Crossrail denial of "blacklisting" is exposed by the evidence

Crossrail denial of "blacklisting" is exposed by the evidence

0605 [0548] Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 January 2013

The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical Commentary: 

Crossrail denial of "blacklisting" is exposed by the evidence that in 2012 many pro-trade union statements appeared against the Crossrail company's blacklisting activities. So where were the Crossrail propaganda personnel then? [2]

The “Eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk”

has published a claim from “Crossrail” denying that they had ever allowed blacklisting of workers to be carried out by any of their contractors.

But this is exposed as another lie because the OBSERVER [Guardian Media Group] carried a long piece in December 2012 claiming the opposite. 

Crossrail has only now come out on the issue because of last week’s “debate” at the London Assembly [which we have commented on already].

We have EXPOSED ‘East London’ Member for the London Assembly John Biggs for his pathetic role, as we identified him as a player of the callous role over Crossrail’s other, the more serious attacks on the community, as had been planned.

Khoodeelaar! STOPPED Crossrail from doing the attacks, we reminded Biggs last week.

Here, just for reference, is a Internet piece from one of the pro-trade union sites:

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=29671

[To be continued]