BREAKING COMMENTARY on the latest careeristic utterances about VOTE FRAUD in Tower Hamlets.

BREAKING COMMENTARY on the latest careeristic utterances about VOTE FRAUD in Tower Hamlets.

1505 Hrs GMT London Thursday 23 February 2012
BREAKING COMMENTARY on the latest careeristic utterances about VOTE FRAUD in Tower Hamlets.
In the last three hours, Grant Shapps et al have been joined by the likes of Jim Fitzpatrick in their echoing of what we have been demanding for for more than two years.
In view of the latest parroting by the time-serving careerists we ask:
Is Jim Fitzpatrick, “MP”, reliable himself when he makes this call for doing what we have been calling for?
That vote fraud in Tower Hamlets should be investigated?
If the evidence of Jim Fitzpatrick conduct in context is any guide, he has to do much better than belatedly join the bandwagon of “investigate vote fraud in Tower Hamlets” that we have been working for the past two years to have really established.
Vote fraud is just the tip of the iceberg. Political careerists in Tower Hamlets have been BANKING on the culture of nepotism and abuse for decades. That has been their main “talent”. They neither practise democratic accountability, nor are they even familiar with most of the tenets of democratic behaviour.
Vote fraud has followed as an inevitable part of that behaviour.
This is why the investigation, if it ever jhappens, will have to be done by following rigourous criteria and standards. Is that going to happen?
We have on record the behaviour of Peter Golds, the Tory councillors leader n Tower Hamlets Council who too failed to support us. In fact he supported the bogus referendum result and was adamant in his offensively one-line "reply" t us in backing the status quo over the alleged referendum in 2010.
So if Peter Golds is who Grant Shapps, David Cameron and Eric Pickles are listening to or are going to listen to then there is no chance of there being any really transparent inquiry. They should listen to people without any Partisan or personal careerist agenda. That is ordinary people who genuinely want and deserve an honest and transparent Council and electorally political office seekers and holders.
[To be continued]