AADHIKAR Media Foundation © Muhammad Haque London “CONDEMNED Society” Commentary.
1215 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 09 May 2011, Part 4 of the exclusive examination of the paralysis of the Tower Hamlets Labour Party and the Apartheiding of the Tower Hamlets Council.
PART of the diagnostic examination of the corruption that has been reinstated in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council during the past 20 years.
Why do I say “reinstated in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council during the past 20 years [.] ” ?
Because in the wake of the then SDP [= ‘Liberal’ ‘Focus’ Team/Group] take over of the Council [1986 - 1994], the previously entrenched and corrupt clique had been INTERRUPTED in various ways.
One was the affiliations on ‘Party’ lines. Because of that interruption, and I say mo more than that, the clique needed a few years to regroup. Which it did in the middle of the SDP ‘hold’. And once the SDP was ousted, the older elements got back together. Not always on the Council’s payrolls. But in effect in shaping the agenda of the Council. That regrouping has led to an unprecedented deterioration of democracy in the East End. And the process of the decline has been exacerbated by the corruption inside the Labour Party in the same East End Borough of Tower Hamlets.
[To be continued]
2606th Edition.
1105 Hrs GMT London Sunday 05 October 2014
AADHIKAR Media Foundation.Editor©Muhammad Haque London E1 UK. AADHIKARMEDIA Foundation supporting KHOODEELAAR! Defending the community in the East End of London, including KHEYDAIEELAAR! ‘Keep Banglatown’ IN. In association with 62+non-profit initiatives active 53rd year: The KAY JORDAN FOUNDATION, All Volunteers News, Brick Lane Community
Monday, 9 May 2011
Why does Suffolk County Council look suddenly next door to Tower Hamlets? Or why it SHOULD do!
1125 Hrs GMT London Monday 098 May 2011. © Muhammad Haque London :”Democracy Deficit”: Commentary.
Apartheid Council: why Tower Hamlets Council is susceptible to abolition.
Why does Suffolk County Council look suddenly next door to Tower Hamlets? Or why it SHOULD do!
I am asserting the first on the evidence of the misconduct by Tower Hamlets Council that I have witnessed for a very long time. And I am posing the second, the question about Suffolk, on the evidence that OTHERS have brought out into the open about the behaviour of that County Council...
I am joining the two together and concluding that on objective basis, the two Councils should be treated as the same, in principle of course. And when such treatment is 'meted out' [!!!], the people affected by BOTH these Councils would be better off. Contextual sparkling of course.
Here is how the London DAILY TELEGRAPH has been reporting on the Suffolk County Council Chief executive's latest state. I shall cite and examine other sources in due course later today.. [Monday 09 May 2011].
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8496578/Extended-leave-puts-future-of-218000-council-boss-in-doubt.html
Apartheid Council: why Tower Hamlets Council is susceptible to abolition.
Why does Suffolk County Council look suddenly next door to Tower Hamlets? Or why it SHOULD do!
I am asserting the first on the evidence of the misconduct by Tower Hamlets Council that I have witnessed for a very long time. And I am posing the second, the question about Suffolk, on the evidence that OTHERS have brought out into the open about the behaviour of that County Council...
I am joining the two together and concluding that on objective basis, the two Councils should be treated as the same, in principle of course. And when such treatment is 'meted out' [!!!], the people affected by BOTH these Councils would be better off. Contextual sparkling of course.
Here is how the London DAILY TELEGRAPH has been reporting on the Suffolk County Council Chief executive's latest state. I shall cite and examine other sources in due course later today.. [Monday 09 May 2011].
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8496578/Extended-leave-puts-future-of-218000-council-boss-in-doubt.html
Apartheid Council: why Tower Hamlets Council is susceptible to abolition
Apartheid Council: why Tower Hamlets Council is susceptible to abolition
Coming here, next
Coming here, next
UPDATER commentary and ACTION REPLAY from October 2007: The month when Gordon Brown behaved as a poodle of Neo Cons Big Biz and ignored EDDINGTON
0120 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
09 May 2011
UPDATER commentary and ACTION REPLAY from October 2007: The month when Gordon Brown behaved as a poodle of Neo Cons Big Biz and ignored the recommendations on the UK railway industry as compiled by Rod Eddington...[1]
THE KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been vindicated at every stage as it has been shown to have been active in defending the community in the East End of London. The vindication has been seen in the recognition that the CONDEM CUTS agenda - which in October 2007 was years away as far as the “stooged tools in Government’ were able to claim ‘parliamentary authority’- is part and parcel of the agenda of Big Business that had spawned the Crossrail hole plot.
[To be continued]
FROM THE MUHAMMAD HAQUE commentary as published on the UK Indymedia web sites in October 2007:
"Exposing the latest crassness of the MPs’ 'committee' for Crossrail hole plot
10.10.2007 01:44
By © Muhammad Haque
0045 GMT London Wednesday 10 October 2007:
Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole plot, scam, scheme project Bill, examining the Evidence of the latest display [dated 9 October 2007] of Crassness by the poodle 'scrutiny' [!] committee of MPs in the UK House of Commons set up to facilitate the agenda of the Big Business lobby for CRASSrail. They are called, on paper, the ‘Crossrail Bill' ‘select committee’ [House of Commons, London]. They do show recognition to four persons in the Princelet Street [parallel to Hanbury Street] [off Brick Lane] who put their objections to the Crossrail hole plan, before that poodle committee of MPs in June 2006 because the Crossrail hole would affect their property and its value….
The Brown Govt accepts the recognition and a makes [so far] unique undertaking to pay the persons cash.
But then neither the CRASSrail committee, nor the Alistair Darling administration show any recognition of the rights of anyone else in Princelet Street or in the Hanbury Street or indeed in the Bethnal Green south ward [in Tower Hamlets Council] that are going to be also affected by the CRASSrail hole/s…
We examine the ‘hint’ that CRASSrail may NOT dig a hole in the Hanbury Street-Princelet Street, after all! And we scrutinise the other crassness of the Crassrail promoters…here and on the Khoodeelaar! - associated No to CrossRail hole web sites and pages
Khoodeelaar! The London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole Bill
e-mail: lawmedia@htmail.co.uk
Homepage: http://khoodeelaar.com
London
Monday
09 May 2011
UPDATER commentary and ACTION REPLAY from October 2007: The month when Gordon Brown behaved as a poodle of Neo Cons Big Biz and ignored the recommendations on the UK railway industry as compiled by Rod Eddington...[1]
THE KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been vindicated at every stage as it has been shown to have been active in defending the community in the East End of London. The vindication has been seen in the recognition that the CONDEM CUTS agenda - which in October 2007 was years away as far as the “stooged tools in Government’ were able to claim ‘parliamentary authority’- is part and parcel of the agenda of Big Business that had spawned the Crossrail hole plot.
[To be continued]
FROM THE MUHAMMAD HAQUE commentary as published on the UK Indymedia web sites in October 2007:
"Exposing the latest crassness of the MPs’ 'committee' for Crossrail hole plot
10.10.2007 01:44
By © Muhammad Haque
0045 GMT London Wednesday 10 October 2007:
Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole plot, scam, scheme project Bill, examining the Evidence of the latest display [dated 9 October 2007] of Crassness by the poodle 'scrutiny' [!] committee of MPs in the UK House of Commons set up to facilitate the agenda of the Big Business lobby for CRASSrail. They are called, on paper, the ‘Crossrail Bill' ‘select committee’ [House of Commons, London]. They do show recognition to four persons in the Princelet Street [parallel to Hanbury Street] [off Brick Lane] who put their objections to the Crossrail hole plan, before that poodle committee of MPs in June 2006 because the Crossrail hole would affect their property and its value….
The Brown Govt accepts the recognition and a makes [so far] unique undertaking to pay the persons cash.
But then neither the CRASSrail committee, nor the Alistair Darling administration show any recognition of the rights of anyone else in Princelet Street or in the Hanbury Street or indeed in the Bethnal Green south ward [in Tower Hamlets Council] that are going to be also affected by the CRASSrail hole/s…
We examine the ‘hint’ that CRASSrail may NOT dig a hole in the Hanbury Street-Princelet Street, after all! And we scrutinise the other crassness of the Crassrail promoters…here and on the Khoodeelaar! - associated No to CrossRail hole web sites and pages
Khoodeelaar! The London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole Bill
e-mail: lawmedia@htmail.co.uk
Homepage: http://khoodeelaar.com