Muhammad Haque London Commentary about the paralysis of democratic accountability in Britain as published on the NEW STATESMAN

Muhammad Haque London Commentary about the paralysis of democratic accountability in Britain as published on the NEW STATESMAN website at 1348 GMT Monday 04 April 2011.

That Commentary is n response to the NEW STATESMAN piece by OLLY GRENDER a Lib Dem party ex-employee as a publicity ‘expert’ now having a sub-career as an apparently accessible part of the propaganda war on behalf of the CONDEM COLLUSION.

QUOTE MUHAMMAD HAQUE to OLLY GRENDER:

Your recent career has been a transparently positive one, as an insider expert whose appearances on the election linked broadcast media slots have been solely based on your erstwhile job! However, you are failing to face up to the truth: the crisis is NOT because of the alleged and or claimed differences between the ‘main’ [numerically relevant] ‘Political’ Parties, it is because there really is no difference when the various services as empirically objectively consistently tested on the ground at points of contact between the supposed deliverer of service and the ‘citizen’.

Empirical evidence verified this very afternoon, in the past 40 minutes in Tower Hamlets IN CONTEXT, confirms that there is no democratic accountability at work at any level of the maintained [that is publicly- paid for] agencies including in the actualities of the contacts [as defined above] with the "elected" local Council. I say Tower Hamlets for a very good reason: it is going to become one of the most cited names of an inner city area in England in the coming period when the poverty-creation programme being carried on under the CONDEM COLLUSION begins to hit where it will hurt even more than it did under the Blair and the Brown years.

On all measures known to students of analysis and evidence, the 'welfare state' typified now by the NHS and the Department for Want and Poverty creation [ =DWP] has been failing because the real agenda setters who wield the real powers in the name of the people in this society never wanted it to succeed.

Face it. This is the truth.

Had they wanted it to, they would have made sure that there were accessible, tangible and transparent audit, accountability and honesty built into the processes.

Instead, there is wanton and brazen self serving going on at all levels of the bureaucracies. And inevitably, there are massive failures at every point. It does not require a person to be all that clever to find faults. So the two agencies get kicked under the given regime. This analysis can be extrapolated so easily to take in the schools, the colleges and the universities and the legal trade as well as the Police and the seriously malfunctioning courts of law.

The crisis is one of the whole society. What kind of society do the majority want? Well, there is a problem finding an answer to this question too.

With AV being peddled as furiously now as the word ‘change’ was being promoted by Nick Clegg after that launch via the Granada TV, there may not be an answer as to the majority! Society is not broken. Society is soon to vanish into institutionalised electoral confusion! Bank on that!

UNQUOTE MUHAMMAD HAQUE to OLLY GRENDER: