2606th Edition.
1105 Hrs GMT London Sunday 05 October 2014
AADHIKAR Media Foundation.Editor©Muhammad Haque London E1 UK. AADHIKARMEDIA Foundation supporting KHOODEELAAR! Defending the community in the East End of London, including KHEYDAIEELAAR! ‘Keep Banglatown’ IN. In association with 62+non-profit initiatives active 53rd year: The KAY JORDAN FOUNDATION, All Volunteers News, Brick Lane Community
Tuesday, 5 April 2011
Kay Jordan has carried a case load for the community for thirty years. In fact for more than 30 years.
2140 [2130] [2125] Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
05 April 2011
Editor © Muhammad Haque
Kay Jordan has carried a case load for the community for thirty years. In fact for more than 30 years. With the passage of each day, Kay’s caseload for the Community got bigger. I have known of that case load for more than 23 years. The number of years is not important to me in this context. Whatever the number of years, the principles that I share with Kay make the number peripheral. What is meaningful and what must be shared is the universality of Kay Jordan’s care for the other people. People that she has had no need personally to care for or care about. Yet she has been showing that care for so long that it must be shared with other people. In this updater, I shall highlight some of that case load. Then I shall delve deeper into the details. The most important item has been the campaign to stop[ the Crossrail hole assault. I have already published in the past three months some,e of the crucial contributions Kay has made in the campaign to stop the Crossrail hole. In the next parts I shall share some more insights into Kay Jordan the conscientious community defender. [To be continued]
Kay Jordan's caseload for the community in the East End of London - Coming NEXT
Kay Jordan's caseload for the community in the East End of London - Coming NEXT
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
CALLING for BBC News Channel presenter Chris Eakin to be held to account for blaming Ian Tomlinson for his own death as Eakin 'broke' the news...[4]
Justice for Ian Tomlinson and family
2050 [2015] Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
05 April 2011.
Editor© Muhammad Haque
CALLING for BBC News Channel presenter Chris Eakin to be held to account for blaming Ian Tomlinson for his own death as Eakin 'broke' the news of Mr Tomlinson's death on that April night in 2009
Why are we making this call?
Because Ian Tomlinson was innocent. He did not commit a wrong. He was walking home. Or that was what he was trying to do, on his way home. He would have got home eventually had he not been denied that freedom. He was instead treated as a wrongdoer. For nothing. Not only did they take away his freedom, they took away his life too. No matter how many other permutations to their excuse they may yet try to come up with, those responsible must answer.
And they must be held to account fully and conclusively. Those who blamed Ian Tomlinson after his tragic loss of life must answer comprehensively, comprehensively and all the lessons that are due must be learnt and due respect and recognition must be paid to Ian Tomlinson for the aggravated extra disrespect that was heaped on his soul by the BBC and the News Channel presented Chris Eakin. So far we cannot identify or name anyone else inside the BBC who might have contributed to that attack on the character and the soul of Ian Tomlinson
Minutes after the “authorities” had confirmed that a man had died at the G20 demonstration still ongoing in the City of London area, Chris Eakin was reading the “breaking news item” and one of the assertions he made a few times was that the death had been due to violence by the demonstrators! Eakin did NOT name any other person. The only person that he identified was the person who had died. Added to that was Eakin’s statement as to the CAUSE. He stated that CAUSE to be the violence by the protesters, the demonstrators. There was no doubt whatever that Eakin was linking the three elements there. The Death itself. The violence. And the doers of that violence. He only described the man. The one who had died. In that statement containing the elements, the only person in effect identified was Ian Tomlinson's. He was blamed for his own death. He was also blamed for the violence. He was also called a demonstrator. Now, after the events, ALL THREE components of Eakin’s “news: statement have been exposed as untrue, as lies too. So how long before there is justice for Ian Tomlinson in so far as any justice can be established by the BBC and Chris Eakin being held to account for lying and for blaming the victim?
[To be continued]
2050 [2015] Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
05 April 2011.
Editor© Muhammad Haque
CALLING for BBC News Channel presenter Chris Eakin to be held to account for blaming Ian Tomlinson for his own death as Eakin 'broke' the news of Mr Tomlinson's death on that April night in 2009
Why are we making this call?
Because Ian Tomlinson was innocent. He did not commit a wrong. He was walking home. Or that was what he was trying to do, on his way home. He would have got home eventually had he not been denied that freedom. He was instead treated as a wrongdoer. For nothing. Not only did they take away his freedom, they took away his life too. No matter how many other permutations to their excuse they may yet try to come up with, those responsible must answer.
And they must be held to account fully and conclusively. Those who blamed Ian Tomlinson after his tragic loss of life must answer comprehensively, comprehensively and all the lessons that are due must be learnt and due respect and recognition must be paid to Ian Tomlinson for the aggravated extra disrespect that was heaped on his soul by the BBC and the News Channel presented Chris Eakin. So far we cannot identify or name anyone else inside the BBC who might have contributed to that attack on the character and the soul of Ian Tomlinson
Minutes after the “authorities” had confirmed that a man had died at the G20 demonstration still ongoing in the City of London area, Chris Eakin was reading the “breaking news item” and one of the assertions he made a few times was that the death had been due to violence by the demonstrators! Eakin did NOT name any other person. The only person that he identified was the person who had died. Added to that was Eakin’s statement as to the CAUSE. He stated that CAUSE to be the violence by the protesters, the demonstrators. There was no doubt whatever that Eakin was linking the three elements there. The Death itself. The violence. And the doers of that violence. He only described the man. The one who had died. In that statement containing the elements, the only person in effect identified was Ian Tomlinson's. He was blamed for his own death. He was also blamed for the violence. He was also called a demonstrator. Now, after the events, ALL THREE components of Eakin’s “news: statement have been exposed as untrue, as lies too. So how long before there is justice for Ian Tomlinson in so far as any justice can be established by the BBC and Chris Eakin being held to account for lying and for blaming the victim?
[To be continued]
Ian Tomlinson - why the BBC presenter Chris Eakin must be held to account for blaming the victim
Pc Simon Harwood told an inquest into the newspaper seller's death that he was ''amazed'' his ''poor push'' caused the 47-year-old to plunge to the pavement.
The officer said his actions were meant as ''encouragement'' to get Mr Tomlinson away from police lines during demonstrations.
As a jury reviewed footage of his actions, Pc Harwood said: ''He wasn't moving away from the police line, he was encroaching. That's why I moved forward.''
When asked whether Mr Tomlinson had been assessed as a threat, Pc Harwood replied: "No."
The officer said he first saw Mr Tomlinson talking to two police dog handlers and an officer near a bike shed on the Royal Exchange.
"I then remember Mr Tomlinson moving in front of me from my right to my left as though he was walking or encroaching into the police line," he said.
Pc Harwood said he struck Mr Tomlinson because he was ignoring other officers' requests for him to move.
"I moved forward to engage Mr Tomlinson. I then struck Mr Tomlinson around the upper part of his left leg towards his thigh with my baton.
"I did not get any immediate reaction from Mr Tomlinson... I then, as a reaction, pushed him in the top part of his right shoulder."
He said he was "amazed" the push caused Mr Tomlinson to fall.
Mr Tomlinson had been pushed away from the police line by another officer and was also seen being bitten by a police dog, the officer added.