WE are here reporting that Tower Hamlets
Council is operated by a corrupt, incompetent and dishonest clique.
We are also at the same time giving space to an empirical diagnosis, just published this evening [Saturday 11 August 2012] on the London Guardian newspaper’s web site, which analysis accuses the decision-makers on behalf of the Curry Restaurants in Brick Lane, of their own ignorance, narrow mindedness. .
We are also at the same time giving space to an empirical diagnosis, just published this evening [Saturday 11 August 2012] on the London Guardian newspaper’s web site, which analysis accuses the decision-makers on behalf of the Curry Restaurants in Brick Lane, of their own ignorance, narrow mindedness. .
We are doing so to bring out and put on the
record the full extent of the evidence of the factors underlying the compound degeneration of the area.
.
We are about to publish, later this weekend,
more and updater evidence to support the
thesis that there is an orchestrated agenda for the degeneration of the “Brick
Lane area” so that multinational corporations operating via surrogate outfits, can
make the move that they have been plotting for decades and take over the area.
.
We shall show how the corrupt elements controlling the relevant operational agenda ion behalf of the formal Tower Hamlets Council have been sabotaging all attempts at uniting the traders of the Curry Restaurants and other small outfits.
.
We shall show how the corrupt elements controlling the relevant operational agenda ion behalf of the formal Tower Hamlets Council have been sabotaging all attempts at uniting the traders of the Curry Restaurants and other small outfits.
[To be continued]
THE following comment has just appeared on the
Guardian web site, about the lack of trade by Curry restaurants in Brick Lane . .
The comment is signed by “linesofhunger”. .
THE following comment has just appeared on the
Guardian web site, about the lack of trade by Curry restaurants in Brick Lane . .
The comment is signed by “linesofhunger”. .
The comment is the fifth one on the Guardian’s London blog in response to
Dave Hill’s piece
.
”Olympics
diary: losing out in Leyton and Brick Lane
While the big picture appears mixed, its
clear that some east London small businesses have not received an Olympics boost
“
The LINESOFHUNGER comment on the Guardian web site is definitely from the Tower Hamlets area.
It focuses on the failure by the individuals who make the decisions on behalf of each of the Curry restaurants for the lack of trade and for the declining trade.
Here is the comment [with one spelling error cor4cted]:
The LINESOFHUNGER comment on the Guardian web site is definitely from the Tower Hamlets area.
It focuses on the failure by the individuals who make the decisions on behalf of each of the Curry restaurants for the lack of trade and for the declining trade.
Here is the comment [with one spelling error cor4cted]:
Your promotion of the
"East London Advertiser" needs to be qualified. It is actually the
website that you are referring to, the previous, long running; "East
London Advertiser" has been merged with another of the current owners'
titles.
Secondly, you repeat a claimed comment that there was a lack of marketing, as the key reason for the dearth of business as far as the "Curry" restaurants are concerned.
How then is it that so man " restaurants-linked" "associations" become available to at least parts of the media yet they cannot get organised enough to do THEIR own marketing?
Why do they need the Council to do their marketing, especially when certain individual “restaurant owners” and proprietors are too eager to make their points whenever they get a spot in the media?
The truth is that the "Curry" restaurants are not united.
The individuals who “decide” on behalf of each of the known Curry restaurants in Brick Lane and in the neighbouring streets don’t have the necessary respect for the standards of genuine economic and social organisation to understand that only by genuine and sustained unity can they make any significant and lasting impact on the Council and more importantly in the “open market” of customers.
They have been missing the opportunity to get the basic unity on strictly common trading, economic and the crucial community bases.
They have also failed to respond to or cooperate with the local community initiatives - specially created for the benefits of the Curry trade over the past forty years in the area - to organise the Curry restaurants on a level from where the really important issues could be addressed, thus making the Curry restaurants sound and attractive to customers all year round.
Secondly, you repeat a claimed comment that there was a lack of marketing, as the key reason for the dearth of business as far as the "Curry" restaurants are concerned.
How then is it that so man " restaurants-linked" "associations" become available to at least parts of the media yet they cannot get organised enough to do THEIR own marketing?
Why do they need the Council to do their marketing, especially when certain individual “restaurant owners” and proprietors are too eager to make their points whenever they get a spot in the media?
The truth is that the "Curry" restaurants are not united.
The individuals who “decide” on behalf of each of the known Curry restaurants in Brick Lane and in the neighbouring streets don’t have the necessary respect for the standards of genuine economic and social organisation to understand that only by genuine and sustained unity can they make any significant and lasting impact on the Council and more importantly in the “open market” of customers.
They have been missing the opportunity to get the basic unity on strictly common trading, economic and the crucial community bases.
They have also failed to respond to or cooperate with the local community initiatives - specially created for the benefits of the Curry trade over the past forty years in the area - to organise the Curry restaurants on a level from where the really important issues could be addressed, thus making the Curry restaurants sound and attractive to customers all year round.
.
”Olympics diary: losing
out in Leyton and Brick
Lane
While the big picture appears mixed,
its clear that some east London small businesses have not received an Olympics boost
“
The LINESOFHUNGER comment on the Guardian web site is definitely from the Tower Hamlets area.
It focuses on the failure by the individuals who make the decisions on behalf of each of the Curry restaurants for the lack of trade and for the declining trade.
Here is the comment [with one spelling error cor4cted]:
The LINESOFHUNGER comment on the Guardian web site is definitely from the Tower Hamlets area.
It focuses on the failure by the individuals who make the decisions on behalf of each of the Curry restaurants for the lack of trade and for the declining trade.
Here is the comment [with one spelling error cor4cted]:
Your promotion of the "East London
Advertiser" needs to be qualified. It is actually the website that you are
referring to, the previous, long running; "East London Advertiser"
has been merged with another of the current owners' titles.
Secondly, you repeat a claimed comment that there was a lack of marketing, as the key reason for the dearth of business as far as the "Curry" restaurants are concerned.
How then is it that so man " restaurants-linked" "associations" become available to at least parts of the media yet they cannot get organised enough to do THEIR own marketing?
Why do they need the Council to do their marketing, especially when certain individual “restaurant owners” and proprietors are too eager to make their points whenever they get a spot in the media?
The truth is that the "Curry" restaurants are not united.
The individuals who “decide” on behalf of each of the known Curry restaurants in Brick Lane and in the neighbouring streets don’t have the necessary respect for the standards of genuine economic and social organisation to understand that only by genuine and sustained unity can they make any significant and lasting impact on the Council and more importantly in the “open market” of customers.
They have been missing the opportunity to get the basic unity on strictly common trading, economic and the crucial community bases.
They have also failed to respond to or cooperate with the local community initiatives - specially created for the benefits of the Curry trade over the past forty years in the area - to organise the Curry restaurants on a level from where the really important issues could be addressed, thus making the Curry restaurants sound and attractive to customers all year round.
Secondly, you repeat a claimed comment that there was a lack of marketing, as the key reason for the dearth of business as far as the "Curry" restaurants are concerned.
How then is it that so man " restaurants-linked" "associations" become available to at least parts of the media yet they cannot get organised enough to do THEIR own marketing?
Why do they need the Council to do their marketing, especially when certain individual “restaurant owners” and proprietors are too eager to make their points whenever they get a spot in the media?
The truth is that the "Curry" restaurants are not united.
The individuals who “decide” on behalf of each of the known Curry restaurants in Brick Lane and in the neighbouring streets don’t have the necessary respect for the standards of genuine economic and social organisation to understand that only by genuine and sustained unity can they make any significant and lasting impact on the Council and more importantly in the “open market” of customers.
They have been missing the opportunity to get the basic unity on strictly common trading, economic and the crucial community bases.
They have also failed to respond to or cooperate with the local community initiatives - specially created for the benefits of the Curry trade over the past forty years in the area - to organise the Curry restaurants on a level from where the really important issues could be addressed, thus making the Curry restaurants sound and attractive to customers all year round.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.