Editor © Muhammad Haque
of 24.7 twitter.com/khoodeelaar UPDATERS by KHOODEELAAR! ACTION DEFENDING the Community in the East End of London agains the Agenda of Big Biz takeover being carried out via the cabal in control of Tower Hamlets Council’s “Bureaucracy” as is typified in the daily loss of Tower Hamlets land and say to Big Biz takeover merchants and City of London Agenda couriers and occupiers.
1912 [1900] [1825] GMT Friday 05 September 2014.
KHOODEELAAR! Action Diagnosing the “jurisprudence” about Tower Hamlets Council and the implications of it for the behaviour of the said Council in relation to the rights of the people in the geographical Community covered by Tower Hamlets.
Contextually evidentially citing and strictly as a reference an item we have retrieved just now from the website called eastlondonadvertier.co.uk stating that it is reporting on the ruling by a High Court judge in London earlier this week.
The eastlondonadvertier.co.uk web site does not give a date when the said judge had given the ruling in the High Court.
However, we cite the piece strictly as a contextual reference and to ALSO diagnostically make the point that - regardless of the details of the judge’s “reasoning” - the key, the crux of that ruling (if it is later found to have been given without prejudice, bias and with no racism in the thinking underlying the judgement) VINDICATES those of us who have maintained, consistently, concisely (as well as ind detail at ties) that the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council is bad news; that the clique is in denial; that the clique is dishonest; that the clique is corrupt; that the clique is illegally engaged in breaking the duties and the obligations the “Council” owes to the people in the Community in the “London Borough of Tower Hamlets” which - LBTH - is the area, the geographic, the demography called Tower Hamlets area than and as clearly different from any controlling clique or cabal called “Tower Hamlets”.
Finally at this stage we say:
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!
That the succession of overpaid licensed law traders in the name of Tower Hamlets people has been paid on false pretence and that most of these licensed law traders have been exposed as being ignorant, incompetent and dishonest.
These “licensed law traders” are as they have been unfit for purpose.. UP TO NO GOOD!
These licensed law traders are easily evidentially, demonstrably called licensed liars.
[To be continued]
http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/tower_hamlets_bid_to_stop_town_hall_audit_rejected_by_high_court_judge_1_3759302
Tower Hamlets bid to stop Town Hall audit rejected by High Court judge
LBTH Mayor Lutfur Rahman (left)
and Communities Secretary Eric Pickles Mike Brooke
Friday, September 5, 2014
3:51 PM
A top High Court judge has this week rejected attempts by Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman to halt a major inspection of his council’s public spending which had been ordered by Communities Secretary Eric Pickles.
The Town Hall applied for a judicial review in July to stop an audit by Pricewaterhouse-Coopers into its finances—which was ordered by the Secretary of State more than three months earlier over allegations of fraud and financial mismanagement.
But Judge Kenneth Parker has thrown out Mayor Rahman’s application on several grounds including legality.
“The first ground is hopeless,” his statement says. “The defendant (Mr Pickles) was plainly entitled to exercise his common law power to ask an expert body (Pricewaterhouse-Coopers) to assist him by providing advice on any aspect of public affairs that was of potential concern to him.”
Mr Justice Parker adds:
“Where concerns have been raised that a local authority is poorly governed, poorly managed financially and may even have engaged in fraud, it stands to reason that there must be concerns as to whether such an authority has exercised its functions as economically, efficiently and effectively as could properly have been expected. The contrary is simply not arguable.”
There were also serious issues of delay, the judge pointed out. The audit was ordered on April 4, but the council applied for a judicial review as late as July.
The application “plainly has to be brought within days—not months,” the judge pointed out.
Legislation which makes the local authority pick up the tabs for a Government-ordered audit came into effect on April 3, a day before Mr Pickles sent in the auditors. The judge said:
“The council allowed the inspector to carry out an investigation for a substantial period, no doubt at considerable public expense, before launching its belated challenge and asking months later for the decision to be quashed. “There is no good reason for extending the time in which this claim (by the council) should have been brought.”
The council’s next move is for an oral hearing in which its QC Jonathan Swift will challenge the audit. The hearing would decide if a full judicial review should go ahead.
A Town Hall spokesman confirmed this-afternoon: “We will now be proceeding to apply for an oral hearing, which will be lodged today. “ The audit—thought to be costing £1 million so far—follows allegations about misuse of public funds in a BBC Panorama programme just before May’s local elections.
Attempts to halt the audit follows another High Court rejection of a council move to throw out a petition claiming fraud at the polls. Tory group Opposition leader Peter Golds called the latest High Court rejection “an extraordinary indictment of the management of the council”.
Cllr Golds added: “Twice in four days Rahman has been severely criticised by different High Court judges.”
Tories claim the audit investigation was “another example of Rahman treating the taxpayer as a personal ‘piggy bank’ for his own ego.”
of 24.7 twitter.com/khoodeelaar UPDATERS by KHOODEELAAR! ACTION DEFENDING the Community in the East End of London agains the Agenda of Big Biz takeover being carried out via the cabal in control of Tower Hamlets Council’s “Bureaucracy” as is typified in the daily loss of Tower Hamlets land and say to Big Biz takeover merchants and City of London Agenda couriers and occupiers.
1912 [1900] [1825] GMT Friday 05 September 2014.
KHOODEELAAR! Action Diagnosing the “jurisprudence” about Tower Hamlets Council and the implications of it for the behaviour of the said Council in relation to the rights of the people in the geographical Community covered by Tower Hamlets.
Contextually evidentially citing and strictly as a reference an item we have retrieved just now from the website called eastlondonadvertier.co.uk stating that it is reporting on the ruling by a High Court judge in London earlier this week.
The eastlondonadvertier.co.uk web site does not give a date when the said judge had given the ruling in the High Court.
However, we cite the piece strictly as a contextual reference and to ALSO diagnostically make the point that - regardless of the details of the judge’s “reasoning” - the key, the crux of that ruling (if it is later found to have been given without prejudice, bias and with no racism in the thinking underlying the judgement) VINDICATES those of us who have maintained, consistently, concisely (as well as ind detail at ties) that the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council is bad news; that the clique is in denial; that the clique is dishonest; that the clique is corrupt; that the clique is illegally engaged in breaking the duties and the obligations the “Council” owes to the people in the Community in the “London Borough of Tower Hamlets” which - LBTH - is the area, the geographic, the demography called Tower Hamlets area than and as clearly different from any controlling clique or cabal called “Tower Hamlets”.
Finally at this stage we say:
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!
That the succession of overpaid licensed law traders in the name of Tower Hamlets people has been paid on false pretence and that most of these licensed law traders have been exposed as being ignorant, incompetent and dishonest.
These “licensed law traders” are as they have been unfit for purpose.. UP TO NO GOOD!
These licensed law traders are easily evidentially, demonstrably called licensed liars.
[To be continued]
http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/tower_hamlets_bid_to_stop_town_hall_audit_rejected_by_high_court_judge_1_3759302
Tower Hamlets bid to stop Town Hall audit rejected by High Court judge
LBTH Mayor Lutfur Rahman (left)
and Communities Secretary Eric Pickles Mike Brooke
Friday, September 5, 2014
3:51 PM
A top High Court judge has this week rejected attempts by Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman to halt a major inspection of his council’s public spending which had been ordered by Communities Secretary Eric Pickles.
The Town Hall applied for a judicial review in July to stop an audit by Pricewaterhouse-Coopers into its finances—which was ordered by the Secretary of State more than three months earlier over allegations of fraud and financial mismanagement.
But Judge Kenneth Parker has thrown out Mayor Rahman’s application on several grounds including legality.
“The first ground is hopeless,” his statement says. “The defendant (Mr Pickles) was plainly entitled to exercise his common law power to ask an expert body (Pricewaterhouse-Coopers) to assist him by providing advice on any aspect of public affairs that was of potential concern to him.”
Mr Justice Parker adds:
“Where concerns have been raised that a local authority is poorly governed, poorly managed financially and may even have engaged in fraud, it stands to reason that there must be concerns as to whether such an authority has exercised its functions as economically, efficiently and effectively as could properly have been expected. The contrary is simply not arguable.”
There were also serious issues of delay, the judge pointed out. The audit was ordered on April 4, but the council applied for a judicial review as late as July.
The application “plainly has to be brought within days—not months,” the judge pointed out.
Legislation which makes the local authority pick up the tabs for a Government-ordered audit came into effect on April 3, a day before Mr Pickles sent in the auditors. The judge said:
“The council allowed the inspector to carry out an investigation for a substantial period, no doubt at considerable public expense, before launching its belated challenge and asking months later for the decision to be quashed. “There is no good reason for extending the time in which this claim (by the council) should have been brought.”
The council’s next move is for an oral hearing in which its QC Jonathan Swift will challenge the audit. The hearing would decide if a full judicial review should go ahead.
A Town Hall spokesman confirmed this-afternoon: “We will now be proceeding to apply for an oral hearing, which will be lodged today. “ The audit—thought to be costing £1 million so far—follows allegations about misuse of public funds in a BBC Panorama programme just before May’s local elections.
Attempts to halt the audit follows another High Court rejection of a council move to throw out a petition claiming fraud at the polls. Tory group Opposition leader Peter Golds called the latest High Court rejection “an extraordinary indictment of the management of the council”.
Cllr Golds added: “Twice in four days Rahman has been severely criticised by different High Court judges.”
Tories claim the audit investigation was “another example of Rahman treating the taxpayer as a personal ‘piggy bank’ for his own ego.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.