS THE POOR AS CRIMINALS!

CONDEM CAMERON  CONDEMNS THE POOR  AS CRIMINALS!
1205 Hrs GMT London Monday 21 February 2011 Editor © Muhammad Haque This [attached video link] report by BBC reporter Jo Coburn confirms the Big Business link of CONDEM regime. Caroline Spelman is the subject matter in this report after Spelman had to stage a minute's formal grovelling as she stood at the Dispatch Box in the UK House of Commons and confessed she had got the forests sell off wrong. It is the SAME link, the same thinking, the same agenda that binds CONDEM to Big Biz agenda scam London Crossrail. When will any of them apologise for THAT Scam? While CAMERON stays quiet on his deal with Big Business , he gets on with the implementation of the other item on Big BIz agenda, the dismantling of the ‘welfare’ structure. With Cameron’s ‘new best mate’ Richard Desmond unleashing the DAILY EXPRESS containing daily dozes of dirty tricks against the involuntarily poor, it is clear how the propaganda against the innocent poor has become absolutely brazen. Cameron is now saying that in ‘civilised’ Britain, being innocent and also involuntarily poor’ is an offence. In fact he is not stopping there. David Cameron is saying that being in any way also poor as to be legally entitled to the meagre support called ‘benefits’ amounts to a capital offence. Hence the relentless headlines in the EXPRESS and the SUNDAY TELEGRAPH boldly claiming that rapists, murderers are now ‘demanding’ benefits! The message Cameron is giving out is: Anyone who is even legally.. entitled to benefits is in for a shocking defamation of character as a criminal!!! British values indeed! We shall examine soon what evidence Cameron ‘found’; in the East End of benefit-entitled involuntarily poor people being justifiably describable as rapists and murderers. Did the Warden of the Toynbee Hall advise Cameron about the propensities of those living in the vicinity of the Toynbee Hall to seek housing benefits at an inordinately high rate? [To be continued]

When will Big Biz agenda peddlers in UK Govt apologise to the East End for bid to foist Xrail hole

When will Big Biz agenda peddlers in UK Govt apologise to the East End for bid to foist Xrail hole
AADHIKARonline in association with KHOODEELAAR! 1125 Hrs GMT London Monday 21 February 2011 Editor © Muhammad Haque This report by BBC reporter Jo Coburn confirms the Big Business link of CONDEM regime. Caroline Spelman is the subject matter in this report after Spelman had to stage a minute's formal grovelling as she stood at the Dispatch Box in the UK House of Commons and confessed she had got the forests sell off wrong. It is the SAME link, the same thinking, the same agenda that binds CONDEM to Big Biz agenda scam London Crossrail. When will any of them apologise for THAT Scam? [To be continued]

ALTAB ALI, Tosir Ali, Ishaque Ali martyrs in the East End: Build fitting memorials

ALTAB ALI, Tosir Ali, Ishaque Ali martyrs in the East End: Build fitting memorials
Time for fitting memorials for Altab Ali, Tosir Ali, Ishaque Ali and the other martyrs whose sacrifices have made the Bangladeshi community in the UK what it is today.. Those martyrs have made the wider community that much more conscious and aware about the need for tolerance, fairness and humanity.. 0440 Hrs GMT London Monday 21 February 2011 By © Muhammad Haque. Striving since 4 May 1978 to create a society in Britain that is more tolerant than it was until the moment in the afternoon when Altab Ali on his way home from work in a factory in the Brick Lane London E1 area became a most reluctant martyr. Altab Ali followed Tosir Ali who too had become a martyr a decade or so earlier also in the East End of London borough of Tower Hamlets. Only two months after Altab Ali’s martyrdom there was another Seelotee language speaker Ishaque Ali who too became a martyr following an attack in the London Borough of Hackney. The first public meeting demanding action against such attacks was held on Sunday 07 May 1978 at a building called the Grand Palais cinema. Thousands of Seelotee language speaking workers gathered to demand urgent action and justice for Altab Ali. The meeting was organised by the campaigning group consisting of Mr Abdul Aziz [of Debarai village in the Asirgonj bazaar side of the river Kushira in the Beani Bazaar Upazilla], Muhammad Haque [of Chandarpur, Kushiara, in the Golapgonj Upazilla] and their students Abdus Salam [1], Abdus Salam [2], Somodul Ullah, Najabot Ali [Niazi] [deceased], Monuhar Ali, Ruhul Amin, Azizul Haque [deceased] and a number of close supporters of the campaign in defence of the community. The Abdul Aziz and Muhammad Haque group of campaigners had begun to mobilise opinion in defence of the community since Sunday 02 December 1973. Extracted from UPDATES on ALTAB ALI, Tosir Ali, Ishaque Ali, By © Muhammad Haque London Sunday 20 February 2011 [To be continued]

CAMERON uses ‘Toynbee Hall’ in London E1 as a Weapon of Mass Starvation [WMS]

CAMERON uses ‘Toynbee Hall’ in London E1 as a Weapon of Mass Starvation [WMS]
0645 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 February 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. CAMERON uses ‘Toynbee Hall’ in London E1 as a Weapon of Mass Starvation [WMS] as he targets the ‘new’ natives in the East End who will be thrown into an even bigger hole of poverty than any that Major, Thatcher had been able to justify during the TWO DECADES of THEIR control at UK Central PLC. It hasn’t hit the headlines yet but Ed Miliband is in essence backing Cameron’s agenda. We shall examine the evidence and show how a Bliared Party MP has been backing Cameron’s attacks on the poor. And how Ed Miliband is constantly looking for diversionary platforms for parroting plausible platitudes in order to avoid having to stand up for the new targets of new poverty that CONDEM Cameron is implementing..[To be continued]

The GUARDIAN has been suppressing the truth about poverty creation in East London.......

The GUARDIAN has been suppressing the truth about poverty creation in East London.......
2155 Hrs GMT London Saturday 19 February 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. EXpressing REVULSION by the Guardian's OBSERVER is NOT about Gaddafi only. It is a typically prejudiced pernicious headline by the Guardian against all the people in the region.... Despite the front that the Guardian puts on as a 'liberal' media outfit 'sympathetic' to democratic campaigners in the Middle East......We are examining the Guardian's behaviour. Why does it hide the truth when it persists ion running headlines that are perniciously personally targeted. As is seen on the first editon fo tomorrow's' OBSERVER which contains the word REVULSION aimed at Gaddafi... Bit the Guardian is repulsed by the people in all of the Middle East... Why? [To be continued]

Diagnosing the dire antidemocratic role of the London Guardian...

Diagnosing the dire antidemocratic role of the London Guardian...
TOYNBEE HALL POVERTY CREATION PLATFORM given to David Cameron. The East End action in concert with the democratic wave that is spreading across north and north east Africa, Asia In fact the East End of London has been the setting of pro-democracy action for decades.So how is it that this isn’t mentioned by the BBC? Or by the ITV or by Rupert Murdoch's SKY news network? In fact, how is it that the printed symbol [and now ‘aggressively ferociously liberally’ on the Internet] the Guardian does not recognise this? The answer is that all of these institutions and agencies have got a lot to lose if democratic actions in the inner cities as represented by the democratic activities in the East End of London are recognised. These agencies will lose in the sense that their roles will be exposed in the process of the truth being told about other agencies and about the stage and its local and regional operations as against the democratic demands and desires ofd ordinary people. Take the sad case of the Guardian, London, ‘front-controlled’ [this word is devised here and now by AADHIKAR Media] partly by Alan Rusbridger's and ‘wife’ Lindsey Mackie and by Polly Toynbee and assorted other subsidiary fronters on the other hand. Despite overwhelming evidence that the Guardian has been for DECADES suppressing the truth about the fact and the extent of the squalor and the denials and the hardships being caused in Britain by those with controlling powers and influence on what happens to the public resources and to public rights, entitlements, despite undeniable evidence that democracy is being routinely suppressed in all parts of Britain, despite overwhelmingly objectively verifiable evidence that successive regimes. ententes, alliances and Collusions fronting the forces in control of the powers in the UK have been violating all major obligations that are required by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and various related international charters, the GUARDIAN suppresses the main facts and denies the truth. And yet the Guardian continues to be cited as “the liberal” British media outlet. How is THAT possible? How is THAT done? For an answer, take a look at this week’s GUARDIAN’s role in suppressing the truth of the lies that the CONDEM Cameron mounted on the UK’s most deprived people from a platform based in, yes, in THE BRICK LANE area itself. [To be continued] [To be continued]

Middle East is in democratic ferment. The UK? CONDEM attack the poor, t' Monarch linked to drug

Middle East is in democratic ferment. The UK? CONDEM attack the poor, t' Monarch linked to drug
2000 Hrs GMT London Saturday 19 February 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. Exclusive historical diagnosis and updater report on the role played by Ken Livingstone in the 1980s in London in creating an antidemocratic servile ‘press’ that was entirely dependent on funding from the then Greater London Council [GLC].. and which servility destroyed the universal democratic fervour that would have been present in the pages of the small scale news titles and periodicals small groups of [initially passionate campaigners] without exception came from the Asian and African origins and backgrounds... The neutralising of those campaigners was an act of gross outrage against democracy..... A quarter of a century on, Ken Livingstone is still at it. In fact on 6 February 2010, Livingstone was featuring in a propaganda slot on a 21st century version of the ‘ethnicity linked’ and ‘GLC-funded’ ‘media’ as he made an intervention against democracy in Tower Hamlets. Livingstone was being shown [Saturday 06 February 2010] as calling for the scrapping of councillors in the democratic context when he called for the introduction and installation of an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets. A few years earlier, Livingstone had called for the scrapping of the democratic remits and say of elected London borough councils. When he was in post in London in the name of the people of London, Livingstone behaved as if he had nothing but contempt for London local councils. This came to the fore whenever Livingstone found any significant resistance to planning permission he was intent on giving to Big Business interests seeking to rob and or contaminate and or destroy London’s environment.... UPDATER DIAGNOSTICS Part 1


1905 Hrs GMT London Saturday By © Muhammad Haque The particular 'event' staged in the past week in the UK Houses of parliament buildings featuring Ed Miliband and the ‘Speaker’ of the House of Commons as toadies being feted by some bizarre ‘ethnicity linked’ outfit in London appears to have been linked with a man who was one of the main recipients of the 'ethnicity linked' 'grants' that the former Greater London Council [GLC] in the early 1980s. The GLC, as led by Ken Livingstone, was getting almost always favourable coverage in the ‘ethnicty-linked’ ‘newspapers’ published by the ‘ethnic entrepreneurs’. It was that coverage that played THE DECISIVE role in creating the myth that Ken Livingstone was THE FRIEND of the ‘ethnic’ communities. The words and the terms ‘ethnic’ and ‘ethnic minorities’ in the context of London in the years 1981-1986 denoted without substantial variation the communities of people in inner London boroughs who came from Asia and or Africa and in the context of Hackney, Brent, Lambeth, Islington and Southwark from various islands in the Caribbean where the British colonialists had ruled for centuries. The nearest and the only other ‘community’ whose collective image was being literally pressed into serving the propaganda purpose of Ken Livingstone was broadly speaking the one with backgrounds in Ireland and in ‘Northern’ Ireland. [To be continued]

The BRICK LANE DRAMA REHEARSALS Scene 1 Act 1 Saturday 19 February 2011

The BRICK LANE DRAMA REHEARSALS Scene 1 Act 1 Saturday 19 February 2011
0815 Hrs GMT London Saturday 19 February 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. THE BRICK LANE DRAMA REHEARSALS. 19 February 2011. Transcript-1. Question: Why doesn’t the Council do anything to stop the rot in the local community? Answer: The Council doesn't have to do anything. Question: Why? Answer: Because the Council, that is the candidates for Council ward elections, when the election comes, these candidates get their votes delivered to them on a plate. By the ‘leaders’ of these ‘community organisations’ Question: Who delivers the votes? Answer: These ‘community organisations’. Question: How do they do that? Answer: That is when they activate the Village Button. Question: You mean that is when they PRESS the Village Button? Answer: The same thing! Question: Yes. But “press the village buttons” sounds cuter! Answer: Yes it does. Let’s use it then. Here goes: “That is when the community organisations press the village button to get their co-villagers living in the area to cast the votes in the boxes for the candidates chosen!” Ends transcript 1 Scene 1 Act 1 London Saturday 19 February 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AADHIKAR Media Foundation AVNews Kay Jordan Foundation KHOODEELAAR! Updates http://twitter.com/khoodeelaar

HEBA housing hope for women and families in East London..Continuing reports around Lutfur's return

HEBA housing hope for women and families in East London..Continuing reports around Lutfur's return
0330 Hrs GMT London Friday 18 February 2011. By© Muhammad Haque. If there is a real-life on the ground grassroots antidote - to irresponsibility, lack of care and social indifference - that is years ahead of anything about ‘volunteering’ that David Cameron can ever say, then the HEBA Women's project set up and lovingly kept going by Kay jordan is a good sample and model of that... Very much like Kay Jordan herself: Practical, of our times and of supreme value to the person she is interacting with, the community and society at large ..at a next to nothing cost when her and HEBA’s true values and contributions are added up [To be continued]

Volunteering to defend the community the Kay Jordan way!

Volunteering to defend the community the Kay Jordan way!
By© Muhammad Haque 0540 [0510] [0425] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 16 February 2011 Protecting the vital services that keep a community alive in times of hardship caused by crisis of greed, negligence, selfishness and avarice allowed to dominate the culture that deficit in democracy brings on. In the East End of London, Tuesday 15 February 2011 was another day that witnessed households and individuals struggling to make ends meet. Even in the institutions and agencies including local NHS centres where the CONDEM cuts have yet to take effect, the atmosphere was one of resignation and incredulity. This atmosphere was not helped by the mainstream broadcast news media running as one of the day’s lead news items watched by the vast majority of viewers, the story that the Health Service Ombudsman Ann Abraham had found the treatment of elderly patients in many of the NHS ‘facilities’ to be cruel beyond description. As if that was not depressing enough for supporters of the broadly caring, ‘welfare’ society of which the NHS had been such a central pivot and symbol shown off to the rest of the world as Britain’s social gift to the rest of the world, Ms Abraham also made an appearance before a House of Commons MPs committee during the day and was quizzed in segments on ‘live news TV’ by, among others, Stephen Dorrell, one of the leading Conservative MPs of the John Major and Michael Howard years. The picture that was coming over on the broadcast screens was that the NHS was seriously sick and the CONDEM regime was rubbing its hands in glee while putting on a ‘concerned’ front at the demonstrated decline in its fitness for purpose. It felt throughout the day that the UK’s CONDEM Cameron was being handed a most lethal tool with which to declare the NHS unfit for purpose. The temptation must have been palpable of being thus able to ay, ‘see, we can save Billions by axing so much fat that is in the NHS!’This was also on the day that saw the ‘rate of economic performance’ disappointingly at a negative point with the rate of inflation exceeding all received and sober forecasts and expectations. It was also the day that had been inaugurated, as far as a recent visitor to No. 10 Downing Street DAILY EXPRESS Proprietor Richard Desmond was concerned, with a splash damning the UK’s scandalous behaviour in giving £1 Billion in Aid to India when so many ‘BRITISH’ people were experiencing hardship at home! These were some of the broad indicators of the roof of society creaking before the feared crash! Against such scenarios, in the ordinary East End of London in and around Brick Lane London E1, efforts and endeavours were continuing to protect society from being broken down. One architectural symbol that stands in the space between the Deal Street and Hanbury Street [off Brick Lane] is the Montefiore Centre which has undergone substantial improvement in accessibility and usability as well as in internal appearance under the uniquely gifted and indescribably dedicated community architect Kay Jordan. My picture [on the right] shows three of Kay Jordan’s recent colleagues, Aziz Choudhury, Pervez Qureshi and Askandar Ali walking on their way to nearby Brick Lane where they later met Lutfur Rahman [my picture on the left] to discuss the vital service to local women’s needs being provided by HEBA. [To be contionued]By© Muhammad Haque 0510 [0425] Hrs GMT London Wednesday 16 February 2011 Protecting the vital services that keep a community alive in times of hardship caused by crisis of greed, negligence, selfishness and avarice allowed to dominate the culture that deficit in democracy brings on. In the East End of London, Tuesday 15 February 2011 was another day that witnessed households and individuals struggling to make ends meet. Even in the institutions and agencies including local NHS centres where the CONDEM cuts have yet to take effect, the atmosphere was one of resignation and incredulity. This atmosphere was not helped by the mainstream broadcast news media running as one of the day’s lead news items watched by the vast majority of viewers, the story that the Health Service Ombudsman Ann Abraham had found the treatment of elderly patients in many of the NHS ‘facilities’ to be cruel beyond description. As if that was not depressing enough for supporters of the broadly caring, ‘welfare’ society of which the NHS had been such a central pivot and symbol shown off to the rest of the world as Britain’s social gift to the rest of the world, Ms Abraham also made an appearance before a House of Commons MPs committee during the day and was quizzed in segments on ‘live news TV’ by, among others, Stephen Dorrell, one of the leading Conservative MPs of the John Major and Michael Howard years. The picture that was coming over on the broadcast screens was that the NHS was seriously sick and the CONDEM regime was rubbing its hands in glee while putting on a ‘concerned’ front at the demonstrated decline in its fitness for purpose. It felt throughout the day that the UK’s CONDEM Cameron was being handed a most lethal tool with which to declare the NHS unfit for purpose. The temptation must have been palpable of being thus able to ay, ‘see, we can save Billions by axing so much fat that is in the NHS!’This was also on the day that saw the ‘rate of economic performance’ disappointingly at a negative point with the rate of inflation exceeding all received and sober forecasts and expectations. It was also the day that had been inaugurated, as far as a recent visitor to No. 10 Downing Street DAILY EXPRESS Proprietor Richard Desmond was concerned, with a splash damning the UK’s scandalous behaviour in giving £1 Billion in Aid to India when so many ‘BRITISH’ people were experiencing hardship at home! These were some of the broad indicators of the roof of society creaking before the feared crash! Against such scenarios, in the ordinary East End of London in and around Brick Lane London E1, efforts and endeavours were continuing to protect society from being broken down. One architectural symbol that stands in the space between the Deal Street and Hanbury Street [off Brick Lane] is the Montefiore Centre which has undergone substantial improvement in accessibility and usability as well as in internal appearance under the uniquely gifted and indescribably dedicated community architect Kay Jordan. My picture [on the right] shows three of Kay Jordan’s recent colleagues, Aziz Choudhury, Pervez Qureshi and Askandar Ali walking on their way to nearby Brick Lane where they later met Lutfur Rahman [my picture on the left] to discuss the vital service to local women’s needs being provided by HEBA. [To be contionued]

Exclusive report: Lutfur Rahman backing HEBA women's project

Exclusive report: Lutfur Rahman backing HEBA women's project
© Muhammad Haque reporting on Lutfur Rahman's latest statement supporting HEBA the unique women';s educational project pioneered by Kay Jordan in the East End of London. Coming here next. [To be cxontinued]

EAST END Challenging Boris J and K Livingstone

EAST END Challenging Boris J and K Livingstone
“CAN Ken Livingstone show IF he in fact has a lot more ethics and standards than Boris ever had or ever will? © Muhammad Haque examines the records of the two main contenders as recognised by the YOUGOV poll published on the London EVENING STANDARD online Monday 14 February 2011 As the student of the careers in the name of the people in and of London over the past four decades, I had advised Boris Johnson in 2007 before he even got the Conservative Party card as their candidate to seek to replace Livingstone as the holder of the post in the name of the people of London, to PROVE that he had ethical standards and morality that were higher than Ken Livingstone's. By the contens of your report today, I am not convinced that Boris cared much for ethics and morality. Had he done so, he could have made the difference. The question now is: Is Ken Livingstone going to come clean on the many cronies that he created and which flaw in his record in fact did a lot to discredit him to a significant number of genuinely democratic supporters of a broadly democratic London as opposed to a London dominated by the Big Business agenda and its couriers via the City of London and the Place of Westminster? . Is he going to behave genuinely democratically and stop treating people [“Oops”! voters] as niche factions that are only there to be exploited for their votes? Whatever Ken Livingstone actually does, this will be his last opportunity in the London democratic arena. . So has he got what it takes: will he show that he in fact has a lot more ethics and standards than Boris ever had or ever will? Ken Livingstone's practical and demonstrably objectively verifiable response will determine the outcome of the polls in London as they are currently planned and scheduled.

East End Commentary on the political ‘integrity, ethics, morality, honesty’ ‘of’ London in 2012.

East End Commentary on the political ‘integrity, ethics, morality, honesty’ ‘of’ London in 2012.
© Muhammad Haque examines the records of the two main contenders as recognised by the YOUGOV poll published on the London EVENING STANDARD online Monday 14 February 2011. East End Commentary on the political ‘integrity, ethics, morality, honesty’ ‘of’ London in 2012. “Does either Boris Johnson have the ethics, the honesty and the morality to deserve to be trusted by the voters?” “CAN Ken Livingstone show IF he in fact has a lot more ethics and standards than Boris ever had or ever will?” As the student of the careers in the name of the people in and of London over the past four decades, I had advised Boris Johnson in 2007 before he even got the Conservative Party card as their candidate to seek to replace Livingstone as the holder of the post in the name of the people of London, to PROVE that he had ethical standards and morality that were higher than Ken Livingstone's. By the contens of your report today, I am not convinced that Boris cared much for ethics and morality. Had he done so, he could have made the difference. The question now is: Is Ken Livingstone going to come clean on the many cronies that he created and which flaw in his record in fact did a lot to discredit him to a significant number of genuinely democratic supporters of a broadly democratic London as opposed to a London dominated by the Big Business agenda and its couriers via the City of London and the Place of Westminster? . Is he going to behave genuinely democratically and stop treating people [“Oops”! voters] as niche factions that are only there to be exploited for their votes? Whatever Ken Livingstone actually does, this will be his last opportunity in the London democratic arena. . So has he got what it takes: will he show that he in fact has a lot more ethics and standards than Boris ever had or ever will? Ken Livingstone's practical and demonstrably objectively verifiable response will determine the outcome of the polls in London as they are currently planned ......

POVERTY of Cameron's Big Society Big Let down

POVERTY of Cameron's Big Society Big Let down
2030 Hrs GMT London Monday 14 February 2011. By© Muhammad Haque. As I have been reporting exclusively, David Cameron's real poverty is his denial of the paramount importance IN ECONOMICS of democracy. After he staged his embarrassingly incoherent stunt today, I shall examine just how like Gordon Brown and John Major Cameron has become so quickly. The omens are very ominous for the Condem careerists..[To be continued]

POVERTY of 'service' by a highest-paid Town Clerk in Tower Hamlets

POVERTY of 'service' by a highest-paid Town Clerk in Tower Hamlets
2244 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 February 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. One of the Country's most deprived boroughs, Tower Hamlets, ‘boasts’ of carrying one of the country's highest paid town clerks! [To be continued]

"Society is rotting because democracy is missing....” East Ender tells David Cameron

"Society is rotting because democracy is missing....” East Ender tells David Cameron
2220 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 February 2011 Society is rotting because democracy is missing....” East Ender tells David Cameron why his Big Society is a Big con 1810 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 February 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. David Cameron is not going to make things better for people in the inner cities by mouthing the most patronising platitude that he has been given by whoever has been behind his Big Society confections Nor is he going to improve the standards of society in those parts of the UK where apparently affluent neighbourhoods experienced what are in fact ‘inner city’ failures . And when they do that, they moan and the Daily Mail is driven to carry the stark headlines. Otherwise, things are left to fester and fester and fester. As they have been for decades in the inner cities. For this reason the Big Society promotion is a Big Sick Joke to most East Enders struggling to enjoy ‘home’ on the sink estates that Tower Hamlets Council has allowed prevail and thus to become no-go neighbourhoods for the big majority of the residents in the given areas. Neither “Dr” Kevan Collins the over hyped town clerk nor the “elected councillors” care about the socially sinking states of the sink estates. Tower Hamlets Council is in a Collusion with the Conservatives and the token ‘minor’ ‘party’ ‘councillors’ on keeping quiet about this as long as the ‘wider public’ doesn’t find out about the sinking state.... By the looks of it, the “moderate” “journalists” “specialising” in the fanatical propaganda journalism about the Borough's allegedly fundamentalist tendencies are content to let the same Council.. maintain the sinking standards on so many estates and neighbourhoods. Thousands of people across this one inner city east London borough endure misery of indescribable proportions every week. There is no ‘authority’ serving the needs of the population in the vast majority of cases. It is not Thousands of young people are growing up in Tower Hamlets without the universal standards of education and without being equipped with the universal values that are absolutely important for a responsible dignified and positive life. This is not something that has just come about in recent weeks or months or even years. This is something that “local politicians” of all parties and groups have been party to creating over the years. Years that have witnessed Tower Hamlets “Labour Party” [which has been in “elected” control of the local Tower Hamlets Borough Council for all that time] be ‘in control’ via special bureaucratic and undemocratic control from the Party HQ. That has been taking place with the local people having neither any say nor any requirements from ‘the party’ TO have or to OFFER any say about what is taking place in the name of the Borough inside the Party that has been in control of the local Council or what has been actually being ‘thought’ by the “elected” councillors who have been used by the controlling Party;s bureaucracy and by the internal controlling clique on the Council itself. Whichever way they are looked at they have been - and are continuing to remain - unaccountable, unaudited and uncaring. So they are the ones that should be held to account to begin with. They are the ones that should be demonstrably held to account for the hundreds of £Millions that they have pocked by way of ‘salaries’, ‘bonuses’ and ‘other costs’ in the name of serving the population that has been reduced to the states of sinking social disparities, discord and disability all across this East End borough. But Cameron is not going to even acknowledge this statement of the state of the sinking estates that we have here diagnosed and updated. cameron will listen to the very sort of ‘reliable sources’ that have cared the sinking mess. And he will even ‘honour’ some of them in no time at all for creating the bad society that is certainly getting badder [Oops! ‘worse’] by the hour. With the passage of every hour that sees another repeat by David Cameron of his Fake Society chant, there is another thousand casualties of the bad society being added to whatever is supposed to still operate as ‘emergency’ services.... Society is rotting because democracy is missing. But Cameron is on to a con and he is too busy confecting his spin to notice that it is democracy that he must do his best urgently and immediately to restore... He will not do anything for democracy. Why? Because he does not care for democracy. He cares for the agenda that Big Business prefers. And Big Business prefers a smokescreen to be created. This is the truth. The truth that Ed Miliband has appropriately failed to notice let alone to condemn. Why? Because like David Cameron himself Ed Miliband too is cosy with Big Business. There is not much that separates them. Elecant the dates of their careers in the particular posts. [To be continued]

Brick Lane replying to today's CON on Society by 'CONTHEM!' Cameron

Brick Lane replying to today's CON on Society by 'CONTHEM!' Cameron
2220 Hrs GMT London Saturday 12 February 2011. ©Muhammad Haque Political Poetry: Lines in solidarity with all the people crying freedom everywhere! From Brick Lane to Tahrir Square Cairo Part 2 “When the world is witnessing a moment of light when everything on earth feels almost right it is it must be it can only be a moment of joy it is also just when Cameron wants to destroy...” [To be continued]

Lines from Brick Lane London to Tahrir Square Cairo

Lines from Brick Lane London to Tahrir Square Cairo
Muhammad Haque Political Poetry: From Brick Lane in solidarity with the people of Egypt 2030 Hrs GMT London Saturday 12 February 2011 Part 1: Do you know what joy feels? Do you know what denial feels? Do you know what freedom feels? Do you know what prison feels? Do you know what being alive feels? Do you know what being denied feels? Do you know what a day of liberation feels? Do you know how long an age of darkness feels? [To be continued]

Real Society are the real people in ordinary East End of London...

Real Society are the real people in ordinary East End of London...
0555 [0535] [0515] [0455] [0435] Hrs GMT London Friday 11 February 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. Less than 2 months ago, KHOODEELAAR! voiced the demand for justice for the people in the East End of London. That was on Thursday 16 December 2010. We were setting out to mount a new campaigning New Year 2011 then. One staunch campaigning pioneer in the setting of the Brick Lane London E1 area, Kay Jordan and I were taking stock of the many calls that we had been party to making in the year that was fading out and we were drawing up plans for the New Year, poised to fade in appropriate words and noise to utter the demands that would make those in posts where ‘decisions are supposedly made’ sit up and listen! Decisions that affect the lives of communities like the ones that struggle for dignity and space across most of the borough.... Thursday 16 December 2010 was ten weeks ago. On the following Thursday, 23 December 2010, we sat in the Montefiore Centre in the Hanbury Street for lunch. One of the things that Kay and I talked about was the future of the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area. We were updating our programme to put up the ALL VOLUNTEERS News on the Windows of the Montefiore Centre as an added facility for the local community to find out about the community activities. Always in the context of positive learning and information. Almost two years previously, we decided to launch the ALL VOLUNTEERS News. That is now happening. This is part of the ALL VOLUNTEERS News. We start with a question: who is a volunteer? First off, let us dispose of the misconceptions that David Cameron has arrived with. HIS volunteers are not OUR volunteers. OUR Volunteers are the truly selfless, unselfish, ungreedy, unscheming, forever universally transparent and universal givers of their own time, energy and resource for the good of others. The givers and the receivers are not state-targeted.They are volunteers out of universal compassion and humanity. As very different from confected couriers of contamination of human rights. OUR Volunteers are timeless and they transcend place and expose parochialism as the malaise that it is against decent universally dignified society. OUR Volunteers help life factors come back to the near-dead whom Cameron-like fronters of emotional and propaganda violence would consign to the lowest level known to human destitution and denial. We are embattled in places like the East End of London against the combined consolidated contempt for humanity that capitalism generated and is busy spreading upon society under the pretexts for poisonous discord that Cameron has been peddling via his Munich Manifesto. Despite all their efforts, the apologists for Munich ‘Dave’ have failed to provide one iota of universally ethically sustainable and tenable substantiation for the deeply damaging and unjust motivation and promotion of the ‘benefits’ of fabrication, fakery, malice, intolerance and prejudice based on religion and insinuated by abusing probably one of the most untruthful paragraphs of twenty-first century imperialistic racist mythological expositions. This has applied all last week as much to the predictable apologists who surfaced on the airwaves and on the electronic media screens as well as in print via the DAILY MAIL [which deployed, as we have already pointed out earlier this week] Stephen Glover and similar commentators to denounce those who challenged Munich ‘Dave’s’ dire desperate diatribe against decent society. As it did last night, another Thursday, to Francis Maude who appeared on the BBC Question Time alongside Jacquie Smith, the former Home Secretary who could not help herself as she featured in so many news bulletins of the very anti-societal kind whilst brazenly denying all claims being made against her conduct and against her related lack of probity. If what those two [‘panellists’ CONDEM Maude and Bliaring Smith] said was any guide, they both didn’t get it about Society.The Big Society drum that Munich Dave was beating before he ever launched anything from Munich, was never on. Why? Because the phrase could not be truthfully uttered by any self-respecting volunteer doing their job for people who are the real society. Big Society was condemned even before CON Dave connived and confected CONDEM! The real society, the real people who make the real society and who therefore are the society, are people like Kay Jordan. [To be continued]

ALL VOLUNTEERING for decades in the East End of London

ALL VOLUNTEERING for decades in the East End of London
DEFENDING THE EAST END OF London for decades.... ALL VOLUNTEERING for decades in the East End of London... Coming here in the next hours

STAND UP FOR THE RIGHTS of those whom CONDEM regime is oppressing with lack of economic rights

STAND UP FOR THE RIGHTS of those whom CONDEM regime is oppressing with lack of economic rights
DEFENDING THE EAST END OF London for decades.... ALL VOLUNTEERING for decades in the East End of London... Coming here in the next hours

Kay Jordan: ‘Volunteer Leader defending community of diverse humanity..’

Kay Jordan: ‘Volunteer Leader defending community of diverse humanity..’
0640 Hrs GMT London Thursday 10 February 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. ALL VOLUNTEERS NEWS featuring Kay Jordan will be online in the evening of Thursday 10 February 2011. [To be continued] {From previous editions] 1910 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 09 February 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. East End's true answer to faker Cameron: How to do real volunteering when the entire community is being submerged and surrounded by the City of London-interests-flaunted greed, avarice, caprice and ignorance and indifference.... The EXCLUSIVE serialisation of the reports on Kay Jordan's 30 years of dedicated selfless action defending the diversity of humanity in the inner city community of the East End of London.... the East End. Starting in ALL VOLUNTEERS! News of Thursday 10 February 2011 [To be continued]

Benefit FRAud propaganda by benefit fraud minister ! Exposed via South London Press!

Benefit FRAud propaganda by benefit fraud minister ! Exposed via  South London Press!
1620 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 09 February 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. I have in the past hour posted a briofe commnet on the SOUTH LONDON PRESS web site. IO update on DAVID FREUD's fradulent career at the ewosnew of peop[le whop have been pused into invl;unary poverrty by sucessibve regiesm in the UK. " News Cuts to housing benefit backed by wrong figures Tuesday, 08 February 2011 1 2 Next Campbell Robb Campbell Robb Lord Freud Lord Freud Claims of 750,000 affordable rental homes exaggerated By Paul Dietrich A TORY peer quoted hugely exaggerated figures in comments justifying cutting housing benefits to thousands of low-income families, it has been revealed. Welfare reform minister Lord Freud said, despite introducing a cap on claims, there would still be 750,000 private rented homes in the capital affordable to people on benefits. But when quizzed in the House of Lords, he was forced to admit the error and that the number was actually a third of that – just 250,000. Lord Freud made the cock-up in a piece written for the South London Press last month. He was defending the Government’s proposal to cap housing benefit at £400 a week against claims it would price low-income families out of London. Describing the claims as “sensationalist myths”, he said: “In London, around 750,000 private rental homes will still be affordable.” But in a written answer in the House of Lords on January 25, he admitted the error in response to a question by Labour peer Lord Knight of Weymouth. Lord Freud said: “There are fewer than 700,000 private rented sector homes in total in London, and a conservative estimate is that about 250,000 of these will still be affordable after the housing benefit reforms have been implemented.” A spokesman for the Department for Work and Pensions said the 750,000 figure had been used “in error”. Campbell Robb, chief executive of housing charity Shelter, said: “Rather than accusing others of scaremongering, the Government should concentrate on accurately assessing the impact of these changes so that Londoners who will be affected have some clarity about what lies ahead.” The Government’s further claim that private rents would be “driven down” as a result of the reforms has also been questioned by Shelter. Lord Freud said the rental market should become cheaper because landlords would not be able to charge as much to families on benefits. Mr Robb said: “A recent survey of landlords who let to benefit claimants showed that 90 per cent would be less likely to continue to do so as a result of the cuts.” A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said an independent review would be carried out into the reforms. Email: paul.dietrich@slp.co.uk For the full story, you can get a full online edition at www.slp-e-edition.co.uk Bookmark and Share Comments on this news item: Thank you. Your comment has been received and should be displayed below: 1 comments on this news item Posted by : Muhammad Haque, London | Wednesday 09/Feb/2011 | Report this comment Is it at all possible on the facts that the ’Tory Peer’ and poverty-creation minister at the Dupe [Oops! DWP] David Freud is the same person who had been caught faking it at least once before? On THAT earlier occasion, [he was yet to be adorned by Cameron’s abuse of the Constitution] Freud appeared without the P word exposed about him. It was Samira Ahmed on Channel 4 News who tried to extract a semblance of substantiation from Freud on his then packaged propaganda against the Involuntarily poor. Freud failed! "

Cameron's fraudulent propaganda against Involuntary poor

Cameron's fraudulent propaganda against Involuntary poor
1605 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 09 February 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. CONDEM's dupe-the-involuntarily-poor ['DWP'] 'minister' David Freud exposed as having faked the figures against lawful benefit claimants! This follows Freud’s fraudulent propaganda issued to the SOUTH LONDON PRESS! [To be continued]

CONDEM Cameron and Osborne exposed as City of London stooges!

CONDEM Cameron and Osborne exposed as City of London stooges!
UK CONDEM Collusion’s unreliable Finance fixer George Osborne cannot hide the truth of the Bullying he is doing to Society by the bogus ‘penalty’ on bankers! 1135 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 09 February 2011 By © Muhammad Haque http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHculcyibc4 The latest stunt by the UK CONDEM Finance Minister George Osborne [Tuesday 08 February 2011] parading another untruth in his fakery about ‘taxing the banks’ has already been exposed in the reports carried on several of today's’ front pages showing that the City of London interests have made concerted plans to appropriate the UK Government. The details now published about the City of London paying David Cameron’s CON Party pre election [06 May 2010] [as reported by the London GUARDIAN http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/feb/08/city-conervative-party-election-campaign-funding] leave no doubt any more that the CONDEM Coalition is not what its peddlers claim it is. In fact my diagnosis of the CONDEM COLLUSION is again vindicated by these new disclosures and reports. So where is Cameron taking Society with the agenda being sent by the City of London interests? Society is being dragged down hill and the plastic words attributed this morning to the routine Opposition will not stop the slide into anti-social depression. Society itself must stand up to the forces that are now driving the CONDEM bulldozer fronted by the increasingly untrustworthy marketeers whose ideology is defined by the fact that some of their key numbers derived their inspiration [what a dreadful poverty of language we are CONDEM-ed to with this anti-Society brigade!] from the fountain of authoritarian and thuggish culture associated with the Bullingdon Club. They have done enough damage by now to Society for the key word to be updated to BULLYING DONE CLUB! [To be continued]

OSBORNE's stunt 'tax' on greedy banks is exposed as another sham!

OSBORNE's stunt 'tax' on greedy banks is exposed as another sham!
1220 Hrs GMT London Weds 09 February 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. AADHIKARonline reporting SUNDAY PEOPLE Political Editor Nigel Nelson commented as he reviewed some of the London Dailies on the BBC News Channel Tuesday night 08 February 2011 [To be continued]

SOCIETY alone can stop CONDEM City of London attacks on Society!

SOCIETY alone can stop CONDEM City of London attacks on Society!
BULLYING DONE CLUB! UK CONDEM Collusion’s unreliable Finance fixer George Osborne cannot hide the truth of the Bullying he is doing to Society by the bogus ‘penalty’ on bankers! 1135 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 09 February 2011 By © Muhammad Haque http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHculcyibc4 The latest stunt by the UK CONDEM Finance Minister George Osborne [Tuesday 08 February 2011] parading another untruth in his fakery about ‘taxing the banks’ has already been exposed in the reports carried on several of today's’ front pages showing that the City of London interests have made concerted plans to appropriate the UK Government. The details now published about the City of London paying David Cameron’s CON Party pre election [06 May 2010] [as reported by the London GUARDIAN http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/feb/08/city-conervative-party-election-campaign-funding] leave no doubt any more that the CONDEM Coalition is not what its peddlers claim it is. In fact my diagnosis of the CONDEM COLLUSION is again vindicated by these new disclosures and reports. So where is Cameron taking Society with the agenda being sent by the City of London interests? Society is being dragged down hill and the plastic words attributed this morning to the routine Opposition will not stop the slide into anti-social depression. Society itself must stand up to the forces that are now driving the CONDEM bulldozer fronted by the increasingly untrustworthy marketeers whose ideology is defined by the fact that some of their key numbers derived their inspiration [what a dreadful poverty of language we are CONDEM-ed to with this anti-Society brigade!] from the fountain of authoritarian and thuggish culture associated with the Bullingdon Club. They have done enough damage by now to Society for the key word to be updated to BULLYING DONE CLUB! [To be continued]

Sign up using the form below to attend Brick Lane Community Forum 2011

Sign up using the form below to attend Brick Lane Community Forum 2011
Brick Lane Community Business Forum 2011 Registration form

Munich Dave Cameron is following clearly Right path of enemies of Society [2]

Munich Dave Cameron is following clearly Right path of enemies of Society [2]
1645 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 08 february 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. Brick Lane ‘may’ look a far away place from “Dave” Cameron’s “tolerance” centre, whatever that is. But it isn’t.Only last week, Cameron’s confirmed CONDEM-backing ‘Conservatives’ operating from a tellingly unreal ‘local address’ called Toynbee Hall residential made a number of claims, at the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council, which could not have been more fabricated. They claimed that they cared for the ‘local community’ in Brick Lane. If they did, they would have by now issued another statement standing by the people in the Brick Lane area who are among the first identifiable inner city English conurbation targeted by “Dave” from Munich as he followed Adolf in the rhetorical line on his 21st century version of the nasty war he was declaring. Munich “Dave” was not far off the line that had been drawn by Matthew Parris in the latter’s incitement to Tony Blair in 2005 to “punish Brick Lane” for daring to vote Oona King Out in May 2005! Matthew Parris told Blair to DRIVE CROSSRAIL THROUGH BRICK LANE! As a punishment t! So Munich Dave must realise that voting was declared an offence by his mentor Parris. Just so that he left nobody in doubt, ‘Dave’ made the long trip to Munich to be absolutely clear! Pace. David Cameron’s extremist links with inner city funded corruption in the UK will not end only because he has gone to extreme lengths travelling to Bavaria in Germany to salvage his sinking image and has made Munich a dateline location for the first time since the place had been appropriated by those ‘nice people’ with such wonderful values as espoused by Adolf Hitler! Aping Adolf has never been a good move! No matter how untenable the decision to do so! Aping Adolf when attacking some of the most important values that have universally served the cause of defending those that have been attacked by Hitler and his supporters cannot be an accident. So who had advised or given the green light to the ignorant Mr Cameron to go to Munch? We shall report the answer to this question. Our search will be propelled as before by our commitment to the defence of the universal values that we have found to be the only guaranteed shelters whenever the people have been put at risk by morality free maniacs making their desperate bids to dominate the world! Today the DAILY MAIL too is back in its 1930s role-mode!!!! It has deployed both Richard Littlejohn and Stephen Glover today to do down all expressions of views that accord with backing a tolerant society. This is in effect what the DAILY MAIL did in the 1930s. It was a backer of David Cameron’s predecessor-in-preaching-poison and prejudice from a platform in Munich. Not very wise. Not very liberal. Not very compassionate at all! Not very factual. Not true, Not responsible. Not intelligent. Not broadminded. In fact David Cameron has shown a firm two fingers to Theresa May and has defied decency and has said: “UP YOURS, Nice Theresa! I am back backing the Nasty Party!” But then ‘Dave’ [Oh so ‘decent’ blokey davey the ‘Dave’ sounds! Almost as embarrassingly showy lovely jovely as he ‘protectively’ paraded his hold on a strategically configured ‘simple-smiling’ ‘Sam Cam’ in another ‘nice’ ‘tolerant’ exhibition on their short way to No 10 Downing Street in May 2010.] The fact is that Dave has never been anything other than the Munich Devil that he has unfurled himself as! He is on a war path. He is flawed. His scriptwriters are flawed. Munich Devil will not be an image that he will be able to live down. yet something must go down. It looks as if it will have to be ‘Dave’! He will lose what remains of any vestige of pretence that was taken with a pinch of salt. This time, he has ‘crossed the rubicon’. That phrase was uttered in London by an Apartheid ‘President’ undergoing his latest moral meltdown. Time soon showed that the ‘Apartheid President’ whom the British broadcast media had given such unrestricted space and prominence in that time, was the one who failed to return to anything like the mighty power palace that he had left behind in South Africa on his way to tour the ‘capitals’ where the regimes had been ‘tolerating’ apartheid for decades! In Brick Lane where the snooping by ‘simple-looking’ ‘tourist’ types forever keen to train their loaded devices in the direction of anyone who looks ‘Asian’ and alert! Munich ‘Dave’ lecturing Society about ‘tolerance’ being ‘heard in Brick Lane’? The ‘Lane’ has been vilified by successions of spies, propagandists and snoopers for the past ten years... Dave’s Munich Manifesto has added new hatred against people among the snoopers whom Dave’s kind of society would find ‘fun targets to make fun of’! Dave has made a start of which Matthew Parris, the South-African born Murdoch-approved spreader of hatred would be very proud of! [To be continued]

EAST END VOLUNTEERS to counter Cameron's condemnable CONDEM Cuts

EAST END VOLUNTEERS to counter Cameron's condemnable CONDEM Cuts
EAST END Volunteers to counter Cameron Cuts AND to defend the Community against the condemnable CONDEM Cuts assault.... CLICK to view latest updates on the khoodeelaar! twitters site

Tower Hamlets Council must be investigated on what it is doing to create new Housing poverty...

Tower Hamlets Council must be investigated on what it is doing to create new Housing poverty...
24dash is hyping up Tower Hamlets Council's continuing housing failures and neglect. CLICK to view shameless plug for Tower Hamlets Council failures

KHOODEELAAR! defending Brick Lane for a dignified community environment for sustainable business..

KHOODEELAAR! defending Brick Lane for a dignified community  environment for sustainable business..
0140 Hrs GMT London Thursday 04 February 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. Brick Lane restauranteurs join the Community Business Form in continuing to work for a dignified environment in the East End street free from anti social behaviour, touting and other distractions. In these exclusive BRICK LANE REPORTS, we bring the most upto date information about Brick Lane from Brick Lane after the street was made the subject of a newly-announced Conservative Party ‘petition’ put to the Tower Hamlets Council [Wednesday 02 February 2011] over ‘touting’ near many of the Curry Restaurants in Brick Lane. We start with Azmol Hussain who owns at least two Brick Lane Curry restaurants . Muhammad Haque interviewed Azmol Hussain between 2130 and 2200 Hrs GMT Thursday 03 February 2011. A video of the interview will appear here later [To be continued]

Brick Lane “Curry town” is attracting an unexpected surge in the activities of CONDEM Conservatives

Brick Lane “Curry town” is attracting an unexpected surge in the activities of CONDEM Conservatives
1300 Hrs GMT London Thursday 03 February 2011. By ˙© Muhammad Haque. Brick Lane “Curry town” is attracting an unexpected surge in the activities of CONDEM Conservatives! Was the Bangladeshi “journalist” right who described the “touting-affected” Brick Lane Curry “district” a scandal a few years ago? [To be continued] [From previous editions] This is how Brick Lane looked at about a quarter to eleven , just over two hours ago. The photo covers the junction between Brick Lane and Hanbury Street, probably the most frequented part of the ‘Curry district’ in the days before ‘the downturn’ hit the UK economy. My picture shows an almost bare Brick Lane. Yet the same street and the same reality would have been mentally painted very differently by others who were relying on what they were being told about the spot by inadequately informed individuals talking under the influence of... prejudice. To those ignorant about Brick Lane as it has been over the past fifty years in this context, the place is now densely populated by touts who are making life of ‘decent passers-by a misery’.. That was not how the ‘spot’ looked to me just under two hours ago. . The ‘spot’ is the part of Brick Lane, on either side, that houses the most ‘curry houses’, Bangladeshi restaurants that have got associated with ‘touts’ who stand outside of the restaurant and accost passers-by with offers of meals at discount rates! The use of ‘touts’ is a relatively new thing. But it is now attracting most hostile attention on and about the Bangladeshi curry restaurants in both Brick Lane itself and in some other parts of London. Two campaigners, one identified as a Conservative party career politico who failed to get elected to Tower Hamlets Council.. in May 2010. He is based at the Toynbee Hall and appeared on a token platform reserved for a brief routine that is performed during Tower Hamlets [the local] Council’s meetings on behalf of ‘the public’. Matt Smith spoke about the Brick L`new touts. [To be continued]

A moment's cry of people hoping for justice ripples across the waves

A moment's cry of people hoping for justice ripples across the waves
0138 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 02 February 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. The moment of hope for justice captured in the picture on the front page of today’s London daily the Independent is a moment that all people across the globe whop are hoping for justice will appreciate... Smaller numbers of people in the inner city East End of London have been hoping like that too. May be the dictator has not been as widely cited name as Mubarak but the impact of injustice has been just as real.... The linked you tube video shows a moment of the KHOODEELAAR! leaflet a for 12 July 2005 when the community was being mobilised to defend the East End against big Business Crossrail hole attack ...The Crossrail hole attack has been a product of the very Big Business interests whose likes have been fuelling the regime of Husne Mubarak in Egypt. No wonder that little people everywhere have been cheering with the people in Egypt whose have come out to demand justice..... In Brick Lane, we have been calling for justice for years...[To be continued]

If “Ministers lied” for Gaddafi deal then MPs lied for Big Biz Crossrail attack on East End too

If “Ministers lied” for Gaddafi deal then MPs lied for Big Biz Crossrail attack on East End too
0930 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 01 February 2011 By© Muhammad Haque In the next parts of this updater, I am going to diagnose the role of Ian Liddell-Grainger. He was the 'MP' that sat in the formal chair of the stooged 'Select Committee' on the ‘Crossrail Bill’ in June 2006 when Kay Jordan presented a brief summary of evidence against Crossrail hole attack. Before I get into the details of the outrageous abuse of "Parliament" by Ian Liddell-Grainger that I witnessed as Kay tried to speak, I put here one particular statement that Kay made on that day about the East End of London. This is taken from the UK Houses of Parliament web site. Kay Jordan to MPs committee [June 2006] [Taken from the official records, closing comments in defence of the East End of London]: 11372. In my opinion, now that we do not have a spoil tunnel up to Pedley Street there is absolutely no reason why they cannot be on the southerly route. Therefore, Chairman, when you ask me, and I am sure you will, "What do you want, Ms Jordan", I will say I want you to take the advice that my father gave to me when I started practising. My father clearly said, "Look, just remember, if it is not broken do not mend it, but if risk is identified then what you should do is avoid it if you can". I would say that after all our presentations we have undoubtedly identified risk. You are risking the lives, the health and the well being of the people of Spitalfields, without any doubt at all. You could possibly be risking the buildings in Spitalfields, both our amazing and absolutely precious conservation area of Georgian buildings and our Victorian buildings, and even our 1970s, dare I say, slab blocks, because ground conditions in Spitalfields are so bad, it is such Swiss cheese, that they do not know, they cannot tell you, and I cannot say, that these buildings will not go down holes. Until it happens we do not know. They do not know and I cannot tell you. You will be risking a whole load of buildings, some of which are the most precious Georgian buildings in London. 11373. Therefore, in those circumstances and in view of the fact that you are charged with considering the situation about the route, I want you to tell Crossrail to go south to avoid all these risks, to avoid any unrest, any difficulties with the community, in an area where major developments will be going on anyway where they can put their shafts in without any of the problems that we are going to have to face. 11374. Mr Liddell-Grainger: Kay, thank you. Mr Mould?” [Muhammad Haque’s diagnostic report on the role played by Ian Liddell-Grainger for Big Business agenda scam Crossrail in June 2006, follows this introductory flashback] [To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2005 and January 31, 2004: landmark events in the defence of East End..

KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2005 and January 31, 2004: landmark events in the defence of East End..
2355 [1310] Hrs GMT London Monday 31 January 2011 By © Muhammad Haque. In December 2005, a document was published in and from the East End of London that caused political shock waves in the East End of London. What was that document? Who published it? What evidence is there that there was a political shock wave - let alone ‘shock waves’- caused by that document? The evidence is emphatically there. One of the monumental events that KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto intervention created in January 2006 was to set off something unseen before in the area called tower hamlets. The concentration of all the key postholders and careerists exposed as a cabal colluding to stay on in their positions under the unprecedented democratic demand on them to account for their conceit and their complicity with the corrupt agenda of City of London elements plotting to destroy the East End of London generally and the Brick Lane London E1 area in particular. What the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto did in january 2006 has been defining the careerists’ many ‘dream’ ambitions and other “achievements” ever since. A clutch of the KHOODEELAAR! landmark events began on this date January 31, 2004. Kay Jordan called that meeting as the campaigning cry to combat Crossrail hole assault cooked up by the crooked City of London interests and to protect the East End of London from that attack [To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! rocked the corrupt clique on Crossrail-inviter Tower Hamlets Council..

KHOODEELAAR! rocked the corrupt clique on Crossrail-inviter Tower Hamlets Council..
2355 [1310] Hrs GMT London Monday 31 January 2011 By © Muhammad Haque. In December 2005, a document was published in and from the East End of London that caused political shock waves in the East End of London. What was that document? Who published it? What evidence is there that there was a political shock wave - let alone ‘shock waves’- caused by that document? The evidence is emphatically there. One of the monumental events that KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto intervention created in January 2006 was to set off something unseen before in the area called tower hamlets. The concentration of all the key postholders and careerists exposed as a cabal colluding to stay on in their positions under the unprecedented democratic demand on them to account for their conceit and their complicity with the corrupt agenda of City of London elements plotting to destroy the East End of London generally and the Brick Lane London E1 area in particular. What the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto did in january 2006 has been defining the careerists’ many ‘dream’ ambitions and other “achievements” ever since. All of the KHOODEELAAR! landmark events began on this date January 31, 2004. Kay Jordan called that meeting as the cam2355 [1310] Hrs GMT London Monday 31 January 2011 By © Muhammad Haque. In December 2005, a document was published in and from the East End of London that caused political shock waves in the East End of London. What was that document? Who published it? What evidence is there that there was a political shock wave - let alone ‘shock waves’- caused by that document? The evidence is emphatically there. One of the monumental events that KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto intervention created in January 2006 was to set off something unseen before in the area called tower hamlets. The concentration of all the key postholders and careerists exposed as a cabal colluding to stay on in their positions under the unprecedented democratic demand on them to account for their conceit and their complicity with the corrupt agenda of City of London elements plotting to destroy the East End of London generally and the Brick Lane London E1 area in particular. What the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto did in December and January 2006 has been defining the careerists’ many ‘dream’ ambitions and other “achievements” ever since. All of the KHOODEELAAR! landmark events began on this date January 31, 2004. Kay Jordan called that meeting as the campaigning cry to combat the crooked City of London and to protect the East End of London from that attack. paigning cry to combat the crooked City of London and to protect the East End of London from that attack. [To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! demonstrated outside the Palace of Westminster on 6 June 2006

KHOODEELAAR! demonstrated outside the Palace of Westminster on 6 June 2006
2255 Hrs GMT London Saturday 29 January 2011 By © Muhammad Haque Khoodeelaar! demonstrated outside the Palace of Westminster on 6 June 2006. That was a part of our the series of action that we took especially in June 2006 around the palace of Westminster where the “Crossrail Bill” “Select Committee” was in session taking “evidence” from objectors to the “Crossrail Bill”. On that same day- and before the demonstration which we mounted on the College Green opposite the Palace itself - we had also kept a campaigning appointment to reach the front door of No 10 Downing Street. Minutes beforehand, I stood on the pavement in the main mall whence Downing Street and wrote in long hand a letter FAO Tony Blair from KHOODEELAAR! that we then delivered at the Door making sure that the message got through to Tony Blair who was in post as UK PM. While we were doing those things, Ken Livingstone was keeping himself busy too. He too was in contact with No 10 Downing Street. Whereas we had gone there emphatically demanding an end to Crossrail, Ken Livingstone was doing his bits to SUPPORT Crossrail. [Top be continued]

Khoodeelaar! enters 8th year of defending Brick Lane London E1 area and beyond

Khoodeelaar! enters 8th year of defending Brick Lane London E1 area and beyond
2020 [1955] Hrs GMT London Saturday 29 January 2011 By © Muhammad Haque In this picture [shown above] Kay Jordan is seen speaking at the first Khoodeelaar! DEMONSTRATION that was held [1800 Hrs on Friday 22 October 2004 in the Greatorex Street London E1, nr Brick Lane] to demand that the ‘Local’ Tower Hamlets Council stopped supporting the attack on the East End. That demonstration was held only after Khoodeelaar! had spent MONTHS asking Tower Hamlets Council to see sense and stop its policy of collusion with the Big Business agenda Crossrail hole attack on the East End. Following that demonstration and as a result of our other extensive constitutional and democratic campaign work ongoing, Tower Hamlets Council's controlling clique began to ‘see’ sense. Every instance of that took us months of action! Those actions are and have been legal, lawful, constitutional, ethical and evidential. Our first action was the public meeting held with Kay Jordan’s help at the Montefiore Centre at the corner of the Hanbury Street and the Deal Street London E1 on Saturday 31 January 2004. [The ACTION updates continue]

ANGER of the community continues into the 8th year! Davos diverts and distorts as ever...

ANGER of the community continues into the 8th year! Davos diverts and distorts as ever...
0645 [0630] Hrs GMT London Saturday 29 January 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. The following ‘[mildly edited] record is from the official publication by the UK Parliament [House of Commons] showing the typical equation between the so-called Opposition Party and the CONDEM regime. BOTH are stooged by Big Business to peddle CROSSRAIL. There is no evidence in the recorded exchanges that the stooged MPs [typified now by maria Eagle] or the stooged minister [typified now by Ms Villiers] are uttering independently about the objective needs for the proper provisions of transport in London. They BOTH recite the word Crossrail more as a chant. They worship the evil force of BIG Business that overrides all known tenets and demands of accountability, democracy and ethics. The same fanatic, irrational, brainwashed zombie behaviour has been on display this week at Davos in Switzerland where George Osborne, the man who began the week by blaming the snow for the crass figures about the last quarter of the cycle in the economic manipulation, was doing his stooged bits to peddle the agenda set for him buy his Big Business controllers. Like Maria Eagle and Theresa Villiers in the extracts shown below this diagnostic update, George Osborne was treating Crossrail as being exempt from all requirements of need, cost-effectiveness and accountability. Like Eagle and Villiers, Osborne worships on the orders of Big Business! Big Business defies ethics, morality, environment, real economics.... [To be continued] Maria Eagle: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport under what budget headings the savings on the Crossrail project under the proposals in the Comprehensive Spending Review will be made. [19792] Mrs Villiers [holding answer 26 October 2010]: Crossrail is funded under sponsors agreement, partly by the Department for Transport and partly by Transport for London. The spending review announcement confirms Government's joint commitment with the Mayor of London to delivering Crossrail in its entirety. Working with Crossrail Ltd and the Mayor, the Government have identified substantial savings of more than £1 billion to the Crossrail funding package, which includes the lengthening of the delivery programme for the central tunnel works by around a year. Teresa Pearce: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport in which year he expects the Crossrail line to open. [21185] Mrs Villiers: Under the revised programme for the construction of the central tunnels, we expect that phased introduction of Crossrail services will commence from 2018. [AADHIKARonline/Khoodeelaar! publishing 2011]

Today's Times is partly reporting on the rampant corruption KHOODEELAAR! diagnosed years ago!

Today's Times is partly reporting on the rampant corruption KHOODEELAAR! diagnosed years ago!
0818 London Monday 07 February [2210 Hrs GMT London Friday 28 January] 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. One of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign’s diagnostic and evidential pillars has been our still active assertion that the “railway” bureaucracy in Britain is corrupt to the core. Today’s “news’ featured on the Times front-page merely touches the surface. KHOODEELAAR! has said since January 20904 that Crossrail has been a front for the corrupt cabal that actually holds most of the powerful positions in the UK’s railway bureaucracy. The front-page of the TOWER HAMLETS RECORDER dated 27 October 2004 was devoted to the first KHOODEELAAR! demonstration held in the Greatorex Street against the complicity of the Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘leadership’ with Crossrail hole attacks on the community . The main montage features Kay Jordan holding a campaign banner that Kay herself had helped design to show the effects on the Brick Lane London E1 area of the then planned CROSSRAIL Dirt Hole......[To be continued]

Poverty creation in East End rampant under CONDEM-courier councils

Poverty creation in East End rampant under CONDEM-courier councils
1228 [1225] [1200] Hrs GMT London Friday 28 January 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. How far is the “City of London” from the inner city. ‘deprived’ East End of London? Not far at all;. In fact the “City of London” is almost upon the East End, so far and far reaching has been its agenda of take-over and occupation! This has not however changed the centuries long tactics or agenda of exploitation and looting that have taken place in the iniquitous relationship. The ideology of caprice, greed, avarice and immorality and acquisition is as rampant in the behaviour of the “City of London” today as it always has been. And in her daily struggle to keep the greedy ones away from the ordinary people typically inhabiting the Brick Lane London E1 area, Kay Jordan in the past 30 years has had to deal with some of the most immoral “city of London” profiteers. We shall UPDATE on that battle, starting with one particular assailant [Oops! “City of London” “entrepreneur”!]. As a contextual introduction to that OVERDUE UPDATE, we shall take a detailed look at the role of the lower courts in the English judicial system in CREATING poverty, hardship, dispossession in the inner city areas. Nowhere is the poverty-creation programme going on as rampantly as it is in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. [To be continued]

Battle defending the community in the East End continues

Battle defending the community in the East End continues
Battle defending the community in the East End continues

Kay Jordan, leading Volunteer came to defend those attacked by Council-created poverty

Kay Jordan, leading Volunteer  came to defend those attacked by Council-created poverty
1230 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 26 January 2011 By © Muhammad Haque The poverty-creating assault by CONDEM continues as many in Tower Hamlets are experiencing. Tower Hamlets Council is using the cuts agenda as pretext to depress the community even more. What with George Osborne blaming the weather for the dire data released yesterday confirming the CONDEM Collusion’s economic failures, the so-called “regeneration” of the inner city areas typified by Tower Hamlets has been hitting the buffers every day. The train of fantasy “regeneration” that is the Crossrail propaganda has been again given yet another spin this week, with Boris Johnson making yet another contradictory and facile statement in justification of the Section 106 penalty that he is adding to the list of looting tax that he has been foisting on the ordinary people. Boris Johnson has been unable to make a coherent statement let alone deliver a policy consistent with the economic capacity of the community ion London. He is and will remain an organ for the promotion of the Big Business interest that has been running the ‘London mayor’ and the agenda of that post holder ever since the diversionary wasteful bureaucracy was created by Blair ten years ago. If Boris Johnson has been failing to deliver economic sustainability for the people across London so has every single local Council in inner city London. The behaviour of Tower Hamlets Council.. has been as dishonest, unrepresentative of the people and as unaccountable this past quarter [here referring to George Osborne weather-faked lies uttered yesterday Tuesday 25 January 2011] as it was being in the previous quarters, years and even decades. But this is not being reported by any of the known media. Neither the “local” press - which now includes the Big Biz agenda-peddling ‘titles’ {names of ‘newspapers and magazines’} published from addresses sited in what they falsely and misleading persist in calling “the Dockhands” when in truth the area concerned is still the same one that used to be known as the Isle of Dogs very much in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets] - nor the ‘national” “mainstream” media is even reporting this, let alone investigating the nature and the implications of what is going on. AADHIKAR Media is covering this exclusively., And we shall be reporting on the empirical studies being conducted on the reality of Tower Hamlet Council creating news and additional poverty in the Borough. We shall draw on the work of the ALLVOLUNTEERSNEWS which has been actively engaged in the empirical studies over the years. ALLVOLUNTEERSNEWS is one of the initiatives jointly founded in the Brick Lane London E1 area by Kay Jordan in the past 24 months. [To be continued]

Kay Jordan has shown how to accommodate “all faiths” and “no faiths”, in the workforce!

Kay Jordan has shown how to accommodate “all faiths” and “no faiths”, in the workforce!
1110 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 25 January 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. What is the evidence that shows that Kay Jordan has resolved the issue of faith [in the sense of religious beliefs] and no faith [in term of having no conventionally understood religious faith] in another superb way? Plenty. We report some of that evidence this week on this blog [To be continued] [From previous editions] 2035 Hrs GMT London Monday 24 January 2011 By © Muhammad Haque When even the die-hard Tory paper the DAILY MAIL admits that CONDEM is wrongly targeting society's vital arteries for cuts the answer is CLEAR. That answer to the question we had earlier today posed on this blog: Does Cameron care? The DAILY MAIL is reporting about the effects the CONDEM cuts are having on vital social facilities. Services, support and back up that are central to the survival of society. This latest admission by the likes of the London DAILY MAIL is linked to the report published by a policy research group called “Centre for Social Justice”. All the main news agencies trading in the UK have reported the CSJ’s findings in identical manner. The “coalition cuts are hitting the wrong targets”. This is in fact the same conclusion that even the CBI’s outgoing director general Richard lambert has come to. That the CONDEM regime is on to a loser! The loss is going to be a big one: Society itself. Measured against this kind of dire destructive “initiative” that is also at the same time costing £BILLIONS of public money, the work that has been going on in the past 30 years or so under the initiative of the uniquely gifted Kay Jordan merits more than a detailed look. We have been looking at some of Kay Jordans’ work already. In the next part, we examine the miniature miracle of sustainable economics that Kay Jordan has been bringing about in the Brick Lane London E1 area in the past 30 years! [To be continued] [From previous editions] Can David Cameron undo the dispossessions done by the likes of David Cohen from the EVENING STANDARD? Does Cameron care? 1630 Hrs GMT London Monday 24 January 2011 By©Muhammad Haque How long will it take David Cameron to get it about society? Perhaps he will never get it. Going by the way that his CONDEM collusion is smashing up most of what remains of what used to be society in Britain. The first target Cameron has hit is the idea, the principle, the value of society. And once he has undermined it, the rest is going to happen fast. And it is already happening. Whichever direction you look, CONDEM is doing something that alarms, worries and weakens. All the CONDEM targets are on the one side: the already struggling and under other attacks. Even the Rupert Murdoch-owned Times newspaper has been running the headline today about Cameron’s assault on society... I shall examine some key CONDEM behaviour witnessed ion the East End of London to show just how wrong cameron is in his assault on society. [To be continued] [From previous editions] 2010 Hrs GMT 23 Jan 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. If Rupert Murdoch's News of the World/Andy Coulson have violated 'celebs' then David Cohen has violated the DISPOSSESSED! [To be continued] [From the previous editions] 2000 [1955] Hrs GMT London Sunday 23 January 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. Gordon Brown’s reported concern about his privacy being invaded by the Any Coulson-linked Rupert Murdoch-controlled ‘News of the Wold’ [=‘NoW’] may appear to be of a different order than our concern in the East End of London about the invasion of our space and the violation of our scope as perpetrated by david Cohen from the EVENING STANDARD on 18 October 2010. But it is not different. Both the Coulson-linked ‘hacking’ events and the EVENING STANDARD’s DISPOSSESSOR David Cohen's violations constitute the core of the evidence of the CONDEM regime being about smashing up society. Breaking up Society. Not brining about “Big Society”. But reducing society into bits of broken down, smashed up, denied society[To be continued]

Monday:17 January 2011. Prayers for Kay Jordan are going on in the East End of London today

Monday:17 January 2011. Prayers for Kay Jordan are going on in the East End of London today
0540 [0510] Hrs GMT London Monday 17 January 2011. By © Muhammad Haque. Today, 17 January five years ago, Kay Jordan took a leading part in another historic defence of the East End. All this week we update on that act! The Movement that had defended the right to democratic say for the people of the East London ‘Parliamentary constituency’ of Bethnal Green and Bow in the period to the 5 May polling day at the 2005 UK General elections, enabling the ouster of Oona King and her replacement, did not have long to review the events as the Blairite media machine got pressed into overtime service to destroy the individual who had been put in place by the electorate. George Galloway became the target and the focus of so much vitriol starting in the second week of January 2006 that ALL evidence was that he would be out of Parliament in the not too distant future. There was nothing on the UK Political and mainstream media horizons to suggest otherwise. Why? Because the key allies that George Galloway had relied on during the months after his declaration that he would seek election from Bethnal Green and Bow had become extinct in the second week of January 2006. EXTINCT in terms of any support to Galloway who was coming under such fierce and one-sided attack and vilification that it was impossible to think of him as the same person who only months earlier had been publicly feted in the East End generally and in the UK Bangladeshis’ front-line street Brick Lane in particular. [To be continued] [Previous editions] 0100 Hrs GMT London Monday 17 January 2011 By © Muhammad Haque.FIVE years ago today 17 January [2006], Kay Jordan spoke in the Hanbury Street London E1 against the Crossrail hole attacks. Two years later, Rhoda Brawne, Kay’s friend, went with Kay Jordan to register opposition to the Crossrail hole Bill then being processed via a committee in the House of Lords. There they encountered a group of peers who had been assembled as the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’. The Group of peers behaved true to form. The form had been set already in the 2006-2007 ‘session’ of the House of Commons’ version of the “Crossrail Bill Select Committee”. The behaviour of the peers’ ‘committee’ in that ‘sitting’ was as daft, as banal, as really contextually irresponsible, undemocratic, antidemocratic and as contrary to the requirements of universally desirable codes of accountability as had been on display during the comparable sitting staged in the House of Commons during the previous ‘parliamentary year’. The result was that Kay Jordan found herself being misaddressed, misheard by the perpetrating peers performing the parts of the peddling of the agenda of Big Business that their little committee had been routinely contrived to perform. This created moments which Kay Jordan spent trying to explain her role so that the parasitic peers would be prevented from persisting in obstructive or offensive obiter interruptions. So offensive were the peers and so unhelpful that Kay Jordan’s friend Rhoda Brawne decided to speak. Inevitably, the parasiting peers failed to get the real message thus ending up with an inane and creepy exchange aimed at Rhoda Brawne herself. So deeply insulting were they that Rhoda Brawne went on record to assert that she should not be addressed as if she were a schoolchild! [To be continued]

The most ordinary Brick Lane in the East End of London houses some very extraordinary entrepreneurs

The most ordinary Brick Lane in the East End of London houses some very extraordinary entrepreneurs
1230 Hrs GMT London Saturday 08 January 2011 By © Muhammad Haque. I shall be continuing with the report on Neil who has been telling me about Kay Jordan and her extraordinary help to him in Brick Lane [The first part of my report on Neil is currently being archived and will be republished online after a technical break] [To be continued]

Friday, 19 July 2013

KHOODEELAAR! leading the action as the first comprehensive comment on the NUJ's entry into the "fray" over Tower Hamlets' Council's "town hall" "pravda" dubbed "East End Lies" -1

KHOODEELAAR! Leads the way again in voicing the truth about East End Lies and much more... Image may not appear here [due to Internet factors] of Eric with the overblown Pickles [his ego, for a start] as published by the UK PRESS Gazette, now known only as press gazette.co.uk. Muhammad Haque is a historian of the UK Press Gazette, having been an avid original writer and contributor to its column where he helped launch the campaign in the 1970s and 1980s against racism in the British Media 0610 Hrs GMT London Friday 19 July 2013: The Most Original Journalism for the East End of London is being brought here by the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign - The Campaign in the mainstream Media and in the UK Parliament over Tower Hamlets Council: The Muhammad Haque Commentary straight from the front line in the Community in the East End of London,m exposing the East End Lies and also putting Eric and his over-blown Pickles in the context where the Community must have the say on what our local Council owes to us and how we hold this Council to account and why the East End Lies must stop lying to us and begin to tell us the truth about our whole community.... The © Muhammad Haque Evidential Commentary on the dire state of the East End Lies, also known as the "town hall Pravda" The Commentary below has been posted online on the PRESS GAZETTE web site. http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/government-plans-curb-them-nuj-comes-out-defence-council-newspapers London Friday 19 July 2013. Helen Watson, from Tower Hamlets NUJ Branch which is involved in the “East End Life” writes: “Most of us came here because it represented a better offer than the publications we were working on. Our wages and conditions were much improved, it allowed us to provide a better standard of living for our families and helped us achieve a decent work/life balance.” Has it occurred to Ms Watson that the people who ordinarily live or try to live in Tower Hamlets may be also entitled to a “work/life balance”? In relation to the Council which is obliged to deliver services that directly affect work, life and the balance that is deserved? Where in the current edition of the “East End Life” would she say is an accurate reflection of the Life of the people of the borough of Tower Hamlets? I would suggest that the title is a false one. It should be called “East End Lies” which is what I have been calling it on the records for the past at least 14 years. I know most current councillors, the majority of whom have been in the Borough for years before getting into the Council. But I do not see them being reflected on the East End Lies as people. I see some of them who are featured only because they are in “the Cabinet”. They come across as caricatures, not as real life people with real links connections or concerns about the community which has been experiencing one of the most depressing economic and social, communal times, as even the Guardian has had to admit [against its own record of mysteriously “approving” of the L B Tower Hamlets Council controlling bureaucracy] only this week when comparing the glaring disparity that exists between Canary Wharf, HSBC and the ordinary Tower Hamlets. It is not Eric Pickles who is leading the call for a truthful “in-house” title. It is ordinary people like me who are and have been doing so. I even know when the first issue of the East End Life was published and who edited it and where that person is now. A can confirm that from that issue on, all the promises made then have been broken and the ordinary people depicted with nothing short of contempt by whoever has been setting the toxic, dishonest editorial tone of the “East End Lies”. Deny, divert and dissemble are three words that combine to make up the attitude of the East End Lies: Distort! Sure, Eric Pickles will gain a few points as a Conservative Politician. But the real losses, damages and misinformation have been caused to the ordinary people in the Borough for as long as the editorial contents of the East End Lies” have been geared to please the controlling “political faction, group or entity”. As the organiser of the first openly political and democratic mobilisation on Sunday 7 May 1978 following the racist murder of Altab Ali on Thursday 4 May 1978, I spoke of the moral legacy that our peaceful but ethically determined and restraining Campaign for a tolerant Society has had. I spoke on 4 May 2013 at the Altab Ali Park. There were a number of others who had later become involved in that year and helped mobilise many people in the peaceful Actions of all races against racism. Did the “East End Life” report that anniversary event? Not really. It carried an offensive, misleading, tokenistic piece of anonymity that had neither any mention of those who had taken part in that socially and in the universal context a significant even a pioneering consciousness-raising, universal movement in May 1978 nor ddi it have any in-depth ethical lessons or social far less international humanitarian or political lessons recounted. Yet our movement in may 1978 had all those elements and they transformed the environment not only in the East End but seriously impacted for the good on the rest of what happened, and has been happening, in British politics, as a whole. As at least one of the speakers said exactly that at the rally this year at the Altab Ali park on 4 May 2013. But the “East End Life” was busy faking up its own set of lies to insert in place of the real life on the streets of Tower Hamlets. Not only that, the Council has been caught as being callous on the memorial on the victims of racist violence. Altab Ali again in context: I have published, twice now in the past two years, criticism that the “mural” inscription on the side of the Altab Ali Park, written in Bangla, gives the wrong year as being that of Altab Ali’s murder and martyrdom! In the English language text, the year is correct, 1978. But the Bangla language version has the year 1977 as the year when Altab Ali was murdered and martyred. But even that is not a consistent text! Tower Hamlets Council, which commissioned that work, has ignored the error and the fact that it has been pointed out, more than once. I last spoke about it on a satellite TV programme on 29 May 2013. Whatever Ms Helen Watson and her “NUJ” branch colleagues may say in support of their work and wages in Tower Hamlets Borough Council, one thing is clear, they cannot say that the “East End Lies” is telling the basic truth about the life of the community outside the Council! All self-respecting NUJ members must pay a little attention to the constituency in whose name they take part in the editorial decision-making and in the publication of something like the “East End Life”. How can Ms Watson’s branch be so careless and inattentive to what we the ordinary people out in the Borough of Tower Hamlets have been saying for years, many years before anyone had ever heard of Eric or had any idea of his own Pickles? As the NUJ has been my only trade union, I would not refer to it carelessly. But I believe that one of the aims that the NUJ has aways claimed to encourage its members to support is to tell the truth about ordinary Society! That aim is being weekly trampled on by the editorial practices of the East End Lies. And there cannot be any basis for claiming that it is a right practice. Finally, I am and have been very active in this community for a very long time. In 1981, I was involved in an effort to create an alternative to the “East London Advertiser”. That was called EAST END NEWS. So, I cannot be and must not be in any associated with any agenda that the East London Advertiser or their owners ARCHANT would have for liaising with Eric Pickles or anyone of that ilk. What I am saying here is a fraction of what I have always said and I have done so both on the EVENING STANDARD website, on the Guardian and also on broadcast programmes where I have evidentially dealt with the dishonesty that dominates the “editorial” line which is based on pretending that in Tower Hamlets there is no life in the ordinary community except in the diversionary, the dubious, the distorted, the twisted fabricated contents of the fantasy title they call “East End Life”! On most of the photos they publish, the supposed human characters are seen mostly beaming! Whatever for, especially in a borough where most of the ordinary people are undergoing experiences that do not constitute grounds for putting on cheesy, cheeky or cheery appearances! Written and posted this online at 0455 Hrs GMT London Friday 19 July 2013 Eric Pickles picture [below] as used by the PRESS GAZETTE where the Muhammad Haque commentary [above] appears about the dire role of the town hall pravda the "East End Lies". Muhammad Haque dismisses Eric and his Pickles when it comes to claiming what the ordinary people of Tower Hamlets have to say about the Council’s “town hall” “pravda” the “East End Life” which Haque has been calling “East End Lies” for longer than Eric or his Pickles have been heard of far less have had any recognition about real Life of the people in the the East End of London at all. Muhammad Haque's trade union, the National Union of Journalists had an attempt in the early 1980s in Bethnal Green to establish an alternative to the East London Advertiser. That is one of the historic foundations Muhammad Haque uses above to dispel any even suggestion that criticism of the diabolically “edited” "East End Lies" is linked with the East London Advertiser or with the Conservative Party. Muhammad Haque's Political Party is the Labour Party, the only Political Party he has ever been prepared to join and remain a paying member of! http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/government-plans-curb-them-nuj-comes-out-defence-council-newspapers