Aadhikaronline Original diagnosis of the mainstream MEDIA: George Galloway [1]

Aadhikaronline Original diagnosis of the mainstream MEDIA
UPDATED in context on Friday 27 April 2012.

This CONTEXT being the perpetuation of a racist untruth to the effect that George Galloway was somehow

[a] representing “the Muslims” and/or

[b]that he was even a “convert” to Islam.

If the core evidence of G Galloway’s

statements, role and affiliations/s associations over the past say 20 years  is any guide then the most that can be evidentially justifiably said about him with reference to “the Muslims” is that he has come across and demonstrably embraced as his own a mode of quasi-democratic operation for the continuation of  certain usable effects of the British Empire and that he has done so while successfully being allowed access by communities where

the relevant operating sub-democratic outfits have found in G Galloway a plausible image that has been put to use for temporary opportunities for their own linkages and even “branding”.

There have been other involvement too that could come straight from the universally defined traditions of the movements for justice and fairness.

But the “brand” Galloway has had to be  invented every so often especially 

after a setback in the career side.
And that “brand” Galloway has been  most

cost-effectively reconfigured with the availability of  “people without a voice”, “without representation”, “without hope”.

[To be continued]

The 1st Edition 

at 0530 Hrs GMT 

London 

Wednesday 24 January 2007 

The only thing that the world at large has been made aware of about the contribution to politics made by George Galloway is his widely reported stand on Iraq. The second thing, internationally, is that he has almost without exception been described as being not only biased in favour of Muslims but as being excessively biased in favour of Muslims. 

How valid is that perception as based and tested on the evidence of Galloway’s conduct and comments?

AADHIKAR Media Foundation 

Aadhikaronline 

The 1st Edition 

at 0530 Hrs GMT 

London 

Wednesday 24 January 2007 

Breaking news at 0530 GMT Wednesday 24 January 2007 East London [Bethnal Green and Bow] Member of British Parliament, George Galloway, says on BBC News 24 'Muslims hate' his 'Respect' 'party'! Galloway said this in the last sentence of the programme 'Hardtalk' as broadcast at 0455 GMT today, Wednesday 24 January 2007. Interviewed by Stephen Sackur, one of the BBC's 'former' Washington correspondents, who by that description, is a 'journalist' with no record of independent practice free from the White House Pentagon Neo Con line on the world that is battered by that axis.. 

Galloway was asked in the last part of the interview to explain some of the rash comments and stamens that eh had made in the recent past. 

Galloway’s answer contained a detailed list of justifications from his standpoint. He denied that he ever made the most quoted remark about Saddam Hussein. 

He claimed that it was a comment he had made about the 'Iraqi people'. 

Then he was asked about his 'RESPECT' 'party' which was said [by Sackur during the broadcast edition of HARDTALK 24 January 2007] to be full of 'Muslim' 'extremists'. Galloway included the words “extremists” and “Muslim”/”Muslims” in the first part of his reply but failed to do so in the final part as broadcast. He made a negative reference to “Muslims” and Blair in the same last sentence as broadcast! 

Without further clarification, that remark is bound to be treated as a remark that shows that Galloway is hostile to Muslims generally. 

A view that will be examined in the forthcoming commentaries to be published by AADHIKARonline in the near future