EAST END democratic audit campaign BHANGEELAAR! makes a second response to the Guardian today 11 March 2011. This too focusses in context on the failu

EAST END democratic audit campaign BHANGEELAAR! makes a second response to the Guardian today 11 March 2011. This too focusses in context on the failures of the “locally” elected Tower Hamlets Council.

1715 [1700] [1650] Hrs GMT

London

Friday

11 March 2011

Editor © Muhammad Haque

EAST END democratic audit campaign BHANGEELAAR! makes a second response to the Guardian today 11 March 2011. This too focusses in context on the failures of the “locally” elected Tower Hamlets Council.

This one is another exclusive evidential comment on the report on the Guardian web site by journalism professor and media commenter Roy Greenslade about the in-house propaganda sheet “East End Lies” and its counterparts published for the careers of the controlling cliques on other local Councils. BHANGEELAAR! exposes the real hole in the Roy GREENSLADE analysis by referring to the serious issues that the local ‘ordinary press’ too is failing to report on. Here is the full text of the BHANGEELAAR! comment published in the last 30 minutes or so on the Guardian web site. It examines the role of the Guardian piece itself and the roles of the local “East London Advertiser” and the Tower Hamlets Councils PRAVDA the “East End Lies” in denying local democracy and suppressing the truth of the most appallingly unaccountable decision-making by the Council which continues to neglect the people over the needs and the facts demand [To be continued] You say

I pointed out some weeks ago that the Pickles code had one huge loophole. There are no penalties for ignoring its "guidance."

Why should you refer to that as if it were an exception, Roy?

Look at the so-called ‘local democracies’.

What are the penalties for their failures to serve the local communities in accordance with the universally recognisable codes of democratic requirements?

How have they been setting the CONDEM imposed CUTS budgets?

Don’t THOSE matter more than the estimated impact on the business of the ‘local press’, associated most often in your pieces to the “East London Advertiser” when referring to Tower Hamlets?

Shouldn’t the approach be guided by an aim to correct the disservice being done to the ordinary public in any area covered [or left bereft of substance and the truth] by the relevant local authority and their local ‘independent titles’ in context?

Have you actually done a sustained contens analysis of the “East London Advertiser” and that of a comparable “real local newspaper”?

Would be interesting to see what you have found.

As far our campaign has found there is no point in simply reciting the fact that the “East London Advertiser:” has been losing out as a result of the Tower Hamlets Council’s persistent PRAVDA publication we have long described on the facts as the “East End Lies”.

What needs to happen is an objective awareness about what BOTH types of ‘newspaper’ or medium actually bring to the local communities. Do they bring real news or do they bring untruths?

Going by the absence of rigourous investigative and arduous journalism [as opposed to gossip and hypes for certain Right leaning Councillor leaking in a bizarre indulgence of his own] about all the key decisions and policies affecting the real parts of the peoples’ lives in the East End, we can say that the general atmosphere among ordinary people is not a fraction as committed to the “East London Advertiser” as it could be ! And this is more like a reason why the “East End Lies” is set to be perpetrated. Mr Starbrook or whoever in his place over at Ilford now “Editing” the “East London Advertiser” may like to ask themselves why that title has been failing to publish stories that could have awakened a lot of local people to the massive failures that we have been faced with by the CUTS-compliant Council since before the period of CONDEM cuts! 1635 Hrs GMT London Friday 11 March 2011 BHANGEELAAR! The Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets

EAST END democratic audit campaign tells off Cherie Blair over l

EAST END democratic audit campaign BHANGEELAAR! makes a second response to the Guardian today 11 March 2011

1700 [1650] Hrs GMT

London

Friday

11 March 2011

Editor © Muhammad Haque

EAST END democratic audit campaign BHANGEELAAR! makes a second response to the Guardian today 11 March 2011. This too focusses in context on the failures of the “locally” elected Tower Hamlets Council.

This one is another exclusive evidential comment on the report on the Guardian web site by journalism professor and media commenter Roy Greenslade about the in-house propaganda sheet “East End Lies” and its counterparts published for the careers of the controlling cliques on other local Councils.

BHANGEELAAR! exposes the real hole in the Roy GREENSLADE analysis by referring to the serious issues that the local ‘ordinary press’ too is failing to report on.

Here is the full text of the BHANGEELAAR! comment published in the last 30 minutes or so on the Guardian web site. It examines the role of the Guardian piece itself and the roles of the local “East London Advertiser” and the Tower Hamlets Councils PRAVDA the “East End Lies” in denying local democracy and suppressing the truth of the most appallingly unaccountable decision-making by the Council which continues to neglect the people over the needs and the facts demand..

[To be continued]

East End NO to elected mayor campaign tells off Cherie Blair on latest marketing stunt for low lawyers

1515 Hrs GMT

London

Friday

11 March 2011

Editor © Muhammad Haque

East End NO to elected mayor campaign tells off Cherie Blair on latest marketing stunt for low lawyers

The ticking off comes as a comment published on the London GUARDIAN website in the past 30 minutes rejecting the wife of Tony Blair over her marketing of the UK 'legal profession' dressed up as a ''rescuing' bid' for the alleged disadvantage youngsters attending the under achieving schools etc. The BHANGEELAAR! campaign tells Cherie Bliar to look at the real creators of the disadvantage, the failing schools and the agencies of state that are supposedly there funded so hugely to do their job and equip youngsters with high standards of education and qualification to get on in life.

The BHANGEELAAR! Campaign also points out the persistent practice of lying for the failures that is carried out daily by the local media and also in particular by the OFCOM-licensed and ethnicty-linked satellite TV channels.

[To be continued]

Expanded text of the BHANGEELAAR! diagnostic rejection of Cherie Blair's stunt today on the GUARDIAN:

Our Movement has been defending the "underprivileged" in

the East End of London for the past half century. Our half

centenary report, being finalised for publication this year,

shows that the “professions” are as entrenched and as

indifferent to social justice now as they ever were. Most

certainly as they were in the 1950s and 1960s.
The way

forward on the entrenched injustices of the professions in

the UK is that there is no way forward with the agents of the

same professions doing the marketing for the professions on

occasions strategically selected by their agenda setters.

Cherie Booth ‘QC’ could find, if she really wanted to, that

the most intractable factor obstructing justice via the

professions is the failure of those who are promoted as

‘icons’ and or ‘celebrities’ peddling the marketing mantras

phrased in suitably socially disguised language to tell the

truth.
The legal profession is as much a morality free zone

now as it was two hundred years ago. The only thing that is

different is the odd, exceptional events when one incident or

other forces the practitioners to confess to some always

manageable flaws in their updating of their grip on the rest

of society.

The thing that Ms Booth overlooks and has overlooked throughout her career as a recorded member of the Bliared promotion trade is the failure of the existing agencies and institutions that are fully or adequately funded to provide the high standards of education and qualifications to the young people they already process but whom they persistently betray, undermine, under-encourage and under-appreciate. If these institutions and agencies had been identified as the really large factor for the backwardness and failures that they are and have been for ever of so many who fail because they have not got their potential learning and qualifications then the kind of promotion Ms Booth is now embarked on would become unnecessary.

Does she have what it takes to face up to THAT challenge and start campaigning for truly transparent, accountable and honest locally elected councillors delivering their democratic duties encompassing all sectors including schooling and Education? If she ever visits Tower Hamlets again, she may like to examine the actual role being played by those who control the academic destinies and horizons of the overwhelming majority of young people enrolled in the various institutions. Any truthful audit of these would show that really disadvantage is being created and maintained by so much failures within those walls that ought not to be tolerated. But the failure is being tolerated.
We know the consequences of the failure are being borne bitterly by mostly silenced people across the borough who daily limit their own freedoms so as not to come face to face with the products of the criminalising institutions and agencies!

CONTRARY to the reassuring sound bytes and mythological safer neighbourhoods’ stunts perorated routinely via the lazy local ‘media’ and by the even lazier and the OFCOM-licensed ethnicty-linked channels carried by BSKYB, life in the East End will NOT change for the better following Ms Booth’s latest strategically placed propaganda for her profession!

1500 [1448] Hrs GMT

London Friday 11 March 2011

BHANGEELAAR!

The Campaign against an elected executive mayor in Tower Hamlets