Tuesday, 1 May 2012

Say no to Boris on Thursday. Boris will bring more cuts, more sufferings, more losses to ordinary people in London


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/apr/30/boris-johnson-vote-more-austerity

A vote for Boris Johnson would be a vote for yet more austerity
The London mayoral election is not a personality contest. A Johnson victory would have knock-on effects on us all

Jon Trickett
guardian.co.uk,
Monday 30 April 2012 14.35 BST


A huge effort is being made to represent the London mayoral elections as a merely localised personality contest between two "flawed" individuals. This is a convenient myth that conceals more than it reveals.
To truly understand what is happening in London, we need to see the wider context.
Looking back to the financial crisis it is easy to see in retrospect that the collapse in the markets was used to increase the power of an oligarchy of elites. The millionaires were rewarded and the millions are paying more.
The Sunday Times rich list shows the wealthiest 1,000 gaining fabulous new wealth. But it's austerity for the rest.
This consensus is beginning to break up. Throughout Europe there is increasing evidence of growing resistance to austerity. An insurgent spirit is emerging that challenges the decision by those who act on behalf of the 1% to impose austerity on the 99%. Equally, the argument for growth and jobs is increasingly powerful.
The French elections are only one of a series of events that indicate that a new mood is beginning to emerge. Here in the UK we have our own elections, of which London is certainly among the most important. The background to this is the debate taking place within the Tory high command that would strengthen the elites and intensify austerity.
The Treasury has made it clear that it wants billions of pounds more in spending cuts.
At the centre of this Tory debate is their mayoral candidate. Boris Johnson has worked tirelessly over almost two decades to present a comic outsider persona – harmless, affable and entertaining. He has attempted to harvest the anti-politics mood of the wider insurgent spirit that is growing everywhere.
But let's be clear; Johnson's positioning is a dangerous deception. He is not a harmless buffoon. He is part of the oligarchy. His policies are to the right of the coalition. He emerged out of the very core of the 1%, and is located at the centre of the most dangerous group within an already dangerous Conservative party.
Already there is a nascent battle for the soul for the Conservative party and for the succession when David Cameron leaves. A Johnson victory would embolden George Osborne and unleash a further dynamic within the Tory party to tighten the austerity.
For those who find this argument exaggerated or hard to believe, we should recall that he was among the first to advocate a tax payback to the richest in our country.
It was Johnson who took up the cause for a reduction in the 50% tax rate almost as soon as Labour announced the higher rate. He was the ideological pioneer who prepared the ground for the recent Tory budget. Long before Osborne took the decision to cut the top rate of tax and put huge sums of money back into the pockets of the top 1%, Johnson was calling for double the tax giveaway for the very richest, supporting a cut to just 40%.
Now we see once again Johnson acting as a rightwing outrider for the 1% with his suggestion of further tax reductions in this week's Sunday Telegraph, aimed not at helping the millions of Londoners but the vested interests in the City.
Under the coalition led by his Tory colleagues, the UK has slipped back into a disastrous and avoidable recession. Millions of Londoners are facing huge pressure on their family budgets thanks to the complete failure of Tory policies – endorsed and promoted by Johnson – to protect the interests of the public and deliver jobs and growth.
After all, let's remember that Johnson himself is a major beneficiary of the reduced rate. But it is the millions of ordinary people in London and elsewhere who will pay for this tax gift to the very richest.
Johnson's now infamous "chicken feed" comments – referring to the £250,000 a year income he receives for a second job writing for the Telegraph on top of his mayoral responsibilities – confirm just how obscenely out of touch he really is.
While he rakes in this "chicken feed", more than 400,000 London pensioners have lost money through the Tory "granny tax" to pay for a tax cut for the super rich. And almost 120,000 London families face losing all of their tax credits because of the Tory tax credit cuts.
And let's not forget, Johnson was a strong supporter of Section 28 on the basis that "we don't want our children being taught some rubbish about homosexual marriage being the same as normal marriage". He is out of touch, as exemplified by his numerous comments, using phrases such as "piccaninnies" with "watermelon smiles" just a few years ago.
It is irresponsible of many in the commentariat to ignore these issues and to pretend that the mayoral election is only a battle between two personalities with no real national consequence for the wider society. Do not believe this even for a second.
We can't let the Tories get away with it. A second term for a Tory mayor will have consequences for us all. On Friday, Nick Clegg was told in a visit to a supermarket about mothers who were going without meals to feed their children. He said you would have to be made of stone not to be affected, as if their plight had nothing to do with the government of which he is the deputy prime minister.
But the voters must not think, like Clegg, that they can wash their hands of responsibility for their actions on Thursday if they fail to vote against the Tories. Let every elector in London understand that their actions on Thursday can either accelerate the austerity or contribute to the resistance.
It is time to resist.

Charles Clarke is exposed as a Cameron-backer & antidemocratic Bully


Muhammad Haque rebutting the latest antidemocratic propaganda by the London  EVENING STANDARD Tuesday 01 May 2012.

Is it by any chance the same Charles Clarke who was part of the electoral disaster when Neil Kinnock 
was in place as Labour Party leader?
Clarke is one of the fakers that have always abused the Labour Party for their petty careers.
The needs of the ordinary London people are as alien to Clarke as they are to Cameron and to Cameron's  “Bullyingdone” Club backers.
I would give Clarke the time if he could show any evidence to justify his Cameron-peddling presumptions to tell the electors of London that taking away the Society from them was a "good" thing. Which is what is happening already with ConDem. Boris is part and parcel of everything that Cameron and Osborne are about.
So why would Clarke even speak now unless he wanted to damage the rights of London people to stop the CONDEM Bullies’ assaults?
Is it possible that the Plan B  strategy that Murdoch is now working on includes the subsidiary  parts for 
careerist Blairing rejects who are overly keen to diss the residual democratic say that people are still just about entitled to?

Boris Johnson has been allowed far too much space by the STANDARD which will be forced to regret its abuse of “MEDIA” “power” that has been taking place over this particular poll scheduled for Thursday 03 May 2012.
The STANDARD must stop its abuse of its own proprietor’s slogan about “press” “freedom”.
1710 GMT
Tuesday
01 May 2012

Cameron 'has yet to show he has read' report that could smash deprivation cycle

0230 Hrs GMY
Tuesday
01 May 2012


From the web site of the Daily Mail

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137621/Frank-Field-accuses-David-Cameron-ignoring-poverty-report.html#ixzz1ta77wRhT






Poverty tsar in attack on PM as he says Cameron 'has yet to show he has read' report that could smash deprivation cycle


  • Former welfare minister accused David Cameron of squandering two years
  • Maverick Labour MP has failed to take charge of all policy for the under-fives

The Prime Minister’s anti-poverty tsar has accused David Cameron of wasting the first half of his term in government by ignoring a study into how to smash the cycle of deprivation.
Frank Field said Mr Cameron had squandered two years by failing to implement any of his suggestions.
The former welfare minister said the Prime Minister ‘has yet to show he has even read’ the study he commissioned into bridging the class divide for youngsters.
Pleading poverty: Former welfare minister said it was a 'missed opportunity'
Prime Minister David Cameron
Pleading poverty: Former welfare minister Frank Field (left) said David Cameron (right) had 'missed an opportunity'
The maverick Labour MP called for a dedicated Cabinet Minister to take charge of all policy for the under-fives, saying so far the coalition had failed.
The government’s dithering had led to a ‘lost opportunity’ to ensure that children from low income families did not go on to fail at school.
Mr Field’s ground-breaking study, commissioned by Mr Cameron, warned that children’s life chances were almost entirely determined before they even got to school.
His report called for health visitors to measure children’s behaviour and communication skills from the age of two to catch youngsters who were falling behind in their development.
The MP for Birkenhead also called for parenting classes to be offered in schools.So far, however, his suggestions had only been taken seriously by a few keen civil servants, he said.
Mr Field told the Daily Mail: ‘This is a missed opportunity. I am puzzled as to why the Prime Minister would be so anxious for me to do all this work when he has yet to show that he has read it.
Living on the breadline: The government's dithering had led to a 'lost opportunity' to ensure that children from low income families did not go on to fail at school
Living on the breadline: The government's dithering had led to a 'lost opportunity' to ensure that children from low income families did not go on to fail at school
‘Time is running out, we are coming up to halfway in this parliament. 
‘If the Prime Minister had hit the ground running from day one two years ago, they [the coalition] could have said, ‘we may have made a mess of things in these other areas but at least we are trying really hard on this’. ‘ 
He added: ‘This report was about giving the Prime Minister a flagship policy which would have taken politics into a new era. He needs to get on with it.
‘It would have raised voters’ morale, so they could have felt that despite all this mess, we know they are sorting out life chances and they are on the right track.’.
Downing Street dismissed the criticism, saying the Prime Minister took tackling poverty very seriously.
A source close to Mr Cameron said: ‘Of course the Prime Minister is committed to trying to reduce poverty. This Budget was about taking many of the poorest people out of tax altogether. A lot of the Queen’s Speech will also be focused on the family.’ 
'Time is running out, we are coming up to halfway in this parliament'
Mr Field’s paper ‘The Foundation Years: preventing poor children becoming poor adults’ revealed that many children begin school without knowing their first name because their parents barely speak to them.
One of his most damning findings was that youngsters who were behind when they started school never caught up to their peers.
He blamed the situation on the low aspirations of parents trapped in poverty where no one in the family has worked for generations.
These parents do not bother to play with, talk to or read to their children. Education experts also blamed the arrival of the internet which they say has contributed to a fall in verbal communication in many households.
The government is expected to miss its target, of ensuring that no more than 1.7 million children live in poverty. This is despite successive governments spending £150 billion on tackling poverty since 1997.
Child poverty is also measured against median earnings and the recession should have made the problem easier to mask, Mr Field said.
The former minister argued for poverty to be measured against other indicators such as parenting and the quality of childcare rather than just income.
He said that the Labour policy of ‘income transfers on a massive scale did not work’.
When his report was published in December 2010, it was welcomed by the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg as a ‘hugely valuable contribution’ to the coalition Government’s drive to end child poverty by 2020.





BBC web site: Metropolitan Police probes Tower Hamlets fraud claims

BBC web site
Retrieved  at 0112 GMT Tuesday 01 May 2012:


30 April 2012 Last updated at 18:25

Metropolitan Police probes Tower Hamlets fraud claims


Related Stories

An investigation has begun into a potential electoral fraud in an east London borough, the Metropolitan Police (Met) has said.
The Electoral Commission has alerted the Met about "potential fraudulent registration of voters" in Tower Hamlets.
Police are also investigating another allegation in connection with a recent by-election held in the same borough.
On 3 May, voters will elect the mayor and London Assembly Members.
A statement from the Met said: "On the afternoon of 26 April, the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) received an allegation from the Electoral Commission relating to potential fraudulent registration of voters in Tower Hamlets.
"We are currently investigating this allegation plus a further allegation of offences linked to a recent by-election in Tower Hamlets received on 28 April.
"All allegations of electoral fraud are assessed, and where appropriate, thoroughly investigated by officers from MPS Specialist Operations, in close liaison with local authorities, the CPS and other relevant agencies."
A statement from Tower Hamlets Council said: "We work to the full extent of our powers to ensure the electoral register is as accurate as possible - in fact we conducted extra visits to over 4,700 electors in the days before the register closed.
"As a result, we removed 890 electors from the list as they had moved on.
"However, it is important not to confuse fraudulent activity with a register that changes by up to 20% a month because we have a population that is highly mobile - our borough includes a high proportion of students and restaurant workers."
Both the police and the council appealed to residents to report any suspicious activity.