London Borough of Tower Hopeless Over 10,000 people including children, of course, are ‘budgeted’ in Tower Hamlets to be made homeless in the coming months!

Tower Homeless Borough: 10,000 more to be made homeless in coming months

London Borough of Tower Hopeless

Over 10,000 people including children, of course, are ‘budgeted’ in Tower Hamlets to be made homeless in the coming months!

By © Muhammad Haque

0250 Hrs GMT London Friday 20 December 2013

Tower Homeless London borough:


This is a scene from Tower Hamlets in 2013.


The man slumped on the desk is an identifiable ‘homeless’.

The woman sitting is an identifiable ‘helper’.


For legal reasons (because the woman is a piece of evidence) her identity is being withheld here, until the legal reason
no longer applies.


The picture is a proof that in Tower Hamlets there is an active policy of MAINTAINING homelessness.


That is, to create homelessness as in causing it and in
doing things that keep people homeless.


Tower Hamlets Council is the biggest causer
of homelessness in the
Borough.

[To be continued]

Tower Homeless Borough: 10,000 more to be made homeless in coming months

London Borough of Tower Hopeless

Over 10,000 people including children, of course, are ‘budgeted’ in Tower Hamlets to be made homeless in the coming months!

By © Muhammad Haque

0250 Hrs GMT London Friday 20 December 2013

Tower Homeless London borough:


This is a scene from Tower Hamlets in 2013.


The man slumped on the desk is an identifiable ‘homeless’.

The woman sitting is an identifiable ‘helper’.


For legal reasons (because the woman is a piece of evidence) her identity is being withheld here, until the legal reason
no longer applies.


The picture is a proof that in Tower Hamlets there is an active policy of MAINTAINING homelessness.


That is, to create homelessness as in causing it and in
doing things that keep people homeless.


Tower Hamlets Council is the biggest causer
of homelessness in the
Borough.

[To be continued]

Into 34th year with AADHIKAR the Rights Media Defending the Community..

Into 34th year with AADHIKAR the Rights Media Defending the Community...

On taking the AADHIKAR Media into the 34th year since its foundation in New Road London E1 1HE UK on Monday 19 December 1980, thirty three full years ago....

PAYING for the multiplicity of tasks entailed in the Defence of the Community: the term “paying” includes literally paying from my own pocket to confront and to challenge the (word deleted) that are continuing to let down, misrepresent, violate and exploit and abuse the overall Community and its rights..... Just why it is that I have to be doing the paying while so many are getting PAID £Millions in the name of “serving” the same community that I maintain they are DISSERVING, will be revealed in the course of this UPDATER Commentary.

As will be the facts about my “sources” of the money that I have been forced to spend in defending the most vital rights and interests of the whole community mainly in the East London borough of Tower Hamlets (LBTH)

I start by focussing on the CURRENT dysfunctional state of the local Tower Hamlets Council, about which the AADHIKAR Media has been specially unique and about which our findings as published and chronicled by the AADHIKAR Reports in the last 33 years have been without exception vindicated

This UPDATER Commentary REFLECTING

on the battle against publicly funded corruption 

and antisocial practices, decisions and linked entrenchment via the unaccountable, unethical, unelected Bureaucracy operated via democratically dyfunctioning local Tower Hamlets Council (LBTH)  including the collusion of the superficially “elected” “regional’ London Assembly (whose distorted, obverse ‘face’ is imaged via “Boris Johnson”) as well as by the corrupting collusion of those claiming links with the so-called elected Parliamentary Constituency at the “Palace of  Westminster”

Part 1

0745 Hrs GMT London Monday 16 December 2013

AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR! Action Report

London Monday 16 December 2013.

Muhammad Haque (pictured)  campaigning

against imposing an elected mayor system on

Tower Hamlets, pictured speaking

in Hanbury Street on Saturday

06 February 2010. The loudhailer

Muhammad Haque used in that

action had been borrowed from

a local person based in Shadwell.

To get that loudhailer, at short notice,

Muhammad Haque paid for a mini cab 

and then also for the batteries that

were needed to get the loudhailer to work.

The demonstration that I (Muhammad Haque)

addressed on that occasion was (it was later found out)

filmed by Channel 4 TV (amongst others).

But the key points  that I (Muhammad Haque) made

on that day or later, were not reported by

Channel 4 who also failed to show me (Muhammad Haque)

speaking. 

Now, I do NOT need C4 or any other 'Mainstream' or "surrogate' Media se to ‘show me in their footage’. I point this out because years later, the same Channel 4 TV station, did a so-called ‘Dispatches’ investigation (June 2013 in fact] about how the incumbent (name left out of here)  as the ‘elected executive mayor’ was, as they claimed, abusing his "executive mayor" "powers and position" and  how he was wasting the public money. They broadcast a string of allegations.  

They (C4 Dispatches” June 103) reinforced one particular accusation that had been made by the Labour Party’s now confirmed candidate to seek election as “the executive mayor” to the effect that the incumbent (“executive mayor” of Tower Hamlets)   was indulging in a series of vanity programmes and activities.

As have some other quarters ever since - those quarters too have made the same allegation.

Now, my point on 6 February 2010 was that a rigorously accountable democratic local Council is the first stage for local I people’s having the basic democratic say on things that affect their lives., that matter to them and their communities.

So if you undermine that democracy platform you do a great disservice to the whole community.

Yet I was the only speaker at that whole event who addressed

all the key aspects of the then attempt (first stage via the “Referendum" which was given unwarranted 'attention' by the recruitment of Ken Livingstone, George Galloway and Keith Vaz, amongst others, by the real forces of antidemocratic interests who drove the “YES” project at that stage and launched it formally on that ate - hence our demonstration against that launch ) at dismantling democracy at the Tower Hamlets Council and I was the one who set out the key evidential, historic, social contexts and parameters and priorities for the future for a cohesive Society and Community in the East End of London.

Not only has C4 been exposed as being untenably stupid to leave out what I was saying then. It has also been exposed as being untenably uncaring and ignorant about the subject.

Why was it stupid?

Because, as the record will show: I was the one who made the most relevant points about why there should not be an “executive mayor” system in place in LBTH Council.

I also remain the only opponent to the mayor system in Tower Hamlets.

All the others who “listened to me” and were also shouting slogans “against” an elected mayor system, have turned!

They are all now “believers” in the Mayor system.

Some of them have even tried to be candidates for being elected to that post!

Those who were “OPPOSED” to the Mayor system, have ALL CONVERTED to being supporters of the system.

Not only that, even as I was speaking on 6 February 2010 on the assumption that I was addressing “like minded” opponents of the mayor system, some of those present and even posing for Channel 4 TBV crew, were in  contact (by their cell phones and by personally knocking o  their doors) cat with their potential, supporters (as voters) for when they (these WANNABEs) would need their votes when returning to the voters as  Mayor candidates!

It remains the case that the entire ‘change’ to the

Tower Hamlets Council (LBTH)  from the old system of

the Council making key decisions in a Cabinet made up

of elected local Councillors, to one where an “executive mayor” , a sole individual, 

has all the powers in or about the Council’s “decision-making”, has made things

very much less democratic and has turned an already very poorly

accountable local Council into a very seriously lethally dysfunctional, antidemocratic one. 

The impact of the badness of the LBTH Council are demonstrably many times worse. 

Every day.

Heygate destroyed - the height of hatred for home for all! More, next.

Heygate destroyed - the height of hatred for home for all!  More, next.

The BBC brings to the viewers Keith Vaz looking after his career while the BBC fails to interrogate him thoroughly on his claims, as BBC starves the UK of the truth on poverty

The BBC brings to the viewers Keith Vaz looking after his career while the BBC fails to interrogate him thoroughly on his claims, as BBC starves the UK of the truth on poverty

We caught a split second on the BBC Breakfast programme this morning where Keith Vaz, made famous by the DAILY MAIL and others as “sleaze Vaz” during his “brillianT’ (NOT!) career when Bliar was at No 10 Downing Street, was heard to justify his craving for appearing on the BBC by making, in the context, a most incredible assertion. He said that “our” Police were the best Police service in the world”.

That would have been acceptable for a few minutes if it wasn’t for the fact that the ever-flexible Vaz was actually on the early morning BBC slot about a thing called Plebgate - or Plebs-Gate as it ought accurately to be called if at all called anything about PLEBS - the various allegations and counter allegations that were still flying furiously among the various Police, Neo Cons Ministers and others.

The flexible Vaz, whom Arif Ali (of the now disbanded but still “profiting”’‘Hansib’ 'Publishing' !!!!!!!!!!, based for a long time in the Finsbury Park area of north London when he justified the grab from Ken Livingstone's vanity-programmes of funding some of the strategically installed claimants to ethnicity linked Media promotions under the Ken-controlled purses at the GLC) praised as one “our greatest political achievers”, to talk about the serious “reputational damage” that the Police faced over the Plebs-Gate shenanigans! Now if EVER there was flexibility in positioning a 'political' career in three or four places at once then Keith Vaz definitely has displayed it!

More, LATER , on Keith Vaz and his role in 2009-2010 in lumbering the Borough of Tower Hamlets with an “Executive Mayor” system...

We shall also look at his co-participants in the obscene stunts they thought they pulled about getting rid of Corruption in Tower Hamlets Council! They are Ken Livingstone and George Galloway

1110 [1048] Hrs GMT London Sunday 03 November 2013

BBC is starving Britain

The BBC is starving Britain of the truth!

[To be continued]

1022 GMT

London

Sunday

03 November 2013

AADHIKAROnline KHOODEELAAR!

© Muhammad Haque Reporting on

BBC failure to tell the truth about hunger, starvation in the UK Sunday 03 November 2013. This item featured in this clip is only shown by the BBC because it referred to an X-Factor actress! Not about real starvation and hunger. Because

in the slot with Pete Waterman, a Rightwing individual that appears on the BBC from time to time allegedly to review the papers, there was no reference toe starvation at all.

And there wouldn't 't have been, if Pete Waterman had anything to rio with it.

If he were to talk about starvation, at all,

then he would more likely

blame the victims of starvation and hunger, of poverty and hardship than he would

those who caused them....

Come to think of it, there must be quite a few people across Britain who have been starving so that they won't be hounded by the BBC bailiffs demanding the licence fee!

[To be continued]

24.7 KHOODEELAAR! Action Commentary and updates on twitter.com/khoodeelaar

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAdcawaWmZA&feature=youtu.be

No to HS2:, Camden campaigners find their 'local' resident Ed Minibrand is shortsighted

No to HS2:, Camden campaigners find their 'local' resident Ed Minibrand is shortsighted

0115 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 29 October 2013

KHOODEELAAR! Contextual Campaign UPDATE and Commentary

The first picture shows Chilterns area MP Cheryl Gillan who is one of the Conservative MPs opposed to HS2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheryl_Gillan

Muhammad Haque 0048 GMT 29 October 2013 No to HS2 -3 Ed Miliband is back to being Mr Miniature again! As the Camden New Journal shows the evidence of Mr Minibrand's ignorance, self-serving and disconnection. Here is their NEWS REPORT: Labour leader Miliband tours home turf but is reluctant to protect Camden from HS2 building Ed Miliband and Chuka Umunna meet Camden Town butcher Miguel Martin Published: 17 October, 2013 by RICHARD OSLEY LABOUR leader Ed Miliband toured the area set to be worst affected by the London to Birmingham HS2 rail link on Thursday – his home turf of Camden. But while he shelled out promises to freeze business rates and energy bills, he could not promise to halt the years of demolition and disruption that the £50billion high-speed link will cause around Euston and in Camden Town. Instead, he insisted Labour still backed HS2, a project his party’s members in Camden say they oppose. As it stands, the HS2 plan will see residents and businesses in the south of the borough turfed out, while Camden Town is turned into a construction site as the new link is hooked up to the existing HS1 line to Kent over the ageing London Overground bridges. Mr Miliband, who was visiting Camden Town with shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna, said: “I would say you have to make the decision on HS2, first of all, on what is in the national interest and the interests of London, and then you have to look at what can be done about local concerns. "You have to get the national decision right first, and then look at Camden.” His support for the scheme is unlikely to go down well with Labour members locally who will tell voters they are doing their best to fight HS2 ahead of next May’s elections, but seem unable to convince their own party’s leader. Mr Miliband added: “There are two issues on HS2 – there’s the overall issue, and we’ve said we are in favour of HS2, although ensuring that it is value for money. "That’s the important thing, there can’t be any blank cheques. “The second thing is the local concerns, and that’s got to go through the proper planning processes – and I do understand the local concerns in Camden as a local resident. I do, but that’s the process it has got to go through.” On their tour of Camden, Mr Miliband and Mr Umunna visited Martin’s Butchers in Camden High Street, which warned they might have to move out of Camden Town if business rates did not stop rising. Later, in a newsagent, Mr Miliband was warned by a builder struggling to find work that people “felt like crying”, and that people lined up for work on a construction site each morning like a scene from On The Waterfront, each hoping to be picked. Mr Miliband, who lives in Dartmouth Park and is a former student of Haverstock School, said rising business rates should not be blamed on Camden Council. He insisted: “A lot of this comes from central government. The council is trying to help as hard as it can, but the responsibility lies with the government.” And the Camden New Journal Editorial comment: http://www.camdennewjournal.com/new-journal-comment-hs2-whose-‘national-interest’-are-we-talking-about-rent-control-worthy-risk The look says it all! IMAGE BELOW from Camden New Journal. Words by © Muhammad Haque, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign Organiser. A very sterile, a very blank and a very unfriendly stare on Ed Minibrand's face as he is confronted by local trade Miguel Martin in Camden.. . 0018 GMT London Tuesday 29 October 2013 The Guardian continues lying for the Neo Cons’ HS2 scam -2 In the past 10 minutes, the Guardian web site has posted a piece by its Rightwing, Neo Cons-peddling place man place man Nicholas watts peddling the Neo Cons' latest lie for HS2. Typically when the Guardian is in that mode, It does not have space or any option online for Comment. So here is a first comment. It is another lie by the HS2 Gang that Manchester is "due to be connected to London" by the bogus project.  Why is it a lie? For a start, the word "due" is an IMMEDIATE word. it is not at all about anything that is behind a year. So for the lying peddlers to insert that phrase "due to be connected..." is to insult the intelligence of thinking people... [To be continued]

Has John Biggs got what it takes to serve the people of Tower Hamlets? WHAT exactly is he about?

CONTEXTING the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2014
The © Muhammad Haque Daily Ethical and the KHOODEELAAR! Contextual Commentary about the future of the Community in Tower Hamlets -

John Biggs has got to come out and tell us what he stands for in truth. Does he know there is a serious problem of corruption in the controlling clique in Tower Hamlets Council and that it has been thus for years?

Does he believe that Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘town hall pravda’ “East End Lies” is being kept in production significantly in part because of the rampant inadequacies and the persistent  idiocies of the East London Idiotiser (aka ‘Docklands and East London Advertiser’)? -
UPDATER 1

1730 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
23 October 2013

So John Biggs will merely 'review' the Tower Hamlets Council PRAVDA, will he?

John Biggs has got to come out with a clear commitment to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth 'if elected'.

He should do so even if he is NOT elected.

The point surely is that John Biggs has stayed silent for too long on too many issues that affect the people in Tower Hamlets.

Why is he so reticent?

The real test is whether he has the full confidence himself as the candidate. If he has then let us see and hear the evidence of that confidence.

John Biggs needs to stop playing it safe.

His safe playing isn’t hitting any targets. Not where I am sitting!

Be unambiguous, John.
Be unequivocal.
Be ethical, moral, democratic and  accountable.

Merely letting slip minor utterances is not enough democratically, ethically, and most emphatically it isn’t enough electorally.

Make a splash, tell the whole programme.

What will you offer the people?

Will you keep the lying Council bureaucracy intact?
Or will you get them out of the community's way?

In my finding: the controlling clique of bureaucrats in Tower Hamlets Council is corrupt.

Will John Biggs stop the corruption?

I cannot believe that he has even the notion that there is any corruption in Tower Hamlets Council at all.

He keeps making bland, 3 letter 4 word utterances.
Ever so rationed.
Ever so totally unheard!

A £Billion miles away from a splash!

Will you show respect to the people who daily do the work for nothing for the community’s good?

What is your big plan Mr Biggs?

Or haven’t you got a big plan?

And a Billion other questions in that same order!

[To be continued]
Today's [weekly] front-page of the "Docklands and East London Advertiser'




http://khoodeelaar.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/contexting-the-khoodeelaar-manifesto-for-tower-hamlets-2014-the-muhammad-haque-daily-ethical-commentary-contextual-commentary-about-the-future-of-the-community-in-tower-hamlets-john-bigg/

The CONTEXT of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2014 UPDATE

0625 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 23 October 2013
The CONTEXT of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for Tower Hamlets 2014 UPDATE includes:
The Rupert Murdoch-paid, Thatcher-peddling Rhodesia-bent
self-admitted liar [in his own 'autobiography']  Matthew Parris who could see in the name "Brick Lane" only aliens, only people from 'not Rhodesia' (of ‘his culture, his heritage, his empire...’) and thus easy targets to be removed, displaced from their homes, from their Community and disenfranchised....
Parris spewed out his racist contempt for the people of “Brick Lane” in July 2005, literally weeks after the voters of Bethnal Green and Bow kicked out Oona King who had been a part of those who were engaged in hoodwinking, in misleading and in defaming the people they had targeted for a programme of displacement so that the Big Biz forces could expand and occupy the Brick Lane London E1 Area....
Parris was also voicing the racists’ hatred of those who mistook George Galloway (who was let in by the fact that the voters had decided to kick out Oona King) for a natural
member of the “Brick Lane London E1 Area” and so he (the racist Parris) let rip by messing together Galloway and the Community and “concluding” that because the voters had let in Galloway so they must be punished!
Parris knew exactly the worst punishment tool: It was the Crossrail hole!
Parris said that Bliar (for it was Bliar still in post at No. 10 Downing Street) should drive Crossrail through Brick Lane and smash everything that it found in the  way!
There was no restraint.
No sign of rationality.
No reasonable deference to even the idea of democracy there.
And there was no opposition from the elected councillors.
Not even a any known retort from George Galloway himself.
Not then in July 2005.
Not once ever since.
Not now, October 2013, EIGHT years and almost three months after the
poisonous Parris spewed out his racist provocation and incitement against Brick Lane London E1 Area and published it.
Except KHOODEELAAR!
KHOODEELAAR! spotted Parris’ poison and we put that in the spotlight and we extensively analysed it then and we have been doing it ever since.
Now that Brick Lane is EIGHT years and three months  from those days , we have a lot of other material contextual UPDATES to make.
Which will be continued to be done in the coming parts.
[To be continued]

THE KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for the East End of London

By © Muhammad Haque

The Organiser of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign and Author of

the KHOODEELAAR! Manifestos 2006 - 2014

1442 HRS GMT

LONDON

SUNDAY

20 OCTOBER 2013

UPDATER Commentary on

THE KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto for the East End of London

Anyone interested in the future of the East End of London should read the following quoted from our Manifesto published on 4 January 2006.

From January 2006 to 20 October 2013 SEVEN years EIGHT months and 16 days.

That is almost TWO terms of the “elected” Tower Hamlets Council.

With over 50 councillors, that is almost 400 “councillor years”!

What, then, have they done in that time?

What have they said in that time?

What did they hear from the Community but did not admit in that time?

What rights, what obligations, what entitlements have they denied in that time?

What havoc, what losses, what harm have they allowed to be inflicted on how many lives in Tower Hamlets in that time?

What crimes of denial, deprivation and wilful illegality and plot to undermine the legal duties as perpetrated by employees in the Council have the “elected Councillors” allowed to take place in those two Terms, from January 2006 to 20 October 2013?

THIS SERIES OF UPDATES on the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2014 will examine the LATEST evidence and seek the answers to these and related outstanding questions so that the people in Tower Hamlets get a competent, honestly working locally elected Council that they need, have needed but have been denied.

[To be continued]

Editorial note: The email address law media@hotmail.com 

which has been one of the key email addresses created and used by KHOODEELAAR! as part of the Movement Defending the Community in the East End of London is currently the subject of technical investigation and legal assessments and is not to be addressed as the destination email address for sending any messages. Not until further notice.

The email address that can be used is for the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign is the following. 

KHOODEELAAR! only recommends the following email address to be used STRICTLY for legal and Constitutional law queries. Messages must not exceed 30 words. This is due to administrative and management reasons. Messages exceeding 30 words will be treated as spam and junk and shall not be attended to.. 

khoodeelaar@yahoo.com

The following is the text of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto as published on 04 January 2006.

[That was one of several parts and editions of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto 2006]

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 04, 2006

Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill

© The Author / CBRUK / KHOODEELAAR 2006

Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill 

London 1100 Hrs Wednesday 4 January 2006

Why a manifesto ?

The current Tower Hamlets Council’s controlling group is made up of councillors who got elected without a traceable manifesto in 2002. 

Since that election, there has been no evidence of any audit by the people in Tower Hamlets of the behaviour of those councillors or of that Council. The audit cannot take place or if one is attempted it cannot be an effective one without a frame of reference to make sense of the actual behaviour of the councillors.

By all independent accounts, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council has abolished local peoples’ democratic say. 

On the Crossrail hole Bill and the collusion with the promotion of that Bill by controlling group councillors. Over the past five years. With not a jot or an iota of their secret contacts with he City of London and the Crossrail hole promoters being made known to the local electors. To the local community in Tower Hamlets.

Who are the controlling group on Tower Hamlets Council loyal to?

Answer: To Crossrail hole Bill promoters. 

To Big Business interests that represent their colluders in the City of London,

Tower Hamlets Council is one of the most notorious users of ‘inner cities deprivation funding’ from the UK central Government and via the UK central Government. 

Tower Hamlets Council is not delivering democratic representation to the people in Tower Hamlets. The controlling group on Tower Hamlets Council has effectively abolished all pretences to local democracy.

This is evident in the dishonest and the corrupt way that the controlling group of councillors on Tower Hamlets Council has colluded with the actual interests that are (and have been for the past four years) pushing for the uneconomic Crossrail plan to be given UK parliamentary approval in the Crossrail hole Bill.

That Crossrail hole Bill is currently scheduled to be tokenistically ‘scrutinised’ by a group of MPs before Tony Blair pushes it through the two Houses of UK Parliament making it the ‘Crossrail Act’ and thus giving the Big Business and City of London interests the ‘powers’ to carry out their planned assault on the Brick Lane London E1 Area. 

The Crossrail hole Bill scheme plotters and planners will wreak havoc on the East End community by destroying peoples’ lives, their families and their livelihoods. 

The Crossrail hole will destroy homes and the spaces and the environment in the Brick Lane London E1 Area .

It will also have long term and immediate destructive effects on the wider parts of the East End.

The price the East End of London will pay will not be recoverable.

And yet that price need not have to be paid.

The fact that the Crossrail hole plan is at all included in the Crossrail hole Bill is to do with the undemocratic, the unrepresentative and the untenable role played by the VERY small but the ‘controlling group’ of councillors on Tower Hamlets Council.

They have behaved dishonestly throughout and have done so despite it being pointed out to them by the local community that their behaviour would constitute grounds for several legal claims against them and against the particularly identifiable senior employees in the present Tower Hamlets Council.

That state of affairs has existed because there has been no political action within the Council or within any of the officially recognised political groups 'listed' on the current Tower Hamlets Council to either monitor the conduct of Tower Hamlet council or to hold the anti-community controlling group of councillors or their colluding employees on the Council to proper political account.

Key points from the KHOODEELAAR! MANIFESTO 2006 Part B published in London UK at 1000 Hrs GMT on Wednesday 4 January 2006

1. KHOODEELAAR the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will provide maximum possible support for the widest possible public attention to be drawn to the conduct of the controlling group that makes the decisions ‘in the name of and as the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council’ in relation to ALL uses of the ‘resources, human and material and the revenues, the reserves, the stocks, the powers, facilities, influence’ of the LBTH Council over land, properties, the environment, the Council duties, Council links with any party or parties whose objects, aims and plans and or tactics or strategies are or may be in conflict with the interest of the community in Tower Hamlets

2. KHOODEELAAR the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will monitor the behaviour of the 'key' employees in the LBTH Council in relation to the above and will put in place a system whereby any violating behaviour by any employee of the LBTH Council is first drawn to attention of the employees themselves for rectification failing which the implications of the behaviour will be drawn to the public attention of the local community in Tower Hamlets.

3. Any ‘key’ or ‘senior’ employee in the LBTH Council (or any of their counterparts acting as a one off contractor or as an agent or ‘representative’ of any duration and acting in the name of the corporate legal entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council ) who is authoritatively and reliably known and or is found to have been engaged in any identifiable or actual conduct or behaviour (whether actively or passively) to conceal from the local community the facts of the LBTH Council’s collusion with any agency or agencies in the promotion of the CrossRail hole plan affecting the Brick Lane London E1 Area community or similarly affecting any other part of the Borough will be named and their role will be featured in the community audit of Tower Hamlets Council that will be held from time to time.

4. KHOODEELAAR the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish - or cause to be published - the key findings of the independent investigation under the auspices of the London Community Audit Network (un-funded and totally party politically and financially independent organisation for the defence of the democratic rights of the people across London) into the collusion by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council in the period 2001 - 2005 (so far) with Crossrail hole plan promoters so far. 

5. The publication will take place to give the local community the facts of what the Tower Hamlets Council is being used for and by who and with what negative, devastating consequences to the community and against the welfare, safety and future of the people in the community.

6. KHOODEELAAR the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will ask each councillor to make an immediate and public and fully factual and comprehensive statement on their own understanding and preferences on the Crossrail hole Bill attack on the Brick lane London E1 Area especially in view of the fact that those councillors who were each given a personally addressed copy of all the relevant Questions and analyses by the CBRUK - KHOODEELAAR ! campaign between March 2004 and May 2004 have failed to make any comment to the community about what they (these councillors) think about the Crossrail hole attack plan on the community. Many of the same councillors are already known to be included as candidates for the scheduled May 2006 election to the Tower Hamlets Council.

[Part C of the manifesto to appear in the next week]

Explanatory notes on the KHOODEELAAR! MANIFESTO 2006 AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL hole Bill -

A Manifesto is a programme of action that the party publishing it will implement in office following an ordinary election. Here, the KHOODEELAAR campaign is not NECESSARILY fielding candidates for election to the Tower Hamlets Council at the scheduled May 2006 local council election. This manifesto is an advance guidance for observance by those who will seek election to the Tower Hamlets Council and the terms of this manifesto will form the full set of references against which the conduct of the elected councillors will be audited by the community generally and by the KHOODEELAAR! campaign in particular.

The Tower Hamlets borough-wide implications of the KHOODEELAAR MANIFESTO 2006, will be felt by and or be relevant to all ordinary members of the population in the East London borough in relation to their consideration and understanding of the behaviour of the ‘elected Tower Hamlets councillors’ [in the individual capacities of those councillors on issues that are raised with them for representation on behalf of the electors - whether or not the electors actually cast their votes or if they voted for the councillor concerned) over any matter that may become the subject of any contention, dispute or debate or controversy related to the use and or the abuse of the ‘constitutional powers of the elected holder of office on a local council’ or over any matter related to or arising from the undemocratic, improper, sleazy or corrupt behaviour of a given councillor or of more than one councillor.

KHOODEELAAR Manifesto 2006 against the CrossRail hole Bill also will be citable, de facto, as a frame of democratic references for the establishment of a democratic right [or more than one right] in the context of the legally definable and the statutory duties [and the remits] of the elected councillor/s and those of the decision-making components or units, agents, agencies and ‘employees’ of the ‘elected Council’ in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.

The facts of the publication in December 2005 and in January 2006 of the KHOODEELAAR Manifesto 2006 against the CrossRail hole Bill will be relevant evidence in any formal court or legal proceedings that members of the local community - individually or as group/s- may take or may find themselves involved in, in support of the existence from the dates of the publication of the democratic demands and guidance for the candidates seeking election to the Tower Hamlets Council at the scheduled May 2006 local council election.

KHOODEELAAR the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will - between now and the last moment of any ordinary ‘election campaign’ in connection with the scheduled May 2006 local council election in Tower Hamlets - draw attention of the community to all verifiable cases of abuses and false claims by either any existing councillor/s or by anyone definitely planning to be a candidate to become a councillor after the May 2006 scheduled council election.

Constitutional law queries

Any original constitutional law or legal queries on the KHOODEELAAR Manifesto 2006 against the CrossRail hole Bill may be addressed via e-mail [total texts in the initial message may not exceed 200 words] to

BBC London unit does a piece about housing crisis in Tower Hamlets. Typically, the BBC's overly pro-surrogation Kirt Birling fails to put across the true picture of the housing disaster that the Council has created

Gangsters and criminals mostly control “elected” Councils’ 'housing'

Gangsters and criminals mostly control “elected” Councils’ 'housing'

fotografix montage for AADHIKAROnline the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign 

including the DAILY MAIL pictures of Eric Champ and the Renfrewshire Council building at the centre of the battle for housing and democratic and social rights

The © Muhammad Haque Daily World Exclusive Ethical Commentary on the Housing crisis that is rampant across and in the UK with the professional gangsters and criminals capturing control of the locally “elected” Councils’ housing mis-operations and those of the  so-called registered social landlords who were given a golden opportunity to comprehensively rob, loot and plunder the Council housing stock, “thanks” to the stupidities of John Prescott as the then “Secretary of State”  and the criminal agenda-pushers for Big Business that operated within the Bliaring  UK regime – UPDATE [1]

1620

[1610] 

[1550] [1530] 

Hrs GMT

London

Saturday

19 October 2013. 

Whoever had thought that the idea of social housing – as represented “in” “Council housing” – was ever compatible with or was ever safe in the hands of Council cliques controlling the provision got that totally wrong.

Corrupt Council employees involved in housing decision-making, budgeting and “strategic plans” devised internally and then rubber-stamped by mostly docile and or collusive councillors across the UK have proven to be corrupt, criminal and contemptuous of the core service that housing SHOULD be but isn’t.

This has been allowed to be so by the rampant antidemocratic and non-democratic behaviour of “elected” Councils and “elected Councillors” across the UK.

There have been many adverse and serious consequences.

Having studied housing over decades, I can say that there is a very fundamental link between the UK local Councils’ decreasing link with democratic remit and the simultaneous collusion by the time serving self-serving “political  groupings with the naked, greedy elements that have been making personal gains and profits while they have been undermining the social and the objectively defined economic benefits for people and communities that social hosing brings.

Housing has been used as an anti-hosing profiteering field where criminal gangsters – ‘property developers’ – have been allowed to move in by the collusion  successive “planning” stooges in the Councils.

Those stooges have been allowed to serve the criminal assaults by the property gangsters because the Councils’  ‘planning’ has been exposed as nothing but a rubber stamping tool that is now routinely being used to destroy what remains of social housing and social housing spaces.

Neither the Neo Cons nor the Lib Dumbs nor the Bliar-ed Bureaucracy in what used to be the Labour Party can be expected to oppose the trend.

Despite the totally ridiculous and infantile noises being made from time to time by the

very securely paid and pension-protected  ‘trade union’ ‘leaders’ – who  operate their own brands of self-serving agendas – and despite the very pathetic half-awareness spiels and spits that some of the residual “left” “Labour” MPs mouth and pen by suggesting that they are all for “action against the Class Enemy”, there is no sign anywhere across the vast terrains now subject to property gangsters’ robbery programmes that housing will be available to Society on a Social basis…

Just as Frank Field, wearing a “Labour” badge but operating a Neo Cons pro-racist agenda on “welfare” did to undermine the universal concepts of rights and as Liam Byrne has done in the past three years to give legitimacy to the illegitimate agenda and activities of the Neo Cons and their Lob Dumbs and ‘Labour’-labelled colluders across the board on ‘welfare’.

In Tower Hamlets in London’s ‘East End’, universally admitted as having a population that is one of the most deprived in all of England (and the UK), housing provision has been the target of property gangsters posing as controlling members on a number of key ‘registered social landlord’ outfits. Internally, Tower Hamlets Council has allowed a gang of its own posing as “housing” “service” staff, to operate to sabotage housing rights and to decrease the housing provisions on a social scale and basis. 

The absence of democratic audit is so rampant  and its adverse impact on housing and on Society locally so extensive and pervasive that it warrants full and detailed treatment. I shall UPDATE that perpetration in the later parts of this Commentary, to be posted in the course of the next 24 hours (I am writing this at 1505 Hrs GMT Saturday 19 October 2013).

AS a contextual introduction to the rampant housing crisis creation and operation by Tower Hamlets Council;s very own in-house gang of ‘housing decision-makers’:

The BBC’s Kirt Birling fronted a short piece for BBC London TV this past week about 

the housing crisis in London that included a relatively big chunk of references to Tower Hamlets Borough and the Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘role’ in housing.

In that very ignorant piece fronted by Kirt Birling failed to address the matter of stock, the matter of dereliction and the matter of deliberate criminality that the Tower Hamlets Council Housing “bureaucracy” has been involved in perpetrating for a very long time. 

IT IS AGAINST such a background that I now link to a piece, taken from the DAILY MAIL’s London web site, featuring the stand taken by a lone tenant on a Council housing building in the Scottish Council of Renfrewshire.

There are quite a few online comments posted on that piece that in fact echo the experiences of so many hundreds of thousands of people across the UK: that the local Council housing “operations” (the ceased to be “housing services” a long while ago)  are marred by corruption and that local Councils are abysmally failing to deliver basic accountability let alone fully fledged democratic service to the local communities.

It is most clear that neither local Councillors, nor local MPs nor anyone else who claims to have been elected by the local peoples’ votes on the promise to deliver any democratic service to the local population, is anywhere to be found actually defending the rights of the embattled tenants and those of the thinking, principled, ethically active morally assertive citizens like the one featured in this particular news item by the DAILY MAIL web site below.

No wonder the person has to take the stand that this one has taken, thus exposing the sham democracy that his local Renfrewshire Council is!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2467100/Defiant-council-flat-resident-living-high-rise-tower-block-refusing-budge-local-authority-battle-bring-bulldozers.html

fotografix montage for AADHIKAROnline the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign 

including the DAILY MAIL pictures of Eric Champ and the Renfrewshire Council building at the centre of the battle for housing and democratic and social rights

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against City of London Big Biz Agenda fronted via Crossrail hole attacks: A contextual updater Commentary at 1815 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 15 October 2013How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against City of London Big Biz Agenda fronted via Crossrail hole attacks: A contextual updater Commentary at 1815 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 15 October 2013

How a hurricane of racist hatred has been fomented by racists operating in the East End...
And how one has been prevented so far on a large scale but how it is POSSIBLE that racists are carrying out attacks and violations away from the glare of public awareness.......
Simmering racist hatred could take the form of a hurricane of racist storm in London's East End - a contextual commentary after Cyclone Phailin in India.

1800 [1750] [1740] [1720] GMT London Tuesday 15 October 2013
By © Muhammad Haque

This is what would have happened if Murdoch-employed ex-Neo Cons ‘MP’ Matthew Parris’ racist incitement against the Brick Lane London E1 area in July 2005 had been allowed to be implemented against Brick Lane.

HURRICANE Phailin to Racist Hatred:
Assaults, Emergencies and Displacements
From Orissa to Seelot to Brick Lane and the East End of London:



Noting a recent agency image of some people escaping the impact of the
Cyclone Phailin, as pictured in Orissa that has now been renamed as the eastern Indian region of Odissa/Odisha.
There is a long link between the people of Orissa and those of Seelot
that linguistically straddles the Aakhomia (Assamese)  language to the north and the north east and the Bangla language to the south and the south east.
Oorr-ee-ah is the Selotee language word for the people from Orissa.
They were itinerant trades people very much like the Kaboolees (Tagore wrote about them in his Kabooleewahla short story).
The terms and the manner of trade differed but both groups travelled through Seelot only to trade with the Seelotees.
There were many groups of such traders who would ply their stuff mainly to
households.
And by definition, the Oorreeahs’ trading decisions were made by Seelotee women.
Household, domestic stuff.
And loads of fancy goods!
And what was without exception a very noisy, haggling session!
The sight (in this image) of stranded Ooreeah people is not so far from many that could be found in the East End of London.
What would happen if a community was under attack by a racist gang?
This is the nearest to a cyclone that can be imagined in the context of the
simmering intolerance that is maintained in Britain by pro-racist elements in the Neo Cons Parties (those include the racists in the Labour Party bureaucracy too).
This could have been so as recently as September this year.
So how was such an attack  prevented?
It was not once.
Such an attach could take place any time.
But for the fact that some of the community members have remained ever vigilant against the attacks .
This has then had the impact on those who crave the votes, most of those coming from the voters targeted by racists in the context of Tower Hamlets.
And those in turn have had some correlational links with the Police who have no alternative but to be seen to be active against threatened assaults by racists on the population.
But what if the numbers of the racists were smaller than those witnessed on Saturday 7 September 2013?
Would the Police take action?

[To be continued]

Against corruption under cover of 'social housing' in the East End of London -UPDATER Report

Against corruption under cover of 'social housing' in the East End of London -UPDATER Report

1912 Hrs GMT London Thursday 10 October 2013

This is a relatively recent Image of David Orr who is cited in a multi-million£ claim against wrongdoers involved in attacking the Community in the East End of London

Orr is cited in relation to a part of the claim that refers to his role in the violations of the rights of a family in the East End of London which violations are at the centre of the multi£million claim.

Tower Hamlets Council is also cited.

David Orr, who has been featured on the British “media” as a champion [!!!!!!!!] of social housing is accused of being the opposite and his involvement in the promotions of the Tower Hamlets Community Housing [THCH], condemned by many residents with the demonstrable the knowledge of Tower Hamlets Council’s key decision-makers and Council-appointed “THCH board members” , has been described as a contributory factor in the sabotage of the residents’ say and welfare after Tower Hamlets Council was misled a decade or so earlier into handing over so much Council housing stock to rogue individuals who took up controlling positions and were allowed to be installed in the grabbing outfits a number of which posed as “Registered Social Landlords”

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! Campaign defending the Community in the East End of London  against corrupt & antisocial 'registered social landlords' [RSLs] continues  

1835 Hrs GMT

London

Thursday

10 October 2013

Firstly NOTING the revelation [Oops! NOT] that the stupid East London Idiotiser is still stupid!

It does not require a revelation.

Those who have been at the receiving end of the stupidities of the IDIOTISER know that the outlet is stupid almost every single time.

The IDIOTS who allegedly edit this idiotic outfit have sat on their ignorance

for a good number of weeks since the decision was made to public 

CONDEMN the Tower Hamlets Community Housing [THCH]

INSIDE HOUSING has had the following on its web site since 25th  September 2013 and the East London Idiotiser has not run the story!

It is THREE WEEKS  and a day since then and the IDIOTISER is conceding the “relevance” of the news item for people in Tower Hamlets only today!

Little does the IDIOTISER realise that it crass stupidity and its matching racist backwardness have been allowed to deny access to such important news items that the people in the East End of London borough - ‘recognised’ as one of the most deprived - deserve.

We have more news and disclosures about the corruption in Housing that has been going on in Tower Hamlets for years and even decades.

The IDIOTISER has not touched a single one of those corrupt activities or their severe lethal effects on the community in Tower Hamlets

[To be continued]

______________________________________

http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/regulation/housing-association-is-downgraded-by-regulator/6528730.article

• Home Regulation

Housing association downgraded by regulator

25 September 2013 | By Pete Apps

A housing association has been criticised for a ‘weak financial profile’ and ‘inappropriately delegating’ responsibility for key risks, in a judgement published today.

It received a ‘G2’ rating for governance, meaning it needs to improve aspects of its governance arrangements, and a ‘V2’ rating for viability, meaning it needs to manage its material exposures to continue compliance.

‘The regulator has concluded that the board has inappropriately delegated to committees ownership and responsibility for key risks, and is concerned that this could lead to failings in risk management or internal control,’ the judgement said.

‘The regulator is not assured that THCH’s large board, combined with long terms of office and infrequent review of performance and skills, position it appropriately to manage risks arising from the challenging external environment and its plans for increased development.’

It said the total of 16 board members, eight of whom are elected tenants, is more than suggested by the landlord’s code of governance.

THCH has committed to reviewing its governance arrangements later this year.

Downgrading its viability, the judgement noted that with two exceptions, THCH forecasts a net deficit every year until 2027, with interest cover below 100 per cent for several of them.

‘This is due to high levels of investment in stock and high service and management costs relative to income, which contribute to low social housing operating margins,’ the judgement said.

‘This weak financial profile makes the impact of other risks such as cost increases and underperformance against business plan assumptions more significant.’

The housing association has confirmed it has introduced more rigorous development cash flow forecasting, with senior management team oversight on a fortnightly basis.

Inside Housing was unable to reach THCH for comment before the judgement was published today.

_________

Here [below] is the text of the East London Idiotiser piece published 3 weeks and a day after the above [Inside Housing] report was put online on 25 September 2013 about the same THCH failures and downgrading by a reluctant HCA!

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/tower_hamlets_community_housing_board_criticised_by_watchdog_1_2872433

http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/tower_hamlets_community_housing_board_criticised_by_watchdog_1_2872433