The © Muhammad Haque Daily Lines of Hunger and Deprivation lived by millions in CONDEMed Britain: [8]

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Lines of Hunger and Deprivation lived by millions in CONDEMed Britain: [8]

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Lines of Hunger and Deprivation lived by millions in CONDEMed Britain: [8]

1915 [1855] Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 January 2013.

What are the words, could be the words, that the millions forced to choose between heating or eating, would use to convey their experience?

There would be no words!

They would be unable to speak

They would be unable to reason

They would be unable to restrain

The experience would be too bleak

They would not be disposed at all to hearing politicos

whom they despise for the latters’ obstructive porticoes

that ‘peoples’ reps erect as shields from the electorate

whom they relegate post-poll to a patronised protectorate

Words are not available to express feelings about political postholders

Except the strongest wish to be present as the guaranteed beholders

watching the fall of the despised ones from the perches of power and glory

That is the only feeling that can just about express the denied sense of fury!




[The Lines to be continued as the denial and the deprivations continue]

Does Ed Miliband know what the community really really wants from 'him' as 'leader'?

If he does then it is time that he told us about what he knows!

So far, Ed has mumbled very safely structured sentences.

Not as poor as Liam Byrne's bankrupt note, notoriously stupidly left at the UK Treasury in May 2010 ['There is no money left'] but not very much

different.

Ed Miliband has got to raise his intellectual game. He is playing at

a damp field. He has got to get up on the real field, where most people

can see him.

Otherwise, he will end up a damp squib even if - that is a big EVEN IF - he finds the address in Downing Street unoccupied!

[To be continued]

OBAMA's 2nd Big Oath: Remembering another Kenya: 3 March 1959

OBAMA's 2nd Big Oath: Remembering another Kenya: 3 March 1959

As Barack Hussain Obama prepares for his Second Big Oath for the Occupation of the White House in Washington DC, USA, thousands of miles away across the Atlantic, eager adoring pulses run at near-hysterical rates......

And Kenya, the word, once again gets included as part of the compulsory history and biography notes... But hardly a month ago, no less a place than a very America-worshipping [by media brainwashing ] UK population was told of Britain’s unique [imperial] achievements in Kenya that had taken place on 3 March 1959.

As reported [below] in December 2012 by a Kenyan English language news outlet from London UK:

http://www.nation.co.ke/News/africa/Secret-British-files-show-Kenya-massacre-cover-up/-/1066/1633980/-/14p4cq2z/-/index.html

Secret British files show Kenya massacre cover-up

By AFP

Posted  Saturday, December 1  2012 at  00:26 IN SUMMARY

• The files shed more light on the March 3, 1959 deaths during the Mau Mau uprising, which were initially blamed on contaminated water, though autopsies found the men were severely beaten. No prosecutions were ever brought

• Wambugu Wa Nyingi, one of three elderly Kenyans who last month won a High Court ruling allowing them to sue the British government for damages over torture in detention, claims he was beaten unconscious during the Hola incident

• At least 10,000 people died during the bloody 1952-1960 Mau Mau uprising against British colonial rule, with some sources giving far higher estimates 

LONDON Secret documents released on Friday showed how British colonial authorities in Kenya tried to hush up the 1959 Hola detention camp massacre, in which 11 men were beaten to death.

The files shed more light on the March 3, 1959 deaths during the Mau Mau uprising, which were initially blamed on contaminated water, though autopsies found the men were severely beaten. No prosecutions were ever brought.

The papers revealed that prison camp staff made no attempt to tell the truth about what happened, while the government minister for Britain's colonies wanted the incident to "drop out of sight", according to the files.

Many more Kenyans were injured in the incident.

The testimony of a Kenyan colonial official that the camp commandant knew "perfectly well what was going on" was discounted by the attorney-general due to suspicions over his connections with a Kenyan nationalist politician.

The declassified Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) documents have been released by the National Archives.

Wambugu Wa Nyingi, one of three elderly Kenyans who last month won a High Court ruling allowing them to sue the British government for damages over torture in detention, claims he was beaten unconscious during the Hola incident.

"I suffered physical violence on my head, on my legs, I still have the scars today because of the beatings from the colonial administrators," Nyingi told AFP in an interview last year.

Britain is appealing against the judgement, arguing it is not liable and a fair trial would be impossible more than 50 years after the event.

Lawyers for the three veterans said that in light of the documents released Friday, Britain now "had nowhere to go other than to sit round a table and agree a settlement for the Mau Mau survivors".

Early public statements suggested the 11 men had died after being poisoned by a contaminated water cart.

But three days later Evelyn Baring, Britain's colonial governor in Kenya, wrote to Alan Lennox-Boyd, Britain's colonies secretary in London, to say such reports had been misleading.

"Result of first three autopsies is that in each case, death was due to violence," said his telegram to London.

On March 9, Baring sent another telegram, reading: "The injuries are reported to be consistent with being caused by heavy sticks or batons and/or boots."

As inquests into the deaths began, Baring told London in another telegram: "Government chemist told of examination water from cart and stomach contents. Both negative, no poisonous substances found."

Summing up the magistrate's findings, Baring said: "Broadly, death was caused by shock and haemorrhage due to multiple bruising caused by violence.

"Evidence as a whole so conflicting and unreliable that impossible to be certain of exact happenings on March 3 when things got out of control of one man.

Crossrail denial of "blacklisting" is exposed by the evidence

Crossrail denial of "blacklisting" is exposed by the evidence

0605 [0548] Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 January 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: 

Crossrail denial of "blacklisting" is exposed by the evidence that in 2012 many pro-trade union statements appeared against the Crossrail company's blacklisting activities. So where were the Crossrail propaganda personnel then? [2]

The “Eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk”

has published a claim from “Crossrail” denying that they had ever allowed blacklisting of workers to be carried out by any of their contractors.

But this is exposed as another lie because the OBSERVER [Guardian Media Group] carried a long piece in December 2012 claiming the opposite. 

Crossrail has only now come out on the issue because of last week’s “debate” at the London Assembly [which we have commented on already].

We have EXPOSED ‘East London’ Member for the London Assembly John Biggs for his pathetic role, as we identified him as a player of the callous role over Crossrail’s other, the more serious attacks on the community, as had been planned.

Khoodeelaar! STOPPED Crossrail from doing the attacks, we reminded Biggs last week.

Here, just for reference, is a Internet piece from one of the pro-trade union sites:

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=29671

[To be continued]