CALLING for BBC News Channel presenter Chris Eakin to be held to account for blaming Ian Tomlinson for his own death as Eakin 'broke' the news...[4]

Justice for Ian Tomlinson and family




2050 [2015] Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
05 April 2011.

Editor© Muhammad Haque

CALLING for BBC News Channel presenter Chris Eakin to be held to account for blaming Ian Tomlinson for his own death as Eakin 'broke' the news of Mr Tomlinson's death on that April night in 2009
Why are we making this call?
Because Ian Tomlinson was innocent. He did not commit a wrong. He was walking home. Or that was what he was trying to do, on his way home. He would have got home eventually had he not been denied that freedom. He was instead treated as a wrongdoer. For nothing. Not only did they take away his freedom, they took away his life too. No matter how many other permutations to their excuse they may yet try to come up with, those responsible must answer.
And they must be held to account fully and conclusively. Those who blamed Ian Tomlinson after his tragic loss of life must answer comprehensively, comprehensively and all the lessons that are due must be learnt and due respect and recognition must be paid to Ian Tomlinson for the aggravated extra disrespect that was heaped on his soul by the BBC and the News Channel presented Chris Eakin. So far we cannot identify or name anyone else inside the BBC who might have contributed to that attack on the character and the soul of Ian Tomlinson
Minutes after the “authorities” had confirmed that a man had died at the G20 demonstration still ongoing in the City of London area, Chris Eakin was reading the “breaking news item” and one of the assertions he made a few times was that the death had been due to violence by the demonstrators! Eakin did NOT name any other person. The only person that he identified was the person who had died. Added to that was Eakin’s statement as to the CAUSE. He stated that CAUSE to be the violence by the protesters, the demonstrators. There was no doubt whatever that Eakin was linking the three elements there. The Death itself. The violence. And the doers of that violence. He only described the man. The one who had died. In that statement containing the elements, the only person in effect identified was Ian Tomlinson's. He was blamed for his own death. He was also blamed for the violence. He was also called a demonstrator. Now, after the events, ALL THREE components of Eakin’s “news: statement have been exposed as untrue, as lies too. So how long before there is justice for Ian Tomlinson in so far as any justice can be established by the BBC and Chris Eakin being held to account for lying and for blaming the victim?

[To be continued]