"Calls for investigation into Warsi's £12,000 flat expenses"

AADHIKARMedia diagnosing the Media. By © Muhammad Haque. 

The item below was 

retrieved from  the DAILY TELEGRAPH Media group web site at 1355 GMT Sunday 27 May 2012
Calls for investigation into Warsi's £12,000 flat expenses

Baroness Warsi faces an investigation into her expenses claims after the Conservative Party chairman was alleged to have claimed more than £12,000 in overnight accommodation expenses while staying rent-free at a friend's house and admitted failing to declare thousands of pounds in rental income.

By Jason Lewis, and Patrick Hennessy

1:41PM BST 27 May 2012

Baroness Warsi charged the taxpayer £165.50 a night for attending the House of Lords while staying at a house in Acton, west London.

The owner of the house said she had her own bedroom and front-door key and said he received no money in rent from Warsi or from Naweed Khan, the party official who was also staying there, it was reported.

She claimed £12,247 in over-night subsistence within six months of taking her seat in October 2007, records show. It was the equivalent of 74 nights' stay. The Lords sat for 84 days in the period. She was then the youngest peer at the age of 36.

The property was owned by Dr Wafik Moustafa, a GP. He said Warsi had stayed at the house over four months between Mondays and Thursdays and occasionally at the weekend.

He said: "Baroness Warsi paid no rent, nor did she pay any utilities bills or council tax. It was an informal arrangement, so no tenancy contract was drawn up.”

Moustafa, 63, added: “I’m not exactly sure how many days she stayed in total, but I believe my home was her main London residence [at the time].”

Warsi also said she did not tell House of Lords authorities that she was receiving income from a London property she had bought and rented out.

She apologised last night for the breach of parliamentary guidelines, blaming “an oversight, for which I take full responsibility”. However, she claimed she had paid tax on the rent.

Warsi last night said she had stayed in the flat on "occasional nights" as the guest of Khan at the house but during the period she had "predominantly" stayed in two hotels.

She said when she did stay with Khan she gave him "an appropriate financial payment equivalent to what I was paying at the time in hotel costs".

Mr Khan, who later became Warsi's special adviser, said: "I confirm she made a financial payment on each occasion, which compensated for the inconvenience caused and additional costs incurred by me as a result of her being there.”

But Mr Moustafa said: "Naweed Khan never paid me any money."

Labour MP John Mann said he would write to the Lords commissioner for standards asking him to investigate Warsi's expenses.

"If you are paying no rent where you are staying, you can't possibly be claiming subsistence for staying there," Mann told the Sunday Times.

"It all seems very murky. We need a full investigation into the matter."

Shadow business minister Chuka Umunna told BBC1's Sunday Politics: "To rebuild trust and demonstrate this is being dealt with in a proper way there has to be a proper, independent investigation.

"So long as these stories endure, we are going to struggle to rebuild the trust and confidence we need there to be between Westminster and the people it exists there to serve."

Conservative deputy chairman Michael Fallon said the controversy was "embarrassing" but said Lady Warsi believed she acted within the "spirit and letter" of the rules.

The failure to make a declaration about the rental income from her flat means that the public was unaware that she had another source of income, over and above her salary, which is paid by the Conservative Party, and the £300 a day allowance which she is eligible to claim when she attends the Lords.

The baroness updated the register of interests for members of the House of Lords last Monday. It now states under “land and property”: “Flat in London NW from which rental income is received.”

The Prime Minister and Baroness Warsi have spoken of the commitment to transparency by the Conservatives and the Coalition.

In November 2010 Mr Cameron said “it is our ambition to be one of the most transparent governments in the world”.

In July last year the peer said: “This Government is delivering unprecedented transparency.” The total amount that she failed to declare is not known because Baroness Warsi did not disclose it last night.

Peers are required to register any rental income worth more than £5,000 in a calendar year but do not have to say how much.

However, the amount is likely to run into five figures because it involves rental income from a home in London for at least 12 months.

As well as raising questions over her own financial affairs, it will further strain relations with grassroots members, among whom the 41-year-old baroness is not believed to enjoy widespread popularity.

The political career of her special adviser was also in question last night.

The revelations follow a dispute that emerged between Baroness Warsi and the Egyptian-born Conservative donor and fund-raiser, Dr Wafik Moustafa.

He was upset when the Conservative Arab Network, which he founded, was told earlier this year to sever its links with the party and was subsequently threatened with legal action by Baroness Warsi.

That prompted him to disclose that he had given her and her special adviser, Naweed Khan, accommodation in London.

In the course of inquiries made because of his public statement, the failure to make a disclosure about her rental income was discovered.

Baroness Warsi said last night that she bought a flat in Wembley, north-west London, in September 2007 to use after being ennobled.

However, she said that the property transaction was not “due for completion” until 2008 and so she had to find accommodation elsewhere, “predominantly” in two hotels.

“Not having made advance bookings for these hotels, there was a period of about six weeks when I spent occasional nights at a flat in Acton, which was occupied by Naweed Khan, at the time a member of Conservative Campaign HQ staff,” she said.

“For the nights that I stayed as a guest of Naweed Khan, I made an appropriate financial payment equivalent to what I was paying at the time in hotel costs.” However, Mr Naweed was actually staying rent-free at Dr Moustafa’s home in London, meaning that by extension Baroness Warsi was receiving his hospitality.

Baroness Warsi said she moved into the Wembley home in March 2008 and stayed there until June 2010, when “upon security advice, I moved to another address closer to the House of Lords”.

She said that some months later she began, “with the prior approval of the Cabinet Office and the Leader of the House of Lords, to let out the Wembley property”.

“Due to an oversight, for which I take full responsibility, the flat was not included on the Register of Lords’ Interests when its value and the rent received came to exceed the thresholds for disclosure,” she said.

“When the discrepancy became apparent this week, I immediately informed the Registrar of Lords’ Interests of its omission. I repeat: at all times my ownership of the flat and the fact that it was being let out was fully disclosed to Cabinet Office officials and HM Revenue and Customs, and was appropriately reported on the register of Ministers’ interests held by the Government.”

The disclosure means that she failed to declare rental for at least 12 months, and up to 18 months. An average rent for a one-bedroom flat in Wembley is currently £1,000 a month, meaning the amount undeclared could be as high as £18,000.

Conservative deputy chairman Michael Fallon said: "These sorts of thing are always embarrassing but the key thing here is that Lady Warsi has admitted she's made a mistake, she's apologised for it."

"She's corrected the record now and she's very happy to cooperate with any investigation back into her claims and I think it should be left at that until any investigation is reported."

Speaking to Sky News, Mr Fallon said Lady Warsi had paid the other tenant but not the owner of the Acton property.

"She stayed overnight in the other property before her own house was available and she believes she was fully entitled to claim the overnight allowance from that and to pay the other tenant for some of the costs involved," he said.

"She believes that was within the spirit and the letter of the rules as they were then and she's very happy to cooperate with any investigation."

Baroness Warsi has been criticised over her performance as Tory party chairman.

Some Conservative MPs want Mr Cameron to replace her with Grant Shapps, the housing minister. Earlier this month the Conservatives performed poorly in local elections, losing more than 400 council seats.

Baroness Warsi became the first Muslim woman to be selected as a parliamentary candidate by the Tories, contesting the Dewsbury seat in 2005, but failed to win.

She went on to be a special adviser to Lord Howard, the former Conservative leader, but saw her career take off under Mr Cameron, who made a special effort to promote ethnic minority candidates and party officials as part of his drive to modernise the Tories.

This month she said a small minority of Pakistani men saw white women as “third-class citizens” and “fair game” — following a case which saw nine Muslim men found guilty of grooming young white girls for sex.

RELATED ARTICLES

• Profile: Sayeeda Warsi, the trailblazing peer who divided the Tories 27 May 2012

• Warsi: Some Pakistani men see white women as 'fair game' 18 May 2012

• Warsi attacks 'secular fundamentalists' during Pope meeting 15 Feb 2012

• Baroness Warsi attacks 'lilberal elite' 15 Feb 2012

Sayeeda Warsi: Another Ethnic Surrogate is exhibited as aiding and abetting the cause of racists...

0900 GMT Sunday 27 May 2012 AADHIKAROnline ORIGINAL DAILY ETHICAL Diagnostics:
Editor © Muhammad Haque

Another Ethnic Surrogate is exhibited as aiding and abetting the cause of racists who ca parade her as a thief who is a disgrace t the public office she was elevated to.

Citing a “journalism” piece as  a reference:

 From the London DAILY MIRROR GROUP  [“SUNDAY MIRROR”] website London


Sunday 27 May 2012

Cabinet Minister Baroness Warsi last night admitted breaking Parliamentary guidelines by failing to declare rent from a flat.

The Tory co-chairwoman also revealed she used taxpayers’ cash to pay a friend “hotel rates” to stay in his flat while builders were finishing work at her home.

The disclosures will pile pressure on the Baroness, who has already faced calls from Tory backbenchers to quit over her lacklustre performance as party boss.

Last night she apologised, blaming an “oversight” for her failure to declare rent from her North London flat in the Register of Lords’ Interests for more than a year. She claimed she had paid tax on the income.

Baroness Warsi, who became the first  Muslim woman to serve in the Cabinet in 2010, could now face sanctions from Parliamentary authorities.

The total sum she failed to declare is not known.

Peers are required to register any income or benefits of more than £500 a year.

The Baroness said she stayed at the home of Naweed Khan, now her special   adviser, and gave him “an appropriate financial   payment” to match what she was   spending on two hotels. Tory sources said she stayed for “eight to 12 nights”.

The Baroness said she told the Cabinet   Office she had the flat when she became a minister. She had the approval of the Cabinet Office and House of Lords   Leader to let it out when she went to another   property.

But she added: “Due to an oversight, for which I take full responsibility, the flat was not included on the Register of Lords’ Interests when its value and the rent received came to exceed the thresholds for disclosure.”