2100 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
16 january 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
Five years ago on 17 January 2006, Kay Jordan spoke in the Hanbury Street against Crossrail.
Two years later, Rhoda Brawne told Peers about Kay's work
[To be continued]
2606th Edition.
1105 Hrs GMT London Sunday 05 October 2014
AADHIKAR Media Foundation.Editor©Muhammad Haque London E1 UK. AADHIKARMEDIA Foundation supporting KHOODEELAAR! Defending the community in the East End of London, including KHEYDAIEELAAR! ‘Keep Banglatown’ IN. In association with 62+non-profit initiatives active 53rd year: The KAY JORDAN FOUNDATION, All Volunteers News, Brick Lane Community
Sunday, 16 January 2011
Kay Jordan as a true champion of universal human rights naturally turning a tough concept into a most affable human experience!
Kay Jordan as a true champion of universal human rights naturally turning a tough concept into a most affable human experience!
1420 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
16 january 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
Kay Jordan has been a foremost supporter of the universal human rights movement. As she has shown repeatedly whenever an issue has arisen about the appropriate language of communication in the Brick Lane area or elsewhere in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
Kay has been perplexed at the persistent ignorance of those who keep on referring to the Bangladeshis inaccurately. On many occasions in the past decade she has shown an active awareness of and respect for the appropriate language. Nowhere else has that issue been more important than when eding with the needs of so many Bangladeshi women in the Kay Jordan community. There is no other phrase to best describe the people, many of them women, who have grown to look on Kay as their sister, big sister, friend and true interpreter of their needs.
When I first discussed the matter of organising the local community with Kay in 2004 at the start of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole threat, one of the very groups of people Kay mentioned very positively was the women. “I will get my women together!”
So I said let’s go and talk to them!
It was with this preparation that Kay and I arrived at an address in the Princelet Street, not far from the plotted site for the nasty Crossrail hole . The rest of that walk, as they say, has become part of the ongoing action that is the campaign against the Big Business agenda scam Crossrail.
Kay has known from her life of contact with and of helping so many women what their ordinary language is. What their cultural expressions and preferences are. What makes them feel at home and what gives them human sustenance. Kay has lived a true active hectic life in a really alive community where her sense of being has been daily confirmed by the affinity she has felt with so many people, more than half of them women.
So when I was speaking from the rooftop of a former factory in the Hanbury Street I was doing so only in English. I had minutes earlier picked up the megaphone and had aimed it in the direction of the imminent batch of the House of Peers Crossrail Bill Select Committee [February 2008] quite literally blasting out bold English terms when I noticed that a fast walking Kay was approaching me. As all the people lined up behind the Khoodeelaar! campaign paraphernalia looked visibly OK, I was curious as to what had just gone awry to make Kay head in my direction that fast. It wasn’t long before I knew. Kay wanted me to do a bit of my campaign spiels in the Seelotee language. Not that I would need much convincing to turn on the Seelotee repertoire! Out of interest, however, I asked why. Kay had no hesitation: some of the women would like that as they spoke Seelotee as their main language!
A self-confessed tough talking no nonsense Yorkshire woman approaching a village boy sited in inner city East End of London since materialising on these shores from far away Seelot in the “remote region in Bangladesh” and reminding him that a number of the women among those gathered to back the campaign he was conducting could do with a bit of Seelotee language campaign talk!
If that was not behaviour totally designed to make Kay Jordan feel one of us in the community, I cannot think of anything else that could be!
And this I recall before I get down, here, NEXT, to updating on Rhoda Brawne’s backing of Kay Jordan as they both did battle with the House fo Peers Crossrail hole Bill “select committee” in March 2008
[To be continued]
1420 Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
16 january 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
Kay Jordan has been a foremost supporter of the universal human rights movement. As she has shown repeatedly whenever an issue has arisen about the appropriate language of communication in the Brick Lane area or elsewhere in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
Kay has been perplexed at the persistent ignorance of those who keep on referring to the Bangladeshis inaccurately. On many occasions in the past decade she has shown an active awareness of and respect for the appropriate language. Nowhere else has that issue been more important than when eding with the needs of so many Bangladeshi women in the Kay Jordan community. There is no other phrase to best describe the people, many of them women, who have grown to look on Kay as their sister, big sister, friend and true interpreter of their needs.
When I first discussed the matter of organising the local community with Kay in 2004 at the start of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole threat, one of the very groups of people Kay mentioned very positively was the women. “I will get my women together!”
So I said let’s go and talk to them!
It was with this preparation that Kay and I arrived at an address in the Princelet Street, not far from the plotted site for the nasty Crossrail hole . The rest of that walk, as they say, has become part of the ongoing action that is the campaign against the Big Business agenda scam Crossrail.
Kay has known from her life of contact with and of helping so many women what their ordinary language is. What their cultural expressions and preferences are. What makes them feel at home and what gives them human sustenance. Kay has lived a true active hectic life in a really alive community where her sense of being has been daily confirmed by the affinity she has felt with so many people, more than half of them women.
So when I was speaking from the rooftop of a former factory in the Hanbury Street I was doing so only in English. I had minutes earlier picked up the megaphone and had aimed it in the direction of the imminent batch of the House of Peers Crossrail Bill Select Committee [February 2008] quite literally blasting out bold English terms when I noticed that a fast walking Kay was approaching me. As all the people lined up behind the Khoodeelaar! campaign paraphernalia looked visibly OK, I was curious as to what had just gone awry to make Kay head in my direction that fast. It wasn’t long before I knew. Kay wanted me to do a bit of my campaign spiels in the Seelotee language. Not that I would need much convincing to turn on the Seelotee repertoire! Out of interest, however, I asked why. Kay had no hesitation: some of the women would like that as they spoke Seelotee as their main language!
A self-confessed tough talking no nonsense Yorkshire woman approaching a village boy sited in inner city East End of London since materialising on these shores from far away Seelot in the “remote region in Bangladesh” and reminding him that a number of the women among those gathered to back the campaign he was conducting could do with a bit of Seelotee language campaign talk!
If that was not behaviour totally designed to make Kay Jordan feel one of us in the community, I cannot think of anything else that could be!
And this I recall before I get down, here, NEXT, to updating on Rhoda Brawne’s backing of Kay Jordan as they both did battle with the House fo Peers Crossrail hole Bill “select committee” in March 2008
[To be continued]
Kay Jordan has been defending the East End of London with the help of a number of close friends. One of the most important has been Rhoda Brawne.
0605 [0555] [0545] [0530] Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
16 January 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
One of the people that Kay Jordan has worked very closely with in identifying the Crossrail hole attack threat to the Brick Lane London E1 [and adjoining] area has been Rhoda Brawne.
I update on Rhoda Brawne's work with Kay Jordan in this series, starting with the report that follows this contextual introduction.
The “Brick Lane London E1 area” has been “important” in the measurement, calculation, indexing, description, reference concerning “deprivation`’ in the “inner cities” in the UK.
Over the past 50 years at least, the prominence of deprivation in the UK’s internal social control strategy “thinking” has been increasing. Deprivation strategy as a tool for state-linked action and agenda setting has been getting deeper. And the fact, the incidence and the presence of deprivation in the context of the policy decisions made for the furtherance of the various cravings of Big Business have been included as essential items of reference not to address and eradicate deprivation but to use deprivation as a central plank of the assault on the deprived communities to keep them down and to further deprive them.
Deprivation is material.
Deprivation is environmental.
Deprivation is social.
Deprivation is political.
Deprivation is in breach of all declared codes of state, Government and Political behaviour!
So when the Khoodeelaar! campaign was founded SEVEN years ago on Saturday 31 January 2004, it was done with the clear aim to stop the FURTHER IMPOSITION of deprivation on the Brick Lane London E1 area and on the similarly deprived adjoining parts of the inner city East London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
At that founding event, Kay Jordan described in brief some of the technical and engineering ploys as known at that point time that had been devised to drive the Crossrail hole scam through the area. Kay Jordan stated at the meeting held on 31 January 2004 at the Montefiore Centre [Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane] how deeply and extensively the then known Crossrail plot would impact on the area. I can recall that the meeting was attended by a significant number of locally resident and or locally working personnel. Only Kay Jordan spoke at length about the technical aspect and the most logically feasible scenarios that would result from the then known Crossrail plot details at that meeting. Others who spoke did so either very briefly or as inquirers wishing to be informed of what the Crossrail plot was about.
That aspect, the status - and more importantly the ABSENCE from the peddlers and the prompters of the Crossrail scam of RELIABLE - information, has been a constant feature of the behaviour of the Crossrail scam promoters, peddlers and pushers. Those peddlers, promoters and pushers have included of course the UK central Government Department for Transport [DfT] and the London “mayor-controlled” outfit the Transport for London [=TfL].
Both TfL and DfT have persisted over the past SEVEN years in denying information when asked or they have been unable to answer logical, rational, constitutional law question and queries.
The same has been their position about the environmental questions. And about the technical, engineering questions.
Kay Jordan has been a leading questioner on the engineering and the planning aspects fo the Crossrail plot.
[To be continued]
London
Sunday
16 January 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
One of the people that Kay Jordan has worked very closely with in identifying the Crossrail hole attack threat to the Brick Lane London E1 [and adjoining] area has been Rhoda Brawne.
I update on Rhoda Brawne's work with Kay Jordan in this series, starting with the report that follows this contextual introduction.
The “Brick Lane London E1 area” has been “important” in the measurement, calculation, indexing, description, reference concerning “deprivation`’ in the “inner cities” in the UK.
Over the past 50 years at least, the prominence of deprivation in the UK’s internal social control strategy “thinking” has been increasing. Deprivation strategy as a tool for state-linked action and agenda setting has been getting deeper. And the fact, the incidence and the presence of deprivation in the context of the policy decisions made for the furtherance of the various cravings of Big Business have been included as essential items of reference not to address and eradicate deprivation but to use deprivation as a central plank of the assault on the deprived communities to keep them down and to further deprive them.
Deprivation is material.
Deprivation is environmental.
Deprivation is social.
Deprivation is political.
Deprivation is in breach of all declared codes of state, Government and Political behaviour!
So when the Khoodeelaar! campaign was founded SEVEN years ago on Saturday 31 January 2004, it was done with the clear aim to stop the FURTHER IMPOSITION of deprivation on the Brick Lane London E1 area and on the similarly deprived adjoining parts of the inner city East London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
At that founding event, Kay Jordan described in brief some of the technical and engineering ploys as known at that point time that had been devised to drive the Crossrail hole scam through the area. Kay Jordan stated at the meeting held on 31 January 2004 at the Montefiore Centre [Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane] how deeply and extensively the then known Crossrail plot would impact on the area. I can recall that the meeting was attended by a significant number of locally resident and or locally working personnel. Only Kay Jordan spoke at length about the technical aspect and the most logically feasible scenarios that would result from the then known Crossrail plot details at that meeting. Others who spoke did so either very briefly or as inquirers wishing to be informed of what the Crossrail plot was about.
That aspect, the status - and more importantly the ABSENCE from the peddlers and the prompters of the Crossrail scam of RELIABLE - information, has been a constant feature of the behaviour of the Crossrail scam promoters, peddlers and pushers. Those peddlers, promoters and pushers have included of course the UK central Government Department for Transport [DfT] and the London “mayor-controlled” outfit the Transport for London [=TfL].
Both TfL and DfT have persisted over the past SEVEN years in denying information when asked or they have been unable to answer logical, rational, constitutional law question and queries.
The same has been their position about the environmental questions. And about the technical, engineering questions.
Kay Jordan has been a leading questioner on the engineering and the planning aspects fo the Crossrail plot.
[To be continued]