1728 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
05 March 2011.
Editor© Muhammad Haque
Justine Greening last made a perfectly embarrassing appearance for Boris Johnson on the BBC when she mechanically delivered praise for Boris Johnson.
She did do so despite paucity of evidence, despite the fact that there was no substance justifying her perorations for Boris.
Neither on the facts of the moment nor in context.
Her speechless stance on being faced with the news featured on today’s DAILY TELEGRAPH front page about the banks being suspected of being engaged in a new wave of looting the UK public was an astonishingly timely vindication of our diagnosis made even before any of the con artistes got into bed as CONDEM and our warning against trusting any of them with the management of the UK Economy.
[To be continued]
2606th Edition.
1105 Hrs GMT London Sunday 05 October 2014
AADHIKAR Media Foundation.Editor©Muhammad Haque London E1 UK. AADHIKARMEDIA Foundation supporting KHOODEELAAR! Defending the community in the East End of London, including KHEYDAIEELAAR! ‘Keep Banglatown’ IN. In association with 62+non-profit initiatives active 53rd year: The KAY JORDAN FOUNDATION, All Volunteers News, Brick Lane Community
Saturday, 5 March 2011
Justine Greening has been fast-tracked into political office at such a speed that it will take years to make an adequate list of the people whom she
1330 [1250] [1105] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
05 March 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
Justine Greening has been fast-tracked into political office at such a speed that it will take years to make an adequate list of the people whom she has been allowed to overlook, ignore, deny or violate in her determination to get where she has been going. This has been obvious every time Justine Greening is given a spot in a broadcast slot. Like this morning on the BBC Breakfast news programme. Justine came across as green as ever. [To be continued]
London
Saturday
05 March 2011.
By © Muhammad Haque.
Justine Greening has been fast-tracked into political office at such a speed that it will take years to make an adequate list of the people whom she has been allowed to overlook, ignore, deny or violate in her determination to get where she has been going. This has been obvious every time Justine Greening is given a spot in a broadcast slot. Like this morning on the BBC Breakfast news programme. Justine came across as green as ever. [To be continued]
Justine Greening, in this BBC clip of her appearance this morning on the Breakfast news programme, was unconvincing
Justine Greening, in this BBC clip of her appearance this morning on the Breakfast news programme, was unconvincing
Exposing the real bankruptcy at the heart of UK ‘Finance’ man George Osborne's empty Treasury! Here, NEXT
Exposing the real bankruptcy at the heart of UK ‘Finance’ man George Osborne's empty Treasury! Here, NEXT
Anna Lynch and how she ‘may’ been 'persuaded' to become a temporary tool in the sockpuppeteers' assault on the East End
The LATEST ‘row’ created in the propaganda media continuing the Empire Flag by the sockpuppets who have been operating the assault on the community in the East End of London for the past one year and four days [Monday 01 March 2010 to Saturday 05 March 2011], is about the topic that can almost without any evidential likelihood of contradiction can be said to belong to the career as a ‘Tower Hamlets-sited’ Conservative [currently] also ‘sitting’ on the Tower Hamlets Council as ‘a councillor’. He is Peter Golds1055 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
05 March 2011
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
The LATEST ‘row’ created in the propaganda media continuing the Empire Flag by the sockpuppets who have been operating the assault on the community in the East End of London for the past one year and four days [Monday 01 March 2010 to Saturday 05 March 2011], is about the topic that can almost without any evidential likelihood of contradiction can be said to belong to the career as a ‘Tower Hamlets-sited’ Conservative [currently] also ‘sitting’ on the Tower Hamlets Council as ‘a councillor’. He is Peter Golds. Golds has become the MAIN source of all ‘news’ that is retailed and repeated through the two couriers online for the crowds of sockpuppets who are mobilised to mount the mala fide mutterings against ‘the mosque’ ad nausea. To those sockpuppets and their two sockpuppets, the ‘Mosque’ is the ‘East London Mosque’ on the Whitechapel Road London E1. The sockpuppets and the sock puppeteers are as ignorant as each other. Thus there is no distinction between the core identity of the poison that each component sprays online ‘against’ the ‘East London Mosque’. So complete is the sockpuppets’ ignorance of very basic facts about the Islamic faith and also about the original concept of the Ummah or the Muslim community that they have been referring to the “East London Mosque” as if the Mosque itself were a human being doing all sorts of things that the sockpuppets and their puppeteers have been accusing the Mosque of!. The sockpuppets and their sock puppeteers do not know that any Mosque is and must remain above and independent of appropriation by any individuals Muslim or a group of Muslims. So the sockpuppets have resumed their attacks on ‘the East London Mosque’. There is no basis for their doing so. But they persist in their poisonous perpetration of the venom aimed against ‘the Mosque’. The more they do so the more ordinary Muslims they persuade to oppose them [these sockpuppets] and then side with the people who are and have been in de facto control of all relevant ACCESS TO the “East London Mosque” by ordinary Muslims in Tower Hamlets. This phenomenal ignorance is behind the willingness on the part of the likes of the newly-entered “Councillor” [Weavers Ward, Tower Hamlets] Anna Lynch to volunteer to serve as a known face in what they have become or BEEN pressed into claiming to be “convinced” is a legitimate attack on the elements that are not desirable in a society with the ‘vah-loos’ being espoused now by Peter Golds [who misses no opportunity to emphasise what his vah-loos are] aided and abetted by the two sockpuppeteers via the sockpuppets that then get activated on the cyberspace.
So how is it that the ordinary members of the community in the Brick Lane London E1, Whitechapel Road London E1 area never see the alleged attacks on certain members of the public with particular personal preferences as has been focussed on and claimed by the sockpuppeteers in the past fortnight in Tower Hamlets? We shall be continuing the examination of the ANNA LYNCH Enlisting, in this diagnostic report? [To be continued]
*
London
Saturday
05 March 2011
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
The LATEST ‘row’ created in the propaganda media continuing the Empire Flag by the sockpuppets who have been operating the assault on the community in the East End of London for the past one year and four days [Monday 01 March 2010 to Saturday 05 March 2011], is about the topic that can almost without any evidential likelihood of contradiction can be said to belong to the career as a ‘Tower Hamlets-sited’ Conservative [currently] also ‘sitting’ on the Tower Hamlets Council as ‘a councillor’. He is Peter Golds. Golds has become the MAIN source of all ‘news’ that is retailed and repeated through the two couriers online for the crowds of sockpuppets who are mobilised to mount the mala fide mutterings against ‘the mosque’ ad nausea. To those sockpuppets and their two sockpuppets, the ‘Mosque’ is the ‘East London Mosque’ on the Whitechapel Road London E1. The sockpuppets and the sock puppeteers are as ignorant as each other. Thus there is no distinction between the core identity of the poison that each component sprays online ‘against’ the ‘East London Mosque’. So complete is the sockpuppets’ ignorance of very basic facts about the Islamic faith and also about the original concept of the Ummah or the Muslim community that they have been referring to the “East London Mosque” as if the Mosque itself were a human being doing all sorts of things that the sockpuppets and their puppeteers have been accusing the Mosque of!. The sockpuppets and their sock puppeteers do not know that any Mosque is and must remain above and independent of appropriation by any individuals Muslim or a group of Muslims. So the sockpuppets have resumed their attacks on ‘the East London Mosque’. There is no basis for their doing so. But they persist in their poisonous perpetration of the venom aimed against ‘the Mosque’. The more they do so the more ordinary Muslims they persuade to oppose them [these sockpuppets] and then side with the people who are and have been in de facto control of all relevant ACCESS TO the “East London Mosque” by ordinary Muslims in Tower Hamlets. This phenomenal ignorance is behind the willingness on the part of the likes of the newly-entered “Councillor” [Weavers Ward, Tower Hamlets] Anna Lynch to volunteer to serve as a known face in what they have become or BEEN pressed into claiming to be “convinced” is a legitimate attack on the elements that are not desirable in a society with the ‘vah-loos’ being espoused now by Peter Golds [who misses no opportunity to emphasise what his vah-loos are] aided and abetted by the two sockpuppeteers via the sockpuppets that then get activated on the cyberspace.
So how is it that the ordinary members of the community in the Brick Lane London E1, Whitechapel Road London E1 area never see the alleged attacks on certain members of the public with particular personal preferences as has been focussed on and claimed by the sockpuppeteers in the past fortnight in Tower Hamlets? We shall be continuing the examination of the ANNA LYNCH Enlisting, in this diagnostic report? [To be continued]
*
AADHIKAROnline devises a new diagnostic tool and word: ToxiCity. Forming part of the Language of the Movement against BigBiz agenda
0705 [0640] [0605] Hrs GMT
London
Saturday.
By © Muhammad Haque.
One of the forces that DEMANDS poverty and therefore causes the pressures to ensure that poverty is kept being created is of course the conglomeration widely known as the City of London [which is NOT a Metropolitan or a democratic entity at all but] the collection of the most secretive money-linked, money-laundering operations that have been taking place from the so-called ‘Square Mile’ situated between the metropolitan London borough known as [another ‘City’] City of Westminster and the “inner cities, one-of-the-most-de;proved” East London Borough of Tower Hamlets! And the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets! starts from the east of Bishopsgate which is the bit of London more identified with the Liverpool street train stations [Overgrown Rail and Underground rails] in the popular frame of daily life activities Brick Lane is a mere five minutes’ walk eastwards from Bishopsgate. The gross poverty-creating lies that the City of London conceives of and then perpetrates are not confined to members of the cabal in or of the City of London itself. A significant population of time-serving ‘professionals’ operates AS THE ARMY OF PERIPHERALS CARRYING THE plethora of excuses and lies to make acceptable and reasonable the pernicious AGENDA OF POVERTY-CREATION and to stooge the ordinary people in the ‘peripheries’ contemptuously labelled ‘City Fringe’ areas. The utter majority of those ‘areas’ are to be found in the Brick Lane London E1 area. Some, only some, are in fact situated in the London boroughs of Hackney and Islington to the north and the north-east of Tower Hamlets. These ‘fringe’ areas ‘to the City of London’ are not so called because of any democratic decision by the ordinary people in the areas so condemned. These are pejoratively misrepresented as “City Fringes” because of the confidence that the inner circles of the City of London has in its operatives being successful in stooging the target people in the areas so called. Thus the Section 106 lure! One of the fakers parading as a candidate at the so-called mayor election [dated 21 October 2010] for the post of “executive, elected mayor” in the name of the people of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets was emphasising his claim to being for accountability by the “City of London”. One ‘method’ which he lobbed in front of the ‘audience’ [average number 30, in a po;population of almost 200,000] assembled at tokenistic ‘question and answer’ events was this dubious phrase ‘Section 106’! This phrase is not as pernicious sounding when uttered on its own. Its true toxicity is apparent only when the phrase is followed by ‘gains’!
When scrutinised, he was as false, as fake and as untruthful as any of his ‘rivals’ as candidates for mh same post. This ‘candidate’ has NEVER once made one single objectively democratically accountable and transparent comment let alone adverse comments about the encroaching on the East End by the City of London:. The ToxiCity! Here, then, is the devsing of a new word: ToxiCity!
[To be continued]
London
Saturday.
By © Muhammad Haque.
One of the forces that DEMANDS poverty and therefore causes the pressures to ensure that poverty is kept being created is of course the conglomeration widely known as the City of London [which is NOT a Metropolitan or a democratic entity at all but] the collection of the most secretive money-linked, money-laundering operations that have been taking place from the so-called ‘Square Mile’ situated between the metropolitan London borough known as [another ‘City’] City of Westminster and the “inner cities, one-of-the-most-de;proved” East London Borough of Tower Hamlets! And the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets! starts from the east of Bishopsgate which is the bit of London more identified with the Liverpool street train stations [Overgrown Rail and Underground rails] in the popular frame of daily life activities Brick Lane is a mere five minutes’ walk eastwards from Bishopsgate. The gross poverty-creating lies that the City of London conceives of and then perpetrates are not confined to members of the cabal in or of the City of London itself. A significant population of time-serving ‘professionals’ operates AS THE ARMY OF PERIPHERALS CARRYING THE plethora of excuses and lies to make acceptable and reasonable the pernicious AGENDA OF POVERTY-CREATION and to stooge the ordinary people in the ‘peripheries’ contemptuously labelled ‘City Fringe’ areas. The utter majority of those ‘areas’ are to be found in the Brick Lane London E1 area. Some, only some, are in fact situated in the London boroughs of Hackney and Islington to the north and the north-east of Tower Hamlets. These ‘fringe’ areas ‘to the City of London’ are not so called because of any democratic decision by the ordinary people in the areas so condemned. These are pejoratively misrepresented as “City Fringes” because of the confidence that the inner circles of the City of London has in its operatives being successful in stooging the target people in the areas so called. Thus the Section 106 lure! One of the fakers parading as a candidate at the so-called mayor election [dated 21 October 2010] for the post of “executive, elected mayor” in the name of the people of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets was emphasising his claim to being for accountability by the “City of London”. One ‘method’ which he lobbed in front of the ‘audience’ [average number 30, in a po;population of almost 200,000] assembled at tokenistic ‘question and answer’ events was this dubious phrase ‘Section 106’! This phrase is not as pernicious sounding when uttered on its own. Its true toxicity is apparent only when the phrase is followed by ‘gains’!
When scrutinised, he was as false, as fake and as untruthful as any of his ‘rivals’ as candidates for mh same post. This ‘candidate’ has NEVER once made one single objectively democratically accountable and transparent comment let alone adverse comments about the encroaching on the East End by the City of London:. The ToxiCity! Here, then, is the devsing of a new word: ToxiCity!
[To be continued]
Action in thought against poverty in the UK. AADHIKARonline pub,shed our exclusive diagnosis of poverty creation in the UK and in the world in 2005 ..
AADHIKAR DAILY WORLD COMMENTARY on another historic poverty year
©Muhammad Haque / AADHIKAR Media Foundation
The following commentary was published on 31 December 2005
One of the web sites it ws published on was the INDYMEDIA UK.
Indymedia UK has removed the article as it was found when AADHIKAR Archives checked the state of publishing online at 0505 Hrs GMT London Saturday 05 March 2011
©Muhammad Haque / AADHIKAR Media Foundation
The following commentary was published on 31 December 2005
One of the web sites it ws published on was the INDYMEDIA UK.
Indymedia UK has removed the article as it was found when AADHIKAR Archives checked the state of publishing online at 0505 Hrs GMT London Saturday 05 March 2011
31.12.2005 06:18 | Analysis | Globalisation | Social Struggles | World
The year 2006 appears set to witness repeats of similar
poverty-creating activities.
Poverty is set to increase at historically high rates during 2006.
poverty-creating activities.
Poverty is set to increase at historically high rates during 2006.
AADHIKAR DAILY WORLD COMMENTARY
0550 Hrs GMT London Saturday 31 December 2005
A day to pay homage to the
millions of people who
barely stayed alive in 2005, another year ruled by ‘democratic’, free-market opportunities to cause and to maintain hunger starvation and famine
The resources of the world
belong to the people of the world.
Most of the decisions made about the control and the use of the world’s resources during 2005 were made behind closed doors.
Or by small groups of individuals motivated by considerations of profit for the few and gratification for the minority.
Not moved by concern for the millions at home and abroad who are denied food and are condemned to just rot away.
In 2005 protest events took place against poverty and hunger.
But the G8 leaders showed that they did not have to pay attention to the needs of those in involuntary hunger and starvation. Populist self-seekers jumped on the bandwagons of allegedly anti-poverty shows.
Some even met GW Bush. None of these alleged activists against poverty issued a single sentence against warmongers.
They mouthed words vaguely. Others created barriers against the voices of the actually impoverished from reaching the wider public across the world.
Others who plotted against those in poverty have just been ‘honoured’ by the key=deciders of events and practices that keep[ poverty alive!
The year 2006 appears set to witness repeats of similar
poverty-creating activities.
Poverty is set to increase at historically high rates during 2006.
0550 Hrs GMT London Saturday 31 December 2005
A day to pay homage to the
millions of people who
barely stayed alive in 2005, another year ruled by ‘democratic’, free-market opportunities to cause and to maintain hunger starvation and famine
The resources of the world
belong to the people of the world.
Most of the decisions made about the control and the use of the world’s resources during 2005 were made behind closed doors.
Or by small groups of individuals motivated by considerations of profit for the few and gratification for the minority.
Not moved by concern for the millions at home and abroad who are denied food and are condemned to just rot away.
In 2005 protest events took place against poverty and hunger.
But the G8 leaders showed that they did not have to pay attention to the needs of those in involuntary hunger and starvation. Populist self-seekers jumped on the bandwagons of allegedly anti-poverty shows.
Some even met GW Bush. None of these alleged activists against poverty issued a single sentence against warmongers.
They mouthed words vaguely. Others created barriers against the voices of the actually impoverished from reaching the wider public across the world.
Others who plotted against those in poverty have just been ‘honoured’ by the key=deciders of events and practices that keep[ poverty alive!
The year 2006 appears set to witness repeats of similar
poverty-creating activities.
Poverty is set to increase at historically high rates during 2006.